1 00:00:02,840 --> 00:00:06,200 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg day Break Asia Podcast. I'm Doug Krisner. 2 00:00:06,600 --> 00:00:09,400 Speaker 1: Markets in the Asia Pacific are bracing for the fed's 3 00:00:09,440 --> 00:00:12,560 Speaker 1: final policy decision of the year, and in a moment 4 00:00:13,000 --> 00:00:15,200 Speaker 1: we'll take a look at the US rate environment with 5 00:00:15,360 --> 00:00:19,239 Speaker 1: Mark Heppenstaal. He is President and CIO at Pen Mutual 6 00:00:19,320 --> 00:00:23,239 Speaker 1: Asset Management. But we begin in Bangkok, Thailand. It's there 7 00:00:23,280 --> 00:00:27,000 Speaker 1: we find David Chao, the global market strategist at Invesco 8 00:00:27,120 --> 00:00:29,960 Speaker 1: Asia Pacific. David, thank you for having the chance to 9 00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:32,199 Speaker 1: speak with us. It's always a pleasure, and I want 10 00:00:32,240 --> 00:00:35,000 Speaker 1: to begin with a story that we have been reporting 11 00:00:35,080 --> 00:00:39,840 Speaker 1: on Japanese carmakers Honda and Nissan preparing to begin negotiations 12 00:00:39,840 --> 00:00:42,680 Speaker 1: on a possible merger. Give me your sense of where 13 00:00:42,680 --> 00:00:45,879 Speaker 1: the automobile industry is right now globally, in terms of 14 00:00:46,280 --> 00:00:49,559 Speaker 1: what could be described as excess capacity. Is that a 15 00:00:49,560 --> 00:00:50,159 Speaker 1: fair statement. 16 00:00:50,800 --> 00:00:52,519 Speaker 2: I think that's a fair statement. I think that what 17 00:00:52,560 --> 00:00:55,480 Speaker 2: we're seeing now is a pretty big shake up in 18 00:00:55,520 --> 00:00:59,560 Speaker 2: the global auto industry, and I expect further consolidation as well. 19 00:01:00,120 --> 00:01:02,040 Speaker 2: What we have right now, there's just too much supply 20 00:01:02,880 --> 00:01:08,440 Speaker 2: for cars, evs, hybrids, combustion cars out there, and I 21 00:01:08,440 --> 00:01:13,320 Speaker 2: think that that certainly is pushing profit margins to levels 22 00:01:13,319 --> 00:01:16,080 Speaker 2: we haven't seen for a while, and I think that's 23 00:01:16,120 --> 00:01:19,640 Speaker 2: going to ultimately drive the consolidation, whether it's in Japan 24 00:01:19,800 --> 00:01:23,039 Speaker 2: or in other places. Chinese automakers are now the world's 25 00:01:23,080 --> 00:01:27,759 Speaker 2: most dominant at automakers out there. China makes round seven 26 00:01:27,800 --> 00:01:32,440 Speaker 2: to eight million cars a year, yet the domestic demand 27 00:01:32,480 --> 00:01:34,920 Speaker 2: is somewhere closer to two to three. It's around five 28 00:01:34,920 --> 00:01:38,520 Speaker 2: to six million cars need to find homes in other 29 00:01:38,560 --> 00:01:41,360 Speaker 2: parts of the world, whether it ends up in places 30 00:01:41,400 --> 00:01:45,640 Speaker 2: like South America or Africa versus places like the US 31 00:01:45,760 --> 00:01:50,680 Speaker 2: or Europe. It's pretty clear that China is now trying 32 00:01:50,800 --> 00:01:56,080 Speaker 2: to make better trade partners now that they've had taxes 33 00:01:56,160 --> 00:02:00,720 Speaker 2: on evs on under ten thousand dollars in Western countries. 34 00:02:00,880 --> 00:02:03,840 Speaker 1: I think the overcapacity story in China goes well beyond 35 00:02:04,000 --> 00:02:06,320 Speaker 1: just evs. I mean, there are other segments of the 36 00:02:06,480 --> 00:02:10,560 Speaker 1: Chinese industrial economy, the manufacturing economy, that also have far 37 00:02:10,600 --> 00:02:11,600 Speaker 1: too much capacity. 38 00:02:11,880 --> 00:02:14,120 Speaker 2: That's right. I mean we have to remember that China's 39 00:02:14,320 --> 00:02:18,720 Speaker 2: political economy is a command one very much set forth 40 00:02:18,760 --> 00:02:22,640 Speaker 2: by by policy makers, compared to in the US, whereas 41 00:02:22,680 --> 00:02:26,200 Speaker 2: more market is driven by market forces, and so the 42 00:02:26,200 --> 00:02:30,119 Speaker 2: industrial policy in China has been one that they recognize 43 00:02:30,240 --> 00:02:33,920 Speaker 2: that acaonomic growth propellers for Chinese economy is slowing. So 44 00:02:34,000 --> 00:02:35,640 Speaker 2: what are they going to do. They're really going to 45 00:02:36,560 --> 00:02:41,920 Speaker 2: kind of amp up capital expenditures and investments in manufacturing 46 00:02:41,960 --> 00:02:45,320 Speaker 2: and exports in order to give the economy a boost. 47 00:02:45,440 --> 00:02:48,520 Speaker 2: That's before the consumption can pick up, Although the most 48 00:02:48,520 --> 00:02:52,000 Speaker 2: recent numbers that we've seen from China show that perhaps 49 00:02:52,360 --> 00:02:54,720 Speaker 2: there could be a little more physical stimulus and more 50 00:02:54,760 --> 00:02:59,280 Speaker 2: monetary stimulus to enable consumers to feel more comfortable buying 51 00:02:59,760 --> 00:03:01,080 Speaker 2: and consuming in China. 52 00:03:01,160 --> 00:03:03,320 Speaker 1: So that takes me to the next question about the 53 00:03:03,360 --> 00:03:06,080 Speaker 1: stimulus that we have had from the Poluit bureau lately, 54 00:03:06,160 --> 00:03:09,520 Speaker 1: or at least the messaging of it. What's your takeaway here? 55 00:03:09,600 --> 00:03:11,120 Speaker 1: Is it going to be enough to move the needle? 56 00:03:11,120 --> 00:03:13,760 Speaker 1: Do you think, especially where consumption is concerned. 57 00:03:14,240 --> 00:03:19,480 Speaker 2: I think that it's likely to be enough to start 58 00:03:19,480 --> 00:03:24,079 Speaker 2: to invigorate the domestic consumption market in China. It's probably 59 00:03:24,080 --> 00:03:26,840 Speaker 2: not going to be enough, you know, for for markets. 60 00:03:26,840 --> 00:03:31,000 Speaker 2: I think markets still want significant size of Bazuka sized stimulus, 61 00:03:31,919 --> 00:03:34,320 Speaker 2: whether it's monetary or fysical simulus. I don't think we're 62 00:03:34,320 --> 00:03:37,040 Speaker 2: going to get that. But this is the first time 63 00:03:37,120 --> 00:03:41,440 Speaker 2: that we've heard the Pollup Bureau address both physcal stimulus 64 00:03:42,280 --> 00:03:47,760 Speaker 2: and helping domestic consumption in the same document, and so 65 00:03:48,400 --> 00:03:52,240 Speaker 2: I think that's a welcome surprise. And I think that 66 00:03:52,280 --> 00:03:54,920 Speaker 2: in the coming year GDP growth in China is probably 67 00:03:55,120 --> 00:03:58,560 Speaker 2: also going to be set around five percent, and I 68 00:03:58,600 --> 00:04:01,520 Speaker 2: think that more stimulus it's likely, but we're not going 69 00:04:01,560 --> 00:04:03,040 Speaker 2: to get significantly anymore. 70 00:04:03,360 --> 00:04:05,960 Speaker 1: Does it cause you to change your strategy when putting 71 00:04:05,960 --> 00:04:09,280 Speaker 1: money to work in China? Maybe that's an assumption that 72 00:04:09,320 --> 00:04:11,560 Speaker 1: I'm making. Are you putting fresh money to work in 73 00:04:11,600 --> 00:04:13,360 Speaker 1: the Chinese market right now? 74 00:04:13,720 --> 00:04:18,920 Speaker 2: I am. I think that the Chinese markets look quite attractive. 75 00:04:18,960 --> 00:04:22,440 Speaker 2: We know that they are momentum driven. Chinese stocks are 76 00:04:22,480 --> 00:04:25,800 Speaker 2: around down round ten to fifteen percent from their recent highs. 77 00:04:26,240 --> 00:04:29,040 Speaker 2: We saw a surge back in September, and you know, 78 00:04:29,440 --> 00:04:32,800 Speaker 2: we've seen them come down since then. I think that 79 00:04:32,880 --> 00:04:35,960 Speaker 2: we get another leg up from now and over the 80 00:04:35,960 --> 00:04:41,000 Speaker 2: next few months. What's interesting is when Trump was elected 81 00:04:41,960 --> 00:04:45,080 Speaker 2: president back in November, you think that Chinese stocks would 82 00:04:45,120 --> 00:04:48,680 Speaker 2: get dinged because of his threats of tariff policy, but 83 00:04:48,720 --> 00:04:51,360 Speaker 2: they actually went up. So I think this time around, 84 00:04:51,640 --> 00:04:55,800 Speaker 2: Chinese companies and policymakers are a lot more ready for 85 00:04:55,960 --> 00:05:00,640 Speaker 2: his terrorft policy, and secondly, more stimulus is come online. 86 00:05:00,680 --> 00:05:02,560 Speaker 2: And thirdly, I think that there could be another leg 87 00:05:02,680 --> 00:05:03,960 Speaker 2: up relatively shortly. 88 00:05:04,160 --> 00:05:06,520 Speaker 1: Hey David, let's take a look at what's going on 89 00:05:06,560 --> 00:05:08,880 Speaker 1: in Japan if we can pivot there. A boj's got 90 00:05:08,880 --> 00:05:12,240 Speaker 1: a policy decision at the end of the week. Conventional 91 00:05:12,279 --> 00:05:14,159 Speaker 1: wisdom right now is that the BOJ is going to 92 00:05:14,200 --> 00:05:18,120 Speaker 1: do nothing. Maybe they look at something as soon as January, 93 00:05:18,160 --> 00:05:21,039 Speaker 1: perhaps March of next year, before they raise rates again. 94 00:05:21,640 --> 00:05:24,599 Speaker 1: How are you understanding what the BOJ is trying to 95 00:05:24,640 --> 00:05:25,720 Speaker 1: accomplish right now? 96 00:05:26,320 --> 00:05:28,760 Speaker 2: Well, you're right, I think they're likely to sit on 97 00:05:28,800 --> 00:05:32,400 Speaker 2: their hands this week, but we know that there's more 98 00:05:32,480 --> 00:05:35,760 Speaker 2: room for tightening. I think that there could have been 99 00:05:35,839 --> 00:05:41,080 Speaker 2: a bit of post traumatic stress from what happened in 100 00:05:41,080 --> 00:05:45,000 Speaker 2: that September time period where they you know where they 101 00:05:45,040 --> 00:05:48,960 Speaker 2: cause were they royal the currency markets and also stock 102 00:05:49,000 --> 00:05:53,000 Speaker 2: market because they didn't telegraph the cut that was coming, 103 00:05:53,040 --> 00:05:57,640 Speaker 2: they didn't telegraph the policy pathway forward. So I think 104 00:05:57,800 --> 00:06:00,200 Speaker 2: this time around, although the economy I think could very 105 00:06:00,279 --> 00:06:05,720 Speaker 2: much survive and thrive with a hike, I think that 106 00:06:05,800 --> 00:06:09,080 Speaker 2: the message is more that they're going to be gradual. 107 00:06:09,480 --> 00:06:11,760 Speaker 2: If we look at the most recent Bank of Japan 108 00:06:11,960 --> 00:06:15,880 Speaker 2: tank Kan December service that showed that even small Japanese 109 00:06:15,920 --> 00:06:19,920 Speaker 2: companies have not felt more stress in their financial positions 110 00:06:20,360 --> 00:06:22,560 Speaker 2: from the two rounds of pikes that we've seen so far. 111 00:06:22,839 --> 00:06:27,679 Speaker 2: So the Japanese economy is on on much sure sound footing. 112 00:06:28,160 --> 00:06:31,599 Speaker 2: I think that I think that a hike would not 113 00:06:32,440 --> 00:06:35,240 Speaker 2: throw a wrench in that kind of economic recovery there. 114 00:06:35,800 --> 00:06:38,880 Speaker 2: I think Japanese stocks are also tracked it because Japanese 115 00:06:38,920 --> 00:06:43,520 Speaker 2: consumers are finally having you know, that positive real consumption power, 116 00:06:43,680 --> 00:06:47,279 Speaker 2: meaning that their wage growth is above inflation, uh you know, 117 00:06:47,360 --> 00:06:50,400 Speaker 2: over you know, and it's been negative over the past year. 118 00:06:50,600 --> 00:06:53,120 Speaker 2: So I think the mesic consumption is going to pick up, 119 00:06:53,320 --> 00:06:55,800 Speaker 2: you know. So for those traveling to Japan, you know, 120 00:06:55,880 --> 00:06:58,720 Speaker 2: to enjoy the week and over the holiday period, you 121 00:06:58,760 --> 00:07:01,040 Speaker 2: may have a much harder time at a restaurant reservation, 122 00:07:01,720 --> 00:07:04,359 Speaker 2: not because of you know, competing from other tourists, but 123 00:07:04,400 --> 00:07:08,479 Speaker 2: from actually domestic you know, Japanese consumers, and that week 124 00:07:08,520 --> 00:07:11,720 Speaker 2: currency has really helped to drive the export economy in Japan. 125 00:07:11,760 --> 00:07:13,920 Speaker 1: I think in the month of November, exports were up 126 00:07:13,920 --> 00:07:17,520 Speaker 1: three point eight percent. Shipments to China alone were up 127 00:07:17,560 --> 00:07:20,680 Speaker 1: about four point one percent. A lot of this has 128 00:07:20,720 --> 00:07:24,000 Speaker 1: to do with chip making machinery, maybe some non ferrous 129 00:07:24,040 --> 00:07:27,200 Speaker 1: metals in there as well, so kind of also helps 130 00:07:27,200 --> 00:07:29,680 Speaker 1: out Japan Inc. That we currency. 131 00:07:30,240 --> 00:07:33,960 Speaker 2: That's right. I think the japan is going to start 132 00:07:33,960 --> 00:07:37,200 Speaker 2: firing on all cylinders pretty soon. The only missing link 133 00:07:37,280 --> 00:07:40,040 Speaker 2: so far has been domestic consumption. But we're starting to 134 00:07:40,040 --> 00:07:42,800 Speaker 2: see that pickup, and so you better watch out when 135 00:07:42,800 --> 00:07:46,800 Speaker 2: they're firing on all cylinders. And Japanese equities continue to 136 00:07:46,840 --> 00:07:50,000 Speaker 2: be very attractively priced, especially when compared to the US, 137 00:07:50,160 --> 00:07:52,559 Speaker 2: and so I continue to like Japan as my most 138 00:07:52,560 --> 00:07:56,680 Speaker 2: favorite developed market. Four for twenty twenty five. 139 00:07:56,720 --> 00:07:58,440 Speaker 1: Hey, David, before I let you go, can I get 140 00:07:58,480 --> 00:08:01,120 Speaker 1: your view on what's happening in South and what it 141 00:08:01,280 --> 00:08:03,000 Speaker 1: means for the South Korean markets. 142 00:08:03,560 --> 00:08:06,920 Speaker 2: Well, let me just compare what happened back in twenty 143 00:08:07,080 --> 00:08:12,520 Speaker 2: sixteen when the Korean president was impeached then and what 144 00:08:12,600 --> 00:08:17,119 Speaker 2: markets did. Actually, markets outperformed the following year, and Korean 145 00:08:17,120 --> 00:08:22,600 Speaker 2: stocks did really well, and that's because of the semiconductor upcycle. 146 00:08:22,800 --> 00:08:26,800 Speaker 2: When companies were spending money on hard tech, and so 147 00:08:26,960 --> 00:08:29,960 Speaker 2: I think that leads me to think that Korean stocks, 148 00:08:29,960 --> 00:08:33,920 Speaker 2: the Korean market cares more about the global macro dynamics 149 00:08:33,920 --> 00:08:39,400 Speaker 2: and semiconductor cycle then what's happening from a domestic political situation. 150 00:08:39,600 --> 00:08:41,439 Speaker 2: So yes, I think that maybe over the next few 151 00:08:41,480 --> 00:08:45,280 Speaker 2: months there could be noise, but ultimately it's really the 152 00:08:45,280 --> 00:08:47,600 Speaker 2: semi conductor cycle that drives Korean stock. 153 00:08:47,720 --> 00:08:49,680 Speaker 1: And to be okay, we should point out the Central 154 00:08:49,720 --> 00:08:52,360 Speaker 1: Bank in South Korea has vowed to kind of guard 155 00:08:52,400 --> 00:08:56,160 Speaker 1: against instability in not only the currency but financial markets 156 00:08:56,200 --> 00:08:58,280 Speaker 1: as well. David, thank you so much for being with us. 157 00:08:58,320 --> 00:09:01,840 Speaker 1: He is David Chow, the global market strategist at Invesco 158 00:09:02,040 --> 00:09:05,560 Speaker 1: Asia Pacific, joining us from a Bangkok, Thailand here on 159 00:09:05,600 --> 00:09:15,040 Speaker 1: the Daybreak Asia podcast. Welcome back to the Bloomberg Daybreak 160 00:09:15,080 --> 00:09:18,920 Speaker 1: Asia Podcast. I'm Doug Krisner. FED decision tomorrow and a 161 00:09:19,000 --> 00:09:21,880 Speaker 1: quarter point rate cut is expected to take a closer 162 00:09:21,880 --> 00:09:24,800 Speaker 1: look at where the FED is in its process of 163 00:09:24,920 --> 00:09:28,520 Speaker 1: lowering interest rates and markets in general. We're joined by 164 00:09:28,600 --> 00:09:32,000 Speaker 1: Mark Happenstall. He is the president and CIO at Pen 165 00:09:32,160 --> 00:09:35,400 Speaker 1: Mutual Asset Management. It's not really going to be a surprise, 166 00:09:35,480 --> 00:09:38,240 Speaker 1: I think in terms of the rate cut. Markets are 167 00:09:38,640 --> 00:09:41,120 Speaker 1: firmly convinced of this fact. One of the things I'm 168 00:09:41,160 --> 00:09:43,719 Speaker 1: wondering about, though, has to do with the outlook where 169 00:09:43,800 --> 00:09:45,600 Speaker 1: we go from here. What's your sense on that? 170 00:09:46,360 --> 00:09:48,839 Speaker 3: Well, that is going to be I would say the 171 00:09:49,200 --> 00:09:52,520 Speaker 3: topical question, because in some ways, you know, the interest 172 00:09:52,600 --> 00:09:57,439 Speaker 3: rate decision tomorrow is less important than the dot plot. 173 00:09:58,000 --> 00:10:01,040 Speaker 3: And I would say the economic projections forward next year, 174 00:10:01,080 --> 00:10:03,600 Speaker 3: because if you look at where markets are pricing in 175 00:10:03,720 --> 00:10:06,440 Speaker 3: sort of that long term neutral rate, it's just below 176 00:10:06,480 --> 00:10:09,720 Speaker 3: the four percent level, about one hundred basis points higher 177 00:10:09,760 --> 00:10:13,000 Speaker 3: than the Fed was projecting at the September meeting. So 178 00:10:13,760 --> 00:10:15,840 Speaker 3: I think that's going to be the primary focus for 179 00:10:15,880 --> 00:10:19,600 Speaker 3: investors where they see the FED funds rate ending next 180 00:10:19,640 --> 00:10:22,560 Speaker 3: year as opposed to Mars's interest rate decision. 181 00:10:22,720 --> 00:10:25,040 Speaker 1: I thought it was interesting because the reading today on 182 00:10:25,120 --> 00:10:27,760 Speaker 1: retail sales top estimate's a gain of seven tens of 183 00:10:27,840 --> 00:10:30,840 Speaker 1: one percent, and that was driven in large part by 184 00:10:30,880 --> 00:10:34,280 Speaker 1: big jump in car purchases. And when I think of vehicles, 185 00:10:34,320 --> 00:10:38,600 Speaker 1: I think of that category as being very interest rates sensitive. 186 00:10:38,800 --> 00:10:39,760 Speaker 1: Makes sense of that for. 187 00:10:39,760 --> 00:10:44,400 Speaker 3: Me, Well, that is true, clearly, you know the low 188 00:10:44,440 --> 00:10:47,920 Speaker 3: borrowing costs you know, especially post COVID, I think helped 189 00:10:47,960 --> 00:10:50,719 Speaker 3: did sustain the auto industry in what would have been 190 00:10:50,800 --> 00:10:53,880 Speaker 3: more difficult times. But I will say, you know, if 191 00:10:53,920 --> 00:10:56,520 Speaker 3: you look at the consumer wealth that has been attained 192 00:10:57,280 --> 00:11:02,640 Speaker 3: more recently, whether it's the equity markets, clearly really really 193 00:11:02,679 --> 00:11:06,920 Speaker 3: strong gains there, those that have invested in crypto clearly 194 00:11:07,280 --> 00:11:10,959 Speaker 3: incredible gains there as well. So it does feel as though, 195 00:11:11,160 --> 00:11:13,120 Speaker 3: you know, even though there are haves and have nots 196 00:11:13,160 --> 00:11:15,320 Speaker 3: within the US consumer, and I would say across the 197 00:11:15,320 --> 00:11:18,960 Speaker 3: country broadly, that goes for corporations as well, it does 198 00:11:19,040 --> 00:11:21,760 Speaker 3: feel as though there's still a lot of money slashing 199 00:11:21,760 --> 00:11:24,520 Speaker 3: around in the system. And so to the extent that 200 00:11:24,600 --> 00:11:27,760 Speaker 3: folks can afford new vehicles, it seems though they have 201 00:11:27,800 --> 00:11:29,160 Speaker 3: the wherewithal to spend on that. 202 00:11:29,360 --> 00:11:31,800 Speaker 1: So a lot of money slashing around the system. That 203 00:11:31,920 --> 00:11:36,040 Speaker 1: sounds inflationary. Are we wrong to expect aggressive rate cuts 204 00:11:36,040 --> 00:11:36,559 Speaker 1: in the new year? 205 00:11:36,600 --> 00:11:39,839 Speaker 3: Do you think my base case would be maybe one 206 00:11:40,120 --> 00:11:43,160 Speaker 3: or two rate cuts next year? I just feel as 207 00:11:43,200 --> 00:11:47,000 Speaker 3: though inflation isn't ready to sort of come close to 208 00:11:47,040 --> 00:11:49,559 Speaker 3: the FEDS two percent target. And I think, I mean, 209 00:11:49,600 --> 00:11:52,640 Speaker 3: I guess the other interesting aspect of Tomor's meeting will 210 00:11:52,640 --> 00:11:55,560 Speaker 3: be the descents, because clearly there are seems though a 211 00:11:55,600 --> 00:11:58,240 Speaker 3: growing number of FED officials that feel as though we 212 00:11:58,360 --> 00:12:01,520 Speaker 3: need to make more progress order to keep lowering interest rates. 213 00:12:01,559 --> 00:12:06,040 Speaker 3: So again, the dissent votes will be interesting tomorrow as well. 214 00:12:06,080 --> 00:12:09,240 Speaker 3: But I think my base case again is for just 215 00:12:09,320 --> 00:12:12,400 Speaker 3: barely lower interest rates next year, as opposed to material 216 00:12:13,240 --> 00:12:14,079 Speaker 3: lowering of rates. 217 00:12:14,120 --> 00:12:16,200 Speaker 1: So do you think that what we've heard in terms 218 00:12:16,240 --> 00:12:19,440 Speaker 1: of economic policies from the incoming Trump administration, do you 219 00:12:19,480 --> 00:12:24,240 Speaker 1: think those details, sparse as they may be, would give 220 00:12:24,400 --> 00:12:28,439 Speaker 1: the Fed a little unease about maybe trying to plan 221 00:12:28,600 --> 00:12:29,679 Speaker 1: too much in the future. 222 00:12:30,360 --> 00:12:34,240 Speaker 3: Well, I will say what has been interesting to me is, 223 00:12:34,360 --> 00:12:36,920 Speaker 3: you know, the bond market has really viewed the world 224 00:12:37,080 --> 00:12:41,480 Speaker 3: of you know, potentially in terms of policy a little 225 00:12:41,520 --> 00:12:46,880 Speaker 3: more glass half empty, maybe focusing on higher inflation, possibly 226 00:12:47,080 --> 00:12:50,920 Speaker 3: from tariffs and immigration policies. It seems so the equity 227 00:12:50,960 --> 00:12:56,640 Speaker 3: markets look more so at deregulation in a more favorable 228 00:12:56,720 --> 00:12:59,760 Speaker 3: tax environment. So I will say I think the two 229 00:12:59,840 --> 00:13:02,880 Speaker 3: have sort of coexisted so far. But I do think 230 00:13:02,880 --> 00:13:05,120 Speaker 3: that if rates at the long end of the yield 231 00:13:05,120 --> 00:13:08,840 Speaker 3: curve move in the vicinity of five percent, I think 232 00:13:08,880 --> 00:13:12,199 Speaker 3: that it's likely that risk assets and equity markets are 233 00:13:12,440 --> 00:13:14,679 Speaker 3: going to struggle with interest rates reaching that level. 234 00:13:14,840 --> 00:13:18,559 Speaker 1: So how are you adjusting your strategies these days when 235 00:13:18,559 --> 00:13:20,640 Speaker 1: it comes to putting new money to work in markets. 236 00:13:21,120 --> 00:13:24,040 Speaker 3: Well, we focus primarily on the fixed income markets, and 237 00:13:24,400 --> 00:13:28,679 Speaker 3: we're still sourcing really attractive opportunities. I will say, I 238 00:13:28,720 --> 00:13:31,760 Speaker 3: think we found a little bit better relative value in 239 00:13:31,800 --> 00:13:35,800 Speaker 3: the world of securitized credit versus corporate credit where spreads 240 00:13:35,840 --> 00:13:39,319 Speaker 3: sit today. But you know, the all in yield levels 241 00:13:39,360 --> 00:13:42,280 Speaker 3: that we're witnessing today, whether it's cover credit or securitized credit, 242 00:13:42,360 --> 00:13:45,320 Speaker 3: or even treasury rates, really it's about as good as 243 00:13:45,360 --> 00:13:48,760 Speaker 3: it's been since the global financial crisis. So again, it's 244 00:13:48,800 --> 00:13:54,079 Speaker 3: been really attractive new investment opportunities that we're witnessing in 245 00:13:54,120 --> 00:13:55,199 Speaker 3: the credit markets today. 246 00:13:55,360 --> 00:13:57,480 Speaker 1: What's your outlook for the bond market next year? When 247 00:13:57,520 --> 00:14:01,200 Speaker 1: we're talking about things like potential terror, we're talking about 248 00:14:01,240 --> 00:14:04,240 Speaker 1: tax cuts, I mean these seem to be maybe a 249 00:14:04,280 --> 00:14:06,000 Speaker 1: little worrisome for bond investors. 250 00:14:06,440 --> 00:14:09,160 Speaker 3: Well, you know, I do think it's going to be 251 00:14:09,160 --> 00:14:12,000 Speaker 3: an interesting time. I do think in some ways maybe 252 00:14:12,040 --> 00:14:16,200 Speaker 3: the tails of the curve have been expanded, just you know, 253 00:14:16,200 --> 00:14:19,200 Speaker 3: I would say that's possibly to the upside and to 254 00:14:19,240 --> 00:14:23,040 Speaker 3: the downside in light of some of the uncertainty, some 255 00:14:23,120 --> 00:14:26,560 Speaker 3: of the disruption that is likely to be implemented under 256 00:14:26,920 --> 00:14:30,440 Speaker 3: the Trump administration and new policies there. So, you know, 257 00:14:30,600 --> 00:14:32,880 Speaker 3: I think being good investors you have to have a 258 00:14:32,960 --> 00:14:35,760 Speaker 3: level of being proactive and also reactive. And I would 259 00:14:35,800 --> 00:14:37,960 Speaker 3: say that, you know, next year may be more a 260 00:14:38,000 --> 00:14:41,120 Speaker 3: case of being able to react to current events that 261 00:14:41,160 --> 00:14:44,560 Speaker 3: are happening as opposed to, you know, basically setting a 262 00:14:44,600 --> 00:14:45,680 Speaker 3: game plan in advance. 263 00:14:45,840 --> 00:14:47,760 Speaker 1: So and I'm wondering as well, as long as we're 264 00:14:47,800 --> 00:14:51,520 Speaker 1: talking about the possibility of fewer regulations, whether we can 265 00:14:51,800 --> 00:14:54,400 Speaker 1: assume maybe a little bit more in the way of 266 00:14:54,520 --> 00:14:58,480 Speaker 1: merger and acquisition activity, and if any of that deal 267 00:14:58,520 --> 00:15:00,680 Speaker 1: making is going to be funded by the issuance of 268 00:15:00,680 --> 00:15:02,120 Speaker 1: some new debt. What do you think about that? 269 00:15:02,760 --> 00:15:04,920 Speaker 3: Well, you know, I think that you know, clearly the 270 00:15:05,040 --> 00:15:09,440 Speaker 3: M and A activity has really been pretty stagnant. So 271 00:15:10,480 --> 00:15:13,640 Speaker 3: but clearly, you know, I would say this administration is 272 00:15:13,760 --> 00:15:16,480 Speaker 3: going to be much more M and A friendly, So 273 00:15:16,680 --> 00:15:19,840 Speaker 3: you know, that does I would say, increase the possibility 274 00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:24,200 Speaker 3: of more debt issuance. But I will say, you know, 275 00:15:24,280 --> 00:15:28,760 Speaker 3: the corporate credit markets have been incredibly wide open this year, 276 00:15:28,960 --> 00:15:31,520 Speaker 3: so both investment grade and high credit spreads are really 277 00:15:32,600 --> 00:15:35,520 Speaker 3: approaching or at the tightest levels we've seen since the 278 00:15:35,600 --> 00:15:40,200 Speaker 3: nineteen nineties. So even given the level of interest rates today, 279 00:15:40,240 --> 00:15:43,080 Speaker 3: the level of treasure yields, you know, corporate borrowing is 280 00:15:43,120 --> 00:15:48,320 Speaker 3: still relatively attractive if you compared to longer term historical metrics. 281 00:15:48,360 --> 00:15:51,680 Speaker 3: So again, you know, I would expect and A debt 282 00:15:51,720 --> 00:15:54,240 Speaker 3: activity to increase, but I will say a lot of 283 00:15:54,280 --> 00:15:56,800 Speaker 3: issuers have been able to take advantage of the tight 284 00:15:56,840 --> 00:15:59,680 Speaker 3: credit spread environment and basically push out any near term 285 00:15:59,760 --> 00:16:02,600 Speaker 3: which so we think that you know, the opportunities for 286 00:16:03,120 --> 00:16:06,600 Speaker 3: defaulse is likely to be somewhat diminished as a result 287 00:16:06,600 --> 00:16:08,640 Speaker 3: of all the refinancing that's happened this year. 288 00:16:08,880 --> 00:16:11,480 Speaker 1: At what point on the curve are you kind of 289 00:16:11,480 --> 00:16:13,240 Speaker 1: focused more so at the shorter end? 290 00:16:13,520 --> 00:16:17,320 Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean I do think that, you know, longer term, 291 00:16:17,360 --> 00:16:20,320 Speaker 3: the yield curve is likely to steepen, So I would 292 00:16:20,360 --> 00:16:23,960 Speaker 3: say sort of that intermediate, sort of middle part of 293 00:16:23,960 --> 00:16:26,200 Speaker 3: the curve, the so called belly of the yield curve, 294 00:16:26,280 --> 00:16:28,920 Speaker 3: tends to do best in a yield curve steepening. And 295 00:16:28,960 --> 00:16:33,720 Speaker 3: again given the flatness of the treasury yeld curve, oftentimes. 296 00:16:33,080 --> 00:16:33,520 Speaker 2: You're all in. 297 00:16:33,600 --> 00:16:37,600 Speaker 3: Yield levels are just as attractive there as opposed opportunities 298 00:16:37,600 --> 00:16:39,560 Speaker 3: further out the curve. So again, you know, we think 299 00:16:39,600 --> 00:16:41,920 Speaker 3: on a risk adjusted basis, it makes sense to be 300 00:16:42,360 --> 00:16:46,040 Speaker 3: sort of that intermediate duration debt maturity spectrum. 301 00:16:46,080 --> 00:16:48,000 Speaker 1: Mark, good stuff. We'll leave it there. Thank you so 302 00:16:48,080 --> 00:16:51,520 Speaker 1: much for being with us. Mark Happenstall, Presidency Io at 303 00:16:51,560 --> 00:16:54,760 Speaker 1: Pen Mutual Asset Management, joining us here on the Daybreak 304 00:16:54,760 --> 00:17:01,480 Speaker 1: Asia Podcast. Thanks for listening to today's episode of the 305 00:17:01,520 --> 00:17:05,600 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Daybreak Asia Edition podcast. Each weekday, we look at 306 00:17:05,600 --> 00:17:10,040 Speaker 1: the story shaping markets, finance, and geopolitics in the Asia Pacific. 307 00:17:10,240 --> 00:17:13,480 Speaker 1: You can find us on Apple, Spotify, the Bloomberg Podcast 308 00:17:13,560 --> 00:17:16,840 Speaker 1: YouTube channel, or anywhere else you listen. Join us again 309 00:17:16,880 --> 00:17:20,159 Speaker 1: tomorrow for insight on the market moves from Hong Kong 310 00:17:20,280 --> 00:17:24,600 Speaker 1: to Singapore and Australia. I'm Doug Chrisner, and this is 311 00:17:24,640 --> 00:17:25,160 Speaker 1: Bloomberg