WEBVTT - (Radio)

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look at the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak anchors

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>all around the world. Straight ahead on the program, the

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>housing market and the economy. I'm Amy Morris in Washington.

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm Stephen Carol in London. We're asking if things look

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>any better or worse for next year. I'm Brian Curtis

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Daybreak a ship. We crack the code on the

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>biggest market trends expected in twenty three for Hong Kong

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and China. I'm Joe Matthew in Washington. President Biden ends

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a tough year on a high note. That's all straight

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:40.159
<v Speaker 1>ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg eleven three, on

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:44.599
<v Speaker 1>New York Bloomberg one, Washington d C, Bloomberg one oh

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>six one Boston, Bloomberg nine sixties, San Francisco, d A

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>B Digital Radio, London, Sirius XM one nine ten, and

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>around the world on Bloomberg Radio dot com and via

0:00:55.080 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. Good day to you. I'm Amy

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>more As we begin today's program with housing. A bunch

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of housing data coming next week, including pending home sales

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>for November economists we've surveyed are forecasting another drop. You remember,

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>pending sales fell in October as buyers faced mortgage rates

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty much at twenty year highs. Pending home sales are

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a leading indicator, so we're watching that one closely for

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you here this coming Wednesday, with live coverage breaking it

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>all down for you on Bloomberg Radio. Existing home sales

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>also fell in November, but it's interesting some are saying

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>home sales may not fall much more from here, including

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zandy of Moody's Analytics. Yeah, I think in terms

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of home sales, I think we're pretty close to the bottom,

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty close to the bottom, and that reflects the peak

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in mortgage rates, which we're back a couple of months

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>ago when they were significantly north of seven percent for

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>three year fix. Now we're down closer to six percent

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think we're going back to over seven again.

0:01:57.160 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're pretty close to the bottom and

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>sales now. Mark's Andy of Moody's Analytics also tells us

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that home prices could fall more from here because mortgages

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>are still just taking up too much of people's paychecks

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. You're right, I mean affordability has been completely

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>hammered here, and that's the fundamental issue. You know, you

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>mix the high mortgage rates with the high previously high

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>house prices, it's just too much to bear. I mean,

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the average monthly payment for a typical for

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>American buying a typical priced home is up the seven

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred bucks from where it was about a year ago.

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's just not affordable. So we need a combination

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.239
<v Speaker 1>to get restore affordability and get demand moving in the

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>right direction again. We need a combination of of lower

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>mortgage rates, lower house prices, and rising incomes. And my senses,

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>if mortgage rates come in back to you know, five

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half percentag is, which is where I would

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>expect them in the long run, incomes continue to rise,

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't go into recession. We need about a ten

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>percent decline in house prices to restore for affordability sufficiently.

0:02:56.560 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>That probably won't happen until late going into twenty I

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>think we've got a couple of years here before affordability

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to a place where you know, demand will

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>start to improve again, significantly improve. Now. Mark Zany, chief

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>economist of Moodies Analytics, also tells us he thinks the

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Fed does not need to go too much higher on

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>its benchmark interest rate, and one reason he thinks inflation

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>is abating is that rents are coming down. Market rents,

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the rents that are being charged people that

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>are signing leases today, they've suddenly gone week and down

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>for uh for in part because rents are so high

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that people can't afford to rent. So you had so

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>called demand destruction and a lot more supply. The supply

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>chains are easing and builders can get appliances and building materials.

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Labor markets are easing. For an Immigrants that work in

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>construction sites are getting on the job, getting a lot

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>more properties going across the finish line to completion. More

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>more supply less demand. Rents are weak, and that's gonna

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>show up in the cost of housing services over the

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>course of the next six, six and twelve months. And

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that's one reason I feel reasonably confident that inflation's gonna

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>be coming in here pretty quickly. We're also going to

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>be getting the SNP Cora Logic Home Price Index this

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>coming Tuesday that is expected to show home prices fell

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>about one and a half percent monthly in October, but

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>still gained more than eight percent year on year. Michael

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>fred Antoni is chief economist at the Mortgage Bankers Association

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:25.239
<v Speaker 1>and says, if mortgage rates stay lower than the October peak,

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>we could see a big wave of home buying starting

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>this coming March and April. If we can keep rates six,

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit below stakes as we get into

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter of next year, when we're at the

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the spring buying season, that's really going to

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>be impactful. A lot of the folks have stepped away

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 1>from the market in two and May and June because

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of that sticker shock and stayed away through the fall.

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>They still need to live somewhere. They're still seeing their

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>rent increase. So I'm not going to be surprised if

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 1>the market shifts a bit more towards sort of the

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>first time home buyer segment, because again, a lot of

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the folks that would have planned to have bought last

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>year put it off. Give him this Vike and raid

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 1>swee had just a little bit of leite of relief

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and mortgage rage, they could come back. Michael fred Antonia

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 1>is chief economist at the Mortgage Bankers Association, and he

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>also tells us he thinks that nationally home prices won't

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>fall too much more next year, maybe one down on

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the year. We'll be getting more data on that from

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the f hf A this coming Tuesday. As well. Housing

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>demand very affected by the ability to get a mortgage.

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 1>Another thing we're watching in the housing market how big

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>banks are doing on their promise to boost lending to

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>black homebuyers. Joining me now to talk about this very

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>important part of the housing story that's shaping the economic

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>health of housing and black Americans in the months and

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>years to come, Bloomberg Senior economics writer Sean Donnan. Sean,

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it is always a pleasure. Thanks for taking the time

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 1>with us. Hey, thanks so much for having me. Now

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.679
<v Speaker 1>set the stage for me here. You did a deep

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>five into a block in Baltimore. Um, and this actually

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>wound up being a feature story in a Bloomberg Big

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>take on the Bloomberg Terminal. It's really fascinating. Tell us

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>what you found. Yeah, what we dived into was really

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>one of the main causes of the racial wealth gap

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in America. We have learned a lot about in recent

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>years about how there's this persistent gap in wealth between

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 1>black families and white families, and and how that kind

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.359
<v Speaker 1>of nause at the economy. One of the main causes

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 1>of that is the home ownership gap. Black families, about

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>forty of them own the homes that they live in

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>versus about of white families. And that is a gap

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that has persisted for years. And one of the things

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>we saw in recent years is the big banks in America,

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>alongside other companies, make some big promises to the black community,

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 1>to the USA economy to try and close that racial

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>wealth gap, that home ownership gap. And so we dove

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>into that, and that took us all the way down

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to the block of Waber Captain. Now, when you got there,

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>when you dig when you were digging deep, let's say,

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>did you find that promises were made and well, not

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>kept necessarily, but at least the attempt was there. So

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the promises that we looked at were some big, ambitious

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>promises made by the banks. Wells Fargo in made the

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>biggest of those. It said that it would lend sixty

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars that's billion, not a million, sixty billion dollars

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to create two hundred and fifty thousand black homeowners in

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>America within a decade and so we looked at the

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>data and what we found was that actually every year

0:07:56.200 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>since making that promise, Wells Fargo, which was the biggest

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>bank player was actually the biggest player in the mortgage

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>market in back in that every year since making that promise,

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Wells Fargo has actually backed fewer mortgages to black home

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>buyers than it did the year before, and that it's

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>gone down to a point where actually the San Francisco

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>based lender underwrote forty fewer mortgages to black buyers than

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it did in when it made that promise. It isn't

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the only bank to have made such a promise. JP

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Morgan in October twenty after that summer of racial reckoning

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that we had in America, and made a promise to

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>create or originate mortgages to an additional forty thousand black

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and Latino buyers over five years. Now it's much earlier

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>into delivering on its promise. But in one it originated

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>just two more mortgages to black comebuyers than it did

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in the year it said as a benchmark, and it's

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>lending to Latino home buyers actually went down in Bank

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:13.959
<v Speaker 1>of America has made some some slightly different promises. They're

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>they're they're broader, they're harder to measure, but it's pledged

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty billion dollars in lending and down payment assistance to

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>minority and low income homeowners in America. All of this

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>matters because what we're seeing across the board and what

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we've seen over the last fifteen years, it's been a

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>big dip in in originations and mortgages that are issued

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to two black home buyers in America, and that hasn't

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>caught up with where we were back If you remember

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the last financial crisis of the two thousand and eight

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine, the subprime crisis was the type of

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 1>lending we had back in the early two thousands that

0:09:56.920 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>beetn't caught up to those levels until actually in the

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 1>middle of the pandemic. And in that time, we've had

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a huge housing boom of property boom in America, and

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of wealth that's been created for homeowners

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>in America that black families simply have missed out on

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>because they have that lower homeownership break. All Right, just

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>terrific reporting, Sean, Thank you so much for digging deep

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>into this issue. You can find it on Bloomberg's Big

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Take and on the Bloomberg terminal. Thank you so much, Sean,

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me, Bloomberg Senior economics writer Sean Donn

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And and coming up on Bloomberg Daybreak weekend, things aren't

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly looking up for the UK economy in three more

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 1>on that just ahead. I'm Amy Morris. This is Bloomberg.

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak week and our globe will look

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>ahead at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm Ammy Morris in Washington. Up later in our program

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>as President Biden really finally hit his stride, but first

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a roller coaster year for the UK economy, with political

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:19.319
<v Speaker 1>upheaval adding to the already gloomy economic outlook. Things aren't

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>looking up in three either. The o E c D

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>is warning the UK is said to be the worst

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>performer in the G twenty Russia for the next two years.

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>For more, let's go to London and bring in Bloomberg

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Daybreak Europe anchor Stephen Carroll. We've had three prime ministers,

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>four finance ministers, and one ill fated budget in the

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>UK this year, all of that dragging the pounds than

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>an inch of parity versus the US dollar at one point. Overall,

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been quite the wild ride for the UK economy.

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Now the Bank of England is expecting a prolonged recession

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>in twenty three. Joining us to discuss the year that

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>was and what's ahead our UK correspondent Lizzie Byrden and

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>our senior UK economist Dan Hansen. And Lizzie, let's start

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>with you. One measure of the volatile as we've seen

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>this year is in the pound. Talk us through what

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>were the highlights and low lights for sterling? And two,

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very obvious what the low light would

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>have been, but you could say that this whole year

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>has been an annus horrible ifs for sterling. So we

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>started the year at one dollar thirty five and then

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the pound dropped to a record low in September of

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>near adult the parity, and of course that was just

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>after the mini budget. And ultimately it was the chaos

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>in currency and FX markets that ousted Liz Trust. They

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 1>were the guardrails on the government in the end. Now

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>we've got Risci Snack in number ten. His fiscal plans

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>are obviously more austere than Lizz Truss. Is this Dullness

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>dividend has helped to recover the pound somewhat, but even

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>after the recent rebound, it's still sterling down almost ten

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>percent since the start of the year. Yes, dollar strength

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 1>has played in but to give it some historical context,

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>two has been the pound's worst ever apart from the

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>break sit vote, the financial crisis and Black Wednesday in

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>ninety two another collection of greatest hits. Don How is

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the UK economy finishing the year compared to how it started? Well,

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it started the year pretty strongly if you look at

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the data, because if you if you remember back then,

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>it seems an awful long time ago. Now we had

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:18.559
<v Speaker 1>we had the rebound from the homochron wave, so you

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>had a pretty strong GDP reading at the start of

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the year, and since then things have really really slowed

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>down to the second quarter was there was growth in

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:27.839
<v Speaker 1>the second quarter, but it was weak, and then we've

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously had a fall in GDP in the third quarter,

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and most forecasts are expecting a fall in GDP in

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the final quarter. Though I think I know we've we're

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna we're most likely going to have two consecutive quarters

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of negative growth, which as we all know that will

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>signal the start of a technical recession, but I think

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>try and sort of put a positive spin on it. Actually,

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>those two quarters have been very, very mild in terms

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of their drops. So you've had a point two drop

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>in the in the third quarter and the fourth quarter.

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>The Bank of England has said that it thinks that

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the drop waby point one percent, So yeah, us it's

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>not good news. But when you put that in the

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>context of the living squeeze that is occurring here in

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the UK, actually the economy is holding up relatively well. Yes,

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>we were probably heading into a recession of protractive recession,

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's going, at least on our forecast, to be

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>relatively mild. So I know, those aren't Those aren't words

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>people want to hear, recession, downturn. But actually when you

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>look at the depth of it relative to his past

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>down turns, it doesn't look like it's going to be

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>as bad. Okay, Lizzie. In terms of Sterling, are we

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>over the worst of the upheaval that we've seen this

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>year when we look into three Yes, But says she trepidaciously,

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the options market, there's currently a

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>fort chance that the plan is going to get stuck

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>between one dollar turn and one dollar thirty for the

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>next two years, and that's still it's weakest have a

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>trading range. And that's because of the factors Done talks about.

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>We've got a year of high inflation ahead rising interest

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>rates to combat it, housing slowdown, and this is a

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>content innuation of a long term downward trends. So the

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>five years before the Brexit vote in twenty sixteen, the

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>pounds average was about one dollar fifty nine. The five

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>years before that it was about one dollar seventy six.

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>But it's not just a Brexit thing. It's what Brexit

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>has created, more trade frictions with the EU, It's left

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the labor market short of workers, it's undermined business investment.

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Looking ahead Bank of America. I was there speaking to

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the economists last week. They say that Sterling in three

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>is actually going to be dominated by Brexit and whether

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>this government can reach a compromise on Brexit, whether they

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>can find a sustainable solution on the Northern Ireland Protocol.

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>And I have to say, even though Rischie Sunac, probably

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>for the benefit of the Brexit wing of his party,

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>has talked tough on not wanting a Swiss style deal

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 1>as as was reported. Actually in the markets, people are

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>very optimistic that he will be pragmathematic on Brexit. So

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>for me, three is about feeling how much he's willing

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to stand up to his party or in their eyes,

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the degree to which he's a true Brexitter. Yeah, indeed,

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>And of course the deadline for that that everyone's notionally

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>aiming for is the anniversary of the Good Friday Agreement

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>in April of next year. Is the hope is that

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>they will have done a deal between the UK and

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the EU by then that will resolve the issues and

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>allow there to be an official commemoration of that deal

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>without the ongoing political tensions that we've seen in Northern

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Ireland on that issue. And optimistically all of this back

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and forth is just choreography to show that everybody's trying

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to defend their sides, but hopefully we'll get to something then. Yeah.

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a listen now to what the Bank having

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>The Governor Andrew Bailey said that their last rate decision

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>about what he expects in terms of inflation next year.

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>We think we've seen, possibly this week, the first glimmer

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that with the figures that were released this week that

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not only beginning to come down, but it was

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit below where we thought it would be,

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's obviously very good news, but it's a long

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>way to go, and there is and we expect that

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>to happen. By the way, we expect inflation to start

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>falling more rapidly, probably from the late spring onwards, but

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>there is a risk that it won't happen in that way,

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>particularly because the labor market and labor supply in this

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>country are so tight. Okay, So that's what Andrew Bailey

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>has to say about the outlook for the next year.

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Dan Hansen, what are the particular pressure points you're watching

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 1>out for going into next year. Andrew Bailey seems to

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>think things are going to improve pretty soon an inflation, Yes,

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>so I think I think you can think of the

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>inflation path next year in sort of to two elements

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.360
<v Speaker 1>to it. So over the winter and into the first

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>quarter of next year, we don't think inflation is going

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to drop below ten per cent. I think our forecast

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>in March in fact, just has it dropping a little

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>bit low below ten per cent here to nine and

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a half. So you've got pretty sticky inflation for the

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>next sort of four or five months. But then what

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>you'll we think at least and we hope you'll see,

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>is these base effects coming through um and the impact

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of the energy price rises that we've seen this year

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>falling out of the annual comparison. And what the Governor

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>was a loud into there was the good news from

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>the latest inflation print was that core goods inflation. So

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a bit of the inflation basket that's been

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 1>really impacted by supply constraints, and we've seen it coming

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>off very sharply in the US. We think those that

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that part of the inflation basket is going to ease

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>quite sharply as well. So I think what you'll get

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 1>is is a pretty sharp fall in inflation. But the

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>key thing to remember here is that I think the

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>easy bid is getting from say ten to four or five,

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the hard bid is getting from four or five to two.

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>And what that reflects is what's going on, as the

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Governor mentioned there as well, is what's going on in

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the labor market, and what's going on in with services inflation,

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and before you get services inflation, what's going on in

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>pay So I think you'll see you'll see a pretty

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>sharp drop this year, but they're the sort of easy yards.

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>You've got the hardy yards to come. And that will

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that will only really be revealed in the latter half

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of three the sort of what's the residual bit of

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 1>inflation and that that's really what will that will focus

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the bank next year as well, Lizzie, we are rattling

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of the year in the UK and

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>amidst this massive wave of strikes. Is that going to

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>be a continuing theme when we think about the labor

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Marcus next year. Well, my colleague Philip aldric Our, senior

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>UK Economics reporter, had a really interesting conversation with Charles Goodhart,

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:24.400
<v Speaker 1>who's a former bankoving the policymaker, and he said that

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>it might not just be a winter of discontent, it

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>could be a year of discontent unless the government agrees

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to a wage deal to end this industrial action. Labor's

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>point the opposition Labor Party is that you need to

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>treat it as a whole rather than strike by strike,

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>union by union. And if you think about what DNS

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>saying that this inflation is going to be sticky, it's

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>not going to drop below ten percent for four to

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>five months. That really keeps the pressure on the government. Okay,

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much to Blomberg's UK corresponded Lizzie Burden,

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>and to our senior UK economist Dan Hansen as well.

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm even Carl in London. You can catch us every

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>weekday morning here for Bloomberg Daybreak Europe, beginning at six

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:07.880
<v Speaker 1>am in London and one am on Wall Streets. Thank you, Stephen.

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Coming up on Bloomberg Daybreak weekend. President Biden continues to

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>chalk up successes. But can it last? We'll find out.

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Amy Morris. This is Bloomberg broadcasting live from the

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg in our active broker studio in New York. Bloomberg

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Even three oh to Washington, d C, Bloomberg to Boston,

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg one O six one to San Francisco, Bloomberg nine

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>sixty to the country Sirius XM Channel one nineteen to

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>London d A B Digital Radio, and around the globe

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business Act and Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg day Break Weekend. I'm Amy Morris in Washington

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 1>with your global look ahead at the top stories for

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>investors in the coming week has does it in Biden

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>really finally hit his stride. Were more here in our

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg NY nine one newsroom in Washington. We go to

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Sound On host Joe Matthew. Jo thank you Amy.

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>President Biden feeling good as he heads into the new

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>year after what was arguably the best mid term performance

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 1>by a sitting president in decades. The President saying, it's

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 1>clear Americans are committed to protecting and defending democracy, a

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>strong rejection of election deniers at every level, from those

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 1>seeking lead our states and those of seeking to serve

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in Congress, and also those seeking to oversee the election.

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now to talk about this, Bloomberg White House

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 1>reporter Josh wind Grove, Josh, happy holiday, is great to

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 1>see you. Thank you for being here as we talk

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>about this moment for Joe Biden. Uh, not only did

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>he outperform in the mid terms, your reporting shows that

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 1>he did a bit of an end run around his

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>own advisors by insisting that democracy itself beyond the ballot

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to so many other issues that were in

0:21:55.119 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the air. I guess his instincts were correct. Yeah, I think, Look,

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy that likes to measure twice or

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>three times and four times, five times and then cut once. Right,

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Like the knock on that strategy is sometimes they get

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a little flat footed. But on the flip side,

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>you know he thinks that he keeps his eye on

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the ball or you know, has a focus that he's

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>not distracted. Uh. You know, rewind to the start of

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the year, right, you know, the inflation was really taking off,

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the COVID's cases. We all remember the omicron start of

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Jurga was insane. Of course, Russia was about to invade Ukraine.

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.919
<v Speaker 1>Things were in installed in Congress, everything had collapsed with

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Mansion and you know, things turned around. They got some

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>bills through Congress. The mid term performance are pretty happy

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 1>about and so on balance, you had Biden there being like,

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>how can I frame this? How do we avoid the

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>blood bath politically speaking that presidents usually see in the

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>middle of their first term. And you know he's been

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:51.679
<v Speaker 1>sitting down and talking with historians that sort of thing.

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's when you got this focus on we gotta

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>make it on democracy. We've gotta be like, vote for

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>anyone that will honor the result of the vote. Do

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you remember he did that speech in Philly that kind

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.239
<v Speaker 1>of bombed. It was like a weird background and like

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 1>red and very like you know, the seventies horror film

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of like look. So he did sort of took

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>it a second kick at the can, a bit of

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a haphazard one here in d C. But they think

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that that was part of the message that resonated, of

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>course in the broader context about their messages as well,

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, things like that moves on student loans for instance,

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>motivating young voters, things like that, you know, cocktail and stuff.

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>He's buoyant right now. You can tell, because he's a

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>little chippy with the press that he feels boldened a

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 1>little bit right now. I like new Gingrich's take in

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 1>your piece the former speaker basically referring to Joe Biden's

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>challenges that lead many Republicans to underestimate him, his speech impediment,

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>his memory lapses that lead new Gingrich to compare Joe

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Biden to Eisenhower or even Ronald Reagan. Yeah. Well, Gingrich

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>just kind of put himself out on a limb, right

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 1>If you read his blog post, essentially what it is

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 1>he's he's enumerating a pretty sharp, grueling attack on Joe Bay.

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 1>But the headline is we keep underestimating. In other words,

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to convince his fellow sort of Republican brethren

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that that just sort of casting Biden is like, you know,

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>either extreme, which voters tend not to believe because he's

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:15.719
<v Speaker 1>been around it kind of known quantity, or as you know,

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>bumbling grandpa, great grandpa or whatever. Um. Then um. Then

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 1>they sort of get away from the stuff that actually

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>might work more and being like we should attack him

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 1>for his policy. So you have you have Gingrich saying, look,

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>if we just write Joe Biden off because he's now

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>eighty years old and we think he's going to stumble

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>his way out of the presidency out of sixteen hundred Pennsylvania,

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>then he thinks that they should give their head a shake.

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Because that's the argument from Gingris. You know, we reached

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.679
<v Speaker 1>out to a lot of Republicans for their thoughts on

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 1>what new Gingridge is saying, we got a lot of

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>we got a lot of no responses. So you know,

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's not a it's it's a pitch that

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 1>they're willing to let sail right by rather than thinking

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 1>a wing at So we'll see where whether Gingrich is

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>speaking for the sort of silent you know, chunk of

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the party who might think that. But remember we're sitting here.

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, Joe b and has not formally announced his

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>re election campaign, but gosh, all signs point yes, and

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it's right. This is a guy that is not looking

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>for his exit, and he'll have inflation waiting for him

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>when he makes that decision and when he enters the

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>new year and the new Congress begins as he tries

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>to put a good face on all in the world

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>where inflation is rising a double digits, so many major

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>economies around the world. Inflation is coming down in America,

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>then again, ask Muhammadhill area. Inflation is not going to

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 1>come down in an orderly fashion. We're gonna get sticky inflation.

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>The Bloomberg opinion columnists on Bloomberg. Of course, sticky inflation.

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>It's come down a bit, the feed is still working,

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and you've also got the prospect of breaking the job

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>market to fix the inflation issue. Josh, how do you

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>square that when you're starting a re election campaign? You know, Look, yeah,

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the chances that even if it doesn't come down, you know,

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden could be facing a recession either a year

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 1>or even six months out of the next election. That

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:59.360
<v Speaker 1>sucks for any for any president reelection technical term, right, yeah,

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the that's the macro term. Um. So you

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>know he right now. I think that they are praying

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that some of the stuff kicks in and in the meantime,

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the stuff that they have done, which is

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit nibbling around the edges, were being honest,

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>but not for the people who it affects. It starts

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to kicking things like Medicare capping the cost of insulin

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>for certain people starting in January. That's a big deal.

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Biden's approach to inflation has essentially been we can try

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to lower certain costs per month for certain people to

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>try to ease the pain across the board and cost

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:31.239
<v Speaker 1>that everyone in America is facing. The thing is, if

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>he did get a recession, energy prices would fall, food

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 1>prices would fall. He enters the final year of a

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>presidential campaign, inflation is licked. We're going to fix the economy,

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and the guy I'm running against it could be under

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.919
<v Speaker 1>indictment by them. Yeah, I mean yeah, I don't know

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that any president wants to see a bunch of people

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>losing their jobs, and right and then, like equity matters

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>to this administration. I mean, some people think it might

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>be virtue signaling here and there, but like the people

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that will lose their jobs are the types of people

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:06.879
<v Speaker 1>workers that Joe Biden at least rhetorically talks about a lot, Right,

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:09.719
<v Speaker 1>There are people that that live paycheck to paycheck, hourly

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>wage workers, often minority, just like he grew up right

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly so, like he genuinely seems to just believe that

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>he thinks that there has to be a third way,

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>There has to be a magical sort of landing here

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:22.919
<v Speaker 1>where And you know, he might be right, I suppose,

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but that whereby the inplation can come

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>down and all those folks who so often are the

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>first ones to take it on the chin are the

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 1>ones that don't have to do it yet again, I think,

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:34.439
<v Speaker 1>and that that is what he's sort of holding his

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>breath on. Spending time with Josh wind Growth here as

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>we slide into the new year, and I have to

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>ask you about Ukraine. What a performance this week in

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 1>an appearance to historic appearance from President Zelenski speaking to

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a joint session of Congress. Course, he spent most of

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>his day with President Biden at the White House, and

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>there was one resounding message, Your money is not cheerity.

0:27:55.680 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 1>It's an investment in the global security, and dumont or

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>see that we handle in the most responsible way. So

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in a remaining moment here, Josh, how much of a

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>challenge is it going to be for Joe Biden to

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.679
<v Speaker 1>continue the money and the weapons flowing to Ukraine in

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>this new Congress? We don't know. There's one challenge that

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>he can control or has more control over, and there's

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:20.119
<v Speaker 1>another he can First just to back up very quickly,

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a surprise. It is that Biden

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:26.120
<v Speaker 1>is seems pretty jazz that he was that that Zelenski

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>is here, he seems to have gotten along well with him.

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>The takeaway is twofold number one, big standing ovations for Zelenski,

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>notable exceptions among top Republicans, or at least prominent Republicans.

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>The question is the billion or so that that that

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that the OMNI carved out for Ukraine? Is that the

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>last bucket for Ukraine? Will Kevin McCarthy or whoever led

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Republican House allowed another dollar to go at the door

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>very unclear. The second thing which got toward Zelenski publicly

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>asked for in Congress next to buy him wherever he could,

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, shouting from the rooftops was more weaponry, more

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>band's weaponry, particularly offensive weaponry, and Biden has been hesitant

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>something that's a different story. I want to trigger something,

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>so that's real rob will Biden start ratching up the

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>type of gear he's willing to send. Lensky's already been

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>ratching it up, including the Patriot miss that he announced,

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and will Congress might be a different conversation, different conversation

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>he certainly does not seem Keenanity's hinted that he thinks

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>NATO's support for the war would fall apart if you

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>did it. So, so Biden has his own reservations about

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>what to send. Congress has their own reservations about what

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>check to right. Those two things, you know, are are

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>hanging in the background, But the top line was Joe

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Biden standing there and pledging Ukraine that US will be

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>there for them as long as they're in this war.

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Historic moment. Josh wind Grove is the man that Joe

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Biden looked at and said, if I had his voice

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I would have been elected president a lot earlier. Yeah, yeah, great,

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>It's great to see what am I doing with my

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>life here. Well, you're talking on the radio. Everyone's listening

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to your voice. Happy Holidays, Happy New Year, see twenty three.

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Bloomberg White House reporter Josh wind Grove. Amy,

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, thank you, Joe. That was Joe Matthew, host

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Sound On from our Bloomberg Noddy nine one

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>news room here in Washington. And you can hear Sound

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>On with Joe Matthew weekdays at five pm Wall Street Time.

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 1>And for more political news coverage, you can tune into

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Balance of Power with David weston weekdays at noon Wall

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Street Time. All of that right here on Bloomberg Radio.

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Coming up next on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend to look at

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>market trends to watch out for in China. I'm Amy Morris,

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg m This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend,

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>our global look ahead at the top stories for investors

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>in the coming week. I'm Amy Morris in Washington. COVID

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>is still very much hanging over China. Bloomberg Daybreak Asia

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>host Brian Curtis keeping track of all of it for US,

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Brian Amy, China is reopening and Hong Kong is trying

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to rest back the mantle of Asia's world city. As

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a result, we're curious what new trends we might see

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>in markets in twenty twenty three for Hong Kong and

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>China joining US now, is Sofia Orte Costa, Bloomberg's chief

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>China Markets correspondent Sofia After a couple of very tough

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>years for these two markets, might we see better market

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>conditions in three? I think the living with COVID story

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>UM is the biggest theme going into next year. You know,

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>there's still a lot of questions over whether this is

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>reckless or not. Some people are calling it the big

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>U turn, but it's been so dramatic for China, it's

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the big V turn on COVID zero. So UM.

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>The key thing here is data. You know, will China's

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>reopening be positive or negative on the economy? Will it

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>be good or bad for consumption? Is they're going to

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>be short term gain, short term pain, um for longer

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>term gain in terms of growth and also for the

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world. You know, is it inflationary or

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>will it actually lead to deflation, So it will be

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>harder actually to track the effect of the outbreak on

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>China's economy because actually China releases after releasing December data,

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>it only then releases combined January and February data in March,

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>So it will be a while before we get any

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of real sense of on the ground impact from this.

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Do we have a sense that markets will get well

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>out in front of the economy or because the reopening

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>has been so uneven so far, will investors really wait

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>until they see the proof in the pudding. Investors have

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of priced in the first leg of the reopening

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:47.719
<v Speaker 1>story um at some some cull side analysts saying that

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>about forty has been priced in. I mean, also, Brian,

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 1>let's not forget the huge outflows that Chinese assets had

0:32:56.880 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>in It really didn't take much um to move to

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>move the needle when it came to markets, you know,

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you only had to revert to the mean. Is already

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a gain for for Chinese stocks. I'm curious whether investors

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>think the Party has done a flip flop on market

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>friendly and business friendly policies going forward and changing from

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 1>what used to be pretty restrictive policy over the past

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>eighteen to twenty four months. It's been perhaps the biggest

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>surprise um and in this year is the policy environments

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>turning really more friendly for for China China investing. We

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 1>tend to think that China cares cares more about the

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 1>economy than it does about markets, and now it's all

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>about creating a better environment and market confidence. Really taking

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>sense of stage, this is highly unusual. The last time

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>we heard any kind of wording around this was in

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>eighteen when the trade war was really hammering confidence in

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Chinese markets. So what's that means? We still don't know.

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Um A lot of support for a private enterprise seems

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to be the focus. Also refinancing help for private developers.

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're seeing a revival in in in financing

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>efforts for property companies. That is extremely different and a

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 1>complete one eighty to what to the trends we've seen

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:21.959
<v Speaker 1>in in the past two years, Is there one big

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>mega trend we can identify for next year? One big

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 1>mega trend? I mean beyond the reopening story, um is,

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I think decoupling, whether that's still a thing. Every single

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical analyst was talking about that and freendch shoring whether

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that's whether people are moving out of China and whether

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, China really showing itself as a more friendly

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>actor in the global stage. We seem to get we

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>seem to be getting um some evidence of that now.

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 1>So is China aligning itself less with other actors like

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:01.399
<v Speaker 1>like Russia and moving close to the West. That would

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 1>be a hugely positive development when it comes to investing

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in China. Sophia, thanks so much. Always enjoy your insight.

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sophia Orte Costa, Bloomberg's chief China Markets correspondent. I'm Brian Curtis,

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 1>along with Doug Krisner. You can catch us every weekday

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>here for Bloomberg Daybreak Asia, beginning at seven am in

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong and six pm on Wall Street. Amy all right,

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Brian, and that does it for this edition

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend. Join us again Monday morning at

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>five am Wall Street time, where the latest on markets

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 1>overseas and the news you being to start your day.

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Amy Morris. This is Bloomberg