WEBVTT - Special Edition: Nvidia Forecast Misses Loftiest AI Estimates

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news third.

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Quarter adjusted earnings per share coming in above estimates at

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 2>eighty one cents. Estimate was for seventy four cents. Third

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 2>quarter at revenue coming in at thirty five point one

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars. Estimates were for thirty three point twenty five

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.319
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars third quarter data center revenue. This is what

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 2>everybody wants to see that coming in above estimates thirty

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 2>point eight billion dollars. The estimate was for twenty nine

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 2>point one four billion dollars. Carrol Nvidiac's fourth quarter revenue

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 2>at thirty seven point five billion plus or minus two percent.

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 2>The estimate was for thirty seven point one billion dollars.

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 3>Gotta say, initial reaction, folks, not an upbeat one. Kunjan

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 3>Zabani of our Bloomberg Intelligence Senior semi conductor team, he's

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 3>an analyst. And then we're going to want to bring

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 3>in another guest to kind of give us some more

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 3>thoughts about what we got from video today.

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Caroline Hyde, who hosts Bloomberg Technology on Bloomberg TV,

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 2>is joining us now. She's got our eyes closely watching

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 2>everything happening over ed in video that forecasts failing to

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 2>meet the loftiest estimates for the company cheers in the

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 2>after hours right now down about four percent, so they're

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 2>off of those lows, Caroline, But is this just about

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 2>high expectations, very high expectations and in Nvidia coming out

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 2>and saying Okay, we're almost going to meet them, but

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 2>not quite.

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 4>And a very high market valuation that is the most

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 4>valuable in the world, that has seen a run up

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 4>of almost two hundred percent so far in the years.

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 4>So maybe some profit taking when you are seeing, Yes,

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 4>Luke Capital, if you dig into the analysts expectations for

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 4>the fiscal fourth quarter or twenty twenty five, Luke Capital

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 4>had it at about forty four billion dollars as the

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 4>highest realm.

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 5>Then you had few one and securities at about forty one.

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 4>Billion, and then you get into the thirty seven billion

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 4>dollar range with the likes of Craig Hullum and Da

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 4>Davidson was a little bit above that. So compared to

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 4>perhaps some of the highest levels out there, they're coming

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 4>in below and there's a plus or minus two percent

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 4>there to be built in as well. So I think

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 4>there is some digesting that this isn't beaten raised and

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 4>blown out of every single analysts expectations.

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 5>Still, these are incredibly strong numbers.

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 4>This is a guide to the fact that we're getting

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 4>Blackwell on stream. That supply side will be ironed out,

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 4>and I think we'll have far more from Gensen hung

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 4>on that particular perspective, and that demand is still incredible.

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 4>So I think there's just a little bit of profit

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 4>taking coming on. When we've seen that the rapid rise

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 4>has been two hundred percent over the year, maybe four

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 4>or five percent sell down isn't the most remarkable.

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Shift, Caroline Great point, right, it's not Reay yet. Well,

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, listen, this is her world that she's talking

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 3>to these you know, tech companies, following them inside and outside,

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 3>and this idea that there's still supply, that there's demand,

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 3>it's just the supply constraints. It's not like people are

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 3>running away from the products. Having said that, I want

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 3>to tap into your knowledge of this industry and that

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 3>you do have companies that come out and it's gangbusters,

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.119
<v Speaker 3>and then maybe they have some issues with supply constraints

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 3>and so on and so forth. This is kind of

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 3>part of the process. Is that fair?

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 4>I think that's fair when it comes to in Video

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 4>as well, and the rapid rate of innovation. I mean,

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 4>they've almost become an Apple in every single year they're

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 4>bringing out their latest neww chip set and design, and

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 4>we go from Hopper swiftly on to Blackwell, and people

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 4>have got to keep up with that innovation.

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 5>Just the way in which you store your.

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 4>Chips and the infrastructure within your data centers means that

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 4>if they're vertically stored, well, that's going to lead to

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 4>more heating issues. Then if you're doing it more broadly

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 4>on a horizontal perspective. There is a lot of innovation

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 4>that has to come along with in Video's own GPU

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 4>CPUs and overall chipsets. So I think that they have

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 4>said and guided to the market that yes, you're getting

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 4>this reporting of overheating, Yes you're getting these reports of

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 4>snags and design. This is entirely normal, and we're working

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 4>very closely with our hyperscale sub clients to fix this,

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 4>to innovate with them and ensure that we can get

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 4>them out there as swiftly as possible. I think there

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 4>has been also just trying to spreading out of AI demand.

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 4>What's been interesting hearing from Jensen Wong of late has

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 4>been the scaling laws. Basically, the theory goes is that

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 4>the more data you fire, the more compute power you bring,

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:56.839
<v Speaker 4>the faster and more sophisticated.

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 5>These large language models become.

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 4>But actually we started to hear from the anthrop from

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 4>the great reporting coming out of San Francisco with the

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg team that Rachel Mets is saying maybe open aiyes

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 4>had to slow down a little bit in terms of

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 4>the developments of their own large language models because they're

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 4>not getting as sophisticated as it happen in the Leaps

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 4>and Bounds. Jensen still saying, Look, in the next decade,

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 4>you're going to see a million times increase in compute.

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 4>But we've just got to get there in terms of

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 4>actually making it happen.

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, hard to even imagine, hard to even

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 2>imagine that kind of increase in compute at this point,

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Kun john'subney, I want to bring you back in here

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 2>over a senior intell senior analysts over at Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.719
<v Speaker 2>We're seeing shares down about two percent in the after hours.

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 2>A couple headlines the company sees fourth quarter revenue coming

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 2>in at thirty seven point five billion dollars plus or

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 2>minus two percent. That's pretty much in line with estimates

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 2>at thirty seven point one billion dollars. Third quarter Data

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.799
<v Speaker 2>center revenue blowing past expectations at thirty point eight billion

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 2>dollars estimates report twenty nine point one billion dollars Coon, John,

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 2>what's the question you'd ask, Jensen Wong?

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 6>I mean, my questions really would focus on trying to

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 6>figure out the physical twenty six calendar twenty twenty five

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 6>black Well revenue ramp magnitudes and around gross margins. I mean, look,

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 6>we have seen in the past when vidias come out

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:10.679
<v Speaker 6>and beat way more than what they did right now,

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 6>and the stock has still plummeted double digits. You also

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 6>have to keep in mind this end of the year.

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.359
<v Speaker 6>The stock has tripled this year, right, so there is

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 6>some incentive for profit locking and taking the gains away

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 6>from the table as well.

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, I also do think about how do you feel, Kunjon,

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 3>that they are giving numbers for fiscal year twenty twenty

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 3>six good sign? Do you trust that visibility? Like, how

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 3>do you think about their ability to put out a

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 3>number and maybe that number might change based on if

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 3>they figure out the supply issues.

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I see that as a very strong sign

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 6>I mean, look at this earning season across the semi

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 6>sector right nobody is giving out numbers that far out.

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 6>Even in Vida's competitors who are trying to address the

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 6>same opportunity and are sing the same strong demand signals,

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 6>are not giving out numbers, strong confident numbers that in

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 6>year out. So that really speaks to the strength and

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 6>the confidence that they have that they'll be able to

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 6>support this demand and the demand is there, and you guys, it'd.

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Be tech talk to him a lot, like I'm just

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:18.359
<v Speaker 3>curious with the top of mind, if you were sitting

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:20.239
<v Speaker 3>down with him right now, like top two.

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 4>Questions, and if Ed Ludlow was but he's out in

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 4>fraternity leaves and congratulations.

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 5>To on Ed Ludler becoming a father.

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 4>But I think first and foremost we'd be asking exactly

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 4>as Kuan Jhn has been saying, as you all have

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 4>been saying, it's got to be about supply coming on

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 4>tap and just talking a little bit more around Blackwell

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 4>and the incredible demand, What exactly does that really mean?

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 5>Who are the key clients?

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 4>How are we seeing that diversify out of the main

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 4>hyper scalers, if.

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 5>At all, and then I think sort of trying.

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 4>To articulate that, look, yes, maybe we haven't blown past

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 4>the highest analyst expectations, but thirty seven and a half

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 4>billion dollar guide that's still seventy percent ramp up in revenue.

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 4>That's following a ninety percent ramp up in revenue of

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 4>the fiscal quarter just reported their fiscal third quarter. I

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.239
<v Speaker 4>think he's just going to have to sort of remind

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 4>the market how far they've come, how far they've still

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 4>to go, and maybe just take a bit of a

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 4>reality check here that you know, at the moment, the

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 4>numbers will go up, but maybe not at the two

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 4>hundred percent that we were hoping to see well, that

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 4>we did see in the first quarter of twenty twenty

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 4>five for their fiscal year reporting.

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Hey coon, John ian King on the live blog bringing

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 2>up a really interesting point, and it kind of gets

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 2>at the question that I was asking with regard to

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 2>super micro computer. Ian notes that cloud computing providers are

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 2>the biggest companies in technology, and they still dominate in

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 2>videous sources of revenue, making up fifty percent of sales

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 2>for its data center unit. So that's just a handful

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 2>of companies that are making up the majority of the

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 2>revenue for the data center in video watchers want that

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 2>number to go down. Three months ago that number was

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 2>forty five percent. Is that a concern to you.

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I don't want to look at it from

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 6>quarter to because remember these large customers are lumpy in nature, right,

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 6>they have to also manage their capex and deployments. We

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 6>did see over the last two to three quarters, if

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 6>I'm not wrong, the number come down. It was about

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 6>close to fifty or even about fifty and it has

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 6>been coming down steadily. So that was a good sign

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 6>for us. I still have to go and digest the

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 6>numbers later on, but the fifty percent in the short

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 6>term might not be that great of a sign. But

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 6>I would not jump to conclusions just looking at one quarter.

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 6>It could be very well timing of you know, them

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 6>picking up a lot more Hopper supply supply right now

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 6>when they cannot get their hands on blackwell.

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm looking at the supply chain analysis on

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg function. When it comes to Nvidia, Microsoft, about

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:45.559
<v Speaker 3>nineteen percent of the revenue for Invidio, Meta, about ten percent,

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 3>super Micro nearly eight percent Alphabet about six percent, Amazon

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 3>more than five percent, Dell more than three percent. So

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 3>we talk about a handful of companies, these cluster of

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 3>companies that are so involved. You know, Caroline, I want

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 3>to bring you back in here. You know, Nvidia. This

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 3>has been such a focal point right the end of

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 3>the earning season, just thinking about it so much. You know,

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 3>how do you think about you know, Bloomberg Technology, you know,

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 3>into the Thursday edition, you guys when you're on air

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 3>and like, what's the tomorrow's story?

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 5>The tomorrow story.

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 4>I think we'll be trying to articulate where the growth

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 4>trajectory goes from here. I think we're gonna hear from

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 4>Jensen the next decade. You're gonna hear him talking about

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 4>humanoid robots. You're gonna hear him talking about drug discovery,

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 4>the capabilities of generative AI, the return on AI investment.

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 4>So I think we're gonna want to be talking to

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 4>the investors that back that vision. We're going to be

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 4>wanting to hear from the analysts out there that are

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 4>trying to square these numbers with where their own viewpoint

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 4>have been on the here and now at the fiscal

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 4>fourth quarter. But I think we're also going to we

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 4>want to think about who else is in the space

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 4>at the moment. It's answering some of the development issues,

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 4>some of the heating issues, some of the concerns around AI,

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 4>generative AI chip development and manufacturing. Who are the startups

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 4>in the space, wh the rivals in the space? What

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 4>are we seeing in terms of the hyper scalers building

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 4>their own chips. So I think there's so many directions

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 4>that we could go for, But for me, it's going

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.359
<v Speaker 4>to be really interesting talking about where does AI infrastructure

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 4>go from here?

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 5>And where does in video's view on selver in AI?

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 5>Where does in video's view on China? Where does in videos.

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 4>View on the next repurposing of their chips not just

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 4>to keep hammering large language models, but the development of

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 4>generative AI in the real world.

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 2>So what are some of the names, Caroline, that our

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 2>investing audience has to have their eyes on. Is it

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:29.439
<v Speaker 2>the sam Altman's of the world who are trying to

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 2>raise lots and lots of money to go after Invidia?

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Is it the hyperscalers who are going to be doing

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 2>this in house? Who who holds a candle to them

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:39.439
<v Speaker 2>or who could hold a candle.

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 4>To them in terms of siphoning off future demand or

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 4>in terms of just wanting to know who the name

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:46.199
<v Speaker 4>key players are.

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Off future demand because you know, Intel, Intel, Intel's in

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 2>a tough position right now, as you guys have reported

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 2>on a lot over the last year. Am D maybe,

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 2>but what about those upstarts.

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 4>Hmmm, I mean, and that's going to be interesting as

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 4>to whether or not we just get a future type

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 4>of chip development. You know, we've got the grocks for example,

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 4>that are backed by venture backing who have been looking

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:12.559
<v Speaker 4>to ways in which we expand and have faster and

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:17.440
<v Speaker 4>more efficient chips. You've also got you know, different players

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 4>out there thinking about not just the data that you

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 4>have to train, but then the inferencing that you do,

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:25.319
<v Speaker 4>and that does that become a different type of conversation

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 4>around the technology and ultimately whether you need to have

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 4>more efficient chips within an energy source and an energy suck.

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 4>So I think so many people AMPI has been doing

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 4>things around that particular innovation of different types of chips. Eventually,

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 4>will people start to go to Galdhi and what Intel

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 4>has been providing. How much can AMD chip away in

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 4>terms of market share, in terms of the AI part

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 4>of the business as well. So there are so many

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 4>people and analysts and investors that are looking at distributing.

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 5>Some of their bets.

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure, but for now in video has been the

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 4>only game in town and certainly the easiest one to

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 4>back in terms of up into the right Coon.

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Jent, I want to bring you back in here looking

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 3>at our live blog. Ian King, who follows the semiconductor

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 3>space and video as well. He says, one question analyst

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 3>will have when the conference call begins, what's happening in

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:15.959
<v Speaker 3>networking sales? And that business slid sequentially dropping by that

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 3>five hundred million dollars and videos acquired. Networking tech has

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 3>faced opposition from many rivals, some of which argue for

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 3>an industry standard approach rather than a reliance on and

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 3>vidious proprietary technology. Weigh in on that, yeah, I.

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 6>Mean, look, we have identified since last year that networking

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 6>in AI servers is going to be sort of the

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 6>next wave of growth, especially in terms of where the

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 6>dollars spend. The dollars go beyond just accelerators. So I mean,

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 6>until now in media, if you look at the market

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 6>for the first Hopper series, right, they had this advantage

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:51.719
<v Speaker 6>of shipping their own proprietary networking gear, which customers had

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 6>no other option but to just buy that. So two things, right,

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 6>They got all the dollars, but they also got great

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 6>profit margins because they could really charge whatever they wanted. Now,

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:05.359
<v Speaker 6>the competition there is increasing. Customers want to move to Ethernet,

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 6>which again Nvidia has started offering and starting from the

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 6>black Bell series. So we are going to see that

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 6>Ethernet revenue also increase for Nvidia, But when you compare

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 6>it from perchip dollar perspective, it's still less. We still

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 6>think positive for Nvidia's networking revenue share going forward, but

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 6>there will be a lot more competition there. It won't

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 6>be just one company taking everything in your area.

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 3>That's a really good point, right, And I do think about,

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, and Videa's really had this world to its

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 3>own for a while, and you think about increasingly kind

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:39.119
<v Speaker 3>of what's going on in the future as there's more competition.

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 3>YouTube Dynamic Duo, thank you so much. Your insight really

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 3>so important to breaking down these results from Nvidia. Bloomberg

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Technology co host Caroline Hidketcher at eleven am Wall Street

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 3>Time on Bloomberg Television for Bloomberg Tech and of course

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 3>our thanks to ku Joan Sabani of our Bloomberg Intelligence team.

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 3>He's a senior semiconductor analyst. So again, some great insight

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 3>we'll watch for some of you research. Let's continue our conversations.

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg News Equities reporter at Ryan Lostelico with us. He

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 3>has been writing about it and kind of you know,

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 3>talking about markets bracing for what we might get from Nvidia.

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 3>He joins us from Chicago. Also with us is our

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 3>own Red Brown, who follows the earning season and sets

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 3>us up. Bloomberg News Earnings reporter. He's back in New

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 3>York City. Ryan, come on in on this your report.

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 3>Ahead of the release in Nvidia, traders bracing for a

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 3>potential three hundred billion dollar earnings move. It was down

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 3>more than four percent though initially.

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, I don't think it would be all that

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>surprising to see the stock really take some swings from

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>where it's trading right now. I mean, this is not

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a huge move, especially not for our company as viollatile

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>as Nvidia is. Just to put it in context. Palo

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Alto also reported that stock is at about five percent

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and after hours trading in video is obviously much bigger,

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>but you know, not a huge move by their standard.

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 2>I like that Ryan's out here talking about Pallelt the networks.

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 2>It's a good well there is Look, there are other

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 2>companies out.

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 3>There, no question, but listen, we're gonna get you in

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 3>just a moment. But Ryan, I mean, it's been so

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 3>important in terms of market momentum, right, Like, give us

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 3>some of that context. We talk about it all. We've

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 3>talked about the mag seven, but when it comes to

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 3>momentum that aid this is a big one.

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh absolutely. The stock is almost tripled this year. It's

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>added more than two trillion in market capitalization. Like you mentioned,

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it's the biggest stock in the world. You know, We've

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>had plenty of analysts come out and say this is

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>more important than the FED, this is more important than

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>inflation data. This is the key report for Wall Street

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>this week, if not this month. So it's obviously very significant.

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I do think, you know, we just got the numbers.

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>People are still digesting the report. We are still waiting

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>on the conference call. It's likely we're going to get

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a bigger move maybe, you know, once we get you know,

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>full details, once we hear from you know, the management

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>team once people get a little bit more context for this.

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>But this is certainly not, you know, a sky is

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>falling type report. It's falling short of some of the

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>most optimistic expectations. But you know, people just got very

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>used to forecasts that are just, you know, billions dollars

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>above the consensus.

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 3>Carmen Ryanick here, stocks reporter on our live blog, digging

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 3>into the plus or minus two percent on the revenue

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 3>outlook that we got from Video a little math, doing

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 3>some quick math, it means and Video expects fourth quarter

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 3>revenue between thirty six points seventy five billion and thirty

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 3>eight point twenty five billion. The average analyst estimate was

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 3>thirty seven point one billion. So if it's on the

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 3>minus two percent, it would fall short of expectations. And

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 3>I think that's why you are seeing investors, at least

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 3>in the aftermarket, wanting a little bit more color or

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 3>commentary around this.

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so Red Brown, come on in here, because you've

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 2>got your eye on what's going on after hours and

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Video shares down about two percent? Is that what it is?

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Is that concern around that plus or minus two percent?

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think it kind of has to be the

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 7>main focus for everybody right now, you know sound it

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 7>felt like analysts maybe weren't as kind of euphoric heading

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 7>into this report. Things definitely war more tempered, So I

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 7>guess it isn't that much of a surprise to see,

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 7>you know, stock kind of trading a little bit less

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 7>volatile than it has in recent quarters. I was also

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 7>just looking at some of the customers because we don't

0:16:56.160 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 7>read Ryan's point just how important this is for the

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 7>wider market. And you know, Microsoft and Meta, two of

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 7>their biggest customers, both not really reacting as well.

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 3>So so what are you read watching out for? Listen,

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 3>you are with us throughout the whole earning season. It's

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.199
<v Speaker 3>been it feels like a long one, you know. But

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 3>here we are with Nvidia, which is such a huge

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 3>one in terms of the reporting season, and you know

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 3>what we get from Nvideo. But you know, how are

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 3>you thinking about it as we were kind of reporting

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 3>into it and now we are on the other side,

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 3>and there's still some questions to be had that will

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.479
<v Speaker 3>hopefully play it on the analyst call, but you know,

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 3>walk us through it in an earning season, you know

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 3>how this kind of fits in, especially against some of

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 3>those MAGS seven, those very important big tech names.

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 7>I think one thing that I'm looking at for and

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:45.199
<v Speaker 7>Vidia specifically and kind of how it fits into the

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 7>wider landscape is actually the R and D spending. So

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 7>if we look and actually grow forty eight percent, if

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 7>you compare that to their peers, super Micro forty five

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 7>percent up this quarter, Broadcom jump seventy five percent. So

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 7>when we kind of start to dig in beyond on

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 7>just the top line numbers, I think a kind of

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 7>an interesting dynamic is playing out there in video is

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 7>kind of really expending hand over fist to keep up

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 7>or to kind of continue to have their their lead

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 7>in this race, And I think it really helps when

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 7>you can, you know, double your revenue every quarter as well.

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 7>That there's that spending three billion dollars on R and

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 7>D is a little bit easier than it is for

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 7>a company like Broadcom, which is actually you know, the

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 7>percentage wise, the margin that they're spending is actually much higher,

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 7>so that race they are kind of still a distant

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 7>second compared to in videos, so trying to can maintain

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 7>that lead that they have in the air space.

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Ryan, what about when it comes to blackwell and

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 2>demand around Blackwell. To what extent is that? The question

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 2>on the call later it went from insane to incredible.

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 2>As Caroline Hyde pointed out to us, how are you

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 2>thinking about it?

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that a deceleration to go from insane to incredible?

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think, you know, in general demand, I

0:18:57.680 --> 0:18:58.199
<v Speaker 1>think it is.

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.959
<v Speaker 3>You tell me, I think it is insane to incredible.

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's a declation.

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we say incredible a lot. We throw that word around.

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 3>When you say insane, that's like a whole other level.

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, fair enough. Obviously, you know, people continue to focus

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>on supply. There have been some you know, production hiccups here.

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Like I said before, people are focused very much on

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, pricing and margins for Blackwell. So all these

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:21.639
<v Speaker 1>things together, you know, this remains like a point of

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>real focus for investors, even kind of beyond just sort

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 1>of the headline numbers of the forecast and so forth.

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Guys, thank you so much. Busy afternoon, of course. Bloomberg

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 3>News Earnings reporter Red Brown out there in New York City.

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 3>Ryan Lostelica in Chicago. He's Bloomberg News Equities reporter