WEBVTT - Martin Wolf on the 'Terrifying' Superpower That the US Wields

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:01.599
<v Speaker 1>Hello, odd Logs listeners.

0:00:01.639 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Allaway.

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Tracy, We're going to be doing another live show, this

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>time once again in our hometown of New York City.

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 2>That's right on the evening of May twenty eighth, from

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 2>seven pm. We will be at Citywinery with a fantastic

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 2>lineup of guests.

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I really like our live show. There are a

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>great chance to meet the listeners. There are chants for

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:25.159
<v Speaker 1>listeners to meet us and actually, more importantly, listeners to

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>hang out with other listeners and you know, all that

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>community stuff.

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 2>But if you would like all that community stuff, and

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk a lot about the future of

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>trading because of that is a very New York City topic.

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Still figuring out the exact schedule, but yes, if you'd

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>like to come to our live odd Lauge show at

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 1>City Winery in New York City on May twenty eighth,

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>go find details at bloomberg dot com, slash odd loads

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>or look on either one of our Twitter handles. There

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of spaces to find it, and we'd love

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to see you there.

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 2>That's right, Get offline and interact with some actual human

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 2>beings and do some of that commute stuff. We look

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 2>forward to seeing you there.

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>IRL is the new URL.

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Audults podcast.

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Joe Wisenthal.

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Joe, we're back in London.

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>We're making a tradition back in London. We're here last spring.

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>That last year is April. At this time it's May.

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>But I like the idea, let's do a recurring spring

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:40.279
<v Speaker 1>trip to London.

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Now, when you're in London, do you feel the urge

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 2>to sort of stroke your beard and think about geopolitics?

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Can I say, well, yes for sure. But as you

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>can confirm anytime there's like some big you know, there's

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>something feels pivotal or historical, geopolitical. I turned to you

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in the office, I say, you know what we really need.

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>We really need like an episode with an old guy

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>with a British accent, like some moments. That's just what

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it calls for.

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 3>You gave the.

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Secret away, you gave the secret all blots of books.

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Who it is per save is like there's a certain

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>type of guests that's like this is what this moment

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>calls for some with wisdom, someone with perspective.

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.399
<v Speaker 2>All right, well you've given it away at this point,

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 2>but we are back here for our yearly check in

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.239
<v Speaker 2>with Martin Wolf, who is, of course the chief economics

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 2>commentator over at the Financial Times, one of the most

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 2>famous geopolitics geoeconomics commentators of all time, and someone who

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 2>is really good to talk to when we're living through

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 2>these potentially historic capital h historic events on what seems

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 2>to be more than a yearly basis at this point.

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 2>So the last time we spoke to him was in

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 2>April of twenty twenty five, and it was just after

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 2>the Liberation Day tariff announcements. Now we're here in May

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six, and we have the Iran situation going on,

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 2>we have headlines about further fracturing of US europe relations.

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:10.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean, all of these potential potentially pivotal moments seem

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 2>to be happening on a sort of monthly, if not

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 2>weekly basis at this point.

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely right. And as you mentioned, when we were here

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>last year, it was in the immediate wake I mean,

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe even just a week after the or

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a few days after the Liberation Day tariff schedule had

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>come out, it was still during that period of absolutely

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>insane volatility, and there is a sense in which, I mean,

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the pure volatility currently is not actually like it was

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>back then. But at the same time, perhaps probably because

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>we're in the middle of a war ceasefire aside, April

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five feels a little quaint compared to where

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>we are right now.

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that something? I mean, everything's relative, I guess. Okay, Well,

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 2>on that note, why don't we bring in our perfect guest,

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 2>older gentleman, older British gentleman with a British accent per

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Joe's description, Martin Wolf, thank you so much for coming

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 2>back on odd lauds.

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'm very glad to fill a niche I didn't

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 4>know you had.

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 2>You truly are the perfect guest, though, because you know,

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 2>I again, a lot of people have described you as

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 2>one of the most important economics commentators of all time,

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 2>and so I think it's great that we get you

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 2>back to opine on some of these very big events

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 2>that we're seeing. Speaking of large events, you have described

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 2>the Iran situation as a nightmare scenario. Walk us through

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 2>what you're thinking there, because when I look at some

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 2>of the headlines around markets at the moment, S and

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 2>P five hundred closed at a record on Friday, it

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 2>doesn't seem like markets are aligned with that particular point

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 2>of view. What's going on?

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, I suppose the so many different things aspects of this.

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 4>I've been thinking of this wonderful Shakespearean line, life being

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 4>a tale told by any an idiot, full of sound

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 4>and fury, signified nothing. So one feels that when markets

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 4>are looking at this, they feel this is full of

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 4>sound and fury, but it doesn't signify anything. And I

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 4>think two possible reasons for that. One is the famous

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 4>taco line from my dear colleague Robert Armstrong that Trump

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 4>all with chickens out. So in the end, he's not

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 4>going to blow up the world. He's going to find

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 4>a way out of this, which will have done some damage.

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 5>It will make I think the.

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 4>US look fairly ridiculous, but it can be forgotten, declare

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 4>victory and stop, And I think that's still perfectly possible,

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 4>a perfectly reasonable view, because he's already sort of stopped

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 4>the fighting, and it feels like he's looking desperately for

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 4>an endgame. The question is whether the other side will

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 4>play ball, and that is still to be seen. And

0:05:56.240 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 4>then there's the other possibility that in the end, if

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 4>the oil were lost, as it were everever, the world will.

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 5>Adjust to that.

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Yes, the output that goes through the straits is very large,

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 4>but in the longer run a lot of it can

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 4>go through pipelines. They can build these. It will take

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 4>quite a while, and the world can compress this demand

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 4>in time. It might take a few years. The world

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 4>growth will be lower, but what we're losing is about

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 4>a fifth world output. Oil is much less important than

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 4>it used to be seventy years ago. Prices have risen,

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 4>but actually, if you look at real terms of the

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.239
<v Speaker 4>long history of oil prices since the first oil shot,

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 4>they're not sensationally high, and so we will adjust to it,

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 4>and we're very good at adjusting to it. The Gulf

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 4>will end up as a different place because it won't

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 4>be exporting the same way, but it's not enough to

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 4>derail the world economy. And incidentally, the country that is

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 4>likely to be the least damage of the major ones

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 4>is the US, which is not a coincidence. After all,

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 4>they wouldn't have started it if that weren't at the

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 4>back of their minds. China will be damaged. Russia is benefiting,

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 4>but I don't think that's going to bother mister Trump.

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 4>So in the end, the losers are Europe and China,

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 4>not favorite, if favorite countries. I think that on the whole,

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 4>mister Trump prefers China to the Europe. But the and

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 4>the world economy will continue, and there's this huge technological

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 4>upheaval going on, which is very much what the markets

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 4>they're talking about, which looks transformative. So I think the

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 4>market's assumption that the profitability of companies is going to

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 4>be fine. The world will have possibly a recession, but

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 4>that's not the end of the world. World as recessions

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 4>probably not even zero growth, and life goes off.

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>When you I'm glad that when you Shakespeare and sounded

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>furious signifying nothing, you were not referring to our conversations,

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Always something though that I'm anxious about with

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>respect to our business, because we type and talk and

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like, what doesn't really matter all.

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 5>That big said.

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the profitability of companies and if profits stay high,

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>let stock stay high, and it's all very explicable. One

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>has to admit, or you have to admit, like sitting

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>here today recording this may forth, you have to admit.

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty surprising, isn't it, Like if you knew all

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the headlines over the last year and a half between

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Liberation Day and a subpoena for Chairman Powell and this

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>war the early existence is pretty surprising.

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is what I don't get. So I think

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned this the last time we spoke, but both

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Joe and I did international relations at university and we

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 2>were told over and over again that the global economy

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 2>does not like instability, it doesn't like chaos, and yet

0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 2>here we are in the midst of a lot of chaos,

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 2>and things are more or less chugging along.

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I think that's right, and there's been a greater

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 4>disconnect that I would have expected. And so I have

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 4>more than once used another famous quote from a British author.

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 4>Of course, it has to be given the intro Adam Smith.

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 5>Adam Smith, there's.

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 4>A great deal of ruin in a country, which was,

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 4>if I remember correctly, actually said in response to somebody

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 4>saying that the loss of the American colonies was a tragedy,

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 4>a catastrophe for this country, and I think that's the context.

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 4>I believe that's the context in which you said there's

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 4>a great deal of ruin in a country, so there's

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 4>a great deal of ruining the world economy. I have

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 4>a favorite statistic which I use in many of my

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 4>presentations because it surprised me so much when I looked

0:09:53.160 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 4>at it. So since nineteen fifty on the data, Angus Madison.

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 5>Must be right.

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 4>There have only been two years in which the world

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 4>economy shrank two and they're both perfectly obvious. One was

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and nine, and even then he crank barely.

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 4>It was close to zero because China was still growing,

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 4>lots of countries were still growing. And the other was

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 4>the pandemic twenty twenty. Otherwise, the world economy grows and

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:32.079
<v Speaker 4>nearly always between two and four percent. It's changed over time.

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 4>Why well, because everybody, everybody matters is in a growth mode.

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 4>I could go through what's driving it. I looked at

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 4>this actually after the pandemic, I thought, how often is

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 4>it that we've had a genuine recession a decline in GDP.

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Now this isn't GDB behead. There will be more often

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 4>times when GDB per head shrank. But basically, the world

0:10:56.200 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 4>economy is unbelievably robust, and that's because lots of people

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 4>are providing stuff people want. There are markets they produce

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:11.319
<v Speaker 4>for the markets, they invest to produce for the markets.

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 4>Investment is very important as a driver in demand, as

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 4>Kine said, and so it takes something really enormous to

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 4>stop it. I went through the two oil shops of

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 4>the seventies. I was already working economists, and they were

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 4>big shops, and we got terrible inflation and all the

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 4>rest of it. Volka came along, and yes he did

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 4>cause a recession in the US, but it wasn't global.

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 4>So I think we have to start off by saying

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 4>the world economy is incredibly resilient. The second thing is

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 4>that and that's why I use the full of sound

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 4>and fury. If you look at the actual policies that

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 4>we've ended up with, they're sort of designed that I'm

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 4>sure they're not intent, not really to hurt, so the

0:11:56.400 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 4>protection is very uneven. This was part of I wrote

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 4>about this before he Trump got into office, and that

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 4>creates the opportunity is designed in the system for trade diversion.

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 4>Right now, if he just put up an average tariff

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 4>of forty percent or thirty five percent, a lot of

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 4>trade would disappear, but that's not what he did.

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:19.559
<v Speaker 5>He ended up with.

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 4>Imposing very high tariffs on some some.

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 5>Origins.

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 4>China still has very high terriffs, but it's the trade

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 4>diversion has been phenomenal. So trade goes through Vietnam, it

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 4>goes through Mexico, and the IMF had a very nice

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 4>chant on that in the latest World Economic Outlook, which

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 4>basically showed that yes, direct trade between the US and

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 4>China's shrunk. Direct trade, but the US Canada's shrunk, but

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 4>other people have played taking its place, and in some

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 4>sense it was designed to be porous. Then there are

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 4>all sorts of exceptions that he's negotiated in return for

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 4>who knows what with sundry companies like Apple. Apple would

0:12:59.400 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 4>have been very bad.

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 5>So it's all very porous and it's all negotiable, so

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 5>it's not as serious as all that.

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 4>And then the shock in the Gulf is significant, but

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:11.679
<v Speaker 4>oil isn't as important as it used to be. As

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 4>we discussed, the energy system has changed across much of

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 4>the world, and this will be accelerated, of course, but

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 4>that's for the future, and prices have gone up, there

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 4>will be a slowdown. I'm absolutely sure we might get

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 4>close really.

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 5>Bad, really bad.

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 4>Maybe the world economy grows at one one and a

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 4>half percent, but it's not a catastrophe. And finally, profits

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 4>are robust because, let's face it, worldwide labor is weak,

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 4>so companies can manage their affairs in a way to

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 4>ensure that they survive.

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure lots I've looked at this.

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure lots of small and medium sized businesses are

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 4>very badly affected. But the colossi that are generating most

0:13:56.880 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 4>of the profits, particularly the tech colossy, not affected by this.

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 5>This is at least expose.

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 4>Perhaps not as surprising as one might have thought. There's

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 4>a great deliver ruin in the world economy.

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 2>We should see if we can do this entire episode

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 2>only referencing British historians and economic thinkers direct for.

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know one other thing you mentioned those

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>exceptions that you know little Last week i think Trump

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>announced that they made a little carve out for UK

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>whiskey or something like that on the question of the King.

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>So therefore, much like us, Trump is a sucker for

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the British accent clearly it was the king and everything.

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>He's like, all right, okay, yeah.

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 5>I think that's something.

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 4>He yes that He's also a sack of people have

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 4>grand positions, didn't he didn't they have some sort of

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 4>maybe it was true social or something else.

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 5>When he referred to.

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 4>There being two kings together, that was I'm sure not

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 4>a joke. I think he would like to be king.

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 4>But when I think about the king he would most

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 4>like to be, I immediately come to Henry the Eighth, who

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 4>was our real king, who made probably the single most

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 4>important decision made by any English monarch, namely to leave

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 4>the Catholic Church and make himself the head of the church.

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 5>I think Donald Trump would quite like that, don't you think.

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 4>And he was an absolute modock who chopped the heads

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 4>of one advisor after another. I think quite like that.

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, he likes the idea of being a king. Now,

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 4>our porking Charles isn't like that, but at least he's

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 4>sort of connected to that, so I can see the glamour.

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 5>And he lives in palaces.

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, don't you think he'd rather like to Mister

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 4>Trump would like to move Buckingham Palace to Washington put

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 4>it in the middle.

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 2>I think the Oval Office makeover is very reminiscent of

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 2>a classic European style palace. I'm thinking of a particular

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 2>French one setting aside interior decorating. And Joe knows that

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 2>I could certainly talk about this for much longer. But

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, you mentioned this idea of Trump as king,

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 2>and you also mentioned this idea of trade adaptations. And

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that's happened since the Iran situation

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 2>is Trump has come out and said, well, if you

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 2>can't get oil from the Gulf and your Europe, why

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 2>don't you can come to the US and get oil

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 2>from the US. And I'm very curious how statements like

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 2>that play on the ground in Europe, given that, on

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 2>the one hand, this is a situation caused by the US.

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 2>I think it's fair to say that Europeans regard Trump

0:16:55.400 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 2>as somewhat unpredictable, somewhat somewhat doing an impersonation of British

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 2>understatedness here, and then his message to Europe is basically, well,

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, trust US for your energy security.

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:14.919
<v Speaker 4>Yes, well, I think the trust US has definitively gone.

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 4>That's hardly news. I think that's true worldwide. I'm just

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 4>trying to think, does anyone actually trust this guy? Because

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 4>being untrust untrustworthy seems to me the core of his

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 4>modus operandi. I mean, he wants to surprise people, and

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 4>he does in both directions. So nobody in Europe believes

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 4>now that there's any promise that will come for this

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 4>administration that is to be believed. And I think that's

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 4>true pretty well for everybody. That's understandable because it's consistent

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 4>with the evidence and the behavior and even what he says. However,

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 4>Europe is in a very very unfortunate position, which is

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 4>that it grew so dependent on America for so long

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 4>that pretty well all its structures, its defense system, very obviously,

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 4>but also the things it didn't bother to produce itself,

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 4>for instance, the whole tech array, the trade relations, the

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 4>investment relations, and of course the underlying ideologic ideology, the

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 4>sort of liberal democracy they imported.

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 5>This all came from America.

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we were wrong to say that it wasn't there.

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 4>A lot of this wasn't there before in different ways.

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 4>But after the war, the first and second together, it

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 4>was so shatteringly demoralized as a continent and so damaged.

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 4>I can go through with the damage done to all

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 4>the different major countries that the US became the core

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 4>of every aspect of security, believe trust. They were very

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 4>very content with this. So whether they were naive or

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 4>not very interesting question. It's all come as a colossal shock.

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 4>Now Trump one was when they the first administration of

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:24.400
<v Speaker 4>Trump was a wake up call. But in the end

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 4>it wasn't so bad. They felt oh well, full of

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 4>sound and fury, but didn't signify that much. In the end,

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 4>he didn't do much so as he didn't change great policy,

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 4>didn't withdraw fromim NATO. He filled his administration with the

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 4>sort of people we're familiar with, we like and trust,

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 4>those sorts of Americans. This is a shock. I don't

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:46.679
<v Speaker 4>think it should have been a shock, but this is

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 4>a shock.

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 5>And in the.

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 4>First year, when suddenly you know your trusted spouse, as

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 4>it were, that very much, the relationship turns around and

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 4>becomes a violent bully. You're sort of shock, but worse,

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 4>you don't know where to go and live. Who do

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 4>you get to, who's your alternative? Do you want to

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 4>become friendly with China?

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 5>Not really?

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 4>Do you want to become friendly with absolutely not. And

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 4>are we strong enough to survive.

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 5>On our own in all these different.

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 4>Dimensions, of course not. The vulnerability of Europe is staggering.

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 4>Do just think what would happen if the American administration

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 4>has decided if he could decide that to just close

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 4>off our access to the American digital stack, as it were,

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 4>cloud computing, all the rest of it. So then the

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 4>question is, well, what do you do? And I think

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 4>they're still really and truly the Europeans that at the

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 4>early stage of deciding what they want to do, and

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 4>they find it difficult to agree, very difficult. There are

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:50.360
<v Speaker 4>so many of them with different attitudes, values, historical relations.

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 4>They don't trust one another. Very important point, by the way,

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, the European history is not so far beneath

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 4>the art the surface. So I think we are there

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 4>at the stage of absolute intellectual, moral confusion.

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:08.679
<v Speaker 5>But they don't trust Trump.

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you sort of anticipated where I was going

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>to go with my next question, because you know, you've

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>written about the threat to democracy that both in Europe

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and the US that you perceived the Trump administration as posing,

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and you mentioned that perhaps Trump actually prefers China to

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Europe at this point, And it seems like, as you've written,

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the administration seems to have two specific big critiques of Europe.

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>One is a particular conception of free speech, which the

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>administration does not perceive Europe as upholding. And then of

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>course immigration, which they would associate with civilizational decline and

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>so forth. Interestingly, in your writing you acknowledge that both

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of those they are stranger their kernels to both critiques,

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that the Europea government has to take seriously border control

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>maintaining those liberal values around speech. How much harder does

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>it or like, you know, how does your charter path

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 1>while also taking into account those factors which may have

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>some grain of reality to them.

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 4>Well, one of the problems we have is we don't feel,

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 4>looking at the whole range of what's going on in

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 4>the United States, that this administration really does believe in

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 4>free speech conception. The mildly quite a bit of hypocrisy

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 4>going on. I don't think I need to lay that

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 4>out for your audience, but there I suppose a number

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 4>of different elements in this story. The I think that

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 4>the administration is right, but I don't think it's a

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they're honest in their critique, but that

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 4>some government it's my own included, have gone too far

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 4>in protecting people from what is called hate speech, and

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 4>that there is a perfectly good argument that both in

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 4>private institutions, universities and so forth, and in public you

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 4>don't have a right not to be offended.

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 5>That's clear.

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 4>However, my view also is that there are some forms

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 4>of speech that European history will see where it goes

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 4>with American history suggests are profoundly dangerous. And the one

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 4>I used in my example of this is that if

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 4>you're lecturing Germans on the import which is started in

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 4>the most notorious start of this was Dvance's speech in

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 4>Munich last year in twenty twenty five. Well, the Germans

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 4>feel that it really would have been a pretty good

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 4>thing if they'd stopped Hitler saying some of the things

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 4>he said. Indeed, if they'd removed him and put him

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 4>in prison for a very long time and not instead

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 4>of just letting him out when he was put in prison.

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 4>So there are questions of what how far you allow

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 4>speech to be free. It's a fine doctrine, but it

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 4>seems actually the administration to believe there are lots of

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 4>things we really don't want people to say so that's

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 4>an issue there. But I think there's a critique there

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 4>on the civilizational thing. I think, and I wrote this

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 4>in my book, that one of the things that define

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 4>a state, and certainly a democratic state, is the possession

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 4>of borders a state and a citizenship which is associated

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 4>with a state in a democratic context is exclusive by definition.

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 4>It is the values universal, but citizenship is not by definition,

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 4>and that we get that or going all the way

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.479
<v Speaker 4>back to the beginning of these ideas for our in

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:13.239
<v Speaker 4>our ancient world, the Greeks and Roman view of what

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 4>a republic or a democracy was. So I think that

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 4>not controlling your borders and making sure that the people

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 4>who come to live in it, particularly the people who

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 4>come to live in it permanently, are people you've chosen.

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 4>It's been a political process in which you've chosen them,

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 4>is essentially in violation of the citizenship compact. And I

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 4>wrote that at length, and I think it's perfectly understandable

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 4>how many citizens would feel, we don't want everybody in

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 4>the world to come here. It would create some very

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 4>very big problems. And I think the view on the

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 4>parts of the left, quote unquote progressive left that borders

0:25:56.040 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 4>should basically be abolished is not compatible with the survivor

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 4>of any form of democratic notion grounded a citizenship. So

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm very clear that was a big mistake. What worries

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 4>me more about the concept of democracy that is emerging,

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 4>which you see in the Trump camp and you saw

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 4>in some of the people admired, like Victor Uban, is

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 4>the idea that if you are elected, anything you do

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:35.919
<v Speaker 4>by definition is democratic, and that is absolutely incompatible, inconsistent

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 4>with obviously the core premises of the Constitution, particularly what

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 4>we would think of as the Madisonian principles, that there

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 4>is such a thing as the tyranny of the majority.

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 4>So even if somebody has a majority very rare that

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 4>they do, that doesn't entitle them to do whatever they want.

0:26:56.200 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 4>Constraining institutions are the core of a republic, the republican idea,

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 4>and we are I am concerned that ideologies that reject

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 4>that on the left and the right are being have

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 4>been reborn over the last twenty or thirty years, perhaps

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 4>a bit longer, and that's what the Second World War

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.880
<v Speaker 4>was fought against in a very extreme form. So I'm

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 4>not comparing them with that, and So while I agree

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 4>that there are important elements of the critique which are

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 4>serious and we should take seriously, which I've mentioned, that

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 4>the critique doesn't seem to me to be coming from

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 4>an honorable place. If the aim is to prefer preserve republics,

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 4>if the aim is to preserve ethno national dictatorships, which

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 4>mister Putin would certainly agree with, then that's something else.

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 4>But that's not my side.

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it's become a cliche at this point

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 2>to you know, no matter what happens in the world,

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.360
<v Speaker 2>people always seem to say, you're is like the loser. Yeah,

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 2>it's good for Europe? Right? Is there a sliver of

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 2>hope down the line if we think that one of

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 2>the things that Europe has struggled with is you know,

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 2>strategic autonomy and managing all these different national interests. And

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 2>if we think that, you know, maybe the US emerges

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 2>as a force for Europe to you know, unite against

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 2>or maybe encourage it, motivate it to develop some form

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:32.679
<v Speaker 2>of like centralized strategy or autonomy. Couldn't we see like

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 2>a more united Europe out of the situation.

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 4>Well that's one possibility, and it's a possibility that pretty

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 4>much everyone who's a friend of mine who's European, and

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 4>I suppose I one would want to see. I think

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 4>it's important to understand why it's so difficult, And this

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 4>gets back to the sort of like the historical tragedy

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 4>of Europe. How do you get to be where it is?

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 4>I wrote one column on this which I'm particularly proud

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 4>of it, so I will repeat some of the argument.

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 4>The essentially that Europe transformed the world. It's absolutely nambiguously

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 4>the case. This, this peripheral you can call it, the continent,

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 4>is really just a promontory of Eurasia six or seven

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 4>hundred years ago, was pretty irrelevant, and it ended up

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 4>conquering motion of the world and completely transforming the world intellectually, culturally, scientifically,

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 4>and politically by creating these vast empires and one product

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 4>in which was the United States. And how did this happen? Well,

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 4>there are many argiments about this. There was a shared

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 4>civilization and profound political rivalry.

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 5>That the one core element.

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 4>Of European history since the fall for the Roman Empire

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 4>is that it was Christian and divided. And so the

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 4>European states evolved in conflict and they became very very

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 4>very good at it, extraordinarily good at it, so good

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 4>at it that once they really got going, they ended

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 4>up I conquered so much of the world. It's still

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 4>very shocking that they did, you know. I still think

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 4>think of how few thousands of English people succeeded in

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 4>conquering India in the middle of the eighteenth centuries, completely freakish.

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 4>So this fragmentation was a core of it, and the

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 4>cultural development, the scientific was also the core of that.

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 4>Because when there was a problem with one state trying

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 4>to suppress certain sorts of thinking, people moved everywhere somewhere else,

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 4>or the ideas moved somewhere else. So there is this

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 4>idea which I think is right, that the.

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 5>Division of Europe actually made it.

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 4>I think this is very very powerful idea and correct,

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 4>and China's unity held it back because it didn't allow

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 4>for this competition. The Europe was built around competition among

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 4>the states, among the rulers and within them. As a result,

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 4>partly because of this, I won't go through all that

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 4>because it takes too long. So then at the end

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:24.479
<v Speaker 4>of this magnificent process, not surprisingly, when the modern states

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 4>were emerging after the Industrial Revolution, nationalism became the way

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 4>of mobilizing the people for the first time, you really

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 4>created mobilized societies. Before that, the armies were predominantly professional

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 4>or class based armies. The French really invented the universal

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 4>conscription state. And this came culminated in the two World Wars,

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 4>which completely shattered Europe. Shattered that its idea of itself,

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 4>its confidence in itself, and its values. Because look what

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 4>happened in the the death camps. So europe triumph.

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 5>Ended up in a catastrophe.

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 4>And that's what europeans. I'm old enough to remember all this.

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 4>I was born in just after the war.

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Not the colonies, not the colonies.

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 4>It was actually Europe itself that destroyed itself in the end,

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 4>by the way, that led to the direct liberation of

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 4>all the empires, because they didn't have the power anymore

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 4>to do it. And America was very keen on it's

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 4>breaking it absolutely right by the way. So anyway, Europe

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 4>said after that, we have to be something completely different.

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 5>This is really important.

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 4>We have to be something completely different. But the most

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 4>important we need to unite. But we're still state member states.

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 4>We have different histories, languages, cultures, and so forth. We

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 4>can't get rid of that, so we must cooperate. We

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 4>want someone to look after us.

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 5>That was the us.

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 4>We don't trust ourselves. We've lost trust in ourselves. Very

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 4>important British least, which covered this because they got through it,

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 4>so they decided that they would. They feel we can

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 4>be outside it. We're an island, but the others, with

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 4>the enemies to just across the border everywhere. Go back

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 4>to that at the end of the world. So we

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 4>left everything to Uncle Sam because he was a kind,

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 4>generous uncle. We've made a few odd stake but maybe

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 4>we trust it.

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 5>That's how we.

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 4>Got to where we are. This is my ten minute

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 4>history of Europe. Now suddenly you're saying you want us

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 4>to become a superpower. You want us to be a

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 4>great power with an army and a will, and we

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 4>don't trust any of that stuff. The last time we

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 4>tried to do that, we blew up the world. This

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 4>is not this is not nothing. It's still there, the desired,

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 4>the will to power, the famous isn't really there. So

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:54.960
<v Speaker 4>that gets to the answer to your question, what do

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 4>I think will happen? And I think that's exactly the

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 4>struggle now because you could see in a sense, there

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 4>are two forces in Europe today.

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 5>One is a centrist liberal.

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 4>Rather mild desire to create an effective Europe, which isn't

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:18.439
<v Speaker 4>really a state, but is more of one than now.

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 4>That's the center and the other side of the right

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 4>wing nationalists. But the right wing nationalists are nationalists.

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:31.399
<v Speaker 5>They're not European.

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 4>Because when you start going back to who the nation is,

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 4>you go back so France less Germany, but it's going

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 4>to happen. Italy is Italy is a peculiar story. I

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 4>won't go into that. But in France, the French right

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 4>is nationalist, protectionist.

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 5>It doesn't see itself as Europe.

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 4>There aren't any nationalists in the sense that Dvance is

0:34:57.440 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 4>a nationalist or Trump is a nationalist.

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 5>Who are European nationalists? It doesn't.

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 4>That's an excitement. There are, but there aren't many. And

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 4>in political will terms, then you have this either mild

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 4>centralizing desire to pull together be a more effective club

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 4>I would like to see, or it's yes, we would

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:21.879
<v Speaker 4>like to be a great part, but it's the nation.

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 4>And as one famous European politician once said, in Europe

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 4>there are small countries and small countries that don't realize

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:31.359
<v Speaker 4>they're small.

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 5>And so if you honestly.

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 4>Ask me how this will play out, I have no idea,

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 4>and I don't think anyone does. I know what I

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:44.919
<v Speaker 4>would like to see, I've indicated it, but that may

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 4>not be what is possible. What you really need is

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 4>a European Charlemn or Napoleon, and that doesn't come out

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 4>of this because there isn't a European with that will.

0:35:55.680 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 4>The last European will to make Europe was that's what

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 4>he wanted to do. It would have been a German right,

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 4>and before that was a Napoleon. Before that, Luis Cator's

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 4>briefly mentioned. So I think the question of what Europe's

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 4>future is what it can be given its history of

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 4>fragmentation and the extraordinary life that came out at this fragmentation.

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:28.280
<v Speaker 4>I think it's just not a toll clear. But there's

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 4>no doubt that America is helping if it does develop

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 4>an independent sense of itself with its own institution's sense

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 4>of destiny, sense of identity, very difficult in a multinational

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 4>state like this, enteredy like this, then it will be

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 4>because the Americans of saying you can't trust us, We're

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 4>going to beat you around the head. If you don't

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 4>sort yourself, maybe that will count.

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Had a fantastic sort of overview of the history and

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the core challenge. I'm curious. Look, predicting the future is impossible,

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>so we will just stick to the present. In the past,

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the UK left Europe. So the UK left this sort

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of structure that was put in place to sort of

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:43.400
<v Speaker 1>denationalize the content continent. So join accidentally, but also like, okay,

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:47.919
<v Speaker 1>so the UK and theory has more sovereignty now than

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 1>it had when it was part of the EU. What's

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 1>it doing with that sovereignty? Because it doesn't look like

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it's been able to put it. You know, it looks

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>like more or less the struggles of continental Europe and

0:37:59.840 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 1>you care more.

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 5>Or less shared.

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Well, what's holding the UK.

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 4>It's a perfect example of a small country that didn't

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 4>realize it was a small country.

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 5>They thought.

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:16.840
<v Speaker 4>The people who sold this sold this in part because

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 4>they said this will stop all these immigrants. It turned

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 4>out actually we could do an stupendous job of accepting

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 4>immigrants from everywhere else in the world as soon as

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 4>we stopped the Europeans. So that was sort of they

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 4>were sold a Bill of Goods on that was pretty obvious.

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 4>They were told we would be able to do all

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 4>sorts of wonderful deals on our own, and we've done

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 4>a few minor deals. One of the deals we were

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:44.320
<v Speaker 4>promised was a free trade deal with America that certainly

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:49.719
<v Speaker 4>didn't happen. The point is Britain on its own is

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:54.800
<v Speaker 4>a minor power. So the idea that the liberating ourselves

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 4>from the EU will mean that we would suddenly have

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 4>huge choices to trans form ourselves and our relations to

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:06.440
<v Speaker 4>the world was a fantasy. Now that's one side. The

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 4>other side of it is, of course that a very

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:13.360
<v Speaker 4>large part of what we had in common with Europe,

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 4>the welfare state, we had a relatively undeveloped one, but

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 4>we have it in common. The problems of our economy,

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 4>de industrialization, the difficulty of coping with Chinese competition, for example,

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 4>become more obvious. Are weakness in technology well we share

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 4>with Europe. Britain wasn't different from and therefore didn't have

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:40.320
<v Speaker 4>completely different options from European countries.

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 5>We're very similar in the.

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 4>Germans, and they're all different in a certain ways, have

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 4>different strength. But actually in the big picture, Britain is

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 4>just another European country. How else what else could it be?

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:56.320
<v Speaker 4>Look at its history. The only difference has got this

0:39:56.480 --> 0:39:59.840
<v Speaker 4>tiny little water weight between us, and that's preserved independence.

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying it's nothing, but essentially the opportunities and

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:09.280
<v Speaker 4>the challenges for the British economy essentially those of Europe,

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:13.240
<v Speaker 4>and leaving the U hasn't suddenly given us an enormous

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 4>number of new opportunities which allow Britain to transform itself.

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 4>And certainly, no British political leader, and I can say

0:40:20.560 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 4>this with some confidence looking at the whole lot, have

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 4>any fundamentally new ways of operating here which are going

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 4>to transform the performance of the country.

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 5>And that's become more and more.

0:40:33.040 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 4>Obvious, and it will be even more obvious if Niger

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:41.280
<v Speaker 4>Faraj orzach Polanski becomes the next prime minister. Nobody offers

0:40:41.440 --> 0:40:45.399
<v Speaker 4>a coherence strategy for solving the problems of Britain as

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:49.280
<v Speaker 4>they are now, and it's partly because they've actually genuinely

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 4>become very very difficult.

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Since we've been talking sort of broad strokes history throughout

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:59.319
<v Speaker 2>this Yes, can you give us your thoughts on what

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 2>is the world that the US is ultimately working towards,

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:08.320
<v Speaker 2>inasmuch as you can try to eke out a coherent

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:11.239
<v Speaker 2>strategy from the Trump administration, like what is it that

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:16.280
<v Speaker 2>they are working towards.

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm almost speechless in response to that very very good question,

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:27.240
<v Speaker 4>because it's very difficult. Part of the problem, I think

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:32.760
<v Speaker 4>is I see a separation between Donald Trump as a person,

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:41.840
<v Speaker 4>very him, obviously charismatic and exciting, and his views of

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:47.120
<v Speaker 4>the world from that of the various different elements of

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 4>the coalition that he's put together, which is a pretty

0:41:51.239 --> 0:41:56.560
<v Speaker 4>strange coalition pretty intellectually, culturally, it includes obviously a very

0:41:56.640 --> 0:42:02.399
<v Speaker 4>large number of spectacularly wealthy and powerful business people, some

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 4>of whom have a religious belief in the future, and

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 4>at the other hand, it includes intellectual elements and people

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:13.840
<v Speaker 4>who have a religious belief in the past.

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:17.479
<v Speaker 5>Pretty obvious they want to.

0:42:17.440 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 4>Go back to a theocratic state or theocratic state structures.

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 4>They want to establish, re establish patterns of behavior and

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 4>relations between men and women, between racism so well, which

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 4>sort of old fashion. So there's a blistering new and

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:42.920
<v Speaker 4>a crusted old as it were, trying to work together

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:47.720
<v Speaker 4>here there are intellectual elements and then relatively small numbers

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:52.280
<v Speaker 4>I presume and a huge mass are very dissatisfied people,

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:55.440
<v Speaker 4>particularly as far as I can see men and old people.

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 4>What do these people have in common? So you answer

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:03.200
<v Speaker 4>the question, And what do I think America is about?

0:43:04.200 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, because I don't think this the Mega

0:43:06.920 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 4>movement broadly defined, if I can use that word, knows

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 4>what it wants, because I'm not saying that individuals people don't, but.

0:43:14.560 --> 0:43:21.240
<v Speaker 5>They don't share anything that is completely Trump Trump.

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 4>So if I understand this view, what they might share

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 4>and as long as somebody like Trump is there, Trump

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 4>wants to be Okay, I think that's pretty clear. He

0:43:34.000 --> 0:43:36.479
<v Speaker 4>wants to be a man who says my word is law.

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 4>That's pretty obvious. He wants to rule a state which

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:46.280
<v Speaker 4>is free to do anything, which is anything he wants,

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:50.760
<v Speaker 4>and is bound by no constraint or law or rules

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:55.719
<v Speaker 4>external or internal. And look, Ataus would have understood this.

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's perfectly understandable. This is how much of

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:04.800
<v Speaker 4>point of much of humanity was rules since the agrarian age.

0:44:05.120 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 4>Any Egyptian pharaoh would have understood this. So he wants that.

0:44:09.880 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 4>He has no ideology really beyond that, except it is

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 4>very very important to make clear in every bilateral relations

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:23.279
<v Speaker 4>he thinks bilaterally that he's the boss and the others aren't,

0:44:23.560 --> 0:44:28.480
<v Speaker 4>and so he will throw his weight around, particularly against

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 4>anybody who thinks is essentially not showing improper respect in

0:44:32.719 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 4>various different ways. So Maduro, so the mullets, and that's important.

0:44:37.800 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 4>It might be only constrained is my own sense of morality.

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:41.840
<v Speaker 5>Well you will work out what that be.

0:44:42.160 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 4>So that is what he wants, what he wants to be,

0:44:45.280 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 4>and he will naturally respect people who are like him.

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:56.279
<v Speaker 4>The movement, I think, has multiple different objectives. Some of

0:44:56.320 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 4>them would like the United States, which are coincidence with Trump,

0:45:01.080 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 4>to the United States to be a nineteenth century great

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:07.920
<v Speaker 4>power like Britain in eighteen fifty Palmerstonian and Britain. You know,

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:12.960
<v Speaker 4>we have no friends, that no permanent enemies, we have

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:16.520
<v Speaker 4>permanent interests. That would be a more intellectual version of this.

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:19.279
<v Speaker 4>And obviously lots of them think that, but some of

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:24.279
<v Speaker 4>them pretty well. Obviously hexath Is is a Christian crusaders,

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:28.400
<v Speaker 4>a completely different set of ideological aims. Vance seems to

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:32.960
<v Speaker 4>be an isolationist. So there's nothing coherent there. And so

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 4>in the end, when I look at this I think

0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:38.439
<v Speaker 4>this is Trump's party, and with Trump, what you will

0:45:38.480 --> 0:45:46.279
<v Speaker 4>get is action, but not intellectually grounded, pretty ignorant.

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 5>He will use a lot of power.

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 4>If he doesn't work, he will withdraw, Thank heavens, That's

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:55.560
<v Speaker 4>what I see. It doesn't seem to me that we're

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 4>looking at the US under this regime and looking at

0:45:59.840 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 4>the people around that has a coherent sense as a

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 4>whole of what it wants to be and what it

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:10.560
<v Speaker 4>wants to do. That's terrifying because it is the most

0:46:10.640 --> 0:46:13.719
<v Speaker 4>important country in the world. It is the guaranteur of

0:46:13.760 --> 0:46:17.280
<v Speaker 4>the system, which I'd like to point out works sensationally

0:46:17.360 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 4>well for the US. So one of the most astonishing

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:22.360
<v Speaker 4>thing to me is that if you look at it

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 4>from outside the US, I mean, I think it makes

0:46:25.200 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 4>incredible mess of its own policy and politics. It could

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:30.920
<v Speaker 4>do much better, But the US is a spectacular success.

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 4>Whereas everybody want to change everything, it seems very difficult

0:46:34.680 --> 0:46:38.279
<v Speaker 4>to understand, you know, if you compare it with the

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 4>Roman Empire, the United States is sort of in the

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 4>second century, so what's the problem. But this US is

0:46:45.160 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 4>what I see now. It could change, presumably, though I

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:52.360
<v Speaker 4>have no idea whether it could change durably. And this

0:46:52.480 --> 0:46:54.880
<v Speaker 4>is my last point was very much a part of

0:46:54.920 --> 0:47:03.480
<v Speaker 4>my new PostScript for my book. You won't restore confidence

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:05.319
<v Speaker 4>in the rest of the world that the US sort

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:07.719
<v Speaker 4>of knows what it's doing and what it's about, has

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:11.560
<v Speaker 4>a coherent sense of itself just by a defeat in

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:16.239
<v Speaker 4>one election, because that's not it. That's not over. You

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:22.000
<v Speaker 4>have to think that this has become unthinkable and that doesn't

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:26.640
<v Speaker 4>seem to me likely looking at it. So the honest truth.

0:47:26.760 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 4>And someone lived in America for ten years a foreigner,

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 4>but I lived there follow it closely. The place has

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:42.520
<v Speaker 4>become completely bewildering, and a completely bewildering superpower is absolutely terrifying.

0:47:43.239 --> 0:47:50.000
<v Speaker 4>Nobody likes China, nobody really, but they know what it's about.

0:47:50.800 --> 0:47:51.880
<v Speaker 5>It's predictable.

0:47:52.719 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 4>You know how the regime works, you know how the

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 4>system works. Do you know what she's trying to do

0:47:58.960 --> 0:48:03.120
<v Speaker 4>that one can with. It's very difficult to live with

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 4>a country with this power which is as completely bewildering

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:10.879
<v Speaker 4>as this one has become. And I've tried to give

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:13.399
<v Speaker 4>you some sense of how I think about it, and

0:48:13.440 --> 0:48:15.919
<v Speaker 4>in the end, what I do is see an incoherent

0:48:16.040 --> 0:48:20.040
<v Speaker 4>movement of people full of resentments and hatreds, including amongst

0:48:20.040 --> 0:48:24.120
<v Speaker 4>one another. But also I'm against other Americans, the rest

0:48:24.160 --> 0:48:27.400
<v Speaker 4>of the world, and Trump, who is sort of You

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:30.360
<v Speaker 4>can make sense of him as long as you accept

0:48:30.520 --> 0:48:33.440
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't operate in a way that one would normally

0:48:33.480 --> 0:48:36.240
<v Speaker 4>think of as rational. So when I think of a ruler,

0:48:36.800 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean like him, I think of Nero.

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:44.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a million ways we could have things

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 1>I could ask you.

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that you're cute to ask about Roman Empire history?

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:52.239
<v Speaker 2>Isn't that we could go You're a middle aged guy,

0:48:53.120 --> 0:48:53.520
<v Speaker 2>That's true.

0:48:53.560 --> 0:48:57.640
<v Speaker 1>You know what I yet I have one you know,

0:48:57.840 --> 0:48:58.239
<v Speaker 1>said I.

0:48:58.280 --> 0:48:59.440
<v Speaker 5>Studied Roman history.

0:48:59.640 --> 0:48:59.920
<v Speaker 3>You did.

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:02.319
<v Speaker 5>I studied classics, so.

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:05.920
<v Speaker 4>I read a lot of Ancient Greek and Latin.

0:49:07.440 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 2>So you are always, in fact thinking about the Roman Empire.

0:49:12.560 --> 0:49:15.720
<v Speaker 4>The first and best column by Fire wrote about Donald Trump,

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:21.320
<v Speaker 4>it was in March twenty sixteen when I said Donald

0:49:21.320 --> 0:49:23.719
<v Speaker 4>Trump is how great republics to meet their end? That

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:28.320
<v Speaker 4>was the headline, and it compared him with the Caesars

0:49:28.480 --> 0:49:32.920
<v Speaker 4>Julius and Augustus, who Tavian who basically ended the Roman Empire.

0:49:33.280 --> 0:49:34.480
<v Speaker 5>But they were far cleverer.

0:49:34.960 --> 0:49:41.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, you mentioned that Europe excelled during a period

0:49:42.040 --> 0:49:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in which there was competition among the states but also

0:49:45.160 --> 0:49:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the shared and you used the Christian civilization when I figured,

0:49:49.600 --> 0:49:50.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, you mentioned that.

0:49:50.640 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 4>They did have two hundred and fifty years of religious

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:55.440
<v Speaker 4>war along with that period.

0:49:55.640 --> 0:49:58.279
<v Speaker 1>But I'm curious you mentioned the sort of like the

0:49:58.320 --> 0:50:03.239
<v Speaker 1>mild liberal you know, not quite a European nationalism, but

0:50:03.280 --> 0:50:07.680
<v Speaker 1>this like sort of mild liberal desire for some sort

0:50:07.719 --> 0:50:11.839
<v Speaker 1>of Europe that exists. You know, one thing I think

0:50:11.840 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 1>about like should there be maybe philosophically maybe in practice,

0:50:16.800 --> 0:50:20.000
<v Speaker 1>like does it would it go along well with the

0:50:20.040 --> 0:50:24.440
<v Speaker 1>revived Christianity in Europe? Because when I think about secular

0:50:24.680 --> 0:50:28.040
<v Speaker 1>liberal Europeans, I one thing is like nobody goes to church,

0:50:28.320 --> 0:50:32.239
<v Speaker 1>but historically a lot of liberal ideas were you know,

0:50:32.640 --> 0:50:36.680
<v Speaker 1>co located, so to speak, with Christian ideas, particularly around

0:50:36.760 --> 0:50:39.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of like equal rights, And there's a lot of framing.

0:50:40.000 --> 0:50:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Does that could that underpin or could that be a

0:50:43.080 --> 0:50:46.680
<v Speaker 1>tailwind for a sort of reinvigorated Europe if it found

0:50:46.719 --> 0:50:51.279
<v Speaker 1>that sort of spiritual vector. Again, one of.

0:50:51.200 --> 0:50:56.880
<v Speaker 4>The things that I think is very important in which

0:50:56.880 --> 0:51:01.400
<v Speaker 4>I didn't stress in the the history of the last

0:51:01.560 --> 0:51:07.840
<v Speaker 4>one two hundred years, particularly the twentieth century, is Europe

0:51:07.920 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 4>spawned a lot of ideologies, spawned all of them. So

0:51:14.719 --> 0:51:19.480
<v Speaker 4>obviously every variety of Christianity you can imagine, which they

0:51:19.520 --> 0:51:25.920
<v Speaker 4>happily fought over from much to their history, Orthodoxy, Catholicism,

0:51:26.200 --> 0:51:34.359
<v Speaker 4>Protestantism and so forth, and of course socialism, communism, fascism,

0:51:35.040 --> 0:51:38.719
<v Speaker 4>the dominant ideologies of the world. And one of the

0:51:38.760 --> 0:51:44.440
<v Speaker 4>things that happened as a result of the religious wars,

0:51:45.800 --> 0:51:50.640
<v Speaker 4>which were devastating. Arguably the most destructive single war in

0:51:50.719 --> 0:51:55.200
<v Speaker 4>European history, though it's very into a particular place, based

0:51:55.200 --> 0:51:57.680
<v Speaker 4>in Germany, was the Thirty Years War of the early

0:51:57.719 --> 0:52:01.400
<v Speaker 4>seventeenth century. I believe something like thirty percent of the

0:52:01.440 --> 0:52:05.360
<v Speaker 4>population was killed, and it was many other things, but

0:52:05.400 --> 0:52:09.360
<v Speaker 4>it was also a religious war. So that was the

0:52:09.400 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 4>seventeenth century. Everybody believed that. The probably is when everybody

0:52:13.080 --> 0:52:16.239
<v Speaker 4>really believes in something, they often find an excuse for

0:52:16.320 --> 0:52:19.040
<v Speaker 4>killing people who don't. And I won't didn't talk about

0:52:19.440 --> 0:52:21.959
<v Speaker 4>what happened to Jews. And then of course the same

0:52:21.960 --> 0:52:26.240
<v Speaker 4>thing happened with nationalism, which led to some pretty spectacular wars,

0:52:26.520 --> 0:52:32.880
<v Speaker 4>and communism that was more mass murder internally, so Europeans

0:52:32.920 --> 0:52:36.280
<v Speaker 4>became and this is part of I think European culture,

0:52:36.360 --> 0:52:45.120
<v Speaker 4>civilization after the Second World War became exhausted with ideology.

0:52:45.160 --> 0:52:48.879
<v Speaker 4>We wanted to stop that because when we I think

0:52:48.880 --> 0:52:51.759
<v Speaker 4>it was very widely shared. Whenever we got one of these,

0:52:51.840 --> 0:52:56.719
<v Speaker 4>we ended up with mass murder. And the truth is,

0:52:57.480 --> 0:52:59.680
<v Speaker 4>nothing bad has ever happened to the US except your

0:52:59.680 --> 0:53:02.319
<v Speaker 4>idiotic Civil War, which should never have been fought because

0:53:02.320 --> 0:53:05.360
<v Speaker 4>of the civil because slavery should have just been abolished

0:53:05.400 --> 0:53:09.759
<v Speaker 4>by then. It wasn't justifiable. So the point is, but

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:12.719
<v Speaker 4>one of my favorite statistics, and I can't remember the

0:53:12.760 --> 0:53:17.319
<v Speaker 4>exact figures, but if you compare the number of Americans

0:53:17.320 --> 0:53:20.960
<v Speaker 4>who've died in war, I think it's a somewhere over

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:23.640
<v Speaker 4>a million, including the Civil War million and a half.

0:53:23.800 --> 0:53:26.800
<v Speaker 4>You can probably give me the exact figures. In Europe,

0:53:26.840 --> 0:53:33.160
<v Speaker 4>it's many tens of millions. So the idea of really

0:53:33.239 --> 0:53:37.000
<v Speaker 4>believing in things, really really believing things to the point

0:53:37.040 --> 0:53:38.719
<v Speaker 4>that you actually want to go and kill people who

0:53:38.760 --> 0:53:41.839
<v Speaker 4>don't share those beliefs, which is where it seems to go,

0:53:42.000 --> 0:53:45.880
<v Speaker 4>is very very frightening. Now, the younger generation now may

0:53:46.160 --> 0:53:48.600
<v Speaker 4>now have forgotten enough history to start it again so

0:53:48.640 --> 0:53:52.919
<v Speaker 4>it might, it might happen, but that was a dominant part. Yes,

0:53:53.000 --> 0:53:55.759
<v Speaker 4>we wanted to defend ourselves against communists because it was

0:53:55.760 --> 0:54:01.160
<v Speaker 4>one of those ideologies, European ideologies that had gone pretty obviously.

0:54:01.400 --> 0:54:05.440
<v Speaker 4>We had realized most of us Stalin's death camps meant

0:54:06.160 --> 0:54:07.240
<v Speaker 4>in terms of deaths.

0:54:08.880 --> 0:54:11.279
<v Speaker 5>So Europeans didn't want that.

0:54:12.200 --> 0:54:16.600
<v Speaker 4>And we look at when I say, I look at

0:54:16.600 --> 0:54:21.239
<v Speaker 4>these europe Americans now with the enthusiasm for ideology and

0:54:21.280 --> 0:54:24.600
<v Speaker 4>for passionate belief and also all I see is people

0:54:24.600 --> 0:54:27.719
<v Speaker 4>who want to come and kill their neighbors because they

0:54:27.920 --> 0:54:31.239
<v Speaker 4>have the wrong views, or they're the wrong color, or

0:54:31.280 --> 0:54:36.760
<v Speaker 4>they're the wrong whatever. And that's Europe, that's European history.

0:54:37.120 --> 0:54:37.799
<v Speaker 5>Hecatombs.

0:54:38.840 --> 0:54:42.759
<v Speaker 4>Now, the problem with that is, if you carefully, it's

0:54:43.320 --> 0:54:47.600
<v Speaker 4>toleration is your dominant mode. You can accept everybody except

0:54:47.640 --> 0:54:52.840
<v Speaker 4>the intolerant, and you crowd them out. That doesn't last.

0:54:52.960 --> 0:54:55.360
<v Speaker 4>As you rightly say, sooner orly can people start getting

0:54:55.360 --> 0:54:58.920
<v Speaker 4>passionate beliefs again. And we may be moving in that direction.

0:55:00.080 --> 0:55:03.000
<v Speaker 4>But I'm one of those people who thinks once you're

0:55:03.160 --> 0:55:07.960
<v Speaker 4>in that mode, it's very difficult to find the off switch,

0:55:08.520 --> 0:55:13.560
<v Speaker 4>because sooner or later everyone around you starts thinking looking

0:55:13.640 --> 0:55:17.880
<v Speaker 4>like an enemy, and so I don't want to go that.

0:55:18.120 --> 0:55:21.280
<v Speaker 4>And most Europeans of my generation or even somewhat younger

0:55:21.280 --> 0:55:24.320
<v Speaker 4>don't want to go that because we bear the scars.

0:55:25.120 --> 0:55:28.360
<v Speaker 4>And I think in a different way, why do the

0:55:28.440 --> 0:55:31.440
<v Speaker 4>Chinese in the end accept the current regime because it

0:55:31.680 --> 0:55:33.879
<v Speaker 4>works and it doesn't kill them all, and they don't

0:55:33.880 --> 0:55:38.760
<v Speaker 4>want to lunatic again. So we're not going to become

0:55:39.200 --> 0:55:42.120
<v Speaker 4>go where you are, because we tend to think where

0:55:42.200 --> 0:55:47.600
<v Speaker 4>you're going could ultimately lead you to some very very

0:55:47.840 --> 0:55:48.759
<v Speaker 4>dark places.

0:55:50.160 --> 0:55:52.880
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't expecting this conversation to be so sort of

0:55:53.120 --> 0:55:56.759
<v Speaker 2>state centric in many ways. But since we've gone in

0:55:56.760 --> 0:55:59.439
<v Speaker 2>this direction, and since again we're talking about the long

0:55:59.600 --> 0:56:03.040
<v Speaker 2>arc history here and society, can you talk a little

0:56:03.080 --> 0:56:06.279
<v Speaker 2>bit about the impact of AI on you know, if

0:56:06.280 --> 0:56:09.880
<v Speaker 2>we think about the social contract between a state's population

0:56:10.280 --> 0:56:14.160
<v Speaker 2>and its political authority, what does it mean when work

0:56:14.200 --> 0:56:18.799
<v Speaker 2>starts to be automated, when maybe culture becomes more automated.

0:56:19.480 --> 0:56:22.200
<v Speaker 2>I realize this is a very general, big picture question,

0:56:22.320 --> 0:56:25.759
<v Speaker 2>but if anyone can respond to this, you can well.

0:56:25.800 --> 0:56:30.680
<v Speaker 4>I think of this as the ultimate Faustian bargain. The

0:56:30.719 --> 0:56:36.560
<v Speaker 4>devil promises infinite wealth and power to Faust in return

0:56:36.640 --> 0:56:41.040
<v Speaker 4>for his immortal soul, which is in some sense he's meaning,

0:56:41.960 --> 0:56:44.880
<v Speaker 4>and he makes the bargain and it doesn't end well.

0:56:46.239 --> 0:56:51.359
<v Speaker 4>So we have been fantastically innovative and creative, and we

0:56:51.560 --> 0:56:56.400
<v Speaker 4>have in the process made ourselves vastly wealthier and wiser

0:56:56.560 --> 0:56:57.880
<v Speaker 4>in some obvious ways.

0:56:58.440 --> 0:57:00.399
<v Speaker 5>But we're always the.

0:57:00.280 --> 0:57:04.560
<v Speaker 4>Brink of catastrophes a result. And the last thing that

0:57:04.600 --> 0:57:09.480
<v Speaker 4>really motivated people around those lines was nuclear weapons created.

0:57:11.000 --> 0:57:14.919
<v Speaker 4>People like Einstein got terribly frightened about what they created. Well,

0:57:14.960 --> 0:57:18.000
<v Speaker 4>I think of Ai that way. We have made a Faust, Embarkin,

0:57:18.600 --> 0:57:23.600
<v Speaker 4>and we have created a servant quote unquote with the

0:57:23.640 --> 0:57:26.720
<v Speaker 4>capacity to replace us or even in some way to

0:57:26.800 --> 0:57:30.480
<v Speaker 4>dominate us. Where this will end up, I don't know,

0:57:31.000 --> 0:57:34.520
<v Speaker 4>but it seems to me there are a number of

0:57:35.000 --> 0:57:40.240
<v Speaker 4>absolutely terrifying dangers I think, And I thought for the

0:57:40.280 --> 0:57:43.840
<v Speaker 4>first time I've read about it three or four years ago,

0:57:44.040 --> 0:57:48.720
<v Speaker 4>that it was going to prove completely unregulatable. It would

0:57:49.120 --> 0:57:53.320
<v Speaker 4>competitionive process and so forth, it would make institutions that

0:57:53.480 --> 0:57:58.480
<v Speaker 4>used it unaccountable in some profound way because decisions were

0:57:58.520 --> 0:58:01.440
<v Speaker 4>not being taken by anyone you can hold to account.

0:58:02.360 --> 0:58:08.080
<v Speaker 4>It would create transformation in our society, in our economy,

0:58:08.720 --> 0:58:13.480
<v Speaker 4>and in our sense of ourselves, which was in avoidably

0:58:13.680 --> 0:58:18.760
<v Speaker 4>just of an ordered magnitude different from anything that it

0:58:18.800 --> 0:58:24.760
<v Speaker 4>can't come before. And in the short to medium run,

0:58:25.200 --> 0:58:29.040
<v Speaker 4>a lot of this would seem very helpful, very encouraging.

0:58:29.200 --> 0:58:31.400
<v Speaker 4>We will we will enjoy it, we will be able

0:58:31.440 --> 0:58:36.320
<v Speaker 4>to do things we couldn't do otherwise. But if we

0:58:36.440 --> 0:58:40.919
<v Speaker 4>do get to artificial general intelligence, and it's absolutely clear

0:58:40.960 --> 0:58:44.600
<v Speaker 4>that the machine dominates humanity in terms of what it

0:58:44.640 --> 0:58:49.880
<v Speaker 4>can do intellectually in every possible way, then there is

0:58:49.920 --> 0:58:53.800
<v Speaker 4>an existential question, obviously, is what is humanity for and

0:58:53.880 --> 0:58:58.480
<v Speaker 4>what does human beings think there for? So when I

0:58:58.480 --> 0:59:01.120
<v Speaker 4>thought about this, and I leave aside the of his dangers,

0:59:01.120 --> 0:59:05.160
<v Speaker 4>the creation of pathogens, we can't possibly manage the creation

0:59:05.240 --> 0:59:11.160
<v Speaker 4>of armies AI run armies, which are completely bought armies

0:59:11.160 --> 0:59:15.560
<v Speaker 4>which could control human population is just flesh and blood

0:59:15.560 --> 0:59:19.480
<v Speaker 4>with such all this is absolutely terrifying. And we're dancing

0:59:19.480 --> 0:59:24.000
<v Speaker 4>into this and souciently under the direction of four or

0:59:24.000 --> 0:59:29.680
<v Speaker 4>five geniuses and their companies, and that's what's happening. My instinct,

0:59:29.760 --> 0:59:32.800
<v Speaker 4>probably those of an old man with grandchildren, is it

0:59:32.800 --> 0:59:34.440
<v Speaker 4>should all be closed down, but of course it's not

0:59:34.480 --> 0:59:37.640
<v Speaker 4>going to happen. I do think it's transformative. I think

0:59:37.680 --> 0:59:39.400
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be transformative in business.

0:59:39.440 --> 0:59:40.000
<v Speaker 5>Is pretty clear.

0:59:40.000 --> 0:59:42.600
<v Speaker 4>They're going to be powerful business models. I can perfectly

0:59:42.640 --> 0:59:45.280
<v Speaker 4>well understand that ten years from now there will be

0:59:45.280 --> 0:59:47.680
<v Speaker 4>no Martin Wolves because the computer will do it so

0:59:47.760 --> 0:59:52.920
<v Speaker 4>much better, though they'd be less fun. But the I

0:59:52.920 --> 0:59:55.840
<v Speaker 4>think we just have to say we are stepping into

0:59:55.880 --> 1:00:00.000
<v Speaker 4>the unknown. We should do our best to work out

1:00:00.080 --> 1:00:04.000
<v Speaker 4>what their big dangers are and focus on them. With

1:00:04.000 --> 1:00:08.480
<v Speaker 4>our current politics, that's impossible, clearly impossible. I think it

1:00:08.600 --> 1:00:14.120
<v Speaker 4>is a huge moment in human history, possibly the single

1:00:14.200 --> 1:00:17.440
<v Speaker 4>most important invention, and there have been some very very

1:00:17.480 --> 1:00:23.720
<v Speaker 4>important ones, and human humanity will change profoundly. Humanity was

1:00:23.800 --> 1:00:29.080
<v Speaker 4>changed by writing profoundly. It was transformed by publishing, by

1:00:29.560 --> 1:00:33.160
<v Speaker 4>the ability to print. It was transformed by the Internet.

1:00:33.640 --> 1:00:36.760
<v Speaker 4>I think this is probably more important than all of

1:00:36.760 --> 1:00:40.360
<v Speaker 4>these put together, but I'm not sure. But my instinct

1:00:40.520 --> 1:00:44.520
<v Speaker 4>is I'm a great fan of Frank Herbert, the June books,

1:00:44.600 --> 1:00:48.280
<v Speaker 4>particularly June itself, and his idea that at some point

1:00:48.360 --> 1:00:50.960
<v Speaker 4>in the past there was something called the but Leary

1:00:50.960 --> 1:00:55.240
<v Speaker 4>and jihad in which at the end of which machines

1:00:55.280 --> 1:01:00.080
<v Speaker 4>that think were banned. I wouldn't be terribly surprised of

1:01:00.080 --> 1:01:02.920
<v Speaker 4>one hundred years from now people, if there are people

1:01:03.000 --> 1:01:05.560
<v Speaker 4>still around, we'll say we should have done that.

1:01:07.920 --> 1:01:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Dune references were also not where I was expecting this

1:01:10.800 --> 1:01:11.800
<v Speaker 2>conversation to go.

1:01:12.000 --> 1:01:14.840
<v Speaker 4>But science fiction is better on this sort of stuff

1:01:14.880 --> 1:01:18.240
<v Speaker 4>than anything else. Yes, as a great science fiction writers.

1:01:18.800 --> 1:01:24.000
<v Speaker 4>Asimov is another of my fans, my hero. Sorry, he

1:01:24.280 --> 1:01:27.920
<v Speaker 4>wrote wonderfully the Laws of robotics, and nobody seemed to

1:01:27.960 --> 1:01:29.280
<v Speaker 4>be thinking about those either.

1:01:29.760 --> 1:01:32.480
<v Speaker 2>We should get a list of recommended sci fi books

1:01:32.520 --> 1:01:34.840
<v Speaker 2>from Martin and put it in the news letter. We'll

1:01:34.880 --> 1:01:39.080
<v Speaker 2>follow up with you afterwards. Martin Wolf, another amazing conversation.

1:01:39.160 --> 1:01:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for coming back on our thoughts.

1:01:41.640 --> 1:01:43.400
<v Speaker 5>That's certainly not what I expected.

1:01:43.800 --> 1:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. We'll chat with you again next spring.

1:01:47.360 --> 1:02:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Joe, that was fascinating. Indeed, I feel I feel

1:02:04.160 --> 1:02:06.800
<v Speaker 2>a little bit like I was back at university getting

1:02:06.840 --> 1:02:09.680
<v Speaker 2>a history lecture. I also just realized, since we've come

1:02:09.720 --> 1:02:14.200
<v Speaker 2>to London from Madrid, we could hit maybe four I

1:02:14.240 --> 1:02:16.880
<v Speaker 2>want to say, four more European cities and get a

1:02:16.920 --> 1:02:20.200
<v Speaker 2>complete European colonial tour. So we just got to go

1:02:20.280 --> 1:02:25.040
<v Speaker 2>to Lisbon, Paris, Brussels. That's three.

1:02:25.600 --> 1:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>We really need. We need to make a we need

1:02:27.680 --> 1:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a European tour, we need we need to make this

1:02:31.040 --> 1:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a recurring spring trip to London. There was so much

1:02:34.920 --> 1:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>in that conversation that was interesting.

1:02:37.280 --> 1:02:40.520
<v Speaker 2>I do think so I do think Martin hit on something.

1:02:40.680 --> 1:02:43.520
<v Speaker 2>And it's funny because this came up in our conversation

1:02:43.600 --> 1:02:45.520
<v Speaker 2>from last year as well, where we were talking about

1:02:45.520 --> 1:02:48.760
<v Speaker 2>the dollar reserve system and the idea that like, yes, okay,

1:02:48.760 --> 1:02:52.400
<v Speaker 2>there are downsides to having the world's reserve currency, but

1:02:52.440 --> 1:02:55.560
<v Speaker 2>there are also a lot of upsides, including being able

1:02:55.560 --> 1:02:59.360
<v Speaker 2>to run a massive fiscal deficit. But like his point

1:02:59.400 --> 1:03:03.600
<v Speaker 2>that it's difficult to understand why so many Americans in

1:03:03.640 --> 1:03:08.440
<v Speaker 2>particular are so aggrieved as to want to blow up

1:03:08.520 --> 1:03:12.360
<v Speaker 2>an existing structure that, compared to the rest of the world,

1:03:12.400 --> 1:03:14.440
<v Speaker 2>seems to have benefited them enormously.

1:03:15.480 --> 1:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I love his point about the sort of like and

1:03:18.640 --> 1:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it raises some questions about the short term future, like

1:03:22.000 --> 1:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>just a few years from now, of what is the

1:03:24.440 --> 1:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump coalition. For example, there's a really big difference between

1:03:28.360 --> 1:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the AI focused Peter teelworld versus some of the people

1:03:32.200 --> 1:03:34.520
<v Speaker 1>would like a world to go back to the nineteen

1:03:34.600 --> 1:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>fifties and so forth.

1:03:36.200 --> 1:03:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Another thing that.

1:03:36.960 --> 1:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't really appreciated until you articulate it on the

1:03:42.120 --> 1:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Europe question. You know, when we joke about the EU

1:03:46.200 --> 1:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and they love their documents and their reports and their

1:03:49.200 --> 1:03:52.959
<v Speaker 1>studies and regulations and stuff like that. But this sort

1:03:52.960 --> 1:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of not just Okay, let's put in some mechanisms to

1:03:56.720 --> 1:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>avoid World War two again or something like that. With

1:04:00.200 --> 1:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the sort of the complete.

1:04:01.320 --> 1:04:02.640
<v Speaker 5>Exhaustion of ideology.

1:04:02.760 --> 1:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's such an interesting, such an interesting framing. It's

1:04:06.120 --> 1:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>like every time we've gotten into some new ideology, it

1:04:09.600 --> 1:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>like end terribly. So it's like, let's let's make the

1:04:12.400 --> 1:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>attempt of sort of creating a post ideological super state

1:04:17.360 --> 1:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>in somewhere. It's such an interesting framing and like, I

1:04:19.960 --> 1:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know, like maybe it's that was Maybe that's an

1:04:23.360 --> 1:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>experiment with a finite, finite time span.

1:04:26.360 --> 1:04:28.920
<v Speaker 2>I guess we'll find out. Shall we leave it there?

1:04:29.040 --> 1:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave it there.

1:04:30.000 --> 1:04:32.280
<v Speaker 2>This has been another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

1:04:32.320 --> 1:04:35.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

1:04:35.120 --> 1:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart,

1:04:38.120 --> 1:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen armand dash Ol

1:04:41.440 --> 1:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Bennett at Dashbot and Kevin Lozano at Kevin Lloyd Lozano.

1:04:45.280 --> 1:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>And for more Odd Lots content, go to Bloomberg dot

1:04:47.560 --> 1:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>com slash odd Lots. We have a daily newsletter and

1:04:50.000 --> 1:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>all of our episodes and you can shed about all

1:04:52.400 --> 1:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>these topics twenty four seven in our discord discord gg

1:04:56.360 --> 1:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>slash odd Lots.

1:04:57.800 --> 1:04:59.680
<v Speaker 2>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you want us

1:04:59.720 --> 1:05:02.040
<v Speaker 2>to do a science fiction review with Martin Wolf, then

1:05:02.080 --> 1:05:05.120
<v Speaker 2>please leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform.

1:05:05.360 --> 1:05:07.880
<v Speaker 2>And remember, if you're a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen

1:05:07.920 --> 1:05:10.680
<v Speaker 2>to all of our episodes absolutely add free. All you

1:05:10.800 --> 1:05:13.160
<v Speaker 2>need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple

1:05:13.200 --> 1:05:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening