WEBVTT - Draft Show: Final Senior Bowl Thoughts

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show, your

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>war room for in center news and draft analysis from

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>deep within the confines of Cowboys Headquarters at the Star

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>in Frisco, Dallas Cowboys like C. D. Lamb and now

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>your hosts Dane Brugler, Jeff Kavanaugh, Kevin Turner and Kyle

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeoman's It's a wonderful Thursday edition of the Draft Show,

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>presented by Miller Lite from the SWBC Mortgage Studios here

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>from the Star in Frisco, as we continue to get

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you ready for the NFL Draft, as it is now

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>just eighty one days away. April twenty ninth is when

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>things kick off in Cleveland, Ohio, and it's starting to

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>get to be crunch time because well the Senior Bowl

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>is in the rear view mirror. The heat is starting

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to get turned up on these front offices, and the

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>same thing goes for the Draft Show. Jeff Kavanaugh, We've

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>got Kevin kat Turner, Dane Brugler from the Athletic. I'm

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Yelman's just trying to drive the bus as always

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>here on this show. And gentlemen, the like I said,

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Senior Bowl in the rear view mirror, we talked about

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit on Tuesday with Bucky Brooks. Brian

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>brought us and David Hellman and had a great conversation

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>about kind of the Cowboys feel with it. I kind

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of want to get in to some of the prospects today.

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk a lot about the quarterback position. We're

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about the corners as well. In that secondary

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>we can the Cowboys find their type of corner, and

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>by type of corner, Jeff Kavanaugh has a different idea

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of what type of corner he potentially wants to see

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>as a Dallas Cowboy. But Dane start us off by

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of giving us your final general thoughts in terms

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Senior Bowl. What you took from the week

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>down in Mobile. It was definitely weird. It was definitely different,

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, that's different than what we're used to.

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, I'm very thankful that we

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>had it. You know, all the credit the Jim Nage

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and his staff for we're being able to pull it

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>off um and a safe environment and gave the team's

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to look at these guys even more, and it

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>also gave a lot of these players the opportunity to

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>help themselves and we are we touched on it, you know,

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>last week a little bit just you know, some of

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 1>the risers guys that helped themselves. But some of these players,

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we're gonna look at them totally different

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>now compared to uh, you know, a week ago because

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of what they were able to do. Quinn Miners from Wisconsin,

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Whitewater being you know, one of the biggest risers, a

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>guy like Richie Grant who I had a third round

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:34.239
<v Speaker 1>grade on him, loved them coming into the week after

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing him live and up close like that, he's going

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in the top fifty. That's you know, you gained a

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>different bandage point. I think seeing these guys live, at

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>least for me, and that's you know, my process and

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the way I look at these guys. Um, you know,

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of other players helped themselves. D Escridge

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>from Western Michigan. Um, you know, it's just it's a

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>loaded group of slot receivers in that second to fourth

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>round range. How were these guys guys gonna really shake

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>out in terms of how they're gonna be stacked? And

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Dskridge and Marie Rogers and Shy Smith. The

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>guys that were down there, Kaye Johnson, they were able

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.239
<v Speaker 1>to make, you know, kind of a statement like why

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 1>they should be a little bit higher. So just a

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>really productive week and I think we have a better

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>feel for these players now than we did before the

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Senior Bowl. Katie. Yeah, I would say my thoughts, and

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be a jerk, but if I

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>was a cornerback, I would not go to the Senior

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Bowl ever again because all the wide receivers are really good.

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm kind of kidding, I'm sort of kidding a

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but it was amazing how you know, you

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>go into the week with an eye on cornerbacks and

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you just get distracted by all of the wide receiver talent.

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm in this world right now. I don't know

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>how you guys look on your boards. And I know

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>on the Thursday incarnation of the Draft Show, we haven't

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>done a lot of wide receiver talk yet, partially because

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys are kind of set there. But I'm sitting

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>there going, Okay, am I really gonna have fifteen? Am

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I really gonna have twenty wide receivers in the top

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>three rounds? Like there's a lot of separation on the

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>draft board. I'm gonna have to figure out because I've

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>as I continue to work through the wide receivers, I'm going, okay, well,

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>there's enough about him that I like that I would

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>consider him a top one hundred pick. And I end

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>up going, oh my god. And then meanwhile I can wait,

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>going okay, well, what cornerbacks really impressed me? Keith Taylor

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>was great in the game on Saturday. Keith Taylor, the

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>cornerback from Washington. I'm not sure I loved his tape.

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I can tell you that I didn't really

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>like his tape. But he was moving a little better

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>at the Senior Bowl, and you're asking yourself, Okay, how

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 1>do you balance that out? Did he just improve? Like

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>what happened? So I'm more confused at quarterback maybe than

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>ever based on the guys who were at the Senior Bowl.

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>But man, that wide receiver position, I'm in love. I

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>would never sign a wide receiver again. I think I'll

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>just continue to draft him. They're incredible. That's a good

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>point point because I thought throughout the week it was

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>impressive for some of those corners that ended up playing

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>decently well. I mean, you mentioned Keith Taylor. I thought

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>he had a poor week to practice, and I'm right

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>there with you, Katsie. I don't like his tape that much.

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean I had like a late third round grade

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>on him in terms of his tape. But he played

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>really well in the Senior Bowl. I mean there were

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>guys like, oh man, I'm blanking on their names. Oh,

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Trey Norwood and Trey Brown, both out of Oklahoma. I

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>thought they had decent weeks of practice, and then I

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think they played very well. So overall, I think

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at the cornerback position as something that is

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of wishy. Watch you when you go up against

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>those receivers that are as talented as the wide receiver

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>group was down in Mobile. Now, Jeff, what were your

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of thoughts on the week. Did you agree in

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the fact that some of these corners just didn't show

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>out the way that you thought they would well. I

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>think I would think that NFL teams no going into

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>this that it's really hard because in the real world,

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not all that often that you're legitimately going to

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>be you guy all by yourself, and he can run

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a drag all the way across the field five yards

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, oh, good luck. So I think NFL

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>teams know that it's advantage wide receiver in the one

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>on one drills. But I think guys like um melifon

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Wu from Syracuse, Aaron Robinson, Central Florida, I think there

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>were dbs that that helped themselves throughout the Senior Bowl practices.

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>So I wouldn't I wouldn't be terrified to go there

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>if I was a dB, I would just know that

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna go there and it's gonna be what you're

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>used to in practice settings. One on one is hard

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and you gotta you gotta really believe in yourself and

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>go ball out. But there's there's there's opportunities to make plays.

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>And I thought some of those guys, did Dan, do

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you agree? Yeah? I thought Trey Brown was one of

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>those guys who he's five ft ten on a good day,

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>but his competitiveness that he played with was awesome to

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 1>watch during practice. Really impressed with what he did. Yeah,

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I agree with Jeff, and it's I think

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's you're as a corner, You're expected that you're

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna have a tough time, You're gonna get beat.

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you do make a play, teams, you're gonna

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>remember that. And so I think you take your chances

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and you go there and compete. And you know, we

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>saw it, you know this year where the guy like

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 1>like like I said, with Trey Brown, I thought helped

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.239
<v Speaker 1>himself as a he projects probably as more of a nickel,

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>but a guy that coming out of Senior Bowl week,

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>teams maybe have a little bit better opinion of what

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>did you think of MVP or offensive MVP of the

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Senior Bowl Kellen Mond. And I know a lot of

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>fans around here want to hear about Kellen Mond because

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>they just grew up Aggie fans. I mean there's a

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of Texas and Maggie's around this state. And I

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>know with Kellen Mond, there's been kind of wishy washy

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>whenever it comes to his thought process, the whenever it

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>comes to his draft rating. I mean, the inconsistency is

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>on the field and off the field with him in

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of the grading of him and the scouting of him. Dan,

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>what did you think about him throughout the week? And

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>ultimately Coleman in that MVP outing during the game. But

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I kind of want to just hear about what he

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>did at the Senior Bowl. I think it mirrored what

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>we saw on tape for his career at A and M.

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And the thing that just bothers me the most with

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>hitting with Mind is I could show you a clip

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>from or a game from his sophomore year and then

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>show you a game from a senior year and it

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>looks like it was, you know, the same same guy. Yeah,

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I just I think the same level of inconsistency. He's

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 1>clearly talented. Clearly he's got, you know, a good arm,

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>he can move around a little bit, He'll make some

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>really impressive throws. His highlights are as impressive as anybody's.

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>But when you talk about the full scope, the body

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of work, I just see the same player that we

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>saw as a sophomore that we're seeing as a senior.

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>And we saw during practice up and down with his

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>decision making, up and down with his placement down the field.

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's easy to look at his highlight tape and say, Okay, yeah,

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>this guy can play. But when you look at the

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>full body of work, it's just it's just a back

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and so I find it really hard to get excited

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 1>about any of these senior quarterbacks. Uh, there's not a

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>there's not a single senior quarterback that I'm really overly

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>excited about. And you know, Man's kind of in that

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>mix with with Jamie Newman and you know the rest

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of that group that probably gonna go somewhere on day three.

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>It's just, uh, you know, hard to guess exactly where.

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>It's just gonna come down to teams and their preference

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.839
<v Speaker 1>and exactly what they're looking for. You're still not very

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>excited about mac Jones either. Well, I don't consider he's

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>not a senior, so you know, he's all the underclassmen

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I can I can get there, even Davis mills from Stanford.

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I there's something there. And I you know, I think

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that there's a little bit of optimism for a Davis

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>mills Um. You know, I think he's got a good

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>chance to be drafted ahead of Kyle trask Um and

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>because he's got starter potential. So and mac Jones, he

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought he helped himself by being there. I think

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the obvious connection now is going to be with the Panthers.

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Matt Rule couldn't help but rave about mac Jones, the

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>way he handled himself during practice behind the scenes, his leadership,

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the way guys follow him. It's going to be interesting

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to see how that might play out on draft day

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>with the Panthers having a lot more intimate knowledge of

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>mac Jones and how he's wired compared to some of

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>these other teams that are looking at quarterbacks in the draft.

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So's it's a really interesting group of quarterbacks this year

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>where the first six drafted might all be underclassmen than

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the other you know, three or four drafted could be seniors, Jeff,

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>whenever it comes to the quarterback position, I mean, we're

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about these senior quarterbacks, but I mean it's a

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a very heavy field. Whenever you look at Trevor Lawrence, Justine,

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Zach Wilson, Trey Lance, all of which that will probably

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>go inside the top ten. And now there's been rumblings

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>around Dak Prescott and of course we're coming down to

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the wire. I mean, the transition tag period starts in

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteen days and it ends a couple weeks after that

0:10:56.320 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 1>or three weeks after that, So ultimately your clock is

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:03.199
<v Speaker 1>running out on Dak Prescott if you're the Cowboys right now.

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>And Brian broad Us has said this previously on the

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday show that once that time starts clicking and it

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>starts taking a little bit further down, and you have

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to franchise Dak Prescott, you're gonna have to start talking

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>about one of these quarterbacks. But which quarterback would you

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about? If you were the Dallas Cowboys. Oh,

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.719
<v Speaker 1>I would like to quote the great Kevin Turner if

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I could, let you know. He's pretty good at this stuff.

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:32.839
<v Speaker 1>I hate, I hate quarterbacks. So if you are the Cowboys,

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>what you should do is sign your top eight quarterback

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. You should have done that two years ago,

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 1>one year ago, and then you should do it again. Now.

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Now if because you are the Cowboys front office, you've

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>screwed this up so royally that now it's gonna be really,

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>really hard because Dak's like, well, I'm on the doorstep

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to free agency, so you're gonna have to blow me away.

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>And Jerry's still like, hey, you signed what we offer

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you and that's it. And yeah, you may have to

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>look at a guy because you have a top ten pick.

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think realistically you're gonna be talking about either

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Justin Fields, Trey Lance, or Mac Jones because just going

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>off of what we hear and what we're seeing. I

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>would imagine that Zach Wilson and Trevor Lawrence are gone,

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and then it's kind of the wild card what is

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the order and how quickly do they all go? Because

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I could totally see a scenario where five quarterbacks are

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:30.199
<v Speaker 1>gone when the Cowboys pick. I could see that, yeah,

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think we also have to acknowledge it's possible

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that two quarterbacks are gone when the Cowboys pick. It's

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.559
<v Speaker 1>the weirdest top of a draft that I've seen in

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the seven years that I've been doing this, because I

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you're like, if you're not sold, there's

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>teams in the top five or in the top eight

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that there's at least four or five of them that

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I think should take quarterbacks. But if you don't believe

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>in the guys that are available this year, then you're

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>not going to because all of these teams have other

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>options they could roll with. So if you're the Cowboys

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's Hey, which guy are you keeping an eye on?

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 1>I guess the most likely answer would probably be Trey

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Lance North Dakota State, And that would be wild to me.

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>If the Cowboys were like, Hey, we're gonna move on

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>from a top eight quarterback in the league because this

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>guy's got a big harmonies athletic and maybe you could

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>be good one day. So Cowboys, sign your quarterback. Come

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>on the magical mystery ride with me real quick. I'm

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>coming to you now as half myself, Kevin Turner and

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>half the Dallas Cowboys. And the fact that we're even

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about this already tells you that the Cowboys are

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty comfortable being lucy goosey at the quarterback position, because

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>otherwise the deal would have already been done, like it

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>just would have been done. And I don't want to

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>hear the stuff about Dak's side and what they're demanding.

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>There's a market value. The deal could have been done

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and should have been done, all right, And that's the

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>end of that. That being said, after taking a full dive,

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I carved out some special time to really go through

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>all few of the games that we have of North

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Dakotas day. My quarterback too this year is Trey Lance,

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and I am so comfortable with that. I'm kind of

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of in love with the guy again. I'm

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>willing to be loosey goosey at the quarterback position, I

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>guess right, because I mean, I think Dak should be

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>your quarterback. But if we're gonna get to this point,

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>this hypothetical area that we're talking about, which would even

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>have us talking about a quarterback, that I'm doing whatever

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it takes to get Trey Lance on my team. If

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm the Dallas Cowboys, he would have an ideal one

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>year to sit while Dak is on the tag and

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>then we are ready to go. I think his ball

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>placement and armed talent is just as good as as

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Zach Wilson's better than Zach Wilson personally. I think the

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>way that he has he feels pressure in the pocket,

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>like anyone can play when the pocket's clean, right, but

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>when he can fill it in the pocket, And that's

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>something that I didn't always see with Justin Fields. A

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>little escapability. Yeah, I can kind of kind of move around.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I didn't always feel it. Trey Lance feels it. And

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>for a nineteen year old to have that season he had,

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>he looked pretty advanced. He didn't look like a nineteen

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>year old. And I understand Division two, I get all

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that stuff, But if we're if we're rolling dice anyway

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>at the position. That's my guy, because there's a whole

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>other dynamic. He adds. Watch the James Madison game from

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, which he only throws the ball like fifteen

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>times that game. He runs the ball thirty times in

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that game. Is the new GM that game an entire

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>other to the game? Yeah, twenty nineteen, he would be

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in that game, right, Trey versus the news, that's that's

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that's fascinating. Uh, is your guy? No, it's very boord.

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you talk about a guy, and I like

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Trey Lance, but I mean we have to recognize just

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>how unprecedented of an evaluation this is. The guy has

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>seventeen career starts, all versus FCS competition. Uh. You look

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>at his college resume and the stats just on paper

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>look great eight but you know many times he trailed

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>in the second half of a game in his career once. Like,

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>there's so much about him we don't know. There are

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>so many one read and then run type of plays

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>on his film where he's not making full read or

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>full field reads. He's not going through progressions things like that.

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>You know last year, this this great season that he

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>had which was statistically great sixteen to those season national

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>title fcs. He averaged in his career eighteen point six

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>pass attempts per game. Meanwhile the running game, they averaged

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>forty five rush attempts per game. At the North Dakota State,

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>they leaned on that rush, that run game. That's that's

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>what their offense is based off of, and then they would,

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, pass off of that. So I love

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the traits. I think that the poise that he shows

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>is really impressive. You know, the competitive nature that he has.

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I like, but there's just there's so much about him

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>as a quarterback that we don't know. And maybe he'll

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>get there, but I mean we have to recognize just

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>how big of a risk that it is, not not

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 1>just you know, moving on from dak and going to

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a new quarterback, but moving on to a new quarterback

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that is so we just there's so many unknown variables

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>right now. I mean, for me, I'm a Zach Wilson guy.

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I wrote about it back in October. I took a

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:20.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of heat when I said he's, you know, right

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>there in the mix to be quarterback too, behind Trevor

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence UM. But I think more people are catching on

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 1>that Zach Wilson is he's legit and I think, you know,

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>when I quarterback, it's such a hard position to evaluate,

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I've had plenty of misses doing this,

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:39.719
<v Speaker 1>so you know, don't. I am not like the final

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>voice on on these quarterback prospects. But something that I

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>really look for is the ability to make the great

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 1>spontaneous decision. That's a that's an old Bill Walsh thing.

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>You want guys that can make that spontaneous decision and

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>create and to me, that's Zach Wilson. His ability, his

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>feel for throwing off platform, his field, for ball placement

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 1>down the field, He's naturally accurate. He's got a whip

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of an arm. I wish you were a little bit bigger.

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>There's some durability concerns there, uh, you know, just that narrow,

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>narrow frame. But you know, and sometimes he'll play an overdrive,

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 1>he'll you know, bail the pocket before he needs to.

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Mechanics get a little wild that that that's part of

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>his game. But he has a natural ball placement to

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>him down the field. I think there's a lot you

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 1>can do with Zach Wilson. I think he's the clear

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 1>number two quarterback in this draft, but it's it's just

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a really intriguing group of pastors because they're all really

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 1>really talented, and you know, they could all end up

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 1>being starters in this league. Just to play Devil's advocate here, Dane,

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and you were talking about with Trey Lance and his

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>competition and the unknowns, and there certainly are a ton

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of unknowns coming from an FCS level regardless. But with

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Zach Wilson, are there not still a ton of unknowns?

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Because he had one good season? I mean, yeah, yeah,

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the decent year twenty nineteen, but I mean his completion

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>percentage went from sixty two to seventy three in one

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>year and then all of a sudden, he's a top

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 1>two quarterback in this draft, behind Trevor Lawrence. But he

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>also played kind of lesser competition than the guys like

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a Justin Fields and a Trevor Lawrence and a Kyle

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Trask and a Mac Jones. Because you look at by

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>US competition, Troy Navy Louisiana Attack UTSA, Texas State, North

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Alabama Coastal Carolina was their toughest game. I think overall,

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>there's still a lot of question marks around Zach Wilson.

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>White is Zach Wilson more of a lock than a

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe a Trey Lance. Well, I just think we know

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>more about Wilson, and I mean, you're absolutely right in

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>terms of the level of competition, But I also think

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:46.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a pretty big gap from you know, talking about

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Troy compared to the Missouri Valley Conference. Yes, yes, level,

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know that's just the facts. Nothing against that

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>level of camp. It's just there's there's a different competition

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>level in terms of talent. So, you know, Zach Wilson

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>and I think, you know, he also benefited from a

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>strong run game. A strong run game, reliable targets to

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>throw to a good offensive line. So yeah, absolutely, I don't.

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Zach Wilson's a sure thing by any means.

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I just I'm a more believer, more of a believer

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>in his talent um. I think we've seen more, we

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 1>know more about him compared to uh, Trey Lance. And

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 1>then you know, let's just throw Justin Fields into the mix,

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, so we can you know, talk about him

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 1>as well. I think that there's a lot to like

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>about him from a physical perspective. Uh, you know, he's

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a naturally accurate guy. We saw that

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 1>in the Clemson game. When when he's in rhythm and

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>everything is going right, the play design is where it

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>needs to be. He looks outstanding. But when that first

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>read's taken away, or you know, the defense does something

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:46.959
<v Speaker 1>with their coverages or their blitz that he hasn't accounted for,

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:49.719
<v Speaker 1>that's where the play breaks down. And that's where he

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 1>needs to have a better plan B, C, and D

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:55.919
<v Speaker 1>and play with more urgency if he's going to make

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.120
<v Speaker 1>it at the next level. But I think the intangibles,

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the athleticism, the accuracy, it's all there for fields to

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>make it. It's just he needs to get over that

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.719
<v Speaker 1>hump when it comes down to making that spontaneous decision.

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Like I mentioned, was Zach Wilson. Hey, hey, Jeff, can

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I run something by you real quick? Because another thing

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to throw in about really just the position

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in general. And I do think the Cowboys will get

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a deal done with Chach. I think they will do

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:24.439
<v Speaker 1>it reluctantly. But if they don't, that tells you that

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>they didn't value their investment. Okay, since I can do

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>let a top eight quarterback in the league walk, well,

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>then I've got no problem. Let my quarterback run twenty

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>times a game if he needs to. And Trey Lance

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>is a guy who I think could probably do that

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>for you. I guess I'm done looking for the perfect passer. Now,

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm done looking for all that. If my team right

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 1>here is not going to go ahead and go full

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>forward the investment because they want to sign the running

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>back in the linebacker like that, that's kind of where

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.199
<v Speaker 1>I kind of go. Well, apparently I don't need to

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>worry about developing this guy into some you know, long

0:21:58.320 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 1>term thing, and I don't need this guy to be

0:21:59.880 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen year quarterback for me, which is ideal. Ideally

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>you have that guy who's your quarterback for ten and

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years and he becomes an excellent drop back passer

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and all those things. Right, Well, if you're just not

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna sign the guy because you don't believe it giving

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 1>him that much money, because you don't believe it giving

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 1>him market value, then screw it. Treat the quarterbacks like

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the running backs, then Burnham, who cares? What do you

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>think about that, Jeff? I mean, I dig the idea

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of unleashing the running quarterback. I think it's fun. I

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>love watching the Ravens play. I don't know how Amari

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Cooper and Ceedee Lamb would feel about it, probably because

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I also I also like to feel to

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball. So you know, a quarterback who's gonna

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>run like what does Lamar do? Probably fifteen times a game,

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>give or take. I think it's fun for winning. I

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's a good way to be consistently good. And

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're never going to pay a quarterback, I don't

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>mind that approach. But I've got a team that's got

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>some really good receivers and a really good quarterback. So

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 1>but Kat, your love for Trey Lance makes me think

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm cool with him and we can we can rock

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>with him because I believe he can throw. H. We

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have to risk our guy fifteen times a game,

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>do we. We don't have to to do that, Okay, yeah,

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>but I don't paint the picture that he's like Jet Yeah,

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>we could and could. I don't want to paint the

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 1>picture that he's like not a throwing quarterback or whatever. Like, uh,

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and we all, I mean, I don't know. I don'

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>want to speak for everyone, um, but I think we

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>all kind of thought Lamar Jackson, we knew we had

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>work to do in the passing game, but I think

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 1>we all thought he might continue to take a step forward,

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe not have that regression. You kind of go look

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>at their wide receivers and in Baltimore like no offense,

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>but like they brought in Dez Bryant, they were that desperate, like, yeah,

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>they need a little more a few more weapons out

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:47.360
<v Speaker 1>there to kind of help him out a little bit.

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>But like, I don't like, I don't think those are

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>like I want to be careful when we talk about

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>other players like that we're not talking about a comparison.

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>A couple of things about Trey Lance that early jumped

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>out to me. And again, I'm talking about a nineteen

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>year old, and I'm talking about a guy who ideally

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play again next year. Hopefully we get a preseason

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 1>game and maybe he can play then, but I hopefully

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>he gets time to sit behind someone for one year

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>at least. And one thing that I think about with

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Trey Lance, some little things just like playing off of

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 1>play action because they did run a lot that was

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 1>very helpful for him, are throwing on the run and

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>things like that. You can see that and see those

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>skills and then along with when you have you know,

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>blitz is coming from the blind side, just when you're

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>when you can't see it, to fill it and know

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:35.400
<v Speaker 1>it and step up out of it. Just looks very

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>comfortable doing that. And those are the types of things

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>that I really love. When the guy's keeping his eyes downfield,

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>when he's in the pocket and moving around, and I

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>understand some of the things that Dame was talking about.

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're we got to make sure this guy

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>can throw with the right amount of anticipation and things

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>like that. How accurate is he on the five yard drag?

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:56.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, all day long, you didn't see a ton

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of that, and a lot of his throws are throwing

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it down the field quite a bit. You know, you

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>want to see a little more accuracy and a little

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>more consistency, and quite frankly, more tape. In general, you

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>want to see more tape. But I am I'm pretty

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>smitten with my guy, Trey Lance right now, and I

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.679
<v Speaker 1>think based on what I've heard, and I don't know

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the guy, so if I could text you, I would,

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>But I think you've got a guy who's got a

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty good football IQ and things like that. Who who's

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 1>going to be uh, you know, I don't want to

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:27.479
<v Speaker 1>be Jen Jason Garrett here, but you know, kind of right,

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of guy type type of thing. You hear those things,

0:25:30.920 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's good. But we heard those things

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>about Carson Wentz too, So yeah, it's the same program.

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Last think I'll say about this, last think I'll say

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 1>about these quarterbacks is that I think this year, more

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 1>than more than ever, with these this group of quarterbacks,

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it's going to come down to the interviews, you know,

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.120
<v Speaker 1>when just to figure out where are they in their

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>mental development? How much do they know, how much do

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>they not know? How much are they able to learn?

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>How those interviews go are going to be just paramount

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:00.200
<v Speaker 1>when they throw out the tape on and they say, okay,

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>well what are you looking at here down in distance?

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:04.919
<v Speaker 1>What's the coverages? You know? Are you setting the protections?

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 1>What are you doing? Okay, this read's taken away? What

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>is your what is your outlet? What do you what's

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>your thought process? Right now? Just going through all of

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>these positive and negative plays and to get a better

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 1>feel for where they are mentally, that more than that's

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.679
<v Speaker 1>that's the key every year that we're not really we

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.479
<v Speaker 1>don't have access to that information, and it's you know,

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a big missing piece of the evaluation process for

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>those of us on the outside when evaluating quarterbacks, but

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>more so than ever because college offenses are getting easier

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>and easier to operate, and so I think for a

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of these quarterbacks they're less prepared for the NFL

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.719
<v Speaker 1>where and so for these the interview process, it's going

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to be important for them to really understand the questions

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that are going to be asked and to be ready

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>for Yeah, and it's going to be virtual this year

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 1>because of everything that's gone on with COVID nineteen. So

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 1>add an extra wrench into it is how how these

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 1>virtual interviews are going to go. They did a lot

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of that last year as well because there were no

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty days. It's because there was no Dallas Day. But

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be much of the same this year. So

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>hopefully the Cowboys in really everybody around the league able

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to evaluate the right way. And just one thing added

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 1>on onto what Katie and Jeff we're talking about before.

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 1>We had to break here really quickly, but the fact

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 1>that you have Kellvin Moore as your offensive coordinator, Katie,

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>makes me think that your theory of running the football

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>with your quarterback may be debunked just a hair because

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't like running the football a whole lot. You

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>can kind of see that as a former quarterback himself.

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>They like to throw the football, and so I think

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Trey Lanz can certainly do that. But you're not gonna

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>run a thirty times a day. So I guess Jeff,

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you can. You can rest easy at night thinking that

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Trey Lance wouldn't run at thirty times in a game

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 1>every single time, but one of the quarterback. Yeah, I agree.

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's sign Dak and not have to worry about that.

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I agree. Let's go to break. When we come back

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>here on the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show, we're

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about a little bit of Twitter on the twenty.

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>We've got some great questions coming in from you guys

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter when we return right after this. There's nothing

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>as unique as our eyes, which is why Selor pioneers

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>ways to make lenses as unique as you. Varilux for

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>super sharp vision, Essential Blue for protection, and Crisolve for

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 1>freedom from glare, three cutting at solutions and a single

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 1>unique lens, so whatever your needs insist On Selor, visit

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 1>your local slor experts and find a perfect lens for you.

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 1>Seymore do Moore Selor. Since eighteen sixty five, Stetson hats

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 1>are American made with pride right here in Texas, and

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Stetson is proud to be on the field with America's team.

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Want to show your Texas and team pride too, You

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>can by purchasing your own Stetson. You can look just

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>like how the flag guys do on field at every

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>home game. Stetson hats the official crown of all self

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>respecting Cowboys and your favorite football team. Get yours today

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>shop dot Dallas Cowboys dot com or at Stetson dot com.

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jay Novachek, former tight end for the Dallas Cowboys

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 1>back in the day. I was a guy who always

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>got the tough yards, and that's why I run with

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>John Deer today. In fact, I have a John Dear

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>three zero twenty five E tractor that can handle any

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>yardwork I need to do, even the tough yards way

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>out back. So if you have one acre or a thousand,

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>John Deer has the equipment that's just right for you.

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Visit a John Deer dealer today. And run with us.

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>We are the official tractor provider of your Dallas Cowboys.

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Here it's nineteen o eight. Don't you think we should

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 1>get electricity and stop using candles to see it night?

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just electricity lights up the room fast, It's more

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>reliable than candles blowing out, and people seem to love

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>it nationwide. Well, candles, DA, did you just run into

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the wall. I have a new candle please. Historically, switching

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to new technology is a no brainer. Today it's AT

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and T five G fast, reliable, secure and nationwide. Switch

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to AT and T five G. It's not complicated. Five

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>G requires compatible plan not being your areus he att

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash bog for you for details. Is the

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot com Draft Show? Back here with a

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>second segment to hear the Dallas Cowboys dot com Draft Show.

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>We've got Kevin KT Turner, Jeff Cavanaugh, Daan Brugler. I'm

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Yeomans as always here on the Draft Show every

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Thursday at ten am Central time. Glad you uh you

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>guys are along for the ride. So now we've got

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>some time to hit up these Twitter questions and go

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>into some Twitter. On the twenty on the Twitter, Chris

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Beam in the back punching the buttons and doing a

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>fantastic job as always. Okay, we're gonna start things off

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>with John Marshall on Twitter. He says, I want the

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>team to fix the defensive tackle position. I want to

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>also add to that, John, So do we all? We

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>all want that to happen, he says, And Dan Quinn's defense.

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Is Tristan Hill and Evil Gallimore more suited to a

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>three tech or more of a pin trading one technique?

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>And what are the top defensive tackles on the board?

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Who can feel each of those roles? Jeff Cavana will

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>start with you. Oh, I think, to me, both Tristan

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Hill and Neville Gallimore are guys that are your rotational

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>three techniques that you're gonna line up over the guard.

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think either one of them is a guy

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that you necessarily want having to battle double teams because

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think either one of them is going to

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>handle it very well. So to me, I think in

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>this draft, if you're looking for a defensive tackle, I'm

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:36.959
<v Speaker 1>looking for the big boys, and it's a really interesting group.

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Because I will agree with Dane that I think to me,

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Christian Barmore is the best defensive tackle prospect because I

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>think Alabama, because I think he offers both where I

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>think he is powerful enough to play the run and

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 1>battle and hold his ground, but he also offers some

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>upside as a pass rusher. And then I do like

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Wilson despite the not good tape of twenty twenty,

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I still think even down his twenty twenty tape, the

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Florida State defensive tackle, former five star recruit, there's just

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>something about when I see guys that have violent hands

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that are hard for guys to sort of maintain blocks on.

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I like that in a player. And then in twenty nineteen,

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>when you just watch him when he hits people, it

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 1>looks like it hurts a lot, and I like that

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 1>in my defensive tackles. So Christian Barmore, Marvin Wilson, and

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>then I would throw in NC States. Let's tell me

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to say his first name, Alam McNeil. You know, he's

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a guy that I think when you watch him play

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>nose tackle, knows how to extend on guys, knows how

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of blockers, has a nice first step.

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think he's one of those guys that is

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a one technique but also has a little bit of

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>quickness that you want in a three technique. So I

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>think that would be a really good fit for this team.

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>So those the first three names that jump to mind

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>for me. I want to throw another name out there,

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not reaching for this guy, but if you're

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 1>telling me we get to round four, maybe he's still there.

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I would take a shot at three hundred and forty

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>five pound Tyler Shelvin from LSU. Didn't love his tape,

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's got great get off. I said his way,

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and forty five pounds. He's gonna eat space,

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna take on double teams. He has a run player.

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>He's not gonna add anything as a pass rusher. But

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>if we get the feeling that Dan Quinn wants that

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>bigger defensive tackle on the inside, I think Tyler Shelvin's

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a name I've kind of written down as kind of

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a guy who I think had a little hot, a

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>little more upside, a little more ceiling, and maybe didn't

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>show out as much as people might have wanted at LSU,

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and he did opt out, you know, twenty twenty. But

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a guy. If I'm in round four

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:41.239
<v Speaker 1>and he sides out of the top one hundred, that's

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a guy I'm taking a look at because I do

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>see some untapped potential there. Yeah, those are good names.

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean the two that came to mind, where McNeil

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and Shelvin. I think both probably are gonna go in

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the third round. Maybe I don't. We'll want to see

0:33:56.920 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>if they wait maybe a little bit longer. An interesting

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 1>play or Bobby Brown from A and m Um, Yeah,

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>he's he flashes, but he's inconsistent. Um. You know, I

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 1>think he could play some of that one because he

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 1>does have some power to him, and you know, I

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 1>think that he has yet to play his best football.

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>He's he's still young. He hasn't turned twenty one until

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I think August, so um, you know, Bobby Brown is

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 1>one of those intriguing upside guys in a class that

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>is just a not good nose tackle group. And he

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>played his high school ball right down the street from

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>AT and T Stadium, from Lamar High School in Arlington,

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 1>so hey, He's he's known the area. He's been around here,

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and they've had a lot of good defensive line talent

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 1>coming out of Arlington. Kind of keeping with this though, Dane,

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I've got kind of a two part question for you here,

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and this is from Connor Livesey are a good friend

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter who's been trying to ask a question for

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:54.320
<v Speaker 1>like four weeks and I keep missing his question somehouse

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>whenever the show comes up. So I'll get to this,

0:34:57.040 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>and I know I'm the worst. What area of McNeil's

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:04.280
<v Speaker 1>game do you guys have questions about? And why isn't

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 1>he defensive tackle? Number one? That's the first part of

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the question, Dan. The second one is he wants a

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>scouting report on Syracuse defensive tackle McKinley Williams and why

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>was his Clemson tape the best defensive line tape of

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:23.479
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty. Well with McNeil, Uh, you know, I think

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>there's there's plenty to like about him. Uh, you know,

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>he played. He reminds me a lot of or you

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't get. He gave me flashbacks of watching Javon Hargrave

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>as a prospect. He's he's heavy handed, He's got that

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 1>body type that you want to thick thighs, that thick

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>torso that bubble that you're looking for in those tackle

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>bottom exactly. Uh. And he plays close to the ground,

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:49.839
<v Speaker 1>so he's got some flexibility to him. Uh. He eats

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 1>up blockers, he wins gaps. Uh, he can reset the

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:54.919
<v Speaker 1>line of scrimmage with his power. He just I don't

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see a very rangey player. Um. And I

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 1>thought he was part of a pretty heavy rotation that

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 1>really allowed him to stay fresh. Something to consider as well.

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, he's he's an easy player to like. Um,

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that he's going to It's tough with

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 1>defensive tackles because you have to really understand what's their

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>impact potential, you know, especially if they're not It's one thing.

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:18.320
<v Speaker 1>If they're a pass rusher, then it's a little easier

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to project their impact potential. If they're not a pass rusher,

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 1>then that's where it gets a little bit tougher too,

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to truly understand what's their value in the draft. You know,

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>is are they a third round pick, fourth rup you know?

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think McNeil falls in that category where I

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know how much he gives you as a pass rusher,

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:40.399
<v Speaker 1>and so what is that exact value? And so that's

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:42.720
<v Speaker 1>why I think he's I think he's a day two player,

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>but even that maybe more of a third than a two.

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:47.840
<v Speaker 1>It just you know it's gonna come down to preference,

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 1>and we have the factor in two. This is a

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>week nose tackle group, So a guy like McNeil could

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 1>get pushed up the board for a team that you

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 1>know is looking for that guy if you're picking it

0:36:57.320 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to say the Cowboys, for example, If you're picking mid

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 1>second round and you know you are looking at nose

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 1>tackle and you don't feel great about the guys that

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 1>are going to be their third fourth round, you might

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 1>feel pressured to maybe pull the trigger a little bit earlier.

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 1>And not just the Cowboys, but several teams there are

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in the market for a one technique or you know,

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a player that can play over the center. So it's

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a it's a really interesting dynamic with these nose tackles.

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 1>What about McKinley Williams. Have to handle McKinley Williams. Oh,

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 1>yes from Syracuse. Uh, I don't know. I need to

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 1>see more in him. Um, I don't think I have

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a great feel for him yet and where he fits

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>in this class. But give me time on him. We'll

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 1>come back to Okay, that's fine. Yeah, I mean, it's

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>still what is it, February fourth at this point, So

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that makes a lot of sense. Connor's just ahead of

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>all of us. That's the only issue. Um Now, I

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 1>don't think Connor's ahead of Dane. Oh no, he's not.

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>He's not ahead of Dane. Don't work. Anyone's ahead of

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>nobody's had a date. Even some of the gms in

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the league or not ahead of Dane. Most of the

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>gems in the league or not ahead of Dane. Okay.

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:09.719
<v Speaker 1>Kevin on Twitter asked this, and I'm gonna go straight

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to Katie with this one, and he said some would disagree.

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>How did the Cowboys pass on Kyle Pitts if he's

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:19.800
<v Speaker 1>there at ten? And what is your opinion on Tyson

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Campbell with the second pick meaning forty fourth overall? I mean,

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you pass on him if a cornerbacks on the board,

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>or you know, and if it's a player that you're

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:33.919
<v Speaker 1>in love with is on the board, or if Trey

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Lance is on the board because you've decided not to

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>sign back, that's how you pass on kW Pits. But

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like I understand the kle Pits think. I

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>think you can get by tied in with another year

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of Jarwin, another year of Dalton Shoult as your backup.

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 1>If they want to bring back the Bell Dozers tied

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 1>in three, I'm all about it. And that's how you

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 1>pass on kal Pits. I love Kyl Pits and other

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>than there's a good chance Cowpits is not there at ten.

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:03.360
<v Speaker 1>But I just it's asset allocation and roster building is

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>more important than ever when you are paying your quarterback

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:07.959
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and the Cowboys are going to be paying

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>their quarterback a lot because they're going to either tack

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 1>him or sign him. And that's all important, and that's

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 1>what you should do. You should pay your quarterback. Tyson

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Campbell is very interesting and it kind of leads to

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>something we're gonna talk about in the third segment about

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a cornerback size. I'm a little higher on Eric Stokes

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 1>than Tyson Campbell, but Tyson Campbell's the better athlete. Tyson

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Campbell is longer. I've got him at six two five.

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:37.239
<v Speaker 1>The traits are all there, the length, the speed, you know,

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:40.760
<v Speaker 1>those are the things that are all there. There are times,

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's not always. There are times when it just

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look natural playing the cornerback position. You go watch

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Patrick certain play, it looks pretty natural. Even one of

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:52.799
<v Speaker 1>the Eric Stokes take. To me, he looks pretty natural

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 1>on the other side. But you know, Tyson Campbell's gonna

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:58.400
<v Speaker 1>get drafted higher than Eric Stokes because he's got better traits.

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 1>And it's all about traits. But I think he did

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a good job, you know, carrying wide receivers across the field.

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>You could see that, and he could keep up with

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 1>them because he's got good recovery speed. If they do

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:11.239
<v Speaker 1>get a step or two on him, I don't know,

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, give it with this link. I want him

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:16.360
<v Speaker 1>getting a more of a jam at the line of scrimmage.

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 1>You didn't always see that when he was up and

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 1>pressed technique. But to me, tons of ceiling. I got

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ceiling with Trevon Diggs over there as well.

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I like Tyson Campbell. I've got a second round grade

0:40:29.320 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>on him. But there are just some things that you

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 1>want to be you want to see shut up with him.

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I think one thing with him too. When you watched

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 1>him this year offenses, we're not afraid to throw at

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 1>him because it's tough, because he has a lot of

0:40:44.680 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the traits. But I mean when you when you are

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:49.840
<v Speaker 1>drafting a corner in the first you know, fifty or

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:51.799
<v Speaker 1>sixty pick. You want a guy that can get his

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:53.920
<v Speaker 1>head turned and find the football, and he just didn't

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 1>do that consistently, and that really worries me. On Campbell,

0:40:56.760 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>so I agree with a lot of what you said.

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Traits are easy to like, and I you know, the

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 1>length size. Uh, you know, he is a very smooth

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:09.760
<v Speaker 1>athlete for a guy that big. But you know it's

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the way offensive attacked him. Uh, really do make you worry.

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 1>Oh and one thing on McKinley Williams. The reason I

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 1>have not seen enough of him yet he's not in

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:19.840
<v Speaker 1>his draft class. So I just want to put that

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 1>out there. Oh wow, well that makes a lot of sense.

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's a See. Anytime Dane says give me time,

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>it means the dude's not not even in the draft

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:31.120
<v Speaker 1>at all. Just to just to clarify, I'm falling back

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 1>to school, so it's gracious, real quick on Campbell, I'll

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 1>be quick here. I have him just on my board

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 1>right now. I have him as my eighth cornerback. So

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and that's probably second round, right, that's probably

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that's probably the potential to get the top sixty picks.

0:41:52.600 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's it's tough when you compare him to

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, Eric Stokes and Mela fawn Woo and Aaron

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Robinson Elijah Molden, Like, there's different types of corner. Now

0:42:06.200 --> 0:42:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you're cooking, Dane, I don't want to. I don't I

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 1>don't want to step on If we're gonna talk about

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 1>this in a little we are, but a lot of

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 1>different types of corners, So we'll save it for a

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:18.399
<v Speaker 1>little bit later. Jeff, do you want me to save

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it or do you wanna Do you want to go

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:21.319
<v Speaker 1>to break real quick? I mean we could come right

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 1>back in here. Yeah, I mean it's just a carryover

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of this topic. For instance, Um Campbell and Stokes are

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 1>my tenth and eleventh corners and kind of this draft

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:33.359
<v Speaker 1>and it plays into what we're gonna talk about next,

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the reason behind it that makes sense. We're back in

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a tasty treat that's sweeping air waves and taste buds.

0:42:41.160 --> 0:42:43.879
<v Speaker 1>It's new doctor pepper and cream soda. Let's take a listen,

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Bada. Is he a new combone that's music to

0:42:49.120 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 1>my ears? Okay, doctors music to my ears and mouth,

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>New doctor pepper and cream soda a delisious There's nothing

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:12.400
<v Speaker 1>as unique as our eyes, which is why SLOR pioneers

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:16.279
<v Speaker 1>ways to make lenses as unique as you. Varilux for

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:20.680
<v Speaker 1>super sharp vision, Essential Blue for protection, and Crisol for

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:24.720
<v Speaker 1>freedom from glare. Three cutting edge solutions in a single

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:29.719
<v Speaker 1>unique lens. So whatever your needs, insist on sealor visit

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>your local SLOR experts and find a perfect lens for

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you to seemore do more SLOR. The Cowboys Way, where

0:43:39.080 --> 0:43:42.360
<v Speaker 1>sixteen Hall of Famers and five championships shows us what

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:45.839
<v Speaker 1>success looks like. Where Turkey is always the second best

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>part of Thanksgiving Day, Where we are all defined by

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 1>one single thing, the star, where we as fans know

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it's our job to keep the tradition going. Bank of

0:43:56.239 --> 0:43:58.319
<v Speaker 1>America is proud to be the official bank of the

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys and to or the quest of living life.

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:05.759
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys Way. Copyright twenty twenty Bank of America Corporation. Dear,

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it's nineteen oh eight. Don't you think we should get

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:11.399
<v Speaker 1>electricity and stop using candles to see it night? It's

0:44:11.400 --> 0:44:14.400
<v Speaker 1>just electricity lights up the room fast. It's more reliable

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>than candles blowing out and people seem to love it

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:20.759
<v Speaker 1>nationwide candles, dar did you just run into the wall?

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I have a new candle please. Historically, switching to new

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:25.920
<v Speaker 1>technology is a no brainer. Today it's AT and T

0:44:26.080 --> 0:44:29.359
<v Speaker 1>five G, fast, reliable, secure and nationwide. Switch to AT

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and T five G. It's not complicated. Five G requires

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:33.839
<v Speaker 1>compatible plan may not be in your area. See att

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash five G for you for details. Is

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys dot com Draft Show back here on

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the Draft Show final fifteen minutes or so. Glad you're

0:44:47.600 --> 0:44:50.719
<v Speaker 1>with us. Jeff Cavanaugh, Dame Burgler, Kevin, Katie Turner. I'm

0:44:50.800 --> 0:44:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Yeomans. And this is the conversation Jeff has been

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:56.840
<v Speaker 1>itching to have. Whether you're a Cowboys fan, you're a

0:44:56.880 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 1>draft fan, you're an NFL fan, doesn't matter. This is

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:01.719
<v Speaker 1>a disc and we need to have. It's a sit down.

0:45:01.760 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a heart to heart with Jeff Cavanaugh about different

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:06.759
<v Speaker 1>types of corners. And Dane said, there's a lot of

0:45:06.800 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 1>different types of corners in this draft that could potentially

0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:12.399
<v Speaker 1>intrigue you. I mean, we talked about elijah'm Olden out

0:45:12.400 --> 0:45:16.239
<v Speaker 1>of Washington, Florida States, Asante Samuel Junior, then you've got

0:45:16.280 --> 0:45:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the top guys like a Patrick Jutan and a Caitla Farley.

0:45:19.280 --> 0:45:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are all these different types of corners.

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:24.719
<v Speaker 1>But Jeff, whenever it comes to the Cowboys, why are

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you so skeptical on the types that they're looking at? Well? Okay,

0:45:30.880 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>so this is my thing with how we do the

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:35.520
<v Speaker 1>draft and how we do cornerback. I feel like everybody

0:45:35.600 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 1>is looking for guys that are six two and up,

0:45:38.760 --> 0:45:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just kind of going backwards and asking myself

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and everybody else, why why are we pretending that everybody

0:45:49.000 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to cover in the NFL is like

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:54.000
<v Speaker 1>sixty three? When I get a bunch of dudes in

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, and it's like, all right, congrats, you got

0:45:56.000 --> 0:45:58.239
<v Speaker 1>all your six two guys. Now, time to go win

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the super Bowl. Here's Tyreek Hill, all right, Well, my

0:46:01.160 --> 0:46:04.000
<v Speaker 1>guys falling down every time tire Hill changes direction, and

0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, here's the super Bowl. Go cover Stefan Diggs.

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:10.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, my six two guys falling down left and right.

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I just I wonder why are we so into the

0:46:13.960 --> 0:46:19.000
<v Speaker 1>idea of the six two and the six three corner?

0:46:19.440 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And maybe part of it is just that I'm finding

0:46:21.239 --> 0:46:23.279
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of corners in this class that I like

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that are under six foot and I'm tired of them

0:46:26.480 --> 0:46:29.920
<v Speaker 1>being height shamed, you know, by the community. So my

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:33.200
<v Speaker 1>guys who are five ten, five eleven, just like Jayre

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Alexander maybe the best corner in the NFL. I don't

0:46:37.480 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 1>want to just immediately throw everybody who's five foot ten

0:46:40.120 --> 0:46:42.640
<v Speaker 1>into well, he's a nickel guy, because there's plenty of

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:46.439
<v Speaker 1>receivers in the NFL that are five nine to five

0:46:46.520 --> 0:46:48.920
<v Speaker 1>eleven that are number ones that play outside that you're

0:46:48.920 --> 0:46:51.440
<v Speaker 1>going to have to cover. So just the idea that

0:46:51.520 --> 0:46:54.759
<v Speaker 1>in the draft world, I Am not going to be

0:46:54.880 --> 0:47:00.319
<v Speaker 1>consistently looking for and rewarding guys for being tall, going

0:47:00.400 --> 0:47:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to find the best players, and I'm gonna have guys

0:47:04.480 --> 0:47:09.239
<v Speaker 1>like Asante Samuel and Elijah Molden and Robinson at UCF

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and Shakur Brown at Michigan State ahead of Tyson Campbell

0:47:14.640 --> 0:47:18.239
<v Speaker 1>six two runs fast from Georgia because I care less

0:47:18.280 --> 0:47:20.719
<v Speaker 1>about your profile. And maybe this comes back to the

0:47:20.760 --> 0:47:22.239
<v Speaker 1>thing that Dane talks about where it's kind of like

0:47:22.320 --> 0:47:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the player versus the traits. You can keep your traits.

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I want the players. So the five ten and the

0:47:30.239 --> 0:47:34.360
<v Speaker 1>five eleven guys that can cover really well, that are physical,

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:36.719
<v Speaker 1>that can play a football, I'm gonna take them over

0:47:36.800 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 1>six foot two and four to three all day or day.

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 1>That's my corner thing. It's a question, it's a comment,

0:47:42.640 --> 0:47:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a commentary, it's speech, and uh and I'm done. Now,

0:47:46.360 --> 0:47:48.920
<v Speaker 1>have a great day. I'll see you guys next week.

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:51.799
<v Speaker 1>I think you're I mean, you're right, Like that's how,

0:47:53.280 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that's how it should be. The number one trait when

0:47:56.000 --> 0:47:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you're scouting the cornerback position should always be athleticism. To me,

0:48:00.800 --> 0:48:04.240
<v Speaker 1>easy more so than size. And I would argue next

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is your ability to the process. You know, you're mental processing.

0:48:07.400 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>So those are the top two traits that I know personally.

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I look for athleticism and then mental processing. If you

0:48:14.000 --> 0:48:15.880
<v Speaker 1>have those two things, yeah, you can play for me

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:18.360
<v Speaker 1>any day. I think when we talk about length with corners,

0:48:18.880 --> 0:48:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not too dissimilar when we talk about you know,

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:25.359
<v Speaker 1>arm arm length for offensive tackles. You know, like I think,

0:48:25.400 --> 0:48:28.120
<v Speaker 1>just it helps if you're a little bit longer, if

0:48:28.160 --> 0:48:30.279
<v Speaker 1>you have thirty five inch arms compared to thirty two

0:48:30.280 --> 0:48:33.799
<v Speaker 1>inch arms, and as offensive tackle, those three inches can

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:38.239
<v Speaker 1>sometimes make a big difference, and so helping that kind

0:48:38.280 --> 0:48:42.479
<v Speaker 1>of you know, close the gap is something that teams

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:45.520
<v Speaker 1>will look for. But if you're not if you can't

0:48:45.560 --> 0:48:47.600
<v Speaker 1>move as an offensive tackle, it's not going to matter much.

0:48:47.600 --> 0:48:49.359
<v Speaker 1>And it's the same thing with the corners. If you're

0:48:49.680 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 1>super long player, that's great, but if you're not a

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:55.520
<v Speaker 1>good athlete, it's not going to matter much. So the

0:48:55.600 --> 0:48:58.880
<v Speaker 1>size is something that I think should be used to

0:48:59.000 --> 0:49:02.920
<v Speaker 1>help break tie. So if you think Tyson Campbell and

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Elijah Molden are on the same level as a prospect,

0:49:07.840 --> 0:49:10.120
<v Speaker 1>then Tyson Campbell should get a little bit of a

0:49:10.120 --> 0:49:13.000
<v Speaker 1>bump because he has the size advantage. But if you

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:15.200
<v Speaker 1>think that Elijah Bowl and just a flight out better player,

0:49:15.239 --> 0:49:19.640
<v Speaker 1>then I certainly understand that too. No, I think I've

0:49:19.680 --> 0:49:22.560
<v Speaker 1>been guilty of this before in the past, and you

0:49:22.600 --> 0:49:26.279
<v Speaker 1>always try to get better at this, right, we sometimes

0:49:26.480 --> 0:49:31.359
<v Speaker 1>take measurements and information that you would typically get at

0:49:31.360 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 1>pro days or a combine or whatever. We sometimes tend

0:49:34.200 --> 0:49:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to take those measurements and we treat him like currency

0:49:36.320 --> 0:49:39.160
<v Speaker 1>almost And it really doesn't have to be that way.

0:49:40.840 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 1>You trust what your ic and things like that. But

0:49:43.920 --> 0:49:46.239
<v Speaker 1>just to play Devil's advocate to what Jeff said, because

0:49:46.239 --> 0:49:48.919
<v Speaker 1>I agree with most, if not everything, But Jeff said

0:49:49.520 --> 0:49:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Tyree Hill in the Super Bowl, Well, what happens if

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:55.880
<v Speaker 1>our Darius Washington from TCU is your free safety and

0:49:55.960 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>he's got to get over and get on top of

0:49:58.920 --> 0:50:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans the Super Bowl? You're gonna do? You wish it?

0:50:02.840 --> 0:50:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Your guy who's gonna do it, You're gonna I want

0:50:06.680 --> 0:50:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the guy who's gonna get there. If look if if

0:50:10.440 --> 0:50:13.359
<v Speaker 1>your quarterback throws a perfect ball and does the math

0:50:13.440 --> 0:50:15.959
<v Speaker 1>in his head for sixty yards downfield, when the free

0:50:15.960 --> 0:50:18.640
<v Speaker 1>safety gets there where the corner is and leaves it

0:50:18.680 --> 0:50:21.960
<v Speaker 1>outside and high on the sideline where my five eight

0:50:22.080 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 1>safety can't reach it, good on you try it again.

0:50:25.440 --> 0:50:31.319
<v Speaker 1>I'd much rather have a badass, instinctual athletic dude that

0:50:31.440 --> 0:50:35.040
<v Speaker 1>makes plays than a guy who's taller and faster. That's all.

0:50:35.800 --> 0:50:37.759
<v Speaker 1>That's all. And you didn't have to drag you didn't

0:50:37.800 --> 0:50:39.520
<v Speaker 1>have to drag my safety into it. That's something that

0:50:39.560 --> 0:50:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you chose to do, Katie. You chose violence on a

0:50:42.680 --> 0:50:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Thursday with me. You didn't have to bring him into this.

0:50:46.000 --> 0:50:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Nobody asked you to do that, or Darius Washington safety

0:50:49.280 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 1>number one all five eight of him. Let's go offside

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:59.359
<v Speaker 1>rich Richie Grant safety number two. Like something else that's

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:02.000
<v Speaker 1>throwing into this carversation with corners, because that cornerback might

0:51:02.040 --> 0:51:04.879
<v Speaker 1>be my favorite position to evaluate because it's so much fun.

0:51:04.920 --> 0:51:07.680
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's like you're you're breaking down a dance.

0:51:08.080 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 1>You have to be so technically refined, but at the

0:51:10.160 --> 0:51:12.719
<v Speaker 1>same time, you have to be a top athlete. Um,

0:51:12.800 --> 0:51:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, first and foremost, I think you need you

0:51:15.000 --> 0:51:18.360
<v Speaker 1>need space athletes, guys that can hold their own in space.

0:51:18.680 --> 0:51:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And then you have to judge. You know, there's just

0:51:21.040 --> 0:51:23.200
<v Speaker 1>not a good athlete and a bad athlete. There are

0:51:23.239 --> 0:51:26.319
<v Speaker 1>certain levels of athlete. You know, you have to you know,

0:51:26.400 --> 0:51:30.440
<v Speaker 1>there's different types of speed. There's uh, you know, transition speed,

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:33.839
<v Speaker 1>there's drive speed, there's break on the ball speed, all

0:51:33.840 --> 0:51:37.080
<v Speaker 1>these different levels, so, uh, you know, the it's just

0:51:37.120 --> 0:51:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a really fascinating position to evaluate. And I think the

0:51:40.480 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 1>better athlete, the more you can compromise on size, because

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 1>ideally you don't want a five nine corner, but if

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:49.719
<v Speaker 1>he's a top athlete, then the more you can compromise

0:51:49.760 --> 0:51:52.640
<v Speaker 1>on that. It's something that is a it's really a

0:51:52.640 --> 0:51:56.840
<v Speaker 1>fascinating uh because it's it is arguably the toughest position

0:51:57.600 --> 0:51:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to play, just because you're left out on an island

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:03.280
<v Speaker 1>again another top athlete and you don't know what's coming

0:52:03.440 --> 0:52:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and you just have to stop them from making a play,

0:52:05.960 --> 0:52:09.319
<v Speaker 1>and it's tough, but you know that's it makes it,

0:52:09.560 --> 0:52:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I think, a fun position to evaluate. Well. And Jeff

0:52:12.600 --> 0:52:16.480
<v Speaker 1>says something very interesting in our just really quickly here Kata,

0:52:16.640 --> 0:52:18.960
<v Speaker 1>but kind of tying together what all three of you

0:52:19.000 --> 0:52:22.080
<v Speaker 1>guys were just talking about. But that was specifically whenever

0:52:22.120 --> 0:52:25.680
<v Speaker 1>it came to the size and the athleticism of these corners.

0:52:26.040 --> 0:52:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Whenever you look at the division that the Cowboys are in,

0:52:28.800 --> 0:52:30.879
<v Speaker 1>who are they going up against in terms of wide

0:52:30.880 --> 0:52:33.760
<v Speaker 1>receivers that are the better wide receivers. It's Terry McLaurin

0:52:33.800 --> 0:52:36.920
<v Speaker 1>for Washington, It's Sterling Shepherd for New York, and I

0:52:36.920 --> 0:52:40.879
<v Speaker 1>guess the Shan Jackson slash Jalen Rager for Philadelphia. I mean,

0:52:40.920 --> 0:52:43.879
<v Speaker 1>those are the guys. They're slot receivers that are quick,

0:52:43.960 --> 0:52:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that are not very tall, that are agile, and they're

0:52:46.680 --> 0:52:49.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna come right over the middle of the field. So

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:53.480
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't these smaller corners that have that athleticism that Dane's

0:52:53.520 --> 0:52:55.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about that kind of allow you to take them

0:52:55.600 --> 0:52:58.920
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the draft. Be higher value to the Cowboys, Jeff,

0:52:58.960 --> 0:53:03.400
<v Speaker 1>because just based off of the competition they're going for, well,

0:53:03.440 --> 0:53:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they should be a higher value by everybody

0:53:05.160 --> 0:53:08.120
<v Speaker 1>because sure, like you know, Davante Adams isn't small and

0:53:08.200 --> 0:53:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans big and Alan Robinson's not small. But I

0:53:12.840 --> 0:53:18.240
<v Speaker 1>mean it's the NFL receivers look like us, it's different,

0:53:18.360 --> 0:53:23.800
<v Speaker 1>not quite like us. They look like five nine, six

0:53:23.840 --> 0:53:26.800
<v Speaker 1>foot six one. This guy's five eleven. Oh, here's a

0:53:26.840 --> 0:53:29.279
<v Speaker 1>six three guy. This guy's six foot, he's six one

0:53:29.480 --> 0:53:32.279
<v Speaker 1>oh six four over there. It's it's all over the place.

0:53:32.320 --> 0:53:34.400
<v Speaker 1>So I just I don't think you need to be

0:53:34.560 --> 0:53:38.120
<v Speaker 1>like building your team with the idea that you gotta

0:53:38.200 --> 0:53:42.280
<v Speaker 1>have this this height in this length. Like if um,

0:53:42.920 --> 0:53:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to pick on the guy, but if

0:53:44.600 --> 0:53:47.520
<v Speaker 1>camp if Tyson Campbell, the six two guy at Georgia

0:53:47.640 --> 0:53:51.120
<v Speaker 1>has a better career than Sante Samuel Junior, I'll eat

0:53:51.160 --> 0:53:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the microphone. Like there's just there's a different level to

0:53:54.640 --> 0:53:58.880
<v Speaker 1>how well you understand the game, how quickly you're processing information. Uh,

0:53:59.120 --> 0:54:02.320
<v Speaker 1>just this the spatial awareness that comes with playing corner

0:54:02.360 --> 0:54:05.800
<v Speaker 1>when you're playing zone. So like sure, you in theory

0:54:06.160 --> 0:54:08.759
<v Speaker 1>might even and maybe even outruns him in the forty right,

0:54:08.800 --> 0:54:11.719
<v Speaker 1>and so now you're bigger, longer, faster. But if we

0:54:11.800 --> 0:54:14.799
<v Speaker 1>run twenty football plays and we see who creates the

0:54:14.840 --> 0:54:18.719
<v Speaker 1>smaller window for the quarterback in various situations, it's gonna

0:54:18.719 --> 0:54:22.879
<v Speaker 1>be a Sante Samuel Junior because he's better at it. Jeff,

0:54:22.920 --> 0:54:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested in you said, I think Tyson, Campbell and

0:54:25.160 --> 0:54:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Stokes were at ten and eleven ranked corners. I'm interested

0:54:28.840 --> 0:54:32.480
<v Speaker 1>who are your top ten corners that you've studied so far?

0:54:33.440 --> 0:54:39.320
<v Speaker 1>It is Caleb Farley one, Patrick Surtan, JC Horne Asante,

0:54:39.400 --> 0:54:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Samuel Asante, Samuel Junior four, Elijah Mulden five, Melafonwu six,

0:54:48.880 --> 0:54:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Robinson seven at Central Florida, Brown at did him yesterday,

0:54:56.440 --> 0:55:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Brown at Michigan State eight and actually a grand Am

0:55:00.320 --> 0:55:05.160
<v Speaker 1>junior at Oregon is not Senior Bow. Then Campbell and Stokes,

0:55:06.600 --> 0:55:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know how I did it. I don't

0:55:07.560 --> 0:55:08.920
<v Speaker 1>know I did it Senior Bowl. But I liked his

0:55:09.560 --> 0:55:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I liked the tape that I've gotten too so far.

0:55:11.680 --> 0:55:16.439
<v Speaker 1>On Graham, I like it. No, I mean, the only

0:55:16.440 --> 0:55:19.600
<v Speaker 1>one out of that that I don't really love is Graham. Um.

0:55:19.640 --> 0:55:21.799
<v Speaker 1>But the rest I mean, I yeah, I have no

0:55:21.880 --> 0:55:25.040
<v Speaker 1>really big disagreements there. I guess my only disagreement would

0:55:25.080 --> 0:55:27.839
<v Speaker 1>be I really like Greg Newsom from Northwestern. He would

0:55:27.840 --> 0:55:30.120
<v Speaker 1>be I haven't seen him yet. It's cheating, So just

0:55:30.280 --> 0:55:33.319
<v Speaker 1>call Campbell and Stokes eleven and twelve or whatever, move

0:55:33.440 --> 0:55:35.120
<v Speaker 1>him down one because I'm assuming i'll like knew some

0:55:35.280 --> 0:55:39.080
<v Speaker 1>vetter Edge Simpson gotcha. Yeah, No, it's and that's I mean,

0:55:39.160 --> 0:55:41.720
<v Speaker 1>all those guys that you mentioned are top one hundred

0:55:41.719 --> 0:55:43.919
<v Speaker 1>guys so or maybe top seventy five guys. So it's

0:55:44.000 --> 0:55:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a really interesting group. Corners. Where are you on?

0:55:47.160 --> 0:55:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Dry and Kendrick Dane from Clemson he didn't come out,

0:55:51.480 --> 0:55:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah he went back Clemson. Oh break and Connor Man Yeah, Katie,

0:55:58.080 --> 0:56:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I was really I wanted him. I wanted him to

0:56:00.840 --> 0:56:03.080
<v Speaker 1>come out, but he ended up going back. I agreed

0:56:04.360 --> 0:56:06.480
<v Speaker 1>he might have been the best athlete in the group

0:56:06.520 --> 0:56:09.279
<v Speaker 1>among all these guys, just really really raw, and so

0:56:09.480 --> 0:56:11.879
<v Speaker 1>I think he made but maybe the better decision by

0:56:11.920 --> 0:56:13.480
<v Speaker 1>going back. He has got a chance to be a

0:56:14.080 --> 0:56:16.160
<v Speaker 1>really good corner if he figures things out, because he's

0:56:16.160 --> 0:56:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver. When he showed up, he's still he's

0:56:17.920 --> 0:56:20.680
<v Speaker 1>still figuring things out. Yeah, I think another year with

0:56:20.640 --> 0:56:26.680
<v Speaker 1>at college levels him. Well, I have the same almost

0:56:26.680 --> 0:56:29.239
<v Speaker 1>the same order, Aaron Robinson of Central Florida. I have

0:56:29.360 --> 0:56:36.840
<v Speaker 1>fourth so Farley certain Horne, Robinson, Samuel Stokes, Campbell Moulden,

0:56:37.080 --> 0:56:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Melifon Wu Newsome. For me, I think that's ten I

0:56:41.200 --> 0:56:42.920
<v Speaker 1>named up, and then I've kind of got on my

0:56:43.000 --> 0:56:47.680
<v Speaker 1>day three radar um Tariq Castro Fields from Penn State.

0:56:47.719 --> 0:56:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Although I need to check and see if he came

0:56:49.280 --> 0:56:54.360
<v Speaker 1>out and he's going back. Okay, he's gone back. Kat

0:56:54.800 --> 0:56:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you. I know if I tell you

0:56:58.280 --> 0:57:01.359
<v Speaker 1>that that extra year of eligibile it messed everything up.

0:57:01.960 --> 0:57:04.000
<v Speaker 1>It's tough. Yeah, a lot of people are a lot

0:57:04.000 --> 0:57:06.279
<v Speaker 1>of kids are taking advantage of that. So thanks for

0:57:06.360 --> 0:57:10.759
<v Speaker 1>tuning into the draft show with three experts and Katie, Hey,

0:57:12.719 --> 0:57:15.680
<v Speaker 1>make sure that it's on tape. Let's market that Jeff's

0:57:15.680 --> 0:57:20.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna eat the microphone. Campel has a better career than Samuel.

0:57:20.720 --> 0:57:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Can we just get that and keep it? Sure? Yeah,

0:57:23.080 --> 0:57:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna keep this microphone for that purpose. This one

0:57:25.920 --> 0:57:30.720
<v Speaker 1>right here, that's gonna terrible meal and the like. There

0:57:30.720 --> 0:57:32.640
<v Speaker 1>are some there are a couple of corners that we

0:57:32.640 --> 0:57:34.720
<v Speaker 1>haven't talked about that are you know, pretty good, you know,

0:57:34.760 --> 0:57:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Pulsing Adibo. We got to figure out what to do

0:57:36.480 --> 0:57:40.120
<v Speaker 1>with him out of Stanford. Um. Yeah, Robert Rochelle from

0:57:40.120 --> 0:57:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Central Arkansas is a small school guy, but a really

0:57:43.400 --> 0:57:46.640
<v Speaker 1>good athlete who could go comp one hundred. UM. I

0:57:46.680 --> 0:57:48.920
<v Speaker 1>really like what we saw from Benjamin Saint Jus from

0:57:48.920 --> 0:57:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota at the Senior Bowl. Uh, you know Keith Taylor,

0:57:52.120 --> 0:57:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, somewhere in that mix. So it's a it's

0:57:54.320 --> 0:57:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting group of corners that uh, you know,

0:57:57.760 --> 0:57:59.560
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a lot of split opinion when we

0:57:59.560 --> 0:58:03.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about corners four through twelve in that range, and

0:58:03.360 --> 0:58:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be like that throughout the course of the

0:58:05.320 --> 0:58:09.000
<v Speaker 1>draft process. Also, Brian Mills out of North Carolina Central,

0:58:09.400 --> 0:58:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe is that what his school is? Yeah, North

0:58:13.160 --> 0:58:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Central. That just tells you how much I know

0:58:15.200 --> 0:58:17.240
<v Speaker 1>about that school. But yeah, I thought he looked really

0:58:17.320 --> 0:58:18.920
<v Speaker 1>nice at the Senior Bowl. I thought he had a

0:58:18.920 --> 0:58:21.400
<v Speaker 1>good week of practice down in Mobile. So there's a

0:58:21.400 --> 0:58:23.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of those corners that are gonna be kind of

0:58:23.600 --> 0:58:25.680
<v Speaker 1>talked about all the way through the draft. I mean,

0:58:25.720 --> 0:58:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of course, with the Cowboys needing help at corner, I

0:58:28.320 --> 0:58:30.480
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised if they doubled up at that position

0:58:30.520 --> 0:58:32.760
<v Speaker 1>again for the second straight year. Last year it was

0:58:32.800 --> 0:58:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Trayvon Daxon Reggie Robinson. One of them didn't catch the field.

0:58:35.840 --> 0:58:37.760
<v Speaker 1>The other one has a ton of upside as a

0:58:37.800 --> 0:58:39.880
<v Speaker 1>starter and maybe the number one corner on this ball

0:58:39.920 --> 0:58:42.600
<v Speaker 1>club at the moment. But corner is definitely gonna have

0:58:42.640 --> 0:58:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a microscope on it, and we'll continue to do that

0:58:45.360 --> 0:58:47.360
<v Speaker 1>along the way here on the Draft Show. But that's

0:58:47.400 --> 0:58:49.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it for us today, for Chris Beam and

0:58:49.800 --> 0:58:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the back for Kevin kat Turner, Jeff Kavanaugh and Dame Brugler.

0:58:53.920 --> 0:58:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Kyle Yeoman's We should have catched this group again

0:58:56.320 --> 0:58:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Thursday next week ten am Central time, and then you

0:58:59.800 --> 0:59:01.920
<v Speaker 1>can also have the other group with Brian Brodess, Bucky

0:59:01.960 --> 0:59:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Brooks and David Hellman at ten am Central Time on Tuesday.

0:59:05.680 --> 0:59:07.880
<v Speaker 1>But until then, so long here on the Draft Show.

0:59:09.440 --> 0:59:12.320
<v Speaker 1>This has been a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:59:12.320 --> 0:59:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.