WEBVTT - How to Start Your Investment Journey 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio News.

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to MEREN Talk to Your Money. The personal finance

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 2>edison of MEREN talks money. In these weekly episodes, we

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 2>talk about the best strategies for making the most of

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 2>your money. I'm MEREN sum Stweb and with me senior

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 2>reporter and Money Distilled author John Steppack.

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Hi, John, Hi Melton. It's not happy New Year anymore,

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 3>is it?

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 4>We did that last week, so it's just measurable in

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 4>your year.

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm folding rather as we suspect it isn't it? Never mind,

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 2>More of that later. This is another one of those

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 2>episodes where we built but this is not God. This

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 2>is one of those episodes where we bring in an

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 2>expert voice to help us tackle the question of the

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 2>week as well. John and I know a lot. Amazingly,

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 2>we don't know everything. So with us today is Holly mackay,

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Founder and see of Boring Money, a go to resource

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 2>to help normal people make smart investment decisions. Welcome Holly,

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for joining us.

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>Him aren good for you.

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Now we're asking a lot of you today. We've got

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot of listener questions in on the same sort

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 2>of topics. Everyone wants to know how to get started

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.559
<v Speaker 2>on investing. What do I do to kick the journey off?

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 2>So we want to talk about things like what platforms

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 2>you'd recommend for beginners, what is it reasonable.

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 3>To pay, and how do you how do you choose?

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 2>How do you get started with choosing a platform and

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 2>then choosing the investments to put into whatever wrapper is

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 2>it is that you've chosen on the platform. So I'm

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 2>going to start with something so basic that you're going

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 2>to think it's ridiculous, but it's still important. What Holly

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 2>is an investment platform?

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.839
<v Speaker 1>No, it's a good question, Baron. I mean, I think

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of it like it's a combo between a department store

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and a storage deposit unit. So it's somewhere you go

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to buy your investments, and then once you've bought them,

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>is someone that actually keeps them for you and does

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>all all the admin, gives you that website you can

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>log onto. So really, the investment platform, it's just a

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>word right that says it's where you go and buy

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and hold investments in twenty twenty five.

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so that's what you would do if you're doing

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 2>it DIY, And then if you were to use a

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:22.679
<v Speaker 2>Wealth Manager or an IFA, etc. You would go through them,

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 2>but they would be using their own.

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Platform exactly exactly the sort of tech that they all use.

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think what's really interesting, particularly for people not

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>using an advisor, is the massive growth we've seen of

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>these platforms. And I was looking today actually at some

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>stats they've grown seventy eight percent over the last five years.

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's sort of holding their money and buying sort of

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>things this way. So it's really the go to for

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 1>DIY investors in particular.

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 3>And most people will know the big names.

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 2>They'll have heard of Huggridge, Landsdown, they'll have heard of

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Interactive Investor, They'll have heard of Aja Bell.

0:02:58.040 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 3>But there are many more.

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 2>And if we're looking at the universe that an ordinary

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:04.679
<v Speaker 2>person coming to this fresh might choose from, how many

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 2>are they choosing from? How many reputable, profitable brands are

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 2>there that you would say we could go to.

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>So there are some reputable ones that probably aren't profitable today,

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>but kind of those that I think are worthy of

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>consideration is about sort of thirty five to forty in

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:22.519
<v Speaker 1>the market. I've got test account. O.

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 3>God, oh that's more than I thought of. It is terrible.

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh, my phone is like my sort of search unit.

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I have about thirty two accounts. I think test accounts

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of out there with with DIY investment platforms, which

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>makes my sort of annual tax return quite interesting.

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 2>God, I bet I'd like to back off, by the way,

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 2>from saying it's terrible. It's not terrible. It's wonderful. We

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 2>love competition, We adore competition. The more competition the better,

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 2>but it does make it hard to.

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 3>Choose, so it does.

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:52.839
<v Speaker 2>What are the criteria? So we're coming at this. We've

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 2>got we've we've we've done a bit of googling. We've

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 2>got a list of thirty five. What criteria are we

0:03:57.440 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 2>looking for?

