1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:05,080
Speaker 1: Attacking free speech, your freedoms, and your rights. Now, I'm

2
00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:07,480
Speaker 1: sure you see it. I'm sure you feel it. You

3
00:00:07,480 --> 00:00:10,000
Speaker 1: see it happening all over. We are going to jump

4
00:00:10,000 --> 00:00:14,560
Speaker 1: into a conversation with a constitutional attorney, a high profile

5
00:00:14,640 --> 00:00:17,360
Speaker 1: constitutional attorney who has worked on some of the biggest

6
00:00:17,360 --> 00:00:19,520
Speaker 1: cases in the United States, and we're going to talk

7
00:00:19,520 --> 00:00:23,160
Speaker 1: about the three ways that your freedom of speech or

8
00:00:23,200 --> 00:00:27,200
Speaker 1: constitutional rights are being chipped away. You may don't maybe

9
00:00:27,240 --> 00:00:29,960
Speaker 1: won't recognize it at first, but once you understand this,

10
00:00:29,960 --> 00:00:31,960
Speaker 1: you're gonna see it. We're gonna talk about ways that

11
00:00:32,000 --> 00:00:35,720
Speaker 1: the do o J and the FBI are being weaponized

12
00:00:35,720 --> 00:00:39,720
Speaker 1: against you, how the judicial system has been compromised and

13
00:00:39,760 --> 00:00:43,920
Speaker 1: they're using this to rewrite the laws right now, right

14
00:00:43,960 --> 00:00:47,720
Speaker 1: before your very eyes, going around constitutional rights. We're gonna

15
00:00:47,760 --> 00:00:51,800
Speaker 1: talk about what's happening with high public of figures when

16
00:00:51,800 --> 00:00:56,080
Speaker 1: it comes to censorship, doing things you couldn't even imagine,

17
00:00:56,360 --> 00:00:59,320
Speaker 1: things that I couldn't imagine. We're gonna talk about the

18
00:00:59,440 --> 00:01:01,880
Speaker 1: reasons why they're doing this. But it's not all doom

19
00:01:01,920 --> 00:01:04,760
Speaker 1: and gloom. We're gonna talk about how this has happened

20
00:01:04,760 --> 00:01:06,520
Speaker 1: before in the United States. As a matter of fact,

21
00:01:06,600 --> 00:01:10,160
Speaker 1: a couple of times before, how we've overcome and how

22
00:01:10,240 --> 00:01:13,759
Speaker 1: we've overturned these things, and even though it's looking dark,

23
00:01:13,800 --> 00:01:16,399
Speaker 1: there's massive hope on the horizon. We're gonna talk about

24
00:01:16,640 --> 00:01:18,560
Speaker 1: how we can continue to build that and how we

25
00:01:18,600 --> 00:01:20,880
Speaker 1: continue to push that. So this is a conversation you

26
00:01:21,000 --> 00:01:24,240
Speaker 1: do not want to miss, super important, and I hope

27
00:01:24,280 --> 00:01:26,120
Speaker 1: you share it with as many people as possibles. AEAD

28
00:01:26,200 --> 00:01:30,000
Speaker 1: jump right into the conversation with Robert Barnes. Robert, thanks

29
00:01:30,040 --> 00:01:33,360
Speaker 1: for joining me today. Uh, I'm happy to have you back.

30
00:01:33,400 --> 00:01:35,080
Speaker 1: I've been following along with all this stuff you've been

31
00:01:35,080 --> 00:01:39,920
Speaker 1: talking about. I am I'm shocked. I'm alarmed of what's

32
00:01:39,959 --> 00:01:43,360
Speaker 1: going on. There's attacks happening all over the place, and

33
00:01:43,400 --> 00:01:44,520
Speaker 1: so I've been wanting to talk to you for a

34
00:01:44,520 --> 00:01:46,080
Speaker 1: couple of weeks. I'm glad we finally got a chance

35
00:01:46,080 --> 00:01:49,720
Speaker 1: to do this. Absolutely so um Man, there's so many

36
00:01:49,720 --> 00:01:51,680
Speaker 1: things that, so many things to dive into, so many

37
00:01:51,720 --> 00:01:55,200
Speaker 1: topics to jump into. UM let's start with the one, um,

38
00:01:55,240 --> 00:01:57,920
Speaker 1: a big one, and then we can dive down. So

39
00:01:58,560 --> 00:02:02,320
Speaker 1: um I've been talking about been seen. It looks like

40
00:02:02,400 --> 00:02:07,080
Speaker 1: we have a tax on free speech from like almost

41
00:02:07,160 --> 00:02:10,960
Speaker 1: every angle I've been saying that I believe we're in

42
00:02:11,000 --> 00:02:13,400
Speaker 1: a war. Um. It's just a war of information and

43
00:02:13,440 --> 00:02:17,680
Speaker 1: money and so um on the information front. Um, if

44
00:02:17,919 --> 00:02:21,119
Speaker 1: the powers that be are losing their grip on the narrative,

45
00:02:21,560 --> 00:02:23,760
Speaker 1: then they have to up their game to win the

46
00:02:23,800 --> 00:02:26,280
Speaker 1: war on information, and so they need to find ways

47
00:02:26,320 --> 00:02:29,320
Speaker 1: to censor people, silence people, et cetera. So I've been

48
00:02:29,320 --> 00:02:32,040
Speaker 1: seeing this as this attack on free speech from multiple angles.

49
00:02:32,040 --> 00:02:34,240
Speaker 1: So a couple of ones that I've seen are the

50
00:02:34,320 --> 00:02:38,400
Speaker 1: Alex Jones trial. Right. Um, they're trying to use something

51
00:02:38,440 --> 00:02:41,240
Speaker 1: that has this unanimous consensus that everybody thinks is bad

52
00:02:41,280 --> 00:02:43,960
Speaker 1: and use that to chip away. We have the Trump

53
00:02:44,320 --> 00:02:47,600
Speaker 1: January six um thing going on, and then we had

54
00:02:47,639 --> 00:02:51,480
Speaker 1: this Tornado cash which was like a public utility or protocol.

55
00:02:52,200 --> 00:02:54,600
Speaker 1: But I think they all look like a tax on

56
00:02:54,680 --> 00:02:59,360
Speaker 1: free speech to me. What's your take on that? No doubt.

57
00:02:59,400 --> 00:03:01,320
Speaker 1: And in fact, the case that a lot of people

58
00:03:01,360 --> 00:03:05,600
Speaker 1: have not paid enough attention to is the Alex Jones trials.

59
00:03:05,639 --> 00:03:08,320
Speaker 1: So in those cases, they're using it as a test

60
00:03:08,400 --> 00:03:11,840
Speaker 1: case to whether you can basically run show trials in America,

61
00:03:11,919 --> 00:03:14,840
Speaker 1: complete show trials. So they have gutted him of all

62
00:03:14,880 --> 00:03:17,240
Speaker 1: of his procedural rights. Not allowed to bring motions to

63
00:03:17,280 --> 00:03:19,960
Speaker 1: dismiss not allowed to bring motions for summary judgment, not

64
00:03:20,080 --> 00:03:23,560
Speaker 1: allowed to challenge the legal sufficiency of the case against him,

65
00:03:23,600 --> 00:03:26,720
Speaker 1: not allowed even to testify on his own behalf as

66
00:03:26,760 --> 00:03:29,560
Speaker 1: to his innocence. He the only in fact that the

67
00:03:29,680 --> 00:03:32,680
Speaker 1: trial that's guilty until proven guiltier where he is not

68
00:03:32,720 --> 00:03:35,920
Speaker 1: allowed to defend himself, where evidence against him is introduced,

69
00:03:35,960 --> 00:03:38,240
Speaker 1: but he is not allowed to impeach or cross examine

70
00:03:38,280 --> 00:03:41,120
Speaker 1: that evidence in a meaningful way. Now. In fact, for example,

71
00:03:41,120 --> 00:03:44,520
Speaker 1: in the Connecticut trial going on right now, the judges said,

72
00:03:44,560 --> 00:03:46,800
Speaker 1: there's one name that cannot even be talked about in

73
00:03:46,840 --> 00:03:50,160
Speaker 1: the entire trial, and that's Hillary Clinton. That's how insane

74
00:03:50,200 --> 00:03:52,320
Speaker 1: the cases, even though Hillary Clinton has a lot to

75
00:03:52,360 --> 00:03:55,280
Speaker 1: do with how that trial came about. So uh and

76
00:03:55,280 --> 00:03:58,480
Speaker 1: and the reason for that is their secondary objective. Uh,

77
00:03:58,480 --> 00:04:00,800
Speaker 1: they're stripping of all of his proceed Drill writes his

78
00:04:00,880 --> 00:04:03,080
Speaker 1: day in court. He hasn't given any day in court,

79
00:04:03,360 --> 00:04:05,800
Speaker 1: his right to trial by jerry on the merits. He's

80
00:04:05,800 --> 00:04:08,640
Speaker 1: being denied his right to trial by jury on the merits. Uh.

81
00:04:08,680 --> 00:04:11,120
Speaker 1: They claim that he didn't participate in discovery but anybody

82
00:04:11,120 --> 00:04:13,400
Speaker 1: watching the trial realizes he must have because they have

83
00:04:13,440 --> 00:04:16,240
Speaker 1: more discovery the other side than anybody's ever had to

84
00:04:16,240 --> 00:04:20,360
Speaker 1: give in any case. It's it's about ultimately using him

85
00:04:20,400 --> 00:04:24,279
Speaker 1: as an example to take away other people's speech because

86
00:04:24,320 --> 00:04:27,480
Speaker 1: the legal president they're establishing. Because the other unique factor

87
00:04:27,560 --> 00:04:29,799
Speaker 1: here is Joe is being sued and for like unfair

88
00:04:29,839 --> 00:04:33,680
Speaker 1: competition and trade laws and consumer protection laws, but the

89
00:04:33,680 --> 00:04:36,320
Speaker 1: people suing him are not consumers. There are people who

90
00:04:36,400 --> 00:04:39,120
Speaker 1: disagree with what he said about topics over the years,

91
00:04:39,760 --> 00:04:43,760
Speaker 1: um and in instead it's basically a defamation case. Yet

92
00:04:43,800 --> 00:04:45,800
Speaker 1: they're being allowed to sue under these theories that no

93
00:04:45,839 --> 00:04:49,040
Speaker 1: one's ever heard of being applied in this context before.

94
00:04:49,680 --> 00:04:53,039
Speaker 1: But the it's not only that, the constitutional requirement is

95
00:04:53,080 --> 00:04:56,479
Speaker 1: that you can't be sued for defamation unless you say

96
00:04:56,480 --> 00:05:00,800
Speaker 1: a specifically factual statement that's false that you know to

97
00:05:00,839 --> 00:05:05,600
Speaker 1: be false about someone specific. So that's how we protect

98
00:05:05,800 --> 00:05:08,960
Speaker 1: robust free speech. We uh, there's no such thing as

99
00:05:09,000 --> 00:05:12,600
Speaker 1: a wrong idea in America. Yet they're trying to gut

100
00:05:12,640 --> 00:05:15,280
Speaker 1: all of that because in the Jones case, he never

101
00:05:15,320 --> 00:05:18,799
Speaker 1: talked about the people that are suing him, never mentioned

102
00:05:18,839 --> 00:05:22,400
Speaker 1: him by name, never referenced him. So forth the people

103
00:05:22,440 --> 00:05:24,640
Speaker 1: that are suing him, there's only one or two people

104
00:05:24,640 --> 00:05:27,839
Speaker 1: that even got referenced directly or indirectly. Almost all the

105
00:05:27,839 --> 00:05:30,640
Speaker 1: people are suing him, including FBI agent. You have an

106
00:05:30,640 --> 00:05:34,760
Speaker 1: FBI agent suing him who didn't identify anything Alex Jones

107
00:05:34,800 --> 00:05:37,560
Speaker 1: every even said about him. He's an FBI lawyer, So

108
00:05:37,640 --> 00:05:40,440
Speaker 1: how is this FBI lawyer being allowed to sue? The

109
00:05:41,160 --> 00:05:45,960
Speaker 1: new theory is if you say something that upset somebody,

110
00:05:46,000 --> 00:05:48,920
Speaker 1: and you know it might upset somebody, they can sue you,

111
00:05:49,120 --> 00:05:51,680
Speaker 1: and if it's controversial enough, they can sue you into

112
00:05:51,760 --> 00:05:55,040
Speaker 1: bankruptcy and oblivion, as the plaintiffs lawyers have said, is

113
00:05:55,040 --> 00:05:58,000
Speaker 1: their exact plan here in the Connecticut case, they said

114
00:05:58,000 --> 00:06:00,800
Speaker 1: it out loud in the courtroom the place lawyer said,

115
00:06:00,839 --> 00:06:04,200
Speaker 1: justice is preventing Alex Jones from ever having a microphone,

116
00:06:04,400 --> 00:06:07,520
Speaker 1: ever having access to the media, ever being able to

117
00:06:07,640 --> 00:06:11,400
Speaker 1: have his opinion heard by you, the people, ever again.

118
00:06:12,120 --> 00:06:14,920
Speaker 1: And that's why the Jones case is so dangerous. They're

119
00:06:14,920 --> 00:06:18,159
Speaker 1: trying to establish the precedent that they can use lawfare

120
00:06:18,200 --> 00:06:22,800
Speaker 1: in the legal system to completely financially obliterate any dissident

121
00:06:22,839 --> 00:06:27,320
Speaker 1: opinion and it's a precarious precedent, and because it's Alex Jones,

122
00:06:27,400 --> 00:06:30,200
Speaker 1: and because the topic is Sandy Hook, most people are

123
00:06:30,240 --> 00:06:33,320
Speaker 1: too scared to look into it, to talk about it,

124
00:06:33,360 --> 00:06:36,400
Speaker 1: to challenge the media narrative, to contest what's happening, to

125
00:06:36,520 --> 00:06:39,600
Speaker 1: expose what's happening. Too many people on the right who

126
00:06:39,640 --> 00:06:43,080
Speaker 1: have disagreements with Alex Jones are letting those disagreements with

127
00:06:43,120 --> 00:06:46,440
Speaker 1: Alex Jones blind the fact that just like he was

128
00:06:46,480 --> 00:06:49,240
Speaker 1: the Canarian the coal mine on big tech, when they

129
00:06:49,240 --> 00:06:51,400
Speaker 1: took out Alex Jones, they used it as the precedent

130
00:06:51,520 --> 00:06:54,880
Speaker 1: ultimately take out the President of the United States, they're

131
00:06:54,920 --> 00:06:57,480
Speaker 1: now using him in the law fair arena to say

132
00:06:57,520 --> 00:07:00,280
Speaker 1: we if we don't like your speech, we can now

133
00:07:00,480 --> 00:07:04,240
Speaker 1: use the state court civil justice system to bankrupt you

134
00:07:04,320 --> 00:07:06,640
Speaker 1: because we don't like your speech, and we can do

135
00:07:06,720 --> 00:07:09,520
Speaker 1: it without every giving you your day in court, without

136
00:07:09,600 --> 00:07:12,360
Speaker 1: every giving you trial by jury on the merits, without

137
00:07:12,440 --> 00:07:14,960
Speaker 1: ever giving you basic core rights that every American is

138
00:07:15,000 --> 00:07:18,640
Speaker 1: supposed to have. Wow, that's a lot. That's a lot

139
00:07:18,680 --> 00:07:21,640
Speaker 1: so um little known fact people will find out here.

140
00:07:21,680 --> 00:07:24,000
Speaker 1: But about two weeks ago I went and sat down

141
00:07:24,040 --> 00:07:26,720
Speaker 1: with Alex Jones, and I even hosted the info War

142
00:07:26,800 --> 00:07:28,960
Speaker 1: Show for a segment and then we went into a

143
00:07:29,000 --> 00:07:32,320
Speaker 1: long interview. Um, so I'm having that come out, but

144
00:07:32,520 --> 00:07:34,720
Speaker 1: I'm afraid to put that on YouTube. So it's probably

145
00:07:34,720 --> 00:07:36,640
Speaker 1: gonna be on my Rumble, It'll be on the Odyssey,

146
00:07:36,680 --> 00:07:38,400
Speaker 1: It'll be on my podcast. It won't be on my YouTube,

147
00:07:38,560 --> 00:07:40,440
Speaker 1: just because I'm afraid of the backlash that will have.

148
00:07:40,520 --> 00:07:43,200
Speaker 1: But I was surprised at just the backlash I already

149
00:07:43,240 --> 00:07:46,200
Speaker 1: got people saw me on info Wars, even from my

150
00:07:46,280 --> 00:07:50,000
Speaker 1: own daughter, who's like, he's such a bad man, and

151
00:07:50,040 --> 00:07:53,400
Speaker 1: he said these bad things. And I told my daughter,

152
00:07:53,440 --> 00:07:56,240
Speaker 1: I'm like, look, okay, so he said bad things. It

153
00:07:56,280 --> 00:07:58,360
Speaker 1: made people feel bad, Like that's wrong and I don't

154
00:07:58,360 --> 00:08:00,400
Speaker 1: approve that, and he shouldn't have said that. Okay whatever,

155
00:08:00,440 --> 00:08:05,040
Speaker 1: but like it's not illegal, it's not illegal. It shouldn't be. Um,

156
00:08:05,080 --> 00:08:07,760
Speaker 1: you know, in his in his defense to what he said,

157
00:08:07,800 --> 00:08:09,760
Speaker 1: he's like, you know, he goes live whatever four hours

158
00:08:09,760 --> 00:08:12,560
Speaker 1: a day, so that's whatever, twenty hours a week, uh whatever,

159
00:08:12,560 --> 00:08:15,360
Speaker 1: almost a hundred hours a month he's live. He said.

160
00:08:15,440 --> 00:08:17,800
Speaker 1: The total amount of time he talked about that topic

161
00:08:17,880 --> 00:08:20,360
Speaker 1: was twenty four minutes, I think, is what he said.

162
00:08:20,640 --> 00:08:22,160
Speaker 1: And he said the same thing as you. He never

163
00:08:22,200 --> 00:08:26,480
Speaker 1: mentioned anybody's name, he never directly said anything whatever. Um.

164
00:08:26,520 --> 00:08:28,679
Speaker 1: And some of the comments I got from other people

165
00:08:28,720 --> 00:08:32,079
Speaker 1: were like, well, he used this to his advantage. He's

166
00:08:32,120 --> 00:08:34,880
Speaker 1: trying to gain from this. I'm like, he talked about

167
00:08:34,880 --> 00:08:36,920
Speaker 1: it twenty four minutes. The media has talked about hundreds

168
00:08:36,960 --> 00:08:40,679
Speaker 1: of hours. Who's using what to gain? But digging back

169
00:08:40,720 --> 00:08:42,240
Speaker 1: into some of the things that you said, because it's

170
00:08:42,280 --> 00:08:44,839
Speaker 1: way worse than I had even imagined. Um, it's a

171
00:08:44,840 --> 00:08:46,880
Speaker 1: way worse. Its not even imagined. So they're denying him

172
00:08:46,960 --> 00:08:50,000
Speaker 1: all these things to the point that you're making um.

173
00:08:50,040 --> 00:08:53,840
Speaker 1: And I didn't write them all down, But um, how

174
00:08:53,880 --> 00:08:57,200
Speaker 1: are they able to do that? I mean, is it

175
00:08:57,200 --> 00:08:59,720
Speaker 1: because they have a judge that's just going along with

176
00:08:59,760 --> 00:09:01,640
Speaker 1: it and they're doing that? I mean, will he be

177
00:09:01,679 --> 00:09:04,640
Speaker 1: able to appeal this? I mean, I I understand laws

178
00:09:04,640 --> 00:09:07,559
Speaker 1: are being changed and it's becoming more and more unfair,

179
00:09:07,960 --> 00:09:10,400
Speaker 1: But for the ones that are still there, I mean,

180
00:09:10,480 --> 00:09:13,839
Speaker 1: doesn't isn't there some sort of recourse there? There should?

181
00:09:13,880 --> 00:09:16,200
Speaker 1: The problem is it's the failure of the judicial branch,

182
00:09:16,320 --> 00:09:20,120
Speaker 1: and the judicial branch is not stepping up to meet

183
00:09:20,160 --> 00:09:23,560
Speaker 1: and protect Alex Jones's rights because he's Alex Jones. So

184
00:09:23,840 --> 00:09:26,199
Speaker 1: the other dynamic is that there's sort of an underlying

185
00:09:26,280 --> 00:09:29,679
Speaker 1: class conflict in all of this because most of Jones's

186
00:09:29,760 --> 00:09:33,280
Speaker 1: supporters are working people. So they may be business people,

187
00:09:33,280 --> 00:09:36,120
Speaker 1: they may be successful people, but they are not the

188
00:09:36,200 --> 00:09:40,320
Speaker 1: professional class, the clerical class, the managerial class. They don't

189
00:09:40,320 --> 00:09:42,520
Speaker 1: have a bunch of little letters after their name like

190
00:09:42,559 --> 00:09:46,160
Speaker 1: we're reinstating old English royalty these days with j D

191
00:09:46,320 --> 00:09:49,840
Speaker 1: or m D or pH D and all that jazz. Uh.

192
00:09:49,880 --> 00:09:52,680
Speaker 1: But the the the group that doesn't like Jones is

193
00:09:52,679 --> 00:09:56,640
Speaker 1: from that professional, managerial class. So Jones has an underrepresented

194
00:09:56,640 --> 00:09:58,559
Speaker 1: as part of his audience. And for people who don't know,

195
00:09:58,559 --> 00:10:00,000
Speaker 1: I mean, this is a man who, according to government,

196
00:10:00,040 --> 00:10:03,960
Speaker 1: its own polls, media's own polls, over thirty million Americans

197
00:10:04,320 --> 00:10:07,320
Speaker 1: are are huge fans. That's as many people who vote

198
00:10:07,320 --> 00:10:10,080
Speaker 1: in the Republican presidential primaries to give people an idea.

199
00:10:10,400 --> 00:10:13,360
Speaker 1: So that's the scale of his influence, his influences. He

200
00:10:13,400 --> 00:10:15,440
Speaker 1: has been the biggest critic of the deep State of

201
00:10:15,480 --> 00:10:18,560
Speaker 1: anybody in recent American history. He's one of the most

202
00:10:18,559 --> 00:10:21,800
Speaker 1: important populist voices out there, and that's why he's being targeted,

203
00:10:22,440 --> 00:10:24,800
Speaker 1: that's why. And there's this mythology, like most people who

204
00:10:24,800 --> 00:10:27,400
Speaker 1: bash Alex Jones remind me the people who bashed Rush

205
00:10:27,400 --> 00:10:30,600
Speaker 1: Limbaugh and I'd be, I'd be. They would describe a caricature,

206
00:10:30,679 --> 00:10:33,040
Speaker 1: they would describe someone that's not the person. I'm like, Okay,

207
00:10:33,240 --> 00:10:36,280
Speaker 1: you're bashing someone you've actually never watched, you've actually never

208
00:10:36,320 --> 00:10:38,800
Speaker 1: listened to, you've actually never read. If you're gonna bash them,

209
00:10:38,840 --> 00:10:40,640
Speaker 1: at least you know, engage with them and then come

210
00:10:40,679 --> 00:10:43,920
Speaker 1: up with a determination. Um. But the it's this caricature

211
00:10:43,960 --> 00:10:46,520
Speaker 1: of him. But there's this underlying class conflict where the

212
00:10:46,520 --> 00:10:49,439
Speaker 1: professional class hates him. The status hate him. Uh, the

213
00:10:49,800 --> 00:10:52,839
Speaker 1: working class, the working person, the ordinary felt person, they

214
00:10:52,920 --> 00:10:56,120
Speaker 1: love him. But in the judicial branch, which is making

215
00:10:56,120 --> 00:10:59,000
Speaker 1: all the decisions here, it's it's by definition dominated by

216
00:10:59,040 --> 00:11:02,960
Speaker 1: the professional manager, a real class. So in their little group,

217
00:11:03,080 --> 00:11:06,800
Speaker 1: in their little bubble, Alex Jones is almost universally despised,

218
00:11:06,840 --> 00:11:09,720
Speaker 1: so they can just ignore the rules. The other scary

219
00:11:09,800 --> 00:11:11,959
Speaker 1: thing is, I mean, this is a trial. These trials

220
00:11:12,000 --> 00:11:15,520
Speaker 1: make Idiocracy's trial look like a beacon of justice. That's

221
00:11:15,559 --> 00:11:19,000
Speaker 1: how bad they are. Um in their parodies of parodies

222
00:11:19,320 --> 00:11:21,800
Speaker 1: and the problem is known none of the other judges,

223
00:11:21,840 --> 00:11:23,560
Speaker 1: because that's the only people who can put a stop

224
00:11:23,600 --> 00:11:26,200
Speaker 1: to this higher courts. So it's all judges getting to

225
00:11:26,200 --> 00:11:29,040
Speaker 1: decide the ethical conduct of judges, which I've always had

226
00:11:29,040 --> 00:11:31,400
Speaker 1: a problem with. Uh, they're they're all in on it.

227
00:11:31,520 --> 00:11:34,520
Speaker 1: I mean that they all want Jones hurt. So there

228
00:11:33,960 --> 00:11:37,600
Speaker 1: were For example, Jones was because he made criticisms of

229
00:11:37,600 --> 00:11:40,480
Speaker 1: a lawyer from his own TV network Early on in

230
00:11:40,520 --> 00:11:43,480
Speaker 1: the case, the judges said, if you become if you

231
00:11:43,520 --> 00:11:45,880
Speaker 1: are sued, you lose your free speech rights. As to

232
00:11:45,920 --> 00:11:49,360
Speaker 1: that case would never happen. That's directly contrary to U. S.

233
00:11:49,360 --> 00:11:51,840
Speaker 1: Supreme Court law. But unless the U. S. Supreme Court

234
00:11:51,880 --> 00:11:54,960
Speaker 1: gets involved, and they almost never do, the other judges

235
00:11:55,000 --> 00:11:58,240
Speaker 1: get away with violating his rights. And if anybody thinks

236
00:11:58,240 --> 00:12:00,240
Speaker 1: they're not planning on using this as a press of it,

237
00:12:00,559 --> 00:12:03,280
Speaker 1: that's the mistake. They're using Jones because they know he

238
00:12:03,320 --> 00:12:07,360
Speaker 1: has inadequate political protection amongst their colleagues in the professional

239
00:12:07,400 --> 00:12:09,840
Speaker 1: managerial class and the press and in the legal world.

240
00:12:10,480 --> 00:12:13,000
Speaker 1: But then they're gonna take that precedent and apply it

241
00:12:13,040 --> 00:12:16,080
Speaker 1: to everyone else. It's what big Tech did. People may

242
00:12:16,080 --> 00:12:18,240
Speaker 1: not remember when they took down Alex Jones. They lied

243
00:12:18,240 --> 00:12:20,480
Speaker 1: about it. They said, oh, this is limited Alex Jones.

244
00:12:20,600 --> 00:12:22,600
Speaker 1: We're not doing this because of his speech. We're limited.

245
00:12:22,760 --> 00:12:25,199
Speaker 1: It's certain incidents that occurred. They could never find or

246
00:12:25,280 --> 00:12:28,000
Speaker 1: identify what those incidents were. Very similar. They had like

247
00:12:28,000 --> 00:12:30,440
Speaker 1: a fake trial of their own kind. And then of

248
00:12:30,480 --> 00:12:32,439
Speaker 1: course they said, well later on, well we took out

249
00:12:32,440 --> 00:12:34,400
Speaker 1: Alex Jones for wrong think, we can take out the

250
00:12:34,400 --> 00:12:37,360
Speaker 1: President United States for wrong things. So the they're gonna

251
00:12:37,360 --> 00:12:40,440
Speaker 1: do the same thing here and that there should be

252
00:12:40,480 --> 00:12:43,800
Speaker 1: remedies at the Court of Appeals. In reality, other than

253
00:12:43,840 --> 00:12:46,439
Speaker 1: the Texas Supreme Court and the U. S. Supreme Court

254
00:12:46,480 --> 00:12:49,160
Speaker 1: and those respective cases, those are the only courts that

255
00:12:49,280 --> 00:12:52,439
Speaker 1: might actually do justice. The problem is they don't have

256
00:12:52,520 --> 00:12:54,680
Speaker 1: to take the case. The judges that do have to

257
00:12:54,720 --> 00:12:58,160
Speaker 1: take the case are willing to violate the rules to

258
00:12:58,200 --> 00:13:00,600
Speaker 1: get at Alex Jones, and and doing so they want

259
00:13:00,640 --> 00:13:02,600
Speaker 1: to establish new rules so they can get it the

260
00:13:02,640 --> 00:13:06,320
Speaker 1: rest of us. So it's almost like these judges have

261
00:13:06,400 --> 00:13:08,480
Speaker 1: it out for him to the kind of past case

262
00:13:08,520 --> 00:13:11,720
Speaker 1: that you're making um and if he got another judge

263
00:13:11,760 --> 00:13:14,079
Speaker 1: that was more sympathetic or really want to uphold the

264
00:13:14,160 --> 00:13:17,720
Speaker 1: law regardless of who it's being examined against, maybe he

265
00:13:17,720 --> 00:13:20,600
Speaker 1: could catch a break, but that's not happening. But I

266
00:13:20,600 --> 00:13:23,760
Speaker 1: think what's even more dangerous as to the point you're making,

267
00:13:23,880 --> 00:13:27,520
Speaker 1: is that even though they're ignoring the law, um, once

268
00:13:27,559 --> 00:13:29,800
Speaker 1: they rule this way, then it sets present. So they're

269
00:13:29,800 --> 00:13:31,800
Speaker 1: almost they're ignoring the law. But then if they rule

270
00:13:31,840 --> 00:13:35,440
Speaker 1: this way, they're actually changing the law. That's exactly right, okay,

271
00:13:35,440 --> 00:13:36,880
Speaker 1: And it was what they're going at. They wanted to

272
00:13:36,920 --> 00:13:39,280
Speaker 1: show that they could do a modern day show trial

273
00:13:39,640 --> 00:13:41,480
Speaker 1: and get away with it. And they could do it

274
00:13:41,559 --> 00:13:45,079
Speaker 1: as to someone as well known as Alex stand well despised,

275
00:13:46,080 --> 00:13:49,520
Speaker 1: exact and that, and because today he's well despised, tomorrow

276
00:13:49,559 --> 00:13:51,120
Speaker 1: they'll go to the person who's not as well as

277
00:13:51,240 --> 00:13:53,360
Speaker 1: who may who's just well despised by the wrong people.

278
00:13:53,600 --> 00:13:57,240
Speaker 1: That they'll continue to escalate in the same way, big technic,

279
00:13:57,520 --> 00:13:58,959
Speaker 1: and they'll say, hey, we did this in the Alex

280
00:13:59,000 --> 00:14:00,920
Speaker 1: Jones case, so we can do it to you. So

281
00:14:00,960 --> 00:14:04,560
Speaker 1: they try to find something that has general consensus in

282
00:14:04,640 --> 00:14:07,760
Speaker 1: the community that most people would agree that if this

283
00:14:07,800 --> 00:14:10,760
Speaker 1: guy said mean things about parents losing their kids, everybody

284
00:14:10,760 --> 00:14:13,199
Speaker 1: would agree that's probably not good. And so then they

285
00:14:13,240 --> 00:14:16,040
Speaker 1: take that. Everybody agrees that, well, let's let's prohibit that

286
00:14:16,120 --> 00:14:19,480
Speaker 1: from happening, and so um everyone Nope, nobody wants to

287
00:14:19,480 --> 00:14:21,280
Speaker 1: stand up for it. And they're just okay, seen it

288
00:14:21,320 --> 00:14:24,160
Speaker 1: happened to this bad guy, um, not realizing that their

289
00:14:24,200 --> 00:14:27,360
Speaker 1: next I guess that's exactly right there, that they're signing

290
00:14:27,400 --> 00:14:30,600
Speaker 1: their own death moran. So so there's there's one one

291
00:14:30,840 --> 00:14:32,840
Speaker 1: when when you're talking about it, and I want to

292
00:14:32,920 --> 00:14:35,360
Speaker 1: jump into this later, but just as you're talking about it, um,

293
00:14:35,680 --> 00:14:37,880
Speaker 1: this big takedown that just happened was this Andrew Tate.

294
00:14:38,800 --> 00:14:42,120
Speaker 1: And I was watching part of this interview with Patrick

295
00:14:42,160 --> 00:14:46,640
Speaker 1: by David on Value Tayment, and he was just saying, how, um, look,

296
00:14:46,680 --> 00:14:50,040
Speaker 1: I don't have viewers. I have fans. And the difference

297
00:14:50,120 --> 00:14:52,640
Speaker 1: is my fans will follow me to wherever I go.

298
00:14:53,040 --> 00:14:55,320
Speaker 1: They don't just watch me because I'm there. So Alex Jones,

299
00:14:55,320 --> 00:14:57,440
Speaker 1: he got wiped off the face of the earth, He's

300
00:14:57,440 --> 00:15:00,320
Speaker 1: still alive and well on his main channel, he still

301
00:15:00,320 --> 00:15:03,760
Speaker 1: has millions of people tuning in regularly. Those were fans, right,

302
00:15:03,800 --> 00:15:06,080
Speaker 1: and so Andrew tay said, those are my fans, he said,

303
00:15:06,160 --> 00:15:08,760
Speaker 1: and they don't want me standing up and saying these

304
00:15:08,760 --> 00:15:12,200
Speaker 1: things having fans, and he systematically broke down how all

305
00:15:12,240 --> 00:15:14,440
Speaker 1: these things are trying to accuse him of. We're all

306
00:15:14,480 --> 00:15:17,400
Speaker 1: taken out of context from little snippets or whatever. But anyway,

307
00:15:17,480 --> 00:15:19,280
Speaker 1: I don't want to jump into that the next thing.

308
00:15:19,400 --> 00:15:22,360
Speaker 1: So that's okay. So so Alex Jones, there's taking something

309
00:15:22,400 --> 00:15:24,600
Speaker 1: that's just general consensus and they're using it to chip

310
00:15:24,600 --> 00:15:27,680
Speaker 1: away at freedom of speech. Then we have this Tornado

311
00:15:27,720 --> 00:15:29,160
Speaker 1: Cash and I don't know how much you looked into that,

312
00:15:29,200 --> 00:15:32,400
Speaker 1: but Tornado Cash is a protocol that allows people to

313
00:15:32,440 --> 00:15:38,160
Speaker 1: mix their cryptocurrencies to gain more privacy. Now they say that, well,

314
00:15:38,360 --> 00:15:41,960
Speaker 1: criminals uses, terrorists uses and they could be laundering their

315
00:15:42,000 --> 00:15:44,000
Speaker 1: money and then they're gonna go blow up schools and

316
00:15:44,040 --> 00:15:47,400
Speaker 1: kill a little kids. And of course nobody wants that. Uh,

317
00:15:47,440 --> 00:15:49,240
Speaker 1: I don't I have little kids. I don't want my school,

318
00:15:49,480 --> 00:15:52,560
Speaker 1: my kids school bombed, And so that has general consensus.

319
00:15:52,600 --> 00:15:55,360
Speaker 1: We all agree that's bad. But then they try to

320
00:15:55,400 --> 00:16:00,080
Speaker 1: attack this, uh protocol, a public utility that's been as

321
00:16:00,120 --> 00:16:03,480
Speaker 1: I understand, three times the Supreme Court has upheld that

322
00:16:03,880 --> 00:16:06,960
Speaker 1: encryption as freedom of speech. So it seems to me

323
00:16:06,960 --> 00:16:10,080
Speaker 1: it's an attack on freedom of speech, oh no doubt.

324
00:16:10,160 --> 00:16:12,560
Speaker 1: And and it's freedom of speech at multiple levels. So

325
00:16:13,120 --> 00:16:16,320
Speaker 1: they've often tried to use the monetary or regulatory angle

326
00:16:16,640 --> 00:16:20,280
Speaker 1: to circumus to limit speech. So that's what Citizens United

327
00:16:20,320 --> 00:16:23,320
Speaker 1: was all about. So, like you look at campaign finance reform,

328
00:16:23,440 --> 00:16:26,960
Speaker 1: often campaign finance reform was about making a person get

329
00:16:27,000 --> 00:16:31,400
Speaker 1: the consent approval of an elite donor class. Right, if

330
00:16:31,440 --> 00:16:35,120
Speaker 1: if one person can be the sole donor of a campaign,

331
00:16:35,520 --> 00:16:37,800
Speaker 1: then you can run for office if you don't have

332
00:16:37,840 --> 00:16:39,960
Speaker 1: your own money and you and un let's say you

333
00:16:39,960 --> 00:16:42,280
Speaker 1: don't have the means of crowdfunding back in the day,

334
00:16:42,400 --> 00:16:44,920
Speaker 1: then uh, with just the support of one percent of

335
00:16:44,960 --> 00:16:48,720
Speaker 1: the economic elite. Right, but if you if everybody's limited

336
00:16:48,720 --> 00:16:50,640
Speaker 1: at what they can contribute, they can require you to

337
00:16:50,640 --> 00:16:54,240
Speaker 1: get the consent of twenty of the economic elite because

338
00:16:54,320 --> 00:16:57,440
Speaker 1: it's it becomes its own form of donor control of campaigns.

339
00:16:57,560 --> 00:16:59,960
Speaker 1: And then one part of this was always how can

340
00:17:00,080 --> 00:17:04,040
Speaker 1: of this happened when money? When you cannot have speech

341
00:17:04,160 --> 00:17:06,480
Speaker 1: if you don't spend money on that speech, Right, I

342
00:17:06,480 --> 00:17:09,320
Speaker 1: got a mike here? If suddenly having a mic means

343
00:17:09,359 --> 00:17:11,840
Speaker 1: I don't get the right to speech because it cost

344
00:17:11,880 --> 00:17:13,960
Speaker 1: me money to have the mic, then all of a sudden,

345
00:17:14,000 --> 00:17:15,960
Speaker 1: I lose my right to free speech. Without the freedom

346
00:17:15,960 --> 00:17:20,600
Speaker 1: of payments, there is no freedom, precisely. And so currency

347
00:17:20,800 --> 00:17:24,359
Speaker 1: is power, and the currency is the means by which

348
00:17:24,480 --> 00:17:27,800
Speaker 1: speech is expressed and the means by which speech has heard.

349
00:17:27,880 --> 00:17:30,359
Speaker 1: Which is always important for people to remember that what

350
00:17:30,440 --> 00:17:33,280
Speaker 1: they're trying to do is prohibit our ability to hear

351
00:17:33,440 --> 00:17:37,240
Speaker 1: what we choose to hear. And that's part of free speech.

352
00:17:37,640 --> 00:17:39,600
Speaker 1: It's not just the right to speak, it's the right

353
00:17:39,640 --> 00:17:42,040
Speaker 1: to hear what we want to hear. Freedom of thought,

354
00:17:42,119 --> 00:17:45,399
Speaker 1: freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom of belief, freedom

355
00:17:45,400 --> 00:17:47,960
Speaker 1: of religion, freedom of pressed. That's what they all come

356
00:17:48,000 --> 00:17:50,479
Speaker 1: back to, the right for me to hear what I

357
00:17:50,560 --> 00:17:52,840
Speaker 1: want to hear, not the government to gate keep it

358
00:17:52,880 --> 00:17:55,399
Speaker 1: for me. Uh. And so they were always going to

359
00:17:55,480 --> 00:17:59,040
Speaker 1: go after anybody in the crypto space that they thought

360
00:17:59,119 --> 00:18:01,320
Speaker 1: they could mean that's a lot of what the sec

361
00:18:01,480 --> 00:18:04,640
Speaker 1: actions are. They're trying to convert everything into a secure

362
00:18:04,680 --> 00:18:08,800
Speaker 1: transaction as if it's a publicly traded stock, when that's

363
00:18:08,840 --> 00:18:12,080
Speaker 1: a real reach in my view, they've they've always to

364
00:18:12,560 --> 00:18:15,840
Speaker 1: uh expanded the definition of security to reach things that

365
00:18:15,840 --> 00:18:18,800
Speaker 1: were not originally intended in the legislation. I mean, you

366
00:18:18,840 --> 00:18:21,119
Speaker 1: see it so many different places, the FDA trying to

367
00:18:21,160 --> 00:18:23,480
Speaker 1: regulate medicine, the U. S d A trying to regulate

368
00:18:23,760 --> 00:18:27,840
Speaker 1: little Amish family farmers. Uh. And so the same context

369
00:18:27,880 --> 00:18:30,119
Speaker 1: here is they want to be able to get in

370
00:18:30,160 --> 00:18:34,800
Speaker 1: and restrict your ability to express yourself and have meaningful

371
00:18:34,880 --> 00:18:37,840
Speaker 1: power to have your voice heard and to hear what

372
00:18:37,960 --> 00:18:41,480
Speaker 1: you want to hear by using the disguise that this

373
00:18:41,560 --> 00:18:47,280
Speaker 1: is about monetary control of a financial instrument. Yeah. So um.

374
00:18:47,640 --> 00:18:49,960
Speaker 1: And it's also because of encryption. So I think it's

375
00:18:49,960 --> 00:18:52,199
Speaker 1: the encryption that's been upheld as free speech. It's like

376
00:18:52,240 --> 00:18:53,800
Speaker 1: it's code. They printed it out, they took it to

377
00:18:53,840 --> 00:18:56,440
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court and they said, yeah, that is code. Um.

378
00:18:57,200 --> 00:18:59,680
Speaker 1: And then also the President that this sets too because

379
00:18:59,680 --> 00:19:03,440
Speaker 1: it's a public utility. So typically people are sanctioned or

380
00:19:03,600 --> 00:19:06,160
Speaker 1: nations are sanctioned. Maybe there's some due process there where

381
00:19:06,160 --> 00:19:09,880
Speaker 1: that person could defend themselves maybe, um, But we don't

382
00:19:09,920 --> 00:19:13,040
Speaker 1: have a public utility. So because a criminal drove on

383
00:19:13,080 --> 00:19:16,280
Speaker 1: a road, now we're gonna sanction the road. Because because

384
00:19:16,280 --> 00:19:18,480
Speaker 1: the criminal drove in a car, we're gonna sanction a car.

385
00:19:18,680 --> 00:19:22,399
Speaker 1: Because the criminal used a protocol, then we're gonna sanction

386
00:19:22,400 --> 00:19:26,120
Speaker 1: a protocol. What kind of precedent does that set? All

387
00:19:26,160 --> 00:19:28,159
Speaker 1: of it kind of reflects a broader principle of what

388
00:19:28,200 --> 00:19:31,240
Speaker 1: they allow to have who they allowed to give privacy

389
00:19:31,280 --> 00:19:34,159
Speaker 1: and secrecy to. Right, It's it's always fails, Like I

390
00:19:34,200 --> 00:19:36,160
Speaker 1: always get a kick out of the government that says

391
00:19:36,240 --> 00:19:39,560
Speaker 1: any means of privacy or any means of secrecy will

392
00:19:39,640 --> 00:19:43,400
Speaker 1: be the key for criminals to do bad acts. Yet somehow,

393
00:19:43,480 --> 00:19:46,399
Speaker 1: when it comes to the government privacy and secrecy or

394
00:19:46,440 --> 00:19:50,640
Speaker 1: absolute must we they must have things classified, etcetera. But

395
00:19:50,680 --> 00:19:52,760
Speaker 1: I mean, isn't the same government that told us secrecy

396
00:19:52,840 --> 00:19:57,200
Speaker 1: equals criminality, privacy equals criminality. So the now we it's

397
00:19:57,320 --> 00:20:00,679
Speaker 1: a good transition. It goes into the Trump case. So

398
00:20:00,840 --> 00:20:03,159
Speaker 1: it's like, here you have Trump, but the government is

399
00:20:03,200 --> 00:20:07,399
Speaker 1: asserting that the deep state is asserting that administrative bureaucrats

400
00:20:07,480 --> 00:20:09,720
Speaker 1: you call it, the National Security apparatus, called whatever, the

401
00:20:09,760 --> 00:20:14,280
Speaker 1: administ exactly the administrative state. These are people that have

402
00:20:14,560 --> 00:20:17,400
Speaker 1: only they have no elected constitutional power of their own.

403
00:20:17,840 --> 00:20:20,959
Speaker 1: They're only power comes from the President of the United States.

404
00:20:21,400 --> 00:20:24,560
Speaker 1: And yet they are putting the the former president and

405
00:20:24,680 --> 00:20:28,600
Speaker 1: likely future president of the United States under criminal investigation

406
00:20:29,240 --> 00:20:32,920
Speaker 1: because he chose to keep his own documents on the

407
00:20:32,920 --> 00:20:38,040
Speaker 1: grounds that they the administrative bureaucracy, the deep state, gets

408
00:20:38,040 --> 00:20:41,480
Speaker 1: to gets to decide what is and isn't classified, that

409
00:20:41,560 --> 00:20:45,280
Speaker 1: they decide what isn't isn't a presidential record, that they

410
00:20:45,359 --> 00:20:48,800
Speaker 1: decide what isn't isn't a national security record, that they

411
00:20:48,800 --> 00:20:52,080
Speaker 1: get to decide over the president. And it's someone who

412
00:20:52,080 --> 00:20:55,760
Speaker 1: only has power from the president getting to declare they

413
00:20:55,800 --> 00:20:58,960
Speaker 1: have power over the president. It is an attempt to

414
00:20:59,160 --> 00:21:02,720
Speaker 1: not only criminal eyes political disagreement and use criminal law

415
00:21:02,880 --> 00:21:07,320
Speaker 1: fare to go after their most critical political adversaries, but

416
00:21:07,400 --> 00:21:10,720
Speaker 1: it's an attempt to usurp our entire constitutional system of

417
00:21:10,760 --> 00:21:14,119
Speaker 1: governance so that they get to decide what the people

418
00:21:14,160 --> 00:21:16,359
Speaker 1: get to hear and see, because it's the same version

419
00:21:16,400 --> 00:21:19,280
Speaker 1: of it. That's what classification is all about. Who gets

420
00:21:19,320 --> 00:21:21,520
Speaker 1: to hear it, who gets to see it, who gets

421
00:21:21,560 --> 00:21:23,720
Speaker 1: to know it. That's the decision that's supposed to be

422
00:21:23,760 --> 00:21:28,000
Speaker 1: made exclusively by the president, by the Constitution and by

423
00:21:28,040 --> 00:21:31,640
Speaker 1: prior decisions. Yet they're actually in court arguing that it's

424
00:21:31,640 --> 00:21:33,879
Speaker 1: a crime for the president to have it. It's a

425
00:21:34,000 --> 00:21:36,960
Speaker 1: crime for the president to try to declassify it that

426
00:21:37,119 --> 00:21:40,040
Speaker 1: they the deep state, get to unilaterally decide what do

427
00:21:40,080 --> 00:21:42,720
Speaker 1: people get to see and hear, even though nobody gave

428
00:21:42,760 --> 00:21:46,679
Speaker 1: them that power, not the people, not the Constitution. I

429
00:21:46,760 --> 00:21:49,639
Speaker 1: just I mean hearing that. I just don't see how

430
00:21:49,680 --> 00:21:52,760
Speaker 1: they have any leg to stand on to the point

431
00:21:52,800 --> 00:21:56,359
Speaker 1: that you're making. Uh, there's there's specifically don't have the

432
00:21:56,400 --> 00:21:58,199
Speaker 1: power to do that. They're they're trying to take it,

433
00:21:58,240 --> 00:22:00,760
Speaker 1: but they don't have it, And so what's what what

434
00:22:00,880 --> 00:22:02,320
Speaker 1: lady do they have to stand on? And and I

435
00:22:02,320 --> 00:22:05,320
Speaker 1: guess then in this is this something that's again sort

436
00:22:05,320 --> 00:22:07,840
Speaker 1: of like the show trial. Um, they're taking something that

437
00:22:07,880 --> 00:22:10,720
Speaker 1: maybe has this big unanimous kind of consent. And we'll

438
00:22:10,720 --> 00:22:14,320
Speaker 1: get more into this uh uh framing of these maga

439
00:22:14,359 --> 00:22:16,480
Speaker 1: people will get more into that in a minute. But um,

440
00:22:16,560 --> 00:22:18,919
Speaker 1: does this have any weight at all? Or is it

441
00:22:18,960 --> 00:22:22,119
Speaker 1: similar to like these impeachments that they didn't have a chance.

442
00:22:22,160 --> 00:22:24,240
Speaker 1: Everyone knew they didn't have a chance, it got shut down,

443
00:22:24,280 --> 00:22:26,280
Speaker 1: but they still did it. Anyway, Is it like that

444
00:22:26,440 --> 00:22:30,520
Speaker 1: or is there actually teeth here? There's no legal merits

445
00:22:30,640 --> 00:22:32,480
Speaker 1: at all to their claim. In fact, it's a very

446
00:22:32,480 --> 00:22:35,359
Speaker 1: perilous press that they're trying to set. However, it is

447
00:22:35,400 --> 00:22:38,840
Speaker 1: like the Alex Jones case is, it's another example of

448
00:22:38,880 --> 00:22:42,560
Speaker 1: our judicial brands and our justice system breaking down. There's

449
00:22:42,720 --> 00:22:47,840
Speaker 1: enough rogue prosecutors, enough rogue FBI agents who in a

450
00:22:47,960 --> 00:22:51,000
Speaker 1: DC jury pool because the case is being handled in

451
00:22:51,040 --> 00:22:53,919
Speaker 1: the District of Columbia, which there's problems up to begin with.

452
00:22:54,280 --> 00:22:57,480
Speaker 1: But basically the swamp gets to judge the swamp and

453
00:22:57,520 --> 00:23:00,360
Speaker 1: gets to judge the critics of the swamp. And we've

454
00:23:00,400 --> 00:23:03,119
Speaker 1: already seen in jury trial after jury trial they're just

455
00:23:03,200 --> 00:23:06,800
Speaker 1: politically biased. So they can have somebody completely guilty and

456
00:23:06,800 --> 00:23:09,320
Speaker 1: they let him walk because they like his politics. They

457
00:23:09,320 --> 00:23:12,160
Speaker 1: can have someone completely innocent and they railroad him because

458
00:23:12,200 --> 00:23:15,320
Speaker 1: they dislike his politics. So I say that Martin Luther

459
00:23:15,440 --> 00:23:17,760
Speaker 1: King had a better chance at a fair trial in

460
00:23:17,880 --> 00:23:22,600
Speaker 1: nineteen fifties Birmingham than any MAGA or Trump supporter has

461
00:23:22,640 --> 00:23:25,919
Speaker 1: in the District of Columbia. And so because the the

462
00:23:26,119 --> 00:23:30,800
Speaker 1: d C jurors are the grand jury and the trial jury,

463
00:23:30,840 --> 00:23:33,199
Speaker 1: and you have a lot of weak, need politically corrupt

464
00:23:33,280 --> 00:23:36,119
Speaker 1: judges in the process, that's how this case could somebodyill

465
00:23:36,160 --> 00:23:38,840
Speaker 1: end up in an indictment, which would be utterly insane.

466
00:23:39,119 --> 00:23:42,159
Speaker 1: It would be without legal president, without legal merit. It

467
00:23:42,160 --> 00:23:45,160
Speaker 1: would be the open, overt political weaponization of the criminal

468
00:23:45,200 --> 00:23:49,159
Speaker 1: justice system for a corrupt and competent president to blame

469
00:23:49,320 --> 00:23:52,280
Speaker 1: to actually take out his political opposition. I mean, here

470
00:23:52,320 --> 00:23:57,760
Speaker 1: you have Biden's administration trying to indict the the candidate

471
00:23:57,800 --> 00:24:00,639
Speaker 1: who is leading in the elections against him. This is

472
00:24:00,640 --> 00:24:03,359
Speaker 1: something you hear about from third world nations, but it

473
00:24:03,480 --> 00:24:07,040
Speaker 1: is right now contemporary reality in America. Well, and um,

474
00:24:07,080 --> 00:24:09,760
Speaker 1: when Trump was running against Biden last time in this

475
00:24:09,800 --> 00:24:13,240
Speaker 1: whole Ukraine, call came up and then they he said, fine, here,

476
00:24:13,280 --> 00:24:15,159
Speaker 1: listen to the call or whatever. But they said that

477
00:24:15,200 --> 00:24:18,920
Speaker 1: he was they were trying to go after his opponent, Biden,

478
00:24:19,240 --> 00:24:20,960
Speaker 1: and that was the big deal. How how dare you

479
00:24:21,000 --> 00:24:23,760
Speaker 1: go after your opponent? Right? But now that's exactly what's

480
00:24:23,760 --> 00:24:27,480
Speaker 1: happening here, exactly. They're doing it openly and overtly. It's

481
00:24:27,480 --> 00:24:30,560
Speaker 1: extrait like they complained when Trump was critical of Hillary

482
00:24:30,600 --> 00:24:33,520
Speaker 1: and said she belonged in jail. They complained when he

483
00:24:33,600 --> 00:24:37,200
Speaker 1: was going to expose the Biden corruption in Ukraine the

484
00:24:37,400 --> 00:24:40,080
Speaker 1: UH and and we've seen what that has led to

485
00:24:40,160 --> 00:24:41,960
Speaker 1: in terms of the war in Ukraine and all the

486
00:24:41,960 --> 00:24:44,280
Speaker 1: other problems that we now have under the Biden administration.

487
00:24:44,520 --> 00:24:46,159
Speaker 1: But yeah, I mean it goes even worse than that,

488
00:24:46,280 --> 00:24:49,920
Speaker 1: going to suppressing speech. Uh. They are going after Project

489
00:24:50,000 --> 00:24:54,679
Speaker 1: Veritas for simply getting access to hunter By to Ashley

490
00:24:54,720 --> 00:24:59,920
Speaker 1: Biden's diary concerning very questionable conduct to put it kindly

491
00:25:00,600 --> 00:25:02,800
Speaker 1: of the President of the United States and his own daughter,

492
00:25:02,800 --> 00:25:05,120
Speaker 1: according to his daughter's own words. They're trying to put

493
00:25:05,119 --> 00:25:09,399
Speaker 1: people in prison for simply sharing that information with members

494
00:25:09,400 --> 00:25:11,760
Speaker 1: of the press. And they're trying to put James O'Keefe

495
00:25:11,800 --> 00:25:15,080
Speaker 1: in Project Veritas in prison. Shut down Project Veritas put

496
00:25:15,160 --> 00:25:18,120
Speaker 1: James O'Keefe in prison again after they, you know, wrongfully

497
00:25:18,119 --> 00:25:20,399
Speaker 1: went after him about a decade ago or so. And

498
00:25:20,440 --> 00:25:22,280
Speaker 1: it shows you how nuts it is. And the FBI

499
00:25:22,400 --> 00:25:26,640
Speaker 1: is acting as the private personal Stasi of the incumbent administration,

500
00:25:26,760 --> 00:25:29,879
Speaker 1: the and the deep state apparatus, and their weaponizing the

501
00:25:29,960 --> 00:25:33,680
Speaker 1: legal process in a way we've never witnessed before. And unfortunately,

502
00:25:33,720 --> 00:25:36,439
Speaker 1: so far, the judiciary has been an inadequate check on

503
00:25:36,480 --> 00:25:39,359
Speaker 1: that abusive power. Yeah. Well, and when the and and

504
00:25:39,400 --> 00:25:42,560
Speaker 1: now we're also seeing them frame up the judiciary branch

505
00:25:42,600 --> 00:25:47,000
Speaker 1: as being bad corrupt, outdated, etcetera. So now we see

506
00:25:47,040 --> 00:25:49,840
Speaker 1: these ramped up attacks on the Supreme Court, where the

507
00:25:49,840 --> 00:25:52,880
Speaker 1: Supreme courts an activist court now, and the Supreme Court

508
00:25:52,960 --> 00:25:55,760
Speaker 1: needs to be we need to impeach Clarence Thomas and

509
00:25:55,920 --> 00:25:57,640
Speaker 1: like all these other things. So not only are they

510
00:25:57,760 --> 00:26:01,280
Speaker 1: using this legal system um for their own weaponization, but

511
00:26:01,320 --> 00:26:04,800
Speaker 1: they're also attacking it and breaking down the integrity or

512
00:26:04,800 --> 00:26:07,840
Speaker 1: at least I guess the opinions of people towards that court.

513
00:26:08,720 --> 00:26:11,280
Speaker 1: They're trying anybody that pushes back when the court system

514
00:26:11,280 --> 00:26:14,080
Speaker 1: gets attacked. So the judge that issued a special master

515
00:26:14,280 --> 00:26:17,639
Speaker 1: requirement in the Trump case, which is very common protocol.

516
00:26:17,640 --> 00:26:20,240
Speaker 1: By the way, nothing she did was unusual at all.

517
00:26:20,520 --> 00:26:23,000
Speaker 1: What was unusual as rating the president of the United States.

518
00:26:23,040 --> 00:26:26,480
Speaker 1: That's never been done before ever in American history. What's

519
00:26:26,520 --> 00:26:29,359
Speaker 1: unusual is claiming that the deep state has legal control

520
00:26:29,400 --> 00:26:33,280
Speaker 1: over classification, designation of records, over the president who controls

521
00:26:33,320 --> 00:26:36,040
Speaker 1: them and from whom all authority flows. That's what's unusual

522
00:26:36,040 --> 00:26:40,160
Speaker 1: and unprecedent. What's unusual unprecedent is one administration going after

523
00:26:40,200 --> 00:26:43,439
Speaker 1: their political opponent in such an overt way. Uh, the

524
00:26:43,640 --> 00:26:46,359
Speaker 1: all that's unusual what the district court judge did, would

525
00:26:46,359 --> 00:26:49,160
Speaker 1: simply say, let's have a third party involved, a special master,

526
00:26:49,480 --> 00:26:52,160
Speaker 1: to make sure this is done correctly. And what happens,

527
00:26:52,280 --> 00:26:54,919
Speaker 1: she gets personal death threats. There's people already being arrested

528
00:26:54,960 --> 00:26:58,320
Speaker 1: for it. Where does that come from? Political media press criticism.

529
00:26:58,560 --> 00:27:01,520
Speaker 1: Because they believe that all all tools of power should

530
00:27:01,520 --> 00:27:04,840
Speaker 1: our ends justify the means that they will weaponize any tool,

531
00:27:04,960 --> 00:27:09,120
Speaker 1: and anybody who doesn't go along gets attacked, even if

532
00:27:09,160 --> 00:27:12,400
Speaker 1: you're the most well established justice of the most well

533
00:27:12,520 --> 00:27:16,120
Speaker 1: established legal institution in the world, in Clarence Thomas. Their

534
00:27:16,160 --> 00:27:17,960
Speaker 1: their point of Clarence Thomas is if we can go

535
00:27:18,040 --> 00:27:20,800
Speaker 1: after him, we can go after anybody. So you better

536
00:27:20,840 --> 00:27:23,200
Speaker 1: play ball and do what we we demand you do

537
00:27:23,640 --> 00:27:26,160
Speaker 1: and ignore the law and weaponize it for our political

538
00:27:26,160 --> 00:27:29,120
Speaker 1: purposes or your own personal and professional careers. At stake

539
00:27:32,000 --> 00:27:36,760
Speaker 1: man breakdown of our institutions at the at the highest

540
00:27:36,840 --> 00:27:40,320
Speaker 1: level and at the fastest pace that I could imagine

541
00:27:40,359 --> 00:27:43,240
Speaker 1: ever seeing this. I was really shocked when we saw

542
00:27:43,280 --> 00:27:45,520
Speaker 1: the leak at the Supreme Court on the Roe v.

543
00:27:45,680 --> 00:27:49,199
Speaker 1: Wade situation. And so we have the highest institution, the

544
00:27:49,240 --> 00:27:54,040
Speaker 1: highest court in the land, and an activist Obviously an

545
00:27:54,080 --> 00:27:57,000
Speaker 1: activist leaked this because it was a very sensitive information

546
00:27:57,119 --> 00:28:01,160
Speaker 1: on one side, right, um, very polarized thing that was leaked,

547
00:28:01,200 --> 00:28:03,879
Speaker 1: and that was a complete breakdown of trust in the

548
00:28:03,960 --> 00:28:07,080
Speaker 1: high institution. But then um, the Supreme Court had also

549
00:28:07,200 --> 00:28:11,240
Speaker 1: rolled back some policies I believe on like on on guns,

550
00:28:11,400 --> 00:28:15,280
Speaker 1: concealed carriers, etcetera. The State of California hated that, was

551
00:28:15,400 --> 00:28:18,199
Speaker 1: very open about that. The Governor of California and the

552
00:28:18,200 --> 00:28:20,440
Speaker 1: head of the d o J, the d A said

553
00:28:20,480 --> 00:28:22,359
Speaker 1: that they were a g said that they were going

554
00:28:22,400 --> 00:28:25,399
Speaker 1: to do everything possible to overturn that. And then like

555
00:28:25,440 --> 00:28:29,240
Speaker 1: a week later, all the records just mysteriously got leaked

556
00:28:29,280 --> 00:28:33,159
Speaker 1: in California. Like we're witnessing, uh, the breakdown of the

557
00:28:33,280 --> 00:28:37,240
Speaker 1: highest level of institutions in the land completely. And it's

558
00:28:37,240 --> 00:28:40,880
Speaker 1: it's part of a generational shift that the new generation

559
00:28:40,880 --> 00:28:42,880
Speaker 1: of power, the new Left. I tell people, if you

560
00:28:42,920 --> 00:28:46,240
Speaker 1: want to comparison, don't look to the nineteen sixties for

561
00:28:46,280 --> 00:28:48,840
Speaker 1: the mindset of the new Left that it looked to

562
00:28:48,880 --> 00:28:52,920
Speaker 1: the nineteen thirties. It's very much a status goal and

563
00:28:53,000 --> 00:28:55,840
Speaker 1: it's very much that the ends justify the means, so

564
00:28:56,000 --> 00:28:58,400
Speaker 1: and that they've been taught this in various ways from

565
00:28:58,400 --> 00:29:02,320
Speaker 1: the time they've grown up throughout their educational institutions. These

566
00:29:02,400 --> 00:29:05,960
Speaker 1: slow march through the institutions, as Gramcy called it, the

567
00:29:06,200 --> 00:29:09,760
Speaker 1: sort of Marxist objective to take over society from within

568
00:29:10,400 --> 00:29:14,840
Speaker 1: has effectively taken place in America's educational and cultural institutions.

569
00:29:15,120 --> 00:29:17,320
Speaker 1: That's why our films are such crap, you know, That's

570
00:29:17,320 --> 00:29:21,200
Speaker 1: why our TV shows, I mean couple one after the other.

571
00:29:21,200 --> 00:29:23,720
Speaker 1: I mean, they destroyed Star Wars, they destroy Star Trek,

572
00:29:23,760 --> 00:29:26,320
Speaker 1: they destroyed Marvel. I mean that because they're going through

573
00:29:26,320 --> 00:29:28,040
Speaker 1: one after the next, after the next. Now they're going

574
00:29:28,080 --> 00:29:30,320
Speaker 1: after a little Mermaid. It's gonna be one thing or

575
00:29:30,360 --> 00:29:33,320
Speaker 1: the next. It's because they want to culturally control the

576
00:29:33,400 --> 00:29:36,120
Speaker 1: minds of the populace and the people of this new

577
00:29:36,160 --> 00:29:39,560
Speaker 1: generation that says the ends justify the means that free

578
00:29:39,560 --> 00:29:42,920
Speaker 1: speech is actually bad because free speech is dangerous speech,

579
00:29:43,000 --> 00:29:46,760
Speaker 1: free speech is harmful speech, free speeches hurtful speech. So

580
00:29:46,840 --> 00:29:48,760
Speaker 1: these are people who grew up in you know, Uh,

581
00:29:48,960 --> 00:29:51,520
Speaker 1: my niece went to Toughs where they had ninety four

582
00:29:51,560 --> 00:29:53,720
Speaker 1: different safe spaces, and I was like, nobody at Toughs

583
00:29:53,800 --> 00:29:55,920
Speaker 1: even disagrees with one another. What do you need ninety

584
00:29:56,000 --> 00:29:59,000
Speaker 1: four safe spaces? And it's just one after the other.

