WEBVTT - Eva Beylin on eGirl Capital, The Graph, and Building Web3

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisnal and I'm Tracy Halloway. So, Trady, I

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>guess it's kind of a cliche like every time we

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>do a crypto episode. Crypto markets have been pretty volatile lately,

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>but actually right now they have been extremely volatile, and

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not just a it's not just a cliche. Right now, Yeah,

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>people are talking about crypto winter, so I guess a

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>redux of what we saw back in where we had

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the big fall and then it took a very very

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>long time for people to get excited and interested in

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>crypto again. But that said, I do feel like this

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>period of time is it feels a little bit different

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>because even though the spot prices of a bunch of

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>different things are falling, it seems like there's still a

0:00:57.240 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>ton of money flooding into the space. And maybe that'll

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>change eventually, but for the time being, it feels like

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>there's still a lot of interest. Yeah, I think that's true.

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>It also feels like there's you know, twenty eighteen en

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>it felt like it was the only thing that people

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>really talked about with crypto was the price. And I

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>still think like the price of the coins is still

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>like the part that captures people's attention the most. But

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:27.759
<v Speaker 1>I guess there is this idea of like, okay, like

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>there's some new Web three point oh Web three that's

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>getting built out, and it's being built towards something, And

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone is that great at describing what

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it's going to look like or what this new version

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet is. But I guess that that it's

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's sufficiently captured people's imagination enough that even

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>if the price were to stay depressed, people want to

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>keep building it out and turning it into something a

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit more tangible beyond speculation. Well, this is one

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of the remarkable things about crypto. I feel like it's

0:01:57.320 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>almost like every time you turn around, there's a new

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>use case that gets invented, And you're right. It is

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>weird to think that a few years ago, we weren't

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about Web three point oh, we weren't talking about

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>defy at all. We were just talking about bitcoin mostly

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>as a unit of payment, maybe an inflation hedge, digital goal,

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. And already in the space of

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:23.079
<v Speaker 1>a few years, the narrative changes so quickly the narrative

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>change is super fast. I sometimes go back and forth

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>whether that's a good sign or whether it's just like, oh,

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>here's our new thing because the last thing didn't materialize.

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>But nonetheless it's ongoing. You know you mentioned in the beginning,

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is really key is that, yes,

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>there is this decline in prices that we've seen, but

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>on the flip side, it feels like there's an intense

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>amount of investment and building and money pouring into like

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>creating new things. And so I really want to explore

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>this tension more by talking about like what's really going

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>on between the price and then you know there's sort

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 1>of like actual activity in this space, because they really

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>are two different things. Yeah, absolutely, let's do it. Okay,

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I am very excited. Oh wait, wait, there's one more

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>thing I want to say. You know what, one thing

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that's really weird about talking about crypto is you're gonna

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>have to narrow it down one weird thing about talking

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>about crypto. There are many weird things. There's one more thing,

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>which is that so many of the best people in

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the space are pseudonymous, like I don't know who they are.

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>There's like all like these like incredible like experts that

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I've learned a ton from over the years, and I

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>literally have no idea who they are. And unlike tread

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>fi like pseudonymous teams, pseudonymous founders, pseudonymous investors, people are

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>just an avatar, you know, maybe a frog, maybe an

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>anime character, maybe something like that could be like these

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>really important voices to listen to the space. Yeah, it's

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>always interesting when you're you're getting really good crypto information

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>from like like digital picture of an ape, a drawing

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of a monkey. Yeah, exactly right. All right, well today

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>we are going to be speaking to a frog, but

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be speaking to a maybe a colleague

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of them. I am very excited. We're going to bring

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>speaking to Eva Balen. She is the director at the

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Graph Foundation, and she is an e girl at the

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Girl Capital, an amorphous crypto investment collective whose members include

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>various handles that people might see at crypto Twitter, like

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>at loom dart and at Digen Spartan and at Crypto

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>cat VC. I'm just looking at their website and Eva,

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>who is not pseudonymous. So Eva, thank you very much

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>for coming out odd lot, Thank you so much for

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>having me excited to chat. So wait, First of all,

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:44.479
<v Speaker 1>I used to be in some discord that was like

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the egirl Capital discord, and now I'm not in it anymore.

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Did I get kicked out or did it disappear like

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>what happened? Oh no, I'm not sure. Maybe we should

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 1>talk to our resident discord owner of the cat in

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the Hasmath suit. But we did have a public chat

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that was just sort of for our unity to come

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>around share information. Alright, well, somehow I'm not in it.

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>The cat is at c L two oh seven. But

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>more seriously, like what is the girl Capital? Yeah, so

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 1>first we started off as just you know, a few

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>and nons, and we quickly realized that the scope that

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>we were covering in our interests, um you know, we

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>could do some damage. We could either start to invest

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>or um you know, start to get more involved in

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.559
<v Speaker 1>the way we were already involved in Web three, which

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, as you mentioned, I'm director of the foundation

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>at the Graph. We've got a few members who are

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>leaders of projects, so Scoopy Trooples, a CEO of Alcomics.

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>We've got another guy named DevOps who leads Saddle Finance.

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>We've got a few traders, a few security engineers. So

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:41.679
<v Speaker 1>we realized that with this breadth of experience, we actually

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>have something very unique to offer that wasn't consistent with

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 1>typical investment funds in UM Web two or in Wall

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Street UM, and not even consistent with Web three, where

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>we don't have any LPs UM and we operate quite independently.

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>So UM even every deal, you know, not every member

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>participates in, and we actually um you know, only agree

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to you know, take on an egirl d if we're

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>all kind of in consensus. So I mean, I have

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of questions already, but maybe just to begin with,

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>could you could you maybe describe your your membership a

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit more? And I guess who are the types

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of people that would join something like egirl Capital versus

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>going down the route of traditional crypto investment, and what

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is it that they get out of this particular organization

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 1>versus again, more traditional forms of investment. And I guess

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>my overarching question is also how do you actually decide

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>what to invest in and coordinate given that you're dealing

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>with a group of disparate people, some of whom, as

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe pointed out in the intro, are pseud aotonomous yes

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and answer your first question. You know, the way we

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>came together was again very kind of organic, and a

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of us have full time jobs that are different.

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I have a full time job as

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a builder, um. Others you know might be trading or

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>running other investments full time. And so for us it

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 1>was like, how can we come together in this way

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that is organic. We don't have some quota or some

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>expectations from LPs, but still provide value. And so for

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:08.799
<v Speaker 1>us that it's much more of a choice. We aren't

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of behold into any expectations and even our investments

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, aren't again meeting some kind of quota per year.

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>So um, we've been around for about a year now

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and we've made two million dollars about two million dollars

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>worth of investments across ten different projects UM. And really

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>our priority is to invest in critical decentralized primitives of

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>web three UM and kind of you know, the metaverse

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>meets defy. So a lot of our projects, um, you

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>know are actually an f T based something like yat

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>um or you know, investing in actually art or unisocks,

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>as you you know might have seen. We startingly believe

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>in um veblin goods and the ability that you know,

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>for goods representing early defy um like unisocks you know,

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>are likely to increase in value long term. UM. But

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>we're also investing in a lot of really critical protocols

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that are going to fundamentally change technology and innovation. So UM,

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>things like connects, which is a layer two protocol that

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>connects literally connects between different layer twos on ethereum UM,

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>or Radical, which is sort of a GitHub replacement a

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>way to have open source code collaboration. UM. So really

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>we are motivated by what are the best projects, what

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>would make the most impact, and what's most aligned with

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Web three. I just want to ask about the coordination

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>portion of it, Like how do you actually go about

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>identifying and evaluating potential investments. Yeah, so all of us

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>are in different sub communities, so typically, you know, there

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>might be one or two members of the girl that

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>are kind of leading that deal. Maybe it was, um,

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, a project they've already been working with or

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 1>got connected with, and then we'll start doing our own

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>internal due diligence. UM. I'm excited to say we now

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>have a few interns we didn't have that here ago UM,

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>but they often will help us do research, whether that's

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.199
<v Speaker 1>looking at on chain metrics, maybe comparing against other projects UM.

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 1>And again, because we're so deep in the space, a

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of us have expertise, whether it's you know, security

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>or smart contracts or business that we can kind of

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>bring to to each deal. UM. But I wouldn't say

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, quite the most traditional due diligence process

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>as hedge funds that you're used to seeing. Is there

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a pooled capital element of it? Like is there a

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 1>pot that you and these fellow your fellow members and

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>put money into. And I'm just curious, like are they

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>anonymous to you as well? Most of them? So first question,

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:20.239
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a potum, although we have been considering

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>growing into a doubt formally on chain um where right now,

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the way we behave is per deal, so you know,

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>we kind of bring it to the group. Anyone who

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>wants to participate, you know, gets a cut or you know,

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>depending on kind of the breakdown or interest, and we

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>typically will um, you know, bring it on as an

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>ego deal if there's enough interest from the group. If

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>there isn't enough interest, you know, again, we have our

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 1>own statures in the community, so often someone will do

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.319
<v Speaker 1>an angel investment or maybe even go work with the

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>project directly. Um. What was your second question again? To

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>what degree? Like, do you mostly know your colleagues as

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a nons or have you like are there some there

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that you still don't know who they are? Oh? No,

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>they're fully ant me. Um. I've met a few of

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>them in person. UM. I know you know a few

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>of their first names, but otherwise you know, I I

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know very much about them. And that's kind of

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the beauty of it. You know. Part of the Web

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:12.319
<v Speaker 1>three and cryptovision is how do we actually utilize pseudonymity

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>in a more productive way. So you know, DJs have

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>been doing this for years. You know, almost every DJ

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>has their own alias or alter ego and they get

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to then create that sub community or sub brand. And

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>so similarly with crypto, you know, you can participate in

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a protocol in a sort of gig economy style. And

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>why do you need that to be tied to your

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>birth identity? Um? When actually you can start to create

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.479
<v Speaker 1>your own alter ego on chain that might be associated

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>with you know, a cat or a monkey. Um. And

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe you're only you know, participating in this one protocol,

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe you have another identity for a different one.

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about David Solomon and DJ soul Um. So sorry,

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>he might be an E girl, he might be yeah,

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 1>who knows. Well, okay, So again this is one of

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>those conversations is just throwing up more and more question.

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>But two things. One y E girl, and I guess

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a really stupid question. Are most of your members

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>female or was there a desire there to get more

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>females on board with crypto? And then secondly, what's the

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>benefit of pseudonymity? Because when I think of crypto and bitcoin,

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I always think, well, this is sort of attention at

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the heart of crypto. On the one hand, it's transparent

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and traceable and you can see all the transactions on

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a blockchain and things like that. But on the other hand,

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily tied to a single identity, and so

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you are able to do anonymous transactions. So I guess

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>what I'm getting at is what's the benefit of preserving

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that pseudonymity of investors. The meme of E girl, I

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>believe came out of more anime and hent culture um

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>as I'm sure you've seen, you know, things like v

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>tubing where people are literally creating cartoon images of their

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>faces and then going on YouTube and you know, doing

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a show has become extremely popular or even streaming, and

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>so we kind of tapped into this idea of you know,

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>anime and m cartoon characters you know, should also be

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>taken seriously as much as suits. Um in a sense,

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>we kind of present this anti suit culture or anti

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>suit meme. And I really personally related to that because

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I used to be a management consultant in New York

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, being forced into sort of this box.

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And it was very clear to me that webs three

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and Crypto are the antithesis of that, where you really

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>can still be taken seriously for your bottom line or

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>for you know, the insightful tweets or whatever you might

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>be investing in. You don't need to be wearing a suit.

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>You could be wearing a hazmat suit, I guess on

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>your second question. So, the biggest misconception to me that

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I see is people think that suitonymity or anonymity means

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that you don't have reputation, when actually it's quite the

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>opposite that if you want to be known, and if

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to have a community or you know, have

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a job, you have to make much more effort to

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>develop that reputation than otherwise, you know, k y C people.

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:02.559
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I'm one of the only DOCS members

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.079
<v Speaker 1>and you know, technically speaking, I've been developing my reputation

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>since I was born, and you know that's google able.

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>But anyone who chooses to take on a different personality

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is starting from scratch um. And so there's this misconception

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that you know, of course, maybe you can't always trust

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and nons, maybe there's some degree of risk, But at

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the same time they've taken on a significant amount of

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>risk too that if they wanted to rebuild that identity

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>or reputation, they would take much longer than for everyone else.

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>So I'm curious, you know, I'm looking at your your

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>portfolio on your website. I'm very amused by the unisocks investment.

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>For one thing, that was for those who don't remember,

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>we had Mike de m Ray on the podcast in

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>December and he was involved in that, which is basically

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:00.319
<v Speaker 1>buy an n f T that's associated with a literal

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>pair of talks. But some of these projects like I

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>think there's like all the like well known I guess

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you would call them docks actually or just sort of

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.959
<v Speaker 1>like established VC firms in them, and then the announcement

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>will like you know, to be like some name that

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:17.079
<v Speaker 1>you've heard of from Silica Valley, egol Capital as part

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of the round do legacy vcs? What do they think

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>about being part of a deal where you guys are

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>listed on the round? You know, I don't. I don't know,

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and to be honest, I don't really care. Um. I

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>think part of what we're trying to bring here is

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>like we're a group of highly capable, you know, folks

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that have been in the space for between you know,

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>three to ten years. Um, you know, some started early

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>on in bitcoin, and we're bringing a lot of value

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to the table that maybe untraditional, but um, you know

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>we're still here. We still were able to get a seat,

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the project believed in our value that we

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>could bring to them. Um. So I think it's really

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>exciting and it's you know, breaking down that barrier that

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, you don't have to be wearing suits, you

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>don't even have to have an identity that's public really

0:14:57.000 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to do well. Can we talk a little bit about

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>out the graph, which is your day job, and I

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>would love to get your summary of what exactly it does.

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>But the other thing I want to ask you is

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it has to do with atherium. It's not like a

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin based application or protocol, and I guess I'm wondering.

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, excitement over a theory um seems to be

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>one thing that a lot of the vcs share. So

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the institutional capital is much more excited over ethereum and

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>applications and defy type stuff that you can build on

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that versus basic bitcoin, which is seen as not being

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>as well suited to those types of applications. So I

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>guess my question is why ethereum and not something else

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and doesn't mean that you sort of share something in

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>common with vcs and institutional money. So the graph is

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a decentralized protocol for organizing and retrieving on chain data.

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And what that means is every application that you see

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that is running on a blockchain or queries smart contract,

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>they have to retrieve that data from a blockchain somehow,

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's actually really difficult for developers to do that.

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>They would have to run their own node, they would

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>have to become experts in that blockchain. It's essentially a

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>back end job. And so what the graph does is

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>we have a standardized layer or a standardized API called

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a subgraph that allows developers to develop you know, an

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>organization style or figure out exactly what information they want

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>from the blockchain and just you know, play around with

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that subgraph. Meanwhile, the actual indexing and processing of that

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>data goes on in the back end on a network

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of index ers. So we're really decentralizing the server or

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the back end of what otherwise would be you know, uh,

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>database UM, you know, indexing infrastructure UM that is serving

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>data to users. So we often like to call ourselves

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the Google of blockchains, so as Google is a search

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>engine and also the back end indexing of all of

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the Internet's data. Currently, the graph protocol is the indexing bit,

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and so we're trying to enable other applications like search

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>engines and just in general to be able to retrieve

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:06.719
<v Speaker 1>that data as efficiently as possible. And why ethereum ethereum,

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>so our our ethos as the graph has always been decentralized,

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 1>and you know, to enable the best security possible. You know,

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>we really believe you can't have a DApp if it's

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 1>not decentralized, meaning all components are. And in our history

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 1>of just assessing blockchains, and you know, having been around

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>for a few years, um Ethereum was the one that

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>stayed true to that mission. Um the strongest, you know,

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>and we're even seeing that today in you know, what

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>some people call Ethereum taking its time with a roadmap.

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Others could see as actually Ethereum being very thoughtful with

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.199
<v Speaker 1>its roadmap to not do things too quickly UM. And

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, you see other problems on newer chains that

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you know Ethereum also experienced earlier on but Ethereum is

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>just at a more mature state. And you know, our goal,

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 1>although the graph network is built on Ethereum, our goal

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is actually to index all of the world's data, meaning

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 1>any blockchain. So our hosted service currently supports twenty seven chains,

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>including many of the layer twos on the aream, and

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 1>soon all those chains will also be supported on the

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>network itself. And you mentioned that other Layer one other

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>chains have had issues recording this January and the last

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>few days. Salana one of the chains that we've talked

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>about in the past that is arguably an Ethereum competitor

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>has seen some pretty big delays and slow down, so

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of kinks still being worked out. You just

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 1>raised at the graph fifty million dollars is led by

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Tiger Global. What is uh, what is the plan for

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:33.880
<v Speaker 1>this money and what do you need to build? Yeah,

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm really glad you asked. So. Over the last year,

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>we've been pioneering this new strategy that we called decentralized

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 1>m n A. So we realized really early on that

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>the mission of the Graph was so ambitious, so vast,

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>it couldn't be done by one team, and nor was

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that the goal. UM. You know, part of decentralization is

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>also decentralizing the contributors. So over the last year, we've

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.439
<v Speaker 1>had four new teams join us full time UM that

0:18:56.520 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 1>specialized in anything from back end infrastructure to cryptography to

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>UM graph q l A p i s and bring

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>them into act basically as full time core developers on

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the protocol. So we aren't no longer you know, one

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>team that you know initially launched the protocol. Where five

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and we raise this round basically to continue moving along

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the strategy. UM. We have a goal of bringing on

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 1>another three to five teams in the next two years UM,

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and that might be to help with the current roadmap

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>elements such as, um, you know, improving the efficiency of

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure. We also are you know, working and doubling

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>down on cryptography to make sure that the data that

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:32.719
<v Speaker 1>is actually being you know, queried by apps is verifiable.

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>So we've got quite a complex roadmap UM, and we're

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>looking to use that fifty million dollars immunition UM to

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>basically continue building on our vision. So you've talked in

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the idea of like, oh, this is going to be

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the Google of blockchains and decentralized are making it easy

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>for any DAP or applicating to centralized application to query

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the chain. That sounds obviously very cool and theory. Can

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>you give a little bit more, I guess some concrete

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:03.360
<v Speaker 1>examples of what kind of apps or what specifically would

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>be involved in that, Like what are like I think

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>this is where when people at least for me maybe

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm projecting, but at least for me, like I sort

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of get trading and how the automated market makers work.

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I sort of get like n f T s. But

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>still when I think about, like, well, what is a

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 1>web three application? What is it true? Like blockchain application.

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk a little bit about specifically how applications

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 1>are using your infrastructure. Yeah, So, in my opinion, a

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>true DAP or true Web three app would be one

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that is open permission lists and decentralized, meaning that it

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>would be very difficult or nearly impossible to take down.

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 1>And users have the right to exit, meaning that the

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>app or the platform itself isn't locking the user in.

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>But because everything is on a blockchain and other protocols,

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.400
<v Speaker 1>they can swap their data and assets between those um

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 1>So you know, one really great example is e n

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>S Ethereum Name Service. So this is you know, ethereum domains,

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and this means that any application could essentially query data

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.439
<v Speaker 1>about your Ethereum name Joe or Tracy and use that

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>information on any website. So instead of using a Google

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Magic link like we use today, we could use Ethereum

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>name service. And that means that any application that wants

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>to get data from your e n S names so

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's your wallet and your activity, they could query

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a subgraph, so that's an e n S a p I.

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>So any information on you know that that's from the blockchain,

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>whether it's trade volumes, or pricing or assets needs to

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>be queried from a blockchain, and subgraphs make it much

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>easier since developers don't need to rebuild their own ap I.

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 1>So you know, anyone building on let's say the unit

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>swap protocol can just use the exact same unit swap API.

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Because it's open source, they can also fork it, rebuild it,

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>maintain it if they want to. Um. You know, the

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.880
<v Speaker 1>end goal being that all these subgraphs are public goods

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're even maintained by the community or a doubt itself,

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and that really enables much more you know, innovation time,

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe even cost savings for the team because

0:21:57.520 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>they don't need to hire a full time engineer to

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>manage that database. UM and it really enables compose ability.

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>So many teams can collaborate on either the same API

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>or you know, the same protocol without having to do

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the same work again. So I really like that definition

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of right to exit because it jives really nicely with

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the wallet idea. We're talking with Mike dem Ray about

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>this about how um you know, if if you have

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a wallet, you know, say meta mask or something, it's

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 1>easy to port that onto something like Rainbow and you're

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>not dependent on the platform in order to access your

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>information and your data and your assets. So that makes

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense to me. But one thing I'm

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 1>wondering is, you know, you've mentioned decentralization a number of

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>times in this conversation, and you've even talked about a

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>decentralized way to invest in decentralization. Why is it so

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>important beyond a better user experience? Because people talk about

0:22:56.840 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Web three point oh as almost creating at our world, right,

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 1>it seems to have all these philosophical attachments and moral

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>values attached to it. What is it about decentralization that

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>makes it so important in your view and presumably so great.

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a few things that we're starting to

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>see even play out in crypto. So one is censorship,

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the very common use case, and we're starting

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to even see folks that just recently entered the n

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>f T space realized that, oh, you know, if the

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>n f T DAP isn't fully decentralized, meaning the A

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>P I, the server and where that n f T

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:32.919
<v Speaker 1>metadata is stored, then you know, is that n f

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:35.679
<v Speaker 1>T really real? Can I have the right to exit

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>that platform? Um? So you know, that's one one use case.

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 1>The second would be, you know, servers get taken down

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Google goes down, Facebook goes down, and

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>they've been around for decades, and when we think about

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>scaling to a global network, you know, whether that's transactions

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>or n f T s, you really want to make

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 1>sure your app doesn't go down. So one really great

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>anecdote for us was Constitution down. So I'm not sure

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.640
<v Speaker 1>if you've heard of Constitution to um, you know, millions

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of dollars collected from the community to come bid for

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution and at its peak, uh, you know, of excitement,

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>It's app went down because the API went down, and

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>so they actually transitioned to using a subgraph that was

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 1>on the decentralized network to make sure that they could

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 1>continue staying up during the auction. So that's a great

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>example of we're already seeing that today that you know,

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>things go down all the time. But furthermore, like why

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>would you want adapt team to be the team also

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>managing the node and doing all the complexities. So one

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 1>thing the graph and other decentralized protocols allow for is

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>unbundling of what we're otherwise centralized services. Or um tasks

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that were managed by the project team originally, but now

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>we can actually completely fragment that. So whereas a team

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>might have been the one that deployed the smart contracts,

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 1>they might not be the team managing the UI. They

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>also might not be the team managing the a p I.

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's fine because at the end of the day,

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>we're all building on top of each other's open source

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>tooling and protocols. So just on that note, I mean

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this is something that people who are iCal of the

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>web three point oh idea will often go after this

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 1>idea that you're just going to have people, you know,

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a community sort of maintaining these databases or being responsible

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:15.199
<v Speaker 1>for individual components of something that all fits together. And

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe they argue that, well, they don't have an actual

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>self interest in keeping these up to date in the

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>same way that a company like a Google or a Facebook,

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>even though you know, you might think it's evil, at

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>least it has a reason to kind of keep things going.

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So the decentralized processes might not be as reliable as

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a more traditional or centralized process. I guess what's your

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>response to that sort of criticism. Yeah, I definitely hear

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that centralized coordination has its efficiency gains. But the benefit

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of blockchains and cryptocurrency is that we have this new

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:55.439
<v Speaker 1>incentive system. So whereas maybe Google had to be the

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>one managing their servers because they owned all their equity

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and they also owned the rights to the server UM,

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 1>we now have a world where anyone can buy a

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>token at any time, a utility token. Anyone can use

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that token in the network. So in the graphs case,

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that would be staking as an indexer or a delegator UM,

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.199
<v Speaker 1>and you can then earn rewards from you know, that

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 1>network and the productivity and value that it creates for

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the world. So I actually think we're you know, solving

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>some scalability issues where typically the only people that really

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 1>care about the product are the people inside the company.

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, often shareholders don't even care UM. But with tokens,

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you allow anyone to you know, contribute and take ownership

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.959
<v Speaker 1>in the graph or whatever protocol it might be. So

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing things like grantees come up with ideas of

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, tooling or protocol improvements just because they've now

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 1>bought in and feel they are part of the community

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.439
<v Speaker 1>as well, even though maybe their full time job is

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, using their real name, and you know maybe

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.719
<v Speaker 1>in the Web two I wanna talk more about you know,

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>censorship and this and the dangers of centralization. And of

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 1>course one of the most obvious cases is Twitter, and

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>people find themselves their accounts are banned, uh suddenly, and

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>there's sort of this impulse to like, you know, this

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>is a word, like people love Twitter. You're on Twitter,

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the fellow egirls are on Twitter. But you know, one

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>day Twitter could just take your account away. And it's

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of this poster child for the sort of like

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the double edged sort of Web two. Yes, there's all

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>these like cool platforms. We can share stuff, we can talk,

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>but we really don't own own anything and we can

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>be cut off. Do you first see Web three depths

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 1>rebuilding that in a decentralized way, Like will there be

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>a decentralized Twitter? Do you envision that, like at some

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 1>point in the next five years, you won't have to

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>use Twitter, you won't have to use Discord, or you

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>won't have to use Telegram because there are new decentralized

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 1>versions where you could share and communicate without the need

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 1>for a middleman company. I really do, and I think

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:58.719
<v Speaker 1>it's going to make building applications way more competitive because

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the switching costs are much ower. So you know, often

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the way banks and credit cards keep customers in is

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the switching costs or hig you can't reach the bank,

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>whatever it might be. UM. Here it's as easy as

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>just sending wallet, sending funds to another wallet, UM, or

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, switching UM your your name or your n

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>f T s. You know, by just selling it in

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace. UM. So it'll be a lot easier to

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 1>build those apps. And we're already starting to see it

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>with adapt called Orbits recently came out. I know adapt

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 1>called Scent has been out for a while, UM, but

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll probably see more iteration. What I'm personally excited for

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>is to see the coupling of the actual actions on

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>chain with our social platforms. So you know, right now,

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>most dows, they typically have a forum or some kind

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of social platform where they discussed the doubt proposals before

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>it's actually put to a vote. And why is it

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that the voting in the forum discussion is disconnected? Um?

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of the things I love about Bloomberg

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>is that the reason you know it kind of kicked

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>off was because the messenger or the chat became so

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>useful for traders, um, to make settlements or OTC trades,

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever it might have been. And so I think we're

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna see that same kind of thing happened where our

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>social applications are gonna start coinciding with maybe actually transactions,

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe um submitting trades, and you know, across

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the board, we could see even the way we behave

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.479
<v Speaker 1>with each other starting to change. You know, people already

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>start to stock each other's e and s names to

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>see what they're doing. Um, So what else could there be?

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to ask another boomer feasibility question, I guess,

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>but I mean a lot of the a lot of

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the services online that people use now, like Twitter or Facebook,

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>they're free. And the way those companies make money, um,

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you know maybe with the exception of Twitter, but the

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>way they're supposed to make money is through advertising and

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>through gathering user data so that they can target these

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>people with the most effective ads. And it's supposed to

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>be the data which is the valuable product here. You know,

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you've got something for free in exchange for providing these

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>companies reams and reams of data. When you move to

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>decentralized applications my understanding, and please correct me if I'm wrong,

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 1>But my understanding is a lot of that data is

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be more freely available, more open, more transparent,

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>which I guess makes it maybe less valuable to a

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>company trying to do something with it. It's no longer proprietary.

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>So I guess the question is, like, how does that

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>wide that wide open data or you know, the way

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that decentralization will make data more accessible, more transparent, more

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 1>widely available, how does that stack up with actually making

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>money from decentralized services and transactions? Like how are profits

0:30:41.200 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>actually supposed to be created through this process? Yeah, that's

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a really good question, and to be honest, I don't

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>have a clear answer because I would say a lot

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of the infrastructure to enable even the most simple like

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 1>data analysis isn't quite there yet. You know, I can

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>speak for the graph and our roadmap is still quite ambitious.

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, we'd like to be able to better support

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>analytics for that use case you're talking about, But I

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I foresee a lot of different kinds of monetization strategies,

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>so kind of like I mentioned, people participating in protocols,

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's revenue, so you know, whether it's a

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>fund or an individual UM staking uh, you know, tokens

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and then providing services. And those services could be anything

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>from you know, looking at images and curating which art

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>is most interesting to actually running hardware or you know,

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe being a trader or a yield farmer UM, and

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that is a way to generate income UM. I think

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll also start to see a lot more innovation in

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the micro payment level. So whereas right now we're you know,

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>not very mature in how do we enable what we

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>call meta transactions, so kind of transactions embedded in the background.

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>But I think what we might see in the future

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>with oracles UM, you know, which is retrieving off Chaine

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>data UM and other tooling UM the ability to charge

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>or or be charged for smaller interactions and that gets

0:31:57.480 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>charged directly to a wallet, and your wallet being you know,

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>something like your E and S name is now tied

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to your identity. Instead of the ad companies paying uh,

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, Twitter, the ad companies could in theories start

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>paying users and that could be micropayments or micro transactions

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that are sent directly to the user wallet. UM. Similarly,

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe instead of UM artists, you know, art being looked

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>at and them never receiving any rewards. Maybe artists are

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>earning to their wallets based on impressions or micro impressions

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram. UM. So I think we're gonna start seeing

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of monetization patterns arrive as the tech also

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>becomes more mature UM. And that includes layer two. It

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>includes things like the graph Um storage. You know, things

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>like are we've ipfs really seeing all those pieces come

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>together to make that possible? So, you know, one of

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the reasons, you know, one that I'm excited about having

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>this conversation is you're really on both sides of the market.

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 1>As part of the Girl collective, you're an investor in

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>various Web three infrastructure, and the director at the graph

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you're building stuff and raising money. So I want to

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>start like, Okay, obviously we've seen this pretty big volatility,

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and by volatility I mean selling Ethereum has basically been

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>cut in half since the middle of November. A lot

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of coins have done worse. So I want to just

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>start with like a simple question, which is have you

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>seen when you're going out to market as an investor

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>looking to buy into projects, has the selling um had

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>any effect on sort of like private market valuations or

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>deal pace or anything like that. I haven't seen it effected,

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and I would be surprised if it does, because the

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>thesis with you know, the girl and others is much

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 1>more long term um typically at least two years, often decades,

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and so we're really focused on what is the next

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 1>thing we're building, and how do we invest in in

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that team that's building it. I mean, when you see

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 1>people talk about crypto winter on Twitter, and you know,

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>there have been people who maybe panic isn't the right word,

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:10.320
<v Speaker 1>but certainly there's a sort of sense of unease amongst

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>crypto investors at the moment. I think, does does it

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 1>affect your investing behavior at all? Or does it affect

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the way you think about things? Does it lengthen the

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 1>timeline to make things come together or be viable or

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:28.720
<v Speaker 1>affected in any way? Yeah, I'd say it probably affects

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>us in how we think about our community. So anyone

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>who is around during the last bear market remembers how

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:37.360
<v Speaker 1>brutal it was. You know, there were a lot of

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 1>really challenging experiences, whether it was layoffs or lack of

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 1>capital um, and so that is The first thing I

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>thought about was, you know, are we going to make

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 1>it as a collective, you know, is everyone going to

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>be okay? But the more controversial perspective I have is that,

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, bear markets are great. You know, as a builder,

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the graph was built in a bear market,

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and most of the best projects and infrastructure today, whether

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it's later two S or n f T s, arrived

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:04.400
<v Speaker 1>during the bear market, and it gives us time to

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 1>actually make mistakes, iterate. And even as an investor, you know,

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you need that time for a project team to iterate

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to actually come up with something innovative. So I'm also excited,

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, if that is what's what's happening, if we're

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:18.840
<v Speaker 1>having a little bit of a slowdown to have projects,

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe take that time, reassess whatever the roadmap

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is and keep shipping. So the other part of this

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 1>and this was, you know, this may be true now

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:32.359
<v Speaker 1>in January, maybe it's probably true in November because there's

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>just an insane amount of like institutional money coming into

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:40.399
<v Speaker 1>the space. And last week there was a report that

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:43.919
<v Speaker 1>in Teresent Horowitz, which raised has a huge crypto fund,

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>has been into the space for a long time, there's

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a report that their rate looking to raise like another

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 1>four and a half billion for another crypto fund. We'll

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 1>see if that comes together. But is there really like

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess there's questions like is their capacity

0:35:57.320 --> 0:36:01.839
<v Speaker 1>like right now can money that scale be put to use?

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Is there enough need for that much capital? Or if

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you have a good project as a builder, like is

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it really like all the options are on your side,

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>like what is the who has the power right now?

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 1>And is there really is there really used for that

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 1>much cash coming into the space. I would say there is.

0:36:19.480 --> 0:36:21.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a lot of projects that continue to raise,

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>whether it's you know, their seed or precede because they're

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 1>just starting to out, or you know, maybe a Series

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>B because we're a few years into their cycle. Um,

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of opportunity to get involved,

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>depending on what the flavor is, you know. So, um,

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.399
<v Speaker 1>some institutionals are more interested in defy given it's more

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 1>consistent with their you know, typical finance exposure, and some

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 1>are more interested in protocols. And I would say protocols

0:36:44.400 --> 0:36:47.320
<v Speaker 1>are probably where there's more opportunity because they take longer

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to build, and so when when an investor might be

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:52.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking about, you know, the roadmap of that team. You know,

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:56.759
<v Speaker 1>Ethereum took what is it now, so about six years

0:36:56.800 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 1>almost six years just to really ship East too, you know,

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, maybe there were some inefficiencies, but really

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just hard problems. It's hard cryptographic problems that requires

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the coordination between many different teams, often global, and so

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the best place that we could see

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 1>more investment, you know, given that the roadmap is likely

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, the next decade. I have a really tough

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:20.880
<v Speaker 1>question and um you know, we talked about in the

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:24.439
<v Speaker 1>intro how there always seems to be a new use

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>case for crypto h So, you know, we had method

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of payment and then we kind of moved into defy

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and then web three point Oh, what do you think

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:37.720
<v Speaker 1>is the next big crypto use case or or perhaps

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 1>what do you think is an underappreciated use case at

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the moment that people are going to be talking more

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>about in the coming years. Yeah. I have two favorites

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>here so E and S. Like I mentioned Ethereum name

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 1>services UM as the universal log in I think has

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>been untapped and you know, watching them grow over the

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 1>past year, grow into a dow you know, is really

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 1>allowing them to flourish and so sort of surpassed the

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Web three community. Everyone in Web three is known about

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>them um. But the goal is really that that could

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>be the killer app that gets WEBB two people in,

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>because a universal login is something we can all relate to.

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, we all log into many apps and we

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:14.800
<v Speaker 1>all forget our passwords. The second is this cross chain universe.

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>So something we've seen at the graph is a lot

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 1>more queries and usage of subgraphs that are more focused

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:24.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe on wrapped bitcoin, so you know, creating some kind

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of wrapped bitcoin or solution that enables access to bitcoin

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 1>on ethereum or other chains. And to me, that signifies

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot more interest from the bitcoin community to actually

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>get involved and defined some of these new activities or markets.

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So whether that's investing in n f t s or

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe actually just doing some investing in utility tokens um.

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Seeing that growth in wrapped bitcoin and wrapped tokens um

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:49.839
<v Speaker 1>signifies a much more mature smart contract ecosystem. UM, So

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:52.959
<v Speaker 1>folks not only interested in the typical Bitcoin use case

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:56.319
<v Speaker 1>of you know, hard money, but also seeing that there's

0:38:56.360 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a bigger world here and a lot more opportunity to

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:01.800
<v Speaker 1>get involved. Well, Eva, that was great. I've always wanted

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to learn more about the work that you do and can,

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:07.399
<v Speaker 1>but you gotta I gotta get back. I really miss

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:11.400
<v Speaker 1>like the morning saying GM in the e girl a discord,

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know what happened, but if it still exists,

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:15.799
<v Speaker 1>I really want to come back yet. Okay, I will

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:17.839
<v Speaker 1>make sure you're invited back in, Tracy, do you also

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>want to join? You know? I think, okay, I'll come in.

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 1>But this is a lot of pressure because now I

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 1>have to think what my avatar is and what my

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to join on the pseud anonymous basis as

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, yeah, I gotta go choose my ape. So

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:37.479
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of pressure. Yeah, exactly, all right, Well,

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Eva Balan, thank you so much for coming out on

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 1>odd Lots. Thank you so much for having me with

0:39:43.040 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the pleasure. Thank you, Eva. That was great, Trazy, I

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 1>thought that conversation was really fun. I really don't know

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 1>how you could like look at like the website of

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Eager Capital and see this investment collective of like all

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:13.799
<v Speaker 1>these cartoon characters and part of their investments are like

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 1>like on their like portfolio page or a bunch of

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>n f T s, And even if you think the

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>whole thing is kind of nuts, like it seems pretty

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>fun and cool. Yeah, I guess. I mean, I don't

0:40:25.000 --> 0:40:28.439
<v Speaker 1>want to get too profound about it, but maybe it's

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:34.279
<v Speaker 1>a really nice like due diligence test where if you

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:36.680
<v Speaker 1>saw a bunch of cartoon characters saying that they were

0:40:36.800 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>investing in all this random stuff, you would be like, well,

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea if they're serious or not, because

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, one is a frog and the other one

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 1>is nape and another's an anime character or whatever. But

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 1>if you actually looked at what each of them is

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>doing and saying and understood whether or not what they

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>were saying was making sense, and whether or not they

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:00.400
<v Speaker 1>were making intelligent commentary on the space, I feel like

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that's actually probably a better method of due diligence than

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing like Mark Anderson is investing in whatever startup and

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 1>so it must be really good, which seems to be

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:14.400
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of people do nowadays. No, I totally agree,

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's exactly right. Like if you know, like I

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>said in the beginning, a lot of the people over

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:22.759
<v Speaker 1>the last you know, We've been following this space for years,

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:24.920
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of the people who I've been following

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and really like must read their stuff, I have no

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 1>idea who they are. They're completely undocked, their pseudonymous, but

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 1>like they've broken through, and in Crypto specifically, I would say, also,

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:38.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think what did what was the term

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 1>that evil years, like anti suit or something like that,

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:44.000
<v Speaker 1>like we're suits, But they said, like a lot of

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the people who I think, like frankly speak the most

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>nonsense and speaking total jargon, are exactly like suits and

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 1>people who like it's like I don't trust you, And

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:57.880
<v Speaker 1>so I do think, like Crypto, the whole world like

0:41:57.920 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 1>short of flips on its head. Where where credibility comes from,

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 1>where credibility has earned? Yeah, And actually, I mean this

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:08.520
<v Speaker 1>has been a challenge for us on all plots because

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:11.239
<v Speaker 1>there have been anonymous people that we want to get

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 1>on the show, especially to talk around n f T s,

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's hard for us to get them on because

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, even if they don't want to docks themselves

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:22.239
<v Speaker 1>on the show. Um, and it's a bit difficult for

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:24.920
<v Speaker 1>us to have totally anonymous people, but if they give

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 1>us an audio recording, you know, unless we like try

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to disguise the voice. Um, there's still a concern that

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:34.239
<v Speaker 1>they might docks themselves. But UM, I don't know. Maybe

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:36.440
<v Speaker 1>if anyone has any good ideas for getting around that,

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:38.920
<v Speaker 1>we would be all ears. The other thing I want

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to say is, you know, we're talking about the difference

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:46.799
<v Speaker 1>between people who just like sort of babble in technical jargon, um,

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:50.319
<v Speaker 1>try to sound like they're knowledgeable versus people who are

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:53.279
<v Speaker 1>actually able to explain this stuff in a clear way.

0:42:53.400 --> 0:42:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And I thought Eva's definition of what you know Web

0:42:57.920 --> 0:43:01.719
<v Speaker 1>three point oh is what true do Centralization is, as

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 1>this right to exit is a really simple and intuitive

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 1>way of thinking about it. Yeah, the idea of like

0:43:12.000 --> 0:43:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that you could like, okay, you have this data or

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to use at cliche term that's or some

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>jarget that's coming back, like the so called social graph,

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and the idea that you could move it, and the

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:25.879
<v Speaker 1>idea that not one company could control it and could

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:28.759
<v Speaker 1>be somewhere else. It's very powerful. I still feel like,

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like, look, we're all like tweeting, even tweeting.

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 1>The other girls are tweeting their discords or sorry discord

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and cetera. Like there's still an incredible reliance on we

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 1>have two tools, and I don't know, like it's still

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:45.319
<v Speaker 1>really hard for me to like envision like what the

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:47.880
<v Speaker 1>decentralized version of all this is going to be. Like

0:43:48.000 --> 0:43:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I get n f t s, I get like having

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a wallet with like showing your n f t s,

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:54.400
<v Speaker 1>But that's different than like updating something that would be

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:57.400
<v Speaker 1>equivalent to a tweet, or sending something a message that

0:43:57.400 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 1>would be there would be the equivalent to an email.

0:43:59.640 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 1>So I still have some part of me that's like

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:04.359
<v Speaker 1>has a hard time wrapping around like what the decentralized

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Internet really looks like. But you know, I don't get

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:09.920
<v Speaker 1>most of this stuff anyway, so I wouldn't necessarily hold

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 1>that against them. Well, to me, that the data is

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the is the important issue here and the thing that

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 1>has the big question mark around it. Right, So if

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:19.719
<v Speaker 1>you have the right to exit, you have the right

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:22.439
<v Speaker 1>to take all this data with you. And historically Web

0:44:22.480 --> 0:44:26.279
<v Speaker 1>two point oh has been run on proprietary data. That's

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:29.279
<v Speaker 1>how people make money. My question is like how does

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that transform into companies that are actually making profits? And Okay,

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:36.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe you don't need everyone to be making a profit

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:39.440
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that Facebook and Google and whoever

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:41.880
<v Speaker 1>have traditionally been making profits. But it seems like you

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:45.319
<v Speaker 1>still have to have some sort of monetization in order

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to incentivize people to come in and build this stuff.

0:44:49.680 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, on the other hand, it does seem

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 1>like there are a lot of people who are interested

0:44:53.719 --> 0:44:56.799
<v Speaker 1>in building it right now, and there's certainly a lot

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of money pouring into the space without that monetization question

0:45:00.120 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>actually having been answered in detail, So maybe that's on

0:45:03.680 --> 0:45:06.960
<v Speaker 1>its way. Who knows. And I certainly believe Eva what

0:45:07.120 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 1>she says that even with the recent selling and so

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 1>many coins basically being cut in half, that these sort

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of like impulse to build and invest is still going strong.

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:18.799
<v Speaker 1>It feels like, I'm I don't think we're going to

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:21.480
<v Speaker 1>have like an actually like crypto winter or everyone sort

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:24.319
<v Speaker 1>of like forgets about cryptover three years the way we

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>did starting. No, it does feel like there's so many

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 1>people and so much money in the space and it's

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:33.319
<v Speaker 1>almost its own belief system at this point that it's

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:37.400
<v Speaker 1>really hard for it to go away totally. Great, All right,

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 1>shall we leave it there, Let's see it there? Okay,

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:43.280
<v Speaker 1>this has been another episode of the all Thoughts podcast.

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:45:46.080 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway and I'm Joey Isn't Thought. You can follow

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at The Stalwart. Follow our guest Eva

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Bayalin she is at Eva Bayalin Fellow or producer Laura

0:45:56.080 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Carlson at Laura M. Carlson. Follow the Bloomberg had a podcast,

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Francisco Leavi at Francisco Today, and check out all of

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 1>our podcasts at Bloomberg under the handle at podcasts. Thanks

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:08.080
<v Speaker 1>for listening.