WEBVTT - Jobs Day, Berkshire, and Kentucky Derby (Podcast)

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day, we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moving news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast called Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Amy Glacier, senior at VP of Business Operations of the

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>firm's called a deco, and a deco was really it's

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a staffing company, permanent placement, outsourcing, career transition really tied

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 1>into the whole labor market and getting people placed in

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>this economy. So Amy's got a great perspective, So Amy

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>some I mean, I'm not sure anybody really saw these

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>numbers coming this morning.

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 3>What's the job market look like to you out there?

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so it wasn't much of a surprise. Actually, from

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 4>what we're seeing boots on the ground, we're still seeing

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 4>leisure and hospitalities super hot. I think, you know, in

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 4>the headlines, there have been all these news about layoffs

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 4>and recession, and from a broader petion perspective, people are concerned.

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 4>But when you really dig in to the trends. There

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 4>are still some really hot opportunities out there, and lots

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 4>of employers that are still hungry for talent, you know,

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 4>especially in restaurants and hotels as they're gearing up for

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 4>the busy travel season.

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 2>And are they getting paid, are they getting raises? Is

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 2>are the you know, salaries and wages keeping up with inflation.

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 4>So salaries and wages are not keeping up with inflation,

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 4>and that's been a ongoing concern for the past six

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 4>months from candidates. So one of the major trends we're

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 4>seeing is that, especially for an hourly workforce, employers are

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 4>choosing to put more weight on that base rate. So

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing less sign on bonuses, less retention bonuses, less

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 4>of those extra monetary perks that tied to total compensation

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 4>in favor of purely putting it in the hourly work rate.

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 4>What we're also seeing is kind of this entrance into

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 4>the part time workforce for a lot of folks that

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 4>have been sitting on the sideline. So I was actually

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 4>a little bit surprised that the participation rate didn't reflect that,

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 4>because that is something we're seeing on the ground that

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 4>as wages aren't keeping up with inflation, folks that are

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 4>looking for secondary jobs or to return to the workforce,

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 4>especially in a part time capacity.

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>All Right, I just wanted to disclose that all four

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Sweeney offspring are gainfully employed in this economy.

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 3>So we're contributing.

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>But I see the Jolts number, Amy, and you know

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it was it came down, but it's still almost you know,

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half million people out there are I'm sorry,

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of open positions.

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 3>Where's everybody? Why isn't every Why aren't more people kind

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 3>of in the workforce.

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I say, the participation rate of sixty two point six percent,

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it seems kind of low to me.

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 3>It should be higher. Talk to us about that part

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 3>of it.

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I think you know, we were at two

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 4>jobs for every candidate seeking employment. Now we're at one

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 4>point six. The reality of the situation is, even if

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.959
<v Speaker 4>we get down to a one point one, it doesn't

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 4>translate into an exact match of where the job opportunities

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 4>are and where the worker resides or what their skill

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 4>set is. So we're going to continue to see that

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 4>talent scarcity just as a simple matter of where they

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 4>physically might live or what their skill set.

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Is is a regional change or differences out there these days,

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>because it just seems like everybody and their brothers going

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to Florida or Texas, and I know, is there some

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>regional bias out or differences out there?

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 4>We're absolutely seeing the East Coast is white hot right

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 4>now in terms of hiring, along with the central part

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 4>and southern part of the US. Now, part of that

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 4>also translates into the leisure and hospitality time of year.

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 4>People and folks are starting to gear up for the

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 4>summer travel explosion. Yeah, exactly. Well, the other cool trends

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing right now. I really think, guys, this is

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 4>going to be the summer of out of office seeing

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 4>people that have stockpile PTO and haven't been able to

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 4>take off over the past two years, especially in some

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 4>of those hourly workforce and essential workers really taking the

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 4>opportunity this year to take that PTO time and focus

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 4>on their personal time off.

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes, okay, yes, I'm not familiar with the acronyms.

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Because you've been in Bloomberg for twenty three years. Yeah,

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>we had a seed.

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Days, we have tea days, yes, okay, So well, I

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 2>think Paul is one of those people. He has been

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 2>He's been bitterly against working from home until he bought

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 2>a beach house on the shore. And I think this,

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 2>so I'm all in, He's going to be working from

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 2>home a lot. How is that working out? How is

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 2>that changing? I mean, are our people are that you

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 2>place still insisting on very flexible workplaces?

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 4>They're absolutely insisting on flexible workplaces. I think what might

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 4>be surprising to some is by flexible, they don't all

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 4>mean remote work from home one hundred percent of the time.

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 4>We've seen that. You know, the American worker really has

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 4>a strong appetite for collaboration, being in person coffee chats,

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 4>talking with their fellow employees. They just don't want to

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 4>do it five days a week. So the employers that

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 4>are getting it right and winning right now are opting

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 4>more for that hybrid work opportunity where sure you come

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 4>into the office to maybe three days a week, that

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 4>you have flexibility in picking those days, and both the

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 4>employer and the worker are benefiting from that flexible schedule.

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 3>How big of a Kentucky Wildcat fan are you, Amy?

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 4>I have a third generation Wildcat grad.

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>Wowret big dog gets here undergrad enter MBA from the

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>University of Kentucky.

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 3>How good is that?

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 1>And it's Kentucky Derby weekend, so I'm sure that's big

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>for you, So that'd be cool. We'll be watching Amy Glacier,

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Senior VP of Business Operations at a Deco. They're a

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>big staffing company out there, and they got their finger

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>on the pulse of kind of what's going on in

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of hiring and firing out there in the economy. Boy,

0:05:56.200 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>it was a blowout jobless our jobs jobs number today,

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>although again there was a revision a prior month.

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 5>But you're listening to the team. Ken's are Live program

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am eastering on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 5>the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business app, or listen

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 5>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to get right to our next guest, Jonathan Hurdle,

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 1>executive chairman of Hurdle, Callahan and Company. I think you

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 1>started that thing around nineteen eighty eight. Before that, he

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>was a little firm called Goldman. Before that, he was

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>an officer in the United States Marine Corps for seven years.

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So we thank him for service. But for me, the

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>highlight is MBA.

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 3>From Penn State.

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Go Nitney Lions, Jonathan, You've got a lot of experience,

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>You've got a lot of perspective.

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's start with.

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>The banking stuff, I mean, the banking stocks. We're not

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>sure whether to call this a crisis, turmoil stress. How

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>do you kind of view what's happening with some of

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>our regional banks.

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 6>First of all, I like to think about it as

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 6>part of the cycle. We had this extended cycle. And

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 6>when you look at a bank, they have to make loans,

0:06:58.120 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 6>and they have to have a how do they make

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 6>their decisions? And if you're in the up part of

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 6>a cycle, where things are accelerating, you can be more aggressive.

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 6>But you don't know how that bank is doing until

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 6>you go through the other part of the cycle, the downturn.

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 6>And if you can measure their performance trough to trough,

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 6>then you see who the better bankers are. So we

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 6>had this weirdly extended easy money cycle. You know, we're

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 6>at the end of the era of easy money, and

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 6>so that unprecedented era of easy money created a lot

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 6>of excess, and part of it was this extended economic boom,

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 6>which lulled a lot of people into a sense of

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 6>laissez faire about their risk policies and so forth. And

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 6>then we got an interest rate shock, and it wasn't

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 6>an increase. It was a shock when you think of

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 6>going just to make the number simple one to three

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 6>or you know, two to four or one to four,

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 6>so it is a triple and so you get that

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 6>kind of we have an economy and a banking system

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 6>based on basically free money. And then at the same

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 6>time this long cycle which lulled people to sleep. It

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 6>doesn't make It doesn't surprise anyone that we have problem

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 6>with banks, I think.

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 2>So I just wonder if a bank, and I won't

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 2>pick a specific one, but if a regional bank does

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 2>have enough assets to cover deposits, does it really matter

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 2>if the shares are driven down to zero? I mean

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 2>beyond obviously the pain the shareholder feels. Does it matter

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 2>for the wider banking system.

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, it only matters if it becomes a vicious cycle.

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 6>So the stock price is key because it's sentiment. And

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 6>we look at what happened to pack West, and so

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 6>you could say, well, this circumstance isn't so bad, but

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 6>the run on the stock could make it bad. It's

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 6>just from a standpoint of psychology. And then the other

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 6>big factor is that we have this only.

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 2>The part I don't get though, how does the run

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 2>on the stock make it bad? I mean, I get

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 2>that the bank could fail, but if we are in

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 2>a place where a bank can fail, I think Joe

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Wisenheal put it like, if we're at a place where

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 2>a bank can fail, like a laundry mat fail, we're okay.

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think what happens is more people get frightened

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 6>because they see this news and the stock price is plumbting,

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 6>and they call and get their deposits out right.

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 2>So that's the concern. But that's not what we've seen happen.

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:13.439
<v Speaker 6>Well, that's why this and that's one of the reasons

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 6>the stock is bouncing back, right.

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, First Republic, how many billions of dollars of

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 2>uninsured deposits we're still there when JP Morgan took it over.

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 2>That's how sticky bank deposits are. It is, all right,

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 2>by the way, twenty billion is the number.

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so Jonathan, all right, So we've got the banking

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>issue out there.

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 3>That's a concern.

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Most more recently, we had a job's number today that

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>was a blowout number. We had a revision downward for

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the prior month, so that tempers it a little bit.

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.599
<v Speaker 1>But are you where's what's your recession call? Because I

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>have a hard time when people come in here and

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 1>talk about recession when I got everybody who wants the

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>job's got a job.

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 6>Right, And I think the thing is it shouldn't be

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 6>a binary discussion. We could have a moderate decession, we

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 6>could have no recession, we could have a soft lining,

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 6>we could have a semi soft line. I mean, I

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 6>really think that's where you have to be. It's hard

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.559
<v Speaker 6>to call in a binary way. My personal feeling is

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 6>we're likely to have a mild recession. That's just my

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:08.839
<v Speaker 6>personal feeling. And then the answer to that is so

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 6>what I mean? So so what I mean? It's just

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 6>we're still managing earnings. Earnings are coming better than expected.

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 6>We have the best managers in the world working on

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:19.599
<v Speaker 6>these stocks. So I think it's all binary. Is a

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 6>hard call, okay.

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if we have unemployment at three point four percent,

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 2>is it possible to get inflation down? Can inflation come

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 2>down if everyone still has a job.

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:32.839
<v Speaker 6>Well, it depends when I mean, how long is it

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 6>going to take. I mean, I'm struck by the fact

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 6>that you know the implied inflation rate and tips is

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 6>a two percent on a ten year bond, So that's

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 6>the implied rate, and the market knows a lot. The

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.319
<v Speaker 6>market is telling us a lot. Maybe ten years from

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 6>now is too long to care about. But I do

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 6>think in general, one of the things we've talked about

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 6>before is the balance between focusing on the cycle and

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 6>focusing on the trend, and so we tend I think

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 6>you need to focus on back both of them. You

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 6>can't ignore psycho but in general, people are more focused

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 6>on the cycle, in my opinion, than they should be.

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 6>They should be focused a little bit more on the trend,

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 6>all of which is positive. And Bernanki talks about the

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 6>idea that there are these secular trends in the world

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 6>that are disinflationary, and technology is certainly one of them.

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 5>Yep.

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:17.239
<v Speaker 2>So you like technology.

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 6>We do like technology.

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 2>You don't think it's overvalued here, Well.

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 6>It could be overvalued here. But software is changing the world, right,

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 6>you know Mark Andriesen's article several years ago software is

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 6>eating the world still true. AI is just another accelerating

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 6>story on that we.

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Can't go three hours in this show without mentioning ai Oh,

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I have personally thought of so many new business cases

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that I might leave and become entrepreneurial multimillionaire because.

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it could be used in so many different ways.

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:51.839
<v Speaker 6>I mean I'm not alone there, yeah, right, But I

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 6>also think just blockchain, I mean, blockchain may revolutionize software

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 6>development as well. So software is going to continue to

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 6>be change our lives lives, and we fortunately are the

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 6>country that leads that.

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 5>So we do like that.

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 6>We like lots of things, but that's one of the

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:07.599
<v Speaker 6>areas we like.

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Hey, what about the banks? You know, I saw a

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 2>great quote in a Bloomberg story overnight. An analyst Ben

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Gerlinger from the Hubed Group wrote, the shares in Western

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Alliance offer a rare, once in an economic cycle entry

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 2>point into a best of breed banking franchise. I'm not

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 2>asking you specifically to common Western Alliance, but if these

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 2>banks are safe and it really is just a short

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 2>seller's attack, isn't it a great time to buy them?

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 6>Well, there's no question that there are opportunities when you

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 6>find dislocation. So for example, in the commercial real estate

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:44.719
<v Speaker 6>challenges which we know are coming, there's going to be

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 6>opportunity to make money there. You always sort of ride

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 6>to the sound of the guns, you know, wherever the

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 6>dislocation is, you want to look there. Whether that fella

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 6>is right or not, only time will tell. And I

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 6>think it's a little bit like picking a lottery ticket,

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 6>like somebody's going to be right, and at the end,

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 6>whoever was right will be declared a genius when it

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 6>was just random.

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>John, We want to take advantage of your experience, your

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>perspective on a really exciting part of the investment marketplace,

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:12.839
<v Speaker 1>and that's private credit. How do you think guys think

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.719
<v Speaker 1>about private credit as an opportunity for investors?

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 6>So we love it. This is one of our big

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 6>emphasies right now. And it's not for amateurs, is the thing,

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.719
<v Speaker 6>and it's not easily available, so you've got to be

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 6>careful who you're with. But done right, private credit is

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 6>a terrific opportunity. We've seen, you know, nominal returns move

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 6>from like seven to twelve and we think are outstanding

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 6>managers now, Paul. The key thing here, I think, and

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 6>this is my opinion, this is one of the things

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 6>that I talk to myself about in our team is

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 6>that this is likely to be a low returning decade,

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 6>and so it's almost like small ball in baseball. You

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 6>got to you know, get a walk, go to first,

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.719
<v Speaker 6>steal second, get a month to move to third. That's

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 6>the kind of environment we're likely to be in for

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 6>the next decade, in my opinion, which is very different

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 6>than the decade we just went through. And so I

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 6>think people are keep thinking how do we get back

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 6>to normal, and they define normal as what was going

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 6>on four years ago. That's not normal. This is more

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 6>normal going through a cycle, having a recession, figuring out

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 6>how to grind out the returns they're going to fund

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 6>your success.

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 2>This is what we heard from Nikolai Tangen, by the way,

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 2>the head of the Norgus Bank, yep, you know, at

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of this year, he said the same thing.

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 2>I think that it's going to be smaller returns than

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 2>we're used to. I think pretty obviously right when you

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 2>have the punch bowl taken away, that's what happens.

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 7>Well.

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 6>And if you go back to Robert Schiller's Nobel Prize

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 6>on his work, was you're going in multiple determines your

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 6>next decade's price. It's a very linear relationship, and if

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 6>you have a twenty two multiple going in on average

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 6>over time, you get like some four percent return or

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 6>some very low return. So we started out this past year,

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 6>you know, the year that we just went through with

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 6>a big negative. So you start out negative and now

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 6>you have to earn your way back to a ten

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 6>year return. So I think that's the face we're likely.

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 6>We don't know, but probability wise, it's more likely that

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 6>we're going to have that low returning grind out, you know,

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 6>singles and doubles kind of a world for the next

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 6>ten years.

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Hey, John, thirty seconds back to office. What's your thought?

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 6>This is a long discussion, but I love people being

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 6>in the office. So one of our four pillars is

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 6>that we embraced the magic of teamwork, and you can't

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 6>have the teamwork, and teamwork's not the same if people

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 6>are not back in the office. I think we're going

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 6>to end up with twenty nineteen New and Improved, which

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 6>means that people do have more flexibility. But in my opinion,

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 6>the default ought to be come to work if you

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 6>stay at home if you need to, not default stay

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 6>at home, come to work if you need to, So

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 6>that might not look that different. But and it gives

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 6>people the flexibility that they didn't have before twenty nineteen

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 6>and before this COVID experience. So we've learned a lot

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 6>and we should learn from that. But in the end,

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 6>it's not the same if you're not together.

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that default way of thinking about it.

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>It makes a lot of sense, Yes, but that's flipped

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>from what it is now. Right Yeah, I say right

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>now people, I'll come in once a week, you know. Yeah,

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>but that has to change as heyel Friday is not

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>one of those days exactly, John the Great having it here.

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 2>We need to get you back for a longer discussion

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 2>because there's so many issues we didn't touch on.

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah's always a pleasure to be with you.

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape Cansur Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 5>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 5>in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 5>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 5>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, I want to get to our next discussion.

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>This is gonna be fascinating Michael Sonenfeld joins us. He's

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>chairman and founder of Tiger twenty one and Tiger twenty

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>one is a network of learning groups for high net

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>worth investors and this is a fascinating discussion. Michael, thank

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you for joining us in our studio here. How does

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a person how does a person come to Tiger twenty

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>one and why do they come to Tiger twenty one.

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 8>So, you know, we have a lot of great entrepreneurs

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 8>in this country, but when the best of them sell

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.199
<v Speaker 8>their business in an instant, they go from being an

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 8>entrepreneur to a wealth manager and they're not prepared for that.

