WEBVTT - Twitter Serves as a Shaky Stage for a Presidential Campaign Announcement

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeartRadio and how the tech

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>are you. It's time for the tech News for Thursday

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:28.479
<v Speaker 1>May twenty fifth, twenty twenty three. So, first thing, I

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>want to address our updates to a story I covered

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday, which was about an incident in Cardiff in

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Wales where a pair of teenage boys died in a

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:45.160
<v Speaker 1>traffic accident and word had gotten around that they were

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in they were being pursued by police and that that

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>contributed to this accident. It caused the accident and there

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>were riots that followed. Now, initially reports were that the

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>police weren't involved at all and that this was misinformation

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and it spread rapidly and that ended up creating the

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>situation that ultimately escalated into a riot. Since then, where

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it has gotten out that CCTV footage has shown that

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>there was a police van that was following the boys.

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>The police in Cardiff have said that there still wasn't

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a pursuit, but the footage shows that there was a

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>police van following behind the boys. The police have given

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a timeline that suggests that the van actually turned off

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>from following them before the crash happened. I don't know

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>what the truth is at this point, but it is

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>important to follow up on it because obviously the initial

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>statement was about this being misinformation that then spread rapidly

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>throughout the community, and it may turn out that it's

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>not misinformation at all. So we'll have to continue to

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>watch the story and see what happens. Obviously, if it

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>turns out that the police were misrepresenting what was going on,

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it is going to make a situation where police relationships

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>with the community are already on shaky ground much worse.

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>So we will keep an eye out to see how

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>this story continues. Yesterday, Twitter attempted to serve as the

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>platform for GOP presidential hopeful Ron DeSantis as he made

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>his announcement that he was officially launching a presidential campaign.

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>This had been long anticipated, yesterday was just the formal announcement. Now,

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I say Twitter attempted to serve as a platform because

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the Twitter space that Elon Musk created specifically for this

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 1>event became a cacophony when audio issues made it impossible

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>for anyone to say anything without it being a massive,

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>incomprehensible mess. Musk later said the problem was that Twitter's

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>servers were overloaded. Several tech news outlets have pointed out

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that this event well well attended, virtually it wasn't a

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>small event. It still didn't come close to approaching other

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>large online only events that had, you know, several times

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>more people in attendance, but had fewer technical glitches. Whatever

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the cause of the glitches, the launch did not go smoothly.

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm not going to comment on the political side

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 1>of this, and you're welcome. Instead, I just want to

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>say the problems, the technical problems, really didn't come as

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>much of a surprise to at least the grouchy people

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>like me out in the tech space, because Musk effectively

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>gutted Twitter over the course of his ownership of the platform,

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and since then, essentially a skeleton crew has had to

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>scramble to meet whatever sometimes apparently arbitrary goals Musk comes

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>up with, or at least that's how it looks on

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the outside, And I fully admit I am looking at

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>this from the outside. I could be one hundred percent

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>off base with these observations and assumptions. So I don't

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:08.839
<v Speaker 1>want to suggest that my view is the the sum

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>total of the truth. Just from the outside, it looks

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>like Musk keeps wanting Twitter to tackle these huge projects,

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:21.119
<v Speaker 1>but with such a reduced workforce that it's it's kind

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of setting the platform up to fail, which is unfortunate

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>because I'm sure the people who are actually working on it,

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, they don't want things to fail, and they're

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>working hard, but they're doing so with a lack of

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>assets and resources. All right, now it's time to talk

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>about AI again, and to talk about Sam Altman, CEO

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of open AI again. Now you might remember that very

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>recently Altman appeared before US Congress and said that AI

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>is a field where regulation is needed. And at the time,

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of hopeful that this meant Altman was

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 1>really sincere in that belief and that he was going

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to take an active role to really draft useful regulations.

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 1>But then you could also say, well, yeah, but Sam

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Bankman freed said very similar things about cryptocurrency and regulations,

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and then look where he's at right now, so that

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe you shouldn't take these these statements at face value.

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>So over in the EU, Altman's tune is slightly different

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>than it was in the US. So I would say

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that the EU has people who are far more skeptical

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>and concerned about AI than what you typically see here

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:41.919
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Not to say that people in

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the US are totally cool with AI and they have

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>no worries, But in the EU, I think it's it's

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 1>more prominent. And in the EU, the EU has passed

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a law called the AI Act, which categorizes artificial intelligence

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>into three different buckets according to perceived risks. So at

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the very very top of this are unacceptable risks, So

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>these would be AI applications that would potentially violate citizens' rights.

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>So these would be applications that the EU would just

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>outlaw period like these, you cannot use AI to do

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>these sort of things, So this would be something like

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>China's social scoring system for example. That's where each person

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:30.679
<v Speaker 1>would receive a score which really relates to how useful

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and loyal they were according to the state. That would

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>be right out as a use of AI. Under this

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>are is a category called high risk AI systems. These

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 1>could potentially be useful, so they could have a social

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>benefit to them, but they're also potentially harmful. So because

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of that anything that fell into this category would need

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 1>to follow a strict set of rules and regulations in

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>order to be legal in EU. So, in other words,

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a high risk system would be allowable under EU law,

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>provided that the companies that were making and using those

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>systems abided by the rules and remain transparent and such.

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Altman says that chat, GPT and the GPT Large Language

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Model would fall into this high risk category as the

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>EU has defined it, and he objects to that. He

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>says that shouldn't be the case. And he also seems

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to think that the rules and regulations are too restrictive

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and that they are going to harm small companies that

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.679
<v Speaker 1>wish to integrate AI. Now keep in mind those small

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>companies integrating AI. I think Altman's looking at those small

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>companies as customers, right, These are companies that would be

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>essentially licensing open AI's platforms for work. So that's you know,

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>he has a vested interest in this. So I guess

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>what Altman appears to be saying. This is my interpretation

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>is that he's all for regulations if he has a

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>heavy hand in making them so that you know, they

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>don't actually impede his business. But if a country or

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a European Union creates rules independently, He's ready to take

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>his toys and go home. Or really, to quote him,

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>he said, quote, if we can comply, we will, and

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>if we can't, will cease operating. We will try, but

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:34.479
<v Speaker 1>there are technical limits to what's possible. End quote. Meanwhile,

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Brad Smith, Microsoft President, called on US lawmakers to form

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>rules that would limit or prevent integrating AI into critical

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>systems like say the US power grid or various water infrastructure,

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. He also called for AI companies

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 1>to be held accountable if and when their tools cause problems.

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>And considering how Microsoft has really invested heavily in open

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>AI and integrated GPT into its Microsoft Being product, this

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty interesting take. But Smith said, quote this

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>is the fundamental need to ensure that machines remain subject

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 1>to effective oversight by people, and the people who design

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and operate machines remain accountable to everyone else's end quote.

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>So here's the thing I agree with that. I think

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that is a reasonable thing to call for. I think

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the world in general needs to come up with rules

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>for the design and integration of AI and limitations to

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that right, like where AI should and shouldn't be used,

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>and how it should and shouldn't be used. And I

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>think those rules need to require companies to be as

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>transparent as possible. Just getting more and more complicated as

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>these AI models get more and more complex, and also

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the rules need to make sense, they need to be effective.

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>They need to prevent companies from just having the protect

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of rules being in existence as they continue to develop AI.

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>So by that I mean this, Okay, So if there's

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>no rule, like there's an absence of rules, companies can

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>actually be a little nervous as they operate. Right, you

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>have no rules, you have no oversight, But that means

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.319
<v Speaker 1>that if you do something really bad, there's going to

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>be a big ruckus and perhaps an overreaction to the ruckus,

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 1>which means that you end up harming yourself more than

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you would have if you just made a set of

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>rules and abided by them. Now, when you make rules, well,

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that means that you do have these these rules, these restrictions,

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>but usually not everything's covered, right. There are often gaps

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>or loopholes. So if you do something unanticipated but something

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that isn't covered by the rules, your defense is, well,

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing in the rules that says, you know, I

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 1>can't make AI that automatically denies credit to people who

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>come from such and such a place, because historically we

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>know all those folks default on loans or whatever. Rules

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that are intended to protect the public sometimes have an

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>odd way of protecting the perpetrators of bad deeds. That's

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying. Like, if there were no rules, then

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you might have a much larger reaction. If there are

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>rules and whatever you did wasn't covered by them, then

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you can say, hey, I was following the rules. Yeah,

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>this bad thing happened, but I wasn't breaking the law.

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>So creating rules does need to be done, but it

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>needs to be done with care and critical thinking. And

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it also has to be an ongoing process. It's not

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>something you do once and then you walk away. According

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to a research firm called Watchful Technologies, TikTok has been

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>testing an AI chatbot in Apple mobile devices. In the

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>TikTok app, the chatbot is called Taco and I don't

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>know if it only works on Tuesdays. Oh, hang on,

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it's actually spelled Takoh. The chatbot is meant to help

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>with discovery, so users apparently activate this chatbot and converse

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>with it to help find stuff they like or to

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>answer questions they have. They might have a question of

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>what does it mean if my toilet won't flush or whatever,

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and then the AI agent will find videos that somehow

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>relate to that kind of thing. Now, according to the researchers,

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Taco's purpose seems mostly just to keep people on TikTok

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>longer and keep them watching videos. So it's not like

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Taco's posing as a best friend or something like that,

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>but rather augmenting the recommendation algorithm to find stuff that's

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>going to maximize users time on the app. Okay, we're

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>going to take a quick break. When we come back,

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>we've got some more tech news to cover. We're back,

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>so yesterday. On Wednesday, Meta held another round of layoffs,

0:12:56.040 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>hitting somewhere in the neighborhood of six thousand people time.

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>The jobs affected were mostly on the business side of

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Meta's operations, as opposed to, you know, like the tech side. Reportedly,

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:14.319
<v Speaker 1>morale is in pretty bad shape in Meta. There were

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 1>a couple of articles I saw this morning that we're

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>saying things like Meta employees are trying to avoid being

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>included in a future round of layoffs by essentially creating

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>work like they're manufacturing work for them to do. It's

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the bosses coming look busy kind of mentality.

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Others at Meta appear to have no motivation to work

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>at all, because you know, when you don't know whether

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>or not you're going to have a job the next day,

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it can really do a number on you. I have

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>been there, and it is tough now. According to tech Crunch,

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>this most recent round of layoffs should theoretically be the

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>last major layoffs for the foreseeable future. Meta has indicated

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that it was aiming to eliminate ten thousand jobs the

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>spring total across layoffs, and this one was the second

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>round of layoffs, so they have definitely hit that ten

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand mark. And since late last year, Meta has handed

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 1>around twenty one thousand staff they're walking papers and has

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>also put a a hiring freeze on thousands of open positions.

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg, Meta's CEO, has called twenty twenty three the

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Year of Efficiency, indicating that Meta had a bloated workforce

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't really representative of the actual amount of work

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that needed to be done. In other words, we got

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>more people than we have work for them to do. Also,

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the company continues to face some pretty hefty costs which

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>might be motivating some of these cutbacks. That includes a

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>more than one billion dollar fine that came down from

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the EU earlier this week. To learn about that, just

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>listen to Tuesday's episode of Tech Stuff. Apple has announced

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a truly ginormous deal with the company Broadcom that will

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>see these two companies making five G components in the

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>United States. So, according to an article in courts, Apple

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>will invest somewhere in the neighborhood of four hundred thirty

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars to boost US manufacturing, largely in the five

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>G realm, but the connectivity space in general. So over

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years, Apple has been looking for

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>ways to decrease its reliance on Chinese manufacturing for various components.

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of different reasons to pull out

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of China, ranging from optics because it doesn't always look

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>good to be doing business with a country that has

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty awful human rights record all the way to

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>practical things like supply chain issues if you want to

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>be super cynical. But it's not really easy to just

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>extract from China, largely because companies like Apple depend upon

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the lower, the much much lower costs of labor in

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>China to keep production costs down. Recently, a manufacturing facility

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>in India actually announced it would no longer manufacture Apple

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>components because Apple's demands regarding costs of production meant that

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>this Indian company their profit margins were nearly non existent.

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, potentially the company would end up losing money

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to make stuff for Apple because Apple was saying, We're

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>not going to pay you more than X amount, and

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>meanwhile it costs why amount to make the stuff. So

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>there are companies in other places where Apple has previously

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>tried to move to avoid working in China that have

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>already kind of bulked because of this issue. You know,

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that unless Apple is willing to pay the

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>amount that is acceptable within that country for labor, then

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just not going to get done. So a move

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>out of China is likely going to mean increased prices

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on items in the long run. Global economics are super complicated.

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>The attorneys general for several states here in the United

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 1>States have banded together to level a massive lawsuit against

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a telecommunications company called Avid Telecom, and, according to the lawsuit,

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>this one telecommunications company facilitated billions of robocalls to people

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>who had previously signed up on the national Do Not

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Call Registry. So that registry is supposed to protect the

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>people who sign up to it from receiving nuisance and

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>unwanted calls, primarily telemarketing calls, but also things like scams

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.919
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. Citizens can actually designate the types of calls

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that they are willing to receive. So if you want,

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 1>you can go to and you're in the US, you

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>can go to the Do Not Call Registry, sign up

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>for free, and even indicate which calls you don't mind getting. Anyway,

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that, at least according to this lawsuit,

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Avid Telecom allowed telemarketing calls and scams and such to

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>go through when they absolutely should not have been able to.

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>The lawyer for Avid Telecom denies the charges, saying the

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 1>company acted in accordance with the law and expressed disappointment

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that all these Attorneys general didn't just sit down for

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>a civilized discussion before bringing a nasty lawsuit. We'll have

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to see where this goes from here. Sony held a

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>PlayStation event this week, a PlayStation showcase event, and unveiled

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>a new handheld gaming device that will be capable of

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>playing any non VR game streamed from a nearby PlayStation five.

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>So essentially, you're running the game on your PlayStation five,

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you're just streaming it to this handheld device that's within

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a certain range of that PS five. It doesn't even

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 1>have an official name yet, but the internal name for

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the handheld is Project Q. So Project Q will be

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 1>dependent upon a console. It will not be able to

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>play games natively. You can't just take it on the

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>go like you would with a Nintendo Switch. It kind

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of looks like someone took a modern PlayStation controller, cut

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.439
<v Speaker 1>it in half, and then shoved an eight inch screen

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:03.679
<v Speaker 1>in between the two halves. I'm not crazy about this design,

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>but I'm also in the minority of folks who don't

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>like PlayStation controllers in general. I know I'm bonkers. Anyway.

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>That's about all we know so far about Project Q.

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Sony didn't have information on how much folks should expect

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>this to cost or when it will come out. If

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 1>it's on the more expensive side, that's kind of a

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>deal breaker in my book. But then I also don't

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.479
<v Speaker 1>own a PS five yet. I might actually change that

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>next month. Because I'm thinking about buying myself one as

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a Berthday present, but I'm pretty sure i'll skip Project Q. Finally,

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>South Korea successfully launched a rocket carrying eight satellites earlier today.

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>The rocket, called Nuri, launched in the afternoon in South Korea,

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and according to South Korea's Ministry of Science, it achieved orbit.

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 1>The office also reported that the primary satellite on board

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the next SAT two has already established communications with Korea's

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>station in Antarctica. And as for the other satellites, at

0:19:57.400 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the time of this recording, there was actually questions if

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>one of them microsatellites failed to deploy properly from the rocket.

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't have more information on that just yet, but

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>South Korea is now the seventh country to achieve a

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>launch carry more than a ton of payload into orbit.

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's it for the tech News. I hope you

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>are all well and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.