WEBVTT - Day Two at Schwab Impact in Philadelphia

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Wait inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Live at Schwab Impact twenty twenty.

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:26.440
<v Speaker 3>Three here in Philadelphia. And we just turned Charlie wrapping up.

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 2>The markets right now.

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 3>But the S and P five hundred still headed toward

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 3>its toward it's lois since May gauge briefly crossing the

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 3>threshold of a correction, down ten percent from its July peak.

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 3>So I'm curious what Jeff Klinapp has.

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 2>To say about all of this.

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 3>He's chief Global investment strategist at Charles Schwab and he's

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 3>here with us on site.

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 2>It's good to see you. It's been a while.

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me.

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's great to be bad.

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 2>So what do you make about I don't know.

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't know whether it's smart to ever look at

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 3>one day, given trend, day of trade or really think

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 3>about kind of where we are from the summer, Like,

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 3>how do you look at it?

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 6>There's been a lot of days like this Carol, though,

0:00:59.000 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 6>that's what I'll say.

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Recently, Well, and this is a wacky one where we

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 3>got aggressive growth data backward looking, and then yields moved lower.

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 2>So how do you look at it?

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, they came down, and those Magnificent seven stocks weren't

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 7>so magnificent today. They were the Keystone cops, I guess,

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 7>just tripping over themselves. And I think that's one of

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 7>the interesting things I've noticed, particularly in recent months, but.

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 5>Really over the last year.

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 7>The average international stock is outperforming the average US stock.

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 7>So if we look at the equal weight of benchmarks,

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 7>the equal weighted ETH index outperforming the equal weighted SMP

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 7>five hundred, and I think because doesn't have those Magnificent

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 7>seven stocks in it, but also because they're more value oriented, right,

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 7>lower valuations. But interestingly, in the third quarter, what do

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 7>we get today? We got really strong US economic data.

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 7>Not true in Europe. Germany is probably in its fourth

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 7>quarter of negative economic growth. But that's what central banks

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 7>want to see. And so you know, we're seeing probably

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 7>a clearer path to rate cuts over seas than in

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 7>the US.

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 5>I think that's favoring those equities.

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, So wait a minute, though, so it doesn't.

0:01:56.560 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 3>It feels more dire overseas, right in terms of the economy, economics,

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 3>so right economically, so it makes sense that those stocks

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 3>are under more pressure versus what we're seeing in the US.

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 7>Note, Well, what I'm saying is they're outperforming on an

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 7>equal weight basis in almost every sector, which is counterintuitive

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 7>looking at the economic and earnings picture. But they're undervalued,

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 7>and I think, looking forward to great.

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Cuts, outperforming undervalua.

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 6>So essentially they're ahead of us when it comes to

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 6>great cuts from their own central banks. And perhaps that's

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:27.679
<v Speaker 6>why we're seeing, in your opinion, opportunity there.

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think so. I think that's where I want

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 7>to be focused for next year. And there are a

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 7>couple different reasons. One valuations, they're braced for more difficult environment.

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 7>I really do think we're going to see it turned

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 7>down in the job environment. You know, there's so many

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 7>leading indicators of a softening in the labor market. I

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 7>think we're starting to begin to see beginning to see that,

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 7>and I don't think the US markets are as well

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 7>positioned for that that overseas.

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 6>We did just hear from Mark Bitzer, the CEO of Whirlpool,

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 6>who said you know, we're not at the same place

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 6>we were when it comes to employees over the last

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 6>two years. I mean, you know, raises aren't the same.

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 6>It's not as difficult to get them as they've been.

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 6>But still, I mean, look at Jeff the data that

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 6>we get each week when it comes to the jobs market,

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 6>and then each month we're still adding more than two

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 6>hundred thousand dollars two undre thousand jobs a month in

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 6>the US.

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's interesting. I think there's a bit of a lag.

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 7>And what we're seeing is, you know, credit conditions tightening

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 7>banks are the tightening lending standards. We're hearing more from

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 7>CEOs that we moved out of a labor shortage environment

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 7>to maybe a labor glut, and that's maybe that's overstated.

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 6>I haven't heard about a glut yet.

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 7>But they've talked more about, you know, just tracking the

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 7>number of mentions of layoffs or headcount reductions or euphemisms

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 7>for layoffs versus those for hiring in recent quarters has

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 7>really started to pick up, and we're now seeing more

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 7>layoff announcements than hiring discussions or talking about jobs being

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 7>difficult to fill. I think that's the start of a

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 7>turn here that what may see towards the end of

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 7>the quarter.

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 3>I will say our Bloomberg Economics team, I was just

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 3>looking through my notes. The surgeon continuing unemployment insurance claims

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 3>indicates workers are find finding it increasingly difficult to find

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 3>new jobs. So if you start to parse through, as

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 3>just the CEO of Worldpool said, go below the headlines,

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 3>like you start to see some weak points, all right,

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 3>So hmm okay, So I'm want to go back to international.

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 3>So if they are out performing even though their economy

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 3>is underperforming, are investors they're already factoring good news or

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 3>good news to come at some point because they're starting

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 3>to kind of trade on what their expectations of kind

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 3>of where things go.

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to get an idea of yes as being

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 2>a forward looking mark.

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's a good way to put it. Rampant pessimism

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 7>in Europe. We've got war recession beginning to turn around,

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 7>some signs of improvement. Some get tied to China's economic

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 7>growth actually showing some signs of improving. I like to

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 7>watch air pollution in China that's been on the rise

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 7>for a couple of months now.

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 6>That's depressing, but that's like a good news.

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 4>It's good news.

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 6>I'm just going to throw that up right, like.

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 2>What the different metrics you what you watch yet?

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 7>But sort of the Magnificent four in Europe are luxury

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 7>good stocks and they benefit from a stronger Chinese consumer,

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 7>So they're already starting a price in that turn.

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 2>So we've had a mixed bag with some of that

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 2>luxury guys we have.

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think it's early to count on that,

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 7>but I think they're beginning to price in a better

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty four.

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 2>So you're saying, if you have new money to put

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 2>to work, you would go to Europe?

0:04:58.560 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 4>I would you would go to Europe?

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 3>And so what's your exposure to the US, Like how

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 3>much of you scaled back? I'm assuming you would still

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 3>suggest some position to the United States? People are are

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 3>you saying, no.

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 7>What the right allocation is to international versus US? And

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 7>I'm just saying more international than you have. Now it's

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 7>been fifteen years, it's probably time to reconsider that and

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 7>rebalance back into it. So I think almost any exposure

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 7>is going to benefit of portfolio.

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 6>Okay, that's interesting because sorry.

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead, Well, but then I want to get an

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 3>idea of like, what would you say in terms of

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 3>the US exposure?

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 7>You know, I worry a little bit more about the

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 7>very narrow US market. So I think if you can

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 7>get away from those, you know, the thirty percent of

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 7>the market, the magnificent seven, I think the market's looking better.

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 7>But I would favor energy and financials in the US,

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 7>which are where you can find the more attractive values

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 7>and the stronger cash flow, which I think is going

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 7>to be king of all right.

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 3>So you're not going to say thirty percent US. I

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 3>know it's all individual, but I just try and get

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 3>an idea of how aggressive you are saying Europe VERSUS

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 3>are outside US versus US.

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think you could look at it in

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 7>the way you might look at the all country world, right,

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 7>which is like sixty percent US and forty percent international.

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 5>I don't think that's a bad allegation.

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 6>Okay, what would you say to someone who would push

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 6>back on you and say, wait a second, if you

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 6>look at the stocks in.

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 2>The S and P five I say, wait a second, Wait.

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 6>A second, that so many of the stocks in the

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 6>S and P five hundred have huge exposure internationally. I mean,

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 6>especially those those big you know, big ones like Apple,

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, the majority of its revenue comes from outside

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 6>of the US.

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 7>For example, They're huge international companies that have a lot

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 7>of US revenue. So I think what it really comes

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 7>down to is where is the investor base. For example, NESLEI,

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 7>I think, is the second largest stock in the EF index.

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 7>Compare that to Coca Cola. They stealt beverages and snacks

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 7>to literally the same people around the world. Their revenue

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 7>growth is almost exactly the same every year, but one

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 7>trades three or four multiple points above the other Coca Cola.

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 7>Why Because eighty percent of Cokes investors are US based,

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 7>about eighty percent of Nestle's investors are European based. And again,

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 7>recession war, their pessimism is giving you a cheaper valuation.

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 6>I think those converted opportunities.

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, how confident do you feel about making calls right now? Well,

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, do you even have like the federals, You know,

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 3>you have Jay Powell to talk about. Listen, there's multiple

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 3>that the idea in terms of what kind of scenarios

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 3>could come why, you know, I forget how we said it,

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 3>but there's a lot out there in terms of how

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 3>we could move from here globally in markets, in the economy.

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, his focus is on the US.

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 4>So I think the.

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Thinking was like, all right, so how confident does he

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 3>feel about making forecasts?

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 2>How confident do you feel at this point?

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 7>I think that benefits a broader allocation rather than a

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 7>concentrated one. Right, when you're super confident in an outcome,

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 7>you can concentrate. I think now broader global acid allocation

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 7>makes even more sense in a more uncertain world.

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, when's the last time you made that kind of call?

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 4>Oh gosh?

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 7>I mean, so we liked international in the two thousands,

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 7>right in the twenty tens, a long time. We were

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 7>in a different cycle where interest rates were so low

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 7>and barrow, you know, borrowing was so cheap. Now you

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 7>want cash rich companies, You're going to find more.

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 4>Of those overseas.

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 2>China. You like China too, You know.

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 7>China's a tougher call. I do think the economy is improving,

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 7>but you have political risk is such a wild card

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 7>over there, and the stocks can swing sixty percent on

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 7>you know, up or or down.

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 5>We we've even seen that this year.

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 7>I know, I'm more confident in developed markets than Yeah, Okay,

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 7>well here's.

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 6>The develop market that's close to home the US. Are

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 6>we headed into a recession or are we in a recession?

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 6>Are adding?

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 7>I think we are in a cardboard box recession. Manufacturing

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.119
<v Speaker 7>and trade are inner recession things we put in a box.

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 7>If you can't put it in a box, it's not

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 7>in a recession. I lived three miles from Walt Disney World.

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 7>There's no recession at Space Mountain right now, and so

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 7>I'm a little worried that services slide into a recession

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 7>and meet we're manufacturing is rather than a rapid rebound

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 7>in manufacturing. So I'm gonna watch for that next year.

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 3>Jeff, what do you think we've got thirty seconds left?

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 3>What every investor should be asking themselves at this.

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Point right now?

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 7>I think I think asking themselves about their you know,

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 7>their allocation international. I'm going to come back to this

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 7>because when international is in favor, it tends out performed

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 7>five six hundred basis points a year. That's important to

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 7>stay on track.

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 3>To You're find I have to say, when I started,

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 3>I feel like we used to talk about international investing.

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 2>So much more.

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 3>And you know, our global investing, including the whatever you

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 3>know but it's just interesting how it's gone kind to

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 3>the wayside.

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Timer, what's good reason?

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 2>Maybe, but maybe it's a different environment. Jeff, thank you

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 2>so much, my pleasure.

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me.

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Really fun.

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Jeff clientop Chief Global Investment Strategies at Charles Schwab obviously

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:13.319
<v Speaker 3>onsite with us here in Philadelphia at Schwab Impact twenty

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 3>twenty three. A lot going on, Carol Master, timstead of It,

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 3>a lot more interviews to come actually from the Saved.

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen on

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business app,

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:33.199
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 3>So much going on in the market environment, and we've

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 3>got a great guest. Chloe Berry is Managing director and

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 3>head of the Infrastructure Income Strategy over at Brookfield Asset

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 3>Management firm, very well known to our audience, of course,

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 3>run by Bruce Flatt, and she joins us here at

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 3>Schwab Impact.

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Welcome, Welcome, so nice to have you. Thank you, it's

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 2>great to be here.

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 3>Tell us about your world and how you think about

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 3>the environment that's out there in a day where you know,

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 3>we get a hot GDP report and yet guilds go down,

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:04.239
<v Speaker 3>like things don't always make sense, and we're trying.

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 2>To read the tea leaves. So tell us how you

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 2>guys see it.

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so look in infrastructure. The beautiful thing about infrastructure

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 8>is that it's really an assa class for all cycles. Right,

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 8>So so current environment to only plays a small part

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 8>in what we're looking for, because infrastructure are essential assets.

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 8>They're the backbone of the global economy. They're you know,

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 8>electricity transmission lines powering the buildings we're sitting in. It's

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 8>the telecom towers you know, pinging the signal for this call,

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 8>or the you know, data centers housing our photos, and

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 8>so these are essential assets with long term contracted revenues,

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 8>inflation linkage and downside protection through these stable cash flows.

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 8>And so infrastructure is really like what we like to say,

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 8>is an asset class for all cycles, and so we

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 8>don't have to predict what's going to happen tomorrow to

0:10:58.160 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 8>have a stable, predictable cash flow stream.

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:02.719
<v Speaker 6>To what extent do you watch governments spending around the

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 6>world affecting your asset classes.

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 8>So it's a really good question, because so much is

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 8>going on in that right now. Right We've seen the

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 8>Inflation Reduction Act, the Chips Act, the Infrastructure and Jobs Act.

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 8>It's all positive. We love people talking about infrastructure. They

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 8>should be talking about infrastructure. We need to modernize our infrastructure,

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 8>and so it's great that it's more of a household topic.

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 8>And all that influx of capital, all the incentives that

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 8>the government is putting, multiple governments are putting really into

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 8>the infrastructure sector is really a tailwind. We at Brookfield,

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 8>we don't rely on those, you know, to make an

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 8>economic return r in our investments, but they are huge tailwinds.

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 2>For the sector.

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 6>But what one challenge with rising interest rates, of course,

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 6>is also the deficit. And there's a concern too that

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 6>Washington might pull back on some of the spending as

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 6>a result of rising rates and as a result of look,

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, there's no other way to put it, but

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 6>disagreements between Democrats and Republicans. Things are pretty frack even

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 6>within parties as we speak. How does that concern you?

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 8>So so again we're not relying on you know, the

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 8>government programs to to earn our return that we're looking

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 8>you know, with the you know down to it, we

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 8>are economic investors looking for a return, and we don't

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 8>rely on that. It's helpful, but really we're looking, you know,

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 8>for assets that withstand that and and and I think

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 8>just more generally, it's you know, the interest rate environment

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 8>and capitalized or i should say more constrained balance sheets,

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 8>whether that's governments or corporates right that are trying to

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.559
<v Speaker 8>de lever in this environment. That creates opportunity for us

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 8>because we're private capital investors, and there's a huge deficit

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 8>in what these governments and corporates who have traditionally funded

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 8>infrastructure can spend in today's market relative to the trillions

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 8>of dollars that needs to be spent to upgrade our infrastructure.

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 8>And so we play a really critical role and opportunities

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 8>are opening all the time.

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 4>Because of that.

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:06.199
<v Speaker 2>We're more opportunities public or private infrastructure.

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 8>So we're predominantly private market infrastructure, right, but we see

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 8>opportunity in the public markets to take assets or companies private.

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 8>What that really allows us to do is take a

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 8>longer term view on the asset. Right, we're not subject

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 8>to the whim of the market and the shareholders on

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 8>any one day or what is the sentiment of that day.

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 8>We can drive value and really long term compounded growth

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 8>over significant periods of time instead of making decisions based

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 8>on really what's on vogue today.

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 3>When I do wonder what expands or reduces maybe the

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 3>expected timeline for returns for your investors. Right, you guys

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 3>do these massive fundraises and I think there's is it

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 3>one hundred billion dollars twenty twenty three your goal for

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 3>is it going to happen?

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 8>So, look, infrastructure, I think that number is across Brookfield

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 8>more broadly in the infrastructure space. Look, we're raising huge

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.559
<v Speaker 8>amounts of capital and it's still coming in. It's still

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 8>coming in. Look that you know, capital is more constrained

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 8>than it has been in the past. But infrastructure assets

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 8>are what people are looking for today. Inflation linkage, right,

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 8>so topical, Maybe we're peaked on inflation, but it's still high,

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 8>right right, interesst rate protection rates all the higher for longer,

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 8>all that sentiment. These are assets that can be financed

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 8>with long term fixed rate debt, and so the assets

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 8>are protected from that interest rate environment. And when we

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 8>buy new assets, you know, we're pricing that in to

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 8>the assets that we're buying.

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 3>What would you say, Chloe, are the most interesting assets

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 3>out there when it comes to infrastructure investing that you

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 3>guys are just really keen on. You're known for, you know,

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 3>certain trends and plays, but what is it in particular?

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 8>So so we like to talk about what we call

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 8>the three d's, and this is decarbonization, deglobalization, and digitalization.

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 8>And so really this is about dec urbanization. It's everything

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 8>from you know, more renewable power generation of course, you

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 8>know that's an obvious one, but it's going beyond that.

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 8>It's building out electricity transmission lines to connect that renewable

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 8>power to population centers or to the grids, and it's

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 8>in our homes. It's residential infrastructure, rooftop solar panels, heat pumps, generators,

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 8>ev charging stations.

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 6>What about nuclear?

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 8>So nuclear where we like to play in nuclear is

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 8>on nuclear services, right, So nuclear generation itself is often

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 8>done by governments or government utilities because projects.

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 2>So this is again where public drives it. But you

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 2>guys find.

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 8>Exactly will we will service it and be around the ancillary,

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 8>but we will not generate the nuclear pack.

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 6>Where do you rely on that in terms of like

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 6>do you believe more of that will happen in the

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 6>US or those projects too big and too daunting for

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 6>local governments to take on just the last thirty seconds

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 6>that we yes, So.

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 8>We believe that nuclear will pay a critical role in

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 8>decarbonizing our environment and really you know, energizing the world

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 8>of the future. It's really critical for that baseline power even.

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 2>In the US. Yes, really do you see signs of it?

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 8>Look, there's there's opportunities kind of around the world where

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 8>we're seeing it. You know, we we just looked in

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 8>Poland and got some opportunities there. You know, geopolitical concerns

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 8>around the world that's really driving you know, on shoring

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 8>of critical industries and energy security and so you know,

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 8>could it happen?

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 4>I think so.

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Really interesting. Chloe, thank you.

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 6>So much for the infrastructure.

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Come back. So do we come back into here, come

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 2>back and join us. We do love it infrastructure.

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Chloe Berry, she's managing director and head of the Infrastructure

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Income Strategy over at Brookfield Asset Management. Joining us here

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 3>live in Philadelphia at Schwab Impact twenty twenty three.

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Easter on Bloomberg Radio,

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business app, and YouTube. You can also listen

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 3>You know, earning is certainly front and center right now,

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 3>especially in the blackout period as we wait for the

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 3>next FED meeting. Having said that, one of the things

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 3>we continue to talk about here at Schwab Impact twenty

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty three is all about the fixed income market higher

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 3>for longer rate environment. We heard Janet Yellen, former FED

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 3>official head of the FED, obviously US Treasury Secretary, making

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 3>some comments. Well, it continues to be top of mind

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 3>for investors. And what's interesting is Schwab has actually done

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Schwab Asset Management a survey specifically on ETFs. They do

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:44.679
<v Speaker 3>it an annually survey and it's called ETFs and Beyond.

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 3>So we want to bring in David Botset to talk

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 3>about it. He's head of Equity Product Management at Schwab

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 3>Asset Management with us in Philadelphia. I'm stumbling through because

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 3>I want to get to you. There's a lot going on.

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 3>This is our world, So forgive, forgive, forgive, we're going

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 3>to watch earnings and bring them to our our audience.

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 3>But you guys did do a survey about millennials and ETFs.

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 2>Tell us about that what you found.

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:07.479
<v Speaker 9>Yes, so this is a survey we've been doing for

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 9>over a decade. So not only do we get great

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 9>results this year, but we can compare it to past years.

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 9>And one of the things we're seeing you mentioned fixed income,

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 9>is the increased interest and familiarity with fixed income ETFs

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 9>and millennials in particular, using more fixed income in their

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.360
<v Speaker 9>portfolios than what we're seeing from Gen X or baby boomers.

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 6>I mean, is there anything hotter out there right now

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 6>than TLT?

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 5>There isn't.

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 6>Okay, that's what I thought. Let's just get right to

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 6>the Let's just get right to it here. Even though losses,

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, it's anyone who's invested in TLT this year

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 6>has just gotten hammered.

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 5>They have.

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 9>But right they're really thinking about the future. You mentioned

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 9>the FED. Where they going are they stopping? We clearly

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 9>we're on the precipice of perhaps a pause.

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 5>We're closer to the top.

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 9>We don't know if it's the top, but I think

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 9>they're looking at where do I position my portfolio for

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 9>what comes next?

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 3>When the millennials start talking about fixed income, does it

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 3>just mean that the error is over and then.

0:18:56.040 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 2>It's time to sorry saying peak read the peak?

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 10>Now?

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 2>I do wonder, like, how do you guys read and

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 2>interpret that?

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 9>You know, when we think about what the millennials have

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 9>gone through, think about the Great Financial Crisis. You know,

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 9>some of the older millennials have hit the tech boom

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 9>and bust. They've seen what their parents have experienced, and

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 9>in some cases we believe they're a little bit more

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 9>conservative with their allocations that when we're seeing with the

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 9>older generation they are conservned.

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's funny.

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 3>I was listening to I think the team on Surveillance

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 3>or maybe it was Paul and Matt on Markets Today,

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 3>But this whole idea of you have this generation, the

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 3>millennial generation that came out of the crisis that was

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 3>really rough. They saw maybe the impact on their parents,

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 3>they saw themselves if they were entering the job market

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 3>not easy. And then to see kind of coming out

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 3>of the pandemic.

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 6>T me to keep going student loan debt.

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's crippling, bumped out right, Yeah.

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 6>Like I mean, you know then you to try to

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 6>buy your first house and then mortgage rates hit eight percent.

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 9>Well thanks, be pretty great. They but let's look at

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 9>the flip side. Suddenly income is part of fixed income

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 9>investing again. So we're out of your interest rate environment.

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 9>You're looking at duration, you know, intermediate term five six percent,

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 9>ending on where you're going. So it's a much more

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 9>attractive opportunity in your portfolio today than it was two

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 9>years ago.

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 6>Okay, there's a glad glasses always tough full.

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, well, I always do wonder what you guys do

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 3>with like these studies and like you know, we've been

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 3>talking to many members of the Schwab investment team, you know,

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 3>who are looking at the markets and trying to fig

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 3>We talked, you know, figure out what goes next. Jeff

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 3>clientap talking about like overseas like not you know, non us.

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 3>How you now, maybe it's time to start looking at it.

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 3>So does it mean that in terms of the thinking

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 3>and strategy, this whole idea of fixed income right, that

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 3>it is going to be a strategy that sticks around

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 3>a lot longer than everybody.

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 2>May be anticipating.

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely so from an asset management standpoint, for Swab, asset management.

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 5>We use this type of data to inform the type

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 5>of things we want to bring to market.

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 11>Right.

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 9>Earlier this year we launched the Schwab High Yield ETF

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 9>and recently we reduced the expense ratio to three basis

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 9>points of that product responding to client needs.

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:56.360
<v Speaker 6>Does it just go to zero eventually?

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 5>I don't think it goes to zero.

0:20:57.880 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 6>Is there a race to zero?

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 5>I think we're getting very close to the bottom, right.

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 9>There's always going to be costs that we're going to

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 9>need to be able to cover for the product, and

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 9>we're going to need.

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 5>To have an expense ratio that's going to cover those costs.

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 2>But that makes it tough, right to be very careful

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the pricing.

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 9>You have to be very careful, and you've got a

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 9>price at a level that you're expecting a certain asset

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 9>level to get to.

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 3>One of the things that we keep hearing too and

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 3>I feel like we heard it for a while, David,

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 3>and then I feel like it went away.

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 2>But this whole idea of.

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Personalization in terms of portfolios, does stuff come out of

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 3>the survey on that as well?

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.199
<v Speaker 9>Yes, it has greatly. So that's one of the questions

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.160
<v Speaker 9>we ask is about personalization. And when we think about

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 9>the personalization, we think about it in a couple of

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 9>different ways. One is what type of ETFs investors are using,

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 9>So using things like thematic ETFs to get exposure to

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 9>specific areas of the market where they may not want

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 9>to take the individual stock rist of an Amazon, Afford

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 9>and Intel, right, but they want exposure to that.

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 5>Industry very narrowly within their portfolio.

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 9>So thematic is a play other things like ESG is

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 9>playing forward as well.

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Is ESG is as a try active or interesting two

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 3>millennials or others at this point, Yeah, I think know

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 3>the reckoning and we all keep talking about where people

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 3>want to really kind of understand what exactly is e

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 3>SG so that when I invest, what is it really doing?

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 9>I think that's one thing the industry continues to be

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 9>challenged with. Everybody defines it in a different way. If

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 9>we had a common nomenclature that everybody could get behind,

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 9>it would be much easier.

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Does money back off because as a result, I don't

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 3>think so. It's also a performance like I think. I

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 3>think when when it was a cheap money environment, everything

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 3>seemed to do well.

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 9>It did, but you still look at that differentiation by demographics.

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 9>The younger generation continually looks at that opportunity and they

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 9>want to be closer to investing as their values.

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 6>How long do you think we're going to be in

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 6>a high rate environment?

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Boy, if he knew, he would not be talking to him, you.

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 6>Would still be out with us. Were cool, We talk

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 6>about TLT, we talk about new ETL.

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 5>So I don't know how long we'll be in a

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 5>high rate environment.

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:55.439
<v Speaker 9>I set through a session yesterday and they ask the

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 9>group of rias that were in the room how many

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 9>of them thought interest rates were going to be come

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:02.880
<v Speaker 9>down from the FED in the first half of next year. Yeah,

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 9>I'd say it's probably ten to fifteen percent of that audience. Okay,

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 9>they ask about the second half of that of next year,

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:11.959
<v Speaker 9>it was like ninety percent of the audience. So I

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 9>think it's telling from the community and from the professionals

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 9>we have at this conference what their view is.

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:19.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but remember was it earlier this year that if

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 3>you had done that, you probably got the same response,

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 3>like when the regional bank.

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Crest is very true, it's just been a tricky environment.

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 9>It is a very tricky environment. The numbers came out

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 9>this morning. The US economy much stronger than anticipated. I

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 9>don't think anybody's necessarily lower.

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So it's really fascinating. Great to check in on survey.

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much, Thanks for your patience.

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 3>As we were going through kind of all of the

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 3>earnings completely understand.

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for the time, so appreciate it.

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 2>David Bwow.

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 3>David Bot said he's head of Equity product Management at

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 3>Schwab Asset Management. Onsite with us here in Philadelphia.

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business app and YouTube. You can also and

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 1>jo Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 3>We are live at swap in Back twenty twenty three,

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:13.360
<v Speaker 3>and there's a lot of.

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 6>You might hear some stuff in the background. It's like,

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 6>you know, we're getting toward the end of the keynote here,

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 6>people are packing up, the wine is out, the Wi

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 6>Fi is working really well because people are starting to leave.

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 6>So's that's we're just setting the scene here.

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 10>Actually before we went on air, They're like bringing us wine,

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 10>which was like yes, no, yes, no wine until six o'clock, Carol,

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:40.479
<v Speaker 10>we can't do all right, We're gonna talk.

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna get serious for a moment.

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Because the markets, Charlie was breaking down some of the earnings,

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 3>a lot of stuff. We saw a rebound in tech

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 3>giants kind of fading in the after hours, Amazon whipsawing around.

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 2>It's a hard market to make sense of.

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Bringing Kevin Gordon Hello, Hello, senior investment strategist at Charles Schwab.

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious after two days they are wrapping up, but

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 3>there's been tons and tons of conversations about kind of

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 3>where we are and where we go from here. So

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 3>tell us about some of the chats you've had and

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 3>have you had all kind of altered your outlook about

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 3>maybe the next.

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Six months into the market.

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 12>Know, we kicked it off on the big stage Tuesday night.

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 12>I took Wi Jeff klentop Are chief global strategist, and

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 12>Mike Townsend, who's our man in Washington, And at the

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 12>time it was.

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 4>Who's going to be the speaker?

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:24.439
<v Speaker 12>And you know, in Washington fashion, it's got solved, you know,

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 12>pretty quick as no one was expecting quick as not

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 12>took a quick catch a few weeks After a few weeks, yeah,

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 12>but after so many you know, disruptions and trying to

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 12>figure out who it was going to be. But you know,

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 12>I think the outlook actually hasn't really adjusted in my view,

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 12>because you've got these really interesting opposing forces at work

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 12>in the at least the US equity market, which is

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 12>you know what I focus on where since July. Definitely

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 12>it's been exacerbated over the past month, but since the

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 12>July peak for the SMP, you've had a pretty significant

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 12>washout and sentiment both on the attitude and on the

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 12>behavioral side, and the degree of pessimism we're starting to

0:25:57.560 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 12>see in all the metrics that we track would actually

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 12>start to lay the groundwork for a pretty nice rally.

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 2>I like when people get down on the market.

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:06.200
<v Speaker 12>The only yeah, and the only trouble with that is

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 12>you need a catalyst to get you there. And so

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 12>the opposing force for that is that you don't have

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.439
<v Speaker 12>bread statistics that are acting well at all, whether you're

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:14.199
<v Speaker 12>looking at the percentage of you know, S and P

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 12>five hundred members, rustle two thousand members above their fifty

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 12>or two hundred day moving a yeah, exactly not so

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 12>that deteriorating bread puts more downward pressure on the market.

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 12>And that's the two opposing forces right now.

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 6>So what could be that catalyst? I mean, does it

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 6>have to be a rate cut from the Fed?

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 12>No, I actually don't think that's what we need. I

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 12>think definitely more clarity on whether we've got the pause

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 12>in place, But I don't think that matters for the

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 12>equity market at all because actually what's interesting is if

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 12>you go back in the long history of the FED

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 12>and tightening cycles and when they've been done, you know,

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 12>you could look at an average move for the S

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 12>and P and yeah, it's up just a little bit

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 12>six and twelve months after that final hike, but there's

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:52.199
<v Speaker 12>a huge range around that, with the max up thirty percent,

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 12>that then the men down thirty percent twelve months after.

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 4>So you never want to use.

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 12>The FED you know, final hike as or the first

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 12>cut as a signal for the market itself. I actually

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 12>think the catalyst is probably somewhere within it, because.

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 3>I feel like so many other people like, hey, as

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 3>soon as the FED stops, that's like, you know, yeah, historically, what.

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 6>He just said, we just he just said what the

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 6>catalyst is and I didn't hear.

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 12>Well somewhere in earning season. But to Carrol's point, I

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 12>will say, you know what's interesting is I keep hearing

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 12>this narrative where well, as soon as the FED is done,

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 12>we're off to the races. That's not the case, as

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 12>you know, as history would show, and history is actually

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 12>consistent in saying that every single time is different. And

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 12>what I mean by that is, if you know, we

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 12>got used to in this kind of great moderation era,

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 12>you know, sort of post two thousands, early two thousands,

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:39.199
<v Speaker 12>in those tightening cycles, from start to finish, what was

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 12>normal for the US equity market was from you know,

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 12>the first hike to the last hike, stocks went up

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 12>the entire time. It wasn't until after where you really

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 12>started to see the long and variable lags kick in

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 12>and then the market was looking ahead and that's when

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:54.880
<v Speaker 12>you turned over into a bear market. So what kind

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 12>of confused this whole situation was that we had a

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 12>bear market last year as the FED was aggressively tightening.

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.199
<v Speaker 12>That was not normal for the past decade or so.

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 3>I feel like we've had a market that is at

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 3>point looking ahead and then all of a sudden kind

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 3>of smacked down.

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 12>And you know, I think looking ahead actually, and what's

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 12>interesting is that everything has sort of been masked by

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 12>the super seven that we all know now has been

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 12>doing so well this year. But actually, if you just

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:18.959
<v Speaker 12>peel that market, you know, onion layer back one just

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 12>one bit, I think out of the surface, the market's

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 12>telling almost the same story as the economy because our view,

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 12>and you know, I work for Thos Anzander's our chief

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:29.239
<v Speaker 12>investment strategists, and what we've been thinking about and how

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 12>we've been explaining the economy for the past year and

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 12>a half is that we've been suffering from rolling recessions.

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 12>Different parts of the economy have been deep in recession,

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 12>like housing, housing related consumer goods, while you've had the

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 12>offsetting strength from services in labor. And that's actually kind

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 12>of what the market's telling you too, where if you

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 12>take out the big players, the sort of beneficiaries of

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 12>rates even going up because they're earning more on their

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 12>cash than they have to oh on their debt. When

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 12>you take all that away, SMP equal weight it is,

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 12>you know down here to date, Russell two thousand is

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 12>now retesting its lows from last summer breaking through, So

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 12>that is more consistent with the economic message in my mind.

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 2>So US market, do you what's your advice to investors?

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 12>You know, we've been a lot more as getting away

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 12>at least in this environment from kind of your traditional

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 12>sector focus and to factor focus, you know, investing where

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 12>you know, I'll give an example right now. The biggest

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 12>worry for the economy, arguably aside from everything going on geopolitically,

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 12>but if we want to look domestically, is the interest environment,

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 12>the interest expense environment, where rates are going, what companies

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 12>have turned out their debt and don't have to suffer

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 12>from it as much. And I think actually one of

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 12>the reasons that energy has been the outperformer since the

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 12>July peak in the market is not only because of

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 12>oil prices, but is also because it has a high

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 12>and rising interest coverage ratio and it actually scores pretty

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 12>well on some of those profitability metrics. So you can

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 12>find you can screen for that metric or that factor

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 12>and find it in any sector.

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 2>So that is that is that your only factor that

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 2>you're no, not.

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 12>The only one, no anything quality profitability based, So looking

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 12>at forward profit margins, what the expectations are for companies

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 12>also trailing profit margins to show that they actually have

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 12>some strength. But I would also add in there, and

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 12>back to my comment earlier about earning season kind of

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 12>being the little gem or the little catalyst, is revenue growth.

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 12>You know, for all the cheering in the second quarter,

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 12>when we had an earnings beat rate that went up

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 12>closer to eighty percent, you had a revenue beat rate

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 12>that was still trending down and you actually had almost

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 12>no revenue growth for the entire market, and an inflation

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 12>adjusted terms, it was down for the third quarter. Yeah,

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 12>So I think that's going to be the thing to

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 12>watch for because if you have revenue growth that's continuing

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:29.719
<v Speaker 12>to slow, but you have earnings growth that keeps rising,

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 12>that just means you're aggressively cutting costs and you can't

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 12>cost cut your way to glory. So I think you

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 12>need to show actually right.

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 6>So, your colleague Jeff Kinetop was on with us a

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 6>little earlier, and he was very bullish on European equities

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 6>and said he wouldn't give us a target, but he

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 6>basically said, you know, if you have in your portfolio

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 6>you need you need to increase your allocation to European

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 6>I mean, do you guys like duke it out because

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 6>you're the US guy.

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 12>No, I mean this is this is our you know,

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 12>not just I mean I think that it's a time

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:01.479
<v Speaker 12>to check you're wrong. No, definitely not. I mean I

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 12>think no, I think the world of Jeff no pun intended.

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 4>I think he is. I mean, he's he's right about

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 4>this aspect.

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 12>And I would I would weave in our Collie Kathy

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 12>Jones on the fixed income sites, Yes, because you have

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 12>to think about where we're at across the spectrum of

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 12>asset classes for fixed income now, I would I would

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 12>actually just point to fixed income almost as a way

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 12>of playing defense as an equity investor, because you have

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 12>an income in fixed income again, and at a time

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 12>when risk reward for equity still doesn't look as good

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 12>from a valuation perspective. You know, all the valuation metrics

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 12>we track for the market here are still relatively expensive.

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 12>Even you know, with all of the selloff that we've

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 12>seen in the past few months, you're still looking pretty expensive.

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 12>So I just think international, Yes, when we go through

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 12>something like dual cycles, what we call dual cycles, where

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 12>you've got you know, some form of a recession, some

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 12>a form of a bear market, which we did have

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 12>last year, and arguably we're still in that process. It

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 12>tends to usher in new leadership. It's not this instant,

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 12>you know, turn the switch and then you go into

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 12>new you know, sort of new leadership. But I think

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 12>you need to start considering that because you know, x

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 12>US fixed income have been shunned by a lot of investors,

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 12>and for some investors in a younger generation, these yields

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 12>are sort of a new thing.

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 6>I mean, let's be honest. For you and me, well

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 6>you know.

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 4>And hey, well it's fine, it's fine.

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 6>But Carol, you make this point all the time, Carroll,

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 6>with with people who I'm trying to think myself, I'm

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 6>trying to think myself out of a hole available with

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 6>the truth here. But you make the point all the time, Carroll,

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 6>that there are many people on Wall Street. There's an

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 6>entire generation of people on Wall Street, not just people

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 6>media really talk to media, but there's an entire generation

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 6>of people on Wall Street that have not seen a

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 6>market like this, that have not seen rates like perspective.

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 3>I was listening to Matt Miller and Paul Sweeni on air,

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, and Paul just got a mortgage and it

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 3>was I think six percent or something or four percent,

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, four six percent, and he was like.

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 6>It's pretty good.

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 3>He was complaining, this was this was a few months ago.

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 3>He was like complaining, and then he's like, no, I

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 3>actually feel pretty good about it right now. So it's

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 3>like perspective, best investment thought right now, idea thirty seconds.

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 4>Don't get caught trying to time the market.

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 12>And I say that not as just general advice, but

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 12>because last year at the October low, a lot of

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 12>people are comparing this most recent action today with the

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 12>October low we saw last year in the S and

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 12>P and we've just passed the anniversary of it. So

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 12>what I would say is pay attention to bread statistics,

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 12>the fact that we're a year off of a major

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 12>market low and you are not seeing any action under

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 12>the service that you would tend to see in the

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 12>year after a major market low, whether it's a recessionary

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 12>or a non recessionary.

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 4>Bear, I want to say.

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 2>It's different this time around. I know I'm going to

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 2>get in trouble all that, but if.

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 4>You're done, respect it. If it's like, I don't know.

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Did you did you ever live through a pandemic before?

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 12>In kind of it, the only thing I'll say is

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 12>that take a look at bank stocks and small caps.

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 12>They're never looking like this after a year you've made

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 12>off of low I will say.

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 2>That interesting thoughts. This was fun.

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much, guys.

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 3>We got to run Kevin Gordon, Senior Investment Strategies at

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Charles Schwab right here at Schwab Impact twenty twenty three.

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us live.

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>We do Nunes from three to six Eastern Listen on

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business app,

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 1>or wants just live on YouTube.

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 3>No secret when it comes to atfs that they've been

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 3>gaining ground on mutual funds for years. You know, I

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 3>actually started my career flows this news no on.

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 2>The mutual fund industry. It was a mutual fund show.

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 2>It was twenty five thirty.

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:26.840
<v Speaker 6>Year and you know what's pretty amazing.

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Because it was like everybody all of a sudden had

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:30.760
<v Speaker 3>four oh one k's and they were investing.

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 6>What's the show that Bloomberg TV has now about funds

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 6>etfiq etfi right, So we're not doing a mutual fun show.

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 6>We're doing an ETF show.

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 2>It's really fascinating terms of the shift.

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, the numbers are there to back it up. So

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 6>the divide between flows into the two different investment types

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 6>wide into an all time high in twenty twenty two,

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 6>hitting a record rift carol of one point five trillion dollars.

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 6>It's between bonds or exceeds me between ETFs and mutual funds.

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 2>From nine hundred and fifty billion and twenty twenty one.

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 2>That's according to our own Bloueberg intelligence.

0:34:57.360 --> 0:34:59.919
<v Speaker 3>It makes sense ETFs are tax efficient and a tray

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 3>like stocks, But what about separately managed accounts, And that's

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 3>what we wanted to talk about SMAs. Our next guest

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 3>argues that they are even more tax efficient than atfs.

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Manji Brea is head of custom SMA Investments over at

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:13.800
<v Speaker 3>all Spring Global Investments.

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 2>He is with us on site at Schwab Impact. It's

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 2>getting a little darker. They're bringing the lights.

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 5>Down, I know.

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, end of the day, we say the best for last.

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:24.279
<v Speaker 3>We like to do it intimately here, So talk to us,

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 3>make your case about SMAs.

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 11>Sure, yeah. I mean, you know, as you were talking

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.319
<v Speaker 11>about the flows into mutual funds and ETFs. So what

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 11>has happened Carol in the last call it like a

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:36.240
<v Speaker 11>decade or so, is the sms have actually tripled in size.

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 11>If you look at the overall sm sizes about two

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 11>point five trillion and growing double digits, so it's probably

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 11>the second largest growing you know, kind of vehicle after ETFs. Yeah,

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 11>and they're kind of three factors that are actually driving that.

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 11>So one is really I think from you mentioned, ETFs

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 11>are tax efficient, but sms are probably relatively more tax

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 11>efficient than ETFs. So tax efficiency in the SME vehicle

0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 11>is probably the most just because you're holy individual stocks

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 11>and bonds, so you can harvest losses and you can

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:05.720
<v Speaker 11>kind basically maximize your after tax returns.

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 11>The second thing is customization. You've talked about like personalization, customization,

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 11>you know, touching all aspects of investing. I think SMAs

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 11>actually provide you a great vehicle to customize your portfolio

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 11>based on investor needs, values, you know, risk tolerance, tax objectives.

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:24.280
<v Speaker 11>And the last thing is there is actually multiple trends

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 11>in the industry that's actually helping assets move from legacy

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:31.879
<v Speaker 11>portfolios into kind of more tax official wealth exactly. Yeah,

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:34.799
<v Speaker 11>the great transfer of wealth, you know, moving assets from

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 11>like brokerage to more managed solutions in the wirehouse space.

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 11>So for that again, SMAs is a great vehicle to

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:43.720
<v Speaker 11>do that. So those three factors.

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, But what happens when a lot of retail interest

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:49.840
<v Speaker 6>is in stuff that's kind of easy, which is like ETFs,

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 6>And don't don't SMAs have to be served by advisors?

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 5>They do?

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:55.840
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so I agree. I mean, I think the knowledge

0:36:55.880 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 11>base across the advisors is actually growing. It used to

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 11>be the case that they didn't really understand what sms are.

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.319
<v Speaker 11>ETFs are easy, it's easier to buy its one line

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 11>item versus like hundreds, right, But actually that has changed

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 11>in the last few years, tim, So what has happened is,

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 11>you know, direct indexing something.

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 4>That we all hear about.

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 6>Is that an SMA.

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 11>That's an SMA. So if you think about SMAs, there

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 11>are three big categories, right, direct and xing Inequities is

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 11>the largest, followed by munis and then taxable fixing.

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 6>Explain direct equities because I think a lot a lot

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 6>of people they think about, okay, buy buying an s

0:37:27.640 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 6>and P five hundred etf Right. Direct indexing essentially gives

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 6>you tax benefits, but you're able to more control what's

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:36.280
<v Speaker 6>in that basket of stocks. Right, that's correct.

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so you're essentially tracking an index passively. But what

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:41.840
<v Speaker 11>you're doing is while you're doing that, your housing processes.

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:45.319
<v Speaker 11>So you might be holding two hundred stocks to track

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 11>an S and P. Right, you're not holding all five hundred,

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 11>but in the process, when markets go down or go up, right,

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 11>depending on what's happening, there will always be stocks in

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 11>that two hundred that you hold which are in losses,

0:37:57.480 --> 0:37:59.880
<v Speaker 11>so you can basically harvest them, right. And while you

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:02.880
<v Speaker 11>do that, you can accumulate those losses, so that actually

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 11>helps you boost your after tax returns. Right. Twenty twenty

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 11>two S and P was down eighteen percent. The after

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:11.720
<v Speaker 11>tax return if you had direct and xing was probably

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:14.319
<v Speaker 11>four percent better than that eighteen percent, Right, so tax

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 11>alpha was close to four to five percent.

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 2>So if it's so good, why doesn't everybody do it?

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:22.760
<v Speaker 11>Because it's catching you know, listen, it's catching hold. It's

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 11>been a process. If you look at direct and xing,

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:27.279
<v Speaker 11>it's probably around two hundred billion or more.

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 4>But I think it's growing.

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 11>It's growing double digits, and to me, I think custom

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 11>messim is leading with direct and xing is the future, right,

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 11>That's where the direction of travel is. So I do

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 11>think that it's going to pick up. But if you

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 11>look at the advisors, there are three hundred thousand advisors

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 11>in US. Yeah, I would say about forty percent of

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:48.279
<v Speaker 11>them I've actually embraged rerect and xing or heard of

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:50.319
<v Speaker 11>directing and xing, So there are sixty percent of them they

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:52.879
<v Speaker 11>don't know what direct indexing is. So there's a huge

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 11>education piece, right, So I think that's really where the

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 11>opportunity set is to But is it.

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Something you could do through your four OHEK.

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 3>You could potentially, yes, but it has to be if

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:04.919
<v Speaker 3>it's part of the plan.

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 11>If it is part of the plan, but it has

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 11>to be a separately managed account, meaning you have to

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 11>I believe some of them do they actually because I'm.

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Just thinking that there's so much in terms of retirement

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 3>assets what they want to impact an investment trend or

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 3>if it makes sense, I feel like it eventually finds

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 3>its way into four oh one K plans, And I

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:23.760
<v Speaker 3>guess that's my question.

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:27.360
<v Speaker 11>Potentially actually, you know, if you think about the taxable

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:28.439
<v Speaker 11>and you can tell.

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Me, oh, that's a really super stupid question.

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. I haven't seen that yet.

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 2>But what I'm saying that eventually the trends find their

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 2>way there.

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 11>It's definitely feasible. I haven't seen it yet, but it's feasible.

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 11>It can definitely get into the four one case.

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 6>Is it always a passive strategy.

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 4>Direct indexing case.

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:48.279
<v Speaker 11>But if you look at other parts of SMS, right,

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 11>so like you know, text income ESMEs, they're actively managed.

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 11>Some of them are like if it's a ladder, right,

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 11>you can actively manage that. So you do have passive

0:39:57.160 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 11>and active SMS. Direct indexing have to be a passive SM.

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:03.359
<v Speaker 6>Okay, what if somebody's listening to this and they're saying,

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 6>wait a second, what is the difference between this and

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 6>a mutual fund or this in an ETF?

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 11>Right, So in an ETF, you're essentially holding, you know,

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 11>a share class of a fund that you know that

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 11>actually holds the usual stocks of bonds. Right in SMAs,

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 11>you're directly holding the bonds or stocks, and you know,

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 11>in an account, so you essentially have direct ownership of

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 11>bonds or stocks, But.

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 6>In a mutual fund, you're directly on in the stocks too.

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:29.799
<v Speaker 11>Right, that's right, but you're holding part of the Commingle fund, right,

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:32.240
<v Speaker 11>So you don't really actually have direct ownership of stocks

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 11>a bond. So that's what like, you know, when they're

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 11>basically capital you know, gains distributions and things like that,

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 11>you get a piece of that right as part of

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 11>holding the fund, but you don't really own like an

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 11>actual share of Tesla or Apple for that matter.

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:48.280
<v Speaker 3>What's been the biggest, biggest question you've gotten about SMAs

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 3>at this event? We just got about thirty seconds left.

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:51.439
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:53.479
<v Speaker 11>I think the thing people want to know is really

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:55.880
<v Speaker 11>what the direction of travel is, right, So I do

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:59.280
<v Speaker 11>believe personalization and private So the two trends that are

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:02.799
<v Speaker 11>actually facting retail essumes, you know, So personalization to me,

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 11>it's all about custom esmeys and customer a sismie is

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 11>all about like direct indexing inequities munis and taxable fixed income.

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 11>I think that's really what the direction of probl is.

0:41:12.560 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 11>So people want to know where that's heading, right, So

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 11>to me, I think the growth is pretty obvious.

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, you're magical because you got the lights back on

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 3>for us, although we just lost these lights.

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah that's okay, I can't win them on Carl.

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, listen, this.

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Was really interesting. I really appreciate it. Magic Break is

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:31.279
<v Speaker 2>head of custom SMA bestcas there at.

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:34.360
<v Speaker 3>All Spring Global Investments, joining us here at Job Impact

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty.

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:36.279
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much, Thank you so much.

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:36.800
<v Speaker 11>Thanks for having me.

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, good evening.

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast of a Little Apple,

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Spotify and anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:50.800
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:41:57.400 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg Jermale