WEBVTT - The Mango Hack

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Crypto, a daily Bloomberg I Heart podcast,

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:08.559
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Stacy Marie Ishmael, Managing editor of Crypto for

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. It's Monday, November. Well, now, there's been a

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>lot going on in crypto in just the last few days.

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Sam bank Win Freed's global empire has come crumbling down

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 1>around him. Multiple of his companies have filed for bankruptcy protection.

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Various wallets associated with his exchanges were drained of their funds.

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Sam himself was questioned by police and regulators in the Bahamas,

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.879
<v Speaker 1>where FTX was based. How did it all come to this?

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>You'll hear more about what's going on and how we

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>got here on some special episodes of the Bloomberg Crypto

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>podcast this week. On Tuesday, my colleagues Vildanna Harrick and

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Katie Greifeld will discuss the very latest developments in the

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>SPF FTX Ala Mina universe. But for today's episode, which

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>we recorded before the shenanigans of the last several days,

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about Mango. No, not the fruit,

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the de Fi protocol one that was hit by a

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>one hundred million dollar exploit recently. Mango experienced a type

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of exploits that's really raising eyebrows and crypto these days.

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>It's called a price manipulation attack, and it involves taking

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>advantage of how de fi platforms are supposed to work.

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>In this episode, I'll be joined by Bloomberg report to

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Muchen you Never Sleep, and by Evgeny gave a NASA

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>experience was a hack back and back in the summer

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is Optimism, the CEO and founder of winter Mute, a

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>trading platform that was itself hacked for a hundred and

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty million dollars back in September. We are what's been

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>going on with DeFi and specifically with Mango that has

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>folks a bit stressed right now. I think it's really

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>all started of this us being at this stage of

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the market, a lot of tokens are not as liquid

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>as used to be, as there's a less retail interest

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>in the space and there's also less assuming institutional interests

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 1>in the space. So as a result, a lot of tokens,

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>as we know in the past, especially in the bull market,

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a hundreds of tokens that's been created now because

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>there's less interests, there's less money in the space a

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of tokens. They are not as liquid as used

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to be. Therefore, it's easier for people to sort of

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>manipulate the prices of these tokens by singlely just like

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 1>a one trade or a few trades, so they can

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>move the price either up dramatically or down dramatically easily.

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>This doesn't seem to be technically or practically illegal as

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>far as any of the various lawyers that we've spoken to,

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 1>just kind of in principle, it's very obsetting, right, you

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>are the owner of a platform, or you are people

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 1>who are affected by this thing, and someone comes in

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and is able to take advantage of price movements that

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>they may themselves be triggering to you know, buy or sell,

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>or both buy and sell in a way that allows

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>them to walk away with a significant amount of money.

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>But again, as somebody who has been sort of on

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the other side of these kinds of exploits that exist

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>in the legal gray area, what is it like to

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>go through it? Basically, I was I'm encryptophor over five

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>years now, but before that I was in normal traditional finance,

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and I would say those kind of tradings allages, quote unquote,

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it would be very much illegal and traditional markets, like

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>if somebody would keeps up like this on I know,

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>see me and nicely for examples, they would get into

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of trouble. So to me, it's a very

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 1>very much illegal what happened to be honest people who

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>are engaging in these kinds of exploits. And there is

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>one in particular as it relates to Mango, who has

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:28.239
<v Speaker 1>sort of publicly been talking on Twitter on discord saying well,

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>you know this isn't illegal. Your contracts allow me to

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 1>do this kind of stuff. I'm going to do this

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. And to our knowledge, he has not

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>been charged with any crimes. He's definitely not been arrested.

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>But what has been happening is a sort of how

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>shall I say, rage from from folks in the defied

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>community that he does have this degree of impunity to

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of say well, yeah, I'm going to do this

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>thing and you can't do anything about it. And specifically

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>when he was first able to do this exploit with Mango,

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and the initial amounts that he was able to, you know,

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 1>manipulate in his favor was a hundred million. Eventually it

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>was cut to about half. We are what happened between

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that hundred million and that fifty million, Like, what were

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the conversations between Mango and this person that reduced the

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>amounts that was lost? I mean, correct me if I

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:23.679
<v Speaker 1>were on what I was hurt? Is that what happens

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>they he posed a statement about what happened, and again

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>he says everything he did was totally illegal, But he

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>had a conversation with the Mango team. Eventually they made

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 1>a deal that he would have returned part of the

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>money back to the Mango Markets team just because what

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>happens Mango as a result is that the whole project

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we can't sort of insolvent and they had no money,

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>low liquidity, and a lot of users are trapped with

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there's no money left there now. If Geinny,

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 1>I've got to ask you this question, right like winter,

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you was affected by an exploit in September to the

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>tune of sixty million dollars. What did you learn going

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>through that and what are you doing? How are you

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the space differently as a result. Honestly, not

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>much changed, I guess in my in my thinking like

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it's I see those hacks exploits as basical cost of

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 1>doing business in a way. But it's I wouldn't say

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>it's inevitable, but it's something well. As an operator in

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the space, you basically have to accept that's that's a

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>possibility for in the training strategies you do that as

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>there is a possibility of a hack of exploit, of

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>something going wrong with the protocol, you own no productol

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>your trade off. So for us as a firm, nothing

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>changed in terms of a strategy. Like we obviously learned

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit on this event, we will we will

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>approach trading going forward in a much safer way, But

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing changed in terms of our well, in terms of

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>us being really interested in the space, in terms so

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>far as being really invested in the space and basically

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>asked continuously working too, Yeah, continue trading, continue moving the

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>space forward. Is there actually a way to design a seatbelt?

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Is there a way to get this be from a

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>cost of doing business to something that is unattractive to

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>potential exploits. Look, it's it's always possible to make it

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>super safe, and I guess that's that's what the whole

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem defied community is working towards and ultimately as they

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>will arrive, like if you look at battle tested protocols

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>like Halba for example, it looks like it's it's pretty

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>safe to use and there are like billions of assets

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and in protocols like this, but it does take time

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to arrive to the stage where like protocols like Holbor

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>like unit small for example, are pattal tested and it's

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>basically as a run or exploits possible like for those

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>particular protocols, but the main challenge always arises when there

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>is an interception between different protocols, which is the coolest

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>thing about defining general when when the protocols can coexist

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>with each other and like built on top of each other,

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and like in case of Manga specifically as the oracles,

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and from what we saw from a lot of exploits

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>in the space, and not not just Maga but but

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>other ones, oracles are typically is the most vulnerable vulnerable

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>point because like that's that's where the manipulation can potentially happen.

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>And if you design your protocol as something that has

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.839
<v Speaker 1>to rely on oracle, yes, that's that's that's ultimately can

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>be a point of failure. Now, when we talk about

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>oracles and defy, we don't just mean some like all

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 1>seeing entity. We what we're describing are the pricing systems

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that folks use to say, oh, yes, this token is

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>actually treading at x y z price. And it sounds

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>like what you're describing is the fact that these automated

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>systems that assume a price that exists is valid is

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>point of vulnerability because that price might have been manipulated

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>five seconds before exactly and basically, in traditional finance as

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>price manipulation would be illegal, while encrypto at the moment,

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not. Well, you started by saying, you know, one

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons this type of exploit has been possible

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:26.079
<v Speaker 1>is because of the relative lack of liquidity. In an

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>environment with less liquidity, it's a lot easier to make

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>these sorts of dramatic price moves that allow the sorts

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of trading strategies that folks are using to make these

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>kinds of profits. There have been a couple of platforms

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and thinking and protocols I'm thinking about, like Compound and

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a couple of others that said, okay, for like less

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 1>liquid tokens, we're going to take certain types of steps

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to make them less prone to this kind of manipulation.

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>What other things have you seen or are you talking

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to people about that they're also considering as a way

0:09:56.640 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to mitigate the risks here. A big part of of

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>what happened with the Mango markets and the similar attacks

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>was what kind of collaterals you can use to borrow

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>money in the space. I think when projects in general

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>consider what are the tokens that we except as collateral

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 1>is very important. I think sort of due diligence around

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>each token and about technical details and and everything else

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>around the token and the project is very important, you know,

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>like as Crypto seven it never sleeps. It's also very

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:35.959
<v Speaker 1>important to having established or integrate sort of own chair

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>analysis and monitor around your project, just to make sure

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that you know, if something bad happens, you can detect

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it early on and being able at least having time

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to fix it or or to save it. Afghani as

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>somebody who is in the position of having to convince

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>borrowers lenders that they should continue to be using you know,

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>not just like your protocol, your platform, but like defy

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>in general. What are you saying to folks out there

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>who are looking at this under the like is my

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 1>money at risk? If I am you know investing or

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:14.839
<v Speaker 1>in any way involved in defy. Right now, I think

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>one once something to considers just hot transparent it is.

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think, like I'm coming from, like very basic

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>example is lending protocols. We've seen this here is that

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>well Salsus collapsed companies like Block Fine, Voyager or head Issues,

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and like one unified seam around all of those is

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>like you could put your money in Celsius, but you

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>would have no idea where as a where as a

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.839
<v Speaker 1>yield that's coming from defied, it's very much transparent to

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>clear whereas the yield is coming from, like whether you

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 1>put it on another or you put it on on

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Maple for example, you know exactly where as the yield

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>is coun from. And that's that's a very big shift

0:11:54.840 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>from very intransparent like traditional centralized player. That's a centralized

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of place. Coming up more from Bloomberg report of

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Muyashen and from Winter Mute CEO of Guinea, Guy Avoid

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>on how the recent attack on Mango is shaking up

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the crypto industry. Now, in the immediate aftermath of the

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>hack that affected Winter Mute, you know, you tweeted that

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you were willing to offer a ten percent bounty to

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.959
<v Speaker 1>the hacker if they returned the funds. How have your

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>feelings on bounties evolved over time? Do you think that

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>these are effective? Do you think that something like a

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:44.559
<v Speaker 1>cap makes sense? I think it's ultimately up to every

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:47.079
<v Speaker 1>protocol what to do with it or every company what

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to do with it. To me, something between like five

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to generally makes sense. Put in a cap one might

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>make sense as well, like we had. Another another experience

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>was a hack back back in the summer with with Optimism,

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>where it ended up successfully where hacker did accept and bounty.

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I personally think tund sounds fine. Limited to five million

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars can also work, I guess yes, but in general

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 1>like it. I think it's it's a great saying if

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>we have some kind of standard sets in place so that,

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>like every protocol or every company doesn't have to keep

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>reinventing it every time something like this happens. The thing

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>is that every time you like, at least what I

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>talked to somebody in defy and I start saying where

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like agreed standards, They're like, no, that is the

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>opposite of decentralization. You know this, How how do you

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>square those things. Yes, I think that there was actually

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a recently debate between SBF and Erica or HISS and

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.079
<v Speaker 1>Eric and his post. He basically like there is a

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 1>difference between regulation and standards, and regulation is like close

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and post on you and standards the sumpthing, Well, you

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>can agree to follow basically, and you follow the standards,

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>people will television more likely, but you don't have to,

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.199
<v Speaker 1>Like you can say, yeah, I'm not gonna divide by

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the standards. I'm gonna do my own saying. And that's fine.

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>We all you talked to a lot of folks and

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>defy kind of all day long. We've said on this

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>podcast over and over that one of the it's almost

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>like a meme at this point. If you are the

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>CEO of a big crypto exchange, you're like, we just

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>want regulatory clarity, like like we just want to know

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen. What is the vibe among the

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>other DeFi executives that you that you speak to as

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>it relates to this regulation and enforcement piece. I think

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it's funny. I think when I first started covering crypt

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>or way back then, I mean saying way back then,

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit a little bit exaggerated because just

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>deify as being existing only for this this few years

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>in the past. You know, in the beginning when we

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>talked to Defy folks, and it's usually just those DJs,

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, anymalous people on discord and trying to find

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the alpha. Like now, like I think people are becoming

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>more realistic. Like a lot of folks when I talk

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to them, they understand, you know, like for Defied two

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>really to grow, to really go bigger, you need bigger

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>money coming into the space. You need people to use

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it for real life application, and you know, people can

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>borrow and landing like even real world assets in the space,

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and you have to have regulations on that. I think

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the sort of a general consensus as as I'm

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>getting from from people these days. But I think as

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>we just discussed it, it's really hard to tell how

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>we can get everyone together to have some sort of

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>agreement on how to regulate it and how can sort

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of enforce people to follow the rules. Again, from your perspective,

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>what is kind of your ideal version of something like

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that for Defy, Like if we ever get to this

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of scale for Defy where the applications are things

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>like you know, widespread availability of mortgages or you know

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>what our sorts of consumer finance people might need. What

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>does that look like for you? To me, the ideal

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>regulation aroundefined and maybe not maybe regulations not even the

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>right world worked here, But to me, the ideal would be,

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>for example, with SEC not saying the security is not security,

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>which they're not even saying to be honest, but it

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>would be saying, okay, guys, we looked into a syrium.

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>It can be like risky, but it's definitely not a

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>scamp something like this. So basically, instead of prosecuting protocols

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>for potentially being securities or not, basically making a list

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of safe things to invest it, that to me would

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>be ideal because the world where like what especially American

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>investors are running into now or ordinary people really is well,

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>they cannot legally use a big portion of defied protocols

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>like divid X for example, because the ideas just IP

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>blocks US people because it doesn't want to deal with

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the FTC or SEC because it doesn't want to break

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the lot, which is very understandable, but it also means

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that basically, big chunk of the market, big big chunk

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of opportunity, which is open for the rest of the world,

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is just really closed for normal retail people in Yes, well,

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure to have you both on the show. Thank

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you again for taking the time. Thank you, Thank you.

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>You can find more of Mooshan's repausing on the Bloomberg terminal,

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot com and on Twitter. This is Bloomberg Crypto,

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a daily podcast from Bloomberg and I Heart Radio. For

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 1>more shows from I Heart Radio, visit the I Heart

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Send us your comments, questions, or suggestions for the show

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 1>to Crypto at Bloomberg dot net. The supervising producer of

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Crypto is Vicky very Galina. Our senior producer is

0:17:56.640 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Janet Babin. Our producers are Mohammed Fruke and Sharon Barrio.

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Our associate producers are Ty Butler and Moses on Them.

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Desta wonder At is our engineer. Original music by Leo Sidrn.

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm Stacy Maria Schmall. We'll be back tomorrow.