WEBVTT - Special Episode: Dr. Paul Offit & Tell Me When It’s Over

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Aaron Welsh and this is this podcast will

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Kill You. You are listening to the latest episode in

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>our tp w k Y book Club series, where we

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>chat with authors about their popular books in science and medicine.

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>We've gotten to have fantastic conversation so far, and there

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>are so many more to come. If you'd like to

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>see the full list of books we've already covered and

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>those that we'll be covering later this season as a

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>part of the series, check out our website this Podcast

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>will kill You dot Com, where you can find a

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>link to our bookshop dot org affiliate account. Under the

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>extras tab on our bookshop page, there are a bunch

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of TPWKY lists featuring books we've read for our regular episodes.

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Memoirs about Health and Disease, a list of fiction books

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>about disease. Should we do a book club on disease

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>themed novels? Is anyone out there a member of a

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>book club on disease themed novels? Because that sounds like

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>so much fun? And also on our bookshop is of

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>course a book club list where you can find all

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of the books we're featuring in this and last season's

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>TPWKY book Club series. As always, we'd love to hear

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>from you about how you're in joying these episodes, whether

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you have any book suggestions for future episodes, favorite episodes

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>so far. Whatever your thoughts are, send them to us

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>via the contact us form on our website. All right,

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>let's get into the book of the week. Doctor Paul

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Offitt joins us to discuss his recent book, Tell Me

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>When It's Over and Insider's Guide to Deciphering COVID myths

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and navigating our post pandemic world. Frequent listeners of the

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>podcast are no doubt familiar with doctor off It's name.

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>We've mentioned a few of his previous books in some

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of our episodes, such as his book Vaccinated, One Man's

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Quest to Defeat the World's Deadliest Diseases, which tells the

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>story of Maurice Hillman, who developed many of the most

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>common vaccines in use today. Or maybe you've heard us

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>mention Deadly Choices, How the anti vaccine movement Threatens Us All,

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>which takes readers through the history and rise of anti

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>vaccine sentiment. And doctor Offitt is somewhat of a public

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>health celebrity, appearing on popular news programs championing the life

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 1>saving power of vaccines. Off Its titles and credentials are

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>almost too long to list. The Maurice Hillman, Professor of Vaccinology,

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Professor of Pediatrics at the Pariland School of Medicine at

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the University of Pennsylvania, Director of the Vaccine Education Center

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, member of the FDA

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, and so many others.

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>But perhaps one of his biggest accomplishments is as co

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>inventor of a rotavirus vaccine, which has prevented hundreds of

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>thousands of deaths around the world. Off It's passion for

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>communicating about the power and safety of vaccines, as well

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>as combating the miss and disinformation undermining public health efforts

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>takes shape in his newest book about the COVID pandemic.

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>In the aptly name Tell Me When It's Over, Afa

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>takes readers through what we have learned about the COVID

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>pandemic and stars COVID two, the virus at the center

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of it all. He breaks down where this virus originated,

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>dismantles the lab leak conspiracy theory, discusses some of the

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>ways that the public lost confidence in US government institutions

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic. Explores this new flavor of anti vaccine

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>sentiment that took hold during COVID and which has really

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 1>only grown since, and presents ways that we can fight

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>against the rise in anti science and regain public trust.

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>The COVID pandemic revealed how we can accomplish incredible feats

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>by investing time and resources into public health, giving us

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a safe and effective vaccine in record speed, But it

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 1>also showed the gaps in our system, how myths and

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>disinformation can quickly fill a knowledge foroid, and how crucial

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>it is to learn how to communicate our science to

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:09.359
<v Speaker 1>the public, including when science doesn't know it all or

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>gets it wrong. COVID is here to stay, and unless

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 1>we do something about it, so is this rise in

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>anti science and anti vaccine sentiment. Let's get into this

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>interview right after this break, Doctor Offitt, I really can't

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>express how excited I am to be chatting with you today.

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>You are a huge public health hero of mine and

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the incredible and impactful science can communication work that you do,

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>especially when it comes to vaccines, and not to mention

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>your work on developing said life saving vaccines, it is

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>simply amazing. So thank you so much for being here.

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:13.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, thanks for asking me. It's my pleasure.

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Your latest book, Tell Me when it's over, covers the

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>COVID pandemic, getting to the root of some COVID myths,

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>explaining the vaccine, and it essentially acts as a guide

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>for how we're supposed to get used to this post

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>pandemic world. How did you decide that you wanted to

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>write this book?

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 2>What was cathartic? I mean, I am you know, the

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 2>virus came into the US early twenty twenty. In April,

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Francis Collins, who was then head of the NIH, asked

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 2>me to be part of this public private partnership called

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 2>active activ which stood for Accelerating COVID Technological Innovations and Vaccines,

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 2>and so you know, we were essentially advising pharmaceutical companies

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 2>on how best to test vaccines and potential law viral

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 2>and I'm on the FDA's Vaccine Advisory Committee, so I

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 2>really got to watch this up close. And in many

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.679
<v Speaker 2>ways the book was cathartic. I don't know if you remember,

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 2>with the way it played out in twenty twenty. Aside

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 2>from having nothing right, we didn't have anti virals. To October,

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 2>we didn't have monoclonals. Still in November, we didn't have

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 2>vaccines stil December, so ate nothing other than avoiding human

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 2>to human contact. And then in April, the Trump administration

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 2>was convinced that hydroxy cleric when was our ticket out right.

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 2>This was going to be the magic medicine that was

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 2>going to make it all go away. And so the

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 2>government bought almost thirty million doses of hydroxychloric WIN and

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 2>successfully twisted the arm of the FDA to authorize it

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 2>without any evidence that it worked, without any evidence that

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 2>it worked to either treat or prevent the disease. You

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 2>certainly already knew about the safety issues, which were potential

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 2>harder rhythms, and so they approved it, and that scared people.

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 2>It scared me, I wrote an op ed for The

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 2>New York Times, saying, fearing in October, surprise, here the

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration successfully twisted the arm of the FDA to

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 2>approve it drug that didn't necessarily work to treat it preventzies.

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 2>That's their job, I mean, the job of the FDA

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 2>is stand to stand between pharmaceutical companies and the public

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 2>and protect the public. So now you know you're scared

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 2>about how the vaccine's going to play out, right, I mean,

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 2>the Trump pulled Stephen Hahn into his office and in

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 2>an invective, Leyden Tirade said, I want this vaccine out

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 2>before the election, which was the beginning of November. And

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 2>were that to be true, then you wouldn't have that

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 2>two month safety follow up that you have for pretty

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 2>much every vaccine after the last nose, which wouldn't be

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 2>till December. So the Hans still to his credit, stood

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 2>up to him put it on their website this is

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 2>what we're going to do. But people still didn't. Now

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 2>you've really had a critical loss of trust in the FDA.

