WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: Who Wants To Live Forever?

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tex Stuff, a production from my Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and how the Tech Area. It's time for a tech

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:25.959
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Classic episode. This episode originally published back on July

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fifteen. It is titled Who Wants to Live Forever?

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>It's really about digital immortality, and the great Josh Clark

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of Stuff you Should Know joins the show on this episode.

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Hope you enjoy. I have a feeling the title of

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>this episode will be who Wants to Live Forever? Because

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big fan of Queen. Yeah, who wants to

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Live Forever? That came from the soundtrack to the hit

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>film Highlander. Oh cult classic? Did Queen do the whole

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>sound check? They did Highlander? And Flash Gordon? They did.

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I did not know Highlander and I saw Highlander the

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>other day and I was like, does not hold up? No,

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the movie is one of those that I wish we

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>could just wipe from history and redo because the concept

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 1>is amazing. Yeah, but that's not what we're gonna talk about.

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Although there are immortals in Highlander, Yeah, yeah, there are, Yeah,

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's the that's the connection, right, I guess so,

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>or Queen your love of Queen in Queen doing the

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Highlanders sound chracktality. Yeah, it's ultimately it all goes back

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 1>to uh tesla. No, we're gonna be talking about digital immortality,

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>this concept of using technology to extend our lifespans indefinitely. Yeah,

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to immortality, Yeah, to the point where essentially until the

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>sun burns out right and the great heat death of

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Yeah, I mean yeah, because you could in theory,

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>if you were had digital immortality, there's nothing stopping you

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>from hopping on a spaceship and high tailing it somewhere else,

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, or being transmitted it near the speed of light. Yep. Yeah,

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>you could be beamed from one point to another and

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>sure if you I wonder what that experience would be like. Well,

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe that it's that's the future of space travel. Physical

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>space travel is as digital beings rather than maybe that's

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the while we keep banging up against is the physical limitations,

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and then that will finally unbridle us and allow us

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to really do like interstellar travel, intergalactic travel, though presumably

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you would have to have something you're beaming into Well

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you're just purely digital, then you have to have something

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to house that information. I mean, I guess you could

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>just be literally just information beaming around, but I don't

0:02:45.240 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>know how. I wonder what that experience would be, like

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I wondered to be like going to sleep. Think about

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a laser. The laser doesn't have any sort of infrastructure,

0:02:54.880 --> 0:03:00.519
<v Speaker 1>just beaming and you're transmitting light information in one place

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to another at the speed of light. Right. Well, what

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>if we figured out a way to digitize ourselves, as

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about um, and we were able to beam

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>ourselves in much the same way that a laser beams light. Right,

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>But the question is then, because if we are digitizing ourselves,

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>we're usually talking about that with the the understanding that

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 1>that digital information rests on top of some physical architecture. Right,

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>just as software needs hardware to run off of, Right,

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you need like fiber optics. Now, yeah, I'm saying, what

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>if you remove that, we figure out a way to

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>remove it, then there's no Leyeah. If you can get

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to a point where we become pure information and there

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>is no need for physical infrastructure beneath that, then we're golden.

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>There's no limit. Then I guess we would need some

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of receptacle to beam into even on the end,

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>even if we don't have something connecting the two points.

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>That's what I was kind of if you're just gonna

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>send someone ahead, like, all right, Bill, it's your job

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to set up all these these EPU talent. Bill, do

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>not let us down. Make sure they're all plugged in,

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and please use one of those uninterrupted power supplies because

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>if if there's a blackout, we don't want you know,

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>we lost Lucy, and then make it over. Please don't

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>smoke while you're setting them up, Bill, because we could

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.239
<v Speaker 1>smell it last time. It's dunk up the whole place

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>right right. So to get down to what we're actually

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about, you probably picked up on this. The idea

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of digital immortality largely revolves around this concept of somehow

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>transferring human consciousness and experience into a digital format. Usually

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the way we describe it as uploading your brain into

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a computer. That's kind of the easiest way to explain it,

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and there are a lot of really smart people who

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>have been talking about this possibility beyond saying it's hypothetical,

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>saying it will be possible or it will happen. A

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of people strut around like they're just cock of

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the walk, saying it's going to happen, and some sometimes

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>they even put like DAYTI on things like this, Oh

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>yeh know the guy we got to talk about to

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>be at least Ray Kurts Watch Kurtzwile Uh famous for

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>his futurism predictions, including the idea that we will reach

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 1>what is called the singularity. There's the point at which

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>technology is evolving so quickly that there is no meaningful

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>way to describe the present because it's changing that fast

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and in the way I always think about singularities. Usually

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>it's also the moment where UM one of two things

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>has just happened. Either UM in AI has awakened and

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>become conscious right and therefore we it is now the

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>master of the universe as far as we're concerned, or

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>we it's the moment we merge biology merges with technology

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:57.239
<v Speaker 1>at a point where we're able to UM remove ourselves

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 1>from the limitations of evolution and chart our own course

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>from that point on. Yeah, that's that's pretty accurate. I

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>would argue that there's also, uh, there's the possibility of

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>developing UM technology that allows us to genetically alter ourselves

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>without having to directly incorporate like computers or electronics into

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>our systems. That also can be It's transhumanism, is what

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about here. We're like right there. Yeah, we're

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>on a kind of happening, like very crudely, but it's

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>we're like right there. As far as that last definition, yeah, yeah,

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>we're there. Well, even with the incorporation of technology, we're

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>getting there. You look at things like cochlear implants, and

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>while this is this technology is specifically meant to give

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>people who have either lost or never developed a particular

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>uh sense or maybe some other form of neurological process,

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>uh you know right now, it's meant to address that.

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>In the future, it could be meant to augment, not

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>just to to repair down image or to address a

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>loss of something. Right, Like, the defining characteristic of trans

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>humanism is that, um, you don't want a blade prosthetic

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>leg because the one you were born with was removed.

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>You want to blade prosthetic leg because you want to

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to run faster. Right, It's not to it's

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>not to make up for a loss, it's to further.

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>It's to go to the next step exactly. So, uh, this,

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>this singularity idea is very closely related to digital immortality,

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and largely because of Ray Kurtzwild, because, as it turns out,

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair to say Ray Kurtzwild has an

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>issue with the concept of mortality. Yeah. I was wondering, like,

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that much about Kurtzwild. I mean, I'm

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>slightly familiar, but you clearly know a lot more about

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>him than I do. And I was wondering if he

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>is a like a fretful fannie, Like, does he constantly

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>worry about misstepping and dying, you know, people dying really weird,

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>random mundane ways every day. Yeah, and I wonder if

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>he just lives in literal mortal fear of that. Well,

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>he he is certainly taking great precautions to extend his

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>life because he does believe firmly that we will reach

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>this point in which technology will allow us to extend

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>our lifespans indefinitely within his lifetime if he takes care

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of himself. So he he is determined, he doesn't. I mean,

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you would kind of feel like a like a dufus

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>if you, you know, if you were capable of feeling

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>if you died the day before they invented digital immortality. Right,

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>it's the like the last guy to die in a war,

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>right after like right before the ceasefires. Right, Yeah, there's

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a there's a great um. Have you ever seen there's

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a British sketch comedy show called that Mitchell and Webb.

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Look you've told me about it though, Yeah, it's it's

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a two comedians, uh, David Mitchell and Robert Webb who

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>do this series, And one of the ones they they

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>have is it's just supposed to be off the cuff

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>conversation between the two, so it's not in the context

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of a sketch so basically like what we're doing, kind

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of what we're doing now, except it's obviously scripted and

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>ours is not. But in that case, they have a

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>conversation where David Mitchell is very upset with the thought

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>that his generation is going to be the last generation

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to die, and he is spiteful of the of the

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>next generation. He's mad at them for being able to

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>live forever while he has to die. Webb is like,

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you could just be happy for them. There's no same

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing I think with Kurt Swile is that

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>he's um taking great pains to take care of himself.

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>He's advocate for a healthy diet and exercise, which is fantastic.

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.359
<v Speaker 1>He takes something like a hundred and fifty dietary supplements.

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have to correct you. And this is

0:09:55.920 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>from the article that you wrote. Yeah two, or if

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the advice she is constantly taking pill you know. Yeah,

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's uh. And and there there are plenty of

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>studies that have suggested that unless you are suffering a

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>deficiency of some sort, these supplements are not actually helpful. Well, um,

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like um, vitamin A. I believe vitamin

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a UH is known to help you see better. Pretty sure,

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it's vitamin a UM. And it's been shown that if

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you're especially like night vision is a little deficient, that

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>if you eat some carrots your night vision will improve.

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>So carrots do help you, But if it's already up

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to whatever your baseline night vision level is, you can't

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>all the carrots in the world and it's not going

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to help it. As a matter of fact, you will

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:48.719
<v Speaker 1>turn rage. My wife turned a little orange because she

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>like carrots so much when she was a kid. So

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>but she couldn't see any better beyond her baseline night

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>vision level. And so I think it's the same thing

0:10:56.840 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>as what you're saying. The same thing with vitamin C. Right,

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>once you hit a certain level of vitamin C, anything

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>beyond that you're such as just going to pee away.

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:07.079
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, vitamins can become toxic. Much of anything

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:11.079
<v Speaker 1>is is toxic to the human body because it seeks homeostasis. Right,

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>So I'm wondering if kurts, Well, surely he's smart enough

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>to know, like, maybe I should cut this one out,

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>or maybe I'm taking too much of this. Well, it's

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>also possible that the reported number of supplements that he

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>takes has been you know, exaggerated, as it's been reported

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>over and over again. I am personally a little skeptical

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>that he takes that many, But at any rate, the

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>whole point is that he wants to make certain to

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>live long enough to see the day when his prediction

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>comes true, that that we will have the technological ability

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to port a person's mind into some kind of electronic construct.

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back with more of this classic episode of

0:11:53.000 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff after this quick break. I have, just while

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 1>you were speaking, pulled out my calculator and Ray Kurtzwell

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>takes a pill every five point seven six minutes a day,

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>assuming he stays up all twenty four hours in a day,

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>assuming again that that number is in fact accurate, that

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the number of supplements. Not that I completely trust your math.

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a little bit about some of the concepts

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 1>here about how this could in theory happen. Now, obviously,

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>we are not at the point where we can create

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>any kind of hardware and or software that would allow

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>us to uh to migrate and intelligence from our meaty brains, right,

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's a huge problem what you just said, We're

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>we are dealing in something called software hardware when what

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the substrate that our our brains and consciousness exists on

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>is what you would term wetware. Yeah, by all logical material. Yeah,

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and where it's not necessarily analogous to a computer. Even

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>though people tend to think of the brain is such,

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that it is the same thing. That's

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>absolutely correct. I mean, let's let's take memory for an example.

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Memory is a great way to illustrate the difference between

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a computer system and the brain. All right, So in

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 1>a computer system, you end up designating a certain space

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>on some medium like on magnetic tape or in certain

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it all depends on whatever the form is

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 1>that you're saving it too, But at any rate, it

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>all ends up being zeros and ones, and it is unaltered.

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>If you call up a file and you know you

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't done anything to it since the last time you

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.719
<v Speaker 1>looked at it's going to be exactly the same there,

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>unless there's some sort of corruption in the file or

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you have made changes to it and then saved it again.

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 1>You're not you know, it's gonna be the same experience

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>every time. Human memory totally different a memory is, and

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>we only sort of understand memory. Uh, we don't have

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a full grasp on how memory works. But based upon

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>what we do know, when you experience something, your brain

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>creates a certain neural pathway in response to the stimuli

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you are experiencing. So, for example, right here in this

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>room my brain is your hair. The heat in this room,

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the light in this room, little things, and I'm not

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>noticing everything that's hair look pretty good, isn't it again?

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Start contrast with all the rest of the experiences is

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>amazing hair. So the these these pathways are forming in

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>my brain later on, assuming that I have converted this

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>particular experience to long term memory, which is a pretty

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>big assumption. Honestly, I can't remember what a podcast that

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>about two weeks ago. Yeah, I think my hair is

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>going to make it into your long term memory. But

0:14:57.520 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the more you say it, the more likely it's gonna

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>happen when when I think back on it, my brain

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>will reconstruct that same pathway. So the memory is essentially

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>representative and the physical relationship between the various synapses that

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>light up when I have this experience. Right, So there

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>is a physical pathway that is retraced when you recall yeah, right, Yeah,

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>But it's not like your memory of how great my

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>hair looks is sitting in one little spot of your

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>brain like it would be on a computer's magnetic tape.

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>It's distributed, and it's faulty because when I remember the

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>process of remembering, sometimes that that pathway doesn't form exactly

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the way it did, and sometimes it adds new stuff exactly,

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I might fill in some gaps. Like imagine if you

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>opened a power point presentation that you've made and uh,

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>there are a few slides missing, but then there's some

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>new stuff and maybe it was a little bit better

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>than before. But you haven't done anything. I don't remember

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>this transition it all right, we'll go with it. Just

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the very active retrieving it from your computer's memory and

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>opening it again changes it. Right. That doesn't happen in

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a computer, but it doesn't in human memories, right, right, exactly.

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>That is exactly what I'm saying. And the reason why

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I say it is that that's a problem because if

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>we are ever to move from wetware in center brains

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to hardware and software in the digital realm, unless we

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>factor that in somehow, like we create an algorithm that

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>mimics the experience of remembering something, the experience is going

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to be fundamentally different. The experience of remembering will be

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>totally different. I mean, one of the reasons why I

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>very much argue against eyewitness testimony for things, especially for

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>crimes that might have happened a long time in the past,

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>is that our memories are faulty. Now, if we were

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in this other experience where we had moved to hardware

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and software and our memories were more analogous to computer memory,

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that would not be an issue. I witness that would

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>be so. But that's a that'sn't just one illustration of

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>how this is a tricky thing. It is tricky, and

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you say that, you know, comparatively speaking, it sounded like

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>your take on it was that human memory is faulty

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>compared to computer memory. I I would positive that there's

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>also another way to look at it, that um, human

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>memory is much more robust and rich than computer memory,

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>because think about it, when you say, smell something for

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.399
<v Speaker 1>the first time, and then you smell it again and again,

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that that memory of what something smells like is going

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to become more detailed. There's going to be more to it,

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it will become more refined, and it will be totally

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>different from that first sent memory that you created of

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 1>whatever it was you smelled. And so I would pose

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>it again. Sorry to use that word twice, but it

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>makes me sound pretty smart when I does um that

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 1>that additional adding new material, adding new stuff to it

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 1>when you recall things or when you experience something. The

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:07.360
<v Speaker 1>ability to make your memory more robust and more rich

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and and to be able to refine it just through recall,

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to me, is superior to just straight Here's the information

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that a computer will give you, and it should be

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you have before. And also with memories, we

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>can associate stuff that previously was not connected in our brains,

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 1>whereas with computers, the way you do that as through

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>meta data. You tag stuff. Right, You're like, okay, well

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>let's tag this piece of information with all the metadata

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 1>we can think of that that that describes what this

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>information is really about. And then if I want to

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>associate things, I have to look for similar tags like

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>but but in my brain it doesn't automatically, and it

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>does it in ways that you cannot necessarily anticipate, which

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>can lead to things like innovation, creativity. Yes, precisely, and

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 1>you also kind of hinted at something that's the big

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>problem they seeing the idea of uploading ourselves onto the

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>internet strick It is that with with memory, we can

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>figure out memory will will eventually figure out how human

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>memory works exactly. And that's what There's a philosopher called

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 1>David Chalmers. That's what he's pointed out as the easy

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>problem of consciousness. We understand, we're going to understand how

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the mind functions. Sometime down the road, we will figure

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that out. There's a hard problem is what what Chalmers

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>has also pointed out in figuring out how phenomenal experience,

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 1>our experience of reality is produced from those processes. That

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>that is the big issue that is facing us trying

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>to upload ourselves onto the Internet. It's like when you

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 1>talked about meta. The computer is not writing meta itself.

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>It might be able to simulate memory retrieval in its

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>own way, but it's not writing its own tags. It's

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>not making these connections. It takes a human consciousness to

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>do that. And not only do we not know how

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to make a computer simulate that, we don't even know

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>how we do that. We may never know. There's a

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of philosophers out there like we may never figure

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>out the hard problem of consciousness. We've got more to

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>say in this classic episode of tech stuff after these

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>quick messages. Neuroscientists would say that clearly the mind which

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:36.719
<v Speaker 1>is what we could probably you know, use as an

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>umbrella term for things like consciousness and experience, like intelligence

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and the kind of stuff that that emerges from the

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>physical construct of the brain, because you can you can

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>observe changes to the mind when someone suffers an illness

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>or injury that damages the brain. And therefore it stands

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to reason that the mind in fact, is a product

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of the brain. So if you could figure out how

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to simulate a brain to a significant level of sophistication,

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>hypothetically you could have intelligence emerge naturally from that simulation, hypothetically,

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>hypothe because we can't do it yet. The best we

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>can do right now is to simulate a few thousand neurons.

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>But there are you know, we're talking about billions of

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>neurons and synapsis in the human brain. Yeah, from what

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 1>I saw, the low but average estimate is something like

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>eight six billion normal human brain. I'm sorry, not synapthis neurons, neuron,

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it's trillions of synantha, right, So it's it's incredibly complicated,

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, there's some people who suggest that it

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>may be to truly simulate a human brain, you may

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>have to go down to the molecular level, at which

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:48.959
<v Speaker 1>point the computational requirements for simulating that brain are going

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to be so vast as to be impractical or impossible

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to achieve. Well, you mentioned the Blue Brain Project in

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 1>this article that you wrote, um, and I was just

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of skimming their website and they mentioned that in

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>their simulations it requires about a laptops worth of computing power.

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>They didn't say what kind of RAM or hard drive

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>for storage or anything it had. They just used a

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>laptops words, you can kind of let your imagination from

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>on with it, but that that was required just for

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>one individual neuron to power. Yea, so we're talking about

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>U billion laptops, which is that's you know, should be

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>great news for the exactly any hardware manufacturers out there. Um,

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:35.439
<v Speaker 1>there are actually quite a few different uh projects out

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 1>there that are attempting to simulate brains for one reason

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>or another, not necessarily so that we can pourt consciousness

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to them, but also to just study things like, uh,

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, how our brains work, how we might be

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>able to treat brain damage or illnesses that that damage

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the brain, that how how certain medications might react to

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>our brains. Building these very common plex simulation so some

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of them. M I. T has a course on the

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>emergent science of connect tomics. I've seen that lately too.

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>It sounds so full of bs, but apparently it's it's

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.399
<v Speaker 1>a real deal, and and once you look into it

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>it makes total sense. Just the terrible name. Connectomics is

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>all about the connections that happen within the brain and yeah,

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it does. Connectomics sounds like it's some sort of weird

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>economics course or like maybe an l Around Hubbard book. Yeah,

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 1>like dineticsnets part two connectomics. Yeah. So that's an example.

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>There's the US Brain project, there's an EU Brain project,

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>there's the Google project. Yes, and there's the Google Brain project.

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>They hired Ray Kurtzwile. Yeah, he's their chief engineer, director

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of engineering. Yeah, for for specifically for the Google Brain project.

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>They mean, clearly Google has just put their cars in

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the table. They're like, we're putting some serious resources behind

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 1>figuring out how to get people on to digital consciousness. Right.

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 1>It's it's one thing to think about this kind of

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, armchair computer scientists neuroscientists sort of approach, but

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>they're really putting actual money towards research and development on

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, including hiring another guy named Jeff Hinton, who

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>is a British computer scientist who who specializes in neural networks.

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 1>So they're looking at using neural networks for lots of stuff,

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 1>not just to simulate a human brain. I mean that

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>might be part of it too, but neural networks can

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>be really useful for processing different types of information. For

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:43.479
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of applications, right, true. And also I mean,

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it, just figuring out some of

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the efficiencies that the human brain is evolved to include

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>as far as networking goes, if you could just even

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>get some insight or inspiration from that, that could help tremendously. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>There's some other great things I can mention. There's um

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Ted Burger, who is a professor at the University of

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Southern California's Center for neuro Engineering, who built a prosthetic

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of the hippocampus. Now, the hippocampus is, uh, hippocampuses is large. Yeah,

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it's largely associated with the formation of memories, also with

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>incorporation of emotion. But memory is a big part of

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>what hippocampus is involved in. So I think it also

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 1>um takes in century information, determines what region it should

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>be transmitted to, if it should go into long term

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 1>memory or that kind of stuff. It's kind of like

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a big engineer in this case. And so in two

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>thousand eleven came up with a proof of concept hippocampll

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:49.719
<v Speaker 1>prosthesis and tested it in live rats. In two thousand

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:55.879
<v Speaker 1>twelve tested it in non human primates and supposedly sometime

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>this year they're going to test it in people. Man,

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that is amazing. So like, if you have some sort

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of damage to your hipocampus and you're no longer able

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 1>to form memories, than this would be the thing for you.

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Kind of yeah. I mean, this could end up being

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 1>depending upon the nature of of the the problem. I mean,

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>it could potentially be a treatment for things like Alzheimer's.

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Um Whether or not that turns out to be the case,

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:21.959
<v Speaker 1>we'll still have to wait and see, but it is

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>very promising. Have you ever heard of Henry Mollison. I

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 1>have not. He is like one of the one of

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 1>the more facing, one of the more famous patients, or

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>to save time, you could just say one of the

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>more faithents um in as far as memory studies go,

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>because he had some he had I believe epilepsy, and

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>some old timey doctor gave him some brain surgery and

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>messed up his his hippocampus and the guy was unable

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to form new memories from that point on. He could

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>remember everything up to that point under the surgery. Then

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:01.640
<v Speaker 1>after that it was almost like his brain freshed every

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I think something like thirty seconds and he was just

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>lived in an institution and was fortunately taken care of

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>by a few doctors that like really studied him, but

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>also like really kept him from the public limelight. His

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>name wasn't published in the life he died, but he

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>yielded a lot of information about how memories are formed

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks to the hippocampus. But it sounds like he would

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>have been a great candidate for that. Yeah, I'm reminded

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of and I have to trust other people's uh details

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of this, because I have no memory of it. I

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:39.159
<v Speaker 1>uh had There was a time where I had a

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>kidney stone. It was so bad that I had to

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:44.439
<v Speaker 1>go to the hospital and they treat me with a

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>very powerful pain killer that just knocked your hipocampus out

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of convintion. I couldn't remember things. I had no short

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>term memory. Well, it makes sense. Like also, when you're

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>drinking um, your hippocampal function is is messed with your

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>You are not forming new memories, and you require the

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>hippocampus do this. So if you're doing something, if you're

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>on drugs, if you have some sort of structural damage,

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>if you have been drinking, like that's why you're you're

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 1>not forming new memories. That accounts for a blackout, that

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>accounts for amnesia. Your hippocampus is just not functioning properly exactly. Uh.

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>There's another expert I want to mention, Ender's Sandberg of

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford University. I'm a

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>huge fan of that institute. Yeah, yeah, one of my

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>favorite people in the world works. There's names Nick Bostroma. Yeah,

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that guy I know of, Nick Bostrom. So Sandberg had said,

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a quote. The point of brain emulation is

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to recreate the function of the original brain. So this

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>is talking about actually creating a copy of a of

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a person's brain, not just the concept in general, but

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in the specific case of this person's brain, we're going

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to recreate it. If run, it will be able to

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>think and act as the original brain. We are now

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>able to take small brain tissue samples and map them

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>in three D. These are at exquisite resolution, but the

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>blocks are just a few microns across. We can run

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>simulations of the size of a mouse brain on supercomputers,

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>but we do not have the total connectivity yet. As

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>methods improve, I expect to see automatic conversion of scanned

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>tissue into models that can be run. The different parts exist,

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>but so far there is no pipeline from brains to emulations.

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Now he thinks that it may be very difficult to

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>ever simulate memory in a computer the way that humans do,

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 1>for the very reasons we mentioned earlier. Um He also

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>points out that there is a problem with this particular approach,

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>as the scanning essentially damages or destroys the brain tissue

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>because there's not a non invasive way. It's all over again.

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 1>You gotta pretty much crack the nogg and open and

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>mush around in the gray stuff to find out, you know,

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to really scan it and get that resolution. This this

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>scanning would either kill you or you need a freshly

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>dead person, in which case there's no longer consciousness right

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>right exactly. Problem, So you can make you can make

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a copy of a dead brain, which, as you point out,

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>not really that useful, or you could make a copy

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of a living brain, but in the process you kill

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the living brain. You are left with the copy. Now,

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>theoretically this copy would think and react in a way

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that would be exactly the way the original person thought

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and reacted. But the original person is still dead. So Josh,

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>if you had this done, there would be a Josh

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>computer Josh Bought two thousand and Josh Bought would think

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>like you, would have quips like you with even better hair,

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>with even better hair than you, and feel somewhat smug

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>about it. Meanwhile, Josh Clark, the human being would be

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>no more. And this comes to another big problem in

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the concept of digital immortality, which is continuity. Sure, so

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>continuity being the continuous experience of you as Josh Clark,

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>whether you are in your meat body or poured it

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>over to some digital format. I don't think that's that

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>big of a problem. Really think about it. Man. Every

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>day there we we have gaps in continuity. We go

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to sleep and then we wake up. But you're talking

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>about functional continuity. There's also a physical continuity, and there's

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the real problem. So functional continuity is exactly what you're

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about. It's our our experience that we are having,

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and it does have interruptions, whether it's when we go

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to sleep or we are put under for exactly all

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of that. It could end up being a break in

0:31:55.880 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 1>our functional continuity. We can recover from that because is

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the physical continuity. The stuff that's in our brains is

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>still there, so that even though we have that reset,

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>we can come back and everything will be fine. If

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the physical continuity is destroyed, as in the actual brain dies,

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>then you have a problem. Now. An interesting thing is

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that I've looked at some neuroscientists UH and their work

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and what they have to say about this, and it

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 1>was really interesting to me. There's a guy named Stephen Novella.

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:31.719
<v Speaker 1>He's a neuroscientist works at Yale. He has a great

0:32:31.800 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 1>podcast called Skeptics Guide to the Universe UM, and he

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>is a critical thinker and a skeptic UH. He has

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot about this as well. He's blogged about

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 1>it and his idea or his perspective. The way he

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>communicates it is that as humans, we have brains that

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>are divided into two hemispheres. Now, through drugs or through surgery,

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you can have one of those hemispheres separated from the other.

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>It essentially is rendered inactive. But the two hemispheres are

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>largely copies of each other. So even if this does happen,

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you can have a relatively normal experience. You might have

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>find that some things are now very hard to do,

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like math. If your corps colossom isn't exactly. Yeah, so

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>he says, but these two halves, which individually can act

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>as a single brain, work together, and we have you know,

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>even if you have the one shut down, the other

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>one can continue to work. You're still you, largely you.

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>So he says, what if we then extend this and

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>we make the assumption that yes, we have created the

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>hardware and software that will allow for the simulation of

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a brain in some way, we connect that to a

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>person's brain so that it becomes an extension. It's another

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>part of the brain, kind of like a third hemisphere,

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess. And and so this one is starting to

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 1>form pathways that mimic what your brain does naturally, so

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 1>over time it helps you think the way you think already.

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 1>It also starts to build in redundant memories, so it's

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>essentially backing up your memories, and gradually it's going to

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>act like it another hemisphere of your brain. And it

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:35.800
<v Speaker 1>could even be more powerful. Potentially you could do things

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>like include algorithms that like make it way easier for

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you to do math. You'd be a math genius. I

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>would hope that if I were uploaded on the internet,

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:49.359
<v Speaker 1>my math skills would just automatically improve. I would expect that. Yeah,

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:53.400
<v Speaker 1>there's certain little like base assumptions you want to make, right,

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that's one of them. It would be it would be

0:34:55.560 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>funny to be intially immortal, but crap at math. So

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 1>I guess you get me fun of by all the

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:05.319
<v Speaker 1>other digital immortals. Very likely, you know, the Kurgan is

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>just taunting you before cutting off your digital head. Uh So,

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>the his point being that over time you would be

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>relying more heavily on the AI version of your brain,

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 1>that even while your meat brain goes to sleep, your

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 1>AI brain could stay awake so that you know, you

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you as you could remain active all day long because

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's it's your organic brain that's sleeping,

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>but your AI brain takes over, and it could get

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>to a point where you don't even really notice that

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:38.839
<v Speaker 1>part of you as asleep, and you could theorectly reach

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a point where your AI brain is doing the vast

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>majority of the work, so that the time when your

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 1>organic brain dies is a non event to you. Well,

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I hope that you really got a lot out of

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 1>that classic episode of tech stuff. If you didn't, don't worry,

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:56.919
<v Speaker 1>Josh Clark will be back next week because this ended

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 1>up being a two parter, so we will continue are

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 1>just gusion about digital immortality on that episode next week.

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>If you have suggestions for topics we should cover on

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>episodes of tech Stuff, please reach out to me. The

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>best way to do that is on Twitter. The handle

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>for the show is text stuff h s W. I'll

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again really soon Y. Tech Stuff is

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 1>an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from I

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows