WEBVTT - Lakers Win In OT, Chiefs vs Dolphins Preview & Nick’s Picks

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by all State. Some

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>by checking all State first, Like you know, to check

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the date of the Big Game first before you accidentally

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>buy tickets on your twentieth wedding anniversary and have to

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>spend the next twenty years of your marriage making up

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for it. Yeah, checking first is smart, So check all

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>State first for a quote that could save you hundreds.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>You're in good hands with All States savings. Very terms

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>apply All State Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, Northbrook, Illinois.

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in episode one nine, What's Right with Nick Wright?

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Apologies for not being here on Tuesday. I was a

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 2>little under the weather and was trying to save my

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 2>voice for the television shows, so I didn't mean to

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 2>put the podcast second. But you gotta make trade offs

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.040
<v Speaker 2>at times. So apologies for not being here Tuesday. We

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 2>got a huge show for you today though, and it's

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 2>our gambling show. And as listen if you're new to

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 2>the Gambling Show, here's how it goes. I go too

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 2>and three and Demande loses his teaser. That's just what

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 2>it's been all year long. So I you know I've

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 2>in the last week I felt optimistic. I said, it

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 2>feels like a five and oh week. We started out

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.479
<v Speaker 2>two and oh and then lost loss, loss. Demonse once

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 2>again went two for three on his teaser legs, which

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 2>he has done I think seven weeks in a row,

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 2>which of course turns into a loss. So i'd last

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 2>year we made a lot of money and we had

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 2>a fifty to one futures bet that was alive until

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the final weekend. It could be alive in our Niners

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Chief super Bowl. This year. Our preseason gambling show might

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 2>have given out you know, ten units of winners. But

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 2>our week by week picks have been pathetic. They've been awful.

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Demonde declared himself a teaser guy, and right now is

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, historically bad at it. I'm not picking on

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:14.239
<v Speaker 2>your pal, I'm rooting for you, but it's I mean,

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, of all media personalities. If we were to

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 2>do this like we do sports stats, it's like of

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 2>everyone with it this at least this many games played.

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 2>This guy is ex of all media personalities, of which

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 2>you are one who have given out to a nationwide

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 2>audience at least eight teasers. I think you are the

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.679
<v Speaker 2>worst in history, I think. I think twelve and a

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 2>half percent winners is the worst. And so the bright

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 2>side is can only go up from there. And the

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 2>bright side is you maybe don't have quite the the

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 2>following that you know I have to where you're not

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 2>being mocked as relentlessly as I am for just going

0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 2>two and three every week, and two and three every

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 2>week on the podcast somehow is turned into one and

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 2>two or zero and three on TV. It's really been bad.

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 2>There's just no way around it. Go ahead.

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Somebody, somebody straight up tweeted me the other day like,

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, love the show, love what you guys are doing,

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 3>but I can't listen to Demanze's teasers anymore, Like I

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 3>just can't follow you and like you just said it. Finally,

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 3>he wasn't trying to make fun of me. He was

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 3>like very serious, which made it hurt a little bit more,

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 3>but I respect it. Dude. I'm not trying to no listen.

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 2>At this point, everyone's got to do what's best for

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 2>themselves and their families, and right now that is not

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 2>following Demonse's teasers. It's not following my picks either. Listen.

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 2>I am not if you had the opportunity from an

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 2>ev perspective of going two and three against the spread

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 2>every week or just losing one teaser every week. It

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 2>costs you a little bit less to just lose a teaser,

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 2>cause you're only losing one unit a week. I'm losing

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 2>one point three units a week because of the big

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 2>So that regard you have been you know less. I

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 2>don't want to say more profitable, but less negative than me.

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 2>But it just feels embarrassing for both of us. And

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna do better right now. You know, right now,

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 2>we simultaneously have the best father son gambling show and

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 2>the worst. Because we're the best because it's the best.

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 2>We're the worst because we just can't win any bets it.

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 2>We're going you know what, I take that back. I'm

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 2>not promising we're gonna turn it around. We're gonna do

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 2>our best. That's all I can say at this point.

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 2>We're just gonna do our best. I can't make false

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 2>promises to people anymore. I have a five year streak

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 2>on the line of being profitable against the spread publicly.

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Actually that's not right. Five of the last six and

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 2>that is in dire straits right now. It's in dire Straits.

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:02.919
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, like we're the Raiders of Betty. You know,

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 3>we gotta tear it down research.

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Does that mean we have to Does that mean we

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 2>have to fire Gabe and Matt. I don't think that

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 2>would be right. It's not on them bench. You fire

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Gabe and Matt, and I'm just Mark Davis, like, I

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 2>don't know what you want from me. By the way,

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 2>shout out to Matt who's not here today because he

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 2>is a new father, happy, healthy wife and baby, the

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 2>our fearless leader, Matt Ford, who I can now say,

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 2>by the way, because he's hopefully not watching this show.

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 2>He's just you know, covered in marital and baby bliss euphemistically,

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 2>of course. I finally rewatched Top Gun for the first

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 2>time since I was a child. Start to finish not good.

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 2>I love Tom Cruise. I'm the biggest Mission Impossible fan

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 2>in the world. And now I've not yet seen Top

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Gun Maverick and I will watch it. But I watched

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.919
<v Speaker 2>Top Gun and I said, this is a bad movie.

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 2>And I know we have to get to the sports

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 2>business very quickly, like at there is in that movie.

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Are we just supposed to suspend disbelief that the culminating

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 2>the culminating scene. Wasn't the beginning of World War three

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 2>like there was? We had we had hot warfare between

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 2>the US and another nation state. There were jets shot

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 2>down and then they like smashed cut to like the

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 2>news coverage. They're like, oh, they're covering it up, Like huh,

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 2>I think there'd be nukes dropping. Okay, time for the show.

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 2>Here's what missed the cut? Uh we made demanse. We

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 2>did it. We made it through all of baseball season

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 2>without doing a baseball topic. I don't know if that's

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 2>good or bad, but at least it's honest. But hey,

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 2>shout out to the Rangers they win their first World

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 2>Series ever. Shout out what Oh, yeah, you're right, we did.

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Talk to Otani, and shout out to Bruce Bochie, who

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 2>now has won a remarkable fourteen of his last fifteen

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 2>postseason series as a manager. Four World Series rings for

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Bruce Bochie, and also shout out to you might say,

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 2>how can that be the case? Bruce Bochi since he

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 2>took over the Giants, basically either misses the playoffs or

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 2>wins the World Series. He has managed in the last

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty or in the last fifteen years, he has managed

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 2>five teams to the playoffs. Four of them won the

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 2>World Series, one lost in the NLCS to the Cubs.

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 2>One of those World Series he won in seven games

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 2>over my beloved Kansaity Royals. Klay Thompson last night hit

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 2>a game winner against my beloved Kings, and the NBA

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 2>in season tournament pool play begins Friday. I'm gonna be

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 2>totally honest, I still don't totally understand how this thing works,

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 2>but I'm excited for it. I suppose what I'm definitely

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 2>excited for, Demons is to talk about a game I

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 2>stayed up for, watched the entirety of, and that is

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 2>last night's Lakers Clippers game. For the well, you go

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 2>ahead and walk us through it.

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 3>So the Lakers managed to not lose twelve games in

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 3>a row to the Clippers. They won Lebron scored thirty

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 3>five and played in forty two minutes. But the Clippers

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 3>weren't playing James Harden and they obviously have no depth.

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Is this a problem moving forward that the Lakers, you know,

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 3>are barely hanging around with these types of teams.

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 2>I guess I don't know if the Lakers are right now,

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 2>a great team. In fact, I don't think they are.

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Austin Reeves needs to play better now. As far as

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 2>depth goes, I understand the Clippers traded away a lot

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 2>of their depth for Harden, and Harden didn't play, but

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 2>the Lakers were without four of their top nine rotation pieces.

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Jared Vanderbilt still hasn't played, Gabe Vincent didn't play, Torrian Prince,

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 2>who's been a starter, didn't play, and Ruey Hotchramura didn't play,

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 2>which is why Cam Reddish was in the close lineup.

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 2>It's why Max Christy got real minutes, and they won

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 2>the game despite being down nineteen at one point, despite

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 2>not having beaten the Clippers since the beginning of the bubble.

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 2>They won the game for one reason and one reason only.

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 2>We've never seen an athlete like Lebron. And I'm not

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 2>being hyperbolic. I'm not being over the top here and

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm not even trying to have a goat conversation. And

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 2>I tweeted this last night at it says ten o'clock.

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 2>That's on the West coast because our producers that's where

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 2>they are, but it was one am out east. Well,

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Lebron is doing right now. Is without president sports history,

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 2>impossible still be this athletic, this productive, and this good

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 2>at this stage, just impossible. Lebron was on the court

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 2>last night Demonse with three other no doubt first ballot

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Hall of famers in Kawhi Russ and Anthony Davis. One

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 2>guy who will have have a fringe somewhat controversial Hall

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 2>of Fame case in Paul George. Those guys, just for

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 2>some context here, Kawhi Leonard came into the league. Lebron

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 2>came into the league in two thousand and three. Kawhi

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Leonard came into the league in twenty eleven. Paul George

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 2>came into the league in twenty ten. Russell Westbrook came

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 2>into the league in two thousand and eight, Anthony Davis

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 2>came into the league in twenty twelve. Lebron was better

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 2>than all of them, and this year has been better

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 2>than all of them. Lebron is less than four hundred

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 2>minutes shy of having played the most minutes of any

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 2>player in the history of basketball playoffs in regular season combined,

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 2>and yet he still has the energy athleticism two in

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 2>his four first minute of play in overtime, galvanizing a

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty point comeback, he can catch that lob from Austin

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Reeves and have his head even with the rim. I

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 2>I really want folks to have the context for what

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 2>he's doing at this point, which is if you go

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 2>through the games this year, and prior to yesterday, Lebron

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 2>hadn't played great throughout the bulk of the season. Despite that,

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 2>he's twenty five points, nine rebounds, seven assists on fifty

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 2>seven percent shooting, and in the clutch. This year he

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 2>has been unbelievable. He's scored the winning baskets against Phoenix,

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 2>he hit the go ahead three against Orlando, and he

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 2>made the biggest plays of the game against the Clippers

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 2>on both ends. He blocked Russ, he had another block

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 2>that was ridiculously called a goaltend. And it's not just

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 2>that he turns thirty nine in less than two months.

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 2>It's the minutes. It's that I don't you know what,

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna check this real quick. I think Lebron has

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 2>let me see if I can even prove I should

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 2>have done this before the show, I apologize. I think

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Lebron has more minutes than Kawhi career minutes. Then Kawhi

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 2>and Paul George combined, and so let me just see

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 2>if Kawhi is even on this well he the I

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 2>mean yes, I mean because Kawhi is Notawhi is not

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 2>in the top two fifty all time as far as

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 2>minutes played. Let me see if Paul George is, Paul

0:12:55.200 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 2>George might be. Paul George is at one night, Paul

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 2>George is at thirty one thousand, and wherever Kawhi is,

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 2>it's not in the top two to fifty. So it's

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:09.239
<v Speaker 2>under twenty eight thousand. So Kawhi and Paul George combined

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 2>are well shy of sixty thousand. Lebron is about to

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 2>be at sixty six thousand, and still at the end

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 2>of these games, has more left in the tank. They

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 2>said he's going to be on a minute restriction. It's

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 2>the third game in four nights. He's on no type

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:32.199
<v Speaker 2>of minutes restriction. He has gone Sunday night thirty nine

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 2>minutes in overtime, Monday night thirty three minutes, Wednesday night

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 2>forty two minutes. And right now, and this is not

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 2>just Lebron. Right now, while you have Devin Booker can't

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 2>get on the court, Kyrie has already missed a couple games,

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 2>Bradley Beal can't get on the court. The three icons

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 2>of this generation of basketball really of last generation of basketball,

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Lebron James, Steph Curry, Kevin Durant are showing up to

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 2>work every night, bawling out, carrying, otherwise at this moment

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 2>somewhat underachieving, supporting casts. And Katie's had some rough moments

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 2>at the end of these games, but part of that's

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 2>because he's out there without Beal, without Booker, and Katie's

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 2>old ass with you know, post Achilles surgery and foot

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 2>surgery and all of this is like, I'm ready to

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 2>come to work. Steph Curry, I'm ready to come to work.

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 2>And Lebron James ready every damn night to come to

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 2>work and deliver. And now listen, the new generation yokichenianis

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 2>also been ready to come to work and been yacht.

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 2>The Bucks are. The Bucks might have a little more

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 2>issues than some of us thought. The NUGG it's despite

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 2>losing last night, clearly do not. And but those guys,

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm not taking anything away from them at all. But

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 2>those guys are in their late twenties, the two best

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 2>players in the league. They're supposed to be the two

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 2>best players in the league. They're doing what's expected. I

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 2>almost think because Lebron is doing this, folks are under

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 2>selling how crazy it is that Durant and Steph are

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 2>doing what they're doing.

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 3>That we think he's very heartwarming. By the way, Sorry,

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 3>you've you've You've come so far. Gave him his props.

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, and I didn't even call him second best. I

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 2>said he's one of the two best. I do think

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 2>he's the second best, but I'm not. I don't argue

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 2>with people anymore. If they say he's the best, I

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 2>mean that the guy is. The guy's done everything you

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 2>could ask a guy to do. But I just just

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 2>some context for people. Kobe Bryant one of the greatest

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 2>players by any definition. I want to get his make

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 2>sure I have his birthday right. So he was born

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 2>in January of I'm sorry, in August of seventy eight.

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 2>In August, Okay, Kobe Bryant's last great season, he was

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 2>thirty four years old. That was the year he snapped

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 2>his achilles He played after turning thirty four. Kobe played

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 2>a total of one hundred and seven games, zero playoff games,

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 2>and after turning thirty five, I should say after his

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 2>thirty four year old season and was by you know,

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 2>by any definition, you know, was not good average less

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 2>than twenty points per game on well under forty percent shooting.

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 2>And nobody was like, oh what happened to Kobe? They're like, oh, well,

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what do you want from him? He's thirty five,

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 2>thirty six, he's coming off an injury. Steph is thirty

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 2>five years old. Kevin Durant is Kevin Durant thirty five?

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 2>I think he is. Kevin Durant is, yeah, thirty five

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 2>years old, just turned thirty five. He also came off

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:21.919
<v Speaker 2>in Achilles. Lebron is about to be thirty nine, like

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 2>Kareem is the greatest ever prior to Lebron on longevity,

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:33.479
<v Speaker 2>on like this guy was awesome latent to his career.

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 2>And I understand and folks are not wrong when they

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 2>mentioned with Kareem that he has the four years of

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 2>college basketball, which you know, obviously there's a wear and

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 2>terror factor there. I understand that. But Kareem's last great well,

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:58.439
<v Speaker 2>his last great great season, like MVP caliber season he was.

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's not won his last MVP at thirty two.

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 2>His thirty two year old season, he won a Finals

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 2>MVP at thirty seven and Kareem it was considered the

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 2>gold standard for old guys still contributing. At thirty eight,

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:20.360
<v Speaker 2>he was twenty three point six rebounds a night Lebron.

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 2>If Lebron this year put up twenty three and six,

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 2>everyone would be like, man, father time got it. Like

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 2>that father time finally caught up to him.

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 3>He's you can't help yourself. What what do you mean

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 3>you can't help yourself. This is definitely a broad as

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 3>the debate. This wasn't supposed to be. Oh, he's no.

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 2>I I again, I listen some people, I'm I'm almost

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 2>post that. Like if some people want to just Michael

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Jordan in a way that they there and the six

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 2>for six, I get it.

0:18:57.680 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 3>I it.

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:03.199
<v Speaker 2>The The thing is at if people aren't moving it is.

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 2>What is frustrating to me on that note is it

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 2>feels like a lot of people's opinions on that argument

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 2>have not moved in the last five years, despite Lebron

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 2>adding more and more to the resume, including another championship,

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 2>another Comper files appearance five more all NBA teams over

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 2>the last five years. So they're not gonna move that's fine,

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 2>but that that debate shouldn't distract us from appreciating the

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 2>fact that this old ass dude last night was on

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 2>the court with Anthony Davis, Kawhi, Leonard Russell Westbrook, and

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Paul George and he had the most in the tank

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 2>at the end, he was the best player. He was

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 2>the one people were showing up to see. It's just remarkable.

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 3>And he takes care of his body. He's huge.

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 2>Well he's just like, yes, the the take care that

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 2>takes care of his body part. And this is where

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 2>like it is a little frustrating when you see a

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 2>great player in Devin Booker, like you're you were able

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 2>to play the first game of the year and now

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 2>you're just out. You're just out, just not available. Kyrie,

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 2>he played a few games, now you're just out, Like

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I do. There is a level of and I've made

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 2>this point before and then we'll get to football for

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the show. And by the way, shout

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 2>out to Demonse Celtics. They did hang one and one

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 2>fifty when last night, yeah yeah, yeah, one fifty five.

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 2>They look really good. There is and I've made this

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 2>point for I just want to make it again. People

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 2>talk about, oh, you know, Lebron doesn't have this skill

0:20:54.840 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 2>or the bag of certain other guys. And my argument

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 2>there it's, first of all, I think that's a little overstated.

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 2>But second of all, let's just say it's true. Like

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't have the handle of certain guys, there's no

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 2>doubt about it. He doesn't have the pure shot of

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 2>other guys, no doubt about it. All that's true. Despite that,

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 2>of course, he's you know, he's scored more points than

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 2>anyone ever AND's gonna play all that doesn't matter.

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Set that aside.

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Here is Here is the I think the obvious point there.

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 2>There are only so many hours in the day. Lebron

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 2>has chosen to prioritize in a way we have never

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 2>seen from an NBA player, to use his time making

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 2>sure his body is ready and available, rather than spending

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 2>all the time working or a disproportionate time working on skill.

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.160
<v Speaker 2>And so there is a trade off there. His hand

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 2>is not as tight as other guys, even his size, right,

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 2>But how useful is a tight handle or a silky

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 2>jump shot if you're not available. Lebron's going to end

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 2>up being the most available player in sports history, and

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be because that is how he prioritized

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 2>his time. And there is a lesson in that, which

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 2>is if. And he said it after the game last

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 2>night when they were like, you know, there's the most

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 2>points anyone's ever scored in year twenty one, and he

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 2>was like, yeah, I don't care about that. I think

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 2>he does a little bit. But he said, listen, I

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:45.439
<v Speaker 2>spend a lot of time making sure my body and

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 2>my mind are ready to go. And because of that,

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 2>he has this extended sub prime because he's not peak Lebron,

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 2>but he is this lesser version of peak Lebron that

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 2>is still at damn near forty, unequivocally one of the

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 2>eight best players in the league. And we've never seen

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 2>anything like it. All Right to football, Go ahead.

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 3>All right, guten talk. What's right, fans? The Chiefs and

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Dolphins are heading to Germany for a face off. Yep,

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Kinsey's practice games are over and all that. Taylor Swift's

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Boyfriend's really mad about the offensive production and says that

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 3>it needs to come to a stop before things get

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 3>out of hand. If these struggles continue and this offensive

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 3>production continues to lack, how are they going to keep

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 3>up with the Dolphins. Well also struggles they yeah, I

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:38.439
<v Speaker 3>mean go ahead nine points on a defense that allowed

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 3>seventy points just earlier this year. Is I don't really

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 3>know how you what do you say about that?

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so the so a few things on the Broncos game. Obviously,

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs looked terrible offensively and scoring nine points, and

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 2>by the way, in the game they won against the Broncos,

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 2>they only scored nineteen. Now, it should be noted since

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 2>that seventy point debacle, the Broncos defense has been far

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 2>far better. People are like, oh, the Jets scored thirty

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 2>on them. No, I mean Russell Wilson had a fumble

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 2>six in that game. The Jets scored twenty four. The

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Packers scored seventeen. The Broncos defense has, you know, improved

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 2>from the seventy, but it's not a great defense. I'm

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 2>not arguing that. But I also think that two things

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 2>are happening with the with the Chiefs discourse right now.

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 2>One is we are our memories have never been shorter.

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs offense looked terrible on Sunday. Okay, sure, the

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 2>week before, Mahomes had over three hundred yards at halftime.

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 2>The one week ago. The question was, is Patrick Mahomes

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 2>going to set the single game all time record for

0:24:56.240 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 2>passing yards, which Norm Van Brocklin has held for seven years.

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 2>So that's first of all, second of all. In this

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Broncos game, the offense moved the ball, but they had

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 2>five turnovers. No one wins with five turnovers. In NFL

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 2>history games, you have five turnovers, you win six percent

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 2>of the time. In NFL history games you lose the

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 2>turnover battle by four or more, which the Chiefs did,

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 2>you win less than three percent of the time. Last year,

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs when they got in the red zone got

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown more than seventy percent of the time, best

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 2>in the league. This year, the Chiefs when they get

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 2>in the red zone they score a touchdown fifty percent

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 2>of the time, dead middle of the league, like seventeenth.

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Everyone right now, except for me, it would seem is

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:59.120
<v Speaker 2>freaking out about the wide receivers. They will be fine.

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 2>You have the same group as last year with Rashi

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 2>Rice in for Juju Smith Schuster Nick, what about the

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 2>red zone stuff? Juju had three total touchdowns last year.

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 2>He was not the red zone answer. So a couple

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 2>things are going on with the Chiefs. One is Mahomes

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 2>needs to play better. I know no one wants to

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 2>say it, but the reason the Chiefs believe they can

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:31.719
<v Speaker 2>get by with this group of skill position guys is

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 2>because they believe they have the head and shoulders best

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 2>player in the world. They do. Thus far this year,

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 2>he has simply played like a fringe MVP candidate rather

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 2>than the head and shoulders greatest quarterback we've ever seen.

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 2>That is a big responsibility to put on him. He

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 2>can handle it. That's the first part of it. The

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 2>second part of it is and people can say, Nick

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 2>your wish casting here. I know I'm right on this.

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs have different I don't want to say different playbooks,

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:17.120
<v Speaker 2>but Andy Reid has the red zone packages and plays

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 2>that he would rather not use early or often against

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 2>bad opponents because he wants to keep them under wraps

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 2>for the bigger games and for later in the season.

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 2>And you know how I know this because last year

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 2>they when they were playing a mediocre opponent, they were

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 2>so they were so bored in the red zone they

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 2>did the damn ring around the Rosie play that the

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:50.360
<v Speaker 2>players had drawn up earlier in the week. The idea

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 2>that Andy Reid doesn't have certain things he's holding in

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 2>reserve is nonsense. Now it bit them against the Broncos,

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 2>there is no doubt about that. But the idea one

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 2>week ago, the discussion was Patrick Mahomes is the NFL's MVP.

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 2>After the Charger game, he was the Vegas favorite. We

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 2>couldn't even do the topic on first things first because

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 2>everyone agreed. And now a week later, the sky's falling. No,

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 2>it's not Rashi that Now. What I do think they

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:23.680
<v Speaker 2>need to do with the receivers is this they were

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 2>using the first couple months of the season. I called

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 2>it practice, but it was also kind of tryouts. Who

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 2>is going to earn the actual spots? And the answer

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 2>has been Rashi. Rice has earned it, Sky Moore has not.

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 2>So Sky's snaps are gonna go down, Rashi's snaps are

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna go up. But this this idea that the Chiefs,

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 2>who if the playoffs started today, would be the number

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 2>one seed, the Chiefs, who Vegas right now has as

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 2>the favorites to win the Super Bowl. Apologies guys that

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 2>the idea that that team is in dire straits is lunacy.

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 2>So here's a prediction for you. The Chiefs are gonna

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 2>go to Germany and win. They're gonna beat the Dolphins.

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 2>You know why, because the Chiefs defense can slow down

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 2>the Dolphins offense, and the Dolphins defense is not going

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 2>to have its way with the Chiefs offense. The Chiefs

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 2>aren't gonna have a bye and then at home off

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 2>of bye, they're gonna beat Philadelphia and in three weeks

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 2>everyone's going to be you know, the topics on the

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 2>talk shows are gonna be God, that was stupid when

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 2>everyone panicked about the Chiefs. They're going to be fine.

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead to my topics. Probably they're kind of in

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 3>the same situation that the Bills are in when they

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 3>want to go face Trevor Lawrence, and Trevor Lawrence is

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 3>already a week prior. The Chiefs are getting there after

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 3>the Dolphins. And you always say that the checks with

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 3>the flight and all that stuff, you know, groggy tiredness.

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Are you worried about that at all with the Chiefs?

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 2>So no, And I want to be clear on what

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 2>I said about that. I thought the fact that the

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Jags had been over there a full week earlier was

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 2>going to be a real advantage. And I don't know

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 2>if it was or it wasn't. The Jags ended up winning.

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 2>The Dolphins went over on Tuesday. The Chiefs are going

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 2>over today. I am going to read you some tweets

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 2>from Bobby Stroup. Apologies if I'm Bobby, If I'm saying

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 2>your last name wrong, He's Patrick. If you watched quarterback,

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 2>he's Patrick Mahomes's trainer, his personal trainer. The guy who

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 2>works with Bobby writes this, there's a lot of talk

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 2>about NFL schedules to Germany this week. I would like

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 2>to put out some information that is relevant. There are

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 2>many ways to do this and experience coaches with Olympics,

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 2>less frequent foreign competitions that have trialed options. And then

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 2>he includes in there a research paper on this. He

0:30:56.680 --> 0:31:00.959
<v Speaker 2>goes on to write, general consensus from research is seven

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 2>days is the best usually not an option for the NFL.

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Three and five days before present problems for reasons cited

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 2>in research. Arrival two days before works great if players

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 2>stay on us time with their schedules. This is just

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 2>the information. This is a big part of the overseas

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 2>game outcomes and it does matter how this is managed.

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 2>This is not an opinion on how any team has

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 2>managed it years past, present or future, just my own

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 2>research on the topic and reaching out to Olympic level coaches.

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 2>So I say all that to say this, there is

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 2>not a perfect way to go about this. The Chiefs going.

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs could have gone on Tuesday like Miami did.

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs are choosing to go on Thursday. According to

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 2>what Bobby wrote three and five days present problems. Well,

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Miami went five days ahead, the Chiefs went three days ahead.

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there is going to be a significt

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 2>different in this game on the jet lag factor for

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Miami or Kansas City. It's if one of the teams

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 2>has been over there.

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 3>By the way, say it again, you slandered Buffalo for

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:14.719
<v Speaker 3>going on a Friday.

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 2>No, here's the thing. No, I didn't brew did I

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 2>did not? I know that's in the script. I know

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 2>that that. But if find the tape of me slandering

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo for going on a Friday, what I did do

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 2>the what I did do was say beforehand that the

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Jags being over there for a full week I thought

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 2>was going to be an advantage. And the point that

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 2>I am trying to make here is that I don't

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 2>know what the what the correct uh, perfect travel plan

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 2>is I do know that this is not done haphazardly.

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 2>My Miami clearly thinks that having to do their week

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 2>of practices and having to spend more time out of

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 2>their homes is worth the tra in Germany is worth

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 2>the trade off of getting there, you know, way early

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 2>so their bodies are fully adjusted. The Chiefs clearly believe

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 2>they would rather have more time on a regular week schedule,

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 2>and the trade it's worth the trade off of having

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 2>less time to have their bodies be adjusted. I don't

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 2>think that will be the story of this game. I

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:35.719
<v Speaker 2>also think, because it's a story at all, it's a shame,

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.479
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a shame that a game this big

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 2>is happening at nine thirty in the morning eastern six

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 2>thirty West coast time with this added variable.

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 3>All right, next, all right, Speaking of elite quarterback matchups,

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 3>the Bills play Cincinnati Sunday night. We always know you'll

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 3>choose Mahomes over the field. So I'm going to give

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:57.959
<v Speaker 3>you three remaining elite quarterbacks, and you tell me what

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 3>you want out of the three for all all weeks,

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 3>just this week or no weeks between. Tua. Okay, go ahead, Oh, Tua,

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Joe Burrow, and Josh Allen.

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 2>So for all weeks, it's Joe Burrow with no question whatsoever. Uh,

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:24.280
<v Speaker 2>for just this week, I'm going to go Josh Allen

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 2>because I think that Alan can have Listen, Josh Allen

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.879
<v Speaker 2>has not played well in his last few couple games

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 2>against Cincinnati and this is a massive game for them,

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 2>So I think Josh Allen can have some success. And

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 2>this is really unfair. I mean, the only one left

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:47.720
<v Speaker 2>I guess is Tua with no weeks. But my feeling

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 2>on Tua is very simple compared to those other two guys.

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 2>I believe. I know Joe Burrow can work anywhere and

0:34:56.880 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 2>into any system. I know Josh is going to be

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allen anywhere and in any system, the good, the bad,

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 2>the highs, the lows. I don't know that about Tua,

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 2>and there is I know there is a level of

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 2>folks that will say that is unfair. I think it

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 2>is incredibly fair and I think it's very consistent. Tua,

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 2>to me, is a good quarterback who is not as

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 2>good as his numbers this year suggest. And if the

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Miami Dolphins, well, I'm not saying Tyreek Hill is carrying him,

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:38.799
<v Speaker 2>But I do think Tyreek Hill is clearly the most

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 2>important player on that team. And people can say, well,

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 2>if Tua goes out, they fall apart like last year,

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 2>that part true because there aren't enough solid quarterbacks in

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 2>this league. What I would say is, who is give

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 2>me a guy that this is gonna be hard, But

0:35:55.800 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 2>who is the definition of like the median league average corps?

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:05.919
<v Speaker 2>Like if you replace that might be you know, Kirk

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:08.799
<v Speaker 2>actually had been playing so well that he might be

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 2>a little better than that. It's a shame popped his achilles,

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 2>so someone. But yeah, so I don't uh right now,

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 2>what's tough is there really isn't a league average quarterback.

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 2>There's like twelve good ones and then a bunch of

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 2>either media, well you will. This is the we don't

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 2>even have to talk about the Jimmy g thing. I've

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:33.800
<v Speaker 2>taken my victory laps on that I told everybody he

0:36:33.960 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 2>was a product of Kyle Shanahan's system entirely, and now

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 2>he leaves Kyle Shanaan's system. All he has DeVante Adams,

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Josh Jacobs, and he's benched and he leads league picks.

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 2>So let me put it, like, let's say C J. Stroud.

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's use c J. Stroud is like right now, league average,

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 2>If you replace Tua with c J. Stroud, how different

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 2>would the offense look versus who is a league average

0:36:57.280 --> 0:37:00.839
<v Speaker 2>number one receiver? Not a league average receiver league average

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 2>number one Terry McLaurin. Let's say that he's probably like

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:07.840
<v Speaker 2>the sixteenth best number one receiver. If you replace Tyreek

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 2>with Terry McLaurin, I think the offense drops way more

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 2>than if you replace Tua with CJ. Stroud, if that

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:18.359
<v Speaker 2>makes sense. Now, if you replace Tua with his backup,

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 2>that is a different story because now you're replacing so

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Tua is the guy they could least afford to have injured.

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:34.359
<v Speaker 2>Tyreek is the guy they could least easily replace. If

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:36.759
<v Speaker 2>that makes like, if Tyreek left and you had to

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 2>go get another number one, nobody could do for them

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:43.959
<v Speaker 2>what he's doing for them. All right, next, All.

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:46.360
<v Speaker 3>Right, So the Raiders got rid of everybody except for

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:49.920
<v Speaker 3>DeVante Adams, the poor guy, man, poor guy. As a

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs fan, you've got to be, it's gotta be very

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 3>great news for you. So it's time to figure out

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 3>the Raiders' future with a game of likely maybe or

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 3>what if gave Las Vegas options for their future, each

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 3>more galaxy brained than the last one.

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so I'm actually not gonna because we've gone so long,

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna give them three options. I'm just gonna

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 2>tell them exactly what they should do. What the Raiders

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 2>should do is in the offseason, everyone's gonna try to

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:27.839
<v Speaker 2>hire Ben Johnson. Let's assume they can't because he's gonna

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 2>have his options. They should hire Eric b Enemy, who

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 2>I think has done quite well outside of Kansas City,

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 2>making Sam Howell look like a legitimate quarterback. They should

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 2>use the seventh pick of the draft, which is about

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:46.360
<v Speaker 2>what they're gonna have on Shad Or Sanders, which will

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 2>a give them a quarterback of the future and b

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 2>give them real juice in Vegas, so all those home

0:38:56.200 --> 0:39:00.960
<v Speaker 2>games are not simply opposing teams fans trap to Vegas

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 2>where they don't have a home field. You would have

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 2>some real star quality there. And then see they should

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 2>trade away Devonte Adams. Maybe trade away and this one

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 2>would hurt a lot Max Crosby. You would get two

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 2>first round picks for Max Crosby because he's young, awesome

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:23.879
<v Speaker 2>and on a great contract. You would get one first

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:27.399
<v Speaker 2>round pick for Devonte Adams and you would start over

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 2>and you would say, Okay. In twenty twenty four, we

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 2>are cleaning up our cap, cleaning up our books, and

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 2>drafting young talent. In twenty twenty five, we hope to

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 2>be competitive, and in twenty twenty six we hope to

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 2>be contenders. Because if you draft the right quarterback and

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 2>you build the right pieces around him, by that quarterback's

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:52.880
<v Speaker 2>third year, you can be a contender. That should be

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:56.279
<v Speaker 2>the plan. Now, I don't know that they'll listen to me.

0:39:57.080 --> 0:39:58.439
<v Speaker 2>What's the other one.

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:01.319
<v Speaker 3>They're Lincoln Riley guy. There's talks of him wanting a

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 3>coach in the NFL move up, and maybe they get

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 3>him and Caleb Williams.

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:09.000
<v Speaker 2>The problem is they're gonna be They're not gonna have

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they already have three wins. They're not gonna

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 2>be able to get Caleb. And by the way, I

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:18.280
<v Speaker 2>don't know that I want Lincoln Riley as my head coach.

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Nobody's gonna trade the Caleb pick. I mean Lincoln Riley

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't think has done a great job at USC

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 2>this year. I mean once for his for his seventh

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 2>straight year. He can't field a defense. I think USC

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 2>is underachieved somewhat. People are trying to put that on Caleb.

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:39.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that's ridiculous May and the and the Daniel

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:41.479
<v Speaker 2>Wrights in there. That Drake May is on the top

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 2>of some people's boards. Yet idiots. Anybody that is going

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 2>to argue that you should not take Caleb Williams with

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 2>the number one overall pick doesn't know what they're talking about.

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 2>There is the idea that we are going to somehow

0:40:58.080 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 2>twist ourselves into knots and say saying, you know what,

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 2>maybe Caleb isn't the number one pick is lunacy, But

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:05.920
<v Speaker 2>they're not gonna be able to get Drake May either.

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 2>They're like, they're not gonna have a top two pick,

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:10.839
<v Speaker 2>and the top three picks of the draft are going

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 2>to go Caleb, Drake, Marvin Harrison. That we know the

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 2>rest is yet to be seen. All right, let's go

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:20.280
<v Speaker 2>to the Eagles Cowboys this weekend.

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Dallas and Philly face off in a potential NFC championship preview.

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna be a great game. That's assuming Brock Party

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:29.319
<v Speaker 3>is still bad and the Niners aren't the equation for

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 3>the sake of your Cowboys Super Bowl prediction. How important

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 3>is it that Philly steals this game, that Dallas steal

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Dallas steals his game in Philly.

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:44.319
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, well I don't. I don't think Dallas has to

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 2>steal this game for them to be alive Super Bowl contenders.

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 2>But if they do win this game, they are in

0:41:50.080 --> 0:41:54.240
<v Speaker 2>great shape because Philly the Dallas is next three games

0:41:54.239 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 2>after this are Giants, Washington and Carolina the Eagles. Next

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:04.760
<v Speaker 2>five games after this Cowboys game are the Chiefs, the Bills,

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the Niners, at the Cowboys, and at the Seahawks. That

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs games in Kansas City. So if Dallas Dallas wins

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 2>this game, they're they're de facto tied for first in

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 2>the conference. And then all of a sudden, you know,

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 2>they they can actually create some space. What's so interesting

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:26.880
<v Speaker 2>about the NFC right now is you've got five teams

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 2>that are at the midway point of the season essentially

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:34.880
<v Speaker 2>locked into the playoffs, that are just fighting for seating.

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 2>So Dallas and Philly are gonna be in, Detroit's gonna

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 2>be in San Francisco, and Seattle are gonna be in.

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 2>That's five teams. You then have the NFC South winner

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:47.759
<v Speaker 2>whoever that is. That's six, and then who the hell

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:51.000
<v Speaker 2>is the seventh team? Gonna be Washington that just traded

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 2>away it's best two edge rushers, Minnesota who's quarterback just

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 2>popped his achilles, the Rams who just got rolled by

0:42:57.560 --> 0:43:00.880
<v Speaker 2>the Cowboys, or someone else from the NFC South. So

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:04.800
<v Speaker 2>no matter what happens to any of those five good

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 2>NFC teams, they it's almost impossible for them not to

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:11.840
<v Speaker 2>make the playoffs. So all they're playing for at this

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:15.319
<v Speaker 2>point is the number one seed winning their division home

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:18.680
<v Speaker 2>playoff games. We'll get to more on the Dallas Philly

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 2>game in our pick segment. Uh, but I think Dallas

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 2>is in a really good spot here. We're not gonna

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 2>do the wimb conversation because this segment went forty minutes.

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Take a quick break, come back and do our picks

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 2>for the week. And Demons's teaser tries to win for

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:36.719
<v Speaker 2>the first time since Labor Day, What's Right?

0:43:43.160 --> 0:43:45.960
<v Speaker 4>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:49.360
<v Speaker 4>inspiring true story about Anthony Roblasts, who defined every expectation

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:52.319
<v Speaker 4>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:55.920
<v Speaker 4>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg.

0:43:56.040 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 4>Evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:03.040
<v Speaker 4>thrilling wrestling, Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast including

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 4>Jarrel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Tania, and Bobby Kanavalli.

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:11.239
<v Speaker 4>Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 2>All Right, welcome back in Watch Drive with Nick write

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Episode one, ninety demands before we get to our picks,

0:44:17.040 --> 0:44:21.880
<v Speaker 2>the producers say that they've pulled the tape of me

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:26.719
<v Speaker 2>talking about how the Bills lost because they went on Friday.

0:44:26.840 --> 0:44:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's hear the tape and let's see what I said.

0:44:30.040 --> 0:44:31.799
<v Speaker 3>Isn't the travel of the main thing you're always saying

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:32.800
<v Speaker 3>is like a big factor.

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:38.280
<v Speaker 2>It is a big factor, of course, and grown up teams,

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:43.920
<v Speaker 2>teams that have a level of consistency and emotional maturity,

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:47.160
<v Speaker 2>they either understand how to deal with it or they

0:44:47.160 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 2>don't fly to London on Friday. Why did you do that?

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Why did you fly there on Friday for a Sunday

0:44:55.760 --> 0:44:56.399
<v Speaker 2>morning game?

0:44:57.160 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 3>Dude, that's bad, that's bad. I mean you, you, like

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 3>ten to fifteen minutes ago, you said that you literally

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:09.560
<v Speaker 3>didn't do exactly what we just saw you do. You

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:11.480
<v Speaker 3>made fun of the Bills for leaving on a Friday

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:12.400
<v Speaker 3>for a Sunday morning game.

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:15.840
<v Speaker 2>I said you either, I said, hold on just a

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:19.120
<v Speaker 2>second year. This is why it's important to pull the tape. Yeah,

0:45:19.440 --> 0:45:23.680
<v Speaker 2>I said, you either understand how to deal with it,

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 2>or you fly earlier. You don't fly late, and they that.

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 3>So you're just saying so, you're just saying the Bills

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:32.760
<v Speaker 3>didn't know how to deal with it, and the Chiefs

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:35.320
<v Speaker 3>magically do. The Bills are the dumb guys.

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, what's today? I'm just curious what's today? Today,

0:45:41.080 --> 0:45:43.839
<v Speaker 2>Thursday or Friday? Okay, when's the game?

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:46.920
<v Speaker 2>No, no, when's the game? Tell me?

0:45:47.040 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 3>So, the way to deal with it is to leave

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 3>a day before the Bills do. That's the way you want.

0:45:51.080 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I don't know. I mean the Chiefs

0:45:53.600 --> 0:45:57.600
<v Speaker 2>are getting there today, which is Thursday. The Bills got

0:45:57.640 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 2>their Friday, and I don't see what the real issue

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:06.480
<v Speaker 2>here is. Like I did not say they lost because

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:10.879
<v Speaker 2>they went on Friday. I said, either you know how

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:12.640
<v Speaker 2>to deal with it, or if you don't know how

0:46:12.640 --> 0:46:14.759
<v Speaker 2>to deal with it, you leave earlier. I think the

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:16.840
<v Speaker 2>chiefs know how to deal with it, and they're leaving.

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Earlier Friday did seem like maybe a touch close, but

0:46:20.800 --> 0:46:23.000
<v Speaker 2>just know how to deal with it. You're shaking your head.

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:25.880
<v Speaker 2>I stand by everything I said then and everything I

0:46:25.920 --> 0:46:28.600
<v Speaker 2>said now. I think it is one hundred percent consistent.

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:31.279
<v Speaker 2>Let's go on to the picks. Let's go on to

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:35.279
<v Speaker 2>the picks. Last week started out great, den did not

0:46:35.480 --> 0:46:38.640
<v Speaker 2>end great. Last week's picks, we can show you the recap.

0:46:38.920 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 2>We won on Thursday night thanks to Baker Mayfield heroics.

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:47.200
<v Speaker 2>We won on Sunday morning thanks to Trevor Lawrence being awesome.

0:46:47.680 --> 0:46:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Atlanta minus two and a half. I thought that Malik

0:46:52.280 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Willis and Will Levis were gonna split snaps instead will

0:46:55.800 --> 0:46:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Or Malik Willis barely played and Will Levis was awesome.

0:47:00.280 --> 0:47:03.400
<v Speaker 2>I thought Indy could hang with New Orleans. New Orleans

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:07.160
<v Speaker 2>hung almost forty on them, and I said nine points

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:10.359
<v Speaker 2>was just too much for the Chargers to be laying

0:47:10.400 --> 0:47:13.920
<v Speaker 2>to anybody. And the Chargers blew out the Bears pretty

0:47:13.920 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 2>thoroughly throughout. So it started out great, went in terribly.

0:47:18.160 --> 0:47:21.319
<v Speaker 2>We are you know still because it's just two and

0:47:21.440 --> 0:47:24.520
<v Speaker 2>three basically every week with a few three and twos

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:28.560
<v Speaker 2>mixed in. We're still just one great week away from

0:47:28.600 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 2>having our head above water. But at this point, I

0:47:31.120 --> 0:47:33.960
<v Speaker 2>can't guarantee that great week. I just can't. I wish

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:36.760
<v Speaker 2>I could. I'm hoping for the best. I'm not proud

0:47:36.760 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 2>of how the clips have gone so much, so so

0:47:40.840 --> 0:47:43.440
<v Speaker 2>much lately. But we move on from there. What do

0:47:43.440 --> 0:47:44.560
<v Speaker 2>we got this week? Demanse?

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:48.840
<v Speaker 3>You got Kansas City minus one and a half versus Miami.

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:49.920
<v Speaker 3>This one surprises me.

0:47:51.120 --> 0:47:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Why does it surprise you?

0:47:54.200 --> 0:47:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Why Miami probably win that game? Chiefs in Offensive Production?

0:48:01.480 --> 0:48:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Can I ask questions out there?

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Can I ask question? What? What's Miami's good? Like? Wow,

0:48:10.680 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 2>they're They're a legit contender. Look who they beat? Performance

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:16.080
<v Speaker 2>this year.

0:48:16.520 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm just cured they have right. They have not had

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:21.120
<v Speaker 3>the toughest lady games, I'll admit.

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, they've had two very tough games and they

0:48:24.200 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 2>got blown out in both of them. They Week one,

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:31.799
<v Speaker 2>they played the Chargers and that's a good win, but

0:48:31.920 --> 0:48:34.240
<v Speaker 2>that's a win. They also needed a fourth quarter comeback

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:37.440
<v Speaker 2>to execute and they win by two. Week two, they

0:48:37.480 --> 0:48:41.239
<v Speaker 2>play the Patriots and they win by seven. The Patriots

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:42.719
<v Speaker 2>butcher the end of the game when they have a

0:48:42.840 --> 0:48:46.200
<v Speaker 2>chance to tie it. Week three, they embarrass and annihilate

0:48:46.239 --> 0:48:49.640
<v Speaker 2>the Dolphins hang seventy on them. Week four, they play

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:54.279
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo and get annihilated. Week five they beat up on

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:57.640
<v Speaker 2>the Woebegone Giants. Week six they beat up on the

0:48:57.920 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 2>just as wobegon Caroline Panthers. Week seven they play a

0:49:02.000 --> 0:49:06.040
<v Speaker 2>big boy team, the Eagles. They get annihilated. And last

0:49:06.040 --> 0:49:09.759
<v Speaker 2>week they beat the Patriots again thirty one to seventeen.

0:49:09.960 --> 0:49:15.480
<v Speaker 2>I the Dolphins with Jalen Ramsey I am more interested

0:49:15.520 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 2>in because he came back last week immediate impact. I

0:49:23.320 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 2>don't think I think the Dolphins are good. I think,

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:30.040
<v Speaker 2>despite everyone saying the sky is falling, I think the

0:49:30.120 --> 0:49:34.719
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs are great. I think the Chiefs defense will be

0:49:34.880 --> 0:49:40.080
<v Speaker 2>able to handle as much as anyone can handle Tyreek Kill.

0:49:40.600 --> 0:49:42.880
<v Speaker 2>They're familiar with him, they have the best pair of

0:49:42.960 --> 0:49:47.239
<v Speaker 2>corners in the NFL, and McDuffie and Sneed, and the

0:49:47.320 --> 0:49:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs are pissed off. Mahomes is clearly upset with what

0:49:52.239 --> 0:49:56.040
<v Speaker 2>happened last week for all of those reasons, and I'm

0:49:56.160 --> 0:50:00.440
<v Speaker 2>laying less than a field goal and one other note

0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:04.840
<v Speaker 2>that I think is relevant in the Mahomes era, the

0:50:05.000 --> 0:50:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs have lost back to back games sparingly few times.

0:50:11.280 --> 0:50:15.400
<v Speaker 2>So if we go through it, the Chiefs have. Last

0:50:15.480 --> 0:50:19.040
<v Speaker 2>year they lost back to back games zero times. In

0:50:19.120 --> 0:50:23.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one, they lost back to back games one time.

0:50:24.040 --> 0:50:27.279
<v Speaker 2>One was a one point loss to Baltimore and then

0:50:27.520 --> 0:50:31.640
<v Speaker 2>a final possession lost to the Chargers. In weeks two

0:50:31.640 --> 0:50:35.440
<v Speaker 2>and three twenty twenty, they never lost back to back games.

0:50:35.800 --> 0:50:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Twenty nineteen, they lost back to back games to Indy

0:50:39.880 --> 0:50:42.600
<v Speaker 2>and Houston and that was it. In twenty eighteen did

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:45.040
<v Speaker 2>they ever lose back to back In twenty eighteen, oh,

0:50:45.080 --> 0:50:47.640
<v Speaker 2>at the very end of the season. So mahomes six

0:50:47.719 --> 0:50:50.359
<v Speaker 2>years career as a starter, they've lost back to back

0:50:50.400 --> 0:50:54.680
<v Speaker 2>games three times. Ever, all of them involved at least

0:50:54.680 --> 0:50:56.759
<v Speaker 2>one of those games, either the loss coming on the

0:50:56.800 --> 0:51:00.399
<v Speaker 2>final play or in overtime or by one point. They're

0:51:00.400 --> 0:51:04.280
<v Speaker 2>not losing this week, I and so I like the Chiefs.

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:06.960
<v Speaker 2>If it were three and a half, I'd feel differently.

0:51:07.440 --> 0:51:10.000
<v Speaker 2>At one and a half, I like Kansas City. I

0:51:10.120 --> 0:51:13.600
<v Speaker 2>don't typically put the Chiefs in Knicks picks because they're

0:51:13.640 --> 0:51:18.200
<v Speaker 2>not a great covering team, but they are also not

0:51:18.320 --> 0:51:21.919
<v Speaker 2>typically favored by less than a field goal. And by

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:24.799
<v Speaker 2>the way, but the producers put in there. Two has

0:51:24.880 --> 0:51:28.319
<v Speaker 2>won eleven consecutive games straight up versus Super Bowl winning

0:51:28.400 --> 0:51:32.600
<v Speaker 2>head coaches. Fun fact, here's the other fact. Touah's only

0:51:32.680 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 2>loss against the Super Bowl winning head coach came against

0:51:35.760 --> 0:51:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Andy Reid and the Kansas City Chiefs.

0:51:38.120 --> 0:51:42.319
<v Speaker 3>Next, all right, Tampa Bay plus three at Houston. I

0:51:42.400 --> 0:51:43.840
<v Speaker 3>love that one.

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:51.280
<v Speaker 2>The you do love that one? Yeah, okay, So Houston

0:51:51.520 --> 0:51:56.120
<v Speaker 2>is a good story. Houston also last week you saw

0:51:56.160 --> 0:51:58.759
<v Speaker 2>it a bit doesn't have a ton of talent on

0:51:58.800 --> 0:52:04.200
<v Speaker 2>the roster. The Carolina is a bad loss. Tampa is

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:08.640
<v Speaker 2>coming off a bye. Tampa is in a spot where

0:52:09.160 --> 0:52:13.200
<v Speaker 2>they absolutely I shouldn't say coming off a bye. Pardon me, Tampa.

0:52:13.719 --> 0:52:17.520
<v Speaker 2>The is had the mini by because they played on Thursday,

0:52:17.600 --> 0:52:19.520
<v Speaker 2>so they're not coming off a bye, but they have

0:52:19.560 --> 0:52:23.800
<v Speaker 2>the extra rest. I should say Tampa getting three points

0:52:24.239 --> 0:52:27.719
<v Speaker 2>when they are a desperate team. They are the more

0:52:27.840 --> 0:52:31.480
<v Speaker 2>veteran team. And Houston right now is coming off its

0:52:31.560 --> 0:52:34.960
<v Speaker 2>worst loss of the year, not because of the margin,

0:52:35.040 --> 0:52:37.840
<v Speaker 2>but because who they lost to and the fashion that

0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:42.800
<v Speaker 2>they lost to. Also, Houston's offense since the beginning of

0:52:42.840 --> 0:52:46.960
<v Speaker 2>the season, offense was rolling hung thirty seven on the Jags,

0:52:47.000 --> 0:52:51.000
<v Speaker 2>thirty on the Steelers. Since then, nineteen against the Falcons,

0:52:51.040 --> 0:52:55.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty against the Saints, thirteen against the Panthers. The Bucks

0:52:55.080 --> 0:52:59.120
<v Speaker 2>have a good defense, They're a desperate team. They're getting

0:52:59.160 --> 0:53:02.080
<v Speaker 2>three points. Think they went out right. I like Tampa

0:53:02.239 --> 0:53:08.440
<v Speaker 2>the spot. Next Atlanta minus four and a half versus Minnesota. Okay,

0:53:09.400 --> 0:53:13.000
<v Speaker 2>so here is the thing.

0:53:13.800 --> 0:53:17.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I have the quarterbacks. Kirk Cousins is the logic.

0:53:17.840 --> 0:53:22.960
<v Speaker 2>I have the last two weeks lost picks that I

0:53:23.000 --> 0:53:27.120
<v Speaker 2>have based purely on who the quarterback is. I lost

0:53:27.160 --> 0:53:30.239
<v Speaker 2>the Tyson Bagent game and then I lost the Will

0:53:30.360 --> 0:53:38.239
<v Speaker 2>Levis situation. So why am I laying four and a

0:53:38.320 --> 0:53:39.880
<v Speaker 2>half with Atlanta?

0:53:40.600 --> 0:53:41.239
<v Speaker 3>Don't do this?

0:53:41.480 --> 0:53:44.399
<v Speaker 2>And it is why are you shaking your head to Mirrow?

0:53:44.640 --> 0:53:46.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you should do this? I think this

0:53:46.520 --> 0:53:49.839
<v Speaker 3>is why shouldn't I do? You know how you say,

0:53:49.920 --> 0:53:52.399
<v Speaker 3>like the hot team or whatever a week by week

0:53:52.480 --> 0:53:54.520
<v Speaker 3>you're doing, You're doing it with quarterbacks. First it was

0:53:54.560 --> 0:53:56.920
<v Speaker 3>the Bears, and then you went for the Bears, and

0:53:56.960 --> 0:53:59.200
<v Speaker 3>now you're going over here in Minnesota because Kirk Cousins

0:53:59.280 --> 0:54:02.040
<v Speaker 3>is missing. I would not give Atlanta any bit of

0:54:02.040 --> 0:54:04.440
<v Speaker 3>fit the doubt to be laying for and a half points.

0:54:04.840 --> 0:54:06.600
<v Speaker 3>That's just where I stand on it. You're probably gonna

0:54:06.640 --> 0:54:07.240
<v Speaker 3>go even hard.

0:54:07.160 --> 0:54:09.520
<v Speaker 2>On it now, but no, I'm not gonna go into

0:54:09.560 --> 0:54:13.240
<v Speaker 2>even harder on it. And what you're saying does theoretically

0:54:13.280 --> 0:54:16.360
<v Speaker 2>make sense. And I understand the point you're making, and

0:54:16.440 --> 0:54:19.200
<v Speaker 2>four and a half is a tricky line, and it

0:54:19.320 --> 0:54:23.919
<v Speaker 2>does feel like that I am this is a very

0:54:24.080 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 2>square pick. I get all of that. The counterpoint is,

0:54:28.920 --> 0:54:34.400
<v Speaker 2>I think that Heinike is better than Ritter and so

0:54:34.520 --> 0:54:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Atlanta going to their backup quarterback, I think they actually

0:54:38.360 --> 0:54:43.919
<v Speaker 2>get an upgrade. Minnesota told us a lot about their

0:54:44.040 --> 0:54:47.319
<v Speaker 2>confidence level in Jaren Hall by the fact that they

0:54:47.440 --> 0:54:52.239
<v Speaker 2>traded for Josh Dopps. So Minnesota has seen Jaren Hall

0:54:52.719 --> 0:54:54.919
<v Speaker 2>and they know they have Mullins coming back at some point,

0:54:54.960 --> 0:54:57.719
<v Speaker 2>and they're still like, we've got to get another quarterback

0:54:57.840 --> 0:55:00.759
<v Speaker 2>in here, and we've got to get it's someone who

0:55:00.840 --> 0:55:04.080
<v Speaker 2>can start for us at some point. Minnesota with no

0:55:04.440 --> 0:55:09.279
<v Speaker 2>Justin Jefferson, with no Kirk Cousins that actually believe it

0:55:09.360 --> 0:55:12.319
<v Speaker 2>or not, does have a bit of a margin for

0:55:12.560 --> 0:55:16.600
<v Speaker 2>error because of like I said in that NFC, who

0:55:16.880 --> 0:55:20.240
<v Speaker 2>you know at four and four right now their position

0:55:20.400 --> 0:55:24.880
<v Speaker 2>to be a wildcard team, and they have after this week.

0:55:25.239 --> 0:55:28.360
<v Speaker 2>They have the Saints, the Broncos, the Bears, the Raiders.

0:55:28.680 --> 0:55:32.600
<v Speaker 2>They have a bit of a runway. Jordan Addison's been awesome,

0:55:33.280 --> 0:55:38.520
<v Speaker 2>but with no Justin Jefferson, with no Kirk Cousins, and

0:55:38.600 --> 0:55:42.080
<v Speaker 2>with the emotional kind of atrophy of losing your quarterback

0:55:42.120 --> 0:55:45.640
<v Speaker 2>for the season just a week ago, I don't mind

0:55:46.160 --> 0:55:49.600
<v Speaker 2>laying the four and a half in Atlanta with Jaren

0:55:49.680 --> 0:55:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Hall making his first career start as a fifth round

0:55:53.440 --> 0:55:57.240
<v Speaker 2>rookie out of BYU, and so I like Atlanta minus

0:55:57.280 --> 0:56:01.560
<v Speaker 2>the four and a half. I understand that there are

0:56:01.600 --> 0:56:04.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of trends against this. They opened as an underdog,

0:56:05.480 --> 0:56:08.839
<v Speaker 2>now they're the favorites. The producers tell me teams are

0:56:08.840 --> 0:56:11.880
<v Speaker 2>forty three and eighty three against the spread since twenty

0:56:12.000 --> 0:56:18.240
<v Speaker 2>nineteen in those situations, I get that. But a fifth

0:56:18.320 --> 0:56:21.000
<v Speaker 2>round rookie making his first career start on the road

0:56:21.320 --> 0:56:24.360
<v Speaker 2>without his best weapon, I am gonna go ahead and

0:56:24.400 --> 0:56:29.680
<v Speaker 2>go with Atlanta. And then demons read what the producers

0:56:29.680 --> 0:56:32.040
<v Speaker 2>are writing about.

0:56:31.640 --> 0:56:33.480
<v Speaker 3>The question why why aren't you gonna bet against the

0:56:33.520 --> 0:56:36.840
<v Speaker 3>Cardinals as well? Since they're starting Clayton tune.

0:56:37.600 --> 0:56:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Well for two reasons. One is I don't know who's

0:56:41.200 --> 0:56:45.799
<v Speaker 2>starting quarterback opposite him, because the Browns right now, we

0:56:45.800 --> 0:56:48.279
<v Speaker 2>don't know if it's PJ. Walker or if it's going

0:56:48.320 --> 0:56:51.000
<v Speaker 2>to be Deshaun Watson. I don't even know what's the

0:56:51.040 --> 0:56:53.880
<v Speaker 2>better option there for them. And that would be laying

0:56:54.000 --> 0:56:57.120
<v Speaker 2>eight points. So that would be I would be relying

0:56:57.160 --> 0:57:01.520
<v Speaker 2>on a team who's often struggles mightily to cover by

0:57:01.640 --> 0:57:05.319
<v Speaker 2>more than a touchdown. That is a different situation than

0:57:05.360 --> 0:57:09.120
<v Speaker 2>a team that I feel just upgraded at quarterback, going

0:57:09.120 --> 0:57:12.600
<v Speaker 2>from Ritter to Heineke. Laying four and a half next.

0:57:13.640 --> 0:57:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Dallas plus three at Philadelphia.

0:57:16.960 --> 0:57:17.840
<v Speaker 2>You don't like this one.

0:57:18.800 --> 0:57:20.600
<v Speaker 3>I think Dallas is gonna get destroyed.

0:57:21.960 --> 0:57:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So here's Dak has lost once to the Eagles

0:57:28.680 --> 0:57:33.440
<v Speaker 2>since twenty seventeen. Dak is the fifth best quarterback in

0:57:33.560 --> 0:57:38.680
<v Speaker 2>NFL history against his own division. Last year, Dak hung

0:57:38.880 --> 0:57:42.640
<v Speaker 2>forty on Philadelphia in a game Jalen Hurts wasn't playing.

0:57:42.640 --> 0:57:47.600
<v Speaker 2>But Jalen Hurts doesn't play defense that Philadelphia secondary. Last week,

0:57:47.920 --> 0:57:52.320
<v Speaker 2>let Taylor Heinike, I'm sorry, let Sam Howell look like

0:57:52.400 --> 0:57:58.560
<v Speaker 2>a star. For all those reasons, I think Dallas absolutely

0:57:58.800 --> 0:58:02.800
<v Speaker 2>can win this game, and I'm getting a full three points.

0:58:03.400 --> 0:58:06.440
<v Speaker 2>And Jalen Hurts is a little GIMPI which makes me

0:58:06.600 --> 0:58:10.320
<v Speaker 2>question whether or not they're gonna be as gung ho

0:58:10.480 --> 0:58:13.240
<v Speaker 2>on running the Brotherly shove, which has been such a

0:58:13.360 --> 0:58:18.240
<v Speaker 2>valuable weapon for them. And listen, Dak is a twenty

0:58:18.280 --> 0:58:21.760
<v Speaker 2>five and ten in his career against the spread in

0:58:21.760 --> 0:58:24.760
<v Speaker 2>the NFC East. Dak is eight and three in his

0:58:24.800 --> 0:58:28.840
<v Speaker 2>career against the spread and straight up against the Eagles.

0:58:29.360 --> 0:58:33.200
<v Speaker 2>And Dak's never lost to Nick Sirianni for three and

0:58:33.240 --> 0:58:35.720
<v Speaker 2>oh against the spread against Sirianni, And yeah, three and

0:58:35.760 --> 0:58:38.800
<v Speaker 2>oh straight up. For all those reasons, I like Dallas

0:58:38.800 --> 0:58:40.160
<v Speaker 2>plus the three points.

0:58:40.520 --> 0:58:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Next, Chargers minus three and a half at the Jets. Yeah.

0:58:47.880 --> 0:58:52.520
<v Speaker 2>I think the Jets performance last week was one of

0:58:52.560 --> 0:58:56.560
<v Speaker 2>the worst performances in a win I've ever seen. I

0:58:56.680 --> 0:58:59.880
<v Speaker 2>understand they got the win against the Giants, that was

0:59:00.320 --> 0:59:05.720
<v Speaker 2>a truly pathetic performance on all fronts. And if I

0:59:05.880 --> 0:59:10.640
<v Speaker 2>know anything about the Chargers, what the Chargers will do

0:59:11.440 --> 0:59:15.919
<v Speaker 2>is beat the Jets and look impressive, only to have

0:59:16.200 --> 0:59:19.720
<v Speaker 2>everyone be like, oh, did we write off the Chargers

0:59:19.720 --> 0:59:25.040
<v Speaker 2>too soon? Only to then have the Lions absolutely annihilate

0:59:25.160 --> 0:59:30.240
<v Speaker 2>them next week in Los Angeles, and so the Chargers

0:59:30.320 --> 0:59:32.640
<v Speaker 2>laying less than a field goal on and by the way,

0:59:33.200 --> 0:59:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Zack Wilson has pretty quickly gone right back to being

0:59:38.800 --> 0:59:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Zach Wilson. I know we gave him his flowers for

0:59:42.600 --> 0:59:46.479
<v Speaker 2>you know, acquitting himself decently against the Chiefs. Since then,

0:59:47.240 --> 0:59:52.800
<v Speaker 2>he's he has a seventy five rating, one touchdown, one

0:59:52.920 --> 0:59:57.240
<v Speaker 2>pick in three weeks of football. Remarkably, the team is

0:59:57.320 --> 1:00:00.000
<v Speaker 2>three to zero in those games. I do not think

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:03.400
<v Speaker 2>I think that is sustainable. I will admit I don't

1:00:03.440 --> 1:00:07.200
<v Speaker 2>love laying the extra half point here. And it's the

1:00:07.320 --> 1:00:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Chargers going cross country. I understand all of that. But

1:00:11.440 --> 1:00:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Zach Wilson on National TV, I think this is gonna

1:00:15.240 --> 1:00:18.280
<v Speaker 2>be one of those games that the Chargers pass rush

1:00:18.840 --> 1:00:22.160
<v Speaker 2>gets home and gets to him. That Jets offensive line

1:00:22.640 --> 1:00:26.840
<v Speaker 2>has not been good. The Jets are one and fourteen

1:00:27.120 --> 1:00:31.400
<v Speaker 2>straight up in home night games since twenty eighteen, and

1:00:32.560 --> 1:00:36.480
<v Speaker 2>you give Robert Salah extra rest, it's not good. He's

1:00:36.480 --> 1:00:38.840
<v Speaker 2>O four and one against the spread in that spot.

1:00:39.160 --> 1:00:42.040
<v Speaker 2>And Herbert's actually pretty damn good at night nine and

1:00:42.120 --> 1:00:44.640
<v Speaker 2>six against the spread. For all those reasons, I like

1:00:44.680 --> 1:00:47.800
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers in this spot, you seem quizzical, you seem

1:00:47.880 --> 1:00:48.520
<v Speaker 2>questioning me.

1:00:48.560 --> 1:00:53.720
<v Speaker 3>There no charges minus three and a half. Rust the Jets,

1:00:53.920 --> 1:00:55.680
<v Speaker 3>I definitely trust. But how do you feel about Zach

1:00:55.720 --> 1:00:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Wilson having his best game against your defense? How you

1:00:59.080 --> 1:01:01.360
<v Speaker 3>feel is that ud good for him?

1:01:01.440 --> 1:01:03.520
<v Speaker 2>If you want to question the Chiefs defense number two

1:01:03.560 --> 1:01:06.320
<v Speaker 2>defense in league, allowing fifteen points per game, you can

1:01:06.360 --> 1:01:08.640
<v Speaker 2>go ahead and have phone with that. Folks want me

1:01:08.800 --> 1:01:12.360
<v Speaker 2>to be worried about the Chiefs. It's like there is

1:01:12.400 --> 1:01:15.760
<v Speaker 2>whether it's on this show or the TV show, there

1:01:15.840 --> 1:01:20.160
<v Speaker 2>is Like people act like my faith in the Chiefs

1:01:20.920 --> 1:01:23.600
<v Speaker 2>is like a Cowboys fan faith in their team or

1:01:23.640 --> 1:01:26.480
<v Speaker 2>something like it's out of nowhere. They have been the

1:01:26.520 --> 1:01:29.080
<v Speaker 2>best team in the league for a half decade. Now,

1:01:29.240 --> 1:01:32.840
<v Speaker 2>they're the defending Super Bowl champs, they're the current one seed,

1:01:33.120 --> 1:01:35.200
<v Speaker 2>and they have the best defense they've had for this

1:01:35.320 --> 1:01:39.720
<v Speaker 2>team in twenty five years. I think the confidence is

1:01:39.720 --> 1:01:42.640
<v Speaker 2>well founded, all right. Recap of the picks. Five picks

1:01:42.640 --> 1:01:44.520
<v Speaker 2>for the week. Kansas City landa point and a half,

1:01:44.720 --> 1:01:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Tampa plus three, Atlanta Lang four and a half, Dallas

1:01:47.480 --> 1:01:50.240
<v Speaker 2>plus three, and the Chargers laying three and a half.

1:01:50.360 --> 1:01:54.800
<v Speaker 2>All Right, Demons. Last week, the teaser once again goes awry.

1:01:54.960 --> 1:01:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Miami was a good leg, Minnesota was a good leg,

1:01:58.680 --> 1:02:01.000
<v Speaker 2>and then the Rams just get their teeth kicked in.

1:02:01.080 --> 1:02:04.240
<v Speaker 2>They're down thirty three to three at halftime. It's just

1:02:04.320 --> 1:02:05.040
<v Speaker 2>a disaster.

1:02:05.320 --> 1:02:08.480
<v Speaker 3>It's I know. Now, that was like a fifteen point teaser,

1:02:08.480 --> 1:02:11.560
<v Speaker 3>but there was probably like ten minutes total of that

1:02:11.720 --> 1:02:13.120
<v Speaker 3>of that game where I was like, all right, we

1:02:13.200 --> 1:02:16.840
<v Speaker 3>might cover give it a lot. Yeah, it gave them

1:02:16.840 --> 1:02:19.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot of points, dude, but yeah, yeah, they got

1:02:20.000 --> 1:02:21.000
<v Speaker 3>they got dominated.

1:02:21.000 --> 1:02:24.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, demonte can you explain this tweet from last

1:02:24.400 --> 1:02:26.120
<v Speaker 2>night before you give your teaser?

1:02:27.200 --> 1:02:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So I've got a gift for everybody I thought

1:02:32.640 --> 1:02:38.080
<v Speaker 3>about deleting sweet the gifts. It's a winning teaser. Oh

1:02:38.080 --> 1:02:40.760
<v Speaker 3>I got you got something. And like somebody came to

1:02:40.760 --> 1:02:42.720
<v Speaker 3>me in my dream and told me that this is

1:02:42.760 --> 1:02:44.560
<v Speaker 3>the right teaser. I had the chance to change this

1:02:44.560 --> 1:02:47.560
<v Speaker 3>this morning. But this this teaser is gonna hit. It's

1:02:47.600 --> 1:02:52.440
<v Speaker 3>a okay, the three, the three team seven pointer we got. Yeah,

1:02:52.560 --> 1:02:57.320
<v Speaker 3>we're teasing Miami up to eight and a half. Okay,

1:02:57.400 --> 1:03:01.240
<v Speaker 3>teasing this one. This It's gonna kill me if it

1:03:01.280 --> 1:03:03.280
<v Speaker 3>comes back to Byby. But there's just no way this

1:03:03.720 --> 1:03:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Seattle plus twelve and a half versus the Ravens, and

1:03:07.400 --> 1:03:12.160
<v Speaker 3>then the questionable leg Cleveland minus a half point. They're

1:03:12.160 --> 1:03:12.960
<v Speaker 3>playing the Cardinals.

1:03:12.960 --> 1:03:16.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that's a question. I like Cleveland. I

1:03:16.560 --> 1:03:19.840
<v Speaker 2>like Cleveland straight up to win against Clayton. Tune that

1:03:20.000 --> 1:03:22.880
<v Speaker 2>defense against Clayton. Tune in Arizona. I like that leg.

1:03:23.440 --> 1:03:27.200
<v Speaker 2>I the I demonse. I'm not trying to talk you

1:03:27.240 --> 1:03:30.960
<v Speaker 2>out anything. Didn't you lose a teaser two weeks ago.

1:03:32.560 --> 1:03:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Because you've faded the didn't believe in the Ravens? Yeah,

1:03:36.000 --> 1:03:36.880
<v Speaker 3>yeah I did.

1:03:37.080 --> 1:03:39.920
<v Speaker 2>I did, and now you're and now you're doing it again.

1:03:41.440 --> 1:03:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, I'm last time it was what was it

1:03:44.560 --> 1:03:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Ravens was Ravens Lions.

1:03:47.560 --> 1:03:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, It's just.

1:03:50.240 --> 1:03:54.600
<v Speaker 3>I just don't I don't see I don't see Seahawks

1:03:54.640 --> 1:03:56.880
<v Speaker 3>losing this game by more than ten points. I mean,

1:03:57.120 --> 1:03:58.919
<v Speaker 3>I just I think they'll be able to hang in

1:04:01.360 --> 1:04:04.000
<v Speaker 3>to I trust it, I trust it. I think the

1:04:04.480 --> 1:04:06.919
<v Speaker 3>are a good team. I think the Ravens are really

1:04:06.920 --> 1:04:09.240
<v Speaker 3>good and I think, and honestly it's my team. I

1:04:09.240 --> 1:04:11.040
<v Speaker 3>think they're on a little bit of a high right now.

1:04:11.760 --> 1:04:13.880
<v Speaker 3>It's a little bit right now.

1:04:14.480 --> 1:04:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Here's a bright side. Here's a bright side for it. Well, yeah,

1:04:17.640 --> 1:04:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the hot team corollary maybe applies to the Ravens. Now

1:04:20.360 --> 1:04:23.120
<v Speaker 2>here's a bright side for you. When the Chiefs blow

1:04:23.120 --> 1:04:26.920
<v Speaker 2>out the Dolphins and this teasers dead before you wake

1:04:27.000 --> 1:04:29.920
<v Speaker 2>up on Sunday morning on the West Coast, you'll have

1:04:30.040 --> 1:04:34.080
<v Speaker 2>enough time to put in a fresh one once. Like

1:04:34.200 --> 1:04:37.320
<v Speaker 2>at least it won't be like the Dallas game where

1:04:37.320 --> 1:04:39.560
<v Speaker 2>it's the last leg of your teaser and you're like,

1:04:39.640 --> 1:04:41.720
<v Speaker 2>damn it, I don't even have time. You'll be able

1:04:41.760 --> 1:04:43.840
<v Speaker 2>to put in a fresh one. When the Chiefs beat

1:04:43.880 --> 1:04:46.600
<v Speaker 2>the Dolphins thirty one to seventeen. All right, what's the

1:04:46.640 --> 1:04:47.480
<v Speaker 2>offer this week?

1:04:47.560 --> 1:04:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

1:04:47.760 --> 1:04:50.160
<v Speaker 2>And I give this teaser is a seat? I give

1:04:50.160 --> 1:04:52.160
<v Speaker 2>it a seat. He's going against his team, he's going

1:04:52.200 --> 1:04:54.400
<v Speaker 2>against my team. I give it a seat. All right,

1:04:54.440 --> 1:04:55.240
<v Speaker 2>what's the offer?

1:04:55.960 --> 1:04:57.960
<v Speaker 3>All right? For today's offer, we're gonna head over to

1:04:58.000 --> 1:05:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Germany in a fade a former chief We're calling this one.

1:05:01.880 --> 1:05:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Tyreek plays his brought worst. I want to broadsworst right now.

1:05:05.480 --> 1:05:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Tyreek hill under under ninety one and a half yards,

1:05:09.960 --> 1:05:13.200
<v Speaker 3>plus under six and a half receptions at plus one

1:05:13.360 --> 1:05:13.959
<v Speaker 3>forty four.

1:05:15.640 --> 1:05:19.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna decline the offer because there's just not enough

1:05:19.280 --> 1:05:24.720
<v Speaker 2>value there the idea. And I understand those two things

1:05:24.800 --> 1:05:28.960
<v Speaker 2>seem correlated, like, oh, if he goes under one, he'll

1:05:29.000 --> 1:05:32.040
<v Speaker 2>go under the other. But I don't know that that's true.

1:05:32.800 --> 1:05:37.160
<v Speaker 2>I think you could hold Tyreek to four catches and

1:05:37.200 --> 1:05:39.160
<v Speaker 2>he could have one hundred and ten yards if he

1:05:39.240 --> 1:05:43.240
<v Speaker 2>breaks one. I also think there's a scenario where the Chiefs,

1:05:43.240 --> 1:05:46.680
<v Speaker 2>because they're a great tackling team, rally and tackle and

1:05:47.320 --> 1:05:51.000
<v Speaker 2>cloud coverage Tyreek and he could have eight catches and

1:05:51.040 --> 1:05:54.720
<v Speaker 2>not hit ninety yards. So I know I'm gonna decline

1:05:54.760 --> 1:05:58.040
<v Speaker 2>this offer. I will. We will take a very quick break,

1:05:58.080 --> 1:06:00.280
<v Speaker 2>come back, answer a few questions before we go, because

1:06:00.280 --> 1:06:02.960
<v Speaker 2>this show's gone too long. Quick break, right back, what's right?

1:06:07.440 --> 1:06:09.440
<v Speaker 2>All right? Welcome back. In What's Drive with Nick Wright

1:06:09.480 --> 1:06:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Episode one ninety demons read us some of these listener

1:06:12.640 --> 1:06:13.760
<v Speaker 2>questions and comments.

1:06:14.960 --> 1:06:17.160
<v Speaker 3>All right, Dussy said, this is one take I've always

1:06:17.200 --> 1:06:21.160
<v Speaker 3>agreed with Nick on awful movie all about Top Gun.

1:06:22.000 --> 1:06:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I just didn't quite get it. I didn't get

1:06:24.280 --> 1:06:24.720
<v Speaker 2>it all right.

1:06:24.840 --> 1:06:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Next one, Colin Nincher asked, overreact and go all in

1:06:29.080 --> 1:06:31.480
<v Speaker 3>on Little Levis tonight or fade the rookie in his

1:06:31.520 --> 1:06:34.000
<v Speaker 3>second start against a sad defensive secondary.

1:06:35.000 --> 1:06:37.720
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm gonna I'm staying away from this game. It's

1:06:38.040 --> 1:06:41.280
<v Speaker 2>it's Titan Steelers, it's two of the best coaches against

1:06:41.280 --> 1:06:45.120
<v Speaker 2>the spread the I'm just staying away. I would say,

1:06:45.160 --> 1:06:47.200
<v Speaker 2>you know what, keep your powder dry. You don't have

1:06:47.280 --> 1:06:48.400
<v Speaker 2>to bet every game, all right.

1:06:48.520 --> 1:06:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Next talking, Cordon oh Finley said, my Seahawks are poised

1:06:52.000 --> 1:06:54.400
<v Speaker 3>to make a playoff push, but you ranked them in

1:06:54.440 --> 1:06:57.480
<v Speaker 3>the next year category on the TV show yesterday. What

1:06:57.640 --> 1:07:00.760
<v Speaker 3>needs to improve? What needs to proved to move them

1:07:00.760 --> 1:07:01.960
<v Speaker 3>into the contention this year?

1:07:02.960 --> 1:07:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, I listen, I think they are fringe contenders. I

1:07:06.360 --> 1:07:08.880
<v Speaker 2>think the problem is I just think they are such

1:07:09.000 --> 1:07:12.880
<v Speaker 2>a young o line in defense that they need another year.

1:07:12.960 --> 1:07:15.360
<v Speaker 2>I believe in their coach, I believe in their quarterback,

1:07:15.720 --> 1:07:18.320
<v Speaker 2>and I like their weapons, but I think they're probably

1:07:18.360 --> 1:07:19.520
<v Speaker 2>a year away, all right.

1:07:19.600 --> 1:07:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Next, Kigaboo Slide asked how does trading for Josh Dobbs

1:07:24.600 --> 1:07:27.200
<v Speaker 3>snuff out any chance of the Vikings getting a draft

1:07:27.240 --> 1:07:30.480
<v Speaker 3>pick getting them a real contingency plan at quarterback?

1:07:31.480 --> 1:07:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, listen, I think that the Vikings are gonna try

1:07:34.840 --> 1:07:36.680
<v Speaker 2>to find a way to sneak into the playoffs. And

1:07:36.720 --> 1:07:38.720
<v Speaker 2>the fact of the matter is, you have four wins.

1:07:39.000 --> 1:07:41.240
<v Speaker 2>You weren't gonna you already weren't gonna get one of

1:07:41.240 --> 1:07:44.520
<v Speaker 2>the top three quarterbacks in this year's draft, so you're

1:07:44.560 --> 1:07:47.440
<v Speaker 2>not like a tank eligible team, and you want to

1:07:47.520 --> 1:07:50.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of keep the some positive momentum going that you

1:07:50.360 --> 1:07:51.480
<v Speaker 2>built up over the next year.

1:07:51.520 --> 1:07:54.280
<v Speaker 3>All right, next this one, I think we might have answered,

1:07:54.320 --> 1:07:58.160
<v Speaker 3>Austin R. Said, with the hot team losing every week? Sorry, Chiefs,

1:07:58.440 --> 1:08:01.160
<v Speaker 3>what is this week's hot team that is destined to

1:08:01.240 --> 1:08:02.880
<v Speaker 3>lose by this new trend this week?

1:08:03.640 --> 1:08:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, the hot team the team of the longest winning

1:08:06.280 --> 1:08:08.680
<v Speaker 2>treats the Jags, but they're on a buy so they

1:08:08.720 --> 1:08:13.480
<v Speaker 2>maybe have avoided it. Baltimore would be a prime candidate.

1:08:13.760 --> 1:08:16.160
<v Speaker 2>But the other one would be Philly, which is a

1:08:16.240 --> 1:08:18.639
<v Speaker 2>top every team's power rankings right now, is the only

1:08:18.680 --> 1:08:21.360
<v Speaker 2>one loss team left and they're playing you know, they've

1:08:21.360 --> 1:08:24.040
<v Speaker 2>got a brutal game against Dallas. The shocking loss would

1:08:24.080 --> 1:08:28.960
<v Speaker 2>be Baltimore. If Baltimore found a way to lose, I

1:08:28.960 --> 1:08:31.280
<v Speaker 2>guess that wouldn't be shocking because they're playing a good

1:08:31.360 --> 1:08:34.400
<v Speaker 2>team in Seattle. But that would be the probably more

1:08:34.439 --> 1:08:38.599
<v Speaker 2>surprising than Philadelphia. But I think Philadelphia is the answer

1:08:38.640 --> 1:08:40.759
<v Speaker 2>to that question. All right, de Mon's a great job today.

1:08:40.800 --> 1:08:43.240
<v Speaker 2>I gotta go. We're running late. See you guys on

1:08:43.320 --> 1:08:45.439
<v Speaker 2>TV at three o'clock. See on Tuesday on the show

1:08:45.439 --> 1:08:48.400
<v Speaker 2>What's Right.