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Country after country, state after state stood up and said

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 2>we're going to have our own vaccine advisor committees. Trust us.

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 2>They didn't trust the Vaccine Advisory Committee. And so it

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 2>was a really turbulent time. And between that and a

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 2>number of what I think were communications errors, including not

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 2>trivia ones that occurred after that, I just this was

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.719
<v Speaker 2>a catharsis. I just had to get this book out.

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 2>I feel much better now, thank you for letting me

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 2>write it.

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>And as you began putting this book together and deciding

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>what you wanted to include. How was your approach guided

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>by your intended audience and was that audience. Is your

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>audience for this book different than for past books that

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you've written.

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 2>No, I think it's the same. I think it's the

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 2>same for all my books. I guess the audience will

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 2>desire that, but it's for a general audience. It's kind

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 2>of what happened because I think in many ways, the

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 2>book is a story of two remarkable, contrasting things. One

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 2>is that we isolate a virus in January of twenty

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 2>twenty we sequence it so now you can potentially make

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 2>a vaccine. It's an unusual virus, had an interesting sort

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 2>of biological and clinical characteristics. And then eleven months later,

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 2>using a technology a messenger RNA that we never used before,

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 2>we had no experience with that technology. We're with the

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 2>vector virus approach by Johnson and Johnson. You had two

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 2>large clinical trials and then the in February of twenty

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty one, you had a large J and J. Johnson

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 2>and Johnson trial that showed that the vaccines were effective,

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 2>remarkably effective. And then over a period of six or

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 2>seven months, we immunized seventy percent for the US population

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 2>a million people a day, two million people a day,

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 2>three million people a day. And then, and I think

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 2>that I think that was the most significant scientific and

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 2>medical accomplishment in my lifetime. And I'm old, so my

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 2>lifetime includes the development of the polio vaccine. I think

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 2>it was amazing. Actually, then we hit a wall and

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 2>by mid twenty twenty one thirty percent of this country

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 2>did not want to get vaccinated. Ultimately, three hundred thousand

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 2>people lost their life because they didn't trust us. They

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 2>didn't trust the FDA, didn't trust the CDC, they didn't

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 2>trust other public health agencies. Why what happened? How did

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 2>we lose that trust? And I think that's why I

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 2>wrote the book What happened? How do we lose it?

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 2>And how can we get it back.

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a quick break here. We'll be back before

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you know it. Welcome back, everyone, I'm here chatting with

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>doctor Paul Offitt about his book. Tell me when it's over.

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's jump back into some questions. Like you said, you've

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>been in the vaccine game for quite some time, and

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you've witnessed firsthand and have written and spoken a lot

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>about this rise in anti vaccine sentiment over the past

0:11:56.160 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>few decades. But now post COVID and during cod we're

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing a drop in vaccine compliance rates unlike anything previously witnessed.

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is unique about this decline and

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:13.079
<v Speaker 1>why was COVID this perfect storm to grow anti vaccine

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in anti science sentiment.

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.079
<v Speaker 2>Well, I would have imagined the opposite was true. I mean,

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 2>typically what anti vaccine activists will say is, give me

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 2>a pandemic, then I get the idea of being vaccinated

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 2>or even mandating vaccinating vaccines. Give me, show me a pandemic. Well,

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 2>this was a pandemic. We had more than one point

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 2>one million people dying this country. People were dying right

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 2>in front of us. I think all of us at

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 2>least know someone who was at least seriously ill and died.

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, my aunt died of this virus. And so

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 2>you didn't have to convince people. I would think that

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 2>it was real and the vaccine clearly worked and it

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 2>was safe. It wasn't absolutely safe, but it was pretty

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 2>darn safe, the mRNA vaccines. It was my caroditis within

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 2>four days of those two, which was generally self resolving

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 2>and short lived. But in the scheme of things, considering

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 2>it was a novel technology for a novel virus, we

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 2>I never really saw the other shoe drop. So so

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 2>you had you had your ticket out of this pandemic,

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 2>and nonetheless people rejecting. And I think the reason was

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 2>because you're right. I think the anti vaccine movement is stronger.

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.839
<v Speaker 2>They're better funded, and they're stronger, and I think it

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 2>all has to do with this, which is politics. I

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 2>think they're there. Although there's always a political implication for

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 2>vaccines because they require support, you know that they you're

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 2>going anything I think that requires funding public funding is

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 2>going to be political, but it doesn't have to be partisan.

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 2>But this was partisan, you know. On the left, anti

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 2>vaccine activity was always you know, just don't inject me

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 2>with anything with a chemical name, you know, so which

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 2>is pretty much water of course has a chemical claim.

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 2>And on the right it was this libertarian I don't

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 2>want the government to tell me what to do. That

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 2>is the current politics, which is federal government off my back.

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 2>And and so that's where all the money came from.

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Eric Trump at you know, Donald Trump's son stood up

0:14:01.800 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 2>at one of the brollies and said, if you don't

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 2>want to get a vaccine, know that the Republican Party

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 2>has your back, which is amazing because it was the

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration that created this vaccine with Operation Warp Speed.

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 2>And yet, if anything, Donald Trump distanced himself from arguably

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 2>his greatest accomplishment. So they're they're very well funded, they're

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 2>more active than ever, and I think that at the

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 2>heart of it is mandates. I think when we mandated

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 2>that vaccine and people lost their jobs and people couldn't

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 2>go to the bar they wanted to go through, the

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 2>restaurant they wanted to go to, the sporting events closed down,

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, schools closed, travel was restricted. People felt that,

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, they were mandated to wear masks, mandated to

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 2>get a vaccine, and that leaned into this libertarian left hook.

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 2>And this is what you have, a well funded, sort

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 2>of libertarian anti vaccine campaign that has now been embraced

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 2>by the right.

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>And I kind of wanted to get into this a

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit more when it comes to like how this

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>miss disinformation spread and the role of social media. What

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>do you think social media is doing to kind of

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>facilitate the spread of this bad scientific information?

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, you can very easily find awful information about vaccines

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 2>that will fit any conspiracy theory. If you're hesitant about

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 2>getting a vaccine, and it's understandable that you would be hesitant.

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you're asking people who are otherwise healthy to

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 2>inject themselves with a biological. In this case, the biological

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 2>is something with which we had no experience, and it's

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 2>a genetic vaccine. And the minute you say that word genetic,

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 2>people are thinking it's going to alter my genes. And

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 2>that's part of the argument that people have made. Right

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 2>there's DNA fragments in this vaccine that will alter your

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 2>genome and or that the mRNA can you know, can

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 2>enter your nucleus and get reverse transcribed and then enter

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 2>your DNA and that would be the best news for

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 2>gene therapy ever, if that actually was possible with this

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 2>m RNA vaccines. But you know, so it's very easy

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 2>to get that notion out there that this vaccines can

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 2>do harm. The CDC director in two thousand and nine

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 2>was a man named Richard Besser, and that's when we

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 2>had this wine flu pandemic, and he was great. He

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 2>was out there every other day, every third day, in

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 2>front of the media, answering their questions. This is what

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 2>the vaccine is, this is how we're going to distribute it,

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 2>this is how it's made, this is what the virus

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 2>is doing. This is where the virus is now, there's

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 2>where this is where we expect the virus is going

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 2>to be. He was the model of how you communicate

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 2>what we were doing and why we were doing it.

