WEBVTT - Weirdhouse Cinema: Cannibal Apocalypse

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind, a production of

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>My Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Weird How Cinema. This

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>is Rob Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. Yeah. Today we

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>have another fun collision of B cinema genres. Here. What

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>happens when you take Italian cannibal exploitation films and you

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>cross them with a good old fashioned Nam exploitation film,

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>as in Vietnam, and then you go ahead and just

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>set the whole picture right here in Atlanta, Georgia. One

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>thing I will say about this concept is it does

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>not sound like it will be under seasoned. Yeah, yeah,

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>how tender eyes? Would you say? This film is? Oh

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:50.239
<v Speaker 1>my god, it has used the spiky side of the

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>meat mallet. It has covered everything in in pineapple puree. Uh,

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be uh, it's gonna be fork tinder all right.

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>The film is Cannibal Apocalypse. The original title in Italian

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Apocalypse Domani, which I believe is Italian for apocalypse tomorrow.

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 1>Oh yes, yes, So it took me a while to

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>understand this title because I actually watched this movie. So, uh,

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>this was your pick, you handed it off. I watched

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it last night and then I immediately started watching it

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>a second time after I watched the first time with

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the with the commentary track that's actually on the disc

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that you rented um by a film critic and historian

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>named Tim Lucas who has written a lot on exploitation cinema,

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly Italian movies and Jello and stuff like that. And

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I know he wrote a book about Mario Bava that

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>is that is pretty popular. But anyway, I might mention

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>some more of Lucas's observations as we go on, because

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>his commentary track was pretty good. But like I said,

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I was watching this and I kept trying to understand

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the title Cannibal Apocalypse. I would have expected with that

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>title that the movie would be a little more apocalyptic,

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>but there's not really anything apocalyptic about it in either

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>sense of the word, so not the original literal sense

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of apocalypse meaning a revelation or unveiling. There's nothing really

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>revelatory about the movie, nor in the common understanding today

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>having to do with the end of the world. It's

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>not really an end of the world movie. But then

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 1>I realized, oh, it's called that because of apocalypse now,

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>but the Vietnam movie, right, So what comes after Apocalypse Now,

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Apocalypse Tomorrow, Apocalypse Demani. Uh. So, if you want to

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>cut right to the quick, what you actually do is

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you take one word from the title of a recent

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>popular movie with similar themes, and then you take another

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>word that is a lurid, conceptual hook word like cannibalism.

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.239
<v Speaker 1>So you end up with cannibal Apocalypse. It would be

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of like if you made a movie today called

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>like the Necrophilia and the Furious or something, uh and

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>then other. There are tons of connections actually with other

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Vietnam movies, but mainly with Apocalypse Now. For example, the

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>main character in this film, what's his name? Him? His

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>name is Norman Hopper. I think it's pretty clear where

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>this comes from. It is a combination of Norman Bates,

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the main character in Psycho, and Dennis Hopper, the actor

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in Apocalypse Now. Oh yeah, yeah, that's a good point.

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>And it is this the sort of role that Dennis

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Hopper could have conceivably played. You know, you could imagine

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>him playing this sort of character. I guess you could.

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>That would be very different. I mean, Dennis Hopper, he's

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>notable in Apocalypse Now for being wild. You know, he

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is on a permanent trip, and he is fully in

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>the thrall of the warrior poet of of Marlon Brando's

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Kurts in the movie. In this movie, the main character,

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Norman Hopper is very much on the edge, but because

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>it's cast as John Saxon, John Saxon has an undeniably

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>even tempered, steady kind of presence. I mean, he he's

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>an extremely grounded actor, and that's contrasted with some of

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the the very like ratlike energy of characters in this movie,

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>such as the character named again, this is really the

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>character's name, Charles Bukowski, exactly the same as the name

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of the author and poet. Oh but but but we're

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>we're burying one of the leads here. Uh so this movie,

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>each kid just have two names for a movie that,

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was an Italian exploitation movie released in

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty, you've got to have at least like six names, right,

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, it's It's also been released as Cannibals

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Streets, which weirdly enough, is the main title

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>for the film on its IMDb listing. Right now, I

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>feel like this was surely not always the case. I

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>think I because I've been aware of this film for

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a very long time, but just had not set down

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and watched it. I think it used to just it

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>used to just be listed as um, Cannibal Apocalypse, because

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that is it's it's most famous name, I thought. But

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>then again, I think Michael Weldon in the Psychotronic Video

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Guide also lists it as Cannibals in the Streets, so

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think it also got an American

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>R rated release, so it was released with in a

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:57.719
<v Speaker 1>in a somewhat edited form, especially in the Southern United States,

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>under the name Invasion of of Flesh Eaters. Is that right,

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe so, yeah, and it may have been released

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 1>it was released in UM to the German market with

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it with several different titles as well, so it's It's

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely one of these films that's often referred to as

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a video nasty because it was. I think it was

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>banned in the UK for a period of time. Um.

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Though it is interesting how you assume that the pictures

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>are that are classified as such that they're all going

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to have like the same level of of nastiness to them, uh,

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's really not the case. Um. I think one

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 1>of the things about this film is that. Yes, it

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>has its grotesque moments and themes. For sure. It is

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>not a family movie by any stretch of the imagination.

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's also not nearly as as bad as or

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>And when I say bad, I don't mean quality wise,

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>but just in terms of taste, it's not. It doesn't

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>nearly have the level of bad taste that it certainly

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>could have had. And it's gonna be fun to discuss

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>why that seems to be as we go through this episode.

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's the only reason, but one that

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>has been mentioned in several sources I came across is

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 1>just the influence of John Saxon being in the lead

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and repeatedly saying about things he was asked to do

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>by the script no I'm not doing that. Yeah, seemed

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to be a moderating influence on the content of the film.

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>That's what you when you when you cast John Saxon,

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you know you're going to get a certain level of

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>energy from the performance and intensity. But yes you're gonna

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.559
<v Speaker 1>get you're gonna get some some other grounding influences as well,

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>which ultimately makes this a better film. I think, all right, well,

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>let's talk just a second about these these different genres

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>that are colliding here. First of all, I mentioned Nam sploitation. Uh,

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 1>these elements aligned with the various Vietnam action films of

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the day, including both numerous US films and then international

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>films that were clearly springboarding off American pictures. For instance,

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>some of the American films, particularly films that dealt with

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Vietnam vets returning home and d with with post traumatic

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>stress to some degree or another. Your funder, Yeah, you

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 1>have like Deer Hunter seventy eight, also Coming Home in

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight starring Bruce Dern, and even First Blood. Yeah,

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess the first Rambo movie would fit more into

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that category. Though. It's funny with even within the progression

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Rambo movies, you see the change in how

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Vietnam subject matter is dealt with. Like earlier on, I

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>think you get more of these movies that are uh,

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, dealing with some of the with some of

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the horrors and the moral ambiguities of the war, and

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>then later on turning uh, the lingering residue of Vietnam

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:40.239
<v Speaker 1>more into just kind of like pure exploitation action cinema

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>subject matter. So like Rambo by the time you get

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to First Blood Part two, Rambo, the character of John

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Rambo has gone from a you know, a a brutalized

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>man who just wants to be left alone and has

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>turned into a like a human slaughter house who you know,

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the point of the movie is to watch his greased

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>up muscles as he just guns down millions of enemies.

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>So like in the first one, you're asking the question

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>is is Rambo okay? I don't think he's okay? And

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>then the second one and on from there Rambo is

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>doing great. Look at him. Go ye, all right. So

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>we have those elements in the film and we'll talk

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>about some of that. But then, of course, also it's

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in the title, this is a cannibal film. And cannibal

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>films at their their absolute worst, they tend to be

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>movies that follow a basic structure where modern day explorers

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>or journalists, or you know, whatever their case may be,

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>they're traveling to a remote part of the world and

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:37.719
<v Speaker 1>they're encountering cannibalism and cannibalistic violence as practiced by an

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>isolated tribal group. I've long known there are a bunch

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of movies like this, but I've never really watched any

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of them. It's one of those that just seems conceptually

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>just like not enjoyable at all to me. Yeah. Yeah,

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>they you know, they're often marketed for their just sheer

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>shock value. That was part of their appeal, and it

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>remains part of their appeal for people who who dig

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:00.839
<v Speaker 1>them today. Uh. They can of course be area exploited.

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>They can be very sleazy. They include such films as uh,

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Sergio Martino, Slave of the Cannibal God from seventy eight,

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Umberto Lindsay's Sacrifice from seventy two, which I think was

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the first major Italian cannibal movie, Umberto Lindsay's Eating Alive

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen eighty, and so many more. But the most

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>notorious example is of course rogero uh Deodata's Cannibal Holocaust

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>from eighty notable for its extreme violence and gore as

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>well as animal cruelty. Yeah, I remember. Actually I think

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe even like reading some sort of like film scholarship

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>about that movie when I was in college. It seems

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>like the kind of thing that is maybe more interesting

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>as like subject matter for film criticism and film historians

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>than it is actually something you would ever want to

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>sit down and watch. Yeah, I agree, and I'll get

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>into some some of the scholarship about it. Though. I'll

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>also point out that when I was when I had decided, like, yeah,

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to check out Cannibal Apocalypse, I pulled up

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 1>what I thought was Cannibal Apocalypse online and it was

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Cannibal Holocaust. So I ended up watching the first five

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half minutes of it, which which are actually

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty goofy and don't have any cannibalism in them. But

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that is as far as I can recommend anyone watch

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in this film. Once I realized, oh, this is not

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.839
<v Speaker 1>the film, this is not John Saxon, I cut out

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and uh and actually send an email to Video Drome,

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>our local video store, to make sure they had a

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>copy of Cannibal Holocaust for us. You mean Cannibal Apocalypse.

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Cannibal Apocalypse. I'm doing it again. It's so easy to

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>get them confused. So if you hear me reference Cannibal

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Holocaust again outside of the context of that film, I

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>probably mean Cannibal Apocalypse. Well, I mean it's clearly. I

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>think it shows what these titles have in common, which

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>is they're just trying to like jam your radar with

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the most shocking words they can possibly fit into a

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>title like ultimate Shocking title density. Yeah, I mean it's

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>all about the shock. So for a little more. I

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>was interested early because you can engage with these films

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 1>at the shock level and all. But then I'm also

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking like, why why cannibalism? Why were these cannibals and

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>films so big at that in the time. So I

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>was reading Cannibalism in Literature and Film by Jennifer Brown,

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>which is a really interesting book. You can you can

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>pick this up as an e book, um, for example.

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>But the author argues that much of what we see

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in this in this genre, especially the colonial cannibalism film,

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to the domestic cannibalism film. So again, think,

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>are you encountering cannibals in Texas, as in the Texas

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Chainsaw Masacre, or are the characters traveling to some you know,

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>former colonial holding, um, some you know nation that was

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>under a colonial rule and encountering cannibalism in those settings, right, Yeah,

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I see the distinction. So Brown's argument is that these

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>colonial cannibalism films are probably resulting from post colonial anxieties

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 1>in the West and media coverage from this time period,

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, especially like the late seventies or the eighties

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and so forth, um of political and social unrest in

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world previously under colonial rule. Quote amidst

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the litany of atrocities, arose the feeling that without the

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>civilizing arm of British colonial law, the world had descended

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>into chaos. And they also explained that there there there's

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a familiar trope of the cannibal other in all of this,

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, as well as a specific variation on colonial

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:24.839
<v Speaker 1>cannibalism based on US foreign policy and its ramifications. So

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>imagining audiences already have a kind of embedded colonial mentality,

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>like this fear that people would have that without boots

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>on the ground in every part of the world and

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>soldiers managing every other country on the world, we can

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 1>only imagine what kind of grizzly horrors are taking place

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>in every other part of the world if we are

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>not constantly pointing a gun at people right, right, and

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>so Brown discusses this at length, and they also they

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>also get into cannibal holocaust itself and talks about sort

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of the the things that are important about it from

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a film history standpoint, but also you know why it

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is so notorious. But but I should be clear that

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Cannibal Apocalypse, the film were primarily discussing here today, doesn't

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>really draw on any of these cultural cannibalism tropes and

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>seems to be largely exploring a concept a model of

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 1>PTSD as viral cannibalism. Yeah, despite the fact that it

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 1>does use all these tropes of Vietnam exploitation movies. Really,

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say it is a domestic cannibalism movie. It's

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a it's about you know, the cannibals are all Americans. Yeah.

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I ultimately really enjoyed this model of cannibalism that is

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>deployed in this film. It reminds me a lot of

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the later film by um uh Antonia Birds Ravenous, which

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:44.719
<v Speaker 1>is a wonderful I guess largely it's got It's a

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>domestic cannibalism film, kind of a frontier cannibalism film as well. Right,

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it's about all these soldiers at an outpost in frontier

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>California who are switched onto the magical wonder of eating

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>human flesh. Yeah. Yeah, Ultimately even more of a vampiric

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>model of cannibalism in that film. Well, that one also

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess it does loosely draw on some rough like

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Windigo mythology, but but then it's I think it's one

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of those movies where you kind of wonder, like wait

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.719
<v Speaker 1>a minute, like within the world of the movie, like

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>is there real magic going on here? Or is this

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>just like an idea that has captured and motivated the

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>minds of the characters. And you could probably argue the

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>same thing about this movie. Yeah. Now, Cannibal Apocalypse, though,

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>is about more than just eating human flesh and US

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy. This film is also exciting for us because

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it is a Georgia movie. It is an Atlanta and

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Decatur movie filmed here back when that was something that

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 1>was notable, you know, back when you weren't filming all

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>these big blockbusters in the state of Georgia. There actually

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>were a good number of Italian horror films shot in

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the US South though, right around this time, like Luccio

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>full Chiese The Beyond, which he shot in New Orleans,

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>said in New Orleans, or like, uh, I think it

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>was also ful Chi who may um City of the

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Living Dead or also known as Gates of Hell. Is

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that Savannah? Yeah, that was in Savannah, which I actually

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>watched just earlier this year. Yeah, there's also the wonderful

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>film The Visitor, which is very much filmed in Atlanta

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>around the time, same time period that is the God

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about Weird House. That is one of the most

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>bizarre movies I have ever seen in my life. I mean,

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that one will make you leave your body. Yeah, we

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>may have to come back to that one. That's a

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>fun one. So so yeah, if you're a if you're

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a local, if you have any connection to Atlanta, Georgia

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>or Decatur, Georgia, Uh, it's worth watching because there's a

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of a lot of local locations that are used,

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>including the Decatur Marta station, which I was looking this up.

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>This film came out in nineteen eighty and the station

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>opened June nine, So it's like a fresh spanking new

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Marta station there that which Marta is the train system

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>here in Atlanta. Uh. But but yeah, you get to

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>see it fresh and new and and uh, you know,

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>unsoiled by by cannibalism. Oh. I just thought of another

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>one that I forgot to mention earlier, though this one

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>is actually not Italian. Some Marta stations appear in uh

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in Escape from New York John Carpenter's movie One of

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the Marta stations here in Town is extensively featured in

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a sequence that was cut from the movie that involves

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Kurt Russell robbing a bank at the beginning of the movie,

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>or maybe sort of like digitally robbing a bank. I

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>think he like steals computer stuff. Um, but he like

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>gets on a Marta train and then like rides it

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to a station and then him and his co conspirator

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>are ambushed right in the middle of a Marta station

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>by a bunch of police. That's how Snake gets caught.

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, that's right. Um. And to be fair, there

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>are some other Georgia horror movies of note from back

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>in the day. I think Squirm from seventy six, I

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>think that was a Georgia movie. And oh, I'm trying

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to remember the name of the one that's set at

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the Beach, um Man, I was just down there recently

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and I had I think I even sent you a

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>picture of one of the locations. Or was it The

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Slayer from Type Island? Yes, from Tybee Island, The Slayer,

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:12.880
<v Speaker 1>which is which actually quite good, um, maybe even too good.

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>It could have it could have been a bit crappier,

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and that would have been probably been better for the

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>viewing experience. It's it's pretty seriously serious minded, but it's

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>so it's a fun view So if you ever, if

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you ever find yourself out on Tybee Island enjoying, you know,

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>beach vacation, bring a copy of The Slayer with you. Okay,

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>So what's the elevator pitch on Cannibal Apocalypse? Green Beret

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:45.679
<v Speaker 1>Norman Hooper or is it Hopper? I guess because it's

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>like Dennis Hopper, Queen Beret Norman Hopper survived the Vietnam War,

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>but he brought something back with him, a stress activated

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>viral hunger for human flesh. Let's set that trailer audio

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>cannibalism that very ridd in the flu market taking pot

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>shots got side. Okay, that's an avoid about Please please

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>try to understand. Listen to me. While she was here,

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:35.199
<v Speaker 1>I had this urge tood by her, good bye her,

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you understand, like Posky, it's so good, it's so good.

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I love the music in this film. I can't wait

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to talk in more depth about the music. Music is

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>great and some of the musical choices, as is common

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>in Italian movies of this period are quite hilarious in

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>their in their deployment in the film, despite being pretty

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>great on their own. But first let's talk about Let's

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about the director, the writer, and some of the

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the cast. So the director here is Antonio Madretti, director,

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>co writer, lived through two thousand and two. Um, I

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 1>believe you're you're very familiar with one of his other works. Oh, yes,

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 1>he's so. He's the director of your The Hunter from

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>the Future from three so a few years after this

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>one was made. That is a Conan the Barbarian rip off,

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a leather diaper barbarian movie starring Reb Brown, the guy

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>from Space Mutiny who screams. You remember him? Oh yes,

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>he's an all time great muscle bro and in this

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>movie he's playing the Conan. But I like how this

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 1>movie mixes cheap barbarian rip off movie with dinosaurs and

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>science fiction. So it has aliens and robots and spaceships

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and the villain at the end of the movie is

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>basically Darth Vader. Well, it makes sense for Margarity because

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.479
<v Speaker 1>he worked in pretty much every genre. He did Vietnam

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>War movies, horror movies, sci fi movies, and more. Yeah,

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he's widely considered sort of an ultimate top

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>tier schlock granddaddy. Uh. And in fact, he gets he

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 1>gets name dropped by a lot of other film nerds

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. And if you are not familiar with these

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Italian schlock movies, but you recognize his name an Tonio Marghariti,

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that might be because you have heard him name checked

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 1>in movies by Quentin Tarantino. For example, in Inglorious Bastards,

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Tarantino has a character who is assuming a false name

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>as and pretending to be an Italian Uh, camera operator.

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I think say that his name is Antonio Margariti. I

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>forgot about that. Um, yeah, yeah, he did it. All

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>he did did like you can pretty much name it,

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and he did it. Did he do underwater horror movie? Yes,

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>he didn't want called aliens from the deep, so many

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of those. Did he do a Hercules movie? Yes, he

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>did a couple of them. Oh yeah, I think he

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>actually did a number of them. So the Sword and

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Sandal movies, as they're often called in the States, uh,

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>they're they're often referred to as peplum movies in the

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 1>in the Italian press, I think named after sort of

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>like the Greek garment that the Hercules type character or

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the Ercole character would wear. Uh in these movies. Uh,

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>these were really popular in Italian cinema from like the

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 1>mid fifties until the early sixties. I think they, like

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>they absolutely dominated the Italian movie scene at the time.

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>What Marvel movies are today. Peplum movies were to Italian

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>movies in the in the fifties through the early sixties.

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>And and he definitely made a few. Yeah, I mean

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>he also did literary adaptations. He did a Treasure Island adaptation. Okay,

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>he did a Christopher Lee horror movie titled Horror Castle

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen sixty three. He did a number of science

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 1>fiction movies that I think are can that I haven't

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>seen any of them, but I think they're considered less

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>over the top and grotesque than a lot of his

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>later works. Uh. And there it seemed to me like

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of like competent, pretty solid, well grounded, well

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:17.120
<v Speaker 1>executed sci fi movies from the fifties. Yeah, it would

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.479
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to explore. I I read that he did

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>special effects as well, including working on two thousand and

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:27.360
<v Speaker 1>one of Space Odyssey in the special effects department. But yeah,

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>he Also I should note that, even though his his

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>name carries more weight today, he generally worked under the

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>moniker Anthony M. Dawson. You know, you had to americanize

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that name, right right. A lot of a lot of

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 1>Italian people in film, not just directors, would have a

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of anglicized pseudonym that they would release their movies under.

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that was designed to make them

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>seem more appealing to English speaking audiences, but so, yeah,

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 1>he would be Anthony UM Dawson. I think I read

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>somewhere that he sometimes directed under the name uh an

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Tony Daisies or Anthony Daisies, which is what Margariti actually

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>means Daisies. So he's co writer on this. But also

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:13.880
<v Speaker 1>we have Dardano Sacchetti, who was born ninety four, Italian

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:17.120
<v Speaker 1>screenwriter who worked with oh, just about all the big

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>names in in um you know, the sort of B

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>movie uh schlock market. He worked with Lomberto Bavo, with

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Lucio Fulci, with in Zog Casta Castelleri, uh, Dario Argento. Uh.

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>In fact, his first credit was Argento's The Cat of

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Nine Tales. Ah, that one. Despite what you would guess

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>from the title is about genetic engineering. I think I've

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>never said it. It involves a murder that takes place

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>in like a genetics lab in the seventies, which is

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 1>very strange. Uh And I think it shares a cast

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>member with this movie. Now. He worked with Fucci a lot,

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>including some of his most well known films such as

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Zombie House by the Cemetery That Beyond New York, ripper Man,

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Hat and Baby, etcetera. He worked on Baba's Monster, Shark

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and Demons, and he worked on Castellarity's nineteen ninety The

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Bronx Warriors. So he's just an important name in Italian

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>be cinema. You're gonna if you start watching b movies

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>from Italy in this time period, you're going to see

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 1>his name. Now, the next person we got to introduce

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>for this film is uh Is is someone who was

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.679
<v Speaker 1>born by the name of Carmine Rico, though you might

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>know him better as John Saxon. That's right. I believe

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>he was the son of Italian immigrants if I recall correctly. Yeah,

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>he's He's Italian American. He was born in New York.

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I think his father was a was It was a

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>dock worker in Brooklyn. Yeah, yeah, he. If you have

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>been listening to our Weird House Cinema episodes, you will

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>remember he was our villain in Hands of Steel. Just

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a legendary American B movie actor. Um. He wasn't close

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to two pictures. He he was born in ninety six,

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:01.360
<v Speaker 1>died in um but had a very long career. Uh.

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 1>He started out in some beach hunk movies I guess

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 1>you'd call them in the nineteen fifties, and he went

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 1>on to be in some really iconic films. He was

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Original and Nightmare on Elm Street playing Nancy's dad.

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>He was in Inner the Dragon, of course, had a

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>huge role in that opposite Bruce Lee. I think that

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>is in some ways considered his big breakout role. Yeah yeah,

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean he it's an incredible role. But yeah, he's

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 1>a guy that was always working, so the films were

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>not always top shelf, but he always brought this quiet intensity,

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you know his he's really piercing eyes. Were already talked

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>about he has kind of a grounding um acting presence

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in a film. Yeah he. I mean he's one of

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 1>these people. Actually. I think Tim Lucas talks about this

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 1>in his commentary track that Saxon operated at the boundary

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 1>between a cinema and be cinema, and it seemed like

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 1>he had a choice where he could sort of be

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a supporting player in A cinema or he could be

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a leading player and top name in B cinema. And

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it was around the time of this movie that it

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>seemed like he just fully embraced I'll be top billing

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:12.120
<v Speaker 1>guy in B movies. Yeah. I was reading an interview

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with him that was from a two thousand two Dutch

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>fan convention where they were talking to him and he

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>was talking a little bit about working in Italy. He

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that, you know, he spoke some Italian, uh, you know,

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.879
<v Speaker 1>enough to get by, but he was took from this

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>interview that he wasn't like truly fluent. Sometimes I see,

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>like an IMDb, I see factoids about him being fluent

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>in Italian, and I don't think that was necessarily the

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>case based on his own words there, because he talks

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>about there being communication issues sometimes um between Italian directors

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>who did not speak English or very good English and

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the cast um. But he says that in these Italian

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 1>films he was often given just a lot of room

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to do like what he wanted with a role. And

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>part of that might have been that they couldn't communicate

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>with him that well. Um, or that maybe they were

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a little intimidated because again he's this this boundary walker

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>between a film and B film and a lot of

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>these guys, I mean, they knew they were making a

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>B film. Uh, and so illusions there. Yeah, and here's

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>John Saxon. We're paying money for John Saxon. We're gonna

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 1>let Saxon do his thing. You know what I had

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>forgotten is that John Saxon has a prominent role in

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 1>tenne Brey Another, a famous Italian jello movie made by

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Dario Argento. Some people consider it Argento's best movie, or

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 1>one of his best movies. I'd put it maybe like

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:31.239
<v Speaker 1>fourth or fifth. But but yeah, it's good. That's one.

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen it yet, but I've listened to the

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>soundtrack before. Oh yeah, good soundtrack. If you see Goblin live,

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>they will play tenner bre definitely. Now. That a two

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>thousand two interview from the Dutch Fan convention. UM. I

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>was reading it on a site to title the flashback file. Um,

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>if you just look for John Saxon interview there you'll

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>find it. But he has a wonderful little story about

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>this film that I think is very revealing. So I'm

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna quote here. This is a quote from John's Good One.

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Let me tell you about that film. It's a real

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>funny story. When the script came, I thought it was interesting.

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:09.639
<v Speaker 1>It was talking about the Vietnam War, like it was

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a virus you could bring home. I thought it was

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a great metaphor for a psychological condition. So I went

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>down there and I met within Tonio Margretti, and I

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>told him how I really liked the script. He said

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>he did not. I didn't understand why he would say that,

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:27.399
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't ask him. Turns out I got an

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 1>English translation of the Italian script, but the translators weren't

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 1>very good. They just left stuff out. But we got

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>babble fished into a role. Yep. Yeah, And he says,

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>but I always found out that that When we were

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>actually shooting, I thought it was just one guy biting

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>another guy in the virus spreads. But at one point

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>we were shooting a scene and a guy brings in

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>this tray of meat. I asked what it was for,

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and they explained to me it was supposed to be

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>body parts, even genitals, and we were supposed to gnaw

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>on them. He continues, I asked Margaritti to take me

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>out of the scene and I went to my hotel room.

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Once I found out what the true nature of the

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>film was, I got so depressed. I had three days

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>off and I flew to New York, and all the

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>while I was dreading to go back there. I've never

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>seen it, and I tried to forget about it. But

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in four I met with a Korean producer who wanted

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>me for a film, and he said, you know, your

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:25.479
<v Speaker 1>film is a big hit in Korea. I asked him

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>which film, Yeah, that one. Oh my god. But even

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in observing the difference between this story and the final film,

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you will see some of John Saxon's influence and saying like, no,

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not doing that, because here he's being asked to

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>gnaw on in trails, and he never does that in

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the movie. Other characters do, but Saxon, I do not

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>think you ever see him with any kind of meat

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>in his mouth. Now. I think the most he ever

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>does is he wiped some blood off of his mouth,

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, So it's implied that he engaged in cannibalism, right,

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it is implied that he does all kinds of horrible things,

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 1>but off camp ra Yeah, alright, so again Saxon plays

0:30:02.600 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Norman Hopper and then his wife in the movie, Jane Hopper,

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>is played by Elizabeth Turner, an Italian actor. This was

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>her last film. She was also in Full Chise the Psychic.

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>She was in a truly throbbingly bizarre movie called Beyond

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the Door that came out in nineteen seventy four. Though,

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>so she's credited as being in that film, But then again,

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't really remember her from it, and it's possible

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that big parts of her performance may have actually been

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>cut out of the movie. But anyway, I'll leave that

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>for you to sort out. Anyway, Beyond the Door, it's

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>worth saying, is a fascinatingly weird, blatant rip off of

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 1>The Exorcist released just so. The Exorcist came out in

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>seventy three, This is seventy four. It's set in San Francisco,

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>but of course it is actually super Italian. I feel

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>like we should get a sting from the trailer here.

0:30:56.080 --> 0:31:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's hear it where Demonic possession lives an evil and

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 1>it trates the soul. Step inside. If you dare you,

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Jessica has gone beyond the door. At first she didn't believe,

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>but she does now. No one must attempt to interfere

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 1>with her pregnancy. You understand, the child must be born

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>beyond the door where demonic possession lives and grows and grows,

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and beyond the door, we dare you not to believe

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a demon possession movie. But the weirdest thing I

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>remember is a scene where there's a couple of the

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>main couple in the movie, or they're like having lunch

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 1>shout on a on a patio, and they're discussing what

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to name their unborn child, and the woman says, with

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>great passion, what about Steve? No offensitive people named Steve

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>or Steven. But I don't know that that seemed really funny. Well,

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the trailer is great. I've I've never seen it, but

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>in looking it up, I do see that it's another

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 1>one of these Italian franchises of sorts where you have

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 1>otherwise unconnected or or you know, just unconnected films that

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 1>have been relabeled in some cases in order to loosely

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>be a franchise. I think this one may have actually

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>been such a blatant rip off of The Exorcist that

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>there were some legal troubles, but all that aside. I mean,

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>who can resist going beyond the door. All right, let's

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>move on to our next actor. This is um Giovanni

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Lombardo Radici. That I hit that right, Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the guy playing that uh that character named

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>again Charles Bukowski. Like, I think this is just a

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>direct nod to the author. Um. I was trying to understand,

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>like what the what the connection might be, And I

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>think basically the idea is that Bakowski was a writer

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>who was uh you know, he he was sort of

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>is self characterized as an outsider. His whole thing was like, well,

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I I need drugs and alcohol to cope

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>with the fact that I have horrible memories of my

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>experiences throughout life and that I don't fit in in society.

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So just somebody who's uh embracing the role of an unaccepted,

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of despised outsider who doesn't fit in. Okay, that

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 1>matches up. So Radici again an Italian actor born nineteen

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty four as of this recording still at it. Played

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sleeves bags in his career, especially his

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>early career. Uh. And and was in more than one

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>cannibal film. Yeah, he was in I think he is

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in a very famous disgusting gore scene from Full Cheese

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>City of the Living Dead, in which he gets like

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a power drill to the head. Okay, I noticed. He's

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>also in Joe Diamato's Cannibal Love, uh, acting alongside Big

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 1>George Eastman. So that's that's exciting. He's also in the

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Church by Michael A Suave. Oh yeah, that's a good

0:34:13.600 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>one from nine. And he's also a in Berto Lindsay's

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Cannibal Fear Rox film that proudly boasted that it was

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>banned in thirty one countries. That's another one of the

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.440
<v Speaker 1>cannibal movies that I have never watched. Yeah, same here,

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's not on my list either. But uh, but yeah,

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a cannibal apocalypse though. And this was his

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 1>first film, but he's gone on to have quite a career,

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 1>including showing up in a couple of Big Us pictures.

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 1>The two thousand and six reboot of The Omen, which

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 1>falls in line with some of what we're talking about here.

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>But also he has a role in Martin Scorsese's Gangs

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of New York. Oh do you remember who he plays

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 1>in that? He's pretty far down the list. I think

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>he he but he has a name, his character has

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a name. Um, he's just I'm assuming one of the

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Italian characters. I haven't actually seen Gangs in New York,

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 1>so I can't I can't be more specific than that. Okay, alright.

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Another actor in this we have a Sinsiad Carols, who

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:11.919
<v Speaker 1>plays Mary the Neighbor. Born nineteen sixty an Italian actor, again,

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a former child actor. I think she was twenty at

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 1>the time that this film was put together, but she

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>had already been in Argento's The Cat of Nine Tales.

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:22.320
<v Speaker 1>She was She went on to be in an Italian

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>TV bio of Helen Keller, and I believe she's worked

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 1>as a as a dubber, dubbing helping to dub various

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>like uh, English language films for instance, into Italian. We

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>also have in this film Tony King. Also known I

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>think more properly known today is Malik Farrakhan Uh. He

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 1>plays Tom Thompson, a vet. He was born in nineteen

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>forty seven. He played for the NFL on the Buffalo Bills,

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I think for one season in nineteen sixty seven, I believe,

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and then he went on to act in a lot

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of B movies throughout the seventies. He's been a political

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 1>movies though he's oh yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah yeah. He

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>did a lot of B movie work. But he also

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 1>pops up in Shaft. I believe. He has a brief,

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe uncredited role in the Godfather. He was in The Toy.

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>He was in Sharky's Machine with Burt Reynolds. Yeah yeah, uh,

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and I I read that he also served and I

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 1>think perhaps still serves as the hip hop group Public

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Enemies head of security. Uh. There's apparently a documentary about

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 1>about him in the works titled The Long Road Projects,

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 1>So check that out. It's The Long Road Project dot com.

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 1>He's great in this, Yeah, he has all right. We

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>also have the character Dr. Phil Mindez played by Ramiro

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:39.239
<v Speaker 1>al oliver Eros, who was born in n and is

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a Spanish actor. It's It's worth driving home. I'm not

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>sure if I mentioned this already, but this is a

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Spanish Italian co production. Um so here's our Spanish presence

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in the film. He's known for such titles as The

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Swamp of Ravens and Black Commando. Tim lucas Is commentary

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>track pointed out the distinctive Italian nous of the inappropriateness

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of this character, This guy who, ostensibly, in another in

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>another version of this movie, would be able to kind

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:07.439
<v Speaker 1>of be the hero of the movie, like the person

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>who uh can can like step in and intervene. Instead,

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:14.680
<v Speaker 1>he's just like he's just wrong in every possible way.

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:18.839
<v Speaker 1>He is well, and we'll get to some examples here

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in a second. Now, one thing about this film is

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's filmed in Atlanta for the most part.

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they shot some tunnel sequences in Rome, but

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:30.839
<v Speaker 1>not Room, Georgia, but Rome, Italy. So it's very much

0:37:30.880 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 1>filmed in Atlanta, and it is set in Atlanta. Not

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in like a hard way. They don't say things like

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 1>what will this cannibalism due to the city of Atlanta

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 1>or anything to that nature, but they don't hide the

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>fact and they seem to embrace on some level that

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>it takes place here. That being said, we have a

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>number of Italian actors who are clearly dubbed, including a

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of them at least that have just ridiculous Southern accents,

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>like like country loyal chicken accents. Oh my god, Foghorn, Leghorn,

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the doctor Fog were in Leghorn at the psychiatric hospital.

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 1>That was so funny. Um. I don't know the actor's name,

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:08.879
<v Speaker 1>but I think he was an Italian actor who looks

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:11.359
<v Speaker 1>just the slightest bit like I forget the actor's name,

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>but the guy who plays the President in Clear and

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 1>President Danger. You know that guy, um, Donald Moffatt. Yes, yes, Oh.

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Also he's in the Thing, the Captain and the Thing.

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, so yeah, I do agree. When

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I was watching this, I was like, he looks like somebody,

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:27.799
<v Speaker 1>and I looked him up and I was like, oh,

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:30.319
<v Speaker 1>he's he's an Italian actor I've never heard of. Yeah, yeah,

0:38:30.400 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it just slightly like in the eyes, looks like him.

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, he's like many characters in this movie and

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:38.440
<v Speaker 1>many other Italian movies of this period, totally dubbed, so

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what his real voice sounds like, but

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 1>they dubbed him with This guy with the most hilariously

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>implausible Southern accent ever, and sometimes edges almost into Cajun

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 1>accent where he's at the hospital, you know, treating somebody

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 1>who's been bitten by by a cannibal and he is like, oh,

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:00.200
<v Speaker 1>geryon d you know, he sounds like Paul Prude m

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 1>or something. Yeah, it's ridiculous. So you have a lot

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of that going on. But but again not every actor

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 1>is dubbed, So you have this this weird exception that

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>makes those accents even more ridiculous because he had this actor,

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Wallace Wilkinson playing Captain McCoy of the Atlanta Police and

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 1>he is not only an actual Southern he's an actual

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 1>who was an actual Atlanta native who lived nine two

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 1>thousand and one. Yeah, so he plays like the hard

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 1>edged police captain in this Yes, and he has some

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>some wonderful lines and it's some some hilarious lines in

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the film. So he's a he's a real pleasure. Uh.

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>He was, of course, when it goes without saying he

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 1>was the nineteen seventy nine The Visitor, that other one

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of the other Italian movies set in Atlanta, like that,

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it just lines up too well, you know, he would

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 1>have to be in that one as well. The cast

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:50.839
<v Speaker 1>in that one is so weird, so it has like people.

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:54.720
<v Speaker 1>It's got Franco neary as as like a space Jesus

0:39:54.840 --> 0:39:59.919
<v Speaker 1>in it. But then it's got Sam Peckinpah the director. Yeah,

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a doctor in the movie for no reason that I

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>can discern. He's just like, Hi, I'm a doctor. I

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:08.279
<v Speaker 1>think he just gives somebody like a prescription. And then

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the scenes over. Yeah. Yeah, you've got John Houston in

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that one. You've got Lance Hendrickson showing up. He's got

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a weird cast. I believe there's a there's a particular

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>long running um or. I think he's retired now. But

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 1>there's a particular political radio host that was Atlanta based

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:28.879
<v Speaker 1>that pops up in it for no real reason. Oh yeah,

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:32.239
<v Speaker 1>he's a background extra. Oh yeah, right wing radio guy

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Neil Boards. Yeah, he's just I think he's just in

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a in the background in like a boardroom scene or something. Alright,

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So Wallace Wilkinson, he's fun in this. Um This doesn't

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 1>mean anything to me, but I'm gonna pass it on.

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:46.880
<v Speaker 1>There's a character in it that's just called Brunette Jogger,

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:51.480
<v Speaker 1>played by Laura Dean, and apparently she is Sophie from Friends.

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I never watched Friends, so I don't know how meaningful

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that is. I don't really know friends, So okay, well friends, fans,

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>you can just take that run with it. Then. Uh,

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>but then finally, let's come back to the music. Oh boy, Yes, yes,

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the score of Cannibal Apocalypse is by Alexander block Steiner,

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 1>who lived nineteen thirty through five. And for my money,

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:16.280
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the real stars of this picture

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 1>because this is just a fabulously like funky disco score.

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:24.759
<v Speaker 1>It's just absolutely tremendous. It may not always feel completely

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 1>at home in this picture, at least for a lot

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of our our our listeners out there. Uh, but it's

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>impossible to imagine this movie without it. It has some

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 1>synth delights in there, it has some spooky bits that

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:39.400
<v Speaker 1>feel very much in keeping with Italian horror. But it

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>has to be the funkiest horror movie score ever. And

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it also has a saxophone love theme. I know what

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, but actually there's a thing I wanted to

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about regarding the music. I was gonna bring it

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>up later, but maybe I'll get into it right now. Yeah,

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 1>let's do it. This is also something that Tim Lucas

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 1>pointed out when commenting on the opening sequence of the

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:00.759
<v Speaker 1>movie that takes place in Vietnam. Uh And it's something

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that's true of that scene in this movie, but also

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 1>just more broadly true of Italian movies of this period. Generally,

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 1>there is this weird cultural disconnect between Italian sensibilities for

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the uses of different types of music and genres of

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 1>music versus American sensibilities. Many Italian directors of the seventies

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and eighties have a distinct predisposition to take a scene

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of high tension, terror and suspense and choose these exact

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 1>moments to let the musical score get the funkiest. And

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:41.360
<v Speaker 1>this always elicits laughter from American audiences because I don't know,

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it just doesn't feel right, like funky bass

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and saxophone is not really what would seem to heighten

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the effect of a scene where someone is creeping up

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 1>on somebody else behind them with a knife or something.

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:57.279
<v Speaker 1>But for some reason this made sense to the Italians.

0:42:57.560 --> 0:42:59.640
<v Speaker 1>So what is going on here with the intended effect

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of funky music? I I don't don't don't hear funky

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:07.279
<v Speaker 1>music and think, oh wow, I'm getting really nervous. I

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 1>think I have a theory on this. I don't know

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 1>if I'm correct, but because certainly there are people that

0:43:12.000 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 1>have more expertise in the genres involved here. But I

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:17.520
<v Speaker 1>think part of it might be might come down to

0:43:17.560 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 1>the disconnect regarding disco culture between the Italian market and

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the Europe in general and the United States, because disco

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:30.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously exploded in the States, but there was this for

0:43:31.000 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a long time, there was this kind of disco backlash,

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like a lot of us grew up

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:38.719
<v Speaker 1>exposed to that backlash, you know, jokes about disco and

0:43:38.760 --> 0:43:42.799
<v Speaker 1>about disco being dead and and being lame to some extent, right,

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, sure, yeah, yeah, But but in Europe, disco

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:50.840
<v Speaker 1>never really died, and horror disco was able to to

0:43:50.960 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of thrive and evolve as its own genre or subgenre.

0:43:55.600 --> 0:43:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Um and is it is actually doing quite well today,

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of artists that were inspired aired by

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 1>soundtracks just such as this one. So you can even

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 1>check out whole labels. There's a wonderful label called Jollo

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Disco Records um which interestingly enough put out a label

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:15.839
<v Speaker 1>sampler titled Apocalypse Domani that's really really, really quite good. Huh. Well,

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I agree with your characterization of the difference

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 1>between Like, yeah, I think clearly disco had a more

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 1>sustained survival and popularity in in European culture than it

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:28.880
<v Speaker 1>did an American culture. But I don't know if that

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:31.840
<v Speaker 1>would really explain the disconnect within the movies, because I

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:35.400
<v Speaker 1>don't feel any personal particular disco backlash, and yet it

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 1>still seems very funny, and I can imagine many other

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:41.799
<v Speaker 1>types of music that would seem equally funny to put

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in these types of like if you were to put

0:44:43.600 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in Simon and Garfunkel, or some kind of like a

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>folk music, or if you were to put in certain

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 1>times of rock music. I think, like any of that

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:54.480
<v Speaker 1>would seem really not fitting with the tone of the

0:44:54.560 --> 0:44:57.759
<v Speaker 1>scene and would be very funny to me. Maybe may yeah,

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:00.279
<v Speaker 1>But but I do wonder if there's something to this,

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>like the idea that that disco was allowed to thrive

0:45:04.360 --> 0:45:07.799
<v Speaker 1>morning Europe, and so European audiences might be just more

0:45:07.880 --> 0:45:11.480
<v Speaker 1>exposed to a wider world of disco, Like disco is

0:45:11.520 --> 0:45:15.839
<v Speaker 1>big enough in Europe and in Italy, perhaps theorizing here

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:19.960
<v Speaker 1>big enough to encompass horror and suspense, whereas in the

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:23.960
<v Speaker 1>United States we almost had this this effort to eradicate disco,

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and so it's just not growing in all the places

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:29.239
<v Speaker 1>it should. Well, I'll keep an open mind about that.

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:32.400
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. I could be completely wrong. It's just just

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 1>throwing that out there. That's that's what's going through my head. Well,

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:39.640
<v Speaker 1>either way, so as as funny and incongress as it

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:42.160
<v Speaker 1>does seem to me in its placement in the film,

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the funky disco tracks are just great. Yes. Uh. In fact,

0:45:46.880 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 1>let's go ahead and listen to a quick sample from

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:51.359
<v Speaker 1>the score. This is one of my absolute favorite bits

0:45:51.440 --> 0:46:09.320
<v Speaker 1>from it. Yeah, and I should also throw into the

0:46:09.440 --> 0:46:12.359
<v Speaker 1>excellent Death Waltz Recording company. They put out a really

0:46:12.400 --> 0:46:15.759
<v Speaker 1>stunning red vinyl edition of this score, which you can

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:18.279
<v Speaker 1>still buy for you know, a reasonable price, and you

0:46:18.320 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 1>can also get it on CD, though I don't think

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 1>official digital versions or are that easy to come by.

0:46:23.760 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Right now, make the score of Cannibal Apocalypse your next

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Friday night. It's a it's a great it's great. I mean,

0:46:30.440 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it feels a good time. If you did not

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 1>know this was cannibal music, I don't think most people

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:38.719
<v Speaker 1>would would associated with cannibal you'd be like cannibals. You think, God,

0:46:38.800 --> 0:46:40.879
<v Speaker 1>this is this is great, this is this is hitting

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the town music. I am at the discotheca. Yeah, about

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to go out and get steak guys, French fries. I

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:50.560
<v Speaker 1>got lots of gas, full moon and a jump in tune.

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:00.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I guess we should talk about a

0:47:00.880 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>few elements from the plot. We mentioned already that the

0:47:04.200 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 1>movie starts with a flashback to the middle of the

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:10.759
<v Speaker 1>Vietnam War, where you get to see some of the

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:14.440
<v Speaker 1>themes I think the movie is trying to establish, like

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it is, it is trying to depict the kind of

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 1>cold brutality of the war in Vietnam. And but also

0:47:21.719 --> 0:47:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the reason that it's kind of funny when the

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:26.759
<v Speaker 1>funky music kicks in in the scene. Um. But it

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:29.480
<v Speaker 1>sets up the plot by showing a couple of American

0:47:29.560 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 1>soldiers who have been taken as po ws at a

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:36.520
<v Speaker 1>at a Vietcong base. And I think the implication is

0:47:36.680 --> 0:47:39.560
<v Speaker 1>that they're they're kept in captivity for so long and

0:47:39.719 --> 0:47:42.759
<v Speaker 1>and fed so little that they are driven to cannibalism,

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:44.880
<v Speaker 1>or at least that's what you were led to believe

0:47:46.200 --> 0:47:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is the causal factor at the beginning, right right, Yeah,

0:47:49.920 --> 0:47:53.279
<v Speaker 1>So the film opens with these choppers moving in. This

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:56.919
<v Speaker 1>is the Green Beret team coming to ultimately rescue these people.

0:47:56.960 --> 0:47:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And I should point out that the blue ray of

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:04.200
<v Speaker 1>this we watched is a wonderful Keno Lerber addition, Um,

0:48:04.440 --> 0:48:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and I believe a new four K remaster from just

0:48:08.160 --> 0:48:13.960
<v Speaker 1>it looks absolutely gorgeous, almost too gorgeous because the just

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:18.240
<v Speaker 1>jarringly good quality for a cannibal movie. And you notice

0:48:18.320 --> 0:48:21.360
<v Speaker 1>this when you cut back and forth between the actual

0:48:21.480 --> 0:48:25.319
<v Speaker 1>film footage and uh, the stock footage of the helicopters. Yeah.

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the stock footage is originally archival sixteen millimeter

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:31.720
<v Speaker 1>news footage that was taken. You know. It's like actually

0:48:31.800 --> 0:48:34.680
<v Speaker 1>from Vietnam, so it's showing helicopters landing and stuff. But

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:37.279
<v Speaker 1>it looks extremely grainy when held up against this nice

0:48:37.360 --> 0:48:41.319
<v Speaker 1>restoration of the cannibal movie here. Yeah, so that they

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:43.440
<v Speaker 1>they're coming in for the rescue. And then there's this

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:48.280
<v Speaker 1>hillatious there's a number of hillacious things happen in quick succession.

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:51.839
<v Speaker 1>Uh that can maybe make it hard for some people

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:54.799
<v Speaker 1>to push on through this movie. Uh, because for one thing,

0:48:55.080 --> 0:48:58.600
<v Speaker 1>they break the dog rule uh pretty quickly. I want

0:48:58.640 --> 0:49:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to say, well, maybe five minutes into the film, oh less,

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean a few minutes into the movie a a

0:49:03.200 --> 0:49:07.680
<v Speaker 1>dog explodes, so there's like a dog bomb, which, yeah,

0:49:07.680 --> 0:49:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say when I was like, I was like,

0:49:09.080 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 1>oh no. And then and obviously also like the battle

0:49:12.600 --> 0:49:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in Vietnam, uh by being based on real events is

0:49:16.719 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of less can be. It's harder to take in

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a lighthearted way like you can with the biting and

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:23.279
<v Speaker 1>the eating of people and the rest of the movie.

0:49:23.880 --> 0:49:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Um so like the I feel like definitely the first

0:49:26.280 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 1>like ten minutes or twenty minutes of the movie are

0:49:29.239 --> 0:49:32.879
<v Speaker 1>are the most unpleasant part of it. Yeah, And there's

0:49:32.920 --> 0:49:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a there's a sequence that's ultimately pivotal to the plot

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:39.360
<v Speaker 1>where the Green Berets they have a flamethrower and the

0:49:39.400 --> 0:49:43.000
<v Speaker 1>flamethrower hits um. It doesn't even appear to be a combatant.

0:49:43.040 --> 0:49:46.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like a Vietnamese woman she's on fire and so

0:49:46.280 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a horrific like burn suit stunt. And then she

0:49:51.160 --> 0:49:54.560
<v Speaker 1>runs away on fire, falls into the pit where the

0:49:54.600 --> 0:49:57.319
<v Speaker 1>two p o ws are being kept and they immediately

0:49:57.480 --> 0:50:00.799
<v Speaker 1>start eating her body. Yeah. And then On Saxon, who

0:50:00.880 --> 0:50:03.520
<v Speaker 1>is the leader of the Green Berets, are actually It's

0:50:03.560 --> 0:50:06.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of confusing because he's wearing a beret that would

0:50:06.040 --> 0:50:08.120
<v Speaker 1>seem to indicate he is a Green Beret, but he's

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:11.240
<v Speaker 1>leading a group of soldiers who are not similarly dressed.

0:50:11.280 --> 0:50:14.040
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure what the composition of this this

0:50:14.160 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 1>group is supposed to be. But they come in. John

0:50:16.239 --> 0:50:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Saxson like opens up the cage on top of the

0:50:19.480 --> 0:50:21.520
<v Speaker 1>pit that these guys are being kept in while they

0:50:21.560 --> 0:50:24.560
<v Speaker 1>are eating a human being and uh, and he reaches

0:50:24.640 --> 0:50:27.480
<v Speaker 1>down to to help these guys out, and what do

0:50:27.560 --> 0:50:30.719
<v Speaker 1>they do. They bite him on the arm. And then

0:50:30.800 --> 0:50:32.640
<v Speaker 1>as soon as they bite him on the arm, suddenly

0:50:32.760 --> 0:50:35.920
<v Speaker 1>John Saxon wakes up. It was all a dream. But

0:50:36.320 --> 0:50:39.120
<v Speaker 1>then he gets up and his his wife wakes up again.

0:50:39.160 --> 0:50:42.960
<v Speaker 1>This is played by Elizabeth Turner and uh, and she's like, oh,

0:50:43.160 --> 0:50:46.000
<v Speaker 1>dreams again. And we see a scar on his forearm

0:50:46.120 --> 0:50:47.800
<v Speaker 1>right where the bite was in the dream. So it

0:50:48.120 --> 0:50:50.440
<v Speaker 1>was a dream, but it was also real. He is

0:50:50.520 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 1>being haunted by the memories of what he saw in

0:50:53.040 --> 0:50:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the war and what bit him in the war. And

0:50:55.680 --> 0:50:57.560
<v Speaker 1>these are actually I think some of the best acting

0:50:57.640 --> 0:50:59.719
<v Speaker 1>scenes for for John Saxon in this you know, where

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:02.400
<v Speaker 1>he has this real haunted. Look, it's him like getting

0:51:02.520 --> 0:51:07.120
<v Speaker 1>up in wandering shirtless around his his house. Uh. And

0:51:07.440 --> 0:51:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and he's good in these Saints. He's in great physical shape,

0:51:10.960 --> 0:51:13.239
<v Speaker 1>by the way, And I detect I feel like I

0:51:13.320 --> 0:51:15.480
<v Speaker 1>have a good sense for when this is happening in movies.

0:51:15.719 --> 0:51:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you can really tell he wants to

0:51:17.719 --> 0:51:20.040
<v Speaker 1>show off the fact that he is currently in really

0:51:20.080 --> 0:51:22.560
<v Speaker 1>good shape while they're shooting this movie. Yeah, he was,

0:51:22.640 --> 0:51:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I think at the time, but he jacked. He looks awesome.

0:51:27.920 --> 0:51:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he was. He was using this movie as

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:34.840
<v Speaker 1>like his dating profile. This is his profile pick, but

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:38.120
<v Speaker 1>also the funny thing. So he gets up and he's like, well,

0:51:38.680 --> 0:51:40.960
<v Speaker 1>another haunting dream about the war. I guess I need

0:51:41.000 --> 0:51:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to go take pills. So he goes to take pills,

0:51:43.640 --> 0:51:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and he like opens the refrigerator and just sees that

0:51:46.280 --> 0:51:51.400
<v Speaker 1>there is just raw, bloody meat just out open in

0:51:51.480 --> 0:51:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the refrigerator, not in a container of any kind, just

0:51:54.120 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 1>dripping maa globin all over. Everything in the fridge. Is disgusting. Um.

0:51:59.360 --> 0:52:02.320
<v Speaker 1>So he's doing that, uh, you know, being troubled. And

0:52:02.480 --> 0:52:07.080
<v Speaker 1>meanwhile his Elizabeth Turner, his one dubbed wife, it just

0:52:07.160 --> 0:52:10.520
<v Speaker 1>seems very irritated by his Vietnam flashbacks and she starts

0:52:10.560 --> 0:52:14.839
<v Speaker 1>flipping through a copy of Fortune magazine. I have to say,

0:52:15.360 --> 0:52:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the meat and the refrigerator scene was a moment we're

0:52:18.760 --> 0:52:20.880
<v Speaker 1>looking back in it. I can imagine this was a

0:52:20.960 --> 0:52:24.279
<v Speaker 1>sequence where they originally they might have wanted him to

0:52:24.360 --> 0:52:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to eat that meat or to drink that meat juice,

0:52:26.880 --> 0:52:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and Saxon was like, I'm not doing that. I'm not

0:52:28.840 --> 0:52:31.480
<v Speaker 1>And ultimately the film's better for it because it's not

0:52:31.640 --> 0:52:34.440
<v Speaker 1>about him, you know, being a midnight uh you know,

0:52:34.760 --> 0:52:37.200
<v Speaker 1>meat drinker, and more about like the what's going on

0:52:37.320 --> 0:52:39.719
<v Speaker 1>in his head when he's looking at it. Right. So

0:52:40.160 --> 0:52:42.439
<v Speaker 1>I guess, once again, we don't have to describe every

0:52:42.960 --> 0:52:45.040
<v Speaker 1>scene in the movie, but I think you can probably

0:52:45.120 --> 0:52:47.920
<v Speaker 1>guess the the basic format of it. So John Saxon

0:52:48.000 --> 0:52:50.719
<v Speaker 1>is still haunted by the war, and he finds out

0:52:50.840 --> 0:52:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that the POW's that he rescued in his in his

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:57.200
<v Speaker 1>dream sequence. Of course, they are real guys, and they're

0:52:57.200 --> 0:52:59.239
<v Speaker 1>about to be they're about to be released from a

0:52:59.239 --> 0:53:03.040
<v Speaker 1>psychiatric hospital where they've been receiving treatment, and one of

0:53:03.080 --> 0:53:06.120
<v Speaker 1>them is this guy, Charlie Bakowski, and we follow him

0:53:06.320 --> 0:53:09.880
<v Speaker 1>once he is released, and pretty quickly he So he

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:12.719
<v Speaker 1>like goes to a movie theater and starts watching a

0:53:12.880 --> 0:53:15.839
<v Speaker 1>war movie that's just like full of violence and explosions

0:53:15.880 --> 0:53:18.880
<v Speaker 1>on the screen, and immediately starts biting people in the theater.

0:53:18.960 --> 0:53:20.759
<v Speaker 1>He like bites a woman sitting in front of him,

0:53:21.040 --> 0:53:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and then the cannibalism cycle kind of ramps up from there.

0:53:24.840 --> 0:53:26.400
<v Speaker 1>And so one of the things that I thought was

0:53:26.480 --> 0:53:30.320
<v Speaker 1>really interesting about this movie was the way that it actually,

0:53:30.680 --> 0:53:36.720
<v Speaker 1>in the mechanics of plot development, very closely mirrors zombie movies,

0:53:38.160 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 1>because what normally happens in a zombie movie, especially zombie

0:53:42.600 --> 0:53:45.560
<v Speaker 1>movies that followed Night of the Living Dead and followed

0:53:45.600 --> 0:53:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the sort of formula established by George Romero, it is

0:53:49.840 --> 0:53:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you have a number of human characters and some zombies

0:53:52.200 --> 0:53:55.400
<v Speaker 1>are roaming around. A zombie bites a human character. The

0:53:55.560 --> 0:53:58.839
<v Speaker 1>bite makes the human character die, and then they turn

0:53:58.960 --> 0:54:01.960
<v Speaker 1>into a zombie and they start biting other people. This

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:05.720
<v Speaker 1>movie has essentially the exact same dynamic, except without the death.

0:54:06.360 --> 0:54:08.800
<v Speaker 1>So you have a cannibal who you could think of

0:54:08.920 --> 0:54:12.000
<v Speaker 1>as like the zombie. They are driven to bite other people.

0:54:12.200 --> 0:54:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Once they bite someone, the bitten person has a sort

0:54:15.440 --> 0:54:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of has a sort of grace period where they are

0:54:17.960 --> 0:54:21.960
<v Speaker 1>recovering from the bite, and then eventually something about the

0:54:22.040 --> 0:54:25.760
<v Speaker 1>bite seizes them, changes them and they start biting people

0:54:25.800 --> 0:54:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in turn. And so I thought that was interesting that

0:54:28.200 --> 0:54:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in an unacknowledged way, it is like a Ramiro zombie movie,

0:54:31.160 --> 0:54:34.760
<v Speaker 1>except everybody is still alive and to a certain extent,

0:54:34.920 --> 0:54:37.640
<v Speaker 1>like even the characters who give in to the cannibalism

0:54:37.920 --> 0:54:41.360
<v Speaker 1>are still human enough that you don't have that clear disconnect,

0:54:41.400 --> 0:54:43.719
<v Speaker 1>because I've often seen it pointed out by sort of

0:54:43.880 --> 0:54:48.359
<v Speaker 1>zombie critics that in the zombie film, there is there's

0:54:48.400 --> 0:54:51.480
<v Speaker 1>no question what you do about zombies. You kill zombies.

0:54:51.840 --> 0:54:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Brutal violence is the way you deal with the problem

0:54:54.280 --> 0:54:57.879
<v Speaker 1>of zombies, and it's okay because the fiction creates gives

0:54:57.880 --> 0:55:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you license to do that. Whereas cannibals, as presented in

0:55:01.840 --> 0:55:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Cannibal Apocalypse, that's never the case, Like there's still mortal

0:55:06.040 --> 0:55:11.279
<v Speaker 1>human beings that could conceivably be pulled back um, even

0:55:11.320 --> 0:55:13.520
<v Speaker 1>if they are, you know, drifting further and further into

0:55:13.600 --> 0:55:17.280
<v Speaker 1>their their cannibalistic obsession. You can almost see several characters,

0:55:17.520 --> 0:55:21.320
<v Speaker 1>especially John Saxon, struggling with the cannibalism thing. It's almost

0:55:21.360 --> 0:55:24.560
<v Speaker 1>like they're conflicted about it, like they feel the urge

0:55:24.640 --> 0:55:27.279
<v Speaker 1>to bite and eat humans, but maybe they're resisting it

0:55:27.400 --> 0:55:29.520
<v Speaker 1>for some period of time. Well, in the film, like

0:55:29.600 --> 0:55:31.440
<v Speaker 1>he he was bitten a long time ago, and it's

0:55:31.480 --> 0:55:34.759
<v Speaker 1>like he's been fighting it this whole time, and it's

0:55:34.760 --> 0:55:36.560
<v Speaker 1>almost it's one of these areas that gets into where

0:55:36.600 --> 0:55:38.600
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's almost or perhaps you can go

0:55:38.719 --> 0:55:42.120
<v Speaker 1>say it it actually is like a clever um commentary

0:55:42.360 --> 0:55:45.680
<v Speaker 1>on sort of either modern life or the American condition

0:55:45.800 --> 0:55:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that you know, you that we were all bitten a

0:55:48.280 --> 0:55:51.160
<v Speaker 1>long time ago ago, and the sickness is already in us.

0:55:51.239 --> 0:55:53.719
<v Speaker 1>The sickness is growing, and it's not a question of

0:55:53.840 --> 0:55:57.440
<v Speaker 1>will we acquire the sickness, but will we give into it?

0:55:58.080 --> 0:56:01.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, can we fight it off? And is it

0:56:01.360 --> 0:56:03.960
<v Speaker 1>ultimately too much for any individual to fight off for

0:56:04.040 --> 0:56:06.319
<v Speaker 1>too long? Yeah, I think that's a really good point.

0:56:06.520 --> 0:56:09.239
<v Speaker 1>And uh, but there's another way of thinking about it,

0:56:09.280 --> 0:56:12.879
<v Speaker 1>which is that so as you mentioned about the zombie movies,

0:56:12.920 --> 0:56:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, a common criticism of them is that, uh,

0:56:15.680 --> 0:56:18.640
<v Speaker 1>is that by creating the zombie plot device, you you

0:56:19.120 --> 0:56:23.160
<v Speaker 1>remove certain types of moral ambiguity from the film. You know,

0:56:23.280 --> 0:56:27.360
<v Speaker 1>because like in the Romero set up. It's frequently emphasized

0:56:27.400 --> 0:56:30.080
<v Speaker 1>by characters who have a kind of scientific authority or

0:56:30.160 --> 0:56:33.400
<v Speaker 1>something that these are no longer your friends and relatives.

0:56:33.520 --> 0:56:36.840
<v Speaker 1>They are not human anymore. They must be destroyed on site,

0:56:37.880 --> 0:56:42.239
<v Speaker 1>and characters are often punished for making the mistake of

0:56:42.440 --> 0:56:45.279
<v Speaker 1>thinking that the zombies in these movies are still the

0:56:45.400 --> 0:56:47.719
<v Speaker 1>person they were before they died. You know, they like

0:56:47.840 --> 0:56:50.360
<v Speaker 1>try to reach out to their friends or relatives and

0:56:50.600 --> 0:56:53.920
<v Speaker 1>then they just get bitten. This movie almost posits that

0:56:54.040 --> 0:56:57.279
<v Speaker 1>you could be a secret zombie, that you could be

0:56:57.440 --> 0:57:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a zombie, but that you could still blend in with

0:57:01.080 --> 0:57:03.439
<v Speaker 1>the living, and that you could talk and you could

0:57:03.480 --> 0:57:05.839
<v Speaker 1>seem like a normal person at least for a while,

0:57:05.960 --> 0:57:07.880
<v Speaker 1>as long as you're able to keep it under wraps.

0:57:08.239 --> 0:57:11.000
<v Speaker 1>But at some point your zombie nature will just sort

0:57:11.040 --> 0:57:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of erupt out of you and then the biting starts. Yeah. Which, again,

0:57:15.560 --> 0:57:18.200
<v Speaker 1>not to give too much credit to this movie, I

0:57:18.360 --> 0:57:21.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want to overstate, uh, it's it's thoughtfulness, but you

0:57:21.360 --> 0:57:23.320
<v Speaker 1>could see that as actually a kind of, you know,

0:57:23.400 --> 0:57:25.360
<v Speaker 1>if you look at it the right way, as a

0:57:25.440 --> 0:57:28.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of clever insight about the the effects of certain

0:57:28.640 --> 0:57:33.080
<v Speaker 1>kinds of trauma or experiences. With brutalization, say in a war. Yeah, yeah,

0:57:33.080 --> 0:57:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I think again this is an area where um Saxon

0:57:36.040 --> 0:57:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps others, right, that is, and then what the

0:57:38.200 --> 0:57:40.840
<v Speaker 1>commentary track indicated that they were it wasn't just Saxon

0:57:40.920 --> 0:57:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that we're encouraging the director to maybe pull back from

0:57:44.360 --> 0:57:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the from the visceral and allow some of the metaphorical

0:57:48.080 --> 0:57:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a little more room to exist. Yeah. Yeah, there, Tim

0:57:51.440 --> 0:57:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Lucas was saying, I think that Saxon and uh and

0:57:53.840 --> 0:57:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Dja as well, we're sort of, uh, we're sort of

0:57:56.920 --> 0:58:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the the angels on Antonio Marghariti's shoulder when making this movie.

0:58:01.680 --> 0:58:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure who the devils were. Maybe it's his

0:58:04.000 --> 0:58:09.200
<v Speaker 1>own devil, the screenwriter. Maybe I don't. But also so

0:58:09.560 --> 0:58:12.520
<v Speaker 1>so that's the kind of interesting, serious thematic part they're

0:58:12.520 --> 0:58:17.320
<v Speaker 1>also there's just so much absolutely unintentionally hilarious stuff in

0:58:17.400 --> 0:58:19.760
<v Speaker 1>this movie. Some of the dialogue and the dubbing is

0:58:19.960 --> 0:58:24.360
<v Speaker 1>so funny, uh like especially one thing that really stands

0:58:24.360 --> 0:58:27.920
<v Speaker 1>out to me is the character of Dr Phil played

0:58:27.960 --> 0:58:32.000
<v Speaker 1>by Rameiro Olivero's Almost every scene he's in is so

0:58:32.320 --> 0:58:35.000
<v Speaker 1>inappropriate and the way that the movie doesn't really seem

0:58:35.040 --> 0:58:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to understand. Yeah, I mean it seems where he's like

0:58:38.320 --> 0:58:42.120
<v Speaker 1>he's talking to um John Saxon's character's wife and she's like,

0:58:42.160 --> 0:58:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm really concerned about Norman. Um, you know he's having

0:58:44.960 --> 0:58:48.480
<v Speaker 1>these dreams. And he's like, no, I totally understand by

0:58:48.520 --> 0:58:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the way, I'm still looking for my soul mate. You know.

0:58:51.800 --> 0:58:55.000
<v Speaker 1>So good. There's one part I can't remember the exact quote,

0:58:55.000 --> 0:58:57.120
<v Speaker 1>but this is pretty close. He's on the phone with

0:58:57.200 --> 0:59:00.200
<v Speaker 1>her and he says something like, I do not think

0:59:00.240 --> 0:59:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you should be alone with your husband tonight. He may

0:59:02.360 --> 0:59:04.640
<v Speaker 1>be on the verge of a psychotic break. You should

0:59:04.640 --> 0:59:10.840
<v Speaker 1>have married me and not him. It's so good. Uh.

0:59:11.520 --> 0:59:13.840
<v Speaker 1>There are also some great lines that are that are

0:59:13.920 --> 0:59:16.920
<v Speaker 1>they are not dubbed. For instance, UM, we're talking about

0:59:16.960 --> 0:59:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the the Atlanta police chief character and he has there's

0:59:22.280 --> 0:59:25.160
<v Speaker 1>this one scene where the cannibalism has spread two police

0:59:25.240 --> 0:59:28.120
<v Speaker 1>officers and so they're screaming and he rushes into this

0:59:28.320 --> 0:59:32.360
<v Speaker 1>room and cannibalism has broken out. One character cop character

0:59:32.800 --> 0:59:35.640
<v Speaker 1>is eating human flesh and he says, oh my God,

0:59:35.760 --> 0:59:39.320
<v Speaker 1>put that down, son, And then I think later he

0:59:39.400 --> 0:59:42.960
<v Speaker 1>says cannibalism that maybe in the trailer that we aired

0:59:43.240 --> 0:59:45.560
<v Speaker 1>earlier on in fact, we were we were joking that

0:59:45.720 --> 0:59:49.600
<v Speaker 1>he's like James Brolin as the Republican Governor of Florida

0:59:49.720 --> 0:59:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and the West Wing. You know, he's like cannibalism. Boy,

0:59:53.320 --> 1:00:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know cannibalism. Big side. Um. There was another

1:00:00.400 --> 1:00:02.080
<v Speaker 1>one more thing I wanted to mention about the plot

1:00:02.120 --> 1:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>before we move on. So, of course, you know, it's

1:00:03.760 --> 1:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>just kind of like a spiral into cannibal hell as

1:00:06.200 --> 1:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>more and more people getting bitten and sort of secret

1:00:08.520 --> 1:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>zombified get turned into cannibals. But again with the interesting

1:00:11.840 --> 1:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>difference from the zombie movies that they still retain rationality,

1:00:15.800 --> 1:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that they can speak, that they can form and execute plans,

1:00:19.000 --> 1:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that the cannibals seem to have the ability to collaborate,

1:00:22.480 --> 1:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>like they can work together with each other to further

1:00:24.840 --> 1:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the uh, the coordinated cannibal agenda. Yeah, and it almost

1:00:28.920 --> 1:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>is like it instant, like the once the switch is

1:00:31.040 --> 1:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>turned in the mind, you start working with the other cannibals,

1:00:34.400 --> 1:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>because you know what life is about now, it's about

1:00:36.880 --> 1:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that human flesh. Just in terms of technical filmmaking, though,

1:00:41.000 --> 1:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I thought there was something worth pointing out, which is

1:00:43.920 --> 1:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that there is a central sequence of the movie that

1:00:47.920 --> 1:00:51.520
<v Speaker 1>really stands out, and it's the entire flea market sequence

1:00:51.600 --> 1:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>with Radici in it um where So before this part

1:00:56.000 --> 1:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of the movie, I think it starts maybe like twenty

1:00:59.360 --> 1:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to thirty minute it's in, and then it just goes

1:01:02.520 --> 1:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and goes for like twenty or thirty minutes, almost in

1:01:05.200 --> 1:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>real time. And before this part of the movie there's

1:01:09.640 --> 1:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>just like a lot of bizarre and inappropriate, tasteless stuff happening,

1:01:14.200 --> 1:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and then afterwards it's it's more in kind of like

1:01:17.320 --> 1:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>cannibal escalation mode. But for this one middle chunk of

1:01:21.000 --> 1:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the movie, you just get this really tight, very well executed,

1:01:26.040 --> 1:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>high tension standoff scene with with this character played by Ridici,

1:01:30.680 --> 1:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>this cannibalistic veteran, uh sort of taking over a flea

1:01:34.000 --> 1:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>market with a gun and the police being outside and

1:01:37.280 --> 1:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>there's this whole thing where they're trying to talk him

1:01:39.520 --> 1:01:41.680
<v Speaker 1>down and get him out, And I thought it was

1:01:41.760 --> 1:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>so weird to have this one sequence that just technically

1:01:45.880 --> 1:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and pacing wise, is so different than the rest of

1:01:48.160 --> 1:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the movie. Yeah, yeah, now that you mentioned it, it's

1:01:50.440 --> 1:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>definitely a sequence section of the film that really moves

1:01:52.960 --> 1:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>quite along. I mean, in general, I feel like this

1:01:55.800 --> 1:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>movie kept me invested throughout like it. Oh yeah, yeah,

1:01:59.120 --> 1:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's definitely not boring. Yeah, And I think a

1:02:02.160 --> 1:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of it has to do with certainly with it

1:02:03.760 --> 1:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>with some of these many of these sequences being so

1:02:05.520 --> 1:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>well paced and and in many cases shot really really well.

1:02:08.840 --> 1:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>But but also the last third of the film especially,

1:02:11.680 --> 1:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it goes in a direction I wasn't expecting and in

1:02:14.760 --> 1:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>general didn't seem to be setting itself um in accordance

1:02:19.320 --> 1:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to any particular cinematic pattern, at least one that I

1:02:21.960 --> 1:02:24.920
<v Speaker 1>was familiar with, So I really wasn't sure how everything

1:02:25.000 --> 1:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>was going to play out. Yeah, And I think part

1:02:27.440 --> 1:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of the unpredictability of the movie is created by having

1:02:32.160 --> 1:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>this chunk of the movie in the middle where or

1:02:35.080 --> 1:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the early middle, where suddenly the plot stops developing at

1:02:38.600 --> 1:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the at the kind of uh fast, random pace of

1:02:42.520 --> 1:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>what was happening earlier, and suddenly everything slows down and

1:02:45.360 --> 1:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>we get this real time, very very technical scene that uh.

1:02:50.000 --> 1:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Tim Lucas in his commentary very much compares the way

1:02:52.520 --> 1:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the flea market scene plays out to the filmmaking of

1:02:55.360 --> 1:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>George Romero, which again I think is a good comparison.

1:02:58.320 --> 1:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>It has that kind of I don't know that real

1:03:01.680 --> 1:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>time uh, tactical step by step progression of the way

1:03:06.000 --> 1:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that that Romero does a lot of sequences, and for example,

1:03:08.560 --> 1:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Dawn of the Dead, you recall a lot of What's

1:03:10.880 --> 1:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>actually pleasurable about Dawn and the Dead is the kind

1:03:13.840 --> 1:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of is seeing the characters execute a plan very much

1:03:17.800 --> 1:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in real time, step by step in a way that

1:03:21.120 --> 1:03:23.479
<v Speaker 1>that feels very logical, and you have a good sense

1:03:23.520 --> 1:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of place and and setting and do you know what

1:03:26.080 --> 1:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about. Yeah, yeah, absolutely, yeah, that all of

1:03:28.800 --> 1:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>that is definitely in play with this sequence. They do

1:03:31.600 --> 1:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a really good job of of creating that environment and need,

1:03:34.800 --> 1:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>like the physical expectations of that space. Um, and it

1:03:38.760 --> 1:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>makes for a really solid standoff because you you know

1:03:42.160 --> 1:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>what the environment is like, it's well established. So question

1:03:45.280 --> 1:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>before we wrap up, do you think the movie would

1:03:47.680 --> 1:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>have been better or worse if it did include a

1:03:50.480 --> 1:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>shot of John Saxon just like housing role meat. I

1:03:55.160 --> 1:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>think it would have been worse because I think we

1:03:57.560 --> 1:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>would have we we would have It would have been

1:03:59.800 --> 1:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>hard to root for him if we had seen that,

1:04:02.120 --> 1:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>especially if we'd seen it early in the picture. Even

1:04:04.520 --> 1:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>if it was just him be again being a midnight

1:04:06.960 --> 1:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>meat drinker that would have I think it would have

1:04:09.720 --> 1:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it would have caused that that slip to occur, and

1:04:12.160 --> 1:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>would we would have a harder time thinking that he

1:04:14.560 --> 1:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>had a shot at at a normal life anymore. Uh So, yeah,

1:04:20.120 --> 1:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it ultimately it made the film a little

1:04:22.160 --> 1:04:26.840
<v Speaker 1>less exploitive and and allowed for the film to feel

1:04:26.880 --> 1:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a little more metaphorical for those who wanted to engage

1:04:30.000 --> 1:04:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in that kind of experience. It's funny we keep saying

1:04:32.760 --> 1:04:35.160
<v Speaker 1>this though, about about the ways that it seems to

1:04:35.240 --> 1:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of like hit certain limits because you know, because

1:04:39.240 --> 1:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>once again, I mean, this is a gross cannibal movie

1:04:41.720 --> 1:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that is like inappropriate and in bad taste in most

1:04:45.480 --> 1:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>ways you could imagine. But for some reason, you just

1:04:48.800 --> 1:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>keep noticing about it that it feels like it would

1:04:52.040 --> 1:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>have gone farther in that regard, and and for some

1:04:54.960 --> 1:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>reason it doesn't quite even though it is already pretty

1:04:57.880 --> 1:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>gross and tasteless. Yeah. Absolutely, And and once again, I

1:05:01.160 --> 1:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's a far better film for those restraints being

1:05:04.920 --> 1:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>in place. Uh And you still get to have all

1:05:07.160 --> 1:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>your bloody cannibalistic fun in this film as well. So

1:05:10.040 --> 1:05:12.959
<v Speaker 1>again it's not a family film. It still has plenty

1:05:13.000 --> 1:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of gross and shocking scenes. My only question in my

1:05:16.480 --> 1:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>own mind is whether it would have been better had

1:05:18.640 --> 1:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>George Eastman been in it as well playing a cannibal,

1:05:22.360 --> 1:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>And on that I'm not sure. I'm kind of torn.

1:05:24.400 --> 1:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>On one hand, I'm always up for a good George

1:05:27.000 --> 1:05:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Eastman appearance, but on the other hand, Um, he is

1:05:30.880 --> 1:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>very much a harbinger of of that kind of excessive

1:05:35.960 --> 1:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>quality of filmmaking of it. I feel like like his

1:05:38.600 --> 1:05:40.919
<v Speaker 1>presence alone might have been enough to push the film,

1:05:41.360 --> 1:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>uh into the extremes that we're we're praising it for avoiding.

1:05:45.520 --> 1:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>When we saw the poster for this movie displayed on

1:05:47.840 --> 1:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the menu screen from the blue ray, So Rachel and

1:05:50.880 --> 1:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I she watched this with me and uh, And at

1:05:54.000 --> 1:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>first when I saw the guy, I thought it was

1:05:56.200 --> 1:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>George Eastman the guy, but you know, it's got a

1:05:59.160 --> 1:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of eagerly rendered anthropophagus, kind of Georgie Sman appearance.

1:06:04.200 --> 1:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>But Rachel, upon seeing it, was like, is this a

1:06:07.880 --> 1:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Sasquatch movie? But no, I think it's just supposed to

1:06:11.400 --> 1:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>be Uh and uh, what's his name? Radici? Yeah, some

1:06:15.440 --> 1:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of the you look at some of the posters for

1:06:17.320 --> 1:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>this and there's like another poster or maybe VHS box art,

1:06:21.600 --> 1:06:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure which. That shows John Saxon's face, and

1:06:26.000 --> 1:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>part of half of his face is distorted into like

1:06:28.280 --> 1:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a monster face, which is totally not in keeping with

1:06:31.720 --> 1:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>anything you see in the film at all, or even

1:06:34.640 --> 1:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>really in the vibe of the picture. But they certainly

1:06:37.760 --> 1:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a problem presenting it on the you know,

1:06:39.800 --> 1:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the post or the box art in some market or another.

1:06:42.640 --> 1:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>One last thing I have to mention before we finish.

1:06:45.040 --> 1:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Rachel had a really good one. When I was explaining

1:06:48.080 --> 1:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that I had realized the title comes from trying to

1:06:51.360 --> 1:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>get some of the magic of apocalypse now, she suggested

1:06:54.800 --> 1:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>instead of cannibal Apocalypse, they should have called this movie

1:06:57.360 --> 1:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>apocalypse Chow. Oh would have been good, especially because I

1:07:02.000 --> 1:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>can double with like the Italian greeting. Yeah like that

1:07:05.080 --> 1:07:07.600
<v Speaker 1>like dog chow and yeah chow Okay, all right, I

1:07:07.720 --> 1:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>like it. All right. Uh, well, we're gonna go ahead

1:07:11.040 --> 1:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and close it out there. Again, if you're wondering where

1:07:13.640 --> 1:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>can I watch this, well, I think it's as of

1:07:16.480 --> 1:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>this recording kind of hard to find on legit streaming services.

1:07:20.440 --> 1:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>But again, that Keno Lerber Blu ray is beautiful and

1:07:23.840 --> 1:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you can buy that wherever you get your films. Um

1:07:26.480 --> 1:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it's again just really great remaster four K remaster of

1:07:30.280 --> 1:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the film. We rented our copy from Video Drome, Atlanta's

1:07:33.600 --> 1:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>last rental store, and I think it was meant to

1:07:35.560 --> 1:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>be because when I walked in there to inquire about

1:07:38.040 --> 1:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the film, they were playing Transfers three on the on

1:07:40.840 --> 1:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the screens. So so I got to talk briefly about

1:07:45.000 --> 1:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the Transfers franchise with the with the owner. Uh so, Yeah,

1:07:49.000 --> 1:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a great spot. And if you want to check

1:07:50.440 --> 1:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>out more about Video Drume, you can go to Video

1:07:52.080 --> 1:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Drome a t L dot com or for their merchandise,

1:07:54.200 --> 1:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you can go to Video Drume dot tv. Are we

1:07:56.680 --> 1:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>coming back for Deep Transfer sequels on on Weird House? May?

1:08:01.080 --> 1:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, who knows? We could do Transfers three. I

1:08:03.120 --> 1:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know about four and five, but you know three

1:08:08.080 --> 1:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>three is a possibility. Three basically have like Street Sharks

1:08:11.840 --> 1:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in it. There is a there is a shark character. Yes,

1:08:15.080 --> 1:08:18.519
<v Speaker 1>there's a fun monster character that shows up, and we

1:08:18.600 --> 1:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>have uh in keeping with the second Transfers, there's a

1:08:21.040 --> 1:08:24.679
<v Speaker 1>wonderful villain roll as well. Okay, that's staying on the list.

1:08:25.120 --> 1:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh but I think I actually know what we are

1:08:27.280 --> 1:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>doing next week, and boy is not going to be

1:08:29.160 --> 1:08:31.479
<v Speaker 1>a treat. Let's not spoil it. I do you want

1:08:31.520 --> 1:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>to tease anything about it? Of course not. No, I

1:08:33.479 --> 1:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>want it to be a surprise. Okay, all right, I'll

1:08:36.320 --> 1:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>just say it's going to be an incredible journey. Al Right, Well,

1:08:40.680 --> 1:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I won't even spoil it. Then. At the at the

1:08:43.080 --> 1:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>blog post for this episode, which we'll find it some

1:08:45.280 --> 1:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>new to music dot Com, but I will include some

1:08:48.600 --> 1:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>some clips and some samples and some links to some

1:08:51.240 --> 1:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of the soundtrack stuff we've been talking about here. And

1:08:54.000 --> 1:08:56.439
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch more episodes of Weird House Cinema,

1:08:56.520 --> 1:08:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the place to get it is every Friday in the

1:08:58.760 --> 1:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow your Mind pod cast feed, which we'll

1:09:00.960 --> 1:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>find wherever you get your podcasts. Stuff to Blow Your

1:09:03.400 --> 1:09:06.599
<v Speaker 1>Mind is primarily a science and culture podcast. We run

1:09:06.640 --> 1:09:09.559
<v Speaker 1>our core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays, but we run

1:09:09.640 --> 1:09:12.719
<v Speaker 1>an artifact episode on Wednesday's, we run listener mail on Monday's,

1:09:12.760 --> 1:09:15.519
<v Speaker 1>we run on the weekend, and then on Friday it's

1:09:15.600 --> 1:09:17.599
<v Speaker 1>this It's Weird Our Cinema, you know, which we get

1:09:17.640 --> 1:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk about a weird film. Huge thanks as always

1:09:20.080 --> 1:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you

1:09:23.360 --> 1:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>would like to get in touch with us with feedback

1:09:25.400 --> 1:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>on this episode or any other, to suggest topic for

1:09:27.680 --> 1:09:29.639
<v Speaker 1>the future, or just to say hello, you can email

1:09:29.720 --> 1:09:32.639
<v Speaker 1>us at contact. That's Stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

1:09:39.960 --> 1:09:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of I Heart Radio.

1:09:42.840 --> 1:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts for My heart Radio, visit the i

1:09:45.000 --> 1:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

1:09:47.840 --> 1:09:48.639
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.