Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeart Radio app
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Team. Welcome to the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hut Thursday, September fifteenth edition of the program. We
Speaker 1: have a bunch of illegal immigrants showing up because they've
Speaker 1: been bust or flown to some sanctuary cities, and the
Speaker 1: Libs are freaking out about this, which seems so strange.
Speaker 1: Shouldn't they be throwing a party that should be happy? Right?
Speaker 1: This is better for everybody, they told us, or is
Speaker 1: it not? Apparently when it's in their backyard. We will
Speaker 1: discuss that. Plus, Fetterman is a terrible candidate for the
Speaker 1: Senate in Pennsylvania for a number of reasons, but the
Speaker 1: fact that he wanted to empty out the prisons and
Speaker 1: that happened and it's been awful for his state, that's
Speaker 1: something we need to explore because he is a reckless individual.
Speaker 1: And Stacy Abrams tells everybody she never denied the elect
Speaker 1: results of twenty eighteen, but she's the fake governor of
Speaker 1: Georgia because she denies the election results. So how exactly
Speaker 1: does that make sense? We will break that down for
Speaker 1: you and so much more here coming up in just
Speaker 1: a moment. You love my Pillow products. I'm sitting here
Speaker 1: right now talking to you wearing the my slippers because
Speaker 1: they are amazing and this is how I want to
Speaker 1: do the show every day with the my slippers on,
Speaker 1: because they feel so good on my feet. Mike Lindelle
Speaker 1: launched his brand new all season slippers, slides and sandals
Speaker 1: for as low as twenty nine ninety eight, but this
Speaker 1: is only for a limit of time. The slippers are
Speaker 1: made with a four layer design to ensure comfort. They
Speaker 1: also have breathable fabrics. You can wear them all year round.
Speaker 1: The slides and sandals are extremely comfortable and durable due
Speaker 1: to the patented Impact gel. Mike guarantees these will be
Speaker 1: the most comfortable foot where you will own. It's incredible
Speaker 1: offer won't be around for long, so stock up now
Speaker 1: that slippers, slides and sandals for as low as twenty
Speaker 1: nine ninety eight with promo code buck log onto my
Speaker 1: pillow dot com click on the radio listener specials. By
Speaker 1: the way here, I'm actually I'm wearing this slipper right now.
Speaker 1: I just took it off. If you're listening, you can't
Speaker 1: see it, But if you're watching a Ken twenty eight
Speaker 1: with promo code buck, go to my pillow dot com
Speaker 1: click on the radio listener specials. Use that promo code
Speaker 1: buck to receive this incredible limited time offer one year
Speaker 1: warranty and sixty day money back guarantee my pillow dot
Speaker 1: Com promo code Buck. So hold on a second. Why
Speaker 1: is Martha's Vineyard a place I've spent some time Because
Speaker 1: in college, my college girlfriend was a towny in Martha's Vineyard,
Speaker 1: meaning a year rounder, which is rare there. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's very There's about one hundred and twenty thousand people
Speaker 1: on a busy day in the vineyard this island off
Speaker 1: the coast of Massachusetts in the summer, and then it
Speaker 1: gets down I don't know, twenty thirty thousand, maybe something
Speaker 1: like that the rest of the year. So I spent
Speaker 1: some time out there. It is an enclave of tremendous wealth.
Speaker 1: It is where of the Obamas have a fifteen million
Speaker 1: dollars beachfront mansion there. I can't even begin to name
Speaker 1: all the incredibly wealthy and influential libs who spend their
Speaker 1: off time, their vacation time in Martha's Vineyard and have
Speaker 1: very very fancy homes there. You can only get there
Speaker 1: by boater plane. There's no brad or causeway. It's quite
Speaker 1: a ways out into the Atlantic. And Governor Ronda Santis
Speaker 1: of Florida dropped off some illegal migrants in Martha's Vineyard
Speaker 1: and somehow this is really upsetting to the Libs. Well,
Speaker 1: first let's hear this is de Santis's point about this.
Speaker 1: He's telling everybody, Look, we're just did they say they're
Speaker 1: sanctuary cities. These are Democrat enclaves. They love illegal immigration,
Speaker 1: so let's just let them take care of illegal migrants.
