WEBVTT - What Is Agnosticism?

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff, a production of I Heart Radio,

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey brain Stuff, Lauren fog obamb Here. It's called the

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>rise of the nuns, the rapid increase in the number

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of Americans who claim to have no religious beliefs that

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>has taken place in the last decade or so. When

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Pew's Religious Landscape study came out in it showed that

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the percentage of atheists in America had doubled from one

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>point six in two thousand seven to three point one. Meanwhile,

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.239
<v Speaker 1>the percentage of agnostics had just about doubled from two

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>point four to four point Oh but these terms agnostic

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and atheists are often confused. Let's unpack them. People choose

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>to identify as religiously agnostic for a variety of personal reasons, philosophical, psychological, theological,

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>or even political. But it's not that agnostics are spiritual

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>fence sitters, unwilling to state whether they believe in God

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>or don't. A true agnosticism, it turns out, has nothing

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to do with belief at all. The term agnosticism was

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>first coined by English biologist Thomas Henry Huxley, who lived

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 1>in the mid to late eighteen hundreds. He was a

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>fierce defender of Charles Darwin against religious critics who accused

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>him of denying God's role in creation. As a scientist,

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Huxley didn't concern himself with beliefs. He sought after facts,

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and the fact of any proposition, for example, that God

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 1>created the vast diversity of nature or that it evolved

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>from natural selection, could only be proven by the evidence.

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Huxley stated that agnosticism itself wasn't a creed or a

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>set of beliefs, but a principle, namely quote that it

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:36.199
<v Speaker 1>is wrong for a man to say he is certain

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of the objective truth of a proposition unless he can

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>produce evidence which logically justifies that certainty. The word itself

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>was a combination of the prefix a meaning against or opposite,

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and gnosticism, which comes from a Greek word meaning knowledge.

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Gnosticism was a religious movement that flourished in the first

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and second centuries CE, and held that, among other things,

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the spirit world was good and the material world was evil.

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And although the principle of agnosticism doesn't exclusively apply to

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the question of God's existence, you can be agnostic about

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>any proposition. It's been wrapped up in religion since the beginning.

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Huxley wrote a friend in eighteen sixty, I neither affirm

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>nor deny the immortality of Man. I see no reason

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>for believing it. But on the other hand, I have

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>no means of disproving it. Give me such evidence as

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>would justify me in believing anything else, and I will

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>believe that. So that's agnosticism. But what about atheism. Atheism,

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>according to its classical definition, is the lack of belief

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 1>in God. Whether that God is the Biblical Judeo Christian

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>God or some other higher power is a separate issue.

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>The opposite of atheism is theism, the belief that God exists.

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Atheism and theism are thus both metaphysical claims because they

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>as certain answer to a question about the nature of reality. Agnosticism,

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, doesn't take a position on whether

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 1>God exists. Instead, it takes a position on whether or

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.239
<v Speaker 1>not we can know if God exists. This is thus

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a physical or epistemological question, epistemology being the study of knowledge.

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Agnosticism claims that we cannot know if God does or

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 1>does not exist because there's no compelling evidence that either

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>proposition is true, at least not yet. You might think

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that agnosticism is nothing more than a handy way to

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>dodge the question of whether you believe in God. Instead

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of saying yes or no, the agnostic chooses a third position, neither.

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>But this is where things can get Harry. We spoke

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>with Paul Draper, a professor at Purdue University who specializes

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>in the philosophy of religion. He's witnessed his fair share

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of arguments between atheists and agnostics. He said, people get

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>so angry about this. The atheists will say, you call

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>yourself an agnostic, but you're really an atheist. And you

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>can see the atheists point at face value. It seems

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a razor thin line between saying I don't see

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>any evidence that God exists and I don't believe that

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>God exists. But the friends is that you can be

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>an agnostic and an atheist, just as you can be

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>an agnostic and a believe in Christian or Buddhist or Muslim.

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>That's because agnosticism, at its core is separate and unrelated

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:16.359
<v Speaker 1>to questions of faith. Let's explain, agnostics are nearly always

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>lumped together with atheists as a type of nonbeliever. The

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Pew Research Center defined religious nuns as being either atheists, agnostics,

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>or not affiliated with any particular religion. But agnosticism isn't

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>itself a belief system. One could believe on faith that

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>God exists, but still ascribed to the agnostic position that

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>God's existence cannot be proven by physical evidence or rational arguments.

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Such a person would be an agnostic theist. There's even

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a school of theology called apophatic theology that claims that

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>God is inherently unknowable. Thomas A Queenas, the thirteenth century

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>philosopher and theologian, wrote, now we cannot know what God is,

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>but only what God is not. We must therefore consider

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the ways in which God does not exist, rather than

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 1>the ways in which does. According to Pew, of religious nuns,

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 1>the group that does include atheists and agnostics do believe

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>in a higher power. However, while it's technically true that

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you can be both an agnostic and a faithful believer,

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it's perhaps more common for agnostics to doubt the existence

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of God as such. Bertrand Russell, the British philosopher and mathematician,

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>wrote a treatise on agnosticism in which he explained why

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 1>the agnostic and atheist positions often overlap. He said. The

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>agnostics suspends judgment, saying that they are not sufficient grounds

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>either for affirmation or for denial. At the same time,

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>an agnostic may hold the existence of God, though not impossible,

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>is very improbable. He may even hold it so improbable

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>that it's not worth considering in practice. In that case,

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>he is not far removed from atheism. His attitude maybe

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that which a careful philosopher would have towards the gods

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of ancient Greece. If I were asked to prove that

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 1>Zeus and Pside and Inhera and the rest of the

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Olympians do not exist, I should be at a loss

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to find conclude of arguments. An agnostic may think the

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 1>Christian God as improbable as the Olympians. In that case,

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>he is, for practical purposes, at one with the atheists.

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>As we said at the beginning, the reasons for identifying

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>as agnostic are myriad and different for every person. Draper,

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>who has participated in high profile debates with Christian philosophers,

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>calls himself a local atheist and global agnostic. He explained,

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm an atheist about the all powerful, all knowing, all

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>good God, I'm agnostic about God in a broader sense.

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.119
<v Speaker 1>Is there some being that qualifies for the title God?

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>There could be such a thing. Today's episode was written

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>by Dave Ruse and produced by Tyler Clay. Brain Stuff

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 1>is a production of I Heart Radio's How Stuff Works.

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>For more on this and lots of other philosophical topics,

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>visit our home planet, how stuff Works dot com. And

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>for more podcasts for my heart Radio, visit the I

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.