WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: TechStuff is Caught in a Tractor Beam

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production of I Heart Radios

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works. Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:19.959
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio and I love all things tech and

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>today is a Friday, so it is time for another

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff classic episode. This episode originally published on February

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand thirteen. It is titled tech Stuff is Caught

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in a Tractor Beam. Lauren Vogelbaum and I sat down

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.559
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the technology of tractor beams. Is it

0:00:39.640 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>realistic in what ways? Is it realistic versus unrealistic? How

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>might it actually work? And would it be remarkably different

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>from the way it's depicted in science fiction films. I

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>hope you guys enjoy it, So let's sit back and

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>listen to this classic episode tractor Beam, tractor beams. Yes, Yeah,

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>this is This was something that Lauren had suggested because

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>she saw an item in the news, and at the time,

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine Lauren had no idea how incredibly complex

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a topic this would turn out to be. Ye, As

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, particle physics is not simple necessarily, but

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna tackle it anyway. We are We are indeed,

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>because you know what, we've watched a lot of star

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Trek between the two of us. We have faith in ourselves.

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's talk about what a tractor beam is,

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 1>especially in that realm of science fiction, because I think

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that's where most people have encountered the original idea, right sure,

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and especially since tractor beams do not exist as such

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in three dimensions in the real world yet, not on

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the macro level anyway, right, not not nothing that you

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 1>could see with your own two eyeballs. Right. So essentially

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a intergalactic tow truck kind of thing. Yes, a

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>beam of light that can be used to pull objects

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>towards the source of that light. Yeah, which is that's

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty phenomenal because, as we understand in physics, light does

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>in fact exert a pressure time push stuff. Kepler said

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that Yep, exactly, yep, yep Kepler. Kepler observed this, and

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in fact it serves as the basis for uh futuristic

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>technologies such as sun sales. Similar sales. These would be

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>enormous sales, literally sales that you would extend from a

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>spacecraft and allow sunlight to press against the sale and

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>thus propelled the StarCraft because you're talking about being in

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>an environment where there's no there's no gravity that's affecting

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you apart from well, I mean, they're gonna have gravity

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>within the Solar System, but you're not working like trying

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:35.399
<v Speaker 1>to escape gravity. At that point. You're actually already out

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:39.399
<v Speaker 1>in space, so you're not having to worry as much

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>about things like friction and gravity. So smaller forces, for example,

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>photons can so so to have a kind of light

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that would be able to trap an object and even

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>pull it in is sort of counterintuitive based upon the

0:02:56.280 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>knowledge that photons can push stuff away. So we've seen

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>tractor beams used in lots of different science fiction you.

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Star Trek, of course, is one of the big examples. Yeah.

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>The first reference was actually in The Skylark of Space,

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.519
<v Speaker 1>which was a drama by Et Smith, originally serialized in

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>n and published as a novel in nine. Wow, I

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:17.839
<v Speaker 1>did not know that. I do know that it's used

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.079
<v Speaker 1>in Star Trek quite a bit. There are two things

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that you have to remember about Star Trek tractor beams.

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>They can pull just about anything anywhere, and if you

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 1>reverse the polarity, you can turn it into a weapon. Well,

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 1>reversing the polarity, as we all know, is how you

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>do things in Star Trek. Yeah, I was explaining earlier.

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>It is the have you tried turning it off and

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>on again approach in Star Trek. If if it's something's

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>not working, reverse the polarity and then it works. Uh.

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>And then, of course in Star Wars it was used.

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>The Death Star catches the Millennium Falcon in a tractor

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>beam and a series of tractor beans, a whole connexus

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of tractor being right, and pulls it back into the

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Death Star so that the Millenium Falcon cannot make its

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>daring escape. This, of course allows dar Vader to face

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>off against Obi one Kenobi, and I could go on,

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>but that's not what this episode is about. Also, I

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>suspect that a few of our listeners have seen Star Wars,

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe one or two. Episode four is amazing. If

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you have not seen it, you need to go check

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>it out. But anyway, yeah, so, so science fiction is

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.799
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that is a really useful tool

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>for storytellers. Uh. If they have a story about a

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>ship encountering some sort of wreck or other kind of

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of body out in space, it needs to be pulled away.

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>And the nice thing is is that we've got scientists

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:37.359
<v Speaker 1>here on Earth who are saying, hey, how can we

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>do this science fiction thing for reels right? Knowing how

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>light behaves and uh, and maybe finding new ways to

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>make light behave in perhaps an unexpected fashion. Well, I

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>suspect that, in fact, Star Trek used some actual research

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that was going on in the nineteen sixties as a

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>basis for their tractor beam, because according according to the

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Star Trek universe, the way that their tractor beam works

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>is it's actually WILLI a graviton force beam and I

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>just made little quote marks in the air for the

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>benefit of nobody really, so that was weird. Gravitons are

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:13.559
<v Speaker 1>hypothetical particles that that essentially mediate the force of gravity. Uh.

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>They're hypothetical because we have not observed an actual graviton.

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>We don't know how we would We don't we know

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that in order for our quantum model of the universe

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to make sense, we need something like a graviton to

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>exist to explain the force of gravity. There are four

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>fundamental forces in the universe. There's strong, nuclear, weak, nuclear,

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>electro magnetic, and gravity. Out of those, gravity is the weakest,

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>but it's also the one that we cannot easily incorporate

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>into the quantum model of the physics. Right, It's sort

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of assumed by Einstein's general theory of relativity that gravitational

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>waves are a thing that exists, that ripples in the

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>spacetime continuum, caused by very large moving objects, particularly, but

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 1>nobody has detected these. So so really the way we

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>observe this is through the force of gravity. I mean,

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that's that's that's we can see the outcome just exactly so.

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And to explain to you guys how weak gravity is

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>in comparison to the other forces, here's a very simple,

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>uh experiment anyone can do anyone who has access to

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a comb and a balloon. So let's say you've got,

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, get a balloon. You just inflate the balloon

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>with oxygen. Don't do helium because that will negate the

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>results of this test. Check. So oxygen inflated balloon, you

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>sat down on a table. Gravity is pulling the balloon downward.

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I am oversimplifying here, so physicists please don't don't write

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>in and complain. But the balloon is held to the

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 1>table in part due to friction, but also in part

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>due to gravity. If you were to take your comb

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and rub it against say a sweater, and get build

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>up some stack electricity on the comb, and then touch

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the comb to the balloon and lift, you would see

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that the stag electricity that was generated while you were

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>rubbing the comb against your your sweater would be enough

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to attract the balloon and lifted off the table. That

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>means that the any amount of electromatic force, the static

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>is stronger than the gravity. And the gravity, yeah, You've

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>got an entire planet beneath you that is got this

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>very strong gravitational pull, strong in comparison to other things

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that we directly observe throughout the day, and yet it

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>is dwarfed by strong enough Yeah, strong enough to pull

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a bowling ball from the top of tower. Right but

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>right so, and and gravity just so. To complete the

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>whole picture here, it depends on two things. It depends

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>on really you have to have two different bodies, but

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>it depends on the body's mass and their distance from

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>one another. But they do exert gravity, a gravitational pull

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>against each other. So, for instance, I have a cup

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of tea in front of me, I am exerting a

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>very tiny gravitational pull on the cup of tea, and

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>it is exerting a very tiny gravitational poll on me.

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Now this is dwarfed by the fact that I'm also

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>on the planet Earth and that the Earth is exerting

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>gravitational force on both of you. Right, So I you know,

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't observe this. I don't really, I'm not aware

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of it in any way. But that's that's yeah. So

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>keeping that in mind, one easy, relatively easy way of

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>having a tractor beam like effect, even though you wouldn't

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>be beaming anything, is to use the gravity of one

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>object to influence the movement of another object. Now, this

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.959
<v Speaker 1>is something that we've talked about before on tech stuff,

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>when we were chatting about could an asteroid destroy the

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Earth if if, if some space agency. I was gonna

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>say NASA because that's the one that I'm most familiar with.

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>But if NASA were too identified that an asteroid twenty

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>years away has the the uh the chance potential to yeah,

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that would be a bad thing. Yes, because we all

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>learned in the documentary arm Again, Yes, that wonderful documentary

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that taught me that Steve bu Simmy is a better

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>singer than Ben affleck Uh, which I had no way

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of knowing until I saw that anyway that one way

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of potentially deflecting the asteroid would be to send a

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>spacecraft up so that you move the spacecraft so it's

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>close enough to the asteroid so that they are are

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>pulling one another with a gravitational pull, and then you

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>use thrusters with the spacecraft to just very slowly push

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>just not really really it's pull. You're yeah, you're pulling

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the asteroid because as you move the spacecraft away, the

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>gravitational pull makes the asteroid move with it, and all

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to do is move it. The further out

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you go from Earth, the less you need to move

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the asteroids so that it has it misses the Earth right,

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>because you're talking about angles, So a couple of degrees

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of difference way the way way the heck out in

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>space make enough difference to not kill everything on it, right,

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>it'll miss the planet in hirely, So that's the idea.

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of like a tractor beam in the

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>sense that you're using an object to tow another object,

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.319
<v Speaker 1>in this case objects that are in space, but you're

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>not actually shooting a beam of anything. Right. However, Yeah,

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's not made of light. It doesn't do

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that cool visual effect that you have a sound effect,

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>which obviously that would not not anything in space anyway. Sure,

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but hey, why why should we start criticizing Now that's

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a that's a whole different episode. Um. And So, in

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen sixties, people were really excited about detecting gravitational waves,

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and a few people in fact, suggested that we might

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>make a gravity laser. A couple of people, Helper and Laurent,

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>proposed that this could be called a gazer, which I

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>think is a terrific word. Yeah, and I think means

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>something entirely different. These are modern times, I think, Yeah,

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I agree with you. I think at this

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>point the scientific community would say, can we ya? Um.

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>They proposed that we could vibrate some types of electric

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>crystals and create a whole thing. And but that's it's

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>never really come to fruition because the above re we

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>have never discovered gravitons, We have never measured gravitational waves.

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Right for us to be able to create an object

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that would use gravitons to to make a tractor being

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>we first sort of need to prove that gravitons in

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:22.559
<v Speaker 1>fact exist, because again they're hypothetical right now. It's sort

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of like the Higgs boson, right The Higgs boson was

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a theoretical particle that physicists said, for our understanding of

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the universe to make sense, we need this thing to

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:38.839
<v Speaker 1>exist to explain why matter has mass, same sort of thing.

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>In order for our understanding of gravity to make sense,

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>within the within the framework that we have of our

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of the universe, knowing that we are by our

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>very nature limited in our understanding, a graviton needs to

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 1>exist for that model to really make sense. So we're

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 1>talking about mathematically, yes, these things to exist, but in reality,

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>we just haven't tracked it down yet. So if we

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>ever do, maybe we can make some sort of technology

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>that can take advantage of that. But until then, until then,

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe no gravitational lasers. Yeah, I personally hope that we

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>do crack that nut, because that would be I mean,

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it would be an incredibly useful tool, and not just

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>in the context of space exploration. That's the one that

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>we all think about because again in science fiction, that

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>tends to be where tractor beams come into play. But

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, tractor beams can have a really

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>useful uh well in implementation here on Earth in space

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>on the planet, and I mean moving things is hard,

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>they're heavy, or even if they're or they're really small.

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And so yeah, we'll talk a bit in a second

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>all about how some scientists are making micro versions of

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>tractor beams here on Earth and what those could be

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>used for. But first let's take a moment to thank

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>our sponsor for this episode, and now back to the show.

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, so we've talked about using gravity to create

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a tractor beam like effect, or possibly even using gravitons,

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>assuming we ever understand them. But that's not the only

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>way scientists are looking into creating a tractor beam like device.

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>There's actually been quite a bit of news over the

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>last decade about scientists using various ways of manipulating light

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to pull an object as opposed to push it away. Right,

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Starting way back in six people started playing with what's

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>called optical tweezers, which are lasers that are capable of

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>manipulating molecules and moving them with precision. And now this

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>is not pulling a particle towards the light source, so

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not technically a tractor beam, right, but it is.

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>It is a method of manipulating microscopic particles very precisely.

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>So if you're thinking about a plane like an X

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and Y axis, you could move particles within the X

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and y axis, but you're not moving them along the

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Z axis. That would be you know, from the source

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of light to wherever the particle is. So in relation

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to the source of light, the particle would not get

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>closer further away, but you could trap it and move

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it within that X Y plane. That's that's my understanding. Yeah, yeah,

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and these are well I I that's my understanding as well.

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>These these laser beams that are being used for this

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>have a Gaussian intensity profiles, which means that they're brighter

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>in the center than they are at the edges. Right.

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>A Gaussian distribution is a normal distribution, and it can

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>be for anything from lasers to really you can even

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>see this in social sciences where you do a survey

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and you have a Bell curve that shows a normal

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>distribution that's essentially a Gaussian distribution. So, Okay, light has momentum, right, right,

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and so when it hits an object, the object bends

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the light which changes its momentum, and thus the object

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>is pushed back equally and oppositely by the light. Okay,

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I see, so the lights momentum has changed. The object's

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>momentum is also changed correct according to the conservation of momentum,

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>which you can see in normal, non microscopic classic physics. Right.

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>And so the Gaussian beam is important because if the

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>sample gets off center in the beam, the weaker light

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>at the edges is bending around the object and pushing

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it out, but the stronger lighted center is bending around

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it and pushing it back in, and the stronger force wins.

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I see. Okay, Yeah, that makes way more sense than

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>everything else I read, because everything I read was a

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of this. This research that we did for this

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Pathicunar podcast is in is from scientific journals and uh.

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>And this is a good point for us to make.

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Lauren and I we're advocates of science education. Absolutely, we

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>both love science. That being said, neither of us are scientists,

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and we certainly are not particle physicists. And so when

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you get onto the quantum level, there's a certain level

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of understanding that we are able to achieve. And beyond that,

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>this stuff is it is like magic to us. So

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>we're going to explain things as best we can, but

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>please understand there are subtleties to this that we cannot

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>easily explain because we haven't dedicated our lives to understanding

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>them exact and by so if we get anything wrong,

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>please do right us in Um, we love getting that

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of feedback, right, Yeah, No, we definitely want to

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to communicate the correct information as best we can. But uh,

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you know this, this is exciting stuff. So in this case,

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>what Laurence talking about is using light to to uh

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to isolate and then manipulate microscopic particles. But at this

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>point the stage what we're talking about does not include

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>pulling those particles towards the light source. However, we have discovered,

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>or rather I should say we predibly smart people have

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>discovered ways of using light to act pull things towards

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the source in a bunch of different ways. Actually, um,

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:08.640
<v Speaker 1>there's one of those is called an optical vortex. Um

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>sounds kind of kind of freaky people. The main research

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that I've read from this was from Australian National University

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:21.199
<v Speaker 1>around so pretty recently, and the the idea of this

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.360
<v Speaker 1>one is that they use a hollow laser beam to

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>trap light absorbing particles, and um, they get trapped in

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the center of this laser beam because the heated air

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.919
<v Speaker 1>molecules around them are pushing in on them goutches, so

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>they cannot they can't escape the laser beam. They're stuck

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in that little hollow center, in the hollow center in

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the in the the doughnut shaped laguer Gaussian laser beam. Yes,

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that right there, that thing exactly that you just said. Yeah,

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I have the note. I'm so glad that you did

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 1>more research on this because when I read that, my

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>eyes kind of glazed over. Yeah. Apparently they were able

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to move particles about one and a half meters in

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the air. Yeah, it's it's really exciting. By they found

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 1>out that by using too concentric hollow lasers, they can

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>adjust the brightness of the two of them there by

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>heating and cooling the air around the molecules and and

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>then therefore have the molecules move up and down as

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>they will through this hollow tube of light. Wow. So

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:23.880
<v Speaker 1>so you're using two different lasers in order to make

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 1>that maintain this kind of movement. That makes sense, I

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>understand now. Yeah, I was wondering how that worked beforehand.

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, that that totally makes sense. And yeah, and

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>these are nanofoam particles that they were using to the

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>got transported over a meter and and all of this

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is on the scale again of a very microscopic things. Right.

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.199
<v Speaker 1>That's something that's important and we'll talk a little bit

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>more about that when we finish with all the different

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>laser methods. But yeah, the methods we're talking about are

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>very exciting. Don't get us wrong. They are incredibly exciting,

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>particularly in certain very specific implementations like in the medical field.

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, this is all going to be extremely exciting

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 1>for for example, removing bacteria from samples, sorting cells, municially

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>manipulating DNA strands is something the optical tweezers have been

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 1>used extensively for, right, so that there there are real

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>uses for this. But these are not the same technologies

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that will let us move spacecraft like toe spacecraft away.

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>And we'll talk about why that is when we get

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 1>a little further in, because there are a couple of

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>other laser methods that we need to talk about, right right, Um,

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 1>back back on the kind of sale, the sort of

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>solar sale theme that we were discussing earlier. Optical lift

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is another version of of light that can be used

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to do stuff. It's it's actually just a really simple

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 1>analog of aerodynamic lift, which of course is when um

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you create uh uh, how is it? It's higher pressure

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>underwing than over awing and therefore letting a plane lift

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>off the ground in the game. Before we get any

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>further physicists, that's also an oversimplification, and we acknowledge that, yes,

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>there's more than geology, there's more than just that when

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>it comes to get an airplane off the ground. Also,

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>we know all about the other forward momentum and everything else,

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>but but that that is the concept of lift. Thank you,

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>And so to get slightly fewer angry emails, it's only

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 1>because Chris and I received all those emails already, but

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>but deservedly so right, oh no, absolutely, yes we love

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>negative feedback. But so I nearly spit tea all over

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:30.199
<v Speaker 1>my laptop. Please don't take that as a as a

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Please don't take Lawrence Lauren's statement as a means to

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>send us the most negative feedback ever, because my feelings

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>do get hurt, and I apparent you just made a

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>complete liar out of me. That you almost snorfing your

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>tea completely made me crack up. Sorry about that, excellent,

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>But anyway back to optical lift. It's uh. The scientists

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 1>have discovered that that you can take an object with

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a differently shaped top and bottom surface and it will

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>experience a lift force when please standing uniform stream of

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>light that's fast. This is all blowing my mind because

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:08.360
<v Speaker 1>before we did this research, I never knew about these

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.200
<v Speaker 1>different properties of light and and it just it really

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 1>stresses to me one amazing universe. This is, you know,

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to to know that things behave on such a different

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>level than my previous understanding, and also illustrates quite effectively

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>how ignorant I am. But I love to learn, so

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that's okay. Yeah we get we get paid to learn

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>this stuff and pass it on to you, which is

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>basically the most exciting thing. Um. One of the other

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>categories that I ran across were optical conveyors, which are

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 1>really fun. Those are those are the ones that are

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>using Bessel beams, and I think I think Jonathan has

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a whole section about this one. Yeah, not a whole section,

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>but I can at least tell you what a Bessel

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:49.919
<v Speaker 1>beam is. Because when I encountered that term, I thought, huh, what,

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 1>what exactly do they mean by Bessel beam. It's a

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>specific type of radiation, and that sort of radiation can

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>be a laser, it can be electroma, metic, it can

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 1>be acoustic, it could be gravitational. It doesn't really matter

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>what the type of radiation is, it's the form it takes.

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And that form is a radiation where the amplitude is

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>described by a Bessel function of the first kind. Does

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that mean essentially, it means that as this radiation moves forward,

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it does not diffract in any way. It doesn't diffuse,

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>it does not spread out. In other words, it remains concentrated.

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>So what we think of that like a laser beam.

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>When you shine a laser beam, it doesn't spread out

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>like a flashlight does. But this is a very specific

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>format of that. And in fact, because actually those those

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>laser beams that were that you point at something are

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Gaussian laser beams. That's we discussed there, and so this

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>is different is different. This is different. It is it

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>is focused, It does not diffract in any way, it

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>does not spread out at all. And in fact, one

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a a a feature of a true bessel beam would

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>be that if you were to just interrupt part of

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>vessel beam. Let's let's imagine that the vessel beam is

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>as big around as a pencil, Okay, just for the

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 1>purposes of illustration, and then imagine that you had, uh

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 1>use a sheet of paper and cut a little slit

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in that pencil, and you make the sheet of paper

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>interrupt the vessel beam. Right, So you've got the sheet

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of paper that's interrupting half the vessel beam. The other

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>half is going beyond the edge of the paper. A

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>true vessel beam will heal itself beyond the point of interruption.

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>So if I were to interrupt that beam further down

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the beam, it would become whole again. So it would

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>be the same diameter as it was um at the

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>before a point where you had that interruption. So that's

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>an awesome thing about a vessel beam. Now here's the

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>here's the caveat. A true vessel beam would require essentially

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 1>unlimited power. Uh. So Dr Doom would want to make one, uh, certainly,

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>but none of us would be capable of doing it.

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 1>It's a true vessel beam is effectively impossible for us

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to make. We can make things that approach vessel beams

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 1>and that UH emulate many of its features, but a

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>true one is beyond our capability. That is the short

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>and sweet definition of vessel beam. And do keep in

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>mind we're not just talking lasers. Like I said, it

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>could even be acoustic. So you could create a vessel

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>beam of acoustic energy and make a noise that could

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:26.719
<v Speaker 1>be heard perfectly at the destination, no matter how far

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 1>away it was. That that is fascinating, pretty awesome, that's terrific.

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 1>It's Jonathan from again here to once again break up

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the episodes that we can take a quick break. So

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>researchers are using these. Specifically, some people at New York University,

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 1>building on research by a Chinese team at the a

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Star Data Storage Institute, I believe in around two thousand eleven,

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>two twelve people have been working on using a lens

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to bend and overlap two of these vessel beams um

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>thereby creating what I can crudely, crudely describe as kind

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of a Strobe effect that will, Okay, it'll hit the

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>front of a particle, and because of that, because it

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>can reform around an object, it will reform behind the particle.

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>With enough energy that it actually pushes the particle back

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>towards the light source. All right, so what's happening is

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the photon is is hitting the particle in such a

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>way as to give it a little kick back toward

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.919
<v Speaker 1>the actual source of the photons correct, which is kind

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of crazy. It's awesome. Like there was one point where

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I was reading one of these descriptions and I was thinking,

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 1>the only way I could describe this is if you

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>were thinking about having a smaller particles being pushed forward,

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 1>because larger particles are sinking down, so instead of being

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>pushed down, they're actually going up. And then the more

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 1>I read about the more I'm like, this is a

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>complete misunderstanding of this, and I cannot go with this analogy.

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I thought. I hope Lauren has got discovered,

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 1>and luckily she did. Yes. I like the physics, but

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>physics were always the interesting part to me. I was

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.479
<v Speaker 1>always terrible at algebra, but really good at geometry. I

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>love classical physics. Quantum physics makes my head hurt. I

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.479
<v Speaker 1>just that's the fun headache. I like the I like

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the quantum physics headache. If better you than me, what's

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>that terrific quote. Off. If you're not kind of upset

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>by quantum physics, you haven't understood it properly. I think

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>all of us haven't understood it properly. I think the

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>people who haven't understood it probably the most have the

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>biggest headaches. Those are quantum physicists anyway. But then I

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>say that as as I you know, every quantum physicist

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>interview I've said I've watched tends to include a question

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 1>that's all similar to, but do you really understand what

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it is you're talking about? And the quantum physicist almost

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 1>always says, you know, there's a certain level where I

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 1>don't like. There's certain things that you just say, all right,

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>this is how it is, because that's how it is.

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>But to be able to answer, I can't. And so it's,

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of those things you just have to accept.

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>And my brain starts to melt out of your ears. Yeah,

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of screaming and waving of fists inside

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the craneyde the brain. Yeah. But so the special beaming

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>optical conveyor technology might be an interesting practical use for

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it could be to test the tensile strength of cells.

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>For example, if if a cell has been infected with malaria.

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>It's more rigid than a normal blood cell, and so

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it could be super useful in tiny microscopic medical purposes.

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Similar to another breakthrough that was very recent as of

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 1>the recording of this podcast, we're recording this in early February,

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and there were some publications that we're talking about an

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.679
<v Speaker 1>experiment that had been performed by scientists from Scotland and

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>the Czech Republic about using a beam of light with

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a specific geometry to pull particles of polystyrene. And these

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>particles are very very small, in fact, beyond microscopic, we're

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about nanometers for fos, about four hundred ten nanometers specifically.

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Think most of the particles we've been talking about have

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>been on on that scale. Yeah, pretty pretty tiny stuff,

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>but fomes and one thousand nanometer particles essentially think about

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 1>tiny spheres of polystyrene that are only a few hundred

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>nimeters in diameter. That's essentially what we're talking about here.

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 1>And they found that by uh polarizing the light in

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a particular way, they can manipulate these particles, and in fact,

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>not only could they manipulate the particles, but depending upon

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the way they polarized the light, they could selectively manipulate

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>particles of a certain size while not affecting particles of

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>another size. Yeah, there's a there's a little video of this,

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way, in a press release. We'll link it

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>somewhere on our on our tech staff media. Yeah, yeah,

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you'll have to take a look at this. It's pretty

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>amazing because you think about that, that means that you

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 1>will be able to selectively uh, grip, sort and move

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>right particles, so that way you could you could keep

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>some undisturbed while you're the ones you're interested in, those

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>are the ones you can manipulate and uh and that

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>is a huge breakthrough you're talking about just by by

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>again changing the nature of the light itself, being able

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to affect very specific sizes of particles and it doesn't

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>really matter what the particle is made out of. They

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>were using polystyrene in a liquid solution. So again, this

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>was another breakthrough was that this was something that could

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>work within a liquid, making it very useful for medical purposes.

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>So if you wanted to take a blood cell and

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you needed to move certain particles in that blood cell

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>out or off to a side so that you could

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:57.239
<v Speaker 1>either examine them more closely, or perhaps get them out

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of the way so you can examine something else in

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the blood cell more closely. It would be a very

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>useful tool. One description that I saw of this said that,

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and and this one in particular. There are a lot

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of very intelligent people have said very ierdite things about

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>all of the rest of these forms of tractor beam manipulation,

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and I read them and have said them back to you.

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>This one is so new that not that many people

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>who are smarter than us have really said that many

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>things about it, and so therefore my understanding is tenuous.

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 1>But one explanation that I saw said that they used

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a mirror to bounce the laser beam back across itself,

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>interfering with the head on photons and thereby pushing right.

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And the the interesting thing to me was that it

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>was through that interference that creates this pulling. It was not, however,

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>because you hear mirror and you think, oh, well, all

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>they're doing is shooting the photons, bouncing it off the mirror,

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and then the photons hit the particle and then push

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the particle. But that's not what's happened. That's not what's happening.

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>It's the it's the interaction of the the oncoming beam

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and the reflected beam that create this pulling motion. And

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that to me is phenomenal because at first I thought, oh, well,

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>what they're really doing is just yeah, they're just they're

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>just pushing, they're not pulling. But that's not the case.

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>That actually is pulling actually the light source they're The

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating thing about this is that apparently, under certain conditions,

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the objects held by the beam rearranged themselves into a

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>structure that made the pull stronger. That's pretty awesome. I

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>mean this, this is so mind blowing to me that this,

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 1>this world on the nanoscale is every time I read

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 1>anything about it, it amazes me. It's like, you know,

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the two areas I find the most interesting when it

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>comes to exploration are outer space and nanospace because there

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of parallels, I mean weird parallels between

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>outer space and nanospace fractals. Fractals say that that's a

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that is a known quantity. That just make me think

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Jonathan Coulton song Mandel brought Set, which is awesome.

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Have you heard that? I do not believe I had.

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess what we're doing. After the podcast is over,

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you get to hear a song. Alright, trip, so uh

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 1>we we We alluded to the fact that this is

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff that works on a microscopic scale and would not

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>translate to macroscopic Yes, and here's the reason why. Yeah,

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the reason why is that all of all of this

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>work with lasers. Lasers, of course, um can burn stuff.

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>And if you had a big enough laser to move

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the one of the physicists I think mentioned

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a football. I assume that they were meaning a soccer

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>ball because they were from Scotland, and that was Thomas Sissmar.

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>There you go, um, and it would fry a long

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>time before you would move that soccer ball. Yeah. In

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>other words, the laser would have to be of such

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>an intensity and size as to destroy whatever it was

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you were trying to move. So it might move, but

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 1>only because someone didn't want it to burn down everything else, Right,

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>it would be moved by some one else who's saying,

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>why do you have this flaming soccer ball in the

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>middle of the field. Yeah, that's the that's a problem, obviously,

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's a it's a non trivial problem

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and I mean, I know it's a non trivial problem

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and it sounds like I'm being silly, but no, it's

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>non trivial, and that as far as we are able

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to determine, there's no way to get around that using

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>this particular implementation of the tractor beam idea. So this

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:28.719
<v Speaker 1>would strictly be on the nano and micro scale and

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 1>never get beyond that. That does not mean that we

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>won't find some other way of creating a tractor beam.

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>We very well made, but it's not going to be

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>using these particular methods because obviously we would end up

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>destroying whatever it was we were trying to manipulate. So

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 1>we hope, we hope that we will see some of

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that in the future. I hope you guys enjoyed that

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 1>classic episode of tech Stuff. If you have suggestions for

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 1>future episodes, send me an email. The addresses tech stuff

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>at how stuff works dot com, or you can draw

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>me a line on Facebook or Twitter. The handle it

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>both of those is tech Stuff hs W. Don't forget.

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>You can pop on over to our website that's tech

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 1>stuff podcast dot com. There you're going to find an

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 1>archive of every episode we've ever recorded. It's entirely searchable,

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>so you can check and see if I've covered your

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 1>favorite tech topic, and if not, well get in touch

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:22.399
<v Speaker 1>with me. I mentioned how you could already. You also

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>find on that website a link to our online store,

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>so if you've ever wanted any sort of tech Stuff merchandise,

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a sticker or a mug or a mouse

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>pad or t shirt, go check that out. Every purchase

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you make goes to help the show, and we greatly

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it, and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Tex Stuff is a production of I Heart Radio's How

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works. For more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the I heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.