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 8>They may be a great leader, a great manager, they

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 8>can inspire troops, but what do they know about convertible bonds, equities,

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 8>inflation rates? Obviously they knew it through their business. But

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 8>we're the place that they join and meet with others.

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 8>We're a peer to peer learning center and we have

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 8>about twelve hundred and fifty members managing their own money

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 8>a total of about one hundred and fifty billion dollars.

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 2>So what are the what are the limits? I mean,

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 2>how much do you have to have to be a

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 2>member and what kind of help can you expect once

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 2>you get in.

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 8>So to qualify first as good character, we do a

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 8>lot of background checks. That's really important because there's confidential information.

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 8>But the marketplace we serve is from twenty million to

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 8>a billion of personal assets an average of a little

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 8>over one hundred, with most of our members having between

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 8>thirty and sixty million, and what they can expect. The

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 8>most important thing is to meet other people who have

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 8>also been vetted, going through the same journey they are.

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 8>It's a peer to peer learning model. We have about

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 8>one hundred staff that serve these twelve hundred and fifty people,

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 8>but fundamentally, what they're joining is a network that doesn't

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 8>exist anywhere else.

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 2>By the way, the importance of this, I think needs

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 2>to be underlined because you know, if somebody makes a

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 2>hundred million dollars selling her business, we're not feeling sorry

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 2>for her, right, but she may have no idea what

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 2>to do with that money, absolutely no idea where to

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 2>start other than what her bankers tell her, and they

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 2>of course just want her money. If she loses that money,

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't do any economic good for the society either.

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 2>So it's helpful for all of us if she knows

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 2>how to invest it and does well with it, isn't.

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 8>It for sure? And you know the nature of what

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 8>you know? This isn't just about money. It's about legacy. Family.

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 8>You've had your nose to the grindstone or your head

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 8>to the grindstone for forty years, and all of a sudden,

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 8>now you've sold for.

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 3>The first time.

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 8>You're looking at the broader issues. And this is the

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 8>community that you can explore them with.

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 3>So what are I sell my company? For example?

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>And I like the way you described it before we

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:28.199
<v Speaker 1>went on the air. Oftentimes that sell now feels a drift, right,

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>So when they come to you, what do you find

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>they most need, because presumably they're getting some financial advice from,

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, somewhere.

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Investmentalers that help them sell the company.

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 3>First, all the wealth management business.

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 8>Our members use a lot of the great managers, but

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 8>sometimes you find they're selling instead of serving and learning

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 8>how to figure out the wheat from the chaff. Who

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 8>are the good managers? How do you look at managers?

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 8>That's an important thing. What you're really getting is a perspective.

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 8>How do you become an investor? Just as an example,

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 8>I'll ask you guys a question, how long do you

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 8>think it takes for an incredibly bright, incredibly successful entrepreneur

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 8>to become a mildly competent investor.

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 2>I would imagine years.

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, five years, that's sort of the average. When you

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 8>sell your business, you have no idea what you don't know,

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 8>and unless somebody tells you to go slow, don't invest

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 8>everything right away, wait till you learn a new trade.

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 8>You can make some real bloopers, and we want to

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 8>try and help members avoid that.

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 2>How do you convince members to trust you? I mean,

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 2>is it your track record?

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 4>You know?

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Obviously people want to get into this network, but there

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 2>must be some people who think everyone's trying to take

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 2>what I got, So I need to be protective of this.

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 8>So I'd like to think just we don't just talk

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 8>the talk, we walk the walk. I started this twenty

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 8>five years ago. It is a business, but it was

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 8>a labor of love, and I think we've put members

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 8>first in every decision that we've done. And if you

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 8>come and look under the hood, I think we can

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 8>pretty much defend that. And that's how we've grown to

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 8>seven countries, twelve hundred and fifty members, and almost one

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 8>hundred and fifty billion in assets.

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>So what are your members talking about and discussing over.

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've just come out of this pandemic and

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 1>who knows how it impacted their businesses and their wealth,

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and now we're in, you know, kind of a post

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>pandemic world.

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:26.919
<v Speaker 3>What are some of the items they are discussing?

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 8>So two realms. One is family, legacy, children, multi generational issues.

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 8>But in the economic sphere, it's how do you create

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 8>an all weather portfolio. I'm not here as a trader.

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 8>I've created wealth once and I want to preserve it.

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 8>And that's why our asset allocation is so important. Don't

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 8>we just measure what our members do. We don't dictate it.

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 8>They all manage their own funds. But today, as an example,

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 8>private equity is thirty one percent, public equity is twenty

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 8>two percent, and real estate twenty four percent. That's seventy

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.959
<v Speaker 8>eight percent long. But when you have that much long exposure,

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 8>you better have a lot of cash to weather the storm.

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 8>So eleven percent cash, which is a particularly high number.

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 8>So finding out how to get the benefit of a

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 8>day like today. What a day we're having, right, But

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 8>you didn't know that yesterday what it was going to

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.199
<v Speaker 8>look like if it turned the other way. The eleven

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 8>percent cash creates a kind of buffer, and just dealing

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 8>in those concepts is not what you were doing as

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 8>an entrepreneur, No, not at all.

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 3>You were selling more widgets.

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I was thinking when you said you're seventy eight

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 2>percent long, do you teach them how to hedge? And

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 2>then my thoughts fall back. We have geniuses come in

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 2>the studio all the time. Neil Roseman, for example, I

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 2>will say like, oh, I just sell puts on this

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 2>and that, and I have no idea what he's talking about,

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 2>you know, And I imagine a lot of entrepreneurs are

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:48.640
<v Speaker 2>the same way.

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 8>So look, some of our members are some of the

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 8>world's great traders came out of that. But most of

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 8>our members built a business. They started with a concept

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 8>and they took it to fruition. Even hedging is a

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 8>little complicated. They may be investing in funds that have

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 8>hedging strategies, but having the basic portfolio work for the

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 8>long term, that's the objective.

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 2>Can you start a family office with Tiger? I mean,

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 2>how does this work?

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 8>So we do have a group of members who have

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:23.919
<v Speaker 8>family offices. Family offices typically begin at about two hundred

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 8>million and above. You can't economically underwrite a family office

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 8>at a smaller amount. And then obviously once you get

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 8>into the billions of dollars, you have huge family offices.

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 8>That's not our market. We're from twenty million of investable

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 8>assets to a billion.

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>Just fascinating discussion. Million ways we could go on this.

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:44.959
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna get you back in here because now

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that I understand that you are in New York, there's

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>no excuse. So we're going to get you to STUDI

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more often because we can go a

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:51.719
<v Speaker 1>million different ways. I love to just know what your

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 1>members are doing in markets from time to time. That'd

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>be a good gauge of how these markets are performing.

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Michael Sonenfeld, he's the chairman and he is the founder

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:00.959
<v Speaker 1>of Tiger twenty one.

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Again.

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Tiger twenty one is a network of learning groups. That's

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a good way to describe it. A network of learning

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>groups for high net worth investors. And love talking to

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Michael because he has a very unique perspective into these

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>markets based upon what he learns from his group.

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 3>There, so good discussion.

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the team Ken's are Live program Bloomberg

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 5>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 5>the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business app, or listen

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 5>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 9>Curiously comes on you in the heels of a spate

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 9>of deaths at the track at Churchill Downs. Clearly the

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 9>track and the company are on edge. It's a it's

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 9>a major problem, and it's a major pr problem. And

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 9>I think they are trying to really exercise caution here

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 9>and any horse that there may be any questions about

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 9>of any kind. They are telling trainers get that horse

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 9>out of the race.

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:00.040
<v Speaker 2>So what you say, deaths And immediately I'm concerned a

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 2>would be peda person, you know, except for I don't

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 2>have I don't know the inner strength.

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 3>We have a very nice leather jacket.

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 2>You it don't look like a fact. This is horse leather.

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 2>This jacket and these boots. Horse not go there. But

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 2>is this a problem? Do these horses die because I

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 2>imagine they're doped up? Or are they pushed too hard?

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 2>Do they hit them badly with that stick?

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 9>Like what's the you know, the stick or the riding crop.

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.159
<v Speaker 9>I would say, is one of the things that actually

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 9>is off in the whole conversation, but listen that part

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.400
<v Speaker 9>of it. Actually, they have taken concrete measures to crack

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 9>down on use of the riding crop, and it's used

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 9>a lot less now than it was two, five, ten

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 9>years ago. You can't shockeys can't use it the way

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 9>they used to. I mean Victor Espinosa famously in the

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 9>derby hit American Pharaoh who go on to win the

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 9>Triple Crown. I counted him. I wrote a piece on it.

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 9>He hit American Pharaoh thirty times in the stretch. That is,

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 9>if nothing else unsightly. The issue, yes, that they have

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 9>when you get debts on the track, it can often

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 9>be problems with the race surface. And that's one of

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 9>the big concerns they suddenly have at Church Redowns. It

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 9>is a dirt primarily a dirt surface, and it is

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 9>subject to.

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 6>Rain and cold freezes.

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 9>And then you know, temperatures right around this time of

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 9>year go up and down, and the and the and

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 9>the surface the consistency of that surface can change, and

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 9>you can it can lead to injuries and at times deaths.

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:24.919
<v Speaker 9>And wild on Ice, who was one of the horses

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 9>that was gonna run in the Derby was pulled up,

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 9>brought to the vet and and died. They had to

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 9>put that horse down. So, but is it a concern

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.679
<v Speaker 9>is it in steroids issue? Steroids are no longer an

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:39.439
<v Speaker 9>issue they used to be. I don't know if anybody

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 9>who remembers Big Brown, who was a horse that almost

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:44.880
<v Speaker 9>won the Triple Crown back in two thousand and eight,

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 9>and he was a famous horse that they had, you know,

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 9>on a lot of steroids that drew a lot of

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 9>attention to that particular issue. Steroids have since been banned

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 9>from the game, but there's no doubt that the game

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 9>still has an issue of cracking down on cheaters. Listen,

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 9>there are multiple people, top trainers and again who are

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 9>currently in jail who were busted by the FEDS for cheating.

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 9>Bob Bafford is not in jail, but he's the biggest

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 9>name in racing. He is still suspended from Churchill Downs

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 9>and he suspended for his four having given illegal medications

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 9>to his horses. He might recall two years ago he

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 9>won his seventh record breaking seventh Kentucky Derby. That horse

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 9>Medina Spirit, was found to have illegal substances in his blood.

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 9>He was subsequently disqualified and Bafford was suspended and is

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 9>still on the outside looking in Churchill after this spate

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 9>of deaths.

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Two of the deaths.

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 9>Horses that didn't sustain injuries in the track but literally

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 9>drop dead. Okay, we're trained by Saffie Joseph, a young

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 9>up and coming trainer. Saffie had a horse to run

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.880
<v Speaker 9>in the Derby. Churchill Downs told him, scratch that horse

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 9>from the race, scratch all your horses schedule to run

0:27:56.920 --> 0:28:00.200
<v Speaker 9>at Churchill this weekend and take all your horses at here.

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 9>You're kicked out of Churchill Downs.

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Churchill Downs is a publicly traded company market cap of

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 1>ten point nine billion dollars as symbole c h d N.

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>It's up thirty eight percent year to date a forty

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>five percent on a trailing twelve month basis, so a

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>good investment there for public shareholders. David talk to us

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>about this year's race and the horses who are some

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 1>of the favorites, who are some of them maybe the

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>long shots to keep an eye on, because we had

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a long shot win last year.