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 2>So I saw him at a National Foundation of Infectious

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Disease meeting a couple of months ago and I said

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 2>that to him. I said, you were great, you were

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 2>a model. He said, thank you. I could never do

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 2>it today. Two reasons politics and social media.

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, I want to go back to something that

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, which is about how this anti vaccine movement

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is so much better funded these days. And you know,

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to other subjects that are popular with

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the anti science crowd, so things like human and climate change,

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>or historically cigarettes and lung cancer feel like it's easier

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to see it's easier to make those connections, to see

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the motivations of the people or the groups that are

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>spreading disinformation with climate change. Of course, the fossil fuel

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 1>industry doesn't want to lose profits as a result. Of

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 1>changing policies, and that's more or less the same thing

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.400
<v Speaker 1>with big tobacco. As soon as that link about lung

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>cancer and cigarettes came out, it was like, let's quash

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>this pretty clear motivation there. But I feel like identifying

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 1>the drivers of the anti vaccine disinformation campaigns it's not

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>as straightforward. So how can we categorize some of those drivers?

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 2>No, that's a really good point. I haven't thought of

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 2>it that way, But you're right. I mean, what exactly

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 2>is the financial motivation here? Assuming there's always a financial motivation?

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's just an expression of this notion

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 2>of autonomy, sort of personal freedoms, and that the uber allis.

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that's just sort of become the ra of

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 2>the Republican right. And I think that's why, especially although

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 2>well the right, I'll just say, and so that's their

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 2>current mantra. I think it just fits into their zeitgeist.

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure that there is any financial motivation, but

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 2>there's certainly a lot of money to support it, I

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 2>mean more so than there is. You know, there was

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 2>an article ramonograph by a group called the Center for

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 2>Countering Digital Hate, and they had what they called the

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 2>disinformation doesn't, and so it was twelve people or groups

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.479
<v Speaker 2>that accounted for about seventy percent of the misinformation it

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 2>was out there. Their funding was often the same. They

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:38.400
<v Speaker 2>all got pretty much funding from the same source, which

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 2>was the dietary supplement industry, which in many ways is

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 2>the same thing, because there are two. As a matter

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:48.479
<v Speaker 2>of medical freedoms, we don't want the FDA telling us

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 2>what we can or can say, because when we say

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:53.640
<v Speaker 2>things like, you know, this will make your prostate smaller

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 2>or this will make your immune system better, we want

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:57.679
<v Speaker 2>to be able to say that even though we have

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 2>no evidence that that's true. And so the f HE

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 2>sort of pushes back and doesn't really let you say that.

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 2>You have to be vague or right. It supports pro

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 2>sate health, im you and heal you, heart health, whatever,

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 2>and so they really are in many ways aligned with

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 2>this group, which also likes to make claims that are unsupported.

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like so much of this has to

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>do too with how uncertainty is communicated in popular media,

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>where scientists and people trained as scientists or as medical

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>practitioners are sort of it's ingrained in us to be

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 1>more conservative in saying this causes this, or this is

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the evidence for this, or there's a strong relationship. And

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 1>I kind of wanted this as like a very roundabout

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>way of getting to my question, which is sort of

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>about the way you think that scientists are trained in

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>how to communicate with the public or the popular media,

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>and how we can do better with that.

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 2>I think our training as scientists is the opposite of

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 2>the training that we need to educate the public and

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 2>the about scientific issues, because when you write a scientific

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 2>paper or a publish or scientific paper, the biggest sin you

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 2>can commit is to ever go beyond the data in

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 2>front of you, so you are a good scientific paper

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 2>is one that in theory draws a conclusion and then

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 2>the discussion section is full of caveats. Right, I really

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 2>can't say this or this or this because my data

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 2>limit me in terms of what I can say about that,

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 2>and so we're always very careful. That's number one that

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 2>doesn't come off well, at least in a popular press

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 2>or in the media, because it sounds like you're wishy washy.

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like you're not sure of what you're saying.

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 2>The other thing is is just the nature of the

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 2>scientific method, which is that you formulate hypothesis, and then

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 2>you can do two things with that hypothesis. You can

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.160
<v Speaker 2>reject it or not reject it, but you can never

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 2>accept it, which is to say you can never prove

0:20:54.359 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 2>never because the null hypothesis is paramount, and you can't

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 2>ever accept the n all high positive. So I mean

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 2>so as as an example, as a little boy, I

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 2>watched the TV show Superman, which was black and white,

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 2>and Christopher Reeve was it was before Chris Reeve was

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.880
<v Speaker 2>George Reeves. And you know, he flew. And when you're

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 2>five years old and you're watching TV, TV does not lie,

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 2>and so so you know he tie it. He'd had

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 2>his cape and his hair would fly, and he would

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 2>look at the city below and he would fly. So

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 2>what I did was I went in the backyard and

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 2>on a small chair, I stood up, and I put

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 2>a towel around me and put my hands in front

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 2>of me using the interlocking thumb grip, which I thought

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 2>was critical to the whole experience because that's what he did.

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 2>And I jumped a few times and didn't fly. You know,

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 2>spoiler alert, I didn't fly. Now I could have done

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 2>it a million times, that wouldn't have proven that I

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 2>couldn't fly, it would only have made it all the

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:54.199
<v Speaker 2>more statistically unlikely. I could have done it a billion times,

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 2>ten billion times, because the scientific method does not allow

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 2>me to say I can't fly, the least not without

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 2>a plane, but I can't fly. And so I can

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 2>say that, and I think you have to get used

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 2>to that. So, for example, you can't say the MMR

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 2>vaccine doesn't cause autism. All you can say is that

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 2>there are eighteen studies that have been done in seven

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 2>countries on three continents, involving hundreds of thousands of people

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 2>at the show that you're no more likely to develop

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 2>autism if you've gotten the vaccine if you haven't. That's

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 2>what you can say. And so I had to testify

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.679
<v Speaker 2>once in front of Dan Burton's Committee Office of Government

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 2>Reform about that issue. Andrew Wakefield had just published his paper.

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 2>He was on the other side. I was on the

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 2>side of good trying to explain what we knew about

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 2>MMR vaccine or what we knew about autism. And Colleen Boyle,

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 2>who was great from the CDC, you know, she got

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 2>up and she explained what the early data showed in

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 2>terms of there was no association, no statistical association with

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 2>those two things. But Dan Burton heard weakness in that,

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 2>and he said, so you can't tell me. You can't

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 2>tell me it doesn't cause it, do you, because you

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 2>have and I quote an out in the back of

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.360
<v Speaker 2>this thing and so and so that you know, it's

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 2>hard that you have to get used to that at

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:03.919
<v Speaker 2>some level that you are saying things that at some

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 2>level scientifically you can't say. And for scientists that's hard.

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a quick break, and when we get back,

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>there's still so much to discuss. Welcome back everyone. I've

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>been chatting with doctor Paul Offitt about his book Tell

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Me when it's over, An Insider's Guide to Deciphering COVID

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 1>myths and navigating our post pandemic world. Let's get back

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 1>into things. What do you think is the appeal of

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theories like the microchip in a COVID vaccine.

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, conspiracy theories are easy to understand. They explain something clearly,

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 2>They give you a handle on it, even if it's

0:23:57.600 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 2>not true. I mean, I think the best example at

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 2>the begin this pandemic was the notion that it was

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 2>a lab leak. This wasn't a lablink. I mean it was.

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 2>I was actually just on Morning Joe this morning at

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 2>like a quarter of tenant, and that was his question.

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 2>He said to me, I used a thoughtful smart man,

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 2>he said, you know, I've had people say to me,

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 2>people in the medical field or the scientific field say

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:20.880
<v Speaker 2>to me sort of on the side, as if this

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 2>is our secret. You know that we're trying to hide this,

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 2>that you know this what this may well have leaked

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 2>from a lab and you know it's it's frist has

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 2>never happened. Never has a pandemic virus ever been created

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 2>in the laboratory. Two is all the evidence is on

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 2>the other side, right, I mean you hear you have

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 2>the western section of the Hunah seafood market where there

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 2>were dozens of animals that were sold illegally in very close,

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 2>unsanitary conditions, and the kinds of animals, you know, red foxes,

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 2>raccoon dogs that can catch and transmit a virus like

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 2>SARS Kobe two. I mean SARS one was an animal

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 2>to human spillover event in two thousand and two. Mers

0:24:57.200 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 2>was an animal to human spillover event twenty twelve. I mean,

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's not like the black plague was you know,

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 2>created in the medieval biocontainment lab. You know, it's just

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 2>these things that are invariably animal the human spillover events,

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 2>and you have have you know, the sort of pictures

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 2>that were taken of that western section of the market

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 2>that were sent to to people in the United States,

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 2>media people in the United States, so you see how

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 2>unsanitary those conditions were. And the Chinese really did look

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 2>at for genetic evidence of this virus, SARS Kobe two

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 2>virus in things like the machines that kill the animals,

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, the brushes that brushed the animals, or the

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 2>tables in which the animals were sacrificed, were the you know,

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 2>the the other the cages themselves, and found the evidence

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 2>of SARS Kobe two virus there, So it's creating a lab.

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Then what the laboratory person had to do was then

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 2>travel nine miles to to where this Muhan seafood market

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 2>was across the yankste River and then deposited in a

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 2>place exactly where you would expect an animal to human

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 2>spill over vent to occur. So this is not a

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 2>scientific countries. I mean, you don't have you know, the

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 2>clear smoking gun. I mean, you don't have like a

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 2>raccoon dog standing up like at the end of crime

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 2>and punishment and saying it was me that killed the

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 2>seafood vendor. Right, So you don't have that, but you

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 2>have a confluence of evidence that tells you it's all

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 2>on one side. And actually, my best, the best comment

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 2>I've heard is that this is a promiscuous virus. I mean,

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 2>it's if you were trying to target it to humans,

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 2>it's targeted to at least three dozen other animal species.

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 2>And so the line was if this was created in

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 2>the lab, it was created by an underperforming graduate student.

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 2>I like that.

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean we have so like you said, we

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>have so many road maps for how this happened, and

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>we people have been predicting something like this for decades.

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think that going back to sort

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of this cognitive dissonance between people were hoping and hoping

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:53.400
<v Speaker 1>for a vaccine and when it finally came out, when

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it was finally available, there would be someone who's as

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>their relative is dying in a hospital. This person will

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 1>be simultaneously tweeting about microchips or tweeting about fatal side effection.

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>The vaccine, Like, where does that cognitive dissonance come from?

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's just like a philosophical question that we can't answer,

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's just something that I find really hard to

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of like grapple with.

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 2>I think part of it is we definitely lost trust,

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 2>and I think that there's a few reasons for that.

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 2>One is that there's just a general anti institutional bias,

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 2>so it's not just the FDA and CDC that's lost trust,

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Department of Justice, FBI, etc. Two is there is this

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 2>flood of disinformation at a level I think we've never

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 2>seen before, it's never been better funded before. But the

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 2>third is that I think we did make communications mistakes

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 2>and that's one reason why you lost strust, and therefore

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 2>those conspiracy theories become more more attractive. So, for example,

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 2>to me, the biggest one occurred in July of twenty

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty one, when thousands of men go to Provenstyle, Massachusetts

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 2>to celebrate the July fourth holiday, and seventy nine percent

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 2>were already vaccinated. Nonetheless, there's a COVID outbreak, so three

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:10.120
<v Speaker 2>hundred and forty six men who were in attendance got COVID,

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 2>all of whom had been vaccinated, four were hospitalized. So

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 2>that's a hospitalization rate at one point two percent. That's

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:19.199
<v Speaker 2>a vaccine working very very well, right, I mean, to

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 2>do vaccines doing what you wanted to do, keeping out

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 2>of the hospital. The other three hundred and forty two

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 2>had mild or asymptomatic infection, which when the CDC reported this,

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 2>the headline in MORBIDI Imortality Weekly report was breakthrough infections.

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 2>They called these asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic infections breakthrough infections,

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 2>as if this vaccine had failed. I mean, breakthrough was

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 2>a very negative word. Whereas the goal of this vaccine

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 2>was to keep you out of the hospital. The goal

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 2>of this vaccine was to prevent serious infections, and the

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 2>vaccine was doing exactly that. I mean, you if you

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 2>watch Brett Kavanaugh, for example, Supreme Court Justice. You know

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 2>he's entering the Supreme Court chamber. He routinely screen and

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 2>found to be positive is around the same time, and

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 2>they called that breakthrough infection. If you watch the way

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 2>that the CNN carried that story, you thought the man

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 2>was fighting for his life. I mean, Lindsey Graham actually

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 2>had again, because this is mid twenty twenty one, it's

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 2>two dose vaccine. Time he gotten two dose of vaccine,

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 2>he had a three or four day illness that was

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 2>characterized by sinusitis, and he said, and I quote, this

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 2>would have been much worse if I hadn't been vaccinated. Right,

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Lindsey Graham got it exactly right. And how often do

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 2>you get to say that.

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Even a broken clock is right twice a day? I

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>guess yeah. I think that that sort of messaging has

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>still had lingering effects.

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I remember seeing a news report maybe a couple of

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>weeks back about the latest booster and how it prevented

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>symptoms and X number of people who received it, And

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it's still perpetuating this notion that vaccines are there to

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>entirely prevent any sort of symptomatic disease and that's not

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the case.

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 2>This upsets me more than anything else. I mean, it's

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 2>it's a short incubation period mucoastal infection, my mild infection

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 2>is prevented by high levels of virus specific circulating neutralizing

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 2>antibodies at the time of exposure, and antibodies don't list

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 2>that long. They will fade over four to six months.

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 2>I think we were fulled in a sentence. In December

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty, when those two large clinical trials were

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 2>presented with fires or MODERNA you know, fives or forty

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 2>thousand person modernity thirty thirty thousand, you know, placebo prospective

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 2>placeical control trials, the efficacy was ninety five percent against

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 2>severe disease. It was also ninety five percent against mild disease.

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 2>And the reason is is those were three month studies.

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Those participants had just gotten their second dose. That's why

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 2>it was so good. So six months later, five studies

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 2>showed that protection against severe disease was holding up well

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 2>in the ninety percent range, but protection against mild it

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 2>had faded to fifty percent. That had to happen. And

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 2>see that in combination with mandating vaccine. You have to

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 2>get this vaccine or else you don't get to go

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 2>to work. And then people would did it. They got

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 2>the vaccine, then they had a mild illness that said, say,

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 2>the CDC told me that this vaccine was going to

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 2>protect me, and now it didn't. I'm having this breakthrough illness.

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean it really angered people actually who watched away.

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 2>For example, Rhando Santis his stump speeches would often say

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 2>you you all know the CDC told us this vaccine

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 2>was going to work, and it didn't. Well, it did,

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 2>It worked to prevent severe disease. Actually, if you look

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 2>at the way that they're currently messaging the flu vaccine,

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 2>the CDC, it's exactly right. Their slogan is wild to mild.

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you about something you discussed in

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>your book, which is this difference between a deficit of

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:43.959
<v Speaker 1>knowledge and a deficit of trust when it comes to

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the COVID vaccine, And I was wondering whether you could

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 1>explain a bit more about what you mean by that,

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and also how unequal access to healthcare plays into this right.

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 2>I think probably the most telling studies were that those

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 2>who chose not to get a vaccine often had little

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 2>contact with the healthcare system, which I think is an

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 2>underlining kind of the sorry state of healthcare in this country.

0:32:09.800 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we don't have a national healthcare system, so

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:16.719
<v Speaker 2>not everybody easily gets healthcare, and so therefore there's that

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 2>deficit of knowledge because you aren't able to ask that

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 2>your doctor, you know, should I get this vaccine. There

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 2>was a story I tell in this about a nurse

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 2>name or an intensivist named Britney Kobe in Alabama, who

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, who would often see people come into the

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 2>hospital had unvaccinated, you know, suffering and dying. And she said,

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 2>the question that I always asked was did you talk

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 2>to somebody about this, somebody in the healthcare profession? And

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 2>the answer was invariably no. And so I think, you know,

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 2>if you looking, for example, people over sixty five, they're

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 2>certainly more likely to it's the older you are, the

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 2>more like you are to be a Republican to the

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 2>older you are, the more like over sixty five, you're

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 2>more likely to watch watch Fox News. But misinformation isn't destiny.

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they're also very likely to be vaccinated. There's

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 2>ninety five percent of people over sixty five or vaccinated

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 2>because they because we have Medicare in the United States

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 2>and so they often can get healthcare. And I think

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 2>that's that's key. But I think it is fixable. And

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 2>the story I tell is one of Aila Stanford, who's

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 2>an African American surgeon in Temple, the Temple University, and

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 2>she with her own money, formed something called the Black

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Doctor's COVID Consortium. So with you know, many of her colleagues.

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 2>She went into North Philadelphia, a predominantly black and brown

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 2>community with little contact with the healthcare system other than

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 2>an emergency basis, and she just sat in people's living

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 2>rooms and tried to convince them of why they should

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 2>get the vaccine. So they're seeing someone who looks like her,

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 2>who they therefore trust, and eventually, you know, they didn't

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 2>if they said no, she'd come back again, or she'd

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 2>come back again, and she ultimately vaccinated fifty thousand people

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 2>in North Philadelphia. She's a hero. She is an American hero.

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 2>I just wish that there were a thousand Alea Stanford's

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 2>who could get out there and do what she did,

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 2>because I think that's the solution. I mean, yes, the

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 2>CDC and the FDA should explain in detail what they're

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:08.879
<v Speaker 2>doing and why they're doing it, and yes, I think

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 2>local and state government should do that, but I think

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 2>that that Alas Stanford represents the solution to this problem,

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:17.919
<v Speaker 2>which is we have to find who those people are

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 2>in those communities that are pressworthy and then get them

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 2>the resources they need to get into those communities and

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 2>tell people why vaccination is important.

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, I could not agree more. And I think that,

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, part of the challenge with that is kind

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of something we've already touched on, which is the lack

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of training for researchers or medical professionals in how to

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 1>communicate information to the public. Where you know, we learn

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>about how vaccines work, we learn about how epidemiological studies work,

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 1>how clinical trials are carried out, but we don't necessarily

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>learn how to explain that to someone who you know

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't sitting next to us in the same classroom, or

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 1>even explaining it to them. And so how do you

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>think this these sort of opportunities can be improved upon

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 1>at every level, from like training, to development of these

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>programs to execution right, Well.

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 2>I think, as always, it probably starts at the beginning.

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:20.959
<v Speaker 2>I mean, my father since past been thought in World

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 2>War two, but he explained to me that as a

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:26.280
<v Speaker 2>elementary school and high school student, he was actually taught

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 2>critical thinking, taught the scientific method. We often don't do

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 2>that anymore. I think that would help so and I

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 2>think I do think that. So. For example, if you

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 2>see the CDC recently change their guidelines in terms of

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:47.320
<v Speaker 2>how long one should quarantine associated with being infected, and

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 2>they said something that made a ton of sense, which

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 2>is one a fabrill day. See why that makes sense

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 2>to me is that the virus occurs in two stags.

0:35:57.560 --> 0:35:59.839
<v Speaker 2>This is true for all viruses. But so the first

0:35:59.840 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 2>thing is the virus replication stage, right, reproduce itself over

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 2>and over again. Then what happens is the immune response stage,

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 2>which is when you get symptoms. It's when you make

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 2>antibodies against this virus or or you have cytotoxic T

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 2>cells to kill virus infective cells. That's when you have symptoms. So,

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 2>now as the symptoms increase, because the symptoms are based

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 2>on your immune response trying to eliminate the virus, virus

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 2>replication decreases. So their argument is, and it's a reasonable one,

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 2>if you have one a febrill day, if you've been

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 2>febrill you had fever, wouldn't make sense that the immune

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:36.799
<v Speaker 2>systems abating. And if the immune system is abating, it

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 2>doesn't that tell you that virus replication is really not

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:42.279
<v Speaker 2>a critical part of the disease process anymore. So you're

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:45.280
<v Speaker 2>much less likely to be shedding virus. That makes sense

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 2>rather than saying, you know, quarantine for seven days, ten days,

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 2>fourteen days. Because first of all viruses don't replicate on

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 2>the basis of the metric system of the lunar month,

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 2>So wouldn't it make sense there's just pegg it to

0:36:57.040 --> 0:37:00.879
<v Speaker 2>the person rather than to this arbitrary number. So I

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 2>like that, but explain it. I mean, get out there

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 2>and explain it, because else what you have then other

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 2>people trying to explain it for you that may not

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:12.760
<v Speaker 2>understand it as well.

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to kind of circle back to this issue

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of politics and public health, and politics has been involved

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>in public health in the US for hundreds of years,

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>even before the US was the US. Just look back

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:31.239
<v Speaker 1>to smallpox and oculations during the American Revolutionary War, and

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that for a lot of US, the political

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:38.240
<v Speaker 1>discourse during the COVID pandemic revealed just how much public

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:41.919
<v Speaker 1>health policies are influenced by the politics of the day.

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>As we head into this election year, what public health

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 1>discussions do you think that we'll hear more about or

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 1>will be central to campaign issues?

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 2>You're absolutely right, But I think politics has always been

0:37:57.040 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 2>part of public health because public health requires resources for

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 2>there will always be a political component, but there doesn't

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 2>have to be a partisan component, which is what I

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 2>think has happened here. I don't know what's going to happen.

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:11.440
<v Speaker 2>I fear that what's happening is that science is losing

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:14.320
<v Speaker 2>its place as a source of truth. I mean, Kelly

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 2>and Conway said it best. Well, we have our alternative facts,

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 2>the birth of the term alternative facts, which somehow is acceptable.

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 2>And I think with that erosion in trust with science

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 2>is becoming now just sort of another voice in the room.

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 2>Anything is possible. And I think we just saw that.

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 2>We just saw people denying the impact of this virus

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 2>when one point one million people died, When three hundred

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 2>thousand people lost their lives because they chose not to

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 2>get vaccine, because they chose to lose their lives. I mean,

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 2>that's a frightening time worse. I think, you know, have

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 2>hundreds and hundreds of pieces of legislation that have pushed

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 2>back on vaccine mandates, masking mandates, isolation or quarantine procedures,

0:38:57.000 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 2>and vaccines. I mean, these are the important weapons in

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 2>public health that are being stripped away at some level.

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 2>We want freedom, but we don't want protection, and I

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:09.240
<v Speaker 2>fear that's kind of where we're heading. So what changes

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 2>all this, I think again, I'm an optimist. I mean

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm a Philadelphia Eagle season ticket holder, so by definition,

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm an optimist. But I do think these things have

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 2>to occur very early on where we educate people about

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:27.320
<v Speaker 2>science and educate people about, you know, how to think critically,

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:30.320
<v Speaker 2>and I think some of that is gone. I don't

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:33.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe see I think I became a better critical thinker

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 2>as a scientist than when I was an MD. When

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 2>I was just doing clinical work, I think I was

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 2>more of an anecdotal thinker, more of a pattern recognizer.

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 2>I think once I moved into a basic scientist working

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:47.399
<v Speaker 2>on rodaviruses, I think I became much better at sort

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:51.720
<v Speaker 2>of hierarchically establishing burdens of proof, well, you know, formulate

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 2>a hypothesis, subjecting those proofs to analysis. I became a

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:58.399
<v Speaker 2>clearer thinker somewhere in there, but I'm not sure I've

0:39:58.480 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 2>learned that in medical school.

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I really loved what you just said about how science

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>being just another voice in the room. And I feel

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 1>like this is a future that we have created for

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the past several decades where in general there's been sort

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of this demand for and acceptance of debate, where we

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 1>need an equal sides debate where on one side is

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the scientific evidence and the other side is whatever agenda

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, somebody is pushing, whether that's you know, big tobacco,

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 1>whether that's people who don't believe in evolution. There's this

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of false equal footing debate that doesn't really exist

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:41.839
<v Speaker 1>because the science has already been debated over decades of

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:47.760
<v Speaker 1>peer review, over decades of conferences, and basically what science

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 1>actually does. And I think that we have now gotten

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:52.839
<v Speaker 1>to the point where it's not even just a two

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 1>sides debate, but it's science versus a thousand different agendas.

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 1>And I agree that I really worry about what that's

0:41:00.239 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 1>going to look like in the future. And I feel

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:08.279
<v Speaker 1>like if we say that training students and creating these

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>critical thinking courses in younger students, that I mean, how

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 1>many generations then will it take for this to make

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:18.320
<v Speaker 1>an impact in policy. That's that's I think one of

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 1>my big worries about this.

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:22.840
<v Speaker 2>You know it, this is sort of a corollary to

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 2>your worry. I think science when I would do scientific

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 2>studies and then go to you know, double stranded RNA meetings,

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, to present the science of working ronavirus and

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:37.959
<v Speaker 2>so you would draw a conclusion and then you would

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 2>present your data, and people would challenge your data. So

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 2>it's not really debating science, maybe in the way you

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:45.360
<v Speaker 2>mean it, I think, but you know, they would challenge

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:49.400
<v Speaker 2>the criteria on which you based your conclusion. Did you

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 2>do that, was it internally consistent, was it was it robust?

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 2>Did you do the right controls, et cetera? And that's

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 2>what you you wanted that you wanted to hear that

0:41:56.840 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 2>because that's how your scientific studies got better. That does

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 2>not work well in a public health arena. It doesn't.

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 2>And I think the best example of that for me,

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 2>well two recent examples, but one is the bivalid vaccine.

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 2>I mean the bivalid vaccine. Was the thinking was reasonable, right?

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Omicron BA one, the original omicron came into the country

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:20.320
<v Speaker 2>in December twenty twenty one. It was an immune evasive strain.

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Even if you'd been naturally infected or vaccinated with alpha

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 2>or delta, you weren't particularly protected against mild disease from omicron.

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:30.760
<v Speaker 2>So shouldn't we include omicron in the vaccine? Perfectly reasonable?

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 2>So the thinking was right, let's do a half a

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:35.319
<v Speaker 2>dose of the ancestral strain half a dose of one

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 2>of the omicron variants, which became BA four BA five.

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Not a bad idea didn't work out. I mean, if

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 2>you looked at the data that were presented to our

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 2>committee in June of twenty twenty two, it didn't look

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 2>like immunologically, you were more likely to develop an immune response,

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:54.360
<v Speaker 2>a neutralizing antibody response to this omicron variant if you

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 2>got the monovail vaccine, if you've got the bivalid vaccine,

0:42:56.840 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 2>because of imprinting. That's what happened. So I was a

0:42:59.680 --> 0:43:02.759
<v Speaker 2>NOVA vote. I voted no for that. Now the next

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 2>day the government bought one hundred and five million doses

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:08.719
<v Speaker 2>of Visor's vaccine. You know, but remember I'm in an

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:12.360
<v Speaker 2>advisory committee, so we just give advice, so you know,

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 2>as anybody who's in medicine knows, people don't have to

0:43:14.719 --> 0:43:17.720
<v Speaker 2>follow your advice. But and then the clinical studies were done.

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:19.920
<v Speaker 2>There was one in the US, one in the UK,

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:22.439
<v Speaker 2>one in France showing that you were no better off

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 2>getting the buiveil vaccine their monomail vaccine. So I said that,

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:29.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I said that nationally. I wrote a perspective

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:31.759
<v Speaker 2>piece for the New England Journal Medicine that said that,

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 2>and it was published at the same time that David

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Hoe in Columbia or and Dan Brooke in Harvard published

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:41.319
<v Speaker 2>their paper showing there was no difference immunologically in those

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 2>two vaccines in inducing an immune response likely neutralized and

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:49.840
<v Speaker 2>protective immune response against the omicron variant. Okay, that's okay,

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 2>it's okay not to get it right the first time.

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 2>You learn as you go, there's always a learning curve.

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:58.360
<v Speaker 2>It's invariably steep with this kind of it's a novel virus,

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 2>it's a novel vaccines strategy, it's a novel disease. We're

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:06.839
<v Speaker 2>trying to learn as we go, and so explain that

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:10.319
<v Speaker 2>we didn't get this exactly right, but we've learned, and

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:14.000
<v Speaker 2>so you don't see bivilent vaccines anymore. But that's not

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:16.279
<v Speaker 2>what we did. What we did was we kept saying

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 2>it was better because we wanted it to be better.

0:44:18.600 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 2>And when I was saying, you know, publicly that it's

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 2>not better, not worse, boosters boost it's a value for

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:27.799
<v Speaker 2>people who are in hig risk groups. You know, I

0:44:27.960 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 2>was hammered by public health officials who were really angry

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 2>at me because what had I done, I'd gotten off

0:44:34.000 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 2>the bus. It's a divisive time you're on the bus

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:39.359
<v Speaker 2>or you're off the bus. And they felt I mean,

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 2>because we wanted people to be vaccinated, and I get that,

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 2>but don't misrepresent the data because you're only going to

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:48.799
<v Speaker 2>lose trust not only the public but scientists who see

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:52.040
<v Speaker 2>what the data are. So just be honest and know

0:44:52.120 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 2>that you're not going to get it right, but see

0:44:53.560 --> 0:44:57.239
<v Speaker 2>that the fluidity of that, the fluidity of scientific discovery,

0:44:57.280 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 2>of learning as you go, is disconcerting to the public.

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:02.319
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think if you ask people, do you

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 2>think we're going to know more about science or medicine

0:45:04.840 --> 0:45:06.640
<v Speaker 2>fifty or one hundred years from now than we know now,

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I think everybody would say yes. But when it comes

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:11.880
<v Speaker 2>to your disease or our pandemic, they want to believe

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 2>you know everything you need to know right now, and

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 2>if you don't, then you got it wrong that I

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:17.200
<v Speaker 2>don't believe you anymore.

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering, do you have, like any tips of

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:23.879
<v Speaker 1>you're such a great science communicator, Do you have any

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:28.840
<v Speaker 1>tips for science communication that you have found over the years,

0:45:28.880 --> 0:45:32.400
<v Speaker 1>like work really well or even just like general advice?

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think don't be afraid to explain to science.

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean when when this whole thing. There's a surgeon

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 2>general in Florida. This Florida actually is one of the

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:47.960
<v Speaker 2>I think only four states actually has a surgeon general

0:45:48.120 --> 0:45:51.240
<v Speaker 2>whose name is doctor Joseph Fladappo. So he's become famous

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 2>for his notion that he put out there and sent

0:45:53.640 --> 0:45:56.800
<v Speaker 2>something to all these sort of healthcare people in Florida

0:45:57.280 --> 0:46:01.280
<v Speaker 2>that the mRNA vaccines are contaminated with DNA fragments, which,

0:46:01.640 --> 0:46:04.279
<v Speaker 2>first of all, it's a manufacturing residual. It's not at

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:07.480
<v Speaker 2>all surprising anything that's made from cells, and that's certainly

0:46:07.480 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 2>the plasmad DNA that is the beginning of the process

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 2>of mRNA vaccines. That doesn't just completely disappear as you

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:18.480
<v Speaker 2>go through the manufacturing process. There's nanogram levels of fragmented DNA,

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:21.319
<v Speaker 2>as it is true of in any vaccine that has

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 2>made from cells measles, MOPS or bella of our cellar ronavirus,

0:46:24.960 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 2>all those have small fragments of DNA. And in fact,

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:30.919
<v Speaker 2>we eat foreign DNA all the time, assuming you eat

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:34.359
<v Speaker 2>anything made from plants or animals on this planet, which

0:46:34.400 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 2>is pretty much everybody, which ends up in your circulation,

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 2>by the way, and it fragments much larger and in

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 2>quantity is much larger than here ever getting into vaccine.

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, so he put it out there right, DNA

0:46:45.160 --> 0:46:48.880
<v Speaker 2>fragments can can essentially insert themselves into your DNA and

0:46:48.920 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 2>cause cancer. So explain that. Now you can explain that.

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:56.360
<v Speaker 2>You can explain how you know the cytoplasma doesn't like

0:46:56.400 --> 0:46:59.040
<v Speaker 2>foreign DNA. It's hard to get across the nuclear membrane

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:01.440
<v Speaker 2>of a non dividing cell. Well, then you have to

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:06.120
<v Speaker 2>insert yourself into DNA, which you know requires some sort

0:47:06.120 --> 0:47:09.920
<v Speaker 2>of enzyme like an integrace. But so you can. So

0:47:09.960 --> 0:47:12.480
<v Speaker 2>I was on CNN right with Brianna Killer, and you

0:47:12.480 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 2>don't have much time. You got about four minutes to

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:18.960
<v Speaker 2>explain why Joseph Ladappo is wrong. But don't don't be

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:22.520
<v Speaker 2>afraid to do that. Try and explain the science simply.

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Don't just say so. The FDA, when they dealt well,

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:26.520
<v Speaker 2>this is fine, I mean this, they said, you know

0:47:26.880 --> 0:47:29.279
<v Speaker 2>vaccines are carefully tested for safety, we know you know,

0:47:29.320 --> 0:47:31.600
<v Speaker 2>we know that this exists. But so when they do that,

0:47:31.640 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 2>when they don't express the science, explain the science, they're

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:37.120
<v Speaker 2>basically saying trust me, and and people don't trust you,

0:47:37.160 --> 0:47:39.520
<v Speaker 2>so when you give them something to hang on to,

0:47:39.560 --> 0:47:42.200
<v Speaker 2>even if they don't necessarily understand all those words, they

0:47:42.480 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 2>like integrace. You know, an enzyme like an integrace, but

0:47:46.239 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 2>it is an English sort of sounding thing, right, integrate

0:47:49.120 --> 0:47:53.920
<v Speaker 2>into something. So just I say, don't be afraid of that.

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Don't be afraid to say that. People appreciate that. I

0:47:56.640 --> 0:48:00.560
<v Speaker 2>think they appreciate not being talked down to by making

0:48:00.600 --> 0:48:01.280
<v Speaker 2>it too simple.

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:06.080
<v Speaker 1>In your book, you discussed many different important lessons that

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:09.759
<v Speaker 1>we learned from the COVID pandemic. And this is a

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:12.439
<v Speaker 1>two parter. So the first is what do you think

0:48:12.480 --> 0:48:15.360
<v Speaker 1>is the most important lesson that we actually did learn

0:48:15.840 --> 0:48:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And what do you think was the biggest missed opportunity

0:48:19.640 --> 0:48:22.480
<v Speaker 1>or the thing that we the lesson that we didn't

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:23.600
<v Speaker 1>learn or unlearned.

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think we learned we can make a vaccine

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:29.240
<v Speaker 2>quickly and well, and that we can distribute it quickly

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:35.959
<v Speaker 2>and well. That was good. I think that the thing

0:48:36.640 --> 0:48:39.520
<v Speaker 2>that hopefully we've learned is that we need an international

0:48:39.520 --> 0:48:44.400
<v Speaker 2>surveillance system. You can't depend on a whistleblower in China

0:48:44.480 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 2>to tell you that there's a virus that circulating that's

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:50.239
<v Speaker 2>killing people, and China was xenophobic. They didn't let other

0:48:50.280 --> 0:48:53.839
<v Speaker 2>scientists come in. That gave rise to conspiracy theories. I mean,

0:48:53.960 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 2>that kind of inability to let FORNT or other researchers

0:48:59.480 --> 0:49:03.319
<v Speaker 2>come in. I think it's in us. I do think

0:49:03.400 --> 0:49:04.839
<v Speaker 2>as I sort of talked about the end of the book,

0:49:04.880 --> 0:49:07.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean, when nine to eleven happened, we all held

0:49:07.280 --> 0:49:09.279
<v Speaker 2>each other and hugged and cried. We were all in

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:11.800
<v Speaker 2>this together. I think that was also true when Pearl

0:49:11.800 --> 0:49:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Harbor happened. I think we do at some level see

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 2>ourselves as part of a larger group, and we have

0:49:19.560 --> 0:49:22.960
<v Speaker 2>to if we're going to move forward, we have to

0:49:23.000 --> 0:49:25.319
<v Speaker 2>see ourselves as part of a larger group. There's nine

0:49:25.360 --> 0:49:28.080
<v Speaker 2>million people in this country who can't be vaccinated, for example,

0:49:28.120 --> 0:49:30.799
<v Speaker 2>because they're immune compromise. They depend on those around them

0:49:30.840 --> 0:49:33.719
<v Speaker 2>to protect them. Do we have any responsibility to them?

0:49:33.760 --> 0:49:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Of course we do, and I think we have to

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:38.160
<v Speaker 2>just kind of do our best to sort of emphasize

0:49:38.160 --> 0:49:40.080
<v Speaker 2>that we are part of a whole, we benefit from

0:49:40.080 --> 0:49:42.360
<v Speaker 2>being part of a whole, and just make it clear

0:49:42.400 --> 0:49:44.880
<v Speaker 2>that that's true. So I don't know, I mean, I

0:49:44.960 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 2>think we'll see how the next the story of the

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:50.080
<v Speaker 2>next pandemic is told. But there will be a next pandemic.

0:49:50.120 --> 0:49:52.600
<v Speaker 2>We've had three pandemic viruses in the last twenty years.

0:49:53.000 --> 0:50:00.440
<v Speaker 2>There we're not that far from the next one.

0:50:14.480 --> 0:50:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Offit, thank you so much for taking the time

0:50:16.920 --> 0:50:19.759
<v Speaker 1>to chat with me today. I really enjoyed our conversation

0:50:19.840 --> 0:50:22.759
<v Speaker 1>about this rise in anti science sentiment and what we

0:50:22.800 --> 0:50:26.080
<v Speaker 1>can do about it. It's definitely something that is always

0:50:26.160 --> 0:50:29.200
<v Speaker 1>on my mind. And for those of you who want

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to know when it's over and how to navigate this

0:50:32.200 --> 0:50:35.640
<v Speaker 1>post pandemic world, check out our website this podcast will

0:50:35.719 --> 0:50:37.960
<v Speaker 1>kill You dot com, or I'll post a link to

0:50:38.000 --> 0:50:40.680
<v Speaker 1>where you can find tell me when It's over, as

0:50:40.719 --> 0:50:43.759
<v Speaker 1>well as a link to doctor Offit's website. And don't

0:50:43.760 --> 0:50:46.880
<v Speaker 1>forget you can check out our website for all sourts

0:50:46.920 --> 0:50:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of other cool things, including but not limited to, transcripts, quarantining,

0:50:51.200 --> 0:50:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and placybreada recipes, show notes and references for all of

0:50:54.719 --> 0:50:58.520
<v Speaker 1>our episodes. Links to merch our bookshop dot Org, affiliate account,

0:50:58.520 --> 0:51:02.959
<v Speaker 1>our Goodreads list stand account form, and music by Bloodmobile.

0:51:03.640 --> 0:51:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of which, thank you to Bloodmobile for providing the

0:51:06.920 --> 0:51:10.759
<v Speaker 1>music for this episode and all of our episodes. Thank

0:51:10.800 --> 0:51:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you to Leona Sculacci and Tom Bryfogel for our audio mixing,

0:51:14.920 --> 0:51:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and thanks to you listeners for listening. I hope you

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:21.480
<v Speaker 1>liked this bonus episode and our loving being part of

0:51:21.520 --> 0:51:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the TPWKY book Club. A special thank you, as always

0:51:26.480 --> 0:51:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to our fantastic patrons. We appreciate your support so very much.

0:51:31.680 --> 0:52:02.000
<v Speaker 1>We truly do well. Until next time, Keep washing those hands, U,