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I think they're in. The very first thing people need

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to be honest with themselves about is how confident are

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>they and how much choice do they actually want? Because

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>for many people, out of their choices a nightmare. It's

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>actually complicated. It does your head and you've got other

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>things you'd rather focus on. So I think really people

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>should answer initially, how interested in this am am? I?

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Do I want to learn? Do I want to check in?

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Do I want to choose? Or does that sound like

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>hell on earth to me? Because the answer to that

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>question will pretty much split the type of option you

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>have into two. If you're the sort of person that says, oh, no,

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>too much chores, I haven't got time. I've got other

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>fish to fry. You want someone that can pretty much

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 1>do it all for you and manage it for you,

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>and that might point you to something that we call

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a robo advisor, so more on them later. If you're

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>someone that says, actually, no, you know, I am interested

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in this stuff.

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 3>I want to.

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Build a portfolio. I want to choose between some shares

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and some whatever it might be, then you'll be in

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the market for a more traditional type platform. So for me,

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the very sort of first question. People should ask

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>how much choice door I want? How competent do I feel?

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, why don't we start right there. Let's assume

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 2>that we are the person who wants to invest, knows

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 2>they should invest, but really doesn't want to get to involve.

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about robo advisors first. So these are platforms

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 2>that will effectively make the decisions for you. You input

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 2>your your information, input what you perceive is your risk

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 2>levels perhaps, and then it'll create a portfolio for you

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 2>and you don't need to do anything except for top

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 2>that portfolio up on a monthly or an annual basis,

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 2>whatever suits you use, is that.

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. My kind of thing of it, My

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>analogy is it's like someone that might say I want

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to eat, but I'm rubbish at cooking as well, buy

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a ready meal please, So for me, they're the ready

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>meal of the investment world. You can go, as you say,

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to a website, you can answer some pretty straightforward questions

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>about your atta to money, your time frames, etc. And

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>they'll spit out a sort of suggestion view. You can

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.599
<v Speaker 1>set it up and off you go. So you know

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 1>some of the biggest names in that space where we

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>have groups such as Nutmeg, there's money Box people might

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>have heard, or in the pensions world, you've got Pensions Be.

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>So there are I would say about ten sort of

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:25.119
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen incredible players in this space now for people

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to look at. I think what's great about these options

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>as well is that you can set them up to

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>accept direct debits as well, so you really can set

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and forget and really only have to check in every

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of six to twelve months and try and set

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>up these direct debits so you're chipping in little and

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>often you're not just buying everything at one point in

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the market. You're kind of drip feeding into markets. So

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>there is and and the tech has got so much

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.239
<v Speaker 1>better around these options too, and the apps are pretty good,

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>so people can can check in with their investments as

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>list or as often as they want.

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 3>And what would you expect that to cost? What do

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 3>you pay for that?

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 2>And is there a difference in how you might choose

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 2>based on how much money you have? I mean, let's

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 2>say you're starting with five hundred pounds and putting in

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 2>one hundred a month.

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Is there when you might.

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Choose that is different to when you would choose if

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 2>you were, for example, putting in ten thousand pounds and

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 2>then adding two thousand pounds a yew?

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 3>How does it work? What would you expect to pay.

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>In terms of this sort of first question? What should

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>people pay? Roughly? I think for this option which is

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>all in so it includes admin, includes all the investments,

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it's anywhere between about zero point seventy five and one

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>percent a year. So to translate that into pound terms,

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it's about seventy five pounds to one hundred pounds a

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>year for every ten thousand pounds you have to invest. Now,

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>one way they do differ is in investment performance, because

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of course there's team sitting there running the money, and

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>we track at boring money. We track on a coarty

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>basis performance and we can see there is great difference

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>between these groups in how well they're doing based on

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>what they're picking and based on what they're doing under

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the bonnet. So one thing people should look at is

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the performance over time. Now, as you'll know, kind of

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at this over a relatively short term can be misleading,

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>particularly if we look back at twenty twenty four, where

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, anyone that through darted or board and

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.320
<v Speaker 1>landed anywhere near the S and P five hundred will

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>have done pretty well. But people should look at performance,

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and we do sort of track that and make that

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 1>available on our website.