Speaker 1: They were so proud to be sanctuary jurisdictions, saying how
Speaker 1: bad it was to have a secure border. The minute
Speaker 1: even a small fraction of what those border towns deal
Speaker 1: with every day is brought to their front door, they
Speaker 1: all sudden go berserk and they're so upset that this
Speaker 1: is happening, and it just shows you, you know, their
Speaker 1: virtue signaling is a fraud. Okay. They are supporting policies
Speaker 1: that are just frankly indefensible. It is not defensible for
Speaker 1: a superpower to not have any control over the territory
Speaker 1: of its country over the borders of its country, and
Speaker 1: he inherited a situation where you didn't have this happening.
Speaker 1: And yes, we needed to build the wall. There was
Speaker 1: more than we needed to do. He reversed the Trump
Speaker 1: policies knowing what would end up happening. And you know,
Speaker 1: one of the reasons why we want to transport because
Speaker 1: we obviously it's expensive if people are coming here, you
Speaker 1: got to it taxes social services and all these other things. Yes,
Speaker 1: it is expensive and taxes social services. Almost like there
Speaker 1: are trade offs, maybe even downsides to having illegal immigrants
Speaker 1: coming into the country. Now, keep in mind a marked vineard.
Speaker 1: I think it's about fifty. In New York City, they've
Speaker 1: had about eleven thousand, And the mayor of New York
Speaker 1: City is saying that this is a crisis, that the
Speaker 1: city is at the breaking point. New York has eight
Speaker 1: and a half million people, give or take eleven thousand
Speaker 1: illegal migrants. Is straining the social safety net here that
Speaker 1: much the welfare agencies can handle it. That seems surprising,
Speaker 1: considering that we're told illegal migration is great makes us
Speaker 1: wealthier that they are. Actually, this is the line from Democrats,
Speaker 1: more law abiding, harder, working and just generally better than Americans.
Speaker 1: The people that are here. No, no, no, you are
Speaker 1: not as good as the illegal immigrants who come here
Speaker 1: in violation of US law. They are better than you.
Speaker 1: This is what Democrats constantly say, that is what they believe.
Speaker 1: And yet we're told that there's going to be a
Speaker 1: strain on the resources. Why is that? In fact Chicago
Speaker 1: Mayor Laurie Lightfoot another place where there have been illegal
Speaker 1: migrants dropped off bust up there to Chicago where they
Speaker 1: got a lot of problems for a lot of reasons.
Speaker 1: Blafefoot is saying that it is a national problem. DC
Speaker 1: needs more assistance. Obviously. I know that there's work being
Speaker 1: done by the White House and some of the executive
Speaker 1: agencies to look to other resources that can't happen fast enough.
Speaker 1: So we're going to continue to be in conversation with
Speaker 1: them to let them know what is happening on the
Speaker 1: ground here. I had a series of fairy productive conversations
Speaker 1: when I was in DC on Friday. But we're not
Speaker 1: going to put take our foot off the gas to
Speaker 1: say that we need a comprehensive plan fund the federal government. Again,
Speaker 1: we all know what the reality is this is a
Speaker 1: national problem and needs a national solution, and we as
Speaker 1: cities and states cannot be left to fend to ourselves,
Speaker 1: can't fend for themselves. Why, what's the big problem? Migrants
Speaker 1: are They're doing the jobs Americans won't do, Right, That's
Speaker 1: what we're always told. What's the Oh, they immediately need
Speaker 1: a lot of resources and welfare and public distance right away.
Speaker 1: That's so strange. Now, imagine if that were true for
Speaker 1: the five million illegal immigrants who have come into the
Speaker 1: country while Biden has been in office. Oh wait, it
Speaker 1: is true of the five million. Imagine what it means
Speaker 1: for this country when it comes to law and order,
Speaker 1: when it comes to our sovereignty. Finally, because you have
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants showing up in places where hedge fund libs
Speaker 1: who write checks to Democrat politicians because you know that
Speaker 1: they may have their golf game disrupted on the way
Speaker 1: by seeing tent cities popping up on the streets of
Speaker 1: Martha's vineyard. Now it's a crisis. Now it's a national
Speaker 1: conversation we have to have. Oh interesting, or it can
Speaker 1: get even even crazier. I mean, here is on CNN
Speaker 1: this morning, and this is remarkable. Ken Burns, who is
Speaker 1: apparently a loon. So there's that, and had a big
Speaker 1: role and completely changing around the narrative of the Central
Speaker 1: Park five with his documentary. I would recommend to any
Speaker 1: of you to go back and actually look at the
Speaker 1: You can watch the videos of some of the individuals
Speaker 1: from the Central Park five in the interrogations, and somehow
Speaker 1: some of them new things they couldn't have known unless
Speaker 1: they were there at that horrific incident. But anyway, ken
Speaker 1: Burns made a documentary effectively exonerating them, and you know,
Speaker 1: hashtag racism and all the rest of it. So he's
Speaker 1: a loon, and here he is telling everybody that, well,
Speaker 1: you know, John Berman and him are having a conversation
Speaker 1: because ken Burns has a documentary about the Holocaust. He's like,
Speaker 1: look sending migrants to a vacation paradise where the average
Speaker 1: home is over a million dollars isn't quite the Holocaust,
Speaker 1: but they do want to make some comparison to the Holocaust.
Speaker 1: Here watch. We woke up to the news this morning
Speaker 1: that Governor Ron de Santist of Florida sent two plane
Speaker 1: loads of migrants to Martha's Vineyard off the coast of Massachusetts,
Speaker 1: including kids and whatnot. This is not a one for one,
Speaker 1: This is not a parallel here in any way, but
Speaker 1: it does address some of the same themes that are
Speaker 1: part of this documentary. The abstraction of human life. It's
Speaker 1: basically saying that you can use a human life that
Speaker 1: is as valuable as yours or mine or lens, and
Speaker 1: to put it in a position of becoming a political
Speaker 1: pawn in somebody's authoritarian game. This is the coming straight
Speaker 1: out of the authoritarian playbook. And what we find in
Speaker 1: all our films is that the themes that we engage
Speaker 1: in the past are present today. And so when you
Speaker 1: look at the story that we're telling of the US
Speaker 1: and the Holocaust, you understand that the time to save
Speaker 1: a democracy is before it's lost. We promise you save
Speaker 1: a democracy before it's lost. They dropped off fifty people
Speaker 1: in Martha's vineyard. What is he talking about? Like? What
Speaker 1: is rough? But you were said, the Libs are all
Speaker 1: so hysterical that unless it's effectively at the level of
Speaker 1: their Nazis, it doesn't even resonate with them, Like everything
Speaker 1: has to be Nazi level bad that they don't like.
Speaker 1: You know, if Republicans say, look, I think the corporate
Speaker 1: tax rate should actually be more like twelve percent. They're Nazis,
Speaker 1: you know, because they've convinced everybody that Donald Trump is
Speaker 1: worse than Hitler and all this stuff that they've said.
Speaker 1: Trump could have started a nuclear war with Kim Jong un.
Speaker 1: They've got people on TV as of a week ago
Speaker 1: saying that Trump maybe was going to sell nuclear secrets
Speaker 1: to our enemies for fifty billion dollars. That was floated
Speaker 1: on the air by some maniac. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: going on all the time, all the time. So yeah,
Speaker 1: of course they're they're they're training their brains to think
Speaker 1: in crazy terms. That's what is happening here. And you know,
Speaker 1: sure enough, they'll make comparisons like the one that we
Speaker 1: just discussed. The Fetterman view of crime is something you
Speaker 1: need to be very aware of if you're especially if
Speaker 1: you're going to be voting in the state of Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: This guy is an awful candidate, and it is shameful.
Speaker 1: It is shameful that Democrats on health reasons, for health
Speaker 1: reasons alone, are holding him up. But it actually is worse,
Speaker 1: is worse than that, or rather, in addition to that,
Speaker 1: there's bad stuff. We'll get into it in just a second.
Speaker 1: You know, those data breaches keep coming. There was another
Speaker 1: one that was just announced recently about an Oklahoma student
Speaker 1: loan Authority technology service and there were two point five
Speaker 1: millions to student borrowers that were affected. That meant that
Speaker 1: their social Security numbers were exposed, emails, phone numbers, And
Speaker 1: the problem with being a victim when one of these
Speaker 1: breaches happens is you don't find out about it until
Speaker 1: it's too late. Right, how can you know? So you
Speaker 1: have to be able to protect your online identity. How
Speaker 1: do you do it? LifeLock by Norton, It's important to
Speaker 1: understand how cybercrime and identity the after are affecting our lives.
Speaker 1: Because your information is getting exposed all the time, it
Speaker 1: makes it so easy for cyber criminals to deal your identity.
Speaker 1: LifeLock to text and alerts you to potential identity threats
Speaker 1: you may not spot on your own, like loans taken
Speaker 1: out in your name. If you do become a victim
Speaker 1: of identity theft, a dedicated US based restoration specialist will
Speaker 1: work to fix it. No one can prevent all identity
Speaker 1: theft or monitor all transactions at all businesses, but it's
Speaker 1: easy to help protect yourself with LifeLock. Join now and
Speaker 1: save up at twenty five percent off your first year
Speaker 1: with promo code buck. Call one eight hundred LifeLock, or
Speaker 1: go online to LifeLock dot com and use promo code
Speaker 1: b uck for twenty five percent off. That's LifeLock dot
Speaker 1: Com promo code buck. So John Fetterman is somebody with
Speaker 1: a lot of really bad ideas. It's obvious, and not
Speaker 1: just fashion choices. Here I am in a schlumpy hoodie
Speaker 1: Part one thousand, right aways the same thing at some point.
Speaker 1: You know, how about a cardigan, you know, why not
Speaker 1: just mix it up a little bit, you know, throw
Speaker 1: some buttons on there, look a little more regal, you know,
Speaker 1: do the professor with the elbow patches. Though it's always
Speaker 1: got to be like a champion sweatshirt that's you know,
Speaker 1: size six excel or something that you know, it's just
Speaker 1: the whole, the whole thing. It's such a put on.
Speaker 1: I mean, this guy has never he's not a union guy.
Speaker 1: He's not a construction worker. He's not somebody who's worked
Speaker 1: with his hands and had to show up and do
Speaker 1: tough manual labor he's been. He's a career politician whose
Speaker 1: bills were paid by his parents, literally by his parents,
Speaker 1: Mommy and daddy. Remember when Trump said say goodbye to
Speaker 1: mommy when he was at the rally. Remember that that
Speaker 1: was fun. I miss him, I really, you know, it
Speaker 1: was amazing. We didn't realize what we had with Trump
Speaker 1: rallies until it was gone, because there's nothing like that
Speaker 1: in politics today. Say goodbye to mommy. He was the
Speaker 1: best anyway. But yeah, he was getting money. A Federman
Speaker 1: was getting money from his parents. And here he is
Speaker 1: on the issue of crime, which is one of the
Speaker 1: areas Democrats are most vulnerable. You know, should be vulnerable,
Speaker 1: are vulnerable. And you know, Federman says something crazy here.
Speaker 1: This was a few years ago. It's a compilation of
Speaker 1: different times that he says it. But opening up the
Speaker 1: prisons just because that's what Federman wanted. We could release
Speaker 1: a third of our inmates and not make anyone less safe.
Speaker 1: You could reduce Pennsylvania's prison population by one third and
Speaker 1: not make anyone less safe. He said something remarkable that
Speaker 1: I agree with. He said, we could reduce our prison
Speaker 1: population by a third and not make anyone less safe.
Speaker 1: If we could reduce our prison population. We could return
Speaker 1: these individuals back to their families, back to their communities,
Speaker 1: and everyone is safe for Federals. We could release, you know,
Speaker 1: a third of our prison population and not make us
Speaker 1: any less safe. Well, he's wrong, because they did. Philadelphia
Speaker 1: and the county in which philadelph sits released forty percent
Speaker 1: of prison inmates forty percent actually, and does anyone to
Speaker 1: guess what happened, Well, you know what happened. You had
Speaker 1: over five hundred murders last year in Philadelphia. By way
Speaker 1: of comparison, Philadelphi's got a million and a half people,
Speaker 1: give or take. You had in San Antonio, Texas same size,
Speaker 1: basically million in change, you had one hundred and twenty murders.
Speaker 1: And that, of course also is an indicator of crimes
Speaker 1: across the board, violent crimes, robberies, assaults, theft, everything. So yeah,
Speaker 1: it turns out that they did in Pennsylvania what Feederman
Speaker 1: wanted them to do, which was just open up the prisons,
Speaker 1: let people out, and a lot of people are dead
Speaker 1: as a result, and a lot of people have had
Speaker 1: their homes burglarized, their cars stolen. This is his idea
Speaker 1: of making people safer. Making them less safe. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, I walks around looking like somebody who doesn't
Speaker 1: really give a you know what about what anybody's thinking.
Speaker 1: So maybe it's incumbent upon us to point out that
Speaker 1: he's the absolute worst. He's the absolute worst, because otherwise
Speaker 1: he's not gonna take accountability for any of this stuff.
Speaker 1: He's not gonna say, wow, I was really wrong. You know,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. Maybe I shouldn't be running for a Senate
Speaker 1: seat instead, he's gonna say, you know, here I am,
Speaker 1: and stuff is coming out of my mouth. Their words.
Speaker 1: Not sure which words words big talk words big for me.
Speaker 1: I mean, yeah, make him a senator, yea, Democrats clap yay,
Speaker 1: make him a senator. He's gonna do a great job.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's probably more more with it than Biden.
Speaker 1: Is that's really the excuse now, I guess, although I
Speaker 1: don't know, maybe Bid It depends who's more out of it,
Speaker 1: Biden with his sundowning and early stage amentia or Fetterman,
Speaker 1: who had a stroke and clearly has not entirely recovered
Speaker 1: from it, and yet they want him to be a senator.
Speaker 1: This is what we're up against, folks. We're also up
Speaker 1: against people who are just gonna lie a lot. Democrats,
Speaker 1: that's what they do. They lie a lot. And Stacy
Speaker 1: Abrams a fascinating figure in American politics because she's talked
Speaker 1: about a lot. She was even talked about as a
Speaker 1: vice presidential option for Joe Biden in a very serious way,
Speaker 1: because the identity politics of the Democrat Party are at
Speaker 1: the very the very top of their hierarchy of decision
Speaker 1: making now is the optics of diversity. So they'll pick
Speaker 1: people for things based upon gender, color, gender identity, etc. Etc.
Speaker 1: They'll do that, no question about it. And here we
Speaker 1: are looking at the situation of Stacy Abrams and the
Speaker 1: possible governorship for her in Georgia, being in the governor's mansion,
Speaker 1: the Great State of Georgia, and she's claiming that she
Speaker 1: has never denied because denying election results you got to
Speaker 1: be clear. You deny election results and the FBI might
Speaker 1: seize your phone. You deny election results, the FBI is
Speaker 1: going to show up at your home. This this is
Speaker 1: the standard that has been set. Denying election results is
Speaker 1: a huge problem. It's really bad. Okay, has she ever
Speaker 1: denied election results before? Anyone? Take a guess. Has Stacey abrahams. Well,
Speaker 1: here she is just recently telling everybody she has never
Speaker 1: done such a terrible thing. I have never denied that
Speaker 1: I lost. I don't live in the governor's mansion. I
Speaker 1: would have noticed. And there is this clip that's going
Speaker 1: around and it shows me saying that we won. And
Speaker 1: what I was referring to is that we won in
Speaker 1: terms of communities that were long left out of the
Speaker 1: electoral process finally participated in NATO at outstanding under time.
Speaker 1: But I'm not delusional. So that's clear she's not delusional.
Speaker 1: That's really interesting. Haha, they're all laughing, right, okay, because
Speaker 1: here's just a montage of the things that miss Abrams
Speaker 1: has been saying for the last four years. I saw
Speaker 1: that there was a challenge with our voting system in
Speaker 1: the state of Georgia. I never denied the election. I
Speaker 1: didn't have one very affirmative statements. Thank you, refuse to
Speaker 1: concede and say that you lost. Do you stand by
Speaker 1: that decision today? Absolutely? The election was not fair, The
Speaker 1: process was not fair. Was the election in Georgia statewide
Speaker 1: a free and fair election? It was not a free
Speaker 1: and fair election. But will I say that this election
Speaker 1: was not tainted was not a disinvestment and a disenfranchisement
Speaker 1: of thousands of voters. I will not say that Brian
Speaker 1: Kemp oversaw for eight years the systematic and systemic dismantling
Speaker 1: of our democracy, and that means there could not be
Speaker 1: free and fair elections in Georgia. Oh we won, it
Speaker 1: was tainted. There was not a free and fair election.
Speaker 1: That's not election denial, she says, that's all fine, that's
Speaker 1: all fine. I mean, look at this point, I guess
Speaker 1: they don't care how much she lies about this because
Speaker 1: it's just my team, your team, Democrat Republican. This is
Speaker 1: the way that it all breaks down. But we should be,
Speaker 1: I think, more willing to hold people to account for
Speaker 1: just blatant falsehoods. And that would include doctor Fauci, little Fouch,
Speaker 1: the evil tyrant smurf, going around in his little lab
Speaker 1: coat with his skinny ties and his little trendy sneakers
Speaker 1: in case he has to be on the cover of
Speaker 1: a magazine. But he hates publicity, hates it. Wait, is
Speaker 1: there a camera there? Oh love seeing his face everywhere,
Speaker 1: wrong about everything, dishonest at every phase of the pandemic.
Speaker 1: But he did the Libs bidding. He was a useful
Speaker 1: political tool. In fact, you could argue that he might
Speaker 1: have caused Trump the election, that Fauci's pronouncements and disastrous
Speaker 1: decision making, and also just the way that he played
Speaker 1: into the lib thing about Oh, bideen't listen to the scientists, Bid,
Speaker 1: don't listen to scientists. Biden's like science, heir, I listen
Speaker 1: to the science. My beg aviators on. It is science
Speaker 1: created these giant glasses meant to hide my face. You
Speaker 1: don't see that. I look like I'm asleep all the time.
Speaker 1: Here you have rand Paul grilling Fauci on the point
Speaker 1: of natural immunity and how Faucci didn't want to talk
Speaker 1: about this at all before. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: Reuter's fact check looked at that and said, fauci two
Speaker 1: thousand and four comments do not contradict his pandemic. Actually, actually,
Speaker 1: words don't lie. If you look at the words behind me,
Speaker 1: we can go with them a little bit at a time.
Speaker 1: She doesn't need it, because the most potent vaccination is
Speaker 1: getting infected to yourself. It is true. It is true, Senator.
Speaker 1: It is a very potent way to protect when you're
Speaker 1: trying to tell us that kids need a third or
Speaker 1: a fourth vaccine. Are you including the variability or the
Speaker 1: variable a previous infection in the studies, No, you're not.
Speaker 1: You decry and people decry vaccine hesitancy. It's coming from
Speaker 1: the gobbledygook that you give us. You're not paying attention
Speaker 1: to the science. The very basic science is that previous
Speaker 1: infection provides a level of immunity. If you ignore that
Speaker 1: in your studies, if you don't present that in your committees,
Speaker 1: you're not being truthful or honest with us. Narrator voice,
Speaker 1: he's not being truthful or honest with us. I guess
Speaker 1: that's actually just voice. But I'm narrating this show, so
Speaker 1: maybe that makes sense. Yeah, No, he's a liar. They
Speaker 1: don't talk about natural immunity all. They don't want to
Speaker 1: talk about it. They would rather lecture you about how
Speaker 1: you have no damn right to find out who was
Speaker 1: involved at approving these vaccines and was getting paid royalties
Speaker 1: for the vaccines that were being given. In what other
Speaker 1: part of public life would this be acceptable? Rampaul asked
Speaker 1: him about this as well. Play clip one. Please, We've
Speaker 1: been asking you and you refuse to answer whether anybody
Speaker 1: on the vaccine committees gets royalties from the pharmaceutical companies.
Speaker 1: I ask you last time, and what was your response.
Speaker 1: We don't have to tell you. We've demanded them through
Speaker 1: Freedom of Information Act and what have you said? We're
Speaker 1: not going to tell you, But I tell you this,
Speaker 1: when we get in charge, we're going to change the
Speaker 1: rules and you will have to divulge where you get
Speaker 1: your royalties from, from what companies, And if any man
Speaker 1: in the committee has a conflict of interest, we're going
Speaker 1: to learn about it. I promise you that. Okay, there
Speaker 1: are two aspects for which you said. You keep saying
Speaker 1: you approve, you do this, you do that. The committees
Speaker 1: that give the approval are FDA through their advisory committee.
Speaker 1: The committees that recommend are CDC through their advisory committee.
Speaker 1: And you keep saying, I'm the one that's approving a
Speaker 1: vaccine based on certain data. So I don't really understand.
Speaker 1: It's always the committee, don't you see? It's never fauci.
Speaker 1: I never made a decision. I was just one of
Speaker 1: so many. I was just a part of the machine.
Speaker 1: This is evading accountability. This is what a slimy bureaucrat
Speaker 1: slash tyrant does when finally people with an IQ above
Speaker 1: room temperature have figured out across the board. Oh, this
Speaker 1: guy was awful and wrong and a liar. So there's that.
Speaker 1: Thanks for rolling with me today. Team back with you tomorrow.
Speaker 1: We'll have a lot of fun then on the bux
Speaker 1: xt and show. Please share the show on your Facebook page.
Speaker 1: Tell us somebody about the best thing is to tell somebody,
Speaker 1: Be like, hey, check out the buckx Extent podcast. Be
Speaker 1: like what is that? Be like, well, you'll find out.
Speaker 1: She'll tie