WEBVTT - Douglas Borthwick on Crypto (Audio)

0:00:00.000 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get back to the cryptocurrency story really

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>grabbing global headlines. It's Binances. It backed out of its

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>takeover of FTX dot com Big Big Blue. For investors

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that were hoping that Binance would support ft x's customers

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to give them liquidity. Let's get over to Douglas both Week,

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:20.319
<v Speaker 1>chief business office at I n X Limited. Douglas so

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense of what happened here and whether

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>we should be concerned about this being the canary in

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the coal mine. Well, I think that we all knew

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>this was can happen um a couple of days ago

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>when cz over A Binance tweeted that he was looking

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>into f t X, didn't like what he saw and

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>he was going to start selling aggressively their token. I

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>think it was five million dollars of it, so it

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly telegraphed as he did that. Obviously there was a run.

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>That run on the bank essentially meant that f t

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>X I think it was six billion dollars of outflows

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and it seems that they couldn't cover it. Um. Then

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>they signed a non binding l o I, and I

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>think we all agree that a non by lloy means

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>very very little today cz command said, you know what,

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to buy it after all, and you

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.559
<v Speaker 1>saw continued contagion in the market. So obviously bitcoins taking

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a hit, a lot of all coins

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>are taking a hit. It's it's a bit of a mess.

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the media right now is concentrating on the

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>people that invested in the equity rounds at f t

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 1>X and how much they're going to get hurt. But

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to remember there's a lot of investors that

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>have their money now locked in at f t X,

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and who knows when that money is gonna be allowed

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to come out again. I mean, there's a bit of

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>stink on this isn't there from the way that c

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>z JAW handled this and the way that it unveiled

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>or rolled out. From a regulations standpoint, well, I think, well,

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>on a regulatory stand standpoint, neither of these companies seemed

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>regulated inside the United States. None of them are public companies,

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>neither of them are audited in the United States and

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>so and neither of them way I believe can have

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>US investors invest in them, um and so that that's

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>one point. But you know, I think that one of

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:04.919
<v Speaker 1>the big stinks that's coming out is that it seems

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that f t X was using their own token and

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>perhaps buying that with customer funds that were deposited on

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the exchange, pumping up the price of it, and then

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>using that pumped up price to then go out there

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 1>and purchase other companies. UM. And that sort of thing

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I think people look at and think that's that doesn't work.

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>That's very off, very odd. But do you know, asking

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you whether this was the current canary in the comn

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I was referring to f t X, do you think

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the many others like this out there and what does

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>it tell you about the crypto space? But I certainly

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>think that there's a lot of palaces that are built

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>on sand, and I think that we need to remember

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that and a lot of guys that kind of rushed

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>out to the Facebook model and break it then fix it. Um.

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:47.799
<v Speaker 1>They did that with a m l K y C.

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>They've done it obviously with the way that they've not

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>really had auditors in making sure that they do things

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that they say they're doing. UM. I think that a

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks are now looking at other these exchange

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>tokens and how are they you Easton. How are they

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>manipulated by other companies that have exchanged tokens. My company

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>has an exchange token, but it's a registered security. It's

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the only fully registered security public security that exists for

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>an exchange, and so we're audited. Um, We've got rules

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that we have to follow as a company, and none

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of these other companies seem to have these rules. It's

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>very hard to know, you know, the the finances. Uh

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know, we don't know obviously, you know,

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't know when someone's cheating. But it's very worse.

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And because sam Banquan Freed and FTX had been almost

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a savior of sorts for a number of other exchanges

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and another other a number of other companies, you know,

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of backstopping them. If you'd asked me a week ago,

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you know whether or not this company was very likely

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to to fall into this kind of trap, I just said, oh,

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>it's probably one of the least likely. Well. I think

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that this is an interesting thing here, and that there's

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of distressed assets, both on the minor

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>site and exchanges in the market, and I think that

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Binance and f t X have both been bidding for

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>them and there's been a bit of a back and

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>forth between the two and CZ certainly that's the head

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of Binance certainly went out there and said, look, I

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>don't like how we're being dragged through the mud in

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of the regulators, and I think that that sort

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of personal TIFFs sort of set off everything else, and

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that he decided he was going to kind of pull

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>up the curtain on on what was going on at

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 1>f t X and obviously has created this. But you know,

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it's an absolute mess. Canarian the coal mine is correct.

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>But you know, this is the third time we've seen this.

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>We saw Celsius go down doing similar type things, we

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 1>saw Voyager go down similar type things, and now we

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>see f t X going down, and you know, I

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>think people are wondering who's going to be next. Well,

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>this is it, isn't it. I Mean the thing is

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>crypto clients who have kind of shunned the industry from

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.599
<v Speaker 1>being regulated may well start demanding, as you put it

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 1>in your notes, regulation with regards certain where does that

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>leave things? You know, Mike Mike Tyson always said that

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>everyone's a champion until they get punched in the face.

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think that everyone wants to be bankless until

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the company they're dealing with goes bankrupt, and then they're

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>wondering why the regulators aren't stepping in, where's my f

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>D I C insurance, where's the regulators, where's the backstop

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>from the Fed? And then the reality is I think

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to see more regulation and more safeties,

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly for US investors. It's been tough for for coin

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Base and and robin Hood. Uh, you know, slightly different

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>businesses obviously, but those stocks are down in just two

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>days of trading. Um, we'll have to leave it there, Douglas,

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Douglas Boorthwick, Chief business Officer at I n

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>X Limited,