WEBVTT - How Facebook Enabled Scam Advertisers Via Affiliate Marketers

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Facebook

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>heady brief for previow yesterday, but shares are down nearly

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>one percent again today after losing nearly fourteen percent uh

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>IF their shares last week. Here to join us to

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.480
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about a behind the scenes look

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>at how Facebook approached marketing and how they attracted certain

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>shady advertisers is Robert Friedman, Senior editor on the Projects

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and Investigations team here at Bloomberg News. This is an

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>amazing story. It's going to be in Business Week. It's

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>written by Zeke Fox. I recommend everybody read it. Can

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 1>you just give us a sense of where it begins

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>this conference at why it's notable. Well, Zeke is on

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a well deserved vacation this week, UM, so I'm here

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to uh to speak for him. This story has been

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>in the works for over a year. UM. And Zeke

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>came to me last spring and said, I want to

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>go to this conference in Berlin for affiliate marketers. And

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I said, what is that. I just want to go

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to Berlin and DC And then he said, and there's

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>also an after party and abissa which I want to

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>go to. And I said, Zeke, are you scamming me?

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>And um. But the more he told me about this

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 1>strange world of affiliate marketing, UM, I the more I

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 1>got interested. So affiliate marketing is basically just a bunch

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of middleman who buy clicks and views from Facebook and

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>sell them to people who try to sell stuff. A

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of it's legitimate. UM. Plenty of companies use this

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>as an advertising tool. But UM, all the shady advertisers

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>who sell uh stuff through you know, free iPhone offers

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>or diet pills approved by Oprah Winfrey or Elon Musk's

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>UM smart pills, UM, fake endorsements, UM, stuff that pops

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>up and pollutes your your your Internet experience. UM. They

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>all actually um take advantage of this affiliate marketing deal.

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>And they all congregate around this conference, which is hosted

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>by a suspiciously sounded group called Stack that money. So

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Zeke Z stack that mine. So Zeke went out there

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and the first thing he noticed was all the Facebook

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>people that were there. They were on stage, they were

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:43.959
<v Speaker 1>moderating panels, they were out mingling with the with the crowds.

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.239
<v Speaker 1>And he said, what is going on here? And u

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>uh And thus began an investigation into the strange relationship

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>between these affiliate marketers and Facebook. Um. Facebook um, as

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, has built a very very powerful tool to

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.679
<v Speaker 1>a good people. Um and and based on all the

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 1>data that you and I and everybody else gives them

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 1>two point to billion people and the advertising community figured

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>out pretty quickly that this was a valuable tool for

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>them to let Facebook find the suckers for them. And

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that began this, uh, this adventure. Okay, So this sort

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 1>of brings us to a fork in the metaphorical road

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>here for Facebook, because on one hand, uh, they have

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>said that they try to fare it out bad actors,

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>people who are trying to sell miracle pills that don't

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>work or iPhone iPhones that are free to end up

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>charging you EIGHTI six dollars a month for the rest

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of your life. UM. I'm just wondering what they knew

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>about the bad actors, what they did to stop them

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>or is there evidence that they've been actively recruiting them.

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>So Facebook has certain rules about things you're not supposed

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to advertise on on it, and they have reviewers who

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>somewhere overseas or reviewing content and UH. For years they

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>had a very small skeletal crew of three engineers they

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>were set to sort of combat this UH you know,

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>fraud on advertising fraud. But it was a half hearted effort.

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>And at the same time their marketing people were attending

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>conferences and UH and recruiting trying to sell these ads.

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 1>It's hundreds of millions of dollars of advertising revenue. So

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 1>they had they had at best a complicated, um bifurcated

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>relationship with with this world, but they were looking the

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>other way in in in my view, it's only recently

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>in the last year that they're beginning to think this

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>more seriously. They hired a new person to sort of

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>come up with and they've they and lots more reviewers

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and they've done But the the the ad scammeras are

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>smart and they have developed a program and that's in

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>this story. UM a guy named Rob Grin who became

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of the king of these affiliate marketers developed a

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>program that allows you to cloak your ads. Um cloaking

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>means that when they can figure out when a Facebook

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.279
<v Speaker 1>reviewer is reviewing the ad, and when they and the

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Facebook reviewer clicks on the add they get an innocuous

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>um landing page, but everybody else falls on a on

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>on the actual uh scam add So so um, they

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>were just much smarter than Facebook. Um was able to

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>keep up with whatever efforts they were making. And um,

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah, so that's Are there any laws that were

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>broken here? Because on one hand, you know, people are

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>free to try to portray their objects, they're their their

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>wears as as positive as possible, and that's not considered

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a clear violation. This is a clear violation of FTC

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>rules about fraudulent advertising. Yeah, so who's liable here? So

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the FTC occasionally makes a case. They busted a ring

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>that in San Diego that was selling you know, fraudulent

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>diet pills and made they had made a undred and

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine million dollars off of their their scam. Um,

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's it's it's a half hearted effort on

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 1>the regulatory agencies, half hearted effort on the part of

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the technology companies and a great opportunity for all these

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>uh scamming marketers. This is an amazing story. I recommend

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody read it. The main character, Grant, who's sort of

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the king of these, uh, these sort of shady advertisers

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and the intermediaries of them, said that when he first

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 1>realized how much money he could make, he almost felt

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.359
<v Speaker 1>ill with excitement, panic, he described, panics. Yeah, but was

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>he minting money? And then you know, he tries to

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of pedal back and wonder whether he should do

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>something better with his life. And then thanks better of that?

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>And thanks? What am I a communist? Robert Friedman, thank

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being with me. And really I

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>recommend people read the story. Robert Friedman, Senior editor of

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the Projects and Investigations team for Bloomberg News. The story

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>how Facebook helps shady advertisers sell fake Ellen smart pills

0:06:54.279 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>by Zeke Fox. There has been a lot of turnover

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>in President Trump's cabinet. Mike Pompeo going to be elevated,

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>leading President Trump to nominated Gina has Belt to replace

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Pompeo as c A c I A director here with us,

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Jack Divine founding partner and president of the ark And Group,

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>also former acting director of the c i A and

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a very familiar person with Gina Haspell. Jack, Thanks so

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>much for being here. So Gina has been a very

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>controversial pick. A lot of people have said that she

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>was in charge of torture programs, that she discarded evidence

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>tied to video tapes. You want to be on record

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>supporting her absolutely. I've known her for many, many years,

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think the first thing you think of is

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a professional and frankly, even though I've known I can't

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you whether she would vote Republican or Democrats. She's

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.679
<v Speaker 1>in that category of so many of us that don't

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>carry our politics into place. But when you look at

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the the panorama today of who's available here, you have

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.679
<v Speaker 1>someone who's been at the top of the operational director

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and now the top of the agency and working apparently

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>very well with the Trump administration. Downtown and the workforce

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>is very high on her. I think she's been painted

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and as more of a as a symbol of something

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that is not a reality. I think the hearings are

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>actually going to be very conducive to straightening this out.

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the confirmation process, while grueling one,

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I think when the facts are surface, it's going to

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>be far less dramatic and we're understandable when they get down,

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>as they are now getting down and asking specifics. I

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>think she will show extremely well. And I also want

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>want to forget the fact which I think is getting lost,

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>how big a deal it is to have the first

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>woman to actor of CIA. I watched it over forty years.

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>It's really quite an amazing development. Why is that a

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>big deal? Well, when when I first joined the agency

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>many years ago, the workforce had on our training class

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty people too women, None of them went in operations. Today,

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>half of the agency's operators are now women, holding key

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:23.839
<v Speaker 1>positions that are reflective of the time. Um, but they've

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>never been at the very top of the service. In fact,

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>she'll be the only the second person in the history

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of the agency that's been in the operational part that

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>has made it all the way to become the director.

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>The other was Stick Helmels back in the sixties. I

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>think that mindset of being a careerist and having those

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>operational background steeped in it and at the policy level

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>is critical today when we're looking at what Russia is

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>doing either meddling in elections and taking out people with

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>nerve agents. I mean, we got a really tough wear world.

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>We better have somebody in that job that understands that world.

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Want to pick up on the Russia point because we

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>did see earlier this week President Trump ejected sixty Russian

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>diplomats over the UK poisoning incident. That was more than

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>people had expected. How did you interpret this? Well, I

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>know the Russians will be living. I mean I have

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 1>seen and seen folks P and GD we called, you know,

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>persona non grata, you're thrown out. I mean people have kids,

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>they have schools that they running agents, they're doing business

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>at pack up out of there back home. It is

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a very disruptive thing. So the institutions and my bed

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't have the names in front of me, but

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you can bet there's a high number of the sixty

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that are intelligence oriented. So they are going to be

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>losing capability. They're closing Seattle. It's a big it's a

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>big deal and a big blow, and then it creates

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 1>such a h an international development. The Russians will probably respond.

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>So there's some toughening of the lines between the Western

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Allies and Russian and I don't think this is a

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>good This is not going to play well for Putin

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>over the long haul. So one theory was that President

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump took a harder than expected stance on Russia in

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>order to sort of pledge allegiance to the Allies in

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:22.319
<v Speaker 1>return for some support as h he goes ahead with

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>ripping up the Iran Deal. What do you make of

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that theory. I don't put a lot of stock in

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>that theory. I mean, you know, Tip and Neil used

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to say politics is all local. I think President Trump

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>was looking at the winds of war, if you will.

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think the American people are starting to get

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>increasingly um agitated and concerned about Russian behavior and are

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>going back to a mindset that's more closer to the

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:54.239
<v Speaker 1>to the Cold War, which I think is most unfortunate.

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>But Putent seems to be determined to push this. And

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 1>I must say my own estimate of of Putin he

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>would have been flattered. I thought he was a great strategist.

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Now I have great doubts about that. I really, yes,

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I have. I have changed my views. And the Econdis

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>magazine had him on the cover is a great chess player.

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I really, I'm not even sure he's a good checkers

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:21.079
<v Speaker 1>player whoa really interesting and other uh checkers or chess player.

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>We're not sure Kim Jong un. And I'd love to

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>get your opinion on the surprise visit to Beijing. What

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>do you think that's about and is there any relationship

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>between some of the tariff talk that we've heard between

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the US and China and this visit. Well, I think,

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I would say Kim is at least

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a good checkers player. I mean, they've they've been playing

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>this game for a long time where they move their

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>programs forward and then where they get to a plateau,

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>they say, well, let's let's negotiate. So I'm for the negotiations.

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I've been urging it for a long time. You know,

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>there's no real military option here, so you've got to

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 1>get back to the table. Who comes to the able

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>And as you point out, the Chinese are a major factor.

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I think they're less so than many people realize, in

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the sense that the Chinese had great influence for many

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>many decades, were the last fifteen twenty years. It's less

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>but more than anybody else, certainly, And they can be

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>very helpful. I think the Chinese are are torn on

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 1>this one, but I don't think they want to be

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>left on the sideline. So I think that's what we're

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at here. Um, just taking a little bit of

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a step back home. I'd love to just get your impression.

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>In some of the turnover that we've had in the

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>White House cabinet with John Bolton becoming National Security Advisor,

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people were saying this brings us closer

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to having a war, with Ian Bremer saying that this

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 1>was the single worst day for geopolitical risk in a

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>long time. What's your take, Well, I think you know, again,

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>there's been a number of changes, and this is very common.

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>As you know new administrations. The end of the first year,

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>there's usually significant trends, and normally they move more to

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the center. If there to the left, the move center left.

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>If they're to the right, they move center right. And

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's UM and the bureaucracies themselves and the

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>civil servants begin to gain more and more influence, and consequently,

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>when I look at Pompeo, the move of Pompeo, who

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>has been a very successful director of CIA and and

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a confidant of the President, and I don't think they

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>knew each other very well when it started. It's now

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be over a state. This is a good

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>thing for the State Department. Gina. We talked about moving

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>her up. You now have a team that knows Trump

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>works with them, and I think they're pragnantists and realists.

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>The Monkey, the Wrench, the person you have not mentioned

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and I we're just going to say the tricky one here,

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and I must tell you I'm sitting back and looking

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>at it doesn't seem to fit. Is his Bolton, And

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I wish I knew him and could size it up

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>face to face. But on the surface, my big concern

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>with the administration early on, and it looked like the

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>neo cons might be making a way back into the

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>White House and that stopped. Yeah. Now I worry whether

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>if Bolton sticks to his position, whether or not we're

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>going to see a more oct We're gonna have to

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>leave it there. Founding partner and president of the ark

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>And Group, also former acting c I a chief. Another

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>grocery store chained Southeastern Grocers Chapter four filed four Chapter

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>eleven bankruptcy today in Delaware, Delaware, it is similar in

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>some ways declare Stores and Toys r US in that

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it has a lot of debt linked to a two

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand and five buy out, and here to kind of

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>draw the links together for us. As Jared Dillion, a

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>columnist for Bloomberg View, Jared, thank you so much for

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>being with us. He is also an editor and publisher

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of The Daily Dirt Nap. Jared, can you talk a

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit about how we should sort of view the

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>growing volume of bankruptcies that we've seen with LVO financed

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>or bought out companies UM like claires, like Toys r

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>US now Southeastern Grocers. You know, I think I think

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that you know, it's just a small trickle at this point.

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>But the alarming thing is is that, you know, we're

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>really at the top of the expansion um and we're

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>seeing some of these bankruptcies, and you know, usually that's

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>not when you see bankruptcies like these. Now the retail

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>environment has changed a lot for Claires and Toys r

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>US and also for groceries, but you shouldn't be seeing

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>these deals fall apart at the top of the cycle.

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>So what do you make of that? Well, you know,

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I think if you look at some of these individual deals. Uh,

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just too much debt. And you know, in the

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>case of Claire's, they had over two billion, and this

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>is not it's not a big business, you know. Uh,

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>two billion is a lot. I just I think from

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.679
<v Speaker 1>an outsider looking in, it just doesn't pass the common

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 1>sense test. Uh, toys r Rust had fion going out

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the door every year and interest expense. I mean this

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>is you know, it depends on what your philosophy of

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>debt is. What a lot of people think that businesses

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>should borrow as much as they possibly can without going

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>bankrupt to maximize profits. So you're the the title of

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:50.360
<v Speaker 1>your column was private equity, it's more like pirate equity.

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>And you seem to place the blame on private equity

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>companies for basically forcing these companies to incur as much

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 1>debt as they have. Of you know, a lot of

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>people would say private equity companies have some misses, this

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>is to be expected, but they need a lot more

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>wins in order to deliver good profits. Explain where llain here.

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I think the issue here is really one

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of public opinion. I think that the private equity industry

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>has to be careful. Um, you know, after the Toys

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>r US deal, I saw some uh you know, left

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>leaning stuff on social media just blaming the private equity

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>companies for thirty three thousand job losses, which is not trivial.

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>And if we have a recession, if we have you know,

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>an honest to go to this downturn and we get

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>more PD deals fall apart and more layoffs, it is

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 1>going to point back directly at the private equity industry.

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.199
<v Speaker 1>Um So, really like the point of the piece was

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>about how public opinion can turn on an industry very fast,

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're already seeing the beginnings of that.

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And and this sort of is analogous to what we

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>saw with Wall Street after the two says an innate

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 1>financial crash. I'm wondering what will be the implication if, say,

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>there is a rash of private equity sponsored companies that

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 1>do go bankrupt and that does do result in many

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>job losses. What will be the consequences if public opinions hours?

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it more regulation? Well? I don't, I don't. I

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>don't see how regulation would really uh benefit the situation.

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>But I think that you know this, it's not just

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street, it's the academic community. It's the c f

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>A program. It's it really is going to result in

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>a see change about how people think about debt and

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>how it should be used. Um, right now people are

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 1>using it to maximize profits. In the future, they might

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>try to minimize debt in order to maximize safety. You know,

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>one of the people I mentioned in the piece was

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>d Ramsey, And Dave Ramsey is a personal finance expert

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>who has a following of millions of people, and he

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>advocates at the consumer level to pay off your mortgage,

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to pay off your car loan, to pay off your

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>credit card debts, and to live debt free. And it's

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the corporate sector that has leveraged up massively while consumers

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>have de leveraged. I guess what I was trying to

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>get at is for Wall Street, the consequences of souring

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:31.199
<v Speaker 1>public opinion were huge finds or more regulation and frankly

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a brain drain, with a certain number of people who

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>would have otherwise gone to Wall Street going to say

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley. What will be the sort of analogous consequence

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 1>for private equity. Well, you know, I think that, uh,

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, public opinion will turn against private equity much

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that it did in Wall Street.

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>And it could result in a brain drain. It could

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it could result in the government talking about

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>some you know, reasonable limits that can be placed on debt.

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I really, you know, I can't speculate as to how

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it's going to turn out. I mean I think that, um,

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>we're still probably a year or two away from this

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>cycle playing out. Jared Dillion, Thank you so much for

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>being with us. It's really an interesting column. Jared Dillion,

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>columnist with Bloomberg View, also editor and publisher of The

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Daily Dirt Nap and investment strategist also at Malden Economics.

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Right now, I want to turn the attention to deals.

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 1>There are a couple of big ones joining us now.

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Chris Hughes, deal's columnist for Bloomberg gad Fly. It's a

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>commentary section for Bloomberg View in Bloomberg LP. Thank you

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us, Chris. I want to

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>thank your take. I want to start with the Glaxo

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Smith Klein and Novartists deal. It's a thirteen billion dollar

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>deal to buy some consumer mere brands from Novartis. This

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>is already a joint venture. Shares of both companies went up.

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>How is this possible that it is so universally thought

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to be good for both of them? Well, I think

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>um Black has really gone up today and the vats

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>up a bit. Obviously the market helps. I mean for

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>both sides, it gives them certainty. For a while they've

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>been in this joint venture. Earlier this month, Novartis gained

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.199
<v Speaker 1>the right to sell its share of it to the

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>blackso side everyone's been wondering, you know, when is that

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>going to happen, on what price? And so we know

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it's happening now and we know the price. So there's

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I think relief all around that we know what the

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>side of this is. From Blacks perspectives, there's a sort

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:47.199
<v Speaker 1>of double release because the market also knows that if

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 1>they're doing this, they're going to be a bit more

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>constrained from doing other big deals. And the one that

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone's been focusing on is the possible deal for Fizers

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>consumer healthcare business that could have cost up to twenty billions.

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 1>So I think blackst Shells in particular, thinking well, we

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>know what they're doing here with the joint venture buy out.

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>They're probably not going to go for Fiser in the

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 1>short term. And I think that's what's what's pleasing Clacko

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>shareholders today. So it's going to keep them from doing

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>something stupid. Well in the short term, I mean, one

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>would hope that shareholders are going to be on their

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>toes here and keeping management from doing something stupid whatever.

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 1>But UM, certainly in the short term this is this

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>is this is sort of big deal for clacks so

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>but further out they're probably going to be in quite

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a good space later in the year. They're also talking

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>today about UM selling off some of the consumer brands

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:42.400
<v Speaker 1>within this within this business, so that's going to sort

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of shrink the deal a bit. And they're talking to

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>about exiting but possibly exiting UM that they're Indian subsidiaries.

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 1>That would raise some money too. So the strain of

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>this is certainly being offset by some other other sales

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>they're planning. Let's talk about the other deal of the day,

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>at least from my perspective, the Axo Noble deal. It's

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>selling its specialty chemicals unit to US private equity firm

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Carlisle Group for about twelve and a half billion dollars UM.

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>So can you describe a little bit about what Axo

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Noble is and give us your take on whether this

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>price is too high or too low. So about big

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>European paints and chemicals company, It had an unslisted bid

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>last year from PPG Industries of the state's very very

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 1>bitter battle there which in the end saw PPG walk away. Now,

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>this sale today of the specialty chemicals business for ten

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>point one billion euros about UM to our thirteen billion

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:47.959
<v Speaker 1>dollars UM is actually part of really originates from that

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 1>PPG bid. One of the key aspects of access defense

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 1>against the PPG approach was that it was going to

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>split itself into and finally here nearly a year on UM,

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:02.959
<v Speaker 1>we've got we've got that split taking place, with this

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>business being sold to m to Carlisle and on the

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>on the on the price, well, this is this is

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a price that has been achieved after a very long auction.

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Lots of private private ecty firms interested in this sort

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of asset. They love, you know, unloved assets from a

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 1>big company. I did some maths on this so a

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago it looks to me like a private

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>exty owner at this price and probably double their money

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>if they can sort of turbo charge the performances and

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>if they can get some cost out and the revenue

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a bit three years time, they want to be able

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to double their money on this. And it caps a

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>quarter of some pretty big buyouts. And I'm just wondering,

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>are we expecting to see another big buyout quarter next?

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't. I wouldn't be surprised. You know you've got

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got private with a lot of dry powder. We've

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 1>seen some very ambitious deals union Leavers, spreads and in

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Europe we've seen a bid for for TDC from private

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>equity and infrastructure investors. To know there's an appetites out

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>there and if they can find it, in particular unloved

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>assets and big corporates that are available, they're kind of

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>go for them, and it's necessary, they'll team up to

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>do it, as as Carlile's done here. Chris Hughes, thank

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being with us. Chris Hughes is

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a deals columnist for Bloomberg, Goadfly and Unloved or perhaps

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>just not quite as loved. In this era of incredible

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>amounts of cash sitting in the coffers of private equity

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>firms and big investment companies looking for a place to go,

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo.

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:26:53.640 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio