WEBVTT - Guarding the Grid: Hackers Target Smarter Power System

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This is Dana Perkins, and you're listening to Switched on

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the BNF podcast.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about you, but it seems like all

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of my friends are talking about AI lately. And among

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the myriad of things to consider is cybersecurity. It's such

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a hot topic, in fact, that it was even featured

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in the most recent Mission Impossible film. But cybersecurity is

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>not a new topic, as will come to find, as

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>much of the world has an increasingly complex grid that

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>has evolved to become even smarter and more digital and

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>capable of optimizing energy use, which will prove helpful in

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 1>the race to net zero. These very additions themselves have

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>created new vulnerabilities which cyber attackers can exploit. So what

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of damage can be caused by a cyber attack

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>on electric utility and can we protect them? And what

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly is an air gapps. It's a computer or network

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>which is isolated from other networks for security reasons. Today,

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>instead of me telling you any more about it, I'm

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>joined by our Grids and Utilities team member Amanda al

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>She's going to discuss some of the findings from her

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>recent report called Guarding the Grid Utilities Fortify cyber defenses. Together,

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we discuss the different forms a cyber attack can take,

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the motivations behind these attacks, and the scale of damage

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that can be caused, as well as the costs involved

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in fixing them, and to ward off attacks. Can anything

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 1>be done at the government level to beef up cybersecurity.

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>We assess some of the policies countries have put in

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>place to strengthen cybersecurity in both the public and private sectors,

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and the marketplace for companies offering grid security. And finally,

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>what does the future of grid security look like? As

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 1>we enter an era of AI and quantum computing with

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>even greater computing capabilities, also comes some potential threats and

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>are there measures that can be put in place to

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>combat these even more complex attacks. To access Amanda's report,

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>BADF subscribers can find it at BNF dot com, on

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>benf Go, on the Bloomberg terminal, or on the BNF

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>mobile app. If you like this podcast, make sure to

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and you'll receive an update when a future episode

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is published. And if you give us a review or

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a rating on Apple Podcasts or Spotify, it'll make us

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.079
<v Speaker 1>more discoverable by others. But right now, let's jump into

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>our conversation with Amanda. Amanda, thank you very much for

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>joining switched on today.

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me.

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>So today we're going to talk about grid security. What's

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>at stake here? What is the worst case scenario?

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 2>So, I mean utilities are really integrating more and more

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 2>digital technologies, meaning that they're investing in more technologies like

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:46.399
<v Speaker 2>sensors and creating digital models of the grid and investing

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 2>in communication technologies. And as they do that, it means

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 2>that first of all, the grid is getting the eyes,

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 2>the brain, and the sense that it needs to act efficiently.

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 2>By at the same time, integrating all these new technologies

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 2>which have in at access means that it's increasing the

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 2>potential cyber attack service of the power system. And with

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 2>this new link with the Internet, it basically means that

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 2>cyber thread actors could potentially access physical grid infrastructure, leading

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 2>to damages, leading even to power outages.

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>So we're most concerned about blackouts maybe citywide, statewide, Like

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>what scale would the worst case scenario be? And I

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>guess the follow on to that is really how connected

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>is it? Is it all of the grids across the US,

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>barring or cut that are all connected. You know how

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>big could a problem be if there was a cyber

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>attack they got in If we're specifically focused for this

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>question on power outages.

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's really hard to say, because what we

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 2>know right now is that there is malware out there

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 2>that could specifically target technologies on the grid, like substations

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 2>or other kind of operational technologies. So I mean, hypothetically

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 2>a cyber attack could maybe take out and an ore

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 2>utilities network. Hypothetically, I'm just saying, but I mean, of course,

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 2>utilities are investing in new cybersecurity technologies to make sure

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't happen. But potentially the more and moral malware

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 2>coming out that can target power systems means that this

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 2>could lead to outages across utilities.

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>So outages and then you also reference the damage to equipment.

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>So is that one way of targeting or using malware

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 1>is to actually cause maybe a piece of equipment to

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>malfunction and to actually cause very expensive damage to critical infrastructure.

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. So there's one example. There's a kind of

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 2>malware called crash override, also known as in destroyer. I

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 2>love these names that're kind of funny, but what they

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 2>do is really not funny. For example, crash override was

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 2>used actually used in an attack on Ukraine's grid in

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty sixteen. And this malware basically took and codified, meaning

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 2>put into code knowledge of how control systems work, so

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 2>the control system for substations, how they work, and then

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 2>use this to shut down the substation in Kiev. And

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 2>this was one substation. But the scary thing is that

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 2>cybersecurity professionals here thing that this could have been a

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 2>proof of concept since not all of this malwar's functions

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 2>were used. So if this is not on a larger scale,

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 2>it can really damage the grid and of course impact

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 2>people that depend on electricity.

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a little bit about the olden days

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>when the grid was not connected and things were much simpler.

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Technology hasn't just spreaded immediately. Over time, systems have gotten

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 1>more sophisticated, and there used to be security measures built

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>into the way that it was designed. Can you talk

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about how the grid used to be

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 1>designed and really what precipitated such a dramatic change to

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>make everything interconnected.

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 2>I mean, originally the text structure of the grid or

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 2>the digital tech structure of the grid was based on

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 2>two main elements so it's informational technology and operational technology

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 2>or IT and OT, so for IT think things like

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 2>file management, emails, internet, and for OT. These are the

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:10.119
<v Speaker 2>technologies that monitor and physically control power equipment on the grid,

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 2>like substations. And originally these were kept separate because you know,

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 2>if OT, like a substation or circuit breakers on the

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 2>grid were compromised, then it could result in power outages.

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 2>So keeping IT and OT separate was the OG, like

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 2>the original kind of cybersecurity mechanism for the power system

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 2>to ensure a hack in it would not impact the

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 2>physical grid. But I mean now we're seeing utilities are

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 2>digitalizing at a rapid pace. And what I mean by

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 2>digitalizing is that, as mentioned earlier, the grid is integrated

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 2>news technologies like sensors and analytics software to access and

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 2>analyze data from the power system to help run this

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 2>physical infrastructure more efficiently. So this is great, you know

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 2>if you think about efficiency, But this also means we're

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 2>integrating IT and OT. So with this new link between

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 2>information technology and operational technology, if a cyber thread actor

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 2>hacks into an IT system, you know a simple thing

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 2>like a phishing email, it might be able to move

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 2>laterally and access ot networks and really cause damage to

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the grid like we've been seeing.

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>So we talked a little bit about the olden days

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of the grid when things weren't as interconnected, and there

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>is some brilliance in that simplicity in that.

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Is there a.

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Move to in some way make these grids a little

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>bit isolated from one another to actually minimize the risk.

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I know that there's a lot to gain in terms

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of efficiency and reducing waste when we have a much

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>more connected grid. And we're all familiar with these terms

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>connected grids, smart grid, and actually even the rise of

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>new business models like virtual power plants. But is there

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a space for grids to not be connected with one

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>another and to have a series of non connected units

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that you know, the connectivity essentially ends somewhere, And is

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>there thought being given to how connected is to connected?

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 2>That's a good question. I think that it would be

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 2>very difficult not to have connected grids because we need

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 2>both ram above and distribution grids and transmission grids and

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 2>interconnection among these grids to support a broader sustainable energy transition.

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 2>So I think what we need to do is understand

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 2>that the power grid is getting more and more access

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 2>to distributed energy resources such as evs such as roofs

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 2>of solar and batteries that are connected to the distribution grid,

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.959
<v Speaker 2>which are connected to the transmission grid, which are communicating

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 2>more and more with one another to help balance the

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 2>overall power system. And as more of these decentralized energy

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 2>resources come online, the cybersecurity of power systems also needs

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 2>to reflect or mirror increasingly decentralized nature of the power

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 2>system as well. Because it's happening, We're seeing a lot

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 2>more virtual power plan projects. We're seeing a lot of

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 2>more distribe engry resources come online. So of course some

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 2>grids might like for example, microgrids, they can be islanded

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 2>when need be. But what we're seeing is that a

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 2>broader focus on coordinating the broader power system.

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Now, cyber attacks are something that are probably not new

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to any of us. We all think about phishing emails

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>when we think about our own inbox. And what I

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>want to know is how much of the focus I

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>guess on these cyber criminals is on the energy system.

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>And is this a big thing for us to be

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>worried about.

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean, short answer, yes, Unfortunately, that's exactly what we're

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 2>seeing is that cyber attacks on utilities are on the rise,

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 2>and the frequency of cyber attacks on utilities are reaching

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 2>even new very high levels. And this is because as

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 2>we digitalize the power system and connecting more and more

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 2>connected resources. Connecting mean that they're connected to the internet,

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 2>it means that the cyber attacks surface of the power

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 2>system is growing and because of that, we're seeing more

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 2>cyber attacks. So the frequency of cyber attacks on utilities

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 2>we saw reach very high levels during the pandemic and

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 2>part driven by more remote work and cyber attacks have

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 2>also been increasing since the war in Ukraine, potentially because

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.559
<v Speaker 2>this is allowing threat actors to showcase their cyber war

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 2>for techniques. So it's clear that this geopolitical and social

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 2>issues and upheaval usually leads to an increase in cyber attacks,

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 2>and this seems to indicate that the energy sector really

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 2>is becoming more and more of a target. For example,

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 2>according to the data from IBM, the energy sector for

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 2>about eleven percent of the total global number of cyber

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 2>attacks IBM tracked in twenty twenty two, which is higher

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 2>than the sector's pre pandemic levels of about six percent,

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 2>and North America in particular has been the most targeted

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.439
<v Speaker 2>region for attacks, according to this data on energy firms

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 2>over the past two years.

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>What happens after a cyber attack? Do the consequences include

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>needing to as you referenced, know if something gets broken,

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>repairing kit or is this a conversation around actually being

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>held round because that happens sometimes as well, where they

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>won't release your system until you've paid a certain amount

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 1>to the cyber criminal. What happens and how do these

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>companies respond to these attacks when something does go wrong?

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean a cyber attack can make many things

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:20.199
<v Speaker 2>go wrong, from money being lost due to just downtime

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 2>of the power system, to having to pay off ransomware,

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 2>to potentially having to pay fines because the cyber attack

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 2>was caused by some kind of non compliance with regulation,

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 2>or you know, fixing or repairing damage equipment. We've seen

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 2>that Also, IBM estimates the global average cost of a

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 2>data breach, which means just accessing illegitimate access of confidential data.

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 2>They're saying the global average cost of a data reach,

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 2>specifically for the energy sector, has reached nearly five million dollars,

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 2>and this is because actually identifying and dealing with those

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 2>reaches is getting costlier and taking longer because honestly, these

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 2>cyber thread actors are getting more and more sophisticated in

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 2>their techniques. At the same time, there's more technologies and

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 2>services coming out specifically to respond to these attacks, so

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 2>incident response technologies that includes both services like some companies

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 2>like Drego's offer services like playbooks, which are basically lists

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 2>of action items for specific cyber attacks that a company

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 2>can do, and Dregos is specifically focused again on operational

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 2>technologies such as in the grid. So other than services,

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 2>there's also startups and companies coming out with new technology

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 2>to support and even automate incident response. So, for example,

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 2>there's a technology or group of technologies called SORE like

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Fly in all caps, which means Security Orchestration, Automation and Response,

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 2>which uses basically AI algorithms to help both detect and

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:55.359
<v Speaker 2>automate some of the response to actual cyber incidents.

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>So there are new companies that are seeing this vulnerability

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and fire a way to really help utilities figure this out.

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 1>But surely it's not all coming from startups looking to

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>strategically fix these problems. I would assume that the utilities

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>themselves are invading in various ways to protect themselves. What

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>is happening with the utilities and what other I guess

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>domestically grown technologies or responses are they then turning to

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 1>in order to secure their grid.

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 2>What we've been seeing really is that utilities are spending

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 2>more on cybersecurity and developing their own cybersecurity strategies, especially

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 2>the larger utilities. So basically that involves one developing business practices.

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 2>So that's things like growing security teams, having cybersecurity expertise

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 2>on board levels, and also running annual incident response practices,

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of running hypothetical cyber attacks that might happen on

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 2>the utility and have the security teams actually practice what

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 2>they would do in that situation. That's the business evolutions side.

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 2>There's also a lot of new investments coming out of

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.319
<v Speaker 2>utilities on cybersecurity. You know, what we're seeing is that

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 2>spending is on the rise on cyber For example, in

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 2>the US, we've seen that utility is a spending more

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 2>in terms of capital expenditure on cybersecurity, specifically operational technology security.

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 2>So for example, Southern California Edison or see their capex

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 2>on cybersecurity, Rose about two thirds from sixty million USD

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty to nearly one hundred and ten million

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty one. And that was kind of driven

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 2>by their grid modernization program to make sure that their

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 2>grid technologies really are cybersecurity. And you know, we're BNS,

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 2>so we had to quench the numbers. And we found

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 2>that in the US, be calculated that the annual cybersecurity

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 2>capex for utilities is likely already one billion US dollars,

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 2>with the average share of capex allocation usually around one percent.

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 2>And I mean, of course this might be higher or

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 2>lower by utility, but this real isn't a small number,

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 2>and it is likely to grow, we think as well.

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 2>One regulations get more strict and two when, if, and

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 2>when cyber attacks grow so.

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Much like you can't drive a car without insurance in

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>many parts of the world, is there an obligation illegal

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>obligation in some countries for cybersecurity to be in place

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>because nobody wants blackouts, least of which the company is

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>operating the grid and also the power providers. But are

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>governments getting involved?

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 2>The US really is leading the way in terms of

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 2>regulation and standards for cybersecurity specifically in the power sector.

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's potentially because cybersecurity has been seen

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 2>as a matter of national security for a while now.

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 2>And for example, in two thousand and eight, the North

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 2>American Electric Reliability Corporation NERK came out with mandatory standards

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 2>for critical infrastructure protection called NIRKSIP. Sorry a lot of

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 2>acronyms there, for both physical security and cybersecurity of the

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 2>bulk electric system. And bulk electric system here refers basically

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 2>to the transmission grid, so violations of these standards can

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 2>result in fines of up to one million dollars per

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 2>day per violation. But while the US has been kind

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 2>of leading the charge in cybersecurity regulation and policy, I

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 2>think also Europe is catching up. Originally, the European Union

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 2>couldn't really impose strong regulations for power system cybersecurity because

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 2>issues like cybersecurity are really related to national security, and

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 2>I think countries don't really appreciate when you meddle into

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 2>matters of national security, so it was difficult to do that. However,

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 2>as cybersecurity is becoming more of an issue, and also

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we have a bunch of grid interconnections among

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 2>European countries, which means a cyber attack in one country

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 2>might affect another country. The EU is stepping up their

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 2>cybersecurity directives as well, and the biggest thing there right

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 2>now we're seeing is the Network and Information Security Directive

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 2>or NIS number two, which is an update of that directive,

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:04.199
<v Speaker 2>which basically calls for essential entities which includes grids, to

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 2>ramp up their cybersecurity measures. And there's a lot of

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 2>fines there too, and it has to requires member states

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 2>to basically set a maximum fine of at least ten

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 2>million euros, which is about ten point six million dollars

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 2>or two percent of their global annual revenue, whichever is

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 2>higher if they fail to comply. So I think the

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 2>European Union is also ramping up regulation here.

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Now you're only as strong as your weakest link. Is

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>there a specific part of the network that is most vulnerable?

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:36.640
<v Speaker 1>And how do most of these problems actually get in?

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>Is it malware connected to an email or is it

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 1>something else? Is it our smart refrigerators or the electric

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>vehicles connected to the grid directly, where are the biggest vulnerabilities?

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, based on what I've seen, most cyber attacks

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 2>on utilities are still the regular ones, So phishing or

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 2>through public facing applications or through websites and stuff like that.

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 2>But as we get more and more distributed enjury resources

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 2>connect to the grid, like electric vehicles, smart meters, even

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 2>air conditioning units are becoming smart nowadays and can give

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 2>and take electricity from the paragrid, it means that we're

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 2>getting more and more end points connecting to the paragrid

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 2>which are also connected to the Internet. And this means

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:25.479
<v Speaker 2>that honestly, utilities networks are becoming far more complex than

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 2>they used to be and have far more endpoints than

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:32.120
<v Speaker 2>they used to be, which means that having regular firewalls.

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 2>I think when we think about cybersecurity, right we think

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 2>about traditional firewalls, which are basically like putting a giant

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 2>fence around your corporate network. That's really not enough anymore

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 2>as we have more and more of these endpoints flooding

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 2>utilities network, So that's really calling for new sets of

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:53.120
<v Speaker 2>cybersecurity technologies down to the actual endpoints, specific security measures

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 2>for these distributed energy resources and within the network.

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>So if I had to break this down in its

0:18:58.800 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 1>simplest sense, it is a system that is connected to

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the electrical grid and in some way is trying to

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>decide whether or not it pulls electricity or it stops

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>pulling electricity based on what it's getting in terms of

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 1>data from that grid, regarding perhaps peak demand at that time,

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in power prices or whatever that input is. What I'm

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>wondering is with these firewalls that exist, those that are

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 1>trying to break into the network, is it that the

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 1>network inherently has vulnerabilities and they find those? And this

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>raises the question of AI and an increasingly smart computer

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>system that can go through a number of permutations very

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>quickly and find those vulnerabilities versus when human being and

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>mistakes do happen, responds to as you mentioned, phishing and

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>essentially allows that vulnerability to happen because they made a mistake.

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I would expect that both of these exist, and you

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>said the vast majority are coming from fishing right now.

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>My question there lies, do we think that first scenario

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 1>that I went through the w and where AI and

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:05.360
<v Speaker 1>locating those vulnerabilities without being aided by someone like myself

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>clicking on the wrong thing, is that something that we

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>additionally need to think about in the future.

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 2>Phishing is one that we know of for now, but

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 2>I think as we have more resources connecting to the grid,

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 2>we have more entry points for cyber attackers. So, for example,

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 2>if we think about electric vehicles, even though a utility

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.239
<v Speaker 2>has its own set of cybersecurity measures, it needs to

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 2>interface with an increasing amount of additional second and third

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 2>party players. Right, so, every think about EV's they connect

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 2>to the grid, and for example, a startup called si

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Flow is focused specifically on EV cybersecurity, and based on

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 2>data that they're sharing, they show that the communications protocol

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 2>used for EV charging management systems can be compromised by

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 2>cyber thread actors, and by doing that, the thread actor

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.919
<v Speaker 2>could for example, turn EV chargers on and off, or

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 2>even steal and as more evs come online as v

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 2>an EFC's will happen in our new energy outlook and

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:09.959
<v Speaker 2>electric vehicle outlooks, if we do depend more and more

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 2>on electric vehicles and systems like vehicle to grid where

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 2>the power system calls on EV's to help support the grid,

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.439
<v Speaker 2>this could really cause damage as well. So basically what

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to say is as more endpoints come online

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 2>and the grid depends more and more on distribute energy

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:29.199
<v Speaker 2>resources which are also connected, that's a huge issue on

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:33.120
<v Speaker 2>the endpoint security level, which is kind of lacking right now.

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>So when I think about hacking, I think about non

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>state actors, but we also know that some of these

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>are either first of all state sponsored or secondly, is

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>there a fear that essentially this could be weaponized.

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean what's a bit scary is that cyber

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 2>thread actors are getting better and better at specifically developing

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 2>malware and attack techniques targeting operational technologies like substations on

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:02.120
<v Speaker 2>the power grid, Meaning they're figuring out how to launch

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 2>cyber attacks that are tailor made for the power grid,

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 2>and this can definitely be used in cyberwarfare. So a

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 2>very famous example of an attack on an industrial control

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 2>system was stucksnet, which basically targeted a nuclear power plant

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 2>in Iran by taking advantage of a software vulnerability to

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 2>access controllers in that plant, and basically the attackers use

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 2>this vulnerability to compromise the control system and make the

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 2>centrifuges spin too fast, causing damage to the plant. So

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 2>this and some other examples we've seen around the world

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 2>are kind of showing us that cyber warfare is an

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 2>increasingly normal thing, specifically targeting the power system.

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Another data point that came up also from IBM is

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that the cost per data breach is averaging around four

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>point seven eight million US dollars each time. So this

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>is expensive. It's expensive for the breech and invariably now

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>it's costing more money to try and prevent them and

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>cut it off at the past. So this is a

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>burgeoning industry of companies that are looking to service this.

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>But what is the next thing for you now that

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you've spent time researching this, What is the next thing

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to look at and look into that

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been covered in this research note in the vein

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 1>of trying to better understand cybersecurity.

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 2>That's a good question. I think what I've been seeing

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:29.919
<v Speaker 2>in general in cybersecurity tech innovation is that the security

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 2>focus is coming closer and closer to the end resource

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 2>or the endpoint. So it's going from being this massive

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 2>firewall around the network to end point security, which basically

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 2>gives endpoints like ev smart meter substations their own set

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 2>of security measures. And this endpoint or resource focused security

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 2>also brings us the access control, So we've been seeing

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 2>a lot of innovation and access control, which traditionally is

0:23:55.200 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 2>things like encryption or firewalls or multi factor authentication. And

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 2>what interesting innovations here are zero trust models and quantum

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 2>resistant encryption. So in a zero trust model, access is

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 2>basically provided to resources like a substation, for example, or

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 2>a smart meter on a per asset and per request basis,

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to kind of you know, allowing access to

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 2>all assets in a network once an actor is within

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 2>a firewall. So for example, ge and other tech vendors

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 2>are beginning to integrate zero trust architecture as a layer

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 2>in their grid software portfolios. And then on top of that,

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:38.159
<v Speaker 2>another interesting innovation is think about a future when quantum

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 2>computing becomes a reality. Encryption like today's encryption can be

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 2>easily decrypted with an actual functioning quantum computer. So encryption

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 2>today needs to get up to speed, so new kinds

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 2>of cryptography or post quantum cryptography can help. For example, IBM,

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Google and university partners co developed a kind of lattice

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 2>day digital signature in which encryption security relies on the

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 2>difficulty of finding short vectors and lattices. So basically what

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 2>that means is it's a very very difficult mathematical problem

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 2>about finding specific vectors in a three dimensional space. So

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 2>definitely we've been seeing some cool innovations in access control

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 2>and any kind of tech that's bringing the security closerts.

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>At the end, resource, I love that the form of

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>protection you brought up is called zero trust architecture.

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 2>It makes exactly it really, don't trust anyone.

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Don't trust anyone I might click on that phishing email. Amanda.

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for walking us through not only

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 1>what's happening with cybersecurity, but also this different set of vocabulary,

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 1>so these different systems that are being used in different acronyms,

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and also my personal favorite from the show, zero trust architecture.

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:55.439
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me.

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg NEF is a service provided by Bloomberg Finance LP

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>in its affiliates. This recording does not constitute, nor should

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>it be construed as investment advice, investment recommendations, or a

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>recommendation as to an investment or other strategy. Bloomberg NEF

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>should not be considered as information sufficient upon which to

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:26.360
<v Speaker 1>base an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance LP nor any

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of its affiliates makes any representation or warranty as to

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this recording,

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 1>and any liability as a result of this recording is

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>expressly disclaimed.