1 00:00:00,800 --> 00:00:03,760 Speaker 1: Hey, guys, ready or not, twenty twenty four is here 2 00:00:03,920 --> 00:00:06,400 Speaker 1: and we here at Breaking Points, are already thinking of 3 00:00:06,440 --> 00:00:08,639 Speaker 1: ways we can up our game for this critical election. 4 00:00:08,840 --> 00:00:11,760 Speaker 1: We rely on our premium subs to expand coverage, upgrade 5 00:00:11,800 --> 00:00:15,160 Speaker 1: the studio ad staff, give you, guys, the best independent 6 00:00:15,200 --> 00:00:17,400 Speaker 1: coverage that is possible. If you like what we're all about, 7 00:00:17,440 --> 00:00:19,520 Speaker 1: it means the absolute world to have your support. What 8 00:00:19,560 --> 00:00:22,000 Speaker 1: are you waiting for? Become a premium subscriber today at 9 00:00:22,000 --> 00:00:41,559 Speaker 1: Breakingpoints dot com. Good morning everybody, Happy Thursday. We have 10 00:00:41,600 --> 00:00:43,240 Speaker 1: an amazing show for everybody today. What do we have 11 00:00:43,280 --> 00:00:45,960 Speaker 1: grissal Indeed, we do big breaking news for you this morning. 12 00:00:46,000 --> 00:00:49,720 Speaker 1: Facebook slash Meta has decided to let the big guy himself, 13 00:00:49,760 --> 00:00:53,960 Speaker 1: Donald Trump back on the platform. Not a huge surprise 14 00:00:54,000 --> 00:00:55,560 Speaker 1: at this point. I mean, the guy is running again. 15 00:00:56,120 --> 00:00:57,280 Speaker 1: Like there was a lot of pressure for them to 16 00:00:57,360 --> 00:00:59,360 Speaker 1: ultimately do this. But we'll dig into the decision because 17 00:00:59,360 --> 00:01:01,440 Speaker 1: they've thrown into caveats there as well, trying to kind 18 00:01:01,440 --> 00:01:04,600 Speaker 1: of have it both ways same time. Huge huge news 19 00:01:04,640 --> 00:01:07,279 Speaker 1: with regard to Ukraine, we have decided to send them tanks. 20 00:01:07,280 --> 00:01:09,520 Speaker 1: That is a line in the sand that we'd drawn 21 00:01:09,560 --> 00:01:12,440 Speaker 1: previously and even as recently as five days ago. There 22 00:01:12,440 --> 00:01:14,119 Speaker 1: are all kinds of news articles that were like, yeah, 23 00:01:14,160 --> 00:01:15,800 Speaker 1: we're not going to do that. Well now we are, 24 00:01:15,840 --> 00:01:17,560 Speaker 1: so talk about what that means. We also have some 25 00:01:17,640 --> 00:01:21,440 Speaker 1: new financial disclosures from George Santos that, if anything, just 26 00:01:21,560 --> 00:01:24,000 Speaker 1: deepened the mystery of where his cash that he put 27 00:01:24,040 --> 00:01:27,760 Speaker 1: into his campaign actually came from. We've got the Mississippi 28 00:01:27,760 --> 00:01:31,160 Speaker 1: auditor some incredible video of him sounding off on that 29 00:01:31,280 --> 00:01:35,600 Speaker 1: Brett Favre welfare scandal. Nancy Pelosi caught in a gigantic 30 00:01:36,000 --> 00:01:41,520 Speaker 1: trade just before major antitrust action against Google and in 31 00:01:41,520 --> 00:01:44,000 Speaker 1: a related anti trust no. We also have Jim Kramer 32 00:01:44,240 --> 00:01:48,560 Speaker 1: melting down on CNBC about government action against some of 33 00:01:48,600 --> 00:01:51,160 Speaker 1: these big companies. We have Ryan Cooper on the show 34 00:01:51,200 --> 00:01:54,480 Speaker 1: today to dig into an idea that has just been floated, 35 00:01:54,720 --> 00:01:57,600 Speaker 1: which is using a sovereign wealth fund in order to 36 00:01:58,080 --> 00:02:00,720 Speaker 1: fund social security. So be interesting get his take on 37 00:02:00,760 --> 00:02:02,560 Speaker 1: all of that. Yeah, but let's start with Facebook. This 38 00:02:02,600 --> 00:02:05,120 Speaker 1: is obviously huge in the realm of tech and censorship, 39 00:02:05,200 --> 00:02:06,600 Speaker 1: so let's go ahead and put this up there on 40 00:02:06,640 --> 00:02:09,240 Speaker 1: the screen. Meta, the parent company of Facebook, always have 41 00:02:09,280 --> 00:02:12,000 Speaker 1: to say that is ending its suspension of Donald Trump's 42 00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:15,959 Speaker 1: accounts with new guardrails to deter quote repeat offensive written 43 00:02:15,960 --> 00:02:18,560 Speaker 1: by Nick Clegg, the former British politician the president of 44 00:02:18,600 --> 00:02:21,639 Speaker 1: Global Affairs over at Meta, He says, quote, we will 45 00:02:21,680 --> 00:02:24,440 Speaker 1: be ending the suspension of mister Trump's Facebook and Instagram 46 00:02:24,440 --> 00:02:26,560 Speaker 1: accounts in the coming weeks. We have put in new 47 00:02:26,560 --> 00:02:29,840 Speaker 1: guardrails to place to deter repeat offenses. The public should 48 00:02:29,840 --> 00:02:31,840 Speaker 1: be able to hear what politicians are saying so they 49 00:02:31,840 --> 00:02:35,440 Speaker 1: can make informed choices. Imagine what a controversial decision, So 50 00:02:35,520 --> 00:02:37,120 Speaker 1: here's what they say. The public should be able to 51 00:02:37,120 --> 00:02:38,799 Speaker 1: hear what the politicians are saying, the good, the bad, 52 00:02:38,840 --> 00:02:40,679 Speaker 1: and the ugly, so they can make informed choices to 53 00:02:40,720 --> 00:02:42,920 Speaker 1: the ballot box. I agree, but that does not mean 54 00:02:43,000 --> 00:02:44,760 Speaker 1: there are no limits to what people can say on 55 00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:48,239 Speaker 1: our platform when there's a clear risk of real world harm. 56 00:02:48,480 --> 00:02:51,120 Speaker 1: A deliberately high bar for Meta to intervene in public 57 00:02:51,120 --> 00:02:54,440 Speaker 1: disclosure we act now. Of course, that is an outrageous standard, 58 00:02:54,520 --> 00:02:56,720 Speaker 1: one of which is deeply capricious, and of which is 59 00:02:56,760 --> 00:03:00,880 Speaker 1: completely open to their own interpretation. Go through a whole 60 00:03:00,880 --> 00:03:03,880 Speaker 1: bunch of fake legalies. And the reason I'm saying that 61 00:03:04,040 --> 00:03:08,400 Speaker 1: is there's no law. All of this is contrived this 62 00:03:08,520 --> 00:03:13,880 Speaker 1: blog post refers to its oversight board, to its internal processes. Listen, 63 00:03:14,200 --> 00:03:17,720 Speaker 1: it's all fake. They claimed that, oh, well, after a 64 00:03:17,800 --> 00:03:21,640 Speaker 1: rigorous standard put into place, we decided on January eighth 65 00:03:21,680 --> 00:03:25,400 Speaker 1: to suspend Donald Trump's account on Facebook as if it 66 00:03:25,520 --> 00:03:29,639 Speaker 1: was part of some long standing decision, and then finally 67 00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:32,800 Speaker 1: enter that's outrageous. All of it was done in a 68 00:03:32,840 --> 00:03:37,960 Speaker 1: completely supposedly uncoordinated act by Twitter, Facebook and many other 69 00:03:38,040 --> 00:03:40,520 Speaker 1: big tech platforms with regards to Trump, and of kind 70 00:03:40,560 --> 00:03:44,320 Speaker 1: of a post January sixth hysteria. But whenever they do 71 00:03:44,440 --> 00:03:46,600 Speaker 1: restore the account, they say some things which we should 72 00:03:46,640 --> 00:03:49,040 Speaker 1: hold them to account in the future. They say, quote, 73 00:03:49,080 --> 00:03:51,240 Speaker 1: the normal state of affairs is that the public should 74 00:03:51,240 --> 00:03:53,360 Speaker 1: be able to hear from a former president of the 75 00:03:53,440 --> 00:03:56,680 Speaker 1: United States and a declared candidate for office again on 76 00:03:56,720 --> 00:03:59,400 Speaker 1: our platform. Now that time period of suspension has elapsed, 77 00:03:59,440 --> 00:04:01,760 Speaker 1: the question is not whether we choose to reinstate mister 78 00:04:01,800 --> 00:04:05,320 Speaker 1: Trump's account, but whether there remain such extraordinary circumstances that 79 00:04:05,440 --> 00:04:10,280 Speaker 1: justify extending the suspension beyond the original two year period. Gristle. 80 00:04:10,360 --> 00:04:13,040 Speaker 1: They say that they have now quote new guardrails in place, 81 00:04:13,080 --> 00:04:15,160 Speaker 1: and that there will be a strike system, and that 82 00:04:15,240 --> 00:04:19,160 Speaker 1: should he ever quote endanger the public again in the future, 83 00:04:19,200 --> 00:04:21,599 Speaker 1: that they will take his account down. But look, at 84 00:04:21,640 --> 00:04:23,000 Speaker 1: the end of the day, this is all in Mark 85 00:04:23,040 --> 00:04:24,960 Speaker 1: Zuckerberg's hand. He made the call to take it down, 86 00:04:25,000 --> 00:04:26,880 Speaker 1: he made the call to put him back on. It's 87 00:04:27,080 --> 00:04:30,279 Speaker 1: insane that this is even in the power of a 88 00:04:30,320 --> 00:04:32,440 Speaker 1: single man. And I just hate all of the fake 89 00:04:32,800 --> 00:04:36,440 Speaker 1: contrivance around who will now we have disci here's our protocols, 90 00:04:36,480 --> 00:04:39,560 Speaker 1: as if they won't just completely dispatch with them or 91 00:04:40,000 --> 00:04:44,240 Speaker 1: come up with some sort of tortured rationale for the 92 00:04:44,240 --> 00:04:46,800 Speaker 1: next time they take action against this account. Yeah, I 93 00:04:46,839 --> 00:04:49,600 Speaker 1: mean all of the legalies and the quote unquote guardrails 94 00:04:49,600 --> 00:04:51,240 Speaker 1: that they put out here. It's just an attempt to 95 00:04:51,320 --> 00:04:53,919 Speaker 1: quiet critics who want Trump to remain off of Facebook. 96 00:04:53,920 --> 00:04:55,400 Speaker 1: They're trying to have it both ways, to try to 97 00:04:55,640 --> 00:04:57,839 Speaker 1: you know, the other piece that we shouldn't ignore here 98 00:04:58,040 --> 00:05:01,039 Speaker 1: is it's not just their assess men of like free 99 00:05:01,040 --> 00:05:04,600 Speaker 1: speech and potential you know, acts of violence. They've also 100 00:05:04,680 --> 00:05:07,159 Speaker 1: got a bottom line that they have to worry about. 101 00:05:07,200 --> 00:05:10,320 Speaker 1: And Donald Trump spends a lot of money on Facebook ads. 102 00:05:10,440 --> 00:05:12,560 Speaker 1: So I heard Roconomy at this point, and I think 103 00:05:12,560 --> 00:05:15,240 Speaker 1: it's a good one. It's not an accident that all 104 00:05:15,279 --> 00:05:18,080 Speaker 1: of these social media platforms and Facebook in particular, because 105 00:05:18,080 --> 00:05:20,440 Speaker 1: they probably got the most money from the Trump campaign, 106 00:05:20,800 --> 00:05:22,680 Speaker 1: Like the one year that they don't have them on 107 00:05:22,880 --> 00:05:24,640 Speaker 1: is the year that it happens too. He's happens to 108 00:05:24,680 --> 00:05:27,640 Speaker 1: be like irrelevant to the political process basically, and also 109 00:05:27,960 --> 00:05:30,280 Speaker 1: irrelevant in terms of their bottom line because he's not 110 00:05:30,440 --> 00:05:32,640 Speaker 1: wasn't running for anything. It was like the only year 111 00:05:33,000 --> 00:05:35,040 Speaker 1: since he popped up on the scene where he wouldn't 112 00:05:35,040 --> 00:05:37,240 Speaker 1: have been spending really money with them anyway, So it 113 00:05:37,320 --> 00:05:39,480 Speaker 1: was not any sort of loss to them. Well, now 114 00:05:39,520 --> 00:05:41,840 Speaker 1: that he's ramping up his campaign, well now there's some 115 00:05:41,920 --> 00:05:44,360 Speaker 1: money to lose, so that also has to weigh into 116 00:05:44,360 --> 00:05:47,240 Speaker 1: some of these decisions as well. But yeah, ultimately this 117 00:05:47,320 --> 00:05:50,080 Speaker 1: is all of oars. They will do with this account 118 00:05:50,160 --> 00:05:53,159 Speaker 1: what they decide. It is in the hands of Mark Zuckerberg. 119 00:05:53,320 --> 00:05:56,960 Speaker 1: He has previously concocted these sort of elaborate schemes to 120 00:05:57,000 --> 00:05:59,080 Speaker 1: try to distance himself and make it like there's this 121 00:05:59,160 --> 00:06:04,279 Speaker 1: Facebook Supreme Court and it's this independent board of arbitration. No, 122 00:06:04,640 --> 00:06:07,159 Speaker 1: it's up to him. He made the decision. He will 123 00:06:07,160 --> 00:06:09,520 Speaker 1: make the decision again. And all of this is just 124 00:06:09,560 --> 00:06:11,640 Speaker 1: an attempt to apply at critics, which of course won't work. 125 00:06:11,640 --> 00:06:13,680 Speaker 1: I mean, the people who won him off forever, they're 126 00:06:13,720 --> 00:06:15,400 Speaker 1: going to continue to want them off forever, and that's 127 00:06:15,440 --> 00:06:18,760 Speaker 1: not going to change, exactly. Correct. And Trump, to his credit, 128 00:06:18,800 --> 00:06:20,719 Speaker 1: actually into some of this. Put this up there on 129 00:06:20,760 --> 00:06:23,320 Speaker 1: the screen, he says, Facebook, which has lost billions of 130 00:06:23,360 --> 00:06:26,520 Speaker 1: dollars in values since deplatforming your favorite president me, has 131 00:06:26,680 --> 00:06:29,240 Speaker 1: just announced that they are reinstating my account. Such a 132 00:06:29,240 --> 00:06:31,400 Speaker 1: thing should never again happen to a sitting president or 133 00:06:31,440 --> 00:06:34,159 Speaker 1: anybody else which is not deserving of retribution. Thank you 134 00:06:34,200 --> 00:06:37,160 Speaker 1: to truth Social for doing such an incredible job. Your 135 00:06:37,240 --> 00:06:40,279 Speaker 1: growth is outstanding in future limited And I'm not sure 136 00:06:40,279 --> 00:06:44,240 Speaker 1: about that part, but I am sure definitely that they 137 00:06:44,279 --> 00:06:46,200 Speaker 1: did lose some money. And at the very least, look, 138 00:06:46,200 --> 00:06:48,360 Speaker 1: he's not wrong. I mean, in terms of the way 139 00:06:48,640 --> 00:06:51,040 Speaker 1: that we thought about these platforms, a lot of it 140 00:06:51,120 --> 00:06:54,400 Speaker 1: was destroyed in twenty seventeen with deplatforming and in general 141 00:06:54,680 --> 00:06:57,720 Speaker 1: really ramping up throughout those years. But the final act 142 00:06:57,800 --> 00:07:00,920 Speaker 1: really was Trump, And actually, when really think about it, 143 00:07:00,920 --> 00:07:04,240 Speaker 1: it was Trump in conjunction with Parlor. I still remain 144 00:07:04,480 --> 00:07:08,720 Speaker 1: that Parlor was one of the most dangerous and censorious 145 00:07:08,720 --> 00:07:12,400 Speaker 1: things that ever happened, because that was about the infrastructure 146 00:07:12,480 --> 00:07:15,680 Speaker 1: of web itself, like with Amazon Web Services and the 147 00:07:15,760 --> 00:07:20,960 Speaker 1: denial of servers that will literally allow a company to exist. 148 00:07:21,440 --> 00:07:23,800 Speaker 1: That is where things really kicked into high gear. And 149 00:07:23,800 --> 00:07:27,080 Speaker 1: I've done other monologues here since then about Andrew Tate. 150 00:07:27,200 --> 00:07:30,000 Speaker 1: You can hate Andrew Tate, but simultaneous deep platform across 151 00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:33,680 Speaker 1: the Internet, that's pretty insane. Kiwi Farms was another big one. 152 00:07:33,720 --> 00:07:36,400 Speaker 1: I mean, we're talking about d listing on Google like 153 00:07:36,440 --> 00:07:39,400 Speaker 1: that's then we're talking about the very like ability to 154 00:07:39,480 --> 00:07:41,840 Speaker 1: exist online. I'm not even saying I like any of 155 00:07:41,880 --> 00:07:43,840 Speaker 1: these places, but it's not about like, it's like, how 156 00:07:43,840 --> 00:07:46,440 Speaker 1: can this be in the hands of you know, of 157 00:07:46,760 --> 00:07:50,000 Speaker 1: Sindhar Pachai over at Google, of Tim Cook the removal 158 00:07:50,000 --> 00:07:52,120 Speaker 1: from the App Store that was another big one. I mean, 159 00:07:52,360 --> 00:07:56,680 Speaker 1: I believe Apple has, if not a majority, near majority 160 00:07:56,760 --> 00:07:59,280 Speaker 1: of control over cell phones in the United States. These 161 00:07:59,280 --> 00:08:01,880 Speaker 1: are all things where and this is the classic example 162 00:08:02,000 --> 00:08:03,720 Speaker 1: the phone company. The phone company doesn't care what you 163 00:08:03,760 --> 00:08:05,240 Speaker 1: say on the phone, right if you break the law 164 00:08:05,280 --> 00:08:07,000 Speaker 1: when you're on the phone, it's the government's job to 165 00:08:07,040 --> 00:08:08,440 Speaker 1: go and get in a subpoena and be like, Okay, 166 00:08:08,440 --> 00:08:10,120 Speaker 1: he's breaking the law while he's on the phone. It's 167 00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:12,720 Speaker 1: not AT and t's job to censor what you're saying 168 00:08:12,720 --> 00:08:15,120 Speaker 1: to somebody else in a private phone call. Now you 169 00:08:15,120 --> 00:08:17,440 Speaker 1: can say, yeah, but the Internet is different because you're 170 00:08:17,480 --> 00:08:19,480 Speaker 1: talking to everybody. But not really. I mean, when you 171 00:08:19,480 --> 00:08:21,840 Speaker 1: think about infrastructure, that's the whole point is the infrastructure 172 00:08:21,920 --> 00:08:24,840 Speaker 1: is supposed to be completely content neutral, and where we 173 00:08:25,360 --> 00:08:28,280 Speaker 1: escaped that on January eight, twenty twenty one. I mean, 174 00:08:28,320 --> 00:08:30,360 Speaker 1: I think it's a little more complex than that, because 175 00:08:30,400 --> 00:08:34,480 Speaker 1: I've almost everybody agrees there should be some limits to 176 00:08:34,559 --> 00:08:37,240 Speaker 1: what people are able to say. I mean, threats of violence, 177 00:08:37,280 --> 00:08:42,280 Speaker 1: docks like, you know, outright harassment, revenge, porn like. There 178 00:08:42,320 --> 00:08:45,680 Speaker 1: are lines that I think society would want to draw, 179 00:08:45,760 --> 00:08:47,680 Speaker 1: and that we draw with the First Amendment as well. 180 00:08:47,679 --> 00:08:49,800 Speaker 1: But even a place like eight chan has some rules 181 00:08:49,840 --> 00:08:53,080 Speaker 1: around what you can and can't post. So that's where 182 00:08:53,080 --> 00:08:56,319 Speaker 1: things ultimately get complicated because then you have to ask. 183 00:08:56,400 --> 00:08:58,640 Speaker 1: It's not like a phone company, because you have to ask, 184 00:08:59,120 --> 00:09:03,040 Speaker 1: where do we draw that line? The problem is having 185 00:09:03,240 --> 00:09:06,120 Speaker 1: the power to decide where do we draw that line? 186 00:09:06,640 --> 00:09:08,920 Speaker 1: On something that ends up being really critical to our 187 00:09:08,960 --> 00:09:13,480 Speaker 1: democratic infrastructure in the hands of a very few people, 188 00:09:14,000 --> 00:09:17,080 Speaker 1: and it being a complete black box. I mean, before 189 00:09:17,200 --> 00:09:19,800 Speaker 1: the Twitter files came out, we really had no insight 190 00:09:19,960 --> 00:09:22,840 Speaker 1: into the internal process within Twitter, as one example for 191 00:09:22,960 --> 00:09:25,920 Speaker 1: how they came to this decision, and once we did 192 00:09:25,960 --> 00:09:28,360 Speaker 1: have some insight into how they came to that decision, 193 00:09:28,400 --> 00:09:31,080 Speaker 1: it was exactly as we suspected. It was completely ad hoc. 194 00:09:31,160 --> 00:09:34,000 Speaker 1: It was driven by a couple of ideological actors. It 195 00:09:34,040 --> 00:09:37,240 Speaker 1: was driven by, you know, external pressure and the sense 196 00:09:37,280 --> 00:09:39,880 Speaker 1: of employees at Twitter of like how the people around 197 00:09:39,920 --> 00:09:42,040 Speaker 1: them in their lives would judge them if they didn't 198 00:09:42,080 --> 00:09:45,240 Speaker 1: take action against these things. And so even though they 199 00:09:45,320 --> 00:09:50,319 Speaker 1: had these stated rules governing the platform, ultimately when push 200 00:09:50,360 --> 00:09:53,199 Speaker 1: came to shove, it just ended up being their own 201 00:09:53,320 --> 00:09:56,880 Speaker 1: personal decision making that led to the outcome of Trump 202 00:09:56,960 --> 00:09:59,840 Speaker 1: being banned from the platform. So, you know, that's that, 203 00:10:00,120 --> 00:10:01,840 Speaker 1: to me, is the core of the issue, and in 204 00:10:01,880 --> 00:10:04,320 Speaker 1: fact is quite relevant. We have a number of stories 205 00:10:04,360 --> 00:10:06,800 Speaker 1: in the show today about antitrust actions being taken the 206 00:10:06,800 --> 00:10:09,360 Speaker 1: attempt to curb and check some of the power of 207 00:10:09,400 --> 00:10:11,800 Speaker 1: big tech, which obviously is relevant in terms of censorship 208 00:10:11,840 --> 00:10:13,880 Speaker 1: but relevant in terms of all sorts of aspects of 209 00:10:13,920 --> 00:10:17,280 Speaker 1: our lives on and off the Internet, and it really 210 00:10:17,320 --> 00:10:20,480 Speaker 1: is the sort of crucial frontline battle of our time, 211 00:10:20,800 --> 00:10:24,760 Speaker 1: and one that you know, fortunately there is some some 212 00:10:25,160 --> 00:10:28,400 Speaker 1: genuine bipartisan bipartisanship on. There are plenty of people who 213 00:10:28,480 --> 00:10:30,880 Speaker 1: just posture, you know, plenty of Republicans who just want 214 00:10:30,880 --> 00:10:33,240 Speaker 1: to posture about the censorship. But then, like Jim Jordan, 215 00:10:33,320 --> 00:10:35,199 Speaker 1: ultimately all they're doing is like carrying water for the 216 00:10:35,240 --> 00:10:37,360 Speaker 1: tech companies. They don't actually care about the power piece. 217 00:10:37,679 --> 00:10:41,000 Speaker 1: If you're not focused on the power of these companies 218 00:10:41,000 --> 00:10:43,360 Speaker 1: when it comes not just to censorship, but all of 219 00:10:43,400 --> 00:10:46,040 Speaker 1: the activities that they engage in all of their impact 220 00:10:46,120 --> 00:10:49,080 Speaker 1: on public life, then ultimately you're not really serious about 221 00:10:49,080 --> 00:10:51,400 Speaker 1: this important point. We're going to table this discussion. We're 222 00:10:51,400 --> 00:10:54,240 Speaker 1: going to talk a lot more about about both the 223 00:10:54,400 --> 00:10:57,520 Speaker 1: Google lawsuit that the Department of Justice, the second Justice 224 00:10:57,800 --> 00:11:00,840 Speaker 1: Department lawsuit against that company, and all so about the 225 00:11:00,880 --> 00:11:03,680 Speaker 1: overall reaction to anti trust and how things are changing. 226 00:11:03,679 --> 00:11:05,360 Speaker 1: So let's go ahead and talk about Ukraine. That's what 227 00:11:05,400 --> 00:11:07,760 Speaker 1: we originally were going to start our show with before 228 00:11:07,800 --> 00:11:10,960 Speaker 1: the Trump news broke last night. There's a major Titanic 229 00:11:11,000 --> 00:11:14,880 Speaker 1: development here in Washington. The decision to send some dozen 230 00:11:15,040 --> 00:11:18,880 Speaker 1: two dozen or so M one Abrams tanks to Ukraine 231 00:11:19,000 --> 00:11:22,600 Speaker 1: on the battlefield in conjunction with Poland, with Finland, and 232 00:11:22,640 --> 00:11:26,120 Speaker 1: with Germany, and the departure of tanks from all of 233 00:11:26,160 --> 00:11:28,880 Speaker 1: these Western nations to try and help Ukraine in its 234 00:11:29,040 --> 00:11:32,240 Speaker 1: offensive in the coming months. President Biden making this announcement, 235 00:11:32,320 --> 00:11:35,520 Speaker 1: let's take a listen. Putin expected Europe and the United 236 00:11:35,559 --> 00:11:39,120 Speaker 1: States to weaken our resolve. He expected our support for 237 00:11:39,280 --> 00:11:44,120 Speaker 1: Ukraine to crumble with time. He was wrong. He was wrong. 238 00:11:44,840 --> 00:11:46,920 Speaker 1: He was wrong from the beginning, and he continues to 239 00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:51,520 Speaker 1: be wrong. We are united. America is united, and so 240 00:11:51,760 --> 00:11:54,880 Speaker 1: is the world. We approach the one year mark as 241 00:11:54,920 --> 00:11:57,320 Speaker 1: we do of the Russia full scale invasion of Ukraine. 242 00:11:57,360 --> 00:12:01,840 Speaker 1: We remain united and determined as and our conviction and 243 00:12:01,880 --> 00:12:05,240 Speaker 1: our cause. These tanks are further evidence of our enduring 244 00:12:05,240 --> 00:12:08,640 Speaker 1: an unflagging commitment to Ukraine and our confidence and the 245 00:12:08,640 --> 00:12:12,280 Speaker 1: skill of the Ukrainian forces. This is an important decision marker. 246 00:12:12,360 --> 00:12:15,640 Speaker 1: It was one that was never contemplated by the Pentagon, 247 00:12:15,760 --> 00:12:18,920 Speaker 1: by the Biden administration, and by Western officials, which changed 248 00:12:19,160 --> 00:12:21,120 Speaker 1: all within the last month. So let's go all the 249 00:12:21,160 --> 00:12:24,600 Speaker 1: way back. So, first, President Zelenski visits here in Washington. 250 00:12:24,640 --> 00:12:27,360 Speaker 1: One of the two main asks that he asked President Biden. 251 00:12:27,600 --> 00:12:29,920 Speaker 1: Number one was not just patriot missile system but more 252 00:12:29,920 --> 00:12:33,080 Speaker 1: patriot missile systems. Number two is tanks and jets. Now, 253 00:12:33,160 --> 00:12:35,800 Speaker 1: jets are off the table for now, but listen to 254 00:12:35,800 --> 00:12:39,040 Speaker 1: this story. Because the tanks were completely off the table. 255 00:12:39,240 --> 00:12:42,120 Speaker 1: Then what happens is that Poland has in possession some 256 00:12:42,240 --> 00:12:45,000 Speaker 1: Leopard tanks that were given to it by Germany. Poland says, 257 00:12:45,240 --> 00:12:47,679 Speaker 1: I want to give these tanks to Ukraine because of 258 00:12:47,880 --> 00:12:51,160 Speaker 1: repeated requests by President Zelenski. Well, then what happens what 259 00:12:51,240 --> 00:12:52,959 Speaker 1: they have to go to Germany because Germany is the 260 00:12:52,960 --> 00:12:55,120 Speaker 1: one who gave them the tanks. Germany says, no, We're 261 00:12:55,160 --> 00:12:57,840 Speaker 1: not going to give you those tanks, because then the 262 00:12:57,920 --> 00:13:00,600 Speaker 1: decision is on us to allow pole And to do it. 263 00:13:01,240 --> 00:13:04,880 Speaker 1: Chancellor Oloff Schultz says, the only way I'm giving these 264 00:13:04,920 --> 00:13:08,760 Speaker 1: tanks to Ukraine is if you give tanks to Ukraine, 265 00:13:08,840 --> 00:13:13,160 Speaker 1: because then it's a complete NATO decision, especially led by 266 00:13:13,200 --> 00:13:15,840 Speaker 1: the United States, and not one that lands in Germany. 267 00:13:15,880 --> 00:13:18,200 Speaker 1: Because Germany doesn't want to be the one that is 268 00:13:18,240 --> 00:13:21,960 Speaker 1: retaliated against by Russia if such an attack to happen. 269 00:13:22,080 --> 00:13:23,880 Speaker 1: They don't want to be out there on their own. 270 00:13:24,520 --> 00:13:27,240 Speaker 1: Not to cut you short, but just to insert a 271 00:13:27,240 --> 00:13:29,960 Speaker 1: little piece here. This is from politicos reporting about behind 272 00:13:29,960 --> 00:13:33,800 Speaker 1: the scenes negotiations. This should make everybody very uncomfortable. Schultz 273 00:13:33,840 --> 00:13:36,520 Speaker 1: was adamant in his discussions with Biden that's supplying Leopard 274 00:13:36,520 --> 00:13:40,200 Speaker 1: tanks to Ukraine marks such a qualitatively new step that 275 00:13:40,280 --> 00:13:43,080 Speaker 1: the US, as the world's biggest military power, but also 276 00:13:43,240 --> 00:13:48,440 Speaker 1: Germany's guarantee for nuclear deterrence, must be involved. They also 277 00:13:48,440 --> 00:13:50,960 Speaker 1: want to demonstrate unity toward Putin important to the Chancellor 278 00:13:51,000 --> 00:13:52,600 Speaker 1: from the very beginning that we take every step with 279 00:13:52,640 --> 00:13:55,760 Speaker 1: as much unity as possible, as spokespersons said. So they're 280 00:13:55,800 --> 00:13:59,360 Speaker 1: basically like, listen, we don't feel like our nuclear deterrence 281 00:13:59,480 --> 00:14:03,280 Speaker 1: is enough. We want the world superpower on our I mean, 282 00:14:03,320 --> 00:14:08,320 Speaker 1: that's how provocative they ultimately view this step, and they'd 283 00:14:08,360 --> 00:14:11,880 Speaker 1: really come to loggerheads because they're the military. In particular, 284 00:14:11,920 --> 00:14:13,800 Speaker 1: Pentagon really did not want to send these tanks, and 285 00:14:13,840 --> 00:14:15,760 Speaker 1: they put out there like, oh, it's because it's hard 286 00:14:15,800 --> 00:14:18,120 Speaker 1: to train on whatever. You No, they saw this as 287 00:14:18,120 --> 00:14:22,400 Speaker 1: a significant escalation. They also worry about our own readiness, 288 00:14:22,440 --> 00:14:25,280 Speaker 1: as we've been talking about as well. Biden was reluctant, 289 00:14:25,600 --> 00:14:29,480 Speaker 1: and effectively, Germany was under pressure and there was starting 290 00:14:29,480 --> 00:14:31,760 Speaker 1: to be this ugly split in the NATO alliance, and 291 00:14:31,840 --> 00:14:34,840 Speaker 1: Biden just caved and was like, all right, fine, Rather 292 00:14:34,880 --> 00:14:37,680 Speaker 1: than have any demonstration of disunity, we're just going to 293 00:14:37,720 --> 00:14:40,400 Speaker 1: go along with sending these tanks, something that they had 294 00:14:40,600 --> 00:14:44,600 Speaker 1: completely ruled out early in this conflict. Because remember, it's 295 00:14:44,640 --> 00:14:47,040 Speaker 1: easy to lose track of how these things all started. 296 00:14:47,440 --> 00:14:50,240 Speaker 1: The original thought and the original what was sold to 297 00:14:50,280 --> 00:14:53,040 Speaker 1: the American people, We will provide them whatever they need 298 00:14:53,080 --> 00:14:59,320 Speaker 1: for their defense. Tanks are a strictly offensive capability. So 299 00:14:59,560 --> 00:15:02,440 Speaker 1: this was previously like, you know, completely out of bounds, 300 00:15:02,480 --> 00:15:04,800 Speaker 1: and now here we are. Well. The reason it also 301 00:15:04,840 --> 00:15:07,680 Speaker 1: matters is the offensive itself. What is that offensive going 302 00:15:07,720 --> 00:15:09,720 Speaker 1: to look like? Where you can combine that with some 303 00:15:09,840 --> 00:15:11,800 Speaker 1: reporting that we brought to you all just a couple 304 00:15:11,840 --> 00:15:14,200 Speaker 1: of weeks ago about the US is warming to the 305 00:15:14,240 --> 00:15:17,160 Speaker 1: idea of Ukraine taking back Crimea. Now look, I have 306 00:15:17,280 --> 00:15:20,000 Speaker 1: no idea whether they even have that capability, And on 307 00:15:20,040 --> 00:15:21,840 Speaker 1: the tank piece, it's important, so I asked some of 308 00:15:21,840 --> 00:15:24,720 Speaker 1: my friends who work in the defense industry, and I 309 00:15:24,760 --> 00:15:26,560 Speaker 1: was like, all right, what's actually the deal with these tanks? 310 00:15:26,560 --> 00:15:28,000 Speaker 1: And they're like, look, we don't actually even know the 311 00:15:28,040 --> 00:15:30,440 Speaker 1: detail of the tank itself. The tank itself is a platform. 312 00:15:30,480 --> 00:15:32,640 Speaker 1: There's a lot of technology that goes into the US tank. 313 00:15:33,080 --> 00:15:34,920 Speaker 1: There's in terms of the ones that we sell, we 314 00:15:35,000 --> 00:15:36,760 Speaker 1: sell them all over the world. Some of them are 315 00:15:36,760 --> 00:15:38,600 Speaker 1: from the nineteen eighties. Some of them you wouldn't like 316 00:15:38,760 --> 00:15:41,240 Speaker 1: a twenty twenty three Abrams tank versus nineteen eighty tank, 317 00:15:41,280 --> 00:15:43,560 Speaker 1: and twenty twenty three one is going to win every day, 318 00:15:43,640 --> 00:15:46,320 Speaker 1: even though they look kind of similar. So the point 319 00:15:46,440 --> 00:15:49,440 Speaker 1: is that that's actually unclear. They need to be specially 320 00:15:49,480 --> 00:15:51,960 Speaker 1: manufactured in the next couple of months by the US 321 00:15:52,000 --> 00:15:55,680 Speaker 1: defense industry. So congratulations to the makers here in Northern 322 00:15:55,720 --> 00:15:58,720 Speaker 1: Virginia who are going to be supplying those tanks. So 323 00:15:58,720 --> 00:16:01,400 Speaker 1: they're specially manufactured, they need to be trained on it. 324 00:16:01,520 --> 00:16:04,240 Speaker 1: There's an entire logistical pattern that needs to develop in 325 00:16:04,320 --> 00:16:06,880 Speaker 1: order to supply and keep up. These tanks are in 326 00:16:06,920 --> 00:16:11,200 Speaker 1: general pretty advanced pieces of technology, so that's a piece 327 00:16:11,240 --> 00:16:15,320 Speaker 1: of it. However, it was immediately noticed by Russia. Let's 328 00:16:15,320 --> 00:16:17,440 Speaker 1: put this up there on the screen. The city of 329 00:16:17,520 --> 00:16:23,080 Speaker 1: Kiev immediately under bombardment. That happened right after Kiev secured 330 00:16:23,080 --> 00:16:25,480 Speaker 1: the tanks. And the reason here is that the US 331 00:16:25,520 --> 00:16:30,080 Speaker 1: and Germany are sending these tanks. Immediately after this decision 332 00:16:30,160 --> 00:16:33,240 Speaker 1: was made, the strike happened on Kiev. So when we 333 00:16:33,360 --> 00:16:36,040 Speaker 1: put those two things together, clearly the Russians see it 334 00:16:36,080 --> 00:16:39,120 Speaker 1: as something. Now, how exactly are they going to respond? 335 00:16:39,360 --> 00:16:42,120 Speaker 1: We genuinely have no idea. I actually saw a really 336 00:16:42,160 --> 00:16:45,600 Speaker 1: troubling headline this morning in the New York Times. It 337 00:16:45,640 --> 00:16:48,000 Speaker 1: says that the Ukraine War or it says here's how 338 00:16:48,000 --> 00:16:51,000 Speaker 1: President Biden reluctantly agreed to send tanks to Ukraine. But 339 00:16:51,080 --> 00:16:52,560 Speaker 1: let me read you, guys the subhead It was just 340 00:16:52,560 --> 00:16:55,480 Speaker 1: this morning the decision unlocked a flow of heavy arms 341 00:16:55,480 --> 00:16:57,560 Speaker 1: from Europe and inched the United States and it's NATO 342 00:16:57,600 --> 00:17:00,520 Speaker 1: allies closer to direct conflict with Russia. That is a 343 00:17:00,920 --> 00:17:04,600 Speaker 1: that is literally, that's not me scaremongering or whatever. That's 344 00:17:04,640 --> 00:17:07,640 Speaker 1: from the Times, probably one of the most hawkish outlets 345 00:17:07,880 --> 00:17:10,760 Speaker 1: in this entire conflict. It also comes on the heels 346 00:17:10,800 --> 00:17:14,520 Speaker 1: of the Doomsday clock, the famous clock about how close 347 00:17:14,560 --> 00:17:18,040 Speaker 1: we are supposedly to nuclear war. Let's go ahead and 348 00:17:18,080 --> 00:17:20,280 Speaker 1: put this video up on the screen. I can speak 349 00:17:20,320 --> 00:17:23,360 Speaker 1: over it. From the Bureau of Atomic Scientists, they now 350 00:17:23,440 --> 00:17:26,520 Speaker 1: say we are set one hundred seconds or sorry, ninety 351 00:17:26,520 --> 00:17:31,639 Speaker 1: seconds to midnight, which is the closest to catastrophe that 352 00:17:31,680 --> 00:17:34,160 Speaker 1: we have ever been in the history of the Bulletin 353 00:17:34,440 --> 00:17:39,720 Speaker 1: of Atomic Scientists calling it, quote a global catastrophe. Look all, 354 00:17:39,760 --> 00:17:43,160 Speaker 1: we're trying. We're trying to approach this in a very 355 00:17:43,960 --> 00:17:47,080 Speaker 1: level headed way and not be skeptical. I'm even trying 356 00:17:47,119 --> 00:17:49,320 Speaker 1: not to let my bias come in here. When it's 357 00:17:49,320 --> 00:17:50,800 Speaker 1: Germany and I'm like, yeah, why don't you send them 358 00:17:50,800 --> 00:17:52,359 Speaker 1: the tanks. I'm like, you're the one who's only like 359 00:17:52,359 --> 00:17:55,320 Speaker 1: a couple hundred miles from there. It's your country, You're 360 00:17:55,320 --> 00:17:57,359 Speaker 1: a continent. Why do we have to be the ones 361 00:17:57,359 --> 00:17:59,320 Speaker 1: to do it. The reason why I think that this 362 00:17:59,400 --> 00:18:02,000 Speaker 1: is significant and was regarded as such by President Biden, 363 00:18:02,119 --> 00:18:04,480 Speaker 1: by General Mark Milly, by the Navy Secretary who said 364 00:18:04,480 --> 00:18:06,280 Speaker 1: that we're going to have to start cannibalizing our own 365 00:18:06,359 --> 00:18:09,560 Speaker 1: supplies if we continue to have to supply Ukraine, is 366 00:18:09,600 --> 00:18:12,840 Speaker 1: that this could change the entire ballgame on the battlefield, 367 00:18:12,840 --> 00:18:15,640 Speaker 1: because look at what happened with Russia. Russia's armored carriers 368 00:18:15,640 --> 00:18:19,320 Speaker 1: and everything is breaking down, their global infrat or their infrastructure, 369 00:18:19,359 --> 00:18:22,639 Speaker 1: military supply chain disaster. That's why they're so reliant on 370 00:18:22,760 --> 00:18:25,720 Speaker 1: railroads like it's World War Two. They don't have the 371 00:18:25,840 --> 00:18:28,600 Speaker 1: upkeep Ukraine capturing many of these things, and it was 372 00:18:28,600 --> 00:18:30,000 Speaker 1: one of the ways that they were able to cripple 373 00:18:30,119 --> 00:18:32,320 Speaker 1: the Russian offensive in the first place. Well, now, if 374 00:18:32,320 --> 00:18:35,879 Speaker 1: they have sophisticated Western technology that can out match Russia 375 00:18:35,880 --> 00:18:38,439 Speaker 1: on the battlefield, we're not talking just about breakthroughs, but 376 00:18:38,520 --> 00:18:40,920 Speaker 1: you don't know where that's going to stop. And let's 377 00:18:40,920 --> 00:18:43,560 Speaker 1: say that it stops in Crimea. Now what we're actually 378 00:18:43,600 --> 00:18:47,040 Speaker 1: a completely different strategic situation. I'm not even saying I 379 00:18:47,040 --> 00:18:49,920 Speaker 1: think Russia will should have Crimea. But what we're saying 380 00:18:49,960 --> 00:18:52,520 Speaker 1: is they think they should have Crimea and they have nukes. 381 00:18:52,600 --> 00:18:55,639 Speaker 1: So what does that mean? Now? According to The Times, 382 00:18:55,800 --> 00:18:58,320 Speaker 1: President Biden his advisors believe that the risk of the 383 00:18:58,320 --> 00:19:01,320 Speaker 1: tactical nuclear weapon being used in Ukraine has gone down. 384 00:19:01,600 --> 00:19:03,840 Speaker 1: What does that mean? I don't know. You know, the 385 00:19:03,920 --> 00:19:06,200 Speaker 1: risk of everything seems to go down until it goes 386 00:19:06,240 --> 00:19:09,200 Speaker 1: way up whenever the strategic situation changes, right, I Mean, 387 00:19:09,240 --> 00:19:12,240 Speaker 1: they're logic here seems to be like, well, they haven't 388 00:19:12,320 --> 00:19:15,200 Speaker 1: nuked us yet, so should be fine. Like I guess 389 00:19:15,240 --> 00:19:17,840 Speaker 1: they're just not going to. And I do think it's 390 00:19:17,880 --> 00:19:21,919 Speaker 1: a real myth the idea that Russia has not escalated 391 00:19:22,040 --> 00:19:24,320 Speaker 1: in response to some of the actions that we have 392 00:19:24,480 --> 00:19:28,040 Speaker 1: taken with regard to Ukraine. They did escalate. Now they 393 00:19:28,080 --> 00:19:31,960 Speaker 1: didn't escalate to nuclear war yet, but they did escalate 394 00:19:32,040 --> 00:19:35,280 Speaker 1: in terms of going back to attacking, keep going to 395 00:19:35,480 --> 00:19:38,200 Speaker 1: attacking the energy infrastructure to try to make this winter 396 00:19:38,280 --> 00:19:42,000 Speaker 1: as brutal and painful as Ukrainians as they possibly can. So, 397 00:19:42,240 --> 00:19:44,639 Speaker 1: you know, they ultimately went forward with the draft, and 398 00:19:44,680 --> 00:19:48,080 Speaker 1: there's rumors that they may do another round of conscription domestically. 399 00:19:48,160 --> 00:19:52,040 Speaker 1: So I think even this mythology that Russia didn't respond, 400 00:19:52,119 --> 00:19:55,600 Speaker 1: that there was no escalation is just factually inaccurate. And 401 00:19:55,640 --> 00:19:58,639 Speaker 1: it also, as I said before, it reminds me of 402 00:19:58,680 --> 00:20:01,359 Speaker 1: some of the conversations that came out in the WikiLeaks 403 00:20:01,440 --> 00:20:05,240 Speaker 1: cables that were revealed by Bronco marcitic He talked about 404 00:20:05,320 --> 00:20:06,600 Speaker 1: how there were a lot of people said all the 405 00:20:06,640 --> 00:20:09,520 Speaker 1: Russians always say that about Ukraine and NATO and they 406 00:20:09,560 --> 00:20:11,960 Speaker 1: never really do anything. So the fact that they didn't 407 00:20:12,000 --> 00:20:15,240 Speaker 1: act instantly was taken as proof that like they're all 408 00:20:15,240 --> 00:20:18,240 Speaker 1: blust or they're not ultimately going to move forward. That 409 00:20:18,359 --> 00:20:21,080 Speaker 1: turned out to not be correct in reality. It was 410 00:20:21,119 --> 00:20:23,640 Speaker 1: a red line for them in a reality. In reality, 411 00:20:23,640 --> 00:20:27,960 Speaker 1: and this again bonus and burden and culpability fully on 412 00:20:28,160 --> 00:20:31,159 Speaker 1: Putin and the Kremlin, etc. But they had drawn a 413 00:20:31,200 --> 00:20:33,479 Speaker 1: red line, we ignored it, and that is part of 414 00:20:33,520 --> 00:20:36,840 Speaker 1: the context of how we ended up ultimately in this place. 415 00:20:36,880 --> 00:20:40,199 Speaker 1: And I just see a lot of echoes of that here. 416 00:20:40,240 --> 00:20:42,320 Speaker 1: And the last thing that I'll put in here is, 417 00:20:42,359 --> 00:20:43,840 Speaker 1: you know, a lot of what they're trying to sell 418 00:20:43,920 --> 00:20:45,560 Speaker 1: to the process, like, oh, well, this was all about 419 00:20:45,640 --> 00:20:47,800 Speaker 1: unity with NATO and unity with Germany, and you heard 420 00:20:47,800 --> 00:20:50,200 Speaker 1: that in the president's comments. There was a line though, 421 00:20:50,240 --> 00:20:52,439 Speaker 1: in that Politico piece that just came out of the 422 00:20:52,520 --> 00:20:54,720 Speaker 1: like inside story or whatever that really stuck out to 423 00:20:54,760 --> 00:20:59,560 Speaker 1: me too, because part of the debate before they decided 424 00:21:00,000 --> 00:21:02,320 Speaker 1: whether or not to send these tanks was about the 425 00:21:02,320 --> 00:21:04,679 Speaker 1: capability of the tanks. If it really made sense in 426 00:21:04,720 --> 00:21:07,520 Speaker 1: this context, some of the drawbacks of this particular type 427 00:21:07,520 --> 00:21:10,639 Speaker 1: of tank and apparently, according to Politico, you'll love this. 428 00:21:11,080 --> 00:21:16,400 Speaker 1: Those comments frustrated defense industry executives who felt the Pentagon 429 00:21:16,440 --> 00:21:20,280 Speaker 1: was making disparaging remarks about US manufactured equipment. Weeks before, 430 00:21:20,359 --> 00:21:23,400 Speaker 1: Laura Cooper, Pentagon official charge with overseeing Ukraine policy, had 431 00:21:23,400 --> 00:21:26,719 Speaker 1: called the Abrams tanks a gas guzzler. The US does 432 00:21:26,760 --> 00:21:29,560 Speaker 1: not have to advocate for sending the Abrams, when industry 433 00:21:29,600 --> 00:21:33,560 Speaker 1: insider said, but administration officials shouldn't criticize the tank. That's 434 00:21:33,680 --> 00:21:36,320 Speaker 1: especially true since another country in the region, Poland, is 435 00:21:36,359 --> 00:21:41,040 Speaker 1: buying em once from General Dynamics. Other countries like Morocco, Iraq, Australia, Sauta, Arabia, 436 00:21:41,040 --> 00:21:44,400 Speaker 1: and Egypt have purchased export versions of the tank as well. 437 00:21:44,440 --> 00:21:47,960 Speaker 1: So they were also deeply concerned that this was impacting 438 00:21:48,000 --> 00:21:50,680 Speaker 1: their bottom line and ability to sell weapons around the world. 439 00:21:50,680 --> 00:21:53,480 Speaker 1: So they're putting pressure on the administration to make this 440 00:21:53,600 --> 00:21:55,919 Speaker 1: decision from their own bottom line perspectives. One of the 441 00:21:55,960 --> 00:21:57,960 Speaker 1: reasons why I think this again is so important is 442 00:21:58,000 --> 00:21:59,400 Speaker 1: they don't know how to make these tanks. They don't 443 00:21:59,400 --> 00:22:00,760 Speaker 1: know how to do anything, and they don't have the 444 00:22:00,760 --> 00:22:02,520 Speaker 1: money to buy them. That means that we're on the 445 00:22:02,560 --> 00:22:06,199 Speaker 1: hook forever. Like a real nation, whenever it mounts a defense, 446 00:22:06,440 --> 00:22:09,320 Speaker 1: it has an industrial base, it has an economy, it 447 00:22:09,359 --> 00:22:12,399 Speaker 1: has a populace that is capable of mounting that singular defense, 448 00:22:12,440 --> 00:22:15,359 Speaker 1: sometimes with allies, but not wholly reliant on them in 449 00:22:15,480 --> 00:22:18,399 Speaker 1: order to mount it and defend its sovereignty. Ukraine has 450 00:22:18,520 --> 00:22:20,719 Speaker 1: none of that. I mean they would not they wouldn't 451 00:22:20,720 --> 00:22:23,399 Speaker 1: even deny it without NATO. In the Western countries, they 452 00:22:23,440 --> 00:22:25,600 Speaker 1: failed to exist in a single moment. If we cut 453 00:22:25,640 --> 00:22:28,439 Speaker 1: them off on ammunition, they're dead. It's over. And so 454 00:22:28,600 --> 00:22:31,199 Speaker 1: when does it end? Like what does the actual an 455 00:22:31,200 --> 00:22:33,520 Speaker 1: period look? Because even if they push Russia out, what 456 00:22:33,520 --> 00:22:35,359 Speaker 1: are they going to do? Then they'll say, if you 457 00:22:35,400 --> 00:22:37,520 Speaker 1: don't continue to get us all these things, then they're 458 00:22:37,560 --> 00:22:39,040 Speaker 1: just going to come back. Yeah, so are what are 459 00:22:39,040 --> 00:22:40,920 Speaker 1: we on the hook for fifty one hundred billion a 460 00:22:41,040 --> 00:22:44,000 Speaker 1: year for every single year going forward? And I really 461 00:22:44,000 --> 00:22:46,600 Speaker 1: cannot let the Europeans off the hook. This is Libya 462 00:22:46,640 --> 00:22:49,760 Speaker 1: all over again. They're the ones who d I'm quoting 463 00:22:49,920 --> 00:22:54,600 Speaker 1: Susan Rice, who herself was a complete hawk, who said, too, 464 00:22:54,960 --> 00:22:57,359 Speaker 1: this is all in the transcript. You're not going to 465 00:22:57,480 --> 00:23:01,440 Speaker 1: drag us into your shitty war in They didn't. Obama 466 00:23:01,480 --> 00:23:03,960 Speaker 1: did not want to go into Libya. It's the Germans 467 00:23:03,960 --> 00:23:05,399 Speaker 1: and the French who were like, no, we got to 468 00:23:05,400 --> 00:23:08,160 Speaker 1: do it for human rights, all this stuff. Oh look 469 00:23:08,160 --> 00:23:10,960 Speaker 1: at Benghazi, Gadafi, all this, and then now what's happening 470 00:23:11,000 --> 00:23:13,399 Speaker 1: in Libya right now? They're literal slave markets that are 471 00:23:13,400 --> 00:23:16,359 Speaker 1: over there. And ask the people who live in a 472 00:23:16,600 --> 00:23:19,880 Speaker 1: literal like anarchy whether they prefer then or now. I'm 473 00:23:19,920 --> 00:23:21,640 Speaker 1: not saying Goadafi was a good guy, but the point 474 00:23:21,720 --> 00:23:23,720 Speaker 1: is like, should we have been the ones who determined 475 00:23:23,720 --> 00:23:25,639 Speaker 1: exactly what was going on there? Is all during the 476 00:23:25,640 --> 00:23:27,879 Speaker 1: promise of the Arab Spring? It was only ten what 477 00:23:28,000 --> 00:23:30,639 Speaker 1: ten years ago that that happened, Like, how do we 478 00:23:30,760 --> 00:23:34,040 Speaker 1: have collective amnesian I think it should scare everybody that 479 00:23:34,080 --> 00:23:36,199 Speaker 1: they were not willing to do it without the burden 480 00:23:36,320 --> 00:23:39,560 Speaker 1: on us, because listen, we're all in it now and 481 00:23:39,640 --> 00:23:42,479 Speaker 1: we don't have any says. And this is also why 482 00:23:42,720 --> 00:23:45,960 Speaker 1: I was always advocating for the Congress to step up 483 00:23:45,960 --> 00:23:50,359 Speaker 1: to its constitutional responsibility and to write strategic provisions in 484 00:23:50,400 --> 00:23:53,159 Speaker 1: the arms that are given to Ukraine and define the 485 00:23:53,280 --> 00:23:56,840 Speaker 1: exact platforms and to take it out of the executive hand. 486 00:23:56,920 --> 00:23:59,200 Speaker 1: Biden is an eighty year old man. He could drop 487 00:23:59,240 --> 00:24:01,960 Speaker 1: dead tomorrow. Or the policy of the United States then 488 00:24:02,200 --> 00:24:04,800 Speaker 1: is all in the hands of Kamala Harris. Are we 489 00:24:04,840 --> 00:24:07,520 Speaker 1: comfortable with that? Are you comfortable with that? Like take 490 00:24:07,560 --> 00:24:10,080 Speaker 1: away even the nuke button? Look at this. This is 491 00:24:10,119 --> 00:24:13,560 Speaker 1: the extraordinary amount of responsibility that they have abdicated. I 492 00:24:13,560 --> 00:24:15,640 Speaker 1: think it's really important. And again, let's s the next 493 00:24:15,640 --> 00:24:18,080 Speaker 1: one up on the screen. It just shows you that 494 00:24:18,160 --> 00:24:20,520 Speaker 1: this was just a couple days ago. Top US officials 495 00:24:20,520 --> 00:24:23,600 Speaker 1: don't want to give Ukraine tanks despite German pressure five 496 00:24:23,640 --> 00:24:26,679 Speaker 1: days ago. That's how quickly that we fold. And it 497 00:24:26,760 --> 00:24:28,840 Speaker 1: shows you the power of the Ukraine lobby here in 498 00:24:28,840 --> 00:24:30,800 Speaker 1: the United States. All right, let's go to the next 499 00:24:30,800 --> 00:24:33,560 Speaker 1: one here because this is also important in terms of Ukraine. 500 00:24:33,960 --> 00:24:37,080 Speaker 1: What's happening. Basically, let's put it up on the screen. 501 00:24:37,359 --> 00:24:42,239 Speaker 1: Zelenski fired nine of his top officials after reports that 502 00:24:42,359 --> 00:24:45,840 Speaker 1: members of his government went on vacation to Spain and 503 00:24:46,000 --> 00:24:49,840 Speaker 1: France and took bribes during the war. These are the 504 00:24:49,880 --> 00:24:52,720 Speaker 1: senior most officials in the top Ukrainian government who have 505 00:24:52,880 --> 00:24:57,440 Speaker 1: been fired actually during the war. So let's look at 506 00:24:57,680 --> 00:25:00,680 Speaker 1: who these people are four deputy men misters in the 507 00:25:00,800 --> 00:25:04,960 Speaker 1: Ukrainian government, including five regional governors, were sacked by the 508 00:25:05,040 --> 00:25:09,399 Speaker 1: Ukrainian cabinet. This was on Tuesday. The prosecutor Deputy prosecutor 509 00:25:09,480 --> 00:25:13,639 Speaker 1: General also announced his resignation as a result of this, 510 00:25:13,960 --> 00:25:18,080 Speaker 1: and it was because of internal investigations showing that some 511 00:25:18,160 --> 00:25:22,240 Speaker 1: of them were going on lavish vacations using a Mercedes 512 00:25:22,359 --> 00:25:27,119 Speaker 1: owned by a prominent Ukrainian businessman. A spokesperson for the 513 00:25:27,200 --> 00:25:31,600 Speaker 1: Ukrainian Border Guard was maligned for partying in Paris as 514 00:25:31,680 --> 00:25:36,680 Speaker 1: the war continued in Eastern Ukraine. Zelenski painted this as 515 00:25:36,760 --> 00:25:40,840 Speaker 1: an anti corruption move. This is also after they talk 516 00:25:40,880 --> 00:25:45,399 Speaker 1: about how the apparently the former deputy Defense minister resigned 517 00:25:45,520 --> 00:25:48,800 Speaker 1: after the papers reported that he had purchased food for 518 00:25:48,920 --> 00:25:53,840 Speaker 1: the military at prices inflated two or three times higher 519 00:25:54,080 --> 00:25:57,560 Speaker 1: than what was actually in the grocery store, spending some 520 00:25:57,760 --> 00:26:02,719 Speaker 1: three hundred and sixty million dollars on food. Now, let 521 00:26:02,800 --> 00:26:05,239 Speaker 1: me ask you who's dollars do you think that is? 522 00:26:05,280 --> 00:26:08,600 Speaker 1: Because there is no such thing as Ukrainian economy right now, 523 00:26:08,680 --> 00:26:12,879 Speaker 1: we are backstopping everything. So congratulations, American taxpayer, you're the 524 00:26:12,880 --> 00:26:16,480 Speaker 1: ones who paid. Yeah, you've funded these all expenses paid 525 00:26:16,560 --> 00:26:21,840 Speaker 1: vacations to Paris, Spain and wherever else. So way to go. Yeah, yeah, 526 00:26:21,840 --> 00:26:24,160 Speaker 1: I mean this is one of the key things that 527 00:26:24,160 --> 00:26:28,040 Speaker 1: the media has really gas led us on. Up until 528 00:26:28,280 --> 00:26:31,080 Speaker 1: Russia's invasion of Ukraine, there was all kinds of reporting 529 00:26:31,119 --> 00:26:32,760 Speaker 1: and you were allowed to say, this is a nation 530 00:26:32,800 --> 00:26:35,320 Speaker 1: that struggles with corruption. Yeah, the most oft entry in Europe, 531 00:26:35,680 --> 00:26:38,399 Speaker 1: very corrupt nation. Okay, the minute that this happened, you 532 00:26:38,440 --> 00:26:40,600 Speaker 1: were not allowed to say that anymore. That's why they 533 00:26:40,800 --> 00:26:43,639 Speaker 1: deserve to be invaded, right, yes, of course, of course. 534 00:26:44,200 --> 00:26:47,399 Speaker 1: But the reason that that became out of bounds in 535 00:26:47,520 --> 00:26:51,280 Speaker 1: terms of you know, commenting on whatsoever, is because then 536 00:26:51,320 --> 00:26:55,640 Speaker 1: that naturally raises questions in the minds of the American people. Okay, well, 537 00:26:55,680 --> 00:26:57,520 Speaker 1: what are we sending them and where's it going? And 538 00:26:57,560 --> 00:26:59,840 Speaker 1: maybe let's have like an inspector general to keep track 539 00:26:59,880 --> 00:27:01,480 Speaker 1: of where the weapons are going and with the money 540 00:27:01,560 --> 00:27:04,399 Speaker 1: is funding, et cetera, et cetera. But that was that 541 00:27:04,480 --> 00:27:06,800 Speaker 1: was out of bounds. You couldn't ask those questions, and 542 00:27:06,840 --> 00:27:10,399 Speaker 1: so it was important to just pretend like Ukraine was 543 00:27:10,440 --> 00:27:15,040 Speaker 1: this pristine beacon of democracy. And again, the fact that 544 00:27:15,080 --> 00:27:18,159 Speaker 1: they had struggle with corruption, as you know, many nations 545 00:27:18,160 --> 00:27:21,360 Speaker 1: around the world do, including our own. Doesn't mean they 546 00:27:21,400 --> 00:27:23,879 Speaker 1: deserve to be invaded, doesn't mean that they were like 547 00:27:24,040 --> 00:27:25,879 Speaker 1: you know, it's their fault, or that Russia has a 548 00:27:25,920 --> 00:27:28,720 Speaker 1: point or any of that. But it should have been 549 00:27:29,000 --> 00:27:32,879 Speaker 1: always part of the context to inform the debate, debate 550 00:27:32,960 --> 00:27:36,679 Speaker 1: here domestically about what we wanted to do and how 551 00:27:36,720 --> 00:27:39,639 Speaker 1: we wanted to do it. Instead, you know, Rand Paul's 552 00:27:40,040 --> 00:27:42,600 Speaker 1: very reasonable proposal, Hey, let's have an inspector general to 553 00:27:42,600 --> 00:27:44,439 Speaker 1: watch over where these funds are going and where these 554 00:27:44,480 --> 00:27:49,160 Speaker 1: weapons are going, was completely voted down and dismissed as unreasonable. Yeah, exactly. Look, 555 00:27:49,240 --> 00:27:50,880 Speaker 1: I mean, you know, is it too much to ask 556 00:27:50,920 --> 00:27:53,040 Speaker 1: if you're going to give somebody a hundred billion, is 557 00:27:53,040 --> 00:27:55,720 Speaker 1: it at least being spent on you know, Like, who 558 00:27:55,760 --> 00:27:57,720 Speaker 1: do I feel for the most in this whole situation, 559 00:27:58,200 --> 00:28:01,960 Speaker 1: actual Ukrainian people and soldiers. I mean, listen, one of 560 00:28:02,000 --> 00:28:04,520 Speaker 1: the crazy things about warfare in the twenty first century 561 00:28:04,800 --> 00:28:06,680 Speaker 1: is and I remember this during Syria, and I remember 562 00:28:06,800 --> 00:28:08,920 Speaker 1: now you can watch some of these videos of guys 563 00:28:08,920 --> 00:28:11,840 Speaker 1: getting ambushed on the front line, both Russian and Ukraine. 564 00:28:12,119 --> 00:28:14,919 Speaker 1: It is terrifying, and it just shows you too. Like 565 00:28:15,400 --> 00:28:18,600 Speaker 1: look war, for all the talk of tech, a lot 566 00:28:18,600 --> 00:28:20,119 Speaker 1: of it is just two guys in a hole, and 567 00:28:20,160 --> 00:28:22,280 Speaker 1: some of it comes down to like horrific hand to 568 00:28:22,280 --> 00:28:25,359 Speaker 1: hand combat with bullets, and it is terrible. And you 569 00:28:25,400 --> 00:28:27,000 Speaker 1: know the idea, I think a lot of us can 570 00:28:27,040 --> 00:28:28,520 Speaker 1: take pride and it's like, all right, you know, these 571 00:28:28,560 --> 00:28:30,800 Speaker 1: guys are fighting for the defense, they got weapons in 572 00:28:30,800 --> 00:28:32,760 Speaker 1: their hands, and they're standing up to try and do 573 00:28:32,840 --> 00:28:34,920 Speaker 1: something about it. But at least you want to make 574 00:28:34,960 --> 00:28:37,560 Speaker 1: sure that that's actually happening, not that the rations that 575 00:28:37,560 --> 00:28:41,520 Speaker 1: they're eating have been horrifically overpaid for by the American 576 00:28:41,560 --> 00:28:44,640 Speaker 1: taxpayer so that some guy in Ukraine can take a 577 00:28:44,800 --> 00:28:48,560 Speaker 1: vacation in Paris. That starts to really piss me off. 578 00:28:48,640 --> 00:28:50,800 Speaker 1: And I think a lot of people should be really 579 00:28:50,840 --> 00:28:53,440 Speaker 1: pissed off about what's going on there. And the fact 580 00:28:53,600 --> 00:28:56,640 Speaker 1: is it's like look, in terms of the Western media, nothing, 581 00:28:56,840 --> 00:29:00,920 Speaker 1: I mean, yeah, absolutely, no reporting. No, it's hard to 582 00:29:00,960 --> 00:29:04,120 Speaker 1: find all these like vacations and whatever that we're apparently 583 00:29:04,200 --> 00:29:06,880 Speaker 1: going on that Ukrainian government knew about. There was no 584 00:29:06,920 --> 00:29:09,560 Speaker 1: reporting on that. I have to go to like Ukrainian 585 00:29:09,600 --> 00:29:12,680 Speaker 1: sources or Russian sources and use the translate thing and 586 00:29:12,720 --> 00:29:14,920 Speaker 1: be like all right, well I think that's what's actually 587 00:29:15,200 --> 00:29:17,840 Speaker 1: going on here, and it's like all right, And this 588 00:29:17,920 --> 00:29:20,240 Speaker 1: is also why, like do I know what's happening? The 589 00:29:20,280 --> 00:29:22,160 Speaker 1: presumption that any of us know what's actually happening in 590 00:29:22,240 --> 00:29:25,520 Speaker 1: Ukraine it's a farce, Like almost everything that you see 591 00:29:25,760 --> 00:29:28,200 Speaker 1: in front of you, unless it's literal ravity. Even then 592 00:29:28,320 --> 00:29:31,240 Speaker 1: you know, yeah, even in terms of questionable what they're 593 00:29:31,280 --> 00:29:35,160 Speaker 1: bringing out and whether the translation is correct, it is, 594 00:29:35,600 --> 00:29:37,800 Speaker 1: it shows you the difficulty that we face here and 595 00:29:37,800 --> 00:29:41,360 Speaker 1: trying to give people a fullsome picture of what's going on. 596 00:29:41,480 --> 00:29:44,200 Speaker 1: But anyway, I think it's an important story. It's something 597 00:29:44,240 --> 00:29:45,920 Speaker 1: that you got to track. I mean, Selenski's a guy, 598 00:29:45,920 --> 00:29:48,920 Speaker 1: he's cracked on media, he's fired or does banned some 599 00:29:49,040 --> 00:29:52,960 Speaker 1: opposition parties that were actually in Ukraine. In terms of 600 00:29:52,960 --> 00:29:55,120 Speaker 1: the people he's replacing, I mean, who knows, like whether 601 00:29:55,440 --> 00:29:57,560 Speaker 1: those people are good or not? Are they corrupt in 602 00:29:57,560 --> 00:30:01,600 Speaker 1: the right way? That's always a real question. The bribes, etc. 603 00:30:02,160 --> 00:30:04,720 Speaker 1: I've done my best to try so. For example, they 604 00:30:04,760 --> 00:30:06,600 Speaker 1: talk about the bribe Mike, well, who bribed him? You know, 605 00:30:06,640 --> 00:30:09,200 Speaker 1: I'm looking into it. Some one of these deputy ministers 606 00:30:09,200 --> 00:30:12,239 Speaker 1: takes a four hundred thousand dollars, but nobody's naming the bribe. Mike, well, 607 00:30:12,280 --> 00:30:15,360 Speaker 1: who is is it Russia? Is it Eastern Europe? Like, 608 00:30:15,600 --> 00:30:19,080 Speaker 1: where's the money coming from? None of that is open 609 00:30:19,360 --> 00:30:20,880 Speaker 1: in their board. We're going to stay on this because 610 00:30:20,880 --> 00:30:23,360 Speaker 1: I actually do think it is really important. Yeah, and 611 00:30:23,400 --> 00:30:26,760 Speaker 1: just one more piece on you know, the incomplete picture 612 00:30:27,360 --> 00:30:29,480 Speaker 1: and the lack of questioning that we get from the 613 00:30:29,720 --> 00:30:33,280 Speaker 1: Western press. Year. There's some real questions about exactly what 614 00:30:33,400 --> 00:30:36,600 Speaker 1: happened with regards to this apartment block that was hit 615 00:30:36,640 --> 00:30:40,520 Speaker 1: with a missile, devastating attack on civilians there. Yeah, and 616 00:30:41,160 --> 00:30:44,880 Speaker 1: you know, the Western press reported very definitively and conclusively 617 00:30:44,920 --> 00:30:47,920 Speaker 1: that this was definitely a Russian missile strike. Well, go 618 00:30:47,960 --> 00:30:50,520 Speaker 1: ahead and put this up on the screen. A Ukrainian 619 00:30:50,600 --> 00:30:56,120 Speaker 1: advisor actually suggested that it was not a Russian missile 620 00:30:56,200 --> 00:30:59,760 Speaker 1: which hit that building, but that it was a Ukrainian 621 00:31:00,000 --> 00:31:03,680 Speaker 1: attempt to disrupt that missile that ended up incidentally hitting 622 00:31:04,280 --> 00:31:08,320 Speaker 1: this building. And Zelenski himself made some comments at the 623 00:31:08,320 --> 00:31:10,800 Speaker 1: World Economic Form that seemed to suggest that was also 624 00:31:10,880 --> 00:31:16,080 Speaker 1: a possibility. But this advisor resigned, apologized over the comments 625 00:31:16,480 --> 00:31:19,000 Speaker 1: and Listen. I don't know what the reality is of 626 00:31:19,000 --> 00:31:21,360 Speaker 1: what happened here with this apartment block, but I do 627 00:31:21,520 --> 00:31:24,719 Speaker 1: know that there should be some curiosity in the press. 628 00:31:24,960 --> 00:31:29,240 Speaker 1: Now listen. Ultimately, right, if Russia wasn't firing on this area, 629 00:31:29,440 --> 00:31:32,880 Speaker 1: then this catastrophe wouldn't have happened. So, yes, still Russia 630 00:31:32,960 --> 00:31:35,560 Speaker 1: is to blame. But there's a qualitative difference between Russia 631 00:31:35,640 --> 00:31:38,479 Speaker 1: was trying to hit and you know, energy block and 632 00:31:38,920 --> 00:31:41,440 Speaker 1: ends up you know, the Ukrainians and trying to disrupt 633 00:31:41,440 --> 00:31:44,320 Speaker 1: that missile ends up with these casualties on the apartment building. 634 00:31:44,360 --> 00:31:47,120 Speaker 1: That's a very different portrait being painted of this war 635 00:31:47,560 --> 00:31:51,480 Speaker 1: versus Russia intentionally targeting civilians in an apartment right, Well, 636 00:31:51,480 --> 00:31:53,680 Speaker 1: we have no idea. Again, I have no clue. Guess 637 00:31:53,680 --> 00:31:55,840 Speaker 1: what I know. The Ukrainians lied and they said that 638 00:31:55,880 --> 00:31:58,960 Speaker 1: it was Russia that fired on Pole, that accidentally hit 639 00:31:59,160 --> 00:32:01,200 Speaker 1: those guys in Pole and kill two people, when it 640 00:32:01,240 --> 00:32:04,920 Speaker 1: was actually adamant, right, they were adamant. They didn't admit 641 00:32:04,960 --> 00:32:07,000 Speaker 1: it until we straight up had the forensic proof, and 642 00:32:07,000 --> 00:32:08,800 Speaker 1: then even then they're like, oh, yeah, show is the proof, 643 00:32:08,800 --> 00:32:10,440 Speaker 1: and they probably still deny it to this day. I 644 00:32:10,440 --> 00:32:12,120 Speaker 1: guess we're all just not supposed to talk about that. 645 00:32:12,360 --> 00:32:14,520 Speaker 1: Do I put it past Russia to hit civilians and 646 00:32:14,600 --> 00:32:16,920 Speaker 1: kill them? No? Absolutely not. Of course, of course, you 647 00:32:16,920 --> 00:32:19,560 Speaker 1: know why would we especially maybe it wasn't intentional, Maybe 648 00:32:19,560 --> 00:32:22,640 Speaker 1: they're just guided systems or shit, which is also sad 649 00:32:22,680 --> 00:32:25,640 Speaker 1: at war. We know this actually in terms of them 650 00:32:25,680 --> 00:32:27,320 Speaker 1: hit they like try to hit a bridge and they 651 00:32:27,400 --> 00:32:28,960 Speaker 1: end up hitting a park. I mean, you know, they've 652 00:32:29,000 --> 00:32:31,440 Speaker 1: hit several civilians. This is part of the problem, which 653 00:32:31,480 --> 00:32:33,640 Speaker 1: is you know, you shouldn't put anybody in a pedestal. 654 00:32:33,920 --> 00:32:37,360 Speaker 1: Nobody is you know, the hagiography of Ukraine is exactly 655 00:32:37,360 --> 00:32:40,360 Speaker 1: what makes it so difficult to ask questions. But I'm optimistic. Look, 656 00:32:40,400 --> 00:32:42,360 Speaker 1: we're a year into this thing, and I'm not saying 657 00:32:42,360 --> 00:32:44,360 Speaker 1: this tanks and all this stuff doesn't worry me. But 658 00:32:44,480 --> 00:32:47,360 Speaker 1: people are asking more questions today than ever before, and 659 00:32:47,400 --> 00:32:49,920 Speaker 1: one day we will get a real account, just like 660 00:32:49,920 --> 00:32:52,560 Speaker 1: we did with Libya, just like we did with Iraq. 661 00:32:52,680 --> 00:32:54,920 Speaker 1: And just remember what it was like in two thousand 662 00:32:54,960 --> 00:32:56,360 Speaker 1: and three if this show had been on the air 663 00:32:56,360 --> 00:32:58,640 Speaker 1: and we've been saying what we were saying, what we 664 00:32:58,720 --> 00:33:01,640 Speaker 1: believed about Iraq, and then a year later you're totally 665 00:33:01,880 --> 00:33:05,360 Speaker 1: and completely vindicated. So well, let me just say to 666 00:33:05,760 --> 00:33:09,240 Speaker 1: offer the administration's perspective, what they would say back to 667 00:33:09,320 --> 00:33:12,120 Speaker 1: us about the tanks in particular, is this is an 668 00:33:12,160 --> 00:33:14,960 Speaker 1: all in an attempt to really strengthen the Ukrainian hands 669 00:33:14,960 --> 00:33:16,800 Speaker 1: so they're in a better position to sit down at 670 00:33:16,800 --> 00:33:19,760 Speaker 1: the table for Nego ultimately. But like you could make 671 00:33:19,800 --> 00:33:23,400 Speaker 1: that argument indefinitely, right, But that's that's ultimately the case 672 00:33:23,400 --> 00:33:26,560 Speaker 1: that they would put forward. All right, let's move on 673 00:33:26,680 --> 00:33:33,120 Speaker 1: to American's America's Congressman George Santos aka Anthony Divalder aka Katara. 674 00:33:34,880 --> 00:33:37,280 Speaker 1: This is a big deal. I mean, listen, all the 675 00:33:37,400 --> 00:33:39,720 Speaker 1: lies and the like insanity of him claiming he's on 676 00:33:39,760 --> 00:33:41,720 Speaker 1: the volleyball team, and the video of him as a 677 00:33:41,840 --> 00:33:45,360 Speaker 1: drag queen and all of that stuff is you know, interesting, uh, 678 00:33:45,440 --> 00:33:48,480 Speaker 1: And obviously I've been really fascinated by it. But the 679 00:33:48,560 --> 00:33:52,560 Speaker 1: key question here has always been where did that money 680 00:33:52,600 --> 00:33:56,000 Speaker 1: come from that you put into your campaign, buddy, hundreds 681 00:33:56,040 --> 00:33:59,200 Speaker 1: of thousands of dollars, when there is no real track 682 00:33:59,240 --> 00:34:01,920 Speaker 1: record of this business that you claim you ran doing, 683 00:34:02,000 --> 00:34:06,560 Speaker 1: any sort of you know, actual business. It appears that 684 00:34:06,800 --> 00:34:09,719 Speaker 1: up until very recently you had very little funds to 685 00:34:09,760 --> 00:34:12,239 Speaker 1: your name. You were getting kicked out of apartments. You 686 00:34:12,280 --> 00:34:14,640 Speaker 1: reported I think a fifty five thousand dollars income the 687 00:34:14,680 --> 00:34:17,160 Speaker 1: last time you ran from Congress. So how did you 688 00:34:17,200 --> 00:34:19,759 Speaker 1: suddenly have this big change of fortunes where now you're 689 00:34:19,760 --> 00:34:22,959 Speaker 1: putting in seven hundred k to your own campaign. Well, 690 00:34:23,480 --> 00:34:28,680 Speaker 1: the Santos campaign has now just filed an amended financial disclosure. 691 00:34:29,080 --> 00:34:31,879 Speaker 1: This was with regard to their campaign expenditures. It's got 692 00:34:31,880 --> 00:34:33,680 Speaker 1: to put this up on the screen. From Daily Beast. 693 00:34:34,120 --> 00:34:38,920 Speaker 1: Late Tuesday afternoon, Santos afternoon, Santos's political operation filed a 694 00:34:39,000 --> 00:34:43,400 Speaker 1: flurry of amended campaign finance reports, telling the FEDS, among 695 00:34:43,400 --> 00:34:46,440 Speaker 1: other things, that a five hundred thousand dollars loon he 696 00:34:46,520 --> 00:34:50,640 Speaker 1: gave to his campaign did not in fact come from 697 00:34:50,640 --> 00:34:54,960 Speaker 1: his personal funds as he previously claimed. However, while the 698 00:34:54,960 --> 00:34:57,120 Speaker 1: newly amended filing told us where the funds did not 699 00:34:57,200 --> 00:35:00,279 Speaker 1: come from, it also raised a new question where did 700 00:35:00,280 --> 00:35:02,720 Speaker 1: the money come from. While both the old new campaign 701 00:35:02,719 --> 00:35:05,719 Speaker 1: filings claimed that the loans came quote from the candidate, 702 00:35:06,200 --> 00:35:09,719 Speaker 1: the most recent amended filing had ticked the box for 703 00:35:10,080 --> 00:35:14,440 Speaker 1: personal funds of the candidate, And on this new amended filing, 704 00:35:15,080 --> 00:35:18,120 Speaker 1: that box is unchecked, so they are no longer claiming 705 00:35:18,520 --> 00:35:21,759 Speaker 1: that this was personal funds of the candidate, So they're 706 00:35:21,840 --> 00:35:25,000 Speaker 1: saying that it came from the candidate, but not from 707 00:35:25,080 --> 00:35:28,360 Speaker 1: the personal funds of the candidate, which raises a whole 708 00:35:28,360 --> 00:35:32,640 Speaker 1: slew of questions. Then again, where did the money come from? 709 00:35:33,040 --> 00:35:37,640 Speaker 1: And effectively the only legal answer to that would be 710 00:35:37,840 --> 00:35:40,600 Speaker 1: is if he got like a bank loan, you know 711 00:35:40,680 --> 00:35:43,240 Speaker 1: that then proceeds go into his account and he uses 712 00:35:43,280 --> 00:35:48,279 Speaker 1: that bank loan to fund his campaign. That is from 713 00:35:48,320 --> 00:35:50,920 Speaker 1: what I read from other you know, campaign finance experts, 714 00:35:50,920 --> 00:35:55,719 Speaker 1: et cetera. That is effectively the only legal answer to 715 00:35:56,120 --> 00:35:58,759 Speaker 1: that question given these new revelations. And by the way, 716 00:35:58,760 --> 00:36:00,640 Speaker 1: there was another one hundred and twenty five thousand dollars 717 00:36:01,040 --> 00:36:05,400 Speaker 1: loan that they made the same change to unchecking that 718 00:36:05,480 --> 00:36:08,399 Speaker 1: box saying that it came from the candidate's personal funds. Yeah. 719 00:36:08,440 --> 00:36:10,400 Speaker 1: I really believe that this will be the downfall of 720 00:36:10,440 --> 00:36:13,360 Speaker 1: Santos more than anything, just because it's you said, You're like, look, 721 00:36:13,400 --> 00:36:14,920 Speaker 1: as long as you follow the rules, we have one 722 00:36:14,920 --> 00:36:17,399 Speaker 1: of the most corrupt campaign finance laws in the entire world. 723 00:36:17,800 --> 00:36:20,200 Speaker 1: But if you don't follow the rules, you are going 724 00:36:20,200 --> 00:36:23,719 Speaker 1: to jail. Like it's like denetch deesuza right, Like one 725 00:36:23,760 --> 00:36:28,160 Speaker 1: straw donation, that's it, you know, welcome to the federal penitentiary. 726 00:36:28,280 --> 00:36:30,120 Speaker 1: That's part of the reason why I think SBF is 727 00:36:30,160 --> 00:36:33,120 Speaker 1: screen even if he was not guilty of wirefraud, which 728 00:36:33,120 --> 00:36:36,960 Speaker 1: I really allegedly but do believe that he is. It's like, 729 00:36:37,120 --> 00:36:40,200 Speaker 1: if he they can prove even one straw donation, they'd 730 00:36:40,200 --> 00:36:43,720 Speaker 1: have you the Feds. You're done. FEC violation is actually 731 00:36:43,840 --> 00:36:45,520 Speaker 1: not hard to prove. It's part of the reasons why 732 00:36:45,520 --> 00:36:48,800 Speaker 1: campaign spends so much time, energy and more investing and 733 00:36:48,840 --> 00:36:51,200 Speaker 1: making sure they at least do follow the limited rules 734 00:36:51,239 --> 00:36:53,759 Speaker 1: and at least go around the loopholes with five oh 735 00:36:53,800 --> 00:36:55,719 Speaker 1: one c threes and fours right and all this. You 736 00:36:55,800 --> 00:36:57,440 Speaker 1: got to know the way to work the loop right, 737 00:36:57,480 --> 00:36:59,439 Speaker 1: But he didn't do right. You can do whatever you want, 738 00:36:59,480 --> 00:37:01,479 Speaker 1: but you have to do it in the right way 739 00:37:01,680 --> 00:37:03,440 Speaker 1: or else. Yeah, your face in prison time. And he 740 00:37:03,520 --> 00:37:06,320 Speaker 1: doesn't appear to I mean, look like you said, unless 741 00:37:06,360 --> 00:37:08,239 Speaker 1: he straight up took a bank loan. And who the 742 00:37:08,280 --> 00:37:11,640 Speaker 1: hell is going to give Anthony divald or George Santos, 743 00:37:11,760 --> 00:37:17,600 Speaker 1: a proven Ponzi schemer fell in whatever criminal history. Who's 744 00:37:17,600 --> 00:37:19,600 Speaker 1: gonna give him a five hour, thousand dollars bank loan 745 00:37:20,080 --> 00:37:23,200 Speaker 1: like it's maybe, Or but if he took it from 746 00:37:23,200 --> 00:37:26,640 Speaker 1: somebody and reported it as personal, that's it. I mean, look, 747 00:37:26,680 --> 00:37:30,279 Speaker 1: you could try and revise the filing in but in 748 00:37:30,320 --> 00:37:32,200 Speaker 1: the past, but you know, lying to the FBC is 749 00:37:32,239 --> 00:37:34,880 Speaker 1: a very serious crime. Yeah, I very much think that 750 00:37:34,920 --> 00:37:36,839 Speaker 1: this is gonna this is going to go down. I 751 00:37:36,880 --> 00:37:39,120 Speaker 1: agree with you. I don't see how he gets out 752 00:37:39,120 --> 00:37:40,640 Speaker 1: of this one or how he comes up with any 753 00:37:40,640 --> 00:37:43,719 Speaker 1: sort of explanation that really makes sense, which is why 754 00:37:43,760 --> 00:37:46,440 Speaker 1: I mean, this new filing is just honestly bizarre. Just 755 00:37:46,480 --> 00:37:50,279 Speaker 1: to remind you of what he had said previously. Previously 756 00:37:50,360 --> 00:37:53,360 Speaker 1: it's said that this was quote money I paid myself 757 00:37:53,520 --> 00:37:57,839 Speaker 1: through the Devulter organization. He had confirmed to The Daily 758 00:37:57,880 --> 00:38:00,480 Speaker 1: Beast last month that he withdrew money from his firm 759 00:38:00,520 --> 00:38:03,480 Speaker 1: specifically to underwrite his campaign, reasoning he was the firm's 760 00:38:03,520 --> 00:38:07,200 Speaker 1: sole owner. It was actually an LLC, not a sole proprietorship. 761 00:38:07,239 --> 00:38:09,440 Speaker 1: But you know that you could you could maybe see 762 00:38:09,840 --> 00:38:12,200 Speaker 1: if he was earning a bunch of cash into this 763 00:38:12,280 --> 00:38:14,960 Speaker 1: company that is his company, and then he takes it 764 00:38:15,040 --> 00:38:17,720 Speaker 1: in salary, which is kind of what he had claimed before, 765 00:38:18,120 --> 00:38:20,000 Speaker 1: and then uses a big chunk of that to fund 766 00:38:20,000 --> 00:38:22,720 Speaker 1: the campaign. You may say, like, well, that wasn't really 767 00:38:22,800 --> 00:38:24,480 Speaker 1: that wise, given that you don't seem to have that 768 00:38:24,520 --> 00:38:27,240 Speaker 1: many other funds. But okay, it may technically be legal 769 00:38:28,120 --> 00:38:31,960 Speaker 1: now though if you're saying this wasn't actually your your 770 00:38:32,160 --> 00:38:37,880 Speaker 1: money that you were putting in. Again, the only legal 771 00:38:37,960 --> 00:38:40,040 Speaker 1: answer to what's going on here is that he got 772 00:38:40,080 --> 00:38:42,239 Speaker 1: some kind of a bank loan. It can't have it 773 00:38:42,239 --> 00:38:44,759 Speaker 1: can't have been you know, just passed through from some 774 00:38:44,880 --> 00:38:47,239 Speaker 1: other rich person like that is not that is not 775 00:38:47,280 --> 00:38:49,800 Speaker 1: going to pass muster. So he's under a lot of 776 00:38:49,800 --> 00:38:52,440 Speaker 1: scrutiny there. At the same time, you know, we've been 777 00:38:52,520 --> 00:38:57,240 Speaker 1: covering the fact that he has now been caught involved 778 00:38:57,239 --> 00:39:01,359 Speaker 1: with what the SEC Securities Exchange commiss is accusing of 779 00:39:01,400 --> 00:39:04,560 Speaker 1: being a Ponzi scheme and appeers based on the indictment 780 00:39:04,600 --> 00:39:07,120 Speaker 1: that I read of very much being a Ponzi scheme. 781 00:39:07,560 --> 00:39:11,560 Speaker 1: Washington Post has new reporting on how Santos operated within 782 00:39:11,600 --> 00:39:14,040 Speaker 1: this Ponzi scheme, the way that he worked to try 783 00:39:14,080 --> 00:39:17,320 Speaker 1: to draw investors in, and it is really fascinating. I 784 00:39:17,320 --> 00:39:19,319 Speaker 1: don't know if you guys watch that inventing Anna about 785 00:39:19,320 --> 00:39:22,120 Speaker 1: Anna Deelvey, This like supposed this woman who portrayed herself 786 00:39:22,120 --> 00:39:24,680 Speaker 1: as a German heiress and like really fooled a bunch 787 00:39:24,719 --> 00:39:26,719 Speaker 1: of people in New York City, like almost got away 788 00:39:26,719 --> 00:39:28,960 Speaker 1: with the whole scheme. There are a lot of Anna 789 00:39:29,040 --> 00:39:33,000 Speaker 1: Delviy vibes contained in this Washington Post article. Is going 790 00:39:33,000 --> 00:39:35,719 Speaker 1: and put this up on the screen. The headline here is, 791 00:39:35,800 --> 00:39:39,160 Speaker 1: I felt like we were in Goodfellas. How George Santos 792 00:39:39,320 --> 00:39:44,560 Speaker 1: would investors for an alleged Ponzi scheme. They open this 793 00:39:44,800 --> 00:39:50,000 Speaker 1: article with a sort of like dramatic, dramatic description of 794 00:39:50,080 --> 00:39:53,440 Speaker 1: him bringing in investors to this restaurant, one of the 795 00:39:53,440 --> 00:39:55,719 Speaker 1: restaurants that he spent like tens of thousands of dollars in, 796 00:39:55,760 --> 00:39:59,080 Speaker 1: by the way, in his campaign finance reports, and would 797 00:39:59,160 --> 00:40:04,120 Speaker 1: pitch them and over multi course elaborate meals. Really sort 798 00:40:04,120 --> 00:40:07,719 Speaker 1: of portrayed himself like he was this very wealthy, high 799 00:40:07,800 --> 00:40:11,760 Speaker 1: up individual that he was hobnobbing with elites in the city. 800 00:40:11,960 --> 00:40:13,960 Speaker 1: Which again, if you watch the Anadelvi thing, like that 801 00:40:14,040 --> 00:40:16,120 Speaker 1: was her whole thing. It's just if you project that 802 00:40:16,160 --> 00:40:18,640 Speaker 1: you are that and you have the right people around you, 803 00:40:18,840 --> 00:40:22,239 Speaker 1: other elites will basically buy into this mythology that you're 804 00:40:22,280 --> 00:40:25,719 Speaker 1: creating about yourself. So here's some of the details they 805 00:40:25,719 --> 00:40:28,040 Speaker 1: say in internal Harbor City meetings. That's name of the 806 00:40:28,040 --> 00:40:31,799 Speaker 1: Pazzi scheme. Santos refined his pitch braasily, offering stories he 807 00:40:31,840 --> 00:40:34,800 Speaker 1: said he could tell investors to demonstrate his credentials or 808 00:40:34,880 --> 00:40:38,360 Speaker 1: lighten the mood. According to zoom recordings that the Post obtained, 809 00:40:38,680 --> 00:40:41,560 Speaker 1: some of the tales were self deprecating, but they delivered 810 00:40:41,600 --> 00:40:44,799 Speaker 1: the same message that he operated in the orbit of 811 00:40:44,840 --> 00:40:47,520 Speaker 1: the rich and powerful. For example, he told this story 812 00:40:47,560 --> 00:40:51,280 Speaker 1: about I think it was the Blackstone CEO that Santos 813 00:40:51,360 --> 00:40:53,520 Speaker 1: was in a meeting with him and fell over a 814 00:40:53,600 --> 00:40:55,880 Speaker 1: table or something like that. So again it was like 815 00:40:55,920 --> 00:40:59,239 Speaker 1: self deprecating, but it was like a humble brag. The 816 00:40:59,239 --> 00:41:01,560 Speaker 1: bottom line of this story was, these are the sorts 817 00:41:01,560 --> 00:41:03,399 Speaker 1: of people that I'm friends with, These are the sorts 818 00:41:03,400 --> 00:41:05,719 Speaker 1: of people I know. Of course, is all completely completely 819 00:41:05,760 --> 00:41:09,600 Speaker 1: made up. They also talk about the way that this 820 00:41:09,840 --> 00:41:13,400 Speaker 1: the staff at this restaurant, which again he spent thirty 821 00:41:13,520 --> 00:41:16,719 Speaker 1: thousand dollars on in his campaign. According to his reports, 822 00:41:17,480 --> 00:41:21,359 Speaker 1: they would welcome him and his clients he would order 823 00:41:21,400 --> 00:41:24,360 Speaker 1: dish after dish, and one of the people that was 824 00:41:24,360 --> 00:41:26,640 Speaker 1: involved said it really made her worry that he was 825 00:41:26,680 --> 00:41:29,080 Speaker 1: trying to fleece this person that she had put him 826 00:41:29,120 --> 00:41:31,080 Speaker 1: in touch with, and she said, I was so pissed. 827 00:41:31,120 --> 00:41:33,640 Speaker 1: He did this nice show and dance. Everyone at the 828 00:41:33,640 --> 00:41:35,880 Speaker 1: restaurant knew it. It felt like this was a routine 829 00:41:35,920 --> 00:41:39,160 Speaker 1: he did, like this was not the first time. So 830 00:41:39,719 --> 00:41:42,600 Speaker 1: also raises some questions there about whether he was using 831 00:41:42,600 --> 00:41:46,760 Speaker 1: the campaign funds in order to finance these elaborate dinners 832 00:41:46,800 --> 00:41:48,960 Speaker 1: that he was using to try to pitch people on 833 00:41:49,440 --> 00:41:51,640 Speaker 1: a Ponzi scheme. Yeah, exactly. And you know, I've also 834 00:41:51,680 --> 00:41:54,719 Speaker 1: been fascinated by schemers. I've really just gone back to 835 00:41:54,760 --> 00:41:57,680 Speaker 1: the case of made Off. Madeoff was also a genius 836 00:41:57,760 --> 00:42:01,240 Speaker 1: exactly in this regard, in that even when he needed 837 00:42:01,239 --> 00:42:04,160 Speaker 1: money desperately. One time he was like two hundred million 838 00:42:04,280 --> 00:42:06,160 Speaker 1: in a hole and some guy came up to him 839 00:42:06,239 --> 00:42:07,719 Speaker 1: was like, Bernie, I want to give you one hundred million. 840 00:42:07,760 --> 00:42:09,960 Speaker 1: He's like, that's not going to cut it. And at 841 00:42:10,000 --> 00:42:13,040 Speaker 1: a gala and you know, they're talking and he's like, well, 842 00:42:13,040 --> 00:42:15,440 Speaker 1: what do I He's like, I've got longtime clients I'm sorry, 843 00:42:15,640 --> 00:42:18,680 Speaker 1: I can't do it. For for me to do it, 844 00:42:18,880 --> 00:42:21,160 Speaker 1: I'd have to put somebody away. And he's like, okay, 845 00:42:21,160 --> 00:42:23,440 Speaker 1: two hundred million. He's like, no, no way, I'm sorry. 846 00:42:23,440 --> 00:42:24,920 Speaker 1: That's just not going to do it. He goes to 847 00:42:24,920 --> 00:42:27,120 Speaker 1: two fifty, which is exactly what Bernie needs. He needs 848 00:42:27,160 --> 00:42:29,640 Speaker 1: it in order to make his next withdrawal for one 849 00:42:29,680 --> 00:42:31,759 Speaker 1: of his clients. He said, nah. He works him all 850 00:42:31,840 --> 00:42:34,000 Speaker 1: the way up to four hundred million, and he's like, 851 00:42:34,120 --> 00:42:36,399 Speaker 1: all right, I guess I could make that work. And 852 00:42:36,440 --> 00:42:39,120 Speaker 1: that it worked, I mean, that's there. It's like you 853 00:42:39,520 --> 00:42:42,720 Speaker 1: read about it and you're like, that's just the craasiness 854 00:42:42,400 --> 00:42:45,080 Speaker 1: of the lack of shame. I just can't. If he 855 00:42:45,080 --> 00:42:47,479 Speaker 1: doesn't get this money around it, it collapses, the whole 856 00:42:47,520 --> 00:42:49,799 Speaker 1: scheme collapses unless he gets that money today. It ended 857 00:42:49,840 --> 00:42:53,319 Speaker 1: up collapsing like a couple of months later. But I mean, 858 00:42:53,640 --> 00:42:56,200 Speaker 1: you know, I don't have that in me, man I. 859 00:42:56,360 --> 00:42:59,239 Speaker 1: Whatever that is, it's a rare, rare quality, and it 860 00:42:59,320 --> 00:43:02,640 Speaker 1: auto select for the Bernie maid offs for the rare quality. 861 00:43:02,760 --> 00:43:06,640 Speaker 1: He doesn't feel ever right now, I don't know. It's 862 00:43:06,640 --> 00:43:09,000 Speaker 1: a rare quality. It's an amazing story. There's actually a 863 00:43:09,000 --> 00:43:11,880 Speaker 1: movie on it where they dramatize that scene on HBO 864 00:43:12,000 --> 00:43:15,719 Speaker 1: called Wizard of Lies. I gotta watch that. That is incredible. 865 00:43:15,800 --> 00:43:18,040 Speaker 1: I mean, you know, I really have been obsessed with 866 00:43:18,080 --> 00:43:21,160 Speaker 1: this story, not even so much like the political implications whatever, 867 00:43:21,239 --> 00:43:23,879 Speaker 1: Like politicians lie, We get it. You know, this guy 868 00:43:24,840 --> 00:43:27,600 Speaker 1: part of why a lot of people feel like there's 869 00:43:27,680 --> 00:43:30,239 Speaker 1: extra scrutiny on him or something because he's a Republican. 870 00:43:30,239 --> 00:43:32,200 Speaker 1: But I gotta tell you, I mean, I think anyone 871 00:43:32,239 --> 00:43:36,959 Speaker 1: who lied this brazenly and just invented these personas, there's 872 00:43:37,080 --> 00:43:40,640 Speaker 1: just a public fascination with the way that you can 873 00:43:40,719 --> 00:43:45,799 Speaker 1: navigate through the world making up elaborate lie after elaborate lie. 874 00:43:46,000 --> 00:43:50,319 Speaker 1: And you know, ultimately he did. He did trick a 875 00:43:50,440 --> 00:43:54,719 Speaker 1: lot of supposedly sophisticated people. You know, even with this 876 00:43:54,800 --> 00:43:58,680 Speaker 1: Ponzi scheme, tricked at least some number of supposedly sophisticated 877 00:43:58,680 --> 00:44:01,640 Speaker 1: investors to get in on this thing, tricked a lot 878 00:44:01,640 --> 00:44:04,879 Speaker 1: of Republican elites. A least Dephonic apparently was a big 879 00:44:04,920 --> 00:44:07,400 Speaker 1: sort of patron of his and sort of reviving his 880 00:44:07,480 --> 00:44:12,359 Speaker 1: congressional campaign after some opposition. Some internal research that they 881 00:44:12,400 --> 00:44:14,160 Speaker 1: had done revealed some of this stuff and a bunch 882 00:44:14,200 --> 00:44:17,040 Speaker 1: of his campaign staff fled. Well she's the one that 883 00:44:17,080 --> 00:44:19,680 Speaker 1: comes back in and her consultant gets on board, and 884 00:44:19,680 --> 00:44:22,200 Speaker 1: that kind of enabled him to continue in this race 885 00:44:22,239 --> 00:44:23,960 Speaker 1: in the way that he did and ultimately win it. 886 00:44:24,040 --> 00:44:26,719 Speaker 1: So that's the part that is really fascinating to me, 887 00:44:26,800 --> 00:44:28,799 Speaker 1: is like the psychology, what it says about the holes 888 00:44:28,840 --> 00:44:30,839 Speaker 1: in our political system, what it says about like what 889 00:44:30,880 --> 00:44:33,319 Speaker 1: people are vulnerable to in terms of the stories that 890 00:44:33,600 --> 00:44:36,319 Speaker 1: get told. So it is remarkable, that's what it is. 891 00:44:40,200 --> 00:44:44,360 Speaker 1: Another fraudster, Brett Barv former you know, NFL Hall of 892 00:44:44,360 --> 00:44:47,960 Speaker 1: Fame quarterback, etcetera, etcetera. So we dug deep into this 893 00:44:48,080 --> 00:44:51,120 Speaker 1: story because it truly, truly is shocking. And just to 894 00:44:51,200 --> 00:44:53,840 Speaker 1: remind you of some of the details, I did a 895 00:44:53,840 --> 00:44:55,480 Speaker 1: long monologue on this if you want to go back 896 00:44:55,480 --> 00:44:58,800 Speaker 1: and review all of the nitty gritty details. Bottom line, 897 00:44:58,960 --> 00:45:03,280 Speaker 1: Brett Farv was involved in a scheme to steal millions 898 00:45:03,560 --> 00:45:07,960 Speaker 1: of dollars from Mississippi's welfare fund. This is money that 899 00:45:08,120 --> 00:45:10,920 Speaker 1: is supposed to go to poor people in a state 900 00:45:11,000 --> 00:45:12,640 Speaker 1: where you have a lot of poor people. Number one 901 00:45:12,719 --> 00:45:16,279 Speaker 1: and number two, where they are so stingy with distributing 902 00:45:16,320 --> 00:45:19,320 Speaker 1: this money. It's almost like there is no welfare system 903 00:45:19,360 --> 00:45:24,120 Speaker 1: in the state of Mississippi. Instead, multi multimillionaires like Brett 904 00:45:24,120 --> 00:45:26,799 Speaker 1: farre were like pigs at the trough for this thing. 905 00:45:26,840 --> 00:45:28,920 Speaker 1: He alleges no wrongdoing and I had no idea what 906 00:45:29,000 --> 00:45:30,480 Speaker 1: was going on for the lawyers. Let me just put 907 00:45:30,520 --> 00:45:34,960 Speaker 1: this out there. Well, the Mississippi Auditor is speaking out 908 00:45:35,000 --> 00:45:39,919 Speaker 1: in a new interview on HBO talking about how this 909 00:45:40,080 --> 00:45:44,600 Speaker 1: was the largest public fraud case in the history of 910 00:45:44,640 --> 00:45:46,799 Speaker 1: the state. And it wasn't just far. There were other 911 00:45:46,840 --> 00:45:50,319 Speaker 1: players involved who ultimately robbed this welfare fund of like 912 00:45:50,440 --> 00:45:54,200 Speaker 1: one hundred million dollars. Let's say, take a listen to 913 00:45:54,239 --> 00:45:56,600 Speaker 1: what that Mississippi State Auditor is saying. What I can 914 00:45:56,640 --> 00:45:58,720 Speaker 1: tell you is that this is the largest public fraud 915 00:45:58,760 --> 00:46:00,560 Speaker 1: case in the history of the state of mississ Here, 916 00:46:00,560 --> 00:46:03,000 Speaker 1: in the poorest state in America, money from the state 917 00:46:03,040 --> 00:46:06,560 Speaker 1: welfare fund, intended to help alleviate poverty was instead being 918 00:46:06,560 --> 00:46:09,400 Speaker 1: re routed by those in charge to their cronies and friends, 919 00:46:09,719 --> 00:46:12,560 Speaker 1: nearly one hundred million dollars in all. They thought of 920 00:46:12,600 --> 00:46:14,600 Speaker 1: this fund as not only their own fund to do 921 00:46:14,640 --> 00:46:15,759 Speaker 1: what they wanted with, but they thought of it as 922 00:46:15,800 --> 00:46:17,919 Speaker 1: a slush fund that no one was watching at all. 923 00:46:18,520 --> 00:46:20,719 Speaker 1: They thought of it as a slush fund. Just a 924 00:46:20,719 --> 00:46:23,880 Speaker 1: reminder on some of the details. Specifically with regard to FARV, 925 00:46:24,239 --> 00:46:27,239 Speaker 1: he took five million dollars for a project to build 926 00:46:27,320 --> 00:46:30,840 Speaker 1: a volleyball stadium at the university his daughter was attending, 927 00:46:30,840 --> 00:46:34,480 Speaker 1: where he had also attended. That was like the big 928 00:46:34,560 --> 00:46:37,480 Speaker 1: part of his involvement. But there was also and this 929 00:46:37,520 --> 00:46:40,200 Speaker 1: is something he says, there there's a weird transaction involving 930 00:46:40,200 --> 00:46:42,879 Speaker 1: one point one million dollars going directly to far where 931 00:46:42,920 --> 00:46:46,799 Speaker 1: he was supposed to speak at three total speaking engagements, 932 00:46:46,840 --> 00:46:49,399 Speaker 1: but he didn't show up to those events. So I mean, 933 00:46:49,560 --> 00:46:54,200 Speaker 1: already disgusting that you, who are a very wealthy man, 934 00:46:54,360 --> 00:46:57,320 Speaker 1: are taking this money to do these speaking gigs that 935 00:46:57,360 --> 00:46:59,399 Speaker 1: are supposed to be about like motivation or whatever. That's 936 00:46:59,440 --> 00:47:02,239 Speaker 1: the way that they justified taking this out of the 937 00:47:02,280 --> 00:47:04,960 Speaker 1: welfare funds, which is disgraceful to start with. But then 938 00:47:05,000 --> 00:47:08,719 Speaker 1: you don't even do the speaking gigs allegedly, Again he 939 00:47:08,840 --> 00:47:12,439 Speaker 1: says there was no wrongdoing here, but this is having 940 00:47:12,520 --> 00:47:18,040 Speaker 1: huge political reverberations. Also. Sober the former Mississippi governor was 941 00:47:18,160 --> 00:47:20,839 Speaker 1: really implicated in all of this and had sort of 942 00:47:20,880 --> 00:47:23,440 Speaker 1: like direct involvement. There were text messages that were revealed 943 00:47:23,480 --> 00:47:25,879 Speaker 1: between him and some of the key players in this 944 00:47:25,920 --> 00:47:28,279 Speaker 1: where he seemed to know exactly what was going on. 945 00:47:28,360 --> 00:47:31,960 Speaker 1: He also denies the wrongdoing the current governor Tate Reeves 946 00:47:32,040 --> 00:47:35,400 Speaker 1: Ryan Krim look alike in case you want an image 947 00:47:35,400 --> 00:47:39,319 Speaker 1: in your head, and the previous governor. You know, they're 948 00:47:39,360 --> 00:47:42,279 Speaker 1: really tight. He was sort of like an acolyte of 949 00:47:42,320 --> 00:47:44,880 Speaker 1: the previous governor. They have of the same network of 950 00:47:44,920 --> 00:47:47,320 Speaker 1: donors and social circles and all of that sort of stuff. 951 00:47:47,360 --> 00:47:50,120 Speaker 1: So he is also implicated here and seemed to be 952 00:47:50,280 --> 00:47:53,480 Speaker 1: involved in what looked to be a cover up of 953 00:47:53,520 --> 00:47:56,120 Speaker 1: this whole scheme during his time in office. Well, I 954 00:47:56,120 --> 00:47:58,200 Speaker 1: don't know if this is the whole story of why 955 00:47:58,600 --> 00:48:00,360 Speaker 1: the people in the state are not too us with 956 00:48:00,400 --> 00:48:02,640 Speaker 1: Tate Reeves, but he's actually in a little bit of 957 00:48:02,640 --> 00:48:07,160 Speaker 1: trouble for re election. Obviously, Mississippi deep red state. The 958 00:48:07,239 --> 00:48:09,759 Speaker 1: idea that a Democrat could have any shot in this 959 00:48:09,880 --> 00:48:12,439 Speaker 1: state is incredibly far fetched. I'm not going to say 960 00:48:12,440 --> 00:48:14,480 Speaker 1: that the Democrat is going to win. The fact that 961 00:48:14,560 --> 00:48:19,160 Speaker 1: even within striking range is quite remarkable. It's an article 962 00:48:19,160 --> 00:48:21,759 Speaker 1: from the Hill, they say, Democrats, the Mississippi's governor race 963 00:48:21,800 --> 00:48:25,319 Speaker 1: as ripe for an upset. He's got some of the 964 00:48:25,360 --> 00:48:28,560 Speaker 1: lowest approval ratings Tate Reeves does in the entire country. 965 00:48:29,120 --> 00:48:30,680 Speaker 1: Has been named checked, they say at times, in the 966 00:48:30,719 --> 00:48:34,279 Speaker 1: state's long running welfare scandal. And if you look at 967 00:48:34,280 --> 00:48:37,759 Speaker 1: the polling, you know the Democratic candidate is only a 968 00:48:37,800 --> 00:48:41,120 Speaker 1: few points behind right now. So there's a real chance 969 00:48:41,200 --> 00:48:44,799 Speaker 1: that if this thing continues to unravel the way that 970 00:48:44,840 --> 00:48:47,000 Speaker 1: it has been, you know that people are just done 971 00:48:47,040 --> 00:48:49,840 Speaker 1: with this dude. Again, wouldn't bet on it, but I 972 00:48:49,880 --> 00:48:52,120 Speaker 1: think the fact that this is even a question mark 973 00:48:52,200 --> 00:48:54,839 Speaker 1: right now shows you how devastating the scandal has been 974 00:48:55,000 --> 00:48:58,440 Speaker 1: for him. In the entire Mississippi political class in that state, 975 00:48:58,760 --> 00:49:03,160 Speaker 1: red blue, independent, everybody thinks it's pretty gross to use 976 00:49:03,160 --> 00:49:07,560 Speaker 1: public funds that are allocated for single moths and poor 977 00:49:07,600 --> 00:49:11,840 Speaker 1: people so that a one hundred millionaire can embezzle money 978 00:49:12,120 --> 00:49:14,960 Speaker 1: and build a new volleyball stadium for his daughter. I mean, 979 00:49:14,960 --> 00:49:17,720 Speaker 1: I think we can all just kind of come around 980 00:49:17,719 --> 00:49:20,040 Speaker 1: that and say, yeah, this is pretty crazy. And look 981 00:49:20,040 --> 00:49:22,520 Speaker 1: with Brett, they have these people dead to rise. So 982 00:49:22,560 --> 00:49:25,359 Speaker 1: you got text messages, what do they say nobody's gonna 983 00:49:25,360 --> 00:49:28,319 Speaker 1: find out about this, right, Yeah, that's right. It will 984 00:49:28,320 --> 00:49:30,680 Speaker 1: never be Yeah, it's like the press is never going 985 00:49:30,719 --> 00:49:34,000 Speaker 1: to know about this, right, Like yeah, yes, First of all, 986 00:49:34,160 --> 00:49:36,520 Speaker 1: what are you doing planning the ever heard a signal? 987 00:49:36,560 --> 00:49:39,680 Speaker 1: I don't really understand uh boomers, you know when? Yeah, 988 00:49:39,680 --> 00:49:44,080 Speaker 1: that's true. That's thinking that iCloud or whatever is safe. 989 00:49:44,480 --> 00:49:47,440 Speaker 1: The Mississippi auditor here. Also, it's not like these are liberals, 990 00:49:47,480 --> 00:49:49,400 Speaker 1: it's not like these are democrats. They're like, this is 991 00:49:49,400 --> 00:49:54,239 Speaker 1: a horrific, massive public fraud case talking about millions of 992 00:49:54,280 --> 00:49:57,760 Speaker 1: dollars where you're literally using welfare funds as a slush 993 00:49:57,760 --> 00:50:00,920 Speaker 1: fund to build and spend on infrat structure projects that 994 00:50:01,040 --> 00:50:04,600 Speaker 1: personally benefit you. This is corruption that you used to 995 00:50:04,640 --> 00:50:07,680 Speaker 1: see in the United States in like the eighteen hundreds. Yeah, 996 00:50:07,680 --> 00:50:10,280 Speaker 1: and that's really what it. In a way, it's analogous. 997 00:50:10,320 --> 00:50:12,799 Speaker 1: You have a you know, a governor he thinks he's untouchable, 998 00:50:13,000 --> 00:50:14,879 Speaker 1: Brett Fahr, he's like a king, right, He's I mean, 999 00:50:14,960 --> 00:50:17,520 Speaker 1: look undeniable. He's like one of the most famous people 1000 00:50:17,719 --> 00:50:20,360 Speaker 1: in the United States from Mississippi's like it's one of 1001 00:50:20,400 --> 00:50:22,640 Speaker 1: the most famous people ever come out of the state. Ever, 1002 00:50:22,880 --> 00:50:26,359 Speaker 1: so he's probably like a god in Mississippi and that's 1003 00:50:26,360 --> 00:50:28,759 Speaker 1: how they treat him. And apparently he thinks he's above 1004 00:50:28,760 --> 00:50:31,520 Speaker 1: the law. Yeah, absolutely, ridiculous, absolutely, And I mean, I 1005 00:50:31,560 --> 00:50:34,239 Speaker 1: do think the fact that you have effectively, you know, 1006 00:50:34,280 --> 00:50:36,799 Speaker 1: well one party state in Mississippi at this point where 1007 00:50:36,880 --> 00:50:38,719 Speaker 1: they don't feel like there would ever be any sort 1008 00:50:38,760 --> 00:50:41,319 Speaker 1: of political accountability. Just to give you the numbers on 1009 00:50:41,480 --> 00:50:43,720 Speaker 1: Tate Reeves and what's going on here. Morning Consult poll 1010 00:50:43,920 --> 00:50:46,360 Speaker 1: released this month found him among the ten governors with 1011 00:50:46,400 --> 00:50:49,640 Speaker 1: the lowest approval rating in the country Mississippi Today Siena 1012 00:50:49,680 --> 00:50:53,120 Speaker 1: College poll found fifty seven percent of respondents, including thirty 1013 00:50:53,120 --> 00:50:56,239 Speaker 1: three percent of Republicans, want to see someone other than 1014 00:50:56,480 --> 00:50:59,759 Speaker 1: the governor as the state's top official. It wasn't that 1015 00:51:00,080 --> 00:51:02,759 Speaker 1: Mississippi was one of the last states to sort of 1016 00:51:02,800 --> 00:51:06,799 Speaker 1: transition from the era of like electing Democrats locally and 1017 00:51:06,840 --> 00:51:09,279 Speaker 1: like the Dixie Crab model and that whole thing. So 1018 00:51:09,440 --> 00:51:13,200 Speaker 1: it actually wasn't that long ago that the governor was 1019 00:51:13,280 --> 00:51:16,080 Speaker 1: a Democrat. But you know, in recent years, these are 1020 00:51:16,080 --> 00:51:19,719 Speaker 1: blowout elections. They're winning by twenty thirty points, so to 1021 00:51:20,200 --> 00:51:25,040 Speaker 1: have an even close at all, again, utter indictment and 1022 00:51:25,239 --> 00:51:28,200 Speaker 1: shows you how disgusted the public there is with this 1023 00:51:28,520 --> 00:51:30,960 Speaker 1: entire scandal. Yeah, and you know what, I really think 1024 00:51:30,960 --> 00:51:34,600 Speaker 1: that they should be So speaking of public corruption, scandals, fraud, 1025 00:51:34,680 --> 00:51:37,360 Speaker 1: and the history of the United States, it's all opportunity. 1026 00:51:37,440 --> 00:51:41,000 Speaker 1: Hear you know, I guess past speaker Speaker Pelosi, she 1027 00:51:41,120 --> 00:51:43,719 Speaker 1: no longer has as much of an impact, let's say, 1028 00:51:43,760 --> 00:51:45,920 Speaker 1: on public policy. But let's just say she's probably in 1029 00:51:45,960 --> 00:51:49,759 Speaker 1: the know as the representative from San Francisco. So we're 1030 00:51:49,760 --> 00:51:52,040 Speaker 1: about to talk about in the ticketmaster block, but really 1031 00:51:52,040 --> 00:51:56,719 Speaker 1: about anti trust, the government suing Google over its monopoly 1032 00:51:56,800 --> 00:51:58,920 Speaker 1: in the ad market, something we could probably talk about 1033 00:51:59,480 --> 00:52:02,640 Speaker 1: a lot of your breaking points with respect to YouTube. Well, 1034 00:52:02,960 --> 00:52:06,200 Speaker 1: right before that lawsuit came about whether it was public 1035 00:52:06,280 --> 00:52:08,560 Speaker 1: knowledge or not, who knows. Let's put this up there 1036 00:52:08,840 --> 00:52:13,720 Speaker 1: on the screen. Nancy Pelosi reportedly with her husband sold 1037 00:52:13,880 --> 00:52:18,239 Speaker 1: three million dollars actually worth of the stock just four 1038 00:52:18,280 --> 00:52:21,719 Speaker 1: weeks ago. So the next one we could put up 1039 00:52:21,760 --> 00:52:25,280 Speaker 1: there on the screen. It actually shows you the exact 1040 00:52:25,360 --> 00:52:28,960 Speaker 1: trades that were disclosed in the periodic transaction report. You 1041 00:52:28,960 --> 00:52:31,960 Speaker 1: could see it right there, several trades all that just 1042 00:52:32,040 --> 00:52:35,600 Speaker 1: hit in the last weeks of December, and what do 1043 00:52:35,640 --> 00:52:37,960 Speaker 1: we see. We see trades between five hundred to five 1044 00:52:38,000 --> 00:52:40,759 Speaker 1: hundred thousand to a million dollars, all of Class A 1045 00:52:40,880 --> 00:52:45,720 Speaker 1: stock that were being made. And the real question is why. 1046 00:52:46,040 --> 00:52:49,520 Speaker 1: I mean, in many respects like we're talking here about 1047 00:52:49,560 --> 00:52:55,080 Speaker 1: people who literally run the government in the know representative 1048 00:52:55,160 --> 00:52:59,040 Speaker 1: here even from San Francisco. Let's even Crystal put aside 1049 00:52:59,280 --> 00:53:02,520 Speaker 1: the lawsuit. You represent a lot of people from Google. 1050 00:53:02,520 --> 00:53:05,319 Speaker 1: You should not be trading Google, period But then you 1051 00:53:05,360 --> 00:53:09,719 Speaker 1: add in the actual discussion, you add in or the lawsuit, 1052 00:53:10,000 --> 00:53:13,640 Speaker 1: you add in the potential of insider knowledge, and let's 1053 00:53:13,680 --> 00:53:16,040 Speaker 1: all be real here. The only reason that we even 1054 00:53:16,160 --> 00:53:20,080 Speaker 1: know is because of the toothless periodic transaction report that 1055 00:53:20,200 --> 00:53:23,080 Speaker 1: comes out the it's not even real time data. That 1056 00:53:23,120 --> 00:53:26,960 Speaker 1: none of them may really feel particularly compelled to fawed 1057 00:53:27,040 --> 00:53:30,920 Speaker 1: by the law. Right who fought the exact fo or 1058 00:53:30,920 --> 00:53:33,480 Speaker 1: who fought the idea of a stock trading ban until 1059 00:53:33,560 --> 00:53:36,640 Speaker 1: they were ridiculed publicly and it became a major kind 1060 00:53:36,640 --> 00:53:38,600 Speaker 1: of meme online. And at the end of the day, 1061 00:53:38,880 --> 00:53:41,319 Speaker 1: did the stock band pass that Congress? Well, no, I 1062 00:53:41,360 --> 00:53:45,960 Speaker 1: didn't listen. Both of these parties recognized that there was 1063 00:53:46,239 --> 00:53:51,320 Speaker 1: real public appetite for some anti corruption measures, in particular 1064 00:53:51,520 --> 00:53:56,680 Speaker 1: banning members from trading stocks. There was genuine bipartisan efforts 1065 00:53:57,160 --> 00:53:59,920 Speaker 1: working across the aisle at Agallanz Bamberger home in general, 1066 00:54:00,000 --> 00:54:02,759 Speaker 1: I'm a big fan of she was involved with a 1067 00:54:02,840 --> 00:54:05,920 Speaker 1: significant effort reaching across the aisle to come up with 1068 00:54:05,960 --> 00:54:08,080 Speaker 1: something that would actually have some real teeth on this. 1069 00:54:08,280 --> 00:54:12,680 Speaker 1: It was all there and lo and behold, not while 1070 00:54:12,760 --> 00:54:15,560 Speaker 1: Democrats had the House. And remember when Kevin McCarthy pretended 1071 00:54:15,600 --> 00:54:18,640 Speaker 1: like this was something he cared about. Hey, why isn't 1072 00:54:18,640 --> 00:54:22,239 Speaker 1: this one of the demands that the Kevin McCarthy holdouts 1073 00:54:22,400 --> 00:54:25,240 Speaker 1: wanted in terms of their negotiations when they were extracting 1074 00:54:25,239 --> 00:54:28,040 Speaker 1: their pound of flesh? Hey, why isn't Kevin McCarthy talking 1075 00:54:28,080 --> 00:54:30,319 Speaker 1: about the stock trade ban now that he's actually in 1076 00:54:30,320 --> 00:54:33,160 Speaker 1: a position of power. Lo and behold, these people have 1077 00:54:33,200 --> 00:54:36,040 Speaker 1: no interest in changing the rules because they're making them 1078 00:54:36,160 --> 00:54:38,239 Speaker 1: fabulously wealthy. And you know the bottom line with this 1079 00:54:38,480 --> 00:54:42,760 Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi stock trade and many others. Besides, it almost 1080 00:54:42,800 --> 00:54:46,080 Speaker 1: doesn't matter whether it was based on inside information or not. 1081 00:54:46,480 --> 00:54:50,160 Speaker 1: The outcome is just as damaging to the American public 1082 00:54:50,239 --> 00:54:51,759 Speaker 1: because no one is going to look at this and 1083 00:54:51,800 --> 00:54:53,840 Speaker 1: think like, oh, this is all just like fair and 1084 00:54:53,840 --> 00:54:57,279 Speaker 1: above board and based on public information. Bullshit, When three 1085 00:54:57,280 --> 00:55:00,840 Speaker 1: weeks later this lawsuit is real yield to the public 1086 00:55:00,880 --> 00:55:03,080 Speaker 1: and we know how close you are with the Biden administration, 1087 00:55:03,160 --> 00:55:05,480 Speaker 1: and we know how much insider knowledge you ultimately have, 1088 00:55:05,719 --> 00:55:08,120 Speaker 1: Like no one is going to buy and Google stock dropped, 1089 00:55:08,160 --> 00:55:10,799 Speaker 1: you know, immediately after the lawsuit. I mean, not like 1090 00:55:11,120 --> 00:55:16,000 Speaker 1: aren't they why, Like what exactly is going on here? 1091 00:55:16,080 --> 00:55:18,960 Speaker 1: And it's not just you know, it's not just Pelosi. 1092 00:55:19,120 --> 00:55:21,400 Speaker 1: There's so many of them. There's like so many accounts 1093 00:55:21,440 --> 00:55:24,000 Speaker 1: these days. I just found one guy on Instagram. He 1094 00:55:24,080 --> 00:55:26,919 Speaker 1: does a bunch of these videos. The Nancy Pelosi stock 1095 00:55:26,960 --> 00:55:30,800 Speaker 1: trader account actually does Republicans as well, and they disclose 1096 00:55:30,880 --> 00:55:33,319 Speaker 1: and they show all kinds of trades. I mean, the 1097 00:55:33,360 --> 00:55:35,880 Speaker 1: fact that any of this is legal is insane. And 1098 00:55:35,920 --> 00:55:37,880 Speaker 1: you know, I was talking with some people on the 1099 00:55:37,960 --> 00:55:40,239 Speaker 1: Hill and you know, they've even brought it up to 1100 00:55:40,280 --> 00:55:42,080 Speaker 1: their bosses. They're like, hey, like what are you doing 1101 00:55:42,360 --> 00:55:44,120 Speaker 1: And the bosses are like, oh what, you know, like 1102 00:55:44,160 --> 00:55:46,360 Speaker 1: I'm and they were like no, dude, They're like, unless 1103 00:55:46,440 --> 00:55:49,200 Speaker 1: unless you can prove you're innocent, you're guilty. And I 1104 00:55:49,280 --> 00:55:52,120 Speaker 1: actually think that's the exact right way to approach a 1105 00:55:52,200 --> 00:55:56,120 Speaker 1: public politician, somebody with so much power, so much influence 1106 00:55:56,160 --> 00:55:59,200 Speaker 1: on the decision, unless you can literally prove. And then 1107 00:55:59,520 --> 00:56:02,000 Speaker 1: again to point to the fact that we're not even 1108 00:56:02,040 --> 00:56:04,240 Speaker 1: talking about ETFs. We're not talking about the Dow Jones 1109 00:56:04,320 --> 00:56:06,520 Speaker 1: or s and P five hundred. We're talking about direct 1110 00:56:06,560 --> 00:56:11,799 Speaker 1: stocks directly impacted by US government decisions of which you know, 1111 00:56:11,880 --> 00:56:13,719 Speaker 1: she was one of the most powerful members and she 1112 00:56:14,120 --> 00:56:16,319 Speaker 1: was actually the speaker at shell. Is you think she's 1113 00:56:16,360 --> 00:56:20,640 Speaker 1: not you know, King Jeffries is her hand righted successor. Yes, 1114 00:56:20,840 --> 00:56:23,160 Speaker 1: you don't think that there he's doing the things that 1115 00:56:23,280 --> 00:56:26,560 Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi strongly suggests that he should do. No, you're right, 1116 00:56:26,680 --> 00:56:29,000 Speaker 1: she's still in charge over in the Democratic side, no doubt. 1117 00:56:29,200 --> 00:56:31,120 Speaker 1: I should note that the trades were all made technically 1118 00:56:31,120 --> 00:56:32,960 Speaker 1: while she was still speaker and would have been privy 1119 00:56:33,000 --> 00:56:34,920 Speaker 1: to a lot of the discussion. So there you go. 1120 00:56:35,200 --> 00:56:37,480 Speaker 1: You can take that to the bank. This is corrupt 1121 00:56:37,520 --> 00:56:39,279 Speaker 1: as hell, and I really just can't believe that we 1122 00:56:39,360 --> 00:56:42,480 Speaker 1: just continue to let it happen. It's outrageous. Yes, So 1123 00:56:42,719 --> 00:56:46,399 Speaker 1: on a more positive side of things, there are two 1124 00:56:46,440 --> 00:56:50,560 Speaker 1: areas where I really think the Biden administration deserves some credit, 1125 00:56:50,719 --> 00:56:52,560 Speaker 1: and both of them have less to do actually with 1126 00:56:52,600 --> 00:56:54,600 Speaker 1: Biden himself and more to do with people that he 1127 00:56:54,680 --> 00:56:56,719 Speaker 1: put in some key posts. So you know, I've been 1128 00:56:56,840 --> 00:56:59,480 Speaker 1: very improssed with the head of the NLRB, the National 1129 00:56:59,520 --> 00:57:02,280 Speaker 1: Labor Relates Board, in terms of, you know, really trying 1130 00:57:02,320 --> 00:57:06,200 Speaker 1: to rebalance the scales with regard to corporations and labor. 1131 00:57:06,239 --> 00:57:08,919 Speaker 1: The other areas anti trust, where you had Tim Woo, 1132 00:57:09,000 --> 00:57:13,040 Speaker 1: Jonathan Cantor, and Lena Khan who have really sought to 1133 00:57:13,440 --> 00:57:15,799 Speaker 1: usher in a new era where we actually care about 1134 00:57:15,800 --> 00:57:18,560 Speaker 1: corporate power and we actually attempt to check corporate power. 1135 00:57:19,280 --> 00:57:22,520 Speaker 1: There has been This obviously, is something that Stolar attracts 1136 00:57:22,640 --> 00:57:25,600 Speaker 1: very closely and has done a phenomenal job educating a 1137 00:57:25,600 --> 00:57:29,280 Speaker 1: lot of people, myself included. On and this week in particular, 1138 00:57:29,480 --> 00:57:32,280 Speaker 1: there were a few things that were quite significant in 1139 00:57:32,640 --> 00:57:36,680 Speaker 1: the anti trust news. Number one is there were Senate 1140 00:57:36,720 --> 00:57:41,080 Speaker 1: hearings with regard to Ticketmaster and the whole Taylor Swift debacle, 1141 00:57:41,120 --> 00:57:44,640 Speaker 1: which led to a lot of justified questions about this 1142 00:57:44,800 --> 00:57:47,760 Speaker 1: monopoly and the way that they gouge consumers and screw 1143 00:57:47,920 --> 00:57:51,200 Speaker 1: artists and have total control over so much of the 1144 00:57:51,240 --> 00:57:53,480 Speaker 1: live performance market. We'll get to that in a moment 1145 00:57:53,560 --> 00:57:57,600 Speaker 1: with Ticketmaster. And the other piece was that the Department 1146 00:57:57,600 --> 00:58:01,480 Speaker 1: of Justice announced a big lawsuit again Google, and they're 1147 00:58:01,520 --> 00:58:05,240 Speaker 1: having some success there ultimately, so folks over at the 1148 00:58:05,320 --> 00:58:09,280 Speaker 1: NBC they're very unhappy about this whole development, and in 1149 00:58:09,320 --> 00:58:13,880 Speaker 1: particular Jim Kramer, bless his heart, having total meltdown on 1150 00:58:14,000 --> 00:58:16,520 Speaker 1: air and also, by the way, getting a bunch of 1151 00:58:16,680 --> 00:58:20,400 Speaker 1: key facts just straight up wrong in his Google lobbyist 1152 00:58:20,480 --> 00:58:22,960 Speaker 1: talking points that he's parroting. Here. Let's take a listen 1153 00:58:22,960 --> 00:58:24,920 Speaker 1: to what he had to say. This is the most 1154 00:58:24,960 --> 00:58:29,800 Speaker 1: ideological anti trust department I have seen since and you'll 1155 00:58:29,840 --> 00:58:34,160 Speaker 1: get this standard oil and in Teddy Roosevelt that is 1156 00:58:34,240 --> 00:58:38,160 Speaker 1: their ideology. David, that's an ideology. I remember I took 1157 00:58:38,200 --> 00:58:40,840 Speaker 1: marks and angles. Remember when when Angles said to people's lot, 1158 00:58:40,880 --> 00:58:42,720 Speaker 1: people are like a sack of potatoes. After she was 1159 00:58:42,720 --> 00:58:46,040 Speaker 1: speaking of the peasantry understood and under Andy trusts law, 1160 00:58:46,040 --> 00:58:47,720 Speaker 1: it may be very difficult for them to prove a 1161 00:58:47,760 --> 00:58:50,160 Speaker 1: case that said, there is most shortage that she is 1162 00:58:50,280 --> 00:58:54,040 Speaker 1: anti the man. It's a real throwback. We're not used 1163 00:58:54,040 --> 00:58:56,040 Speaker 1: to it. Because Obama wasn't like this, right, but they 1164 00:58:56,160 --> 00:58:59,880 Speaker 1: lost the House representatives, so they go real hard. They're hard. 1165 00:59:00,680 --> 00:59:03,360 Speaker 1: Ohbama wasn't like that. I've read Mark first of all, 1166 00:59:03,400 --> 00:59:06,520 Speaker 1: I highly doubt the actually effort Marx Andegra. I don't 1167 00:59:06,520 --> 00:59:09,000 Speaker 1: know if he's ever wrote a book ever that said 1168 00:59:09,080 --> 00:59:12,560 Speaker 1: I mean, look, that's the finance industry getting pedaled. Really 1169 00:59:12,560 --> 00:59:15,680 Speaker 1: what they see is they're calling it ideological. Whenever you're 1170 00:59:15,720 --> 00:59:18,200 Speaker 1: talking about straight up literal I mean, one of the 1171 00:59:18,200 --> 00:59:21,760 Speaker 1: things that's important A he misses who's actually doing the suing. 1172 00:59:21,840 --> 00:59:25,720 Speaker 1: But like the investigation itself is pretty clear. Read the 1173 00:59:25,720 --> 00:59:27,920 Speaker 1: facts that are laid out in the lawsuit. They're like, 1174 00:59:28,000 --> 00:59:31,120 Speaker 1: by our estimation, you have a monopoly, which is against 1175 00:59:31,800 --> 00:59:34,720 Speaker 1: US law. It's now on the government to actually prove 1176 00:59:34,760 --> 00:59:38,040 Speaker 1: those facts in a court and convince somebody that it's true, 1177 00:59:38,080 --> 00:59:40,600 Speaker 1: and then we can figure out what exactly it looks 1178 00:59:40,640 --> 00:59:42,280 Speaker 1: like on the other end. But you know, we talked 1179 00:59:42,280 --> 00:59:44,600 Speaker 1: about this, I think in one of our last shows. 1180 00:59:44,880 --> 00:59:48,040 Speaker 1: Does anybody think the promise of the internet actually came true? 1181 00:59:48,200 --> 00:59:50,000 Speaker 1: I remember being online in two thousand and seven, and 1182 00:59:50,000 --> 00:59:52,360 Speaker 1: I remember just being like wow, man, like anything is possible, 1183 00:59:52,400 --> 00:59:54,920 Speaker 1: Like MySpace and Facebook and all this the idea of 1184 00:59:54,960 --> 00:59:57,640 Speaker 1: meeting all these people, Like, did we really imagine that 1185 00:59:57,680 --> 01:00:00,720 Speaker 1: we would have centralized choke hold points of Like, that's 1186 01:00:00,760 --> 01:00:03,760 Speaker 1: not really what was promised. Now we're in the middle 1187 01:00:03,800 --> 01:00:06,520 Speaker 1: of the AI Revolution, and I don't know. At first 1188 01:00:06,520 --> 01:00:08,880 Speaker 1: I was skeptical, but increasingly the way I see a 1189 01:00:08,920 --> 01:00:11,160 Speaker 1: lot of institutions behave I'm like, you know, I think 1190 01:00:11,160 --> 01:00:14,120 Speaker 1: this is great. Like when I'm watching these professors lose 1191 01:00:14,160 --> 01:00:16,360 Speaker 1: it that they can no longer just assign busy work 1192 01:00:16,400 --> 01:00:18,200 Speaker 1: and then try and put They're like, oh, we made 1193 01:00:18,240 --> 01:00:21,000 Speaker 1: actually do something and you know, have oral examine it, which, 1194 01:00:21,000 --> 01:00:22,480 Speaker 1: by the way, I think is fantastic. I think oral 1195 01:00:22,520 --> 01:00:25,120 Speaker 1: examination and all that is really important in terms of 1196 01:00:25,120 --> 01:00:27,040 Speaker 1: what you're actually going to take away, and maybe even 1197 01:00:27,080 --> 01:00:29,360 Speaker 1: the idea of credentialism and life scales and what a 1198 01:00:29,360 --> 01:00:31,760 Speaker 1: lot of busy work even looks like in the workplaces, 1199 01:00:31,800 --> 01:00:35,120 Speaker 1: being miserable can be taken away. That's all a result 1200 01:00:35,280 --> 01:00:41,640 Speaker 1: of monopolization, which is being enormously profitable for Google, for Facebook, 1201 01:00:41,680 --> 01:00:43,880 Speaker 1: a few select companies. And I think it's a very 1202 01:00:43,920 --> 01:00:45,840 Speaker 1: open question, like do we want that. We had a 1203 01:00:45,840 --> 01:00:48,040 Speaker 1: big fight in this country about that with railroads, which 1204 01:00:48,080 --> 01:00:51,560 Speaker 1: we recognize as infrastructure. We had the same fight with banks. 1205 01:00:51,560 --> 01:00:53,720 Speaker 1: We kind of forgot that lesson a little bit two 1206 01:00:53,760 --> 01:00:56,080 Speaker 1: thousand and eight. But why should we Why should we 1207 01:00:56,080 --> 01:00:59,200 Speaker 1: forget that lesson? It's important, this is our country. Why not. 1208 01:00:59,240 --> 01:01:01,640 Speaker 1: There's so much say about the Pramer piece. I mean, 1209 01:01:01,640 --> 01:01:03,440 Speaker 1: first of all, as you point out, it just straight 1210 01:01:03,480 --> 01:01:05,040 Speaker 1: up got a number of the facts wrong. I thought 1211 01:01:05,040 --> 01:01:06,720 Speaker 1: it was Lena Khan that was involved in the suit. No, 1212 01:01:06,800 --> 01:01:09,040 Speaker 1: was Jonathan Cantor of the Department of Justice, number one, 1213 01:01:09,160 --> 01:01:12,360 Speaker 1: number two. This was also not just this Justice department. 1214 01:01:12,400 --> 01:01:14,400 Speaker 1: This was also a group of eight states, So it's 1215 01:01:14,440 --> 01:01:17,880 Speaker 1: not just like one crazy idea log or whatever. And 1216 01:01:18,240 --> 01:01:21,200 Speaker 1: there are other lawsuits against Google that also involve a 1217 01:01:21,280 --> 01:01:24,600 Speaker 1: lot of states, including like Texas and Ken Paxton hardly 1218 01:01:24,640 --> 01:01:29,640 Speaker 1: some like hard left maniac that's number one, number two. 1219 01:01:29,920 --> 01:01:32,520 Speaker 1: And this was something a stolar flag for me as well. 1220 01:01:32,720 --> 01:01:37,240 Speaker 1: Is Lena Kahn actually was at odds with a lot 1221 01:01:37,280 --> 01:01:40,520 Speaker 1: of labor activists who also you would say, you know, 1222 01:01:40,600 --> 01:01:44,800 Speaker 1: broadly oftentimes on the left over Microsoft and Activision because 1223 01:01:44,800 --> 01:01:46,880 Speaker 1: she was opposed to that going through. Of course, they 1224 01:01:47,240 --> 01:01:50,080 Speaker 1: liked the idea of some people on the left like 1225 01:01:50,160 --> 01:01:53,080 Speaker 1: the idea of large corporations, because then that gives you 1226 01:01:53,160 --> 01:01:55,520 Speaker 1: one node that you can organize and can make it 1227 01:01:55,560 --> 01:01:58,520 Speaker 1: easier for Labor United to gain support. So even the 1228 01:01:58,560 --> 01:02:02,720 Speaker 1: idea that everybody on the left has one view of 1229 01:02:02,760 --> 01:02:06,040 Speaker 1: how this should all go, even that basic fact is 1230 01:02:06,440 --> 01:02:10,440 Speaker 1: not true. But the bigger context for all of this 1231 01:02:10,720 --> 01:02:15,920 Speaker 1: is the fact that these mergers and acquisitions are big 1232 01:02:16,080 --> 01:02:20,760 Speaker 1: business and big bonuses for Wall Street. So Kramer's friends 1233 01:02:20,920 --> 01:02:23,600 Speaker 1: who are still working on Wall Street and still very 1234 01:02:23,680 --> 01:02:28,680 Speaker 1: much in the industry, their paychecks depend on these you know, 1235 01:02:28,800 --> 01:02:32,919 Speaker 1: big paydays from mergers going through ultimately. And so since 1236 01:02:32,960 --> 01:02:35,880 Speaker 1: there's been a slowdown in that kind of activity because 1237 01:02:35,880 --> 01:02:39,680 Speaker 1: the government is applying new and long overdue, frankly scrutiny 1238 01:02:40,480 --> 01:02:43,280 Speaker 1: to these companies getting larger and larger and larger and larger, 1239 01:02:43,320 --> 01:02:46,919 Speaker 1: and the impact that has on our society overall, that's 1240 01:02:47,000 --> 01:02:50,520 Speaker 1: upsetting Kramer and I'm sure upsetting a lot of his friends. 1241 01:02:50,520 --> 01:02:53,600 Speaker 1: So that's sort of the context here is he feels 1242 01:02:53,640 --> 01:02:55,360 Speaker 1: that there's you know, a lot of money at stake 1243 01:02:55,360 --> 01:02:57,880 Speaker 1: that people are losing out on because they can't just 1244 01:02:57,920 --> 01:03:02,280 Speaker 1: continue the industry of growing every thing larger and concentrating 1245 01:03:02,320 --> 01:03:04,720 Speaker 1: more and more power in these industries, and not just 1246 01:03:04,800 --> 01:03:07,440 Speaker 1: tech either. If you look at agriculture, if you look 1247 01:03:07,440 --> 01:03:11,480 Speaker 1: at basically any industry, meat packing, any industry in this country, 1248 01:03:11,760 --> 01:03:14,760 Speaker 1: the amount of power and consolidation in the hands of 1249 01:03:14,800 --> 01:03:17,960 Speaker 1: a very few people is really disturbing. It's bad for labor, 1250 01:03:18,000 --> 01:03:20,520 Speaker 1: it's bad for competition. It's the opposite of having an 1251 01:03:20,560 --> 01:03:22,480 Speaker 1: actual like free and fair market. Yeah, but it is 1252 01:03:22,520 --> 01:03:25,600 Speaker 1: great for stockholders, right, That's really what it's all abo 1253 01:03:25,600 --> 01:03:27,520 Speaker 1: about Wall Street. And when we think about it too, 1254 01:03:27,600 --> 01:03:29,959 Speaker 1: Ticketmas this is one other reason we should be hopeful. Look, 1255 01:03:30,160 --> 01:03:35,640 Speaker 1: the entire Congress basically was unified essentially against Ticketbaster in 1256 01:03:35,720 --> 01:03:37,920 Speaker 1: their hearings. I know Ryan and Emily covered it, but 1257 01:03:38,000 --> 01:03:40,920 Speaker 1: I just think it is astounding to watch this mashup 1258 01:03:41,320 --> 01:03:44,960 Speaker 1: of senators from all sides, you know, using the tailor 1259 01:03:45,000 --> 01:03:48,840 Speaker 1: Swift doing the tail Swift tobacle, and sure it's cringe 1260 01:03:48,880 --> 01:03:52,560 Speaker 1: watching old people do it. That's like Taylor Swift. Should 1261 01:03:52,600 --> 01:03:55,240 Speaker 1: we care? I mean, they're trying to capture the public 1262 01:03:55,280 --> 01:03:58,320 Speaker 1: imagination in order to bring good to our industry. So 1263 01:03:58,640 --> 01:04:00,880 Speaker 1: that's a good thing in my opinion. Let's take a listen. 1264 01:04:01,040 --> 01:04:05,720 Speaker 1: Ticketmaster Auto look in the mirror and say I'm the problem. 1265 01:04:06,040 --> 01:04:09,440 Speaker 1: It's me once again. She's cheer captain and among the bleachers. 1266 01:04:09,560 --> 01:04:13,080 Speaker 1: So as a ode to Taylor Swift, I will say, 1267 01:04:13,320 --> 01:04:17,640 Speaker 1: we know all too well, tarma's a relaxing thought. Aren't 1268 01:04:17,640 --> 01:04:20,480 Speaker 1: you envious that? For you? It's not. That's all I've 1269 01:04:20,520 --> 01:04:23,000 Speaker 1: got to say. So what do you see there? I mean, 1270 01:04:23,120 --> 01:04:26,240 Speaker 1: we literally have Mike Lee, we have Republicans, Democrats all 1271 01:04:26,320 --> 01:04:30,440 Speaker 1: quoting Taylor Swift, and through the quotes what's actually coming through. 1272 01:04:30,800 --> 01:04:34,400 Speaker 1: They're all against the Live Nation Ticketmaster merger, which at 1273 01:04:34,400 --> 01:04:37,800 Speaker 1: the time only a couple of bands spoke out. Nobody 1274 01:04:37,840 --> 01:04:40,960 Speaker 1: in Congress thought about it. Obama gives it the rubber stamp, 1275 01:04:41,280 --> 01:04:44,880 Speaker 1: and now here we are, it's like a complete catastrophe. 1276 01:04:44,920 --> 01:04:48,040 Speaker 1: You know. One of the artists who testified before the 1277 01:04:48,040 --> 01:04:51,440 Speaker 1: Congress just did a really fantastic job like laying out 1278 01:04:51,560 --> 01:04:53,680 Speaker 1: how much that it's hurt him. And this is somebody 1279 01:04:53,720 --> 01:04:56,160 Speaker 1: who's actually I mean, he's not like a household name 1280 01:04:56,200 --> 01:04:59,400 Speaker 1: per se, but gets a lot of views on Spotify 1281 01:04:59,480 --> 01:05:03,160 Speaker 1: and elsewhere, and he was just showing exactly the problems 1282 01:05:03,160 --> 01:05:05,720 Speaker 1: that it has faced his industry. Taylor Swift is just 1283 01:05:05,760 --> 01:05:09,320 Speaker 1: the bleeding Ageum, I was just in Mexico listened to 1284 01:05:09,440 --> 01:05:11,680 Speaker 1: a lot of Bad Bunny. Apparently they even screwed up 1285 01:05:11,680 --> 01:05:14,840 Speaker 1: a Bad Bunny concert in terms of their admittance there. 1286 01:05:15,040 --> 01:05:19,040 Speaker 1: And the important point actually Matthew Zeitlin pulled this, which 1287 01:05:19,080 --> 01:05:24,080 Speaker 1: is over on TikTok. People are unironically like posting a 1288 01:05:24,240 --> 01:05:27,360 Speaker 1: clip of Josh Holly going after Ticketmaster. I don't even 1289 01:05:27,400 --> 01:05:30,840 Speaker 1: think they know anything about Ticketmaster or even or sorry, 1290 01:05:30,880 --> 01:05:33,000 Speaker 1: they don't know anything about who Josh Holly is. But 1291 01:05:33,280 --> 01:05:37,880 Speaker 1: the clips on Congress of Ticketmaster getting flamed is really 1292 01:05:38,000 --> 01:05:41,200 Speaker 1: touching a cultural nerve. Here's an example of that. You're 1293 01:05:41,200 --> 01:05:43,640 Speaker 1: forcing everybody who just wants to get this ticket on 1294 01:05:43,680 --> 01:05:46,640 Speaker 1: the resale market, who hasn't bought from you suberctad to 1295 01:05:46,680 --> 01:05:49,400 Speaker 1: begin with, You're forcing them to become your customer in 1296 01:05:49,480 --> 01:05:52,360 Speaker 1: order to take possession of this ticket. I mean that's 1297 01:05:52,440 --> 01:05:54,480 Speaker 1: really something. I mean, hats off to you, I guess 1298 01:05:54,520 --> 01:05:56,640 Speaker 1: for being innovative and using your monopoly, But I have 1299 01:05:56,680 --> 01:06:00,320 Speaker 1: to tell you, from a competition standpoint, this really really 1300 01:06:00,320 --> 01:06:02,520 Speaker 1: worries me. So what do you see there? It's like 1301 01:06:02,680 --> 01:06:05,040 Speaker 1: whoever put those and overlight that on it? It's clearly 1302 01:06:05,040 --> 01:06:07,880 Speaker 1: becoming like a meme. It's something that really was felt. 1303 01:06:07,920 --> 01:06:11,400 Speaker 1: So Taylor Swift situation, I think just happened really at 1304 01:06:11,400 --> 01:06:14,200 Speaker 1: the exact right time. Your entire job of Celtic is 1305 01:06:14,240 --> 01:06:16,479 Speaker 1: you literally can't even do that in a competent manner. 1306 01:06:16,560 --> 01:06:18,760 Speaker 1: But there's a lot more that's been going on behind 1307 01:06:18,800 --> 01:06:21,120 Speaker 1: the scenes over a decade. And if this is the 1308 01:06:21,120 --> 01:06:23,680 Speaker 1: one heartening area where we can say like something is changing, 1309 01:06:23,840 --> 01:06:26,880 Speaker 1: good reward politicians for this instead of like, you know, 1310 01:06:26,960 --> 01:06:29,640 Speaker 1: his January sixth to fist point good point. Yeah. See, 1311 01:06:29,760 --> 01:06:32,600 Speaker 1: you can go the cynical place to ultimately take a 1312 01:06:32,640 --> 01:06:36,040 Speaker 1: stand up. Sometimes you can go viral whenever you do 1313 01:06:36,120 --> 01:06:39,320 Speaker 1: good things. So listen, it's a message of hope. I 1314 01:06:39,320 --> 01:06:44,919 Speaker 1: think Bush all right, Zager, what are you looking at it? Well. 1315 01:06:45,080 --> 01:06:47,720 Speaker 1: One of the reasons that gas prices matter politically is 1316 01:06:47,760 --> 01:06:50,240 Speaker 1: the simple fact that most Americans just drive past it 1317 01:06:50,280 --> 01:06:52,320 Speaker 1: on a day to day basis. You drive one day, 1318 01:06:52,400 --> 01:06:54,120 Speaker 1: you see the price go up. You do it every 1319 01:06:54,160 --> 01:06:56,040 Speaker 1: single day for a month. You pull in, you see 1320 01:06:56,040 --> 01:06:58,120 Speaker 1: a bill higher. Then you just say, what the hell's 1321 01:06:58,160 --> 01:07:00,320 Speaker 1: going on in this country? It's a relative in a 1322 01:07:00,360 --> 01:07:02,800 Speaker 1: lastic product. Most of us needed on a regular basis. 1323 01:07:02,800 --> 01:07:05,560 Speaker 1: It's very difficult to adjust to when you see even 1324 01:07:05,600 --> 01:07:08,360 Speaker 1: massive increases in price. But gas it's not the only 1325 01:07:08,400 --> 01:07:10,880 Speaker 1: product that's doing that, so is the grocery store. And 1326 01:07:10,960 --> 01:07:13,000 Speaker 1: while we focus a lot on the grocery store bills 1327 01:07:13,000 --> 01:07:15,320 Speaker 1: and the aggregate, let's zoom in on something that a 1328 01:07:15,360 --> 01:07:18,560 Speaker 1: lot of you have taken notice of. Eggs. Eggs are interesting. 1329 01:07:18,800 --> 01:07:21,840 Speaker 1: Most Americans buy them on a weekly basis. In fact, 1330 01:07:21,880 --> 01:07:25,400 Speaker 1: the average American consumes nearly three hundred eggs per year, 1331 01:07:25,600 --> 01:07:27,800 Speaker 1: and actually the amount of eggs that we eat has 1332 01:07:27,840 --> 01:07:30,160 Speaker 1: significantly gone up in the last few years to the 1333 01:07:30,240 --> 01:07:33,360 Speaker 1: highest level in over fifty years. Eggs are and I've 1334 01:07:33,360 --> 01:07:35,600 Speaker 1: always been an important part of the American diet, from 1335 01:07:35,640 --> 01:07:38,720 Speaker 1: its inclusion in baked goods to the quintessential breakfast, which 1336 01:07:38,720 --> 01:07:41,080 Speaker 1: is why the price increase over the last few years 1337 01:07:41,160 --> 01:07:43,560 Speaker 1: or so has been so devastating to a lot of 1338 01:07:43,560 --> 01:07:46,200 Speaker 1: households and shocking. As you can see in the chart 1339 01:07:46,240 --> 01:07:49,040 Speaker 1: before you, before the pandemic, eggs were roughly the same 1340 01:07:49,080 --> 01:07:52,200 Speaker 1: price as the nineteen eighties. There was minor price improvement 1341 01:07:52,200 --> 01:07:54,800 Speaker 1: in two minor price movement in twenty fifteen, but by 1342 01:07:54,840 --> 01:07:57,640 Speaker 1: and large it was like a reliable, staple, stable product. 1343 01:07:57,880 --> 01:08:01,000 Speaker 1: Relative productivity increases in the egg industy actually kept the 1344 01:08:01,000 --> 01:08:03,880 Speaker 1: price down over time. It's part of why Americans could 1345 01:08:03,920 --> 01:08:06,400 Speaker 1: be so reliant on eggs as a cheap way to 1346 01:08:06,400 --> 01:08:09,720 Speaker 1: feed their families. That is, of course, until twenty twenty two, 1347 01:08:09,760 --> 01:08:12,160 Speaker 1: and now twenty twenty three. As the chart shows, the 1348 01:08:12,280 --> 01:08:16,360 Speaker 1: national retail price of eggs is over four dollars a dozen, 1349 01:08:16,600 --> 01:08:19,000 Speaker 1: when just a year ago it was a buck seventy nine. 1350 01:08:19,320 --> 01:08:22,000 Speaker 1: What accounts for a two hundred percent increase in the 1351 01:08:22,040 --> 01:08:24,879 Speaker 1: price of eggs, Well, if you ask the egg industry, 1352 01:08:25,000 --> 01:08:27,920 Speaker 1: they will tell you bird flu. Seems simple though, right. 1353 01:08:28,160 --> 01:08:30,960 Speaker 1: A historic bird flu outbreak that is killing hens means 1354 01:08:31,040 --> 01:08:33,880 Speaker 1: less supply while demand is high hans the price. But 1355 01:08:33,960 --> 01:08:36,240 Speaker 1: is that everything that's going on? If you read deeper, 1356 01:08:36,360 --> 01:08:38,800 Speaker 1: it doesn't really appear to be the case. While bird 1357 01:08:38,840 --> 01:08:41,800 Speaker 1: flu is definitely bad, the total flock size of egg 1358 01:08:41,880 --> 01:08:44,680 Speaker 1: layers across the country has actually only gone down by 1359 01:08:44,760 --> 01:08:47,599 Speaker 1: four to five percent. A four to five percent reduction 1360 01:08:47,680 --> 01:08:50,040 Speaker 1: in the number of hens laying eggs does not even 1361 01:08:50,080 --> 01:08:53,320 Speaker 1: come close to explaining that price increase. In fact, the 1362 01:08:53,439 --> 01:08:56,600 Speaker 1: largest US producer of eggs, cow Maine, Foods is the 1363 01:08:56,640 --> 01:09:00,479 Speaker 1: perfect illustration. Last month, it reported its overall sales dollar 1364 01:09:00,560 --> 01:09:03,600 Speaker 1: volume rose to a nearly one billion dollars over the 1365 01:09:03,680 --> 01:09:06,800 Speaker 1: last quarter, helping it generate one hundred and ninety eight 1366 01:09:06,920 --> 01:09:09,720 Speaker 1: million dollars in profit. So how much profit did they 1367 01:09:09,720 --> 01:09:12,599 Speaker 1: make the year before, Well, it was a million dollars. 1368 01:09:12,880 --> 01:09:14,880 Speaker 1: So are you starting to get the picture? You have 1369 01:09:14,920 --> 01:09:17,360 Speaker 1: a two hundred percent increase in the price and then 1370 01:09:17,400 --> 01:09:20,240 Speaker 1: you have a two hundred percent increase in profit. Interesting, 1371 01:09:20,360 --> 01:09:23,240 Speaker 1: but it's bird flu that's the largest segg producer. Though 1372 01:09:23,280 --> 01:09:25,120 Speaker 1: to be fair, it hasn't been so easy for egg 1373 01:09:25,120 --> 01:09:27,559 Speaker 1: producers in the last year or so. The Russian invasion 1374 01:09:27,560 --> 01:09:30,320 Speaker 1: of Ukraine and the subsequent sanctions on the Russian economy 1375 01:09:30,479 --> 01:09:34,400 Speaker 1: have actually pushed grain prices to sky high levels, leading 1376 01:09:34,439 --> 01:09:37,960 Speaker 1: to an immense increase in the cost for egg producers 1377 01:09:38,080 --> 01:09:40,360 Speaker 1: to feed their hens. When you add on top the 1378 01:09:40,360 --> 01:09:44,040 Speaker 1: immense amount of petroleum product needed for transportation, farm equipment, 1379 01:09:44,320 --> 01:09:47,880 Speaker 1: natural gas, and all of that redirected into a refrigeration, 1380 01:09:48,160 --> 01:09:50,240 Speaker 1: and you get the result of what we have right now. 1381 01:09:50,800 --> 01:09:52,920 Speaker 1: Really bad news is that while prices appear to be 1382 01:09:52,960 --> 01:09:56,160 Speaker 1: receding from their December high, that's peak egg demand during 1383 01:09:56,200 --> 01:09:59,400 Speaker 1: the holidays, the price effect is actually still being felt 1384 01:09:59,400 --> 01:10:02,439 Speaker 1: heartily at the grocery store. Worse, we are beginning to 1385 01:10:02,439 --> 01:10:04,320 Speaker 1: see the same thing that we did with gas at 1386 01:10:04,360 --> 01:10:06,839 Speaker 1: five dollars a gallon. When gas got to the highest 1387 01:10:06,840 --> 01:10:10,240 Speaker 1: point in modern history, people just started driving a lot less, 1388 01:10:10,560 --> 01:10:12,960 Speaker 1: not because they wanted to, but because they had to. 1389 01:10:13,160 --> 01:10:15,640 Speaker 1: They stopped going out to eat, reduce their lifestyle. They 1390 01:10:15,680 --> 01:10:18,439 Speaker 1: were just more miserable reduce their savings. Same things happening 1391 01:10:18,479 --> 01:10:21,120 Speaker 1: right now with eggs. Putting aside the nineteen nineties idiotic 1392 01:10:21,200 --> 01:10:24,000 Speaker 1: thinking about cholesterol, eggs are actually very good for you. 1393 01:10:24,040 --> 01:10:27,639 Speaker 1: They're relatively fresh, natural and a complete protein filling. There's 1394 01:10:27,640 --> 01:10:29,519 Speaker 1: a reason that a lot of people eat them for breakfast. 1395 01:10:29,640 --> 01:10:32,879 Speaker 1: But as egg prices increase and people adjust, they're naturally 1396 01:10:32,880 --> 01:10:35,680 Speaker 1: going to reduce their consumption of food in favor of 1397 01:10:35,760 --> 01:10:40,360 Speaker 1: what is cheap. What's cheap you already know process fast food, 1398 01:10:40,600 --> 01:10:44,320 Speaker 1: anything instant. It's probably processed as hell, designed to be hyperpalatable, 1399 01:10:44,520 --> 01:10:47,760 Speaker 1: more likely to be less nutritious. What says cheap in 1400 01:10:47,840 --> 01:10:51,120 Speaker 1: bad times versus what gets expensive actually tells you a 1401 01:10:51,160 --> 01:10:54,519 Speaker 1: lot about society and what it's designed for. The simple 1402 01:10:54,560 --> 01:10:57,559 Speaker 1: truth appears to be. We are designed to make sure 1403 01:10:57,800 --> 01:11:02,120 Speaker 1: the lowest common denominator of price is the least nutritious. 1404 01:11:02,360 --> 01:11:05,559 Speaker 1: Thus the poorous and most vulnerable amongst us are pushed 1405 01:11:05,720 --> 01:11:08,639 Speaker 1: to process food. At the outbreak of COVID, I actually 1406 01:11:08,640 --> 01:11:10,479 Speaker 1: have a lot of hope come together, as we did 1407 01:11:10,479 --> 01:11:13,160 Speaker 1: in previous national crises, wake up to our lack of resilience, 1408 01:11:13,280 --> 01:11:15,680 Speaker 1: the fact that we don't make anything here anymore. Our 1409 01:11:15,760 --> 01:11:19,040 Speaker 1: hyper concentrated economy designed for just in time and not 1410 01:11:19,080 --> 01:11:21,200 Speaker 1: for the flourishing of our people. But we didn't wake 1411 01:11:21,240 --> 01:11:23,040 Speaker 1: up to any of that. We didn't get good leadership 1412 01:11:23,120 --> 01:11:25,560 Speaker 1: under Trump or Biden. We're just left to fend for ourselves. 1413 01:11:25,720 --> 01:11:28,519 Speaker 1: That's why people are so angry right now. They're not stupid. 1414 01:11:28,720 --> 01:11:31,800 Speaker 1: They know what's going on is not right. It's just 1415 01:11:31,840 --> 01:11:34,599 Speaker 1: that nobody is looking to actually do anything about it. 1416 01:11:34,600 --> 01:11:37,439 Speaker 1: It's really frustrating. That's the interesting thing about eggs. I 1417 01:11:37,479 --> 01:11:39,320 Speaker 1: love that statistic where they're liking and if you want 1418 01:11:39,320 --> 01:11:42,439 Speaker 1: to hear my reaction to Sagre's monologue, become a premium 1419 01:11:42,439 --> 01:11:48,040 Speaker 1: subscriber today at Breakingpoints dot com. Chrystal, what do you 1420 01:11:48,080 --> 01:11:50,880 Speaker 1: take a look at? Well, guys, Joe Rogan recently floated 1421 01:11:50,920 --> 01:11:54,360 Speaker 1: a conspiracy for what is really behind the Biden document scandal. 1422 01:11:54,439 --> 01:11:57,559 Speaker 1: Take a listen. If I had to guess they're trying 1423 01:11:57,600 --> 01:11:59,920 Speaker 1: to get rid of him, Yeah, that my guess would 1424 01:11:59,920 --> 01:12:01,360 Speaker 1: be they're trying to get rid of him. If all 1425 01:12:01,400 --> 01:12:06,439 Speaker 1: of a sudden, his own aids are sending these instead 1426 01:12:06,439 --> 01:12:10,200 Speaker 1: of like taking these classified documents which you have located 1427 01:12:10,479 --> 01:12:12,880 Speaker 1: and go well, let's not do that again and fucking 1428 01:12:13,040 --> 01:12:17,280 Speaker 1: locking them up somewhere, his own aids self reporting. Dude, 1429 01:12:18,000 --> 01:12:20,599 Speaker 1: Come on, that sounds suss Well, no one self reported 1430 01:12:20,640 --> 01:12:24,560 Speaker 1: that fucking laptop. I know that was that was Russian disinformation. 1431 01:12:25,360 --> 01:12:28,200 Speaker 1: That reeks ovation. They got a hold of the social 1432 01:12:28,240 --> 01:12:31,360 Speaker 1: media companies and lied to them. They did whatever the 1433 01:12:31,360 --> 01:12:33,760 Speaker 1: fuck they could to keep that from happening. And even this, 1434 01:12:33,920 --> 01:12:38,280 Speaker 1: they discovered this before the midterms. Now, I'm not sure 1435 01:12:38,320 --> 01:12:40,200 Speaker 1: that any of the people around Biden are actually clever 1436 01:12:40,320 --> 01:12:43,240 Speaker 1: cunning enough to pull off this elaborate plot, but Rogan 1437 01:12:43,320 --> 01:12:45,800 Speaker 1: is picking up on something that is a real dynamic here. 1438 01:12:46,080 --> 01:12:48,839 Speaker 1: Biden is not in a great position politically in general, 1439 01:12:48,880 --> 01:12:51,519 Speaker 1: and the continued fallout from this document scandal has been 1440 01:12:51,600 --> 01:12:55,800 Speaker 1: an absolute catastrophe for him. On a substantive level, there 1441 01:12:55,880 --> 01:12:59,040 Speaker 1: remain real questions about how the hell this all happened, 1442 01:12:59,200 --> 01:13:02,360 Speaker 1: the level of airlessness it implies, the real possibility of 1443 01:13:02,439 --> 01:13:06,080 Speaker 1: national security compromise, the arrogance of expecting a separate system 1444 01:13:06,120 --> 01:13:09,639 Speaker 1: of justice for yourself. On a political level, though, if anything, 1445 01:13:09,800 --> 01:13:14,320 Speaker 1: the situation is even worse. Why because Biden's document scandal 1446 01:13:14,400 --> 01:13:17,760 Speaker 1: hits him right where it matters the most, electability, and 1447 01:13:17,800 --> 01:13:20,599 Speaker 1: there were already some real warning signs for Joe Biden 1448 01:13:20,720 --> 01:13:23,800 Speaker 1: in that buried department. Stretch your memory way back to 1449 01:13:23,840 --> 01:13:26,360 Speaker 1: the days of the twenty twenty Democratic primary. Pete and 1450 01:13:26,439 --> 01:13:29,240 Speaker 1: Kamala and Beto and John Delaney. They were all there. 1451 01:13:29,320 --> 01:13:32,000 Speaker 1: Bernie too, of course, but in the end one figure 1452 01:13:32,040 --> 01:13:35,720 Speaker 1: stood alone, Joseph Robinette Biden. It wasn't that voters were 1453 01:13:35,720 --> 01:13:38,960 Speaker 1: particularly enthusiastic about Biden's policy positions. They did have some 1454 01:13:39,000 --> 01:13:42,160 Speaker 1: warmth for him personally, but they preferred Bernie on any 1455 01:13:42,240 --> 01:13:45,360 Speaker 1: number of issues. Ultimately, though, they came to believe Biden 1456 01:13:45,560 --> 01:13:49,200 Speaker 1: was best on the issue that they put above all others, electability, 1457 01:13:49,600 --> 01:13:52,639 Speaker 1: And they were right, sort of, because he completed the mission. 1458 01:13:52,680 --> 01:13:55,040 Speaker 1: He did beat Donald Trump, although it was ultimately really 1459 01:13:55,040 --> 01:13:58,240 Speaker 1: too close for comfort. Now Biden is facing his reelect, 1460 01:13:58,320 --> 01:14:01,320 Speaker 1: and in some ways, up until recent that squishy pundit 1461 01:14:01,360 --> 01:14:05,360 Speaker 1: defined quality of electibility looked relatively intact strengthened even first 1462 01:14:05,400 --> 01:14:08,000 Speaker 1: and foremost, he is the incumbent president that typically does 1463 01:14:08,040 --> 01:14:10,719 Speaker 1: count for something. But he also defied history in the midterms, 1464 01:14:10,720 --> 01:14:13,920 Speaker 1: avoided the absolute democratic she lacking that looked imminent and 1465 01:14:13,960 --> 01:14:15,800 Speaker 1: which had become a sort of political custom for the 1466 01:14:15,800 --> 01:14:19,240 Speaker 1: party in the White House. Sure voters consistently told pollsters 1467 01:14:19,280 --> 01:14:21,200 Speaker 1: they would love some options other than Joe Biden and 1468 01:14:21,240 --> 01:14:24,600 Speaker 1: Donald Trump. Sure Democratic voters consistently said they did not 1469 01:14:24,720 --> 01:14:28,000 Speaker 1: actually even want Biden to run for president again. But 1470 01:14:28,439 --> 01:14:30,360 Speaker 1: in the wake of the midterms, it felt like those 1471 01:14:30,479 --> 01:14:33,800 Speaker 1: lingering doubts would surely be assuaged. But the truth is, 1472 01:14:34,000 --> 01:14:36,200 Speaker 1: although the midterms might have shut up the press and 1473 01:14:36,280 --> 01:14:39,439 Speaker 1: the Democratic politicians who distanced themselves from Biden leading up 1474 01:14:39,439 --> 01:14:43,080 Speaker 1: to November, they didn't actually quiet the public's doubts. For 1475 01:14:43,120 --> 01:14:46,360 Speaker 1: an incumbent president. Biden continues to be in a very 1476 01:14:46,520 --> 01:14:50,760 Speaker 1: weak position with regards to his own Democratic base. As 1477 01:14:50,880 --> 01:14:54,200 Speaker 1: a shocking example of how that weakness shows up in 1478 01:14:54,200 --> 01:14:56,120 Speaker 1: the numbers, there's a new poll that just came out 1479 01:14:56,400 --> 01:15:00,160 Speaker 1: testing a hypothetical twenty twenty four Democratic primary in the 1480 01:15:00,200 --> 01:15:03,559 Speaker 1: key state of New Hampshire. Overall, you're ready for this, 1481 01:15:04,240 --> 01:15:07,920 Speaker 1: sixty six percent of New Hampshire Democrats say they are 1482 01:15:07,960 --> 01:15:11,519 Speaker 1: opposed to Biden running for a second term. Plus and 1483 01:15:11,560 --> 01:15:13,040 Speaker 1: this makes me throw up a little bit in my 1484 01:15:13,040 --> 01:15:16,679 Speaker 1: mouth to say, but it's got Pete Boodhagic beating Biden 1485 01:15:16,960 --> 01:15:20,160 Speaker 1: by five points. What's even more notable is that Biden's 1486 01:15:20,200 --> 01:15:22,320 Speaker 1: actually lost ground in this pole since the last time 1487 01:15:22,320 --> 01:15:24,360 Speaker 1: they tested the water so that was back in July. 1488 01:15:24,920 --> 01:15:28,960 Speaker 1: Back then, Biden only trailed Pete by one Elizabeth Warren 1489 01:15:28,960 --> 01:15:32,320 Speaker 1: and Bernie Sanders they have also seen their support rise now. 1490 01:15:32,320 --> 01:15:34,719 Speaker 1: Biden's erosion in this poll is counter to the media 1491 01:15:34,800 --> 01:15:37,320 Speaker 1: narrative that the midterms basically shored up his standing and 1492 01:15:37,360 --> 01:15:41,040 Speaker 1: erased any lingering Democratic doubts. The result is even more 1493 01:15:41,080 --> 01:15:44,080 Speaker 1: worrying for Biden given what a colossal mess Pete has 1494 01:15:44,120 --> 01:15:46,639 Speaker 1: made lately with his unwillingness to hold the criminal airlines 1495 01:15:46,680 --> 01:15:50,040 Speaker 1: to account. They're losing to that guy. Now. It's true 1496 01:15:50,040 --> 01:15:51,920 Speaker 1: that New Hampshire is not a great state for Biden. 1497 01:15:51,960 --> 01:15:54,160 Speaker 1: He does better with black and Latino Democrats than with 1498 01:15:54,200 --> 01:15:57,839 Speaker 1: the overwhelmingly white population of New Hampshire, but he continues 1499 01:15:57,880 --> 01:16:01,240 Speaker 1: to show plenty of weakness at the national overall level. Two. 1500 01:16:01,640 --> 01:16:04,559 Speaker 1: In a new Emerson pole, a sizable minority forty two 1501 01:16:04,600 --> 01:16:07,639 Speaker 1: percent of Democrats say they want a different nominee. That 1502 01:16:07,680 --> 01:16:10,719 Speaker 1: same pole finds Biden losing a head to head matchup 1503 01:16:10,760 --> 01:16:14,839 Speaker 1: against DeSantis, but even more disturbing, it's got him trailing 1504 01:16:15,280 --> 01:16:18,920 Speaker 1: Trump by forty four to forty one. Now this comes 1505 01:16:18,960 --> 01:16:21,080 Speaker 1: on the heels of a separate Harvard Harris pole, which 1506 01:16:21,120 --> 01:16:25,240 Speaker 1: found Biden trailing Trump by five. Since Democratic voters selected 1507 01:16:25,280 --> 01:16:28,439 Speaker 1: Biden for his electability, it then makes sense that their 1508 01:16:28,439 --> 01:16:30,479 Speaker 1: continued support of him would rise and fall with their 1509 01:16:30,520 --> 01:16:33,479 Speaker 1: sense of whether or not he can win again, whether 1510 01:16:33,560 --> 01:16:35,439 Speaker 1: or not he is the best candidate to take on 1511 01:16:35,520 --> 01:16:38,519 Speaker 1: a Trump or a DeSantis, And they have some good 1512 01:16:38,560 --> 01:16:41,240 Speaker 1: reason at this point to be a little doubtful. For one, 1513 01:16:41,600 --> 01:16:44,320 Speaker 1: Biden ain't getting any younger or any more capable. His 1514 01:16:44,360 --> 01:16:46,400 Speaker 1: ability to do the job for another four year term 1515 01:16:46,479 --> 01:16:48,920 Speaker 1: has long been one of the top concerns of Democratic 1516 01:16:49,000 --> 01:16:52,840 Speaker 1: voters and general election voters alike, But now Biden is 1517 01:16:52,880 --> 01:16:55,799 Speaker 1: in a terrible position to make a strong case against Trump. 1518 01:16:55,960 --> 01:16:58,120 Speaker 1: It's going to be Hillary Clinton all over again. Try 1519 01:16:58,160 --> 01:17:00,000 Speaker 1: and attack Trump on his character but being two flowed, 1520 01:17:00,040 --> 01:17:02,479 Speaker 1: but personally for any of it to really land and stick, 1521 01:17:03,000 --> 01:17:06,240 Speaker 1: there's no way that Biden can use Trump's own document 1522 01:17:06,280 --> 01:17:09,439 Speaker 1: malfeasans against him now, Not to mention, the fact that 1523 01:17:09,479 --> 01:17:12,320 Speaker 1: Biden now Pence had been caught in very similar misdeeds 1524 01:17:12,479 --> 01:17:15,160 Speaker 1: makes it so much less likely that Trump is going 1525 01:17:15,160 --> 01:17:18,439 Speaker 1: to be indicted. Listen, not long ago, I thought that 1526 01:17:18,600 --> 01:17:21,040 Speaker 1: was really little likelihood that Trump could make it back 1527 01:17:21,040 --> 01:17:23,479 Speaker 1: into the White House again. Now I am not so 1528 01:17:23,600 --> 01:17:27,040 Speaker 1: sure whatsoever. Republicans did not stick the knife in and 1529 01:17:27,080 --> 01:17:31,759 Speaker 1: Biden's thrown him a massive lifeline. Biden's supposed delectability saved 1530 01:17:31,760 --> 01:17:34,360 Speaker 1: his political career in twenty twenty, but in twenty twenty 1531 01:17:34,360 --> 01:17:36,840 Speaker 1: four he's going to have to sell something else to 1532 01:17:36,880 --> 01:17:41,240 Speaker 1: Democratic voters because far from a strong contender, he looks very, 1533 01:17:41,560 --> 01:17:45,719 Speaker 1: very vulnerable and there's a bit of an intrad democratic 1534 01:17:45,760 --> 01:17:48,479 Speaker 1: and if you want to hear my reaction to Crystal's monologue, 1535 01:17:48,479 --> 01:17:54,679 Speaker 1: become a premium subscriber today at Breakingpoints dot com. Ryan 1536 01:17:54,720 --> 01:17:57,880 Speaker 1: Cooper is The Prospect's managing editor and also author of 1537 01:17:58,120 --> 01:18:00,439 Speaker 1: how are you going to pay for that? Smart answers 1538 01:18:00,479 --> 01:18:04,120 Speaker 1: to the dumbest question in politics. Great to have you, Ryan, Welcome, 1539 01:18:04,160 --> 01:18:07,760 Speaker 1: Good to see you man, Glad to be here. Yeah. Absolutely, 1540 01:18:07,800 --> 01:18:11,479 Speaker 1: So you wrote an intelligent piece about this new idea 1541 01:18:11,520 --> 01:18:14,360 Speaker 1: that was proposed by Bill Cassidy and Angus King. Let's 1542 01:18:14,360 --> 01:18:16,639 Speaker 1: go and throw this up on the screen. The headline 1543 01:18:16,680 --> 01:18:19,680 Speaker 1: here from the Prospect is the smart bipartisan plan to 1544 01:18:19,840 --> 01:18:23,799 Speaker 1: shore up social Security. Bill Cassidy and Angus King propose 1545 01:18:23,880 --> 01:18:26,880 Speaker 1: an American Social Wealth Fund. So I would love it 1546 01:18:26,920 --> 01:18:29,320 Speaker 1: if you could just start with the very basics of 1547 01:18:29,760 --> 01:18:33,120 Speaker 1: what is a social wealth fund and why is this 1548 01:18:33,200 --> 01:18:36,400 Speaker 1: even being contemplated at this point at all. Yeah. Well, 1549 01:18:36,680 --> 01:18:40,520 Speaker 1: a social wealth fund is quite simple. It's just a 1550 01:18:40,560 --> 01:18:45,920 Speaker 1: government investment account. Basically, you know, the government finds a 1551 01:18:46,000 --> 01:18:48,800 Speaker 1: source of revenue from somewhere and they use it to 1552 01:18:48,880 --> 01:18:54,080 Speaker 1: buy buy up some kind of investment stocks, bonds, real estate. 1553 01:18:55,720 --> 01:18:58,479 Speaker 1: Alaska actually has one of these. They seeded it with 1554 01:18:58,560 --> 01:19:03,479 Speaker 1: their oil money, but it's not the They pay a 1555 01:19:03,520 --> 01:19:07,120 Speaker 1: dividend out of that to every Alaskan. The money doesn't 1556 01:19:07,120 --> 01:19:09,400 Speaker 1: come directly from the oil. It's important to understand it 1557 01:19:09,400 --> 01:19:12,120 Speaker 1: comes from the investment returns of the fund they have 1558 01:19:12,160 --> 01:19:14,880 Speaker 1: about I think the current total is about seventy five 1559 01:19:14,920 --> 01:19:19,200 Speaker 1: billion dollars right now. So anyway, it's it's as simple 1560 01:19:19,240 --> 01:19:23,160 Speaker 1: as that. It's just like any wealthy individual they has 1561 01:19:23,560 --> 01:19:25,960 Speaker 1: stuff like this. This will be just doing it on 1562 01:19:26,000 --> 01:19:29,599 Speaker 1: a government scale. And the proposal is to just use 1563 01:19:29,680 --> 01:19:35,200 Speaker 1: that as a source of revenue to basically bolster the 1564 01:19:35,200 --> 01:19:39,479 Speaker 1: finances of Social Security, find another revenue stream for it, 1565 01:19:39,520 --> 01:19:44,280 Speaker 1: as it were. And so they proposed to not take 1566 01:19:44,320 --> 01:19:47,880 Speaker 1: the existing Social Security Trust Fund, but to find some 1567 01:19:48,160 --> 01:19:51,879 Speaker 1: money from somewhere else, in this case by borrowing actually 1568 01:19:52,400 --> 01:19:57,599 Speaker 1: and invest it in stocks or I think that's mainly 1569 01:19:57,600 --> 01:19:59,840 Speaker 1: what they proposed. But you know, theoretically you could put 1570 01:19:59,840 --> 01:20:03,000 Speaker 1: it and whatever you wanted to, right So, Ryan, I mean, 1571 01:20:03,080 --> 01:20:04,760 Speaker 1: what are the arguments against this? I guess one of 1572 01:20:04,800 --> 01:20:07,880 Speaker 1: them would be, at least with Social Security, it's a guarantee, 1573 01:20:07,960 --> 01:20:10,519 Speaker 1: you know, stop s and P five hundred returns like whatever, 1574 01:20:10,560 --> 01:20:13,639 Speaker 1: thirteen percent on average, but sometimes it drops by twenty 1575 01:20:13,640 --> 01:20:15,960 Speaker 1: two percent and sometimes it got up by forty sight. 1576 01:20:16,080 --> 01:20:18,519 Speaker 1: What would you do? How do you mitigate the downside 1577 01:20:18,600 --> 01:20:21,000 Speaker 1: risk I guessed to taxpayer money and to the overall 1578 01:20:21,000 --> 01:20:27,840 Speaker 1: benefit well, there's a risk with everything, you know. One 1579 01:20:28,479 --> 01:20:31,880 Speaker 1: of the reasons we have this problem right now, which 1580 01:20:31,960 --> 01:20:35,160 Speaker 1: is that the Social Security Trust Fund is scheduled it'll 1581 01:20:35,280 --> 01:20:39,280 Speaker 1: they estimate it will be exhausted by about twenty thirty 1582 01:20:39,320 --> 01:20:42,920 Speaker 1: four or so, is because that the money has been 1583 01:20:42,960 --> 01:20:48,120 Speaker 1: invested in this hyper conservative account, which is all Treasury bonds. 1584 01:20:48,439 --> 01:20:51,000 Speaker 1: And as you say, you know, there's an enormous difference 1585 01:20:51,120 --> 01:20:53,800 Speaker 1: over the last like thirty years, is about an eight 1586 01:20:53,880 --> 01:20:56,960 Speaker 1: percentage point difference between the return on the S and 1587 01:20:57,000 --> 01:21:00,519 Speaker 1: P five hundred and the return on the United States debt. 1588 01:21:00,760 --> 01:21:04,960 Speaker 1: So you know there is a risk, but you know 1589 01:21:05,040 --> 01:21:08,200 Speaker 1: there's also a risk to not doing it, which is 1590 01:21:08,240 --> 01:21:10,599 Speaker 1: that you know you're leaving money on the table. And 1591 01:21:10,600 --> 01:21:13,280 Speaker 1: one of the nice things about a government is that 1592 01:21:13,320 --> 01:21:17,280 Speaker 1: you have a theoretically infinite time horizon, and so if 1593 01:21:17,320 --> 01:21:20,160 Speaker 1: there's a bad turn in the market, you can usually 1594 01:21:20,240 --> 01:21:22,280 Speaker 1: just wait it out. You know, this is this These 1595 01:21:22,320 --> 01:21:25,960 Speaker 1: are usually transitory things that only last a couple of years, 1596 01:21:26,360 --> 01:21:28,880 Speaker 1: and so you can you can basically sit on your hands. 1597 01:21:29,360 --> 01:21:32,880 Speaker 1: You could in the case of an you know, extreme event, 1598 01:21:33,200 --> 01:21:36,240 Speaker 1: just like bolster it up with some extra borrowed money 1599 01:21:36,479 --> 01:21:39,600 Speaker 1: or something like that. And just wait for things to 1600 01:21:39,960 --> 01:21:42,559 Speaker 1: turn around. So you know, it's not like a person 1601 01:21:42,760 --> 01:21:46,400 Speaker 1: where they you know, you absolutely must get your money 1602 01:21:46,439 --> 01:21:49,200 Speaker 1: out when you need it. You know, the government can 1603 01:21:50,040 --> 01:21:52,400 Speaker 1: shore things, you know, paper over the cracks for a 1604 01:21:52,439 --> 01:21:55,400 Speaker 1: long time. Got it. How do you like this idea 1605 01:21:55,600 --> 01:21:59,439 Speaker 1: as opposed to what Senator Sanders has long proposed and 1606 01:21:59,560 --> 01:22:02,400 Speaker 1: others And apparently Joe Manchin just came out in support 1607 01:22:02,439 --> 01:22:05,240 Speaker 1: of the idea of lifting the income cap. So right 1608 01:22:05,280 --> 01:22:08,120 Speaker 1: now there's a limit to the amount of wage income 1609 01:22:08,160 --> 01:22:10,679 Speaker 1: that is actually taxed to go into the Social Security 1610 01:22:10,680 --> 01:22:13,080 Speaker 1: Trust Fund. The idea is like, why are we giving 1611 01:22:13,080 --> 01:22:16,400 Speaker 1: this tax break to the wealthy? Basically that is undercutting 1612 01:22:16,439 --> 01:22:19,000 Speaker 1: the ability to make sure that social security benefits will 1613 01:22:19,040 --> 01:22:22,320 Speaker 1: be there for retirees into the future. What do you 1614 01:22:22,360 --> 01:22:27,880 Speaker 1: make of that proposal? Instead? I think that's great. You know. 1615 01:22:27,960 --> 01:22:30,920 Speaker 1: The reason I would say I mainly like this social 1616 01:22:30,920 --> 01:22:34,040 Speaker 1: security you know, investment scheme is that it puts the 1617 01:22:34,120 --> 01:22:36,559 Speaker 1: idea of a social wealth fund on the table, and 1618 01:22:36,600 --> 01:22:39,280 Speaker 1: I think if you're actually going to do it, you know, 1619 01:22:39,320 --> 01:22:41,920 Speaker 1: the way to do it would be like Alaska. Basically, 1620 01:22:42,280 --> 01:22:46,760 Speaker 1: you know, you're taking some of the capital income of 1621 01:22:46,800 --> 01:22:50,439 Speaker 1: the country, the income from investment returns. This is about 1622 01:22:50,520 --> 01:22:54,400 Speaker 1: thirty percent of national income goes overwhelmingly to the richest 1623 01:22:54,400 --> 01:22:57,240 Speaker 1: people in the country, and just like getting the government's 1624 01:22:57,320 --> 01:23:02,040 Speaker 1: fingers in that particular, you know high and you know, 1625 01:23:02,400 --> 01:23:04,280 Speaker 1: you could do it for social security, or you could 1626 01:23:04,320 --> 01:23:08,400 Speaker 1: do a universal basic dividend like my friend Matt Brunnick proposes. 1627 01:23:09,400 --> 01:23:11,680 Speaker 1: But yeah, I don't think these necessarily trade off. I 1628 01:23:11,680 --> 01:23:15,200 Speaker 1: would also raise the get rid of that peril tax cap, 1629 01:23:15,240 --> 01:23:18,200 Speaker 1: and that would I think shore up the social securities 1630 01:23:18,240 --> 01:23:21,720 Speaker 1: finances indefinitely as well. So you know we could do 1631 01:23:21,840 --> 01:23:24,120 Speaker 1: we could do both and and in fact boost social 1632 01:23:24,120 --> 01:23:27,439 Speaker 1: security benefits higher than they are now, which is probably 1633 01:23:27,520 --> 01:23:30,519 Speaker 1: a good idea. Do we have any examples of other 1634 01:23:30,600 --> 01:23:32,960 Speaker 1: nations you know that are able to do I know 1635 01:23:33,080 --> 01:23:35,280 Speaker 1: Norway has a good one, but again that's kind of 1636 01:23:35,360 --> 01:23:38,000 Speaker 1: oil related. Is there anybody on par with us that 1637 01:23:38,080 --> 01:23:43,000 Speaker 1: has a similar financing scheme? Yeah, I mean Norway's the 1638 01:23:43,000 --> 01:23:46,720 Speaker 1: big one. They own like one point three percent of 1639 01:23:46,760 --> 01:23:50,160 Speaker 1: all the stocks in the world, which is crazy when 1640 01:23:50,160 --> 01:23:54,479 Speaker 1: you think about small the country is. There are a 1641 01:23:54,520 --> 01:23:59,840 Speaker 1: lot of you know, petro states have them. Alaska. Alaska's 1642 01:24:00,040 --> 01:24:05,800 Speaker 1: probably the the single most relevant example I believe North 1643 01:24:05,880 --> 01:24:09,080 Speaker 1: Dakota has one as well. And as you say, you know, 1644 01:24:09,160 --> 01:24:12,519 Speaker 1: these these tend to come from from oil rents because 1645 01:24:12,720 --> 01:24:16,280 Speaker 1: the it's it's much more easily politically to do it 1646 01:24:16,320 --> 01:24:18,920 Speaker 1: that way, you know, because it's like the oil is not, 1647 01:24:19,320 --> 01:24:22,040 Speaker 1: you know, being created by a capitalist or something like 1648 01:24:22,080 --> 01:24:24,720 Speaker 1: that sort of you know, the heritage of everyone. But 1649 01:24:25,240 --> 01:24:30,040 Speaker 1: you know, the guy who set up Alaska's dividend thing, 1650 01:24:30,880 --> 01:24:34,240 Speaker 1: he tried that multiple times with different sources. He wanted 1651 01:24:34,280 --> 01:24:36,320 Speaker 1: to do it with fish taxes, and then he wanted 1652 01:24:36,320 --> 01:24:38,400 Speaker 1: to do it just with tax money. And there's no 1653 01:24:38,479 --> 01:24:44,800 Speaker 1: reason why you couldn't just use regular government money, you know, 1654 01:24:44,920 --> 01:24:46,760 Speaker 1: I mean that you know that buy is just as 1655 01:24:46,760 --> 01:24:49,679 Speaker 1: good as anything else. You know, it's just a question 1656 01:24:49,720 --> 01:24:53,639 Speaker 1: of getting the politics squared away. And you know, eight 1657 01:24:53,720 --> 01:24:57,280 Speaker 1: percentage points of investment return is is really that's a 1658 01:24:57,400 --> 01:24:59,800 Speaker 1: that's a huge you know, imagine being a Wall Street 1659 01:24:59,800 --> 01:25:02,760 Speaker 1: trad and you're looking at something like that. Just being 1660 01:25:02,800 --> 01:25:05,160 Speaker 1: able to borrow at these rock bottom prices and invest 1661 01:25:05,160 --> 01:25:08,280 Speaker 1: in the market. I mean, you know, it's a total 1662 01:25:08,360 --> 01:25:12,519 Speaker 1: no brainer. Yeah, good point. Last question to you, Ryan. 1663 01:25:13,479 --> 01:25:16,240 Speaker 1: Part of why there's all this discussion now of social 1664 01:25:16,240 --> 01:25:18,360 Speaker 1: security and Medicare is because you have some in the 1665 01:25:18,360 --> 01:25:21,799 Speaker 1: Republican caucus who are once again back to floating cuts 1666 01:25:21,800 --> 01:25:26,439 Speaker 1: to quote unquote entitlement programs. Joe Biden seems a newly 1667 01:25:26,479 --> 01:25:28,599 Speaker 1: reformed man, but he has in the past been open 1668 01:25:28,640 --> 01:25:31,400 Speaker 1: to these cuts as well, including during the Obama administration 1669 01:25:31,439 --> 01:25:34,320 Speaker 1: when they floated insanely this grind bargain, which the only 1670 01:25:34,360 --> 01:25:36,160 Speaker 1: reason we didn't end up with it is basically because 1671 01:25:36,160 --> 01:25:38,120 Speaker 1: the Tea Party at the time was like, no, this 1672 01:25:38,160 --> 01:25:41,040 Speaker 1: doesn't even go far enough. So, you know, we have 1673 01:25:41,320 --> 01:25:44,120 Speaker 1: this debt sealing situation coming up where the Republicans are 1674 01:25:44,200 --> 01:25:46,720 Speaker 1: very committed to holding the country hostage in order to 1675 01:25:47,000 --> 01:25:50,400 Speaker 1: extract some sort of spending cuts, maybe with entitledment spending 1676 01:25:50,479 --> 01:25:54,000 Speaker 1: quote unquote, maybe in some other area. What is your 1677 01:25:54,080 --> 01:25:57,840 Speaker 1: level of confidence in the ability of this administration, led 1678 01:25:57,840 --> 01:25:59,960 Speaker 1: by Joe Biden, to sort of hold firm to their 1679 01:26:00,160 --> 01:26:02,360 Speaker 1: current position that we are not going to negotiate on 1680 01:26:02,400 --> 01:26:08,479 Speaker 1: the debt ceiling whatsoever. I am semi confident. You know, 1681 01:26:08,600 --> 01:26:12,040 Speaker 1: Biden's a party guy at the end of the day, 1682 01:26:12,360 --> 01:26:15,559 Speaker 1: and you know the party has totally come away from 1683 01:26:15,680 --> 01:26:20,000 Speaker 1: the position of Obama in twenty eleven, when as you say, 1684 01:26:20,040 --> 01:26:22,880 Speaker 1: he was putting like eight hundred billion dollars in Social 1685 01:26:22,920 --> 01:26:25,720 Speaker 1: Security and Medicare cuts on the table, you know, to 1686 01:26:25,800 --> 01:26:30,960 Speaker 1: give to the to the Tea Party. By twenty sixteen, 1687 01:26:31,000 --> 01:26:34,360 Speaker 1: Obama was proposing an increase in Social Security benefits, you know, 1688 01:26:34,400 --> 01:26:37,320 Speaker 1: pressed by Elizabeth Warren and other folks at Bernie Sanders 1689 01:26:37,320 --> 01:26:40,320 Speaker 1: as well. The other thing about Joe Biden, though, is 1690 01:26:40,360 --> 01:26:42,240 Speaker 1: he he tends to be a little bit of a 1691 01:26:42,280 --> 01:26:46,760 Speaker 1: flap jaw who just sort of say stuff without you know, 1692 01:26:46,960 --> 01:26:52,280 Speaker 1: really thinking it through. And I've heard from people inside 1693 01:26:52,320 --> 01:26:55,680 Speaker 1: the Congressional you know, staffers on the Hill are who 1694 01:26:55,720 --> 01:26:58,280 Speaker 1: are afraid that he'll just get to talking with the 1695 01:26:59,200 --> 01:27:04,240 Speaker 1: Republicans just randomly proposed some like big bargain. But you know, 1696 01:27:04,800 --> 01:27:07,439 Speaker 1: at the end of the day, social Security and Medicare 1697 01:27:07,479 --> 01:27:11,400 Speaker 1: are so popular, you know, Pupil from a couple of 1698 01:27:11,439 --> 01:27:14,200 Speaker 1: years ago said seventy four percent of Americans do not 1699 01:27:14,240 --> 01:27:16,639 Speaker 1: want social Security benefits to be cut. I think Biden 1700 01:27:16,760 --> 01:27:18,840 Speaker 1: is a savvy enough politician that he knows that that 1701 01:27:18,880 --> 01:27:21,559 Speaker 1: would be horribly unpopular and it would be a terrible 1702 01:27:21,640 --> 01:27:25,160 Speaker 1: precedent to give the Republicans anything in return for like 1703 01:27:25,240 --> 01:27:30,920 Speaker 1: holding the Global economy hostage, so you know, fingers crossed basically. Yeah, Well, 1704 01:27:31,040 --> 01:27:33,360 Speaker 1: especially when you have Trump actually already out there. I mean, 1705 01:27:33,400 --> 01:27:34,920 Speaker 1: this was one of the ways he broke rents with 1706 01:27:34,960 --> 01:27:37,599 Speaker 1: Republican orthodoxy in twenty sixteen, and he's already come out 1707 01:27:37,600 --> 01:27:39,680 Speaker 1: and said you should not put penty of cuts from 1708 01:27:39,720 --> 01:27:42,240 Speaker 1: Social Security Medicare on the table. So it'd be terrible 1709 01:27:42,280 --> 01:27:44,640 Speaker 1: position for Biden to be in going into reelective. He 1710 01:27:44,760 --> 01:27:47,360 Speaker 1: is up against Trump again to be to let Trump 1711 01:27:47,360 --> 01:27:49,800 Speaker 1: get to the left of you on those issues. Thank 1712 01:27:49,840 --> 01:27:52,320 Speaker 1: you for breaking all of this Downforce. We really appreciate Ryan. 1713 01:27:52,360 --> 01:27:56,840 Speaker 1: Thank you Ryan by pleasure. Absolutely, thank you guys so 1714 01:27:56,920 --> 01:27:58,720 Speaker 1: much for watching. Really appreciate it was man, it was 1715 01:27:58,760 --> 01:28:00,840 Speaker 1: fun show today. It was a long show. That's a 1716 01:28:00,840 --> 01:28:02,560 Speaker 1: lot to talk about. It always happens, and whenever we 1717 01:28:02,600 --> 01:28:04,479 Speaker 1: got to break stuff down, we got breaking news all 1718 01:28:04,520 --> 01:28:05,800 Speaker 1: of that. I hope you guys do it. Enjoyed the 1719 01:28:05,880 --> 01:28:09,280 Speaker 1: counterpoints yesterday, We certainly did. They did a phenomenal job. 1720 01:28:09,320 --> 01:28:12,400 Speaker 1: We've got great content, partner content specifically for everybody all 1721 01:28:12,400 --> 01:28:14,800 Speaker 1: throughout the weekend. Shout out to the previous subscribers who 1722 01:28:14,920 --> 01:28:17,280 Speaker 1: enable all of our work here possible. We just really 1723 01:28:17,360 --> 01:28:19,919 Speaker 1: couldn't do it without you, and especially with the discussions 1724 01:28:19,920 --> 01:28:22,280 Speaker 1: we're having right now Crystal new Said and logo and 1725 01:28:22,320 --> 01:28:24,400 Speaker 1: all this other stuff. It costs a lot of money, 1726 01:28:25,479 --> 01:28:27,679 Speaker 1: costs a hell of a lot of money, and literally 1727 01:28:27,720 --> 01:28:29,599 Speaker 1: the only way is because of all of you. So 1728 01:28:29,640 --> 01:28:32,080 Speaker 1: thank you all so so much for giving us that confidence. 1729 01:28:32,120 --> 01:28:34,080 Speaker 1: And we will see you all next week. Love you guys, 1730 01:28:34,080 --> 01:28:35,080 Speaker 1: have a wonderful weekend.