WEBVTT - Impression Management

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of Iheartradioy.

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 2>And welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh, and there's Chuck

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 2>and Jerry's here too, and we're putting on our best

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 2>faces in this episode of Stuff you.

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Should Know right our front stage self.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and speaking of stage check, I have a great

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 2>intro to this. I believe it was Rush who first

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 2>said all the world's is stage, and the men and

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 2>women on it are merely players or something like that.

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, performers and portrayers. Yeah, each another's audience.

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Is that what he says? I never knew, and I've

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 2>never bothered to look up the lyrics because there's definitely

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 2>some words in there. I'm like, I don't know what

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Geddy Leek just said.

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think I'm pretty sure that's right.

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 2>It's a great, great song, Limelight, very well written, what

0:00:54.960 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 2>very original stuff. Yeah, so we're talking about impression management today, right, Yes, sir,

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 2>And what do you think about it?

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Well? I think that I just the more I've done

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>this show over the years, the more I realized that

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I could have been a sociologist. Oh yeah, yeah, man,

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>this stuff fascinates me to no end. I took one

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>sociology class in college, and that's it. And I remember

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>at the time, you know, when very little outside of

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>English major classes interested me. I was like, man, this

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is super interesting to me, but not enough to pursue it.

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>But human behaviors is endlessly fascinating to me.

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And one of the things, sociology gets beat up

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 2>and edged out and elbowed in the face by psychology

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot unfairly, I think too.

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm not talking about social psychology, no, be clear, sociology.

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And if sociology started out, we should say basically

0:01:56.400 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 2>examining massive institutions. It was macro sociology religion, like economics, politics,

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 2>that kind of stuff, and just how people behaved and

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 2>interacted or how people came together to form these institutions.

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 2>And then the guy we're going to talk about today

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 2>came along and he's like, let's kind of zoom in

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 2>a little more. And like you were saying, he kicked

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 2>off this this type of sociology that examines like people,

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.839
<v Speaker 2>just interactions, very small interactions that sometimes we don't even

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 2>know what we're doing. And apparently you're very interested in that.

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I am, And you know what, it seems like the

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>more I've learned about Irving Goffman through today's research, and

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, researching him a little further. Like he's a

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Canadian American sociologist, and this is like the mid twentieth century,

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifties ish when he started doing a lot of

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>this work. He seems to me like someone who was

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>just fascinated by human behavior, even more even in a

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>way that like other sociologists weren't, especially at the time.

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure, he yeah, And he also I read

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 2>that he developed like a real sympathy for the people

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 2>who were pushed to the fringes of society unfairly, basically

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 2>across the board. So he was not only like a

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 2>really good sociologist and very intuitive, and apparently had a

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 2>really interesting writing style too. He loves a good like

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 2>turn of phrase. He was also like a very empathetic,

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:26.399
<v Speaker 2>good person. That's what I can tell.

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh, man, I'm so glad I didn't hook my wagon do.

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:31.679
<v Speaker 2>The wrong dude, right, But no, you hooked his to

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 2>the right guy.

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And when it's somebody from the nineteen fifties, you never

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>know what's going to happen there. We should probably say

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about though, impression management or self presentation or

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>perception management is basically these are terms that he all

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>came up. He came up with all of these essentially,

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's just how you present to others. And

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll get into the nuts and bolts of it.

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>But how much you might think about that, how much

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>is automatic, how much is intuition, how much of it

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>is authenticity. It's super fascinating to me. I just I

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>love this stuff.

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and a lot of it. I mean, when we

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 2>start talking about it too, it'll just seem very common sense, like, yeah,

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 2>of course you're going to you know, mind your p's

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 2>and cues and sit up straight and be friendly in

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 2>a job interview. And that is a type of impression management.

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 2>But it is way more granular than that, to the

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 2>point where like, if you're into language linguistics that kind

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 2>of thing, the entire purpose of a conversation is to

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 2>exchange information like I know this now I'm sharing it

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 2>with you. The other person says, thank you very much,

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 2>And that's what a conversations for as far as impression

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 2>management goes. And Irvin Goffman and his Milk conversations are

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 2>essentially performances that two people share and do for one another.

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 2>That helps create a version of ourselves that we kind

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 2>of walk around with, and that that changes. And there's

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 2>very little point to a conversation other than that it's

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 2>a radically different view of things.

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I also think it's interesting, and this is you know,

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 1>this is all just precursor stuff that we're babbling on about.

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 1>But when you said it just seems like instinct or whatever,

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>would you say, common sense to do these things? Not everybody,

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>my friend, And that is something that I've gotten better

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>about over the years. It used to be something that

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>really bothered me, and I would you know, leave an

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 1>interaction with somebody or something and with Emily and be

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>like god, like just social cluelessness is such a turn

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>off for me, like read the room, buddy, that kind

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of thing. But then the more I've gotten older and

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the more we've all learned about different neurodiversities, I've definitely

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>found myself in a place where i'd try to be like, hey,

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what this person's deal is, Like they

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>may be struggling just to present themselves as you know,

0:05:57.920 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>passing or masking, and you know, we're going to talk

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>about all this stuff in a situation just to sort

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of get by. So I try to really keep that

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff in mind these days.

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 2>For sure. And I feel like there's different tranches. Yeah,

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 2>there's the one you just describe. There's people who this

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 2>is so effortless too, they don't even have to think

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 2>about it, and they're just great basically across the board.

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Then there's everybody else in the middle. Some people in

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 2>the middle are better at it than others. Some people

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 2>think too hard about it and they become obvious and

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 2>clumsy and essentially though no one can escape it, I

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 2>think is my point. There's nobody out there who doesn't

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 2>engage in some sort of impression management essentially their entire lives.

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and neurodiversity society again, which we'll talk about. There

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>are also people who aren't neurodiversity who were just glueless

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a holes. And I have found too in my life

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that I believe narcissism plays a part. I think narcissists

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>have a much harder time because they're generally just have

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>their heads up, their own buttson or so about the

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>self that they are off. And the ones that I found,

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>if they don't have some sort of you know, nerdivergence.

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the reason why they are like they are, maybe

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>because of narcissism, because you know, usually the reply after

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>someone is like read the room, buddy, they're like, what.

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 2>What, I'm perfect, what do you mean read the room?

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 2>You read the room exactly. So let's get into it

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 2>and we'll start with Goffman and where he got his

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 2>start again, this is Irving Goffman, groundbreaking sociologist. He started

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 2>off doing field work in a Scottish village and rather

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 2>than figuring out how the city council worked for that

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 2>or the village elders basically kept everybody in line, he

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 2>just ameshed himself in the village and just paid attention

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 2>to how people interacted with one another. And really like,

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 2>that's a very anthropological way of studying. Is very not

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 2>how they did it at the time among sociologists. So

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 2>here's groundbreaking. He essentially went like, I'm going to take

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 2>this field and just put it, take it in a

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 2>different direction. So let's go.

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure. He wrote a book in nineteen fifty

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>six called The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. What

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a great title, No Colon's it's exactly what it says.

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>It is a very big book in the world of sociology,

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and the International Sociological Association named it as a tenth

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>most important sociology book of the twentieth century. And in

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>this book is where he touched on what you talked

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>about with this sort of performance aspect of our everyday

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>lives with He didn't invent it, you know, it was

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>an existing concept, but dramaturgical theory, which is what you said,

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>like we're all sort of operating on a social script,

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the terminator, Like it's pretty limited. You

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have endless options, like maybe you should say one

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of these four things at this dinner party when someone

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>brings up a thing. And even if it's a brand

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>news situation, you're drawing on the scripts that you've used

0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>over and over in your life to work out how

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to inner act in the scene.

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 2>Right. Yeah, And it's also, yeah, it's been shaped by

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 2>interactions with other people. It's shaped by what you've seen

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 2>on TV, which can be very dangerous because stuff that's

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 2>like hilarious on a sitcom does not necessarily translate well

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 2>into real life. It's like you're being a huge jerk

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 2>or you're not really that funny. You know, in the

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 2>case of somebody who models themselves after friends.

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like, pull my finger doesn't always break the ice.

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 2>No, pull my finger always works. Okay, great, but yeah,

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 2>so what his point was in the dramaturgical theory, And

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 2>like you said, he didn't invent it, but if you

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 2>if you look into it, he's basically like he's the

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 2>guy who took it and ran with it. Yeah, no

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 2>matter where you are, you're performing, and depending on where

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 2>you are you're going, your performance is going to be different. Right,

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 2>So if you're sitting there at school, you're gonna act

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 2>different than you do at a bar.

0:09:55.640 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right, sure, ideally, yeah, you wo hope for sure.

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 2>And then if you're at work, you know you're going

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 2>to act a little different from that too. And it's

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 2>essentially even when you're hanging out with your closest friends,

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 2>sociologists believe that you're still performing in some way, shape

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 2>or form, just probably less than you normally do.

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and some think even when you're by yourself that

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that still informs how you talk to your little person

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>on your shoulder, right, which is really interesting. He talked

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>about appearance and like clothing even and how they will convey.

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 1>And when we say actor, we're just talking about a person,

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>but in his context of it all being a performance,

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>he'd called them actors. But you know, your your costume

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that you put on is going to convey like maybe

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 1>your social status, maybe what kind of job you have.

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>There's you know, there's that outward appearance, and then there's

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the manner in which you deal with someone. And obeying

0:10:56.400 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 1>the sort of societal rules in a social situation is

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a big time thing. And if you start to do

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>things that don't comply with what people generally expect in

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, at a dinner party or on an elevator

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, it can upset people around you.

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the interesting thing that I took from that is,

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's kind of common sense, but when you're writing,

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>like a screenplay or something like dramatic writing or a play,

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting characters are usually people that do things

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that surprise you, or that fly in the face of

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe a social norm, or make a decision that's unexpected.

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's interesting that in drama it makes

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>for very compelling characters, but in real life we kind

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of don't want that generally.

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like the Manic Pixie dream Girl.

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Right, I don't know what you mean by that. I mean,

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I know what that term means, but I don't know

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:47.719
<v Speaker 1>how it relates to this.

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh they're always doing like crazy stuff that like makes

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.679
<v Speaker 2>the protagon or fall in love with them or whatever.

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I gotcha. So in terms of a script,

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that might be engaging even within the world of the script,

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 1>whereas in real life, I don't know, a man at

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Pixie dream Girl might go over, but the person saying

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>pull my finger the dinner party may not.

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's funny that you say drama too, because to me,

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 2>where in my mind was comedy, Like almost all comedy

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 2>is a person behaving in a way that is violates

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 2>the situation that they're in, violates the scene and the

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 2>script that they're supposed to be saying. That's all from

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 2>Adam Sandler to late Adam Sandler, right, it's all basically that.

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, that's the basis of joke telling. Really

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is the unexpected thing happens super interesting.

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:41.079
<v Speaker 2>And then one other thing too. He made a really

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 2>good point. He said that the characters or the people

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 2>who are interacting and again just essentially performing that they're

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 2>trying to come to a common definition of the situation

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 2>is what he called it.

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that expected norm.

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so like if you see, say, a scene

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:00.439
<v Speaker 2>on TV, it's just such a perfect analogy because that's

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 2>essentially what he's talking about. And there's just one dude

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 2>standing at a bus stop and it's a businessman. Say

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 2>that scene is in a superposition. It hasn't been defined

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 2>yet because there's only one person, and by the entrance

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 2>of the next person, that's when the scene will start

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 2>to be defined. If it's that guy's boss, he's gonna

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 2>act totally different than if it's a pickpocket or something

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 2>like that. So the scene hasn't been defined yet. But

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 2>regardless of how it ends up, like what scene it is,

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 2>both are playing their role essentially that we just innately

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 2>know almost not innately because it's learned, but it becomes

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 2>just second nature for most people.

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure. He also thought that, you know, there's

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously verbal and nonverbal parts to this, with body language

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and how you dress and all that stuff. But Goffman

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>himself thought that the non verbal part did I say

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>non purple?

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 2>If you did? It was lost on me. But I

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 2>like non purple more Okay.

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I might have said non purple anyway, which

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is basically every other color but purple. Yeah. He thought

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the non verbal part was the most significant because it's

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>harder to fake, which I think is pretty interesting.

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah for sure.

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>And that also, like, while you're performing quote unquote again,

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>do we need to keep saying that, like people know

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>what you mean?

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, I mean we could just say interacting with

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 2>another person.

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, while you're interacting as the actor, right, you may

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>be aware that you have like a goal in mind,

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>like I got a you know, I met this thing,

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I got a present really well, or you may not.

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you may not have a goal. It may be,

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 2>as we'll see, you're just trying to keep from freaking

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 2>the other person out, you know, like you're not trying

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 2>to get anywhere. You're not trying to advance or get

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 2>something from the person or make somebody think that you're great,

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 2>but just being engaged, forced into a social interaction like

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 2>that you have to perform a certain way or else

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 2>the other person is going to be weirded out, is

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 2>going to want to get away from you. Sometimes people

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 2>get really upset when somebody violates norms. And I think

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 2>you can, really you can. This explains it a lot,

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 2>because it's like someone is expecting somebody to behave in

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 2>a certain way. That person purposefully doesn't behave in that way.

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Then the people around them might get angry at that person,

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 2>even though they might just be being themselves.

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, or get scared. Like you know, when you get

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>on an elevator by yourself and there's only one person

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>on there, you act in a certain way as an

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>almost way to say you're safe right now. You don't

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>need to worry about me. I'm just going to my room.

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna I'm not that guy that's going to

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>be some weirdo on the elevator. I promise you're okay.

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, or even like try to strike up a conversation

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 2>like that that's unnerving and disarming.

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I think definitely not as much for

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>me as for some people. Because I was raised in

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the South, I'm more used to that. And definitely also

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in an enclosed space like an elevator, the norms are

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>much different than like walking down the street or something.

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>For sure, you know you're trapped basically in that little.

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Box, right, Yeah, you have a captive audience.

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>And now I'm panicking.

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 2>So, just to kind of wrap up the whole dramaturgical

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 2>theory part, Goffman said, we have our front stage selves,

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 2>which I think you referred to earlier.

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Right, that's us right now, and that's what we do

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>on our job every day.

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, but I feel like we're not that much

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 2>different in real life. No.

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right. I mean, that's one of the

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>reasons this show works, I think, and why a lot

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of podcasts work is because people are their more true selves.

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's also sort of the best version of our

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>true selves, Like we're not the jerks that we can

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>be in real life.

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that's a really great point that we'll see later. Like,

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 2>just because you're doing this doesn't mean you're a phony

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 2>or inauthentic. You're just drawing on the parts of yourself

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 2>that are already there that apply to the situation best

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 2>in presenting those.

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, totally. And I said we I meant me you're

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 1>not a jerk. And so I'm just speaking for myself.

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Hey man, I'm always happy to be included with you.

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm along for the ride.

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, everybody compete like that here and there. That's all

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, right right, I know what you're saying. You

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have to explain it to me, all right, I

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>was explaining to everyone else. Didn't think I was just

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>dragging you down with me.

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 2>So you've got front stage selves. This is when you're

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 2>you're on stage, you're really out there. There's backstage when

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 2>you're hanging with your homies. Yeah, homeboys, homegirls, Yeah yeah,

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 2>and just general homies, maybe your family. If you get

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 2>along with your family, and you might feel comfortable and

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 2>calm around them, So that would be your backstage self.

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 2>But note this, he's not saying front stage self, and

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 2>then yourself, it's still a backstage self. You're still attached

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 2>to the stage. You're still in the theater. Yeah, even

0:17:57.760 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 2>when you're hanging out with your homies.

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's true. And then there's the off stage, and

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 1>that's when it's just one on one this is the best,

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's still a kind of performance.

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. This example is just so it just nails it.

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:14.919
<v Speaker 2>When you're a teacher and you see your student at

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 2>the grocery store, yeah, see him, ir L, that's like

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 2>that's just such a jarring thing to see as a kid.

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, I think it's thrilling, it's exciting because they

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>don't exist outside of that role.

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 2>No exactly. So now you see them and they're not

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 2>dressed like they normally are. Oh, they're friendly to your

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 2>mom or something like that. There, and then they're buying

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 2>olives too, and they look like they're really into the

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 2>figuring out which all ofs they want, right, So, yeah,

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 2>that's just for the kid. For the teacher, you still

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 2>have to comport yourself in a way that's like, you know,

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to just start cussing in front of

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 2>the student and just talk like I might normally talk.

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 2>I still have to pretend or act like I do

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 2>when I'm this kid's teacher. But that's still it's like

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 2>a it's it doesn't necessarily fit the grocery store stage,

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 2>so that teachers in a really weird position, right then, Yeah,

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 2>that would be off stage interactions.

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, for sure.

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 2>I love that. One time for a break, Yes, all.

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Right, we're just getting cooking, everybody, So come back more

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>if you want to learn more about yourself, right for.

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 2>This learning stuff from Josh Chimes stuff you shun all right.

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>So one of the keys to Goffman's theory is how

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>important it is to avoid being embarrassed or embarrassing others.

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>He talked about face work like saving face or losing face,

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>not wanting to be embarrassed, but also he wrote about

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>just the your facial expressions, especially in intern of how

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you disagree with somebody, even if you say the words

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that you think are the right way to disagree with someone,

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>but your face as WTF like that conveys a confusing message.

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>So even the facial expressions you make have to be considered.

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's that speech plus nonverbal that equals your performance, right, Yeah. Yeah,

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 2>It's funny to see people who are trying to say

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 2>something but their facial expression just something matchup.

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean that's a problem I've had to work

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>on in my own marriage with not being the best communicator,

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>which you know, which is Emily being like, well, you're

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>saying one thing, but that's not what I'm getting.

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm right. Ah, yeah, No, I don't want to play

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 2>red dead redemption.

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>That's always true the opposite, that is right.

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 2>So the other point of that, in addition to that

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 2>nonverbal use of face, you said, also you're trying to

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 2>help people save face, right, So I said earlier that

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 2>you might be forced into a social to act in

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 2>a social situation a certain way just because you don't

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 2>want to freak out your friend's mom who you saw

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 2>at the mall by acting bizarrely or you know, in

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 2>a different way than you should. Similarly, if your friend's

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 2>mom at the mall falls like slips and falls in

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the mall and is embarrassed, you are

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 2>going to do something that your performance calls for you

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 2>to do something to help her save face as well.

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 2>That's part of face work.

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Too, Yeah, for sure. And face work is another dramatic term.

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 2>Oh is it? I didn't know that.

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think face work and body work that's all

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a drama thing.

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 2>That makes sense. Is there a thing how to move.

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Within your space? Yeah, private parts work, so to Goffman,

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it could be an obvious thing, like

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:48.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're you know, on a first date or something

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>like that, or like you mentioned earlier job interview, like

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the super obvious situation, but a lot a lot

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of times it's you know, it's really everyday interactions still count.

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>H And there's a philosopher name Lucy McDonald who was

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>writing about like when somebody falls down in public, almost always,

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the very first thing that will happen is that person

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 1>will look around to see if anyone saw them, and

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>based on that, it's going to change their reaction. And

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it reminded me of that story up told before about

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>in college when I saw the guy bust bust his

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 1>butt on a bike in Athens and the books went

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 1>spilling all over the sidewalk, and this dude just opened

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 1>one of the books, laying on his side with his

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>bike will spinning, act like he was reading it. And

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the funniest things I've ever seen. And

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>then the other day, on my new bike, I tried

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to do a wheel slide in a gravel parking lot

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and I busted my butt and fell. I didn't go,

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, ass over apple cart, but I hit the dirt.

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>And the first thing I did, as a fifty four

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.199
<v Speaker 1>year old was look up and see if anybody saw me.

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 2>You didn't jump up and say I meant to do that.

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, if somebody had been had seen me, I would have,

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>but nobody saw me, so I just sat there and

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>was like, no one nuts.

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Right, So if you do that, like say, if people

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:07.160
<v Speaker 2>do see you, you might like look back, like closely

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 2>at the ground, like what did I strung over?

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>What's wrong with this bike?

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Or you might say like I hate Mondays or something

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 2>like that. And what you're doing is something you mentioned earlier.

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 2>You're reassuring people like I'm not a threat to you

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 2>or to the social order. That was just a total accident. Yeah,

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 2>And it might seem like that person is overly self

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 2>conscious or something like that, or they might be a

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 2>little neurotic. I feel like they have to do that, Yeah,

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 2>But the philosopher Lucy McDonald that you mentioned also points

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 2>out that that's actually not what's going on. That everybody

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 2>feels like they need to do that, and that it's

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 2>a rational response to the social expectations that we have

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 2>of one another. So it just kind of reveals this

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 2>social intelligence that most people have that is you don't

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 2>even know that you're doing in a lot of cases,

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 2>and that you feel even compelled to do internally. Like

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 2>when I do that, if I'm so embarrassed, I will

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 2>blurt something out like oops, or I hate Mondays, and

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.439
<v Speaker 2>it feels like it's coming up from you know, my

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 2>guy yea, and then out of my mouth like it's

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 2>not something where I'm like, I better say something really quick,

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 2>just an involuntary reaction essentially, because it's so ingrained.

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because you're not a sociopath.

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I like to think so.

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I like to think so too. It's funny thinking

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 1>about that guy in Athens it fell. He didn't even

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>look around because it wasn't like, oh did someone see me?

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Because hundreds of people for sure saw him.

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>It was like a crowded campus. So I felt bad

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>for the guy, but it was hysterical. And one day

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna meet that person, I think.

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I wonder what he's doing now.

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine if I was at a party one

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 1>day and somebody was telling that story, like one time

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>in college, I wrecked my bike, and after I was reading.

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 2>A book, what would you do? Would you buy him something?

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I would hug him immediately and be like I saw that,

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>and I've been telling that story for forty years.

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 2>That's great.

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:03.959
<v Speaker 1>Forty No, not even thirty.

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thirty's about right. Yeah, and you would be like,

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a hugger.

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, then I've screwed up yet again. Uh.

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 2>So I said that when people fall in there, they're

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 2>saying like oops, or I hate mondays, they're looking at

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 2>the crack or they're going through their book whatever. They're

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 2>reassuring people that that they're actually normal. And the norm

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 2>in countries like the US, say in the West, is

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:39.199
<v Speaker 2>what's called civil and attention to where you ideally you

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 2>acknowledge the presence the existence of another person so that

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 2>you're you're on a subway with and then yeah it

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 2>ends there. Right. Something that I find dismaying is I

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 2>see more and more that acknowledgment doesn't even happen. It's

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 2>just totally ignoring one another. And that, man, that gets me,

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 2>especially if you not at somebody else and they just

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:06.200
<v Speaker 2>ignore you. I think that is awful.

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean not to be old man here, but

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>cell phones and smartphones have definitely played a part in that,

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I think because people escape into the comfort of like, well,

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 1>I'll just look at this instead.

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, and they're just like, oh, what's on my phone?

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, if you were raised in the South

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>or have lived in the South, then you're more comfortable

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:30.439
<v Speaker 1>with more acknowledgment and maybe even a brief conversation with

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.199
<v Speaker 1>a stranger. Sure, that can be very off putting for

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>people that aren't used to that. So I try to

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.439
<v Speaker 1>remember that when I am going to maybe have had

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a drink or two and I struck up a conversation.

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 2>With someone I don't know on an elevator.

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I've done that too. I did it last week in fact.

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 2>So speaking of elevators, Chuck, you've mentioned going into an

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 2>elevator and turning around, and what a violation of the

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 2>social order that is the elevator Is this perfect little

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 2>encapsulation for sociolists, no man to study, because we just

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 2>know what to do. When somebody gets on an elevator

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 2>and there's already people on there, everybody spreads out, rearranges

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.719
<v Speaker 2>himself to make room for this person in their personal space.

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 2>And it's not like we're like, Okay, I'm going to

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:18.360
<v Speaker 2>go over here. You go here, and then when somebody

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 2>the next person comes on, you get off, and then

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 2>this person's going to go where you were. It just happens,

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 2>and it's a beautiful synchronized effort, right.

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 1>It really is.

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 2>But when sociologists get on elevators and they turn around,

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:38.719
<v Speaker 2>there's apocryphal story about Irvin Goffman doing that and studying

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 2>and people just flipping out by it.

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:42.679
<v Speaker 1>Now they don't turn around. They just go straight in

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and stand there looking at the rear.

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yes, exactly, Yeah right, not well put So that's

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 2>actually not just what sociologists like to do. It was

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 2>like a big one on Candid Camera back in the

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 2>day for a while. Yeah, and there was one Candid

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Camera episode where they did the opposite where the elevator

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 2>was already had a bunch of people on it, but

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 2>they were facing the rear when the door's opened and

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:10.880
<v Speaker 2>the person who was being I guess pranked came on.

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't get on that elevator car.

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:16.439
<v Speaker 2>So this person they got on, and they kind of

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 2>looked like they didn't know what to do for a second,

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:21.199
<v Speaker 2>and then they turned and they faced.

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I knew it. Wow, that's incredible.

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. It was almost like they thought that they hadn't

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 2>gotten the revised pages that day and everybody else did,

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 2>so they just needed to go along with it because

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 2>they didn't want to upset the apple cart. Things had changed.

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 2>This is not what they expected, but they weren't about

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 2>to be the one who just stuck to the original

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Norman upset everybody else.

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Wow did they yell out, can I have the new sides.

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Please take someone to fly those in line. That's really

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>funny and that doesn't surprise me. And I bet the

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>live audience at Cannon Cambridge just got a big old hoo.

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you laugh on that?

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 2>One man?

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>So there was a guy named Harold Garfinkel and others

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>socioists that would I mean, he called them breaching experiments,

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's really messing with people. And he did things

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>like that like sit down on the escalator or just

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>like point at somebody. And I'm not a big fan

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of those kind of experiments.

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 2>No, but they're all over YouTube people doing that. I

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 2>bet it's pretty funny. But yeah, if you're ever in

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 2>a mall and somebody sits down on an escalator or whatever,

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 2>it's probably a sociologist. Yeah.

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>If not just politely go in any other direction.

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Well no, that's why you carry a water gun around

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 2>with you. You just scored them in the house a

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 2>few times and say stand.

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Up, super soaker.

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 2>So there's ways that we figure out how to perform because,

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 2>like I said, a lot of it just seems ingrained.

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 2>A lot of it requires thought too, especially if you're

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 2>trying if you have a goal, like you're trying to

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 2>become a member of a country club, which everybody's been

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:56.719
<v Speaker 2>through that, yeah, Yeah. And these two researchers, they were

0:29:56.760 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 2>psychologists back in nineteen ninety nineteen ninety, Mark Leary and

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Robin Kowalski. They basically figured out how we do this

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of stuff, and they broke it into two things.

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 2>There was impression motivation, why you're doing this? An impression

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 2>construction how you're doing this?

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And as far as motivation, it's based on a

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>few factors. One is how relevant a person thinks their

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>images to achieve this goal. So, in other words, does

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it really matter here how I'm acting to get what

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I want? How valuable the goal is, which is do

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I this is something I really want? Am I trying

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to get a job or just whatever? Something a little

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>less stakes? And then finally, the extent to which they

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>believe they're not currently being perceived in the most useful way.

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 1>In other words, how much do I need to pour

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it on here to get what I want?

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Like, how am I being perceived? And what do I

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>need to do to change that?

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Right? Exactly? So you put all those together and that's

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 2>your motivation for figuring out some impression management. Again, This

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 2>is the ones where you're like actually giving thought to it, right,

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Impression construction, how you actually care this stuff out. They

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 2>broke into five little parts. One is your self concept, right,

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 2>So you're going to base how you carry this out

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 2>on how you feel you are. So you're trying you're

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 2>starting with your authentic self ideally, right, because people value authenticity.

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 2>People don't want to just keep up a lie. Again,

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 2>that's a half hour sitcom right there, because it always crumbles.

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:32.479
<v Speaker 2>It always crumbles everybody in real life and on sitcoms.

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>In twenty two minutes and then it gets resolved.

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Right exactly. So your self concept is where you're going

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 2>to start, and you're going to kind of draw from that.

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Imagine a big steamer trunk on stage that carrot tops

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:48.959
<v Speaker 2>going through, just pulling a bunch of props out of.

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 2>That's what you're doing when you first start to figure

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 2>this out. That's going through the steamer trunk of your

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 2>self concept.

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Wait a minute, are you saying right now we are

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a carrot.

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 2>The entire world is yeah, all the world to stage,

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 2>and we are merely carot carrot tops.

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Then there's the desired identity. So you're trying to protect

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>an identity, and you base that on what like what

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you what you want people to think you like and

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>don't like, or what you want to be or don't

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>want to.

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Be, right, So you might really try to distance yourself

0:32:28.600 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 2>from something you don't want to identify with.

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like, oh boy, how about that John Legend that

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>was random and all that immense talent, Like, get over it, buddy.

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 2>You want to be very careful with this. This is

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 2>one of those things that shows what a tightrope you

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 2>can be walking when you're purposefully constructing impression management. If

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 2>you're in that case yucking someone's yam, that can turn

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 2>people off and ruin all of the other stuff that

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 2>you just did. So it can backfire.

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Someone opens up their jacket and they're wearing the John Legend.

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, or you accidentally say it to John Legend because

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 2>you didn't recognize him.

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know why I pulled him out. I

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>know nothing much about him other than La La land

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>in the fact that he's super talented.

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. No, he was perfect, I mean totally neutral. Everybody

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 2>loves him like it was just that was great, non

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 2>controversial in almost any way. Yeah, right, he's managed to

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 2>distance himself from his wife's public persona. So yeah, non controversial.

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Who is she Chrissy Teagan?

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh? I know that name, but I don't know much

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>about her either.

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 2>That's fine, all right, moving on. Yeah, So the next

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 2>one is target value, and it's basically saying, like, you're

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 2>just going to take those things from your steamer trunk

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 2>of your authentic self and you're going to adorn yourself

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 2>with the ones that make the most sense for this

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 2>identity that you're trying to be viewed with.

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but based on what you think they want, right.

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, But again, this is not where you're just like,

0:33:57.520 --> 0:34:01.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, stealing stuff from other people and making it

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 2>your own. You're going ideally, you're going into your own

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 2>authentic self and saying this one makes the most sense

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:10.399
<v Speaker 2>to what this person's going to expect or want.

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, Like aligning yourself with someone else's value is

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>ideally stopping short of, like, you know, doing something that's

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 1>not an authentic Yeah.

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 2>And there's one thing I think we should say at

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 2>this point, because it's really easy to just assume like

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 2>this is what everybody should be doing, and I think

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 2>it's worth questioning. It's not inherently a good thing to

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 2>change yourself or to rearrange yourself. It can be a

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 2>bad thing, but it can also be a good thing too.

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 2>So just know, we're not saying like you should be

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 2>out doing Yeah, it should really be thinking about what

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 2>you have inside yourself that you can impress other people with.

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 2>That's not what we're saying. But people do do that,

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 2>and that's falls under the umbrella of impression management.

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're saying, this is what Leary and Kowalski have

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:56.800
<v Speaker 1>noticed happens.

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:59.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, blame it on them and the rain.

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 1>And then there's current Oh I'm sorry, I skipped one,

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:08.439
<v Speaker 1>didn't I roll constraints presenting yourself in a way that's well,

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:10.319
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the same thing as target value, except

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>target values a little less that I want to align

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 1>myself with what you may be into, yeah, and a

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>little more of just like the general expectations of a social.

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Role, right, Like you would wear a top hat in

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 2>a monocle to a meeting with a bunch of bankers

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 2>because that's what they would expect.

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:26.760
<v Speaker 1>You to do, exactly.

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 2>And then there's current social image, which is what you

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:34.319
<v Speaker 2>perceive of yourself and if other people, if you think

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 2>other people perceive you in a way you don't like.

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there are some other techniques that they've you know

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that people can use flattery, of course, we'll get you everywhere, ingratiation,

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. Conforming to expectations. That's kind of like

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the other stuff I think, like role constraints

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. And then a big one is

0:35:56.400 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 1>like suppressing your emotion and maintaining your self control. Like again,

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean to be anauthentic, but that just means like,

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>read the room. Is it time for me to be

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 1>overly emotional about something or is it not? Do I

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 1>need to kind of put a little net for now?

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you're triggered and you have a temper because

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 2>people are taking too long in the grocery store line,

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:19.839
<v Speaker 2>don't push a whole load of groceries back into an

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:22.839
<v Speaker 2>aisle and shout a curse word and storm out. Oh

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:27.320
<v Speaker 2>I've seen it in real life. Actually, Oh I'm sure. Yeah,

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:30.320
<v Speaker 2>it's like what is going on? Buddy?

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to not think just constantly what's wrong with people?

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know what the fact is, again, as I

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:37.440
<v Speaker 1>get older, there's a lot wrong with a lot of people.

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:38.839
<v Speaker 1>So I try to keep that in mind.

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, everybody's got some sort of burden they're carrying, and

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 2>some people are more vocal about it than others. I

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 2>guess that's a very nice way to say some people

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 2>misproject it in the wrong way more loudly than others.

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>That's another way to say it.

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 2>There's also one called basking and reflect a glory, which

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 2>is basically like hanging out with somebody who's a great

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 2>example of the kind of self you want to be

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 2>identified as. Yeah, not necessarily good. It's much better to

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 2>blaze your own trail, make your own version. But I

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of I get it. The one that's just not

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:18.760
<v Speaker 2>good at all is the downward comparison, which is putting

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:21.399
<v Speaker 2>someone down to show that you're not like them at all.

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's not a good thing to do. And again,

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 1>all of this convey Like, to convey all this stuff,

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you got to have a pretty good cognitive empathy and

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty good self monitoring. You got to be able to

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 1>read the room, read social cues, regulate your emotions. And again,

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I think this is why people with like a narcissistic

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>personality disorder may have a harder time, may have more

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>difficulty doing stuff like this for sure, another break.

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Have forty minutes in, let's take our second break.

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll be back. This is going to be

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a little beefy, guys, but we're into it, you.

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Chuck, So just real quick before we keep going on,

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 2>it's worth mentioning that forming an online identity is essentially

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:24.359
<v Speaker 2>it's like a whole new can of worms. Yeah, as

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:27.240
<v Speaker 2>far as sociology is concerned, we just couldn't do it before,

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 2>and it allows you to do things, try on new

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 2>things and ways that we it was just impossible to previously.

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure. But that yeah, that's that could be

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a shorty or something on its own.

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Huh h for sure.

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Should we talk about authenticity though a little.

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 2>More, Yeah, because again this is everybody wants to be

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:47.759
<v Speaker 2>viewed as authentic, and just the fact that you've realized

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 2>now that you're performing at all times can make you

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 2>feel like you're not authentic. But we're here to tell

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 2>you you're still authentic.

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure. There have been researchers that, I mean,

0:38:57.320 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>it kind of depends you can there are a lot

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of ways to I don't like saying skin a cat anymore.

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 1>To tackle the cat. Now, there's a lot of ways

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to pet the cat.

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:08.880
<v Speaker 2>We're not saying skin the cat anymore.

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, it just occurred to me.

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:13.680
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty horrific thing to think about.

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know where that came from, but sure either,

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 2>I guess I can get on board with that.

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, there's a lot of ways to pet a cat.

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Actually there's only one way, and that's with the grain.

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, how about skin your knee? Sure, there's a

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways to skin your knee, Like fifty four

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:33.959
<v Speaker 1>year old wrecking is new BMX bike exactly. Some people

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 1>say there's a real distinct distinction between self presentation, which

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:41.880
<v Speaker 1>is like the influence that you're feeling by pressure and

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the effort that you're putting out, and then self expression,

0:39:44.560 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 1>which is your authentic self. But there are psychologists or

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:50.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, yeah, I guess psychologists in this case a

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:54.959
<v Speaker 1>guy named Barry R. Schlinker, who says that actually self

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 1>presentation is everyone does it in all social interactions, like

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>even if you're married, you're influencing each other and behaving

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in a certain way. It may not even require like attention,

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 1>and probably doesn't if you're married, but it doesn't mean

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you're being an authentic if you're still doing that kind

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of within your marriage.

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 2>No, and even like within yourself, Like when we did

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 2>the Inner Dialogue episode, we talked at some point about

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:25.920
<v Speaker 2>how even when you're talking to yourself, that inner voice

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:31.760
<v Speaker 2>is often shaped by external forces. And some sociologists say, yeah,

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 2>even it goes even that far. That's how far the

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 2>self is shaped by these scripts and these performances and everything,

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 2>that even when you're alone, you still might find yourself

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 2>engaging in some performance or another.

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the stuff that we feel like is automatic

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and you kind of touched on this earlier is maybe

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 1>not automatic. You may not even realize that this is

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff that you've been practicing your whole life. I think

0:40:57.680 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's ever had a kid has seen that kid

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:03.239
<v Speaker 1>like practicing faces in the mirror. There's some I mean

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a very tropy movie scene is someone who practices a

0:41:07.440 --> 0:41:10.880
<v Speaker 1>scene in the mirror of like interacting with someone like, oh,

0:41:10.960 --> 0:41:13.240
<v Speaker 1>let me get that chair for you, and practicing a smile.

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Nathan Fielder has a whole show about this

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>called The Rehearsal. It's fascinating.

0:41:19.760 --> 0:41:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I love that guy.

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Are you watching the new season yet.

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 2>No, no, is that the one that's an actual like

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:26.320
<v Speaker 2>it's fiction?

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 1>No? No, no, that was the one he did with

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Emma Stone. This is the rehearsal season two, which is

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 1>he sets up these elaborate rehearsals for everyday live stuff. Okay,

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you should check out season one and then just steamroll

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 1>into season two. It's fascinating sociological stuff.

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:46.319
<v Speaker 2>Nice. I definitely will. Yeah, do you ever rehearse what

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 2>you're going to say? I know you rehearse like what

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 2>you're doing next, like if you're cooking something, You've said that, right,

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 2>But do you ever like practice in your head what

0:41:56.600 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 2>you're going to say, like even mundane stuff like what

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:00.839
<v Speaker 2>am I going to say to this venience store clerk

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 2>when I go to check out?

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Now, all that stuff is pretty innate for me.

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 2>That's very lucky.

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 1>But again, maybe innate from years and years of practice.

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's possible, or maybe you were just born with it.

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's maybe Lane. So you mentioned the automatic stuff

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 2>that is essentially breathing, Like if you look at how

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 2>it's how Schlinker describes it. He's describing the same thing

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 2>as breathing, like it's just that automatic and that automatic

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:33.840
<v Speaker 2>mode can be in a like high gear or low gear.

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:38.720
<v Speaker 2>And typically if you're backstage hanging out with your friends, embarrassment. Again,

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 2>the driver here is preventing embarrassment, preventing from embarrassing yourself,

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:51.839
<v Speaker 2>preventing embarrassing other people or making them feel embarrassed by association,

0:42:52.320 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Like you're preventing embarrassment. And one of the reasons why

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 2>it's easier to hang out with people in your backstage

0:42:58.000 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 2>mode is because the stakes are low. Embarrass yourself, it

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:04.200
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter nearly as much as if you embarrass yourself,

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:07.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you pee your pants into job interview.

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Although the funny ironic thing for us is, and

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe anyone that performs on stage literally backstage sometimes

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:17.480
<v Speaker 1>can be some of the most anxious when people are

0:43:17.560 --> 0:43:19.839
<v Speaker 1>sent back there, like you know, oh, the company wants

0:43:19.840 --> 0:43:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to send back these strangers you don't know like that.

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 1>That's the almost the height for me of like a

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:28.479
<v Speaker 1>boy here, I got to turn and turn on the chuck,

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:28.759
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I just want to apologize for the group

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:36.800
<v Speaker 2>of City Bank cardholders from like ten years ago and

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:38.880
<v Speaker 2>we had a meet and greet with and it was

0:43:39.040 --> 0:43:42.000
<v Speaker 2>very awkward so sorry, guys, you never really got me.

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, that's why we don't do meet and greet anymore.

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 1>It's just, yeah, we just want to be backstage with

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:48.360
<v Speaker 1>our homies exactly.

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So there's also we can also automatically go into

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 2>a much more performative mode when the sticks get a

0:43:57.640 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 2>little higher. Yeah, but either way it's still automatic. So

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Schlinker is like, Nope, we're really kind of performing almost

0:44:06.680 --> 0:44:08.920
<v Speaker 2>at all times. And then there was a scholar of

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:11.880
<v Speaker 2>gender named Judith Butler and by what was I mean is?

0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 2>And Judith Butler said, everything about you is shaped by

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:24.400
<v Speaker 2>sociological forces, including gender. That people learn how to behave

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 2>according to what society says it's their gender is, or

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 2>what's expected of that gender, and that that's just how

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:38.200
<v Speaker 2>we learn to behave certain ways according to gender.

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I'm sure there are plenty of grown

0:44:42.800 --> 0:44:45.200
<v Speaker 1>men who have a story where they're like when I

0:44:45.239 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 1>was in the third grade, I played with dolls and

0:44:47.680 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I got made fun of and because that wasn't the

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:54.760
<v Speaker 1>socially acceptable, you know, masculine construct And from that day forward,

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I started doing things to where I fit in a

0:44:58.080 --> 0:45:01.439
<v Speaker 1>little more on the playground, and that shapes how they are,

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:03.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, decades later sometimes.

0:45:03.120 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, carried over from the playground into the rest

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:06.279
<v Speaker 2>of their life.

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and this stuff is all changing for the better,

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I think, but it's still it's not like it's been eradicated,

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And speaking of gender too, I wondered if you

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:18.360
<v Speaker 2>know how some people are just deeply offended by people

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:20.879
<v Speaker 2>who are gender fluid, like to the point where you're like, what,

0:45:21.200 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 2>you don't even know this person, why do you hate

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 2>this so much? It may be wonder like if the

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 2>person who's so offended by it is upset because that

0:45:30.719 --> 0:45:34.439
<v Speaker 2>other person is flagrantly violating a social script and it's

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 2>making them and other people uncomfortable. And that brings up

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 2>a further point too, Who's which is more valuable that

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:45.840
<v Speaker 2>person's authentic self that they're gender fluid or the comfort

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 2>of everybody else, the strangers around them, which one is

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:51.839
<v Speaker 2>more valuable? Who should win out in that case? If

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:53.080
<v Speaker 2>there's a conflict like.

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 1>That, absolutely, I mean sadly stuff like that is being

0:45:57.760 --> 0:46:02.000
<v Speaker 1>literally litigated. But also the idea of changing social norms,

0:46:02.080 --> 0:46:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know, if you're not rolling with the changes

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that are happening in society, you may find yourself on

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:14.799
<v Speaker 1>an island of in acceptance and loneliness, but that may

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:16.719
<v Speaker 1>be fine with you because you may want to be like, no,

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 1>things were better the old way.

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:22.400
<v Speaker 2>At the same time, too, you can't change social norms

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:26.360
<v Speaker 2>without violating them. They tend to just kind of stay static,

0:46:26.400 --> 0:46:28.960
<v Speaker 2>and to make them dynamic, they have to be violated.

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:31.719
<v Speaker 2>And anyone who's seen the movie Pleasantville knows that that

0:46:31.760 --> 0:46:32.799
<v Speaker 2>can turn out pretty good.

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:37.359
<v Speaker 1>You may end up in color one day.

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Man, that was a good movie.

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was pretty good. I haven't seen that in

0:46:40.680 --> 0:46:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a while.

0:46:41.680 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I saw it a couple of years ago. I've

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:44.280
<v Speaker 2>watched it every example years.

0:46:44.640 --> 0:46:46.399
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay, I've only seen it once.

0:46:46.680 --> 0:46:49.279
<v Speaker 2>Oh you should keep waking. Just buy the DVD. Go

0:46:49.400 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 2>old school, all right.

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a lot of movies that kind of

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:54.799
<v Speaker 1>dance around this stuff, like The Truman Show and just

0:46:55.040 --> 0:46:56.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, I feel like this is just ripe ground

0:46:56.960 --> 0:46:58.440
<v Speaker 1>for comedy and drama.

0:46:58.560 --> 0:47:02.840
<v Speaker 2>I agree, Chuck Rife, ripe right purple.

0:47:06.400 --> 0:47:09.319
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I mentioned Neurodiversiens earlier and just sort

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of my and I, you know, when I was doing

0:47:11.640 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 1>this research, I had that awakening of like, yeah, I've

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:17.960
<v Speaker 1>been much more cognizant of that kind of stuff as

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten older, and that stuff is more in the

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 1>forefront and diagnose more and more about like understanding that, Hey,

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that person that I think is like men read the room,

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 1>why are you acting like that? They may have something

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:34.399
<v Speaker 1>going on neurodivergently, there may be a genuine mental illness there.

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Goffman argued that if you have a mental illness or

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:42.759
<v Speaker 1>any sort of thing a disability, or if you are

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:46.239
<v Speaker 1>in housed, or you're obese or a drug user, that

0:47:46.360 --> 0:47:49.719
<v Speaker 1>all just lumps you in as a as a as

0:47:49.719 --> 0:47:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a thing I mean a stigma, which we're going to

0:47:52.239 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 1>talk more about in a second, basically, but and ends

0:47:55.080 --> 0:47:57.920
<v Speaker 1>up sort of creating the symptom of that thing just

0:47:57.920 --> 0:47:59.360
<v Speaker 1>because you're put in that box.

0:47:59.640 --> 0:48:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And so anybody who's who has a social stigma

0:48:03.480 --> 0:48:06.920
<v Speaker 2>like you just mentioned, you rattle off that list. They're

0:48:06.960 --> 0:48:11.160
<v Speaker 2>what Goffman called discredited. They don't have they're not they

0:48:11.200 --> 0:48:14.960
<v Speaker 2>have less value according to society if you this is

0:48:15.000 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 2>where he developed that empathy from researching this stuff. I bet,

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:23.200
<v Speaker 2>especially based on something like someone's ethnicity or whether they're handicapped,

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:26.400
<v Speaker 2>or whether they're homeless or whatever, that the idea that

0:48:26.440 --> 0:48:31.200
<v Speaker 2>they have less value socially speaking in this in this

0:48:31.320 --> 0:48:36.239
<v Speaker 2>sense is totally unfair because the social norms that we

0:48:36.280 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 2>create are generally arbitrary.

0:48:38.840 --> 0:48:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, for sure, and in not all cases. But you,

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:47.680
<v Speaker 1>impression management is a is a tool that people can

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:52.480
<v Speaker 1>use to get over or hide those stigmatized features. I mean,

0:48:52.520 --> 0:48:56.799
<v Speaker 1>we can't get super into code switching, but that could

0:48:56.840 --> 0:48:59.400
<v Speaker 1>be a pretty interesting short stuff to accompany this. I

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:04.920
<v Speaker 1>think that is the idea, and it's not specific to

0:49:05.000 --> 0:49:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the African American community, but it is. If you talk

0:49:09.160 --> 0:49:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to a group of African Americans in the United States

0:49:11.920 --> 0:49:15.560
<v Speaker 1>today or you know, for many years now, they will say, no,

0:49:15.760 --> 0:49:19.760
<v Speaker 1>code switching is how we get by in white America basically.

0:49:20.520 --> 0:49:22.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's the idea that you may change the way

0:49:22.200 --> 0:49:24.759
<v Speaker 1>you talk when you're around white people, or change the

0:49:24.760 --> 0:49:27.480
<v Speaker 1>way you act then you normally would when you're in

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, around your family and friends or your own community.

0:49:29.920 --> 0:49:31.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's a that's a big, big thing.

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And that's a great example of it. You could

0:49:34.200 --> 0:49:37.960
<v Speaker 2>also be like, my last name sounds pretty ethnic, and

0:49:38.080 --> 0:49:40.520
<v Speaker 2>I want to change it so that people call me

0:49:40.560 --> 0:49:44.160
<v Speaker 2>back for job interviews. There's a lot of stuff you

0:49:44.160 --> 0:49:46.719
<v Speaker 2>can do, so you're not you're covering your stigma, so

0:49:46.760 --> 0:49:50.040
<v Speaker 2>you're not an automatically discredited person. But according to Golfman,

0:49:50.280 --> 0:49:54.200
<v Speaker 2>you're discreditabull. If you're found out, you will be stigmatized.

0:49:54.680 --> 0:49:57.839
<v Speaker 2>So sure, it's a terrible situation all around, just to

0:49:57.880 --> 0:50:01.560
<v Speaker 2>stigmatize groups based on our betray you social norms. I

0:50:01.560 --> 0:50:01.920
<v Speaker 2>hate it.

0:50:02.000 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I remember in elementary school. I'm not going to

0:50:04.800 --> 0:50:07.200
<v Speaker 1>name her name name because I don't know if she

0:50:07.200 --> 0:50:09.560
<v Speaker 1>would want this out there, but there was a girl

0:50:09.600 --> 0:50:12.720
<v Speaker 1>from you know, an Indian American girl in our school

0:50:12.800 --> 0:50:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that came back after a summer with an Americanized first name.

0:50:17.320 --> 0:50:19.839
<v Speaker 1>And so she was that from fourth grade till SENI

0:50:19.920 --> 0:50:22.920
<v Speaker 1>year in high school when we graduated together and I

0:50:23.080 --> 0:50:25.759
<v Speaker 1>lost touch with her, and like five or six years ago,

0:50:25.880 --> 0:50:29.359
<v Speaker 1>my good friend in Boston said, oh, well, so and

0:50:29.400 --> 0:50:31.800
<v Speaker 1>so is in town. I said, oh, is she going

0:50:31.840 --> 0:50:33.920
<v Speaker 1>by that name now again? And she went back to

0:50:33.960 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 1>her you know, she grew up a little bit and

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:37.120
<v Speaker 1>was like, no, that is that's my name, That's my

0:50:37.200 --> 0:50:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Indian name. And it just made me feel really good

0:50:39.560 --> 0:50:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that she reached that point, you know, good. Yeah, it

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:45.480
<v Speaker 1>was great. So at you know, the furthest end of this,

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess spectrum as autism. And we've talked about autism

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:52.719
<v Speaker 1>here and there, but a lot of times, if you

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:55.839
<v Speaker 1>have autism, you might have difficulty responding in what people

0:50:55.920 --> 0:51:00.120
<v Speaker 1>might consider an appropriate way in a social situation. And

0:51:00.160 --> 0:51:03.759
<v Speaker 1>masking is a big can be a big part of

0:51:03.920 --> 0:51:06.719
<v Speaker 1>self presentation when it comes to people with autism.

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but there's autism researchers Amy Pearson and Kieran Rose,

0:51:11.640 --> 0:51:14.520
<v Speaker 2>and they make they go to great pains to basically

0:51:14.560 --> 0:51:18.960
<v Speaker 2>say masking is different than impression management, right. Impression management

0:51:19.000 --> 0:51:23.279
<v Speaker 2>is something everyone has to do. Masking is specific to

0:51:23.840 --> 0:51:28.960
<v Speaker 2>typically neurodivergent people to where they are protecting themselves by

0:51:30.200 --> 0:51:34.960
<v Speaker 2>pushing down their actual identities and hiding it at all

0:51:35.040 --> 0:51:39.239
<v Speaker 2>costs because they're afraid of being stigmatized because they've been

0:51:39.280 --> 0:51:41.960
<v Speaker 2>taught over the years that that's not they're not acceptable

0:51:42.120 --> 0:51:44.719
<v Speaker 2>as they are. And so those are those are two

0:51:44.800 --> 0:51:47.839
<v Speaker 2>really different things, even though they seem pretty like they

0:51:47.880 --> 0:51:48.840
<v Speaker 2>have a lot in common.

0:51:49.480 --> 0:51:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure. And masking, you know, there are all

0:51:51.640 --> 0:51:53.799
<v Speaker 1>kinds of people who mask. We talked about that in

0:51:53.840 --> 0:51:58.799
<v Speaker 1>the sociopath episode once again and got emails from people.

0:51:58.800 --> 0:52:00.840
<v Speaker 1>They're like, I'm a sociopath and I put on a

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:02.400
<v Speaker 1>big performance, so people don't know that.

0:52:02.560 --> 0:52:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, they're just always walking around like I love

0:52:05.600 --> 0:52:10.959
<v Speaker 2>you man. Right, Yeah, just one note about autism, which

0:52:11.080 --> 0:52:14.080
<v Speaker 2>obviously deserves its own episodes still coming down the pike

0:52:14.239 --> 0:52:16.960
<v Speaker 2>one day. Don't worry about that. But you were talking

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:19.920
<v Speaker 2>about just kind of learning. As you get older, you

0:52:19.960 --> 0:52:23.280
<v Speaker 2>know that you can't just you can't just make assumptions

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:27.320
<v Speaker 2>about people based on their ability to interact socially. Yeah,

0:52:27.840 --> 0:52:33.000
<v Speaker 2>if you want to develop a familiarity and empathy for

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:36.479
<v Speaker 2>people with autism, I think you could do a lot

0:52:36.480 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 2>worse than starting with Love on the Spectrum all seasons,

0:52:40.160 --> 0:52:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Australian version and American version.

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:45.319
<v Speaker 1>I think that is very sweet because that is like

0:52:45.360 --> 0:52:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the fifth time you've recommended that show to people.

0:52:47.280 --> 0:52:49.480
<v Speaker 2>People need to watch the show. It's so great. This

0:52:49.600 --> 0:52:54.320
<v Speaker 2>season in America deserves an Emmy. It's a masterpiece.

0:52:55.320 --> 0:52:56.239
<v Speaker 1>I've still never seen it.

0:52:56.320 --> 0:52:58.920
<v Speaker 2>You really should. I think you'd love it. All right,

0:52:59.440 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 2>So I guess, Chuck, since I did my every tenth

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:07.440
<v Speaker 2>episode mention of Love on the Spectrum, it's time for

0:53:07.680 --> 0:53:08.359
<v Speaker 2>listener mail.

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey guys, I love the show is about popcorn. By

0:53:14.440 --> 0:53:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the way, Okay, just finished the podcast on popcorn. It

0:53:18.000 --> 0:53:19.880
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of a segment I saw years ago on

0:53:19.960 --> 0:53:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Alton Brown's Good Eats Alton Brown at Lanton and I

0:53:24.719 --> 0:53:26.200
<v Speaker 1>did a little work on that show back in the day.

0:53:26.200 --> 0:53:29.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a prop Scott Nice while not directly related to popcorn,

0:53:29.520 --> 0:53:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and Alton was a good due to work with. By

0:53:30.920 --> 0:53:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the way, nice, while not directly related to popcorn. In

0:53:34.160 --> 0:53:37.759
<v Speaker 1>this particular episode, the show's resident food anthropologists related to

0:53:37.760 --> 0:53:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a factoid on Montezuma's revenge. They thought mona Zuma's real

0:53:42.120 --> 0:53:44.720
<v Speaker 1>revenge was allowing the conquering Spaniards to return to Spain

0:53:44.760 --> 0:53:49.480
<v Speaker 1>with maize without the knowledge of nixtimalization, which resulted in

0:53:49.560 --> 0:53:55.720
<v Speaker 1>widespread pelligra or palagra, causing dermatitis, diarrhea, dementia, and eventual

0:53:55.719 --> 0:53:58.160
<v Speaker 1>death due to a lack of essential nutrients. Nyssen and

0:53:58.520 --> 0:54:02.600
<v Speaker 1>trip to Fan in their diets. Nixt to molization is

0:54:02.640 --> 0:54:06.239
<v Speaker 1>a traditional Mesoamerican process used to prepare maize and other

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:09.760
<v Speaker 1>grains for consumption, involving cooking the grain and an alkaline solution,

0:54:09.880 --> 0:54:13.400
<v Speaker 1>typically limewater, which then allows for the outer paracarp the

0:54:13.440 --> 0:54:16.759
<v Speaker 1>skin to be easily removed. The process significantly improves the

0:54:16.840 --> 0:54:20.440
<v Speaker 1>digestibility and nutritional value of the grain. And that is

0:54:20.480 --> 0:54:21.640
<v Speaker 1>from Bob.

0:54:22.040 --> 0:54:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Bob, that was a great email. Yeah, well a top

0:54:25.280 --> 0:54:27.160
<v Speaker 2>notch one. I'm just gonna go ahead and say it.

0:54:27.600 --> 0:54:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I agreed.

0:54:28.560 --> 0:54:30.239
<v Speaker 2>If you want to be like Bob and send us

0:54:30.280 --> 0:54:32.960
<v Speaker 2>a really interesting, top notch email, we love that kind

0:54:33.000 --> 0:54:35.680
<v Speaker 2>of thing, you can send it off to stuff podcast

0:54:35.800 --> 0:54:40.239
<v Speaker 2>at iHeartRadio dot com.

0:54:40.440 --> 0:54:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For

0:54:43.400 --> 0:54:47.600
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:54:47.719 --> 0:54:49.560
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.