WEBVTT - Ep65 "Why do brains so easily fall for magic tricks?"

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:08.399
<v Speaker 1>We're the first people to discover things about the human brain,

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>neuroscientists or magicians. How do magicians steer your attention? Why

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>can't you see what they're doing when they do something

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:21.119
<v Speaker 1>right in front of you? And how can someone appear

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to read your mind? Welcome to Inner Cosmos with me

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>David Eagleman. I'm a neuroscientist and an author at Stanford

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and in these episodes, we sail deeply into our three

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>pound universe to understand why and how our lives look

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>the way they do. Today's episode dives deep into the

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>world of magic tricks. Why do magic tricks work? I'm

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>not talking about the mechanics of how a card trick,

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>or how a magician saws a box in half and

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>it's actually two ladies and two boxes, or how a

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>magician pulls off a trick with mirrors. I'm not talking

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>about that. I want to talk about the way the

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>human brain works and how that opens the door to

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>us getting fooled. And so I'm going to start with

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>an assertion if brains worked in a totally different way,

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>presumably we would have different sorts of magic tricks. Other

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>things would work for us. So, for example, if we

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:38.479
<v Speaker 1>ever discover life on other planets, we might find that

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the aliens visual systems or attentional systems work differently, and

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>therefore an alien magician stands on stage in front of

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>its alien audience and does things that would seem patently

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>obvious to us, and all the aliens would put their

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>green hands over their mouths and gasp, wow, how did

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>she do that? In other words, if they have some

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of flaw in their understanding of the reality of

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 1>the world out there, then their magicians could take advantage

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of that and they would be flummixed. So in today's episode,

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take the opposite view. We're going to pretend

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>we're the aliens looking at the humans, and we'll get

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to see the flaws in the human brain that way

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that cause us to misperceive reality, which gives rise to

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a class of people known as magicians, who exploit these

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>neural deficits, either for profit or entertainment. And what's fascinating

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>is that even though we've figured out a lot about

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the brain, there's a sense in which neuroscientists are always

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>playing catch up to those people who have mastered the

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>art of perception. This can be the stage magician or

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the mentalist, or the person running a seance, or the

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>guy run the shell game on a street corner, or

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the professional pickpocket. These people have mastered manipulation through a

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of trial and error. And now we're at a

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>fascinating point where there's a collaboration going on between these

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>two fields, where neuroscientists try to figure out the science

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of what magicians already figured out works. In other words,

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>neuroscience is following the scent trails of the magicians to

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>figure out what makes these tricks and sleight of hand

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and illusions full our neural networks. Now, if you've been

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>listening to this podcast, you'll know that the brain lives

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>in silence and darkness, and it's always trying to construct

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>an internal model of the outside world. The critical point

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>for today is that there is not a perfect mapping

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>from the outside to the inside. In other words, it's

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>not as though something happens in the outside world and

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>we have a perfect record of that on the inside. Instead,

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>if something happens outside the spotlight of where you're paying attention,

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you just don't see it at all. But the brain's

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 1>job is to put together a story of what the

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>heck is happening in the world out there, and so

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>it will do so even if it has missed that event,

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>even if its story is totally wrong. Its job is

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>to narrate what is going on in the world given

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>its best understanding. So that means if you don't see

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>some sleight of hand, your brain will nonetheless cook up

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 1>a story like the coin must have disappeared into thin

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 1>air and then it later appeared in my pocket. Now

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>let's say those aliens don't have an attentional spotlight like

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we do, so they can see everything happening in the scene.

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>They would be totally amused that you fell for that.

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>To them, you're like a dog falling for a simple trick,

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>like when you pretend to throw a ball and you

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>hide it behind your back and the dog gets fooled.

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>So today we're going to explore the science behind the magic,

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to get there with the help of

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>two interviews. First, we're going to talk with a magician

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and then with two neuroscientists who study why magic works.

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>So first I called up my friend Robert Strong, a

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>professional magician, and asked him about his experience with manipulating attention.

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.600
<v Speaker 1>So Robert tell us about what magicians need to understand

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>about the brain in order to do what you do.

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 2>So magicians have spent five thousand years abe testing tricks

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 2>on humans to find the moments where the attention, where

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 2>the gaze is upon you, but the attention is not

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 2>on you, so that the eyes may see them, but

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 2>the brain doesn't record it. And what we do is

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 2>we pay really close attention to people for those moments

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 2>where the attention is somewhere else. And sometimes it happens naturally,

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 2>but mostly we manufacture it where the attention is internal.

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>What's an example of how you would manufacture where someone's

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>attention is.

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 2>So the three that I use the most. The first

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 2>is where I'm interested, is where they're interested. So I

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 2>show no interest in the method or the secret, but

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.359
<v Speaker 2>I bring all my folks and attention and my gaze

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 2>to where the secret isn't that's the classical misdirection.

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>So can you unpack that with an example?

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 2>So if I were to hold up a dollar bill

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 2>and I bring my attention and focus to the dollar bill,

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 2>that's where I want them to be. But if I

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 2>want to sneak something into the dollar bill, if I'm

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 2>going to fold a bill around like a coin or

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 2>something to make a prop that I'm going to use later.

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 2>What I'll do is I'll show it intron in the subject.

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 2>So where are you from? Have you ever done a

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 2>magic trick before? Is this your first time being magical?

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 2>And so I take my focus intention interest over there.

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 2>The other thing I could do is I might have

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 2>a red herring for this. I need a pen or pencil.

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Do you have one? Let's look. While they're looking, I'm

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 2>putting the coin in the door, right in.

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Front of them.

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Their eyes could record it, but it just doesn't no pen,

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 2>That's okay. I'll use the bill as a magic wand

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 2>so it's a red herring.

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>And did you say there were three ways you do it?

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 2>There's probably a dozen, but there's three that I use

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 2>the most. The one that I focus on probably the

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 2>most is humor. Just a little joke. And when you

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 2>give a little joke, they laugh for just a moment.

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Their gaze is on you, but they don't record what

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 2>they're seeing. So if they were actually watching a video

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 2>of it, they can rewind it, slow it down, and

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 2>they can see me do the secret move. They didn't move,

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 2>but in real time, they just don't record it, okay,

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 2>And what's the third The third one that I use

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 2>the most is either the trick is over or I

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 2>apparently fail. So if you chose the King of Hearts

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 2>and I pull out the Two of Hearts, you go, Nope,

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 2>that's not it. I go, oh, that just didn't work.

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I dropped my shoulders, I bring my gaze and attention,

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 2>like darn, that didn't work. And when they go, oh,

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 2>the trick's over or he failed, then I could do

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 2>the secret move right in front of them and the

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 2>brain doesn't record it. I go, We'll give me one

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 2>more chance, or tell me what your card is, and

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 2>then their card is in a magical place like inside

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 2>a box they've been holding the whole time. A lot

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 2>of magicians that do really good sleide of hand do

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of overwhelming them with cues. Can you hold

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 2>that a little lower? Can you bring that a little

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 2>bit closer? Can you make sure everybody can see?

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 3>You know?

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 2>And just giving them a set of cues one after another,

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 2>they stop recording the secret move that's right in front

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:56.559
<v Speaker 2>of them because they don't want to get it wrong.

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 2>So if you are an assistant on stage in front

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 2>of two people or ten thousand people, and I give

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 2>you a set of instructions, and I just hit you

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 2>with three or four instructions, especially if number one slightly

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 2>contradicts number four. All of a sudden, you're looking right

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 2>at me, but you're not recording the secret move. So

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 2>if I say, can you hold that a little bit lower?

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Can you hold a little bit closer, no closer to

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 2>your body a little higher?

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 3>Please?

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 2>And now they're thinking that was he said lower to

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 2>a Hi. I don't want to get that wrong, And

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 2>they're trying to split the difference. They're looking right at you,

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 2>but the brain doesn't record a secret move that happens

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 2>right in front of them. Another great one is what

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 2>you do use is called bottom up. Something that just

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 2>comes from nowhere. So a piece of flash paper, a

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 2>flash of light, a sound on a sudden movement, an

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 2>assistant comes on stage, something shiny and bright that just distracts,

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 2>like the cartoon squirrel. You give them something that just

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 2>takes their gaze off for just a moment, and that

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 2>gives you enough time to sneak an elephant to the room.

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh excellent. Yeah. In neuroscience we talk about exogenous and

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:10.079
<v Speaker 1>endogenous attention, meaning you know, exogerous attention is something happens

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the snap, debang, the flash, and it causes you to look.

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 1>It grabs your attention over there, whereas endogenous attention is

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>where I'm choosing to put my attention or where I

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>think I'm choosing to put it. And that's all the

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>first things you mentioned. We're taking people's in dodgenous attention,

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>but the sudden effect is what grabs their attention. Then

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you can do lots of things right under their nose.

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 2>The terms the magicians use are bottom up top down.

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 2>So if I'm holding a lighter and a piece of

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 2>flash paper. For a bottom up, I light the flash paper,

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 2>it makes a big flash in the air of all

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 2>the eyes and gaze goes up while they handholding the

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 2>lighter dumps it into a secret pocket, brings him back

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 2>to the previous position, and when the eyes come down,

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 2>the letter is now apparently vanished. But for top down,

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 2>I might say watch this piece of paper closely, bring

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 2>your gaze in close, watch really closely, and when they're

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 2>following the instructions, probably by force perspective, I can toss

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 2>that piece of paper over their head. Outside of their view,

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 2>all they see is the back of my hand. And

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 2>when I come back down, apparently holding the paper and

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 2>balling up into my other hand, the volunteer sees the

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 2>ball in their mind. When I say sees that, they

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 2>see their mind's eye go into the hand. And because

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 2>I am directing them and keeping them really focused in

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 2>my place, they're not seeing the places I don't want

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 2>them to see. And then I can apparently make it

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 2>vanish and had already been gone for a few seconds.

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about other types of misdirection that you exploit.

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 2>One very powerful type of misdirection that I use all

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 2>the time is something called time misdirection. I'm not a neuroscientist,

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 2>but my understanding is that the brain has really good

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 2>instant recall. So in my being out there in the

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 2>field and doing magic tricks for people, if I do

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 2>the secret move and then the reveal immediately after that,

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 2>the brain is really good at rewinding a set or

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 2>two and going, something just happened, and I know that's

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 2>when the magic happened. Maybe I don't understand what the

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 2>secret move was. So magicians try to create a lot

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 2>of time distance between a secret move and the reveal

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 2>of the magic trick where the magical moment happens. So

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 2>a really good example of time as direction is a

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 2>magic trick that every magician learns at the beginning of

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 2>their career, and it's in every kid's book. It's forcing

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 2>a playing card, giving the illusion of a free choice.

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 2>So if I show I've got a deck of cards

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 2>where the cards are all different, and I peek at

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 2>the bottom card and I secretly know that it is

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 2>the Queen of Hearts, I ask you to cut the

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 2>cards into two piles. So you take the top half

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 2>and place it on the table, and I take the

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 2>bottom half and I criss crossed it across the top

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 2>of the cards.

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Like, so, now I talk to you, I say you

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 3>had a free choice. There's fifty two cards.

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 2>It would be a small miracle if I can tell

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 2>you that you cut to the Queen of Hearts before

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 2>you look at the card you cut to. I just

0:12:57.920 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 2>want to make sure you know that I didn't even

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 2>touch the car cards. And then I go and I

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 2>pick up the pile of the cards, and I show

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 2>you that the card that you cut to was indeed

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 2>the Queen of Hearts. It was simply the bottom card.

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 2>But enough timeness direction, the audience loses track of which

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 2>is the top and which is the bottom.

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Excellent, So tell us how you, as a magician exploit assumptions.

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 3>That's a great question.

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 2>I think everything we do as we exploit assumption is

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 2>because the human brain lives in the future, is predicting

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:29.839
<v Speaker 2>what's coming next. And if we take them down that

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 2>road of giving them all the supporting evidence that everything

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.439
<v Speaker 2>they believe to be is true is true, and then

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 2>we pull back the curtain and we show them a

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 2>new reveal, something that's unexpected, that's the magical moment. So

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 2>we understand that people believe that if I'm holding a

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 2>rubber band and I make a very specific sound like this,

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 2>that the rubber band is now broken. And I gave

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 2>you supporting visual evidence by giving the illusion that the

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 2>rubber band's broken. But the rubber band never broke. All

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 2>I did was pluck it like a musical instrument at

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.319
<v Speaker 2>the right time. The eyes could see that I didn't

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 2>break it. But because you hear the sound, the brain goes, oh,

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.199
<v Speaker 2>that's super familiar. I know that sound. And then they

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 2>see what looks like a broken rubber band. They jumped

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 2>to the wrong conclusion for the right reasons. Oh, for

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 2>the audience that's listening. Here's what I did was I

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 2>took a rubber band and I put my index fingers

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 2>and I'm making a long oval.

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.479
<v Speaker 3>And I took that long oval, and I.

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Collapsed the top band down to the bottom band to

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 2>make the two lines, so it looks like a single band.

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 3>And I stretched it out and made a new circle.

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 2>And now to complete the circle, I took my finger

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 2>out of the oval, and now I've got this little

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 2>nub here I can pluck, and it looks like a

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 2>new circle or a new rubber band, but in reality,

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 2>it's a stretched out rubber band. And that plucking sound

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 2>completes the illusion in the brain that the rubber band

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 2>is broken. And then all I have to do is

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 2>open up the oval and show that it was never

0:14:57.680 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 2>actually broken, or that it's magically restored.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So for the audio audience, it looks like Robert breaks

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a rubber band. It looks like he's got a single

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>stretch of rubber and he pulls it and you hear

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the sound and you think, oh, I see he has

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>just snapped the rubber band. And then a moment later

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>he shows you bunk. Here is the complete rubber band again.

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>But Robert, you're saying a big part of that is

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the sound of seeing it and the assumption of what

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that translates to.

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 2>So that specifically as sound synchronization. But we do give

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 2>an all magic supporting evidence of the illusion, so that

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 2>way all thoughts of hey, there's something funny going on

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 2>or this isn't real goes away and you believe in

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 2>the reality that we're creating terrific.

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all of us, of course live in our own head.

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>We've got our internal models running. We interpret reality, and

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>your job as a magician is simply to navigate what

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>we think is the reality going on. I know you

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>think about forced perspectives like this to tell us about that.

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of times magicians just simply understand your

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 2>point of view literally. So we'll practice in front of

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 2>a mirror or a camera, and if we get the

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 2>angles right, we can create allusion that something appears, disappears,

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 2>or even levitates. And this is one that's pretty easy

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 2>to explain. But from your point of view, you see

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 2>a silver ball that is apparently floating, Yes, But from

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 2>another point of view or another angle, when I turn

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 2>the sideway, so you can see it's a silver soup ladle,

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 2>and you were just seeing the bowl of it and

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 2>weren't seeing the handle, and the handle was simply under

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 2>my armpit, which creates a beautiful illusion in the kitchen

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 2>at soup time.

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So just for the audio audience, he put the

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>soup ladle under his arm so the bottom of it

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>is sticking out towards us, and it looks like a

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>floating silver ball. And then he takes his hands off

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of the silver ball and it makes it look like

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>he's levitating it with his hands. It's so simple and

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>so good and so compelling. Check out the video if

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you're just listening to this on audio. Okay, So that's

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>an example of forced perspective, as in, you know exactly

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>where I am in the case of zoom COVID pandemic.

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Must have been cool for you in certain ways because

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you got to do all kinds of zoom magic tricks

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>where you know precisely what the perspective is. But when

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you're doing this in an audience and live audience with

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>lots of people, what kind of things can you do

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>there in person?

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 2>Combining everything we've talked about, you can create a series

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 2>of illusions that happen back to back to back to back.

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 2>So it's just bombarded with magic. Because one of the

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 2>things I like to create is just a bombardment of

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 2>magic all coming out to your senses, all wines and together.

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 2>It's a cumulative effect and it feels super magical.

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 1>That's great. And people, even if they're sniffing out some

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>particular part of it, you're hitting them with lots of

0:17:58.080 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>different things, and so they're not going to pick up

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>on what's going on.

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and they focus on the one that fools them.

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right. So Robert, how do you make sure

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that you understand what it is like to be in

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the audience's shoes looking at you.

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 2>So magicians have to have a lot of empathy. We're

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:19.400
<v Speaker 2>creating moments of delight and joy for other people, so

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 2>we have to literally see it from their perspective, like

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 2>physically for the magic to work.

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 3>But we also have to know.

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:30.199
<v Speaker 2>What's their life experience and what's their expectations, what's their assumptions,

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 2>and kind of put ourselves in their shoes to create

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 2>moments of joy. And I was wanting to asked, what

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 2>is the best magic trick. My answer was the ham

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 2>sandwich heading. Gnulms, a Baltimore magician I think in the fifties,

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 2>wrote a book and it's just a little paragraph in there.

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 2>And the way it explains how you get to the

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 2>best magic trick in the world is if you and

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 2>I were walking down the street and you said, do

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 2>a magic trick, and I reached the right packet, I

0:18:58.359 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 2>pull out a ham sandwich.

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 1>You like, that's weird.

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 2>But if it were lunchtimer walking down the street and

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 2>you say do magic trick and I pull out ham sandwich,

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 2>You're like, well, that's convenient timing. But if you had

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 2>just explained to me a ham sandwich that you had

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 2>been thinking about all day long, it was from your childhood,

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.640
<v Speaker 2>you could even get it here. And then you say

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 2>do a magic trick and I pull up that ham sandwich.

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 2>It's a freaking miracle. So when I say magicians have empathy,

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 2>they really good magicians really take the time to think

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 2>about where are they physically? Who are they? Are they engineers?

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Are they scientists? What's going on? Do they just get funding,

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 2>do they just get FDA approval?

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:40.479
<v Speaker 3>What's the space they're in there?

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 2>There's a fountain there, and there's or they're on a

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 2>ship in the bay or something like that, and then

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 2>you take the lot all together and you create an

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 2>illusion that is a freaking experience that they'll remember for

0:19:51.600 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 2>the rest of their lives.

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 1>That was Robert Strong, a professional magician. It's wonderful to

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 1>watch his performances, and I'm linking some of his videos

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in the show notes. And next I called up two

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>colleagues of mine, Stephen Macknick and Susannah Martinez Conde. They're

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>both neuroscience professors and researchers at State University of New

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>York Downtown Medical Center. They've been studying the intersection of

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>magic with neuroscience for years, so I wanted to dive

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>in with them. So you've asserted that magicians have been

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>testing and exploiting the limits of attention and cognition for

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of years, and neurosciences just beginning to catch up

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 1>with that. So tell us about that.

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 4>We have been studying the neuroscience of magic for I

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 4>guess about the almost twenty years now, and something that

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 4>we realize early on is that as neuroscientists, we have

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 4>sometimes been reinventing the wheel and arrive into conclusions and

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 4>finding things about the mind and the brain that the

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 4>magicians know for centuries, if not longer. So I have

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 4>an example causes such as change blindness and in attentional blindness.

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 4>These are cognitive neuroscience concepts that basically refer to the

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 4>way that our brain prioritizes attention. So change blindness refers

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 4>to when something changes but you don't realize, you don't

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 4>notice the change because you have not been paying attention,

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 4>sometimes during a gamma change, and we have continuity errors

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 4>in movies and that sort of situation. And in attentional

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 4>blindness simply refers to the fact that we cannot attend

0:21:58.119 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 4>to a million things at once. We can, in fact,

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 4>to attend to one thing at once, and so whatever

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 4>you're not attending to, you are going to ignore. And

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 4>you could say that you're blind to those events you're

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 4>not attended.

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>To, and so magicians take advantage of this.

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 5>What Susanna was saying with inattentional blindness has to do

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:21.640
<v Speaker 5>with when we are paying attention to something, we are

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.640
<v Speaker 5>not able to pay attention to other things. And this

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 5>implies both a time that we're paying attention but also

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 5>a space that we're paying attention. So attention also has

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 5>a spatial component. So that is something that magicians learned

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 5>a long time ago, that there was a spotlight of attention.

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 5>And this is something that neuroscientists, cognitive neuroscience also discovered

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 5>independently from magicians, and in fact, the evolution here of

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 5>both concepts is so convergent that we came across the

0:22:56.280 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 5>same terminology. Both scientists and magicians called this is spotlight

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 5>of attention and independently of each other. And so this

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 5>is where when you're paying attention to something, there is

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:11.679
<v Speaker 5>actually a point in your visual system that's a relatively

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 5>small point where you're paying attention. It can be in

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 5>the center of your vision or outside the center of

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 5>your vision, and this area is where you actually can

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 5>perform tasks that require attention. And outside that area we

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 5>now know to some extent because of research that Susanna

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 5>and I helped conduct, that you actually suppress everything else. Okay,

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 5>so that's how the spotlight seems to be working in

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 5>the brain and what neuroscience brought to the table. But

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 5>magicians knew about the spotlight of attention from their own

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 5>research in performing before anybody else.

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So The magician's task is to draw your spotlight of

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>attention to something they want you to look at while

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>they're doing something else outside of that spotlight that you

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 1>can't see. So give me an example.

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 4>Of that example is in terms of attentional management magicians,

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 4>one term is a misdirection, but it's basically attentional management.

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:14.479
<v Speaker 4>And I'm thinking about the magic tree, the cups and balls.

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 4>This cos back to the Roman Empire. It's still performed today.

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 4>But when we say the magicians have known some of

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 4>these things for a long time, it's a really long time.

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 4>In the Cups and Balls track, you typically performed with

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:33.919
<v Speaker 4>three upside down cups, and balls appear and disappear below

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 4>the cups, and what they do is divide your attention.

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 4>There's a minimum of three locations with the three cups, and.

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 6>They're moving them around.

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 4>And not only you're dividing your attention on three special occasions,

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 4>but the magicians will be talking at the same time,

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 4>tell them.

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 6>Some sort of story.

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 4>They call it pattern And so what that forces spectators

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 4>is to divide their attention. And so in multiple locations,

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 4>cross multiple sensory systems, and as we explained before, we

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 4>do not have the wiring to do that. We can

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 4>really only pay attention to one thing, and so magicians

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 4>are masters of the divide and conquered approach of attention.

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So how does the cups and balls trick work? I mean,

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>aside from dividing your attention, what are they actually doing there?

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 5>So in the cups and balls, so you have three

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 5>cups and you have three or more balls, and what

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 5>they'll do is they'll show you under a cup that

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.400
<v Speaker 5>there's nothing there, and then they put down the cup

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 5>and they show you another cup and there is a

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 5>ball there. And then they move the cups around and

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 5>you can follow. It's not very fast, you can see

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:42.719
<v Speaker 5>which cup is going where. And then when they move

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 5>the cup around, they pull up the cup with the

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 5>ball and earth the ball's gone. And then they opened

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 5>another cup and the ball's there, and you know that

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 5>that was what was empty. And they're doing this with

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 5>slight of hand.

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 4>So there's sleight of hand involved that we should not

0:25:56.920 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 4>really disclose because we have been sworn to secrecy by

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 4>various magic societies. But the main thing from a neuroscience

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 4>perspective is that you are dividing your attention arguably and

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 4>I do not believe the experiment has been done. But

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 4>one experiment I would like to do is to have

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 4>people and that track their say, their eye movements, and

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 4>have them observed just one special location at once, one

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:29.439
<v Speaker 4>one cup, one ball. My prediction would be that they

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 4>might have a much better chance at figuring this out

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 4>just staying still with their attentional allocation than as we

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 4>watch the trick naturally.

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 6>But that, of course is not what we tend to do.

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 5>So we wrote a paper about the Cups and Balls

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 5>using Taelor the magician from Pen and Teller, and he

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:56.160
<v Speaker 5>actually performed it on camera in multiple different ways that

0:26:56.200 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 5>we would consider to be a stimulu of different conditions

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 5>for our experimental paradigm. And then we showed subjects these

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 5>different videos with different conditions and we were able to

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:11.640
<v Speaker 5>learn a few things about how the Cups and Balls

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 5>has done.

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 1>So.

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 5>First off, the general zeitgeist in magic is that you're

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 5>drawing people's attention by moving your hands in a certain

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 5>way and moving the cups in a certain way, and

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 5>while you're making a big move over here, they don't

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.159
<v Speaker 5>notice a small move over there. That's an axiom of magic.

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 5>A big move covers a small move, and the small

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 5>move would be, of course, we're manipulating the balls, and

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.199
<v Speaker 5>the big move would be to draw your attention. And

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 5>that can either draw your eye position as the spectator,

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 5>or it can just draw your attention without moving your eyes. Now,

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 5>Teller had a theory going into this study, and the

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 5>theory was that certain kinds of motions were more attention

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 5>grabbing than others. And in fact, he specifically thought that

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 5>there was one type of motion that he and pen

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 5>had actually developed and was so strong that it was

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:09.479
<v Speaker 5>perhaps the strongest form of stimulus that would draw humans attention.

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 5>And they developed this while they were developing their famous

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 5>cups and balls trick from Pennineller. That trick is famous

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 5>because they actually do it and then they do it

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 5>again with transparent cups, and the transparent cups still work.

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 5>And so this was a huge shock, and it also

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 5>violates all sorts of magical rules or magical ideas, because

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 5>first off, you're not supposed to do the same trick twice.

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:39.239
<v Speaker 5>That's another axiom in magic, because there's a chance that

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 5>the audience will figure out that trick.

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>But cups and.

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 5>Balls are so strong, it's so robust of a trick,

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 5>and they're so good at performing it that they actually

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 5>can do it twice in front of an audience without

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 5>any risk of the audience figuring out the trick. But secondly,

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 5>there's definitely not supposed to do it with transparent cups

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 5>because it is literally possible to see the slag of

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 5>hand in this case. It's much easier anyway to see

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 5>the slight of hand in this case. But it still

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 5>works because the attentional management is so strong, and he

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 5>feels one of the ways they get away with some

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 5>of their biggest moves in the cups and balls is

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 5>with this one thing that he feels was really important,

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 5>which is that if you do something where the ball drops,

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 5>that is, the gravity actually accelerates the ball at nine

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 5>point eight meters per second square down. That that is

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 5>perhaps the strongest thing he thought to draw a human's attention.

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 5>That there's something about things dropping in the gravity, well,

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 5>that will draw a human being's attention very strongly. And

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 5>they were able to do certain things in their act.

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 5>Again we can't talk about the details, but certain things

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 5>in their act were drawn because of dropping the ball.

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:49.479
<v Speaker 5>So they would have a ball on top of the

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 5>upside down cup and he poured the ball off into

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 5>his hand and while the ball was dropping, he could

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 5>get away with magical murder. Okay, that's what his theory was.

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 5>And so we did an experiment where we actually did

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.719
<v Speaker 5>a bunch of different conditions, including the ball dropping and

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 5>including him moving the ball with his hands and other

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 5>things to test what was the strongest draw for attention.

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 5>And what we found was that dropping the ball in

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 5>the gravity well was indeed very strong, but there was

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 5>actually something that was a little bit stronger, which he'd

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 5>never done before because it's not a very good magical technique,

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 5>but he discovered that it actually worked really well, in

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 5>fact stronger than pouring the ball in the graviol which

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 5>is we asked him to just pick up the ball

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 5>with his hand and put it down on the table,

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 5>which is not part of the general set of movements

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 5>that a magician would do, and that actually drew the

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 5>eyes of the audience even better and it allowed him

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 5>with his other hand to potentially do more trickery. So

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 5>we were really thrilled by the outcome because we discovered

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 5>something that not only advanced science did, it also advanced magic.

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>That's terrific because It implies that we care about the

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>social aspect too, not just the physics. But our attention

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>is drawn by a human is doing something and I'm

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>going to watch that. By the way, as a side note,

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I did some experiments a while ago that showed that

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>something that grabs attention even more than let's say a

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>ball dropping in gravity is when it violates the nine

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>point eight meters per second square, when it's actually dropping

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>faster or slower. That is a huge attention grab. I

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know how you pull it off on stage, but

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>for example, one of the reasons that it's so compelling

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>when we watch The Matrix or the movie three hundred

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>is because things are speeding up and slowing down. Let's

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>say Trinity jumps up in the air and we have

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 1>very clear predictions about when she should hit the ground,

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>but she stays in the air longer than she's supposed to.

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>That sort of thing really grabs our attention.

