1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:13,040 Speaker 1: Ye, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. 2 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:17,560 Speaker 1: Daily we bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, 3 00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:23,480 Speaker 1: and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 4 00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:33,560 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Martin 5 00:00:33,600 --> 00:00:35,720 Speaker 1: Secker joins us head of all of our content and 6 00:00:35,720 --> 00:00:40,400 Speaker 1: of course, uh running all of our Washington operation for years, 7 00:00:40,440 --> 00:00:43,560 Speaker 1: and Nick Wadhams joins us in Washington in the blur 8 00:00:43,680 --> 00:00:45,600 Speaker 1: of the day, Nick, I want to drive right down 9 00:00:45,640 --> 00:00:49,239 Speaker 1: to task one, which is Mike Pompeo. Is he going 10 00:00:49,280 --> 00:00:53,120 Speaker 1: to be different than Rex Tillerson and getting us to 11 00:00:53,200 --> 00:00:58,240 Speaker 1: an operational, functional State Department or the will the President 12 00:00:58,400 --> 00:01:02,560 Speaker 1: block that effort? I mean, you know, I think he 13 00:01:02,840 --> 00:01:05,880 Speaker 1: his foreign policy views are generally much more in line 14 00:01:06,040 --> 00:01:09,520 Speaker 1: with the President Trump's, so much more hard line. I 15 00:01:09,520 --> 00:01:13,959 Speaker 1: think Secretary Tillerson did have a foreign policy outlook that 16 00:01:14,040 --> 00:01:16,800 Speaker 1: was much more conventional and sort of in line with 17 00:01:16,880 --> 00:01:19,640 Speaker 1: what we would have thought of the more republican, moderate 18 00:01:19,640 --> 00:01:23,160 Speaker 1: republican administration in the past. Uh that had led to 19 00:01:23,240 --> 00:01:26,520 Speaker 1: a sort of war between the Secretary Tillerson and the 20 00:01:26,520 --> 00:01:29,160 Speaker 1: White House where uh, there we was there was a 21 00:01:29,160 --> 00:01:32,120 Speaker 1: lot of sparring over nominees for posts. That was one 22 00:01:32,120 --> 00:01:34,679 Speaker 1: of the big reasons why, uh, these slots were not 23 00:01:34,760 --> 00:01:38,240 Speaker 1: getting filled. He was objecting to some of the President 24 00:01:38,240 --> 00:01:42,560 Speaker 1: Trump's nominees for posts. The Trump White House was objecting 25 00:01:42,560 --> 00:01:45,800 Speaker 1: to his positions, so usually had this sort of deadlock 26 00:01:45,880 --> 00:01:48,840 Speaker 1: over these nominees. Well, just thirty five days ago, or 27 00:01:48,840 --> 00:01:52,040 Speaker 1: excuse me, forty five days ago, Thomas Shannon left the 28 00:01:52,080 --> 00:01:55,920 Speaker 1: State Department is under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. 29 00:01:55,960 --> 00:01:58,160 Speaker 1: That's just one example of people leaving the door. When 30 00:01:58,200 --> 00:02:02,400 Speaker 1: does the hemorrhagen stop? Nick, Well, I don't think this 31 00:02:02,440 --> 00:02:05,440 Speaker 1: is something that is going to end with Mike Pompeo. 32 00:02:05,520 --> 00:02:08,320 Speaker 1: If anything, it will only hasten it. Um Uh. There's 33 00:02:08,360 --> 00:02:11,240 Speaker 1: a lot of criticism of recky Dollerson, but actually when 34 00:02:11,320 --> 00:02:14,320 Speaker 1: you look at his foreign policy prescriptions, they were fairly 35 00:02:14,400 --> 00:02:17,760 Speaker 1: standarded in line with past administrations. If anything, Mike Pompeo 36 00:02:18,400 --> 00:02:22,040 Speaker 1: will be even more harder to the right and and 37 00:02:22,160 --> 00:02:25,839 Speaker 1: will alienate this building even more. Those those these these 38 00:02:25,840 --> 00:02:30,640 Speaker 1: people tend to be sort of cautious and careful um 39 00:02:31,200 --> 00:02:33,800 Speaker 1: and orthodox and their prescriptions. So when you put in 40 00:02:33,840 --> 00:02:37,000 Speaker 1: someone like Mike Pompeo. They're going to have allergic reaction 41 00:02:37,080 --> 00:02:39,320 Speaker 1: to him. Marta Shanka, I want you to come in 42 00:02:39,320 --> 00:02:41,679 Speaker 1: on this and tell us your thoughts. But specifically, does 43 00:02:41,680 --> 00:02:43,880 Speaker 1: this have anything to do with the ongoing or non 44 00:02:43,960 --> 00:02:46,800 Speaker 1: ongoing relationship that the United States has with Russia. I 45 00:02:46,840 --> 00:02:49,840 Speaker 1: note that that Retch to Listen yesterday was quoted as 46 00:02:49,880 --> 00:02:52,639 Speaker 1: saying that the United States has tried to work more 47 00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:55,440 Speaker 1: diligently and more carefully with the Russians on a variety 48 00:02:55,440 --> 00:02:58,079 Speaker 1: of issues, but said that the Russians have taken it 49 00:02:58,160 --> 00:03:00,560 Speaker 1: upon themselves to us. He says, pivot, Uh in a 50 00:03:00,600 --> 00:03:03,240 Speaker 1: more hardline direction. You know, to me, that's one of 51 00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:05,440 Speaker 1: the more fascinating things. And Nick and chime in on 52 00:03:05,480 --> 00:03:08,720 Speaker 1: this is just what Mike Pompeo thinks about the Russian 53 00:03:08,760 --> 00:03:12,320 Speaker 1: interference in the two thousand and sixteen election. The CIA 54 00:03:12,840 --> 00:03:16,960 Speaker 1: has a central role in looking at that issue. Um. 55 00:03:17,120 --> 00:03:21,320 Speaker 1: Does his political alignment with Donald Trump preclude him from 56 00:03:21,320 --> 00:03:25,560 Speaker 1: being outspoken about the Russians meddling in the election? Or 57 00:03:25,639 --> 00:03:28,480 Speaker 1: does he speak the truth to the president? Uh? That 58 00:03:28,560 --> 00:03:31,519 Speaker 1: will be something that will be fascinating and it will 59 00:03:31,639 --> 00:03:35,120 Speaker 1: come out in his confirmation hearing. UM, I would suspect 60 00:03:35,120 --> 00:03:37,720 Speaker 1: he would get confirmed. But they're going to be some 61 00:03:37,800 --> 00:03:40,800 Speaker 1: hard questions asked at that at that hearing when it 62 00:03:40,880 --> 00:03:43,160 Speaker 1: had when it happens, Marty are they're hard questions to 63 00:03:43,200 --> 00:03:45,360 Speaker 1: be asked about the actual role of the State Department 64 00:03:45,400 --> 00:03:47,360 Speaker 1: no matter who is in charge, because, I mean, there 65 00:03:47,360 --> 00:03:49,840 Speaker 1: has been money allocated for the State Department that is 66 00:03:49,920 --> 00:03:52,800 Speaker 1: yet to be spent. There are a variety of ambassadorial 67 00:03:52,840 --> 00:03:56,160 Speaker 1: posts that have been vacant and have not received any 68 00:03:56,200 --> 00:04:00,320 Speaker 1: specific appointments. Is there a philosophical issue of about how 69 00:04:00,400 --> 00:04:03,120 Speaker 1: the president views the State Department and its use for 70 00:04:03,120 --> 00:04:07,240 Speaker 1: peign policy. Well, traditionally state departments have been really run 71 00:04:07,280 --> 00:04:10,040 Speaker 1: out of the White House. I mean it's the President 72 00:04:10,120 --> 00:04:12,720 Speaker 1: of the United States who sets policy and directs the 73 00:04:14,080 --> 00:04:18,000 Speaker 1: state head of state to actually execute it. One of 74 00:04:18,040 --> 00:04:21,360 Speaker 1: those things that Rex Tillerson did, which was very controversial, 75 00:04:21,960 --> 00:04:26,760 Speaker 1: is a strict adherence to budget restraints and a lot 76 00:04:26,800 --> 00:04:30,040 Speaker 1: of the lack of people in those posts was a 77 00:04:30,160 --> 00:04:34,120 Speaker 1: philosophical issue that we didn't need to Now the question 78 00:04:34,200 --> 00:04:36,960 Speaker 1: is does Mike Pompeo take the same approach and then 79 00:04:37,080 --> 00:04:40,400 Speaker 1: Nick Adams, for example, to your coverage of former Secretary 80 00:04:40,400 --> 00:04:45,040 Speaker 1: of State Tillerson in Chad the other day. How alone 81 00:04:45,160 --> 00:04:49,520 Speaker 1: is he out there compared to Secretary carry traveling three 82 00:04:49,520 --> 00:04:52,600 Speaker 1: and four and five years ago. Oh, I mean, this 83 00:04:52,760 --> 00:04:55,479 Speaker 1: is fascinating. We literally just ended that trip to Africa 84 00:04:55,520 --> 00:04:58,080 Speaker 1: about four hours ago. We got back about five am 85 00:04:58,800 --> 00:05:01,360 Speaker 1: from Nigeria, and on the plane with us he did 86 00:05:01,920 --> 00:05:04,279 Speaker 1: when he obviously knew what was going on. He didn't 87 00:05:04,279 --> 00:05:06,880 Speaker 1: give any indication of it to us at the time, 88 00:05:06,880 --> 00:05:08,800 Speaker 1: but he did have this very rare moment where he 89 00:05:08,800 --> 00:05:10,520 Speaker 1: spoke with us on the record in the back of 90 00:05:10,560 --> 00:05:13,800 Speaker 1: the plane, which he had not traditionally done, very harsh 91 00:05:13,839 --> 00:05:17,840 Speaker 1: words for Russia, which was in dissonance with with the administration. 92 00:05:18,520 --> 00:05:20,920 Speaker 1: H a lot of confidence, he said, he was very 93 00:05:20,960 --> 00:05:24,120 Speaker 1: confident in himself and his own abilities. Um, when we 94 00:05:24,160 --> 00:05:27,480 Speaker 1: asked him about the possibility of negotiations with Kim jongun, 95 00:05:27,839 --> 00:05:30,320 Speaker 1: and then you see this over and over, this dissonance 96 00:05:30,360 --> 00:05:33,920 Speaker 1: with the administration in Chad. He said, Chattians are welcome 97 00:05:33,960 --> 00:05:36,480 Speaker 1: in the United States. Whether it was the administration that 98 00:05:36,600 --> 00:05:40,320 Speaker 1: had imposed this travel panactual reporting and he's in the 99 00:05:40,320 --> 00:05:43,120 Speaker 1: back of the plane coming back from Nigeria. Would you 100 00:05:43,200 --> 00:05:45,760 Speaker 1: suggest that the secret of the former Secretary of State 101 00:05:46,120 --> 00:05:49,760 Speaker 1: in his interview with you and other reporters on that airplane, 102 00:05:49,880 --> 00:05:54,840 Speaker 1: supported the President's efforts with Mr Kim and North Korea. Yes, 103 00:05:55,160 --> 00:05:57,240 Speaker 1: there's there's no question that he did. But he was 104 00:05:57,320 --> 00:06:00,839 Speaker 1: clearly blindsided by the President's decision to accept the meeting 105 00:06:01,520 --> 00:06:04,760 Speaker 1: with Kim Jong hun on on spur of the moment. 106 00:06:04,760 --> 00:06:07,440 Speaker 1: I mean, this goes against everything Rex Tillerson believes in, 107 00:06:07,480 --> 00:06:11,240 Speaker 1: which is deliberation, process, doing things right, making sure you 108 00:06:11,279 --> 00:06:13,760 Speaker 1: have all the bases covered before you go into a meeting. 109 00:06:14,320 --> 00:06:16,960 Speaker 1: So he was not surprised by the president's decision to 110 00:06:17,040 --> 00:06:20,160 Speaker 1: meet with Kim Jong un. He was very surprised by 111 00:06:20,160 --> 00:06:23,040 Speaker 1: the President's decision to say, yes, let's just do this meeting, 112 00:06:23,560 --> 00:06:27,520 Speaker 1: uh quickly without the proper preparation. She's just joining us worldwide. 113 00:06:27,520 --> 00:06:30,160 Speaker 1: Pim Fox and Tom King with our foreign policy reporter, 114 00:06:30,279 --> 00:06:33,800 Speaker 1: State Department reporter, Nick Waddams, and Martin Schenker with us 115 00:06:33,800 --> 00:06:36,160 Speaker 1: of course running all of our Washington shop and now 116 00:06:36,279 --> 00:06:38,599 Speaker 1: head of all of content for Bloomberg News. Marty a 117 00:06:38,680 --> 00:06:42,640 Speaker 1: question for Mr Wadhons just off the plane. Yeah, Nick, 118 00:06:43,279 --> 00:06:46,200 Speaker 1: What's interesting to me is that you're convinced that Rex 119 00:06:46,279 --> 00:06:49,680 Speaker 1: Tillison absolutely knew what was going on? What makes you 120 00:06:49,720 --> 00:06:52,640 Speaker 1: think that that's so? I mean, this president sometimes keeps 121 00:06:52,680 --> 00:06:56,839 Speaker 1: his own counsel, even on things like this. Uh. Two reasons. One, 122 00:06:57,000 --> 00:07:00,320 Speaker 1: on the plane, he he cut this trip short by 123 00:07:00,320 --> 00:07:03,080 Speaker 1: a day, which struck us as extremely odd. You're on 124 00:07:03,120 --> 00:07:06,520 Speaker 1: a five nations trip to Africa. Why come home only 125 00:07:06,600 --> 00:07:08,599 Speaker 1: one day early? If you're gonna cut it short, you 126 00:07:08,600 --> 00:07:11,480 Speaker 1: know why. He he also had he was ill at 127 00:07:11,520 --> 00:07:14,600 Speaker 1: one point in Nairobi, so he spent the entire day off. 128 00:07:14,640 --> 00:07:17,560 Speaker 1: That struck us as odd. He basically had no appointments 129 00:07:17,680 --> 00:07:20,640 Speaker 1: on on that one day. Um. He also said that 130 00:07:20,680 --> 00:07:23,280 Speaker 1: he got a call on Friday morning. He had gotten 131 00:07:23,280 --> 00:07:25,640 Speaker 1: a call on Thursday about North Korea that kept him 132 00:07:25,720 --> 00:07:27,320 Speaker 1: up all night. Then he said, I got another call 133 00:07:27,360 --> 00:07:30,360 Speaker 1: on Friday and I asked him specifically what was that 134 00:07:30,400 --> 00:07:32,160 Speaker 1: call about, and he said, I can't tell you about 135 00:07:32,200 --> 00:07:34,800 Speaker 1: that yet. But so clearly there was a lot going on. 136 00:07:35,000 --> 00:07:37,200 Speaker 1: This is critical. Nick Wadhams, have you seen a change 137 00:07:37,280 --> 00:07:40,560 Speaker 1: behavior in the former Secretary of State over the last 138 00:07:40,600 --> 00:07:45,080 Speaker 1: week or so on this trip to Africa? Well, interestingly, 139 00:07:45,160 --> 00:07:47,640 Speaker 1: the changing behavior I think was the fact that he 140 00:07:47,680 --> 00:07:49,800 Speaker 1: was more willing to speak to us generally he's been 141 00:07:49,880 --> 00:07:53,720 Speaker 1: quite cautious and uh not very outspoken. He would rarely 142 00:07:53,760 --> 00:07:56,760 Speaker 1: do on the record uh interviews with us in the 143 00:07:56,760 --> 00:07:59,480 Speaker 1: back of the plane. This time he did, and he 144 00:07:59,520 --> 00:08:03,840 Speaker 1: was very forth right, particularly in his condemnation of Russia. UM. 145 00:08:03,880 --> 00:08:06,560 Speaker 1: And then, you know, just looking back and piecing some 146 00:08:06,640 --> 00:08:10,080 Speaker 1: of these things together, it is interesting that he obviously canceled, 147 00:08:10,120 --> 00:08:12,480 Speaker 1: he cuts the trip short, which struck us all as odd. 148 00:08:12,840 --> 00:08:15,080 Speaker 1: He had this day where he didn't emerge from his 149 00:08:15,160 --> 00:08:17,480 Speaker 1: hotel room. They said he was ill, which you know, 150 00:08:17,520 --> 00:08:20,600 Speaker 1: obviously in Africa is entirely possible. But when you look 151 00:08:20,640 --> 00:08:23,160 Speaker 1: back and sort of connect the dots like that, it 152 00:08:23,200 --> 00:08:25,080 Speaker 1: does seem that there was a level of sort of 153 00:08:25,120 --> 00:08:28,520 Speaker 1: strain and chaos about this trip. You know, there's also 154 00:08:28,560 --> 00:08:32,080 Speaker 1: this fascinating moment where he basically took the entire afternoon 155 00:08:32,120 --> 00:08:34,720 Speaker 1: off on Sunday to do a game drive with his 156 00:08:34,760 --> 00:08:38,160 Speaker 1: staff in that Roby National Park, UM, which you know, 157 00:08:38,280 --> 00:08:42,679 Speaker 1: for Secretary Kerry had done something similar when he was 158 00:08:42,800 --> 00:08:45,280 Speaker 1: when he was on the job. To do it for 159 00:08:45,360 --> 00:08:48,959 Speaker 1: so many hours on a trip like that, it's just interesting. 160 00:08:49,000 --> 00:08:51,120 Speaker 1: You know, another sort of data point, uh, Nick, just 161 00:08:51,200 --> 00:08:54,160 Speaker 1: quickly give you about thirty seconds here. Gina haspell named 162 00:08:54,160 --> 00:08:58,400 Speaker 1: to become the head of the Central Intelligence Agency. As 163 00:08:58,440 --> 00:09:01,400 Speaker 1: Mike Pompeo looks to the next Secretary of State, tell 164 00:09:01,440 --> 00:09:05,120 Speaker 1: us about the challenges that she faces. Well, I mean again, 165 00:09:05,120 --> 00:09:09,200 Speaker 1: you're gonna have this issue of the intelligence community colliding 166 00:09:09,200 --> 00:09:12,520 Speaker 1: against the Trump administration. Mike Pompeo has been adamant that 167 00:09:12,559 --> 00:09:15,800 Speaker 1: he has not shaded intelligence at all to fit what 168 00:09:15,880 --> 00:09:18,960 Speaker 1: President Trump wants. But there's a huge war going on 169 00:09:19,080 --> 00:09:21,760 Speaker 1: over the exact role that Russia played, you know, obviously 170 00:09:21,800 --> 00:09:24,200 Speaker 1: in the middle of the US elections, and the role 171 00:09:24,200 --> 00:09:27,000 Speaker 1: it continues to play. She's going to be under a 172 00:09:27,040 --> 00:09:30,920 Speaker 1: lot of pressure from both sides, the intelligence community and 173 00:09:30,960 --> 00:09:34,920 Speaker 1: the administration to get this right. Fascinating. Nik Wadhams greatly 174 00:09:34,920 --> 00:09:38,679 Speaker 1: appreciate your travels for Bloomberg News, and of course this 175 00:09:38,840 --> 00:09:42,319 Speaker 1: reporting from the plane was Secretary Tillerson over the last 176 00:09:42,440 --> 00:09:46,360 Speaker 1: few days. Mr Wadhams is our foreign policy reporter in Washington. 177 00:09:46,440 --> 00:09:49,400 Speaker 1: We think Martin Schenker as well, particularly Marty pointing out 178 00:09:49,400 --> 00:09:52,200 Speaker 1: the hearings that are to come with the new Secretary 179 00:09:52,240 --> 00:10:07,600 Speaker 1: of State. Mr Pompeio wanted to bring you now a 180 00:10:07,600 --> 00:10:10,280 Speaker 1: gentleman that we opened the year with with his top 181 00:10:10,360 --> 00:10:14,200 Speaker 1: Rists of the Year, Ian Bremer of Eurasia Group. Dr Bremer, 182 00:10:14,280 --> 00:10:17,680 Speaker 1: thank you for making time with us today. Frankly, this 183 00:10:17,800 --> 00:10:22,920 Speaker 1: instability within six Pennsylvania Avenue and the administration was one 184 00:10:22,960 --> 00:10:26,160 Speaker 1: of your risks this year. We're not surprised, though, are we. 185 00:10:27,520 --> 00:10:29,439 Speaker 1: Uh No, And let's keep in mind that you know 186 00:10:29,480 --> 00:10:33,800 Speaker 1: the initial firings, which you know are at an unprecedented level. Uh. 187 00:10:33,920 --> 00:10:38,920 Speaker 1: Senior posts worried about something like almost double that we've 188 00:10:38,920 --> 00:10:42,640 Speaker 1: seen any any modern day administration in the first year. 189 00:10:42,960 --> 00:10:45,440 Speaker 1: But most of those that were forced out early were 190 00:10:45,440 --> 00:10:49,240 Speaker 1: people that really were not competent to govern needed to 191 00:10:49,280 --> 00:10:52,400 Speaker 1: be out. We're problematic for a bunch of reasons. Most 192 00:10:52,440 --> 00:10:57,400 Speaker 1: recently the Gary Cone and now Rex Tillerson removals are 193 00:10:57,480 --> 00:11:01,400 Speaker 1: actually very different. These are people that are clearly very competent, 194 00:11:01,600 --> 00:11:05,480 Speaker 1: lots of experience, Uh maybe maybe not the best fits 195 00:11:05,520 --> 00:11:08,760 Speaker 1: for the administration for lots of reasons, and certainly king 196 00:11:08,800 --> 00:11:11,080 Speaker 1: with their own problems, but will make it harder to 197 00:11:11,120 --> 00:11:14,640 Speaker 1: do them. Ian, do you just assume that Secretary of 198 00:11:14,640 --> 00:11:18,320 Speaker 1: State Pompeo, if he's more aligned with President Trump, will 199 00:11:18,360 --> 00:11:21,120 Speaker 1: have a State Department that is ever more empty than 200 00:11:21,160 --> 00:11:26,199 Speaker 1: the one that Secretary of State Tillerson enjoyed. No, I 201 00:11:26,240 --> 00:11:29,040 Speaker 1: wouldn't assume that. I mean tell us it was truly 202 00:11:29,200 --> 00:11:34,000 Speaker 1: loathed by the diplomats. Uh. He kept his own counsel, 203 00:11:34,720 --> 00:11:40,199 Speaker 1: a very small basically kitchen cabinet within State, and people 204 00:11:40,240 --> 00:11:44,160 Speaker 1: he brought over from his days at X on Mobile. Uh, 205 00:11:44,200 --> 00:11:46,240 Speaker 1: there was enormous Uh. You know, I had to do 206 00:11:46,280 --> 00:11:48,720 Speaker 1: with more of his management style, and I suspect Pompeo 207 00:11:49,360 --> 00:11:51,040 Speaker 1: is not going to do much force might do a 208 00:11:51,040 --> 00:11:53,840 Speaker 1: little better on that front and on the people around 209 00:11:53,880 --> 00:11:57,520 Speaker 1: him immediately around him issue. The issue had much more 210 00:11:57,600 --> 00:12:00,680 Speaker 1: to do with the actual policies, to listen, has a 211 00:12:00,720 --> 00:12:06,480 Speaker 1: lot of experience dealing with difficult leaders all over the world. Um, 212 00:12:06,800 --> 00:12:10,240 Speaker 1: he had been a moderating force and a fairly independent 213 00:12:10,360 --> 00:12:15,400 Speaker 1: force on trade, on trade with China, on North Korean negotiations, 214 00:12:15,559 --> 00:12:19,800 Speaker 1: on the Iran deal, on Russia. Pompeo will be none 215 00:12:19,840 --> 00:12:22,760 Speaker 1: of those things. Will be you geological hawkus and much 216 00:12:23,160 --> 00:12:25,800 Speaker 1: willing to do whatever Trump wants. Here the bell there 217 00:12:25,840 --> 00:12:30,720 Speaker 1: markets open up a hundred and zero five Ian bremer Ian. 218 00:12:30,960 --> 00:12:32,800 Speaker 1: If I know Pim Fox wants to jump in here, 219 00:12:32,840 --> 00:12:35,120 Speaker 1: if I can play off your new book, US versus Them, 220 00:12:35,480 --> 00:12:39,160 Speaker 1: the failure of globalism, US versus them, the failure of 221 00:12:39,160 --> 00:12:43,199 Speaker 1: our foreign policy. What does Secretary of State Pompeio need 222 00:12:43,280 --> 00:12:49,320 Speaker 1: to fix day one? Uh, He's not gonna fix anything 223 00:12:49,440 --> 00:12:52,920 Speaker 1: they want. That's not why he's being brought in. I mean, 224 00:12:52,960 --> 00:12:55,240 Speaker 1: you know, you now have a president that is saying 225 00:12:55,240 --> 00:12:58,720 Speaker 1: he's going to meet with Kim Jong run um and 226 00:12:59,000 --> 00:13:02,480 Speaker 1: wants to play nice if that works, but if he doesn't, 227 00:13:02,559 --> 00:13:05,560 Speaker 1: he's prepared to become a hard line. Pompeo, I think, 228 00:13:05,600 --> 00:13:08,480 Speaker 1: doubles down on that message. You have an Iran deal, 229 00:13:08,760 --> 00:13:11,040 Speaker 1: the Trump says he wants it better or he wants 230 00:13:11,080 --> 00:13:14,439 Speaker 1: to break it. By May, Pompeo doubles down on that. 231 00:13:14,640 --> 00:13:17,520 Speaker 1: He creates a much more binary set of outcomes that 232 00:13:17,640 --> 00:13:19,800 Speaker 1: either the US gets it the way we want on 233 00:13:19,840 --> 00:13:22,320 Speaker 1: all of these issues, or you're going to see a 234 00:13:22,360 --> 00:13:27,360 Speaker 1: considerably more hawkish policy. Um. Trump might consider that fixed 235 00:13:27,480 --> 00:13:31,320 Speaker 1: in the sense that it's more of what Trump wants, 236 00:13:32,080 --> 00:13:34,760 Speaker 1: but it's much more dangerous world it's and it's more 237 00:13:34,840 --> 00:13:38,000 Speaker 1: volatile for the market. And just a little bit more 238 00:13:38,000 --> 00:13:42,240 Speaker 1: on Mike Pompeo graduated first in his class at West Point. 239 00:13:42,240 --> 00:13:47,480 Speaker 1: His law degree at Harvard and was a congressman from Kansas. 240 00:13:47,840 --> 00:13:52,280 Speaker 1: He also desires regime change in North Korea. What's his 241 00:13:52,360 --> 00:13:56,440 Speaker 1: position going to be as the President prepares for his 242 00:13:56,440 --> 00:14:01,680 Speaker 1: historic meeting with Kim Jong Long of North Korea? Well, again, 243 00:14:01,800 --> 00:14:04,280 Speaker 1: I mean, I think if you're Pumpel in this environment, 244 00:14:04,320 --> 00:14:06,320 Speaker 1: you know the reason you're being brought in is to 245 00:14:06,360 --> 00:14:08,520 Speaker 1: tell Trump that you're right about everything. So it's much 246 00:14:08,559 --> 00:14:13,240 Speaker 1: more like Lightheiser as US trade representatives. It's hearing what 247 00:14:13,280 --> 00:14:16,520 Speaker 1: Trump wants and figuring out a way to deliver that 248 00:14:16,600 --> 00:14:19,400 Speaker 1: message to others and get it back to the Boss. 249 00:14:19,440 --> 00:14:23,840 Speaker 1: So you're never gonna see him making statements on television 250 00:14:24,160 --> 00:14:26,320 Speaker 1: which you're not aligned with Trump. He'll be much more 251 00:14:26,360 --> 00:14:30,040 Speaker 1: like Minute And in that regard and on and because 252 00:14:30,080 --> 00:14:32,880 Speaker 1: we're gonna be talking a lot about North Korea going forward, 253 00:14:33,160 --> 00:14:35,440 Speaker 1: he's gonna be a hot He's gonna be one saying 254 00:14:35,880 --> 00:14:38,600 Speaker 1: um that if we don't see a path or deuterization, 255 00:14:39,240 --> 00:14:41,880 Speaker 1: the military option is on the table. You never hate 256 00:14:41,960 --> 00:14:45,720 Speaker 1: that he's gonna be one talking about maximum sanctions and 257 00:14:45,760 --> 00:14:50,240 Speaker 1: pressure until we get something from Kim Jong lend he 258 00:14:50,600 --> 00:14:55,440 Speaker 1: makes it more likely that the North Koreans offer something substantive, 259 00:14:55,760 --> 00:14:58,880 Speaker 1: but he also makes it more likely the talks breakdown 260 00:14:59,080 --> 00:15:02,320 Speaker 1: or even never happen. What has been his role at 261 00:15:02,360 --> 00:15:05,640 Speaker 1: the at the Central Intelligence Agency? Has it changed under 262 00:15:05,760 --> 00:15:09,960 Speaker 1: the direction of Mr Pompeo. Uh, you know, I think 263 00:15:09,960 --> 00:15:15,560 Speaker 1: that it's been pretty aggressive in terms of counter terrorism efforts. UH. 264 00:15:15,760 --> 00:15:21,720 Speaker 1: Certainly support for an expanded US presents internationally in places 265 00:15:21,800 --> 00:15:25,080 Speaker 1: where we're going with bad actors. UM. You've seen that 266 00:15:25,200 --> 00:15:28,440 Speaker 1: in American support for the saudiast on Yemen. Pompeo has 267 00:15:28,480 --> 00:15:31,200 Speaker 1: played a significant role there. A lot of people say 268 00:15:31,240 --> 00:15:34,240 Speaker 1: that to war the Americans shouldn't be involved in. I 269 00:15:34,240 --> 00:15:37,240 Speaker 1: think Pompeo's position is these are bad guys. They need 270 00:15:37,280 --> 00:15:40,200 Speaker 1: to take military and intelligence efforts everything we can. We 271 00:15:40,240 --> 00:15:43,720 Speaker 1: need to hit them hard. Also, Pompeo's replacement in c 272 00:15:43,920 --> 00:15:47,000 Speaker 1: i A UH was in charge of one of the 273 00:15:47,040 --> 00:15:51,000 Speaker 1: most important black side CIA operated UM, you know, with 274 00:15:51,400 --> 00:15:55,320 Speaker 1: lots of enhanced interrogation techniques. Again, what you're seeing is 275 00:15:55,360 --> 00:15:59,560 Speaker 1: a move towards a more focus, more certaive American foreign policy, 276 00:15:59,600 --> 00:16:02,760 Speaker 1: but more in the lateral as well. Well. In that context, 277 00:16:03,200 --> 00:16:06,880 Speaker 1: Mike Pompeo was in charge of the Counterintelligence Mission Center. 278 00:16:07,280 --> 00:16:11,320 Speaker 1: I believe right. This is at the CIA, and that's 279 00:16:11,360 --> 00:16:15,200 Speaker 1: the department which began the investigation into possible links between 280 00:16:15,640 --> 00:16:20,640 Speaker 1: associates of Donald Trump and Russian officials. Yeah, I mean, 281 00:16:20,640 --> 00:16:22,680 Speaker 1: I get. I think that what we're gonna see on 282 00:16:22,800 --> 00:16:27,120 Speaker 1: Russia is very interesting to watch. That Trump removed Tillerson. 283 00:16:27,600 --> 00:16:29,880 Speaker 1: By the last thing we heard from Tillison were a 284 00:16:29,920 --> 00:16:33,760 Speaker 1: couple of very strong statements that the United States fully 285 00:16:33,920 --> 00:16:38,720 Speaker 1: supported um Theresa May uh in the belief that the 286 00:16:38,800 --> 00:16:43,320 Speaker 1: Russians were behind these nerve agent attacks against British nationals, 287 00:16:43,560 --> 00:16:48,640 Speaker 1: that the Americans would support action against Russia. UM. Pillison's 288 00:16:48,720 --> 00:16:54,240 Speaker 1: also supported sanctions against Russia expanding Uh. The White House 289 00:16:54,280 --> 00:16:57,880 Speaker 1: has absolutely refused to mention the Russians explicit regists. I 290 00:16:57,920 --> 00:17:01,200 Speaker 1: think that Pompeo will know way took a hard wine 291 00:17:01,240 --> 00:17:05,160 Speaker 1: on Moscow unless we see a shift from Trump going forward. Um. 292 00:17:05,320 --> 00:17:07,600 Speaker 1: That's it's very clear we're going to see no daylight 293 00:17:07,680 --> 00:17:09,879 Speaker 1: between these two. Well, can you tell us about his 294 00:17:09,920 --> 00:17:15,080 Speaker 1: relationship with James Madis, Secretary of Defense and specifically the 295 00:17:15,160 --> 00:17:18,720 Speaker 1: military's awareness of climate change as a as a threat 296 00:17:18,760 --> 00:17:21,280 Speaker 1: to US security. That doesn't seem to be consistent with 297 00:17:21,359 --> 00:17:25,600 Speaker 1: Mr Pompeo's views, it's not. But having said that, Madis's 298 00:17:25,680 --> 00:17:27,840 Speaker 1: views have not been consistent with much of the Trump 299 00:17:27,960 --> 00:17:30,199 Speaker 1: in the race. And Madis been very good at not 300 00:17:30,280 --> 00:17:32,880 Speaker 1: getting in the limelight, not making big statements that he's 301 00:17:32,880 --> 00:17:36,119 Speaker 1: going to get criticized for UM and UH and and 302 00:17:36,480 --> 00:17:39,880 Speaker 1: I think that keeping his own counsel UH. The morale 303 00:17:40,040 --> 00:17:42,840 Speaker 1: at the Pentagon, unlike the State Department on the Tilliston, 304 00:17:42,880 --> 00:17:46,399 Speaker 1: has been very high. Maddis as one of the generals, 305 00:17:46,400 --> 00:17:50,000 Speaker 1: has held in very high refused by both both Trump 306 00:17:50,080 --> 00:17:52,960 Speaker 1: and the White House. I actually think everyone that talked 307 00:17:52,960 --> 00:17:55,320 Speaker 1: about a suicide path that the past and was gone, 308 00:17:55,520 --> 00:17:57,920 Speaker 1: that Maddis was gone to I think that was complete 309 00:17:57,960 --> 00:18:02,600 Speaker 1: b speculation that we time mad Dr Bremer. One more question, 310 00:18:02,640 --> 00:18:05,040 Speaker 1: if we could generous of your time this morning the 311 00:18:05,040 --> 00:18:07,720 Speaker 1: President Tilts and his recent comments I don't know you've seen, 312 00:18:07,760 --> 00:18:12,160 Speaker 1: I mean towards Iran. How will our relationship with Iran 313 00:18:12,320 --> 00:18:17,800 Speaker 1: change and does that provide for further Middle East instability? Well, 314 00:18:17,920 --> 00:18:21,520 Speaker 1: there's been a lot of negotiation with Killerson and with 315 00:18:22,400 --> 00:18:27,560 Speaker 1: his advisors, with the Europeans transpiring the way to UM 316 00:18:28,119 --> 00:18:32,480 Speaker 1: continue to ensure that the Iranians will not be able 317 00:18:32,760 --> 00:18:35,960 Speaker 1: to develop nuclear capacity at the end of the tenure period. 318 00:18:35,960 --> 00:18:39,919 Speaker 1: Other words, strengthen uh de termined it the deal without 319 00:18:39,960 --> 00:18:43,760 Speaker 1: breaking the deal. Um. I think that Pompeo is going 320 00:18:43,800 --> 00:18:46,840 Speaker 1: to be less interested um in that path, is going 321 00:18:46,880 --> 00:18:49,120 Speaker 1: to be more interest in trying to bring the iranience 322 00:18:49,160 --> 00:18:51,680 Speaker 1: back to the table to change or break the deal. 323 00:18:52,119 --> 00:18:54,639 Speaker 1: Like with North Korea, it's a more digital and it's 324 00:18:54,640 --> 00:18:57,080 Speaker 1: a more risky out. The new book Us versus then 325 00:18:57,119 --> 00:19:00,639 Speaker 1: the failure of globalization. Ian Bremer with us this morning. 326 00:19:12,880 --> 00:19:16,919 Speaker 1: We're honored now him to bring in George Friedman with us. 327 00:19:17,000 --> 00:19:20,359 Speaker 1: Really really, uh, I think this is a timely interview. Pim. 328 00:19:20,359 --> 00:19:23,800 Speaker 1: Why don't you bring in Mr Freedman with geopolitical futures 329 00:19:23,840 --> 00:19:27,160 Speaker 1: on defense and how it links into the State Department. Well, 330 00:19:27,200 --> 00:19:28,600 Speaker 1: just let him go ahead and tell us what he 331 00:19:28,640 --> 00:19:31,520 Speaker 1: thinks about this new appointment of Mike Pompeio as our 332 00:19:31,640 --> 00:19:35,240 Speaker 1: u S Secretary of State. George Freedman, your thoughts not 333 00:19:35,440 --> 00:19:38,920 Speaker 1: very important at all. Uh. First, this president's which is 334 00:19:39,000 --> 00:19:42,879 Speaker 1: people around. Secondly, a large number of presidents, most of 335 00:19:42,920 --> 00:19:46,600 Speaker 1: them are their own secretaries of state. Trump just made 336 00:19:46,640 --> 00:19:50,760 Speaker 1: a decision, really radical decision to go to North Korea 337 00:19:51,080 --> 00:19:55,639 Speaker 1: to meet with Kim on a major crisis. Uh. He 338 00:19:55,760 --> 00:19:59,800 Speaker 1: obviously doesn't feel that Tillerson is prepared to take you know, 339 00:19:59,840 --> 00:20:03,960 Speaker 1: the he's kind of changes. Tillersen is a very conservative player, 340 00:20:04,680 --> 00:20:06,960 Speaker 1: and he wants somebody backing him who is going to 341 00:20:07,000 --> 00:20:10,280 Speaker 1: be more in tune with him. But I mean, in 342 00:20:10,359 --> 00:20:14,560 Speaker 1: terms of foreign policy, I mean Trump is very, very radical. 343 00:20:14,600 --> 00:20:17,119 Speaker 1: I mean, any other presidents who said, look, I'm not 344 00:20:17,160 --> 00:20:18,719 Speaker 1: going to go to war with North Korea, I'm going 345 00:20:18,760 --> 00:20:22,440 Speaker 1: to talk to them, well be praised a high heaven. Uh. 346 00:20:22,480 --> 00:20:25,359 Speaker 1: In this case, of course, everything he does is going 347 00:20:25,400 --> 00:20:28,119 Speaker 1: to be condemned. But in general, he's had a very 348 00:20:28,160 --> 00:20:31,879 Speaker 1: conservative foreign policy. Tillerson has backed it, but he loves 349 00:20:31,920 --> 00:20:37,320 Speaker 1: shifting personnel around for whatever reason. So in general, the 350 00:20:37,320 --> 00:20:40,800 Speaker 1: Tillerson leaving doesn't mean a whole lot. Pompeo coming in 351 00:20:40,800 --> 00:20:43,320 Speaker 1: doesn't mean a whole lot. Trump is running the show. 352 00:20:44,119 --> 00:20:47,360 Speaker 1: If that's the case, If President Trump is running the show, 353 00:20:47,359 --> 00:20:51,560 Speaker 1: why would Mike Pompeo want this job. Well, to be 354 00:20:51,600 --> 00:20:55,000 Speaker 1: called Secretary of State means a lot. Pompeo seems to 355 00:20:55,040 --> 00:20:57,560 Speaker 1: be closer to the President this week than the other. 356 00:20:58,760 --> 00:21:00,560 Speaker 1: But there have been a lot of press who have 357 00:21:00,720 --> 00:21:03,560 Speaker 1: been whose nowhere to the Secretary of States. When Henry 358 00:21:03,600 --> 00:21:07,920 Speaker 1: Kissinger went to China to open China, William Rodgers, whose 359 00:21:07,920 --> 00:21:11,600 Speaker 1: Secretary of State, was never told that it was happening 360 00:21:11,160 --> 00:21:13,680 Speaker 1: in The reason was it didn't trust the State's Department, 361 00:21:14,240 --> 00:21:16,640 Speaker 1: not the leak. What George treatment from where you set 362 00:21:16,680 --> 00:21:19,800 Speaker 1: with your defense abilities? What is the linkage of our 363 00:21:19,840 --> 00:21:23,840 Speaker 1: State Department with our defense department? Is that overdone? Is 364 00:21:23,880 --> 00:21:27,600 Speaker 1: it overrated? Or is there a real tangible working relationship 365 00:21:27,640 --> 00:21:31,320 Speaker 1: between the two Well depend on the level. There's lots 366 00:21:31,320 --> 00:21:34,359 Speaker 1: of routine things going on that they work together on. 367 00:21:35,160 --> 00:21:38,200 Speaker 1: They have different perspectives on the world at different missions, 368 00:21:38,320 --> 00:21:42,879 Speaker 1: different jobs. But this president and other presidents had felt 369 00:21:43,000 --> 00:21:45,480 Speaker 1: that they could not trust the State Department to follow 370 00:21:45,520 --> 00:21:49,320 Speaker 1: their policies. The State Department has a reputation earned or 371 00:21:49,359 --> 00:21:52,000 Speaker 1: not that they have a view of the world and 372 00:21:52,080 --> 00:21:55,080 Speaker 1: whatever the president says, they're going to go and do it. 373 00:21:55,880 --> 00:21:59,159 Speaker 1: And so in many administrations, the State Department has been 374 00:21:59,200 --> 00:22:01,960 Speaker 1: cut out. They have been left with the routine things, 375 00:22:01,960 --> 00:22:05,879 Speaker 1: but the major breakthroughs they haven't touched. Killerson was told 376 00:22:05,920 --> 00:22:08,840 Speaker 1: to cut the State Department. The budget has been cut. 377 00:22:09,080 --> 00:22:12,359 Speaker 1: We'll see what happens with that, But I mean there's 378 00:22:12,400 --> 00:22:15,880 Speaker 1: always been attention between the Defense Department's view of the world, 379 00:22:15,920 --> 00:22:17,920 Speaker 1: the State department ze of the world, and the CIA's 380 00:22:18,200 --> 00:22:21,800 Speaker 1: department of the world due the world, and good presidents 381 00:22:21,840 --> 00:22:26,000 Speaker 1: have always allowed that to go on, and you know, 382 00:22:26,240 --> 00:22:29,520 Speaker 1: try to have a foreign policy that kind of combines 383 00:22:29,600 --> 00:22:33,320 Speaker 1: the two at that level. So in this particular case, 384 00:22:33,640 --> 00:22:37,800 Speaker 1: this president doesn't trust the State Department. He clearly trust 385 00:22:37,880 --> 00:22:40,920 Speaker 1: the Defense Department, and he has a love hate relationship 386 00:22:41,000 --> 00:22:45,800 Speaker 1: the Sea. The most one of the more more important 387 00:22:45,800 --> 00:22:48,160 Speaker 1: books that you put out is the Flashpoints the emerging 388 00:22:48,200 --> 00:22:51,000 Speaker 1: crisis in Europe. What do you expect Mike Pompeio to 389 00:22:51,080 --> 00:22:54,920 Speaker 1: contribute to the alleviation of any crisis in Europe? Well, 390 00:22:54,920 --> 00:22:58,040 Speaker 1: the crisis in Europe is a European crisis. Uh. Their 391 00:22:58,160 --> 00:23:01,240 Speaker 1: failure to deal with the two thousand eight crisis has 392 00:23:01,359 --> 00:23:05,919 Speaker 1: generated fragmentation among nations, bricksit being only the most visible 393 00:23:06,560 --> 00:23:10,439 Speaker 1: and within nation the rise of nationalist movements. There's the 394 00:23:10,560 --> 00:23:15,520 Speaker 1: United States has not touched the European situation by and large, 395 00:23:15,680 --> 00:23:20,760 Speaker 1: there's nothing we can do and the Europeans wouldn't respond. 396 00:23:21,520 --> 00:23:24,000 Speaker 1: So when we talk about the crisis in Europe, it 397 00:23:24,119 --> 00:23:27,200 Speaker 1: is the crisis, the fact the EU is failing, failing 398 00:23:27,280 --> 00:23:31,080 Speaker 1: is an entity, and that it's kicked off a political 399 00:23:31,119 --> 00:23:34,080 Speaker 1: crisis where even the Germans don't have a coherent government. 400 00:23:34,880 --> 00:23:38,159 Speaker 1: So it's an internal process that really doesn't affect us. 401 00:23:38,200 --> 00:23:41,439 Speaker 1: One of the things. Remember Trump, oddly enough, he's pulled 402 00:23:41,480 --> 00:23:46,400 Speaker 1: back from being responsible for the world. George Freeman, thank 403 00:23:46,400 --> 00:23:50,640 Speaker 1: you so much. That geopolitical futures greatly appreciate the time 404 00:23:50,680 --> 00:24:09,360 Speaker 1: today on short notice. We're there. Economic data, Vincent del Judas, 405 00:24:09,600 --> 00:24:13,680 Speaker 1: good morning time. The consumer price indext the CPI February, 406 00:24:14,080 --> 00:24:16,919 Speaker 1: both the headline and the core rising at a slower 407 00:24:17,000 --> 00:24:20,119 Speaker 1: pace than the prior month, both up point two percent 408 00:24:20,280 --> 00:24:22,520 Speaker 1: c p I in the core month over month February 409 00:24:22,800 --> 00:24:25,280 Speaker 1: up point two percent year over year. We see a 410 00:24:25,280 --> 00:24:28,399 Speaker 1: little bit of a pickup in the CPI two point 411 00:24:28,440 --> 00:24:31,240 Speaker 1: two percent versus two point one, but the all important 412 00:24:31,280 --> 00:24:34,440 Speaker 1: core year over year holding steady at one point eight percent. 413 00:24:34,480 --> 00:24:36,800 Speaker 1: I'm Vinnydale Juda, so let's go back to New York. Vinny, 414 00:24:36,920 --> 00:24:40,119 Speaker 1: thank you very much. The number bang in line, the 415 00:24:40,160 --> 00:24:44,960 Speaker 1: market going nowhere. Treasuries unchanged, the US tenure at two six, 416 00:24:45,000 --> 00:24:48,199 Speaker 1: pretty much unchanged on the session. Euro dollar unchanged off 417 00:24:48,200 --> 00:24:51,240 Speaker 1: the back of this as well. At one fifty two, 418 00:24:51,440 --> 00:24:53,679 Speaker 1: we're up about a tenth of one percent. That we 419 00:24:53,720 --> 00:24:56,240 Speaker 1: do start to climb a little bit higher on euro 420 00:24:56,320 --> 00:24:58,399 Speaker 1: dollar now by about two tents of one percent. A 421 00:24:58,520 --> 00:25:01,440 Speaker 1: very marginal reaction in the f facts market, a weak 422 00:25:01,880 --> 00:25:05,320 Speaker 1: dollar story, and a very small reaction in the bond market, 423 00:25:05,320 --> 00:25:07,679 Speaker 1: which just a tiny bit coming into thrice ras Now 424 00:25:07,760 --> 00:25:10,840 Speaker 1: drama here, Michael McKay, Blind Black's very joining us in 425 00:25:10,880 --> 00:25:14,320 Speaker 1: the studio in New York. No drama in the numbers, Mike, No, 426 00:25:14,480 --> 00:25:18,159 Speaker 1: I'm straining here to find something exciting to talk about. 427 00:25:18,520 --> 00:25:21,240 Speaker 1: We did see a small decline and energy prices that 428 00:25:21,320 --> 00:25:23,800 Speaker 1: probably has to do with seasonals. Energy prices did not 429 00:25:24,000 --> 00:25:28,080 Speaker 1: rise as much as they usually do during the month. 430 00:25:28,080 --> 00:25:31,480 Speaker 1: They're kind of flat, uh down to a certain extent. 431 00:25:31,560 --> 00:25:34,160 Speaker 1: Gasoline prices where so you get a one tenth rise 432 00:25:34,560 --> 00:25:40,879 Speaker 1: that's certainly shaved some off. But almost every category was up, 433 00:25:41,359 --> 00:25:46,320 Speaker 1: which is something that will you know, encourage the the 434 00:25:46,359 --> 00:25:51,120 Speaker 1: inflation hawks. But not up by much. I mean, cannot 435 00:25:51,280 --> 00:25:56,040 Speaker 1: change significantly from January. But Michael McKee, if Mark Mobius, 436 00:25:56,200 --> 00:26:00,119 Speaker 1: legendary investor per chance, was here, he would tell me 437 00:26:00,280 --> 00:26:03,360 Speaker 1: Tom do what the cf as do. Run the smooth 438 00:26:03,560 --> 00:26:07,920 Speaker 1: moving averages, exponential or simple. I run simple moving averages. 439 00:26:08,000 --> 00:26:12,760 Speaker 1: Mike mr Mobius always runs exponential moving averages. The vectors 440 00:26:12,840 --> 00:26:17,399 Speaker 1: going up. But we can't break out of the moving 441 00:26:17,480 --> 00:26:20,880 Speaker 1: averages that we saw four years ago or longer ago, 442 00:26:21,040 --> 00:26:24,399 Speaker 1: you know, pre crisis. All this. Where's the breakout? Where's 443 00:26:24,440 --> 00:26:28,440 Speaker 1: the breakout? Breakout? It's on about the fifteen of April 444 00:26:28,800 --> 00:26:32,760 Speaker 1: when we get the CPI numbers for March. Is that 445 00:26:32,840 --> 00:26:38,800 Speaker 1: a base effect issure effect issue? But what you're seeing 446 00:26:38,800 --> 00:26:41,679 Speaker 1: here is inflation starting to rise across the board. A 447 00:26:41,800 --> 00:26:45,239 Speaker 1: lot of things are moving up in price. And we 448 00:26:45,320 --> 00:26:48,879 Speaker 1: used to have a much more uh stratified, you know, 449 00:26:49,400 --> 00:26:52,720 Speaker 1: diversified thing where if some things went up, something you down. 450 00:26:52,800 --> 00:26:54,919 Speaker 1: Most most are going up, they're just not going up 451 00:26:54,920 --> 00:26:59,600 Speaker 1: by much. I mean, airline fares rose by six tenths 452 00:26:59,680 --> 00:27:03,840 Speaker 1: during a month. Um the motor vehicle insurance last month 453 00:27:03,920 --> 00:27:05,360 Speaker 1: was a big deal because it was up one point 454 00:27:05,400 --> 00:27:07,520 Speaker 1: three percent. Was at one point seven percent this time. 455 00:27:08,000 --> 00:27:10,880 Speaker 1: So you're you're still seeing a lot more stuff going up. 456 00:27:11,040 --> 00:27:13,520 Speaker 1: We're going to hear a lot about goldilocks in the 457 00:27:13,600 --> 00:27:16,600 Speaker 1: days to come. Michael McKey because this is fertile ground 458 00:27:16,640 --> 00:27:18,400 Speaker 1: for for risk assets in the minds of a lot 459 00:27:18,400 --> 00:27:21,720 Speaker 1: of people. Inflation, Yes, things are moving high, they're drifting higher, 460 00:27:21,760 --> 00:27:24,360 Speaker 1: but it's so gradual and the pressure is so subdued 461 00:27:24,720 --> 00:27:26,560 Speaker 1: that what you see in terms of reaction on the 462 00:27:26,600 --> 00:27:28,960 Speaker 1: screen today, Tom, it's not in effect. It's not in 463 00:27:28,960 --> 00:27:31,439 Speaker 1: the bond market, it's in the equity market. Equity future 464 00:27:31,480 --> 00:27:33,560 Speaker 1: is really spiked off the back of that inflation print. 465 00:27:33,600 --> 00:27:38,200 Speaker 1: It's the fear of inflation, Michael, is what's gripping investors. 466 00:27:38,920 --> 00:27:41,360 Speaker 1: And I guess this report this morning says, at least 467 00:27:41,359 --> 00:27:44,119 Speaker 1: for now, nothing to fear, though as you've pointed out, 468 00:27:44,400 --> 00:27:46,359 Speaker 1: next month, in the month after that could be quite 469 00:27:46,359 --> 00:27:50,000 Speaker 1: critical in the next move fear itself, Tom, And we're 470 00:27:50,000 --> 00:27:53,119 Speaker 1: talking about this on surveillance television this morning. Uh, the 471 00:27:53,200 --> 00:27:58,040 Speaker 1: idea that the markets are really really terrified of inflation 472 00:27:58,160 --> 00:28:00,520 Speaker 1: out there, but it's going to be very gradual and 473 00:28:00,520 --> 00:28:02,679 Speaker 1: it's not going to be the inlation of your past. 474 00:28:02,880 --> 00:28:04,800 Speaker 1: Mike McKee, Thank you so much. Much more on this 475 00:28:04,880 --> 00:28:13,560 Speaker 1: in the coming weeks. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg 476 00:28:13,560 --> 00:28:19,520 Speaker 1: Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts. SoundCloud, 477 00:28:19,880 --> 00:28:24,120 Speaker 1: or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at 478 00:28:24,160 --> 00:28:28,400 Speaker 1: Tom Keene before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. 479 00:28:28,840 --> 00:28:29,960 Speaker 1: I'm Bloomberg Radio