WEBVTT - Apple’s $2,000 iPhone Duon Debuts With Limited Supply

0:00:02.730 --> 0:00:10.590
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg audio studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.630 --> 0:00:14.570
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg intelligence podcast. Catch us live weekdays at 10 a.m.

0:00:14.630 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple car play and Android auto with the

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg business app. Listen on demand, wherever you get your

0:00:20.420 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>podcasts or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:26.780
<v Speaker 2>And again, one of the cool stories out there is

0:00:26.860 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Apple's out with a new phone, the foldable phone. It's,

0:00:29.500 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 2>it's a first for Apple, uh, Of course, there are

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:34.460
<v Speaker 2>other foldable phones in the marketplace, but like a lot

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:35.820
<v Speaker 2>of things, Apple takes its sweet time.

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:37.659
<v Speaker 3>And it looks better, usually.

0:00:37.700 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it looks.

0:00:38.540 --> 0:00:39.300
<v Speaker 3>It's more expensive.

0:00:39.380 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, $ 2, 000. What's it mean to Apple and to the

0:00:42.580 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 2>P &amp; L at Apple and to the stock of Apple?

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.409
<v Speaker 2>Maybe the investment psyche around Apple. Let's check it out

0:00:47.450 --> 0:00:51.750
<v Speaker 2>with Anurag Rana, Senior Tech Analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Anurag,

0:00:51.790 --> 0:00:54.690
<v Speaker 2>frame out for us what this new iPhone kind of

0:00:54.770 --> 0:00:57.950
<v Speaker 2>means for the company and for the phone business at Apple.

0:00:59.790 --> 0:01:01.330
<v Speaker 5>I think the biggest thing is going to be, you're

0:01:01.350 --> 0:01:04.710
<v Speaker 5>going to see a shift from customers that are used

0:01:04.750 --> 0:01:06.710
<v Speaker 5>to the Pro or the Pro Max models, which is

0:01:06.750 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 5>the most expensive models that they have. And they are

0:01:09.300 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 5>the ones who are going to migrate towards this duo.

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:13.500
<v Speaker 6>And we think it's only going to be a small

0:01:13.580 --> 0:01:14.300
<v Speaker 6>portion of that.

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.740
<v Speaker 5>At any given time and any given year, Apple sells

0:01:17.780 --> 0:01:22.610
<v Speaker 5>somewhere between 225 to 250 million units globally. We think

0:01:23.069 --> 0:01:25.410
<v Speaker 5>going into the next first 12 months of the launch,

0:01:25.810 --> 0:01:29.390
<v Speaker 5>they will do somewhere between 10 to 14 million units.

0:01:29.410 --> 0:01:31.950
<v Speaker 5>So that's about, you could say, 7% of the base

0:01:31.990 --> 0:01:34.429
<v Speaker 5>and not too much. But that's really where we are

0:01:34.510 --> 0:01:38.910
<v Speaker 5>right now. Given what we have heard on the demand

0:01:38.950 --> 0:01:41.630
<v Speaker 5>side of it, given the orders, we think it's going

0:01:41.670 --> 0:01:44.270
<v Speaker 5>to be perhaps towards the top end of this bucket.

0:01:44.470 --> 0:01:46.690
<v Speaker 5>And it could be even a little higher if they

0:01:46.730 --> 0:01:47.750
<v Speaker 5>are able to meet the demand.

0:01:48.250 --> 0:01:50.290
<v Speaker 2>Scarlett, just looking at the stock, I've been reading a lot.

0:01:50.790 --> 0:01:52.780
<v Speaker 2>seeing a lot recently that maybe Apple's kind of the

0:01:53.020 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 2>anti-AI stock within the tech space that has much less exposure,

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:01.180
<v Speaker 2>not really spending the money. Stock's up 27% year-to-date, hitting

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 2>a 52-week and an all-time high today.

0:02:03.820 --> 0:02:06.340
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's kind of like the safe haven play among

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:10.010
<v Speaker 7>the big tech names. Anurag, talk about the Duo and

0:02:10.050 --> 0:02:13.230
<v Speaker 7>how it fits in with Apple's strategy to lease the iPhone,

0:02:13.310 --> 0:02:17.389
<v Speaker 7>to make the iPhones more accessible to people who may

0:02:17.430 --> 0:02:19.530
<v Speaker 7>not be able to afford the price tag to buy

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:19.970
<v Speaker 7>it outright.

0:02:21.310 --> 0:02:22.970
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think this is one of the most important

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.220
<v Speaker 5>factors about Apple. We've always said that, you know, think

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 5>of Apple or these products as a subscription-based business, because

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 5>it's very rare if you get into the Apple ecosystem,

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 5>and for that matter, you know, Samsung as well on

0:02:35.220 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 5>the higher end, you're not going to leave the ecosystem.

0:02:37.820 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 5>So each individual has their own refresh cycle. You know,

0:02:40.980 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 5>some people keep it for three years, four years, and

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 5>five years. So when you look at Duo, This is

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 5>a very expensive phone. But if you think about the

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:54.420
<v Speaker 5>leasing plan, even on the base model, it starts at $ 55, $ 60.

0:02:53.770 --> 0:02:55.870
<v Speaker 6>Now, for me, it's a little bit higher.

0:02:55.930 --> 0:02:58.049
<v Speaker 5>But for a lot of people who use Uber, Lyft,

0:02:58.169 --> 0:03:02.049
<v Speaker 5>and Uber Eats, this is probably not that large amount

0:03:02.090 --> 0:03:04.730
<v Speaker 5>of money. But I think that's going to be one

0:03:04.790 --> 0:03:07.250
<v Speaker 5>big factor that drives the adoption of this particular phone.

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:11.300
<v Speaker 2>So give us a sense of just kind of how

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:15.830
<v Speaker 2>Cupertino is today in terms of product launches. I mean,

0:03:15.930 --> 0:03:18.870
<v Speaker 2>is there still the same feeling on Wall Street, on Arag,

0:03:18.889 --> 0:03:23.450
<v Speaker 2>that this company can continue to deliver really, really good

0:03:23.889 --> 0:03:25.510
<v Speaker 2>products that customers want?

0:03:27.060 --> 0:03:29.260
<v Speaker 5>In all fairness, that has not been the case for

0:03:29.340 --> 0:03:32.010
<v Speaker 5>Apple for many, many years. This is the first time,

0:03:32.070 --> 0:03:34.170
<v Speaker 5>I would say, within a 10-year period, you're seeing a

0:03:34.270 --> 0:03:37.210
<v Speaker 5>new form factor that has some coolness factor to it.

0:03:37.730 --> 0:03:39.550
<v Speaker 6>And from what we have heard from Mark Gurman.

0:03:39.620 --> 0:03:42.740
<v Speaker 5>And nobody writes better than him in the space about Apple,

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.060
<v Speaker 5>The new CEO is very focused on design and products,

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:48.540
<v Speaker 5>not so much about supply chain, not so much about

0:03:48.580 --> 0:03:51.420
<v Speaker 5>tariffs and other things. And if that's the case, then

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.390
<v Speaker 5>we should anticipate a lot more new products showing up.

0:03:54.710 --> 0:03:56.550
<v Speaker 5>Whether they are hit in the market, to be honest,

0:03:56.570 --> 0:03:59.670
<v Speaker 5>it doesn't matter, but at least shows that these guys

0:03:59.810 --> 0:04:03.490
<v Speaker 5>are trying their best to actively play a part in

0:04:03.750 --> 0:04:07.450
<v Speaker 5>our daily life. For example, this new segment around home, really,

0:04:07.470 --> 0:04:09.270
<v Speaker 5>that's not going to drive a lot of revenue. But

0:04:09.330 --> 0:04:12.730
<v Speaker 5>frankly speaking, Right now, a lot of people don't talk

0:04:12.770 --> 0:04:15.550
<v Speaker 5>to Siri in their house. Everybody talks to Alexa. It's

0:04:15.590 --> 0:04:19.650
<v Speaker 5>a small instrument, but that's where you have the mindshare

0:04:19.790 --> 0:04:22.740
<v Speaker 5>of the consumer because you're talking to Alexa about what's

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:24.460
<v Speaker 5>the weather, order something for me.

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 6>Why shouldn't be that Siri?

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 5>Because Apple controls your biggest ecosystem when it comes to

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.350
<v Speaker 5>phones and also laptops.

0:04:32.570 --> 0:04:33.530
<v Speaker 6>Why not the home then?

0:04:33.980 --> 0:04:36.480
<v Speaker 7>Right. It feels very insidious, but once you hook someone in,

0:04:36.540 --> 0:04:39.659
<v Speaker 7>you hook them in. So does that mean with this

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 7>new CEO, Anurag, that we're going to see less innovation

0:04:42.540 --> 0:04:45.659
<v Speaker 7>in Apple services and just more products thrown out there,

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:47.750
<v Speaker 7>even if it's kind of spaghetti on the wall? You

0:04:47.790 --> 0:04:49.150
<v Speaker 7>don't know if it's going to work, but at least

0:04:49.170 --> 0:04:53.030
<v Speaker 7>they're keeping everyone on their toes with new products all

0:04:53.050 --> 0:04:53.310
<v Speaker 7>the time?

0:04:54.940 --> 0:04:57.910
<v Speaker 5>I actually don't think that, only because from what we

0:04:57.930 --> 0:05:00.849
<v Speaker 5>have read, he's very focused on design. So they are

0:05:00.870 --> 0:05:03.609
<v Speaker 5>going to experiment a lot, but they're only going to

0:05:03.650 --> 0:05:06.950
<v Speaker 5>release stuff, in my view, that is going to be design-centric,

0:05:07.010 --> 0:05:09.770
<v Speaker 5>that is going to have some cool feature around it,

0:05:10.130 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 5>which is It's going to wow the consumer. I think

0:05:12.220 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 5>that is the most important part. I think a lot

0:05:14.420 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 5>of people feel that the innovation has left Apple and

0:05:17.500 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 5>it's not the same what we used to see from

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:21.900
<v Speaker 5>the Steve Jobs era. And I'm hoping for the sake

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:24.860
<v Speaker 5>of the company, frankly, that that comes back because that

0:05:24.900 --> 0:05:26.900
<v Speaker 5>really is completely needed for them at this point.

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Anurag, what's the AI call today when you talk to clients?

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:32.540
<v Speaker 2>Where are we today? Because it seems like it's a

0:05:32.580 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 2>very fluid situation about how people think about the AI trade.

0:05:37.060 --> 0:05:40.330
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, the AI trade is absolutely in shambles right now

0:05:40.430 --> 0:05:43.710
<v Speaker 5>because the big question is, where are the frontier models

0:05:43.730 --> 0:05:44.330
<v Speaker 5>going with it?

0:05:44.510 --> 0:05:46.029
<v Speaker 6>What would be the adoption rate?

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of angst about the open models coming

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.540
<v Speaker 5>out and having an impact on it. We recently published

0:05:53.580 --> 0:05:56.870
<v Speaker 5>a few notes around this topic, and the core of

0:05:57.050 --> 0:05:59.990
<v Speaker 5>the things is this. We have a very massive backlog

0:06:00.029 --> 0:06:02.909
<v Speaker 5>on everybody's balance sheet. So when it comes to growth

0:06:02.950 --> 0:06:05.390
<v Speaker 5>rates over the next one year or two years, I

0:06:05.430 --> 0:06:07.070
<v Speaker 5>think we are going to be okay with that.

0:06:07.150 --> 0:06:08.049
<v Speaker 6>That's not the issue.

0:06:08.410 --> 0:06:10.670
<v Speaker 5>The big issue that's showing up or the cracks that

0:06:10.690 --> 0:06:13.990
<v Speaker 5>they are showing up are what would happen if we

0:06:14.029 --> 0:06:16.430
<v Speaker 5>are not able to get some data center capacity online?

0:06:16.770 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 5>What could happen after the midterms if there is even

0:06:19.620 --> 0:06:22.020
<v Speaker 5>more opposition of new data centers being built up?

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 6>What would happen if the capital.

0:06:24.860 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 5>Funding costs have gone up, and that's probably the biggest

0:06:27.140 --> 0:06:29.419
<v Speaker 5>reason now is the increase in funding costs.

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:41.230
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:06:41.310 --> 0:06:44.349
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at 10 a.m. Eastern on Apple CarPlay and Android

0:06:44.410 --> 0:06:47.710
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:06:47.750 --> 0:06:50.830
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:52.940
<v Speaker 6>I don't know.

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:56.380
<v Speaker 3>I mean, let's talk valuation in the AI space here.

0:06:57.580 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 7>Go back to what Anurag said when we asked him

0:07:00.190 --> 0:07:01.330
<v Speaker 7>how the AI trade is doing.

0:07:01.430 --> 0:07:01.870
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:07:02.630 --> 0:07:03.409
<v Speaker 6>Oh, your colleague.

0:07:03.430 --> 0:07:05.370
<v Speaker 2>Oh, this is Mandeep Singh. He covers tech technology for

0:07:05.390 --> 0:07:09.230
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence. Your colleague, Anurag, we asked, how's the AI

0:07:09.290 --> 0:07:10.330
<v Speaker 2>trade out there in the marketplace?

0:07:10.650 --> 0:07:12.250
<v Speaker 3>It's in shambles.

0:07:12.490 --> 0:07:12.940
<v Speaker 8>Really?

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:13.710
<v Speaker 6>Okay.

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:17.500
<v Speaker 3>Talk to us about open AI because that doesn't look

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 3>like shambles. I'm seeing maybe going to get a valuation

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 3>of $ 1.

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 6>25 trillion.

0:07:22.770 --> 0:07:23.710
<v Speaker 2>What's going on with OpenAI?

0:07:23.830 --> 0:07:28.390
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, they're trying to do another round. And

0:07:28.450 --> 0:07:32.470
<v Speaker 8>all these companies need a lot of money because of

0:07:32.650 --> 0:07:35.910
<v Speaker 8>all the compute commitments they have. We know Anthropic has

0:07:35.990 --> 0:07:41.110
<v Speaker 8>close to $ 750 billion in compute commitments for the next

0:07:41.170 --> 0:07:45.330
<v Speaker 8>few years. So... You know, $ 30 billion is a small amount,

0:07:45.370 --> 0:07:48.350
<v Speaker 8>but they need to raise because how else are you

0:07:48.390 --> 0:07:51.170
<v Speaker 8>going to be able to pay for all the compute

0:07:51.210 --> 0:07:54.270
<v Speaker 8>that you need to grow the revenue? So this is

0:07:54.330 --> 0:07:59.140
<v Speaker 8>a high variable cost business. There is no leverage, inherent

0:07:59.180 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 8>leverage in the business like software companies have typically.

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 6>And I don't know why.

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.900
<v Speaker 2>What is the economic model for these companies? I mean,

0:08:09.230 --> 0:08:10.730
<v Speaker 2>Is it just a top line growth story?

0:08:10.890 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 8>For every dollar of incremental revenue, you need to spend

0:08:15.820 --> 0:08:18.890
<v Speaker 8>right now about 50 cents on compute.

0:08:19.790 --> 0:08:23.030
<v Speaker 6>Plus all the other overheads. Just the compute costs.

0:08:23.550 --> 0:08:25.870
<v Speaker 7>How long do you spend on compute? Is this like

0:08:26.890 --> 0:08:29.890
<v Speaker 7>a recurring cost, constant cost? Or is this, you know,

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 7>you invest in it now and then later on you

0:08:31.700 --> 0:08:33.660
<v Speaker 7>just kind of maintain and upgrade every once in a while?

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:37.819
<v Speaker 8>No, so software used to be, you develop the software

0:08:37.980 --> 0:08:41.660
<v Speaker 8>and then the incremental costs were like negligible. Because we

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 8>started off with, you know, disks. You used to ship

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:48.470
<v Speaker 8>the software and then it was like 100% margins, incremental margins.

0:08:48.809 --> 0:08:49.729
<v Speaker 6>Then it was cloud.

0:08:50.210 --> 0:08:54.510
<v Speaker 8>And now with AI, you're spending, like I said, 50

0:08:54.510 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 8>cents on every dollar you generate. And that's just compute cost.

0:08:58.460 --> 0:09:03.620
<v Speaker 8>That's your GPU consumption and all the... uh overheads that

0:09:03.700 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 8>come the power you need to run those gpus you

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 8>need that there is no shortcut in terms of ai

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 8>compute so do we.

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.100
<v Speaker 2>Have any sense of what the net income margin is

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 2>for these companies vis-a-vis a traditional software company like a.

0:09:16.110 --> 0:09:19.630
<v Speaker 8>Good question yeah so look uh what these companies will

0:09:19.670 --> 0:09:22.189
<v Speaker 8>tell you and we are waiting for anthropic uh s1

0:09:23.070 --> 0:09:26.510
<v Speaker 8>is they will say, we are spending still half of

0:09:26.590 --> 0:09:30.970
<v Speaker 8>our compute on training the next model. So Anthropic, it

0:09:31.030 --> 0:09:37.610
<v Speaker 8>already has Opus 5.5 and Mythos 5.1. It's training the

0:09:37.870 --> 0:09:42.100
<v Speaker 8>Mythos 5.5, the next version, whatever they want to call it,

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.180
<v Speaker 8>and spending almost 40% to 50% of their compute on

0:09:46.260 --> 0:09:50.179
<v Speaker 8>training the model. That's a big upfront investment they have

0:09:50.580 --> 0:09:53.210
<v Speaker 8>to train that next frontier model because you want to

0:09:53.250 --> 0:09:56.709
<v Speaker 8>stay ahead. Open rate models are catching up and that's

0:09:56.809 --> 0:10:01.020
<v Speaker 8>why your net income margin is most likely going to

0:10:01.059 --> 0:10:03.819
<v Speaker 8>be negative on a gap basis because you're spending so

0:10:03.860 --> 0:10:06.740
<v Speaker 8>much on keeping up with the frontier.

0:10:07.460 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Is that an ongoing thing to Scarlett's question or is

0:10:09.660 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 2>it some point we're going to get to a mature.

0:10:11.250 --> 0:10:11.309
<v Speaker 9>P &amp; L?

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:17.610
<v Speaker 8>And that's the thing with every tech company, a new

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:21.330
<v Speaker 8>technology that comes about, you spend a lot upfront, but

0:10:21.390 --> 0:10:23.590
<v Speaker 8>you know there is a mature state where you will

0:10:23.630 --> 0:10:25.090
<v Speaker 8>generate tons of free cash flow.

0:10:25.550 --> 0:10:27.010
<v Speaker 6>That's the hope here because.

0:10:27.030 --> 0:10:28.770
<v Speaker 3>I was going to say, how confident are we in that?

0:10:29.309 --> 0:10:33.030
<v Speaker 8>But these companies are already $ 100 billion in revenue.

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 6>I've heard the revenue number. I'm asking about the profits.

0:10:35.820 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 9>They will.

0:10:36.940 --> 0:10:40.939
<v Speaker 8>Look, if you look at my 35% to 40% R &amp;

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 8>D on training the next model, if tomorrow they decide

0:10:45.050 --> 0:10:47.570
<v Speaker 8>everyone is facing the frontier, which they have talked about

0:10:47.610 --> 0:10:50.510
<v Speaker 8>facing the frontier, what does that mean? Don't spend any

0:10:50.550 --> 0:10:54.690
<v Speaker 8>more on training costs. So now suddenly you start to generate,

0:10:54.730 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 8>you know, 30 cents on every dollar you generate as revenue.

0:10:59.660 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 8>And that could be your free cash flow. You don't

0:11:02.980 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 8>spend on training the next version of the model.

0:11:04.860 --> 0:11:08.630
<v Speaker 2>Two days ago, I thought I had cocktail party knowledge

0:11:08.650 --> 0:11:11.550
<v Speaker 2>of AI that I can hold my own. blown it's

0:11:11.730 --> 0:11:14.550
<v Speaker 2>blown to smithereens yeah i got nothing i got nothing and.

0:11:14.490 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 7>Now that everyone's kind of questioning the ai trade you

0:11:17.420 --> 0:11:19.859
<v Speaker 7>know i feel things that felt certain before that were

0:11:19.900 --> 0:11:22.660
<v Speaker 7>like just assumed maybe you can't assume them anymore all.

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:24.380
<v Speaker 2>Right i don't know well i'll try again on monday

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:28.690
<v Speaker 2>i'll try again stay with us more from bloomberg intelligence

0:11:28.710 --> 0:11:29.770
<v Speaker 2>coming up after.

0:11:29.570 --> 0:11:37.130
<v Speaker 1>This You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us

0:11:37.250 --> 0:11:40.290
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays at 10 a.m. Eastern on Apple CarPlay and

0:11:40.330 --> 0:11:43.580
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand

0:11:43.670 --> 0:11:47.140
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts or watch us live on YouTube.

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:50.849
<v Speaker 7>We are in the thick of earnings season and most

0:11:50.870 --> 0:11:53.429
<v Speaker 7>of the banks have reported. So now it's time for

0:11:53.470 --> 0:11:57.470
<v Speaker 7>the non-bank lenders. American Express being an example of one

0:11:57.510 --> 0:12:00.150
<v Speaker 7>of those. It means a credit card company, credit card issuer.

0:12:00.610 --> 0:12:03.540
<v Speaker 7>And Ben Stein is our consumer finance analyst who covers

0:12:03.940 --> 0:12:09.860
<v Speaker 7>American Express. And Ben, American Express under pressure to keep, retain,

0:12:10.179 --> 0:12:13.020
<v Speaker 7>add to its premium card members. How's it been doing

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 7>in that effort?

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 9>Look, Amex is doing great, right? They're running at a 10%

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:24.310
<v Speaker 9>top line revenue growth and a 15% bottom line EPS growth.

0:12:24.470 --> 0:12:26.770
<v Speaker 9>You know, Warren Buffett is still one of the largest

0:12:26.790 --> 0:12:30.070
<v Speaker 9>shareholders in Amex or the largest shareholder. And that's for

0:12:30.090 --> 0:12:32.810
<v Speaker 9>a reason. I mean, it's got an incredible growth algorithm.

0:12:33.170 --> 0:12:36.750
<v Speaker 9>It's built on the wealthiest, most resilient customers. And, you know,

0:12:36.770 --> 0:12:39.420
<v Speaker 9>spending growth is strong and credit is pristine.

0:12:40.100 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, Ben, just give us a sense. I just

0:12:42.179 --> 0:12:45.870
<v Speaker 2>have to refresh my memory. How global is Amex? What's

0:12:45.890 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 2>their business kind of U.S. versus rest of the world?

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.900
<v Speaker 2>And are there growth opportunities geographically for them?

0:12:52.260 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 9>So they're predominantly in the U.S. They have a couple

0:12:55.059 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 9>different international markets that are pretty important to them, including

0:12:58.820 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 9>the U.K.

0:12:59.220 --> 0:12:59.900
<v Speaker 8>And Japan.

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:04.250
<v Speaker 9>And anecdotally, Paul, I don't know if you ever tried

0:13:04.270 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 9>to swipe your Amex card in Europe, but can be

0:13:07.580 --> 0:13:10.780
<v Speaker 9>quite challenging, even though they're, they've spent years trying to

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:14.570
<v Speaker 9>work on parity of acceptance over there. Um, but, but importantly,

0:13:14.590 --> 0:13:17.329
<v Speaker 9>international is growing faster than the U S it's growing

0:13:17.350 --> 0:13:20.050
<v Speaker 9>at like a mid teens rate. Um, so it's a

0:13:20.070 --> 0:13:21.939
<v Speaker 9>big part of their strategy in the future, but right

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 9>now it's still predominantly a U S business.

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 7>And my apologies, Ben Elliott, not Ben Stein.

0:13:28.780 --> 0:13:29.300
<v Speaker 4>My fault there.

0:13:29.620 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 7>Ben, when we go back and talk about American Express

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.179
<v Speaker 7>for a moment here, not popular in Europe, even though

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.660
<v Speaker 7>they tout the benefits of this card when you're traveling,

0:13:38.860 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 7>presumably sometimes overseas. Also in the US, you now start

0:13:42.380 --> 0:13:45.500
<v Speaker 7>to see companies saying, if you charge by credit card,

0:13:45.540 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 7>we're going to charge you that extra 2% or 3% fee.

0:13:47.700 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 7>A lot of those stores won't even accept American Express

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.500
<v Speaker 7>because the interchange fee is even higher than for Visa

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.860
<v Speaker 7>and MasterCard. How is that showing up for American Express?

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.020
<v Speaker 7>I mean, do you see that making a dent in

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 7>its revenue and its bottom line?

0:14:02.260 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 9>So it's not showing up yet. You know, the bulk

0:14:06.140 --> 0:14:10.390
<v Speaker 9>of the spending is things like airlines and hotels, places

0:14:10.450 --> 0:14:13.170
<v Speaker 9>that are sort of always going to accept American Express.

0:14:13.910 --> 0:14:17.130
<v Speaker 9>But I think looking forward, the value proposition of the

0:14:17.590 --> 0:14:21.290
<v Speaker 9>Amex Platte in particular is really core to earnings growth.

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 9>And as they sort of increasingly kind of try to

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 9>pull in the cost of the Amex plat and you see,

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:34.590
<v Speaker 9>you know, the sort of like reduced acceptance at certain

0:14:34.620 --> 0:14:36.950
<v Speaker 9>smaller merchants, I think it does sort of wear on

0:14:36.990 --> 0:14:40.350
<v Speaker 9>the sheen of the brand and it affects how loyal

0:14:40.430 --> 0:14:42.750
<v Speaker 9>customers might be in the future. But obviously right now,

0:14:42.790 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 9>you know, they're having, they have like a 99% retention

0:14:46.630 --> 0:14:48.700
<v Speaker 9>rate on their Amex plat. So it's really not.

0:14:48.620 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 5>An issue yet.

0:14:49.590 --> 0:14:51.270
<v Speaker 7>I like the way that he calls it the Amex plaque.

0:14:51.310 --> 0:14:52.470
<v Speaker 7>I know. It's for people in the know.

0:14:52.550 --> 0:14:53.220
<v Speaker 6>What do you do?

0:14:53.230 --> 0:14:54.730
<v Speaker 2>You're one of those crazy people with cars, right?

0:14:54.750 --> 0:14:56.130
<v Speaker 7>Yes, I did sign up for it because I got

0:14:56.150 --> 0:14:58.890
<v Speaker 7>this massive sign-up bonus. And whether I keep it or

0:14:58.930 --> 0:15:01.390
<v Speaker 7>not depends on what the perks are, although they did

0:15:01.470 --> 0:15:05.170
<v Speaker 7>add Airbnb to one of the perks where you can

0:15:05.210 --> 0:15:07.210
<v Speaker 7>get a certain amount of credit and apply it towards that.

0:15:07.650 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 7>So that might be worthwhile.

0:15:09.150 --> 0:15:09.820
<v Speaker 6>Let's go there, Ben.

0:15:09.900 --> 0:15:11.020
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm old school.

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 3>I got the green card, dude, that I got back

0:15:12.780 --> 0:15:13.140
<v Speaker 3>in like 1986.

0:15:13.140 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 7>OK, you're one of those members since 1986.

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:17.500
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:15:17.660 --> 0:15:20.380
<v Speaker 2>You know, but talk to me about like these affinity

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.460
<v Speaker 2>programs like like my daughter and Scarlett. They're all into,

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:26.970
<v Speaker 2>you know, comparing the cards and arbitraging the cards and

0:15:26.990 --> 0:15:29.770
<v Speaker 2>doing all this and maximizing the points. How big of

0:15:29.790 --> 0:15:31.910
<v Speaker 2>the part of the business is that kind of stuff become?

0:15:34.180 --> 0:15:36.430
<v Speaker 9>It's a really big part because MX is leaning into

0:15:36.530 --> 0:15:40.910
<v Speaker 9>growth in millennials and Gen Z in particular. And they

0:15:41.230 --> 0:15:43.650
<v Speaker 9>tend to be lower spenders today, but in the future,

0:15:43.710 --> 0:15:46.190
<v Speaker 9>they're sort of the future high spenders. And a lot

0:15:46.210 --> 0:15:49.190
<v Speaker 9>of that lifestyle sort of coupon book stuff is focused

0:15:49.210 --> 0:15:51.930
<v Speaker 9>on millennial and Gen Z customers. And so that's where

0:15:51.950 --> 0:15:55.330
<v Speaker 9>they're getting their new account growth. But the risk you

0:15:55.350 --> 0:15:58.220
<v Speaker 9>see there is the fatigue and sort of the existing

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:03.300
<v Speaker 9>Gen X, Boomer Plus spenders who, you know, they don't

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:05.790
<v Speaker 9>want to spend... oh, they're free time gaming out a

0:16:05.830 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 9>coupon book and then they just want a core value proposition.

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.180
<v Speaker 9>But by and large, it's working and it's driving their

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 9>growth algorithm. And so I think we'll continue to lean

0:16:16.020 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 9>into that.

0:16:16.820 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 7>It's tiresome when you have to consult an Excel spreadsheet

0:16:19.580 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 7>first before you decide how to pay for something.

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:23.970
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'll get phone calls.

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.210
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, and she'll get these crazy deals.

0:16:26.690 --> 0:16:28.370
<v Speaker 6>You know, I'm like, why are you in Barcelona?

0:16:28.630 --> 0:16:30.830
<v Speaker 2>Oh, because I got a special tip from my.

0:16:30.990 --> 0:16:32.370
<v Speaker 3>X and Y and Z card. I was like, all right,

0:16:32.530 --> 0:16:32.730
<v Speaker 3>all right.

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:34.710
<v Speaker 6>And they wanted to.

0:16:34.630 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 5>Go to Barcelona.

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:40.100
<v Speaker 9>Yeah. And I think Amex's response to that is they've

0:16:40.140 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 9>just recently introduced a new business card, the Graphite card,

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.980
<v Speaker 9>which is a pure 2% cash back card. So I

0:16:46.020 --> 0:16:48.860
<v Speaker 9>think they understand the fatigue there. And I would imagine

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 9>that in the future, if it becomes an issue, you'll

0:16:51.740 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 9>start to see a return to sort of more traditional

0:16:54.420 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 9>rewards and less coupon book. But so far, it's working.

0:16:59.080 --> 0:16:59.530
<v Speaker 8>Why fix it?

0:17:01.250 --> 0:17:04.450
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:17:08.310 --> 0:17:12.010
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:17:12.090 --> 0:17:15.129
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at 10 a.m. Eastern on Apple CarPlay and Android

0:17:15.170 --> 0:17:18.490
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:17:18.540 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:23.109 --> 0:17:24.750
<v Speaker 2>We talk about tech spending. It just seems like the

0:17:24.790 --> 0:17:27.010
<v Speaker 2>numbers are going up, up, up, up, up with no

0:17:27.150 --> 0:17:29.830
<v Speaker 2>end in sight. That's true for the AI stuff. But

0:17:29.869 --> 0:17:31.250
<v Speaker 2>for the rest of the tech stack, it seems like

0:17:31.270 --> 0:17:33.830
<v Speaker 2>those folks have to fight for the crumbs here. One

0:17:33.869 --> 0:17:37.330
<v Speaker 2>of those companies is Infosys. Tamlin Basin joins us here,

0:17:37.690 --> 0:17:39.570
<v Speaker 2>tech analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:17:39.590 --> 0:17:43.260
<v Speaker 3>He's based in London. So Tamlin, talk to us about Infosys.

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:46.900
<v Speaker 2>What is Infosys and what are they telling you about

0:17:47.140 --> 0:17:48.460
<v Speaker 2>their results and their guidance here?

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:53.380
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, sure. So Infosys is an IT services company. Now,

0:17:53.420 --> 0:17:55.500
<v Speaker 4>so this is a company that's not in the software space.

0:17:55.540 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 4>What they do really is a lot of the implementation

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:01.100
<v Speaker 4>for enterprises. They make sure that that tech stop is

0:18:01.850 --> 0:18:06.070
<v Speaker 4>operating from top to bottom. So they reported earnings earlier

0:18:06.109 --> 0:18:11.090
<v Speaker 4>this morning. They reduced their fiscal year 2027 sales guidance.

0:18:11.210 --> 0:18:13.290
<v Speaker 4>Now they've lowered that range both at the top end

0:18:13.770 --> 0:18:16.850
<v Speaker 4>and the lower end. And this is the second consecutive year.

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:21.939
<v Speaker 4>cut to their fiscal guidance following 1Q results. So what

0:18:21.980 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 4>they're pointing at is a continued muted discretionary spending backdrop.

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 4>All of this money, as you said, is going to AI.

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:33.380
<v Speaker 4>And a lot of that is putting pressure on spending elsewhere.

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:35.889
<v Speaker 4>And this is a company that's definitely feeling it. And

0:18:36.130 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 4>so they're reducing their near-term guidance. They do see AI

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:43.980
<v Speaker 4>as a tailwind. Their AI revenues accelerated 29% from last quarter.

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.020
<v Speaker 4>But that's just so far not enough to really lift

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:48.060
<v Speaker 4>revenues overall.

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 3>So, you know, there's a lot of uncertainty out there.

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:53.139
<v Speaker 2>And if I'm spending money on my tech budget, I mean,

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.070
<v Speaker 2>I got geopolitical issues. I got surging energy prices. I

0:18:56.109 --> 0:18:59.909
<v Speaker 2>got overall inflation. So what does it mean for, like,

0:18:59.930 --> 0:19:02.629
<v Speaker 2>IT services? That used to be such a steady, steady

0:19:02.690 --> 0:19:05.310
<v Speaker 2>growth business there. But, you know, I guess they're not

0:19:05.350 --> 0:19:07.950
<v Speaker 2>immune to just uncertainty in general, plus the AI industry.

0:19:08.850 --> 0:19:09.230
<v Speaker 3>Crowd out.

0:19:10.230 --> 0:19:12.030
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I think it is a lot of that

0:19:12.090 --> 0:19:16.010
<v Speaker 4>AI crowd out coupled with those macro pressures that you

0:19:16.050 --> 0:19:19.530
<v Speaker 4>just pointed at. So growth is not going negative necessarily,

0:19:19.570 --> 0:19:22.690
<v Speaker 4>but we're looking at very low single digits rather than

0:19:22.730 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 4>sort of the mid single digit growth that we were

0:19:24.910 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 4>seeing sort of pre-COVID. Through COVID, it expanded, accelerated faster

0:19:29.700 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 4>than that. But really, the industry is used to that

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:35.180
<v Speaker 4>mid single digit growth, but it is a lot of

0:19:35.220 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 4>that AI crowd out. You know, decision makers want to

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 4>invest heavily in AI. They don't want to miss the

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:43.270
<v Speaker 4>boat there. And what that does mean is going back

0:19:43.270 --> 0:19:45.660
<v Speaker 4>to their services providers and saying, you know, what, we're

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 4>not going to be able to raise our budget with

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.780
<v Speaker 4>you to the extent that you're used to from years past.

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:52.420
<v Speaker 4>So I think that's where a lot of this is

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.620
<v Speaker 4>coming from, coupled with those macro pressures that are really

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:57.899
<v Speaker 4>tightening enterprise budgets elsewhere.

0:19:58.230 --> 0:20:01.050
<v Speaker 2>So when I see a scenario like that where an

0:20:01.190 --> 0:20:05.670
<v Speaker 2>industry is undergoing what might be a secular process, you know,

0:20:05.690 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of reduction in growth rates. I've been a part

0:20:08.619 --> 0:20:11.940
<v Speaker 2>of them myself in the media space. Suggest maybe consolidation

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 2>might be a solution for some of the companies that

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 2>really want to make a go of it. How do

0:20:15.780 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 2>you think about the IT services sector from a consolidation

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 2>M &amp; A standpoint?

0:20:20.859 --> 0:20:24.540
<v Speaker 4>Sure, absolutely. And we have seen some consolidation, especially with

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:29.419
<v Speaker 4>companies wanting to sort of expand their AI capabilities. So

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 4>we've seen Accenture is probably the leader in the space,

0:20:31.940 --> 0:20:34.859
<v Speaker 4>and it's been most aggressive recently. on M &amp; A. However,

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 4>we haven't seen them necessarily go off after a larger

0:20:38.070 --> 0:20:40.609
<v Speaker 4>peer for acquisitions. What they are doing is doing a

0:20:40.630 --> 0:20:44.410
<v Speaker 4>lot of bolt-on acquisitions, especially in the consulting space, especially

0:20:44.550 --> 0:20:49.010
<v Speaker 4>for smaller firms who are focused on lifting consulting and

0:20:49.060 --> 0:20:53.940
<v Speaker 4>lifting AI exposure in niche areas, whether it be financial services,

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 4>whether it be healthcare or So I think that's where

0:20:56.440 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 4>we're looking to see is probably more of the acquisitions

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 4>going forward, not necessarily tie-ups of two large behemoth firms. Again,

0:21:04.780 --> 0:21:08.669
<v Speaker 4>these are companies that have 500,000, 600,000 employees. They are

0:21:08.869 --> 0:21:12.210
<v Speaker 4>quite massive overall. So I don't think we're necessarily expecting

0:21:13.170 --> 0:21:17.330
<v Speaker 4>consolidation at that level. Probably downstream, we'll see more bolt-on

0:21:17.369 --> 0:21:20.950
<v Speaker 4>acquisitions to sort of enhance AI capabilities.

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:26.290
<v Speaker 7>Now, Tamlyn, President Trump or his administration named Infosys as

0:21:26.330 --> 0:21:29.930
<v Speaker 7>one of the companies abusing immigration policies. There's an imposition

0:21:30.050 --> 0:21:33.610
<v Speaker 7>on restrictions on those H-1B visas. What does that mean

0:21:33.670 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 7>for an Infosys, for other companies that it competes with,

0:21:36.630 --> 0:21:37.300
<v Speaker 7>like a Wipro?

0:21:38.930 --> 0:21:43.550
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, absolutely. And this certainly is risk at retaining talent.

0:21:43.570 --> 0:21:46.609
<v Speaker 4>So these are really mid-level executives who are already living

0:21:46.750 --> 0:21:48.780
<v Speaker 4>in the U.S. It's going to be harder for them

0:21:48.859 --> 0:21:51.899
<v Speaker 4>to get permission to continue staying with this company and

0:21:51.940 --> 0:21:55.060
<v Speaker 4>working in the U.S. So this is really targeting those mid-level.

0:21:55.100 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 4>This is not necessarily the H-1B exposure where they're trying

0:21:57.820 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 4>to attract talent to the U.S. to begin with. What

0:22:00.700 --> 0:22:02.790
<v Speaker 4>all these companies have so far said is that they

0:22:02.830 --> 0:22:05.090
<v Speaker 4>have already reduced their reliance on a lot of these

0:22:05.830 --> 0:22:09.730
<v Speaker 4>visa permissioning. This is sort of as Trump came into

0:22:09.750 --> 0:22:11.969
<v Speaker 4>the second term, they could sort of see the headwinds

0:22:12.020 --> 0:22:14.950
<v Speaker 4>coming their way. But certainly we are going to see,

0:22:14.970 --> 0:22:16.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's going to be a little bit harder

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:18.820
<v Speaker 4>to retain that mid-level talent. There's going to be more

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:21.360
<v Speaker 4>competition within the space for that. So I think this

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.660
<v Speaker 4>is definitely a, you know, it's a political risk. It's

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:26.780
<v Speaker 4>a reputational risk. But I don't know if it's really

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 4>going to change their operations over the near term because

0:22:29.420 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 4>they've reduced their reliance on those visas.

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:22:37.900 --> 0:22:41.820
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:22:41.820 --> 0:22:47.130
<v Speaker 1>10 a.m. to noon Eastern on Bloomberg.com, the iHeartRadio app, TuneIn,

0:22:47.270 --> 0:22:50.429
<v Speaker 1>and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us

0:22:50.550 --> 0:22:54.690
<v Speaker 1>live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal.