WEBVTT - NFC Over/Under Wins: Best Bets (Ep. 1)

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Hey there everyone, and welcome to the Betting Pros NFL podcast,

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by play MGM. I am your host,

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Dan Harris. You can find me on Twitter at Dan Harris.

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Ady with me today is my very good friend who

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>if you play fantasy football you already know and love,

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Mike Taglier. You can find him on Twitter at Mike

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Tagli air NFL tags.

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 2>How you doing, buddy, I'm.

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 3>Doing good man. I don't think that you realize just

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 3>how much of a degenerate you are until you sit

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 3>down and you stalk beat writers Twitter reports, because like,

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm playing preseason dfs tonight and uh yeah, so I've

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 3>become a stalker of beat writers.

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Preseason is always sort of the toughest thing to do, right,

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>That's where you have to pay, frankly, the most attention

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.039
<v Speaker 1>because you have no idea who's actually going to play,

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>what the team's plan is going to be doing. But

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a busy day with this is how. We're recording

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>this on Wednesday. No, sorry, it's Thursday, right, yep, what

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 1>day is it?

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:12.479
<v Speaker 2>Good lord?

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>We're recording this on Thursday night, So there's a lot

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of preseason action to come. So I'm glad you're going

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to be involved, but really, TEGs, I don't want to

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:21.199
<v Speaker 1>talk about that. This is what I want to talk about.

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Text.

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>You are married, of course, to a lovely lady. You

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>have two beautiful children, and you work full time as

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy football analyst. But I need to ask, where

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think being on the inaugural episode of the

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros podcast or ranks in terms of great moments

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in your life? Now, I assume, like me, your wife

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't listen to your podcast and stuff, right, so you

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>can be honest, this is what top three ish.

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it might be the top three thing that

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 3>happened today.

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 2>This is so disappointing.

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I you know, I'm gonna get in touch

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>with our producers because I really wanted you for the

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>first episode. But it's clearly a mistake. I want you

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to know, Tex. But obviously there's a disparity here because

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>for me, this is actually the sixth best moment of

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>my life, and I'm gonna I'm gonna give you the

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>few that it's behind. Okay, Number one the first time

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I tried to shake Shack Burger. Okay, because that was

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>for me pretty life changing. Number two the time Chad

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Pennington told me that I had great hair. That really

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I have lived on that for several years at this point.

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Number three the time that the lady at Coldstone Creamery

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.959
<v Speaker 1>said that I could just reuse the buy one, get

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>one coupon every day for the next three days until

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the coupon expired. Number four the time that Marshaw Lynch

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>did that insane run in Week sixteen against the Cardinals

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the game, and that capped off

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>my most dramatic Fantasy win of all time. Do you

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>remember that one? Like Chris Collinsworth is literally just laughing

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>at the time that it was my avatar for my

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>fantasy leagues have literally just been Marshall Lynch jumping backward

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>into the end zone making a pretty inappropriate gesture.

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 2>But I think it's fine.

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>And number five was the day that I learned that

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>normal shoe companies now make like the large clown shoes

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that I wear that were like extra wide, so I

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to order like plain white orthopedic shoes online

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to fit my gigantic feet. So this slot's in right

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>at number six. It's a little disappointing to hear how

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>little you value our interaction here. But I gotta be honest,

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of pressure on you here because this

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>is very meaningful to me. So you're going to have

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to deliver today. Are you okay with that?

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, we are the two best friends that anyone can have.

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if Bobby's listening, that includes Bobby, that includes you.

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 3>We are the two best friends. You would be the

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 3>third best friend.

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>That's true, And we were actually singing that offline before

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I started recordings.

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely true.

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>So today we're going to be talking about some NFC

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 1>over under win totals, each giving a few of our

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>favorite bets for the upcoming season. Now, I am excited

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>for this inaugural show, as I just said, and for

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>much of the preseason, this is what we're going to

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>be doing on this podcast, talking about some of our

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>best bets for the season. But for our next show,

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>we're actually going to take a quick step back and

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>give you kind of a primer on the landscape of

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>sports betting, because most of you probably think that, well,

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>sports betting is legal, so that regardless of your state,

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you can just Google bet on sports and place a

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>bet on whatever website pops up. That's that's not the case.

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Whether you can go out and place a bet in

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>any state, and if so, how you can actually do

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that is going to depend on where things stand in

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>your particular state. So we're gonna get into all of

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>that and more with Dustin Galker, a guy who knows

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>more about the sports betting landscape than anyone I know.

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing, and I'm going to fill you

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>in on this a little bit before the show starts.

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Is that New Jersey, which spearheaded the litigation that eventually

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.239
<v Speaker 1>led to taking down the federal ban on sports betting,

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>is already up and running. You heard at the top

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of the show that I mentioned that we are brought

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to you by play MGM, And you don't need me

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to tell you about MGM's incredible casinos or the entertainment

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.479
<v Speaker 1>that they offer. But if you're in New Jersey and

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you're wondering where to bet on sports, you really don't

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 1>need to look any further. Just download the play MGM

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>Sports app. Just go to your app store, type that

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>in and you're going to see it right there. With

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the MGM Sports app, you can bet on pretty much

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>any sport you want. That includes college football, baseball, and

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of course the NFL, they're going to be offering point

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>spreads and money lines and odd boosts, futures and props

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>in play wagering and a ton It's super easy to

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>deposit and withdraw your money, and you can do that anywhere.

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>To be clear, you just have to be in New

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Jersey to actually place your bet. But this is the

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>best part. When you download that AUP, use the promo

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 1>code Harris. That is my last name and also the

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>first part of Harrison Ford's first name, So it's like

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>basically impossible to forget. Just use the promo code Harris

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>when you sign up, and when you do, you get

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to play your first bet risk free.

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 2>That is not a joke.

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>If you use the Harris promo code and your first

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>waiger is twenty five dollars or more and you lose play,

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>MGM is going to refund your wager of up to

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>one hundred dollars. I just want to make sure that

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 1>is clear to you guys, because I legitimately had to

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>double check it. Your first wager of at least twenty

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>five dollars is a freebie. If you lose, they're gonna

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 1>refund your wager up to one hundred dollars. So just

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>download the play MGM app, use the promo code Harris,

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and head to New Jersey to place your first wager.

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>So tag's the first thing I want to do is

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit, because you obviously are a fantasy analyst,

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.239
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk a little bit about how sports

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>gambling impacts you as a fantasy analyst generally. So why

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>don't you you know? Because I read your primer every week,

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>which everybody should be doing, and I know you talk

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 1>about things like implied total So I just want to

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>know generally, how you know the lines at Vegas or

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>any sportsbook sets kind of impacts how you think about fantasy.

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a really good question, Dan. This is something

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 3>that legitimately kept me up at night. And I'm not

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 3>like kidding around. I'm not just saying that likes like

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 3>a saying. I've literally woken up at three am sometimes

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 3>when like an idea strikes me and it's like I

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 3>get up to research it. And this was one of

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 3>those things. I wanted to know the average amount of

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 3>fantasy points scored in an average NFL game, and then

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to break that apart into averages based on

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 3>the over under that was set for the game. I

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 3>had never rese I've never released that release research that

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 3>I did because I didn't want I wanted to like

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 3>fine tune it and get a bigger sample size. But

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 3>it definitely has an effect on fantasy output as you

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 3>would expect, and it's definitely a curve. So like, as

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 3>a sample in the twenty one games, when the total

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 3>was in between fifty two and fifty three and a

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 3>half points, that game netted on both sides of the

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 3>ball one hundred and seventy nine fantasy points. By comparison,

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 3>if we drop that down ten points to forty two

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 3>to forty three and a half a point spread, it

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 3>actually average one hundred and thirty eight point five fantasy points.

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:19.679
<v Speaker 3>So you're talking about a difference of like forty fantasy

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 3>points just over forty fantasy points just because the game's

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 3>over under was up ten points and we're not talking

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 3>like the over under was sixty. Vegas has this locked

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 3>down to the point where it's like the odds makers

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 3>they set these lines, they know exactly what they're expecting,

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 3>and most of the time it's going to pan out

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 3>to where if you're ever torn between you know two players,

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 3>you should definitely use the over under to help you

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 3>decide that, particularly in DFS, because as we've seen, you know,

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 3>in this research that I've done, that small sample size,

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 3>is that it does affect fantasy football and if you

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 3>and again if you're torn, choose the player that's got

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 3>the higher over under in his game.

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a really great point. And frankly, that research,

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that was kind of a shocking number how

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>large it was, just the difference that can be done.

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>And in terms of just like by the week, do

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you think that fantasy players can in any way gain

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>any advantage generally by paying attention sort of to sports gambling.

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know they are you know, you mentioned

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the lines that Vegas sets and those you know, they

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>know more about football basically and how to set those

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>lines and where they go than anybody else in the world.

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>But in the end, you know, the lines move, you know,

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>during the week and stuff like that. Does any of

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that impact you essentially as a fantasy analyst or a

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>fantasy player.

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, absolutely, And you have to like it's all about

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 3>correlation and you have to find those things that correlate,

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Like line movement itself can identify opportunity with running backs,

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 3>because you do not want to tie yourself too many

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 3>running backs who are double digit underdogs. Like if you're

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 3>playing DFS for the week and you're like, Wow, why

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 3>is this guy forty three hundred dollars? I should probably

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 3>play him, and then you realize that he's a twelve

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 3>point underdog. The correlation with that is terrible in terms

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 3>of like four running backs. On the flip side, if

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 3>you have a team that's sitting there as a favorite

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 3>by two and a half points and then you see

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 3>the line shift and all of a sudden it's up

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 3>to five and a half points, the running back on

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 3>the big favorite should be bumped up in your rankings

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 3>a little bit and you should be more you know,

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 3>open to playing that guy.

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that those are great points, And I've been doing

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that now for a couple of years, and it really

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:13.439
<v Speaker 1>really does make a difference, especially in DFS. So the

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>bottom line is, even if you are just sort of

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>even if it's not necessarily legal in your state at

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>this point, although I'm sure we'll be soon to bet

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>on sports paying attention necessarily to Vegas lines and the

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>way things are moving in particular, can really give you

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.239
<v Speaker 1>an end, both in your season long leagues and in dfs.

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>So why don't we then get into the bulk of

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the show. Now, we decided to go with the NFC

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>because you know, i've tags as a Bears fan, as

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody pretty much knows, and so I I assume that

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>he's got relatively strong opinions on some of the teams.

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>So tags, why don't we do this? Why don't you

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>start and give me what you think your best over

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>under is for the NFC.

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.359
<v Speaker 3>My best one, I would say that I have Detroit

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 3>under six and a half wins. That's the over under

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 3>on their win total six and a half. So it's basically,

0:09:58.000 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 3>if if you think they're gonna be seven and nine,

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna take the over. If you think they're gonna

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 3>have six wins or less, you're gonna take the under. Obviously,

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 3>there's no push in this situation. Seventy one percent of

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 3>experts actually agree with me on this one, So it's

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 3>not like, you know, I know there's gonna be put

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 3>some people out there listening saying, oh, well, he's a

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Bears fan. I am one hundred percent. I leave those

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 3>take I leave my fandom outside my job. But Detroit.

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, when you look at the division, you see

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 3>that the Bears are projected to win nine or ten games.

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 3>You look at Green Bay, they're projected to win nine

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 3>or ten games. Minnesota the same exact thing. So where

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 3>is Detroit getting their free wins? You know, the NFCS

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 3>as a conference has turned like brutal, like in terms

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 3>of like sheer top end talent. I would say the

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 3>NFC is a tougher conference now and Detroit under Matt

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 3>Patricia unfortunately, you have to be one of two things

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 3>as a head coach. If you want to if you

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 3>want to be you know, a nine to sevent team

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 3>or whatever that is, like just like a winning coach,

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 3>you have to either be a an offensive mind that

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 3>your offense is so good to overcome some defensive struggles.

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 3>Because to be fair, I'd rather have an offensive minded

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 3>coach because the NFL is going that way they want.

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's like the chicks dig the long ball.

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 3>It's just like chickstick touchdowns. That's basically where we're at

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:08.199
<v Speaker 3>now and Detroit they really don't have that, and now

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 3>they're talking about running the ball a whole lot more.

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 3>Matt Patricia is not an elite defensive coach, you know,

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 3>like if you have someone like Pete Carroll who continually

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 3>puts out the best team on the field, that's an

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 3>elite coach in terms of he might not be an

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 3>offensive mind, but his defense comes out to play every

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.079
<v Speaker 3>single week. We didn't see that out of Detroit last year.

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they have the talent and the roster,

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 3>and again, they play in probably the toughest division in football,

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 3>So to say that they'd win seven games, I think

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 3>that's a stretch. So I'd say Detroit was more like

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 3>a five and eleven or six and ten team.

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I definitely think that's fair. And as we'll get

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to with some of my picks, I'm certainly more bullish

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>on some of the other teams in the North. But

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I do want to point something out because you brought

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>up a good point which kind of leads me sort

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of to what I wanted to talk about here, which

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>is you mentioned that seventy one percent of experts are

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>with you on the under, And just to be clear,

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that number comes from bettingpros dot Com, which, by the way,

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>if you love Fantasy pros, you're really gonna love Betting

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Cross because it does a lot of the same things.

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Part of what it does is it pulls together expert

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>picks from across various platforms, It rates the advice, and

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>it then turns it into consensus picks. So at Betting Pros,

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>for example, you can get consensus picks from over one

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty experts, either for over unders or against

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the spread. You can see accuracy ratings for everyone who's

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 1>submitting picks. You can compare expert picks for any game

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you want, and you can see consensus odds across sports

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:30.199
<v Speaker 1>books to make it easy to compare the various odds

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that are out there. We're going with six and a half,

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>as you saw for the over under for the Lions wins,

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and that is the consensus over under. Now it lists

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.079
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of different sportsbooks, and frank they're all happen

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 1>to be at six and a half. But that's another

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>thing that you're going to be able to see at

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Betting pros do com. So if you go into betting

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 1>pros dot com and you go and you look at

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>what the over unders are for the season, and you

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>click on analysis under Betting Pros, you'll see seventy one

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>percent of experts have the under including tags which you

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 1>can see right there, and only twenty nine percent have

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the old. So that is one of the things that

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be doing at the site now. Sticking with

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the North one of the ones I have, I'm not

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>let's just say this, I don't expect to lose this

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>bet with. This is the Vikings over nine wins, and

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the thing is, I nine wins to me feels very safe,

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and so I'm looking at this as the worst case

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>scenario as sort of a push.

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 2>You can't push with.

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>The Lions, they're six and a half. Obviously you're gonna

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>win or you're gonna lose. With the Vikings at nine,

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel relatively confident at this point that they're gonna

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>make at least nine, but I feel pretty good about

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>them getting to ten, possibly eleven. They brought in Gary Kubiak,

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>who I don't even know what his exact job title

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>is at this point, quarterback whisper, whatever it is, is

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>an offensive advisor, but he's basically like a guarantee to

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>have a top ten offense, and he emphasizes play action

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>pass and I really think that that's gonna benefit Kirk Cousins.

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:51.719
<v Speaker 1>So I do expect the offense, which really sort of

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>struggled later on down the stretch, to be better. And

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the team drafted Garrett Bradbury out of North Carolina State.

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>To me, that really really bulks up their offensive line.

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>And best of all, he is familiar with the zone

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>blocking scheme that Kubiak likes to implement, you know, and

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 1>I think Dalvin Cook as well, he's familiar with his

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>zone blocking scheme, so he's going to be back healthy.

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm really excited about it. And the defense, which was

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, i'll say maybe not elite but definitely above average,

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is largely intact, so sort of for the same reasons

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that you do not like the Lions. In the end,

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I kind of think that the Vikings are probably going

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to win both their games against the Lions to start,

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and I really expect them to have a strong season

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>this year.

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the Vikings are a team that under achieved

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 3>last year for sure, and I think that they've always

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 3>had that elite defense. You know, that's one of those

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 3>teams where it's like Mike Zimmer's coach that great defense,

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 3>and once Pat Schrimer left, you kind of just felt like, Okay,

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 3>the talent is there. You know, they brought in Cousins

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 3>and the offense is going to be competent enough to

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 3>get into the playoffs, and they fell apart. Cousins, you know,

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 3>was really up and down in his performances. But you

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 3>know year two in that offense, you know, upgrading the

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 3>offensive line. You know, the defense won't be on the

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 3>field hopefully as much. If they can run the ball

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 3>with Dalvin Cook, if he could stay healthy, I think

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 3>nine wins is right. It's about right for them. Again,

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 3>they play in this tough division, tough conference. But if

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 3>they get everything together and if Kubiak, if they do

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 3>pick up that offense, I could see ten wins out

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 3>of this team. It's just it's really tough to do

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 3>that in the NFC now, And which kind of like

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 3>it's like a good segue to my next team that

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 3>I would have as under is ten and a half

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 3>the New Orleans Saints ten and a half wins. I'm

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 3>going to go under that. The Saints are a good roster,

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 3>but their defense is a little suspect. Okay, Sean Payton's

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 3>always been an elite play caller. We know that that

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 3>offense is going to show up losing Mark Ingram probably

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 3>not going to lose anything in that offense, replacing him

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 3>with Latavious Murray, losing their starting center, that's not ideal

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 3>on the offensive line. That's going to downgrade that a

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 3>little bit. But it's not so much about the offense.

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 3>This is more about the inconsistency on defense and particularly

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 3>in their secondary outside of Actually, I should say Marcus

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Latimore took a step back last year and then they

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 3>traded for Eli Apple, who he's just a mediocre guy.

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 3>I just feel like that defense, I know they've added

0:15:57.400 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 3>a few pieces to it, is a little too inconsistent

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 3>for them to for you to say, oh, I'm guarantee,

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna say they're gonna win eleven games. They're gonna

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 3>go eleven and five. Atlanta is a really good football team.

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Tampa Bay is now coached by Bruce Arians. I would

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 3>I would assume that Arians Indivision is gonna win one

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 3>of those games against them. Breeze when he plays outdoors again,

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 3>maybe that game is at Tampa Bay. When he plays outdoors,

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 3>he's not as good. Carolina is always competitive under Ron Rivera,

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 3>So to win eleven games. I don't see how anybody

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 3>could take the over on New Orleans. I would have

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 3>set that line of ten and made someone pick. You know,

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 3>are you gonna say, are you willing to lay that

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 3>rake in order to bet New Orleans? But the ten

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 3>and a half is just too high?

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree with you, And you know this is

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a little overly simplistic, but you know, eventually,

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I just it's really hard to bet on eleven games

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>when Breeze is what forty years old at this point.

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I love the guy, but you know, it's

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>father time is undefeated unless you know your name is

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady essentially, so at some point the ride is

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna end. And that is just such a huge number.

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>And I know, you know that they can they can

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>put up a thirteen and three season really any year.

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, you know, the Panthers I like a lot.

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I may talk about them if we get there, you know.

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>And again, yeah, Bruce arians certainly making the Bucks better.

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 1>So I'm definitely a little worried about the Saints right now.

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I would also go under with that. I don't think

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>it's one of my best bets necessarily, but it is

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>something where when I choose it, when I put it

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>on the site, I am going to be going under

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>ten and a half for me. My second is the

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Giants under five and a half wins. Now, that is

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a really, really low total, but I cannot see any

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>scenario where this team even remotely succeeds. The best thing

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I can say about them in terms of basically having

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that bet lose is that they get to face the

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Redskins twice. That's really it. And they obviously don't have

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Beckham anymore. Golden Tate is suspended, Sterling Shepard is dealing

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>with his broken thumb. Corey Coleman's out for the season.

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I love Saquon Barkley, I love Evan Ingram,

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, come on, on the defense, I mean,

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>maybe Lorenzo Carter is gonna emerge, you know, maybe Marcus

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Golden's gonna get back to it, but it's certainly not

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:05.239
<v Speaker 1>overly impressive. The offensive line has absolutely no depth. I mean,

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Nate Solder and Mike Grammars are probably they're already battling injury.

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if they're going to play in

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the preseason. If they have an injury there, they're really

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>going to struggle. And the only thing that makes me

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 1>even remotely think about this bet for me is that

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 1>their schedule, they certainly have winnable games. They've got the

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>two against the Redskins, as I said, they're home against Buffalo,

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>They're home against the Cardinals, They're at the Jets, which

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously is not an actual away game. They're home against Miami.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>So there are some winnable games out there. But for me,

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>betting against David Getleman is a pretty good bet, and

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>I feel just. I mean, six wins, it's not a

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>big number, but for me, even them getting there, it

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>feels like almost everything needs to break right.

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 3>I would tend to agree with you. I don't see

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 3>a strong point in this team at all outside of

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Saquon Barkley. Like that defense is decimated. Their cornerback depth

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 3>chart is a joke. They have two new safeties. Safeties

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 3>are kind of like an offensive line to me, where

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 3>it's like the continuity the communication between those guys. To

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 3>have continuity there, it means a lot. And you know,

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 3>when you have two new safeties, or even if you

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 3>replaced one, it's they're playing as a new group and

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 3>there can be miscommunications over the top, And uh, yeah,

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 3>I am with you on this one. I actually had

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:13.239
<v Speaker 3>the Giants there, they weren't there. They would have been

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 3>my like number four pick the NFC teams. But I'm

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 3>definitely with you on that one.

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just, you know, literally as good as

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Saquon is, how you know, how is he ever not

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 1>going to see a completely stacked box? How is he

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:28.199
<v Speaker 1>ever not going to have a spy on him? No

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>matter what happens, they have no weapons out there other

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 1>than Ingram. It's really just something where it's really hard

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to see a scenario where they get to even six wins.

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>And again that's a low total, a really really low total.

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>It's five and a half. I mean, six wins is

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:44.719
<v Speaker 1>nothing you can kind of fall into it. But you know,

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:48.199
<v Speaker 1>this team is almost kind of historically bad in the

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.239
<v Speaker 1>way that I look at it. So that's certainly one

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of my strong ones. How about you, what's number three

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>for you?

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Number three is Philadelphia? And again this is it's

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 3>really tough to say that a seams gonna win double

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 3>digit games, but Philadelphia the line at nine and a half.

0:19:59.880 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 3>I like it because nine and seven is what they

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 3>went last year. They legitimately were down like four of

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:06.959
<v Speaker 3>their five top cornerbacks at one point in the season.

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 3>They lost Carson Wentz, you know, they had some injuries

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 3>to the wide receivers. There were so many things that

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 3>anything that could have went wrong essentially for the Eagles

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 3>last year, did go wrong, and they still went nine

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 3>to seven. Doug Peterson has proven that he's a phenomenal coach.

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 3>He has this team well prepared. Next man up on

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 3>the depth chart, Okay, you're gonna step in, You're gonna

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 3>do this, and they do it. But they've upgraded their roster.

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 3>They're actually they're going to walk in healthy. They have

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Miles Sanders now, who's a true three down back. They

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.719
<v Speaker 3>don't have to necessarily rotate and be predictive with their

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 3>running backs. Carson Wentz seems to be like fully healthy.

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 3>Adding to Shawn Jackson is massive for that offense. He

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 3>may not be the best fantasy player this year, but

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 3>in terms from a real football standpoint, DeShawn Jackson changes

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 3>the way that you approach an offense. And if he's

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 3>able to stretch the field and pull a safety his way,

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 3>that means Alshon Jeffery is going to be in man coverage,

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Nelson Agler is back in the slot where he belongs.

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, they tried pushing him outside when they traded

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 3>for Golden Tate last year. The Eagles just tried to doing

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 3>everything that they possibly could last year, and they just

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 3>they came up short, and they made it a lot

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 3>further than a lot of other teams would have. But

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:07.159
<v Speaker 3>knowing that Dallas is probably gonna be without Ezekiel Elliott,

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 3>it seems right now, knowing that, you know, the Giants,

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 3>as we just talked about, not a good football team,

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 3>the Washington Redskins are a terrible football team as well.

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 3>It seems like they're gonna be starting Colt McCoy. We've

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 3>seen this story before. So I think the Eagles I

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 3>would take the over. And I was surprised to see

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 3>that seventy one percent of experts agree with me on

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 3>that one.

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 2>You were surprised to see that.

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:29.199
<v Speaker 3>I was just because it's it is really tough to

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 3>predict ten wins for a team.

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I know, but tex they basically got four in the bank, right,

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know you can't say that about most.

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>Seems like you said, with Washington and with the Giants, right,

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can you really realistically, can you see any

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>scenario absent catastrophic injury, where they league where they lose

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>any of those games those four games?

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 3>I would like to say, No. I mean, I'm sure

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 3>there's probably one, because there's always that one that you're

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 3>just like, how'd that get away? But division like.

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>When the Bills, but when the Bills beat the Vikings.

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 3>Or like when the Dolphins beat the Patriots or the

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 3>Dolphins beat the Bears. Yeah, that was fun.

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Now, I guess that that's it's fair. But no, I

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 1>mean when I that's certainly a great one. That was

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 1>one of mine. For sure, I would not at all

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:08.679
<v Speaker 1>be surprised at the seventy one percent mark because I

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>feel pretty strongly about that. Again, it's just you know, yes,

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of course there's a possibility. But for the most part,

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>there are a handful of teams that you're gonna be

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>able to really pick on this year, and you know,

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles are in a division with two of them,

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know the fact that they get four games

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 1>against them really makes a difference for me. You know, again,

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>this is one where I think most people are gonna

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>look at the number and they're gonna think the number

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is pretty on and that's the Packers over nine. Again,

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>this is not a half, this is nine. So again

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 1>part of my thinking here is if you hit the

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>number when it's not a half and you push, you're fine.

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>You haven't lost any money or anything like that. So

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>this is one of the ways that I like it,

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and I do expect them to go over Now I'm

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 1>not I'm not going overboard with this one.

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 2>I do have actual.

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 1>Personal money in it. When I went to Vegas, this

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>was one of the ones that I placed. The schedule

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>is certainly rough. I mean, you know, we've talked about

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 1>the North. They get the Bears and the Vikings. They

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>play the Eagles, they play the Cowboy, they played the Chiefs,

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>they played the Chargers. It's not, by any means an

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 1>easy schedule. But you know, the loss of Mike McCarthy

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is basically worth like three wins at this point. I

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>don't even know how Matt Lafleur is going to be

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 1>as a coach, but I don't really care. More so

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>even than the offense, although the offense is something, is

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that the defense. I mean, they were allowing twenty five

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>points per game last year and they just added a

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>heck of a lot to that defense. I've got Zadarius

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Smith and Preston Smith, Adriana Mike Daniels. For whatever reason, right,

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 1>that was a little weird. I don't know, Tags, actually,

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 1>I've been meaning to talk to about it. Do you

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>have insight into why they did that?

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't. I think it was idiotic and now he

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 3>signs with your division rival like, way to go, dummies.

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, didn't make any sense to me. None.

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, it didn't to me either. But it doesn't

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 1>change the fact that I still think, you know, and

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 1>their draft with Rashaun Gary, and I really think that

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in the end, their defense is going to be so

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 1>much better than last year. And more than that, I

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>know Rogers is getting up there. I just have this feeling, Tags,

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:57.439
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna come out and he's gonna go

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 1>nuts because I think that he is so motivated to

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>basically show that McCarthy was really the cause of the

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>is Now he was injured, of course, and he gets

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>injured fairly regularly, but I think that this is going

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>to be a ginormous year for Aaron Rodgers. Again, the

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>schedule is tough, I completely agree, but I think with

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that defense sort of, you know, getting so much better

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>from last year, and with Rogers being motivated and with

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones for the entire season, I really think that

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a big year for them.

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 2>And again, the way I look.

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>At this sort of thing is I don't mind placing

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a bet where I feel pretty confident we're gonna win.

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>But I feel really confident that it's not gonna lose,

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, because I think the number nine is going

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to be hit. I don't see them as a five

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 1>hundred team. I think they're going to be above despite

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the division. Of course they can beat up on the Lions.

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Is essentially for the reasons that you said. But for me,

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think nine is a good number. I

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>know why it's set there, but I'm I feel pretty

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>comfortable that they're going to get to ten wins.

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 3>I wish I could refer you in this situation, but

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 3>I cannot. But I don't know if I could. The

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 3>nine line, I don't like if it was eight and

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 3>a half and you want to say nine to seven, Okay,

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 3>I can't see ten wins in this division from them.

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, yes, they have some talent on the defense now,

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 3>but there's there's still a lot of young guys that

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 3>are still somewhat unproven. You could say that you liked

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 3>him as a prospect or you like them their potential,

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.479
<v Speaker 3>but they may not all come together. The safeties are

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 3>also a big question mark. Again, they drafted. They drafted

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 3>some players in the defense, which should help, but again

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 3>in that tough division. Don't I don't know why Matt

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Leafleour got a head coaching job. I mean, I'm gonna

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 3>be real honest about that. Like, I'm not saying that

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 3>he won't turn out to be a good coach. He could.

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 3>He could, but I just don't understand how he got

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 3>that job. Like, did anybody watch the Titans offense last year?

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't good. And I know that people want to

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 3>blame Marcus Mariota, and that's fine. I remember when people

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 3>were blaming Jared Goff for being bad under Jeff Fisher

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 3>and then like Sean McVay came in. That's where people

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 3>are going wrong with Matt Lafleur is that they're believing

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 3>that he had something to do with the Rams. Now

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 3>he was under Sean McVay, he hit the title of

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 3>offensive coordinator, but he was not calling the place. Sean

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 3>McVay is always called the plays there, and then Lafloor

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 3>he just got too cute, like trying to do things

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 3>like mixing and matching Dion Lewis and Derrick Henry. And

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 3>I thought he may have learned his lesson at the

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 3>end of the season by you know, like when you

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 3>watch Derrick Henry, I know they had good game scripts

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 3>in them, but he kept Derrick Henry on the field

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 3>and good things happened because of it. And now that

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 3>he went to Green Bay, I'm like, Okay, he had

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 3>to have learned right. And anybody that's watched football knows

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 3>that Aaron Jones is the best running back on that

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 3>roster and it's not even all that close. And Mike

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 3>McCarthy was all about, oh he's got a past block

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 3>and this, and it's a bunch of garbage. Mike McCarthy

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 3>was a terrible coach.

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I really, I want to ask you text legitimately

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.360
<v Speaker 1>last year, how many coaches were worse than Mike McCarthy.

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 3>No, No, it's not even just last year. Like I so,

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:40.199
<v Speaker 3>I came out with an article before last season, so

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't like it wasn't like, oh, you just said

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 3>that because they suck no No. Before last season, I

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 3>came out with an article and I had McCarthy as

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 3>a bottom I think it was bottom six head coach

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 3>in the league. And everybody's like, how are you going

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 3>to say that they've been to the playoffs? Blah blah.

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, it's it's really easy to say that when

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 3>you have Aaron Rodgers and Brett Farv like throughout your career,

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 3>like you've you've literally been handed a gift on a

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 3>silver platter and you've done nothing with it, Like Rogers

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 3>has won Super Bowl. That's pathetic.

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And you know they were obviously talking about him

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>possibly coming to the Jets, and so when we hired Gates,

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I was like doing cartwheels because legitimately I'm not a

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 1>gays fan, of course, but anybody was better for me

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>than Mike McCarthy, And I think that's sort of my point.

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't really care that much about matt leafore, because

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I think legitimately, addition by subtraction, getting rid of Mike McCarthy,

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 1>even if you turn the offense over entirely to Rogers

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and let him do what he wants. I just think,

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.679
<v Speaker 1>especially with the increased defense, you know, with how good

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be there, I really just expect this. They're

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:37.199
<v Speaker 1>gonna I think they're gonna, you know, surpass expectations. I remember,

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:39.479
<v Speaker 1>they do have a lot of tough games on their schedule,

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>but you know, they also play the East, they get

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, they get the Redskins, are they get the Raiders?

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a ton of really winnable games out there.

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know, look, I mean neither one of us.

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>My guess is you're probably gonna come with me. I

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>believe the Bears are set at eight at the over

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:54.640
<v Speaker 1>under eight?

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:54.880
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 2>And what they win twelve last year? Or are they

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 2>nine there?

0:27:58.440 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh last year?

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 2>No? No, no they're not.

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they're at nine this year.

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, And what do you think about that? That sounds

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to me about right.

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 3>It's about right. Yeah, That's what I'm saying. Like them,

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:08.640
<v Speaker 3>and I could see Minnesota being right there at nine

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 3>ten ten wins, Like if the Bears or the Vikings

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:13.199
<v Speaker 3>won nine or ten games, I would like that's that

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 3>seems about right. I just don't think that they can

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 3>all win nine or ten games. I think there's gonna

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.120
<v Speaker 3>be one or two teams that disappoint. And if there's

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 3>one coach that I know that I don't like very much,

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 3>it's it's Matt Lafleur so far from what I've seen,

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 3>because I just don't know if he's competent enough. And

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 3>granted he has what I consider to be the most

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 3>talented quarterback of all time during the football And that's

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 3>the part of me that's like it really sucks because,

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 3>like Aaron, I've had Rogers and far of in my

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 3>in the division with the Bears for such a long time,

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 3>and I appreciate the hell out of both those guys.

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Like Brett Favre is a warrior, he was more of

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 3>a gunslinger, But Aaron Rodgers the most talented quarterback I've

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 3>ever seen play the game. And I would love nothing

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 3>more than Rogers to like show the world like I

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 3>am an elite quarterback, Like what do you like? People

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 3>are like so downplaying Aaron Rodgers this year, Like even

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 3>in fantasy football, he's falling to like the fourth or

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 3>fifth quarterback off the board this year, and I'm like,

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 3>did you guys forget who this guy is? Like just

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 3>because of one bad year? And and by the way,

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 3>we're calling it a bad year. He had twenty five

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 3>touchdowns and two interceptions.

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Also, he was playing on one leg the whole year.

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, that's everybody's kind of forgetting that,

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and that is also sort of the point.

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 2>And I agree with you. I mean, Rogers.

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talk about best quarterback you know, of

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>all time all the time, and there's the whole Brady thing,

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, but Rogers is certainly, if not the best,

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>but the most talented maybe quarterback of all time, and

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 1>he can do things with the football that really nobody

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>else in the game can do. To me, man, Look again,

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>part of it is anecdotal, and it really is. I

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>mean again, but I just feel like this is going

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to be the year. This is going to be a

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>big year for them. And I agree, I'm not a

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Matt Lafleur fan, but I don't really care. I just

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>think that things are going to be so much better

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>for them. And again, I think Mike McCarthy has been

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a terrible coach for a long time, as you said.

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>And they were still, of course a very successful football team.

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they didn't win they only won one Super Bowl,

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>but they were a good team year after year, and

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Rodgers has enough to do that. Now I'll

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>back with a good defense. I really think that they're

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>going to get over the nine. And again I really

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to me, I could be wrong here, but I really

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>just I don't see them being a five hundred football team.

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I see them at least getting to nine wins, which

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>again to me, means fine, I'm safe. It's a push.

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>No matter what happens after that, I think we're gonna

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>be out.

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 3>So when you have an A league quarterback like him,

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 3>a nine wins as well within reach for sure. It's

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 3>just getting to that ten that's a problem.

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that that is a fair point, especially because

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>again I'm also bullish on the Vikings and I'm not

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 1>bearish on the Bears. Hey that worth, but you know,

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm not probably you know, I think the numbers

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 1>probably right. I might go under for the eight wins,

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 1>but we'll see, all right. So are there any other

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>over unders that stuck out to you as something that

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you think would be enticing or were those really the

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>three that caught your eyes?

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Those were the ones that were really big, Like, like

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 3>I said, the Giants, I would have taken the under

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 3>on the Giants. I also got down to the forty

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 3>nine ers at seven and a half wins, and I

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 3>was like, I think I'd go the under on that.

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:57.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Cole, they had a bad day. They had

0:30:57.720 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 2>a bad day today. Tags.

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you you know McKinnon, I saw that,

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, sounds like he may need to go on

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the IR because they can't place him back on the

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 1>pup list. He's dealing with some problems. I think was

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Jason Barrett.

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Verrett, He's they're saying it's an angle sprain, but I

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 3>think they did sign someone in order to like at

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 3>least have a body, and that's that's terrible because they.

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Have zero depth a corner right exactly.

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 3>That's why I was wondering. It's like, you guys just

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 3>have to a punter. What was it in the fourth

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 3>round And I was like, wait, you guys could have

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 3>taken some cornerback depth, Like what are you doing?

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 3>I felt like that's a roster that. I mean, their

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 3>front seven got a lot better this offseason, so that's

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 3>always a positive, but the back end is not good.

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Jimmy Garoppolo we still never seen him play over well

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 3>over an entire season. Kyle Shanahan, while he was a

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 3>great offensive coordinator, I think there's certain people in his life,

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 3>like in this world, that are just destined to be

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 3>coordinators rather than head coaches. And I'm not saying that

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Kyle Shanahan is one of those because he's had a

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 3>lot of injuries to his key players. But it's very possible.

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 3>Like think about it, Hugh Jackson was considered a really

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 3>good offensive coordinator, and he was like one of the

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 3>worst head coaches of all time. I just think certain

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 3>guys would just handle the jobs so much better when

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 3>they could focus just on their offense. I hope Kyle

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Shanan's not one of those guys, because I wanted to

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 3>see him succeed in that role. But seven and a

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 3>half wins, I mean, when you have the Rams, the Seahawks,

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the Cardinals are whatever. They could be a

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 3>surprise team this year if that offense takes.

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Actually held on held on before that's exactly right. I

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 1>do want to ask you a little bit before you

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>know we start wrapping up here. I do want to

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>ask you about some of the other teams. The Cardinals

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 1>are at five games. What do you think about the

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>over under und.

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 3>I actually debated saying the over on the show. And

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 3>then I was looking at their schedule and I was

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 3>going through like pickout games, and there was only like

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:35.720
<v Speaker 3>four that I could say like, I for sure saw

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 3>them winning. But the thing is is they they can surprise,

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Like absolutely, I feel like that's a team where they

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 3>can catch teams by surprise. You know, they're playing Detroit

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 3>week one, and Detroit they can beat Detroit, all right.

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 3>They played Baltimore in Week two. That's another that's a

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 3>run heavy team. The Baltimore defense lost a lot of

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 3>pieces this year. I think they can potentially surprise Baltimore,

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 3>not saying they will win that game. Carolina, again, that's

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 3>a team that's re building. Get like they've gotten a

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 3>lot younger. They should. That should be a pretty good

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 3>game between those two teams. They have Cincinnati and that,

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 3>so it's like if they get off to a little

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 3>hot start, it's like they could build some momentum. I

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 3>could see six and ten for them one hundred percent.

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 3>But it's just do I want to put money on it?

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Because I don't. I So when Kyler Murray was drafted

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 3>the number one overall, I didn't think that he in

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 3>most draft classes, he would not have been number one overall.

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 3>I think this is a week class. I'm not a

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 3>huge Kyler Murray guy. I might be wrong on that,

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 3>but what I saw in college was a guy that

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 3>didn't anticipate his throws very much. He basically had he

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 3>bought time with his legs. He did have a good

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 3>offensive line there, he had a receiver that can shake

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:38.480
<v Speaker 3>loose if any defender and Marquis Brown if he bought

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 3>some time and he just waited till players were open

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 3>too much. There was no anticipation like in a route.

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 3>And I don't know how that's gonna work. I know

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Kingsbury people are excited about it, and it might work,

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, the air raid offense, the four or five

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 3>wide receiver sets, whatever you want to do. But that's

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 3>where it's like the whole Chip Kelly business where it's like,

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, nobody really knows what they're doing and they

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 3>are gonna They're not showing anything the preseason from what

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 3>we understand, so.

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Right, but you know, Kelly was successful when he first

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>came in, I mean catch up, right, and but it

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:09.919
<v Speaker 1>took it took a year, It took a couple of years.

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 1>That's that's kind of how why I You know, the

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>way you have described your feeling on the Cardinals is

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly how I feel, because I really wanted to take

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the number over five. I mean that is such a

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>lot number. Yeah, you've already named a couple of normal games.

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>They also they played the Giants. I mean, they can

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>beat the Bucks. You know, you we really don't necessarily

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 1>know what that's gonna be, and they really can kind

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 1>of surprise you. But it is again another one where

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I just said, I just can't do it because I

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 1>just I don't feel confident enough in what's going to

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:38.359
<v Speaker 1>go on. And again the rest of the division, as

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you said, the forty nine ers, I kind of feel

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:41.879
<v Speaker 1>the same way as you do. But what I mean, look,

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the the Seahawks are at eight and a half. Would

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you go over under them?

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 3>I'd probably say over. I mean, like they've lost so

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:51.959
<v Speaker 3>much on defense. But Pete Carroll just always gets it done.

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Wilson's never had a losing record, right, right,

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>He's always had nine wins or more.

0:34:57.640 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 2>And again, we kind of expected the same thing last year.

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 2>We expected that major decline.

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Boom's gone and they still they still won nine games.

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I know, now they've got no Doug Baldwin, you know,

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and and NOWHEREL Thomas and everything like that, but you know,

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 1>they just do it every year. So it's really tough

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to see them, especially in their home park. And I

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:16.280
<v Speaker 1>do want to say one because I can almost guarantee

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to disagree on this one. But what

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 1>would you do with the Rams at ten and a

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>half again?

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 3>I have to go under on that one.

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 2>I I'd go over. I'd go over.

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, it's I don't feel super super strongly about them.

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily expect them to win thirteen games again.

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>And you know, in the end it comes down a

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit too. That's a giant number, Okay. I mean

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>as much as you're like, well they won thirteen eleven

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>wins is a giant number, It'll just basically be like,

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 1>this is what's going to happen one hundred percent agree,

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>especially again in you know, with having to face Seattle,

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be good. And you've got the question

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>mark around Gurley's knee. But I mean even last year,

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:54.439
<v Speaker 1>man CJ. Anderson like just you know, just came off

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>the street kind of and just rumbled for one hundred

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and sixty seven yards against the Cards and one hundred

0:35:58.080 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and thirty two against the forty nine ers, and we

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:02.399
<v Speaker 1>cut back and you know, they they I know they've

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 1>lost some Dominican Sue and la Marcus Joiner, but they

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 1>added Clay Matthews and Eric Weddle. To me, I just

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I kind of feel like they're gonna have another big season.

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:13.399
<v Speaker 1>You get another year from GoF, You've still got Wade

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Phillips on the defense, still got Aaron Donald. I kind

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of just feel like they're gonna go over. But again,

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>this is one all of these on the NFC West,

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 1>they're all where I feel like I have an opinion,

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>but I can't really do it, you know what I mean,

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 1>I can't pull the trigger on being like this is

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 1>one that I feel confident in.

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would. It's tough for me to say any

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:36.240
<v Speaker 3>team wins eleven games, like I understand it's definitely possible

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 3>losing Domakan Sue up front. I think that defense is

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 3>the weak point. I think that, and it's also it

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 3>could be like we're in it for the long run

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:45.400
<v Speaker 3>type thing where it's like they've talked about resting Gurley

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:48.280
<v Speaker 3>and if they do that and you know Darryl Henderson

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:50.000
<v Speaker 3>isn't the player that they thought he was going to be,

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:53.400
<v Speaker 3>or you know, they lose a step without Todd Gurley

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 3>that offensive line. They lost two starting offensive linemen this offseason.

0:36:57.640 --> 0:36:59.840
<v Speaker 3>That's a problem. Like there's things that are changing with

0:36:59.880 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 3>that team. And it's just to me, it's like ten

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:06.839
<v Speaker 3>and six is cool, but like eleven and five, you're like, man,

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 3>it's You're like, Seattle's gonna beat you one of those games.

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, you just know that's gonna happen. It's like,

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 3>does Arizona eke out a win against them? And I

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 3>know that LA actually has a really easy schedule at

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:18.760
<v Speaker 3>the start the year, and then like it gets tougher

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 3>at the end. So I don't know, man, it's just

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 3>so tough to project somebody for That's why I went

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 3>New Orleans under ten and a half because I just can't.

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 3>I can't project them for eleven.

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 2>No, I agree with that.

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, how about we do this send Neither one of

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:33.439
<v Speaker 1>us is willing, of course, to put any actual money

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 1>on this, So how about we make a little friendly

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>wager then on over under ten and a half for

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the rams. I'll take the over, you take the under,

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and the loser can get something for the winner from

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Pristine Auction.

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Sounds like a deal.

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, good That actually leads me, which is good to

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>our August contest, because I mean, look, if you've listened

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:53.439
<v Speaker 1>to Tags on the Fantasy Pros podcast, you've heard about

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Pristine Auction before.

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 2>They're great.

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>They auction off a ton of sports memorabilia, and if

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you are not familiar with them, you can probably go

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to Tags's house or my house and you would see

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a ton of stuff because we love it there and

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 1>at We're gonna do a little contest here involving Christine

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Auction for August, and we are going to give away

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:14.319
<v Speaker 1>a full sized autographed Christian McCaffrey helmet. So all you

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>need to do to be entered into the contest is

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to leave a review for the show on either iTunes

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:22.840
<v Speaker 1>or Stitcher and send a screenshot of that review to

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:25.919
<v Speaker 1>contest at Bettingpros dot com. At the end of August,

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna randomly choose a winner. And guys, understand this.

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 1>This is literally the inaugural episode, which means absolutely nothing

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to Tags, but is like the highlight of my life.

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 1>You don't start a podcast with a ton of reviews

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:39.359
<v Speaker 1>that are already sitting there. I mean, if you guys

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 1>go to leave a review, you might be one of

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the first ten people to leave a review. So it's

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>not as if there are hundreds of people right now

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:47.760
<v Speaker 1>who are going to be entering this contest. Go ahead,

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:50.319
<v Speaker 1>leave a review and screenshot it and send it to

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a contest at bettingpros dot com at the end of August.

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:56.880
<v Speaker 1>We are going to pick a winner. And if you

0:38:57.000 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>are the winner, please make sure to at me on

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Twitter with a picture the helmet because I kind of

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:02.240
<v Speaker 1>want to see it myself.

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm getting a free Christian McCaffrey helmet and like

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 3>having like maybe like a one to twenty five chance

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 3>for like.

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:09.319
<v Speaker 2>Come on that, That's what I'm saying.

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And I said this, you know, I you know, I

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>host you know, the Leading Off podcast for baseball, And

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that was sort of something that I wanted to stress

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 1>because when you're a new podcast, you're not sitting there

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 1>with a ton of reviews because you have just started.

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 1>You can go ahead, leave her you and send it

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 1>in and right it might be twenty five people it

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 1>might be fifty people. It takes two seconds and you

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 1>can win an autographed Christian McCaffrey helmet. I mean, that's awesome.

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm out here, you know, obviously bidding to try to

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, pay for signed memorabilia, and if you can

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>win it for free, there's really no reason not to

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 1>so tags. I mean, I'm a little miffed because this

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 1>was obviously not as important to you as it was

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:46.959
<v Speaker 1>to me. But I really I can't thank you enough

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.360
<v Speaker 1>for joining me today. You know basically about as much

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>about football as pretty much any personal live except Chad Pennington,

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 1>who not only knows football but also great hair. As

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I said, but I really love getting your take. I

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 1>really hope that we can talk more this season, and again,

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:06.839
<v Speaker 1>thanks for coming on and for probably being wrong on

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the RAMS bet and giving me something great from Christine Auction.

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 3>It was my pleasure and I look forward to you

0:40:12.800 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 3>paying your end of the bet at the end of

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:14.440
<v Speaker 3>the year.

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Never gonna happen, buddy. Well, before diving back into some

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 1>other bets that we like for this season, for our

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>next episode, as I mentioned, we're going to be talking

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to Dustin Galker about the sports betting landscape, generally where

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we are, where we're headed, things like that. It's going

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to be a great show, so make sure you subscribe

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast so you don't miss an episode.

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:58.439
<v Speaker 4>I'll talk to you then.

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>The fat and had cost them