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, we're not going to let you just skip over that.

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 3>We want to know. We want to know who's doing

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 3>the best over the last five years or so. Who

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 3>are there? Who are the couple that stand out?

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you think, as I sort of said before, it

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>depends how spicy you want your your investments. So there's

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>different what they call risk profiles for those people that

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>were saying, look, this is long term money, I can

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>ride out some ups and downs. You'll typically put in something.

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>They've all got really silly names like Ambitious or a

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>grill or adventurers, but that just means you're all in

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the sort of shares rather than anything more more cash.

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Like now, if we look at that risk profile, actually

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>groups that have done well, and that'springked mind, are HSBC,

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>in Pact, money Box, aj BELL have done well because

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>they've typically common denominator tended to have more money allocated

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to the US than to other markets, and that's typically

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>been mods driven returns. But also if we look back

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>over the last few years, you'll recall, you know, the

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 1>hiatus we had with Liz Truss is not so many

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>mini budget when the bond markets sort of behave really

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>abnormally and did weird things. What actually happened then is

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that the so called low risk stuff did really badly

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>because bonds didn't behave as they were supposed to. They

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>weren't being the safe, goody goodies in the portfolios, so

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>they had a bit of a hiatus. And what that

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 1>meant is that some people who picked a low risk

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>option got a really nasty shock. And luckily some of

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the banks and banks hate risk, so there's loads of

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>compliance people that are running around in banks going don't

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>do anything naughty, don't do anything risky, so they're lower

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>risk portfolios ten to sort of load up on the

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>things that went really nuts during Liz Trust's mini budget,

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>like government bonds and things. So you've actually had a

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>period where groups that were very, very cautious didn't do

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>particularly well. So some of the banks in particular have

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>had sort of bad performance periods over the last two years.

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I hope that answers your question. There are

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>some groups that do better.

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 4>Something you just said Erelow I think is also really interesting,

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 4>the point about the slightly I guess intellectually mechanical way

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 4>that the risk set up is put together so that

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 4>boinds are saying as low risk and shares are saying

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 4>as high risk, and that is historically a reasonable assumption,

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 4>but sometimes things do go pair shaped and at the

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 4>moment also we've also kind of left a forty year

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 4>bond bull market and actually now boinds are causing quite

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 4>a lot of trouble in markets generally. I know that

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 4>obviously this is a podcast for beginners. But I think

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 4>is that maybe a reason for people to also just

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 4>be a little bit cautious whenever and to understand that

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 4>these definitions are are don't necessarily mean you can't lose

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 4>money even if you are invested in the low risk

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 4>say the things.

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:06.319
<v Speaker 1>I might be a bit controversial here for DILI investors

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>who pick a low risk option, it is often because

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>people have just got the hebgb's about investing, rather than

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>people sort of taking a measured view on volatility. And actually,

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I think for anyone with a timeframe of less than

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>three years, if you look at where interest rates are today,

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't think why you'd invest in a low risk

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of I SUP portfolio rather than in a really

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>decent pain cash kind of basis. You can still get

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>you four point seventy five percent istion the sort of

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>top paying easy access accounts. That's pretty good, right. So

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>for me, especially given the volatility of recent years, I

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>personally question why you're a beginner and you're looking to

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>make your money work hard, but you've got that time

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>frame of two to three years. Interest rates are so

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.719
<v Speaker 1>high at the moment relatively speaking, and looking at the

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>hiatus that we've had in their bomb markets and sort

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of inflation still uncertain for me. I think robo advisors

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and these ready made options really come into their own

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for people with time frames of five years or more,

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:24.959
<v Speaker 1>in which case we should be looking at at least

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, if there's five options, at least actions three,

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>four or five.

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So basically it comes don't risk actually been in

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 4>a functioning time frame rather than your own level of

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 4>fear or not about investing.

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Is there is there one of the robo advisors in

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 2>your mind that stands out as having the correct mix

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 2>of low fees and good performance and not asking you

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 2>to actively recommend one in particular, But is there one

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 2>that over the last say, five to seven years, has

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 2>shown that that mix.

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 1>Here's an interesting point. I think the row advisors got

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>all the press. It sort of came to sort of fame,

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>well fame in my world.

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 5>We're all these, you know, for being the disruptors. They've

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 5>got better apps, they slicker, they're shiny, and they're better

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:18.959
<v Speaker 5>to use. But if you're after a low cost there.

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Are other ways, and we can come on to talk

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>about this that will be lower costs. If you look

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>at the robo advisors, They are not the cheapest way

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to get that ready meal. You're actually better off buying

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>what it's called a multi asset fund from a big

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>name like a Vanguard or a black Rock on one

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of the traditional platforms and having it there. That will

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>cost you probably half or sort of two thirds of

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>what you would pay a robo advisor. So actually, a

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>really important point here is it comes down to what

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>do people value. Some people might say, actually, I like

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the idea of an app, I like the idea of

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>getting good articles. I like the idea of being in touch.

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Mind paying a wee bit more for that. But if

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you're someone that wants rock bottom, listen to the next

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>bit of the podcast when we talk about the auditional platforms,

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>because they might be a bit less sexy, you know,

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>in their sort of tech and how they sort of

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>deliver stuff to you, but they will be cheaper than

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a robo advisor. If we had to look at.

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 3>The robo advisors.

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>To your question, we're just in the middle of doing

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>our annual kind of best buys and sort of digging

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>around behind the scenes. If you bount with monso you know,

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>their ux and their sort of solution is pretty good,

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>not mega being around for the longest they remain competitive.

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>They remain good. If you have pensions you want to consolidate,

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>pension b are good. But they are not the cheapest

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you know there, And so I think it's up to

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>people to be clear on what they want. How much

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>do they want the app and the service and all

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of the bells and whistles, or how much do they

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>want them lowest cost?

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, brilliant, thank you.

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, let's move on then to the traditional platforms or

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 2>the platforms that might be more more DIY.

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think with these platforms, cost is a really

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of fundamental part of it. Comparing cost is not straightforward. Now,

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>some of your listeners will have heard of Hard Greaves Landsdown.

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>They're the biggest platform in the UK by some way.

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>They are renowned for being pretty expensive. They cost zero

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>point four five percent for funds that you hold on

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that platform. However, and here's the cat if you only

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>hold shares or exchange traded funds or investment trusts, there's

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a cap on an ISA there of forty five pounds

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a year. So actually, this platform, which kind of has

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a reputation for being expensive, if you only use exchange

0:16:55.760 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>traded funds and shares, for example, they are fantastic value.

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think what, unfortunately I for your list as

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>they need to do is be quite specific when looking

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>at the costs about what sort of investments they've got

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>in this platform, how often they're likely to trade, because

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>some platforms will charge about ten quid a trade, others

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>might charge nearer a pound if you do it as

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>part of a regular investing program. So people need to

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of be quite specific about what their portfolio looks

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 1>like and go and work out the fees. This is

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of course a very boring headbanging exercise to do. Or

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>do have a price calculator on our website that we've

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 1>built for people which will give them you can put

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in how much you've got and we'll sort of tell

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 1>you what the fees and charges will be.

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Do you need to pay to use that calculator, Harlie, No,

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 2>you don't do.

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 4>Any of them stand out in terms of like I

0:17:56.280 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 4>suppose if you're it's that I can a base platform

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 4>for someone who actually does quite a lot of shit

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 4>trade and on this aide, but has a kind of

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 4>bored in portfolio setting there.

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I mean I think with this you can just

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of throw scenarios at me because it is of course,

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 1>it depends what range of stuff you want to trade.

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to read quite a broad range

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>of things and you want to include, say, for example,

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 1>international shares, then something like an interactive or an aj

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>bell are pretty good options. Also, Saxo have have some

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>new sort of starter deals with people who want to

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:44.959
<v Speaker 1>trade sort of US equities, which is quite interesting. At

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>the other end of the spectrum, if you have people

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of starting out with an ISA, don't particularly have

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 1>sort of large amounts, want to learn, want a decent

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>app Trading to one two doesn't charge people for holding

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>an ISO, so that can be interesting. As I mentioned,

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 1>if you have just exchange traded funds or shares or

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>investment trusts and you've got quite a large portfolio, I

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 1>actually think the hard Greaves landsdown are brilliant value. You know,

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>they are expensive if you have funds in your portfolio,

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>as I've sort of mentioned, but if you've just got

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>those what's called listed securities, they're fantastic value. And their service,

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>for example, is typically good. When you phone someone up,

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you get through quite quickly and you speak to a

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:40.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, typically polite young growd from brittel

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Uni who seems to know what they're on about, and

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, so it's really worse. I think people being

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>clear on do I want the lowest charges, how much

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>do I want a human being to talk to, or

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 1>how much do I want to sort of a nice app?

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Those are the things that I think will drive people's decisions.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 2>A lot of our listeners will be investment trust investors,

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 2>so higris Land would make sense for LAMB. The only

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 2>thing I find with their website is it can be

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 2>quite difficult to analyze your portfolio.

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I find not too bad for research. What I find

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes more and is it quite often will

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>break down. These platforms can look really shiny, can't they

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>When you go onto the public site and it all

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>looks lovely. Then sometimes you become a customer and you

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>get into their secure site and you feel that you've

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>stepped into a different world. I often there's a disconnect

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 1>between wanting to find out about stuff and research it

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and do something I e.

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Buy it.

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I personally find har Grease relatively good there. I think

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Aged Bell are also strong on that. I think interactive

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>investor have got a lot better, really interesting insights, not

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 1>just for investment trusts and shares, but also for funds.

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So I still find those guys are typically better than

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the newer.

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Kind of wanna be you.

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 1>Know, a competitors, sort of a rising up through the

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>ranks in terms of research.

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 2>And I suppose the other thing we should say about

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 2>these big platforms particularly relevant at the moment with and

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 2>again we'll have a podcast later in the week about

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.679
<v Speaker 2>investment trusts and the saber activist intrusion into the gentle

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 2>world of UK investment trust But one of the interesting

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 2>things about the platforms is how they've worked very hard

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 2>to make it easy for you to vote on your shares,

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 2>and we think that's quite important.

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 3>The easier it did, the better.

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>It is, Merron. I mean, there's still a really long

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>way to go in terms of the tech, isn't there.

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>It's still now as easy and whereas it should be.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's a really good example of sometimes

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>how big and boring can be better. And I've talked

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the apps and some of the sort

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of shiny stuff that the newer guys have, but you know,

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes, I'll give you another really tiny which

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 1>definitely fills into sort of fits into the boring camp.

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>But just as an example with the thirty two test

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>accounts of God the bigger guys, if you need to

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>find something like so, for example, your tax certificate when

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you're coming to do your self assessment, Oh my god,

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it's January, and why haven't I done it?

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 3>And I was supposed to do earlier today.

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, this is a lovely opportunity for John to tell

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 2>me again that he finished his tax return in November.

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 3>John, would you just like to tell me that again.

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 4>I'd love to be able to tell you that, but

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 4>I haven't done it.

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I remember, listen as well, remember you telling me

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 2>you've done your tax.

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 3>For this was? This was last year?

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 5>No.

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 4>I got last years done in April, and I felt

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 4>so proude of myself. I was like, the new tax

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 4>should just started and that nued to get myself assessment

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 4>for men for the previous year. But no, I feel.

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>John, Actually, I'm sorry, I seen doing it in April.

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>It's not organized. I think it's so that it's Actually

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a bit boring, John, embarrassing John.

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 4>It is, okay, it is, I mean, I didn't actually

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 4>have a very complicated texture to on that yet. I

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 4>don't have a complicated when.

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Any complicated years tell us more right, anyway, we're going

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 2>off topic again. Everybody, get going with your tax return.

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you what we will do next week. We'll

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 2>do a last minute tax return pod.

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:32.959
<v Speaker 3>How about that?

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 2>John, Well, there were last minute things that things that

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 2>get it done quickly. I have no idea what those are,

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 2>but hopefully I'll find out over the next week.

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 3>While I complete mind.

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 4>We should do Earl's Live for the audience.

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 3>It's not even funny.

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 2>An American politicians, honestly, anyway, Reality off topic, Off topic, Holly,

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 2>is there anything else that we should talk about with that?

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 1>For me, one of the things that people should look

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>at is a lot of the platforms have got better

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>at regular investing. So I think this is something that

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>people should have a look at. If you typically, if

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you set it up to repeat something, to do a trade,

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>for example, every month, you'll pay lower trading fees. It's

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>about sort of setting up those good habits. It's January,

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:23.640
<v Speaker 1>so you may as well sort of talk about that.

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:27.679
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's something people should investigate. What I

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>would say as well, if people are listening who have

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:33.400
<v Speaker 1>had a platform for a week while, do check out

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the fees because things are moving, things are changing, and

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>there's constant sort of downward pressure. So a platform that

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>might have been competitive three or four years ago may

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>well not be competitive today, I think for people, particularly

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>as we move into twenty twenty five and what will

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>be I think a very uncertain sort of market for

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 1>investments difficult to call. Diversification for me remains the name

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of the game, and interestingly, I think more people should

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>look at the ready made options or should consider these

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 1>multi asset funds at least as a core part of

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>their portfolio because that diversification and the avoiding all that

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:18.199
<v Speaker 1>concentration risk, I think is something that's really key. So

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>little and often regular investing, check the fees and make

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>sure you've at least got a part of your portfolio

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 1>from my point of view, well diversified in an easy

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of managed option.

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 3>Brilliant Holly, Thank you so much, John. Is there anything

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 3>you think we've missed?

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 4>The only one thing I would ask Coley's view is

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 4>how much people should think about FSCs protection when that

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:46.199
<v Speaker 4>can sudden know wait to block at it choose and

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 4>if you've got a lot of money, who should you

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 4>think about maybe having more than one ale?

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, really the main thing people need to look at

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>is the custodium because if the platform and John the

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>majority of them do reputable what is called custodian in place,

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>your money is completely ring fenced from all platforms money.

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>So in the event that anything does go wrong, your

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>money is ring fenced and protected. So it's not about

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>looking for any upper monetary value. It's about saying, is

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>there a decent custodian There is my money kept separate

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>from the operating sort of fonds of the platform, And

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>if it is, you actually don't need to spread your

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>money around. So this is a sort of misconception we

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>see that actually means people have two or three platforms

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>sometimes when in fact they don't need to because their

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>money is separated and in the event that anything went wrong.

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>One thing I would say, though, is that that peace

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of mind that many people is the most important. I

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 1>remember years ago John talking to Gorham who used to

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>run hard landsdown, and he said to me that the

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 1>number one concern our customers have is security as their assets,

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.360
<v Speaker 1>like where are they where are they held and from

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>many people. We've talked Maren, You've asked me about fees,

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about apps, we've talked about all of that.

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>For a lot of people, that peace of mind is

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>so fundamentally important that that will be the primary driver

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of why they might pick a bank, or why they

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>might look for a footzy one hundred or whatever it

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.440
<v Speaker 1>might be. So that's another thing I think people should

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:32.680
<v Speaker 1>think about. But with a decent custodian in place, people's

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.479
<v Speaker 1>money is ring fenced and should be safe.

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Brilliant.

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Holly, Thanks for listening to this week's Maren

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Talk to Your Money. If you like us a rink

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 2>review and subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts, or to

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 2>be sure of following me in John on X or Twitter,

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm at Maren sw and John is John Underscore Stepec.

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Holly are you on Twitter for X?

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm afraid I've given up to it. I'm an Instagram

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 1>girl now, Maren when I can be bothered to brush

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>my hair.

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:05.159
<v Speaker 2>And you can find Holly on Instagram at Boring Money Holly.

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 2>This episode was produced by some Saudi production support and

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.919
<v Speaker 2>sound designed by Moses and Questions and comments on This

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 2>show and all our shows are always welcome. Our show

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 2>email is merin Money at Bloomberg dot net