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 9>We did have a long shot win last year, Rich Strike,

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 9>and actually Rich Strike is running today in about an hour.

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 9>If you want to go back. Okay, I will say this,

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 9>after winning at eighty to one on Derby Day last year,

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 9>how many races has Rich strike one sins then zero?

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 9>The number is one zero times. Now I think that

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 9>race is a bit of a fluke. It was a

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.479
<v Speaker 9>sub it was it was circumstances that helped get him

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 9>in the winter circle. But what will absolutely happen this

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 9>year is after an eighty to one shot wins one year,

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 9>everybody goes out and bets the long shots. The next

0:28:57.480 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 9>year that's just gonna happen. So all these crazy long

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 9>shots that you'd be seventy eighty ninety to one, we'll

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 9>get bet down to twenty to one. And that doesn't

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 9>make a whole lot of sense, to be honest, but

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 9>it is something that's absolutely gonna happen.

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 2>By the way, this I don't want to get too

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 2>deep into this if it's complicated. I know nothing about betting.

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Can you short a horse? Can you sell puts? I mean,

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 2>can you get into that sort of derivative stuff? Or

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 2>is it just bet on the ones you think are

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 2>gonna win.

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 9>So it's a lot easier in place like the UK

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 9>you can flat out short a horse and I love

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 9>that right so here because it's just very simple. I

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 9>want to bet against that horse. I essentially, if Paul

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 9>Sweeney wants to bet on the favorite Forte in the Derby,

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 9>I can say, hey, I'll take that action from Paul.

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 9>All right, you bet that bet with me. I'll give

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 9>it a forourte wins, I pay you. If he loses,

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 9>you pay me. In the United States of America, you cannot,

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 9>at least not at the major racetracks and the major

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 9>betting venues. So what you're typically left to do if

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 9>there's a big favorite that you're negative on to bet against,

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 9>find a bookie or you just what we say, you

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 9>fade that horse. You find you have to find the

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 9>most likely up setters to try to beat him.

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 3>But it's much much easier in the UK to.

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 2>So Fortes favored to win. Tell us about the favorites.

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 9>So the favorite so Forte was two year old champion

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 9>last year. He looked dynamite in his return as a

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 9>three year old. All the horses in the Derby are

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 9>three years old, right, He looked dynamite returning in February

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 9>at the races in Gulfstream, looked less great. Last in

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 9>his last race. He won that too. The issue with Forte,

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 9>and this is one of the really things that's unique

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 9>about the Derby, is at the Derby there will be

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 9>one hundred and fifty thousand screaming, drunk human beings. Horses

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 9>are flight animals, they're skittish animals, and surrounded by one

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 9>hundred and fifty thousand drunk people, they can get on

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 9>edge and they can lose their minds and run their

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 9>race before the race even begins. Forte has a bad habit.

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 9>Everyone should watch him in the pre race warm ups

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 9>and in the post brid He has a bad habit

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 9>of getting worked up and riled up and anxious and

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 9>sweaty's if that's happening to him in front of crowds

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 9>of ten and twenty thousand people, you can only imagine

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 9>what it's going to look like in front of one

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 9>hundred and fifty thousand people. That's one of my concerns

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 9>about him. I am indeed negative. I'm fading Forte.

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 3>All right, So other horses, who are you betting?

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Who are you betting on to.

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 9>Win the winner of? Like voting the winner of the

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 9>one hundred and forty ninth Kentucky Derby is named Angel

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 9>of Empire. He'll be somewhere around eight to one ish.

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 9>I just like everything about the way he's coming into

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 9>the race, right. I'm someone who puts a lot of

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 9>stock in the way horses are training in the morning.

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 9>He right now everyone is just you know Gaga or

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 9>the way he looks in the track in the morning.

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 9>He's He's a horse that was a sort of a

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 9>more of a late developer, but he's the now. To me,

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 9>he's the now horse, and I think.

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of value.

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 9>So Forte has had a much more impressive career. But

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 9>you know, Forte very precocious at two, but seems to

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 9>be tailing off. A horse like Angel of Empire, I

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 9>think is a great candid. I also like, you know

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 9>a horse that almost beat Forte and the last race

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 9>of horse named Mage John Tucker. I see he's paying

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 9>attention right that downshot age got it?

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Where can you go to place these bets?

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 9>Ot storing I obvious online there's all you know from

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 9>gambling apps. I mean, the New York Racing Association's got

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 9>one that's very popular, and IRA Bets Churchill Downs has

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 9>one that's very popular called you know Twin Spires dot Com.

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean everyone's I need a long shot.

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 3>That's how I play. You want to long shot on

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 3>a long shot.

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 2>But they're not going to pay off as much as

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 2>the long shots typically do. David just told us everybody's

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 2>betting a long shot that drives the odds down.

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 3>That is absolutely you bet your book. I'll bet my

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 3>book shot.

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 9>The only thing I'll say, and thatcher right, Matt's paying attention.

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 9>Here's the only thing I'll say about the Derby is

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 9>the Derby gets you chaotic results because not only is

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 9>the crowd massive, it's a huge field. And so even

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 9>though we're down to just nineteen horses after the scratches,

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 9>nineteen horses is more than double the typical size of

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 9>a field in a race. So chaos reins. Last thing

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 9>that creates chaotic results and why sometimes long shots are

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 9>a good bet is no horse has ever run this

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 9>distance before this long a mile and a quarter, and

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 9>most of them will never run this distance again. AM

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 9>mile and a quarter is a rare distance. Nowadays they

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 9>tend to could be a mile and so you can

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 9>get chaotic results. So, Paul Sweeney, if you want to

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 9>dial up a long shut or two knock yourself, nice

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 9>good stuff.

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Why don't we have a whole show with David Pye

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 2>knows I know he's coming back.

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna, don't worry.

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 2>At least a weekly show we should have with you exactly.

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>They have a Populattopoulos, executive editor for Bloomberg News, and

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 1>he is our.

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Resident horse guy. You gotta have a horse guy, and

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 3>we got one.

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape Can's are live program Bloomberg

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 5>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 5>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 5>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 5>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 2>It looks like there's a group of shall I say,

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 2>dissidents or activist shareholders yep, that are attempting what I

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 2>imagine is a very long shot bid to remove Warren

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Buffett yeah from the air, from the position his position

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 2>as chairman at Berkshire Hathaway at the annual shareholder meeting

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:09.800
<v Speaker 2>this Saturday. The reason, apparently, is because of his ties

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 2>to Bill Gates. The two are famously close and Bill

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Gates charity charitable foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why, but.

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 3>We've got somebody who does know what exactly.

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:25.280
<v Speaker 2>We've got the author of the article, the reporter joining

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 2>us right now, Bill Allison, comes to us from Washington,

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 2>d C.

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Bill, what do we know about?

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 2>First of all, how how much of a long shot

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 2>is this? I mean, doesn't Warren Buffett have incredible uh,

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:42.360
<v Speaker 2>speaking of brand loyalty, just unbelievable loyalty among Berkshire Hathaway shareholders.

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, he definitely does. And you know he owns, you know,

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 10>almost a third of the stock. So that's going to

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 10>be votes again, and it's you know, it's very unlikely.

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 10>A similar proposal was introduced at the last year's meeting,

0:34:57.600 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 10>but it did get some support. It got almost eleven

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 10>percent support, and that's largely because CalPERS, the California Pension

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:09.439
<v Speaker 10>employee retirement system, voted for the resolution and they said

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 10>that they long support you know, corporate governance where you

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:16.720
<v Speaker 10>have an independent board share rather than having the CEO

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 10>play both roles.

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 3>So is this a political thing?

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>What do we know about the reasoning behind this that

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>perhaps some investors don't appreciate the politics of Gates and

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe some other folks that mister Buffett may align himself with.

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think that this is this is sort of

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 10>the question that these these folks are raising, is that

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 10>you know, Warren Buffett has last year's meeting, he said

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 10>that basically, you know, if you take political positions, you

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 10>end up angering more people than you please. And it's

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 10>you know, he would never do that to hurt Berkshire

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 10>half the way shareholders. And then these guys are looking, well,

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 10>you serve on the board of an organization that, you know,

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 10>maybe not political in the sense of Democrats and Republicans,

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 10>but political in the sense of they take a lot

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 10>of positions on social issues that are you know, frankly,

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 10>really contentious. And it's you know, whether it's you know,

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:13.400
<v Speaker 10>abortion or transgender issues or uh, you know, how how

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 10>we teach students in schools. You know, a lot of

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:18.319
<v Speaker 10>these things have become hot button issues. And what they're

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 10>asking is, you know, are pointing to, is you know,

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 10>you have this close association with this you know, foundation

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 10>that has you know, all kinds of different programs that

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 10>some of which could be controversial or view as controversial

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 10>isn't that doing what you said you wouldn't do?

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 2>All right? So you know, I was struck by your

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:39.800
<v Speaker 2>story in that it says Warren Buffett's ties to Bill Gates,

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:44.920
<v Speaker 2>whose charitable work has triggered criticism, are putting investors in

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Berkshire Hathaway at risk. I would have thought his ties

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:52.360
<v Speaker 2>to Bill Gates are a problem because of Bill gates

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 2>association with Jeffrey Epstein more and more of which we're

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 2>learning about.

0:36:57.560 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 10>Well, that's something that you know that the shareholders. It's

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 10>group called the National Law, Legal and Policy Center, and

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 10>that's one of the issues that they're raising is that,

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 10>you know, there's this reputational risk that you know that

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 10>Bill Gates has kind of become you know, his his

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 10>reputation has taken a hit. You know, it's not just

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:20.360
<v Speaker 10>you know, Jeffrey Epstein. There's the question of you know,

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 10>his you know, the divorce and everything else, and it's

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:26.919
<v Speaker 10>it's kind of that, you know, he's become much more

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 10>of a you know, much less of somebody who you know,

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 10>people thought was you know, always had his heart in

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 10>the right place. To raising some questions about some of

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:37.919
<v Speaker 10>the things that he's done. In fairness, to Bill Gates.

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 10>He said that it was a mistake to know Jeffrey Epstein,

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 10>that he regrets it, but still this is just you know,

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:46.959
<v Speaker 10>you know, Jeffrey Epstein just keeps popping up in the news.

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 10>You know, there's just a couple of series of articles

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:51.800
<v Speaker 10>looking at his appointment calendar and lo and behold. You

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:53.879
<v Speaker 10>know whose name is mentioned in it? But Bill Gates,

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 10>you're listening to the tape.

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 5>Can's are live program Bloomberg Markets week days at ten

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 5>am Eastern on Blomberg Radio, the tune in app, Bloomberg

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 5>dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App. You can also

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 5>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 5>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Brian, You're in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. I love

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the casino business. Most of the casino operators have reported numbers.

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Just generally speaking, are people rolling the bones here these days?

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 7>It appears they are. I mean, gaming has been generally speaking,

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 7>really quite strong. You know, there are some puts and takes,

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 7>but domestically Vegas is looking quite strong. Probably the biggest

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 7>inflection point is the group convention, Business and Business travel appears.

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:39.839
<v Speaker 6>To be coming back.

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 7>But you know, the overall tone of gaming lodging earning

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:46.799
<v Speaker 7>season thus far has been quite positive. Maybe a little

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 7>bit of tentativeness and certaintly about the second half, but

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 7>overall quite positive. And you know, also just directing this

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 7>to what happening internationally, McCaw was also doing quite a

0:38:57.480 --> 0:39:00.399
<v Speaker 7>bit better now that the travel restrictions in that part

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 7>of the world.

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's off the coast of China, that's the the

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:06.800
<v Speaker 1>big that is the Las Vegas strip of Asia, and

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that depends almost entirely on mainland China. And now that

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 1>China's reopened, definitely okay.

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:16.240
<v Speaker 7>I mean, the whole high end business has been choked

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:18.880
<v Speaker 7>off a little bit because there's some restrictions on junkets

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 7>can't want money, you know, junk get credit. But overall,

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 7>you know that business is definitely coming back because of

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 7>the winding down of the zero COVID regime. That's what's

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 7>really helping that part.

0:39:29.520 --> 0:39:29.879
<v Speaker 6>Of the world.

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>So when I think Vegas, how I got into Vegas

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 1>was just a convention route. I mean, you go to

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 1>the Vegas for all these conventions and that's kind of

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 1>exposed to you to Vegas and then you're kind of

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 1>for people like me, kind of hooked and really two

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to three nights is the max for me. Let's be honest.

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So talk to us about that convention business, because we

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>just had a story earlier that says March was a

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 1>like almost pre pandemic levels and it was due in

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 1>part two Taylor Swift and the PAC twelve championship and

0:39:57.080 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 1>thinking things like that. So how's the convention business, So,

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, convention busines, this overall, it's really coming back

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:05.839
<v Speaker 1>at its peak pre pandemic. It was maybe twenty one

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:08.319
<v Speaker 1>percent of total room nights and now we're pretty much

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 1>back there and moving that direction. You know, overall Vegas

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>first quarter gaming revenues was twenty eight percent higher than

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter of nineteen, so we're now we're now

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 1>above pre pandemic levels in terms of revenue.

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Is it the best place? Is it the biggest place

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 2>in the country for conventions? I mean, Paul seems to

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 2>want to go there every other week for a convention,

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 2>but that's just because you want to wants to hit

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 2>the table.

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 7>What makes what makes Vegas really different is if you're

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 7>in a regional casino in another part of the country.

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 7>Gaming is maybe eighty five percent of the total. When

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 7>you're out in Vegas, it's pretty close to fifty to

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 7>fifty sixty forty in favor of the non gaming component.

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 7>So the big change over the last few decades has

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:54.839
<v Speaker 7>been the conventions, restaurants, entertainment, meetings, all those all those

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:55.800
<v Speaker 7>businesses now.

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:56.960
<v Speaker 2>And I would think it's a big part.

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>And I would think, you know, with the work from home,

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:00.839
<v Speaker 1>what I'm hearing from a lot of companies is we're

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 1>being flexible, we're working from home, but we're trying to

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 1>get together as a group more often.

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, Vegas, you know, I mean, are they is that?

0:41:07.880 --> 0:41:09.799
<v Speaker 1>Are they when they're when they're booking some of these groups,

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:11.319
<v Speaker 1>Are they seeing some of that as something new?

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 5>Maybe?

0:41:12.560 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 7>I think so. I mean, Vegas this has you know,

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:17.840
<v Speaker 7>it's not just about Vegas being the fun destination. It is,

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 7>but it has the infrastructure right. It's got the airport,

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 7>it's got the hotel rooms, it's got the amenity package,

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 7>it's got the convention facilities.

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 2>It's also got all the high end dining.

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:29.440
<v Speaker 7>Has everything you need to make.

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 6>It right at the destination.

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:32.799
<v Speaker 1>My man, all right, let's we got you. You cover

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:35.760
<v Speaker 1>all the fun stuff, including the cruise lines. Royal Caribbean

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 1>had some pretty decent results here. I guess people are

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 1>are they cruising, are they worried about inflation, are they

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 1>worried about a recession? Or are they just kind of saying, heck,

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:45.239
<v Speaker 1>booked me up.

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 7>So you know, first of all, the ships are all

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:49.759
<v Speaker 7>back in service now, we're pretty much at our near

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 7>complete redeployment after those ships were paused. And you know,

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 7>just the numbers that just came out recently from Royal

0:41:56.680 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 7>Caribbean where the strength they're seeing, and it's it's really

0:41:59.560 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 7>quite strong.

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 5>Wrong is.

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 7>You know, it's global, but it's it's certainly we led

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:07.800
<v Speaker 7>by the North American consumer in the Caribbean and the

0:42:08.200 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 7>sort of shortly bookings are improving. It's gonna take a

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:13.840
<v Speaker 7>while for cruises in China to come back, you know.

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:18.240
<v Speaker 7>But but the North America consumer of all things leisure

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:19.440
<v Speaker 7>is really health in there.

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:20.839
<v Speaker 3>And that's what he does.

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:24.320
<v Speaker 1>He's a leisure There's an institutional investor magazine category called leisure.

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 6>Have you gone on a cruise?

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:27.320
<v Speaker 4>I have? I have?

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 5>You don't.

0:42:31.200 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 7>I've got on cruises as part of my due diligence

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:35.800
<v Speaker 7>roles in analysts and also for fun. But I actually do,

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 7>I personally do enjoy it, which helps me.

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:40.839
<v Speaker 2>And Paul are gonna go. We're gonna do it cruise.

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:42.799
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna do a cruise and we have to. All right,

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 3>great step Ryanegger.

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 1>He covers all the leisure stuff, the casinos, the hotels,

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the cruises, all that fun stuff you also cover, you know,

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 1>just anything that's fun.

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 3>He tends to cover, which is a great career choice.

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:56.839
<v Speaker 3>He made it, like, yeah, he does, so it's all good.

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Blue Burg Markets podcasts. You

0:43:01.960 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 2>can subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts or

0:43:05.520 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 2>whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on

0:43:09.320 --> 0:43:11.799
<v Speaker 2>Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Paul Sweeney.

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:18.239
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio