WEBVTT - Surveillance: Brexit With London Mayor

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane jay Ley.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance,

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>investment and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com and of course on the Bloomberg Now.

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>The coronavirus crisis will shrink London's economy by forty four

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>billion pounds and if a rebound could take until summer two.

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Now that's a warning. Today in a new report by

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>g l a economics unit at City Hall, with culture, leisure,

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>retail and hospitality all hard hit by lockdowns and social

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>distancing measures. The report also says one could see a

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>four and a half percent drop in the number of

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>jobs in the capitol. Well, I'm very pleased to be

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>joining joined by the Mayor of London citycon who joins

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>us from the historic cutting sark in Granwich. The world's

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>only survivor been tea Clipper Mayor, and I think built

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>in and I don't know whether it goes to the

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of deals that you think London and the UK

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:12.119
<v Speaker 1>should try and have post brexit. But how damaging would

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a no deal Brexit be for the city of London

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.839
<v Speaker 1>and good morning, good morning, it's great to join you. Okay, Look,

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we as a country of our economy is in the

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>professional services, were world leaders in finance and in law,

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in tech, in creative industries, and unfortunately the current deal

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>be negotiated by the government that fails to address the

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>concerns that these industries have in relation to continue to

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>business with our biggest trading partner, partner of the European

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Union as it is, it appears even the flimsy deal

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the government's negotiating may not get over the line. So

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>we are very concerned about the possibility of a no

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>deal brexit that means not having a deal with our

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>biggest trading partner, or a deal that doesn't reflect our economy.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>And the irony, of course is is the USA now

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>has a president who's put in the USA back on

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the world stage, and we the UK may become a

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>very lonely country in the future. So what's the best

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>hope for financial services in this very late stage and

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Brexit talk. Well, at the moment it appears that a

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>number of our sectors they were hoping for a good

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>deal with the EU aren't included. And so even if

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the deal is reached with the European Union this week,

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and we hope one is the problem is for our

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>professional services, finance, legal, tech, creative industries. They will have

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>less favorable access to the Single Market than they had

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>as members of the EU or during this transition period.

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's why it's really important that the UK government

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>understands the importance of issues like equivalence, financial passport in

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>this issue of attracting talent to London and the fact

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that our ecosystem relies upon people as well as capsule

0:02:59.880 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and services moving from London to the parts of the

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>European Union. If we go back into a lockdown that

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>looks more like a Tier three in London, and if

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>we have no deal brexit, would that be the perfect store.

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>What would job glasses actually look like in that scenario. Well,

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>London is very similar to other global cities around the world,

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>like New Yorker. We've suffered hugely because of the reduction

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>in footfall caused by the pandemic. Think of industries and

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>sectors that rely upon footfall retail, hospitality, culture, ledger and

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>so there's those sectors which normally contribute hugely to our

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>countries coffers, wealth and prosperity have really struggled, and the

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>concern is the combination of a continuation of this pandemic. Yes,

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>there is great news with the vaccine, but a combination

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of COVID plus a Brexit with no deal or a

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>poor deal would be really severe for London and our country.

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>As you said, it is a perfect storm, a double Yaman.

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's why it's so important that our government wakes

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>up and realizes what we're heading tours, rather than sleepwalking

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>into a potentially really deep recession. What's the right way

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of doing it? Is it more funds given to London

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and how much of these shifts will actually be permanent?

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>How much will the hospitality business suffer longer term? I

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>think what the government's got to realize is many of

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>these sectors are on life support and they need to

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>stay on life support because we can't afford is for

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>these businesses to go bust. It's far far easier to

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>keep a business fiable with the financial support from the

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>government then allowing a business to go bust and hoping

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that people restart businesses. Similarly, it's far easier to keep

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>people in work with financial support from the central government

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>rather than losing their jobs. Our current estimate is of

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the currnment continues the government continues down this line, we

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:57.679
<v Speaker 1>could see levels of job losses, levels of businesses going bust.

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>We've not seen as a country or city since the

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties. Nobody wants that, and that's why we're lobbying

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>the government to do much more, in particular to help

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 1>those sectors like retail, hospitality and culture that have really

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>suffered at normally in good times contribute hugely towards our

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>wealth and prosperity. When you look at the world famous

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>theater industry in London, will it ever come back to

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:23.919
<v Speaker 1>normally If we have a vaccine and that goes to

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>plan and if government support stays at these levels, when

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>are you expecting tourism to come back? Yeah? Well, the

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>good us and that the light at the end of

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the tunnel is the vaccine. This week Londoners and people

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>across our country will start receiving the vaccine and the

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>government has done the right thing and ordered vaccines from

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a number of different companies. The combination of the vaccine

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>but also we're our starting mass testing of those who

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>are asymptomatic leads us have hope towards the new year,

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's why it's really important the government gives the support.

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Most businesses are planning next year not to be as good,

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>but they want to stay open and viable. We're hoping

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to see tourists return to our city next summer. It's

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>really important they do so and safely. And that's why

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it's really important that the government continues to make progress

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>on the vaccine, on mass testing, but also we need

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>to really get on top of the test trace isolate system.

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>It's really important if somebody has the virus, particularly if

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 1>they're asymptomatic, that they know they've got the virus. They

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>can isolate the virus being passed. And we've learned a

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>lot over the last eight nine months. We've got to

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 1>use those lessons going forward to make sure we can

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>have a swift recovery, which is really important for our

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:41.039
<v Speaker 1>country's well being. How much of it is a risk

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that actually London goes to Tier three and this is

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a tiering system that you know all living in the

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>UK will be familiar with, but will you fight to

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>keep it in Tier two which is a medium lockdown. Well,

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the tiriert system isn't perfectly across our country. For those

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of you youers outside of the UK, we have three tiers.

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 1>Tier one is a with the least restrictions and Tier

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>three is with the most restrictions. London currently is in

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Tier two. We are concerned that there could be an

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>increase in the spread of the virus, a surge because

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of a relaxation of the rules during Christmas. And that's

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>why it's really important to anybody who is in London

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>or visits London follows our rules. When you're using public transport,

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you're in a shop where a face mask, when you're

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in a place where you can't keep you social distance

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>where a face mask, you know, it's really important to

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>carry hand sanitized, to wash your hands regularly and thoroughly

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>follow the rules that would avoid a London going into

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Tier three, because Tier three, because of the additional restrictions,

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>would mean that a lot of the progress we've made

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>with our businesses like here in the Cutty Sark would

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>be undone. That's why it's really important that people follow

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the rules to avoid us either entering Tier three, or

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>even worse, our country potentially entering a third national lockdown.

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>So they can't thank you so much for your time today.

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Of course, that is the Mayor of London from the

0:07:54.120 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>world famous Cutty Stark, Steve Schevara enjoyed us now federated

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>him as portfolio manager State seven or five Eastern time

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>has become like therapy for investors in our audience after

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>rattling through all the negative news. And I think that's

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>been a job at the investor for the market participants

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to almost receive that therapy all this stuff going on

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>around us which is absolutely dreadful, and thinking about about

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>one you have the therapy state. Yeah, I think I do.

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think I think we've been pretty calm

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>through the last few months. Look, I mean what you've

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>seen in terms of recovery is shocking. I mean, in

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of the number of people that have gone back

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to work, in terms of the rebound and retail sales, manufacturing, housing,

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you really do have in a lot of sectors of

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the economy of v shaped recovery with a lot of

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>stimulus coming, not just the fiscal stimulus, not just probably

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more from the Fed in terms of

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>extending duration and things of that nature, but the vaccine

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>itself represents an enormous stimulus over the course of next

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>year as we gradually get acton normal, and I think

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what the market is looking through now. That doesn't

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>mean we don't need support for certain parts of the

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>economy that are really in for it right now with

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.319
<v Speaker 1>these increased restrictions, but that's really about doing the right

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>thing for sectors of the economy. The market as a whole,

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.319
<v Speaker 1>I think is in a much healthier place than certain

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>sectors are. Steve, I get this argument that we're pricing

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in one and that we're looking toward a period past

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. Yet if we've already priced that in, what

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>more can we price in to drive a market higher? Well, well,

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>at least I don't think we are just pricing in one,

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's a longer term runway of growth. Remember,

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:44.119
<v Speaker 1>outside there are no real examples of double dip processions

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>since the Great Depression. When you're looking at recoveries and expansions,

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>these last three, four or five, six years, sometimes as

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>many as ten years. And we just had a recession.

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>We've cleared the deck. We're in early cycles. So yes,

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the market's immediate focus is on the recovery in one,

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>but in reality, you have to start pricing in the

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>idea that we've got a number of years of first

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 1>recovery then expansion, and markets are going to respond well

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 1>to that. Lisa, Tom and I have been going through

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the same story stave over the last several weeks, and

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I've sat here frustrated sometimes board at the outlook because

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:23.079
<v Speaker 1>it's very say me, and I'm wondering whether the group

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>think has actually become group action. Are you worried about

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>actual crowding or as far as your concern, the money

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>hasn't actually been put to work. This is just talk. Still, Look,

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I think this is this is what the scary part

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>about the early part of the cycle, because you'll see

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 1>big percentage moves and thinks that you've missed the whole thing.

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>But let's put it in a perspective. Right, small caps

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.439
<v Speaker 1>have outperformed large by let's call it, you know, ten

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:50.079
<v Speaker 1>of fift since September, but they've underperformed for the last

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>five years. They were flat for the last two years.

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Um even if you look at value versus growth, the

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>ten and fifteen percent performance you've seen there, value underperformed

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>by fifty percent in the first half of this year.

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 1>And so we think it's really those uncomfortable trades around value,

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>around small caps, around international which has started to show

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.199
<v Speaker 1>signs of life, and around dividend players that are really

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>going to continue over the course of the next year.

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>We think that there's still relatively early in their in

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>their days. And we think, again, while the market has

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>priced in a better twenty one, we don't think that

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the market is priced in, you know, a longer term

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>growth trajectory. Steve. This idea of being early earlier a

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 1>word we hear so many times, and this idea of

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.839
<v Speaker 1>it being uncomfortable, and it being uncomfortable to get in

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in the early part of a bull market. And I

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>think April was uncomfortable right now? Can you call it

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.839
<v Speaker 1>early when we've got a record high the Russell, a

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>record high s and P five hundred and a record

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>high the Nastac I mean, just looking at recoveries. You're

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a student of market history much more than I am, Steve.

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, when we start an early stage recovery, do

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>we start a record highs. We don't get there this quickly, um,

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>but you can. For example, if you think about the

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>decline in seven, you were back to all time highs

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>within about a year of that thirty decline, and I

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>can assure you you didn't want to sell in because

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you still had a market bull run until two thousand almost. Um, yes,

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>this can happen. Even if you look back at the

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 1>last recession that we went through, right, you got back

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.839
<v Speaker 1>to the all time high, and again, it would have

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>been very easy to say, Okay, we're back to the

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>all time high, we're long in the two yet another

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>get another six years after that. So no, I don't

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>think it means that we're late just because we're at

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.199
<v Speaker 1>all time highs. I think it's it's just the nature

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of this recovery and the amount of stimulus that we

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 1>got that allowed us to get back to the highest

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>so quickly. I was reading Morgan Stanley's look Ahead yesterday

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Sheets came out and he said that one reason

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>for their bullish outlook is that they expect fiscal and

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy to work together. Yet they still expect the

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 1>ten year yield to get up to one point four

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>or five percent by year end. How high can that

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>yield go before to rail as the equity rally look,

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I think it's a function of what

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the economic context is. Right. So, if you're still in

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>an economic malaise or you have slowing economic data and

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:15.199
<v Speaker 1>you get a surgeon yields because there's expectations that the

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>FED won't be as dubblished, then obviously that that's something

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that's bad. Um. If on the other hand, you know,

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>we're getting higher yields on the back of stronger and

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>stronger economic data, more and more people going back to work,

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>more normal levels of activity, I think that's that's fine. Um.

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Right now, both the yield and the spreads are so

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>low and so tight that it suggested equity multiples could

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>be in the mid to high twenties. We don't need

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>them to stay that high. So there is some room,

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I think, within a healthy economic recovery for yields to

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 1>rise and the market to be okay with that. Stafe

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>writes to catch up. Is it too addy to say

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Happy Christmas? Just in case? No, enjoy the holiday this year?

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Take the opportunity, my friend, enjoy the holidays. Christmas tea

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>chefron Federated irmis thank you, sir. Let's get to this

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>brutal pandemic sweeping across the United States of America, joining Ustan.

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Please to say is Mercedes Carnathon, Norwestern University Department of

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Preventative Medicine Vice Chair, Mercedes Professor. Fantastic to get you

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>back on the program with us. Thank you for joining us.

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Secretary are over the weekend saying that perhaps by Q

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>two all Americans that would like the vaccine would have

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>access to the vaccine. Is this the timeline that you're

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>putting into your models you're thinking about increasingly as well?

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, that is what I have heard as well,

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that hopefully by April, availability of the vaccine will be

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>such in production of the vaccine will be such that

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>everybody who wants it will start to be introduced to

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to get it. Because you have to keep

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in mind, it's two factors. It's how many doses of

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine vaccine do we have available? And how can

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>we get it out to the people rapidly? So let's

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about the process of getting it out. We know

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that for responders, people in nursing homes, those are some

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of the first recipients, are like the recipients of the vaccine.

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Where do we go from there? You know, I think

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it's really important to remember that those two populations are

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>coming first. So what that really means into one is

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that our behaviors can't change. If you think about it,

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>those are not the individuals with the highest likelihood of

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>circulating the virus and the population or spreading it. Nursing

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 1>home residents are in nursing homes, They're not out there.

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>It's the twenty thirty nine year olds who are not

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>being vaccinated early on who are spreading it. So what

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it means is that for the long game, we're looking

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty good once we can get this world out, but

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>for right now, our behaviors can't change. So mercedies, this

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>is the question, right, I mean, how should it be

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>rolled out in order to prevent the deaths that are inevitable,

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that are climbing that we're seeing record hospitalizations currently. How

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>do we best distribute in order to prevent the rampants

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>spread as many people are predicting. You know what I'd

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>like to see. I've heard some discussion about essential workers

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>who are delivery drivers, who are thrusts facing people in stores,

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>being eligible early on for the vaccine, and that would

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>solve two problems for for a large proportion of those workers.

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Those individuals um their income isn't as high. They aren't

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>able to socially isolate themselves, they don't have vast homes

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to be able to spread out, and those populations are

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>often at highest risk for the most severe outcomes and hospitalizations.

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>So it would be ideal to see that population in

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the next round. The good news, Professors, We've had months

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to think about this, how to roll it out. What

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I still don't know, Maybe you can help me, is

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>how long does this last before we have to go

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>back again and get another shot, get another vaccination? So

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>as I understand it with fires, so you get one

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>shot twenty one days later or so you get another shot.

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>What is your immediately like after that? How long the antibodies? Therefore, professor,

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>do we know the answers to that? If I had

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the answered of that, I would be making a lot

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of money. I think right now we still are in

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>the position where we know what we know and we

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know what we don't know, and so I am

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>not sure about that answer. How long one will remain immune?

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you know that information stands to come out

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>at the time when they actually publish their trial results.

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Right now, they're getting emergency use authorization we haven't seen

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the final reports, and hopefully there'll be some hints in there.

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Are you a little worried about the duration that it

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>might be? Do you have a range in mind? Professor?

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I apologize of putting you on the spot, because there

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is a belief at the moment, and we all share

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>this hope that by the middle of the next year

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in places across the world around the planet, we've got

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>society to a position where we can roll back many

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of these restrictions. But I think a big worry for

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>people would be if we had to go and do

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.880
<v Speaker 1>this all over again, quarter after quarter to make sure

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>this last. That would be a much bigger effort. Do

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>you have a time range in mind? That would be

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a much bigger effort. Um, you know. I think what

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I remain hopeful is that this particular vaccine which I hear,

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>is a unique approach to vaccination and how it's targeting

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the virus, that it will not be like the flu

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>vaccine that wrap so the flu the flu virus um

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>mutates quickly. The coronavirus doesn't mutate quite as well I

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 1>think as the flu virus. However, and the way that

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>these vaccines have been developed there's something that is targeting

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 1>something a little more central to the virus, so that

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>ideally this will last longer than one year. However, I

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen the final report yet, Mercedes. I just want

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to wrap up with where we are in the pandemic.

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we are seeing record numbers of cases in

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the United States or seeing hospitalizations we're seeing I see

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you units at capacity. How concerned are you about the

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>next month in terms of the worst aspect of this pandemic?

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, the worst aspect of this is, you know,

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you can always build field hospitals, but how are you

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>going to staff them? As we are filling up the

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>hospitals and I see us and using up the life

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>saving equipment. We need people to run that equipment, and

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that's where we're actually running short right now. So that

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>concerns me a great deal. Our healthcare providers are burnt out,

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>they are exhausted. This is emotionally and physically very draining.

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's very concerning and the only the best thing

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that we can do is to adhere to mask wearing

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and social distancing so that we can try to tamp

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>this down. Professor. We appreciate your hard work and your

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>contribution to this program. Thank you, Mersides Knathan of Northwestern University.

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you and I folk said the same thing. We

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>make the mistake of calling it stimulus. What this really

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is is eight it's an aid package to get us

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to the end of Q two. The stimulus, that's something

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you've got to think about after that. I'm really curious

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>to see the details of the plan. We're gonna be

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 1>getting it today, but I'm curious to see whether they're

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be any direct payments to individuals. The word

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>is there won't be. How they get that aid out

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 1>to small businesses. The details matter, John, especially as the

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>pandemic is getting worse, and will we get that one

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty billion dollars in state and locally. Tina

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Fordham joins us now even hest head of global political strategy. Tina,

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 1>let's just start with your read on negotiations down on

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Capitol here. It certainly sounds a lot more constructive over

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the last week or so. What's your take, Tina, um Well,

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I always get worried when it starts to sound constructive

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>because part of that, you know, signal that talks are

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>going well is in itself just uh reflects the political

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>imperative for both sides to be seen to be working

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in the country's best interest during this time of crisis.

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, everyone uses the same expression the devil in

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the details. I think, um, the observation about this being

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>aid rather than stimulus is a very astute one because

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>we forget how toxic um the term physical stimulus can

0:20:56.560 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>be in the US context. So I am less optimistic

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>actually now than I was the last time, but then

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>I was wrong. So um, I think that it's in

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 1>the it's going to be in Republican interests to be

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>seen to be driving a very hard bargain, especially as

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>we have this signpost of January five, the Georgia runoffs coming.

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 1>So what's the main opposition here? Is it's still the

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>state and local funding. Is that going to be the

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>main sticking point? I think that there is room for

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>for compromise, but that Republicans will be wanting to be

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>seen to be driving the harder bargain. And one of

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>the new twists that we've uh, you know, we've experienced

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>since the presidential elections is Republicans finding religion again on

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>on deficit spending. Right, So this or the size of

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 1>the deficit, so um, they are not going to be

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>wont to be giving into Democrats. And that's why I

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>worry that markets are getting ahead of the politics on

0:21:56.000 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>this one, because we haven't had a Lane duck session

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.199
<v Speaker 1>quite as contentious as this one is likely to be.

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'm worried that the scorched earth tendencies um that

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 1>we've seen thus far might actually bleed into the stimulus discussions.

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm struggling to see where you the deficit hawks are

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>coming back into play here. I mean, even Mitch McConnell,

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>he did propose a skinny bill. He did, there was

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about him signing onto the bipartisan agreement once the

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 1>details were hashed out. President Trump seems amenable, open to

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea of signing off. Who are the deficit hawks, listen.

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that we've seen a different tone in Congress.

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm here in London talking to you about global macro um.

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that the political imperative to get a stimulus

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>deal done was there, um, you know, before the elections,

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 1>and was calling it for them. I'm worried that a

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>contentious um, particularly contentious and polarized mood, where we even

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>haven't even got people willing to recognize the results of

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the presidential elections in the House gives a lot of

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>wiggle room to to say that, you know, we want

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>to do the right thing for the country, but we

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>just can't get there. Tina, You've mentioned the importance of

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>language that it's aid, not stimulus, because that word is

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>toxic in parts of the country and parts of the

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.160
<v Speaker 1>politics of the United States of America. When you start

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to hear the words state aid to another person, that's

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>just a bailout of poorly rand states. And we've heard

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that so many times from the administration. I heard it

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>from them directly on Friday A. Tina, I'm wondering, from

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>your perspective, is there any way that they can offer

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>ad to states without that being considered a state bailout

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of what many Republicans and the electorate might consider to

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>be poorly run states. Well, to me, this is all code.

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm an American who's been living outside my

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 1>country for over twenty years. There didn't used to be

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>this debate about which states were run well by, you know,

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>by governors of which side. So I'm really a worried

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that we're even normalizing this discussion. This is the biggest

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>crisis in decades in terms of its impact on lives

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and livelihoods. And to suggest that it's in any way

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 1>rational or reasonable to do anything other than passive stimulus

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 1>right now, I think doesn't put the you know, the

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 1>economic interests of the country at heart, Which is why

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 1>I was saying what I did about the return of

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>fiscal discipline and frankly finding pretext to avoid doing what

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>needs to be done. The United States in a crisis

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>where people are losing their lives shouldn't be differentiated between

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 1>poorly run states and well run states that just happened

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to be led by a leader of a particular political stribe.

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>So to me, this is a pretext to not do

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>what needs to be done, what every economist, central bankers

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you know have all agreed upon. This is getting held

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>up in Congress. Well, I think ta one step further.

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I think what totally exposes the intellectual inconsistency and the

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>dishonest state in some parts of the debate is that

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>those very same people who are unwilling to offer aid

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to what they consider to be poorly run states are

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>also considering offering aid to airlines, which many people on

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street would consider to be poorly run airlines in

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the context that they have no cash when it hit

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:24.959
<v Speaker 1>the fact, yes, poorly run enterprises, shanking, shrinking enterprises, even

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>dying enterprises. Absolutely, So, I guess I think you kind

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of struck a nerve. I'm just not willing to use

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the current terms to to have this debate. This stimulus

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 1>should be passed um. In Europe where I am, governments

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>composed of many political parties are are are finding common

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>cause and we're seeing these things past so that people

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>can move on with their lives. And we have a

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 1>few more months to go. Now. What really worries me

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>about what's happening in the United States is we have

0:25:58.000 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in some ways the worst of all worlds. We have

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>haven't even had, you know, kind of fully fledged lockdowns.

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 1>They've been partial, and they've been late. Of vaccine um,

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, miraculously or rather thanks to the hard work

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of scientists and epidemiologists, is coming, but we have many

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>months to go before that rollout. And markets are very

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>buoyant um on the you know, the amazing news that

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>vaccine is coming, but we could have many months delay,

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.119
<v Speaker 1>which is why I worry about what I call vacs

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:34.120
<v Speaker 1>popular risk. The combination of weak state capacity as in country,

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>not individual US states, but weak state capacity combined with

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>anti vac sentiment um and you know, compounded by these

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>kinds of delays in the stimulus that's necessary, could really

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 1>make things pretty problematic in the coming months. Some challenges

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 1>still to come in the net term, that's for sure. Tina,

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you, thank you for your time this morning. Tina

0:26:53.119 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>fordom there of even heard when sense of normal? What

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>is normally? Then? Look like, let's bring it down on

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>BMP Parabaut Chief US Economists ahead of mac cris strategy down.

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 1>We keep hearing that vaccinations coming back half of twenty one,

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>it's about the return to normal. What's normal? In the

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>conversations that you have, what is normal sound like in

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the back half of twenty one? Yeah? Normal? Uh, thanks

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 1>for the question. Normal probably means a growth range quote,

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot closer to to Launder potential in the you know,

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 1>two to two and a half, maybe well one and

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 1>half range, but not the eye poppingly large double digit

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>annualized you know, thirty plus and thirty minus, a type

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of growth that we've seen before. But I think, you know,

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 1>beyond just the simple numbers, though it's a real question

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>as to uh, not so much. What happens to to demand? UM?

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, we think that UM, a lot of demand

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:58.199
<v Speaker 1>will will try and renormalize UM. But where are the

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>areas where UM were Our supply is going to have

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to adjust to a new reality that demand is never

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>going to come back. And we were just hearing about

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>about people's uh locational preferences. UM. Does this mean that

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.719
<v Speaker 1>demand for high end luxury condos in Manhattan is going

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 1>to change? Does this mean that people's business travel is

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>going to change? Does this mean not just avolving demand,

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:26.360
<v Speaker 1>but does this mean that demand for digital services UM

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to be at a new permanent high UM.

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 1>A lot of companies are going to have to adjust

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to this and UM. While this is opportunities for some

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of these are challenges for a lot of others. And

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it raises a question about inflation. How do you measure

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>inflation and fundamentally changing economy into one that is more

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>dominant dominated by tech. What do you see in terms

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of inflation picking up? And how should we be measuring it? Yeah? Well,

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the classic ways to try and assess where inflation is

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>going This, of course, so looking at the measurement of

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>outputs lack in the economy, and we actually just released

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>our latest global outlook UM where we see UH technical

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>measures of slack in the economy UM close by the

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>end of two UM. So we do actually UM see

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a bit higher inflation coming UM, putting aside denomination effects

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>starting in UH late early three UM. But really, how

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>widespread is this gonna be? Is this going to be

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a general move hiring inflation across the overall economy? Are

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>we going to see parts of the economy still in

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the doldrums while others are red hot due to you know,

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>more more demand. I think that's gonna be UM. And

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>And is that going to translate into higher weight pressure

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>more generally or again just in a few segments of

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the labor market UM. I think that's a big question

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that actually the new administration will be asking themselves. And

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it's also really hard to even imagine if you think

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>about some of the fiscal support plans and the checks

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that if it's set out to individuals, I mean, if

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the government were to engage in another round of helicopter money,

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>essentially with that change fundamentally change your view on inflation.

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>The United States. Now, I don't think it will fundamentally

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>change it, but I do think it will certainly ward

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>off some of the risk that we could fall into

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a deflationary trap. I think inflationary expectations, at least as

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you measure them by by market break evens, that they're

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of tettering on the edge of potentially moving lower.

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Um if um, this does look like there's going to

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>be lasting scars in the economy, and so the you know,

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the big recovery and break evens that we've seen in

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of months is I think out of

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>hope that the scars will be less damaging as the

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>vaccine is around the corner. Um. But the question is, uh,

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>can there be enough fiscal ports to tide us through

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:05.719
<v Speaker 1>this transition until the vaccine arrives in a way that

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:09.959
<v Speaker 1>will continue to support inflationary explications in the future. UM. So,

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's probably the most important way in which

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>just this immediate physical support can nevertheless have long term

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>impacts of part of the economy. Well, Dan, let's make

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it really simple and just wrap up with this. And

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I think this is why the two thousand that kind

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of number in payrolls like we've got last week is

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>so important. How many jobs do we need to actually

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>generate to actually fill the gap of the last nine

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>months down? And how long would it take it a

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>right two fifty k to get it done. Yeah, we're

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about uh millions of jobs are still displaced. Now.

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a big open question how much of those are

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be perfectly lost and how much of them,

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, should be prominently lost. I think that's gonna

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>be the real sticking point here. Uh uh. You know,

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:03.719
<v Speaker 1>there's no question that some kinds of jobs are going

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to have to go away. Um, the more the new normal,

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>as you said, or the post pandemic normal looks different

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>from the pre pandemic norma. But are those necessarily have

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to go away because the new US supply adjust to

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the new reality, or are they unnecessarily caused um uh,

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, because of bankruptcies or liquidity is advents or

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>things like that. Um. That's uh uh, I'm sure going

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to be in the minds of UM, not just again

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>administration officials, but also a Congress UM as they consider

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>UM debating this this new stimulus package. Dann writes cash

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>ups as always my best to you and at saying Donna.

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast

0:32:56.240 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Radio