WEBVTT - Merck to Acquire Terns Pharmaceuticals in $6.7 Billion Deal 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 2>We need to talk about the M and A deal

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 2>that has come out in New York this morning. MRK

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 2>to buy Turns Pharmaceuticals for six point seven billion dollars

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 2>to grow in the blood cancer space. Michelle Davis is

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 2>our senior deals reporter here in New York and is covering.

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 3>This story for us.

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 2>Feel like we should call it M and A Wednesday

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 2>now because the deals no longer happen on Monday anymore.

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 5>It's because we have a deal show now, so of

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 5>course that's why they're happening on Wednesday. But yeah, big

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 5>deal for Merk today. It makes a lot of sense

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 5>that they're doing this because they they're best selling drug,

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 5>kay Truda, which contributed half of their last year thirty

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 5>one billion dollars, is also the world's best selling drug

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 5>is going off patent, so they really need to do

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 5>M and A to replenish their pipeline turns is not.

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:13.119
<v Speaker 5>Its drug is not yet approved, but analysts are saying

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 5>that in a few years, assuming it does get approval,

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 5>it could have peak sales of several billion dollars. And

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 5>so Mark, for Merk, it's a bet that at the

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 5>end of the decade, around the same time that k

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:25.919
<v Speaker 5>Trude is going off patent, they will have this drug,

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, coming in to kind of help fill some

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 5>of that hole.

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 6>Mark.

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 7>What are they saying about their M and A appetite?

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 7>I guess because we you know, we joke that the

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 7>pharmaceutical industry is such a deal heavy industry, pharm of biotech,

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 7>that kind of thing.

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 6>What's Merk saying? Because they do have that key true

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 6>to risk exactly.

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 5>So Mark has been one of the most aggressive when

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 5>it comes to M and A. Earlier this year at

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 5>the JPMorgan Healthcare Conference, the CEO Rob Davis said that

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 5>he wants to do several deals in the tens of

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 5>billion dollar range, and so that means we'll probably see

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 5>more from them. Also interesting to note that Merk's stock

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 5>is up today on the news, and normally in M

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 5>and A the buyer's stock tends to go down on

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 5>an announcement, but the fact that you know, shares their

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 5>up means investors are applauding this and they you know,

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 5>want merk To to keep doing stuff like this.

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 2>So the deals worth six point seven billion dollars. It's

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.959
<v Speaker 2>a fifty three dollars a share in cash, which is

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 2>a six percent premium to turns last clothes. There are

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 2>some analysts out there who say that maybe Mark is

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 2>not spending enough here and this invites other companies to

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 2>come in and make their own bid for turn pharmaceuticals

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.519
<v Speaker 5>You know, we will see if that happens. There were

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 5>some bidding wars in pharma last year, with the Metzera

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 5>deal being you know, one of the most notable ones

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 5>that said the stock turns. The stock has increased like

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:50.959
<v Speaker 5>fifty percent since January on basically no news. So there

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 5>could be an argument that maybe there was some built

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 5>in you know, m and a speculation already into the

0:02:56.080 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 5>already built baked into the price. But you know, you know, no,

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 5>there are other pharma companies out there who are also

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 5>trying to replenish their pipeline, so it wouldn't be unprecedented.

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 7>Of course, which bankers were on this deal they don't have.

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 7>They didn't list the Acquirer Advisor, but the financial target,

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 7>Centerview Partners and Jefferies, so unusual or not unusual, which is.

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 6>More boutiqui more boutiqui.

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Centerview has I mean, they're generally on most of

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 5>these on the cell side, and Jeffries has been doing

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 5>a lot more on the sell side too.

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah. The boutiques, like we used to call them boutiques,

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 7>but in M and A they're not really boutiques anymore,

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 7>are they?

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Exactly?

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 7>They think they've really made a commitment doing real pgat

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 7>and all those guys. Is there any regulatory risk when

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 7>these healthcare deals get done? Or is it just a

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 7>big mark buying a little biotech thing and nobody really cares?

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 6>How's that work? Not as much.

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 5>I mean, the last time we saw something kind of

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 5>splashy get attention was when Amjen tried to buy Horizon

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 5>and that FDC tried to block that deal. They ended

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 5>up settling and the deal went through anyway. But in

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 5>something like this where you know, turns of drug isn't

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 5>even approved and it's biggest competitor is owned by Novardes,

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 5>you know, the competing kind of compound. It seems unlikely.

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 2>So given what Mark has done, in the fact that

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 2>investors like the deals that it's made so far, I'm

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 2>guessing we're going to expect to see more acquisitions from

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Mark in the coming weeks and months.

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 3>That's probably yeah. Definitely stay with us.

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am. He's done on Apple, Cocklay and

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 7>Let's talk a little media here. Interesting story on the

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 7>Bloomberg terminal. Walt Disney Chief executive officer Josh Tomorrow has

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 7>seen two billion dollar technology bets, Falter one of them

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 7>and raveling entirely just days into his new job. Let's

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 7>see what this means for the Walt Disney Company. We've

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 7>got some other media stuff to talk about, and we

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 7>turned to Keitha Rugana, and she is the media analyst

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 7>for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 6>Keitha, there's news out regarding Disney.

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 7>Can you talk to us about a couple of these

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 7>deals that seemingly are falling apart here.

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is a big deal, Paul.

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 8>I mean, you know, Josh Tomorrow obviously took the helm

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 8>at Disney just a week ago, and we're seeing this

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 8>Open Ai Sora deal that you know, Disney had kind

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 8>of inked about three months ago. And basically the deal

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 8>here was that this would be a three year licensing

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 8>agreement where Disney would make a one billion dollar equity

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 8>investment into Open Ai and Sora would be allowed to

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 8>use about two hundred of Disney's characters to kind of

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 8>create all of these short form videos which you know,

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 8>users could basically engage with on the Disney Plus platform.

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 8>You know, this was kind of I think Disney's way

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 8>of playing offense defense with you know, the whole rise

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 8>in Ai and kind of if you can't beat them,

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 8>join them, kind of really joining the bandwagon and saying, yes,

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 8>we have a stake here with AI. So this falling

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 8>apart definitely kind of leaves Disney definitely they were blindsided.

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 7>Uh.

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 8>They they've they've been kind of trying to do different

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 8>things in terms of really monetizing their ip creating like

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 8>this really uh this this franchise fandom if you will, right,

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 8>really digging deep into it. That's what Josh Tomorrow has

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 8>spoken both with this opening ideal as well as the

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 8>Epic Games deal that was a deal that actually Josh

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 8>Tomorrow had kind of broken. And just over the past

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 8>few days we've kind of seen you know, a lot

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 8>of news with Epic Games too, and so this really

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 8>kind of now raises the stakes for them to kind

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 8>of find out, you know, hoom else they can partner

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 8>with to kind of deepen that that fan engagement.

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so he's got his work cut out for him.

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 2>Certainly makes for a busy first week on the job. Gita.

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 2>We also want to talk to you about what's going

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:49.679
<v Speaker 2>on with Netflix. It's bolstering its live streaming, live streaming

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 2>mega events. There was the BTS Comeback Show, which I

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 2>guess the live show didn't attract as many people as

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 2>people as thought, you know, actually attending the net, but

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the actual streaming of it was a monster hit, wasn't it.

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 8>It was a monster hits. Carlor, You're absolutely right, over

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 8>eighteen million viewers worldwide. And this is again we come

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 8>back to the basic buzzword with in media right now,

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 8>which is engagement. What are all the different ways that

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.679
<v Speaker 8>you can build engagement and you know, again the open

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 8>AI saw a deal with Disney was again a way

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 8>for Disney to build that engagement with their fans. Netflix

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 8>kind of chasing all of these different types of content,

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 8>you know, whether it is sports, whether it is this

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 8>live event the bts come back to, or again trying

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 8>to deepen that engagement, trying to deepen their connection with

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 8>fans as you have more and more sources of you know,

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 8>video basically competing for time spent. Again, huge, You're absolutely right,

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 8>huge event for Netflix really shows how they can kind

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 8>of go after all of these different genres and build

0:07:54.040 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 8>that scale, build that appointment television kind of buzz and

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 8>and you know, really get a good ROI on their

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 8>investment there by the way, they're increasing their content spending

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 8>four events like this this year by two billion dollars.

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 8>That's a pretty sizable step up. So we're looking at them,

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 8>you know, spending about twenty billion dollars scarlet this year

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 8>on content.

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 5>Wow.

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 7>All right, Githa, it's opening day for my New York Yankees.

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 7>They'll be opening up out in San Francisco this evening

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 7>eight pm Eastern.

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 6>First pitch. I'm not going to be a good game.

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 7>Yep. I'm not going to ESPN and watch this I'm

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 7>not even going to the Yankees' own network. Yes, I'm

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:34.320
<v Speaker 7>going to Netflix to watch this game tonight.

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 3>Where are we in this world?

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 7>Where are we in this world? Talk to us about

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 7>you know, Netflix has set out we're never getting into sports.

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 7>Well that's gone by the wayside. What do you think

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 7>There's sports strategy is?

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 8>So their sports strategy, Paul, I mean, this is a

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 8>really important point. The sports strategy has been very very calculated,

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 8>very very measured. At a time when we've seen other

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 8>media companies like you know, Disney and Amazon and YouTube

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 8>kind of spend billions and billions of dollars on sports rights,

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 8>Netflix has taken a far more cautious approach, but an

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 8>approach that has really served them well. So they started

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 8>out with this five hundred million dollar deal for you know,

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 8>WWE content. They went out after some NFL Christmas Day games.

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 8>But this World Baseball Classic was actually their first big

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 8>foray into world live sports, you know, an event in Japan,

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 8>and it has really served them well. So you just

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 8>look at the ROI on that event. They spent about

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 8>one hundred million dollars for you know, forty seven games

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 8>and they got something like thirty one million global viewers.

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 8>Really a huge, huge viewing record for them, and again

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 8>just shows how you know, by making really calculated bets

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 8>again you can kind of build that buzz and for them,

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 8>really build that critical engagement metric.

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that is pretty incredible, and I guess part of

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 2>it is also to build up the Netflix brand outside

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 2>of the US, where sports rights have gotten to the

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 2>point where it's prohibitive, but you look at the rest

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 2>of the world and it's it's a little bit more doable.

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely So if you're just looking this year at sports right,

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 8>scarlet companies are spending about over forty billion dollars just

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 8>this year across the board for US sports rights, and

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 8>we're only looking at that going up further and further.

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 8>As you know, the NFL looks to high, high kits fees,

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 8>the NBA looks to highkits fees.

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:14.319
<v Speaker 3>So yes, they do.

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 8>They are making this really smart move by diversifying going

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 8>across the board, and it's paying off. That's what's so

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 8>great about it.

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 5>To me.

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 7>The defining moment will be when Netflix takes a Sunday

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 7>package from the NFL, the NFL and Githa. I think

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 7>that's that day is coming. What do you think?

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 8>I also think it is coming. So they've already kind

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 8>of dabbled with that, Paul. You know, they've done the

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 8>Christmas Day Games again. They had some of the highest

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 8>viewerships ever for the Christmas Day Games, something like thirty

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 8>five million viewers.

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 8>Anyway, So I also think that they are definitely, you know,

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:55.839
<v Speaker 8>probably going to go for a digital package. I mean,

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 8>I mean, the NFL wants to go there. They know

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 8>that majority of the viewership is migrating to streaming and

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 8>it would be stupid for them not to kind of

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:06.959
<v Speaker 8>sell a digital package. So I definitely think it's going

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 8>to happen sooner rather than later.

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 7>Chewey forecast is sales for the year that beat analyst expectations,

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 7>stocks a pretty bigger ten twelve percent. Here today that's

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 7>good news. Here, let's break it down with Diana prost Opine,

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 7>Consumer staples analyst Bloomberg Intelligence. She joins us live here

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 7>in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. So, Chewy, what did

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 7>you learn on their earnings call?

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean they have been doing pretty well both

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:58.559
<v Speaker 9>on the top line and profitability. There's no complaints from investors,

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 9>or at least they shouldn't be for eat quarter.

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 6>So I'm just looking at the stock here.

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 7>The stock's up again about twelve percent today, but it

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 7>is down twenty percent year to date and then about

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 7>twenty percent over the trailing twelve months. What's the investment

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 7>call here for Chewy? What are the growth drivers top

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 7>line for this company?

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 9>Yes, so it's their ability to grab consumers. Once you

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 9>enter I guess the Chewy you know environment, it's difficult

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 9>for you to leave. They have about eighty eighty four

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 9>percent of their revenue comes from authorship, so it's pretty

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 9>much you set it up.

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 3>It's subscription based pretty much.

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 9>So you set it up and every so often you

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 9>get your goodies at your doorsteps.

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 7>So did they compete against the Amazons of the world,

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 7>the Walmarts of the world, the pets dot com they do.

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so you know, they have about a third of

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 9>the e commerce you know, market share in the United States.

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 9>They compete with Amazon as around the same.

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 7>Well, there are not many companies out there that can

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 7>say they have a third of a market where you

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 7>compete against an Amazon and a Walmart and things.

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:08.079
<v Speaker 3>Like that exactly.

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 9>And the thing with Chew is that they have expanded

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 9>beyond merchandise, beyond food and now you can get your

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 9>you know, your pharmacy, you can get you know, your

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 9>vet needs. They actually have vet locations, eighteen vet locations.

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 3>They're starting to do that.

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 9>They see that that engages customers more.

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 3>So that is, you know, an upside for them.

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 6>So how is that business?

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 7>I have no idea because it's all kinds of pet

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 7>food in general, then stuff like toys and all that

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 7>kind of stuff.

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 6>What's the terriff situation for those that kind of stuff.

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 9>So it seems that they have been able to navigate

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 9>that obviously, you know, some of the pressure they pass

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 9>that through consumers. They're seeing a net sales per active consumer,

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 9>which is kind of like you know, they're pricing grow

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 9>in the low single digits.

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 3>So they are comfortable with that.

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 9>You know, the scale and the price on the product

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 9>mix that they have allows them to kind of like

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 9>get the hit on the margin without you know, showing

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 9>it to us.

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:16.719
<v Speaker 7>This was a obviously a COVID stock that just like

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 7>like a peloton a little bit. But this has obviously

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 7>done much better post How do people view this? Is

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 7>this a kind of a consumer staple kind of name?

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 7>How do you think about that?

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 9>I would say it's a it's a you know, it's

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 9>a retailer, you know, the way that I will see it.

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 9>You know, going back to the you know, pandemic and

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 9>COVID they actually had obviously this was a very favorite

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 9>stock because everybody was at home. And then you know,

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 9>the cohorts that were acquired during the pandemic they kind

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 9>of reduced and that was kind of like a story

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 9>of twenty twenty four. It was difficult for them to

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 9>grow consumers because you know, the cohort was so massive

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 9>that it was pretty much the you know, they couldn't

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 9>keep up with you know, they couldn't keep a lot

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 9>of those consumers. But that has turned around and they

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 9>are seeing you know, significant growth. We actually expect that

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 9>most of the growth in sales is probably going to

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 9>come from active consumers rather than pricing.

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I look at you know, I know nothing

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 7>about this business, but I look at the first place

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 7>I look for when I look at p and LS

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 7>at free cash flow. Great free cash flow here, I

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 7>mek got seven hundred million dollars in for calendar or

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 7>twenty six, maybe eight to fifty projected for calendar or

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 7>twenty seven.

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 3>What do they do with the free cash flow they

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 3>invested in the business.

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 9>They're growing scale, obviously, they're opening vets. That is something

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 9>that they haven't pretty much experienced. They're actually in, you know,

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 9>investing outside of the United States. You know, they're trying

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 9>to get into Canada. They're given some of that back

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 9>and share repurchases, but we don't necessarily expect it to

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 9>be significant.

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, in twenty twenty six, what's.

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 7>The big what's the margin analysis you guys do as

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 7>analysts and investors, where's the leverage in the income statement

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 7>that maybe improve margins because there's a retailer type margins.

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, what can they do? Really?

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 9>I mean there are actually it seems that you know,

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 9>they're working a lot with leverage, operating leverage. You know,

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 9>in their distribution centers they seem to be you know,

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 9>they are automated, so that has been building scale, you know,

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 9>trying to get consumers to buy more premium brands. They

0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 9>have private label which they wanted to grow it to

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 9>like the main teens. That is going to add about

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 9>five hundred basis points to gross margin and you know,

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 9>other non merchandise revenue, so that is usually higher profit

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 9>than merchandise.

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 6>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Plot. Catch us live

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am. He's done on Applecarclay, and Android

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's check in with Justin Priden right now.

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 2>He is vice president of consulting Services at Revenue Management Solutions,

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 2>and he's also an attendee at the Bloomberg Intelligence Farm,

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Food and Fuel conference where they are talking about rising costs,

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 2>especially fertilizer costs, what that means for agriculture, and what

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 2>that means down the line for food operators, restaurant trends. Justin,

0:17:34.560 --> 0:17:37.439
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for joining us. Tell me about

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 2>what you've discussed at this conference and how you think

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 2>about what that means for restaurant menus and the restaurant industry.

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 4>Paul Scarlett, thank you so much for having me, and again,

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 4>the conference has been wonderful about talking about some of

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 4>those input pieces that's really fundamental to restaurants and what

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 4>their costs they're seeing in the bottom line when it

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 4>comes to the products on their menus. At Revenue Management Solutions,

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 4>we're always working to keep our clients ahead of the

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 4>curve and be proactive when it comes to those cost

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:08.920
<v Speaker 4>inputs that they can meet the guests where they're at

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to what items are on the menu,

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 4>their prices and all these pieces, and a lot of

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 4>the topics that have been really important at this conference

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 4>is what these what the downstream effects are going to

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 4>or what the initial effects here are going to cause

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 4>for those menus when it comes to costs and what

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 4>comes to operators are going to be reacting to in

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 4>that food and beverage industry.

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.479
<v Speaker 7>All right, here's the term I dislike slash hate the

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 7>most in the food business over the last six months,

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 7>and that is protein. When did they start using protein

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 7>as opposed to just saying, hey, do you want chicken

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 7>on your salad?

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 2>It sounds better?

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 6>I don't know, So talk to us about that, I mean,

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 6>justin protein.

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 7>Tell us why it's become an issue or a topic

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 7>within the restaurant and food industry and how we should

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 7>think about it.

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:55.239
<v Speaker 4>Paul, I hear you there, and it's so fun as

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 4>a restaurant or originally myself, just calling it protein and

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 4>going there just doesn't sounds good, right. It's not something

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 4>that you think about when you're on the menu and

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 4>think about, hey, I really feel like a protein section today.

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 4>But really it's become a major piece, and it's always

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 4>been a major piece of menus. I mean we see

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 4>right now roughly about eighty five percent just of menu

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 4>items making up that just the core chicken, beef, ork

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 4>type of items. So it's always been there. But the

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 4>real focus on it right now is a is you're

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 4>starting to see a lot of trends focus on protein

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 4>rich or a lot of protein within the diet. These

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 4>are becoming even more important to consumers. Some of the

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 4>generational shift too, you're starting to see is that it's

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 4>even more important to the millennials who are in the

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 4>market now and really becoming some of the chief spenders

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 4>from now and moving forward, really looking for protein as

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 4>a deciding factor and how they're choosing restaurants and how

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 4>they're choosing their items. Also, just some trends with gop

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 4>one and what you're seeing in dietary trends is really

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 4>focused back on protein being a core of that decision process.

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 4>For guests on menus, I think a recent survey we

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 4>saw again three top reasons. It's good for my health,

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 4>it's satisfying, and it's something that I need as part

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 4>of my active lifestyle. And that just keeps increasing as

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 4>we ask guests out there for menus and just what

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing as items come to menus.

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Justin I want to ask you about some trendy food

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 2>that has become like kind of the thing that everyone wants.

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 2>It's certainly showing up all over social media, whether it's

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Macha out of Japan or Asia overall, Ube out of

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 2>the Philippines. Do buy chocolate, that's a big thing.

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 6>Well, you're way ahead of me on this.

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean this is.

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 2>What's all over Instagram. And these things photograph really well,

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 2>and they also lead to increased demand from consumers, and

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 2>restaurants are kind of meeting this demand by incorporating it

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 2>into their menus. Is this something that restaurants do with

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 2>an eye to like just do it for a couple

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 2>of weeks before going back to their normal menu, or

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 2>is it something that they incorporate permanently.

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think you're seeing more and more of those

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 4>trendy types of pieces to mendew if you want to

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.719
<v Speaker 4>call them trendy, but they're also following a lot of

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 4>that global taste and that unique taste piece to cause

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 4>buzz around items and a buzzer bus of the menu

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 4>to be able to bring folks in again. Right now,

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.360
<v Speaker 4>as you're starting to see affordability as a total thing

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 4>for guest visits and transactions being more of a fight

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.680
<v Speaker 4>for share as guests are coming in not necessarily maybe

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 4>new occasions utilizing what's there, what's really current, what's good,

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 4>those short term promotions, the social media aspects and the

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 4>photographing let the camera eat first type of principle of

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 4>being able to take sea food that's really exciting. You're

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 4>seeing that get leveraged a lot as global cuisine as

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 4>some of those trends are really there and again resonating

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 4>with millennials, but again across all folks. As whether it's

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 4>a mainstam menus, there's a real balance. I think you're

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 4>seeing more of that short term type of menu options

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 4>come in promotions and then whether that has staying power

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 4>or how that balance is with what you might consider

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 4>the core of the menu, the things that you're known for,

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:57.199
<v Speaker 4>what you come in for. So it's that balance of

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 4>getting the folks coming in for excitement and for the

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 4>things that they know and always look.

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal.