WEBVTT - Biden Finds Himself Boxed In on China

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analysts in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube.

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Searched Bloomberg Global News lots of headlines when it comes

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 1>to COVID and the pandemic. UK government Tim This is positive.

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 1>They are lifting the restrictions that opposed. But in England

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>back in December when the o maicron variant caused a

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>record spike and infections that now show signs of easing.

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>So a peak coming down, that's good. We're certainly seeing

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that here in New York City, but we should note

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that cases are still soaring elsewhere in Europe. France reporting

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a set a record of nearly four d and sixty

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>five thousand new infections. Italy and Germany also registered all

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>time highs. Switzerland decided to extend a work from home

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>order to the end of February as cases search of

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>different stories playing out. But we're learning more about how

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>quickly hopefully on the cron can peak exactly. Fingers crossed.

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Dr David Kim is back with US, chief Executive of

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Physician Enterprise of at Providence Health. The first known US

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>case of COVID nineteen was confirmed in Washington State at

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 1>Providence Regional Medical Center and Everett that was pack in

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>early January. There are massive hospital system and Dr Kim

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the phone in Irvine, California. Dr Kim

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>so glad to have you back with Tim and myself

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>here on Bloomberg. How are you and what are you seeing.

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing well and we are seeing a lot of

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>what you are mentioning already that the COVID is uh

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 1>the omicron is very infectious, and we're seeing it in

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>fact people much more easily than the previous variants, and

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing our hospitalizations rise as a result of that.

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Um Although the rate of the percentage of people that

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>are winding up in the I c U is much

0:01:55.920 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>lower relative to the previous surges with omicron, and we

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>were seeing milder disease. Okay, so that's a lot of

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>good news. What what can you tell us? And and

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>forgive me, but I like to ask this to everybody

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>who has an idea of what's going on in in hospitals. Uh,

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>who is that? Who is hospitalized right now? And are

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>they vaccinated versus unvaccinated versus boosted? What can you tell

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>us about who is actually getting very sick with covid

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>um So there's there's different ways to answer that question.

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I would say who's getting hospitalized? We're seeing both vaccinated

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and unvaccinated people wind up in the hospital, and that

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>is different with omicron because we saw the delta virus affected.

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Hospitalization is much less in people who are vaccinated. However,

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and what we're seeing is that people who are unvaccinated

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>being hospitalized are getting much sicker. So the percentage of

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 1>people that are going to the IIC you that do

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>get very sick with omicron tend to be people who

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>have not been vaccinated or boosted. Can you believe we're

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>still talking about this and living this? Dr Kim, Yeah,

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>day is like a year these days and you know,

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>depending on how you look at it, this is the third, fourth,

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>or fifth surge we've had over the past two years.

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>It is it has been a remarkable time. And healthcare.

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>How do you balance normal health care with pandemic healthcare.

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>It's difficult, right. Not only are there constraints in the

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>hospital because of the COVID patients, but there is a

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of a shift in the mindset of patients of

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>when do they feel comfortable going to the hospital um.

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>And some of that has been positive and thinking through

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>telehealth and the evolution of being able to get health

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>care in new and novel ways, but some of it

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>is concerning that people who need care aren't getting it

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and where um, there is a concern that once COVID

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>is over, we're going to start seeing people who delayed care,

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>who are going to need care. We're going to see

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>more significant consequences of that. It's so it's so interesting

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>that you said that, I mean a year ago, Carol

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>remembers this. I hadn't been to the dentist any year

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>because of because of COVID, and finally I finally gotten

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>appointment for with a with a physician today for a

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>check out. But it was so difficult to get an

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>appointment because all these healthcare workers, so many of them

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>have gotten sick, so many of them are overworked. So

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the system is kind of being pulled

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>from both ends here. Doctor. Oh yeah, the staffing issue,

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say is almost as much of a concern

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>as the as the COVID itself. That so much of

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 1>our constraints these days are because people are getting sick

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and they can't work or they're just tired, you know.

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>And we see record numbers of people leaving healthcare as

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>as an employment option because of the past two years

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and the and the strains that COVID has put on

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the system, and then the people who work in the system.

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>So what are the changes that need to be made?

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, your your your CEO of Physician Enterprise at

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Providence Health Systems. So so you're making these decisions, and

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you're looking closely at the data about people who are

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:53.799
<v Speaker 1>staying and people who are leaving. What needs to change

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in order to make sure that our health care workers

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in the US do not get burned out? I think

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the that's the million dollar or the billion dollar

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>question we are really thinking through. How do we keep

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>hearts in minds engage, and how do we keep people

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>close to their initial calling of why they went into

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>healthcare in the first place, and why, how we can

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 1>keep healthcare from being a commoditized industry but really be

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a place where people can fulfill the mission of why

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>they chose a career to help others in their communities.

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>And the more we can continue to bring that back

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>into the why of why people came into healthcare and

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>why they come to work every day, I think, the

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>more we can think about how we can sustain them

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 1>through what is a very very difficult time. How do

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 1>we do that, though, like you said, you've got to

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 1>figure it out. What are your thoughts on that? Is

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it a case of pay? Is it a case of respect?

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Is it I love? I don't love. But I think

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>about how you said commoditized, you know, um in terms

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of health care workers. UM, I certainly don't think of that.

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>When I go to see somebody as like a commodity.

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I think about, you're an expert, you went had a

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of education. You know you've got to you know,

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you're taking care of our health. Absolutely, we call those

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>sacred encounters, and it is the reason why it's so

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>fulfilling to be in healthcare to have those moments of

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 1>connection and relationship and intimacy almost with with sharing your

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>life and thinking about your health. How we do that,

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I think is this multiple fold. Some of it is

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>through programmatic work around keeping people focused on the purpose

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and the mission of why. Some of it around creating

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a work environment, whether that's compensation or cultural work, or

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a sense of community that we can really get our

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>arms around how to make people feel part of something

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and and connected to the purpose of what we're trying

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to accomplish together. And part of it is practical is

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>sending people to workshifts that don't burn them out in

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>so that they can find adequate time to rest, and

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>equipping them with tools so that they can check out

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>when their home and not be thinking about work all

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>the time. All about wellness that has been a big

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>theme of this pandemic. Dr Kim David Kim, Chief Executive

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Physician Enterprise at Providence Health, Thank you so much, Bloomberg.

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. President Biden

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Marking one year in office, we're going to hear from

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the president, I guess in about an hour or so

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>on that. In the meantime. In the upcoming issue of

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week, Bloomberg News white house reporter Jenny Leonard

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>writes about how one year in tim the president finds

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>himself boxed in when it comes to China. Jenny Leonard

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>is white house reporter for Bloomberg News. She joins us

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Washington, d C. Also joining us

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>is Joel Webber, editor at Bloomberg Business Week. He joins

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>us on the access line from Brooklyn. Joel, it's so

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting during at this point in the Trump administration, we'd

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>probably be talking about a trade war perhaps it maybe

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>perhaps in the second year of the Trump administration. Up

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>What exactly, though, is the policy that the Biden administration

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>has towards China right now? Well, that's the whole point

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of the story, my friend. So it's a really interesting

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>moment because if I rewound the clock and we were

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>at this moment, like you said, in the Trump administration,

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I had done multiple trade war uh covers already,

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, here we are, um uh when almost

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>one year in knocking on that door for the Biden administration,

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think, as Jenny is about to tell you,

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it looks pretty much like the same framework. That's exactly

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>what I was. Yeah, we haven't really even talked about

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>trade forever. Um, I just forgot all about it. So

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Jenny remind us where do things stand in and what

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>is the Biden administration's uh policies on trade with China? Especially,

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>looked like, yeah, you got it right, Joel. It does

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 1>look a lot like you know, where Trump left office.

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of Democrats fear that that's sort of

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a weakness going into the mid term election because China,

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of course is something that energizes with voters. Of course

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it takes a backseat to COVID and the economy right now. Uh,

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>but Biden hasn't really in the first year in office,

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>put his own stamp on China policy. And even his

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>allies say, hey, you know, I think you I think

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>we're we know where you're hinting at wanting to do,

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>but we don't really know for sure, So why don't

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you tell us? Um, the Biden administration has been meticulously

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>reviewing sort of what they inherited. Right if you guys,

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 1>remember the trade war sort of ended with the Phase

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>one deal inherited that those negotiations are still ongoing. Uh,

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:35.839
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese have fallen short on their commitments, which we

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:40.719
<v Speaker 1>knew going into this administration. Um, and there's really no

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>timeline for when those negotiations should result in any sort

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of outcome. So UM to sum it up, I would say,

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, they really need to hit the gas to

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to show something in the mid terms because Democrats are

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>getting a little anti that Republicans sends a little weakness here,

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jenny, what's the right China policy? I mean

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.319
<v Speaker 1>I talked to the Cisco CEO Tech Robbins earlier. China

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>we know so important to global company companies, But what's

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the right balance when it's safe to say world leaders,

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>US leaders don't agree with Chinese social policies, but they

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>also don't want to lose access to the China's you know,

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>massive market potential that that continues to be out there.

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>So what is the right policy with China? Yeah, I

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>think you hit the nail on the head there on

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you know any government or any U S

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>government is trying to balance and where the different sort

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:39.599
<v Speaker 1>of voices come in when the different principles from agencies

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>are discussing it, right, So you you would have you know,

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>in thinking back to the Trump administration, you would of

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>course have you know the more HACKISHENDVERSH sides, you know, Treasury, U, SCR, Commerce,

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>all these different entities that here from different stakeholders. And

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the Biden administration is hearing exactly the same things.

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Even if a has become more and more difficult to

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>deal with, even as supposedly you know, there's less interest

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in investing in China, We're still seeing how intertwined the

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 1>economies are. And I think you've seen at least the

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Commerce Secretary be very vocal, uh in this Biden administration

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>saying decoupling is not an option, that is not something

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that is possible, that is not something that's desirable. If anything,

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>we need to slow that down China as much as

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>we can, but we need to run faster. And so

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that's been the Biden administration's focus, you know, getting the

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Rescue plan pass getting the infrastructure plan passed, and you know,

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of course now working on their third big plan, the

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Build Back Better Plan, which is stalled. Um, so there

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't really anything in the immediate term, and definitely nothing

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that they can show in the biladult sense where they say, hey,

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 1>we're competing with China in a smarter way. Jenny, we

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>got to talk about the politics of this, because here

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we are, it's midterm elections coming up in November. We

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:09.199
<v Speaker 1>are expecting to hear from the president to really give

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a speech about his first year in office at four

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:15.839
<v Speaker 1>o'clock today Wall Street Time. How are Republicans though, using

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the President's policy towards China, the administration's policy towards China,

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>as a way to criticize him. So I think, um,

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are are definitely you know, seizing the moment that

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Biden for now, and they might prove us wrong, you know,

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>in two months. But for now, Biden has adopted and

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>kept in place Trump's policies, which, of course, uh you

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>remember the Republican Congress has pushed him. There. There's a

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of you know, China Hawks in Congress that are

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe gearing up for presidential runs themselves in two that

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>are running for re election to their Senate seats or

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>House seats in two Uh. So they feel emboldened knowing

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that the Biden administration is sort of boxed in leaving

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>in place the policies that you know, they sort of

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>pushed the Trump administration to go for UH and and

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>they are seeing you know, the this boxed in situation

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>for Biden too that I think they're sort of relishing

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit that Biden is, you know, maybe unable

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to do much on China that could hurt the U.

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:35.719
<v Speaker 1>S economy even more. Uh when you think about tariffs, right,

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>so currently we have tariffs in place. Um, everyone knows that,

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, taking off Harris will probably leave Biden even

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>more vulnerable to criticism from Republicans. But adding more tariffs

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.839
<v Speaker 1>to it, if that is your enforcement tool, is maybe

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>not something they want to go down. It's it's not

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>really a pass they want to you know, go down.

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>And so Republicans see the current reality for Biden and

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably enjoying watching him sort of figure out

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>his way out of this box. Okay, we spent a

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of time learning uh cast of characters in the

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration who would love to tip their cards and

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about how negotiations were going. We've heard nothing about

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>who's leading the charge of the American side, and the

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration. Who are the players real quick Jenny, Yeah,

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly a different casts of characters, and they're way less

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>likely to tell us how it's going. Um it's the

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>chief negotiator here is Katherine tie of the US Trade Representative.

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>She's been in touch with the Chinese, uh, only twice

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in the first year in office. Her deputy, Sarah Bianchi,

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>who handles China issues, has been in touch with the

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Chinese also a couple of times, although the agency decided

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>not to disclose that. So um uh interesting there. And

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>then you know, of course Tresure Secretary Yellen and Commerce

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Secretary are also key players here. Yeah. Aho, a lot

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of top names there in the administration, he thinks so much.

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News White House reporter Jenny Leonard from d C,

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, along with Bloomberg Business Week at or Jill

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Webber from Brooklyn. That story in the upcoming issue of

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week magazine. It's online on the Bloomberg that

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>magazine out lead this week. This is Bloomberg Business Week

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. So we had a bunch of big banks

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>report over the last week, and Tim, we had what

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Morgan in b of a today coming out with numbers. Yeah,

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>we've far already heard from Goldman Sachs, We've heard from

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan Chase. Uh. We're also starting to hear from

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the regional banks as well, right, and I know that's

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>something that's certainly always on the radar of our next guest,

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Anton Shuts is back with us. He's president and chief

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>investment officer at Mendon Capital Advisors. On the phone in Florida. Anton,

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Good to have you here, Happy New Year. How are you.

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing well? Thanks about yourself doing okay? You know,

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>taken one day at a time as as we do. Um.

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Good to hear though and kind of get into earnings

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>because I really love when we start to hear, certainly

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>from the financials and from leaders overall the big banks.

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>How do you see it, not only the numbers today,

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>but the numbers we got last week. How are the

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>banks doing? I mean, compensation is one of those things

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>increased costs showing up big time. Well, it's compensation, it's technology,

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know it's a it's a real difference in

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>strategy between a number of these companies. You know, if

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you think about um, you know, JP Morgan investing twelve

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>billion dolls in financial technology, right, I mean that's more

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>than all the disruptors combined, probably right, investing in new

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>new innovation and research. I mean, they certainly can win

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the game, but you know it comes at a cost.

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing they can earn the amount of money they

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>earned while spending twelve billion dollars. Yeah, Anton, what does

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that look like? Because when we talked to fintech companies

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>for example, you know I talked to Chris Britt, the

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Chime yesterday. It's a twenty five billion dollar

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>fint it doesn't call itself a bank, though it offers

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>banking services. It's it's just got a massive, massive private

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 1>market valuation. Is the idea for for JP Morgan to

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>invest in products like like that? Because help me understand

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>what what these fintech investments are. Well, I mean they're

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 1>they're obviously trying to make themselves more efficient. They're trying

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to improve their delivery process. They're trying to improve their

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>ability to provide compliance, which is you know, it's very

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>expensive and if you look at the core processors the

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>five serves. Jack Henry's the f I s is those

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>are very expensive cores and you know all the banks

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>using them. At the end of the day, if you

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>can find a way to deliver all of your products

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that even exists your customers right cheaper, then you get

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to eliminate some of those very expensive U and capital

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 1>costs that are very bay. You can't get people to

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>come to work anyway. And obviously if you if you

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:54.119
<v Speaker 1>can get people to come to work, you've got to

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>pay them more. So part of part of the money

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>spent on the innovation is not just a new products, right,

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's and how do you deliver those products. That's

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>how you provide compliance for that deliberate and I think

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we'll learn a lot more about that

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:11.199
<v Speaker 1>compliance as the regulators get more involved in unregulated you know,

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>uh sin tex right, the banks are very regulated. We

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>just saw so far this morning. It's gonna become a

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.120
<v Speaker 1>lot more regulated as now you know, it's got approval

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to become a bank. And when one of the first

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>things right and said, well wait a second, you know,

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>on the crypto side, you guys got to back off

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a bit. You know, we've got to get to understand

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>you better. As a thank Anton in terms of the

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>financial space, and you've been investing in in these types

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 1>of names for a long time. Um, you liked off

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>in the regional space. But is fintech and the newer

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>upstarts starting to get you know, garner any more of

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>your attention or potentially some of your thoughts about well,

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you know what we should be putting and committing money there. Well,

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>I really like banks that have fintech embedded in him.

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>So you talked about these private market valuations, but obviously

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the public evaluations and a lot of those

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>comanies don't earn money. And and I'm a traditional value investor,

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of course, I'm always looking for, you know, what creates value.

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>And if I can find banks that are fintech embedded

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.479
<v Speaker 1>in the more managements that are leaning forward, that are

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>going to create a better mouse trap. You know, for instance,

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>in New York and New York community that's really embraced

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, fintech and blotching technology, or a signature bank

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 1>also headquartered in New York has done a lot of it,

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:25.360
<v Speaker 1>or or a silver Gate or a Triumph or we've

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 1>talked about Live Oak Bank before. You know, these banks

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>all have fintech embedded in them. They're all using it

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to liver they're investing in it, and they're part of

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the future. And I think that as we start looking

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:38.719
<v Speaker 1>at that stable coins and and who's going to have

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that ability to really get approval from the regulators, it's

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be the banking system. Is it going to

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>be more regional bankers banks or the big banks? I

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>think the big banks will eventually get because it does

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>seem like the regional banks are leading in that right now.

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>They are. It's it's you know, part of that's the

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>decision trade, right I mean. J K. Morten's a really

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 1>large organization and they literally think said they invested a

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>hundred fin tax last year parsing them, getting them, you know,

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to the to the market, getting them distributed through that

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>very large organization. It's harder to do that if you're

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>smaller entergy. It's a lot faster to bring something to

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>market and you can test things out with some customers

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>and get it going without a very large, um, you know,

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>bureaucracy to say the least. And obviously some of those

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>banks are better getting things to market, but it's a

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>lot easier if you're a multibillion dollar bank rather than

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a multi trillion dollar bank. And what do you think

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the banking environment is going to be like for some

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of the names that that you hold onto, whether it's

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>a live oak, whether there it's an equity bank shares,

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>first bank shares. I mean, it's going to be a

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>better environment because of a higher rates that we're starting

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>to see certainly come through the system. Um, how do

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you see it? Well, all, you know, higher rates, everybody

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>always talks about how great those are. Yes, absolutely a

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>good you occur higher Um, you know, short term interest

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>rates are good for almost all banks, and you've got

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the raise rates quite a bit before you start creating

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>credit issues out there will just obviously the other side

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of that. But I think the thing that's that's really

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>important here is there was so much stimulus put into

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 1>their customers hands that loan growth really didn't exist a

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 1>ton other than some of those faster growing markets like

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee or Texas or Florida, um, nationally, So now you've

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 1>got the loan growth coming back. You've seen some good

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>loan growth numbers out there across the guys that are reported,

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's really critical. So, yeah, higher rates

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>matter and will matter, and they're not all in the

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 1>estimates yet, but loan growth is really what you know,

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>what drives earnings ship right, all right, so we'll we're

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>watching out for that. Anton, thank you so much. We

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>really always appreciate the perspective you have in the informed perspective.

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Anton Shows, President and chief investment officer at Mendon Capital Advisors,

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 1>on the phone in Florida. You're listening to brook Radio. Yeah,

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 1>but you let drive? Oh no, no, no no, non, please,

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>i'vels I want to drive. It's a good question. This

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 1>is the drive to the clothes on Bloomberg Radio. We're

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>driving to the close, just about ten minutes left in

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>today's trading session, and Tim, as Charlie mentioned, we are

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>near our lows at this session on those major equity averages.

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious what our next guest has to say because

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>he runs a fund, the Rational Dynamic Brands Fund. We've

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>talked with him before, and over the last three years

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>it's up on average annually, putting that fund in the

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine percentile according to Bloomberg Data, so it's been

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>an outperformer. We're talking about Eric Clark, portfolio manager at

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Rational Dynamic Brands Fund, He joins us now on the

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>phone once again from San Diego. Eric, how are you.

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm good, Kevin Carroll, how are you. We're doing well.

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>We're doing well. Look, the story today obviously is about

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>what's happening on the NASDAC has it down in correction

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>territory more than ten percent below its peak from November

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth of last year. How are you reading into this?

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I I think there's there's that short term

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>noise surrounding interest rates and the FED and how aggressive

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be with rating, with with rate increases,

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>as well as withdrawing some accommodation and maybe even outright

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>selling a bond. You know, I have my own personal

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>view that the FED is not willing to tank the

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>markets in the economy just to try to reduce inflation.

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think they're more taught trying to talk it down. Um.

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>But you know that that has an effect on high

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>multiple stocks and it's been a very popular part of

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the market, and so I just see that de risking

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>happening until there's some realization that the FED is probably

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to be as aggressive and people are much

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>more wrong footed about where their positionings are, but it's

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly been a painful you know, a couple of months

0:23:57.760 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>for sure for how data stocks. All right, so what

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is it, Eric? For some of the names in your portfolio.

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 1>We've often talked about investments that you've got in an alphabet,

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 1>and Microsoft and Netflix and Apple and Amazon and more,

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those well known tech bass tech names

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, that have certainly provided support to the equity

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 1>markets of the last couple of years. You still like them?

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I do, I absolutely do. I mean, you know, we

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>have certainly shifted up the portfolio in quality. You know,

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>big profits, lots of free cash flow, great balance sheets,

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.199
<v Speaker 1>the ability to buy back stock. But you know, add

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to the dividend growth those kind of businesses which frankly

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>have kind of underperformed over the last couple of years.

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>We you know, it wasn't that long ago when we

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>had the companies without profits and lots of growth were

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 1>really what drove the bus. Now, you know, we're more

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>focused on the stable, predictable growers with great balance sheets,

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that have good pricing power and have a lot of

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>brand loves. So it's a very highly recognizable portfolio currently.

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>So help me out. Microsoft up, it was up last year.

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Oh it was up. Um. Speaking of healthy balance sheets,

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it has a lot on its balance sheet are a

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit less as it buys Activision. Do you want

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to change your holdings at all because of this or

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>do you like Microsoft even more want to add to

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>the position. Well, I would love to add, probably a

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit lower than where it is today because it

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 1>really hasn't had, you know, a real deep sell off yet.

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I did find the potential acquisition of Activision pretty interesting,

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and using Activision's cash as as part of that. So interesting, good, interesting, interesting,

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>good interesting, and scratching my head. Okay, yeah, no, I

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>think I like that just moves further into gaming and

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>also with the potential of what the metaverse could look

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 1>like at some point. So I mean that I p

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.679
<v Speaker 1>and and staff and engineers. They're hard to come by,

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>so in some ways they're buying the infrastructure to too

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 1>key building their video business, you know, their gaming business

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:06.239
<v Speaker 1>and whatever the metaverse looks like over time. Okay, well,

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>speaking of the metaverse, we're not there yet when it

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>comes to Netflix, but that company reporting earnings after the

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>bell tomorrow increasingly getting into games. What are you looking

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>for from Netflix? You know? Last quarter, they told us

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that they were going to be spending aggressively on content.

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>So anybody that's surprised that free cash flow is down

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>when they report tomorrow, I just you know, you just

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>didn't pay attention to last quarter. Bigger picture though, we

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:35.400
<v Speaker 1>still think, you know, let's say they have two million

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>subscribers around the world. We think they have five million plus.

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>They got twenty nine billion in revenue. Now that's gonna

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>equate to maybe a hundred billion in revenue. So I mean,

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the brand when people around the

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>world start to search for content. It used to be

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the cable channel that you opened up. Now I think

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>it's Netflix first, and then if you can't find what

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you want, you go other places. So it's still the

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:01.639
<v Speaker 1>dominant brand. And you know, if if the if the

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>market you know right now the markets that kind of

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>sell everything mode, So if the response is lower, I'm

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>going to buy more for sure. What name have you

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>most recently been adding to. Well, we have been adding

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 1>because of the market volatility. We've been adding some stable,

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>predictable um type of you know, defenses. So we added

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty aggressively, you know, next Terra Energy, not not everybody

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>knows what next Era Energy is. It's the old Florida

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Power and Light. But so it's a public utility, but

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 1>they also have a renewable energy business that's high growth,

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and so that that you know, they have it's a

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:44.360
<v Speaker 1>public utility with great, stable revenues, great dividend growth. It's

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, increased their dividends consecutive years plus. So that

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and maybe a United Health. I thought the quarter was great,

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, reported this morning. The stock you know, has

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>been selling off ever since the print. But again, I

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 1>think we're more in the sell everything mode and those

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of stable, predictable businesses I really like in this

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, in this next you know, six month period,

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>along with some of the more higher beta stuff. So

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>so definitely the defense and even a Sherwin Williams. I

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>still really like the housing trade, particularly as interest rates

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 1>get to the top end of the range. Hey, Eric,

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>what about Amazon? Just in the last minute so that

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>we have with you, the company's down more than six

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 1>percent year to data was only higher by two point

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>three percent. What's going on with Amazon? Well, it's a

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 1>big yawn, and I mean it's been a kind of

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 1>a two year yawn after a really strong two thousand.

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.879
<v Speaker 1>But you know, they have had so many spending cycles

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that lead to higher revenue growth and higher free cash

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>flow periods, So you know, you have to accumulate the

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>stock when they're in high spin mode to get the

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the ramp when the revenue comes back and

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the free cash flow goes back. So whether it's this

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>quarter or next, are going to see all of a

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>sudden the free cash flow vault back up and people

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to be surprised in this box is going

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to catch a good like it has for the last years,

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>just quickly twenty seconds. Has Amazon become a dividend company

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>at some point a dividend pay or they don't need to.

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's part of their their philosophy and

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>their mentality and that there's a lot of those that do.

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>But I just don't see Amazon becoming back. All right,

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna leave it on that note. Always love talking

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>with you. You get into the specifics, you get into

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the names that are in your portfolio and explain why.

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>So thank you so much for that. Eric Clark, he's

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager at Rational Dynamic Brands Fund, joining us on

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the phone from San Diego as we mentioned his doc

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>has been excuse me, his fund has been an our performer,

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>up on average annually, and we've got it in the

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine percent according to Bloomberg. Thanks for listening to

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to our

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>watch us on YouTube. Search to Bloomberg Global News