WEBVTT - Goodbye to the iPod

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Be there and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive reducer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and how the tech are Young. Now, Normally on a Wednesday,

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I would attempt to bring to you a tech Stuff

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Tidbits episode, which is ostensibly supposed to be a shorter episode,

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>but we all know how that goes when you got

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>chatty Cathy over here yapping into the microphone. But today

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to abandon all hope of this being

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>tid bit ish. And that's because yesterday that being made

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>tenth two thousand twenty two, Apple brought an end to

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>an era. The company announced that it was discontinuing the

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>iPod Touch, which is the last model in the iPod

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>line to be made. All the others have already been retired.

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>So the iPod was a transformational technology, and now iPod

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>as a brand is going away. In fact, we get

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>the term podcasting from the iPod. Now, the iPod was

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>not the first MP three player, but it was the

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>model that brought that technology into the mainstream. And moreover,

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the iPod played a pivotal role in turning Apple's fortunes around.

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty easy for us to forget these days that

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>just a couple of decades ago, the multi trillion dollar

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>company that is Apple today back then was on the

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>verge of collapse. So I thought we could do a

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>quick rundown of the history of the iPod and why

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I argue it is one of the most important technologies

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to emerge, specifically for me to get real selfish and

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>egotistical about it, but one of the most technologies to

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>emerge over the last couple of decades. Uh. And I

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>think this dovetails nicely with Monday's episode about dr M disasters.

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>In that episode, I talked about how Apple, under pressure

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>from music labels, included DRM or digital rights management on

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>digital files, that is, songs and albums that it sold

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>through its iTunes music store. A few years later, Apple

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>would be the company that was able to dictate its

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>own terms because the tables had turned. And that's how

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:35.239
<v Speaker 1>much things changed in just a few years. The glove

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>was on the other foot. I might be getting turned around. Anyway.

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's roll back the clock a bit. As I said,

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the iPod was not the first MP three player, and

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>it definitely wasn't the first digital music player. There was

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a British inventor named Kane Kramer who came up with

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the idea for a digital music player way back in

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the late nineteen seventies. He filed a patent for his design,

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>which he called the I X I or X or

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's supposed to be Roman numerals, but anyway, he

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>he filed a patent for it in ninete and he

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>received a patent in Because these things take time, that

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that device was capable of holding about three and a

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>half minutes of audio, which would be about one and

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a half Ramons songs or the bit in a meat

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Loaf song just before meat Loaf starts to sing. Anyway,

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>three and a half minutes is hardly useful. Digital audio

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>files were really big and storage was really limited. That

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>combo just meant that the digital audio player technology wasn't

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>quite ready for prime time, which is putting it lightly.

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Skip ahead to the early nineteen nineties and the emergence

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of the MP three file format. I did a whole

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>episode about the creation and evolution of MP three's, so

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>this is just going to be a short version of

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that story. So the MP three format could compress audio

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>files down to a more manageable size. The format does

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>this by getting rid of information that's in the file. Ideally,

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it's information that doesn't impact the experience of listening to

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>the audio. There's an entire psycho acoustic side to the

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>MP three technology that's all about determining what would be

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 1>perceivable or perceptible and what would not, and you just

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>get rid of all the stuff that isn't. The idea

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>being that if a human is incapable of hearing a

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>particular sound, there's no reason to include that information in

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the compressed file. Now, of course, you can encode m

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>P three's so that they are more or less aggressive

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in their approach to compressing file sizes. The more aggressive

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you get, the smaller the compressed file will be, but

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.919
<v Speaker 1>the worst it will sound. So this is a lossy

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>file format. But if you go easy with your compression,

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>then the file size it won't shrink down as much,

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>but the fidelity the quality of the audio will be better. Anyway,

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the MP three format made audio files more practical for

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the average person, like whether you wanted to

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>just have them on your computer or potentially transfer them,

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>say over the internet, by the late nineties, there were

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple of companies that were experimenting with digital audio

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>players that could play MP three files. See before that

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the really the only way to enjoy MP three's was

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to listen to them on a computer. Eventually, you did

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>have some CD player manufacturers that started to produce compact

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>disc players that could read MP three compact discs. So

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>in those cases, you could burn a CD with you know,

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>more than a hundred songs on it in MP three format,

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 1>so they're not being burned in the the the raw

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>audio files that you would use to digitally imprint CDs. Instead,

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you're you're just burning MP three files to the CD.

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>But those weren't commonplace, and there certainly weren't very many

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>portable solutions around until the two thousand's, so it just

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>was not a very convenient form factor yet. Then you

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of companies like Elgar Labs that started

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to introduce digital audio players that could play m P three's.

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Uh the Elgar Labs one was the mp man F ten.

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing they were kind of naming their products so

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of similar to Sony's Walkman trademark, and

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the F ten had thirty two whole megabytes of memory,

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and it cost two hundred fifty dollars. There was also

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the Diamond Rio p MP three hundred, which was more popular.

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.280
<v Speaker 1>It also only had thirty two megabytes of storage. It

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>hit the market not long after the F ten did.

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 1>And please keep in mind that these play years didn't

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 1>have native connectivity on them. You could not download music

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 1>directly to the device. You could not stream anything to

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the device. Instead, you would have to use software on

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>your computer to manage your music library. Then you would

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>transfer songs from your computer to your MP three player

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>using a physical cable that connected the two. This would

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>be true for early iPods as well, In fact, true

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>for everything up to and including the iPod Touch, at

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>least in the early stages. The p MP three in

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>particular helped start to churn up interest in the MP

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>three format, right Like, there were geeks like me who

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>were interested in MP three's back then. But once you

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>got to a player that could actually store and play

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that stuff on its own and you could carry it

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>around with you, that's when MP three's really started to

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>gain some traction. That's also when the music industry really

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>got involved. The recording Industry Association of America or r

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I double A sued real Port, which was in charge

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of making RIO and the software used to manage the RIO,

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>because there was a general fear that folks would start

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>buying compact discs, rip music from the c d s,

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and then share that music online without you know, everyone

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>going through the proper process of forking cash over to

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the music labels, and the r I double A lost

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that lawsuit. The court said, no, the existence of this

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>saying does not automatically mean what you say. It means.

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>They're certainly not liable for people taking that that path.

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.439
<v Speaker 1>People might, but it's not the fault of the company

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>for that, and MP three players and the software needed

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to transfer music from PCs two MP three players were

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>deemed to be totally legal. It turned out the r

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I double A was kind of on point with its fears,

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.439
<v Speaker 1>even if it didn't have legal grounds to stop in

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>P three players, because people did start to share music online,

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and then once the peer to peer network technology began

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to emerge, it really took off. It became pretty easy

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to distribute music files across lots of computers. So this

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>was the birth of napster. In n and the music

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>labels went banana. A downturn and media sales sent a

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>shock way through the music industry, and they went nuclear

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>on Napster and its users. Now on the MP three

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>player side, developments began to push the technology forward. The

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>remote solutions Personal jukebox MP three player did a big

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>leap frog over earlier devices because it actually included a

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>small hard drive from a laptop as its storage device,

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and that pushed the jukebox's capacity to four point eight gigabytes,

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.559
<v Speaker 1>which was leagues better than that thirty two megabyte limitation

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of the earliest MP three players. But generally speaking, these

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.719
<v Speaker 1>MP three players were bulky, They were not really attractive.

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>The ones with hard drives were also very heavy and

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>delicate because hard drives have moving mechanical components and if

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you were to say, drop your MP three player, you

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>could damage those mechanical components and it wouldn't work anymore.

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>And again, they weren't really stylish and they were really expensive.

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>But Steve Jobs had an idea to change all that.

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll explain more when we come back after this quick break. Okay,

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>so I had set the stage for the early days

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of the MP three player Steve Jobs was in charge

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of Apple at this time, and you know he had

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.839
<v Speaker 1>been a co founder of Apple. He essentially got for

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>style of the company, or essentially pushed aside enough so

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that he left the company all depends on which account

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you listened to, then ultimately came back to rescue the

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>company when it was on the verge of financial collapse.

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>He saw the potential of the MP three player space,

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.959
<v Speaker 1>but the devices on the market lacked style, they lacked utility.

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>No one was knocking it out of the park. The

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>existing ones were just too big and bulky, and they

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>were too ugly. And there were early adopter types who

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>met the Venn diagram overlap of computer nerd and music

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 1>nerd who were buying some of those early MP three players,

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>But most MP three players just weren't user friendly enough

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 1>or attractive enough to hit mainstream success. So Jobs goes

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to his senior VP of Industrial Design, Johnny I've, who

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>was not yet a knight of the realm at this time.

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>He is Sir Jonathan I've now, and Jobs laid out

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>what he wanted. He wanted definitive MP three player that

0:11:55.880 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 1>the average person would want to buy. It had to attractive,

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it had to be useful, it had to hold enough

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>music to make it worthwhile, and this could really be

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple's next big thing. It took Johnny i'ves team a

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>little less than a year to design, prototype, and finalize

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the first iPod, which Jobs himself with debut to a

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>small crowd on October twenty three, two thousand one, and

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Jobs knew he had to win some skeptics over because

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>this was a brand new business that Apple was getting into.

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Speaker 1>So before unveiling the device itself, he explained that Apple

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>was getting into this industry because quote, music is a

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>part of everyone's life end quote. He made a business

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 1>case for Apple to get into the MP three player business.

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>He said, it's not a speculative business. This isn't something

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>where we're placing a bet. This is a sure thing.

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Music is important for everyone, and so all he had

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to do is in at the history of the music

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>industry and say there's your proof. So he was really

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>dismantling criticisms before they could even be formed, which was

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty genius. He was also, by the way, totally right.

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 1>So Jobs argued that there was no established leader in

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the digital music player space. He called out a couple

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of companies. He called out Creative, which made a model

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>called the Zen. Actually owned a Creative Zen way back

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>in the day, and he said, well, that one has

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>had some success, but still a very small company. It

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 1>can't produce these things at scale. Then you had Sony,

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>which was a very very large company, but it had

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>failed to produce a device that was a hit with consumers.

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>So Jobs was saying this gave Apple the opportunity to

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>swoop in and take the lead spot in a blossoming market.

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>And he said that the iPod, the new Apple music device,

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 1>could play the four most popular digital formats for music

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>at the time, which were MP three, MP three VBR,

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Wave or w A V and ai F F H.

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>The wave and ai F formats were for uncompressed audio,

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>wave being essentially developed for Microsoft machines, and ai F

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>being an Apple development. That means you you end up

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>with better sound quality, but the file sizes are much larger,

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>so you're able to store fewer files on your device. Now.

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>The original iPod featured a digital screen and had a

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>mechanical wheel to scroll through options and song choices. That

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>mechanical wheel was flush with the front of the the

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>iPods face so in other words, you would put your

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>thumb on the surface of this wheel and rotate the

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>wheel around in order to scroll through a menu or

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>through your music's collection. It had a five gigabyte hard drive,

0:14:57.280 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>which Job said was capable of holding up to one

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>thou and songs, although he said like for most people,

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that would be their entire music library, so you could

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>just have your whole library in your pocket. He also

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>said those one thousand songs could be encoded at a

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>bit rate of a hundred sixty kilobits. The hard drive

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>in the original iPod had a platter that measured just

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>one point eight inches in diameter and was point two

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>inches thick, so very very thin. The iPod itself measured

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>four inches tall, two point four inches wide, and was

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>point seven eight inches thick. It was, as Jobs put it,

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the size of a deck of cards. Now I realized

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned just a second ago bit rate and I

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't really clarify what that was. But I do plan

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>on doing a Tidbits episode in the near future to

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>explain sample rate and bit rate for digital audio. Those

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>two factors play an important part in how large an

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>audio file is and the audio quality of that file.

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>But I didn't want to take up all of this

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>episode to talk about it, so let's get back to

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the iPod now. To connect the iPod to a computer,

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>which originally was just limited to Mac computers, Apple built

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>in a FireWire port on the iPod. Jobs said it

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>would take ten seconds to load a CDs worth of

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>music onto the iPod, compared to five minutes if you

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>were using an old USB cable between a computer and

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>an MP three player. He also said it could take

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>up to ten minutes to transfer the full one thousand

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>songs to an iPod, but it would take five hours

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to do the same with USB, so

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>he was really touting the superiority of FireWire over USB

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>at the time. Jobs also said that the iPods battery

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>would supply ten hours of continuous play, and that it

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>would have fast charge capability to regain eighty percent of

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>its capacity in one hour of charging, and that the

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>FireWire cable would provide not just data transfer, but also

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>provide power, so you could plug your iPod into your

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>computer using the FireWire cable and you could charge your

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>iPod while you're also transferring music to it, and all

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>this for the low, low price of three dollars. If

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 1>we were to adjust for inflation today, that would be

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 1>about the same as six hundred fifty bucks yells them. Now,

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>by the time Apple unveiled the iPod, the company had

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>already launched iTunes. They launched iTunes at the beginning of

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand one, and the iPod was announced in October

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of that year. Now, at that time, iTunes was strictly

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>a digital music management program. You could put a CD

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 1>into a Mac and you could rip music from that

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>c D and make digital files of it and use

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>iTunes to organize your music collection, but it would live

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 1>on your computer. iTunes would then become the software component

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:01.719
<v Speaker 1>to manage iPods, at least on max, and connecting an

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>iPod to your computer with iTunes would allow for automatic synchronization.

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 1>So if you had added new music to your computer, well,

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the next time you plug your iPod in, those new

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>tracks could transition seamlessly to your iPod, so you'd have

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>them ready for when you're on the go. The iPod

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 1>was a pretty big departure for Apple, and it was

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a success. You know, Apple had experimented with some uh

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>consumer electronics outside of computers a bit in the past

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and had had let's say, mixed success. The Newton is

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a an infamous flop for Apple, right, but the iPod

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>was not a flop, and the following year, in two

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand two, Apple updated the iPod. It would ultimately offer

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.400
<v Speaker 1>two models of the iPod, one that had a ten

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>gigabyte hard drive, so twice of the size of the original,

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 1>and the second would have a twenty gigabyte hard drive.

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:04.199
<v Speaker 1>They also replaced the old mechanical scroll wheel, so you

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>no longer had a wheel that you could physically turn

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 1>around on the face of this iPod, and they replaced

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 1>it with a capacitive sensing touch wheel, so kind of

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>like a touch screen in a sense, except it wasn't

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>a screen. It was just this round, rounded section of

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the surface of the iPod, so you are no longer

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 1>physically turning a wheel to scroll through stuff. The new

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>iPods were also compatible with Windows PCs, which dramatically expanded

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the potential customer base for Apple in the process. Now,

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>at the time, there was no iTunes for PC for

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>for Windows, so PC users had to rely on software

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 1>called Music Match Jukebox in order to organize their music

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>collections and send music over to their iPods. The new

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>iPod also had a thirty pin dock connector, and then

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>you could use a dock that had FireWire or a

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>dock that had USB. That was good because FireWire was

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty much unheard of on Windows PCs. There were some

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that had FireWire reports, but it was not a standard.

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>It was far more common to run into USB connections.

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand three, Apple introduced iTunes for Windows and

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 1>thus migrated away from Music Match, Jukebox and UM. iTunes

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>for Windows was pants, meaning it was not good, at

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>least in my opinion, at least back in those days.

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>It felt bloated and unwieldy. It had massive processor demands.

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>It took up too much of your computer memory. At

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>least in my experience, I really didn't like using it.

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I would have felt differently if I had

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>owned a Mac computer instead of a Windows PC, but

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>on Windows it was a shore. Oh. In two thousand

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>three was also when Apple launched the iTunes music store,

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that that you could actually purchase digital music directly from Apple,

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>rather than rip it from c D s uh. That

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>was the other way you could really get music. There

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>were some other independent and and studio owned digital music

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>stores out there, but none of them had really taken

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 1>off in popularity. And of course there was the black

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>market piracy trading culture out there. Napster was gone by

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand three. It had been sued out of existence.

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's not like piracy just went away after that.

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 1>But this is when Apple introduced the legit iTunes music store.

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>It's also when Apple would introduce the fair Play Digital

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Rights Management or DRM solution, which restricted iTunes purchases to

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>play only on authorized devices. So this was again back

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>when music labels had a lot of leverage over Apple.

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we've got a lot more to get through

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>with the evil of the iPod and its eventual demise.

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 1>But before we get into any of that, let's take

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>another quick break. Okay, we're up to two thousand four.

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 1>That's when Apple would expand iPod line again. So earlier

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>years had seen iPods with you know, larger hard drive

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 1>sizes and that kind of thing, like modest improvements, but

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand four saw entirely new iPod models. Apple introduced

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the iPod many in two thousand four, and as the

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 1>name suggests, it was significantly smaller than the standard iPod

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and it had a hard drive that could hold up

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:46.439
<v Speaker 1>to one thousand songs, similar to the original iPod. Apple

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>also introduced the iPod Photo, which was an iPod with

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a color digital screen that could display photos on it. Obviously,

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you would transfer the photos from your computer to your iPod,

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:00.199
<v Speaker 1>you could scroll through them, and there was also a

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>fourth generation standard iPod as well. Two thousand four was

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>also when the term podcasting began to catch on. Now,

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the practice had been around for a while, right There

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 1>had already been cases of serialized digital audio content that

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 1>people could subscribe to that dated back a few years

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>from before two thousand four, But two thousand four was

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>where podcasting as a word really emerged. I would argue

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>that that really drove home how Apple had nailed the

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>MP three player technology and the marketing for digital audio

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>players because it had become the de facto leader in

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>the space and had to find the technology. You know,

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 1>it didn't it didn't invent it, but they refined it

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to a point where that was the standard, so much

0:23:54.920 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>so that an entire medium was named after the iPod podcasting.

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Then in two thousand five, we got the iPod Nano,

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>which was an even smaller iPod than the iPod Mini.

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 1>It used flash storage rather than a hard drive, and

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in the early days of digital audio players, flash storage

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>was a real limitter and it was really expensive. It

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>couldn't hold very much, and it cost a lot to produce.

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>That's why Apple chose to go with physical hard drives

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>for its early iPods. But by two thousand five, the

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 1>capacity was starting to go up and the price was

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 1>starting to come down, so the Nano was available in

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>two gigabyte and four gigabyte capacity models. It had a

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>color screen, and it was smaller than the iPod Mini was,

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>which in turn was smaller than the standard iPod. A

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>few months after it debuted, the Nano would replace the

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Mini and Apple would just discontinue the Mini model entirely. Also,

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand five was when the iPod Shuffle came out.

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>The iPod Shuffle h is an odd little thing. Most

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>models don't have any display at all. Uh In fact,

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 1>it has a pretty simple interface. It's got a power button,

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a play pause button, and controls that allow you to

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:15.360
<v Speaker 1>change the volume and skip a song or go back

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to a song. And the Shuffle could play songs you know,

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 1>in whatever order was organized on the device, or as

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the name suggests it could shuffle them randomly, so the

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>shovel was even smaller than the nano. It maxed out

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>with a one gigabyte hard drive model when it launched,

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 1>or I guess I should say flash drive model one

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>gigabyte of storage when it launched. Also in two thousand five,

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Apple introduced a fifth generation iPod that was capable of

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>playing video. So now we're at the point where you

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>could transfer video files to a an iPod, which otherwise

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 1>was modeled like the classic iPod, and you can watch

0:25:55.920 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>those videos whenever you wanted. Where still in that where

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you had to physically connect your iPod with your your

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 1>computer in order to synchronize files between the devices and

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 1>to transfer new material to the iPods. So it's not

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>like you could just download videos natively to the device.

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:15.959
<v Speaker 1>You still had to connect it physically to your computer

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to do that. And finally, two thousand five, finally, for

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand five, anyway, it was a critical year for

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 1>my profession. See that's the year that Steve Jobs announced

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that podcasts would be incorporated directly into iTunes, so iTunes

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>users would be able to subscribe to podcasts and whenever

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 1>they synchronize their iPods with their computers, any new episodes

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of the shows they subscribed to would automatically transfer to

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>their iPod, and Apple took podcasting, which at that time

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>was still a very young medium, and they pushed it

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>further toward the mainstream. The success of the iPod in

0:26:56.560 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>no small way contributed to the early growth of podcasts,

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>though it would take more than a decade for podcasts

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to become popular enough so that the average person knew

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>what the heck a podcast was. Occasionally I still run

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>into people who aren't sure what a podcast is, but

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's more rare these days now. The joke is

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody has a podcast. Back then, most people didn't even

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>know what the heck podcast was. And it also became

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>true pretty quickly that if you wanted your podcast to

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:28.159
<v Speaker 1>do well, you really had to hold out hope that

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Apple was going to feature your podcast on its podcast page,

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>because that pretty much guaranteed you would see a rush

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of new subscribers. Some of the shows on our network,

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>such as Stuff You Should Know, benefited tremendously due to

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple featuring the podcast on the iTunes podcast section. Now,

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 1>I also have to point out that if it weren't

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>for the fact that Stuff You Should Know is just

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a really great show with incredibly talented hosts. It wouldn't

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>matter for all the promotion in the world, right, It

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't make a difference. If the show was terrible, people

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:06.679
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't stay subscribed to it. So I don't want to

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>take any credit away from the creators. They are legitimately

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>great at what they do, but the iTunes promotion helped

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>them out considerably in the early days to get a

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>big following. Now, two thousand six was less eventful than

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand five. Apple released updated generations for the iPod

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Nano and the Shuffle. Nothing really spectacular to

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>note here. The new models were obviously improvements over previous generations,

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 1>but that was pretty much it. But then in two

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven we got two things that would be huge

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>for Apple now. The really big one was the iPhone.

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>By this time, Apple's image had really skyrocketed. The popularity

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of the iPod had truly transformed the company, and the

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>iPhone would push Apple beyond the stratosphere and into lower

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>th orbit at least. But that same year Apple also

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>introduced the iPod Touch. The Touch was essentially an iPhone

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>without the phone part. There was no cellular antenna in

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the iPod Touch, but it featured the same multi touch

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>screen as the iPhone. Most of the internal components were

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the same. They would have a camera had it was

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>able to run apps, at least apps that didn't require

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a cellular connection, so in many ways it was like

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>an iPhone, just without the phone part. And the iPod

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Touch also had WiFi connectivity, so you could use an

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>iPod Touch to browse the web or message people, and

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you could even purchase digital music wirelessly. You still couldn't

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>synchronize wirelessly. That would come a little bit later. Apple

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>still offered the original iPod form factor. I mean not

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the original original, because we're not talking about a mechanical

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>scroll wheel or anything, but the the form factor that

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>we associate with the old school iPods, and from that

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>point for at Apple would refer to those types of

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 1>iPods as the iPod Classic. By the end of two

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven, Apple had sold more than a hundred forty

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>million iPods. Like I said, the iPod line transformed Apple,

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>but the iPhone was going to be way more disruptive. Now.

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Over the following years, Apple would continue to evolve the Nano,

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the Shuffle, and the Touch iPod lines. It would continue

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to support the classic line, but those really didn't change

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>too much year to year. In two thousand eight, Apple

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>added a feature that let you play a random song

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>on your nano's playlist if you just shook your nano.

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I really wonder how many nano's perished as people over

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>enthusiastically tried to search for a cool random song. In

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple changed the nano design. It used to be kind

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of like a thin rectangle. It was much taller than

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>it was wide, but the model turned the Nano into

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>a square. It kind of looks like the watch face

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of an Apple Watch. In fact, the fourth generation iPod

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Touch would have a retina display, so that was a

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>very high definition display capable of sharp, vibrant graphics. It

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>could also shoot HD photos and videos, and it was

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the first iPod Touch to have a front facing camera,

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>which meant you could actually use the iPod Touch to

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>make FaceTime calls over WiFi. The fourth generation Touch would

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>also get a further update that would allow for wireless

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>synchronization with iTunes, so now you no longer had to

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>dock your Touch to your computer to synchronize across the

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 1>two devices. The fifth generation Touch got a larger screen

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and a lightning DOC connector, which allowed for even faster

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>data transfer speeds. And during this time, Apple continued to

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>support the iPod Classic models, but the company would ultimately

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>discontinue those in stept Tober two thousand fourteen. The iPod

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Shuffle and the iPod Nano would get the same treatment

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand seventeen. Now, the reason I'm skipping over

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>all that, like I'm going from essentially two thousand eight

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand four to two thousand seventeen, is because

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the evolution of the devices were the kind of gradual

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>like they weren't. They weren't monumental leaps, and it would

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>be ridiculous just to go from year to year and say,

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and here's where these minor changes came into play. But

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>now five years later, in two Apple is saying goodbye

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>to the Touch. And you might wonder why why is

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple sunsetting the iPod line entirely, Well, it really has

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to do with that pesky iPhone you see, as as

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the iPhones battery life and storage capacity and then ultimately

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>access to streaming music services increased the demand for a

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>standalone music playback device decreased. The Touch held out longer

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 1>than the others because it was essentially a cheaper iPhone

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 1>just without the cellular phone part. You could even do

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>WiFi style calls on a Touch. In fact, my buddy

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I as Actor, used an iPod Touch as his mobile

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>phone for a short while. I remember him telling me

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>about that at c E S and it blew my mind. Now,

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>if you look at how much iPods have contributed to

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple's revenue, you would see that they really hit their

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>peak in two thousand six, not peak sales. They didn't

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>hit their peak sales till two thousand and eight, But

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand six they contributed the most by percentage

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to Apple's overall revenue. In two thousand six, they were

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>about of all of Apple's revenue, it just came from

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>iPod sales. So so nearly half of all of Apple's

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>revenue came from selling iPods in two thousand six. See,

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I told you that I pod really turned things around

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:05.479
<v Speaker 1>for Apple. Now, actual iPod sales, like I said, they

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 1>peaked in two thousand eight, So they sold more iPods

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eight than they did in two thousand six,

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>they sold fifty four point eight million units. Back in

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand six, they had sold thirty nine point four million.

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:22.839
<v Speaker 1>But in two thousand eight, even though they sold more iPods,

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>those sales accounted for just tw Apple's revenue. And remember

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand six it was of Apple's revenue. That

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>tells you a lot right there. Right If a company

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:40.879
<v Speaker 1>sells fifteen million more units two years later, but those

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:43.720
<v Speaker 1>sales contribute a smaller amount to the company's total revenue,

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>something else is really taking off. That's something else was

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone. So the iPod was still a mega success,

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:54.319
<v Speaker 1>but the iPhone was leaving it in the dust. From

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eight, it was a downward trend. Now, it's

0:34:58.080 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>not like iPod sales inanked immediately, but in two thousand

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>nine it dipped from fifty four point eight million units

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to fifty four point one million units, and at that

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 1>point the sales were accounting for around nineteen percent of

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the company's total revenue, because again, the iPhone was just

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a monster. By two thousand fourteen, the sales numbers were

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 1>down to fourteen point four million units and accounted for

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>about one percent of the total revenue for Apple. Now,

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:33.800
<v Speaker 1>after two thousand fourteen, Apple would just lump in iPod

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>sales with other categories, so it became impossible to see

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 1>how iPod sales and revenue were going. The iPhone had

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>really eclipsed everything else, so it's not really a surprise

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:49.319
<v Speaker 1>that the iPod touch is going away, or that the

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>iPod line in general is riding off into the sunset.

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Some folks like yours truly held out for a really

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>long time and carried both an MP three player, and yes,

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I eventually abandoned my creative zen for an iPod Classic

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and also carried a smartphone at the same time. I

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 1>was one of those people. I had two devices. That

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 1>was because I didn't want to run down my phone's

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 1>battery while playing music, nor did I want to fill

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 1>up my phone's storage within an enormous music collection. Because

0:36:22.600 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 1>streaming services really were a thing yet at least not

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 1>a common thing. But eventually streaming services increased capacity and

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>better battery life all made standalone MP three players kind

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of obsolete because smartphones could do it all. They could

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>act as your music library and a streaming platform and

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a phone and a computer. There was no reason to

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 1>have to carry two of them. Apple is going to

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 1>sell off all remaining iPod touches that are in stock

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:59.479
<v Speaker 1>and then puff they'll be gone. So if you want one,

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:02.359
<v Speaker 1>now's the time to buy one before they all end

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>up on the aftermarket at ridiculously pumped up prices that

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>they are just not worth that they range in price

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:12.760
<v Speaker 1>from about hundred ninety nine dollars for a thirty two

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 1>gigabyte model up to three dollars for a two hundred

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty six gigabyte model. There are a few different colors available,

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:26.799
<v Speaker 1>though not every color of iPod Touch has all the

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:30.439
<v Speaker 1>different storage capacities available. Some of them are already out

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of stock, and like I said, once the rest are gone,

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:39.239
<v Speaker 1>that's it. So farewell iPod. You set Apple on a

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>trajectory to become one of the most powerful companies in

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the world, and you lent your name to an art

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 1>form that has become my career. Plus, even though I

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 1>am an Android smartphone user and I used to own

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a creative Zen MP three player, I do have to

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>admit that the iPod form factor and its performance were

0:37:58.760 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 1>top notch. Just wish that darn iTunes software had worked

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:07.280
<v Speaker 1>better on Windows. That's it for this episode of Tech Stuff.

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:09.759
<v Speaker 1>If you have suggestions for topics I should tackle in

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>future episodes, please reach out to me. The best way

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:15.279
<v Speaker 1>to do that is on Twitter. The handle for the

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>show is text Stuff H s W and I'll talk

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 1>to you again really soon. Text Stuff is an I

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from My Heart Radio,

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:38:36.000 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.