Speaker 1: Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to
Speaker 1: the Sean Hannity radio show podcast. Hey, there's a lot
Speaker 1: of options when it comes to buying flowers for Valentine's Day,
Speaker 1: but there's only one real rose authority, one eight hundred
Speaker 1: flowers dot com, and right now you can order eighteen
Speaker 1: red roses. It's only or upgraded twenty four red roses
Speaker 1: for only ten bucks. More. Go to one eight hundred
Speaker 1: flowers dot com slash Hannity one eight hundred flowers dot
Speaker 1: com slash Hannity. Mr President, I don't think I quite understand.
Speaker 1: I'm reading a letter from Coretta Scott came to the
Speaker 1: Judiciary Committee from that was admitted into the record. I'm
Speaker 1: simply reading what she wrote about what the nomination of
Speaker 1: Jeff Sessions to be a federal court judgment and what
Speaker 1: it would mean in history for her. This is a
Speaker 1: reminder not for necessly what you just shared. However, you
Speaker 1: stated that they're a sitting senator is a disgrace to
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice. I think that may have been Senator,
Speaker 1: although I would be glad to repeat it in my
Speaker 1: own words. The rule applies to imputing conduct or motive
Speaker 1: through any form or voice to a sitting. Form of
Speaker 1: words includes quotes, articles, or other materials. So, quoting Senator Kennedy,
Speaker 1: calling then nominee Sessions a disgrace is a violation of
Speaker 1: Senate rules. It was certainly not in in the opinion
Speaker 1: of the chair. It is the first President, the majority
Speaker 1: leader Senators impearing the motives and conduct of our colleague
Speaker 1: from Alabama. As warned by the Chair, Senator Warren quote said,
Speaker 1: Senator Sessions has used the awesome power of his office
Speaker 1: to chill the pre exercise of the vote by black citizens.
Speaker 1: I call the Senator to order on to the provision
Speaker 1: to ruin iron team. Mr President Center from Massachusetts. Mr President,
Speaker 1: I am surprised that the words of Coretta Scott King
Speaker 1: are not suitable for debate in the United States Senate.
Speaker 1: I ask leave of the Senate to continue my remarks.
Speaker 1: Is their objection? I appeal the ruling obtection is hurt.
Speaker 1: The Center will take her seat. Al Right. That was
Speaker 1: the show put on by now the face of the
Speaker 1: alt radical left, the face of all of these extremists
Speaker 1: now that are taking to protesting and talking about fantasizing
Speaker 1: about blowing up white houses and and talking about how
Speaker 1: nasty they are, like the bloodstains on their sheets. And
Speaker 1: she is now the face of this group of radicals,
Speaker 1: the alt radical left, loved by the media. I don't
Speaker 1: think how many interviews has she since this this issue
Speaker 1: came up last night. Look, the Senate is the the
Speaker 1: genteel pot of government with this causality, and there are
Speaker 1: certain rules that are in place, and you can argue, well,
Speaker 1: it's it's it's violating her free speech rights. No, if
Speaker 1: you remember the Senate, they have rules and at Rule
Speaker 1: nineteen talks about you cannot impugne the conduct or the
Speaker 1: motive of a colleague in debate, says one of the
Speaker 1: rules of the Senate. It has been applied in the past.
Speaker 1: And she's trying And what when you know you can't
Speaker 1: mention coretit Scott King on the floor of the Senator. Well,
Speaker 1: it was also Senator Ted Kennedy that she wanted to quote,
Speaker 1: and she wanted to insult Jeff Sessions herself. Now I'm
Speaker 1: gonna say this, I'm just fed up with this because
Speaker 1: it's never gonna end. And what we've got to if
Speaker 1: if you want America to change, there's two things now
Speaker 1: that are gonna have to happen that are becoming very
Speaker 1: focused in my mind that we better pay attention to.
Speaker 1: And I've said this before. I did an opening monologue
Speaker 1: on Hannity one night. They are not your friends, liberals,
Speaker 1: the people attacking President Trump. You've heard it now with
Speaker 1: Maxiem Waters wanting to impeach him. You've heard Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker 1: You've heard Chuck Schumer, Chuck Schumer. There's nobody that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump could have picked for the Supreme Court that Chuck
Speaker 1: Schumer is ever going to side with and approve. And
Speaker 1: he's gonna rally his troops as minority leader because they
Speaker 1: feel that they need to cater to this loud, small
Speaker 1: voice of people and radical leftists that think that their
Speaker 1: country has been taken over. Orgy Ramos writing and I
Speaker 1: don't even recognize this country anymore, or hey, uh, I
Speaker 1: have no idea what's different between the time that Trump
Speaker 1: has become president and and Obama being president, except you
Speaker 1: are a radical leftist, not a newsman but an opinion host,
Speaker 1: and you don't like the immigration policies that happened to
Speaker 1: be an always have been the law of the land,
Speaker 1: and America does have it right to protect its citizens,
Speaker 1: and Mexico, of all countries, I've never heard you criticize
Speaker 1: them for their abuse of policy and abusive treatment of
Speaker 1: those that enter their country illegally that are either put
Speaker 1: in jail or sent back immediately without any questions asked.
Speaker 1: So what we see going on here is nothing but
Speaker 1: a flagrant double standard. There's only one guy that I
Speaker 1: was so glad stood up last night. Kudos to Senator
Speaker 1: Ted Cruz of Texas, because I thought he launched the
Speaker 1: most effective response to the Democratic attempts to smear Jeff
Speaker 1: Sessions as a racist. All this is, it's right out
Speaker 1: of the same election handbook that didn't work for Hillary
Speaker 1: this time around, and it is it happens every two years,
Speaker 1: and more importantly, especially every four years. That's why at
Speaker 1: the beginning of every election season, I dig back into
Speaker 1: the archives and I pull out all the greatest hits
Speaker 1: every election season, Republicans, if you elect them, black churches
Speaker 1: are gonna burn Republicans. They don't even want to count
Speaker 1: you in the census. I don't feel no ways tired,
Speaker 1: and on and on and on. No, I don't want
Speaker 1: the montage. We won't play now. But my point is
Speaker 1: so Ted Cruze gets up there last night, and do
Speaker 1: you realize how few Americans think about this, have any
Speaker 1: idea that the ku Klux Klan and Jim Crow laws
Speaker 1: segregation and slavery, the Democratic Party owns it. Now. They
Speaker 1: don't teach the snowflakes and today's college campuses that need
Speaker 1: their puppies and their cookies and their play dough, and
Speaker 1: their legos and their crayons and their coloring books and
Speaker 1: their aromatherapy. They don't teach them on college campuses today
Speaker 1: about the real history of civil rights and the civil
Speaker 1: rights movement. Bull Connor Democrat, George Wallace Democrat, Lestermatics. I
Speaker 1: met Lestermatics when I was enjoyed demokrat or Robert K.
Speaker 1: K K Bird who was Hillary Clinton's mentor, you know
Speaker 1: it was a former klansman. The Democratic Parties pushed to
Speaker 1: keep African Americans separate and unequal. You know, it was
Speaker 1: Republicans that were appealed to by Lyndon Johnson to pass
Speaker 1: the Civil Rights Act of sixty four and sixty five.
Speaker 1: Lincoln was a Republican if you want to understand your history.
Speaker 1: And last night, thankfully somebody in the Senate at the
Speaker 1: enough guts to stand up and lift this veil on
Speaker 1: the Democrats and they're ugly and racist passed and it
Speaker 1: was Ted Cruz. He was on Fox News, Fox and
Speaker 1: Friends this morning. He said, Look, the Democrats, they're the
Speaker 1: party of the Klan. You look at most racist, you
Speaker 1: look at the Dixiecrats. They were Democrats who imposed segregation,
Speaker 1: Jim Crow laws, he said, and then he criticized the
Speaker 1: Democrats for this same tired, disgusting, divisive tactic that they use,
Speaker 1: which is raising allegations of racism anytime they have a
Speaker 1: political difference with a Republican and it's beyond frustrating to me.
Speaker 1: And I think maybe Donald Trump is beginning to churn
Speaker 1: the waters here that the Democratic Party that has had
Speaker 1: a a strangled whole monopoly on the black vote in America.
Speaker 1: They they go ask for votes every four years, they
Speaker 1: call Republicans racist every four years. But if you look
Speaker 1: at inner city schools, they're the worst in the in
Speaker 1: the country and Democrats have done nothing to fix them,
Speaker 1: nothing to help the people in these communities. If you
Speaker 1: look at some of the highest crime uh cities and
Speaker 1: murder rate cities in the country, like Chicago, a democratic
Speaker 1: run city. You know, if if I was the mayor
Speaker 1: of Chicago, You're damn right, I'd have police all over
Speaker 1: these areas that are filled with crime and shootings. How
Speaker 1: do you have four thousand people slaughtered in your eight
Speaker 1: years in eight years of Obama's presidency, and the president
Speaker 1: didn't lift a finger to help the people in Chicago.
Speaker 1: And of those murdered happened to be Black Americans. And
Speaker 1: all that talent and all the gifts that God gave
Speaker 1: every one of those four thousand people, what I mean
Speaker 1: wasted because we didn't have the will, the desire to
Speaker 1: fix what was obviously a growing problem on a daily basis.
Speaker 1: It's an absolute disgrace if you look at the areas
Speaker 1: of the country that have suffered more economically and the
Speaker 1: disproportionate impact of of the Obama economy, who were impacted
Speaker 1: more than anybody else. What what demographic groups, well, Blacks
Speaker 1: and Hispanics, and you see a higher percentage of Blacks
Speaker 1: that went into poverty, that are on food stamps, that
Speaker 1: are out of the labor force during the eight years
Speaker 1: Obama's president. So it's a narrative that is nothing but false,
Speaker 1: libelous slander that gets advanced every single day, and I'm
Speaker 1: getting sick of it. You know, there's a you know,
Speaker 1: you want to if if Elizabeth Warren is now going
Speaker 1: to be the spokesperson for the radical, radical left. Okay,
Speaker 1: let's take a look at Elizabeth Warren. It looks like
Speaker 1: the folks working for the Consumer Protection Agency, which was
Speaker 1: founded by Elizabeth Warren, living pretty high on the hog.
Speaker 1: Daily caller pointed out the pay is flowing so generously
Speaker 1: at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that the hundreds of
Speaker 1: bureaucrats there received more than most members of Congress. Paul
Speaker 1: Ryan is speaker. He gets two and three thousand dollars
Speaker 1: a year, but that's less than what fifty four employees
Speaker 1: at the Consumer Protection Agency that she founded are being paid.
Speaker 1: Liberals are very generous to themselves and very generous with
Speaker 1: other people's money, as they want to redistribute wealth. And
Speaker 1: you've got a hundred and seventy employees of of this
Speaker 1: very same agency that earned more than the Secretaries of
Speaker 1: Defense and State, the Attorney General, the Director of National Intelligence.
Speaker 1: All cabinet salaries are capped at a d seven hundred dollars,
Speaker 1: but not at that bureau. You got thirty nine employees
Speaker 1: that earned more than two hundred thirty thousand dollars that's
Speaker 1: paid to Mike Pence, the vice president. It's pretty pathetic.
Speaker 1: And then out of mothballs, here comes Hillary taking to
Speaker 1: Twitter to weigh in after Senate Republicans rightly enforced the
Speaker 1: rules of the Senate blocking Warren from playing the race
Speaker 1: card on the Senate floor, tweeting out a line from
Speaker 1: Mitch McConnell, which had been widely shared since he led Republicans.
Speaker 1: And you know, to to block this, this rule breaking
Speaker 1: last night, and she tweeted, and it's gone viral, you
Speaker 1: know that. Nevertheless, she was pc persistent, she was warned,
Speaker 1: she gave an explanation. Nevertheless, she persisted, and so must
Speaker 1: we all. Thanks Hillary, We really needed that, you know.
Speaker 1: And Elizabeth Warren maybe having some trouble back in Massachusetts.
Speaker 1: You gotta a W B U R pole that just
Speaker 1: came out. This is gonna get interesting of state. Voters
Speaker 1: in Massachusetts don't think she deserves reelection, only a plurality.
Speaker 1: Forty six percent believe she doesn't deserve a second term.
Speaker 1: That's not good for her. Let's talk that Kurt Schilling
Speaker 1: might run, although one poll didn't have him doing particularly well.
Speaker 1: You Amherst Pole last September found that Warren would be
Speaker 1: in a statistical dead heat with the Lieutenant Governor uh
Speaker 1: Poldo or former Republican Governor Bill Weld. Well, that would
Speaker 1: be fun to watch. And then of course you got
Speaker 1: this whole POLCA huntas lie about her. You know, she
Speaker 1: listed herself as a minority in the American Association of
Speaker 1: Law Schools Directory of Faculty, and then she joined the
Speaker 1: faculty of the University of Pennsylvania Law School, later hired
Speaker 1: at Harvard Law School, and she touted her supposed lineage
Speaker 1: when the program faced doubts about faculty diversity, and she
Speaker 1: listed herself as a minority until the year she accepted
Speaker 1: a tenured position at Harvard. No, she didn't know that
Speaker 1: Harvard used their heritage, she says. Okay, well, but she
Speaker 1: defended it over and over again in interviews. But the
Speaker 1: New England Genealogical Society said there's no proof that she
Speaker 1: was a self proclaimed native that had Native American lineage.
Speaker 1: On top of everything else, she's lying and she couldn't
Speaker 1: prove it. Well, my grandmother saw this picture and therefore
Speaker 1: she thought I was a Native American, so I just
Speaker 1: went with that really really unbelievable fighting the trauma liberal
Speaker 1: media one day at a time, Sean Show. You know,
Speaker 1: there are a lot of options when it comes to
Speaker 1: buying flowers for Valentine's Day, but there's only one true
Speaker 1: rose authority. One hund Flowers never fails to wow all
Speaker 1: the women in my life with the elegant and stunning
Speaker 1: bouquets that they have available. And one hund Flowers they
Speaker 1: have the best deals on Valentine's Day essentials and the
Speaker 1: best part they start at just twine. Simply pick your
Speaker 1: delivery date and let one eight hundred Flowers handle the rest.
Speaker 1: One eight hundred Flowers has an exclusive offer for you
Speaker 1: listeners to this show, The Sean Hannity Show. Now. Today's
Speaker 1: offer is eighteen red roses for only You can upgrade
Speaker 1: to twenty four red roses for ten bucks more, but
Speaker 1: they're only available while supplies last. When it comes to
Speaker 1: Valentine's Day, don't settle for anything less than my rose
Speaker 1: authority one eight hundred flowers dot com. How to get
Speaker 1: amazing Valentine's Day deals like eighteen red roses or to
Speaker 1: upgrade to twenty four red roses for ten bucks more.
Speaker 1: Just go to one eight hundred flowers dot com slash Hannity.
Speaker 1: One eight hundred flowers dot com slash Hannity. Do it
Speaker 1: now for all the women in your life that you love.
Speaker 1: You know, she's not even not only not Native Americans,
Speaker 1: she's not Pocas, she's like a fake Pocahonas with all
Speaker 1: the discussions about fake news, all right, if we're gonna
Speaker 1: go back to Coretta Scott King and we're gonna look
Speaker 1: at the truth and the real wreck heard of Senator
Speaker 1: Jeff Sessions. Let's listen. Let's take a listen to Coretta
Speaker 1: Scott King, and let's hear her praising Jeff Sessions for
Speaker 1: his work on putting together the Rosa Parks. Was it
Speaker 1: a museum, a memorial, or a library. It was a
Speaker 1: library that they put together that he fought hard for.
Speaker 1: As a number of other items for Rosa Parks and
Speaker 1: other great heroic minorities in this country. The President Martindale,
Speaker 1: two Senator Sessions, Mayor Bright Try, State Chancellors Jack Hawkins Jr. Dr.
Speaker 1: Dorothy Height, the Johnny Carr, Nita mm and Affy's Maimie
Speaker 1: Till Mobley to all of the distinguished program participants and
Speaker 1: guests in this audience today. It's a great honor and
Speaker 1: privilege for me to join you and celebrating the grand
Speaker 1: opening of the Rosa Parks Library and Museum. Yeah, Jeff
Speaker 1: Sessions made that happen. I guess that didn't come up
Speaker 1: last night on the Senate floor, nor did the history
Speaker 1: of the Democrats and their connection to racism. I want
Speaker 1: to get into this whole issue. It's very frustrating because
Speaker 1: the Democrats are so busy obstructing all of the cabinet
Speaker 1: appointments of Donald Trump. Look, I don't want to be
Speaker 1: overly critical, but it was very frustrating listening to the
Speaker 1: arguments last night before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Speaker 1: as it relates to the executive order of the President.
Speaker 1: It was frustrating on a couple of level levels because
Speaker 1: the issue before the court was very simple. Does the
Speaker 1: president have the authority to do what he did? Does
Speaker 1: the judge have the authority to stop it? And that
Speaker 1: was really it. And and they're getting into all of
Speaker 1: the nuances of the argument and what Rudy Giuliani might
Speaker 1: have said about a Muslim ban, and then they're questioning, well,
Speaker 1: how many Muslims are actually impacted by it, and is
Speaker 1: it really a Muslim ban or is this a ban
Speaker 1: against countries that baptized the terrorism. It was so beyond
Speaker 1: frustrating to me. So we'll give you the ins and
Speaker 1: outs of that. We're not getting a decision from the
Speaker 1: Ninth Circuit today, the spokesperson for the Ninth Circuit, So
Speaker 1: that is not coming down today. And if Jeff Sessions
Speaker 1: and the Department of Justice had their own people doing this,
Speaker 1: or even if the administration brought in outside council, it
Speaker 1: would have been a far more effective argument from my perspective. Also,
Speaker 1: we've got a major storm hitting the East coast. Will
Speaker 1: tell you about that. Next. He's with WeatherBell dot Com.
Speaker 1: Is our good friend Jovis starting Mr Weather for the
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity Show. And you know, while some people are
Speaker 1: predicting six inches for the New York and the northeastern seaboard,
Speaker 1: he's predicting a foot of more. Why don't I always
Speaker 1: trust you? And you've only been wrong really once that
Speaker 1: I've known since I've known you. Well, we've got six
Speaker 1: or twelve out in his city, his city, but that
Speaker 1: could easily get the fifties. So look, this is the
Speaker 1: thing about this storm is between five and seven o'clock,
Speaker 1: it's libelly. Just turn over and from rain. Let's start
Speaker 1: us some rain in Philly and New York and right
Speaker 1: to what I call a thump snow that's not Trump snow.
Speaker 1: Even though this storm will be huge and unbelievable. Believe me,
Speaker 1: it's a Trumpian storm coming from Hey. You should see.
Speaker 1: You should. It's gonna be huge. It's gonna be so
Speaker 1: much snow. By the way, we're gonna have so much
Speaker 1: winning snow. You're gonna get sick of all the snow.
Speaker 1: We'll we'll be sick of it, will have to build
Speaker 1: a wall to stop it. Next time, my story, your
Speaker 1: invitation is horrible, by the way, it's better in your buddy,
Speaker 1: Alec Baldwin. I'll tell you that right now. Did you
Speaker 1: see my things that you might not know about Sean
Speaker 1: Hannity I tweeted out the other day and one of them,
Speaker 1: as you may not know that, I have a brown
Speaker 1: belt and mixed martial arts krabmagan. It's a eclectic blend
Speaker 1: of krabmagan and jiu jitsu and kempo and boxing, and
Speaker 1: and then the next item was and the person I'd
Speaker 1: most like to use it on is Alec Baldwin. You
Speaker 1: know Alec was a good wrestler. You know that all
Speaker 1: the Baldwins were good wrestlers. I don't care if he's
Speaker 1: a good wrestler. It won't matter. It won't matter, It
Speaker 1: won't matter. A good double legs stops everything. Okay, listen,
Speaker 1: let me get serious here. Uh we This is it
Speaker 1: is going to snow very hard, six to twelve inches
Speaker 1: in a six hour period in a lot of the
Speaker 1: lot of the East Coast from Philadelphia right up to
Speaker 1: New York City in Boston. The totals around New York
Speaker 1: six to twelve locally fifteen, with blowing and drifting at
Speaker 1: the end of the storm and on into Thursday night.
Speaker 1: How is that possible? It's sixty five degrees in New
Speaker 1: York today. How is it possible? Sewan this happened? Okay,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm sixty one. In the in the sixties,
Speaker 1: we had a we had a case in Atlantic City
Speaker 1: in February sixty seven. Between the fifth and the tenth
Speaker 1: we had two ft of snow all gone by the
Speaker 1: fifteen A foot of snow on the ground the morning
Speaker 1: of the seventeen. You get these situations where there's a
Speaker 1: lot of back and forth, and of course the atmosphere
Speaker 1: thrives on conflict that you know, the cold versus the warm.
Speaker 1: So the warm is getting kicked out and along comes
Speaker 1: a wave of low pressure, and this is what is
Speaker 1: going to happen. And this has going to deepen right
Speaker 1: along the eastern seaboard. And so it's it's happened before.
Speaker 1: Believe me, it's just a lot of times you don't
Speaker 1: remember it, or you don't go back and look at
Speaker 1: the maps. But when it when Kennedy inaugural storm, even
Speaker 1: though it's much colder before, this particular storm is very
Speaker 1: much like that, and very much like February five through seven,
Speaker 1: nineteen sixty seven. So what I do is I go
Speaker 1: back and I look at storms and said, you know
Speaker 1: what this looks like this. So you know my emails
Speaker 1: you back on Sunday said I have a prediction now
Speaker 1: because you see the weather pattern that happened before, you say, well,
Speaker 1: a similar event will happen again, And here it comes.
Speaker 1: So it's it's happened quite a bit. But what the
Speaker 1: problem with this is it's going to give me a
Speaker 1: time frame for like Philly, a time frame for the
Speaker 1: northeastern seaboard. Start Philadelphia, change from rain to snow between
Speaker 1: five and seven in the morning, end around noon. New
Speaker 1: York City from north from northwest to southeast, changes over
Speaker 1: from four am in the northwestern suburbs out on the
Speaker 1: island by eight am. The storm ends from northwest west
Speaker 1: to east between noon and three dumb six to twelve
Speaker 1: locally fifteen inches of snow it comes. It's really gonna
Speaker 1: be like in a four hour period of time, you're saying,
Speaker 1: we're gonna get a foot of snow. Yeah, six hours
Speaker 1: is better, but there may be a couple of those
Speaker 1: couple of hours worth snowing too, three four inches an
Speaker 1: hour Boston and Providence, And essentially I'm not gonna say, hey, listen,
Speaker 1: we're gonna shot the quarter down from Philly to New York.
Speaker 1: It's gonna get very difficult tomorrow morning. Blowing and drifting
Speaker 1: comes behind it, because okay, sixty five now, it's gonna
Speaker 1: be twenty five tomorrow the noon at three o'clock will
Speaker 1: be twenty five tomorrow morning at nine o'clock. Okay, but
Speaker 1: Boston and providence in some of these places, and of
Speaker 1: course the island where you get to win. Really howling. Uh,
Speaker 1: it's going to be a big, big storm, and especially
Speaker 1: in light of the fact that there hasn't been much
Speaker 1: and we've had a couple of storms, but this one
Speaker 1: is coming right after a real warm period and then uh,
Speaker 1: you know, you just turn it around and all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, here it is so that that's what's going on.
Speaker 1: All right, Well, I appreciate what you want to hear.
Speaker 1: The funniest Alec Baldwin tape in the history, So Alec Baldwin,
Speaker 1: I'll tell you a funny story. Alec Baldwin wanted to
Speaker 1: be a radio talk show host. And I don't know
Speaker 1: if you remember, Rush used to make fun of like
Speaker 1: the Tom Dashall Show and how boring of the Tom
Speaker 1: Dashell Show would be. And remember Liberals have tried their
Speaker 1: hand to talk radio for many, many years. It's always
Speaker 1: ended in a massive failure. I mean, al Franken just
Speaker 1: flopped on his face. And well, I mean because every
Speaker 1: other outlet is liberal. I mean, let's be honest here.
Speaker 1: We we learned a lot through wiki leaks of out
Speaker 1: how dishonest and how they're even colluding with the Clinton campaign.
Speaker 1: Now every single day Scott Pelly and CBS and every
Speaker 1: other network wants to call Donald Trump a liar. CNN
Speaker 1: is the worst of the bunch. The New York Times
Speaker 1: maybe is right up there with them. And so these
Speaker 1: people have no idea. They don't understand the phenomenon. They
Speaker 1: don't understand what he's doing. They don't understand a politician
Speaker 1: that actually gets work done and keeps his promises. So anyway,
Speaker 1: back in the day, Alec Baldwin wanted to be a
Speaker 1: talk show host. So one day he is at my
Speaker 1: ex wife station in New York and he he's hosting
Speaker 1: a show with a buddy of mine, Brian Whitman, and
Speaker 1: he was the host though of the show. So me
Speaker 1: and le Ven are on the phone together and he goes,
Speaker 1: why do you think you want to call in? Let's
Speaker 1: call in. So we call in, and our our buddy
Speaker 1: Guns is running the phones that night, and so he
Speaker 1: puts us through and we get on with Alec Baldwin,
Speaker 1: we tag team him. Levin gets in his grill a
Speaker 1: little bit, and he got so angry he walked out
Speaker 1: of his own show. He walked out and then then
Speaker 1: when nobody nobody knew about then he goes to my
Speaker 1: affiliate in in Philadelphia, w PHT, and then he goes
Speaker 1: any auditions there. And this is We did not edit this.
Speaker 1: This is this is him doing a radio talk show.
Speaker 1: And we've got the tape. This is and when we
Speaker 1: got some time. Oh great, we're gonna h when can
Speaker 1: we take some calls whenever we want? We have calls
Speaker 1: that are on there now, no calls yet. What number
Speaker 1: do people call to get on the air? I mean,
Speaker 1: do we have that number? It's right there, you know.
Speaker 1: Do I have a call number in front of me? Oh?
Speaker 1: I'm so sorry. Uh, that's interesting, interesting at twelve ten
Speaker 1: at PHT. Of course, any other questions you have, any
Speaker 1: other comments you have, call us um to the what
Speaker 1: else call us please at now. Um. If you don't call,
Speaker 1: we're gonna keep reading from the Scientology Manual. You might
Speaker 1: not feel it. You might not feel the energy right now,
Speaker 1: you might not feel the swell of what's happening here.
Speaker 1: Have any calls yet? There ivan no calls. Let's speak
Speaker 1: some more about scientology. Is Sean Hannity a scientologist Alec
Speaker 1: Baldwin posing the Big questions tonight here do we have
Speaker 1: any calls here yet? I haven't none. Boy, it's just incredible, unbelievable. Well,
Speaker 1: you leave us no choice listeners. I did not edit that.
Speaker 1: I did not edit that. Except for time, I did
Speaker 1: not it was it's didn't remember that. It's the greatest
Speaker 1: tape ever. It is. But remember the Ralph Kraham did
Speaker 1: when he was a Chef of Tomorrow And yes, yeah, exactly.
Speaker 1: You know what the funny thing is, he really wanted
Speaker 1: to be. You know, I've actually when I drive around
Speaker 1: in my car sometimes and I'm in another state, I'll
Speaker 1: just throw on a local radio station. You know, Look,
Speaker 1: I started. I was horrible when I started at radio.
Speaker 1: But this guy is supposed to be trained in movies
Speaker 1: and whatever he does, I don't even know what he
Speaker 1: even commercials. And you know, he thought he was missed
Speaker 1: a talk show host, and he comes in, he comes
Speaker 1: in unprepared. But there's nothing more painful than listening to
Speaker 1: a radio host that's not prepared to do their show
Speaker 1: and that literally is begging for calls. Now it even
Speaker 1: got worse after all you just heard, and he couldn't
Speaker 1: get anybody to call in. Nobody picked up the phone
Speaker 1: to call this guy. Then he called home and he
Speaker 1: put his mother on as a guest. And I didn't
Speaker 1: make that up. Is that not pathetic? She's got to
Speaker 1: be interesting. I feel so sorry. You know, I could,
Speaker 1: I could bring up his you know, treatment of his daughter,
Speaker 1: which was pretty bad. I know Billy. I know Billy
Speaker 1: a little bit, and Billy's a good guy overall, he
Speaker 1: really is. I love I love talking to him. But listen,
Speaker 1: Steve Baldwin is a guys, he writes me. He's very
Speaker 1: politically informed and engaged. He's smart, and you know, I
Speaker 1: feel sorry. And by the way, the brother treats him
Speaker 1: like crap. He won't say it, but I will. You know,
Speaker 1: the brother could help him out, and the guy doesn't
Speaker 1: help his own brother out. I don't understand that. Typical liberal.
Speaker 1: He's only generous with the taxpayer dollars and he doesn't
Speaker 1: want to dig into his own pocket. Thanks must be
Speaker 1: something at that household. I'd love to go there. I mean,
Speaker 1: that'd be great. We'd have a brawl at the at
Speaker 1: the Baldwin house. I would beat a lot of fun
Speaker 1: well at my house every thanks Giving usually, soa why not?
Speaker 1: Except it's not political? But think about this. So Stephen
Speaker 1: ran into a couple of hard times and it's unfortunately
Speaker 1: for him, it maybe became public. Look acting as a
Speaker 1: tough business. You do well, and then you go through
Speaker 1: dry periods, and you go through a long dry period,
Speaker 1: you end up, you know, maybe in over your head
Speaker 1: on a mortgage or something like that. And his own brother,
Speaker 1: who made millions and millions of dollars, Mr Liberal, Mr generosity,
Speaker 1: Mr lecturing us about kindness and diversity, you know, can't
Speaker 1: even help his own brother out the chief skate And
Speaker 1: it's just pathetic to me. And then of course you
Speaker 1: got the way he treated his own daughter, screaming at
Speaker 1: her on the phone and calling her every which which name,
Speaker 1: and then some I mean, who who treats their daughter
Speaker 1: like that? Who talks to them like that? Well, I
Speaker 1: don't know. But the Bassipiqua, that's the home of the Baldwins.
Speaker 1: You're gonna get hammered tomorrow. So get ready, there's snow coming. Alright.
Speaker 1: Weather Bell dot com a very good friend of ours
Speaker 1: and a friend of the program, the official weather guy
Speaker 1: of the Shawan Hannity Show, and that I'll talk to
Speaker 1: you later now. But this was bald Remember I think
Speaker 1: his daughter was like thirteen at the time, and now
Speaker 1: here's some context. So one day we're having a big
Speaker 1: Twitter fight, you know, and everybody's like Twitter fight, Twitter war,
Speaker 1: everybody loves it. Then when it starts going on, all right,
Speaker 1: let's get it on me and Baldwin. And in the
Speaker 1: middle of the fight, his daughter, who, by the way,
Speaker 1: seems like a very nice girl. I don't want to
Speaker 1: bring the daughter into it, but she's she's still a
Speaker 1: teenager at the time. She's older now. She wrote me
Speaker 1: on Twitter and said, please stop engaging my father. She
Speaker 1: didn't write her father and say why don't you just
Speaker 1: knock it off and not stop fighting. Hannity knows she
Speaker 1: wrote with me, and I'm like, what am I gonna do?
Speaker 1: Say no to a teenage girl? And I've stopped anyway,
Speaker 1: here's how he treated her. Okay. I want to tell
Speaker 1: you something, okay, and I want to leave a message
Speaker 1: for you right now, because again it's ten thirty here
Speaker 1: in New York on a Wednesday, and once again I
Speaker 1: made of myself trying to get you a phone to
Speaker 1: grow you at a specific time. When the time comes
Speaker 1: for me to make the phone call I stop whatever
Speaker 1: I'm doing and I go. When I make that phone
Speaker 1: call at eleven o'clock in the morning in New York,
Speaker 1: and if you don't pick up the phone at ten
Speaker 1: o'clock at night and you don't even have that damn
Speaker 1: phone turned on, I want you to know something. Okay,
Speaker 1: I'm tired of playing this game with you. I'm leaving
Speaker 1: this message with you to tell you you haven't sulted
Speaker 1: me for the last time. You have insulted me. You
Speaker 1: don't have the brains or the decency as a human being.
Speaker 1: I don't give a damn that you're twelve years old
Speaker 1: or eleven years old, or that you're a child, or
Speaker 1: that your mothers have thought was pain in the end.
Speaker 1: Who doesn't care about what you do? As far as
Speaker 1: I'm concerned. You have humiliated me for the last time
Speaker 1: with this phone. And when I come out there next week,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna fly out there for the day just to
Speaker 1: straighten you out on this issue. I'm gonna let you
Speaker 1: know just how disappointed in you I am and how
Speaker 1: angry I am with you that you've done this to
Speaker 1: me again. You've made me feel like and you've made
Speaker 1: me feel like a fool over and over and over,
Speaker 1: agree again, and as crap you put on me with
Speaker 1: this damn phone situation that you would never dream of
Speaker 1: doing to your mother, and you do it to me
Speaker 1: constantly and over and over again. I am gonna get
Speaker 1: on a plane or I'm gonna come out there for
Speaker 1: the day and I'm gonna straight and dot out when
Speaker 1: I see you. Do you understand me. I'm gonna really
Speaker 1: make sure you get it. Then we ll clane. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna turn around and I'm gonna come home, so you
Speaker 1: better be ready Friday the twentieth to meet with me.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna let you know just how I feel about
Speaker 1: what a round little pig you really are. You are
Speaker 1: a wordless little pig. Okay, now you mighty say Hannah
Speaker 1: to anyone could have a bad day. Uh No, doesn't
Speaker 1: it not show what a bunch of phony hypocrites these
Speaker 1: people are really How about we do Saturday Night Live
Speaker 1: and we do an imitation of Alec Baldwin, Father of
Speaker 1: the Year. How about we do a Saturday Night Live
Speaker 1: skit Alec Baldwin as the radio talk show star that
Speaker 1: he thinks he is. I'm so of these people, They're
Speaker 1: so fun at telling us how to live. They all
Speaker 1: have security, but don't worry. We're racist because we don't
Speaker 1: want to vet people that come in from other countries
Speaker 1: and will confer constitutional rights to them. Unbelievable. Eight D shocking,
Speaker 1: isn't it. Look at you in the room, you guys, look,
Speaker 1: do you look shocked? I know it's who talks to
Speaker 1: it A leven. He don't even know how old his
Speaker 1: daughter was at the time. It's even worse Sean Hannity. Alright,
Speaker 1: so I have insomnia, but I've never slept better. And
Speaker 1: what's changed Just a pillow. It's had such a positive
Speaker 1: impact on my life. And of course I'm talking about
Speaker 1: my pillow. I fall asleep faster, I stay asleep longer.
Speaker 1: And now you can too. Just go to my Pillow
Speaker 1: dot com. We're called eight nine zero. Use the promo
Speaker 1: code Hannity and Mike Lindell, the inventor of my Pillow,
Speaker 1: has the special four pack. Now you get off to
Speaker 1: my Pillow Premiums and to go anywhere pillows. My Pillows
Speaker 1: made here in the USA has a sixty day unconditional
Speaker 1: money back guarantee and a tenure warranty. Go to my
Speaker 1: pillow dot com right now or call eight zero nine
Speaker 1: zero promo code Hannity to get Michael Lindell's special four
Speaker 1: pack offer. You get to my Pillow premium pillows and
Speaker 1: to go anywhere pillows for off. And that means once
Speaker 1: those pillows arrive, you start getting the kind of peaceful
Speaker 1: and RESTful and comfortable and deep peeling and recuperative sleep
Speaker 1: that you've been craving and you certainly deserve my pillow
Speaker 1: dot Com promo code Hannity, you will love this pillow.
Speaker 1: I just who want to introduce Brian Kuzanna, who's the
Speaker 1: CEO of Intel, a great, great company, and Brian called
Speaker 1: a few weeks ago and said, we want to do
Speaker 1: a very big announcement having to do with our country,
Speaker 1: but also having to do mostly with Arizona and the
Speaker 1: jobs and the great technology that will be produced. So
Speaker 1: this is Brian, and Brian, what don't you say a
Speaker 1: few words and maybe also to form about the product
Speaker 1: you're gonna be making. It's amazing, because thank you, Mr President.
Speaker 1: From this it's an honor to be here today representing
Speaker 1: Intel and to be able to announce our seven billion
Speaker 1: dollar investments in our newest, most Advanced Factory FAB forty
Speaker 1: two in Chandler, Arizona, that we'll be completing that factory
Speaker 1: to make the most advanced seven nanimeter semiconductor chips on
Speaker 1: the planet. Intel is very proud of the fact that
Speaker 1: the majority of our manufacturing is here in the US,
Speaker 1: and the majority of our research and development is here
Speaker 1: in the US, while over of what we sell is
Speaker 1: sold outside of the US. They were consistently one of
Speaker 1: the top five exporters in the country and one of
Speaker 1: the top two research and development spenders in the United States.
Speaker 1: And we've been able to do that even while the
Speaker 1: regulatory and tax policies have disadvantaged us in the past
Speaker 1: relative to the competition we have a across the world.
Speaker 1: And FAT forty two is an investment in Intel, but
Speaker 1: also the US is future in innovation and leadership in
Speaker 1: the semi connector industry, and SCAT forty two will employ
Speaker 1: approximately three thousand direct, high paying, high wage high tech
Speaker 1: jobs at its peak and over ten thousand people in
Speaker 1: the Arizona area in support of the factory. All right,
Speaker 1: that is of course more information coming out as it
Speaker 1: relates to the President, information about how we're going to
Speaker 1: build the economy, meeting with sheriffs and law enforcement, and
Speaker 1: the list never stops. I've never seen a president complete
Speaker 1: that much that fast as this president. The question is,
Speaker 1: can Congress keep up our two of the Sean Hannity
Speaker 1: Show One Seawn is our toll free telephone number if
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. Counsel
Speaker 1: to the President, Kelly and Conway is back with us.
Speaker 1: One of my favorite people in the world. How are
Speaker 1: you great, Sean? How are you today? I'm good, accept
Speaker 1: Look how long have we been friends? Over twenty years? Right,
Speaker 1: so easily? And you know you and I talked so
Speaker 1: many times during the campaign. What mattered to me in
Speaker 1: this election was the people in poverty, on food stamps,
Speaker 1: out of the labor force, no national security policy, American decline,
Speaker 1: all these things. And I love that you guys are
Speaker 1: moving at the speed of light and shock and awe.
Speaker 1: But I bet you're not sleeping very much, are you. Well?
Speaker 1: It doesn't look that way, doesn't Shune. No, No, I
Speaker 1: think you look amazing. I don't mind be able to
Speaker 1: into the box make up artists. I don't mind being tired.
Speaker 1: I mind looking tired, But I work for a man
Speaker 1: who's just like this rolling dervish of activity. He just
Speaker 1: doesn't stop. He's all action, all impact. And even though
Speaker 1: there's been twenty or twenty one executive action since he's
Speaker 1: taken office, only one is getting coverage about the travel
Speaker 1: the travel Hall. Whereas when he opened up the Dakota
Speaker 1: and Keeps One pipelines. We heard from people all across
Speaker 1: the country relieved, feeling it their lives will be measurably
Speaker 1: changed and improved because they'll have jobs now, they'll have
Speaker 1: energy independence, the local economy will be stimulated, National purity
Speaker 1: will be enhanced. When he took us out of TPP
Speaker 1: as he promised he would. We heard from labor unions,
Speaker 1: labor laborers who said, look, I've been voting Democratic like
Speaker 1: my daddy and granddaddy before me, my entire life. But
Speaker 1: I broke ranks and I voted for Donald Trump here
Speaker 1: in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania. And I did that because I
Speaker 1: believe that he's going to renegotiate these bad trade deals
Speaker 1: and keep the jobs and the factories and the work
Speaker 1: here and out of Mexico. In China. He's you know,
Speaker 1: he did Mexico City Policy day two. There's so much
Speaker 1: that he's done that isn't getting coverage, and I think
Speaker 1: it's difficult for people to catch up with him. I
Speaker 1: think it's difficult for Washington to adapt to this type
Speaker 1: of case and this type of impact. But that's what
Speaker 1: happens when guy from the private sector who's accountable and
Speaker 1: used to delivering results and not studying them and not
Speaker 1: talking about divided government, just producing. I just put up
Speaker 1: on the screen regularly on TV. I keep adding to it.
Speaker 1: You know, he eased the burden of Obamacare on day one.
Speaker 1: He took action to freeze all of these regulations and
Speaker 1: promising of seventy cup by the time all and done.
Speaker 1: You mentioned. He withdrew the US from p P t
Speaker 1: p P, instituted a ban on on hiring a federal
Speaker 1: government ban. He issued a ban on providing abortion funding abroad.
Speaker 1: He instituted executive actions for Keystone to code access and
Speaker 1: building the pipe here in America, which helps the steel industry.
Speaker 1: He issued executive actions on the construction of the border
Speaker 1: wall and stripping money from sanctuary cities. He's following up
Speaker 1: on extreme vetting, which will keep the country safe. It's
Speaker 1: the right thing to do. He has the authority to
Speaker 1: do it. He has issued action on rebuilding the military.
Speaker 1: He issued executive action a draft a plan to defeat isis.
Speaker 1: It will be returned to him now in about fifteen days,
Speaker 1: a five year lobbying ban. He nominated as promised an
Speaker 1: originalist to the Court, Neil Gorsuch. And you know, the
Speaker 1: only fear I have is you know, Paul Ryan says
Speaker 1: the first agenda item is going to be repeal and
Speaker 1: replace or repeal and repair. I didn't like the change
Speaker 1: of the phrasing. And number two he's talking about by
Speaker 1: year's end, and that means, where where's the economic plan?
Speaker 1: I mean, you've got a president that wants to work
Speaker 1: at the speed of light in Congress. You know, to me,
Speaker 1: it's almost unconscionable that they didn't have a consensus replacement
Speaker 1: plan in place to go after eight years. That's the
Speaker 1: thing I mean, especially if he's voted to repeal Obamacare
Speaker 1: dozens of times while in the House, you think that
Speaker 1: the second part would be taking care of But I
Speaker 1: will say, we're making great progress with the House, and
Speaker 1: we Speaker Ryan, we're waiting for the Senate to confirm
Speaker 1: President Trump's nominee to the Health and Human Services Secretary,
Speaker 1: which is Tom Price doctor and Connison Tom Price. Once
Speaker 1: we get him in place, once you get Seema Verner
Speaker 1: over at Medicare and Medicaid also brilliant and competent, then
Speaker 1: we'll start cooking when it comes to this replacement, but
Speaker 1: in a repeal and repair. If we're worried about the
Speaker 1: people who currently rely upon Obamacare for coverage, the President
Speaker 1: has made very clear sean those people will be taken
Speaker 1: care of. But the idea that we're going to continue
Speaker 1: with the system that is that is topped down, that
Speaker 1: penalizes people who refuse to get actually and buy government
Speaker 1: run health insurance, that does not put the patients front
Speaker 1: and center, but the government front and center. That gets
Speaker 1: the government in the way of you and your inter
Speaker 1: relationship with your doctor and other healthcare professionals. The idea
Speaker 1: that you can start buying health insurance across state lines
Speaker 1: the way you can almost every other good in service.
Speaker 1: And the idea that you would have a health savings
Speaker 1: account with your name on it. I mean, all these
Speaker 1: are positive, free market, patient centric reforms that will happen.
Speaker 1: If Congress is listening to Donald Trump, that's his view.
Speaker 1: He's put out there what he thinks the replacement should be. Well,
Speaker 1: I agree. And the thing is is, I love the
Speaker 1: pace at which the President's working. And you know, I
Speaker 1: know his schedule. He doesn't go to bed till one
Speaker 1: o'clock in the morning. He's up at five or six
Speaker 1: every morning. So and he gets up and he rolls
Speaker 1: up his sleeves and he goes to work. I'm just wondering,
Speaker 1: you know, why are they lowering expectations within Congress. It's
Speaker 1: beginning to really frustrate me because I would imagine that
Speaker 1: they support his economic plan. It's Reaganesque in every way, imaginable,
Speaker 1: seven brackets, the three of fifty percent corporate rate, repatriation.
Speaker 1: If we move on energy and dependence, we could literally
Speaker 1: create millions of career, high paying jobs for people that
Speaker 1: will help the economy. Getting rid of Obamacare is going
Speaker 1: to be like a tax cut for people. You know.
Speaker 1: To me, it's like, let's go get you, get your
Speaker 1: ass in gear. And I don't see the action that
Speaker 1: I want to see or the sense of urgency that
Speaker 1: clearly the President has at the White House. Remember, they're
Speaker 1: not businessmen, and they're not people that are accustomed to
Speaker 1: delivering results instead of promising them. And also you just
Speaker 1: had this corrosive excuse of divided government for years. It
Speaker 1: has been years and years since the Republicans had the
Speaker 1: House to Senate and the White House. And it was
Speaker 1: sort of at the beginning I think of the Bush
Speaker 1: first term for the beginning or middle and it wasn't
Speaker 1: for that long anyway. And so this idea that well
Speaker 1: we would get X, Y and Z them, but we
Speaker 1: don't have the White House, well we would get, Well
Speaker 1: you do, and you've got over thirty someome governors and
Speaker 1: you've got most of the state legislatures in your control.
Speaker 1: And that means America did that through causation, not coincidence.
Speaker 1: They want, they absolutely demand that actually be taken. The
Speaker 1: other thing is I would just appeal to some of
Speaker 1: these members of Congress through the thing that we know
Speaker 1: they all care about. The polls. Have you seen the
Speaker 1: ib D T I T peopole, because that was the
Speaker 1: one that was accurate, always predicting every day Donald Trump
Speaker 1: with ahead of Hillary Clinton, and he was. But they're
Speaker 1: showing a majority supported executive order to temporary block from
Speaker 1: those seven countries people, the far nationals. You've got um
Speaker 1: who say the country's had in the right direction. It
Speaker 1: was forty before he was elected. He has fifty saying
Speaker 1: the economy is improving. You have more people saying that
Speaker 1: Obamacare should be repealed than it should be left as
Speaker 1: it is two to one. You've got forty two twenty.
Speaker 1: You've got forty seven percent in that poll saying trade
Speaker 1: deals of hurt job creation in the US. Less than
Speaker 1: half that numbers say they've helped. So even for those
Speaker 1: who can't keep up with the Trump in pace, that
Speaker 1: is this unprecedented, unbelievable, but a promise then delivered upon
Speaker 1: and deserved Sewan, Even for those who can't keep up
Speaker 1: with him, keep up with the poles. We all though
Speaker 1: these these politicians love the polls and the people are
Speaker 1: telling you, meet up with his level of action and
Speaker 1: his level of impact. You know, I watched this guy
Speaker 1: every day. I'm with him throughout the day, every single day.
Speaker 1: His commitment to the American people, the sacrifices he and
Speaker 1: his family have made for him to be here and
Speaker 1: do this job, really compels him to get so much
Speaker 1: done in such a quick amount of time. I have
Speaker 1: veterans in my portfolio here. I've opioid used in my portfolio.
Speaker 1: We're going to do things that impact people. This is
Speaker 1: not about prestige. This is about impact. And we hear
Speaker 1: from people all across the country who don't listen to
Speaker 1: the phony bologny, who don't listen to all the snark
Speaker 1: and the eye rolling and the presumpted negativity against the president.
Speaker 1: They're watching. They're not listening. Some people are listening to
Speaker 1: the media. Most Americans are watching the president and they agree,
Speaker 1: and they like the action, they like the movement. And
Speaker 1: I think Congress needs to learn a lesson here that
Speaker 1: things can get done if they just get moving. And
Speaker 1: I'm a little concerned at the pace of which they're
Speaker 1: they're describing action on for example, repealing and replacing, action
Speaker 1: on the economy, action on energy, action on the vat's
Speaker 1: action on the military. I'm thinking, guys, you need to
Speaker 1: keep up. You're really way behind here. Um, you know, so,
Speaker 1: I want to I was gonna ask you this out
Speaker 1: of the box, but I got a little distracted. Here's
Speaker 1: what I want to ask you. I watched you yesterday
Speaker 1: on CNN, and I have known you for twenty plus years,
Speaker 1: and you are one of the nicest kindest you know,
Speaker 1: gentlehearted people I've ever known in my life. That's who
Speaker 1: you are, that is your nature, that's what makes you
Speaker 1: who you are. And I have been watching a steady
Speaker 1: increase in volume and rudeness, and I'm really get as
Speaker 1: a friend, I'm getting annoyed for you that you have
Speaker 1: to tolerate this kind of rudeness from the media. And
Speaker 1: you know exactly which interview I'm talking about. And my
Speaker 1: question to you is, does it get to a point
Speaker 1: where if people are going to be that rude, that
Speaker 1: insulting on a regular basis, that it's not worth your time.
Speaker 1: I can tell you won't get to a point where
Speaker 1: I feel any differently about President Trump and the mission
Speaker 1: that he's put before us and the on her and
Speaker 1: the blessing it is to serve him, because he's serving
Speaker 1: the American people. So anybody is trying to grind us
Speaker 1: all down here, anybody's trying to divide us, knock us
Speaker 1: down like bowling pins one by one, it's not going
Speaker 1: to work insofar as we're here to serve him. And
Speaker 1: if you learn nothing else about me during the campaign,
Speaker 1: it's that I'm very good about caring and loving, like
Speaker 1: you said, but also about being impervious to the naysayers
Speaker 1: and critics. I cannot let somebody redefine or unraveled me. Listen,
Speaker 1: I give you all the arts on Twitter or or
Speaker 1: on a and I'm here to him. All right, hang
Speaker 1: on one second, all the more with Kelly Am when
Speaker 1: we come back on the other side of those break
Speaker 1: predit to reveal and replace Obama's executive orders, and you've
Speaker 1: come to the right place the Shawan Edity Show. All right,
Speaker 1: we continue with Kelley and Conway, who is back with us,
Speaker 1: and of course she is now in the White House
Speaker 1: working with the President every day as a counselor to
Speaker 1: the President. Let me ask you, I know the pace
Speaker 1: at which you all are working. I got to see
Speaker 1: it up close and personal the first week, and it's
Speaker 1: kind of refreshing to see all of that. I'm watching
Speaker 1: the progress that's being made from your timetable, knowing that
Speaker 1: Congress is moving at a snail's pace. How soon do
Speaker 1: you think the President gets to do his budget? How
Speaker 1: soon can we expect to repeal and replacement of Obamacare?
Speaker 1: How soon do we get to the point where energy
Speaker 1: production begins at a mass level that moves us towards independence.
Speaker 1: When do we start fixing the v A, which are
Speaker 1: other things? Again, I'm I'm looking at the success so far,
Speaker 1: which has been, you know, shock and awe, speed of light.
Speaker 1: How soon do you think these other agenda items get done?
Speaker 1: Part of that, Sean is dependent on Congress and the
Speaker 1: congressional schedule. But in terms of the president himself engaging
Speaker 1: on these issues, that's already started. There was actually no break,
Speaker 1: no vacation, no honeymoon period for him between talking about
Speaker 1: as a candidate, winning on it and then preparing his
Speaker 1: president elect into his presidency. So none of that has changed,
Speaker 1: and and it's just been sort of a seamless fine.
Speaker 1: It really depends on some of the congressional on the
Speaker 1: congressional committees and the schedule, but we're very hopeful that
Speaker 1: so much of this will be measurable and impactful this year,
Speaker 1: so that people are going to say, well, that's a
Speaker 1: two thousand nineteen thing, let's wait till after the mid terms.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's just not the way the president's mind works,
Speaker 1: and that's not where his commitment is. But in terms
Speaker 1: of a budget and one that is much more reflective
Speaker 1: our free market anti regulatory overreach, pro tax relief policies
Speaker 1: that cuts out wasteful spending. That budget should be very trumping,
Speaker 1: and that should have the hallmarks of President Trump. This year,
Speaker 1: repealing and replacing Obamacare in some ways has already started
Speaker 1: in that he has had significant meetings and policy advancements
Speaker 1: in terms of what will work and what can't work
Speaker 1: and when. So. But let me say something else about Obamacare.
Speaker 1: That sucker has lots of tentacles and runs very deep.
Speaker 1: The roots go very deep. In March will be seven
Speaker 1: years since we had to suffer through Obamacare. And yes,
Speaker 1: I know millions of people rely upon it, but millions
Speaker 1: were hurt by it. And to really cut something out
Speaker 1: reach and branch takes the roots and branch takes a while,
Speaker 1: and it has to be done the right way because
Speaker 1: you can't just do it piece meal. But in terms
Speaker 1: of action and impact, you are going to feel that
Speaker 1: this year, this can't just be a planning in a
Speaker 1: studying year. It has to be an action and impact year.
Speaker 1: That's his intentions. Well, I think you know all of that.
Speaker 1: Do you do you worry about the filibuster possibility on
Speaker 1: Neil Coursch, which I think was a superb choice by
Speaker 1: the President for the Supreme Court. Um. But Democrats, they
Speaker 1: just seem to be appealing to those people like Madonna
Speaker 1: and Ashley Judd and Elizabeth Warren that are out there
Speaker 1: protesting every day. Do you worry if they filibuster this,
Speaker 1: that the Senate will not go with the nuclear option,
Speaker 1: which Harry read, of course set a precedent for Yes,
Speaker 1: we do worry about that. It's a very real concern,
Speaker 1: only because look at what the Democrats have done just
Speaker 1: in this last week or so. Last night you had
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren being rebuked for her comments about Senator Sessions
Speaker 1: reading something from and then going on Facebook Live to
Speaker 1: try to read the whole thing to anybody wanted to
Speaker 1: tune in, and of course being a fixture on cable TV.
Speaker 1: Ever since she did that, you've got Chuck Schumer, the
Speaker 1: Senate minority leader, since they are in the minority. There
Speaker 1: you have him promising to quote oppose any Supreme Court
Speaker 1: nominee that's that President Trump puts forward before he even
Speaker 1: knows who it is, before he knows the academic credentials temperament.
Speaker 1: There was nobody, There was nobody who would support I
Speaker 1: know you have to learn. There's nobody would support that's right.
Speaker 1: So of course when you say, you know we concerned
Speaker 1: about this, we see what the Democrats are up to.
Speaker 1: I mean, their parties in complete meltdowns, identity crisis, their
Speaker 1: hair is on fire every single day. You don't know
Speaker 1: what's real and what's not. And look what it's gotten.
Speaker 1: In the last two nights in a row, they stayed
Speaker 1: up through the night to try to protest and obstructed
Speaker 1: one of our nominees. Guess would happened. Betsy DeVoss is
Speaker 1: not a Secretary of Education about tomorrow Senator session to
Speaker 1: be our new Attorney General. I got to cut you
Speaker 1: off because I'm on a hard break here. But there
Speaker 1: are those of us out there that are cheering you on,
Speaker 1: and we're sorry that you're putting up with so much
Speaker 1: garbage and on fairness from an abusively biased media. But
Speaker 1: we appreciate your fight every day. Thanks for thanks, as
Speaker 1: always for spending time with us. We appreciate it than
Speaker 1: Mr President. I don't think I quite understand. I'm reading
Speaker 1: a letter from Coretta Scott came to the Judiciary Committee
Speaker 1: from six that was admitted into the record. I'm simply
Speaker 1: reading what She wrote about what the nomination of Jeff's
Speaker 1: Sessions to be a federal court judgment and what it
Speaker 1: would mean in history for her. This is a reminder
Speaker 1: not necessary what you just shared. However, you stated that
Speaker 1: they're a sitting senator is a disgrace to the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice. I think that may have been Senator, and
Speaker 1: although I would be glad to repeat it in my
Speaker 1: own words, the rule applies then to impeding conduct or
Speaker 1: motive through any form or voice to a sitting form
Speaker 1: of words includes quotes, articles, or are the materials so
Speaker 1: quoting Senator Kennedy, calling then nominee Sessions a disgrace is
Speaker 1: a violation of Senate rules. It was certainly not in
Speaker 1: in the opinion of the Chair. It is most President,
Speaker 1: the majority leader, the Senators imputing the motives and conduct
Speaker 1: of our colleague from Alabama. As warned by the Chair,
Speaker 1: Senator Warren quote said, Senator Sessions has used the awesome
Speaker 1: power of his office to chill the free exercise of
Speaker 1: the vote by black citizens. I call the Senator to
Speaker 1: order under the provisions to Rule nine. Mr President Center
Speaker 1: from Massachusetts. Mr President, I am surprised that the words
Speaker 1: of Coretta Scott King are not suitable for debate eight
Speaker 1: in the United States Senate. I ask leave of the
Speaker 1: Senate to continue my remarks. Is there objection? I appeal
Speaker 1: the ruling attection is hurt. The center will take her seat.
Speaker 1: Glad you're with us? Eight nine one Shawn Tolfrey telephone
Speaker 1: number twenty five. Now till the top of the arrow.
Speaker 1: That was Senator Lawrens grandstanding yesterday on the Senate floor.
Speaker 1: What achieving? We can't quote Coretta scot That means this
Speaker 1: must be a racist body. Everything the Democrats racism, sexism,
Speaker 1: misologyny homophobia, xenophobia, islamophobia. I can't even remember all the
Speaker 1: it's the same old thing. But there may be more
Speaker 1: to this grandstanding in the Senate that meets the eye. Now,
Speaker 1: this failed attempt to smear Jeff Sessions, which is well
Speaker 1: known within Senate rules, it's the deliberative body. It is
Speaker 1: the the gentleman's chamber, if you will. In the United
Speaker 1: States Congress. It has always has been, and they have
Speaker 1: rules and those rules have always been enforced. But anyways,
Speaker 1: maybe she thinks it will help her win brownie points
Speaker 1: with all these lunatics like but Donna, who's fantasizing about
Speaker 1: blowing up the White House, or Ashley Judd, who thinks
Speaker 1: she's as nasty as the bloodstains on her sheets, and
Speaker 1: all the other insanity we're hearing out of Ashton kutched
Speaker 1: her and and Meryl Streep and and all the radicals
Speaker 1: now that are training martial arts so they can beat
Speaker 1: up Republicans, as I told you yesterday on the program.
Speaker 1: But anyway, there's a w b U R pole. Only
Speaker 1: percent of Massachusetts voters think Warren deserves reelection a plurality.
Speaker 1: Forty six percent thinks she does not deserve her second term.
Speaker 1: So that's getting interesting. And uh, I know the former
Speaker 1: Boston Red Sox pitcher Kurt Schilling is considering a run.
Speaker 1: He's now doing a talk show himself in Boston. How
Speaker 1: viable he would be, that remains unclear, but we'd have
Speaker 1: to wait and see. There's certainly Bill Weld is considering it,
Speaker 1: although that's a possibility anyway. The person that was literally
Speaker 1: presiding over the Senate last night during this exchange with
Speaker 1: Senator McConnell and Senator Warren, as Warren was trying to
Speaker 1: smear smirge brate Senator Sessions, who was not there to
Speaker 1: defend himself. Is Montana Senator Steve Danes, who joins us, Now,
Speaker 1: how are you, Senator? Yeah, I'm doing well. Sean. Thanks.
Speaker 1: Why don't you just tell everybody what the rules are
Speaker 1: and how the rules are enforced? And is this the norm? Well,
Speaker 1: it's clear. It's called Rule ninety's the standing rule United
Speaker 1: State Senate. And it simply says, no senator in debate shout,
Speaker 1: directly or indirectly, by any form of words impugne to
Speaker 1: another Senator or to other senators, any conduct or motive
Speaker 1: unworthy or unbecoming to a senator. That is the rule
Speaker 1: of the Senate. We listened to the rhetoric I did
Speaker 1: last night, as I presided, while Senator Warren was speaking,
Speaker 1: she was using words about Senator Sessions as a disgrace
Speaker 1: to his race. She said he was shameful. And you
Speaker 1: saw Leader McConnell quote when mc when Warren said, Sessence
Speaker 1: has used the awesome power of his office to chill
Speaker 1: the free exercise the vote by black citizens. That is
Speaker 1: impugning sitting in United States senator to Assessence, who I
Speaker 1: believe will be an outstanding attorney general. And I made
Speaker 1: the ruling from the chair that she was out of
Speaker 1: order and asked her to take her seat. What does
Speaker 1: the rule actually say, Can you tell us well that
Speaker 1: that that is the rule? Does the senator in debate
Speaker 1: may not to impugne another senator? So by using Coreta
Speaker 1: Scott King or the or Senator Kennedy's remarks, that would
Speaker 1: be imputing the character. Is there an impact of whether
Speaker 1: a senator is there to defend themselves or not. So
Speaker 1: the issue, and this is what Sarah Warren made a
Speaker 1: an argument for, was that the fact she was quoting
Speaker 1: in this case both Ted Kennedy and Coreta King. Well,
Speaker 1: the rule is very clear. It's whether it's directly or indirectly.
Speaker 1: So if you're reading a quote, it's impugning a thing
Speaker 1: Senator that is out of or And that is why
Speaker 1: ruled in favor of Lee your McConnell's motion on WULL nineteen. Yeah,
Speaker 1: let's go. Now, there's this controversy that has been going
Speaker 1: on for years where Elizabeth Warren listed herself as a
Speaker 1: minority in the American Association of Law Schools Director of Faculty.
Speaker 1: I guess when she was at Harvard, and well, actually
Speaker 1: if she first did it, when she joined the faculty
Speaker 1: of the University of Pennsylvania Law School, and then she
Speaker 1: was hired as a law professor at Harvard, and Harvard
Speaker 1: touted her supposed lineage when the problem when the program
Speaker 1: faced doubts about faculty diversity, and she claimed that she
Speaker 1: was Native American. And here's how some of that went down.
Speaker 1: If you are elected, you would be massachusetts first female senator,
Speaker 1: would be Would you be Massachusetts first Native American senator?
Speaker 1: I would be their first senator so far as I
Speaker 1: know who has Native American heritage. My Auntie has walked
Speaker 1: by that picture at least a thousand times. Remarked that
Speaker 1: he had that her father, my papa had high cheekbones
Speaker 1: like all of the Indians do, because that's how she
Speaker 1: saw it. And she said, and your mother got those
Speaker 1: same great cheekbones, and I didn't. She thought this was
Speaker 1: the bad deal she had gotten in life. My mom
Speaker 1: and dad were very much in love with each other
Speaker 1: and they wanted to get married, and my father's parents said,
Speaker 1: absolutely not, you can't marry her because she's part Cherokee
Speaker 1: and she's part Delaware, and um. After fighting it as
Speaker 1: long as I could, my parents went off they eloped.
Speaker 1: It was an issue in our family the whole time
Speaker 1: I grew up about these two families. It was an
Speaker 1: issue still raised at my mother's funeral. So what I
Speaker 1: know about my parents is I know that in that
Speaker 1: little town they grew up in that my father's parents
Speaker 1: knew enough about my mother and her family to say,
Speaker 1: I have no doubt that that's the fact that you're scd. No,
Speaker 1: that doesn't tell you don't do that. No, No, it
Speaker 1: is not. It's not about the number. There are lots
Speaker 1: of people who are not enrolled in TRON the number
Speaker 1: you have acknowledged that in that National Oil directory you
Speaker 1: listed yourself as a minority. Now, the New England Genealogical
Speaker 1: Society clarified in a statement they found no proof of
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren and herself proclaimed Native American lineage. The group
Speaker 1: also told The Globe that the candidates family is not
Speaker 1: listed in an early twentieth century census of major tribes
Speaker 1: known as a particular role that they have um would
Speaker 1: it be within Rule nineteen to bring that up on
Speaker 1: the Senate floor that she might have lied about her background.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure Rule nineteen applies to that, Sean, because
Speaker 1: this comes back to another senator, impuning the character of
Speaker 1: a sitting senator. I will say this, though, I think
Speaker 1: you brought the issue of diversity, and as I look
Speaker 1: at college campuses across this country today, diversity seems to
Speaker 1: be defined as as what the liberals see. That is,
Speaker 1: people who think of the same way. And we need
Speaker 1: to see diversity on college campuses that are diversity of
Speaker 1: world view and diversity opinion. Most campuses are seems anymore
Speaker 1: coming from a liberal persuasion, and why don't we stand
Speaker 1: as related to diversity it is It is more than
Speaker 1: just race, It is more than than creed is also
Speaker 1: looking at political persuasion, and I think we need to
Speaker 1: see more diversity frankly in our campus whole and accountable
Speaker 1: have a balance of conservative views and liberal views. If
Speaker 1: we're truly trying to give our students the skill sets
Speaker 1: of critical thinking and making decisions on their own versus
Speaker 1: being indoctrinated by a liberal worldview. You know, Senator, I
Speaker 1: want to ask you this. I have been critical of
Speaker 1: Senator McConnell, especially for President Trump got into office about
Speaker 1: not using the enumerated powers of the person, and I
Speaker 1: thought that they could have fought hotder in both the
Speaker 1: House and the Senate on specific issues, but that's kind
Speaker 1: of behind us. I am very happy what he did
Speaker 1: with Merrick Garland, which was a precedent set by the Democrats.
Speaker 1: And U'm also happy reading some of his comments about
Speaker 1: Neil Gorsuch and I know we're gonna have a hearing
Speaker 1: and we may not get to sixty votes. Do you
Speaker 1: agree with President Trump and myself that, based on the
Speaker 1: precedent set by Harry Read, that the nuclear options should
Speaker 1: be used if the Democrats try to filibuster or if
Speaker 1: you can't get the cloture for an up and down
Speaker 1: vote on Neil gorc and his nomination. Sean, we've been
Speaker 1: very clear, that the leader has been very clear, and
Speaker 1: we simply answer that question by saying this, we will
Speaker 1: put Neil gorst on the bench. End of story. So
Speaker 1: they're trying to work now to get by pars and support.
Speaker 1: We'll see where that all goes. But I can assure
Speaker 1: you and your listeners that Neil Gorcish will be appointed
Speaker 1: in I States Supreme Court. So, in other words, you're
Speaker 1: saying one way or the other, he is not. That
Speaker 1: nomination is not going down. It is not going to
Speaker 1: be stopped by the Democrats, and what did you make
Speaker 1: of go ahead and then say something else, something that
Speaker 1: may have been lost in our country over the last
Speaker 1: six months. And your listeners are very attuned in, they're
Speaker 1: very up to speed on what's going on. But let
Speaker 1: me remind your listeners today, as a Republican U S. Senator,
Speaker 1: how the ground going our way back to a year ago?
Speaker 1: Scali had passed away February of two thousand and sixteen,
Speaker 1: is it during the recess period? I wish there were
Speaker 1: a lot of them. During the election of summer as well.
Speaker 1: Most of October, Republican Senators were going back to Washington,
Speaker 1: D C. One at a time every four day Senate
Speaker 1: we call pro former session. It takes about thirty seconds
Speaker 1: to do that, and by doing that, it blocked President
Speaker 1: Obama from downy recess appointment for the United States Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: I remember, John, I was back home in Montana, and
Speaker 1: I give Senator McConnell. Listen. I give Senator McConnell a
Speaker 1: lot of credit because he kept the Senate in session
Speaker 1: for the very purpose because if they went out of
Speaker 1: session five seconds, you know that the President would have
Speaker 1: jumped in there. With the resource appointment and would have
Speaker 1: muddied the waters in a in a huge way. If
Speaker 1: you could stay just a couple of more minutes, Senator
Speaker 1: Steve Danes, he's from Montana, we'll talk more about the
Speaker 1: advancing agenda of Donald Trump, the president, and how the
Speaker 1: Senate plans to move and will they move expeditiously as
Speaker 1: the President seems to to Final hour roundup is an act.
Speaker 1: You do not want to miss it, and stay tuned
Speaker 1: for the final hour freeverall on the Shawn Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: Right as we continue Shawn Hannity Show News round Up
Speaker 1: information overload. At the top of the hour, we go
Speaker 1: back to our top story, the battle over the President's
Speaker 1: executive border, and that is on extreme fetting. But we
Speaker 1: continue with Senator Steve Daines of Montana. He was the
Speaker 1: one presiding over the Senate last night during the exchange
Speaker 1: between Senator McConnell and Polka HUNTA. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts,
Speaker 1: let me ask you this, look, the President has a
Speaker 1: very aggressive jenda. Do you agree with him? I know
Speaker 1: you agree with him on Neil Gorsuch, who's an originalist.
Speaker 1: Do you agree with him on extreme vetting? Building the wall, repealing, replacing,
Speaker 1: corporate task, tax cuts down to fifteen percent, a middle
Speaker 1: class tax cuts seven brackets to three, repatriation at a
Speaker 1: low rate of trillions of dollars. You agree with him.
Speaker 1: Education back to the stage the v A being repaired. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it is refreshing to see a president who was leading
Speaker 1: and to see a Congress of his acting. As you know, Sean,
Speaker 1: I spent twenty years in the private sector before I
Speaker 1: came up to Capitol Hill four years ago. But first
Speaker 1: and foremost a high priority is to get President Trump
Speaker 1: his cabinet in place. Do you realize this has been
Speaker 1: the slowest, slowest acting Congress in terms of proving cabinet
Speaker 1: officials dating back to George Washington. And that is not
Speaker 1: because of what the Republicans are doing. It is because
Speaker 1: the Democrats are burning every hour possible and obstructing President
Speaker 1: from from having his team on board. So we're we're
Speaker 1: gonna move. When we moved through BESSI Devas yesterday, she's
Speaker 1: gonna be a terrific Secretary of Education. We're gonna move
Speaker 1: Jeff Sessions today. We're gonna get Tom Price, the next
Speaker 1: Secretary of HHS. Dr Price or Speed exurgeon. They've been obstructive.
Speaker 1: But here's my question, dude, are you confident energy, independence,
Speaker 1: vetting the Wall, education, the the the economic plan of
Speaker 1: the President we're all going to get done this year
Speaker 1: because it seems like you have a year's period of
Speaker 1: time to get this done and it's it seems to
Speaker 1: be going very slow when the President wants to move
Speaker 1: at the speed of light. Yeah. Well, Sean, as you know,
Speaker 1: we are still bound by the ability for Democrats to
Speaker 1: burn time in the United States, and I think that's
Speaker 1: wearing thin with the American people. But we've got an
Speaker 1: aggressive plan here. It's going to be the Obamacare repeal
Speaker 1: and replace. We've got these Congression Review Acts move towards here,
Speaker 1: which are are repealing these Obamacare regulations, job killings. When
Speaker 1: do you think that could be done by Senator which
Speaker 1: one Obamacare? Yeah, I think we'll get that done most
Speaker 1: likely by the end of March, should be my best estimate. Honest.
Speaker 1: How do you how do you feel about the economic plan?
Speaker 1: When can we get that in place? So the goal
Speaker 1: here on tax reform, which I support, lowering rates, simplifying rates,
Speaker 1: think about the fact we'd eliminate depreciation and everything's expensed.
Speaker 1: As an example, the only thing we would keep on
Speaker 1: the code here would be protecting home mortgage interest and
Speaker 1: charitable contributions. I hate. That is spot on. I keep
Speaker 1: those in the code, and that's how we binding down
Speaker 1: the rates by limiting all these other loopholes and deductions.
Speaker 1: We want to get that done before the August recess,
Speaker 1: and we'll do that to another reconciliation process, which means
Speaker 1: a vote threshold. You know, the people of Montana are
Speaker 1: such good people in this country. It's so great to
Speaker 1: talk to a normal senator. You know, I'm I'm without representation.
Speaker 1: You do understand that I don't have a congressman that
Speaker 1: will take my call in New York, a senator that
Speaker 1: will take my call. I have nobody that would represent me.
Speaker 1: Nobody wants Nobody likes me here, Chuck Schumer hates me.
Speaker 1: Well yeah, sometimes you know, Well, you're all about who
Speaker 1: your enemies are, Seawan, So congratulations, I appreciate it. Senator
Speaker 1: Danes from Montana. Add him to the list of people
Speaker 1: that I like. I mean, one of the few. What
Speaker 1: is wrong with these people that they don't want to
Speaker 1: come on the show. We'll take a quick break news
Speaker 1: round up information overload is Next, the Court finds that,
Speaker 1: for purposes of the entry of the temporary straining order,
Speaker 1: that the state has met its burden of demonstrating that
Speaker 1: it faces immediate and irreparable injury as a result of
Speaker 1: the signing and implementation of the executive order. I find
Speaker 1: that the state has satisfied the test that it is
Speaker 1: likely to succeed on the merits of the claim, which
Speaker 1: would entitle them to relief. I find that the balance
Speaker 1: of equities favor the States, and lastly, I find that
Speaker 1: a temporary restraining order is in the public interest. If
Speaker 1: I were to apply the Nine Circuits alternative test um,
Speaker 1: I would find that the States have established a question,
Speaker 1: a serious question, going to the merits, and that the
Speaker 1: balance of equities tips sharply in their favor. Pass such,
Speaker 1: I find that the Court should and will grant the
Speaker 1: temporary restraining order. Well, let me ask about the called
Speaker 1: just religious discrimination claim to reach both the equal protection
Speaker 1: and Establishment clause claims. And I'm I'm not entirely persuaded
Speaker 1: by the argument. If only because the seven countries encompass
Speaker 1: only I think a relatively small percentage of Muslims. I
Speaker 1: mean do you have any information is to what percentage
Speaker 1: or what proportion of the adherence to Islam worldwide are
Speaker 1: our citizens or residents of those countries. My quick penciling
Speaker 1: suggested something less than fi. I have not done that that,
Speaker 1: but given that all those countries are countries that have
Speaker 1: been previously tagged as subjects of concern about terrorism, granted
Speaker 1: it's because of perhaps radical Islams x, so there might
Speaker 1: be a religious motivation behind the terrorism. But I have
Speaker 1: trouble understanding why we're supposed to infer religious animus when
Speaker 1: in fact the vast majority of Muslims would not be
Speaker 1: affected as residents of those nations, and where the concern
Speaker 1: for terrorism with those connected with radical Islamic sex is
Speaker 1: kind of hard to deny. You're not the cay saw
Speaker 1: from this court, and the Spring Court is very clear
Speaker 1: that to prove religious discrimination, we do not need to
Speaker 1: prove that this order harms only Muslims or that it
Speaker 1: harms every Muslim. We just need to prove that it
Speaker 1: was motivated in part by a desire to harm Muslims,
Speaker 1: and we have alged that you infer that desire if
Speaker 1: in fact, the vast majority of Muslims are unaffected, Well,
Speaker 1: you aren't. In part, you can infer it from intent evidence.
Speaker 1: I mean, there are statements that we've quoted in our complaint,
Speaker 1: uh that are rather shocking evidence of intent to discriminate
Speaker 1: against Muslims, given that we haven't even had any discovery yet.
Speaker 1: All Right, News round Up and Information Overload hour of
Speaker 1: the Shawan Hannity Show. The first cut you heard was
Speaker 1: from the Seattle Judge James Ropart about ruling for the
Speaker 1: temporary restraining order, And what you heard the second time
Speaker 1: was the Ninth Circuit Court Judge Richard Clifton, you know, arguing, well,
Speaker 1: how do you say this is potentially a Muslim ban
Speaker 1: when Muslims are not impacted by this and in fact
Speaker 1: that both the Obama administration and the Trump administration and
Speaker 1: Congress that identified these seven countries as it relates to
Speaker 1: issues involving terror, not involving religion. But with that said,
Speaker 1: my confidence I've been saying, you know, in the Ninth
Speaker 1: Circuit it's it's it's irrelevant at this point. UM eight
Speaker 1: nine one, Shawn as our toll free telephone number if
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of this program, joining
Speaker 1: us now. Is the senior editor of Conservative Review. Daniel
Speaker 1: Horowitz has been doing great work writing about this all week.
Speaker 1: Representative Andy Biggs of Arizona, welcome both of you to
Speaker 1: the program. Uh, let me first start with we're both
Speaker 1: of you, and Daniel will start with you. You know,
Speaker 1: I know we had a Department of Justice lawyer arguing
Speaker 1: the case last night for the administration because Jeff Sessions
Speaker 1: won't be sworn in until later tonight, and I'm watching
Speaker 1: this whole thing and I'm thinking I could argue this
Speaker 1: better in my sleep. It was frustrating to me. You know,
Speaker 1: it's unbelievable. Sean. I was listening to the same oral
Speaker 1: arguments and I couldn't believe what I heard. The d
Speaker 1: o J attorney agreed to almost nine of the ten premises,
Speaker 1: and they didn't just walk it back. The government doesn't
Speaker 1: have to prove that there's a categorical threat of terrorism
Speaker 1: from each individual. This is what's called plenary power. That
Speaker 1: the Congress has plenary power to exclude or deport any
Speaker 1: non citizen for any reason. It could be a good reason,
Speaker 1: it could be a current reason, it could be a
Speaker 1: bed or discriminatory reason. That is the subject of political
Speaker 1: Toby eight in political branches of government. But the issue
Speaker 1: before them. Yeah, but but the issue before them, isn't
Speaker 1: it simple? Is there? Does the president have the right
Speaker 1: and the authority as president to institute the ban? And
Speaker 1: if you go to to the US Code eight two,
Speaker 1: it says, whenever the President finds that the entry of
Speaker 1: any aliens of any or any of any class of
Speaker 1: aliens into the US would be detrimental to the interests
Speaker 1: of the United States, he made by proclamation and for
Speaker 1: such period as he shall deem necessary suspend the entry
Speaker 1: of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants
Speaker 1: or non immigrants, or imposed on the entry of aliens
Speaker 1: any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Isn't that
Speaker 1: the question? And the question is in the case of Robot,
Speaker 1: you know, did he go beyond his scope of power
Speaker 1: in this, which I would argue he did exactly. This
Speaker 1: was what we call at will plintery power for the president.
Speaker 1: He could shut it off when he makes the determination
Speaker 1: that this is the right thing to do. The rest
Speaker 1: is for Congress to deal with. I'm actually gonna have
Speaker 1: a piece out today noting that Trump is double and
Speaker 1: triple covered by statute for almost every element of this,
Speaker 1: it was very well written. Um, What in fact, Judge
Speaker 1: Robart and likely these at least two of the judges
Speaker 1: in the Ninth Circuit are doing is not just violating
Speaker 1: the president's power. They're essentially saying that even Congress couldn't
Speaker 1: do this because a Congress has already done this a
Speaker 1: number of times. Um be they're saying, there's now a
Speaker 1: constitutional first and fourteenth Amendment right for individuals to affirmatively immigrate.
Speaker 1: That is very dangerous because, like I said, that means
Speaker 1: Congress could not do a similar thing. Also, it's important
Speaker 1: to note that presidents have used this authority forty three times. Um,
Speaker 1: I haven't broken down. Reagan used it five times, George
Speaker 1: Herbert Walker Bush one time, Bill Clinton twelve times, George W.
Speaker 1: Bush six times, and Barack Hussain Obama nineteen times. So
Speaker 1: I didn't even include Carter exactly. And it was almost
Speaker 1: never litigated. The one Supreme Court case with eight to
Speaker 1: one in favor of Clinton. Um. And you know, even
Speaker 1: lower court decisions had made it very clear that this
Speaker 1: is not just statutory authority, but the president has the
Speaker 1: power over foreign affairs. I mean, think about it. Could
Speaker 1: a state go and say we feel we're adversely affected
Speaker 1: because the president has troops in Iraq and we want
Speaker 1: our soldiers home. I mean, that's a federal power. They
Speaker 1: don't have standing. That's such a good point, Congressman, let
Speaker 1: me get to you, if I may hear um. I'm
Speaker 1: assuming you agree with Daniel in his analysis and all
Speaker 1: of this, but it really brings up a broader issue
Speaker 1: that I laid out on television last night, and I
Speaker 1: pointed out that the the Washington Free Beacon had gotten
Speaker 1: a copy of what's called the Democracy Matters Strategic Plan
Speaker 1: for Action. And in this it was a meeting with
Speaker 1: David Brock, was a left wing radical friend of the
Speaker 1: Clintons and and big Democratic donors meeting at a swanky
Speaker 1: resort in Florida mapping out how Democrats will kick Trump's ass.
Speaker 1: And as part of the memo they talk about a
Speaker 1: four year attack plan against Donald Trump and defeating Trump
Speaker 1: through impeachment and among other things, filing lawsuits against the
Speaker 1: Trump administration. And to add fuel to that fire, we're
Speaker 1: seeing the strategy to go judge shopping the way they
Speaker 1: did out in this particular case in Seattle. But we've
Speaker 1: got liberal groups have sued President Trump over his two
Speaker 1: to one executive order issued last week. Environmental and advocacy
Speaker 1: groups and National Resources Defense Counsel, Communications Workers of America
Speaker 1: Public Citizen argue that Trump is unconstitutional, it's irrational. It
Speaker 1: seems like they're gonna try and tie him up in
Speaker 1: knots in in court cases. And having the courts now
Speaker 1: packed with liberal justices and activist justices, it's going to
Speaker 1: be a problem. Yeah, that's a huge problem. And and
Speaker 1: I think what the country is seeing right now is
Speaker 1: what we in Arizona has have experienced for decades, where
Speaker 1: in this instance, you have the Ninth Circuit Court um
Speaker 1: that's probably, I would guess, is going to uphold this wrongheaded,
Speaker 1: uh lower court District court ruling. And it's really and
Speaker 1: the issue that we're talking about is an article on
Speaker 1: Section eight. Problem that is so clear where Congress has
Speaker 1: the authority to make a uniform rule of naturalization. That's
Speaker 1: what that's what they're doing, And they gave some power
Speaker 1: to the executive branch, and we asked the executive branch
Speaker 1: to enforce our laws. Now, maybe they're a little bit
Speaker 1: disgruntled because for the last eight years, maybe longer, the
Speaker 1: executive branch is not enforced the law, and so we
Speaker 1: asked for the enforcement. We've delegated that power uh to
Speaker 1: our our to fulfill our constitutional obligation. And so now
Speaker 1: we're fighting this and you're seeing and then rest of
Speaker 1: the nation is saying that now you get the Ninth Circuit,
Speaker 1: which is um um if. I don't want to be
Speaker 1: too strong about this, but they're unhinged and we are
Speaker 1: left as a nation, just like Arizona has been left
Speaker 1: for a long time at the whim of the Ninth Circuit,
Speaker 1: which gets overturned more than any other district court in
Speaker 1: any other circuit court. Well, it's a there's a reason
Speaker 1: for that. And actually you wrote a series of articles, Daniel,
Speaker 1: this week, and much of many of which I was
Speaker 1: referring to on the program. One of them had to
Speaker 1: do with breaking up the Ninth Circuit, and you made
Speaker 1: a very strong case that as of the end of
Speaker 1: fiscal year and again this includes Hawaii, Alaska, California, Nevada, Arizona, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana,
Speaker 1: and as of the end of fiscal year sixteen, there
Speaker 1: were thirteen thousand, three and thirty four pending appeals before
Speaker 1: the ninth Circuit, which is more than twice the amount
Speaker 1: of the second busiest circuit, which is the fifth Circuit Court,
Speaker 1: and more than ten times as much as the adjacent
Speaker 1: tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. And you wrote another series
Speaker 1: of articles on how they have no jurisdiction over Trump's
Speaker 1: immigration order and how rogue judges are undermining our sovereignty.
Speaker 1: You know exactly. I mean, this is my book I
Speaker 1: put out last year, Stolen Sovereignty, about out of control immigration,
Speaker 1: out of control courts, and the convergence of the two.
Speaker 1: And we're seeing what Justice Scalia called social transformation without representation.
Speaker 1: The notion that the unelected branch could bring people in
Speaker 1: an undermine national sovereignty against the will of the political
Speaker 1: branches is something that has been regarded as the most
Speaker 1: settled area of law, that courts have no jurisdiction over this.
Speaker 1: But you know, liberals aren't bound by a settled law
Speaker 1: like they say, we're supposedly bound by row and over
Speaker 1: things like that. So right there, hold that thought. I agree,
Speaker 1: it's one direction. I also want to ask you about
Speaker 1: whether you agree with my judge shopping theory, because I
Speaker 1: think all the cases that are going to end up
Speaker 1: being filed will be out in the the West Coast,
Speaker 1: on the West Coast, and if they're appealed, they'll all
Speaker 1: go to the Ninth Circus Circuit. And that's going to
Speaker 1: be done by design in America, and American's first. Now
Speaker 1: there's a novel idea. You're on the sea right. As
Speaker 1: we continue Sean Hannity show more on this battle over
Speaker 1: President Trump's executive orders as it relates to the seven countries,
Speaker 1: and we continue with Daniel Harrowitz, senior editor a Conservative
Speaker 1: Review and Representative Andy Biggs of Arizona. Andy, what do
Speaker 1: you think about the idea? Don't you think most of
Speaker 1: these cases are going to be in the states that
Speaker 1: are in the Ninth Circuit district. Don't you think this
Speaker 1: is being done by design? And isn't this isn't this
Speaker 1: ay so much importance to the Supreme Court choice of
Speaker 1: Neil Gorsuch at this time? Yeah, I mean it's ready made.
Speaker 1: This circuit court is ready made for judicial shopping. As
Speaker 1: you've mentioned, it allows. Look, they get overturned by some
Speaker 1: estimates almost of the time. But you have a four
Speaker 1: four split on the court today, and so that exacerbates
Speaker 1: the problem but there are people that are gonna be
Speaker 1: looking to file these lawsuits in the Ninth Circuit. But
Speaker 1: what I see happening is when we dropped the d
Speaker 1: o J dropped the ball on the standing issue last night,
Speaker 1: and if that is really a critical issue, if when
Speaker 1: people are forum shopping like this, I just think that
Speaker 1: you're going to see this for probably the entire time
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump is president. And this is one more
Speaker 1: reason in my opinion that the night have you on
Speaker 1: the air, and you know, I'm a little annoyed with
Speaker 1: what I keep reading. I heard Paul Ryan, your speakers
Speaker 1: say that, well, well, we'll probably get Obamacare repealed and
Speaker 1: replaced or repaired. I don't like the word repaired because
Speaker 1: that was not what the promise was by the end
Speaker 1: of the year, and that that's our top prior already.
Speaker 1: And then I'm thinking, well, where are you on the
Speaker 1: president's economic plan? You know, when are we going to
Speaker 1: get the economy moving? That was one of the main
Speaker 1: main issues for people to go out and vote in
Speaker 1: Michigan and Wisconsin, in Pennsylvania and Ohio for the president
Speaker 1: and to me, waiting till the end of the year
Speaker 1: to do the President's economic plan just delays economic progress
Speaker 1: for an entire year. Why why are things moving so
Speaker 1: slow there? Well, you know, I'm an new be here
Speaker 1: and I can tell you that, Um, I think there's
Speaker 1: a lot of people, there's a lot of activity, um
Speaker 1: that surrounds sometimes un almost static model. But I do
Speaker 1: think I will say this, I perceive there's a tremendous
Speaker 1: will to do something, where as my past observation says
Speaker 1: an outsider has been that that will has not been there.
Speaker 1: So I think, but mean, but don't you think it's
Speaker 1: a little unconscionable eight years into Obamacare that they don't
Speaker 1: have a consensus replacement plan ready to go. And I
Speaker 1: know that they have nine plans. I know nine plans
Speaker 1: are very similar. But they've known since November eight that
Speaker 1: this was going to be their future. What are they doing?
Speaker 1: It's frustrating me. Well, I think that. I think there's
Speaker 1: a lot of people that are frustrated. But I think
Speaker 1: the reality is, um, I'm looking for a complete repeal.
Speaker 1: You know, for me, a repeal says title X, sub
Speaker 1: paragraphs A through Z or whatever it is are gone
Speaker 1: effective on a certain day. That would be a complete repeal.
Speaker 1: So we're trying to you know, some of us trying
Speaker 1: to get a complete repeal. And then and then I'm
Speaker 1: not sure that replaces the right word to use of,
Speaker 1: you know. For me personally, I look at it and
Speaker 1: I say, we can do some things like repeal the
Speaker 1: antitrust exemption for health insurance companies. We can make health
Speaker 1: insurance state portable, you know, And and if you start
Speaker 1: taking these approaches, you can go forward and go and
Speaker 1: get some things well. And then I've got a from Price,
Speaker 1: Tom Price to get Yeah, I agree on the price issue.
Speaker 1: That's a good point I recommend too. Thanks to your congressman,
Speaker 1: join the Freedom Caucus number one and number two. Don't
Speaker 1: be silent, and if they're moving too slow, give them
Speaker 1: a swift kick boot in the ass. Well for us
Speaker 1: out here, that one thing's done, I will do that.
Speaker 1: That's my mission. That's my man. I appreciate it. Be'st
Speaker 1: to luck to you. I hope you joined the Freedom
Speaker 1: Call because the only people I trust right now eight
Speaker 1: D nine pol one Sean when we come back, Tim
Speaker 1: Tebow's gonna check in with us. Already now, hundreds of
Speaker 1: kids are getting ready for the night of their lives
Speaker 1: with special needs who never got the chance to get
Speaker 1: a prom. It's almost prom time. In this one, you're
Speaker 1: not gonna want to miss. Every participant was crowned king,
Speaker 1: poor queen. It is about giving them a voice. It
Speaker 1: is about celebrating them. It is about loving them and
Speaker 1: letting them know that their lives matter and that they
Speaker 1: are special and giving them the time of their life.
Speaker 1: All over the world, they're girls walking down red car
Speaker 1: bats and being told that they're beautiful and being loved
Speaker 1: and being celebrated. That's why you have a crowd or
Speaker 1: tr because you're a queen, are a king. But every
Speaker 1: single day in your life, that's how God it's easy,
Speaker 1: because that's how important you are. All right, That, of course,
Speaker 1: is from the Tim Tebow Foundation, and we found that
Speaker 1: on the online and Tim Tebow has done a tremendous
Speaker 1: job admission to bring faith, hope, love to those people
Speaker 1: that need brighter days in their life and the toughest
Speaker 1: hours of need. And Tim Tebow, our friend, is back
Speaker 1: on the program. How are you. I'm doing good? How
Speaker 1: are you doing buddy? You know I loved your book.
Speaker 1: It really did well to congratulations. I actually give a
Speaker 1: copy of it to my son he's an athlete. Thank you,
Speaker 1: Thank you so much. I appreciate it. That was just
Speaker 1: something that had been on my heart for about a
Speaker 1: year and a half, and I really wrote that to
Speaker 1: try to just be an encouragement to people, because it's
Speaker 1: just life. It's not always easy, and we get knocked down,
Speaker 1: and it's not just about getting back up. It's about
Speaker 1: how we get back up in the attitude in which
Speaker 1: we get back up and and ready to face life.
Speaker 1: You know, it's funny you say that, because I think
Speaker 1: more than anybody that I can think of in sports,
Speaker 1: and this is my opinion, I just think that you've
Speaker 1: been treated very unfairly and that a lot of people
Speaker 1: kind of discriminated I think would be the right word
Speaker 1: against you because of your outspoken faith, and a lot
Speaker 1: of teams, Oh they don't want the distraction. Oh they don't,
Speaker 1: they don't. They don't want Tim Tebow to get the limelight, etcetera, etcetera.
Speaker 1: This this needs to be focused on the game. And
Speaker 1: I've heard those comments from people. So in that sense,
Speaker 1: you've had your own challenges to faces. Has that been hard?
Speaker 1: I think in certain areas, yeah, it's been very hard.
Speaker 1: But I also believe, without a shadow of a doubt
Speaker 1: that everything happens for a reason. And so I didn't
Speaker 1: go through just the highest for a reason. I also
Speaker 1: went through the lows for a reason. I think, you know,
Speaker 1: especially in writing Shaken, you know, I think what made
Speaker 1: me be able to relate to so many more people
Speaker 1: is because of all the times that I've been cut
Speaker 1: or knocked down, or you know, all the times where
Speaker 1: you may be put down, And so you know, it
Speaker 1: could relate to everybody because you know, not a lot
Speaker 1: of people can relate to championships or Hysman's, but so
Speaker 1: many people, almost everybody can relate to get being fired
Speaker 1: or getting out of a bad relationship, or being told
Speaker 1: you're not good enough or you're not wanted. Are all
Speaker 1: of these things and um, you know, so I think
Speaker 1: is much of I'm grateful for the highest, I can
Speaker 1: honestly say, you know, with the clear conscience that I'm
Speaker 1: also very grateful for the lows as well. That's fascinating.
Speaker 1: Is that why you started the Special Foundation? And and
Speaker 1: tell us specifically who you target here and who you're
Speaker 1: trying to help, Well, you know, we we my my
Speaker 1: biggest goal in life, in life period is to fight
Speaker 1: for people that can't fight for themselves. When I was
Speaker 1: fifteen years old, I met a boy in the Philippines
Speaker 1: with a feed on backwards and the entire village wouldn't
Speaker 1: uh No one would touch him except for his two
Speaker 1: best friends because they looked at him as cursed and
Speaker 1: they wouldn't have anything to do with them. And he
Speaker 1: just totally changed my life. And now I want to
Speaker 1: fight for people like him. His name Sherwin. And you
Speaker 1: know now in the in the Philippines, we have a
Speaker 1: hospital where we bring in kids like that and we
Speaker 1: love them, we care about them, and they get to
Speaker 1: be wheeled in and they get to walk out with
Speaker 1: physical care, emotional care, spiritual care um. But specifically what
Speaker 1: you were mentioning with the Night to Shine is that's
Speaker 1: something that I wanted to start because you know, Sean,
Speaker 1: you know, there's been a lot of times in my
Speaker 1: life where I've been praised or celebrated. To clap and
Speaker 1: you have to you know what it's like to be
Speaker 1: you have people say good things about you or to
Speaker 1: be celebrated. I don't know what it's like to get
Speaker 1: the crap beat out of you too, But go ahead,
Speaker 1: but but a lot of these kids, and they're not
Speaker 1: all young people, they don't know what it's like. And
Speaker 1: a lot of times they've never been cheered for, they've
Speaker 1: never been clapped for, and so you know, we know
Speaker 1: that's because they are but we call them kings and
Speaker 1: queens because that's how God looks at them every day
Speaker 1: in their life. And so many of these people with
Speaker 1: special needs they never get cheered for, they never get
Speaker 1: clapped for. And when you want to talk about, you know,
Speaker 1: about treating everyone equally and loving everyone, I think the
Speaker 1: special needs is a huge community where we need to
Speaker 1: make that happen. And so that's why, you know, um,
Speaker 1: two nights from now, we're going to have three problems
Speaker 1: around the world. Were will we will crown seventy five
Speaker 1: thousand kings and queens as our honored guests with over
Speaker 1: a hundred fifty volunteers in eleven countries. And so, you know,
Speaker 1: when we're talking about bringing people together, you know, this
Speaker 1: is one way for us to bring people together, all
Speaker 1: sorts of people, all walks of life from you know, um,
Speaker 1: six different continents, and it's just it's for me, it's
Speaker 1: my favorite night of the year because I believe. I
Speaker 1: do believe in bringing people together the right way, and
Speaker 1: I think this is bringing people together in love. When
Speaker 1: is this? When is this coming? Because I I'd love
Speaker 1: to go to it if I can. Where is It's
Speaker 1: It's Friday night. There will be one right there in
Speaker 1: Times Square, right beside where you work, um at you
Speaker 1: know Amalekis and and we're actually hosting that will be
Speaker 1: at seven thirty so and a lot of people are
Speaker 1: walking into Broadway to watch those shows. There will be
Speaker 1: all these kings and queens that will be going down
Speaker 1: the red carpet right there in Times Square, right beside you.
Speaker 1: So we'd love to be there. Are they Are you
Speaker 1: gonna be there? And then you are they also going
Speaker 1: to see one of the shows? Are They're just gonna
Speaker 1: be in tounch Core? No, they are the show. It's
Speaker 1: a problem. It's so seea these problems. It's it's a
Speaker 1: red carpet where we have hundreds of people cheering them
Speaker 1: down red carpets. We have karaoke rooms, we have um
Speaker 1: we have floors. We have huge problems. It's it's awesome
Speaker 1: and I will be all over the world for it.
Speaker 1: I would be out of the country first, and then
Speaker 1: I'll be back in it. We'll be flying all around
Speaker 1: to different places, so you have to follow and check
Speaker 1: out where we're going, but we're gonna try to make
Speaker 1: as many stops as possible. It sounds like a lot
Speaker 1: of fun. Uh. What is the website for your foundation?
Speaker 1: It's Timtoo Foundation dot org. And but I encourage everybody
Speaker 1: to go be a part of it. If you have
Speaker 1: someone with special needs and um, have them go to
Speaker 1: a prom if they want to be a part of
Speaker 1: it as a volunteer. You know, it's just it's an
Speaker 1: awesome time of bringing people together. And you know what
Speaker 1: it's also really cool, Sean, is this is something where
Speaker 1: we're able to bring together twenty eight denominations were able
Speaker 1: to get bring together businesses. One of our partners and airs,
Speaker 1: they're sending thousands of their employees to to support and volunteer.
Speaker 1: When we have all these different people, whether it's churches,
Speaker 1: it's denominations, it's businesses, it's UM, it's it's you know,
Speaker 1: single parents, it's whoever. It's all over coming together to
Speaker 1: celebrate life and celebrate people that everyone matters. And it's
Speaker 1: just super special and it's my favorite night of the year.
Speaker 1: It was great to see you in Houston. Was that
Speaker 1: not the greatest game I've you've ever seen in your life?
Speaker 1: Or maybe maybe a really good one. I think what's
Speaker 1: so cool this year for football fans is you look
Speaker 1: at the College football National Championship game that was one
Speaker 1: of the best. You look at the Super Bowl that
Speaker 1: was one of the best Super Bowls, and I just
Speaker 1: it's it's been a really good year for football. I think,
Speaker 1: you know, but you've had that experience. I mean, you
Speaker 1: won the Heisman Trophy. Do you want a championship when
Speaker 1: you were in Florida, right, do you want a champion
Speaker 1: to win a couple? Yeah, yeah, when you were when
Speaker 1: you were down there, and I remember when you were
Speaker 1: quarterbacking for the Broncos. This was before they got Peyton Manning.
Speaker 1: I mean, you want a huge game in overtime yourself. So,
Speaker 1: I mean you've had these moments. And what did you
Speaker 1: think of Tom Brady and his performance? I think that
Speaker 1: he is extremely clutch. I think he plays his best
Speaker 1: when his best is needed. Um. I think that's what
Speaker 1: makes him really tom Brady is he's not the best
Speaker 1: in the first quarter, second quarter, third quarter, but he's
Speaker 1: best in the fourth quarter when it's needed. I think
Speaker 1: that he's the way he's able to bring everybody else
Speaker 1: on his team, how unselfish he is, how he's the
Speaker 1: leader of the team. But when I was playing with
Speaker 1: the Patriots, they would coach him the hardest. When you
Speaker 1: when those coaches can coach Tom Brady the hardest, you
Speaker 1: think that a brand new rookie receiver or right tackle
Speaker 1: or linebacker isn't going to pay attention or listen up
Speaker 1: when Tom Brady just got coached, Like, plain, what you
Speaker 1: mean by that? What do you mean they coach him
Speaker 1: the hardest. That's interesting. I've never heard that. Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: I mean he's like he's open to coaching. When they
Speaker 1: when he doesn't maybe go through a progression the right way,
Speaker 1: it's not like they'll coach him the same way. He'll
Speaker 1: go through meetings and he's the first one there and
Speaker 1: he's lifting, and in between you know, uh periods and practice,
Speaker 1: he'll be out there working on something and John McDaniels
Speaker 1: is coaching him and his footwork and you know, is
Speaker 1: going through drills. And when your best player, maybe the
Speaker 1: best player of all time, is your hardest worker, and
Speaker 1: they will continue to coach him and coach him hard,
Speaker 1: and he wants that coaching and he asked for it,
Speaker 1: and he'll go up to Josh and he'll say, all right,
Speaker 1: let's go through it exactly what this read was? Again,
Speaker 1: What are we thinking here? Why are we thinking this?
Speaker 1: And he's so locked in mentally and physically all the
Speaker 1: time that that means everybody else is going to fold
Speaker 1: into line. And when you're when when the culture of
Speaker 1: a team is so strong Sean that whoever the outliers are,
Speaker 1: they're gonna just buy into the culture because it's that strong.
Speaker 1: So you see all these players that maybe we're, um,
Speaker 1: you know, kind of outliers under their teams, and they
Speaker 1: get to New England and they totally buy into the
Speaker 1: Patriot way and it works. And when your best player
Speaker 1: is someone that is your biggest advocate for it, that
Speaker 1: really helps. Now, it's pretty fascinated. One of the reasons
Speaker 1: I love sports and I think it's great for kids
Speaker 1: is you learn that you don't always win. I don't
Speaker 1: think you should get a participation trophy, which is insane
Speaker 1: to me. You also need to learn how to win
Speaker 1: and be a gracious winner. You learn how to accept defeat,
Speaker 1: and you also learn that the heart of your work,
Speaker 1: it usually there's a direct correlation to how you're gonna do.
Speaker 1: And I think it's a great life lesson. Have you
Speaker 1: found that works in your life the same way, There's
Speaker 1: no question, I totally. That's one of the best things
Speaker 1: about sports is you have to deal with highs and lows,
Speaker 1: the good and the bad, and you have to be
Speaker 1: able to have You have to build your character to
Speaker 1: handle both of those moments, whether it's humility when it
Speaker 1: goes well, whether it's determination when it goes bad, whether
Speaker 1: it's identity, because that's how so many people are going
Speaker 1: to view you, is they're going to view you as
Speaker 1: a football player or view you as a basketball or
Speaker 1: baseball whatever it is, and so it's all that Also
Speaker 1: can be a struggle for a lot of athletes, is
Speaker 1: they're so defined by what they do rather than who
Speaker 1: they are, and so that's another struggle a lot of
Speaker 1: the athletes have to deal with. But I think it
Speaker 1: teaches you how to handle life. And you know, I
Speaker 1: have just for me, football and based on basketball, everything
Speaker 1: growing up as has taught me so many life lessons
Speaker 1: that are, you know, so impactful to this very day.
Speaker 1: How did it, how did you make the transition? How's
Speaker 1: it going with the New York Mets. I know they
Speaker 1: signed you, I know you're going to training camp, and
Speaker 1: you know, I've talked to many many people that are
Speaker 1: some that are are pulling for you, and then some
Speaker 1: that maybe are not Tebow fans for whatever reason. I
Speaker 1: don't see any reason why they're not. But well, I
Speaker 1: just think people like to you know, I just think
Speaker 1: people like to hate for a living, some of especially
Speaker 1: some sports and political writers. But how's it going, And
Speaker 1: do you think you have a real shot to make
Speaker 1: the squad this year? Well? I believe in myself, and
Speaker 1: you know, the goal would obviously be to one day
Speaker 1: playing the BIGS. But for me, it's just about getting
Speaker 1: ready for spring training here in a couple of weeks
Speaker 1: and doing the best I can learning, you know, wherever
Speaker 1: they send me from there, just trying to continue to develop,
Speaker 1: see as many pitch as as possible, get used to it,
Speaker 1: and then try to work my way up. And but
Speaker 1: I think at the same time, for me, so many
Speaker 1: people would be like, is it only last me? Is
Speaker 1: it only a success if you make it to the BIGS?
Speaker 1: And I would say absolutely not. You know, it's a
Speaker 1: success every day when you get to live out your dream,
Speaker 1: when you get to do something you love and you
Speaker 1: get to enjoy it every single day. It's not just
Speaker 1: about the end result. It's it's so much about the journey.
Speaker 1: And for me, the entire process has been such a joy.
Speaker 1: It's been so much fun. And yeah, and it's the
Speaker 1: one day playing the Biggs for sure, but I'm also
Speaker 1: going to enjoy the entire process. You know, one of
Speaker 1: the things I've admired about you is your courageous in
Speaker 1: every aspect of your life. You know, I also think
Speaker 1: that there's been this added scrutiny to your life because
Speaker 1: you talk about your faith and your Christianity and you're
Speaker 1: not shy about it, and you show it on the field.
Speaker 1: And I actually think, well, it's a little bit better
Speaker 1: than some of the other athletic role models are athletes
Speaker 1: we have out there, they're not exactly the best role models.
Speaker 1: And and I think there are some people that don't
Speaker 1: understand the the Christianity story, and that is that we're
Speaker 1: all sinners, we all fail. You know, if I'm a Christian,
Speaker 1: but I I need more forgiveness I'm sure than you do,
Speaker 1: because I'm far worse a person than you are. I'm
Speaker 1: just almost incorrigible my whole life, and I still am.
Speaker 1: But in a real sense, I think there are people
Speaker 1: that almost want you to fail. See he's a Christian
Speaker 1: and he failed, and I think that puts added pressure
Speaker 1: on you. And I am I misreading that? Or do
Speaker 1: you feel well? I don't think so. I think some
Speaker 1: people think it's added pressure. But I got some crazy
Speaker 1: breaking news that can go to headlines is I've already
Speaker 1: failed over and over and over again. That's the Christianity messages.
Speaker 1: It's not about our failure, it's about you. I failed
Speaker 1: more than you did, so I'm just you know your
Speaker 1: failures are probably minuscule in comparison, but go ahead. Do
Speaker 1: you know how many times it? You know, you know
Speaker 1: how many sins? It makes it your center at one?
Speaker 1: And you know what that word means. It means missing
Speaker 1: the mark, And every single one of us we've missed
Speaker 1: the mark. I mean, we've messed up in our life,
Speaker 1: We've fallen. But that's okay. It's not about being perfect.
Speaker 1: I don't serve a god that says you have to
Speaker 1: be perfect. What we get to serve as a God
Speaker 1: who is perfect. And that's what's so awesome about the
Speaker 1: about being a Christian is it's not about how good
Speaker 1: we are. It's not about we can ever be enough.
Speaker 1: It's about that He's enough and his love is sufficient
Speaker 1: for every single one of us. And so our goal
Speaker 1: every day is not to be perfect. It's just to
Speaker 1: draw closer to the one that is and just try
Speaker 1: to walk a little bit closer every day. And when
Speaker 1: we fall, it's just about getting back up. And I
Speaker 1: think so many the Christian message can be you know,
Speaker 1: sometimes it can be confused because people will make it
Speaker 1: all about us when it's not about us. It's about
Speaker 1: what Jesus did on the cross, and it's about accepting
Speaker 1: what he did and putting our faith in him, and
Speaker 1: this trying to live each day and love people and
Speaker 1: and help people and just get a little bit closer.
Speaker 1: But you know what, You're gonna have days they're good,
Speaker 1: You're gonna have days that are bad. It's not about
Speaker 1: judging people. It's about loving people, and it's just about
Speaker 1: trying to to do this life together. And when we
Speaker 1: talk about the church, the church isn't these buildings we
Speaker 1: go to on Sunday. It's body of believers. We get
Speaker 1: to do life with every single day, and that's what
Speaker 1: you're gonna be doing on Friday. So listen. I don't
Speaker 1: want to cut your short here, but I want to
Speaker 1: make sure I get this in. It's Tim Tebow Foundation
Speaker 1: dot Org. Right, listen. I always enjoy talking to you.
Speaker 1: You're a great guy of your your courage, and I
Speaker 1: love what you're doing for these kids. It's awesome and
Speaker 1: it's been great to get to know you, Tim Tebow.
Speaker 1: It's pleasure. Thanks for being with us. Absolutely, Thank you, brother.
Speaker 1: Three hours a day of red, white, and Blue America crowds.
Speaker 1: This is the Sean Hannity Show. All right, that's gonna
Speaker 1: wrap things up in Today Hannity Tonight. We got a
Speaker 1: lot of news we're waiting for tonight. Jeff's Sessions vote
Speaker 1: we expect to take place tonight. Elizabeth Warren now apparently
Speaker 1: it's this was a big plan launch for a book
Speaker 1: she's writing. We'll get into that. Also, the merits of
Speaker 1: extreme vetting and why it's important. Stephen Miller, Jay Sekulo
Speaker 1: join us. If you didn't see Maxine Waters and Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker 1: they ought to be mortified for the stupid comments they
Speaker 1: made this week. You're gonna laugh when you see him,
Speaker 1: all right, We'll see it tonight at ten. Thanks for
Speaker 1: being with us. Back here tomorrow,