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 4>I wonder if a neural adaptation also plays into that,

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 4>because these kind of unexpected events sort of like keep

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 4>you on your toes, and that a fast motion followed

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 4>by slow motion, like you may imagine that your neurons

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 4>would adapt to a certain rate of motion and then

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 4>the unexpected or the change is what then drives again

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 4>neural firing. But there's there's nothing else that you brought

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 4>up that I wanted to comment on, and it's it's

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 4>the social aspect of magic that is so important at

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 4>so many levels, and that is one of the main

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 4>tools that magicians use. For one, humor, it's a fantastic

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 4>element of misdirection. One of the magicians that we originally

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 4>collaborated with, Johnny Thompson, the Great TOMSONI he died a

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 4>few years ago, but he used to say that when

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 4>the audience laughs, time stops and the magician can do anything.

0:32:57.000 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 4>And that's because emotions, priority, tie attention so powerfully related

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 4>to this, Magicians they cultivate relationships with the with the audience,

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 4>they're they're empathetic figures. It is in the in the

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 4>magician's favor that the audience wants the magic to work,

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 4>that they want the magician to succeed rather than trying

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 4>to prove it wrong. But that's so that's another element.

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 4>And finally I wanted to touch on the fact that

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 4>a number of magic tricks rely on bringing on stage magic.

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 4>They rely on bringing a volunteer on the stage, and

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 4>that is just so compelling for the audience because spectators

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 4>are identifying with the volunteers, just wondering what's.

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 6>Going to happen.

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 4>Imagine mirror neurons firing wildly, and while the attention is

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 4>fully allocated on the volunteer, then the magician can do

0:33:56.280 --> 0:34:00.040
<v Speaker 4>whatever they need to be doing. And what's more, sometimes

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 4>within that the magician draws an attention to something while

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 4>they're doing something else. But there is also an element

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 4>of time misdirection, because it is not necessarily that the

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 4>magic manipulation is happening right now while the magician is

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 4>misdirected and then maybe setting up a trick for later on,

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 4>or they may be disposing of evidence for a trick

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 4>that happened minutes ago. So things are not happening necessarily

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 4>in the chronology that we perceive them from the audience perspective.

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>We've touched on this issue about attention, and that's something

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 1>that we study in neuroscience, but there are actually so

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>many things that we discover in neuro about what our

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.760
<v Speaker 1>limits are, whether that's about color or about time perception

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:52.319
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. Give us an example of the

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:56.879
<v Speaker 1>way that magicians operate more broadly taking advantage of these

0:34:57.640 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 1>cognitive limits.

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 5>Sure, So, following up on Susanna's comments about the late

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 5>great tom Sony, so he had one trick that we

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 5>discussed in our book Slights of Mind, and it's a

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 5>visual illusion trick. And the way it worked was he

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 5>had a beautiful volunteer, which of course the idea of

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 5>using volunteers, or in this case, he wasn't a volunteer,

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 5>was actually an assistant. But one thing you can do

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:30.280
<v Speaker 5>with volunteers or assistants is pick people who are interesting

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 5>looking or have an assistant whos beautiful or whatever to

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 5>draw attention of the audience to that person. And that

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 5>was the case here. She was wearing a white dress.

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 5>It left little to the imagination as it was described

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 5>to us. We haven't seen the trick, but it was

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 5>described to us. And so he on the stage he

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 5>would tell the audience that he could turn this dress

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 5>into a red dress. And he would say, let me

0:35:57.440 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 5>show you how I do it on the counter of three,

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.279
<v Speaker 5>one two three, and then all the lights on the

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 5>stage would turn red, turning everything red, the white dress,

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 5>the assistant himself, and he would admit that that was

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 5>a bad joke, but he did. You have to admit

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 5>do it that he turned it into a red dress.

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 5>But now he's really going to do it and entre

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:23.400
<v Speaker 5>it like this. At that moment, the lights would flicker

0:36:23.480 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 5>again back to white, and the dress was red under

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 5>white light. So what he actually did that? And this

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:33.720
<v Speaker 5>is a spoiler alert that we have to warn people

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 5>about that we're going to spoil this trick. We had

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 5>the Great Tom Sony's permission to spoil the trick, but

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 5>we also have to put spoiler alerts whenever we do this.

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:45.879
<v Speaker 5>But the way it would work would be to have

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:51.840
<v Speaker 5>the bright red lights on the woman, so super bright

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 5>people are looking at her. He's used his voice to

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 5>direct attention to her, and this is for some period

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 5>of time, which is causing an after image to develop

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:05.320
<v Speaker 5>in their visual system based on this brightly lit woman

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 5>against a back background. And then when the lights turn off,

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:14.280
<v Speaker 5>there are gimmicks in the stage that a trapdoor opens

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:18.320
<v Speaker 5>and her dress is pulled off. And the dress is

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 5>a special dress that's very tight, but she's got an

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:26.320
<v Speaker 5>even tighter dress on underneath that's the same, looks the same,

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 5>but it's actually red. Okay, So the white dress is

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 5>on top of the red one. So just within a

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:35.399
<v Speaker 5>few milliseconds, the white dress is pulled off. She has

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 5>a red dress on while the stage is black. But

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:42.440
<v Speaker 5>they're everybody's seeing this positive after image that that happens.

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:45.839
<v Speaker 5>It's called iconic memory. That happens for just a very

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 5>few brief milliseconds when you turn off the lights, you

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:52.240
<v Speaker 5>can see a positive after image, and then the lights

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 5>come back on and you see her with real lighting,

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 5>with white lighting, with the dress change.

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 1>So let me just repeat this in that during the

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>few milliseconds when the lights went off, in between the

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>red lights and the white lights, the audience is still

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:10.399
<v Speaker 1>seeing her as though she's there because they're having an

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>after image. It's as though the stage hasn't gone black, right.

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:16.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, they can tell something's happened, and the light flickers.

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 5>People see in their normal course of life. They might

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 5>be in the bathroom and about to leave and they

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 5>turn off the lights and they'll see that they get

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 5>an after image. But we learn to ignore these things

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 5>through life, right. But he's got the audience paying attention

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:36.240
<v Speaker 5>intentionally at the woman at the time that this happens,

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 5>and so when the lights are actually off. What they

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.319
<v Speaker 5>can't see is any motion or the trap door or

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 5>the dress going down through the trapdoor in just this

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 5>hundred milliseconds or so that actually happens. They can't see

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 5>it because there is no light on that time, and

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 5>then the lights come back on and she's still standing there,

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 5>and it reduces the chances that they're going to see anything.

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so he's taking advantage of a visual illusion here.

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>So tell us about the difference between visual illusions and

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 1>cognitive illusions.

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:08.400
<v Speaker 6>But we should start with defining what an illusion is.

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 4>An illusion is a perception that doesn't match reality, and

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:18.360
<v Speaker 4>we talk about visual or conit evlusions happen in the

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 4>brain as opposed to optical illusions that have to do

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 4>with the physical property supplied.

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:25.759
<v Speaker 6>Right, So, if we take a glass.

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 4>Of water and we put a pencil inside and it

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:32.759
<v Speaker 4>appears to ban, that's an optical illusion. It has to

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 4>do with the refraction indexes of air and water. It

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:41.839
<v Speaker 4>doesn't happen in the brain per se. But visual illusions

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 4>and cognitive evlutions are constructed in the brain, and the

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 4>difference really has to do with a water level. They

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 4>take place in the hierarchy of information processing, so a

0:39:55.560 --> 0:40:00.399
<v Speaker 4>visual illusion would be primarily a sensory illusion. We can

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 4>also talk about there are attack delusions, auditory illusions, and

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 4>so on. They happen close to the input. In fact,

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 4>some of these visual illusions we can largely explain at

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:12.320
<v Speaker 4>the level of the retina instide of the eyeball, whereas

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:15.319
<v Speaker 4>a coality evlution happens higher up in the brain. And

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:19.439
<v Speaker 4>then we're talking about what we call cognitive processes, such

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 4>as attention and memory and decision making. Magicians are going

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 4>to rely much more often in cognitive evlutions attention and

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:33.240
<v Speaker 4>to a lesser extent, memory and decision making.

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>So give us an example of a cognitive ilution, well, a.

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 6>Cognitive elution that happens in magic.

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, we have already talked about failing to perceive sleight

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 4>of hand techniques and so forth, due to not paying

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 4>attention to that place at a time, or due to

0:40:52.320 --> 0:40:56.840
<v Speaker 4>having your attention divided. One of the great magicians and

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 4>magic theorists is a Juan Tabarith from Spain, and that

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 4>he famously conducts a magic tricking which he vanishes a coin,

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:10.440
<v Speaker 4>and that he has pumped the coin, he has it

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 4>grabbed in the pomp on his hand. But at some

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 4>point he makes a gesture to the audience. He says,

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:19.319
<v Speaker 4>wait a second, and that he actually he's showing them

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 4>the coin. But because he's so masterful that manipulating attention,

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:28.400
<v Speaker 4>the image of that coin is getting into their readiness,

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 4>but they do not see the coin because he's manipulating

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 4>their attention so well.

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:35.240
<v Speaker 6>So he really pushes.

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 4>The boundaries and challenges just how much can I get

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 4>away with in terms of showing the audience exactly what

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:47.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm doing without them noticing because they're not paying attention.

0:41:48.440 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 5>We talked about how attention, which is a cognitive illusion,

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 5>can happen where you pay attention to the wrong place.

0:41:56.719 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 5>One of the ways to do that, the most common way,

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:00.560
<v Speaker 5>perhaps is to get you to look in the wrong

0:42:00.600 --> 0:42:03.120
<v Speaker 5>place with the center of your eyes, so you're looking

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 5>over here while they're doing something over here, and in

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:07.840
<v Speaker 5>the perfe of your vision you can't see very well anyway.

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 5>So that is one way to misdirect attention. We call

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 5>that overt misdirection. Now, with covert misdirection, it's much more

0:42:17.080 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 5>interesting and Wantemoteth is a master of it, and one

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 5>of the things he's been able to do is he'll

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 5>do something with his hands. I can't do it because

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:26.239
<v Speaker 5>my hands would be off camera here, but say, down

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 5>near his waist, he'll have you looking at something he's

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:31.279
<v Speaker 5>doing in his hands, and he'll look at it while

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:34.840
<v Speaker 5>he does it. And because of his gaze position, that

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:39.640
<v Speaker 5>audience learns through normal human and interactions to look where

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 5>your interlocutors looking. So he is really well aware of this.

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 5>So if he looks down at his hands, you guys

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 5>are trying to pay attention and I know what's in

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 5>my hands now, even though it's off camera here. But

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 5>then what he'll do is, while he's doing it, he'll

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 5>look up at you and then look back down. And

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 5>when he looks up at you, you sense that he's

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:57.720
<v Speaker 5>looking up at you, so you look back at his eyes.

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:02.400
<v Speaker 5>And while you're doing that, even before you've moved your eyes,

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:05.360
<v Speaker 5>you'll move your attentional spotlight to see is he looking

0:43:05.400 --> 0:43:07.879
<v Speaker 5>at me right? So you haven't even moved your eyes.

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 5>He's moved his eyes up, got you to pay attention

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 5>to his eyes while he does his magic trick. While

0:43:14.000 --> 0:43:16.880
<v Speaker 5>you're you're still looking at his hands with the center

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:19.400
<v Speaker 5>of your vision. But he's got you to pay attention

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 5>to his eyes and then he looks back down before

0:43:21.520 --> 0:43:25.440
<v Speaker 5>you would move your eyes, and it's this really uncanny

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 5>feeling that he did something huge right at the center

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 5>of your gaze and you're certain of it, and still

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:37.000
<v Speaker 5>this magical effect happens. It's very powerful feeling of magical

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 5>wonderment when that happens.

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:43.359
<v Speaker 1>He must have to time that really carefully, exactly when

0:43:43.400 --> 0:43:45.359
<v Speaker 1>to look up and then when to do the sleight

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of hand. How do magicians get good at doing this?

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:50.680
<v Speaker 1>How do they get the feedback from the audience about

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you know when they're timing this right.

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, generally magicians they they start with sleight of hand

0:43:58.920 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 4>techniques and then they add the misdirection layer on top

0:44:03.840 --> 0:44:08.480
<v Speaker 4>of having mastered slide of hands. When we actually started

0:44:08.640 --> 0:44:12.200
<v Speaker 4>studying magic, and that we did learn magic for a year,

0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 4>and that we perform magic in front of a judge

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:20.360
<v Speaker 4>panel to gain entry to the Magic Castle in Hollywood,

0:44:20.400 --> 0:44:23.279
<v Speaker 4>and that we barely made it, but we made it.

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:27.680
<v Speaker 4>So we are magician members. But the magicians that we

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:31.800
<v Speaker 4>our various magician mentors at the time, they were telling

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:34.280
<v Speaker 4>us that the way that we were going into magic

0:44:34.320 --> 0:44:39.799
<v Speaker 4>ourselves was very unusual because we already knew a lot

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:42.840
<v Speaker 4>of the without calling it misdirections.

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 6>Early, but we knew a lot of the.

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 4>Misdirection principles right from a cognitive science perspective. We knew

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 4>a lot about attention. We knew a lot about memory.

0:44:51.080 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 4>For magicians that generally comes much later.

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 1>So this is a good segue. Why do you, as

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:13.640
<v Speaker 1>neuroscientists study magic.

0:45:14.360 --> 0:45:20.960
<v Speaker 5>We feel as neuroscientists that one of the very best

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:23.520
<v Speaker 5>ways to find out what the brain is actually doing

0:45:24.200 --> 0:45:29.239
<v Speaker 5>is to study illusions, and so we had trained in

0:45:29.400 --> 0:45:32.800
<v Speaker 5>studying illusions I did as part of my thesis. Susanna

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:36.240
<v Speaker 5>and I both studied illusions as postdocs in David Hewbles

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:39.880
<v Speaker 5>Live at Harvard Medical School, and we knew that the

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:45.439
<v Speaker 5>reason studying visual illusions was really important was that it's

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 5>where the physical reality doesn't match perception, and so we

0:45:49.160 --> 0:45:53.360
<v Speaker 5>can study perception in a very pure sense by studying

0:45:53.440 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 5>the neurons that are responding to the illusory effect, but

0:45:56.680 --> 0:45:59.520
<v Speaker 5>not the physical reality. But if you really want to

0:45:59.600 --> 0:46:02.800
<v Speaker 5>understand the underpinnings of perception itself, we realized we really

0:46:02.880 --> 0:46:06.200
<v Speaker 5>had to use illusions because it's where we could study

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:09.440
<v Speaker 5>perception in a very pure sense where the physical reality

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:13.879
<v Speaker 5>was not a confounding factor. Now in doing this, we

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:19.959
<v Speaker 5>started the illusion contest because we realized that it would

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:22.439
<v Speaker 5>be fun and it would bring in the public into

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 5>the world of vision research. If we had an annual

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 5>illusion contest where scientists and later on graphic artists and

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:36.160
<v Speaker 5>people from all around the world various backgrounds could submit

0:46:37.200 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 5>what they've noticed in the world that is illusory, and

0:46:40.120 --> 0:46:43.720
<v Speaker 5>the whole world would be able to vote on these things.

0:46:44.040 --> 0:46:44.239
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:46:44.280 --> 0:46:47.640
<v Speaker 5>Shortly after doing this, we were asked by the Association

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:51.440
<v Speaker 5>for the Scientific Study of Consciousness. They asked us to

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:54.719
<v Speaker 5>run one of their meetings in Las Vegas, and I

0:46:54.719 --> 0:46:56.239
<v Speaker 5>think they were hoping we were going to do the

0:46:56.280 --> 0:47:00.480
<v Speaker 5>illusion contest there, But Susanna and I decided that instead

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:02.799
<v Speaker 5>of doing the illusion contest, we were going to do

0:47:02.880 --> 0:47:07.359
<v Speaker 5>something different that's more related to consciousness itself. When we

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:12.719
<v Speaker 5>did this conference on the Consciousness in Las Vegas, we

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:15.959
<v Speaker 5>were driving up and down the strip doing our administrative

0:47:16.040 --> 0:47:20.640
<v Speaker 5>duties and booking hotels and booking restaurants and all of this,

0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:22.880
<v Speaker 5>and we're trying to think what could we do to

0:47:22.880 --> 0:47:25.759
<v Speaker 5>bring the public in that isn't just the illusion contest. Again,

0:47:25.800 --> 0:47:28.239
<v Speaker 5>we already have that going on for the vision community,

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:31.480
<v Speaker 5>and we realized that we're passing by these hundred foot

0:47:31.520 --> 0:47:35.719
<v Speaker 5>signs of Pennant Teller and other magicians on these hotels,

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 5>and that they magicians were the artists of attention and awareness.

0:47:40.480 --> 0:47:43.839
<v Speaker 5>And this was a huge epiphany for us. We realized

0:47:44.120 --> 0:47:48.200
<v Speaker 5>that they are the ones who create not only interesting

0:47:48.680 --> 0:47:53.160
<v Speaker 5>related cognitive allusions to science, but they create the best

0:47:53.160 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 5>illusions that science could benefit from stealing their techniques and

0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 5>learning and poaching what they do in the stage and

0:48:02.000 --> 0:48:04.600
<v Speaker 5>bringing into the lab with the hope that we would

0:48:04.719 --> 0:48:08.800
<v Speaker 5>actually increase the rate of discovery in science by increasing

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:12.839
<v Speaker 5>the quality and the robustness of the illusions. And we

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:15.960
<v Speaker 5>also discovered when we did this. We started talking to

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:18.879
<v Speaker 5>our friends in the consciouence community, and one of them

0:48:18.920 --> 0:48:22.759
<v Speaker 5>was the late Great Daniel Dennett, and he knew a

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:25.080
<v Speaker 5>lot of magicians because he was part of a group

0:48:25.120 --> 0:48:30.120
<v Speaker 5>of people who were part of this new atheism movement.

0:48:30.600 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 5>And we're doing a lot of podcasts and doing a

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:36.879
<v Speaker 5>lot of different shows to talk about aseism, and these

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 5>groups were generally scientists and philosophers and magicians and magicians

0:48:42.640 --> 0:48:45.600
<v Speaker 5>would talk about in these groups how magic was being

0:48:45.719 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 5>used to trick people in religious ceremonies to think that

0:48:50.280 --> 0:48:55.120
<v Speaker 5>actual miracles were happening. And in fact, one possibility in

0:48:55.160 --> 0:48:57.880
<v Speaker 5>the history of magic is that that's how magic actually started,

0:48:58.080 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 5>was as a religious ceremonyal behavior to invent miracles. When

0:49:05.320 --> 0:49:09.439
<v Speaker 5>we started meeting with these magicians, because Dennett knew them,

0:49:09.960 --> 0:49:13.440
<v Speaker 5>started calling the for example, James Randy, the Amazing Randy.

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:17.400
<v Speaker 5>Randy got us hooked up with Penn and Teller, Apollo, Robbins,

0:49:17.400 --> 0:49:19.880
<v Speaker 5>all these different magicians, the great Tom Sony and we

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:22.560
<v Speaker 5>started having meetings in Las Vegas to talk about a

0:49:22.600 --> 0:49:28.080
<v Speaker 5>collaboration between magic and science, and that became a symposium

0:49:28.080 --> 0:49:32.640
<v Speaker 5>that we had at our conference that introduced the idea

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:36.640
<v Speaker 5>of neuromagic, the idea that we can actually take magic

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:39.759
<v Speaker 5>tricks and study them in neuroscience. And it was during

0:49:39.800 --> 0:49:43.919
<v Speaker 5>these meetings that something very important happened. We realized that

0:49:44.239 --> 0:49:47.680
<v Speaker 5>magicians didn't just have great tricks, but they actually had

0:49:47.840 --> 0:49:51.359
<v Speaker 5>theories about the magic. Okay, they had theories about why

0:49:51.400 --> 0:49:55.239
<v Speaker 5>they worked in the mind. And what we discovered as

0:49:55.360 --> 0:49:58.440
<v Speaker 5>scientists was more than half of these ideas were just

0:49:58.600 --> 0:50:02.280
<v Speaker 5>completely wrong. They were just you know, flat out Nope,

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:05.680
<v Speaker 5>we'd already rolled those things out in cognitive science. Some

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:09.000
<v Speaker 5>of those theories, like for example, the spotlight of attention

0:50:09.520 --> 0:50:14.760
<v Speaker 5>were actually correct, So there was convergent evolution between magic

0:50:14.800 --> 0:50:17.160
<v Speaker 5>and science, which is really interesting to us. But the

0:50:17.239 --> 0:50:20.960
<v Speaker 5>most important thing was that some of those theories we

0:50:21.040 --> 0:50:24.560
<v Speaker 5>didn't know if they were correct or not scientifically, and

0:50:24.719 --> 0:50:28.359
<v Speaker 5>they had plausible ideas in magic that very well might

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:32.680
<v Speaker 5>be right. And this could really cut decades off the

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:37.440
<v Speaker 5>science of cognitive neuroscience because we could potentially have the

0:50:37.480 --> 0:50:40.239
<v Speaker 5>illusions that magic brought to us, but not only the illusions,

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:42.759
<v Speaker 5>but the theories kind of handed to us on a

0:50:42.760 --> 0:50:45.200
<v Speaker 5>silver platter that we could now just go test in

0:50:45.200 --> 0:50:47.240
<v Speaker 5>a scientific method fashion.

0:50:47.800 --> 0:50:50.120
<v Speaker 1>And what do you see as the future of magic

0:50:50.160 --> 0:50:52.399
<v Speaker 1>and how does that intersect with neuroscience.

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 4>I think that we can basically benefit from each other.

0:50:58.440 --> 0:51:02.359
<v Speaker 4>I believe that art is whether we're talking about painters

0:51:02.520 --> 0:51:07.719
<v Speaker 4>or magicians or musicians, say they do a bit of

0:51:08.440 --> 0:51:12.399
<v Speaker 4>research in the informal sense through see what works, see

0:51:12.440 --> 0:51:16.400
<v Speaker 4>what doesn't. If every performance is a bit of an experiment,

0:51:16.880 --> 0:51:21.359
<v Speaker 4>but it's not systematized. And so, as Steve expressed, there

0:51:21.360 --> 0:51:26.640
<v Speaker 4>are volumes like literal libraries of magic theory in which

0:51:27.080 --> 0:51:30.200
<v Speaker 4>these theories have never been put to the test, they

0:51:30.239 --> 0:51:33.839
<v Speaker 4>have never been systematically investigated in a laboratory.

0:51:34.160 --> 0:51:37.200
<v Speaker 6>So what I think that science.

0:51:36.840 --> 0:51:40.799
<v Speaker 4>Can really contribute to magic is in the realm of

0:51:40.960 --> 0:51:47.240
<v Speaker 4>magic theory helping magicians understand why tricks.

0:51:47.640 --> 0:51:50.040
<v Speaker 6>Work the way they do, why misurrection.

0:51:49.680 --> 0:51:52.439
<v Speaker 4>Happens in the way that it happens, and that then

0:51:52.600 --> 0:51:56.480
<v Speaker 4>magicians as artists can take this knowledge and then use

0:51:56.520 --> 0:52:00.359
<v Speaker 4>it in different creative ways. But I think that well

0:52:00.440 --> 0:52:03.400
<v Speaker 4>times can bring to magic and do art and do

0:52:03.880 --> 0:52:07.960
<v Speaker 4>human endeavors in general, is greater understanding.

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think you guys have written, if I'm remembering correctly,

0:52:11.120 --> 0:52:15.920
<v Speaker 1>about how understanding magic can also be used for let's say,

0:52:15.920 --> 0:52:19.799
<v Speaker 1>treatment and diagnosis of various cognitive disorders in neuroscience.

0:52:20.360 --> 0:52:26.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so one of the things that magic does is,

0:52:26.320 --> 0:52:30.080
<v Speaker 5>for example, with misdirection that we talked about, is manipulate attention.

0:52:30.719 --> 0:52:34.480
<v Speaker 5>So it should be possible to use these kinds of stimulation,

0:52:35.120 --> 0:52:39.960
<v Speaker 5>that is, magic tricks to manipulate attention and determine the

0:52:40.040 --> 0:52:45.440
<v Speaker 5>differences between patients who have cognitive decline that affect spatial

0:52:45.440 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 5>attention and patients that do not. For example, it could

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:51.960
<v Speaker 5>become a, for example, a diagnostic and one of the

0:52:52.040 --> 0:52:55.560
<v Speaker 5>reasons we believe this is because there are magicians that

0:52:55.600 --> 0:52:59.799
<v Speaker 5>are specialized for performing for children and in the field

0:52:59.800 --> 0:53:03.560
<v Speaker 5>of it's interesting because it's similar to science. They have

0:53:03.920 --> 0:53:06.359
<v Speaker 5>annual conferences that they go to and they get up

0:53:06.360 --> 0:53:09.040
<v Speaker 5>and give talks to each other, and they reveal how

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:11.520
<v Speaker 5>certain tricks work and don't work to each other in

0:53:11.640 --> 0:53:14.480
<v Speaker 5>very much similar culture that scientists do when they get

0:53:14.480 --> 0:53:16.799
<v Speaker 5>together for annual conferences and give talks to each other

0:53:16.840 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 5>about what they've discovered. And one of the things that

0:53:20.800 --> 0:53:23.600
<v Speaker 5>they do is split these rooms into different kinds of magic.

0:53:24.000 --> 0:53:26.919
<v Speaker 5>One room would be for children's magic, whereas other rooms

0:53:26.920 --> 0:53:29.280
<v Speaker 5>will be for adult magic. And the reason is because

0:53:29.360 --> 0:53:32.759
<v Speaker 5>children have a different attentional system, especially below the age

0:53:32.760 --> 0:53:35.840
<v Speaker 5>of five, than adults, and so certain types of magic

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:38.080
<v Speaker 5>you're not going to work with them in the sense

0:53:38.120 --> 0:53:41.320
<v Speaker 5>that children actually have a gain of function for detecting

0:53:41.360 --> 0:53:45.040
<v Speaker 5>the trick, so they'll actually have a chance of seeing

0:53:45.080 --> 0:53:48.600
<v Speaker 5>something wrong in the trick or seeing a method that

0:53:48.680 --> 0:53:51.279
<v Speaker 5>adults won't because adults are much more likely to be

0:53:51.360 --> 0:53:54.680
<v Speaker 5>led down the garden path because their attentional systems are

0:53:54.680 --> 0:53:58.600
<v Speaker 5>better than children. And this is also true with people

0:53:58.680 --> 0:54:01.800
<v Speaker 5>who have different kinds into attentional deficit.

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:06.200
<v Speaker 4>When an Acdoral example is that, contrary to popular opinion,

0:54:06.960 --> 0:54:09.920
<v Speaker 4>magicians don't like to perform in front of drug people

0:54:10.160 --> 0:54:13.120
<v Speaker 4>because they're harder to misdirect. You really need to be

0:54:13.160 --> 0:54:18.239
<v Speaker 4>able to allocate your attention precisely to be misdirected by

0:54:18.239 --> 0:54:20.799
<v Speaker 4>the magician. Otherwise if the magician, if they cannot be

0:54:20.840 --> 0:54:24.200
<v Speaker 4>in control, that makes their life much harder. There are

0:54:24.640 --> 0:54:28.840
<v Speaker 4>specific magic shows that are devised for children and that

0:54:29.160 --> 0:54:32.359
<v Speaker 4>they frankly don't tend to really so much or misdirections

0:54:32.400 --> 0:54:33.040
<v Speaker 4>per se.

0:54:33.360 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 6>They're more kind of like.

0:54:34.760 --> 0:54:40.920
<v Speaker 4>Comedy magic small small percentage of magic compared to comedy,

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:46.680
<v Speaker 4>and that in fact, children's magicians will often do something

0:54:47.040 --> 0:54:53.719
<v Speaker 4>that almost no magician performing for adult audiences will do,

0:54:54.200 --> 0:54:57.880
<v Speaker 4>which is to announce what they're going to be doing next,

0:54:58.560 --> 0:55:03.880
<v Speaker 4>and that is to the children's attention. But in a

0:55:03.960 --> 0:55:07.880
<v Speaker 4>regular magic show, audiences will be surprised and that it

0:55:08.040 --> 0:55:12.239
<v Speaker 4>works against the performance to say I'm going to make

0:55:12.360 --> 0:55:15.320
<v Speaker 4>a rabbit disappear or I'm going to make a rabbit appear.

0:55:15.920 --> 0:55:18.959
<v Speaker 4>In a show for children, the magician will more often

0:55:19.000 --> 0:55:21.960
<v Speaker 4>than not make that type of announcement to get the

0:55:22.040 --> 0:55:23.399
<v Speaker 4>children to stay on tusk.

0:55:24.360 --> 0:55:28.320
<v Speaker 5>The magician Silly Billy, who we talk about in our book,

0:55:28.680 --> 0:55:33.440
<v Speaker 5>is an amazing children's magician, and he says that you

0:55:33.560 --> 0:55:36.400
<v Speaker 5>have to you have to do different kinds of tricks

0:55:36.400 --> 0:55:39.560
<v Speaker 5>that draw the attention for very short periods of time.

0:55:39.680 --> 0:55:42.239
<v Speaker 5>Like that's why with children you take a coin out

0:55:42.239 --> 0:55:44.480
<v Speaker 5>of their ear. They you know, you have to do

0:55:44.520 --> 0:55:48.320
<v Speaker 5>things that they know about the world. So because certain

0:55:48.360 --> 0:55:51.080
<v Speaker 5>things they don't, they won't know that it's magical, but

0:55:51.120 --> 0:55:53.160
<v Speaker 5>they just so much of what about the world is

0:55:53.200 --> 0:55:55.440
<v Speaker 5>a surprise to them anyway, you know, it has to

0:55:55.480 --> 0:55:58.560
<v Speaker 5>be something that they know is actually not true that

0:55:58.600 --> 0:56:01.000
<v Speaker 5>they don't have quarters in their ear, for example.

0:56:01.400 --> 0:56:05.160
<v Speaker 4>And children are just sometimes not so appreciative of the

0:56:05.280 --> 0:56:10.440
<v Speaker 4>art of magic. Frankly, because when we started working with

0:56:10.560 --> 0:56:14.800
<v Speaker 4>these magicians, our oldest child was a toddler, and I

0:56:14.880 --> 0:56:17.719
<v Speaker 4>remember at some point we had them with us. He

0:56:17.760 --> 0:56:22.759
<v Speaker 4>met Apolo Robins, who's a theatrical pick pocket and he's amazing,

0:56:22.880 --> 0:56:27.880
<v Speaker 4>and he was getting a coin to appear and disappear

0:56:28.160 --> 0:56:31.799
<v Speaker 4>over babies, you know, ears and hands and all over

0:56:31.840 --> 0:56:34.200
<v Speaker 4>his body like he would do on stage and it

0:56:34.360 --> 0:56:39.960
<v Speaker 4>was just the most amazing magic, such a special opportunity,

0:56:40.640 --> 0:56:45.160
<v Speaker 4>and her toddler was just angry that this man had

0:56:45.160 --> 0:56:47.840
<v Speaker 4>given him a coin and then he took it away,

0:56:48.080 --> 0:56:50.400
<v Speaker 4>and then he couldn't know where he was, and he

0:56:50.640 --> 0:56:55.759
<v Speaker 4>was just basically not appreciating the magic whatsoever.

0:56:56.120 --> 0:56:57.240
<v Speaker 6>He was just rage.

0:56:58.040 --> 0:56:59.960
<v Speaker 1>This didn't mean you another question I mean wondering about,

0:57:00.120 --> 0:57:03.440
<v Speaker 1>which is can magic tricks be performed on animals? What

0:57:03.520 --> 0:57:04.359
<v Speaker 1>do you guys know about that?

0:57:04.680 --> 0:57:09.360
<v Speaker 4>I think that it's definitely possible to trick animals, dogs,

0:57:09.360 --> 0:57:13.319
<v Speaker 4>plain FETs, and that you can go to YouTube and

0:57:13.440 --> 0:57:17.480
<v Speaker 4>that search for magic with animals, and that you'll see

0:57:17.480 --> 0:57:21.360
<v Speaker 4>all sorts of monkeys and dogs and cats being tricked

0:57:21.800 --> 0:57:25.760
<v Speaker 4>with magic in various ways. Now that is misdirection, however,

0:57:26.760 --> 0:57:30.280
<v Speaker 4>because I think that magic is not just being tricked.

0:57:30.400 --> 0:57:34.000
<v Speaker 4>Magic is being trigged, and then there's an element of wonder,

0:57:34.160 --> 0:57:37.880
<v Speaker 4>there's an element of art, there's an element of joy

0:57:38.000 --> 0:57:42.000
<v Speaker 4>even because something that happens with a magic trick that

0:57:42.160 --> 0:57:47.080
<v Speaker 4>is very interesting is that people most often they laugh

0:57:47.680 --> 0:57:49.880
<v Speaker 4>as if it's the punchline of a joke. So there's

0:57:49.920 --> 0:57:55.000
<v Speaker 4>this enjoyment something i'n expected happening magic and audiences laugh

0:57:56.200 --> 0:57:58.600
<v Speaker 4>in surprise and enjoyment.

0:57:59.560 --> 0:58:02.200
<v Speaker 6>I don't know that.

0:58:02.360 --> 0:58:07.640
<v Speaker 4>Other animals have this kind of experience, so I think

0:58:07.640 --> 0:58:09.680
<v Speaker 4>that that question remains open a little bit.

0:58:10.320 --> 0:58:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it was Friends the Wall who pointed out

0:58:12.240 --> 0:58:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that chimps just aren't entranced with human magicians, and they

0:58:17.440 --> 0:58:20.040
<v Speaker 1>just simply don't pay attention. Do you suppose it would

0:58:20.040 --> 0:58:23.920
<v Speaker 1>work if you performed magic for chimps but you were

0:58:23.960 --> 0:58:27.120
<v Speaker 1>set up as a hologrammer in VR looking like a chimp,

0:58:27.160 --> 0:58:28.360
<v Speaker 1>would they pay more attention?

0:58:28.760 --> 0:58:32.120
<v Speaker 4>In the case of our own human toddler, he was

0:58:32.320 --> 0:58:36.240
<v Speaker 4>very reward oriented, so he wasn't appreciating the magic in

0:58:36.280 --> 0:58:39.640
<v Speaker 4>which something was being taken away from him for no

0:58:39.720 --> 0:58:42.920
<v Speaker 4>good reason. Is the magic would have been, I don't know,

0:58:43.040 --> 0:58:46.200
<v Speaker 4>to produce toms of candy like one of these production

0:58:46.720 --> 0:58:47.600
<v Speaker 4>magic shows.

0:58:47.800 --> 0:58:49.840
<v Speaker 6>He might have been a lot more engaged by that.

0:58:52.200 --> 0:58:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about magic tricks that take advantage of something

0:58:54.760 --> 0:58:55.640
<v Speaker 1>about our memory.

0:58:56.320 --> 0:58:59.919
<v Speaker 4>Yes, so we have terrible memories and magicians know that

0:59:00.480 --> 0:59:04.440
<v Speaker 4>and they take advantage of it. And in fact, something

0:59:04.640 --> 0:59:08.600
<v Speaker 4>the magician's use in many shows is what we can

0:59:08.680 --> 0:59:13.880
<v Speaker 4>call the recap, and what that does is generates a

0:59:14.000 --> 0:59:15.040
<v Speaker 4>memory illusion.

0:59:15.760 --> 0:59:17.080
<v Speaker 6>So if you have.

0:59:17.120 --> 0:59:19.320
<v Speaker 4>Ever been to a magic show or watch a magic

0:59:19.360 --> 0:59:23.680
<v Speaker 4>show on TV. Oftentimes the magician will do some wonderful

0:59:23.680 --> 0:59:27.280
<v Speaker 4>feit of magic, often with a volunteer, and after that

0:59:27.360 --> 0:59:30.760
<v Speaker 4>they will say, well, we didn't know each other. You

0:59:30.800 --> 0:59:33.680
<v Speaker 4>can hear you got your choice of course, and you

0:59:33.760 --> 0:59:35.800
<v Speaker 4>did this, and then this happened, and then that happened,

0:59:35.800 --> 0:59:38.880
<v Speaker 4>and I couldn't have known, and then this amazing thing happened,

0:59:39.480 --> 0:59:43.920
<v Speaker 4>and the description makes sense and everybody agrees, and that

0:59:44.400 --> 0:59:48.360
<v Speaker 4>the show goes on. Now here's the thing. That description

0:59:48.560 --> 0:59:53.280
<v Speaker 4>is not perfect. It deviates from reality. It doesn't deviate

0:59:53.400 --> 0:59:57.720
<v Speaker 4>from reality in a very obvious way that would make

0:59:58.280 --> 1:00:02.280
<v Speaker 4>people just figure out, okay, this is not what I saw.

1:00:02.360 --> 1:00:06.920
<v Speaker 4>There's something fishy going on, but it's not an accurate description.

1:00:07.520 --> 1:00:10.640
<v Speaker 4>So what happens then is that people go home and

1:00:10.680 --> 1:00:13.800
<v Speaker 4>they talk to their friends and that I saw this thing,

1:00:14.040 --> 1:00:15.200
<v Speaker 4>I went to this magic.

1:00:14.960 --> 1:00:16.680
<v Speaker 6>Show, this happened. That happened.

1:00:17.320 --> 1:00:21.160
<v Speaker 4>But the way that they're describing it now is not

1:00:21.320 --> 1:00:25.200
<v Speaker 4>the original way that they witness it. That's the magician's

1:00:25.280 --> 1:00:30.040
<v Speaker 4>recap that they're using as their description. And so it's

1:00:30.160 --> 1:00:32.200
<v Speaker 4>like now when they try to figure out how the

1:00:32.240 --> 1:00:35.400
<v Speaker 4>magician did it. It's like trying to put together apostle,

1:00:35.840 --> 1:00:39.640
<v Speaker 4>and not only you don't have all the pieces, but

1:00:39.720 --> 1:00:43.280
<v Speaker 4>you have some wrong pieces as well. So it's impossible

1:00:43.320 --> 1:00:48.400
<v Speaker 4>to reconstruct whatever happened exactly on stage. And that's why

1:00:48.680 --> 1:00:52.400
<v Speaker 4>when people come to us sometimes they and they say, well,

1:00:52.800 --> 1:00:54.280
<v Speaker 4>I saw this amazing magic trick.

1:00:54.640 --> 1:00:56.000
<v Speaker 6>Can you tell me how it works?

1:00:56.160 --> 1:00:58.160
<v Speaker 4>And we may say, look, we're not gonna tell you,

1:00:58.200 --> 1:01:02.160
<v Speaker 4>because one we're not supposed to, but also what you're

1:01:02.200 --> 1:01:05.360
<v Speaker 4>describing and what took place are probably very different things.

1:01:06.440 --> 1:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Right. I've seen this where magicians will say something like, okay, now,

1:01:09.920 --> 1:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>as you've seen, I have not touched the deck of cards,

1:01:12.440 --> 1:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>even though they have, And so it becomes something like

1:01:15.440 --> 1:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, eyewitness testimony in courtrooms, where you know your

1:01:19.160 --> 1:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>memory gets overwritten with this statement that you think must

1:01:22.560 --> 1:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>have been true even though it wasn't.

1:01:24.280 --> 1:01:28.760
<v Speaker 5>So they might say something like you chose a number,

1:01:29.160 --> 1:01:31.760
<v Speaker 5>when in fact they picked a card and got the number,

1:01:32.000 --> 1:01:34.880
<v Speaker 5>which is two very different things, because if a magician's

1:01:34.920 --> 1:01:38.120
<v Speaker 5>controlling a deck of cards, they're choosing the number for

1:01:38.320 --> 1:01:42.720
<v Speaker 5>you in certain circumstances, right, And so it's not that

1:01:42.760 --> 1:01:45.400
<v Speaker 5>you picked the number, right, And so this kind of

1:01:45.880 --> 1:01:49.920
<v Speaker 5>discrepancy in the memory can specifically, you know, have you

1:01:49.960 --> 1:01:52.560
<v Speaker 5>go home and because it was a recapped to you,

1:01:52.560 --> 1:01:55.240
<v Speaker 5>you described it that you picked a number right, and

1:01:55.280 --> 1:01:57.920
<v Speaker 5>it may not gel in your memory that you actually

1:01:57.960 --> 1:01:59.600
<v Speaker 5>picked a card rather than a number.

1:02:00.280 --> 1:02:00.520
<v Speaker 3>One.

1:02:00.640 --> 1:02:06.360
<v Speaker 5>Thing that I think that scientists could study in magic

1:02:06.640 --> 1:02:10.880
<v Speaker 5>that would be of real value would be the field

1:02:10.880 --> 1:02:18.160
<v Speaker 5>of magic called mentalism. Now, in mentalism, it's largely standard

1:02:18.240 --> 1:02:21.880
<v Speaker 5>magic tricks, but instead of manipulating coins and cards and objects,

1:02:22.440 --> 1:02:26.280
<v Speaker 5>it's manipulating information. It has to do with the way

1:02:26.400 --> 1:02:30.480
<v Speaker 5>the brain actually works, and we don't know how it works.

1:02:30.680 --> 1:02:35.320
<v Speaker 5>So there are, for example, magic tricks that famously the

1:02:35.560 --> 1:02:40.480
<v Speaker 5>answer is the number thirty seven, and for some reason,

1:02:41.200 --> 1:02:45.160
<v Speaker 5>people are able much more likely than chance to pull

1:02:45.200 --> 1:02:48.320
<v Speaker 5>the number thirty seven out of their brain as an

1:02:48.360 --> 1:02:50.760
<v Speaker 5>answer to this trick. And you do this trick in

1:02:50.800 --> 1:02:55.000
<v Speaker 5>a way where you are essentially using the audience to take,

1:02:55.360 --> 1:02:59.880
<v Speaker 5>in a sense, a statistical likelihood function of what they

1:03:00.240 --> 1:03:02.800
<v Speaker 5>the whole audience is answering. And when you do this,

1:03:02.880 --> 1:03:06.280
<v Speaker 5>there's like fifty people there and ten or fifteen people

1:03:06.320 --> 1:03:09.280
<v Speaker 5>say thirty seven out of When you feel like you've

1:03:09.320 --> 1:03:12.840
<v Speaker 5>just chosen a number one out of fifty right, and

1:03:12.880 --> 1:03:15.360
<v Speaker 5>the chances should be two percent, but they're all you know,

1:03:15.640 --> 1:03:19.680
<v Speaker 5>fifteen percent of them are choosing the same number. It's remarkable.

1:03:19.720 --> 1:03:22.720
<v Speaker 5>And so this kind of thing and other things about

1:03:22.760 --> 1:03:25.360
<v Speaker 5>the way we manipulate symbols in the brain and the

1:03:25.400 --> 1:03:29.480
<v Speaker 5>way that we manipulate certain kinds of information, I think

1:03:30.040 --> 1:03:34.480
<v Speaker 5>these tricks work. It's very mysterious from a neuroscientific point

1:03:34.480 --> 1:03:37.040
<v Speaker 5>of view. It's not explained by sleight of hand in

1:03:37.400 --> 1:03:40.520
<v Speaker 5>and that understanding the neural underpinnings of this would be

1:03:40.560 --> 1:03:45.160
<v Speaker 5>a real insight into how the brain actually manipulates certain

1:03:45.240 --> 1:03:46.040
<v Speaker 5>kind of information.

1:03:46.640 --> 1:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>What is an illusion of choice?

1:03:49.360 --> 1:03:53.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, an illusion of choice would be a situation in

1:03:53.560 --> 1:03:58.680
<v Speaker 4>which you feel that you do have a choice, when

1:03:58.680 --> 1:04:02.600
<v Speaker 4>in fact you don't. And without disclosing too much, I

1:04:02.640 --> 1:04:04.320
<v Speaker 4>think it would be fair to say that in a

1:04:04.400 --> 1:04:09.160
<v Speaker 4>magic show, very few of the choices made by a

1:04:09.360 --> 1:04:14.200
<v Speaker 4>volunteer in the audience are real choices. The magician is

1:04:14.240 --> 1:04:17.440
<v Speaker 4>typically in control of the choice, and that can be

1:04:17.480 --> 1:04:18.960
<v Speaker 4>done in a number of ways.

1:04:19.000 --> 1:04:21.520
<v Speaker 6>But illusions of choice.

1:04:21.400 --> 1:04:25.440
<v Speaker 4>Are yet one more type of cognitive ilution that plays

1:04:25.520 --> 1:04:27.560
<v Speaker 4>or come players from rolling magic tricks.

1:04:32.400 --> 1:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>That was Stephen Macknick and Susannah Martinez Conde, two neuroscience

1:04:36.880 --> 1:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>colleagues at Sunny Downstate who study the intersection of neuroscience

1:04:41.080 --> 1:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and magic. So what does a stage magician have in

1:04:45.240 --> 1:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>common with a pickpocket, or a seance director or a

1:04:49.200 --> 1:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>street hustler. They all have curious minds that chew on

1:04:54.920 --> 1:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>these questions of perception. How could someone misperceive this? How

1:05:00.240 --> 1:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>can I cause a momentary pull of attention so that

1:05:04.040 --> 1:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I can do something right here and no one would

1:05:07.120 --> 1:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>ever see it. People like this have for centuries been

1:05:11.440 --> 1:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>carefully observing and exploiting human minds. So as a result,

1:05:16.880 --> 1:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>nowadays there's a close relationship between magicians and neuroscientists, to

1:05:21.560 --> 1:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the degree that some magicians now collaborate with neuroscientists to

1:05:26.720 --> 1:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>create performances that explicitly incorporate knowledge about the brain. That

1:05:31.600 --> 1:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>means designing tricks that highlight specific pitfalls of perception or cognition,

1:05:38.160 --> 1:05:41.280
<v Speaker 1>ones that weren't known about before but have come from

1:05:41.600 --> 1:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the laboratory. So it's a two way street. Now increasingly

1:05:46.200 --> 1:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see neuroscience informed magic performances, and you

1:05:50.920 --> 1:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>can think about exploiting this to an enormous degree. When

1:05:54.120 --> 1:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we think about the future of magic. For example, I

1:05:58.040 --> 1:06:01.480
<v Speaker 1>did an episode some months ago about the possibility of

1:06:01.760 --> 1:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>mind reading by reading brain signals, and this raises questions

1:06:06.120 --> 1:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>about the potential for magic tricks that involve a deeper

1:06:10.680 --> 1:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>understanding or manipulation of brain signals. This could lead to

1:06:15.520 --> 1:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>new forms of interactive and immersive magical experiences where we

1:06:21.120 --> 1:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>find ourselves totally fooled by an internal narrative that tells

1:06:25.840 --> 1:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>us one thing, even though something else actually happened. So

1:06:29.920 --> 1:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever direction our new technologies evolve, it seems likely that

1:06:34.080 --> 1:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the repertoire of magic is going to keep expanding, and

1:06:38.560 --> 1:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait to go to a magic show twenty

1:06:41.920 --> 1:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>years from now, where we, like the aliens who can't

1:06:45.720 --> 1:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>see obvious things, will find ourselves amazed, astonished, and bewildered

1:06:52.520 --> 1:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>by the mismatch between the external world and our internal cosmos.

1:07:02.280 --> 1:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Go to Eagleman dot com slash podcast for more information

1:07:05.680 --> 1:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and to find further reading. Send me an email at

1:07:09.040 --> 1:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>podcasts at eagleman dot com with questions or discussions, and

1:07:13.320 --> 1:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>check out and subscribe to Inner Cosmos on YouTube for

1:07:16.880 --> 1:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>videos of each episode and to leave comments. Until next time,

1:07:21.040 --> 1:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm David eagleman, and this is inner cosmos.