585
00:29:59,080 --> 00:30:02,200
Speaker 1: And it's that kind of mindset that is now in

586
00:30:02,320 --> 00:30:05,800
Speaker 1: places of power within the press, within the academy, and

587
00:30:05,840 --> 00:30:08,400
Speaker 1: within this and within the government at multiple levels of

588
00:30:08,440 --> 00:30:12,200
Speaker 1: the bureaucracy. And they're trying to weaponize everything around them.

589
00:30:12,600 --> 00:30:15,480
Speaker 1: And that's why they want to use these test case examples,

590
00:30:15,520 --> 00:30:18,800
Speaker 1: whether it's Alex Jones or Trump, to see how much

591
00:30:18,840 --> 00:30:22,560
Speaker 1: can they just purely politically weaponize the process, ignore all

592
00:30:22,600 --> 00:30:25,880
Speaker 1: of our customs, all of our traditions, all of our rules,

593
00:30:26,000 --> 00:30:29,600
Speaker 1: all of our respect for law, all of our constitutional constraints.

594
00:30:29,840 --> 00:30:33,000
Speaker 1: Can they just eviscerate them so that they can achieve

595
00:30:33,040 --> 00:30:35,960
Speaker 1: and attain their objective and use the any tool of

596
00:30:36,040 --> 00:30:38,800
Speaker 1: power they have around them, whether it's a human resources

597
00:30:38,880 --> 00:30:42,440
Speaker 1: or advertising department at a company, or it's an administrative

598
00:30:42,440 --> 00:30:47,320
Speaker 1: bureaucracy or local state court bench to get their political objectives.

599
00:30:47,640 --> 00:30:50,719
Speaker 1: And that and we are living, without doubt in very

600
00:30:50,800 --> 00:30:55,480
Speaker 1: interesting times. Yeah, to say the least. So you said,

601
00:30:55,520 --> 00:31:00,080
Speaker 1: this is similar to the nineteen thirties, So sometimes I

602
00:31:00,160 --> 00:31:01,960
Speaker 1: have to try it. It's like let me let me,

603
00:31:02,040 --> 00:31:03,840
Speaker 1: let me think about this logically, let me let me

604
00:31:03,880 --> 00:31:06,320
Speaker 1: look at this at a at a historical lens um.

605
00:31:06,480 --> 00:31:08,440
Speaker 1: There's many times throughout history where things have been much

606
00:31:08,440 --> 00:31:11,920
Speaker 1: worse than they are today, um um, from from every

607
00:31:11,920 --> 00:31:14,280
Speaker 1: different angle we want to look at um. And so

608
00:31:14,320 --> 00:31:16,400
Speaker 1: you said this is similar to the nineteen thirties. Another

609
00:31:16,440 --> 00:31:18,320
Speaker 1: thing I look at is again back to kind of

610
00:31:18,360 --> 00:31:21,240
Speaker 1: my original statement of a war of information. And so

611
00:31:21,360 --> 00:31:23,920
Speaker 1: they need to control the narrative. The Internet has caused

612
00:31:23,920 --> 00:31:26,000
Speaker 1: them to lose that narrative because now we can all

613
00:31:26,040 --> 00:31:29,200
Speaker 1: converse without their mainstream media. Now we see the rise

614
00:31:29,280 --> 00:31:33,840
Speaker 1: of the alternative news sources that are, you know, beating

615
00:31:33,840 --> 00:31:36,160
Speaker 1: them in every angle. The Joe Rogans gained two hundred

616
00:31:36,160 --> 00:31:39,880
Speaker 1: million views, um, etcetera. And so if they're not able

617
00:31:39,920 --> 00:31:43,000
Speaker 1: to control that, like and Alex Jones, they did delete

618
00:31:43,080 --> 00:31:44,840
Speaker 1: him off the face of the earth, but yet he's

619
00:31:44,840 --> 00:31:47,800
Speaker 1: still alive. So then well what comes next? So I

620
00:31:47,840 --> 00:31:50,240
Speaker 1: guess sue him into oblivion. That's kind of the point

621
00:31:50,240 --> 00:31:52,560
Speaker 1: that you made earlier. But also if you look back

622
00:31:52,560 --> 00:31:55,280
Speaker 1: in the US history, twice in the last hundred years,

623
00:31:55,640 --> 00:31:58,800
Speaker 1: they've made it illegal to say anything critical of the state.

624
00:31:58,880 --> 00:32:03,160
Speaker 1: Right was one the Smith Act, the Sedition Act, and

625
00:32:03,240 --> 00:32:05,320
Speaker 1: so they could just say it's a crime to say

626
00:32:05,360 --> 00:32:08,680
Speaker 1: anything critical, and they've done it before. Do you see

627
00:32:08,680 --> 00:32:10,480
Speaker 1: that being a reality or a danger or is there

628
00:32:10,480 --> 00:32:13,360
Speaker 1: anything that I'm missing in that historical lens. Well, that's

629
00:32:13,360 --> 00:32:16,120
Speaker 1: where the January six cases are very dangerous, as well

630
00:32:16,120 --> 00:32:18,200
Speaker 1: as some of the Trump cases, because what they're trying

631
00:32:18,200 --> 00:32:21,600
Speaker 1: to do is re invoke the specter of the Sedition Act.

632
00:32:22,040 --> 00:32:24,160
Speaker 1: So the Sedition Act for people that don't know what

633
00:32:24,440 --> 00:32:26,760
Speaker 1: you know, was pasted during World War One, and it

634
00:32:26,800 --> 00:32:29,560
Speaker 1: was utilized, and it was a different variation. We first

635
00:32:29,560 --> 00:32:32,600
Speaker 1: tried the alien and sedition laws back in the right

636
00:32:32,640 --> 00:32:35,560
Speaker 1: at the beginning of the founding of the country. Rightfully,

637
00:32:35,560 --> 00:32:39,360
Speaker 1: our core founding generation got it stopped and reversed so

638
00:32:39,400 --> 00:32:42,720
Speaker 1: that it never came back again. And and and it took,

639
00:32:42,800 --> 00:32:45,240
Speaker 1: you know, about two hundred years before it actually came

640
00:32:45,240 --> 00:32:47,280
Speaker 1: back again in one way, shape or form. But it

641
00:32:47,280 --> 00:32:49,960
Speaker 1: took at least a hundred years before hundred twenty years

642
00:32:50,000 --> 00:32:52,240
Speaker 1: or so before it came back at all. And what

643
00:32:52,280 --> 00:32:55,120
Speaker 1: happened was during World War One, people forget A presidential

644
00:32:55,160 --> 00:32:58,840
Speaker 1: candidate was actually put in prison, Eugene V. Debs for

645
00:32:59,000 --> 00:33:02,040
Speaker 1: saying for only for speech, he said he was opposed

646
00:33:02,040 --> 00:33:04,760
Speaker 1: to World War One and you opposed the draft. They

647
00:33:04,760 --> 00:33:06,400
Speaker 1: called that sedition. They locked him up, they put him

648
00:33:06,400 --> 00:33:09,920
Speaker 1: in federal prison. So they're looking to that. And when

649
00:33:09,960 --> 00:33:12,520
Speaker 1: I started hearing talk in the January six cases of

650
00:33:12,920 --> 00:33:15,560
Speaker 1: rather than treating it as a jet, a basic trespass

651
00:33:15,760 --> 00:33:18,760
Speaker 1: riot case, which is what almost all of the alleged

652
00:33:18,800 --> 00:33:21,520
Speaker 1: criminal conduct could be labeled as. And there's a lot

653
00:33:21,560 --> 00:33:24,400
Speaker 1: of peculiarities about how everything came about in that context,

654
00:33:24,400 --> 00:33:27,800
Speaker 1: why the security was strangely missing, why some security people

655
00:33:27,840 --> 00:33:32,080
Speaker 1: were engaged in provocative behavior at attacking the crowd. Uh,

656
00:33:32,120 --> 00:33:33,800
Speaker 1: you know, the a lot of people that went in

657
00:33:33,840 --> 00:33:36,040
Speaker 1: there didn't realize it was illegal because they showed up

658
00:33:36,120 --> 00:33:38,680
Speaker 1: later and the doors were opened and they're walking around.

659
00:33:38,760 --> 00:33:40,600
Speaker 1: So there's all those issues. There's whether or not the

660
00:33:40,600 --> 00:33:43,120
Speaker 1: government was completely turns out like over seventy or eighty

661
00:33:43,440 --> 00:33:46,960
Speaker 1: undercover Feds were part of the crowd from various information

662
00:33:46,960 --> 00:33:48,720
Speaker 1: that's already come out, So there's a lot of reason

663
00:33:48,800 --> 00:33:51,760
Speaker 1: to be suspect about what really happened that day. But

664
00:33:51,840 --> 00:33:55,440
Speaker 1: putting that aside, even in the worst case interpretation of it,

665
00:33:55,760 --> 00:33:58,719
Speaker 1: the behavior is behavior that is just your old school

666
00:33:58,760 --> 00:34:02,560
Speaker 1: trespass rioty, disturbing the peace kind of crimes. This happens

667
00:34:02,560 --> 00:34:05,920
Speaker 1: on a regular basis throughout America. Usually it's almost always

668
00:34:05,960 --> 00:34:08,360
Speaker 1: the left doing it. You know, taking over a government

669
00:34:08,400 --> 00:34:11,399
Speaker 1: building that was prominent throughout the nineteen sixties, all those

670
00:34:11,440 --> 00:34:14,719
Speaker 1: things that's you know, it's disturbing the the piece, it's

671
00:34:14,760 --> 00:34:17,439
Speaker 1: a trespass, etcetera. And then all of a sudden start

672
00:34:17,440 --> 00:34:22,040
Speaker 1: talking about sedition and obstruction and conspiracy, and I was like,

673
00:34:22,200 --> 00:34:25,480
Speaker 1: whoa that. What that is attempting to do is to

674
00:34:25,680 --> 00:34:28,840
Speaker 1: use the January six cases, because it's another example where

675
00:34:29,040 --> 00:34:31,080
Speaker 1: it's the District of Columbia. So you got a corrupt

676
00:34:31,120 --> 00:34:33,640
Speaker 1: jury pull at the grand jury level, corrupt jury pull

677
00:34:33,719 --> 00:34:36,160
Speaker 1: at the trial level. A lot of judges who are

678
00:34:36,280 --> 00:34:38,320
Speaker 1: part of the swamp don't want to judge and govern

679
00:34:38,360 --> 00:34:41,440
Speaker 1: and discipline the swamp. The prosecutors are all connected to

680
00:34:41,440 --> 00:34:44,440
Speaker 1: the swamp. Uh, So you have a very corrupted system

681
00:34:44,440 --> 00:34:46,279
Speaker 1: of justice. And they want to take what they're doing

682
00:34:46,280 --> 00:34:49,680
Speaker 1: in the District of Columbia and export it everywhere across America.

683
00:34:50,239 --> 00:34:53,239
Speaker 1: And that's scary problem number one. Scary problem number two

684
00:34:53,280 --> 00:34:56,120
Speaker 1: is they're using the sedition laws to start to expand

685
00:34:56,120 --> 00:34:59,120
Speaker 1: the prosecution. And sedition laws are basically just speech laws.

686
00:34:59,320 --> 00:35:01,840
Speaker 1: They really are day that you engaged in a certain

687
00:35:01,880 --> 00:35:07,399
Speaker 1: public protest or public speech or other conduct, and consequently

688
00:35:07,400 --> 00:35:08,960
Speaker 1: we're going to call it a crime you can serve

689
00:35:09,000 --> 00:35:11,040
Speaker 1: the rest of your life in federal prison for because

690
00:35:11,040 --> 00:35:14,320
Speaker 1: we don't like the purpose upset speech. I've always considered

691
00:35:14,320 --> 00:35:17,240
Speaker 1: the sedition laws laws that are unconstitutional and never should

692
00:35:17,239 --> 00:35:19,480
Speaker 1: have been allowed to exist in the first place. We

693
00:35:19,560 --> 00:35:21,640
Speaker 1: have we already have criminal laws for treason. We have

694
00:35:21,680 --> 00:35:24,960
Speaker 1: criminal laws for everything on under the earth. Uh that

695
00:35:25,000 --> 00:35:27,840
Speaker 1: could possibly be a crime. We don't need to create

696
00:35:27,920 --> 00:35:30,040
Speaker 1: new criminal laws that can be used to target and

697
00:35:30,080 --> 00:35:33,359
Speaker 1: punished protests. But that's exactly what this is. And and

698
00:35:33,400 --> 00:35:36,719
Speaker 1: that and so that that old sedition president is now

699
00:35:36,840 --> 00:35:40,320
Speaker 1: coming back for the first time in about a century

700
00:35:40,360 --> 00:35:43,720
Speaker 1: a hundred years by the in the January six cases,

701
00:35:43,760 --> 00:35:45,600
Speaker 1: and that would be something to watch because they want

702
00:35:45,640 --> 00:35:48,400
Speaker 1: to use those cases to establish a new precedent that

703
00:35:48,400 --> 00:35:52,239
Speaker 1: they can accuse anyone that is a has unapproved opinions

704
00:35:52,280 --> 00:35:56,200
Speaker 1: that they consider threatning to the government's well being as sedition,

705
00:35:57,440 --> 00:36:01,480
Speaker 1: which is super scary. Um. But I guess also I'm

706
00:36:01,520 --> 00:36:03,799
Speaker 1: always trying to find a sliver of hope here. Um,

707
00:36:04,160 --> 00:36:07,960
Speaker 1: we saw these Druconian measures and these crazy laws. To

708
00:36:08,000 --> 00:36:10,640
Speaker 1: your point, I wasn't aware, but a presidential candidate went

709
00:36:10,680 --> 00:36:14,160
Speaker 1: to prison over speech. Um. But then it got repealed

710
00:36:14,640 --> 00:36:17,279
Speaker 1: and things got better. So we've seen things like this

711
00:36:17,360 --> 00:36:20,640
Speaker 1: go in before and get overturned. We're going back down

712
00:36:20,680 --> 00:36:25,200
Speaker 1: the same road again. Um. It's scary, but maybe it

713
00:36:25,280 --> 00:36:28,359
Speaker 1: gets overturned again at some point. Well, I I think

714
00:36:28,360 --> 00:36:30,640
Speaker 1: it's up to the people. I think the one restraining

715
00:36:30,680 --> 00:36:32,880
Speaker 1: all of these cases, whether it's the Alex Jones cases,

716
00:36:32,960 --> 00:36:37,160
Speaker 1: Donald Trump case, the January six cases, that the cryptocurrency

717
00:36:37,520 --> 00:36:41,000
Speaker 1: area related cases, is it. It's all gonna be. It's

718
00:36:41,040 --> 00:36:44,080
Speaker 1: all only gonna change if the courts have either the

719
00:36:44,160 --> 00:36:46,919
Speaker 1: confidence or the courage to step forward, and that's only

720
00:36:46,960 --> 00:36:50,719
Speaker 1: going to happen, or the legislature has the ability and

721
00:36:50,800 --> 00:36:53,560
Speaker 1: willingness to step forward. That's only gonna happen if the

722
00:36:53,560 --> 00:36:56,880
Speaker 1: court of public opinion is sufficiently outrage. So when this

723
00:36:57,000 --> 00:36:59,520
Speaker 1: was tried by corrupt actors in the yearly eighteen hundreds

724
00:36:59,520 --> 00:37:02,680
Speaker 1: into the and Sedition Acts, it was public outrage that

725
00:37:02,760 --> 00:37:04,920
Speaker 1: led to the repeal of those laws. When it was

726
00:37:04,960 --> 00:37:06,799
Speaker 1: done to Eugen v. Debs, and then we had the

727
00:37:06,800 --> 00:37:11,120
Speaker 1: Palmer raids in nineteen nineteen. The the Jager Hoover used

728
00:37:11,120 --> 00:37:14,440
Speaker 1: all of these political oriented cases to rise to power

729
00:37:14,440 --> 00:37:17,360
Speaker 1: and create the independent FBI that now is one of

730
00:37:17,400 --> 00:37:20,840
Speaker 1: the most corrupt institutions in American law enforcement and the

731
00:37:20,920 --> 00:37:24,160
Speaker 1: and the whole justice system. What there was enough public

732
00:37:24,239 --> 00:37:27,440
Speaker 1: outrage in the nineteen twenties and nineteen thirties that all

733
00:37:27,480 --> 00:37:29,719
Speaker 1: got repealed and pushed back in the deep state drew

734
00:37:29,760 --> 00:37:32,479
Speaker 1: back the nineteen seventies the same thing. I mean, after

735
00:37:32,480 --> 00:37:35,640
Speaker 1: we had when can it be assassinated? Another Kennedy assassinated,

736
00:37:35,640 --> 00:37:39,879
Speaker 1: a king, assassinated, Malcolm X assassinated, a president taken out

737
00:37:39,920 --> 00:37:43,040
Speaker 1: in Nixon, then that's when there was enough public outrage

738
00:37:43,080 --> 00:37:45,239
Speaker 1: about what's going on in our government that led to

739
00:37:45,320 --> 00:37:50,279
Speaker 1: the mk Ultra investigations, the assassination investigations, exposing the Deep State,

740
00:37:50,360 --> 00:37:53,920
Speaker 1: exposing the CIA, exposing the NSA, exposing the FBI with

741
00:37:54,040 --> 00:37:56,400
Speaker 1: cointel pro due to the thing that media, So it

742
00:37:56,800 --> 00:37:59,000
Speaker 1: always comes back to the same thing. It's the power

743
00:37:59,000 --> 00:38:01,280
Speaker 1: and the will of the people, because it's the fifth

744
00:38:01,280 --> 00:38:04,160
Speaker 1: pillar power under all the other pillars of power. If

745
00:38:04,200 --> 00:38:08,759
Speaker 1: public perception falls, then the whole system falls. So it's

746
00:38:08,880 --> 00:38:12,520
Speaker 1: very matrix is in that respect, and so it's the

747
00:38:12,680 --> 00:38:14,840
Speaker 1: best way to defeat the system. The best way to

748
00:38:14,880 --> 00:38:18,120
Speaker 1: stop these abuses is to take the red pill and

749
00:38:18,160 --> 00:38:21,319
Speaker 1: give it to everybody else. And if enough people get it, enough,

750
00:38:21,360 --> 00:38:24,479
Speaker 1: people share it enough, people speak out about it, that's

751
00:38:24,520 --> 00:38:28,960
Speaker 1: when things will change. Yeah, I was as as you

752
00:38:29,040 --> 00:38:31,600
Speaker 1: were talking about this, I was thinking about this. UM.

753
00:38:31,600 --> 00:38:33,239
Speaker 1: I was trying to find the number here, but I

754
00:38:33,280 --> 00:38:36,920
Speaker 1: can't remember top of my head. But this was January.

755
00:38:38,160 --> 00:38:40,480
Speaker 1: The House of Representatives and later the Senate began reviewing

756
00:38:40,480 --> 00:38:43,440
Speaker 1: a document entitled Communist Goals for taking Over America to

757
00:38:43,560 --> 00:38:46,640
Speaker 1: contained an agenda of forty five separate issues, UM that

758
00:38:46,680 --> 00:38:52,000
Speaker 1: in hindsight were quite shocking and then equally setting today. So, UM,

759
00:38:53,239 --> 00:38:55,920
Speaker 1: I forget who the president was, maybe was was whoever

760
00:38:56,040 --> 00:38:57,960
Speaker 1: that was like taking on communism, and then there was

761
00:38:57,960 --> 00:39:01,359
Speaker 1: the McCarthy era whatever. So anyway, UM, on January tenth,

762
00:39:01,960 --> 00:39:03,839
Speaker 1: the House Represents received this document and they had these

763
00:39:03,880 --> 00:39:06,920
Speaker 1: forty five declared goals of communism. Uh, many of these

764
00:39:07,239 --> 00:39:09,640
Speaker 1: what we've seen all over the place, but one of

765
00:39:09,680 --> 00:39:12,280
Speaker 1: which I forget, it's down like number thirty or forty

766
00:39:12,600 --> 00:39:16,920
Speaker 1: was to discredit and destroy the FBI, like lose all

767
00:39:16,960 --> 00:39:20,120
Speaker 1: credibility of the FBI. Um and and that's kind of

768
00:39:20,120 --> 00:39:22,919
Speaker 1: where we're at right now, that's what we're seeing. Yeah,

769
00:39:22,920 --> 00:39:24,760
Speaker 1: I mean, the FBI has managed to do it to itself.

770
00:39:25,160 --> 00:39:27,279
Speaker 1: So you had the fiddle Bureau of Investigation created by

771
00:39:27,360 --> 00:39:31,520
Speaker 1: Jaeger Hoover, and it was always had a political bias,

772
00:39:31,560 --> 00:39:35,200
Speaker 1: but it was political bias, wasn't a partisan bias. And

773
00:39:35,239 --> 00:39:37,680
Speaker 1: that's what's changed now the FB. Like I just saw

774
00:39:37,719 --> 00:39:42,080
Speaker 1: a Harvard poll yesterday, more than half of Republicans don't like,

775
00:39:42,400 --> 00:39:47,319
Speaker 1: don't trust, don't respect the FBI. That's unimaginable just five

776
00:39:47,400 --> 00:39:51,000
Speaker 1: years ago. The biggest defenders of the FBI have been

777
00:39:51,040 --> 00:39:55,440
Speaker 1: your historical conservative Republican in America. But what they've witnessed

778
00:39:55,440 --> 00:39:57,360
Speaker 1: over the lad and this is where they've made mistakes.

779
00:39:57,600 --> 00:40:01,640
Speaker 1: They've overreached. Like if they had had limited themselves to

780
00:40:01,960 --> 00:40:05,080
Speaker 1: just uh, the January six cases, they might have got

781
00:40:05,120 --> 00:40:08,120
Speaker 1: away with it without much public scrutiny or blowback. But

782
00:40:08,160 --> 00:40:10,600
Speaker 1: when you go after Donald Trump, a man who just

783
00:40:10,640 --> 00:40:13,800
Speaker 1: won seventy five million votes, a man who's the leading

784
00:40:13,840 --> 00:40:17,239
Speaker 1: candidate to get the presidency in four a man who

785
00:40:17,239 --> 00:40:20,160
Speaker 1: has a has a the strongest base of any American

786
00:40:20,239 --> 00:40:24,080
Speaker 1: politician in the country and quite sometime since probably Ronald Reagan,

787
00:40:24,360 --> 00:40:26,920
Speaker 1: and the depth and intensity of support of his audience,

788
00:40:27,160 --> 00:40:29,759
Speaker 1: of his of his fans, going back to that he

789
00:40:29,760 --> 00:40:33,400
Speaker 1: he doesn't have viewers, Donald Trump has fans. Um that

790
00:40:33,400 --> 00:40:36,600
Speaker 1: that has backfired on them politically, and and it's where

791
00:40:36,640 --> 00:40:39,680
Speaker 1: if they were smart, they would care about their public

792
00:40:39,719 --> 00:40:42,960
Speaker 1: perception and step back from this. But you have some

793
00:40:43,280 --> 00:40:45,880
Speaker 1: The most dangerous thing we faced currently is that the

794
00:40:46,000 --> 00:40:48,279
Speaker 1: court of public opinion might not always be a check

795
00:40:48,360 --> 00:40:52,319
Speaker 1: on these folks because they show a lack of self restraint. Uh,

796
00:40:52,360 --> 00:40:54,440
Speaker 1: they show a lack of regard for the fact that

797
00:40:54,480 --> 00:40:58,399
Speaker 1: they are being publicly lambasted for their bad acts, and

798
00:40:58,440 --> 00:41:00,640
Speaker 1: that makes them more dangerous probably than they ever have

799
00:41:00,760 --> 00:41:03,000
Speaker 1: been before. Yeah, it's it's actually worse than that. And

800
00:41:03,000 --> 00:41:04,360
Speaker 1: this kind of leads me to the next topic I

801
00:41:04,360 --> 00:41:07,719
Speaker 1: want to jump into, which is um in the court

802
00:41:07,719 --> 00:41:10,440
Speaker 1: of public opinion. To your point, maybe doesn't matter to

803
00:41:10,480 --> 00:41:13,160
Speaker 1: them anymore because exactly what we're hearing in the United States,

804
00:41:13,160 --> 00:41:15,200
Speaker 1: but also I saw it come out of Europe yesterday,

805
00:41:15,440 --> 00:41:17,399
Speaker 1: but we'll talk about that. But basically, what we're seeing

806
00:41:17,400 --> 00:41:21,320
Speaker 1: in the United States? Is that? Uh? Per Biden's speech,

807
00:41:22,000 --> 00:41:24,719
Speaker 1: he gave two speeches. He gave one the one with

808
00:41:24,760 --> 00:41:26,520
Speaker 1: the red background of the Marines in the background. The

809
00:41:26,560 --> 00:41:29,200
Speaker 1: one before that a few days before he said, Oh,

810
00:41:29,239 --> 00:41:31,719
Speaker 1: you Second Amendment supporters, what chance do you think you

811
00:41:31,760 --> 00:41:34,439
Speaker 1: have against us? We have s six teens. So he's

812
00:41:34,680 --> 00:41:39,800
Speaker 1: threatening Americans. That's pretty bold. But what I see angling

813
00:41:39,880 --> 00:41:43,240
Speaker 1: from that is, um, he's basically saying, all you guys,

814
00:41:43,280 --> 00:41:47,000
Speaker 1: your extremist with your views, Um, you have no chance.

815
00:41:47,120 --> 00:41:50,319
Speaker 1: And he's demoralizing people, say you better just stand down,

816
00:41:50,360 --> 00:41:52,800
Speaker 1: you stand no chance. Then went into the next speech

817
00:41:53,680 --> 00:41:57,799
Speaker 1: singling out MAGA Republicans and they're the threat, They're the

818
00:41:57,840 --> 00:42:02,759
Speaker 1: biggest danger, demonizing them, angling to the point where I

819
00:42:02,800 --> 00:42:05,279
Speaker 1: think it's setting up for this indictment because what they're

820
00:42:05,280 --> 00:42:08,520
Speaker 1: trying to do is demoralized people, discredit people, and make

821
00:42:08,760 --> 00:42:11,880
Speaker 1: magat people the worst. So nobody's gonna want to stand

822
00:42:11,960 --> 00:42:15,040
Speaker 1: up formatt Well, I'm against what you're doing, but I

823
00:42:15,080 --> 00:42:16,839
Speaker 1: don't want to stand up for MAGA because you've said

824
00:42:16,840 --> 00:42:20,800
Speaker 1: MAGA is bad. But even worse than that, they're saying

825
00:42:20,880 --> 00:42:26,160
Speaker 1: that it's a threat to our democracy. And so they asked, uh,

826
00:42:26,239 --> 00:42:28,920
Speaker 1: I saw. A question was asked of the White House

827
00:42:28,920 --> 00:42:31,200
Speaker 1: Press Secretary Koree G. Pierre I think her name is,

828
00:42:31,200 --> 00:42:36,279
Speaker 1: and they said, so, what what what defines this extremist?

829
00:42:36,440 --> 00:42:38,440
Speaker 1: She said, Well, in extremist is anyone that doesn't go

830
00:42:38,480 --> 00:42:44,240
Speaker 1: along with the mainstream ideas. And so what they're saying is, um,

831
00:42:44,280 --> 00:42:46,359
Speaker 1: it's a threat to our democracy if you don't like

832
00:42:46,440 --> 00:42:48,120
Speaker 1: what we say. So back to the point that you

833
00:42:48,239 --> 00:42:51,600
Speaker 1: made the court, the court of public opinion. Anyone in

834
00:42:51,600 --> 00:42:53,200
Speaker 1: the public opinion doesn't agree with and they say, well,

835
00:42:53,200 --> 00:42:54,920
Speaker 1: you're a threat to democrat you're not going along with

836
00:42:55,000 --> 00:42:57,640
Speaker 1: mainstream even though Biden has a thirty eight percent approval ratings,

837
00:42:57,680 --> 00:43:00,279
Speaker 1: So we could argue who who is mainstream? But um,

838
00:43:00,320 --> 00:43:02,680
Speaker 1: that's a very dangerous president where they could ignore public

839
00:43:02,680 --> 00:43:04,719
Speaker 1: perception because they don't agree with what we want. So

840
00:43:04,760 --> 00:43:08,080
Speaker 1: it must be a threat to the democracy. It's very

841
00:43:08,120 --> 00:43:12,000
Speaker 1: much sort of safe space ideology now being expressed in

842
00:43:12,000 --> 00:43:14,960
Speaker 1: institutions of power. So it's it's the This is a

843
00:43:15,000 --> 00:43:17,200
Speaker 1: whole generation of people who have grown up believing that

844
00:43:17,280 --> 00:43:21,080
Speaker 1: if you disagree, then that makes you evil, that makes

845
00:43:21,120 --> 00:43:23,800
Speaker 1: you bad, that makes you dangerous, that makes you hurtful,

846
00:43:23,840 --> 00:43:27,000
Speaker 1: that makes you harmful, etcetera. It's what unites all of

847
00:43:27,040 --> 00:43:30,319
Speaker 1: these threats, whether it's January six or Alex Jones or

848
00:43:30,320 --> 00:43:33,960
Speaker 1: Donald Trump or Crypto all the rest. It's there's something hurtful,

849
00:43:34,280 --> 00:43:38,239
Speaker 1: something harmful about your speech, and thus you are an

850
00:43:38,239 --> 00:43:42,880
Speaker 1: extremist if you're advocating such hurtful and harmful speech. Also,

851
00:43:42,920 --> 00:43:45,520
Speaker 1: their idea of democracy is a crop that they don't

852
00:43:45,520 --> 00:43:48,600
Speaker 1: believe in democracy. When they say democracy, they mean them

853
00:43:48,680 --> 00:43:51,360
Speaker 1: having all the power. And now the rest of the

854
00:43:51,400 --> 00:43:54,400
Speaker 1: world has been saying this for over a hundred years.

855
00:43:54,560 --> 00:43:58,000
Speaker 1: They say when America comes talking about democracy, they mean

856
00:43:58,080 --> 00:44:02,200
Speaker 1: American power controlling our society and our economy and our

857
00:44:02,280 --> 00:44:06,680
Speaker 1: resources and our politicians. They don't mean actual democracy. Patrice

858
00:44:06,760 --> 00:44:09,839
Speaker 1: Lamumbo gets elected, we helped coordinate his killing a year

859
00:44:09,920 --> 00:44:13,360
Speaker 1: later in nineteen six one, and uh in in Africa

860
00:44:13,480 --> 00:44:16,160
Speaker 1: with the great Democratic Hope at the done. Uh You know,

861
00:44:16,200 --> 00:44:19,280
Speaker 1: we believe in democracy so much we facilitated and enabled

862
00:44:19,320 --> 00:44:22,160
Speaker 1: and entrapped Nelson Mandela for arrest. So the rest of

863
00:44:22,160 --> 00:44:25,640
Speaker 1: the world knows that America's when it says democracy doesn't

864
00:44:25,640 --> 00:44:28,759
Speaker 1: mean democracy. But now the American people are discovering that too,

865
00:44:29,080 --> 00:44:32,560
Speaker 1: that the American leaders don't mean democracy, they mean their governance.

866
00:44:32,800 --> 00:44:36,640
Speaker 1: That you are challenging our ability to control your life,

867
00:44:36,960 --> 00:44:40,279
Speaker 1: and that makes you a dangerous extremist with hurtful and

868
00:44:40,360 --> 00:44:44,120
Speaker 1: harmful speech who must be excluded from polite society. They've

869
00:44:44,120 --> 00:44:47,440
Speaker 1: been weaponizing the vaccine mandates as an example to go

870
00:44:47,520 --> 00:44:50,640
Speaker 1: after and get rid of any closet Trump supporter or

871
00:44:50,640 --> 00:44:54,480
Speaker 1: really closet free speech supporters, closet liberty supporter out of

872
00:44:54,480 --> 00:44:57,479
Speaker 1: the government. I mean I've been getting I've been hearing

873
00:44:57,480 --> 00:45:01,040
Speaker 1: from people in every aspect of government, even some aspects

874
00:45:01,040 --> 00:45:03,640
Speaker 1: that people might find surprising, the institutions they work for

875
00:45:03,880 --> 00:45:07,400
Speaker 1: where they're being purged under the guise of a vaccine mandate.

876
00:45:07,800 --> 00:45:11,400
Speaker 1: And so it's the same things. No dissident speech allowed.

877
00:45:11,480 --> 00:45:14,879
Speaker 1: Any dissident speech must be banned, must be prohibited, people

878
00:45:14,920 --> 00:45:16,960
Speaker 1: must be fired for it. But people must be removed

879
00:45:16,960 --> 00:45:20,560
Speaker 1: from power from it. They must be labeled and socially stigmatized.

880
00:45:20,600 --> 00:45:25,320
Speaker 1: It's very much nineteen thirties. It's very much communist Stasi

881
00:45:25,480 --> 00:45:28,440
Speaker 1: Germany kind of style of approach. And it's and and

882
00:45:28,440 --> 00:45:31,920
Speaker 1: they're using the FBI and top law enforcement like the

883
00:45:31,960 --> 00:45:35,360
Speaker 1: Soviet Union used the KGB in the East German Communist

884
00:45:35,440 --> 00:45:39,600
Speaker 1: Republic used the Stasi. It's gonna it's It's almost all parallels,

885
00:45:40,000 --> 00:45:41,960
Speaker 1: one after the other after the other after the other.

886
00:45:42,040 --> 00:45:45,799
Speaker 1: The press control, the communication, control, the speech control, the

887
00:45:45,840 --> 00:45:49,520
Speaker 1: weaponization of civil justice, show trials, the weaponization of criminal

888
00:45:49,600 --> 00:45:54,160
Speaker 1: justice powers, the stow social stigmatization to anybody who's a dissident,

889
00:45:54,200 --> 00:45:57,520
Speaker 1: independent thought. It's almost identical to the list you went through.

890
00:45:57,719 --> 00:46:00,920
Speaker 1: We're seeing it in lifetime, that social stickmatizations. So if

891
00:46:00,920 --> 00:46:03,160
Speaker 1: you look at the Bolshevik Revolution, you look at Mao's

892
00:46:03,200 --> 00:46:04,960
Speaker 1: Great Leap forward or hit or whatever you want. But

893
00:46:05,080 --> 00:46:06,920
Speaker 1: like a MoU's great leap forward, um, they had the

894
00:46:07,200 --> 00:46:09,920
Speaker 1: Red army, and the Red Army was the people. It

895
00:46:10,000 --> 00:46:12,880
Speaker 1: was the people turning on the other people. The government

896
00:46:12,880 --> 00:46:14,960
Speaker 1: and the military can't control the people, so they need

897
00:46:15,000 --> 00:46:17,400
Speaker 1: to get the people to turn on each other. And

898
00:46:17,520 --> 00:46:20,640
Speaker 1: Mao had reflected and said, Wow, I can't believe how

899
00:46:20,800 --> 00:46:24,279
Speaker 1: vicious and violent these read these uh these people are.

900
00:46:24,480 --> 00:46:26,400
Speaker 1: He did nothing to stop it, of course, But if

901
00:46:26,440 --> 00:46:28,640
Speaker 1: they can get um, if they can if they can

902
00:46:28,840 --> 00:46:32,680
Speaker 1: stigmatize to the word you use, um, Maga republicans, I mean,

903
00:46:32,680 --> 00:46:34,480
Speaker 1: who would want to make America. Great, I mean, how

904
00:46:34,560 --> 00:46:36,680
Speaker 1: dare you make one? I mean to to even to

905
00:46:36,680 --> 00:46:39,239
Speaker 1: even stigmatize that word. But if they could make, if

906
00:46:39,239 --> 00:46:42,040
Speaker 1: they get the public people to turn against each other

907
00:46:42,320 --> 00:46:44,440
Speaker 1: and stigmatize them, then people don't want to stand up

908
00:46:44,480 --> 00:46:47,520
Speaker 1: one and two. I mean it. I think we're already

909
00:46:47,520 --> 00:46:48,920
Speaker 1: starting to see the violence. I mean it could get

910
00:46:48,960 --> 00:46:52,120
Speaker 1: really bad. Oh no, no, it's collective punishment. And I

911
00:46:52,120 --> 00:46:54,360
Speaker 1: say I encourage people to look at how the Ukrainian

912
00:46:54,360 --> 00:46:57,040
Speaker 1: government is governing because that's also an example of what

913
00:46:57,080 --> 00:46:58,640
Speaker 1: they would like to see. And there, what do you

914
00:46:58,640 --> 00:47:01,120
Speaker 1: see in Ukraine? You see collective punishment of dissidents, you

915
00:47:01,160 --> 00:47:03,560
Speaker 1: see complete suppression of speech, you see locking up of

916
00:47:03,560 --> 00:47:06,520
Speaker 1: the press, you see complete banning of opposition. They took

917
00:47:06,520 --> 00:47:09,200
Speaker 1: their opponent posing leader, locked them up in prison and

918
00:47:09,200 --> 00:47:11,799
Speaker 1: then bragged about it on national TV. They shut down

919
00:47:11,800 --> 00:47:15,600
Speaker 1: any independent press that exists, while awash with all forms

920
00:47:15,600 --> 00:47:20,800
Speaker 1: of corruption, deep state collusion, and excessive war. So Ukraine

921
00:47:20,880 --> 00:47:24,000
Speaker 1: is what the West will convert their own countries and

922
00:47:24,280 --> 00:47:26,799
Speaker 1: societies into if they could, and it should be a

923
00:47:26,840 --> 00:47:29,239
Speaker 1: warning sign to the rest of us that we are

924
00:47:29,320 --> 00:47:33,279
Speaker 1: ultimately the the key barrier to them being able to

925
00:47:33,440 --> 00:47:35,520
Speaker 1: pull off what they want to pull off. And as

926
00:47:35,520 --> 00:47:38,680
Speaker 1: long as enough people resist and push back their agenda

927
00:47:39,000 --> 00:47:42,080
Speaker 1: and do so through lawful and peaceful and democratic and

928
00:47:42,160 --> 00:47:47,239
Speaker 1: constitutional means, that we can sustain our constitutional experiment of

929
00:47:47,320 --> 00:47:49,680
Speaker 1: liberty and freedom a little bit longer, of course, which

930
00:47:49,719 --> 00:47:52,040
Speaker 1: is exactly why they're trying to take it, uh, take

931
00:47:52,080 --> 00:47:55,880
Speaker 1: it over. Um. So, first rip out the tongues so

932
00:47:56,200 --> 00:47:58,920
Speaker 1: they can't say anything, don't allow any kind of public discourse,

933
00:47:59,120 --> 00:48:02,680
Speaker 1: to remove any kind of legal protection or precedence or

934
00:48:02,719 --> 00:48:05,920
Speaker 1: constitutional protection. Um. And then you know, once no one

935
00:48:05,960 --> 00:48:08,160
Speaker 1: can talk anymore, and once there's no more protection, I

936
00:48:08,160 --> 00:48:11,359
Speaker 1: guess than they can have their way. I was thinking about, um. So.

937
00:48:11,480 --> 00:48:14,680
Speaker 1: I recently published a book. It's on Amazon last month,

938
00:48:15,000 --> 00:48:18,800
Speaker 1: is titled The Uncommunist Manifesto. So basically took the Communist

939
00:48:18,800 --> 00:48:20,680
Speaker 1: Manifesto and just kind of rewrote it, and it's called

940
00:48:20,680 --> 00:48:24,600
Speaker 1: the Uncommunist Manifesto. UM. And so thinking a lot about

941
00:48:24,600 --> 00:48:27,200
Speaker 1: communism and how communism seems like it's this old word,

942
00:48:27,480 --> 00:48:30,040
Speaker 1: but really it's just all just been rebranded. Right. So,

943
00:48:30,160 --> 00:48:32,880
Speaker 1: in the original Communist Manifesto, Carl marks that to summarize

944
00:48:32,920 --> 00:48:37,280
Speaker 1: communism in one statement would be the abolition of private property.

945
00:48:37,400 --> 00:48:40,360
Speaker 1: Today we have claud Schwab at the weft saying you'll

946
00:48:40,360 --> 00:48:44,400
Speaker 1: own nothing and be happy. Uh. Right. We had communism

947
00:48:44,480 --> 00:48:47,160
Speaker 1: or socialism was the state controlling the means of production.

948
00:48:47,440 --> 00:48:50,680
Speaker 1: Today from the WEFT, we see this public private partnership.

949
00:48:51,160 --> 00:48:53,960
Speaker 1: And I think about this public private partnership where we

950
00:48:54,040 --> 00:48:57,480
Speaker 1: now have. Zuckerberg told Rogan that you know, the FBI

951
00:48:57,640 --> 00:48:59,799
Speaker 1: came and talked to them, and um, Twitter had to

952
00:48:59,800 --> 00:49:02,719
Speaker 1: put back on Alex Bernson because they found out through

953
00:49:02,840 --> 00:49:06,399
Speaker 1: discovery that the government, somehow deministrative had had pressured them

954
00:49:06,400 --> 00:49:08,200
Speaker 1: to get him off, etcetera. So you kind of have

955
00:49:08,239 --> 00:49:11,080
Speaker 1: this public private partnership where the private side is the

956
00:49:11,160 --> 00:49:13,479
Speaker 1: social media, etcetera. Let's let's wipe him off the face

957
00:49:13,480 --> 00:49:16,680
Speaker 1: of the earth. Uh. And then if that doesn't work

958
00:49:16,719 --> 00:49:18,600
Speaker 1: for the people that get through that filter, the Alex

959
00:49:18,680 --> 00:49:20,880
Speaker 1: Jones that still won't go away, Well that's where the

960
00:49:20,960 --> 00:49:23,320
Speaker 1: public side comes in. And now we'll use the weapon

961
00:49:23,440 --> 00:49:28,800
Speaker 1: of the d o J, the FBI or whatever against them. Yeah. Completely.

962
00:49:28,840 --> 00:49:32,839
Speaker 1: And it's the way they see power differently than our

963
00:49:32,960 --> 00:49:36,320
Speaker 1: founding generation in the ordinary America. We look at power

964
00:49:36,440 --> 00:49:39,719
Speaker 1: and we see what purpose does it serve? What principal

965
00:49:39,800 --> 00:49:43,480
Speaker 1: can in advance and what restraints must operate within, and

966
00:49:43,480 --> 00:49:46,880
Speaker 1: what methodology of approach of making decisions will be the

967
00:49:46,920 --> 00:49:50,719
Speaker 1: best one Over time, they see power, They see any

968
00:49:50,760 --> 00:49:53,319
Speaker 1: of these things, and they simply see a tool, a

969
00:49:53,400 --> 00:49:56,239
Speaker 1: tool to be used for their objective and agenda. And

970
00:49:56,320 --> 00:49:58,520
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter what it is. This is why you

971
00:49:58,560 --> 00:50:01,360
Speaker 1: have these people doing things that college and missions screwing

972
00:50:01,400 --> 00:50:05,440
Speaker 1: people over at college and missions for political reasons, excluding students, uh.

973
00:50:05,560 --> 00:50:09,440
Speaker 1: For for these reasons, people getting not getting promotions, getting emotions,

974
00:50:09,520 --> 00:50:13,680
Speaker 1: getting fired. Uh. In the employment context, advertising choices being

975
00:50:13,680 --> 00:50:17,440
Speaker 1: made and marketing choices being made, and YouTube algorithm choices

976
00:50:17,520 --> 00:50:20,799
Speaker 1: being made, and movie and TV choices being made, and

977
00:50:20,800 --> 00:50:24,040
Speaker 1: book publishing choices being made. At every level of power,

978
00:50:24,480 --> 00:50:27,040
Speaker 1: they see, how can I use this as a tool

979
00:50:27,239 --> 00:50:30,640
Speaker 1: to advance my agenda, regardless of what that power is for.

980
00:50:30,800 --> 00:50:33,440
Speaker 1: So the power supposed to have independent literary cultural value,

981
00:50:33,560 --> 00:50:35,520
Speaker 1: they don't care. They see it as, oh, this is

982
00:50:35,560 --> 00:50:37,120
Speaker 1: a means to get people to do what I want.

983
00:50:37,920 --> 00:50:39,960
Speaker 1: If an employment is supposed to be about the job

984
00:50:40,000 --> 00:50:41,959
Speaker 1: and whether you're qualified to do it, they don't care.

985
00:50:42,280 --> 00:50:44,440
Speaker 1: They see, this is an opportunity for me to advance

986
00:50:44,480 --> 00:50:48,000
Speaker 1: my political agenda. And once you understand that, you can

987
00:50:48,120 --> 00:50:51,040
Speaker 1: predict where they're gonna go. And it is a very

988
00:50:51,040 --> 00:50:53,719
Speaker 1: frightening place. I mean, you mentioned the the the V

989
00:50:53,719 --> 00:50:57,359
Speaker 1: for Vendetta president speech that Biden where they literally took

990
00:50:57,360 --> 00:50:59,759
Speaker 1: the background in the set from V for Vendetta where

991
00:50:59,760 --> 00:51:01,360
Speaker 1: the guy is up there. You know, he even he

992
00:51:01,360 --> 00:51:03,200
Speaker 1: even did the screaming bit. You know, he even did

993
00:51:03,239 --> 00:51:05,759
Speaker 1: that bit, you know, the I mean, the almost exactly

994
00:51:05,840 --> 00:51:08,840
Speaker 1: like it. And it's it's because they see they watched

995
00:51:08,920 --> 00:51:12,120
Speaker 1: movies like and B for Vendetta and they think, golly, gee,

996
00:51:12,120 --> 00:51:13,960
Speaker 1: wouldn't it be great if we could be that government?

997
00:51:14,200 --> 00:51:16,879
Speaker 1: You know, I mean, they totally perverse mindset. But that's

998
00:51:16,880 --> 00:51:20,960
Speaker 1: why we have to resist, because that's who these people are. Yeah,

999
00:51:21,200 --> 00:51:23,799
Speaker 1: do you think. Um, So, now we have all this

1000
00:51:23,880 --> 00:51:26,720
Speaker 1: censorship we talked about, you know, Andrew Tate getting deleted obviously,

1001
00:51:26,760 --> 00:51:29,879
Speaker 1: Alex Jones being the kind of poster child for that. Um.

1002
00:51:29,960 --> 00:51:32,839
Speaker 1: But now we've you know, we see it. It's volatile, right.

1003
00:51:32,880 --> 00:51:35,000
Speaker 1: So then Alex Bernson, he got wiped off the face

1004
00:51:35,000 --> 00:51:37,920
Speaker 1: of Twitter because of talking about COVID, but now they

1005
00:51:37,920 --> 00:51:39,719
Speaker 1: had to let him back on. So now he's back,

1006
00:51:39,719 --> 00:51:41,640
Speaker 1: and now it seems like there's a lot of open

1007
00:51:41,719 --> 00:51:44,680
Speaker 1: talk about that stuff supposedly now, which is pretty interesting.

1008
00:51:44,880 --> 00:51:46,719
Speaker 1: But we're also seeing the rise of these, you know,

1009
00:51:47,360 --> 00:51:52,879
Speaker 1: the growth of these alternative platforms, the parlors, the rumbles, etcetera. Um,

1010
00:51:52,920 --> 00:51:54,759
Speaker 1: I mean, do you think they'll they'll probably continue to

1011
00:51:54,800 --> 00:51:57,160
Speaker 1: attack those right again, going back to kind of controlling

1012
00:51:57,160 --> 00:51:59,919
Speaker 1: the free speech, Sedition Act, etcetera. I mean, they didn't

1013
00:52:00,000 --> 00:52:02,120
Speaker 1: to shut it all off, so even those other platforms,

1014
00:52:02,120 --> 00:52:05,080
Speaker 1: as as as they may be popping up, uh, probably

1015
00:52:05,120 --> 00:52:08,920
Speaker 1: won't be allowed to stick around for much longer. I

1016
00:52:08,960 --> 00:52:11,040
Speaker 1: think they're they're gonna have some hurdles because the key

1017
00:52:11,120 --> 00:52:14,440
Speaker 1: was how to fight back intelligently, And so Elon Musk

1018
00:52:14,600 --> 00:52:17,080
Speaker 1: simply talking about and trying to buy Twitter, and now

1019
00:52:17,080 --> 00:52:19,040
Speaker 1: they're in lawsuits because it turned out Twitter has a

1020
00:52:19,080 --> 00:52:21,399
Speaker 1: lot more bots than they were admitting. So he thinks

1021
00:52:21,400 --> 00:52:23,799
Speaker 1: he over he overbought it. Now what he may get

1022
00:52:23,840 --> 00:52:26,480
Speaker 1: out of that is a much deeper discount and haircut

1023
00:52:26,680 --> 00:52:28,400
Speaker 1: and still end up owing it. But as soon as

1024
00:52:28,440 --> 00:52:30,880
Speaker 1: he talked about buying it, all of a sudden, Twitter

1025
00:52:30,960 --> 00:52:33,200
Speaker 1: became a lot less than sorious for a period of time,

1026
00:52:33,440 --> 00:52:35,600
Speaker 1: still a lot of censorship that takes place, but not

1027
00:52:35,680 --> 00:52:38,160
Speaker 1: to the same scale as you know. Now you look

1028
00:52:38,200 --> 00:52:41,960
Speaker 1: at Rumble, Rumble is a meaningful competitor because of who

1029
00:52:42,040 --> 00:52:44,239
Speaker 1: is investing in Rumble. It's now public news at the

1030
00:52:44,280 --> 00:52:47,440
Speaker 1: Wall Street Journal put out there Peter thal jd Vance

1031
00:52:47,520 --> 00:52:50,440
Speaker 1: a bunch of people like that, people with political influence,

1032
00:52:50,719 --> 00:52:56,040
Speaker 1: people with strong economic ties, people with deep resources. Right now,

1033
00:52:56,040 --> 00:52:58,840
Speaker 1: in fact, Rumble has sued Google in that case is

1034
00:52:58,880 --> 00:53:02,400
Speaker 1: going into the discovery age. So because Rumble planned a

1035
00:53:02,440 --> 00:53:06,920
Speaker 1: certain approach, a disciplined methodological approach to being able to

1036
00:53:07,600 --> 00:53:12,040
Speaker 1: uh meaningfully compete and provide an independent platform, It's gonna

1037
00:53:12,040 --> 00:53:14,640
Speaker 1: be very hard for Google and YouTube and the rest

1038
00:53:14,680 --> 00:53:16,560
Speaker 1: to take him out. It's gonna be very hard for

1039
00:53:16,560 --> 00:53:19,319
Speaker 1: them to remove them from the store. They're already like

1040
00:53:19,360 --> 00:53:23,320
Speaker 1: the various apps. That's their current monopolistic source of control

1041
00:53:23,400 --> 00:53:26,560
Speaker 1: is the control of apps on phones and and on laptops,

1042
00:53:26,640 --> 00:53:29,560
Speaker 1: Apple and Google. That's one of the key places that

1043
00:53:29,680 --> 00:53:33,040
Speaker 1: needs to be attacked and legally to to stop that

1044
00:53:33,080 --> 00:53:35,920
Speaker 1: monopolistic power from continuing to be able to use for

1045
00:53:36,239 --> 00:53:39,640
Speaker 1: speech control purposes. But I think the approach Rumble is taking,

1046
00:53:39,680 --> 00:53:41,759
Speaker 1: I mean Russell brand is announced he's gonna be doing

1047
00:53:41,760 --> 00:53:44,480
Speaker 1: exclusive things. A whole bunch of other people saying they're

1048
00:53:44,480 --> 00:53:47,759
Speaker 1: gonna be doing exclusive things on Rumble. Rumble continues to

1049
00:53:47,880 --> 00:53:51,920
Speaker 1: upgrade and improve it's technology, it's technological capacity and capability.

1050
00:53:52,160 --> 00:53:55,960
Speaker 1: Run by Chris Pavlovski, who's deeply personally committed to creating

1051
00:53:55,960 --> 00:53:59,600
Speaker 1: a free speech space that's independent and separate from cancel culture.

1052
00:54:00,080 --> 00:54:03,239
Speaker 1: I think Rumble maybe a meaningful competitor, and I don't

1053
00:54:03,239 --> 00:54:04,919
Speaker 1: think they'll be able to take him out. And that's

1054
00:54:04,960 --> 00:54:07,640
Speaker 1: one of the best white pills in recent time period

1055
00:54:07,719 --> 00:54:11,000
Speaker 1: during this era. Yeah, so I see, I see light

1056
00:54:11,120 --> 00:54:12,920
Speaker 1: and what I see, as you said, we need to

1057
00:54:12,960 --> 00:54:15,920
Speaker 1: get this court of public opinion to turn. Obviously they

1058
00:54:16,000 --> 00:54:18,279
Speaker 1: understand that. So that's their attack vector. So that's part

1059
00:54:18,280 --> 00:54:21,600
Speaker 1: of this. Viva Vendetta's speech is trying to attack the

1060
00:54:21,640 --> 00:54:24,480
Speaker 1: public perception. But at the same time, UM, you know,

1061
00:54:24,520 --> 00:54:26,120
Speaker 1: just back to entertain The one thing I was thinking

1062
00:54:26,239 --> 00:54:29,160
Speaker 1: is um he was he was growing so fast. He

1063
00:54:29,200 --> 00:54:33,560
Speaker 1: was adding over a hundred thousand people per day on Instagram,

1064
00:54:33,560 --> 00:54:37,200
Speaker 1: a hundred thousand people a day, and he has a

1065
00:54:37,239 --> 00:54:40,600
Speaker 1: message that's very similar to UM to Jordan Peterson's which

1066
00:54:40,680 --> 00:54:43,480
Speaker 1: is suck it up, pull yourself up by your bootstraps.

1067
00:54:43,640 --> 00:54:45,400
Speaker 1: So what if you got dealta bad hand, it's the

1068
00:54:45,400 --> 00:54:48,160
Speaker 1: hand you have, Play it the best you can. You know, uh,

1069
00:54:48,239 --> 00:54:50,160
Speaker 1: slap yourself. It's up to you kind of a thing

1070
00:54:50,200 --> 00:54:54,279
Speaker 1: like that. And that's obviously a totally different message than

1071
00:54:54,280 --> 00:54:56,560
Speaker 1: what we get from mainstream media, which is it's okay,

1072
00:54:56,680 --> 00:54:59,080
Speaker 1: you're a victim, you can never get ahead. And um.

1073
00:54:59,080 --> 00:55:01,160
Speaker 1: What I see both from the rise of Jordan Peterson

1074
00:55:01,200 --> 00:55:04,040
Speaker 1: and with Andrew Tait is like there's a need for that,

1075
00:55:04,280 --> 00:55:07,600
Speaker 1: like people want that, and so there's this massive market,

1076
00:55:07,640 --> 00:55:09,000
Speaker 1: which of course why I want to shut down, but

1077
00:55:09,000 --> 00:55:12,040
Speaker 1: that's encouraging. You mentioned Elon must trying to buy Twitter

1078
00:55:12,600 --> 00:55:14,600
Speaker 1: when he put that bid in, and it was all

1079
00:55:14,640 --> 00:55:16,799
Speaker 1: about opening up for free speech. So it's really to

1080
00:55:16,880 --> 00:55:19,200
Speaker 1: me it was like this free speech the pride. The

1081
00:55:19,680 --> 00:55:23,879
Speaker 1: Twitter stock jumped big time with gain at a time

1082
00:55:23,880 --> 00:55:25,960
Speaker 1: when the rest of the markets were dropping. That again

1083
00:55:26,040 --> 00:55:29,200
Speaker 1: shows there's this massive thirst for freedom of speech. The

1084
00:55:29,280 --> 00:55:32,439
Speaker 1: price drove up, um, the rise of Rumble, So there's

1085
00:55:32,440 --> 00:55:34,960
Speaker 1: all these things. So I do see light, I do

1086
00:55:35,040 --> 00:55:38,040
Speaker 1: see hope. Um. But at the same time, man, they're

1087
00:55:38,040 --> 00:55:40,080
Speaker 1: coming after us. Hard. It's coming after us hard. I

1088
00:55:40,080 --> 00:55:42,840
Speaker 1: made the comment to my wife a couple of weeks ago,

1089
00:55:43,560 --> 00:55:47,400
Speaker 1: and I said, uh, I think there's above average chance

1090
00:55:47,719 --> 00:55:50,879
Speaker 1: within the next two years I might not be able

1091
00:55:50,920 --> 00:55:53,200
Speaker 1: to be in the United States doing what I'm doing,

1092
00:55:53,440 --> 00:55:57,279
Speaker 1: maaning being critical of the government. Um, what's your under

1093
00:55:57,320 --> 00:55:58,680
Speaker 1: over on that? Where do you think we're going in

1094
00:55:58,680 --> 00:56:01,080
Speaker 1: the next couple of years. Well, the way I put

1095
00:56:01,120 --> 00:56:05,720
Speaker 1: it is, there's no great hero story without a great villain,

1096
00:56:06,239 --> 00:56:09,200
Speaker 1: and we definitely have a great villain. And the only

1097
00:56:09,280 --> 00:56:11,080
Speaker 1: question is how many of us are going to be

1098
00:56:11,120 --> 00:56:15,239
Speaker 1: capable of being great heroes. Because I think that capacity

1099
00:56:15,320 --> 00:56:17,760
Speaker 1: is there, we are going to face a lot worse.

1100
00:56:18,000 --> 00:56:20,479
Speaker 1: They are doing things they've never done before. They're trying

1101
00:56:20,480 --> 00:56:24,279
Speaker 1: to establish precedents they've never utilized before. That means they're

1102
00:56:24,280 --> 00:56:26,399
Speaker 1: coming for the rest of us. Alex Jones is again

1103
00:56:26,480 --> 00:56:28,719
Speaker 1: the canary in the coal mine. They're going after the

1104
00:56:28,719 --> 00:56:31,360
Speaker 1: president the United States. That answers all your questions about

1105
00:56:31,480 --> 00:56:33,719
Speaker 1: what's the chances they go after me if you they

1106
00:56:33,719 --> 00:56:35,920
Speaker 1: see you as a threat, They answer is high. But

1107
00:56:36,239 --> 00:56:38,600
Speaker 1: the upside of this is it presents an opportunity for

1108
00:56:38,600 --> 00:56:41,360
Speaker 1: people to prove the courage of their character. You know,

1109
00:56:41,400 --> 00:56:43,680
Speaker 1: Poncho Villa'd rather die on my feet than live on

1110
00:56:43,719 --> 00:56:46,120
Speaker 1: my knees. Provides a lot of you know, med your

1111
00:56:46,120 --> 00:56:48,440
Speaker 1: Evers said, you know, most men die a thousand deaths

1112
00:56:48,480 --> 00:56:51,440
Speaker 1: every day. I'm only gonna die once it. You know,

1113
00:56:51,560 --> 00:56:56,280
Speaker 1: great adversary, great evil presents an opportunity for great courage,

1114
00:56:56,360 --> 00:56:58,880
Speaker 1: great honor, and great truth. And we're all going to

1115
00:56:58,960 --> 00:57:01,279
Speaker 1: get the opportunity. And the American people and the people

1116
00:57:01,280 --> 00:57:02,799
Speaker 1: around the world are going to get the chance to

1117
00:57:02,800 --> 00:57:06,399
Speaker 1: show that. And I still have my I love to bet.

1118
00:57:06,440 --> 00:57:08,400
Speaker 1: I'm a gambler by nature. I like sports betting, I

1119
00:57:08,440 --> 00:57:11,600
Speaker 1: like political betting, you name it. I will always bet

1120
00:57:11,640 --> 00:57:14,440
Speaker 1: on the conscience and the soul and the heart and

1121
00:57:14,480 --> 00:57:17,840
Speaker 1: the mind of the ordinary, everyday person to resist this

1122
00:57:17,960 --> 00:57:20,800
Speaker 1: and to maintain the fight for freedom and liberty moving forward.

1123
00:57:21,960 --> 00:57:24,760
Speaker 1: So good, so good. I don't want to add anything

1124
00:57:24,760 --> 00:57:26,040
Speaker 1: on to that. I think that's a good place for

1125
00:57:26,120 --> 00:57:28,320
Speaker 1: us to break because, um, that's a that's a that's

1126
00:57:28,320 --> 00:57:30,440
Speaker 1: a message of hope, it's a message to rally behind.

1127
00:57:30,520 --> 00:57:34,520
Speaker 1: And I think, um, yeah, Unfortunately, we have heroes rise up.

1128
00:57:34,680 --> 00:57:38,080
Speaker 1: Unfortunately also have martyrs in the movement. Um and uh

1129
00:57:38,200 --> 00:57:40,440
Speaker 1: but I think when we stand up for ideologies, it's

1130
00:57:40,440 --> 00:57:43,160
Speaker 1: stronger than anything that the other side can throw at you.

1131
00:57:43,240 --> 00:57:45,960
Speaker 1: So you you said it perfectly with that, will get

1132
00:57:46,000 --> 00:57:48,240
Speaker 1: and sign it off. Robert Um. You know I'm gonna

1133
00:57:48,240 --> 00:57:50,160
Speaker 1: link to your Twitter. I know you're super active on there.

1134
00:57:50,360 --> 00:57:54,400
Speaker 1: Anything else you want to call attention to, everyone should Yeah.

1135
00:57:54,400 --> 00:57:57,120
Speaker 1: If people want to find all the content any and

1136
00:57:57,200 --> 00:57:59,880
Speaker 1: also be part of a community that shares similar in

1137
00:58:00,000 --> 00:58:02,280
Speaker 1: first as we've been discussing today, they can get that

1138
00:58:02,360 --> 00:58:07,200
Speaker 1: at Viva Barnes Law dot locals dot com and what

1139
00:58:07,360 --> 00:58:11,720
Speaker 1: is that. It's a locals community, so Locals as part

1140
00:58:11,760 --> 00:58:14,320
Speaker 1: of it was owned by Rumble. It's an independent platform

1141
00:58:14,360 --> 00:58:17,600
Speaker 1: to replace Patreon or play, subscribe to are and really

1142
00:58:17,640 --> 00:58:20,920
Speaker 1: replace Facebook. So people get to make their own post.

1143
00:58:21,200 --> 00:58:24,040
Speaker 1: I post, exclude, I post a Barnes Brief there every day.

1144
00:58:24,040 --> 00:58:27,680
Speaker 1: That's curated news and information content from across the globe.

1145
00:58:28,160 --> 00:58:30,480
Speaker 1: We do exclusive videos. They have a Hush a series

1146
00:58:30,480 --> 00:58:33,600
Speaker 1: called Hush Hush, which is about the alternative interpretation of

1147
00:58:33,640 --> 00:58:37,000
Speaker 1: events various conspiracy theories that have been debated over time,

1148
00:58:37,280 --> 00:58:40,160
Speaker 1: everything from the Kennedy assassination to the moon landing. We

1149
00:58:40,240 --> 00:58:43,560
Speaker 1: discuss and debate, book reviews, movie reviews, but also people

1150
00:58:43,600 --> 00:58:45,960
Speaker 1: get to interact with one another, They get to post themselves,

1151
00:58:45,960 --> 00:58:48,640
Speaker 1: they get to comment, and it creates a community free

1152
00:58:48,640 --> 00:58:52,760
Speaker 1: of algorithmic manipulation, free of subject matters, censorship, free of

1153
00:58:52,840 --> 00:58:56,440
Speaker 1: trolls and harassers and stalkers, where people really get to

1154
00:58:56,440 --> 00:58:58,360
Speaker 1: share ideas about how do they make the world a

1155
00:58:58,360 --> 00:59:01,640
Speaker 1: better place in these very unique times we face. That's awesome.

1156
00:59:01,720 --> 00:59:03,400
Speaker 1: Everyone should check it out. We're gonna make sure it's

1157
00:59:03,400 --> 00:59:05,320
Speaker 1: linked down below, and with that we'll sign it off.

1158
00:59:05,320 --> 00:59:08,080
Speaker 1: Thanks so much, Robert, thanks everybody than