WEBVTT - Top 20 Must-Have Draft Targets for Keeper Leagues (Ep. 610)

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Playing for keeps, let's talk to the pros. Welcome in

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>everybody to Fantasy Pros. This is the Fantasy Baseball Podcast.

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>To this b Joey p Joe Pizapia, and today we're

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about.

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 2>The keeper league targets.

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about leagues that are starting up that have

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>keepers involved. Some are one, some are ten, some are more,

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>some are less. But we're gonna talk about some of

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>our favorite targets. If you were in one of those

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>drafts this year, that's just starting up guys in some

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of the later rounds and some of the early rounds

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>too that we want to target, or if you're in

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>those salary cap drafts, the one you want to spend

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>some money on or maybe get some nice discounts on

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>later on. The Welsh of course, is here to help

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>me figure it all out.

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 2>And don't forget.

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>If you've got drafts coming up, make sure you use

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>your draft simulator because it's right here.

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Right now.

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>The MLB Draft Wizard is open for business here at

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros. So go to fantasypros dot com slash Draft

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Wizard and you could start your mock drafts. You can

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>do it in ten minutes. Go through undo. I just

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>did one right before here. Actually I did two. I

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>got a B plus on one and I'm an over

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>so I went to another one got an A plus

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>on the second one. So clearly my strategy is starting

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>to take shape here. But you got to get your

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>strategy straight before you get into the twenty twenty three season.

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.559
<v Speaker 1>You could do that fantasypros dot Com slash Draft Wizard again.

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Go get your draft on Welsh while you start off

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>with one of your guys on your top ten list

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>of keeper league targets for twenty twenty three.

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 3>I also just want to add real quick that not

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:25.320
<v Speaker 3>only can you draft and use the Draft Wizard, but

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 3>you can connect them to your own leagues, which I

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 3>just did last week, and it is incredibly invaluable. When

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 3>you even if you're drafting somewhere else, you connect it.

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 3>You get the projections, you get us who we hate you,

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 3>we love you, You get all the incredibly fun information

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 3>even if you're not drafting on Fantasy Pro. So I

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 3>just want to point that out because it is one

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 3>of the most fun tools to use in the offseason,

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 3>is a draft wizard. And it is not just one thing.

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 3>It is many things. Okay, we're talking about keeper buys.

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 3>This one is weird because it doesn't feel like this

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 3>would be a guy that would be a keyper buye.

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 3>But mister Mike Mayer is going to love me for

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 3>it on Fantasy Pros, and I'm a big buy in

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 3>on this guy. My number ten as far as keeper

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 3>pickups this year, going with Ryan Mountcastle. Ray Mountcastle, by

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 3>the way, is only twenty five years old. He'll start

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 3>the season as a twenty six year old. Last two seasons,

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 3>he's put up fifty five homers and an average of

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 3>eighty seven RBI. In that time, he's hit a round

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 3>two fifty with a couple stolen bases that have been

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 3>thrown in. But a couple of things I've really loved

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 3>on him over this past season. Expected slug rate this

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 3>past year was the eighth best in the league at

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 3>five oh nine. Eighth best. That also went with a

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 3>huge increase from his batting average was expected batting average

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 3>a two point fifty batting average with a two seventy

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 3>seven expected batting average. Then on top of it, this

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 3>isn't a one for one because they did change the

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 3>dimensions and this might just be a part of Orioles.

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 3>In general, we had the third biggest home run to

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 3>expected home run differential in the league last year of

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 3>qualif fight batters with an over five home run differential

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 3>five homers. He had twenty two this past year. That

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 3>would be twenty seven homers. And you put all of

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 3>that together with really good, strong, hard hit numbers an

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 3>offense that is trying to rebuild a team that is

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 3>building itself back up. I have a hard time not

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 3>buying into a post one hundred player who's under twenty

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 3>seven years old. He's got a ton of underline analytics

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 3>in his favor in an expected home run ratio that

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 3>just looks like it's going to pop back up. I

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 3>think Ryan Mountcastle is a nice, good, cheap option, even

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 3>if he's not your first baseman, he's your corner infielder

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 3>and he just qualifies on that young keeper range.

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So give me Ryan Mountcastle, all right, number ten for

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>me on my list. Typically, I'm a little antsy when

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it comes to catchers. Francisco Alvarez just missed this list

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>for me because he hasn't quite proven it yet.

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 2>In the show.

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Got a little cup of coffee, but not enough to

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>really know yet.

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 2>It's more of a dynasty league selection. But instead I'm.

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.839
<v Speaker 1>Looking at Adlie Ruschman, catcher for the Baltimore Orioles. Last

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>year thirteen home runs, forty two. He's hit two and

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty four for the Baltimore Oriols. If you'll get the

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>minor league numbers of one hundred and eighty games, thirty dingers,

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:08.839
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and eleven RBI, hit two eighty one, three

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>ninety OVP, forty seven slogging practically a three four to

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>five guy. Everybody knows I love the three four to

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>five guys. He's gonna be twenty five years old this year.

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>He's in a better ballpark situation now that you know

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>they've kind of made some adjustments last year where I

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>think that it's going to look. I know it took

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>away for some and I know the pitchers in some

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>situations were very pleased. We saw the Orioles make a

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 1>run last year. But I think Addley Rutchmand's one of

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>these special players where it doesn't matter what the ballpark

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:37.239
<v Speaker 1>is like. You go back and look at him in college.

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I remember watching them at Oregon State. The guy just

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.479
<v Speaker 1>absolutely mash. I mean, he was just unbelievable. He's a

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 1>first rate guy too, and I think that stuff matters

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>when you look at a keepers, like guys who are

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be leaders of teams, guys who are going

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to be out there. Typically with the catchers, you're worried

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>about them giving up some of the offense to learn

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the pitching staff. I think we got some of that

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>adjustment last year. I think this year it's going forward now.

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>Adley Rutchman's going to be a superstar in the major leagues,

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.799
<v Speaker 1>and a catcher just not a lot of great options there.

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a few, not a lot of great ones. So

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>when keeper leagues, I think Rushman's were of those guys

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>who was number nine on your list.

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Welsh, Well, I'm going to go with the pitcher. There's

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 3>a guy that I've talked up a little bit over

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 3>this offseason. It's Nicolodolo. First half last year and only

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 3>about twenty six innings. It really took up a big

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 3>portion of what he lacked in success. He had a

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 3>five to eight one ERA. He was pitching to batters

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 3>four hundred babbit four thirty five babbitb and over three

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 3>hundred batting average in the second half, which equated to

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 3>essentially three fourths of his season. He had a two

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 3>nine to two ERA batters had an under three hundred

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 3>BAB and a two hundred batting average overall. What's interesting

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 3>about him there are twenty pitchers. If we're looking at Steamer,

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 3>I want to point out the bat and the bat

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 3>X is now out and these numbers look lower. But

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 3>Steamer had projected two hundred strikeout pitchers. There were twenty

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 3>of them this year. I believe the bat has around fourteen.

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 3>There were only two pitchers that were outside the top ten,

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 3>top one hundred in overall eightp that had those two

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 3>hundred strikeouts. Those teammates and Nickelodolo. The difference Nickelodolo used

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 3>ten percent or more on pitches compared to a two

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 3>pitch pitcher. That Hunter Green is ten percent or more

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 3>on four different pitches. For Nicolodolo, Green had a really

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 3>great twenty eight percent whiff rate on his slider last

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 3>year with a forty percent usage. Lodolo on his curve,

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 3>which he used thirty percent of the time, had a

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 3>forty six percent whiff rate, almost the exact same k

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 3>percentage and a full mile per hour less on his

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 3>ev Nickelodolo. I think he's just really prime for a

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 3>big breakout. He's more of a control pitcher where a

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 3>hunter Green's little bit more of a power pitcher. He's

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 3>also a big analytics guy Niicolodolo outside the top one

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 3>hundred overall, a young pitcher on maybe not a great

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 3>team in a bad pitcher environment all things to consider,

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 3>think makes Green more volatile. And I'm a Nickelodolo guy,

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 3>so he's someone I'd be buying in on Dynasty and

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 3>even keeper leagues who doesn't cost especially in keeper is

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 3>not going to probably cost you top one hundred.

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Here's a sneaky guy in keeper leagues too.

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's going to cost you as much

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>as you might think at twenty three years old last

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>year for the leveland and almost at Indians Nope, Guardians,

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness, Collars season without saying it. And this

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>is what happens, you know, when you're still coming off

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of football, your mind is still fuzzy. Seventeen homers, twenty steals.

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I think in roatal leagues Andres Jimenez is a guy

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that people are just really sort of coming around on.

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Certainly a breakout year last year he's so young still,

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna have that job for the foreseeable future. He's

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in a good situation there. I think that the Guardians

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>did well here in this trade when they gave up

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Francisco Lindor. Having watched him come up through the Mets system,

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I saw a lot of Jimenez. It was

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.119
<v Speaker 1>just whether or not you would grow into any power.

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think last year flashing that for sixty six

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>lugging that was a big positive for him, and two

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven batting average was terrific. I mean, this is

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a guy who's gonna hit for batting average, hit for power,

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>give him soul bases in roatal leagues. He might be

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the best return on investments in keeper leagues

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>right now. So I like the adp in those situations,

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and I like the player. I think he's got maybe

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.119
<v Speaker 1>another year, but even if he just becomes this guy,

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>this guy's pretty good to keep, especially in those deeper

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>keeper leagues. All right, Welsh, who is number eight for

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you on your list of twenty twenty three keeper league targets.

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's another one of these young guys. It's really

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 3>interesting and redraft. He comes at a cheaper cost. He's

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 3>going to be a little bit more expensive in keeper leagues,

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 3>but you know what, it might not tick up to

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 3>a crazy degree. Go with Vinnie Pasquinino with the Kansas

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 3>City Royals is one of those guys that's on a

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 3>little ho home of a team overall offensively that I

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 3>don't think really helps. But you know, Vinnie was pull

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 3>heavy and the power wasn't insane and about three hundred

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 3>plate appearances he had ten overall. But we need to

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 3>talk about those home run to expected home run differentials.

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Mount Castle's number three. Paus Quentino number four was number

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 3>four in the league ten homers with an expected fourteen

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 3>point eight on that home run total. You pair that

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 3>with an expected batting average that was within right on

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 3>his overall batting average two ninety five, batting average two

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 3>eighty nine expected, no big difference how to higher x

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 3>slug slug of four fifty and almost four. It was

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 3>four to seventy six on his expect slug, which you've

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 3>gotta love. And overall when you just take a look

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 3>at him, there's big EV numbers. Had almost one hundred

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 3>and thirteen max EV overall, I think a lot is

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:14.439
<v Speaker 3>working in favor of a guy that doesn't strike out.

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 3>A whole bunch is going to hit for power that

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 3>doesn't show up quite yet. A lot of underlining things

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 3>work in favor of it. And if you do have

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 3>a Royals team that tries to manufacture and you get

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.719
<v Speaker 3>modesty back in there, they're running a little bit more.

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 3>It's more RBI opportunity, even though they kind of stink overall.

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Minny Pascuatino doesn't he walks, he doesn't strike out, He

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 3>makes lots of contact, and there's power that's gonna come

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 3>in there. A little Italian breakfast there for you, Joe,

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Minni pass.

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Have a good Italian breakfast.

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Can't get enough little espresso, you know, maybe a biscothy,

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>very nice biscoti.

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:50.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what are you Bisconti? I don't I don't know

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 3>what biscuit? Well, a biscuit, you like a biscuit.

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Bisconti, You don't know what bisconti is.

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.599
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness, after the show, I'm gonna have to

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>send you a whole case. Uh it's a you dunk

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>him in the coffee. It's like this Italian little biscuit

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>cookie thing. And it's kind of shaped almost like a

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>long you ish kind of thing in this chocolate. There's

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>different one. I mean, we're gonna have to educate you

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>on some of the Italians.

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Maybe Veny can educate men.

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:20.839
<v Speaker 1>You can Wander Franco by low Okay, geez, can we can?

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 1>We not overreact. He's barely old enough to drink. I mean,

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty two years old here. And I know last year

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>was disappointing. I was disappointed. I was expecting big things.

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I was expecting a power surge. It didn't happen. Injury

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>happened instead. But there's a reason why the Rays committed

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>so much money to this player. He is a special player.

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>He is still just twenty two years old. In the

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>minor leagues, he hit three thirty five with a four

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred OBP over two hundred and twenty four games. And

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>if you combine and look at the last two seasons,

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you know he's got one hundred and fifty games there,

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 1>thirteen home run, seventy two RBI, ten steals, two eighty

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>two batting average.

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 2>That's something to build on.

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just don't think we're being fair to

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the Wander Franco evaluation system yet.

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 2>And Wander Franco.

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he'll never be a forty home run guy, but

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I do think at some point he's going to be

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a twenty five to thirty home run guy, and I

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be sooner than you realize. And I

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>think you're in the unique position to buy low almost

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>in keeper leagues on him for the first time and

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe the last time you're gonna be able to do that.

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Certainly the last couple years he was very hyped. He

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>should be hyped. He's that good of a player. The

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Rays are the raised and they're always gonna have some

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>deficits there offensively. But I think for me, Wander Franco

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>is that perfect price this year to buy low in

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>these keeper league drafts on him, or if you're in

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a keeper league, buy low on him and just enjoy

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>this player for the next decade, because I think he's

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be an absolute star. And we're just getting started

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 1>still with Wander Franco. Let's not overreact to a down

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and disappointing year. All right, Next on the list here,

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that's my number eight, number seven for you, your keeper

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>league target for twenty twenty three.

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 3>So I'm gonna jump up the board now. This doesn't

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 3>necessarily have to be a board where we're up at

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 3>the top and then we down to the top guys.

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 3>A draft overall necessarily not mine. This is kind of

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 3>ranking and how I'm approaching this. So I'm going to

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 3>jump up the board to a definitely a higher ADP player,

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 3>but in a keeper league, I don't know if there's

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 3>a priority, and I think there's still some value to

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 3>be had at third base, and I'm gonna go with

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 3>Austin Riley. And I know you're thinking to yourself, like, well, okay,

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 3>Austin Riley might be a second round player. Keeper leaks

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 3>you start to get some of the young guys in

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 3>there that might push down. If you're talking about dynasty,

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Austin Riley is a player that actually could push into

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 3>the third round in some places because he doesn't steal bases.

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 3>And I think there's an overall question. I think people

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 3>overall have maybe in the power. My point here is

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Austin Riley is the type of guy that I think

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 3>can still push higher and can you maybe get you

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 3>into a first round overall value, That's what I still

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 3>think is on the table, especially if he pushes back

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 3>a little bit and Austin Riley this past year had

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 3>the eighth best slug percentage in the league or number,

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.559
<v Speaker 3>and he had the six best expected x slug. I mean,

0:12:57.559 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 3>that's crazy, that's crazy to improve off of that, though,

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:04.959
<v Speaker 3>those power numbers are absolutely real. Seventy one homers over

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:08.559
<v Speaker 3>the last two years. His RBIs ticked down a little bit,

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 3>his strikeout numbers came down, but his batting average came off.

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 3>He was a three hundred hitter the year before he

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 3>ticked down to two seventy three. And I think there's

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 3>some value. I would not be surprised if Austin Riley

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 3>pushed forty homers this year and pushes up one hundred hundred.

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 3>He's more of a fat four category player, maybe three.

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:28.719
<v Speaker 3>But I would buy in on keeper leagues because he's

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 3>still really young. And this is a player that could

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 3>be a first run overall talent if you can get

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 3>him in the late second or third round.

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>And some of these guys are going to talk about

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>today that obviously the prices are going to vary. We're

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:40.959
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about the premium guys and the reason

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>why you want to pay for some of them. And

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about some guys in the middle, and some

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of the guys we just mentioned too, Pas Galentino probably

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>going a little later in drafts. There still a little unknown,

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>still divisiveness there on the opinion Wander Franco kind of

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>coming off a down year. Lots of different evaluations of

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:58.599
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these players, and again we're trying to

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>give you a range, you know exactly, you know how

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you're can to approach some of these drafts. And look,

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about some big time players and why

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>they're still worth that big investment.

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 3>And Franco's fascinating. By the way, it's a time for

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 3>another conversation we could have, but Fronco is ultimately fascinating

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 3>because I'm not sure there's a player in Keeper and

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 3>dynasty formats that has a wider range of valuation than

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 3>Wander Franco anywhere from the top twenty five down to

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 3>maybe his redraft value, which is in the nineties. So

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 3>there is a wide, wide spectrum of outcomes for him

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 3>as far as how people value him, and that's what

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 3>makes him really intriguing, especially if you're in a league

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 3>where that value is quite a bit lower and someone's

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 3>in the sixties or seventies is kind of given up

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 3>because the counting stats will never catch up, and I

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 3>agree with you, I don't think that's necessarily the case.

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>And for me, I'm trying to look for guys too,

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>who have proven something in the major leagues already. Like

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>these are guys that you know, again, not pure minor

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>league talent, guys, guys who have shown you at least

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>something here in the major league level. And one guy's

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>shown you a lot so far, and he's still just

0:14:58.240 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years old. Again, a lot of these guys

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and stay in that twenty six and under range too,

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>so I know, like the prime of their career is

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>still ahead of them, which is the twenty eight to

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty one years that's the prime typically of these players.

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 2>So Kyle Tucker.

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Hasn't hit the prime yet, but he's got two back

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to back thirty home run seasons with ninety plus rebies.

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna steal bases twenty five last year. The batting

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>average did take a tumble year over here.

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 2>That's fine. But if there's one guy too, along with.

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Corey Seeger, where the shift change is going to help him,

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be Kyle Tucker back to back years playing

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>over one hundred and forty games as well. You know,

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>he plays in a go ballpark surrounded by good lineup support.

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot to like here with Kyle Tucker. And

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a player too that is going to continue,

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I think, to even get better. But you've seen, my goodness,

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>what a high ceiling he has. There might be another

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>gear in Kyle Tucker where you get all the high

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>batting average, you get all of the thirty plus homers,

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you get fifteen steals, you get everything in there in

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>one season all together. I think it's very possible. I

0:15:57.760 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's probably coming very quickly. So he's one of

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>these guys that I think is starting to you know,

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>like he's a first round talent in any redraft leagues already.

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>But we're talking about salary cap leagues and issues where

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna look at how much you want to pay

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>for a player. This is the guy who's already shown

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you what he is and I think the best is

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>still yet to come with him, which is huge. And

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Kyle Tucker is in a good spot right

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>here at twenty six years old, to be a great

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>investment where you might even overpay to get him. What

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>do you think about Kyle Tucker Welsh?

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm into this. I mean, actually this really fascinating debate.

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Just the other day we were talking about Mookie bats

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 3>versus Kyle Tucker, and that's the range that he's living

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 3>in right now. Stolen bases, we can question how real

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 3>they're going to be, but the powers there, the hit

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 3>tools there were just one of those guys too that

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 3>just you look and you're just like, why are you

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 3>not hitting for more average? And kind of like Austin Riley,

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 3>I also kind of think people are just not caught

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 3>up on like the true value that he holds in

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 3>keeper leagues, especially with top end power and speed. So yeah,

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm with that. I'm pretty aggressive on him. He's a

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 3>top ten and no doubt, so anytime you can get

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 3>him outside of that, whether it's dynasty keeper, that's another

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:07.479
<v Speaker 3>thing to point out as well. Dynasty's and keepers are

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily valued in the same way. That's something I

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 3>had to adjust because I do a huge top four

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 3>hundred dynasty list, but keepers they're all not created equal

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 3>because you could be keeping two or three, or five

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 3>or ten. So there's so many different ways to look

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:23.360
<v Speaker 3>at it, so proximity is more important. And that's also

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 3>why we're not sitting here talking about Ellie Day, La

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Cruz or Jackson Curio in these keeper formats, because there's

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 3>just so many different ways you can go right.

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>And when you're talking with a player like Moogi Bets,

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be thirty this year, Kyle Tucker, I'd rather

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 1>have Kyle Tucker the Moogie Bets, even if the stolen

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>base has never reached Moogie Bets levels or sustainability. That's

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>why I prefer Kyle Tucker because I think you know,

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 1>when you give me five extra years on a guy,

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>it's a no brainer. Let's take a quick break in

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the action to tell you about fan Tracks. Fan Tracks

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:55.479
<v Speaker 1>is the most customizable fantasy platform in the industry, offering

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the greatest fantasy experience of your dynasty, keeper, redraft and

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>bet ball leagues. Create or join a Fantasy Baseball commissioner league,

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>invite your friends and dominate your drafts this season. And

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the top dynasty fantasy Baseball platform in the industry is

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>fan Tracks.

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:12.199
<v Speaker 2>It's not even close.

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Go deeper with the ultimate keeper and dynasty leagues, create

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a simple redraft league or even in a customizable best

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Ball league with up to two thousand teams. If you're

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>coming from another service, fan Tracks can import any of

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>your current leagues and customize as needed. Ever, have a

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>trade go wrong or mistake and dropping a player, fan

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Tracks Commissioner tools allow you to undo any move with

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>one simple click. Among the most trusted names in fantasy

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>sports in two thousand and eight, whether it's football, baseball, basketball, hockey,

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>college basketball, college football, golf, soccer, NASCAR, you name it,

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>they've got it. And if there's anything lacking in your

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>current fantasy league manager, fan Tracks likely has that too.

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy sports doesn't sleep, and neither does fan Tracks. With

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.880
<v Speaker 1>seasons running three hundred and sixty five days a year,

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 1>there's a reason why fantasy players who try fan Tracks

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 1>make it their permanent home for all their fantasy leagues.

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Sign up for free today and be enter to win

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>an official signed Vladimir Guerrero Junior Jersey by simply going

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to fantracks dot com slash Fantasy Pros and signing up today.

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>That's fantracks dot com slash Fantasy Pros for your chance

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>to win that official signed Vladimir Guerrero Junior Jersey fan Tracks,

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the home of Fantasy sports. And now back to the action.

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Next guy on the list for you? Number six?

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 2>Who is it?

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Number six? I'm gonna go with the exact opposite of

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 3>everything we just talked about. I'm gonna go with a

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 3>player that has very little track record, but he's a

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 3>player that in a keeper format he still is prospect eligible.

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 3>But he's a player that you're gonna want to get.

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 3>And you know his price is a little bit higher

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 3>right now in a redraft, which pushes it up, but

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.679
<v Speaker 3>there is top two round upside. I'm talking about Corbyn

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Carroll with my Arizona Diamondbacks, and Corbyn Carroll is coming

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 3>off of a phenomenal Minor league season where he had

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty eight home runs. I got to go through because

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 3>he had some complex level time here. He had twenty

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 3>eight homers between complex and the major leagues. And I

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 3>think there's a lot of questions that people have on

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 3>him overall about like where is this power going to

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 3>come from? Because he looks like a smaller guy. One

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 3>thing I have cited multiple times Corman Carroll in his

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 3>entire minor league since in twenty nineteen, has only once

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 3>had an ISO under two hundred. So I want you

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 3>to think about that ISO a measure of like overall power,

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 3>and it has only been under two hundred once and

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 3>that was that rookie ball as an eighteen year old

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 3>in twenty nineteen. Since then, not a single level has

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 3>it ever been under that. It's not crazy strikeout numbers.

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 3>It's always been a good batting average, and it's elite speed.

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 3>It is top one percent in the overall in the

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 3>league for speed totals. And you look at projections, listen, Steamer,

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 3>I think is more aggressive twenty homers nineteen stolen bases.

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 3>The bat X kind of kills them a little bit

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 3>down to twelve homers and sixteen stolen bases. I think

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 3>you can make arguments across the board on where the

0:20:58.480 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 3>power is going to be. But here's what I know.

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Everybody is understelling the speed. The speed numbers will beat

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 3>every projection system this year. If he leads off for

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 3>the Diamondbacks even half the time lefties and righty's, he's

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 3>gonna have some good run totals. They are going to

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 3>manufacture runs. And I am a believer in Corman Carroll.

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 3>He costs a little bit more in all formats, but

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 3>I think the upside in the return. I don't want

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 3>to do the old Bobby Wit stuff, but I'm just

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 3>saying thirty stolen bases is in my mind, and we

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 3>might have fifteen to twenty homers. And there's a similar

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 3>player that put those numbers up last year.

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Sure was Carol's a guy on my radar two. Gonna

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>talk more about him later in the week, but twenty

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty three rookie of the Year in National League should

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 1>be top of the board guy in my opinion, like

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, if you're going to be making those

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>wagers right now, like that's the guy you're looking at.

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 2>I think one of them anyway.

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>But another great point too about just because a small

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 1>player doesn't me can't hit for power. I mean, doesn't

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Betroit hit for power. Hoseel two a hit for power.

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 3>Miki yeah, MOOKI. Actually, I've always been very intrigued. I

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 3>never went and did this. I was going to do

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 3>this a while back. I wanted to do this big

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 3>minor league comparison on Corvin Carroll and Mookie Bets. I mean,

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 3>he is smaller than Mooki at this point, but MOOKI

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 3>never built into some big, crazy, big physical specimen or

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 3>anything like that. And Corban Carroll's completely transformed his body.

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 3>And this is a guy that for his size is jacked.

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Is very smart analytical. I really believe in the hit tool.

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 3>I worry about slumps that are going to go on

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 3>and how he's gonna adjust, but he's done it at

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:23.640
<v Speaker 3>every stop of his minor league career.

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Next guy on my list is actually the oldest

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 2>guy on my list. Old Man Show. Heyo Tommy at

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight years old.

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of why he is not higher on

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the list, even though he is probably the best player

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>in baseball, even though in most leagues he should be

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the guy. It's the pitcher and the hitter. There's also

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a huge risk in this because he's the pitcher and

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the hitter. It's the same thing we come through every

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:47.640
<v Speaker 1>single year with this player, which is if he has

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a pitching related injury, it takes him out most likely

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of being the hitter as well.

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 2>So this is the go.

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Bigger, go home. But in the situations, I think, especially

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in the keeper leagues where you're limited to a three

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>year window on a player, Otani you could argue is

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the number one because it is go bigger, go home.

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>You can go win a couple years with Otani at

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that peak. You are in the peak of Otani right now.

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:13.199
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to get potentially better than this. I

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>think you've seen the absolute top. If it does get

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>better than this, that's unbelievable. But you're experiencing the prime

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of Otani. And if you're in a keeper league that

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 1>again has the limitations on it's one thing where you

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>can keep the player forever, or you have the escalating

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>contracts on them, or anyo situations. But if you're in

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>one of those situations where it's just you know, you

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>can keep the player three years and that's it, this

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:35.880
<v Speaker 1>is the time to go in on showey Otani because

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you are getting a player in his prime. We're getting

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a pitcher and a hitter in those leagues specifically where

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you can use him as such.

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 2>It's a special talent and he's going to be playing.

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Somewhere else other than LA and there's a good chance

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>wherever that place is could be an even better environment

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 1>for him potentially, because you know, Mike Trout just hasn't

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>been around that much these last couple of years to

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.199
<v Speaker 1>play with him. Unfortunately, the rest of that team is

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>very I would say, how do I put it nicely here?

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 2>With the Los Angeles Angels of Vanna, him and scrubs?

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 2>Is that the best way to say it? Is that

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:11.239
<v Speaker 2>the best way to say it?

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a top party.

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 2>I guess it's total.

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's like an auction valued stars and Suns and scrubs.

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 3>It's like they spell their money on two spots and

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 3>they're trying to make it up in other areas.

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that's not going to work. But shoo Tani.

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know the talent, you know what we're

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about here, perennial MVP candidate. But look, the oldest player.

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>For a reason I don't have him in the top five.

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>It's because of the danger you still have with him.

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>But you can't argue the next three year window for Showyotani.

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to your number five. We're in

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the top five, guys, Now things are getting exciting. Was

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>your top five keeper League target of twenty twenty three?

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And the only thing I just want to add

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 3>to that is I do try to think very much

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 3>and keep her dynasty in three year windows. So I

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 3>think It's why you can also give a little bit

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 3>more of a leeway to even twenty nine to thirty

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 3>year old players that they can push or ma tin value.

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Atani is one of those guys. I really think in

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 3>that window.

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>When you're talking about, like, you know, Ronald Acunya, who's

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>going to show up on our list here?

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's different.

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you've got an extra five years potentially

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>or four years on a player who's already shown you

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>who's elite, it's no comparison, especially when you're trying to

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 1>spend money on salary cap league on there.

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 3>I actually think an incredible debate is Akunya at his

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 3>age and level right now versus Otwani in a daily

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 3>moves one player between pitcher and hit or format like

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 3>interesting that there's an ultimate debate that we're not going

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 3>to have. But yeah, it's some other time. It may

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 3>be some other time. My guy, I'm going to point

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 3>out here is almost laughable to people who followed us

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 3>all year last year because I'm going to tell you

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 3>about O'Neill Cruz. Yes, O'Neill Cruz is on this list.

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.479
<v Speaker 3>Because now we're not dealing with the insane expectations of

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 3>a rookie coming up, and he's had some time and

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 3>we actually saw some improvement on O'Neill cruise. Obviously a

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 3>strikeout numbers overall, we're the biggest concern, almost thirty five percent.

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 3>It was in the forties early on. It was a

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 3>big worry. His batting average kind of struggled, but he

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 3>improved a decent amount on the second half of the season.

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 3>He hit two o four in the first half in

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 3>limited games. Second half, he ended up hitting two forty five.

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 3>Still a few more bases. Power numbers came up. Projections

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.199
<v Speaker 3>pretty favorable across the board. Here was something I had

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 3>put together and this is based on Steamer, just really quickly.

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Was based on Steamer's projection. They had him at twenty

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 3>seven homers in eighteen stolen bases in alle hundred and

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 3>thirty games of the two fifty batting average. Those are

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 3>insane numbers. Well, there's only three players that put up

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 3>those type of numbers last year Kyle Tucker who went

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 3>thirty twenty five, Jose Ramirez who went twenty nine to

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty and Julio Rodriguez who went twenty eight and twenty five.

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 3>So you take those second half numbers. You take those

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 3>projections and you're looking, what do all those guys have

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 3>in common. I've said this before, first rounders the first

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 3>round talent. So there's first round talent built in the

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 3>upside of Oneokruz. Now, if you want to get down

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 3>to earth a little bit, the strikeout numbers are still

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 3>a concern, but even the bat x still is projecting

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 3>essentially as a twenty twenty guy twenty two homers, nineteen

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 3>stolen bases under thirty k percentage, and an almost two

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 3>to fifty batting average. Listen, if he hits two fifty,

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 3>he's hitting thirty homers. He broke stat cast last year,

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 3>the hardest hit ball ever, one hundred and twenty two

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 3>miles per hour. I think there are tons of warts

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 3>in his game, but I do think O'Neill Cruz is

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 3>going to be streaky with enough talent that he's going

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 3>to put up ridiculous numbers. It's like old school Javier

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Baya's stuff, with maybe even less of a swing and

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 3>miss in there. But the stolen base and the power

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 3>numbers are real. The context of the team limits the

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 3>runs in RBI. You should buy in on him. I

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 3>would buy in on him, even if he's risky. It's

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 3>outside the top forty or fifty in a lot of

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 3>places with first round potential. Those are the type of

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 3>guys in keeper leagues I'm going to take a shot on.

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 3>And that's why Oneil Cruz is on the list.

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>What a difference a year makes last year just trying

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to push people away from Monyo Cruz, this.

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Year of pushing towards an Yeo Cruz. But I think

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 2>you're right.

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a much better circumstance now and

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a much better concept of how much he can give

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you this year as opposed to what he could give

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you last year, and projectability thirty twenty could be this year.

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>It's very possible he could put that season together. It

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 1>was unlikely he was going to do it last year,

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:14.959
<v Speaker 1>which is why that was my problem. We were kind

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>of pushing away from him.

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 3>I mean also just pointing out the day it was

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 3>like the day he debuted, he became the NL favorite

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 3>for Rookie of the Year, which was like absurd to me.

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>You're not finish in the top two award. But he

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>was not amidlanded it. He was not a brief well

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>that happened sometimes. Number five on my list, and the

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>only reason he's not top three is because he has

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>had some injuries around the knee.

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 2>He is a bigger guy too.

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Series wondering about how those guys are going to age sometimes,

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>but Jordan Alvarez is that dude.

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he is a special talent.

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>And depending on your league eligibility situations too, there's limitations here,

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and there are some concern whenever you have a younger

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>player who's had a history of some knee issues early on,

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't always bode well for the bigger guy.

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 2>But we've seen plenty of big guys like.

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>David Ortiz play well into their late thirties and being

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>extremely productive, So I think he is worth the risk.

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he's an incredible talent. Obviously, we all know

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>he is. If you look at that one sixty two

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>average for this guy, forty three home runs, one hundred

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and twenty five RBI already to ninety six, batting average

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>nine to seventy three ops. I mean, it's just it's

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>off the chart. He makes baseball look so damn easy.

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>He's only twenty six years old too, so he's again

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 1>still a few ways away. From entering his prime. But

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I think when you get to the true prime of

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>this player, you're looking at like a forty one to

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty kind of guy. Like that's how unbelievable. I think

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the ceiling of Alvarez is and we haven't even gotten

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>there yet. I think we are just kind of getting

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>teased a little bit. If you're asking me the early

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>wager guy for leading the major leagues at home runs,

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>for me, it's Alvarez. He's just got to play enough

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>games to do it, and I think he can. And look,

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I expect a little regression from Judge who hit sixty

0:29:57.880 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>last year, like you can't get Yeah, you can't get

0:29:59.920 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a I hit in sixty on runs every year, at least,

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't think.

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 2>So we'll find out more.

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>But Alvarez to me again, yourson, he's not top three

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>because of those little issues. I would put him right

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>at number five though, because the bat is just too

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>good to ignore.

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Is he gonna steal the bases? No?

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Is he gonna give me incredible power and everything else?

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to cross the board. Yes, that's good enough

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>for me. I want him on the squad. Now we're

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>getting into the top four here, very exciting stuff. Welsh,

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>who's your number four guy and the keeper League targets

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>for twenty twenty three.

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you won't like this one from previous conversations, but uh,

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Sean McClanahan. I'm very much on Sean McClanahan. My one

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 3>of my favorite things about him, and I mentioned this before,

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 3>was he had a dramatic change in his pitch mix

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 3>and he ended up going from an eight percent change

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 3>up to the second most thrown pitch of all pitches.

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 3>And what's so great about that is it ended up

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 3>pushing his slider, which he now has. Four pitches he

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 3>throws over fifteen percent of the time, so it's a

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 3>really good mix. Four pitches have an over forty four

0:30:57.760 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 3>percent with rate, one of those being the change up.

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 3>I haven't gone to look at this. I'd be fascinated

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 3>to know. I don't know if there is a pitch

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 3>being used twenty five percent or more that any pitcher

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 3>has a lower exit velocity hit against it. Is it

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 3>under eighty four eighty three point six percent ev or

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 3>eighty three point six mile per hoor ev on average

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 3>against that change up? I don't know if there's another

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 3>pitch that's used that much who has a lower hard

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 3>hit rate against, and he was able to dead knit

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more. I love the whiff rate, I

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 3>love the mix. He struggled a little bit in the

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 3>second half where the K numbers dropped as era went

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 3>from like two and a half to three and a half.

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 3>But I think he's an elite pitcher. I think you're

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 3>actually going to get more of a discount on him

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 3>in Dynasty. He's my number one Dynasty pitcher because you're

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 3>still looking at a very young mean, especially when you're

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 3>comparing against the rest of the crew. He's twenty five

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 3>years old. Twenty five year old pitchers with a little

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 3>bit of a discount and a keeper format with I

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 3>think really sustainable changes pounds the zone he gets his cas.

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Don't love the second half, but listen, like, this is

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 3>still an adjustment period. This isn't a guy who's twenty

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 3>years old and has multiple two hundred seasons under him.

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 3>So I'm very big on buying on Shae McClanahan.

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 2>You'll see no pictures on my top ten lists. Just

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 2>fair enough?

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 3>Why not?

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And that's and that's how I look at this. Like,

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about elite keepers, like the ten guys

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that I like in terms of target value either their

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>round or the player they are, or I'm willing to

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>overpay for them in salary cap leagues. No pictures, because

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I will figure that out later. I will find a

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 1>way to pieces together. They're just not great investments anymore.

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Long gone with the days of Randy Johnson, Pedro Martinez.

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Randy Johnson was such a great keeper back

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in the day. Every year, you know, two hundred and

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>age strikeouts, three hundred strikeouts, eight hundred and thirty innings,

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Pedro even. You know, there were a lot of guys

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in that era not that long ago. There were very

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 1>good investments every single year. Knew what you were getting

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>out of them.

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Not now. I just can't get there with these.

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 3>It's back as sure, I mean sures there was another

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 3>one of those guys as well, But yeah, I sree.

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 3>I guess my definition is more defining players that I

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 3>think I can sugger upsides from where they're being valued.

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 3>And that's why only two come up on this list.

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 3>But they're kind of like my two key guys this year.

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, one guy came up on my list last year.

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 1>He is going to come up on my list this year.

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Still twenty three years old. Bobby Witt, junior shortstop for

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the Kansas City Royals. One hundred and fifty games last year,

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty home runs, thirty steals. Definitely a rough start, there's

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about that. But if you stayed true and

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you trusted the process and we did.

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 2>You got rewarded.

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Now, he hurt you last year in head to head

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>formats in the beginning of the year, there's no doubt

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>about the guy hurts you. He is no other way

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to put it. But in the rotal formats, if you

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>stayed patient, you got rewarded. And let that be a

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>lesson for you too. With the young players. In the

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 1>rotal format, you can have more patients. It's hard in

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the head to head formats to have the patients. But

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we're just getting started with this guy again.

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>This is another player that has even more upside.

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 1>She mentioned that it's not the greatest offense. The guy

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>still had eighty run score and eighty RBI with the

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Royals last year. I still think that's something that we

0:33:57.200 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of overlook. We talk about the power in the speed,

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>but he still scored eighty runs and he still drove

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>in eighty runs is a rookie. As a rookie, that's

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 1>an incredible.

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Thing to do. He's a star in the making.

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Eventually, the OBP will come up, the batting average will

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>come up. You saw the second half numbers of the ops.

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>All that stuff came up in the second half. It's

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>only going to get better from here. This is a

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 1>player twenty three years old in the premium position two that.

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 2>You go when you target.

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>So while some people might be looking at, you know,

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>some other big time shortstops, I would still be paying

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>extra for Bobby Witt, and I understand why some people

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 1>would still want some.

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Of the guys ahead of him on the list.

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:36.919
<v Speaker 1>And you see him on the ranks and Fantasy pros two,

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the guy that I'd.

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Be targeting Welsh. That's my dude.

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to your number three top three

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>time for the twenty twenty three Keeper League targets.

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Who's number three?

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, a guy that I thought was actually valued like

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Bobby Witt is no longer and it's Bobachett. And Bobachett

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 3>is one of those he used to be Bobby Witt

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 3>and now as a twenty four year old is cast

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:59.319
<v Speaker 3>aside and redraft and even keeper where I think he's

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:01.720
<v Speaker 3>barely even a second round pick in a lot of places.

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 3>And I'm just not done. He has had a kind

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:07.879
<v Speaker 3>of significant decrease over four years if you look at

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 3>it as a total as far as like batting average

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 3>and slugging has gone. But this is a guy that

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 3>actually pushed his hard hit numbers higher than they'd ever

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 3>been before. Barreling is still there, and even those expected stats,

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 3>they're not going that much further down. I don't know

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 3>if projections know what quite to do with the stolen bases,

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:26.919
<v Speaker 3>because he went from twenty five to thirteen the power

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 3>numbers were relative, but he's consistently playing. This is a

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:33.280
<v Speaker 3>sub twenty five year old guy that has twenty twenty

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 3>upside in a great offense, who still hits the ball

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 3>incredibly hard. I'm not ready to give up on Bobaschett.

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:40.880
<v Speaker 3>I think you actually get him in kind of a

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 3>good deal, Like you couldn't even imagine trading Bashett for

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Bobby Witt at this point, and I don't think they're

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 3>incredibly far off now. If the stolen base numbers go away,

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna cap them a little bit, but Bobashet is

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:52.720
<v Speaker 3>still a great buy in keeper leagues.

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, speaking of great buys, this might be the

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 1>one year maybe you get any kind of discount on

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Wan Soto four years old.

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm just never going to give up on Juan Soto

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:05.279
<v Speaker 2>and all my love for him. Now he's not one

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 2>or two.

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe last year we do this list, he maybe he's

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:12.240
<v Speaker 1>my number one guy, he's number three. Still, the consistency

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of Juan Soto is just unbelievable. Now, I understand last

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>year down year for him. This is a player with

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 1>a two to eighty seven career batting average, So I'm

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:22.400
<v Speaker 1>not going to freak out the fact that he played

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>with a Washington team that was dreadful, had nobody in

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.760
<v Speaker 1>front of him, nobody behind him. It was absolutely the drags,

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>all the rumors about being traded, contracts.

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 2>All that stress. He's still a young player. I think

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 2>that affected him mentally.

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>He's a tough kid, but still I think that affected him,

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think the change affected him.

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 2>I think he just flat out pressed too much. How

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 2>many times have we seen.

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>The guys, whether it be Bryce Harper, Carlos Belcher, all

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>these years. The guys who end up somewhere else are

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>in a big contract. They press, they pressed, they pressed,

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>they pressed. This is the same kind of thing you

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 1>went to a situation was like, okay, I gotta be

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:56.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, Juan Soto, superstar guy in San Diego, and

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it just didn't happen. Relax, be fine.

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 2>This year.

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 1>They've got so much talent around this guy. He's a

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal player. He's gonna be playing for a contract pretty

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 1>soon too, and you're getting a player once again.

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:11.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking for upside. Yeah, they're still upside.

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 1>His best season thirty four to one to ten. I

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 1>think he can go forty one to twenty easily. I

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>think there might even be more in the right circumstance

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>for him. Juan Soto is a generational talent. Does he

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>give you the stolen bases and that stuff. No, But

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:27.799
<v Speaker 1>in those OBP leagues especially, he's about as good as

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 1>a gets. I mean, a career four to twenty four

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:32.319
<v Speaker 1>OBP guy, and that is something that's really hard to

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 1>find these days. So if you're in that format, you

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>could even argue one Sodo over some of the other

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>guys too, because you can find stolen bases.

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:41.959
<v Speaker 2>I think guys that get on bas at.

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:44.800
<v Speaker 1>The clip that Jan Soto does consistently, with the power

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 1>he has consistently, with the batting average he typically has consistently,

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to find. Give me Juan Soto still the

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>one to one in my heart. Going to your number

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>two guy, Welsh, who is it?

0:37:56.920 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's do this. I'm gonna make an alteration here

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:03.879
<v Speaker 3>because we I purposely tried to be different from your list.

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 3>I agree with lots of your players. This is one

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 3>that I missed. I didn't see that we had the

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 3>same guys. This is my number one, he's your number two,

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 3>so let's talk about him together. I think it's one

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:15.359
<v Speaker 3>of the most important ones and I can give you

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 3>I actually think maybe the most fascinating conversation as my

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:20.440
<v Speaker 3>number one, and it's ronald' Kunya, who we both have.

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 3>I did not notice that you had him at too.

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 3>I have him at one, and I think this is

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 3>the number one overall player in Redraft this year. I

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 3>think there is debate in question as far as keeper

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:34.479
<v Speaker 3>in Dynasty. He is in the top elite top three

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 3>conversation of overall players. I think go Tani and daily

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 3>leagues you have to still look at the guy that

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 3>as your number one. You have to look at and

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Acunya is in that list. And even when he struggled

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 3>last year, still was able to put up power, had

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 3>top fifteen biggest differential between home run and expected home run.

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 3>He still was in like the top two or three

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 3>or five in stolen bases and under one hundred and

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 3>twenty games last year he compensated, which is exactly what

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:00.839
<v Speaker 3>you want to great line up. Ronald Cunya is young,

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 3>the power he is don't It's a non worry. The

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 3>hard hit numbers are there, everything is still there. Ronald

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Cunya is an easy buy. He's your number two. I'll

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 3>place him at too, so we can be together. And

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 3>what's important here is us focusing that Ronald d'acunya at

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:18.800
<v Speaker 3>any discount in a keeper league based off of maybe

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 3>suppressed power numbers or people worried about injury is a

0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:23.279
<v Speaker 3>buye And I know you agree with you.

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:24.360
<v Speaker 2>One hundred percent.

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Look, he is the only reason he's not my two

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is because of who number one is, which I'm shocked

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that your number one is not the same as my

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>number one.

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 3>Well he is, but I tried to be different. I

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 3>tried to be different. I didn't want to have all

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:37.359
<v Speaker 3>the same names. He would easily be my number one

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 3>buying keeper in Dynasty overall. So that just know that

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:42.360
<v Speaker 3>I completely agree.

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Look Ronald Cunya doing what he has done.

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny because we even touched on it last

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>time we did the show, which is people were worried

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:52.480
<v Speaker 1>about the stolen bases after the knee injury. Well, I

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 1>mean came back, so twenty nine, one hundred nineteen games.

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's stunning.

0:39:56.760 --> 0:39:57.320
<v Speaker 2>The power.

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't drag, but I mean the power was the

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:02.439
<v Speaker 1>thing that you know wasn't quite where it was. I'm

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 1>not worried about Acunya. He's gonna be twenty five years

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:07.879
<v Speaker 1>old this year. The prime is still way ahead of him.

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Is there a time where you might start to look

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 1>at Acunya and say, okay, is the forty one home

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:16.240
<v Speaker 1>run season and outlier?

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think we'd have that conversation.

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:20.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean might be, but is he a player that's

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 1>still maybe your best bet for thirty thirty every year

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 1>or one of the top guys.

0:40:25.000 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I think.

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:27.359
<v Speaker 1>That's what you have to come back to, is that

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty thirty situation, and not to mention, you know, I

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:32.760
<v Speaker 1>have three outfielders in my top three.

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Outfield is not good.

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:35.839
<v Speaker 3>Nope, take a pack.

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 2>It is bad.

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:39.880
<v Speaker 1>And in those leagues where you have to play five

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:44.319
<v Speaker 1>or four even it's rough. Acunya's value is very high,

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 1>SODA's value is very high. So for me, Acunya is

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 1>again number two. I can argue number one, but the

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 1>guy like at number one is just I think you

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>know another special generational talent where we're looking at players

0:40:57.640 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 1>with even more upside. Why don't you go for your

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:01.879
<v Speaker 1>number one too? Since we both had a Kunya there

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:02.760
<v Speaker 1>towards the well.

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 3>And again understanding the context of it, you know this

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:07.840
<v Speaker 3>is I think is an important guy. This is my

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 3>number one important conversation attempting to be different from your

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 3>list because I think your guy is the number one

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 3>keeper dynasty player in general, again taking Otani's context out,

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 3>but it's Fernando Tatis Junior, and I think it's one

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 3>of the most important keeper league. Keep your eye on

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:25.760
<v Speaker 3>situations where Fernando Tatis is coming off of in twenty

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 3>twenty one, of course, a forty twenty forty two, twenty

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 3>five overall season insane numbers. Where in fifty games in

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:36.279
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty still with seventeen and eleven, I mean he

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:39.080
<v Speaker 3>was pacing to put up these same incredible numbers. Obviously,

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 3>there's questions around whatever steroid usage was out there and

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 3>what effect that's going to have. But what you're still

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:48.919
<v Speaker 3>doing is you're still looking at a twenty four year old.

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 3>He just turned twenty four years old. All year he'll

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 3>be twenty four years old. He's had some injury stuff obviously,

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:56.760
<v Speaker 3>might be moving more to an outfielder with them bringing

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:58.279
<v Speaker 3>in Zanto Bogarts and everything like that.

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Because I look at shortstop, I'm looking for the guys

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 1>like you got with Lindor Simmey and you know seeger

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Trey Turner, Boba Schett, you know all these guys, you know,

0:42:07.160 --> 0:42:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Xander Bogar, sim Anderson Swanson, Anio Cruz Franco and man

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:12.920
<v Speaker 1>is like Shortze's pretty good. I almost feel like he

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is more valuable in Fantasy in the outfield now.

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:17.719
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't agree more. I could care any of the

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 3>guys that I take in the first round. I really

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 3>don't care about your position for the most part, Like

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Cosey Ramirez, the differentiating factor between maybe him and Trey

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Turner might be that he has third base, and you

0:42:26.200 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 3>might side on that, but I don't care. I don't

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 3>care that I have Trey Turner as a shortstop. I

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:32.720
<v Speaker 3>don't care about Tatus as a short stop. I actually

0:42:32.800 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 3>care that I get him more an outfield. There's more value.

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:37.840
<v Speaker 3>I could go and take Dansby or Xander later and

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:39.840
<v Speaker 3>I can go and put Tatis out in the outfield

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 3>because it stinks this year. So no, it might keep

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 3>him a little bit healthy. He's still an elite power

0:42:45.040 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 3>speed combo player. You are obviously stepping into a situation

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:51.320
<v Speaker 3>where maybe he's more volatile because you don't know what

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 3>you're getting coming off of a two surgeries in the

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:57.200
<v Speaker 3>offseason and be steroid allegations. But I still I don't think.

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that retracts from the in same talent

0:43:00.719 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 3>of who he truly is. And I'm willing to take

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 3>the buy. And he's under twenty five years old, he's

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 3>got a suspension coming up for this year. You take

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 3>all of that in, you could do a keeper you

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 3>guys could do a keeper league where he's not drafted

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:15.360
<v Speaker 3>in the first round. His ADP is in the second

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 3>round for redraft, but you might have a wheel pick

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 3>in a keeper league where he has not taken, and

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 3>he's a must take. He's a top three overall overall

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:28.320
<v Speaker 3>keeper league dynasty player regardless of this stupid month he's missed.

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:30.719
<v Speaker 3>And it's a great buying opportunity. So if you want

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 3>to chalk this up as top twenty, top ten keeper league,

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 3>pay attention to buys. Guys, you need to know Tatis

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 3>is as important as anybody on this list, because there's

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:44.320
<v Speaker 3>inherent value compared to who we both agree is like

0:43:44.400 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 3>the number one keeper player who you have on your list.

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:48.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know it's funny too if you go back

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 2>two years ago to Tis is probably number one on

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 2>this list.

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:52.840
<v Speaker 3>On both It was number one on my list before

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 3>any of these rights, and.

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 2>I think we can't forget that. Does he have a

0:43:56.640 --> 0:43:58.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of risk? Yeah? Is it a little bit more

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:01.799
<v Speaker 2>inherent now I got to know the player better. Yeah, maybe.

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 1>And there's a chance that San Diego could flip him

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:06.800
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else, Like he's got a huge contract, but you know,

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:09.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe they decided they like Soto instead and they're gonna

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:11.400
<v Speaker 1>move tat Teas and that contract might be appealing to

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:13.640
<v Speaker 1>somebody else and say lock up this young kid instead.

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:15.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, who the teams are? Gonn bring him on?

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 3>By the way, like, is anybody gonna dislike Tatia? I

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:20.120
<v Speaker 3>was about to say, is anyone gonna dislike tatis if

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:22.440
<v Speaker 3>he's a New York Yankee? I mean maybe personally, but

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 3>not fantasy wise.

0:44:23.800 --> 0:44:26.480
<v Speaker 1>No, not fantasy wise, well, the number one fantasy guy. Look,

0:44:26.560 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 1>we tried our best to be patient last year and

0:44:29.640 --> 0:44:32.799
<v Speaker 1>calm about Julio Rodriguez. And I give Welsh a lot

0:44:32.840 --> 0:44:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of credit too, because he's been a Julio guy for

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 1>years and I've liked the player a lot too, and

0:44:37.719 --> 0:44:40.239
<v Speaker 1>both of us were trying very hard to be reasonable,

0:44:41.000 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know what, Julio Rodriguez makes it fun to

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>be unreasonable. Twenty eight home runs is his rookie season.

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:48.399
<v Speaker 1>Twenty five steals. He only played one hundred and thirty

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 1>two games. But that's okay, two eighty four batting average.

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:53.920
<v Speaker 1>It's just about this guy stays healthy. This is the

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:56.840
<v Speaker 1>perennial MVP candidate in the American League. I mean, this

0:44:57.040 --> 0:45:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is who this guy is. He is a forty forty

0:45:00.440 --> 0:45:03.439
<v Speaker 1>type player, Like, that's who this guy is. Those guys

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:06.920
<v Speaker 1>do not grow on trees. He has a good thirteen

0:45:07.040 --> 0:45:09.400
<v Speaker 1>years ahead of him. If you could keep a player forever,

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't care what you gotta pay, what you got

0:45:11.719 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to do to get that first pick. Maybe you know,

0:45:14.719 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 1>if you have an extra kid or laying around your house,

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you're like, you know, I got a bunch of kids.

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Put this kid up and you'll see what we get

0:45:20.719 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to look find a way to get Julio Rodriguez. Okay,

0:45:24.480 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm joking everybody. I don't really want to sell kids,

0:45:27.000 --> 0:45:31.080
<v Speaker 1>although I mean, well, you know, when they start to

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 1>get to that preteen years, you know your kids are

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:36.400
<v Speaker 1>still tiny, You're you're gonna start changing your tune about

0:45:36.480 --> 0:45:37.279
<v Speaker 1>their availability.

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:40.320
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna start at least looking at, you know, kicking

0:45:40.360 --> 0:45:40.880
<v Speaker 2>the tires.

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:44.480
<v Speaker 3>But you're just hoping for good education with those kids.

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:45.320
<v Speaker 3>You're pretty good.

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Off with Julio Rodriguez. Let me tell you.

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:50.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, the thing is you want him to

0:45:50.400 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously dial back on the strikeouts a little bit.

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:54.319
<v Speaker 2>That's something you hope over time can happen.

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Will the league make adjustments to him, Yes, but I

0:45:56.520 --> 0:45:57.960
<v Speaker 1>think this is a player that is going to adjust

0:45:58.000 --> 0:45:59.719
<v Speaker 1>back well, Julio, is your.

0:45:59.680 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Guy talk to it?

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, No, I mean it's everything that you said. I'm

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 3>still enamored personally, just off of my experience, and you

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:10.359
<v Speaker 3>know my interview way back that we all joke about.

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:12.440
<v Speaker 3>It's like everyone's like, have you ever interviewed Julio. We

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:14.799
<v Speaker 3>talked about it a lot, but like it's a fascinating

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:16.560
<v Speaker 3>He was never gonna be a stolen based guy, and

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 3>he literally tells me like, I want to steal more

0:46:18.640 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 3>bases and that was his focus. And look at him now,

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:22.799
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is a guy that could be an

0:46:23.080 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 3>easy thirty thirty, It could be a forty forty if

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:27.400
<v Speaker 3>you want to put on it. It's an incredible it's

0:46:27.400 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 3>an incredible bat. It's elite skills across the board. He's

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:34.080
<v Speaker 3>made himself into a premial five tool player, and he

0:46:34.480 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 3>is what Akunya and Tatis were last year the year

0:46:38.200 --> 0:46:40.760
<v Speaker 3>before that, Like what you envisioned in those type of players.

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:43.920
<v Speaker 3>You have that with Julio. He overcame being pinched by

0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 3>umps early on in the season. He overcame all of

0:46:47.719 --> 0:46:50.080
<v Speaker 3>the rookie struggles that you might think are going to

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:52.960
<v Speaker 3>surround a player. They continuously try to surround him with

0:46:53.120 --> 0:46:56.920
<v Speaker 3>more talent. This is it's an easy bet. Also just

0:46:56.960 --> 0:46:58.719
<v Speaker 3>with the age, you know, I mean he's got two

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:01.439
<v Speaker 3>or three years on pretty much everybody. So like where

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:05.800
<v Speaker 3>Otani is, a daily moves player is so above and

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:08.920
<v Speaker 3>beyond everybody else because if you can daily move him

0:47:08.920 --> 0:47:10.280
<v Speaker 3>to a hitter and pitcher, there's.

0:47:10.920 --> 0:47:13.799
<v Speaker 1>In the leagues where you have windows of time where

0:47:13.800 --> 0:47:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you have restrictions of keeper keeper restrictions. Otani probably is

0:47:17.400 --> 0:47:19.839
<v Speaker 1>my number one, especially in this scenario you're paying.

0:47:19.920 --> 0:47:22.120
<v Speaker 3>But that's why it's so fascinating. A twenty one year

0:47:22.160 --> 0:47:25.680
<v Speaker 3>old thirty thirty potential bat versus a you know, closing

0:47:25.760 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 3>in on thirty multi position. It's a fascinating debate on

0:47:29.160 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 3>where the top goes. And the reiteration of all of

0:47:32.120 --> 0:47:33.880
<v Speaker 3>this is, we give you guys a lot of players.

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:36.840
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't a top ten overall keepers or anything like that.

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 3>It's twenty keepers that you guys need to be paying

0:47:39.080 --> 0:47:42.840
<v Speaker 3>attention to. But keeper leagues are not all equal, So

0:47:43.040 --> 0:47:45.640
<v Speaker 3>understand that in your evaluation of these. Some keeper leagues

0:47:45.800 --> 0:47:48.480
<v Speaker 3>you can pay more attention to redraft values, some closer

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:52.320
<v Speaker 3>to dynasty. These are twenty regardless of your format, that

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:53.360
<v Speaker 3>you've got to pay attention to.

0:47:53.960 --> 0:47:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And those twenty are Ryan Mountcassel on Welsh's list at ten,

0:47:57.360 --> 0:48:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Nick Lodolo, Austin Riley, Vinie Pasquentina Corbyn, Carol Annio Cruz,

0:48:02.320 --> 0:48:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Shane McClanahan, Boba Sheet, Fernando Tatis Junior and Ronald Acunya.

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:08.760
<v Speaker 1>My top ten list of the guys again, different reasons

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:12.560
<v Speaker 1>all of them. Adlie Ruschman at ten, Andres Jmenez at nine,

0:48:12.640 --> 0:48:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Wander Franco at eight, Kyle Tucker at seven, Joey o'tanni

0:48:16.040 --> 0:48:19.319
<v Speaker 1>at six, Jordan Alvarez, he almost at the Jordnal because

0:48:19.320 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I just like saying so much Jordan Alvarez, Jordan. I

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:28.400
<v Speaker 1>like to say Jordan, but Jordan Alvarez, the Houston Astros,

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Whitt Houston. Something I told you, dude, it's techno

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:33.800
<v Speaker 1>tonof football season.

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Alvarez Houston Astros, not Texans.

0:48:37.520 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Witt from the Kansas City Royals, not the Chiefs,

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Juan Soto from the Well there are no more Chargers

0:48:43.560 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in San Diego, Ronald Acunya from Theolanta Braves and Julia Rodriguez.

0:48:48.280 --> 0:48:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Who are your guys? We want to know?

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Let us know we always tweet us at is it

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the Welsh at Joe piece of PS seventeen and of

0:48:54.760 --> 0:48:59.239
<v Speaker 1>course don't forget start preparing now. The Wizard is open

0:48:59.320 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 1>for business Fantasypros dot com slash Draft Wizard. Go get

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:04.360
<v Speaker 1>your draft on. I want to thank the sponsor of

0:49:04.400 --> 0:49:06.840
<v Speaker 1>today's show, and that's Fantrack. Sign up for free today

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and be entered to win that Vladimir Guerrero Junior Jersey

0:49:10.160 --> 0:49:13.680
<v Speaker 1>by simply going to fantracks dot com slash Fantasyprosagain, that's

0:49:13.719 --> 0:49:16.840
<v Speaker 1>fantracks dot com slash Fantasy Pros to win that Vladdie

0:49:17.040 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Junior Jersey fan tracks, the home of Fantasy Sports. That'll

0:49:20.719 --> 0:49:22.000
<v Speaker 1>do it for us, but the story of the game

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:23.000
<v Speaker 1>goes on for the Welsh.

0:49:23.280 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time. Kids. Thanks

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:30.319
<v Speaker 2>for listening to the Fantasy Pros Baseball Podcast. Follow us

0:49:30.400 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter at Fantasy Pros MLB and subscribe to our

0:49:34.000 --> 0:49:37.760
<v Speaker 2>YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB.