WEBVTT - Real Estate's Ticking Time Bomb w/ Bigger Pockets' Dave Meyer #1130

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to How to Money. I'm Joel, and today I'm

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>talking real estates taking time bomb with Bigger Pockets Dave Meyer. Okay,

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>so the housing market fascinates me, but if I'm being honest,

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>it confounds me at times two. It's incredibly complex and

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>there's rarely a simple explanation for why the real estate

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>market moves in the way that it does. And so

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly why I wanted to bring on Dave Meyer.

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>He's a real estate expert, he's a longtime podcaster, he's

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the chief investment officer at Bigger Pockets. And so we're

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna dig into the forces shaping the housing market right now,

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and then we're gonna zoom out. We're gonna look at

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the bigger trends that could influence how we buy homes

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in the years ahead. Dave has some really interesting predictions

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that I'm stoked to dive into both as individuals and investors.

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:07.479
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna going to look at both. And so Dave,

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>he believes that the next decade in housing could look

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot different from the last one, and that makes

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>his perspective especially valuable. And it's because it's deeply grounded

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 1>in data, not just like gut instinct. So Dave, thanks

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>for joining me today.

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Joel, thanks so much for having me. I'm really excited

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 2>to be here.

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Ah Man, I always love talking to you and listening

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to the way you think about the housing market. I

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>said it's grounded in data, which is true, like you

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>use a lot of data to inform your analysis. First question, though,

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>before we get to that, is what do you like

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to splurge on? What's your craft beer equivalent?

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 3>You know?

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, I'm curious to hear what you waste money on,

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:43.839
<v Speaker 1>even though you're going smart stuff for your future.

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I'm so bad about bougie hotels. That's like my thing.

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 3>I am pretty frugal in the rest of my life,

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 3>but if I go on a week vacation, I'm spending

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 3>up for the nice hotel.

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 2>I want all the pampering.

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>That are you getting, like the massage and stuff like

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that too at this fancy hotel.

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Not always. Sometimes it's not even that.

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 3>I just I love like going to a really nice

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 3>place where the service is really good and the food

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 3>is great. I love eating, so I'm a big food guy,

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 3>but I don't normally splurge on that.

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 2>But vacation.

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 3>It's just the one time I can mentally unlock from

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 3>being frugal and thinking about investing and trying to build

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 3>for the long term. And I just let myself turn

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 3>off my brain and just spend a little bit of

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 3>money and enjoy the fruits of my labor.

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>There you go, Yeah, we got to do that, man, Like,

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that's important. You got to have the outlet and remember

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 1>why you're saving, which is spending, right Like saving is

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>delayed spending, So you got to spend it at some

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>point exactly.

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 3>And I you know, when I first started as a

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 3>real estate investor and entrepreneur, travel was the thing that

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 3>motivated me. It was always the thing I wanted to do.

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to see the world. And that's still the

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 3>thing that motivates me. And fortunately I've been doing this

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 3>for sixteen years now and so I have a little

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 3>bit more capital. I'm able to not stay in the

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 3>hostels anymore, and which I did for many many years.

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 3>But canw you know, married now take my wife on

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 3>nice vacations.

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 2>It's it's worked out well.

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I can't think of many instances where my

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 1>wife would leave me, but trying to make her stay

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>at a hostel with me. That's that's one where she

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 1>might she might piece out real quick.

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, Well, we've been together for oh gosh, thirteen

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 3>years now, and so we did it together. We've definitely

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 3>stayed in the bunk rooms and done all that. But

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 3>now we're able to upgrade a little bit, which is nice.

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Nice. All right, let's talk. Let's talk housing. And I

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>want to I want to kind of look down the

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>road further in just a second. But I'm curious, how

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>would you describe the housing market in twenty twenty six

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and did it change reason like what you expected from

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the spring housing market. I don't know. Some curt events

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of might have mess with that.

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, we are in what I've dubbed on our podcast

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 3>at Bigger Pockets, the Great Stall. That's how I help

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 3>people understand what's going on in the housing market. I

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 3>think we're in a period of prolonged flat housing.

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 2>It might even be negative.

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 3>I actually, I know this is unusual for real estate

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 3>investors or people who work in this industry, but I've

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 3>been predicting negative home prices for the last year or so,

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's what we're going to have here

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty six. A lot of people like to

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 3>call you know. The reason for this, the reason we're

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 3>stalling out is just affordability. Everyone knows this, whether you're

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 3>a renter or a homeowner or an investor. Home prices

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 3>are no longer affordable to the average American, and I

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.799
<v Speaker 3>think that's a big problem. I know real estate investors

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 3>do tend to make money off that, but for a

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 3>just from a society perspective, it's bad. People can't afford it.

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:50.279
<v Speaker 3>And so I think we need to see and the

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 3>data shows that when you reach this level of unaffordability,

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 3>home prices need to go down. Now, A lot of

0:04:56.600 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 3>people like to predict something dramatic happening, like a crash,

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 3>something that we saw in two thousand and eight where

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 3>home prices peak to trough went down twenty percent.

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not saying that can't happen.

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 3>It is certainly still possible, but it is unusual. In fact,

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 3>we've only had one period of really significant home prices

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 3>since the decline, since the Great Depression, and that was

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 3>during the two thousand and eight Great Financial Crisis. There

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 3>is another way affordability gets restored to the housing market.

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 2>It's just more boring.

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 3>It's not as exciting to talk about on social media.

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 3>And that's what I call the Great Stall. It's basically

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 3>home prices stay somewhat stagnant or maybe decline a little bit,

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 3>single digit declines. At the same time you see mortgage

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 3>rates start to decline a little bit. Real wages have

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 3>been going up and hopefully that will continue. And when

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 3>you see the combination of those three things, that actually

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 3>improves affordability just slowly, and we're actually starting to see

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 3>that nine months in a row now, housing affordability is better.

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 3>The average mortgage payment if you bought a house today

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 3>a monthly, it's about eight percent lower than it was

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 3>a year ago.

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Long way to go.

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 3>We still need affordability to improve, but we are trending

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 3>in that direction, and outside of sort of black swan

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 3>event where something crazy happens, I think that's the trajectory

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 3>that we're on for the next several years. It could

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 3>be another year, it could be three more years, it

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 3>could be five more years.

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 2>We just don't really know.

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 3>And so when I look at the spring market, it's

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.799
<v Speaker 3>kind of what I was predicting. I actually think I've

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 3>been saying that we're going to have a slow market,

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 3>and because mortgage rates, you know, we're recording this at

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 3>the end of March. Mortgage rates have gone up since

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 3>the invasion, you know, sort of the war conflict, whatever

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 3>people call it in Iran. You know, it's probably going

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 3>to be even slower than we were expected. But I

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 3>was not expecting some big movement in the housing market

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:54.679
<v Speaker 3>this year. I think we're in for a frustratingly slow

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 3>housing market for the foreseeable future.

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right, and I think it is is

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like when what Vanguard is predicted for

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the stock market, right, It's like, hey, actually, we've had

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>incredible returns over the last like since the Great Recession.

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Don't get used to it. Is kind of what Vanguard's

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>saying in their predictions moving forward. I think you're saying

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>something similar, is like, hey, the housing market had some

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>crazy years there where home prices were going up insane

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and an insane rate. Don't get used to it. That's

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>not normal, and and maybe we need a plateau here

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to kind of help help us get back to a

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>state of normalcy.

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Exactly right.

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I've read those same reports about from Vanguard, and

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 3>I agree.

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 2>I think it's similar.

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 3>There's this term you hear sometimes calls a pull forward, right,

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 3>where basically the average in the stock market, the average

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 3>in the housing market is probably not going to change

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 3>that much if you zoom out. But after years of

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 3>incredible above average growth and returns.

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 2>You sort of have to have a counterbalance. You have

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 2>to have years of underwhelming growth. And we can talk

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 2>about this.

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 3>I think there's still ways to invest in real estate,

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 3>because real estate investing is not all about the price

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 3>of an asset. There's definitely other ways to make money

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 3>from it. But I think when you just look at

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 3>pure appreciation, I'm not expecting it in most markets.

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Of course, real estate is very regional.

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 3>There'll be markets that grow, there'll be ones that have

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 3>real significant declients that you could potentially call it crash,

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 3>but I think the average is going to be just

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 3>slightly down to flat.

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>How do you think investors are impacted by recency bias? Right?

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Think about oh Man, big run ups. I guess I

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>should predict more of that, or the longer this housing

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>plateau continues, they are people going to expect that housing

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>is not where it's at, it's not worth investing in

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>because prices aren't going up, and I was banking on

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>appreciation of this asset. I just purchased a lot.

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 3>That's a very good student observation, Joel, is that people

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 3>are really impacted by sort of this recency bias.

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 2>I have dubbed.

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 3>The period from twenty twelve ish to twenty twenty three

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 3>as sort of this Goldilocks error for real estate investing.

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 3>If you know, it couldn't have gotten better for people

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 3>from an appreciation perspective. We had artificially low mortgage rates

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 3>and the lowest we've ever seen. We saw a structural

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 3>supply shortage after the Great Financial Crisis, huge demographic tailwinds

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 3>from millennials, now the biggest generation in the US, reaching

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 3>their peak home buying age.

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:35.439
<v Speaker 2>Just all these things.

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Came together to make it an extremely good time for

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 3>real estate investing.

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 2>And that's great.

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, I sort of came of age as an investor,

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:46.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, slightly before that, but was a beneficiary of it.

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 3>But what I encourage people to do, as Joel, I'm

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 3>sure you encourage people to do outside of just real estate,

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 3>is not compare to the best possible returns. The job

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 3>of an investor, whether you invest in in real estate

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 3>or any other asset class is to compare to what

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 3>else can you do with your money? Right The question

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 3>is I have a certain amount of time, I have

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 3>a certain amount of money. What's the best way to

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 3>optimize for my financial future given the realities of the

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 3>ground on the ground. And unfortunately, I do think we're

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 3>just in a period of lower returns across asset classes

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 3>right now, unless something crazy happens, you know, if we

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 3>start seeing quantitative easing or you know, like there're you know,

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 3>some things that are not currently happening start to happen.

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 1>New AI models, right yeah, right.

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Like stuff that we can't predict.

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 3>But if there is, you know, the status quo I

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 3>think right now is lower returns doesn't mean you can't invest,

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 3>doesn't mean there aren't good returns out there. But I

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 3>think it's just gonna be a little less obvious, Like

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 3>you're gonna have.

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 2>To look a little harder for it.

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 3>You're gonna have to probably be a little bit more

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 3>skilled than you were. But what I say to most

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 3>investors is we're in a period similar to the eighties

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 3>or nineties in real estate investing. People were still making

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 3>money there. You don't need everything to be perfect to

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 3>make money, but you do need to adapt. You need

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 3>different skills and different strategies and tactics to make it work.

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>What you're getting. I mean a little bit like twenty eleven,

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty twelve, twenty thirteen, twenty seventeen, you could any old

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>idiot could kind of get into real estate, right, Like

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, I including myself exactly right, So

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I am. I am that idiot and have done well

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>because of the momentous forces behind me that were that

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the wind at my back, right, And you, just as

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a real estate investor moving forward, you you've got to

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>do more due diligence to ensure that you're making a

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>good investment versus just like, hey, the tailwinds are at

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>my back, I'm just going to take that and run

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>with it. Well, the tailwinds aren't at your back anymore,

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and at least not in the same way that they were,

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>And so you have to be just a lot more thoughtful.

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.959
<v Speaker 1>I think in Parson data specifically where you live, you

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:04.719
<v Speaker 1>have to you have to do a lot more I

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.559
<v Speaker 1>would say analysis, do you agree before making a purchase?

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, you could get away with being a bad investor

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 3>for a really long time in real estate, and it

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:20.719
<v Speaker 3>made people focus artificially in my opinion, on appreciation as

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.959
<v Speaker 3>the way to make money. But real estate investors can

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 3>make money. I would say four or five ways. It's

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 3>an appreciation that market appreciation, which is really out of

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 3>your control.

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 2>It's just macro.

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 3>Conditions pushing home prices up. But there are things that

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 3>are still in your control, like generating cash flow, paying

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 3>down your loan, or value add investing, which I think

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.199
<v Speaker 3>is the number one way people can still make money.

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Buying something that's not up to date and fixing it up.

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 3>That's still a way to make huge gains in real

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 3>estate investing. There's also tax benefits to real estate that

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 3>are very powerful and haven't gone anywhere. In fact, they've

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.679
<v Speaker 3>probably gotten better over the last couple of years given

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 3>recent policy.

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:04.199
<v Speaker 2>And then there are defensive.

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Reasons to be in real estate as well, which I

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 3>think things like inflation hedge. I know we're getting over

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 3>a period of inflation, but I think there's still a

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 3>lot of inflation risk long term in the economy if

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 3>you look at our national debt, and so there's reasons

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 3>to do that as well, and so you need to

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 3>be able to analyze these deals for that combination of

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 3>benefits that come from real estate, not just oh my god,

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 3>the price on Zillo went from four hundred thousand to

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 3>four hundred and fifty thousand.

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 2>There's just more to it than that.

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, how do you when you talk to investors and

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 1>they are super stoked about well, man, I think this

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.599
<v Speaker 1>is a market where I'm going to see outsized appreciation.

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you think of that? Is there a way to

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:51.319
<v Speaker 1>bank that into the way you think about how intelligent

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>that is of a purchase versus what the fundamentals of

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>cash flow are for that property. Do you think of

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the goal of outside appreciation as just a speculative maneuver

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>or is there like, is there something worth worth considering

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>in that.

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 3>It's a great debate. This is something that happens in

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 3>real estate all the time. And you know, people say

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of old school investors would say, you never

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 3>count on appreciation. Actually, I wrote a book called real

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Estate by the Numbers with a guy named Jay Scott,

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 3>fantastic investor, better investor than me, and he never underwrites

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 3>for appreciation. And we always debated that because I think

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 3>during a zero interest rate policy era, you should count

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 3>on appreciation like you could for a really long time,

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 3>and I underwrote deals when I was doing my analysis

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 3>with modest appreciation, never more than three or four percent,

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, pace of inflation, something like that. But I've

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 3>stopped doing that, I don't, you know, in the last

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 3>couple of years. I think the last two or three

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 3>years I said zero appreciation. I've been wrong about that,

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 3>which is good, but that's I guess I'm not wrong

0:14:56.120 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 3>because doing that is not necessarily a prediction that prices.

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Won't go up.

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 3>I want my deals in today's day and age to

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 3>do well even if there is zier appreciation. I think

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 3>that's the way to think about it. Where can the

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 3>combination of cash flow value, add amorization and tax benefits

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 3>get you to the return that you need and then

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 3>appreciation is just gravy and you might get it.

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 2>You probably will, you know, like it will probably.

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Pick back up again at some point. But I like,

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm just a conservative investor. I like underwriting deals and

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 3>being very very selective about deals, and luckily, I think

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 3>that is sort of the benefit of this market. In

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 3>a market where there's less appreciation, usually have more choice,

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 3>you have more leverage, You're better able to negotiate, and

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 3>so I think this is a time where you have

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 3>to be very precise and patient, and if you are

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 3>and underwrite with sort of these conservative principles, you can still.

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Definitely make money.

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 3>It's just a it's a different mindset than this scattershot

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 3>like I just got to buy anything and make all

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 3>cash offers because it's going to go up ten percent

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 3>by next year.

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Is a different way to think about it.

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Yeah, And I think you're right, like, what's happening

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>in the market is very indicative of what you're likely

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to see as far as appreciation in moving forward. And

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who bought a home a year ago,

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a year and a half ago, if they need their

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>need to or want to sell, they're a little nervous

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>because they haven't seen they have to come to the

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>closing table with a lot of money. They didn't. They

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>were like, but I just thought housing prices always went up,

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and I thought they always went up significantly, And again

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that's recency bias. That's not always the case, and what

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we've experienced over the timeframe you mentioned is kind of

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>an outlier. Ultimately, when we talk about the history of housing,

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>let's talk specifically about markets, and you did a video

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>on this recently, but I'm curious to know what you

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>think some of the hottest markets that people kept talking

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>about Austin, Austin, Texas, and it seems like maybe we've

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>reached a little bit of equilibrium there and prices are

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 1>not rent prices are not falling in the way that

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>they were. But how do you help investors think about

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>what markets make sense to invest in and what markets

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe to avoid.

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Generally speaking, you can invest in almost any market, even

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 3>Austin while it was correcting. It really depends on your strategy.

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 3>I think that you know the basics are look for

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 3>strong economic fundamentals. Markets where there is good job growth

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 3>and where there is something called household formation are the

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.479
<v Speaker 3>number one and number two things that I personally look for.

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Economic growth tends to bring people to an area that

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 3>increases demand. It also, you know, as people's wages and

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 3>incomes go up, the pushes prices up for homes and

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 3>for rents as well, which can help your returns as

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 3>an investor. So those are I think two things that

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:55.880
<v Speaker 3>I like to look for. I think the place where

0:17:55.880 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 3>people air, especially in recent years, is only focusing though,

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 3>on the demand side of the market, because every market

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 3>they're a supply and demand, and Austin is a perfect

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 3>example of that.

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 2>People were moving.

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:12.479
<v Speaker 3>There in droves right during the pandemic or Florida. A

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 3>lot of places people moving there, and that means demand.

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 3>It also means that developers are going there and building

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 3>tons of supply. And what we're seeing right now in

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 3>a lot of markets is that even in markets where

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 3>there's sustained demand people want to live there or rent

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 3>there or buy there or.

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Whatever, they've just built too much. There's an over supply.

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 3>There's a glut in some of these markets, and so

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 3>that is pushing down performance. In a market like Austin

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 3>is a great example of that. They are you know,

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 3>people saw Google moving there, Tesla moving there, and developers

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 3>built literally tens of thousands of units. And even though

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 3>we are in a sort of a structural supply shortage

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:53.199
<v Speaker 3>in the United States, you can't have all that inventory

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 3>and all those housing coming in at the same time.

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 3>Not everyone's ready to move or to buy at the

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 3>same time. That price is dropping right exactly, and so

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 3>we are seeing prices drop, which is probably a good thing.

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 3>In Austin, right like it's it got a little unaffordable there.

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 3>And so that's the other thing I really recommend people

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 3>look at is the supply side and trying to understand

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 3>where are markets in equal librium. You basically, as an investor,

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 3>want supply and demand to be roughly equal, ideally a

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 3>little bit more demand than supply because that's going to

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 3>keep some upward pressure on rents and prices and at

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:27.400
<v Speaker 3>least keep paced with inflation.

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:28.120
<v Speaker 2>So that's good.

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I love what you just said there. It makes me,

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess just for the person in the how to

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>money audience who's like not thinking like an investor, They're

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>thinking of someone who wants to buy their first home.

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Seeing rents decline or seeing prices moderate is like music

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>to their ears, right. They're like, I've been trying to

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.360
<v Speaker 1>buy a house, and every time I'm trying to save

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>up and down payment, the market continues to outpace me.

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>And but for an investor, like they're seeing it through

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.959
<v Speaker 1>through different eyes. So I don't know, how do you

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>think about what's good for the investor is often bad

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>for the individual home buyer.

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, I think I have maybe a little

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 3>bit of a contrarian take here. As an investor, I

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 3>don't look for markets that have exploding growth. My personal

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 3>thesis about investing is affordability. I like to invest in

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 3>places where the average person can afford the average price home.

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 3>I just think that's good for society. I don't want

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 3>to be a kind of investor who's like pricing people

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 3>out of their homes. And it's not necessary to be

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 3>a successful investor. You don't need these massive swings of

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 3>appreciation that push people out of the market. In fact,

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 3>on my podcast, and what I do is I look

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 3>for markets where people can.

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.360
<v Speaker 2>That literally, that's the equation.

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Can the average person, based on their average income, afford

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 3>a home here? That to me, is going to ensure

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 3>that there's sustainable growth. Right like that prices keep going

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.640
<v Speaker 3>up in a predictable pattern like two three percent a year.

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 3>That's plenty, and it means that you're not going to

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 3>have these wild swings in valuation. For me, I'd rather

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:09.479
<v Speaker 3>invest in a market like Chicago or a Milwaukee or

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 3>something like that than Las Vegas. Vegas, you can have

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 3>huge run ups in prices, but you have big corrections

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 3>as well. And I think the thing people need to remember,

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 3>whether you're a homeowner and an investor. Is that the

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 3>way you make money in real estate is time. You

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 3>don't need to time the market. You need to buy right,

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 3>but you just need to wait. And so for me,

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 3>I'd rather be in a market that's just going to

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 3>do two three four percent appreciation a year, where people

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 3>are happy. My tenants are not rent burdened. They can

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 3>easily afford to pay the rent. It just makes for

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 3>a better sort of mutually beneficial relationship, which is how

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 3>I believe real estate investing should be approached. So I

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 3>agree with you. Some investors do see it that way,

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 3>but I encourage them not to. I think being in

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 3>a market and being providing a service that the average

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 3>person in your market can afford to me is on

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 3>a personal level, and it's just good business.

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 1>I feel the same way, like I enjoy being a

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>landlord and I have a good relationship with my tenants,

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Like there's something really that I love about that. I mean,

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's conversations, you know, in the past

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:19.159
<v Speaker 1>about the ethical nature of landlording. Is it ethical? I

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>think it totally can be. I think there's a lot

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of unethical landlording, but I think there are a lot

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of great ethical landlords out there too, who just want

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to provide who are not getting getting wildly rich overnight,

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and just want to provide a great place to live

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>for individuals and families. I'm curious too on financing right

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>rates have come down a little bit. How do you

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>help home buyers and investors think about what lending products

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>are worth looking into? And like, there's a rise in

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>adjustable rate mortgages right now, people are more interested in those.

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>To me, they've gotten better as a product and the

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>savings can be significant. How do you versus just like

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a traditional thirty year fixed How do you help people

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>think about that the lending conundrum.

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's tough right now because we're seeing wild mortgage swings,

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 3>unusually large volatility in the mortgage market. I think it

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 3>really depends on who you are and what makes you

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 3>sleep well at night. And the third question, which is

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 3>always hard, is how long you intend to stay in

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:21.919
<v Speaker 3>a home? If you intend to stay somewhere for a

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 3>long term, and the difference between a thirty year and

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 3>a fixed rate mortgage and an adjustable rate mortgage is

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 3>not that big. I'd take the third year fixed most people.

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 3>It helps you sleep at night, you don't have to

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 3>worry about it, and you can always refinance, so that

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 3>is beneficial. That said, I use my first adjustable rate

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 3>mortgage of my life about a year ago for my

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 3>primary home residence because I don't know how long I'm

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 3>going to live here, and it was more than a

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 3>point for you know, it's hundreds of dollars a month

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 3>for me, and I'll keep an eye on it.

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I'll refinance.

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 3>But I think you're right in that the products have

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:02.199
<v Speaker 3>gotten better. I think adjustable more rate mortgage has got

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 3>a very bad rap during the financial crisis with good reason.

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 3>They were garbage loans and they were irresponsible for people

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 3>who are listening. What was happening was the loan officers

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:17.239
<v Speaker 3>were giving out mortgages an adjustable rate, and you'd have

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 3>what they call the teaser rate is to three percent whatever,

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 3>and they would underwrite the borrower based on that two

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 3>or three percent, not what the adjust what it would

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 3>adjust to. So when it adjusted to six seven eight percent,

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot of those borrowers couldn't pay, and that was

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 3>a major contributing factor to the housing crash and the

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 3>financial crisis. Now you do the underwriting standards are much higher,

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 3>and so under you know, the loan officers and originators

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:48.880
<v Speaker 3>have to underwrite based on willingness to pay for what

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 3>they you know, the adjusted rate will be. There's no

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 3>teaser rates anymore, and I think you see longer term

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 3>adjustable rates. So the example, the one I got is

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 3>a seven one, which means that for the first seven

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 3>years of my loan it's locked in. So I know,

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 3>I have a five point twenty five mortgage rate for

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 3>one year for seven years, and then after that it

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 3>can only adjust every one year and the maximum it

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 3>can adjust in any one year.

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 2>Is zero point five percent.

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 3>So for me, although it is a little bit there

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 3>is some risk, the upside was worth it to me

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 3>saving money right now because the worst ten years from now,

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 3>even if it adjusts up three times ten years from now,

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 3>it will be roughly what I would have paid with

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 3>a thirty year fixed So I think it's worth considering.

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 3>But you really do need to just make sure that

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:41.959
<v Speaker 3>you read all the fine print on these to make

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 3>sure you're not putting yourself in a position where you

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 3>might not be able to pay your mortgage. That to me,

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 3>it's the biggest risk in real estate, Like if you

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 3>can pay your mortgage, you.

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 2>Will almost always make money.

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 3>The risk is when you cannot pay your mortgage, and

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:57.199
<v Speaker 3>so you should, in my opinion, do anything you have

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 3>to to not take that risk.

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, more even like ten year arms local credit union

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.200
<v Speaker 1>has a fifteen year like it doesn't awesome. Yeah, the

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 1>rate doesn't adjust for fifteen years. When you think about

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>how long the average person is in their home like that,

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't look less very whisky at all. And yet

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.439
<v Speaker 1>the savings an interest are significant. So all right, I've

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>got more I want to talk to with you, Dave.

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about the future of real estate.

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's go a little further out and make some projections

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>because yeah, I don't know, maybe it was a little

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the title the taking time bomb. Maybe that was a

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 1>little too clickbaity. I don't know, but we'll get your

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:42.479
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on that for a second. O. We're back from

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the break, still talking with Dave Meyer. That was my

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.400
<v Speaker 1>fault on the clickbaity headline, but I went with it anyway,

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:49.959
<v Speaker 1>just because I don't know. Dave's gonna pay it off, right, Dave?

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>The taking time bomb? What is it? And no, I'm kidding,

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 1>so I said it too you did. Okay, all right,

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:55.919
<v Speaker 1>so you said this too, so maybe I stole it

0:26:55.960 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>from you. But like we've been hearing this argument about

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a lack of supply in the United States or so

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:06.479
<v Speaker 1>like that's Hey, that's part of why real estate prices

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>have run up so much is because we're short millions

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of units. And we talk about these parts of the

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>United States where just building has not kept up with

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 1>population growth until recently, at least in some parts, but

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>still in much of the country, especially in places where

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 1>people want to move, there's just not enough supply and

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the regulations around introducing new supply are stringent, and so gosh,

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 1>we need more homes. But you don't know or you

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's going to be the case for too

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>too much longer, right.

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think we're in a structural supply deficit. Depending

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 3>on who you asked, the estimates are huge, Like some

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 3>people say one million, some people say seven million.

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 2>I like to just average them all.

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 3>I think it's somewhere between three to four million housing

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 3>units short.

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 1>And as predictions from what the National Association of Realtors

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and who else.

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we see a lot of private companies do them

0:27:56.960 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 3>as well. I think Toutality puts out one, there's a

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 3>whole The National home Builders Association puts out one, you know,

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 3>and they all very different methodologies, so it's kind of

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 3>hard to pin down, but the logic behind it makes sense.

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 3>After the Great Financial Crisis, there's just a lack of building,

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, a lot of builders just went out of business.

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't profitable to be building new homes in the

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 3>United States. But at the same time, millennials again now

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 3>the biggest generation of the US, reached their peak home

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 3>buying age. So there's a lot of demand for housing

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 3>and that is something that in my opinion, absolutely has

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:32.640
<v Speaker 3>pushed up the price of housing.

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 2>And it's really location dependent.

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:37.719
<v Speaker 3>A lot of rural areas are not seeing this. If

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 3>you live in parts of the Midwest, you're probably not

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 3>seeing this. But for large parts of the country this

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 3>has absolutely been true. We just see it all over

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 3>the place. But I do think there is a chance

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 3>that starts to change. There's a couple of things that

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 3>are happening in the world that are probably going to

0:28:56.400 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 3>impact this dynamic. Now I should caveat this by saying

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 3>normally I don't make predictions for the housing market more

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 3>than a year or two in advance, but you start

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 3>to see some of these big trends taking shape, and

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 3>you wonder, what's going to happen to me. The two

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 3>big variables, there's three big varials. Two are on the

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 3>demand side. One is just lower birth rates in the

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 3>United States. They're lower than the replacement rate. There's this

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 3>thing in demographics where basically every couple has to have

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 3>two children two point one children for population to grow naturally,

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 3>and we're at about one point seven. So that means

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 3>that we are probably going to hit peak population in

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 3>the United States, at least from domestically born people sometimes

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 3>in the twenty fifties, is sort of what people are expecting.

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 3>The other thing that usually supplements, or at least over

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 3>the last several decades in the United States, have supplemented

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 3>population is immigration. Immigration is a pendulum that swings back

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 3>and forth. We are at one end of the extreme

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 3>right now, and actually saw that the net immigration decline

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 3>last year.

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 3>And so a lot of the demand for housing that

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 3>we've seen over the last couple of years is from immigration,

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 3>both legal and undocumented. So like it's not just from people.

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Who are here illegally.

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 3>You also see it from people who are getting visas

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 3>that has actually declined as well. And so when you

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 3>look at those two things together, you say the population

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 3>of the United States unless something changes, because again that

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 3>it's going to decline. Birth rates I have a hard

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 3>time imagining going back up anytime soon. There's all sorts

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 3>of reasons why birth rates are declining, but it's happening

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 3>across the world. It's not just a US phenomenon. That's

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 3>expensive to raise children is the number one reason people

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 3>say that they're having fewer children.

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, some say that having four children is like the

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>new status symbol.

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, it's so expensive, and so I have a

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 3>hard time imagining that. You know, I can't predict what

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 3>immigration policy is going to be ten years from now,

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 3>but if you stay on the same jectory that we're

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 3>in now, we're going to need less housing in the

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 3>United States. Like that's just going to happen. I don't

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 3>think it's going to be in the next couple of years.

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that's going to happen, you know, slowly, probably

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 3>starting in the twenty thirties.

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 2>And then the third thing.

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 3>Is what people call this silver tsunami or the time bomb.

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Is that a lot of the housing in the United

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 3>States is owned by boomers. And although I think the

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 3>calls of this tsunami and crash have been really overblown,

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 3>I've been hearing this for twelve years now, that the

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:31.719
<v Speaker 3>market's going to crash because boomers sell their homes.

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 2>There is some.

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 3>Inevitability to the demographics there right that they're going to

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 3>have to get rid of some of their homes. I

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 3>don't think it's as dramatic as people say, but I

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 3>think this could take these three things combined can take

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 3>us from a supply shortage to hopefully a neutral market.

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 3>But there is a potential that it swings the pendulum

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 3>swing so far in the other direction, where we actually

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 3>have more supply than you need. And I do think

0:31:55.320 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 3>that's another thing that could potentially suppress appreciation in certain areas,

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:05.959
<v Speaker 3>in certain asset classes, in real estate for the foreseeable future.

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>So as a real estate investor who sees the demographic

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>riding on the wall, right, And I talked to an

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>economist from Notre Dame who is it focuses on demographics,

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and I was so curious to pick her brain, because Yeah,

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that's going to impact a whole lot of the future

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of our country, and you're right to point out not

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>just declining birth rates, but a declining immigration and an

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>influx in immigration has at least softened the blow of

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>declining birth rates in this country for a long time,

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's no longer doing that. So, as a real

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>estate investor who sees this coming, how do you react?

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 3>I think it's further reason to be really precise about

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 3>what you buy, because I actually I got into this

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 3>on my show. I was super curious. I started looking

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 3>at what happened in Japan. That's they've had a declining

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 3>population for a while. Look at Germany, and this is

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 3>happening in a lot of Western Europe as well. And

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 3>what you see, generally speaking, is that certain areas are uneffective.

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 3>If you look at large economic centers, urban areas largely unaffected.

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Right that a lot of the demand for housing just

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 3>gets concentrated in these areas where rural and suburban areas

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 3>are hit a little bit harder. And so for me,

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 3>if I'm looking at places where I want to buy,

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 3>and I want prices to at least keep up with

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 3>the pace of inflation, which is sort of a goal

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 3>as an investor, you want at least to keep pace

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 3>with inflation, I would be skeptical. I'm worried about suburbs

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:34.959
<v Speaker 3>or rural areas with higher age groups, higher demographics. You're

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 3>going to see a lot of people selling in those markets,

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 3>and you're not going to be able to find demand.

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 3>Like I don't think a lot of young people are

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 3>going to move to those areas and absorb all that housing,

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 3>and so I think it's just another reason you need

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 3>to be very careful. I don't think prices are going

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 3>to go away everywhere. I also think there's other things

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 3>that can soften this blow. For example, how does construction

0:33:56.880 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 3>respond right if construction slows down because they see the

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 3>writing on the wall, that will soften the blow as well.

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 3>I think people also forget that four hundred thousand homes

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 3>a year just become obsolete because they're too old and

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 3>it's not economical to fix them up, and so there

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 3>could be supply coming.

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Off the board.

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 3>So there are a lot of variables here, But I

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 3>think the key takeaway is we're probably going from demographic

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 3>tailwinds to demographic headwinds, and that's going to further.

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Challenge appreciation.

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Again, though I want to call out that the opportunity

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 3>exists for real estate investors because or home buyers, it

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 3>means you can buy for cheaper, right, and so like

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 3>that's the correction that people need to make, is that

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 3>if you think prices are going to go down or

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 3>they're going to flatten, you need to be able to

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:48.320
<v Speaker 3>buy below current market value. If the current value of

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 3>a home and I'm not saying list price, that's a

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:52.880
<v Speaker 3>key difference because people can list their price for whatever

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 3>they want. The current value that you need to figure

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 3>out through comping. If it's four hundred thousand, can you

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 3>buy it to three eighty five? Can you buy it

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 3>at three eighty can you buy it at three fifty?

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:05.800
<v Speaker 3>And I know that sounds like just making up numbers,

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 3>but that is the ben That is the way the

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 3>market shifts. Right when you go from a seller's market

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 3>to a buyer's market, there are you know, you have

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 3>more leverage as a buyer. And so that's the discipline

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 3>I encourage people to have is don't buy a current

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 3>market value because if it goes down two percent, you're

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 3>not going to get killed. You'll still make money other ways,

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 3>but it will not perform as well. But if you

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 3>can buy ten percent under market value. You're insulating yourself

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 3>against some potential declines and you're ideally walking into some return.

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's where I think a lot of people who

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's really hard not to in real estate, especially

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:40.759
<v Speaker 1>as buying your primary residence, get a little emotional about it.

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 1>But that's where you have to remove some of that

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>emotion because like it's I've already spoken to how to

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Money listeners who have bought something, let's say in the

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 1>not too distant past, and they like, let's say, I

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>don't want to move or want to upgrade their house already, like, oh,

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 1>we we're having twins or something like that, right, and

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:02.319
<v Speaker 1>we need more space. And my goodness, though, I think

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:04.800
<v Speaker 1>we overpaid a little bit. And the housing markets often

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:07.439
<v Speaker 1>and that can feel like a double whammy that makes

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it really difficult to sell and it feels like you're

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 1>forced to stay put then in the house that was

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 1>a joy to purchase now becomes this headache that you

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 1>have to hold on to. And but so much of

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 1>that boils down to purchase price and being able to

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:23.480
<v Speaker 1>negotiate wisely on the front end.

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely one hundred percent real estate. Yeah, being able, that's

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 3>the two things you can't change. In real estate, it's

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:31.359
<v Speaker 3>kind of a note saying is what you pay for

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:33.919
<v Speaker 3>it and the location. So those are the two things

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 3>that I think you really need to focus on is

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 3>in an area with high demand and paying the right price.

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 3>I know it got crazy in twenty two twenty three

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 3>where you had to be really aggressive and if you

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:47.360
<v Speaker 3>start in a family like you just got to do

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:49.280
<v Speaker 3>what you got to do, you know, Like I totally

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 3>get that we're in a totally different market now, though

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 3>you have to be disciplined. You have to be patient

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 3>if that means renting for another year, rent for another year.

0:36:57.760 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Like I.

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Think I surprise people a lot when I tell people

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 3>to rent all the time. I just think it makes

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 3>sense real estate, not just the purchase price, the transaction

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:12.360
<v Speaker 3>costs or what really kill people. Because when you go

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 3>to sell a home, you're usually paying five or six

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 3>percent of the purchase price on commissions.

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot of money.

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you bought a home for four hundred

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:23.240
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars, you're paying five percent on commission, that's twenty grand.

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 3>Means that you'll need to have even either paid down

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty grand of your mortgage or appreciated twenty two twenty

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars just to break even.

0:37:32.560 --> 0:37:36.320
<v Speaker 2>And so especially if you're a homeowner.

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 3>The way, if you are not going to live there

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 3>for three or four years minimum, I'd say keep renting. Like,

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 3>I just think that's a better decision. You could rent

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 3>and buy a rental property if you're going to hold

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 3>onto that for four or five years, if you want

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 3>to put your money to work, that makes sense. But

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's really hard to It's not hard, but

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 3>it's much riskier to buy a home if you don't

0:37:58.239 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 3>know if you're going to live there for three, four

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:00.359
<v Speaker 3>or five years.

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I heard you say recently that your goal, and

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>one you suggest for investors is to buy ten percent

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>below comps, like what what a similar house would recently

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>sold for right in the neighborhood, same similar size acreage,

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:17.759
<v Speaker 1>all that kind of stuff. Okay, people are like, sounds good.

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 1>They we all want that, Right, How do I get

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that sweet ten for us?

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 2>So easy?

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Right? The four hundred thousand dollars house for three to

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 1>sixty How do I do it?

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 3>I think it's about patients. There's different ways that people

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 3>do this. A lot of real estate investors will do

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 3>off market deals, they'll do direct to market to direct

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.879
<v Speaker 3>to seller marketing. They'll you know, email sellers and try

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 3>and do that. That's a great way to do it,

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 3>but I actually think you can still you can start

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 3>to find these things on the mls just publicly listing

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:49.799
<v Speaker 3>things on Zillo. The best way to do it is

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 3>to target either relistings or properties that have a high

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:56.320
<v Speaker 3>days on market. These are this is data that you

0:38:56.360 --> 0:38:59.439
<v Speaker 3>can find on Zilo, on redfin, and any real estate

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 3>agent should be able to help you with. Basically, the

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 3>longer a property sits on the market, the more likely

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:08.400
<v Speaker 3>it is that that seller is going to be willing

0:39:08.400 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 3>to negotiate. And there's this psychological thing that definitely happens

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 3>in the housing market where it's like a property might

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 3>be priced ten grand over so say the property is

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 3>worth four hundred, they put it on for four to ten.

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 3>No one wants to buy that house at four ten

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 3>because everyone's like this is bad. Maybe that seller they

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 3>take too long to adjust and they eventually drop it

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 3>to four hundred, but it's already been sitting on the

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 3>market for one hundred and twenty days.

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 2>People don't look at it.

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't show up in their filter, they think there's

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 3>something wrong with it because it's been sitting on the

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 3>market for so long, and then they drop it to

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:42.240
<v Speaker 3>three ninety and then they drop it to three seventy

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 3>or whatever. And it might just sound like fanciful that,

0:39:46.160 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 3>but this happens all the time, and I think it's

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 3>going to happen more and more, and so go on zillo.

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Now Redfin's actually better for this, But you can go

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:56.399
<v Speaker 3>and put a filter on where it says only show

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 3>me properties that have been sitting for at least ninety days.

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 3>If it's been sitting for nine days, most sellers are

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:04.280
<v Speaker 3>willing to entertain an offer, So go in and write

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:07.279
<v Speaker 3>offers like you don't have to pay what people are

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 3>asking and it's not disrespectful. I know people call it

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 3>the disrespectful offer, but like, this is a free market, right,

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, this is you were You can pay what

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 3>what that asset is worth is what two people are

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 3>willing to agree on.

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, And they can tell you no and laugh in

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>your face.

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, and you have to get comfortable with that.

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:26.399
<v Speaker 3>I think that's sort of the thing that a lot

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 3>of people, especially homeowners, used to because you're it is emotional.

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 3>It's your home, right, you want this home so badly.

0:40:32.800 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 3>I really think in today's day and age, write it,

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 3>write it for less. Maybe they'll come back and you

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 3>agree on something in the middle. But I think that

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:42.760
<v Speaker 3>discipline of trying to get something under asking price, especially

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 3>if you're only going to live there for a couple

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 3>of years, is sort of a crucial skill to learn.

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Not all agents are going to want to do this,

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 3>but find an agent who will, because those are the

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 3>ones you want to work with in today's day and age.

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So is there a specific way to write this offer

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 1>to maybe grab more attention or to not offend and

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to you and to get them to counter back instead

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of just laughing in your face? Is there a way

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to make this offer appealing, appetizing in a way instead

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 1>of potentially frustrating to the person who's got their house

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:12.320
<v Speaker 1>on the market.

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's almost hard. It's hard to avoid.

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 3>I think you don't want to do something totally disrespectful.

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:21.799
<v Speaker 3>People will write that off, but usually if you have

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:26.280
<v Speaker 3>logic to the price that you're putting in front of them,

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:28.479
<v Speaker 3>you can explain that through the agent. I mean, there's

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:31.400
<v Speaker 3>most ways you offer you don't actually communicate directly with

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:34.319
<v Speaker 3>the seller, but you know, if the agent can convey, hey,

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 3>this is you know, the only way as an investor,

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 3>I can make money is buying it at this price.

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 3>If you can't take it, I totally understand, but this

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 3>is the only way it's worth it to me. I

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 3>think that's usually the best way to do it. Or

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:48.239
<v Speaker 3>as a homeowner, just say this is my budget, Like

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 3>I love your home, this is my budget. If you

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 3>can't do it, you can't, but I can't pay your price,

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 3>like both of you are entitled to say. You know,

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:59.240
<v Speaker 3>as a home buyer say I can't pay for four hundred.

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 3>That doesn't work for me, and the seller could say

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to sell for three to sixty.

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 2>That's going to happen.

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 3>And I think if you're going to take this approach,

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:07.839
<v Speaker 3>you need to see it as a numbers game. It's

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 3>not going to work every time. It's probably not going

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 3>to work your first time, it might not work your

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 3>fifth time. But if you do this enough and there

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 3>will be more inventory so you'll have more properties to

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 3>offer on I think it will. You know, for the

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 3>majority of people who are willing to be patient, it

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:23.759
<v Speaker 3>can work depends on the market, right If you're in

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 3>the Northeast right now, super competitive, like it's.

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 2>Not going to work.

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 3>But if you're in Florida, if you're in Texas, if

0:42:29.120 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 3>you're in California where prices are flat and inventory is

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 3>going up, like that's the way to go about this.

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 1>And I've been shocked to see just how much of

0:42:37.000 --> 0:42:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a discount people get versus the list price. Like sometimes

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, oh, that house, it's listed for eight hundred,

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe it'll go if somebody gets lucky for like seven hundred,

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:48.319
<v Speaker 1>And then I see the final details and it sold

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>for five sixty because some patient investor was like, well,

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>this stayed on for a long time, and I'm going

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to try to get the price I think. I think

0:42:55.960 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it's fair at giving the work that this needs. And

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 1>most people just assume the list price. Well, yeah, maybe

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:02.719
<v Speaker 1>I can get a little bit of a discount, but

0:43:02.800 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 1>not that much. But the truth is a lot of

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>people are getting big discounts.

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 2>It's true.

0:43:06.239 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 3>On average, the average discount right now is eight percent,

0:43:09.239 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 3>So just.

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Think about that, like that's average.

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the average discount.

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 3>If you get a discount, I should carveout that the

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:16.920
<v Speaker 3>average discount off list right now is about three percent.

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 3>But for the people who bid under and succeed at this,

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:23.879
<v Speaker 3>the average is eight percent. On an average price home

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 3>in the US four twenty, that's like thirty five thousand dollars.

0:43:26.640 --> 0:43:29.920
<v Speaker 2>That's a lot of money, right like, So that is average.

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 3>So I would recommend trying to do at least that,

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 3>if not more. And the other thing I'll say is

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:39.319
<v Speaker 3>to be patient. Sometimes the seller are not. They haven't

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 3>come to terms with their market. This is just human nature,

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:45.240
<v Speaker 3>right They anchor to what their neighbors sold three years ago.

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:47.279
<v Speaker 2>And they're like, I want to get that. That's not

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:48.240
<v Speaker 2>the market anymore.

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 3>It's softer, it's slower, prices are lower in a lot

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 3>of markets, and they might need three months to come

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:56.760
<v Speaker 3>to terms with that. But if you're respectful and explain

0:43:57.280 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 3>what you're willing to pay, they might call you three

0:43:59.760 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 3>months from now and say, you know what no one

0:44:01.640 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 3>else is offered, and you know, I'll take your price,

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 3>or you know, you go back to the negotiating table

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 3>and figure something out. But I think that's that, you know,

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:11.839
<v Speaker 3>this game of patients in precision is the way to go.

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 3>Right now, it's there's too much. I don't want to

0:44:15.520 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 3>call it garbage, but like there's two because they're not

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:20.799
<v Speaker 3>they're like nice homes for people homes. But there's too

0:44:20.840 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 3>much bad financially. Too many deals are bad financially out

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 3>there right now, and so you need to wade through

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 3>that and find the ones that make sense for you.

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:31.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it takes time, takes patients. You're right, all right.

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:33.399
<v Speaker 1>I got more I want to talk about with you, Dave,

0:44:33.440 --> 0:44:36.440
<v Speaker 1>including I want to get to maybe advice that you

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:40.440
<v Speaker 1>have for a want to be first time investor. We'll

0:44:40.440 --> 0:44:50.200
<v Speaker 1>discuss that right after this. I'm talking with Dave Meyer

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about the taking time bomb in real estate. And Dave,

0:44:54.239 --> 0:44:57.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the things just thinking about moving into the

0:44:57.480 --> 0:45:02.319
<v Speaker 1>future and demographic changes is and we talked about how

0:45:02.360 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that should impact you the way you think as an investor.

0:45:05.360 --> 0:45:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Do you think some investors right now need to change

0:45:07.440 --> 0:45:11.480
<v Speaker 1>their strategy meaningfully? Do they even maybe need to start

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:15.400
<v Speaker 1>unloading some properties that don't make sense moving into the future, Like,

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 1>how are you helping current investors who have let's say, eight, ten, twelve,

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:23.359
<v Speaker 1>fifteen homes they run out think about the supply they

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 1>currently they currently own one.

0:45:25.480 --> 0:45:28.279
<v Speaker 3>Hundred percent Joel I know this is another debate among

0:45:28.320 --> 0:45:30.800
<v Speaker 3>real estate investors. Many of them say, never sell, you

0:45:31.000 --> 0:45:35.000
<v Speaker 3>just buy and never sell. I completely disagree. I'm always

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:37.879
<v Speaker 3>trading out and sort of optimizing my portfolio.

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:38.680
<v Speaker 2>That' said.

0:45:38.760 --> 0:45:41.880
<v Speaker 3>I still buy every property I own with the intention

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:43.440
<v Speaker 3>to hold it for at least five years. You know,

0:45:43.480 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 3>you got to offset those transaction costs. But I think

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 3>we're entering It depends on where you are in your

0:45:49.120 --> 0:45:52.720
<v Speaker 3>sort of investor journey. But I just think right now

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:54.920
<v Speaker 3>is an opportunity to sort of reload.

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 2>I you know, I'm going.

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 3>To sell certain properties I have been selling. I'm selling more,

0:45:59.560 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 3>but I'm not just like exiting the market. I'm just

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:06.919
<v Speaker 3>repositioning my portfolio into better assets right now. I think

0:46:06.960 --> 0:46:09.880
<v Speaker 3>the opportunity is there for real estate investors who are

0:46:09.920 --> 0:46:12.480
<v Speaker 3>in this for the long run to buy great assets

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:15.640
<v Speaker 3>and great locations. This almost never doesn't work, right, even

0:46:15.680 --> 0:46:18.279
<v Speaker 3>if demographics shift, even if we're in a high interest

0:46:18.320 --> 0:46:20.319
<v Speaker 3>rate environment for a long time. You buy a good

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:22.480
<v Speaker 3>asset and a good location, you're going to do well

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:25.120
<v Speaker 3>in real estate like that, I feel very confident about

0:46:25.880 --> 0:46:27.200
<v Speaker 3>During the last couple of years.

0:46:27.239 --> 0:46:28.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, I bought some.

0:46:28.080 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Older homes in ex serbs of the neighborhood because the

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:33.759
<v Speaker 3>trends were good there and I've made money on all

0:46:33.800 --> 0:46:36.080
<v Speaker 3>of them. But like, is it something I want to

0:46:36.120 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 3>hold for five years, ten years, fifteen years.

0:46:38.760 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so.

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:41.399
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to give it to someone who will

0:46:41.680 --> 0:46:43.400
<v Speaker 3>and who will probably make more money off of it

0:46:43.440 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 3>than I would by holding onto it, and just refocus

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:47.040
<v Speaker 3>my portfolio.

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:48.680
<v Speaker 2>I think right.

0:46:48.480 --> 0:46:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Now it's a good time to just sort of take

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:54.200
<v Speaker 3>stock of what you got and prune. You got a

0:46:54.200 --> 0:46:56.560
<v Speaker 3>property that's a pain in your butt, property that sort

0:46:56.560 --> 0:46:58.960
<v Speaker 3>of hit its peak in terms of performance, sell it,

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:01.680
<v Speaker 3>sit on the cash to attend to thirty one exchange,

0:47:01.760 --> 0:47:03.600
<v Speaker 3>and buy something that you do want to hold on

0:47:03.600 --> 0:47:04.240
<v Speaker 3>to for ten.

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:04.799
<v Speaker 2>To fifteen years.

0:47:04.840 --> 0:47:07.319
<v Speaker 3>That's sort of the framework that I'm working on right now.

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Is I'm thirty eight years old. I've been doing this

0:47:10.920 --> 0:47:12.080
<v Speaker 3>for sixteen years.

0:47:12.320 --> 0:47:14.800
<v Speaker 2>I would love to be sort of retired by fifty.

0:47:14.800 --> 0:47:16.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm not one of those people who wants to retire

0:47:16.400 --> 0:47:18.440
<v Speaker 3>right away, but fifty sounds like a good year for me.

0:47:18.560 --> 0:47:21.200
<v Speaker 3>So I'm like, what properties do I want to own

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:23.600
<v Speaker 3>when I'm fifty years old that are going to be

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 3>still in great shape, still in a great location regardless

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:27.359
<v Speaker 3>of what's happening macro.

0:47:27.640 --> 0:47:28.839
<v Speaker 2>And that's the opportunity.

0:47:28.880 --> 0:47:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Because the inventory going up, more of those properties are available.

0:47:33.160 --> 0:47:34.960
<v Speaker 3>And so that's sort of at least how I'm doing it.

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:39.560
<v Speaker 3>And I think that that mindset I see consistently adopted

0:47:39.600 --> 0:47:42.000
<v Speaker 3>by experience investors right now. It's like, how do you

0:47:42.120 --> 0:47:45.279
<v Speaker 3>just prune down to the good stuff and not be

0:47:45.320 --> 0:47:47.960
<v Speaker 3>in growth mode all the time and just focus on

0:47:48.000 --> 0:47:50.719
<v Speaker 3>the stuff that really gets you your long term goals,

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:54.200
<v Speaker 3>which I think most investors is like long term financial stability,

0:47:54.239 --> 0:47:56.239
<v Speaker 3>not trying to make a quick buck in the next

0:47:56.320 --> 0:47:56.719
<v Speaker 3>year or two.

0:47:56.960 --> 0:47:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'd love that you have a long term focus,

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't mean you're averse to making changes along

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the way too. But you're moving your runner slowly instead

0:48:06.680 --> 0:48:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of dramatic turns right based on Well i saw this

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:12.319
<v Speaker 1>study and now I'm freaked out, and so I've got

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to make like a massive overhaul of my portfolio now.

0:48:14.680 --> 0:48:17.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's like tweaking, pruning like you would with your garden.

0:48:18.080 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:22.239
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I think that's exactly the way to think about it.

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:24.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm not the kind of person who's like, oh my god,

0:48:24.239 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to sell everything and get out of the market.

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:28.600
<v Speaker 3>I think that's crazy. Like if you just look historically,

0:48:29.120 --> 0:48:31.399
<v Speaker 3>time in the market. It's an old saying, but it's true.

0:48:31.520 --> 0:48:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Time in the market works. You pay down your mortgage,

0:48:33.360 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 3>your cash flows go up. It's the beauty of real estate.

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:38.000
<v Speaker 3>You have a fixed rate mortgage, your rents keep up

0:48:38.040 --> 0:48:40.359
<v Speaker 3>with inflation. You're going to keep making more money over time.

0:48:40.400 --> 0:48:40.880
<v Speaker 2>It's great.

0:48:41.719 --> 0:48:44.840
<v Speaker 3>So I it's a great tax you know tax advantages.

0:48:44.840 --> 0:48:46.640
<v Speaker 3>It is an inflation has There's so many reasons to

0:48:46.680 --> 0:48:50.359
<v Speaker 3>be in real estate. But you know, there is a time,

0:48:50.560 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 3>the same thing as stock market. There's a time to

0:48:52.239 --> 0:48:55.319
<v Speaker 3>take some bets on growth stocks. Right, there's times and

0:48:55.360 --> 0:48:57.360
<v Speaker 3>take some bets, and there's a time to be a

0:48:57.360 --> 0:49:00.279
<v Speaker 3>little more risk averse. And you know you hear this

0:49:00.360 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 3>from private equity to stock investors. Risk on times and

0:49:03.200 --> 0:49:05.520
<v Speaker 3>risk off times. I think it's a risk off time

0:49:05.600 --> 0:49:08.040
<v Speaker 3>in real estate. Buy the good stuff. It's out there,

0:49:08.040 --> 0:49:10.920
<v Speaker 3>it's still going to perform. I just some people will

0:49:10.920 --> 0:49:11.919
<v Speaker 3>make money doing the risk.

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:14.319
<v Speaker 2>I just don't. For me, it's not worth it.

0:49:14.120 --> 0:49:15.799
<v Speaker 1>So what does that mean if we're in a risk

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 1>off time For the first time investor, the person who

0:49:18.640 --> 0:49:21.600
<v Speaker 1>wants to buy their first rental property, who is still

0:49:21.600 --> 0:49:25.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out how to evaluate and assess whether

0:49:25.800 --> 0:49:29.359
<v Speaker 1>something is a good deal or not. What do they

0:49:29.360 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 1>need to pay attention to? And then also, are there

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:35.440
<v Speaker 1>specific types of properties that made me make more sense

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:37.520
<v Speaker 1>for them? Does it make more sense to buy like

0:49:37.520 --> 0:49:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a multi family house and live in part of it,

0:49:39.200 --> 0:49:42.680
<v Speaker 1>do some sort of like a rental hack right where

0:49:42.680 --> 0:49:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you're reducing your monthly costs at the same time and

0:49:45.680 --> 0:49:48.879
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a can't lose situation, Or how would

0:49:48.920 --> 0:49:51.279
<v Speaker 1>your advice be for someone who's like considering buying their

0:49:51.280 --> 0:49:52.439
<v Speaker 1>first rental property right now?

0:49:52.760 --> 0:49:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely great question. So I think we've covered two of them.

0:49:56.200 --> 0:49:59.560
<v Speaker 3>Location and purchase price two things you really got to

0:49:59.560 --> 0:50:02.839
<v Speaker 3>focus on. If you're in a area that's a little

0:50:02.840 --> 0:50:05.600
<v Speaker 3>bit outside the city, not great demand, I wouldn't buy

0:50:05.600 --> 0:50:07.560
<v Speaker 3>that these days. You want to be in the place

0:50:07.600 --> 0:50:09.360
<v Speaker 3>where you know you're going to find great tenants and

0:50:09.400 --> 0:50:11.400
<v Speaker 3>if you have to sell or want to sell that,

0:50:11.440 --> 0:50:13.400
<v Speaker 3>people are going to like that area. I don't like

0:50:13.960 --> 0:50:17.319
<v Speaker 3>tertiary markets these days, you know, or tertiary neighborhoods, you know.

0:50:17.360 --> 0:50:19.640
<v Speaker 3>I just like being in the thick of things and

0:50:19.680 --> 0:50:20.160
<v Speaker 3>there's more.

0:50:20.040 --> 0:50:21.080
<v Speaker 2>And more good deals there.

0:50:21.680 --> 0:50:24.399
<v Speaker 3>Purchase price we talked about a little bit, and then

0:50:24.440 --> 0:50:27.759
<v Speaker 3>I would also say conservative underwriting. I think a lot

0:50:27.760 --> 0:50:31.920
<v Speaker 3>of people got into this mode where they were presuming

0:50:31.920 --> 0:50:33.840
<v Speaker 3>they were going to get the highest rent comp or

0:50:33.880 --> 0:50:36.239
<v Speaker 3>that appreciation was going to be what it was the

0:50:36.320 --> 0:50:39.200
<v Speaker 3>last couple of years. I you know, if I go

0:50:39.280 --> 0:50:41.280
<v Speaker 3>to my agent and say I'm going to buy this property,

0:50:41.880 --> 0:50:45.920
<v Speaker 3>what's the rent and property manager agent says fifteen hundred bucks,

0:50:45.960 --> 0:50:48.359
<v Speaker 3>immediately say thirteen fifty, Like I'm going to take ten

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:51.040
<v Speaker 3>percent off of that. They're probably right, but I just,

0:50:51.200 --> 0:50:53.839
<v Speaker 3>you know, risk off to me is does this deal

0:50:53.880 --> 0:50:57.239
<v Speaker 3>work with no appreciation and lower rent and high vacancy?

0:50:57.320 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Like I know it.

0:50:58.120 --> 0:51:02.719
<v Speaker 3>Sounds crazy and a little bit I don't know, like

0:51:03.239 --> 0:51:07.719
<v Speaker 3>pessimistic or paranoid, but there are the deals still work.

0:51:07.800 --> 0:51:10.240
<v Speaker 3>So like why wouldn't you in this kind of market

0:51:10.320 --> 0:51:11.279
<v Speaker 3>be that disciplined?

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:12.000
<v Speaker 2>And so that's that.

0:51:12.400 --> 0:51:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Those are the things I recommend to anyone.

0:51:14.320 --> 0:51:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Like planning for the worst and hope for the best.

0:51:16.360 --> 0:51:20.000
<v Speaker 1>And exactly I mean, vacancy for me and the properties

0:51:20.040 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I own was non existent for like a decade, and

0:51:23.280 --> 0:51:25.919
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of years I've actually had vacancy happen,

0:51:26.000 --> 0:51:27.239
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, yeah, it's a good thing you plan

0:51:27.360 --> 0:51:29.719
<v Speaker 1>to build for because it does happen. For the longest time,

0:51:29.719 --> 0:51:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I was like, what are they even talking about with

0:51:31.239 --> 0:51:33.680
<v Speaker 1>vacancy thing, But it's it happens, it's.

0:51:33.600 --> 0:51:34.279
<v Speaker 2>Real, I think.

0:51:34.280 --> 0:51:36.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I had one for ten years in Denver,

0:51:36.280 --> 0:51:38.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, and like not even a day. You know,

0:51:38.520 --> 0:51:40.520
<v Speaker 3>you just have to have to line it up and

0:51:40.600 --> 0:51:42.200
<v Speaker 3>it's changed, and that's fine if.

0:51:42.120 --> 0:51:42.960
<v Speaker 2>You underwrite for it.

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:46.360
<v Speaker 3>I think that's the thing that people that really hurts

0:51:46.360 --> 0:51:50.640
<v Speaker 3>people is they underwrite the deals, they analyze them really optimistically,

0:51:51.040 --> 0:51:54.480
<v Speaker 3>and then when things don't do go perfectly, then it

0:51:54.520 --> 0:51:57.399
<v Speaker 3>doesn't do well well. I think Morgan Housel, I think

0:51:57.440 --> 0:52:00.520
<v Speaker 3>said in his book I don't know he said, or

0:52:00.560 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 3>someone in his book Psychology of Money said, plan for

0:52:03.600 --> 0:52:06.279
<v Speaker 3>your plan to not go according to plan. And I

0:52:06.360 --> 0:52:09.120
<v Speaker 3>love that because it's just like, if you do that,

0:52:09.440 --> 0:52:12.320
<v Speaker 3>then nothing phases you. It's not stressful when you get

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:15.759
<v Speaker 3>a vacancy. It's not stressful when your rents don't come

0:52:15.800 --> 0:52:18.440
<v Speaker 3>in what you expected them because you weren't expecting that.

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:20.760
<v Speaker 2>And then I say this on the show all the time.

0:52:21.080 --> 0:52:23.720
<v Speaker 3>I love being I love putting myself in a position

0:52:24.200 --> 0:52:27.280
<v Speaker 3>where I benefit from being wrong, Like that is the.

0:52:27.160 --> 0:52:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Best to me.

0:52:28.239 --> 0:52:30.319
<v Speaker 3>If I say there's gonna be no appreciation rent growth

0:52:30.400 --> 0:52:33.160
<v Speaker 3>is going to stink, and then it does well great.

0:52:33.360 --> 0:52:36.480
<v Speaker 3>I love being wrong about that. It's really beneficial. So

0:52:36.520 --> 0:52:39.279
<v Speaker 3>I think people should really sort of adopt that mindset

0:52:39.800 --> 0:52:41.560
<v Speaker 3>you did mention, though, I just wanted to say, Joel

0:52:41.600 --> 0:52:44.800
<v Speaker 3>about house hacking or like living in a rental. Personally,

0:52:44.840 --> 0:52:46.640
<v Speaker 3>I think it's the best way to invest in real estate.

0:52:46.719 --> 0:52:48.919
<v Speaker 3>It's boring. I still do it, you know. I'm trying

0:52:48.920 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 3>to do a live in hack myself. I've a living

0:52:51.560 --> 0:52:54.680
<v Speaker 3>flip excuse me, done house hacking for a lot of

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 3>my life. I think it makes just a lot of sense.

0:52:58.120 --> 0:53:01.719
<v Speaker 3>It's solo risk, and there's really good side. There's just

0:53:01.880 --> 0:53:05.239
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's so many benefits that our society has

0:53:05.280 --> 0:53:08.680
<v Speaker 3>created for owner occupant investors, and it's.

0:53:08.360 --> 0:53:09.040
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of fun.

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Like it's a great way to learn the business, see

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:12.040
<v Speaker 3>if you're good at it, see if you like it,

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:14.680
<v Speaker 3>and a great way to get into it even if

0:53:14.719 --> 0:53:15.840
<v Speaker 3>you don't cash flow.

0:53:16.520 --> 0:53:17.799
<v Speaker 2>Most house hacks.

0:53:17.760 --> 0:53:20.799
<v Speaker 3>Will allow you to reduce your living expenses significantly. So

0:53:20.880 --> 0:53:23.080
<v Speaker 3>even if you're still coming out of pocket five hundred

0:53:23.080 --> 0:53:25.560
<v Speaker 3>bucks a month for your mortgage, average rent right now

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:27.480
<v Speaker 3>is eighteen hundred bucks a month. So if you can,

0:53:27.680 --> 0:53:29.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, pulling numbers right, you know, out of thin

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:32.440
<v Speaker 3>air right now. But if you save one thousand and

0:53:32.440 --> 0:53:34.839
<v Speaker 3>fifteen hundred bucks a month after your living expenses, that's

0:53:34.880 --> 0:53:37.600
<v Speaker 3>a big return on that investment. Plus you're getting the

0:53:37.680 --> 0:53:39.399
<v Speaker 3>loan paid down, on the tax benefits and all these

0:53:39.400 --> 0:53:42.560
<v Speaker 3>other things. So I still think that works almost everywhere.

0:53:42.920 --> 0:53:44.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, there are a couple of really expensive markets

0:53:44.640 --> 0:53:45.800
<v Speaker 3>where it doesn't make sense.

0:53:45.600 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Seattle, LA and New York.

0:53:47.120 --> 0:53:50.440
<v Speaker 3>But outside of those super expensive markets, it's a really,

0:53:50.560 --> 0:53:53.760
<v Speaker 3>really reliable way to get invested in the market.

0:53:53.760 --> 0:53:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Even today, it's I agree, it's so underrated, and it's

0:53:58.400 --> 0:54:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it's uncomfortable right in so way and you're like, I

0:54:01.200 --> 0:54:02.719
<v Speaker 1>don't know people living with me, or I'm gonna have

0:54:02.719 --> 0:54:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to like settle for the duplex and rent it out

0:54:05.120 --> 0:54:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the back. But man, it worked for us, and I've

0:54:08.239 --> 0:54:10.520
<v Speaker 1>heard it work for so many other people. Just the

0:54:10.560 --> 0:54:13.000
<v Speaker 1>ability to it's like the snowball rolling downhill, and it

0:54:13.080 --> 0:54:15.520
<v Speaker 1>rolls so much quicker if you if you start with

0:54:15.560 --> 0:54:17.560
<v Speaker 1>house hacking. So I think more people should consider it.

0:54:17.560 --> 0:54:18.280
<v Speaker 2>One hundred percent.

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:21.440
<v Speaker 3>And I will just say I often think people are

0:54:21.440 --> 0:54:24.080
<v Speaker 3>a little dramatic about the discomfort of it.

0:54:24.400 --> 0:54:24.640
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:54:25.560 --> 0:54:28.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, some people do it in an extreme way, you know,

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:30.879
<v Speaker 3>where you buy a single family home, you live in

0:54:31.480 --> 0:54:32.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, one bedroom, you.

0:54:32.480 --> 0:54:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Rent out the other and have roommates.

0:54:34.160 --> 0:54:36.239
<v Speaker 3>I don't even think that that's that bad, but it's

0:54:36.280 --> 0:54:39.000
<v Speaker 3>probably for younger people just generally speaking. I live with

0:54:39.080 --> 0:54:41.799
<v Speaker 3>roommates for a long time after college, and why not

0:54:41.840 --> 0:54:43.480
<v Speaker 3>be the landlord if you're going to do that, you know,

0:54:44.080 --> 0:54:46.239
<v Speaker 3>but even with a family, I know tons of people

0:54:46.239 --> 0:54:48.399
<v Speaker 3>who do this. You can find ways to make it work.

0:54:48.440 --> 0:54:51.239
<v Speaker 3>Buy a side by side duplex, like, you can absolutely

0:54:51.280 --> 0:54:53.680
<v Speaker 3>still make that work. You could buy a single family

0:54:53.680 --> 0:54:56.440
<v Speaker 3>home with an adu or an apartment above the garage.

0:54:56.480 --> 0:54:58.319
<v Speaker 3>You know, Like, there are ways to make this work

0:54:58.360 --> 0:55:00.319
<v Speaker 3>that are comfortable for you and your family.

0:55:00.560 --> 0:55:01.959
<v Speaker 2>It's just a matter of what you want more.

0:55:02.000 --> 0:55:04.279
<v Speaker 3>And I think for a lot of people they choose, Hey,

0:55:04.280 --> 0:55:05.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm willing to do that for a couple of years

0:55:05.920 --> 0:55:11.440
<v Speaker 3>to jumpstart my financial future, because you know, I've done it.

0:55:11.440 --> 0:55:14.520
<v Speaker 2>It's really not that bad. I think it's most people.

0:55:14.960 --> 0:55:15.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:18.080
<v Speaker 3>I grew up in the Northeast, so I'm used to,

0:55:18.160 --> 0:55:20.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, living in an apartment. My mom lives in an apartment.

0:55:20.360 --> 0:55:22.799
<v Speaker 3>It's no different than that, you know. It's like, Yeah,

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:25.040
<v Speaker 3>I've lived in a dorm in college. It's no different

0:55:25.080 --> 0:55:26.839
<v Speaker 3>than that. Like people, it's not that bad.

0:55:26.920 --> 0:55:27.120
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:55:27.160 --> 0:55:29.360
<v Speaker 3>We have this dream in the United States of living

0:55:29.440 --> 0:55:31.600
<v Speaker 3>in a single family home and having privacy.

0:55:32.040 --> 0:55:33.520
<v Speaker 2>And if that's what you want, go for.

0:55:33.680 --> 0:55:36.040
<v Speaker 3>But if you're willing to sort of give up a

0:55:36.040 --> 0:55:39.279
<v Speaker 3>little bit on that, the financial benefits are significant.

0:55:39.400 --> 0:55:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sometimes it's short term pain for long term gain

0:55:42.200 --> 0:55:44.919
<v Speaker 1>as well, right, if it's not your ideal. But Dave,

0:55:44.960 --> 0:55:47.000
<v Speaker 1>this has been a great conversation, man, I really really

0:55:47.000 --> 0:55:49.239
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you taking the time. Where can how do money

0:55:49.280 --> 0:55:51.480
<v Speaker 1>listeners find out more about you and get more of

0:55:51.520 --> 0:55:54.160
<v Speaker 1>those long term predictions and insights that you're throwing out.

0:55:54.600 --> 0:55:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely well, if you're interested in real estate investing, I

0:55:56.920 --> 0:55:59.719
<v Speaker 3>host two podcasts, the Bigger Pockets real Estate Podcast and

0:55:59.760 --> 0:56:03.680
<v Speaker 3>on the Market, and we do those every day, so

0:56:03.719 --> 0:56:06.960
<v Speaker 3>you can find those at the Bigger Pockets podcast network,

0:56:07.280 --> 0:56:08.960
<v Speaker 3>or if you want to connect with me directly. The

0:56:09.000 --> 0:56:12.200
<v Speaker 3>best place is on Instagram where I'm at the data.

0:56:11.800 --> 0:56:15.160
<v Speaker 1>DELI love it, Dave, thank you very much, Thank you,

0:56:15.239 --> 0:56:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Joel all right there there are There are a few

0:56:17.640 --> 0:56:20.960
<v Speaker 1>people I enjoy talking about real estate more with than

0:56:21.080 --> 0:56:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Dave Meyer. My buddy Chad Carson, He's up there too,

0:56:24.800 --> 0:56:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's I think it's largely because their philosophy is

0:56:27.960 --> 0:56:33.880
<v Speaker 1>so sound, it's so steady. And Dave alluded multiple times

0:56:34.239 --> 0:56:37.799
<v Speaker 1>during this talk, during during this interview to the long

0:56:37.880 --> 0:56:41.400
<v Speaker 1>term nature of how he thinks about real estate investing,

0:56:41.640 --> 0:56:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's what makes like we're kindred spirits

0:56:44.360 --> 0:56:46.080
<v Speaker 1>in that way, like when you hear us talk about

0:56:46.120 --> 0:56:49.279
<v Speaker 1>investing in the stock market, it's it's the it's the

0:56:49.320 --> 0:56:53.160
<v Speaker 1>same thing. And and I have never I actually never

0:56:53.200 --> 0:56:55.719
<v Speaker 1>sold a rental property. Doesn't mean I'm against it, and

0:56:55.760 --> 0:56:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Dave's not against it. He's repositioning his portfolio, as he said,

0:56:59.440 --> 0:57:02.640
<v Speaker 1>But I love that. My goal, my thought process, at

0:57:02.719 --> 0:57:04.799
<v Speaker 1>least when I'm buying a rental property and it's been

0:57:04.840 --> 0:57:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a minute, but is to ensure that this is a

0:57:08.520 --> 0:57:10.239
<v Speaker 1>property I want to own for a long time, and

0:57:10.239 --> 0:57:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that there are a number of reasons I see this

0:57:13.160 --> 0:57:16.560
<v Speaker 1>as a sound investment for not just a couple of years,

0:57:16.600 --> 0:57:20.400
<v Speaker 1>but for a decade plus, and man, so much good stuff.

0:57:20.400 --> 0:57:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Like if I'm coming up with a big takeaway, it's

0:57:22.720 --> 0:57:24.800
<v Speaker 1>really hard, but Dave literally said the way you make

0:57:24.840 --> 0:57:27.320
<v Speaker 1>money is time, and it's truly when we talk even

0:57:27.320 --> 0:57:32.040
<v Speaker 1>about the transaction costs of real estate, it's prohibitive if

0:57:32.040 --> 0:57:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't own the home for very long. And it's

0:57:34.320 --> 0:57:36.800
<v Speaker 1>why so many people if their timeline is too short,

0:57:37.400 --> 0:57:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that eats into their ability to do well with that

0:57:41.120 --> 0:57:44.960
<v Speaker 1>with that purchase. And man, just so much good advice.

0:57:45.000 --> 0:57:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Though I think I loved it the most when he

0:57:46.760 --> 0:57:49.360
<v Speaker 1>said that the best deals are going to be less obvious.

0:57:49.400 --> 0:57:50.800
<v Speaker 1>You're going to need to look harder, and you're going

0:57:50.880 --> 0:57:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to need to bring more skill. And it really was

0:57:53.560 --> 0:57:56.000
<v Speaker 1>like shooting a fish and fish in a barrel in

0:57:56.040 --> 0:58:00.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty eleven, right twenty thirteen to buy a property that

0:58:00.840 --> 0:58:04.640
<v Speaker 1>would cash flow well, that was going to appreciate meaningfully

0:58:04.720 --> 0:58:07.720
<v Speaker 1>over the next decade. Like you're sitting pretty, you look amazing,

0:58:07.760 --> 0:58:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you look super smart, but the truth is the tailwinds

0:58:10.360 --> 0:58:12.080
<v Speaker 1>were at your back. And it's not that you weren't smart,

0:58:12.160 --> 0:58:16.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's you have to be even shrewder to make

0:58:16.560 --> 0:58:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a smart decision in today's market. And then at the

0:58:20.600 --> 0:58:23.040
<v Speaker 1>end what Dave said was so brilliant and so insightful

0:58:23.080 --> 0:58:25.439
<v Speaker 1>and so true. It's a matter of what you want more.

0:58:26.040 --> 0:58:28.880
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about something like house hacking or buying a

0:58:28.960 --> 0:58:31.760
<v Speaker 1>rental property. There's a lot of sacrifice that goes into

0:58:31.800 --> 0:58:35.680
<v Speaker 1>it because you're taking a lot of money and you're

0:58:35.720 --> 0:58:39.240
<v Speaker 1>squirreling it away in hopes of making an investment that's

0:58:39.280 --> 0:58:41.960
<v Speaker 1>going to pay off for your net worth, that's going

0:58:42.000 --> 0:58:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to pay off for your ability to live the life

0:58:45.040 --> 0:58:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you want in the future. And so you have to

0:58:48.400 --> 0:58:51.160
<v Speaker 1>be really really think about what do I want more?

0:58:51.200 --> 0:58:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Do I want to utilize this money now, spend it

0:58:54.400 --> 0:58:58.240
<v Speaker 1>on myself in my own life like nicer apartment, whatever,

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:00.760
<v Speaker 1>or buy a better single family home for myself and

0:59:00.800 --> 0:59:04.240
<v Speaker 1>my family now? Or am I willing to make concessions?

0:59:04.320 --> 0:59:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Am I willing? Do I want something else more than

0:59:07.560 --> 0:59:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to inflate my lifestyle right now? Don't want

0:59:10.200 --> 0:59:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the new car, whatever it is. But that's ultimately what

0:59:14.480 --> 0:59:19.240
<v Speaker 1>investing is right in the market or in the housing market,

0:59:19.600 --> 0:59:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to say, actually, I would rather build wealth for the

0:59:24.240 --> 0:59:27.800
<v Speaker 1>future than to consume all my resources right now, and

0:59:29.160 --> 0:59:31.400
<v Speaker 1>if you want to listen to sound advice on real

0:59:31.480 --> 0:59:33.760
<v Speaker 1>estate investing, Dave is one of the best places to

0:59:33.840 --> 0:59:38.200
<v Speaker 1>turn and so highly recommend checking out all the content

0:59:38.240 --> 0:59:41.240
<v Speaker 1>he creates. But I hope this at least gets your

0:59:41.240 --> 0:59:43.560
<v Speaker 1>brain ticking, whether you're a real estate investor already or

0:59:43.640 --> 0:59:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to be a real estate investor. It's not

0:59:46.360 --> 0:59:50.640
<v Speaker 1>as simple, right, but there's actually there's more opportunity I

0:59:50.680 --> 0:59:53.480
<v Speaker 1>think right now in the real estate market than there

0:59:53.520 --> 0:59:57.240
<v Speaker 1>has been in the last few years because of some

0:59:57.280 --> 0:59:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of that softening in the market. So if you're like,

0:59:59.160 --> 1:00:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the market top prices are high, well,

1:00:01.800 --> 1:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we're finally seeing a lot more movement and a lot

1:00:05.040 --> 1:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>more willingness to negotiate from sellers. And as always, thank

1:00:09.360 --> 1:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you for listening to the show. We really appreciate it.

1:00:11.360 --> 1:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>You can find show notes up on the website at

1:00:13.280 --> 1:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Howtomoney dot com. Until next time, best Friend out