WEBVTT - US Inflation Eases, Offering Some Relief Ahead of Tariffs

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Business Week Insight from the reporters and

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 2>editors that bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:20.799
<v Speaker 2>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenovek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 3>We do want to kick off this hour with Moran.

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Today's inflation print. US consumer prices rose at the slowest pace.

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 4>In four months.

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 3>That was in the month of February, offering some reprieve

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 3>ahead of tariffs that are expected to drive costs higher

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 3>here in the United States. The BLS saying nearly half

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 3>of the advance though in the overall measure in February

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 3>was due to shelter costs, but it is still decelerating

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 3>from the prior month. So we wanted to get more

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 3>on the print, and we've got a great person to

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 3>do just that.

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 5>We're back with us as Bloomberg Economics US economist store

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 5>Paul he joins us here in any Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 5>studio a good inflation read. Is there a big caveat here,

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 5>Stuart that it's came before the tariffs have really kicked in.

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 6>That's the first caveat. Yes, they came before most of

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 6>the tariffs kicked in. We get the big retaliatory tariffs

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 6>on April second. Of course Trump doesn't want to do

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 6>it on April Fool's Day. I think that the other

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 6>thing to keep in mind with this report is that

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 6>most of the disinflation came from things like core services

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 6>excluding shelter, some of the supercore services indexes, things like airfares,

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 6>where there was a big seasonal factor dragging down airfares.

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 6>Now we know the demand for air travel hasn't been

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 6>super robust. We heard guidance from Delta. We also could

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 6>just see the TSA numbers. But when you have such

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 6>a big seasonal factor in play accounting for so much

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 6>of the month to month disinflation, I sort of discount

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 6>today's reading. And then beyond that, we do have goods

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 6>core goods excluding autos and including autos boosting inflation both

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 6>headline and core. When you have core goods boosting inflation

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 6>as opposed to providing a minor amount of drag, which

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 6>it typically does, we should be a little bit concerned.

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 6>Add on top of that, used auto prices continuing to

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 6>rise during the month and when you think about auto

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 6>supply chains and auto manufacturing and tariffs coming against Canada

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 6>and Mexico, you have to be a little bit concerned.

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 6>Add on top of all of that.

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Final a lot of additions.

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm just going to point.

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 6>Out somehow I go deep into the details and I

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 6>always find, you know, the opposite of a silver lining.

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 6>But the one final one that I would point out

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 6>is that inflation actually became more pervasive. If you count

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 6>the number of core spending line items that are seeing

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 6>excessive inflation right now. Disinflation and deflation became less pervasive

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 6>during the month. So again there are a lot of

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 6>caveats that we actually have to keep in mind when

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 6>we look at this report. It's going to be a

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 6>really long last mile to the FEDS two percent inflation target.

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Is that why initially I think we saw yields back off,

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 3>but we've moved off. I know we had also had

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 3>a treasury auction today, but you've got what a tenure

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 3>right now yielding almost four thirty four point twenty nine,

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 3>and I'm looking at the sure end of the yell curve.

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Of course, most sensitive to what we might get from

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 3>the Fed three ninety seven So is that why.

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 4>We are seeing yield high or what's your thinking that.

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 6>There was a little bit of a treat in rate

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 6>cut bets. We did see a full three cuts for

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 6>the year priced as of last night today after the

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 6>CPI report, we got just about, you know, sixty eight

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 6>basis points or just a touch under three cuts fully priced.

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 6>And I think that that's a part of it. Looking

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 6>at some of the details of this report, it's not

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 6>the most inspiring report, and when we had tariffs coming

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 6>while we have goods adding to inflation, it could be

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 6>a little bit of a problem.

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 5>Was the market reaction to this report incorrect in your view?

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 5>The equity market reaction.

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 6>Look, I mean it's going to be tough for a

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 6>classically trained economist to say that the market is wrong.

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 4>But are allowed to comment.

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 5>We're giving you these is that because the market is

0:03:57.720 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 5>never wrong.

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 6>I the market is never wrung. I think that the

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 6>retreat in rate cut bets is probably the right move.

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 6>I think that when you start looking at equities, you

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 6>have other things that are in play, including earning's guidance

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 6>and so on.

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 3>So is the Fed fed beating next week right second

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 3>of the year? Is their job getting more difficult based

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 3>on what you say, all these caveats in the inflation

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 3>print reminds us that inflation it ain't over. And then

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 3>you've got tariffs being loaded on.

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 4>So are they in a.

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:27.559
<v Speaker 3>Tricky spot At the same time we do see signs

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 3>of growth slowing down.

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so the FED is in a tricky spot.

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 6>Tariffs make it especially difficult for the FED to achieve

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 6>its dual mandate because you have two things that are

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 6>going on. You have upward inflation pressures that are coming

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 6>from input costs as a consequence of the tariffs. But

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 6>a sort of rebalancing of the economy that comes with

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 6>the implementation of tariffs can be demand destructive. So the

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 6>extent to which those higher input costs can then get

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 6>passed the long to consumer prices isn't abundantly clear quite yet,

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 6>and we know that firms are going to try to

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 6>pass along those costs. Question is just how much to

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 6>man destruction there is.

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 5>You mentioned the airlines, the disinflation that we saw in

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 5>the airlines and the numbers today when it comes to

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 5>airline comes to airline prices. We saw that play out

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 5>yesterday with the market reaction to Delta and American airlines

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 5>coming out and updating their guidance because of soft consumer demand.

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 5>Given everything that we've seen just in the last couple

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 5>of weeks, in your view, how's the consumer doing?

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 7>How is the economy doing?

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 6>We do see higher prices weighing on consumers. We do

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 6>see it in discretionary spending categories. One thing that was

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.919
<v Speaker 6>especially difficult to judge starting in January was the effect

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 6>of weather. Consumers did pull back across the board, But

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 6>one of the reasons why spending was so terrible in

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 6>the month of January is because auto sales were down.

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.799
<v Speaker 6>Nobody wants to spend their time walking on auto dealer's lot.

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 7>During a polar war.

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 6>Attax auto numbers were back up in February, and we

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 6>can expect to see some improvement in retail sales that'll

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 6>come on Monday. Still sharpening our pencils, but overall, it

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 6>does look like consumers are pulling.

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 7>Back quite a little bit.

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 6>We do see credit card default auto loan defaults all

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 6>on the rise, and for that reason, we should expect

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 6>consumers to show a little bit more precautionary savings in

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 6>the months ahead. And when you see consumer consumer sentiment

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 6>and buying plans retreating, you would expect that to be

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 6>reflected in subsequent months and actual spend.

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 3>We are going to talk at the end of this

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:28.359
<v Speaker 3>hour about the wealth effect, and I am curious if

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 3>you guys are also you and the team sharpening your

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 3>pencils over the idea that with all the volatility that

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing in the equity markets and stocks pulling back,

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, fairly dramatically here in twenty twenty five, that

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 3>for those who are the wealthiest sect of our economy,

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 3>who spend a lot in our economy, there are some

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 3>concerns about that having an economic impact.

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 6>That's right, So of course there is a wealth effect

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 6>that works in both directions. Right, So for every additional

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 6>dollar and accumulated wealth, you could expect a few cents

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 6>of additional spending for those who have the most exposure

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 6>to equity markets, stocks retreating nearly ten percent off the

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 6>all time highs. I think that the thing to though,

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 6>keep in mind is the accumulated wealth since the pandemic.

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 6>It's still something like fifty trillion dollars and accumulated well

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 6>since the pandemic. Yes, what we've seen over the past

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 6>couple weeks puts a dent in it, and it will

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 6>make the upper end of the income distribution a bit

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 6>more cautious in their spending behaviors. Is it the sort

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 6>of thing that's good? Is that negative wealth effect enough

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 6>to derail spending completely? Probably not, And there is still

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 6>plenty of credit that can smooth over any sort of

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 6>bumps in the road real quickly.

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 4>Twenty seconds PPI. What do we need to know?

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 6>Keeping an eye really on PPI for airfares, hospital cost,

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 6>physician services, because that's what ends up going into core

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 6>PCE spending. But based on what we have right now,

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 6>fed's favored inflation index, the PCE price Index should have

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 6>a relatively favorable reading at this point based on what

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 6>we know about February.

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Great stuff as always, Stuart, Thank you so much, Bloomberg

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Economics US economist Stuart Paul, all right, the latest US

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 3>inflation print may ultimately cause some relief ahead of US tariffs.

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 4>The tariffs are happening tim.

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 5>At twelve oh one am this Wednesday morning, President Donald

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 5>Trump's twenty five percent tariffs on steel and aluminum imports

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 5>came into force. It triggered concern across export reliant Asia

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 5>and immediate reprisals from the European Union in Canada as

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 5>the global trade war enters a rocky phase, Carol. Meantime,

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.239
<v Speaker 5>Canada announced new twenty five percent tariffs on about twenty

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 5>point eight billion dollars of US made products, including steel

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 5>and aluminum.

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, and these retaliatory measures by Canada will also apply

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 3>to consumer items such as computer sporting goods. They match

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 3>the US tariff's dollar for dollar, and they're going to

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 3>take effect at twelve oh one am New York time.

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 3>All right, so let's get an update on this tariff

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 3>trade war between the US and Canada as it relates

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 3>in particular to the metals market in industry back with

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 3>US as Bloomberg News Metals and Mining Heavy Machinery reporter

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Jodoe an expert on this space. So all right, not

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.719
<v Speaker 3>fifty percent, twenty five percent? How does that change any

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 3>of the conversation like that we had with you yesterday.

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 9>I think it goes back to what most of the

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 9>market was expecting, what most buyers were anticipating, and what

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 9>producers were anticipating. And to be clear, none of them

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 9>wanted this on either side. Well, I mean American steelmakers

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 9>probably did to some level, but people actually making business

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 9>decisions are saying, Okay, well, at least we got what

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 9>we were planning for the past month or so. I

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 9>think that's the first part. The fact that the fifty

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.319
<v Speaker 9>percent did get walked back allowed for people to breathe.

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 9>I spoke to I spoke to somebody in the market

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 9>today in the steel market, who said, yesterday it was hectic,

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 9>but today I'm getting almost no phone calls.

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 4>And are they making trades.

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 9>Well, they're in the service center space, so they don't trade,

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 9>but they do supply important end markets in the United States.

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 7>Can you just you know?

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 5>Fortunately, at Bloomberg, we have a great feature on the

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 5>terminal where I can go and look at this chart

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 5>from our bloombergy economics team that has tariffs and when

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 5>they were enacted and what's expected to That's super helpful

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 5>for me because I'm having trouble keeping track of all this.

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 9>It's helpful for me too.

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 5>Okay, remind us why these were imple in the first place,

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 5>and what the off ramp for these are.

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 9>The Trump administration put twenty five percent steeled terriffs and

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 9>ten percent aluminum terraffs into place back in twenty eighteen

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 9>as a part of his initial move on trade. In

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 9>the years since, the United States gave exemptions to various

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 9>countries and various products for these for these imports for

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:21.599
<v Speaker 9>various reasons, and many of them were approved under the

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 9>Trump administration and others were approved under the Biden administration.

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 9>Trump sat down in the early part of his term

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 9>and probably was even having conversations before he got into

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 9>office in which the steel lobby and various individuals in

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:37.599
<v Speaker 9>the aluminum lobby said you got to get rid of

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 9>the exemptions because they're no longer having the impact of

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 9>giving more production and more profit to the producers inside

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 9>the United States. So he clearly sat down with his

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 9>advisors and said, we're going to re implement it with

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 9>no exemptions, and by the way, we're going to bump

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 9>up the aluminum tariff to twenty five percent.

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 5>But there is there is this related at all to

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 5>border crossings or fentanyl or is there an off ramp

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 5>for these in the near future.

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 9>Section two thirty two is what he okay.

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 5>So they implemented this on security.

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 9>Right, So I think a key thing right, and this

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 9>is a great question, right, is he knew and his

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:14.959
<v Speaker 9>administration knew that the Section two thirty two terrifts in

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 9>twenty eighteen had been tested in the courts and they

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:21.839
<v Speaker 9>had stood up because Section two thirty two was implemented

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 9>under Kennedy right and gives the authority to the President

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 9>of the United States broad reaching power to implement terriffs

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 9>on imports that they deem threaten national security. So under

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 9>that umbrella, they were able to re implement that statute

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 9>with the twenty five percent tariff and pull off all

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 9>the exemptions. That's why this this in particular, had nothing

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 9>to do with the Mexico Canada across the board tariffs.

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 9>That's why this one went into effect. And for the

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 9>most part, people in the markets in the steel and

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 9>aluminum market said, Okay, well, maybe we're not pumped with this,

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 9>but at least we know how it works.

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:55.959
<v Speaker 4>Well, do they feel like that's it?

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:58.439
<v Speaker 3>Because the reason I asked you about the trade, and

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 3>you're right, it was not the right company to be asking.

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 3>But one of the things that stuck with me from

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 3>what you said yesterday that the folks that are trading

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 3>in these markets are free to even make a bet

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 3>because it's just things change and it's not just you know,

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 3>weekly changes, monthly changes, it's like hourly changes.

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 9>And it's largely because of the President of the United

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 9>States coming out and saying, unexpectedly, we're putting we're putting

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 9>tariffs on all imports from Canada and Mexico, right, and

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 9>then days later saying, actually, we're going to delay that,

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 9>and then later on coming out and saying we're going

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 9>to do something called reciprocal tariffs. These are things that

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 9>people in my markets that I cover steal on aluminum

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 9>that is like a totally different component that was not

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 9>on their radar, that they had to start figuring out

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 9>what it actually meant to their markets. And as I

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 9>said to you guys yesterday, the anecdote of the person

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 9>putting on a copper trade right, that was, oh my gosh, Okay,

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 9>So he's we think he's going to put import terriffs

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 9>on a lot of things, and we think copper might

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 9>be one of the things. And the President the United

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 9>States comes out at the end of January and says,

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 9>steal on aluminum, terariffs are coming back on and by

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 9>the way, we're going to do copper too. Well, suddenly

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 9>you see the price of copper go up that trader says, great,

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:06.839
<v Speaker 9>that's a good play for us. And then by Monday,

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 9>the President of United States comes back out and says, actually,

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 9>we're going to walk a few things back, including copper,

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 9>which we might have to do a Section two thirty

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 9>two investigation on. So it's unclear that we might actually

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 9>do this.

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 7>Oh, go ahead.

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 9>So these traders are saying, that's the uncharted territory. We

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 9>know Section two thirty two for stealing aluminum, but all

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 9>these other terriffs are new, and they're coming under things

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 9>like IPA, like trade terrifts that weren't actually put into

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 9>place the first time around. So the Trump administration this

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 9>time around has deald even further into books that were

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 9>dusted off. I mean section two thirty two. I had

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.719
<v Speaker 9>trade lawyers tell us in twenty eighteen, we didn't know

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 9>what Section two thirty two was. We had to actually

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 9>go back into the stacks to read up everything to

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 9>understanding in a long time. And listen. I spoke to

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 9>wilber Ross a month ago and asked him some follow

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 9>up questions on this, and he did make the point. Remember,

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 9>Section two thirty two was tried in the courts and

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 9>was upheld and he knows that is one tool he

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 9>has in his back pocket that he can go through

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 9>with the president does the president of United States, And

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 9>that's what we saw go into effect last night at

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 9>twelve o one or this morning.

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 5>So essentially, the new tariffs that have been imposed this week,

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 5>they've been tested in the mechanism, has been tested in

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 5>the courts.

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 7>That's right.

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 5>These are in the view of the prop Trump administration.

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 5>These are safe, These are good to go.

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 9>These won't be challenged probably, so that's probably how they feel.

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 10>Now.

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 9>The question is will they walk some of it back,

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 9>in other words, will they go into exemptions. That's unclear

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 9>to me. But we did have reporting in our main

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 9>bar story yesterday that we knew of a meeting between Alcoa,

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 9>the CEO of Alcoa, Bill Opplinger, some Rio Tanto officials,

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 9>and the US Aluminum Association president in which they sat

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 9>down with the Commerce Department in the past couple of

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 9>weeks telling the Commerce Department you need to not implement

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 9>the aluminum terras on imports from Canada. Now they had

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 9>the conversation, which at least indicates to the market that

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 9>they're listening to people. So maybe they end up do

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 9>giving exemptions. But as of this point, Trump made it

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 9>very clear we're not giving any exemptions. And remember, the

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.359
<v Speaker 9>biggest people who are against exemptions are the US steelmakers,

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 9>New Core Corporations, Steel Dynamics, US Steel, and Cliffs all

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 9>came out with a letter on Friday and said, mister President,

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 9>do not give exemptions because that will just undo everything

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 9>that we have here.

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 4>Don't ever go away.

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 3>No, it's just it's a complicated, and as Jim said,

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 3>we're trying to keep up to date on what's new,

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 3>what's old, what's on top of each other, because it

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 3>makes a difference in terms of the implications for the industry,

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 3>for companies, for costs, for inflation.

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 4>For the economy. Thank you, Thank you.

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg News Medals and Mining Heavy Machinery reporter Jode, who

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 3>is never going to leave us.

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 10>Well.

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 3>With a lot continuing to come out of the White

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 3>House and Trump administration regarding Tariff's, geopolitics and so much more.

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 3>We wanted to do deep dive into how the United

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 3>States relationship with the world is changing short term and

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 3>possibly longer term, and to try and really suss out

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 3>what President Trump's an endgame and agenda may be when

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 3>it comes to the global role of the US government.

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 3>And to that we turn once again to Ed Price.

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 3>He's a former British Trade official official now non resident

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Senior Fellow over at NYU. He has advised members of

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 3>the European and British parliaments, writes regularly about politics, economic

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 3>policy and more just tying it all together, and he

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 3>joins us here in studio.

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 7>Welcome, Welcome, Thank you very much, Carol.

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 3>You were doing okay, like trying to keep up with

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 3>the headlines and make sense of it all. And I

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 3>think we too are all trying to think longer term change.

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Disruption We talk about it all the time. Can be

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 3>good and we'll get to that in just a moment.

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 3>But you have a recent column he wrote about for Barons,

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 3>and you get into how President Trump's rise marks the

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 3>end of a long progressive era in the United States,

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 3>and you seize on at least you kick it off

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 3>the column with something that the President said in his

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 3>recent joint address to Congress, saying he wants the United

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 3>States to be the most dominant civilization over ever to

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 3>exist on the face of this earth.

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 4>So what is he striving for? What is he in

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 4>your view?

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 11>In my view, he is a good thing for America,

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 11>the nation, and America the democracy, because everybody's talking about

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 11>America and the democracy, and we're sitting here doing this again.

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 11>And he is potentially a very bad thing for the

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 11>Republic and the Union and the United States. And it

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 11>might seem strange to make that distinction, because as things stand,

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.199
<v Speaker 11>we very often think of those things as the same. Right,

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 11>we will say USA and we'll say America interchangeably. And

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 11>as I try to argue in this column, I may

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 11>be wrong. I think that Trump's absolute structural purpose, is

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 11>foundational purpose, is to split those two things in half,

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 11>to get them away from the war from the other.

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 5>Explain how he does that and what that means. People

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 5>might hear you and say, wait a second, these things

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 5>sound like something that are inextricably bound.

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 7>So they're not.

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 11>In my opinion, right, seventeen seventy six is the moment

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 11>that the American nation was born and it was born

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.360
<v Speaker 11>of breaking the law and defying a king. So that's

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 11>the rebelliousness, right, that's the flags on the back of pickups.

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 11>It's great, it's all American. Seventeen eighty nine, when the

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 11>Constitution is ratified, is the moment that we chose to

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 11>be legalists and chose to be a republic. Alexander Hamilton

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 11>in that intereigrament was saying, look, should we have a

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 11>king right? And they were arguments about how powerful the

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 11>president should be. These arguments have never been resolved, and

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 11>we saw with Nixon, we saw with Kennedy the imperial presidency,

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 11>because again, we haven't decided as a nation what exactly

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 11>our republic is fought. So, if President Trump truly wanted

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 11>to create a presidency with unlimited powers, he wouldn't be

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 11>able to do it within the existing seventeen eighty nine

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 11>United States framework.

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 7>He would have to somehow.

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 11>Appeal to the seventeen seventy six animal spirits to misuse

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 11>the term of the nation.

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 4>So is that where doge comes in?

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 7>Doge goodness me?

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 11>So Elon Musk is supposed to be a genius. He

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 11>doesn't realize he's the foe gay right, he's the four guy.

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 11>He's going to be ousted at some point when DOGE

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 11>goes too far, which it will probably into entitlements.

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 4>Trump will need, which is what they are dealing with,

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 4>which is what they want.

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:30.959
<v Speaker 7>To do as we speak.

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 11>Trump is going to need someone that wasn't affirmed by

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 11>this confirmed by the Senate to get rid of quickly,

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 11>and that's Musk. And I think we saw Musk on

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 11>Fox the other day sweating it a little bit with

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 11>Kudlog because it looked like he's starting to realize that

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 11>maybe he's in trouble. His businesses aren't doing very well

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 11>and so on. So DOGE is the kind of battering ram.

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 11>It's like the vanguard that's seeing how far, like a

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 11>test balloon, how far this stuff can go, and when challenged,

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 11>must will be quite easy to peel off.

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, when is I just you know, because I think

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 3>it's safe to say that some have thought government has

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:06.199
<v Speaker 3>gotten really big, and there's some security in that in

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 3>that you don't move fast and break things that maybe

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't be broken. But at the same time, it's very

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 3>easy to get lazy over existing structure, and waste does

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 3>get created. And you know whether it's you know, so,

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 3>what's the balance between good efficiency and disruption, especially.

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 4>In a government like the United States.

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 7>Well, I guess there's two points. Right.

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 11>One is that whether or not the American people want

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 11>a big government is debatable. That's why we have elections.

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 11>Whether or not the Americans want an all powerful government

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 11>was already decided at the aforementioned Constitutional Congress, Right, So

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:47.360
<v Speaker 11>I'm very careful to try and prize away an efficient

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 11>government from the size of the government. Donald Trump wants

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 11>a smaller government, which he then says is more efficient.

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 11>So those of us who are worried, and this is

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 11>the second point, those of us who are worried about

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 11>fiscal and debt, will go, Okay, that makes sense, But

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 11>that's disingenuous because what he actually wants is a more

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 11>powerful government.

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 4>He wants a concentration of power.

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 7>Scentration of power.

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 11>So Lord Acton famously says that power corrupts, and absolute

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 11>power corrupts.

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely.

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 11>I think power accumulates as well, and this is what

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 11>we should be watching for.

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 5>I want to go back to what you said about

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 5>Elon and Doge, because I think a lot of people

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 5>have been proven wrong over the past few months. When

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 5>they said this is a honeymoon that is going to

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 5>end badly. These two look pretty.

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 7>Close at this point.

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 5>And given Elon's status as the wealthiest person in the world,

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 5>he proved in this election cycle that he's incredibly powerful

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 5>with helping to elect people.

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 10>Mm hm.

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 7>And you'll say he might be there longer than I think.

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 5>I think I am, yeah, just because he has the resources,

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 5>and you know, he has said he wants to use

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 5>these in other parts of the ballot.

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 11>So the president with respect has a long and storied

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 11>history of using and discarding people. And I don't think

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.120
<v Speaker 11>that Elon Musk rule of his wealth is I.

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 5>Mean, there are many books written by those people who

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.880
<v Speaker 5>want there's ascribe.

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 11>There's a library of people that have been have been

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 11>let down by the president?

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 7>Shall we say?

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 11>I guess I'm contending. I mean I can see too

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 11>that maybe the time is something I can possibly forecast.

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:18.719
<v Speaker 11>But I think the function of putting Musk into this

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 11>thing called doge is that he's easy to get rid of.

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 11>He's easy to point out later and say this guy

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 11>made these mistakes, not me right, and at that point

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:28.959
<v Speaker 11>he's gone.

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 3>So when you hear things like Canada and this is

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.199
<v Speaker 3>something I think we all too are asking ourselves. You

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 3>know again, what is the endgame here? Do you think

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:41.479
<v Speaker 3>in terms of President Trump?

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 11>Honestly, I mean I might regret saying this. Okay, maybe

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 11>this is my last appearance on your show.

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 7>I don't know. I think he's serious. I think he's serious.

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Canadians are if we if it ever comes off kind

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 3>of jokey on air, I'll be honest with you.

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:57.640
<v Speaker 4>We've had people reach out and say, hey, this is serious.

0:22:57.680 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 7>We don't think this is a I think it's dead serious.

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 11>I think Donald Trump's vision is a big sharpie around

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 11>the entire of North America, including Greenland, with Trump Land

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 11>written on it. And I think that there's some strategic

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 11>sense to this, right because of the world of you know,

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 11>you look at the Second World War, it was just

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 11>who can get the biggest load of resources in one place.

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 11>And if you look at Russia and China, they kind

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 11>of have Eurasia on lock. So it would strategically make

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 11>sense for the America, the North Americans to converge together,

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 11>if not for the fact that we don't behave like that.

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 11>And the very reason for this country is law. As

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 11>I said, seventeen eighty nine. So the seventeen eighty nine

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 11>edition of the United States cannot annex Canada. It tried,

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 11>it failed, It just didn't work. But the sort of

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:47.360
<v Speaker 11>pre seventeen seventy six bubbling rebelliousness of the nation might

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 11>And I feel that he's, as I say, dead serious.

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 5>If he's dead serious, are you saying or predicting that

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 5>he might in fact try to make Canada the fifty

0:23:58.720 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 5>first state.

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 11>I don't know that he would make it the fifty

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 11>first state. I feel like that's a meme, but I

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.359
<v Speaker 11>think he would try to bring heal. He talks about

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 11>it all the time, and Hue might or be it.

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 11>I imagine that the Republicans would never be elected again

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 11>because all of my Canadian friends are pretty liberal. I

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 11>don't know how that works, right, but I think that

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 11>what he wants is some control over the North American hemisphere.

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 11>It's almost like the Monroe Doctrine is being extended north

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 11>and being extended north at the expense of these polities

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 11>that already exist, in particular Denmark and Canada.

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 3>If we go along with your thinking, and some others

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 3>think that he too is not kidding, is it something

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 3>that could happen without US military action.

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 11>Well, I mean at some point the Canadians would not

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 11>be happy about this, right, I mean, you can't tell

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 11>us sovereign state you now belong to us. Others have

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 11>tried that in history, Napoleon, Stalin, Hitler, and it never

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 11>ends well. So I think that the US military would

0:24:56.119 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 11>have to at some point invade. I mean this again,

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 11>it's like amazing to hate yourself say this on a

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 11>live stream. So I don't think Canada.

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 3>But to be fair, the president has talked about it,

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 3>So start kind of carrying it out, like how this

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 3>might happen?

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 11>Sure, Sure, I think I think it's not impossible. I

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:14.880
<v Speaker 11>mean you could come in from Greenland. We have bases there.

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 5>We're Bloomberg. We got to talk market's big picture and

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 5>the way that they have responded to big picture President

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 5>Trump's policies over the last few weeks, or what they

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 5>view as his policies. Do you think it's fair to

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:30.919
<v Speaker 5>say that the equity and bond markets have not necessarily

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 5>been a check on the president.

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 11>He said to himself, to him, right, you don't look

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 11>at the stock market anymore?

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, But I mean he said a lot of things

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 5>he said, you take that to heart.

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 7>I think he's unrestrained. I think at this.

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 11>Point he's he's not thinking about popularity in the way

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 11>that he has previously. Something has changed in his demeanor.

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 5>He's not running for reelection, so or.

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 11>Well, I mean, let me respect that he's not supposed to.

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 7>He's not supposed to run for reelection. Again.

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 3>This is whole goes back to this whole thing.

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 7>This is this whole thing.

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 11>I think he's fundamentally trying to reshape North America. I

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 11>think Russia is a distraction. We of course, we have

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 11>to talk about markets race, so I don't want to

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 11>pivot away from that. Yeah, but the question for me

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 11>is China. Is he getting ready to hand Taiwan over

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 11>py Ukraine?

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 3>And full credit to our producer Ceci because she said,

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, as we were planning for this about how

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:29.199
<v Speaker 3>Trump and his cabinet have signaled that they're content to

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 3>sit back on Taiwan and China. You have Treasury Secretary

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Pssent even said he doesn't see China taking action against

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Taiwan in this term. So what does this messaging tell

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 3>you is the seating ground on global democracy? Should we

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 3>feel confident that Trump's presence is enough of a deterrent.

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 4>Only got about forty five to fifty seconds.

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 11>Democracy is okay because we voted for him. The republic

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 11>might not be. And this is what I mean. It

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 11>might be that there's a period of massive populism in

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 11>this country, including the seating of Taiwan, and democracy in

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 11>Taiwan is in trouble, But in this country it's doing

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 11>pretty well. And that's a real head scratcher, right, because

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 11>we may choose to abandon democratic allies.

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 4>But democracy would continue here.

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 7>Democracy here, I think for a while.

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Yep, I'm going to squeeze in one more question because

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 3>your column ends with all of this political disruption doesn't

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 3>necessarily mean the end of an era, but rather the

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 3>beginning of one.

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 4>Twenty five seconds.

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 11>Said it before, Trump wants some sort of empire, some

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 11>sort of imperium. I don't know if you would brand

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 11>it like that. I don't know if you would be

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 11>honest like that. But at core, he wants to solidify power,

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 11>move himself to send to stage, and create some kind

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 11>of autaki in North America.

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 4>Always an interesting perspective in view at Price.

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so appreciate you coming in, Senior fellow non

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 3>resident at NYU, former British trade official.

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 4>Right here on Bloomberg Business Week.

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Live weekday afternoons from two to five these during listen

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 1>on Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>or watch US Live on YouTube.

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 7>So much of the.

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 5>Focus on tariffs this week has been around what's going

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 5>on in Canada.

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 4>Canada?

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, like a lot.

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 7>A lot.

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 5>Jo Joe gave us a good update on that earlier.

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 4>Back and forth.

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, but let's not forget that earlier this month, the

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.360
<v Speaker 5>US and post twenty five percent tariffs on USMCA non

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 5>compliant goods. This information I got thanks to a great

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg compilation of the measures that happened.

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 8>Is obsessed.

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 5>I was like, Carol, you got to see this thing, and.

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 4>Helix stood over me on my desk.

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 5>No, no, no, I'm gonna send this to you.

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Pull it up, pull it up.

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 5>Pay Yeah, it's really helpful. So if you have to

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 5>check it out on the terminal Mexico for its part.

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:35.239
<v Speaker 4>How do you get it?

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 7>I don't know.

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 4>Oh, okay, I'll set you'll figure it out.

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 5>We'll figure it out. You tweeted out, I was hoping

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 5>you wouldn't ask me how to get it. Mexico, for

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 5>its part, will wait until seeing what US policy is

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:48.479
<v Speaker 5>unveiled on April second before taking any steps to respond

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 5>to tariffs. This is for Mexican President Claudia Shinbaum. She

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 5>said this earlier today. Mexico is the US's largest trading partner,

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 5>it's the second largest economy in Latin America, and it's

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 5>a key focus of this year's Milk and Global Opportunity Index. It's,

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 5>in the Institute's words, something that explores the economic landscape

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 5>of countries worldwide, del businesses make investment decisions, and governments

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 5>identify policies for attracting foreign capital. Maggie sweet Tech is

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 5>Senior director of Research at the Milican Institute. She's also

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 5>the lead author of the report. She joins US from

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 5>Santa Monica, California. Maggie, did this report and how you

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:25.479
<v Speaker 5>went into it change it all given what we've heard

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 5>from the Trump administration just in the first couple of

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 5>first few weeks of this administration.

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:35.239
<v Speaker 10>No, it hasn't really so, as you mentioned the top end.

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 10>As we mentioned in the report, this report really provides

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 10>an objective benchmark for evaluating developative attractiveness of countries for

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 10>foreign investors. And so the fundamentals of the attractiveness of

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 10>the countries hasn't changed. The situation around perhaps this are

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 10>very evolving. But the factors that we measure in the

0:29:56.040 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 10>Global Opportunity Index, such as the abundance of human and

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 10>natural resources and other aspects business perception, are the strength

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 10>of the financial services and financial markets. Those factors really

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 10>have not been affected by you know, the pivots that

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 10>have been happening lately.

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 5>But what if the difficulty in bringing a product into

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 5>the United States is affected by this administration and it

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 5>makes it less attractive to perhaps build a factory in

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 5>a place like Mexico. If a tariff of twenty five

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 5>percent will be charged on that good when it does

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 5>come over the border, doesn't that need to be taken

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 5>into account.

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 8>Well, that does need to be taken into account.

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 10>However, what I will say is that again, this report

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 10>really looks at the fundamentals, what is at the basis,

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 10>So what will change is capital flows probably and the short, medium,

0:30:55.680 --> 0:31:00.959
<v Speaker 10>and possibly long term. Now, these countries such as for example,

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 10>you were talking about Mexico. Mexico is one of the countries

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 10>with the highest level of economic openness on our index,

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 10>and it's economic openness not stems, of course from its

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 10>strong relations with countries such as the United States, but

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 10>also from the abundance of international free trade agreements that

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 10>has with countries across the world. So while United States

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 10>is of course very important and the main trade partner

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 10>from countries such as Mexico, they also have connections across

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 10>the world and those so far had not been affected

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 10>by the changing the in trade situation.

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, and I think Maggie to Tim's point, like just

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, we feel it. We talked to a lot

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 3>of folks who manage a lot of money, you know,

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 3>trying to make decisions, trying to make sense, you know,

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 3>in some cases kind of being in limbo until we

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 3>understand kind of what policy really what it will amount to,

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 3>because it can sometimes seem to in terms of conversations

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 3>or comments out of the White House change from hour

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 3>to hour, from week to week, from day to day.

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:11.239
<v Speaker 3>So I'm just wondering what that, you know, I think

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 3>we're trying to get into.

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 4>Does the world does the world kind of feel.

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 3>That way, whether it's Latin America, South America or elsewhere.

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 8>I'm sure it does.

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 10>And so what I would say is that because of

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 10>that precisely is why I would say that all of

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 10>the information that has been coming out, it's a bit

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:32.239
<v Speaker 10>too soon to judge what effects is going to have

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 10>in the medium and long term. However, what we can

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 10>look at is again the basis of what already has

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 10>been established in those countries. As you were saying yourself

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 10>at the top, there are also the terrors that were

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 10>imposed last week right now, they do not apply to

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 10>USMCA compliant roots. A lot of the lot of the

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 10>trade that is happening between Mexico and the United States

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 10>is within those sectors that are.

0:32:58.280 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 8>Compliant with the USMCA.

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 10>So again, you know, we really, I think everybody still

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 10>has to figure out how this will what will actually

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 10>end up happening in the in the medium term, and how.

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 8>This will impact capital enflos.

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 10>Now, however, within that framework, the Global Opportunity Index does

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 10>provide information about what are the potential attractive factors for countries,

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 10>for countries within Latin America, whether the person could still

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:29.479
<v Speaker 10>be strengthened within that region, and so that really provides

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 10>a little bit more of information that will that should

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 10>apply in the long term regardless.

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 8>Of what happens well, Maggiet with the current trade situation, well, it.

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 5>Raises the question though the Trump administration has been very

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 5>forceful in saying that it wants to make it better

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 5>for companies to do business in the US and worse

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 5>for companies to do business outside of the United States.

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 5>We hear this every day or something along those lines

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 5>every single day from the President. You focus at the

0:33:57.120 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 5>Milking Institute on global opportunity. Does the global opportunity for

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 5>companies and for governments decline with an American first policy

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 5>because America becomes a more attractive place to do business?

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 8>Well, so I would say again.

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 10>That that whether America becomes more attractive or not depends

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.800
<v Speaker 10>on multiple factors. There are a lot of the United

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 10>States is ranked third on our Global Opportunity in Texas here,

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 10>so it definitely is a country that has a very

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 10>high attractiveness to investors. It has and that is without

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 10>saying right, So, how does again, will shape the capital

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 10>flows across across countries is stough to be seen.

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 8>There. It is important to also know that a.

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 10>Lot of the factors that are being produced, all of them.

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 10>A lot of the manufacturing that is produced to the

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 10>United States is dependent on components that comes from abroad,

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:03.839
<v Speaker 10>so a certain level of exchange may still be very

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 10>favorable to countries. How much production happens within the United States.

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 10>Of course, it's good to bring production inside the borders,

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 10>but not everything can be produced within the United States.

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 3>No, that's fair, and we've certainly heard that from other

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:18.720
<v Speaker 3>folks in this studio.

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 4>Maggie, thank you so much. Maggie sweet Tech.

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 3>She's senior director of research at the Milcoine Institute, lead

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 3>author of the report that we were just talking about.

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 3>She's joining us from the West Coast on this Wednesday.

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Mac, Now about you let me drive?

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no, no, this is not a twenty.

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Day please, I want to drive.

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 8>It's a good question.

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 2>This is the drive to the clothes.

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 8>Dot Punk for me.

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:53.320
<v Speaker 12>Effect.

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:58.279
<v Speaker 2>Well, Jona Don on Bloomberg Radio, you.

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:00.320
<v Speaker 5>Just heard from Charlie and Bill Maloney the kind of

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 5>round trip that we saw in the US stocks.

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 8>Where was he?

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 5>Bill's in New Jersey? I think I don't know where

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:08.279
<v Speaker 5>he is. You can never tell with that background. No,

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 5>but he's allowed to work out of the office.

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:10.919
<v Speaker 7>One day away.

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 4>He can do it anyway.

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 5>That guy is here by the way, like you know,

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 5>pre six am or pre five hour.

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 4>He really is judgment judgementcall.

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:22.400
<v Speaker 5>You highlighted something really interesting today in our prep you.

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 5>This is from the Market's Life blog. The word uncertainty

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 5>is appearing on the Bloomberg terminal at its fastest paced

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 5>since November of twenty twenty, as global markets are whipsawed

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 5>by trade wars and recession fears.

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 3>I love stuff like this when we go through either

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 3>earning season and what you know, CEOs are using the most.

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:39.880
<v Speaker 5>And I love the word clouds.

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Word clouds right cool. Just you know whether or not

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 3>it becomes a reality. But sentiment is an important thing

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 3>in terms of markets.

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 5>Hey, let's figure out what Philip Palumbo is thinking. He's

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 5>founder and CEO and CIO at Plumbo Wealth Management. He

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:56.319
<v Speaker 5>joined us from Great Neck, New York. Philip, good to

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:58.240
<v Speaker 5>have you back with us. It has been a while

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 5>since we spoke. What are you hearing from your clients

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 5>right now? As we've seen market's whips over the last

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 5>couple of weeks.

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 12>Don't use the word perfectly uncertainty. I mean it's a

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 12>word that everybody's using. Everybody's very fearful of Trump, and

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 12>is the way he's erratic, and how quickly he's moving

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 12>forward with all his game plan that he talked about

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 12>during the campaign. Nobody realized, really thought that he'd move

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 12>as quickly as as he is moving. And it's scaring

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 12>a lot of clients.

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 5>So do they understand do they buy into this notion

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 5>and do you buy into this notion that the president

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 5>is not paying attention to financial markets or does not

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 5>care about what he sees with financial markets? As he said, Yeah,

0:37:39.680 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 5>I don't buy into that.

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 12>No, So I think he's got one eye on tariffs

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 12>and one eye on the overall market. I definitely think

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 12>it's really important to him to understand the account where

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 12>the economy's going, where the market's going, because Trump is

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 12>a scorecard type person and I can't imagine he's not

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 12>really looking at the markets. And at some point there'll

0:37:58.000 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 12>be a Trump put that will be put into place.

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 3>So in terms of where you want to put money,

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 3>then are you trading for maybe future Trump headlines that

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 3>might undo tariffs and undo some other things like how

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:13.319
<v Speaker 3>do you kind of get your head around it? Then

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 3>fail in terms of if you think that ultimately he's

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 3>going to look at the markets and maybe, you know,

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 3>see some of the impact and then will we.

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:24.319
<v Speaker 4>Undo some of the things that he's done already In your.

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 12>View, it's a lot bigger than that. It's more about

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 12>the way I describe it is you have you know,

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 12>one side of the barbell is the tariffs, and you

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 12>got the doge, which is the cutting of the deficit,

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 12>which is really contracts an economy. The other side of

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 12>it is deregulation and the extension of tax cuts, which

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:43.320
<v Speaker 12>actually can improve an economy. And it's his bed. And

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 12>you know Besson talked about this last week. You know

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 12>that they're trying to go from public spending government public

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 12>spending to private spending, and if they get that right,

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 12>that's going to be beneficial to the overall economy. So

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 12>for us, it's not about trading, it's about Okay, you know,

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 12>uncertainty creates opportunity, Volatility creates opportunity. And if you look

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 12>at someone these businesses, I mean, if you want to

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:03.359
<v Speaker 12>look at the mag seven and video and Amazon as

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:06.440
<v Speaker 12>an example, and these these businesses, they're they're multiple has

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 12>been cut in half, right, So when they're growing at

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 12>ten to fifteen, twenty percent or thirty percent or even

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 12>greater than that. And look at the forward multiple the

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:17.240
<v Speaker 12>market trading pretty much where they're trading, and the SMPS

0:39:17.280 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 12>projected to grow this year around seven. So there's always

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 12>opportunities with volatility. You know, people got to get excited

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:25.759
<v Speaker 12>about this opportunity with volatility because it's an opportunity to

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 12>put money to work with great businesses over the long term.

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 12>Now just caveat is is can it go lower?

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:30.879
<v Speaker 9>Yeah?

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:32.840
<v Speaker 12>Can we get a bear market? Can we go into recession?

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 12>You absolutely can. Nobody can time that, nobody can figure

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 12>that out. You just have to look at opportunities as

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 12>it comes to you in buying great businesses at a

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:41.359
<v Speaker 12>cheap price.

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, I want to talk about some of those companies

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:45.440
<v Speaker 5>that you do argue are great businesses. Some of the

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 5>stock picks that you sent along to our producer, Paul Brennan,

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:51.680
<v Speaker 5>North of Grumman on your radar ticker NOC down three

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 5>point four percent today, a star war when it comes

0:39:55.120 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 5>to Pentagon contracts and government contracts. Why are you bullish

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:03.800
<v Speaker 5>on this company in a doge world?

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, Well, we'll think more about all globally, right, So

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 12>globally defense spending is going to increase. You know, we

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 12>have to restock from what we gave to Ukraine. All

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 12>of that is going to be beneficial to no Throb.

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 12>In addition to that, you know they're winning major defense contracts.

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 12>You know that will last greater than ten years. So

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 12>free cast flow estimate's going forward on average and looking

0:40:24.640 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 12>at around sixteen percent. So we think that beneficiaries of that.

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 12>And if you think about where they're trading today, they're

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 12>trading around twenty percent below fair market value. You know,

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 12>So from our standpoint, we think at this level here,

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 12>if you're a long term investor, we think you can

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 12>do very well.

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 5>The company, though, still gets close to ninety percent of

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 5>its revenue just from the United States, So if there

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 5>are cutbacks in the unit, if there are cuts in

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 5>the United States, that's a really big deal. I mean,

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 5>very little of its revenue comes from outside the US

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 5>accordinate to the terminal.

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 12>All right, there's good and bed to that. In my opinion,

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 12>I don't feel that the DOGE is really going to

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 12>go after defense spending as maybe some people are anticipating.

0:40:57.760 --> 0:40:59.840
<v Speaker 12>I just think that that's an area you know, especially

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 12>think about Trump when he's looking for if we want

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 12>to secure our country, especially all the money we spent

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 12>in Ukraine and different types of defense that we brought

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:09.320
<v Speaker 12>over there. We got to restock and we got to

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 12>strengthen our country, and it starts with defense. So we

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:15.520
<v Speaker 12>really believe that you will continue to see spending there.

0:41:15.520 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 12>We don't see much of a decrease in that area.

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 10>You know.

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:20.680
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting though, because we have heard comments from President

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Trump say, you know, let's cut our military budget in half,

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 3>let's cut back on defense spending, you know, And I

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 3>think he has tried and heeds, I guess maybe hopeful

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 3>all of getting others like President Putin to do the

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 3>same thing in terms of cutting back or China right

0:41:35.239 --> 0:41:35.880
<v Speaker 3>in particular.

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 4>So I do.

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Wonder that if he follows through or makes any progress

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:42.720
<v Speaker 3>on that, what does that mean for somebody like Northrop Grumman.

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:45.319
<v Speaker 5>To your point, Pete Hegseth, the Defense Secretary, said the

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 5>beginning immediately, this was back in February, the Pentagon will

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:50.399
<v Speaker 5>pull eight percent, which is about fifty billion dollars from

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 5>non lethal programs in the current budget. Did you look

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:55.720
<v Speaker 5>at that as not affecting a company like Northrop Grumman,

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:58.359
<v Speaker 5>because we did see some pullback on companies such as

0:41:58.360 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 5>palant Here at that time, and.

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:02.720
<v Speaker 12>That's why you've seen some pressure on the stock. But overall,

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 12>it's the major defense contracts that they already won that's

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 12>ten years or greater that's going to add to the

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:09.799
<v Speaker 12>bottom line. We don't see them coming back contracts. I mean,

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 12>they're really important to our country. And you know northroply

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 12>what they do and especially all the missile programs that

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 12>they're part of. We don't believe that's going to be.

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Cut real quickly. There's two big financials that you like.

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 3>JP Morgan is one name that you like. It is

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 3>down about eighteen percent since mid February. We know financials,

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, definitely were riding a high for a while.

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Certainly coming off the elections. You still think JP Morgan

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 3>is a bye.

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:38.279
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, So that's exactly right. So it was buying a

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 12>room to sell on the news, right. So after an

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 12>orderation day, most of the financials decreased a lot from

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 12>that point. But at the end, if you think about

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:48.279
<v Speaker 12>I think where we're going with the economy, you know,

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:50.719
<v Speaker 12>we think of JP Morgan, you know, the large bank

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 12>in the world great on the commercial side. On the

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 12>investment bank and side, we do think M and A

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:56.320
<v Speaker 12>activity will pick up. If you look at M and

0:42:56.400 --> 0:42:59.239
<v Speaker 12>A activity for January was down thirty percent relative to

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 12>last ed and so we're not concerned about that because

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 12>we feel like the deregulation hasn't been really embedded in

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:07.760
<v Speaker 12>the economy yet. So once some of this black cloud

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 12>subsides that we think financials would be big beneficiaries, and

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 12>you're buying him at a lot cheaper price than they

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 12>were just a couple of three weeks ago.

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:18.879
<v Speaker 5>All right, let's leave it there. There are a couple

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:20.600
<v Speaker 5>more stocks I want to talk about, but we're running

0:43:20.600 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 5>out of time, so I do want to have you

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:24.719
<v Speaker 5>back with us very soon. Philip always good to check

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 5>in with you. Philip Plumbo is the founder of CEO

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:29.719
<v Speaker 5>and CIO at Plumbo Wealth Management.

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:38.920
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:43:38.960 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:46.920
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:52.320
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal