WEBVTT - Digital Assets in Focus, M&A Opportunity

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moving news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 3>So what's the state of the mysterious world of crypto

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 3>now that you can jump in with an ETF? Sandy

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:32.559
<v Speaker 3>call is head of Digital asset in Investor Advisory Services

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 3>at Franklin Templeton. Our next guest. You know, Gary Gensler

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 3>kind of made it clear of the regulatory approval of

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin ETFs. That's no sort of implicit endorsement by the regulators,

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 3>I imagine though that hasn't dampened any of the enthusiasm,

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 3>has it?

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 4>No, definitely has not. A record launch for an ETF

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 4>over three billion and that new inflows into the products

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 4>over the last just week.

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 5>And how do you view some of those inflows? Though,

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 5>I'm looking at Bloomberg Data, black Rock and Fidelity dominating

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:09.479
<v Speaker 5>in terms of flows, both north of a billion. I'm

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 5>looking at least according to the terminal Franklin Templeton closure

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 5>to fifty million. So how does that play out?

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that it depends who your audience is.

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 4>Out of the gate right now, you're seeing a lot

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 4>of the direct self directed investors coming in and accessing

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 4>this for their own personal portfolios. Moving these new products

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 4>on to the wealth advisory platforms is going to take

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 4>a few months as they do their due diligence see

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 4>how the new product works, and so there will be

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 4>a slower buildup of assets in the discretionarily managed and

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 4>in the professionally managed accounts. And I think you will

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 4>see this continue to grow throughout the coming year, so

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 4>kind of an out of the gate with the self

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 4>directed and then over time you will start to see

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 4>more of the advised assets having an allocation to Bitcoin

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 4>in many of these portfolios.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 3>What are your fees? Is there a fee war?

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, our fees right now are zero, So I don't

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 4>think you can beat that.

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 3>You actually could, but I won't go into that.

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, we believe that, you know, we want these early

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 4>investors who come alongside us in our new etf offering

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 4>to really get the one hundred percent full benefit of

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 4>movements in bitcoin. We think we're coming up to an

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 4>important period fundamentally in the bitcoin market, with the upcoming

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 4>having event where the supply is going to tighten systematically.

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 4>This happens through an algorithm, and it's coming right at

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 4>a point where these new ETFs are creating demand in

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 4>the marketplace, and we think it's going to be an

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 4>exciting period for bitcoin. So we want our investors to

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 4>get the full benefit of any price movements that might result,

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 4>and we're not taking any fee. We believe in the

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 4>long term nature of this opportunity and we're willing to

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 4>be in it for the long haul, so we're going

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 4>to wait and take our fees later down the road

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 4>as the product becomes more established.

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 3>I have a host of like wacky questions. You guys

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 3>have ESG offerings. I would imagine, right, okay, so how

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 3>does this conflict with that? Because in order to generate

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 3>this stuff you have to run computers which take gazillions

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 3>of tons of electricity or gigawatts or whatever. That's sort

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 3>of indirect conflict I would imagine with the environmental goals

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 3>of the company.

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 4>You know, intuitively, it would seem to be but what's

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 4>been kind of very exciting about this is that a

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 4>lot of clean energy launches have been held off because

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 4>there has not been a clear use case for them.

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 4>And what we're seeing is a lot of these bitcoin

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 4>miners that have relocated from Russia or from China are

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 4>relocating into areas and they are using clean energy incentives

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.119
<v Speaker 4>that are being offered by the government to build their

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 4>mining facilities. So actually it turns out that bitcoin mining

0:03:59.880 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 4>is starting to be a use case for introducing clean

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 4>energy technology. And of course not all bitcoin miners are

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 4>at that point, but we're seeing a very positive trend

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 4>in this movement towards cleaner, cleaner users of energy for

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 4>bitcoin mining, which we think is a great thing to see.

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 5>And Sandy you mentioned kind of taking the long term view.

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 5>Eric Balchunis are Bloomberg Intelligence analysts coined it the Cooinentucky Derby.

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Which I'm a big fan of.

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 5>I enjoy betting on horses.

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 3>JT.

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:30.359
<v Speaker 5>I don't know about you, now, A little pun for you.

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'll go back to my wacky questions. But it's

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 3>just like I go to the barber shop. That's topic

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 3>dujoure of people who can't afford to lose money and

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 3>who don't know what they're talking about. I don't even

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 3>know this what a bitcoin is. I can't explain it.

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, Ceady, I'm guessing I'm just wondering Coinentucky Derby, use

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 5>your punt, whatever pun you want. There are nine new

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 5>spot bitcoin ETFs. How does the race for money impact

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 5>kind of success and whether or not people are going

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 5>to be pulling out of it?

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I look at it this way. There's two

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 4>sets of offerings that are coming to market through these nine.

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 4>I think it's even eleven. One set is coming from

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 4>firms that have been digital natives and have kind of

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:20.359
<v Speaker 4>grown up in the crypto space. One set is coming

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 4>from traditional asset management firms. I think Franklin Templeton is

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 4>a little unique in that we're actually both right. We

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 4>have been active and operating in the digital crypto native

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 4>space since twenty seventeen. We operating across five different public blockchains.

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:41.359
<v Speaker 4>We do our own node verification, We really understand and

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 4>are a part of the ecosystem, create our own research

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 4>on individual coins, including bitcoin, and put together portfolios of

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 4>multi cooin portfolios through separately managed accounts that we can

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:55.919
<v Speaker 4>work with investors to access. So we've been in this

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 4>space for a long time and really understand it. Yet

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 4>we are also a seventy five year old asset manager

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 4>who is trusted and who has been there for clients

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 4>through many market regimes. So I think it's the coming

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 4>together of the crypt natives and the traditional financial services,

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 4>really epitomized by Franklin Templeton, that I think is creating

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 4>the excitement about what's going to happen. And I don't

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 4>know if it's going to be a derby and some

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 4>aren't going to finish the race. I just think it's

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 4>going to be a long race. Right. It's a new

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 4>asset class. Some of your questions are showing people have

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 4>yet to kind of start to understand it. But once

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 4>they do, I think it's hard not to get excited.

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 4>I saw that in my own career when I had

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 4>my AHA moment. It's like my eyes opened and I

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 4>really saw this new opportunity and potential.

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 5>Sandy, this may be a dumb question. Bitcoin trades twenty

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 5>four to seven. If the token crashes on Saturday and Sunday,

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 5>do I wake up Monday morning with a huge loss

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 5>on my TF?

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, the good news for you is if the token

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 4>crashes on a Saturday or Sunday. We've got portfolio managers

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 4>and traders trading it on a Saturday and Sunday and

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 4>working to keep the spread between the Bitcoin index and

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 4>what's happening in the ETF in line. So we operate

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 4>twenty four to seven in these markets just like the

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 4>markets operate. So it would be like any market. You know,

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 4>if there's a move over the weekend, you'll see that

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 4>move reflected. But the fact that the ETF is closed

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 4>and the market is open isn't going to be a

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 4>problem in this case because we're running a twenty four

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 4>to seven trading desk around this.

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 3>You you mentioned the next big step that includes derivatives

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 3>with respect to bitcoin.

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 4>That's a lot of people are looking already at derivatives.

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 4>I think that, you know, building the education and understanding

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 4>of the opportunity is more important as the next step

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 4>than really thinking about the next product evolution. I think

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people have yet to really internalize. We've

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 4>been in a period where we're used to platforms being

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 4>the way of the economy. Network effects are built around

0:07:55.640 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 4>platforms like Amazon or Uber or airbn be and now

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 4>what we're seeing in the crypto domain is that we're

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 4>seeing protocol based networks right where anyone peer to peer

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 4>can access it. Just like when you type HTTP into

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 4>your browser, that's a protocol. Everyone in the world can

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 4>use that to access the Internet. And these networks that

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 4>are being built like Bitcoin, are protocols that anyone in

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 4>the world can use and everyone can participate in. So

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 4>it's different than a company owning the platform. This is

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:34.719
<v Speaker 4>all of us collectively owning these new networks, and this

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 4>is a new way to access that ownership. So it's

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 4>an education process and I think that that's where the

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 4>focus should be to really help investors understand why this

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 4>can be an important opportunity for their portfolio.

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 5>Sandy, I got to ask about the Franklin Templeton x profile.

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 5>You've got laser eyes on Ben Franklin.

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 3>I would say, there's not in the marketing department. I

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 3>just make it clear.

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 5>I just want to like some of them's weird third

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 5>tweets that I've seen, even in tweet saying the lawyers

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 5>won't let us respond to comments, but we hear you

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 5>posting about the sixty to forty plus bitcoin. What what

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 5>is the marketing plant like, what's going on.

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, this is really you know, as I said, we

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.559
<v Speaker 4>really are part of the crypto made and ecosystem as

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 4>well as being a traditional asset manager, and our analysts,

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 4>interns employees that are in the digital asset unit really

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 4>understand what matters to people in that community, and the

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 4>laser eyes was an important signal to them that we

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 4>stand with them in believing in the future of bitcoin.

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 3>All right, Sandy, thanks for something. I appreciate it. Sandy

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Call had a digital asset in investor advisory Services at

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 3>Franklin Temple. Did I sound too skeptical? It's too harsh.

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 5>Talking to the youth.

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:50.439
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the team Kens Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 6>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 6>iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen on

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 6>demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's make a deal. What's the outlook for M

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 3>and A in twenty twenty four, Bailey Our next guest

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Mitch Berlin. He's vice chair of America's Strategy and Transactions

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 3>with Ernst and Young, and I gotta say I think

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 3>he wins the prize for the coolest looking office on

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 3>zoom today. Are you looking at question? What are all

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 3>the ribbons in the background.

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 7>They're actually dog show ribbons.

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 5>Oh don't shool, I mean you're interested, right, we've just changed.

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 3>We've just changed the topic. So you're gonna get.

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 7>More accomplished than I am. So you know what kind

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 7>of dogs?

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 3>What are the dogs?

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 7>Portuguese water dogs?

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 3>Oh beautiful, Yeah, those are the ones that are like hypoallergenic.

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 3>They don't show right at his office anyway. Okay, so

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 3>we'll get back on topic. Is this an environment right

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 3>now in twenty twenty four that's conducive to deal making

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 3>and kind of what's driving it?

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 7>It will be?

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 8>So twenty twenty three was a reset to the pre

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 8>pandemic deal volume. So if you look at major deals,

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 8>those are those deals that are above one hundred million.

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 8>There are approximately twelve hundred and fifty in twenty nineteen

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 8>and twelve hundred and fifty in twenty twenty three. So

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 8>we were trying to understand what does M and A

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 8>look like going from there now that we've reset to

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 8>pre pandemic levels. And so we looked at the last

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.319
<v Speaker 8>thirty five years of M and A and we correlated

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 8>that to information such as GDP growth, inflation, corporate profits,

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:33.119
<v Speaker 8>the bond spreads and such, and we did see a correlation.

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 8>And so if the predictions for those same metrics hold

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 8>true going forward for twenty twenty four, we should see

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.319
<v Speaker 8>about a twelve to thirteen increase in M and A

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 8>over the twenty twenty three numbers.

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 5>Does the feeling I spend most of my day job

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 5>Mitch covering the IPO market, and the main sense is

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 5>that something's got to give? Is that kind of your sense?

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:54.719
<v Speaker 5>We have a need for deals, We have cash on

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 5>the sidelines, We have companies who are kind of nearing

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 5>the end of their maturity in one sense or another.

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 7>That's exactly right.

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 8>I think that we're at a point now where people

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 8>have been sitting on the sidelines for two years. There

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 8>are a lot of private companies or portfolios or private

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:12.359
<v Speaker 8>equity that are coming to maturity on their debt to refinance,

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 8>we put them in a very different position from an

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 8>ROI than they are today. So they have to do

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 8>the math and figure out should we monetize now or

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 8>do we take the risk of refinancing hoping that we

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 8>can get a lower rate soon enough that it doesn't

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 8>impact our ROI calculations.

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so who's coming together in twenty twenty four. You

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 3>don't have to name names, but like, well that would

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 3>be nice, but industries, I.

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 7>Can name that.

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 8>The industry sectors, the sectors that we're going to see

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 8>the most activity are the ones where the deal multiples

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 8>have gone down. Because in a time where you have

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 8>a very high cost of capital and high multiples, it's

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 8>unlikely that you're going to see a significant amount of

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 8>M and A activity. But if you look at the

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 8>sectors where the deal multiples have gone down, that includes

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 8>life sciences and technology, those deal multiples have gone down

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 8>down about eight points each. And if you look at energy,

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 8>those deal multiples have gone down about four points here

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 8>over year.

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 7>Those are the areas where I thought energy it.

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 3>Was pretty much exhausted, like in twenty twenty three with

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 3>all those deals.

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 7>Well there's still and it may not be the major players,

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 7>but there's still players out there, and they're cost of

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 7>the constant capitals high, but the multiples are going down,

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 7>so they can be attractive targets.

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 5>When you're talking life sciences, we saw a number of

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 5>deals coming out of JP Morgan a few weeks ago

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 5>is that biotech. Are we seeing smaller Bolton deals? Are

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 5>we going to see potentially a return of.

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 9>Major M and A.

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 7>You're going to see both.

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 8>I think the when you look at major M and A,

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 8>there's still patent cliffs looming and they'll need to buy

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 8>an R and D pipeline to continue to turn the

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 8>profits that they want to turn. So I think you'll

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 8>see it on both on both sides and some of

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 8>the smaller biotech deals as well.

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 5>What's up with the FTC and some of this antitrust though?

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 5>Is that something that's it feels like every deal has

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 5>some kind of a tie up. I don't.

0:13:57.640 --> 0:13:59.439
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, stuper with that, Yeah, I know.

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 8>It's a good quest. So the new guidelines came out.

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 8>It's been thirteen years or so since they've come up

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 8>with since they've revised the guidelines. The clients that we're

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:10.599
<v Speaker 8>speaking to understand that it's going to make things a

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 8>little bit more difficult and take longer, but they're not

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 8>shying away from deal making because of many choices. They

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 8>really in many cases, they really don't have a choice,

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 8>and so more will come under the radar because the

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 8>threshold of what they consider to be a movement in

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 8>the consolidation index has tightened, so more will come under

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 8>the radar. They're going to require more information, so the

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 8>timeline to get a deal done is going to take longer,

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 8>so more is going to come under their scrutiny. But

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 8>we are working with clients every day to come up

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 8>with multiple scenarios that they can look at around reshifting

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 8>the portfolio of the combined entity into something that would

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 8>be more appealing to the FTC and DJ Okay.

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 3>You want to weigh in on spirit, I mean, what

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 3>happened there, it's maybe you take not specifically, maybe a

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 3>broader view.

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 8>Well, my guess is that the way that they shift

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 8>to the portfolio of the routes may have not been

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 8>exactly what the FTC is looking for. But it sounds

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 8>like they're going back to the drawing board from the

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 8>From what we're reading in the paper, it sounds like

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 8>they're they're going to go back for another try at it.

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 8>So I imagine they're going to have to reshift their portfolio

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 8>into something that's more appealing.

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, looking at I robot that's coming from Europe, are

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 5>they more stringent typically, like what's to read from one

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 5>of the biggest technology companies not being able to buy

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 5>the maker of a robotic vacuum.

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so I can't speak on behalf of the FDC.

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 8>By are the European regulators on that one? I think

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 8>the concern was around having a market dominance and being

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 8>able to shut other players out because you know, the

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 8>buyer of that has such a significant marketplace that they

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 8>can control who's competing with their own products.

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 7>And I think that there's some sensitivity around that.

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So twenty twenty four overall, you think is going

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 3>to be a pretty hot year for M and A,

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Can we say that?

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 7>We do?

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 8>We think again, you know, twelve to thirty percent increase,

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 8>which would be nice because the last over the last

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 8>two years, M and A has gone down thirty to

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 8>forty percent depending on what sector you're looking at.

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 3>And M and A is not just for the big guys.

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 3>You can have much smaller, even businesses you've never heard of,

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 3>right right, and we would And I mean, how does

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 3>that work? How is that different in terms of funding

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 3>or whatever than the big deals.

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 8>Well, the smaller deals are easy to get fund and

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 8>sometimes you can fund them off balance sheet, but you

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 8>probably will see a pickup in some of those smaller

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 8>deals because quite frankly, they're also coming up with maturities

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 8>on their debt that they're trying to figure out how

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 8>to refinance. And often again it's the constant capital is

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 8>too expensive for them. Now they struck these deals five

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 8>years ago, when you know the cost of capital is

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 8>almost free, and now they're paying five six percent.

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 7>That's a very different economic scenario for them.

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Is that is that one of the bigger drivers behind

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 3>these some of these deals that you know, we got

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 3>a big debt coming up, but whatever, and this is

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 3>the way we can fund that.

0:16:57.440 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 7>It will be for sure.

0:16:58.360 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 8>They need to exit, they need to get they need

0:16:59.960 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 8>to refinance that debt, and to to increase that interest

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 8>rate by four or five percent is significant.

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 5>What's going on with private equity?

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 7>Equity?

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Do we call it private equity anymore?

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 6>Though?

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 7>Pe?

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Do we still call it that because it's morphed into

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 3>something else.

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 8>If we change the name, we'd have to change a

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 8>lot of thought leadership. So we'll continue to call it

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 8>private equity. But they're they're in a in a difficult

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 8>position right now because again, their deals are leveraged. There

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:29.680
<v Speaker 8>were you know, those that were struck five years ago.

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 8>They were probably hoping to monetize by now. But they're

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 8>coming up with the same maturity cliffs, and so they

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 8>have to do the math to say, shouldn't you know,

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 8>should we lower our valuations and try to sell these

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 8>port codes now? Should we refinanced hope that we can

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 8>get refinanced for a lower cost of capital and a

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 8>year or two and keep the valuations high. You have

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 8>to go, you know, you have to go port code

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 8>by port cone, really do the math to see what

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 8>makes sense whether you move now or hold on it.

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 3>Okay, the question everybody's been waiting for, how many dogs

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 3>and what are their names? Games?

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 7>No, so I have five dogs.

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 3>Oh my gosh they are.

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 7>So we got Loot, Tiki, Greta, Berta, and Irma.

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 8>Yes, all right, so if you want a dog, I

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 8>can ship one over to you right away because I

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 8>have too many.

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 5>I will take any and all that I googled. I

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 5>didn't know we have a snowshovel yet, dogging dogside.

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 3>All right, I will leave it there. Mitch Berle and

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Vice chair of America's Strategy and Transactions with Rinstin Young.

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't think he's ever going to come back with

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 3>us for that.

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 5>The real question is would you rather have a dog

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 5>or a shovel I'd rather have talk.

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 3>How about you get a dog that you trained to

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 3>shovel you out or something like that.

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape catch are live program Bloomberg

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 6>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa Bloomberg eleven.

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Let's take a deeper dive into these risk assets, Skyler

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 3>winand is CIO at Reagan Capital. Let's stretch you off

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 3>with the bubble question. Does this feel like a bubble

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 3>to you?

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 9>It sure does.

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 10>With stocks back to all time highs, short end rates

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 10>up five hundred basis points in the last two years,

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 10>long end rates up two hundred and fifty basis points.

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 10>You do the math on where stocks should be given

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 10>that rise in rates, stocks theoretically should be down all

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 10>boards of forty percent over the last two years.

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:41.639
<v Speaker 3>Wow, so you just took Bailey's breath.

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, No, so what breaks than Skyler?

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 9>I'm just looking.

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 5>You know, we've got the for the swaps pricing in

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 5>just under six rate cuts next year or this year.

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 5>We've got a lot of analysts and strategies talking up

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty four earnings and looking into twenty twenty five.

0:19:58.080 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 9>What happens.

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 10>You have to look at leverage first, and the most

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 10>levered players out there are going to break first. We've

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 10>already seen that in banks. Then it goes to private

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 10>equity and very leveraged companies.

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 9>The last folks to lose will be the least.

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 10>Leveraged companies, companies that are using a half a turn

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 10>or maybe over only eternal leverage. So I think the

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 10>market's going to be really bifurcated. You hear a lot

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:28.959
<v Speaker 10>of folks talk about let's stick to high quality. I

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 10>like that, but look to leverage to break before anything else.

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 5>All right, two questions then, off as Skyler, going back

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 5>to your initial point, are you shorting the market? And

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 5>then are you shorting some of these levered stocks?

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:42.199
<v Speaker 7>How are you playing that?

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.439
<v Speaker 10>I think you know we're not stock guys, but but

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 10>in my stock investments, I think you know it's it's

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 10>one of two things. A sometimes the only way to

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 10>win is not to play and to wait it out

0:20:55.920 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 10>and maybe stick in mid to high single digit inc plays,

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 10>but b own the entire market as well, where I

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.479
<v Speaker 10>don't know when the next in Nvidia or Tesla or

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 10>Monster beverage is it going to come along?

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 9>So I want to own them all.

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Who's who's most overleveraged? Is that the right phraseology?

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:19.880
<v Speaker 7>Definitely?

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 9>Banks?

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 10>You know, banks are are are government sponsored hedge funds

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 10>so to speak, allowed up to twelve x leverage. Now,

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:30.919
<v Speaker 10>what's happened over the last.

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:34.199
<v Speaker 3>Time you're talking the majors or regionals or what or

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 3>just the entire.

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 10>Allowed the same leverage. But regionals and community banks got

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 10>a ton of cash in post COVID, post PPP, Right,

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 10>So folks got all this cash, they parked it at

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 10>the banks.

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 9>Banks sat there for eight months. What are we going

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 9>to do?

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 10>Okay, let's go out and start buying treasuries and mortgage bonds.

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 10>What's happened is a lot of those down upwards of

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 10>twenty points, right, And so if you were levering that

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 10>up ten times twelve times, your effective equity now went

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 10>from ten percent down to about four percent, So you're

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 10>upwards of twenty five x leveraged. So what you have

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 10>to look at is you have to look at tangible

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 10>book value, tangible equity, right, and if that percentage is

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.199
<v Speaker 10>at only four or five percent, divide four into one

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 10>hundred that's twenty five x, so you're twenty five x levered.

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 10>So moves like we've seen since the start of the year,

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 10>the bond markets down a point point in a quarter.

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 10>Multiply that times twenty for a regional bank or a

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 10>community bank that owns treasuries and mortgage bonds.

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 3>So who's who's least leverage? Then, on the opposite end

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 3>of the.

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 10>Spectrum, JP Moore, the big guys, the big guys who

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 10>had a lot of money, they took it in. They

0:22:55.320 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 10>focused on on fee paying product product like credit cards.

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 10>They weren't immediately incentivized to go out and buy really

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 10>really long duration paper and so on the flip side

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.360
<v Speaker 10>of the large guys, Via of Alcy has huge amounts

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 10>of unrealized loss of sitting on their balance sheet. JP

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.199
<v Speaker 10>Morgan looks like a genius because they didn't really go

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 10>and invest in all that all of that money into

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 10>you know, Fanny to Fanny two point five qpon paying mortgages,

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.959
<v Speaker 10>which two years ago the market thought everybody was going

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 10>to refinance, and something like seventy percent.

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 9>Of all of all mortgages.

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 10>Have been issued in the last two years, So now

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 10>the market thinks nobody's ever going to refinance again, nobody's

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 10>ever gonna move. Everybody's stuck in these two and a

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 10>half percent qpon mortgages.

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 9>So it's who owns that stuff and who doesn't?

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 10>And JP Morgan stuck really short duration, and now they

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 10>you know, they're they're coming out ahead of everybody. You know,

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 10>the time to own money markets and T bills, honestly

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 10>was when rates were zero, not when rates are at

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 10>five and a quarter five and a half.

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, sky that we've talked a lot about what you

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.239
<v Speaker 5>don't like, what do you like?

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 10>So now there's two sides of the coin, in terms

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 10>of equities and in terms of real estate. Most things,

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 10>it's do you want to be the equity holder or

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 10>the lender? Now is a great time to be a lender, okay,

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 10>And you can be a lender on real estate.

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 9>You can be a lender to.

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 10>Equities i e. Bonds that can you can be a

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 10>lender to municipalities. So now is as good of a

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 10>time as ever to lend. The market's been hoping. Savers

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 10>have been waiting for five plus percent yields on high

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 10>quality fixed income for what sixteen years now, and it's

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 10>here we should be jumping into this like Scrooge mcd up.

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I've always been told you don't fight the fad,

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 3>but certainly the bond market has been fighting the FED,

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 3>or so it would seem your impression. Get a been

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 3>a minute left.

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, the market, the FED has been saying for the

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 10>last two years now, but we have been There's going

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 10>to be a lot of pain, right, and we've seen pain.

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 10>Bonb market was down thirteen percent last year, came back

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 10>the last two months of or I'm sorry twenty twenty two,

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 10>came back the last two months of twenty twenty three

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 10>to make it a positive year. And the Fed is

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 10>still saying rates are only going to drop two to

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 10>three times this year. Yet the market has priced in

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 10>six drops this year, in eight drops over the next

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 10>eighteen months.

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:43.360
<v Speaker 9>So it's a really good time to sit.

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:49.240
<v Speaker 10>In floating rate paper that'll hugely benefit from the FED.

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 10>What's the FED saying happening versus what the market is saying.

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 10>If you're in fixed rate paper right now, what you're

0:25:56.320 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 10>along is rates drop being seven, eight, nine times over

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 10>the next eighteen months.

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 3>We'll a letle bit there. Skyler, weinmand the CIO at

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Reagan Capital.

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape. Catch are live program Bloomberg

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 6>tune it app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 3>They always told me don't fight the Fed, but it

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 3>looks like somebody's fighting the Fed. At least the bond

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 3>market is with the markets, and the FED interact with

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 3>how they're going to interact. In twenty twenty four, Hans

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 3>Olsen is CIO at Fiduciary Trust Company, joining us now

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 3>I think from Boston to discuss so the market, as

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 3>I said, the bond market at least is fighting the FED.

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 3>This has set us up for some kind of disaster.

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:55.199
<v Speaker 11>Now, you know, I do think that this market is

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 11>certainly overbought and overconfident, and I think you see it

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 11>bought a view when you look at sort of the

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 11>the S and p's RSI right, the relative strength. It

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 11>has had one heck of a run and it's corrected

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 11>a bit from that, but now it looks like it's

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 11>making another run to a real overbought position, and the

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 11>overconfident bit is really clean, clearly seeing when you look

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 11>at the difference between what the market expects for rate

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.360
<v Speaker 11>cuts and what the FED is telegraphing, and so far

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 11>the economy is suggesting that perhaps the Fed is more

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 11>right than than is the market.

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 5>We were talking about it this morning. What do you

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 5>make of the University of Michigan sentiment data and how

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 5>does that kind of impact your view on the path

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 5>forward for markets and also the Fed.

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, that's that's a good question. I tend to focus

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 11>on what people do versus what they say, and especially

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 11>in markets, right, you follow the money and without a doubt,

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 11>I mean it was it was a good read. I

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 11>look back at what happened in with retail sales in

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:57.439
<v Speaker 11>December and that was pretty good. If you look at

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 11>what's happening at with excuse me, with employment, that's also

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 11>quite good. So people I think are in pretty good

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 11>rude economic health. At the moment, housing looks like it

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 11>is going to be just fine exception of today's numbers.

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 11>But I think if you look forward permits in the like,

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 11>that all suggests that the economy is and rude health.

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 11>So if that is the case, then one has to

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 11>rethink sort of the timing and the extent of the

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 11>interest rate cuts. And as you know, that's sixteen percent

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 11>run toward in the end of twenty twenty three was

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 11>powered in large part by expectations around rates. It wasn't

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 11>powered by earnings.

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 3>So we are headed for soft landing, no landing, hard landing,

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 3>And which one of those scenarios do you think it's

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 3>going to be and what is that going to mean

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 3>for risk assets?

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 11>Man, John, That's an interesting question because if I had

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 11>told you last year at this time that we would

0:28:59.880 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 11>have interest rates where they were without some sort of

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 11>resetting of economic activity or certainly in the marketing thought

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 11>it'd be back barking mad. But that's exactly what happened.

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 11>So last year in many respects, was a year of

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 11>no landing because we didn't hit the FEDCE target and

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 11>market was fine and the economy was fine. I think

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 11>in many respects there's a good chance that this year

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 11>is going to be a year of either a softish

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 11>landing or indeed possibly no landing, maybe a go round

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 11>right where we don't hit that FED target. The economy

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 11>is actually stronger than people are giving it credit for

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 11>right now, and the markets can do pretty well with that.

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 11>I think, though, the way that you make money in

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 11>that environment is different than the way that you made

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 11>it last year. Returns last year, we're all driven by

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 11>a multiple expansion, and it really happened in Q four

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 11>on the belief of rape cut. So really that powered,

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 11>but it was not powered, was not assisted at all

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 11>by earnings. This year, I think it has to be

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 11>assisted by earnings, so and it's I'm not sure that

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 11>we can expect much on the multiple expansion front. So

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 11>this is the year where I think stock picking really

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 11>starts to matter. A focus on profits is probably the.

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 12>Way to go here, so you get away from necessarily

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 12>incredibly high valuations but more high quality profitable companies being

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 12>the prominent feature that people should be emphasizing in their

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 12>equity portfolioers this year.

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Hans, let's stick on that note in terms of

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 5>what areas you do, Like you mentioned profitability, maybe lower multiples.

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 5>What areas, industries or sectors are you liking for twenty

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 5>twenty four when it comes to the equity market.

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think it's important because it'd be easy to

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 11>talk sectors, but even within each sector, there are companies

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 11>that have these features of what you would want this year.

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 11>So even some of the the higher valued sectors, you

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 11>would find companies that are incredibly profitable, really good allocation

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 11>of capital uh and which will drive some nice returns.

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 11>I think from a sector standpoint at this juncture, you know, software, banks,

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 11>oil and gas computers, those would be areas that we

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 11>can see companies living in that have the features that

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 11>we want. And you can see that if you drill

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:32.479
<v Speaker 11>down into companies like an Exxon Mobile of Berkshire, UH

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 11>and Nvidia and the like. These are these are companies

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 11>that you know they should have the wind at their

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 11>back because the earnings are there and they're likely to grow.

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 11>So so I think that's how I would come at it, rather.

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 12>Than just sort of do a you know, the the

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 12>passive s and P five hundred exposure.

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 3>If we agree we're in a disinflationary environment, what does

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 3>that do to earnings and sales.

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, that's that's an interesting question because it's disinflationary to

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 11>what right, So if we went from nine to three,

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 11>I think we've seen that largely play out. If it

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 11>goes from you know, three down to where it had

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 11>been for the last five or six years, I'd be

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 11>in another case. But I don't think that that's going

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 11>to happen. I think it's really going to be now

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 11>about margins and earnings growth. And to the extent that

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 11>your cost of goods sold has some mixture of fixed

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 11>in it versus floating, right, so you're not as susceptible

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 11>to your input costs rising as much. If you've hedged

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 11>some of your inputs and the like, you can actually

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 11>interestingly see your earnings rise in an environment where there's

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 11>a bit higher inflation. So the details will matter in

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 11>an environment like this.

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Thanks a lot. I appreciate it. I was gonna say,

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 3>snowy Boston, but not yet. It's not its way Hans

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 3>I bet he has a shovel cio fiduciary trust company

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 3>joining us from Boston. Right now, you're listening to the tape.

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 6>Can's our live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 6>Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune It app, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 6>and the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen live

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 6>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 6>say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Bubble or no bubble. That's kind of the question that

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 3>raises for me. Brian veddig Is, the president at MJP, advises.

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 3>He joins us, Now, from where are you Connecticut, Westborth, Connecticut. Job, what'spury?

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh lovely to discuss the outlook for the market. So

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 3>what's say you when I say, oh, my gosh, maybe

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 3>a bubble, Well.

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 13>I don't think that's necessarily true, John, when considering all

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 13>parts of the market. I mean, we look back at

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 13>last year. We know that the majority of the games

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 13>came from megacap tech, and we did see a broadening

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 13>out in the market in the fourth quarter. But really,

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 13>when you look at areas like small cap stocks, some

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 13>value oriented sectors like healthcare and industrials, I really think

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 13>there's some other parts of the market that again, you know,

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 13>to the points that you and barely mentioned about, you know,

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 13>earnings growth, you know, in twenty four I think the

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 13>market's going to come back to fundamentals, and we're looking

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:23.359
<v Speaker 13>at some earnings numbers over the balance of the year

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 13>that can help those areas quit a little bit of

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 13>catch up. While at the same point in time, I

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:31.360
<v Speaker 13>still think there's that longer term trend with AI innovation

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 13>that that is going to play out in aspects of

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:34.760
<v Speaker 13>the technology sector.

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I wanted to ask talking about the ketchup trade

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 5>has been something I feel like has been top of

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 5>mind since really the October bottom second best performer in

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 5>the SP five hundred is in Vidia, up seventeen percent.

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 5>Obviously that coming after the TSM number. So when you

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 5>look at that broadening, what areas are going to are

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 5>we going to see strength broadening out to and what

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:56.799
<v Speaker 5>does that mean for the likes of an Invidia, which

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 5>still seems to be red hot.

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 13>That's a great point, Bailey, I think on the video

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:04.799
<v Speaker 13>side of the house, I'll just address that first. I mean,

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 13>it's that expectation of growth moving forward. So when you

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 13>look at the forward pe for Navidia, as much as

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 13>the share price has had a nice run, the forward

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 13>price to earnings ratio is actually quite reasonable, you know,

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 13>with a twenty handle or so. But when we talk

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 13>about the other areas of the market, let's just be

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:25.240
<v Speaker 13>fair when we take a look at that disparity of return,

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 13>going back to the S and P versus let's say

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 13>the even weight SMP for example, we know that a

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 13>market cap S and P forty percent is in those

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 13>those magnificent seven names or so, and when we look

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 13>at an even weight and we really strip that out,

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 13>we see that the forward price to earnings ratio of

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 13>the market is actually quite reasonable in some sectors under

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 13>their historical average, so healthcare, small caps, mid cap stocks,

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 13>looking at some areas in the industrial complex. I mean,

0:35:57.280 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 13>these are things that we know that there's some some

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 13>breath and some trends there and the outlooks for growth

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:05.240
<v Speaker 13>are actually looking quite promising.

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, since you guys brought up AI got to ask

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 3>when does it start to jail in terms of the sales. Well,

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 3>we've already seen that you mentioned in video. But along

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 3>with the productivity gains that are promised by this new technology,

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 3>when does it all come together?

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, no, I think it's all that's a great question.

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 13>It's almost like when does it come together where we

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 13>start to see, you know, market expectations on rate cuts

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 13>line up with reality from the FED, right, So there's

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 13>so I think that the AI trend is a five

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:39.319
<v Speaker 13>to seven year trend. I mean there's a there's a

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:41.839
<v Speaker 13>high multiple of sales that's being put on a lot

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 13>of these companies right now, which we are a little

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:46.399
<v Speaker 13>wary of, and you have to be selective. I think

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 13>it's looking at it from that productivity point, which is

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 13>why we like areas in technology that are focusing on

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 13>workflow management, data management, thinking about how AI might create

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 13>more productive outcomes when you think about cybersecurity, you.

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 7>Know, things of that nature.

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 13>Then just saying hey, we're going to invest in you know,

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 13>a certain aspect of hardware that's probably going to be

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 13>used because you know AI is going to be coming,

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 13>I think. I think it's a longer term trend. So

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:20.360
<v Speaker 13>will there be volatility in the space, Will there be

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 13>the natural winners and losers kind of play out over

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 13>the next five to seven years. Yeah, we think so.

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 13>But don't forget that again, This is the point I'm

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 13>trying to make, going back to Bailey's questions, don't forget

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:34.280
<v Speaker 13>about some of those other areas that have stable balance,

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 13>these predictable cash flow margins, that look strong and they're

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:40.399
<v Speaker 13>still innovation. And that's why I want to remind people

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 13>about healthcare, because healthcare did not perform well last year,

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 13>But it's one of those those areas of the market

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 13>where you're concerned about economic expansion. This year can be defensive,

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:53.760
<v Speaker 13>but we know there's a lot of innovation coming from

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 13>healthcare companies as well that could be supportive for growth

0:37:57.200 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 13>moving forward.

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 5>But where in healthcare do you particularly like Are we

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 5>talking biotech, medtech that seems to be where innovation would

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 5>be versus something like managed care.

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 13>A great point I think to be selective in healthcare,

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 13>we are looking at areas of some of the biotech,

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 13>some of the big pharma space areas because the big

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 13>pharma companies they're building out, they're going out and acquiring

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 13>other companies right now and building out their pipeline for

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 13>new therapies and drugs. And I think as rates change,

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 13>we might see a little bit more in that m

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 13>and A space from healthcare. And I also think at

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 13>the same point in time, we have a demographic shift

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 13>that we know that is going to continue to play

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:39.239
<v Speaker 13>out in the United States. The baby boomers, they're not

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 13>getting any younger they're still demand for services and care

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:47.400
<v Speaker 13>that's out there. So even looking at some of the

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:51.879
<v Speaker 13>larger healthcare networks, healthcare providers, insurance providers, I know they've

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 13>had a rough week this week when considering concerns around

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 13>Medicare costs. But those that can execute and move through that,

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 13>I think also are areas of healthcare that makes a

0:39:01.600 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 13>lot of sense A bailable.

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I got to I'm not a brown nose,

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:06.479
<v Speaker 3>but I got to point out the bosses. The big

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 3>boss is editorial today. The healthcare system, he writes, is

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:14.919
<v Speaker 3>more short staff than ever, even as it faces its

0:39:15.000 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 3>next big shock and aging population. So tackle that one

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 3>from an investment perspective, since you brought up the healthcare industry.

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:25.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, definitely.

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 13>I mean, I think there is a concern around let's

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 13>say investing and let's say hospitals that are trying to

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 13>run their staffs at certain margin. But we have a

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 13>labor shortage, and we also have issues in quality of

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:46.720
<v Speaker 13>care which might suffer, which that then causes demand shifts

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:49.759
<v Speaker 13>around that space. I'm focusing more on the ways to

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 13>deliver the care and helping them to support productivity, whether

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 13>that might be software and technology in the healthcare space again,

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:04.240
<v Speaker 13>the insurance providers, you know, helping to provide a wider

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:08.319
<v Speaker 13>network or better products or policies that people can take

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 13>advantage of. So I'm not focused so much on the

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:15.400
<v Speaker 13>labor side. I'm looking more at the solution side to

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 13>try to get through some of these problems.

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 3>John, all right, Brian, thanks a lot. We'll leave it there.

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 3>President at MJP Advisors from Lovely Westport, Can I think

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 3>that's isn't that where Martha Stewart lives? Head on Sport.

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 3>You're not that demographic. I'm not going to you're from California.

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm in California.

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 7>Kids.

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcasts. You can

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:42.880
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:46.320
<v Speaker 2>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three and on Faull Sweeney.

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 7>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:48.840
<v Speaker 9>Before the podcast.

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:52.359
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio