WEBVTT - Making renewables a profitable bet… everywhere

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to zero I am Akshatrati this week, sun wind

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>and making money. The COP twenty eighth meeting that ended

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in December led to many big announcements. That's the nature

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of these global climate diplomacy shindix. Lots of countries make

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>big promises, such as tripling renewable energy, transitioning away from

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels. It's only really years after that you can

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>tell whether these countries were serious and delivered on those

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>promises or it was all just good sound bites. However,

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>there was one achievement on the first day of COP

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight in Dubai that is delivering results. The United

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Arab Emirates, the host country, pledged to put thirty billion

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars into a new climate finance fund named al Terra,

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and some of that money was immediately allocated to scaling

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>up renewable energy projects in developing countries where the need

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>for finance is the greatest. One of the firms that's

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>going to put some of those billions to work is

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the Canadian asset management firm Brookfield. Brookfield already manages more

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>than eight hundred and fifty billion dollars worth of assets,

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>everything from real estate to private equity. About a tenth

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>of its total assets are in renewables and the climate transition.

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty one, its renewable division launched the fifteen

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar Brookfield Global Transition Fund. At the time, it

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>was the world's largest private fund of its kind dedicated

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to financing the energy transition. Brookfield is now raising a

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>second fund of the same kind, and Alterra will invest

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>two billion dollars in that fund. More importantly, and separately,

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Altera will invest one billion dollars in a new fund

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that's supposed to only invest in developing country Yes, so,

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>how exactly will it work? To help me understand, I

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>spoke to Connor Tesky. He started his career at Brookfield

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>eleven years ago in private equity and became the CEO

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of Brookfield Renewable Partners in twenty twenty. I spoke with

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Connor at COP twenty eight in December to ask how

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to invest big money in developing countries, how to make

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a good return on renewables, and how to transition fossil

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:44.399
<v Speaker 1>fuel assets into clean energy.

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Connor, welcome to the show.

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, thank you for having us.

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Now at Brookfield. You do a few things, but you

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 2>do head the renewables section, and here at COP twenty

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 2>eight there is a lot of talk about renewables. There's

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:02.519
<v Speaker 2>a global goal to try and trip renewables by twenty thirty.

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Seems Brookfield's target is much more than just tripling, isn't it?

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 3>I would say so yeah, And when we hear the

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 3>global target of tripling renewables by twenty thirty, that seems

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 3>very achievable. When we look across our business today, almost

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 3>across asset classes and across geographies, the one thing that

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 3>is overwhelming today is simply the amount of demand for

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 3>clean power, in particular from corporates. And this has been

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 3>accelerating for years and is at its highest level today

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 3>and only expected to continue to accelerate going forward.

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 2>As is in the management for renewables for you, were

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 2>fifty seven billion dollars in twenty twenty, sixty nine billion

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 2>dollars in twenty twenty one, and seventy seven billion dollars

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty two. Clearly it's gone up, but it's

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 2>slowed down a little bit.

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't read too much into that trajectory. I would

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 3>say our our business is growing faster today than ever before.

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 3>And assets under management. There's a lot of things that

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 3>go into that. What assets are we building, what assets

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 3>are we buying, what assets are we selling. But if

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 3>there was a number to focus on that is illustrative

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 3>of the growth in our business and the growth of

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 3>the renewables market going forward. Is our run rate on

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 3>a global basis is? Today we bring online about seven

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 3>thousand megawatts of new capacity every year. That number is

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 3>up significantly versus three or four or five years ago.

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Now we're talking renewables, but of course there are different

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 2>forms of renewables, and solar deployment globally is at a

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 2>record base. Wind is struggling. So can we just talk

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 2>through the different technologies. Where do you see progress and

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 2>where do you see challenges?

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 3>You're highlighting a great point. Today's solar is the fastest

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 3>growing tech technology on a global basis, and it's important

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 3>to recognize why. Twenty years ago, if you were developing renewables,

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 3>you were likely developing a hydro electric facility. That's millions

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 3>and tons of steel, millions and tons of concrete, multi

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 3>year construction period, usually somewhere out in the wilderness. You

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 3>need to camp workers there overnight, et cetera. Go back

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 3>maybe twelve to fifteen years ago, if you were developing renewables.

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 3>You're developing wind that is far easier than hydro, but

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 3>it's still special ships to transport the equipment. You've still

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 3>got to shut highways at night. If something breaks, you

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 3>got to get a crane. And then came a long solar.

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 3>The majority of solar is built between three and twelve

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 3>feet above the ground. The equipment is modular. You can

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 3>start a construction program on all four sides and meat

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 3>in the middle. And therefore, if you can generate the

0:05:56.360 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 3>same financial return building solar versus building wind or hydro,

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 3>you will naturally pick solar because it is the least

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 3>operationally intensive. Now that being said, the whole world can't

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 3>run on solar. The nature of intermittent renewable technologies is

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 3>we need different forms of energy that have differentiated load

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 3>patterns to provide a complete energy solution to the grid.

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 3>So while solar is accelerating now and wind perhaps accelerated

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 3>a few years ago and is plateauing off, they all

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 3>need to grow going forward. And our view is some

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 3>of the headwinds being felt in the wind space are

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.239
<v Speaker 3>quite discrete in nature and the industry will move past

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 3>them and you will continue to see very significant growth

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 3>in the wind asset class.

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:49.239
<v Speaker 2>When do you see that happening very readily?

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 3>A number of the issues that took place in wind

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 3>are discrete. They can be attributable to disruptions in shipping

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 3>and a cohort of contracts in a number of wind

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 3>farms around the world, in particular offshore wind that we're struck,

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 3>I would say with unfortunate timing and unfortunate economics for

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 3>those across the value chain. We are already seeing the

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 3>industry react very quickly, not only to adjust those economics

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 3>to enable the greater build out of wind going forward,

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 3>but also more appropriate risk sharing across the value chain.

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 3>That will ensure we've learned our lessons from those experiences

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 3>and the whole industry will be better equipped to not

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 3>repeat those going.

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Forward, which is going to cause prices to go up

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 2>for wind deployment. Our customers, the off takers ready for it.

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Are governments ready to ensure that those prices are reflective

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 2>of an industry that needs to grow. Absolutely, the wind

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 2>industry has suffered critical setbacks in recent years. The pandemic

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 2>caused disruptions in the global economy and trade, pushing up

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 2>the cost of coodities, labor and borrowing. That's a problem

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 2>because a lot of wind farms are locked into contracts

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 2>agreed two years ago, and that means produces a bound

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 2>to projects that sell power at fixed rates, which, given

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 2>today's cost structure, makes the project unprofitable. As a result,

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 2>developers have been forced to walk away from contracts. The

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 2>long list of cancel projects is causing a headache for

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 2>governments across Europe and the US that have set targets

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 2>to reach a certain amount of wind power in their mix.

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Now these governments are going to have to pay more

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 2>than they previously thought.

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 3>And this is probably one of the most dramatic things

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 3>that we are seeing across our business around the world today.

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Is yes, due to financing costs increasing, capex costs increasing

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 3>as they have over the last twelve to twenty four

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 3>to thirty months, you have seen corporate off take contracts

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 3>appropriately adjust to ensure that renewable developers can continue to

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:09.079
<v Speaker 3>earn an appropriate margin and capital can continue to be

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 3>attracted to the sector. But what's important to recognize as well,

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 3>there's two dynamics. One they still are typically at a

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 3>significant discount to retail costs, so the end customer is

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:24.719
<v Speaker 3>still getting a energy price discount a cost savings by

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 3>using renewable power. And two, the demand for green power

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:33.079
<v Speaker 3>today is higher than it has been at any point

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 3>in history. There has long been a supply demand imbalance,

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 3>meaning there is more demand for new green power off

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 3>takes and there are ready to build projects available. That

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 3>supply demand imbalance today is stronger than any before. We

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 3>don't struggle to find demand and off take to pull

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 3>projects out of the ground. Well.

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 2>One example played out in the UK where I live,

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 2>where the gun brought in a bid to get offshore

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 2>wind deployment a lower price than had ever been set,

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.319
<v Speaker 2>and the government was pretty confident there would be bids

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 2>coming in. Zero came in and so they've had to

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 2>change and increase their bid for the next round.

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:14.439
<v Speaker 3>That sounds about right, yeah, and.

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 2>They had to increase their price by forty percent. The

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 2>next auction hasn't happened, so we'll see if new bids

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 2>come in, but the industry says they are interested in

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 2>it now. Tripling renewables by twenty thirty is as we've

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 2>looked from other analysts to quite doable. The bottlenecks that

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 2>they see isn't really deploying the assets for wind and solar,

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 2>it's really grids and permitting. How are you thinking about them?

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 3>You nailed it. Depending on the region around the world,

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 3>there tends to be three bottlenecks to the development of renewables,

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 3>securing land, securing grids, and securing permits. And I would

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 3>say in different regions around the world it's a different

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 3>one of those three. The vast majority of the bottlenecks

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 3>are permits and interction. What I would say as well,

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 3>these are real limitations. Today, there is a very cohesive effort,

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 3>I would say, in almost every major market around the

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 3>world to accelerate and overcome some of these bottlenecks. One

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 3>of the very positive outcomes over the European energy crisis

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 3>over the last two or three years, if you've seen

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 3>concerted efforts across the EUS to accelerate the permitting process,

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 3>that had a noticeable impact on the ground at the

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 3>local development level. It was immediately felt and allowed more

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 3>projects to get into planning and construction than at a

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 3>faster rate than before. When it comes to interconnection, there

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 3>is going to need to be significant grid enhancement going

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 3>forward to support the build out of renewables. Grids around

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 3>the world are attracting that capital. It will continue to

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 3>be a bottleneck for some period of time, but it's

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 3>also important to recognize that many of the solutions are

0:11:56.920 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 3>accelerating equally. As fast storage is being built out even

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 3>on a relative basis, growing faster than renewables. That helps

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 3>address some of the interconnection concerns, as well as the

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 3>growth of asset classes like distributed generation where you can

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 3>produce the electricity right at the point of the end

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 3>consumer and not be as reliant on the grid. So

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 3>you're absolutely right, those are the limitations today. They are

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:25.079
<v Speaker 3>getting better. There is still work to do. I would

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 3>say the investors and operators who will drive the greatest

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.599
<v Speaker 3>amount going forward are the ones most well positioned to

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 3>navigate those issues because there are not immediate fixes.

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 2>More from the conversation after the break. Now, developed markets

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 2>are places where you have less risk of all kinds

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 2>and you're able to invest heavily. What is the split

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 2>for Brookfield between developed economies and developing countries Globally?

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 3>We like to think we're generally about three quarters in

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 3>develop markets. Around the world and twenty to twenty five

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 3>percent in developing markets. We have a long history in

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 3>developing markets, in particular large businesses in Brazil, India and

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Latin America, and we are actually in the process of

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 3>expanding that mandate to take some of our capital and

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 3>our operating capabilities to address transition investing in a wider

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 3>spectrum of developing market.

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Can you talk a little more about what new markets

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 2>are you looking at in the developing countries?

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Certainly absolutely a greater reach within Latin and Central America,

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 3>and then Eastern Europe and then the last one I

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 3>would highlight being Southeast Asia. Those are three markets that

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 3>we see tremendous operation tunity, and in fact what's important

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 3>to recognize is we have a global platform and when

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:09.959
<v Speaker 3>we look to invest in these countries, in these regions,

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 3>we need two things. We need one to see a

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 3>market opportunity there, and then two we need to have

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 3>an appropriate pool of capital that matches that market opportunity.

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 3>We've just recently announced a vehicle that will focus specifically

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 3>on those developing and emerging markets with a mandate of

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 3>accelerating the transition in those regions. So we're now very

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 3>excited to have that second component, which is that pool

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 3>of capital to appropriately direct to that investment opportunity set.

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 2>You're hinting at a new fund that was announced here

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 2>at COP twenty eight, the al Terra Fund, which at

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 2>least as plans go, is supposed to have thirty billion

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 2>dollars in it, where twenty five billion dollars would be

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 2>invested in developed countries and five billion dollars would be

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 2>used as concessional finances attract more capital and specifically targeted

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 2>in developm in countries. How much of that is Brookfield

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 2>going to be participating in and how exactly.

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Al Tara and Brookfield are going to partner in two

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 3>different ways. Al Tara is making a very meaningful commitment

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 3>to our Global Transition Fund, which is currently on its

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 3>second vintage. And then, perhaps more interesting to the comments

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 3>you just made, Altara will also be committing one billion

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 3>dollars to what we call the Catalytic Transition Fund, which

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 3>we'll focus on accelerating decarbonization and transition investing in emerging markets.

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 3>And what's very exciting about the one billion dollars that

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 3>al Tara will commit to that fund is it comes

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 3>in the form of catalytic capital that enhances the returns

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 3>to other LPs in the fund, with a view of

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 3>crowding in more institutional capital and really scaling up the

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 3>pool for investment in those markets.

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's break down that jargon. What Connor is saying is

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that at Brookfield will use al Terra's billion dollars to

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>bring in other investors and perhaps launch a four billion

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>dollar fund dedicated to investing in renewable projects in developing countries.

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Why would other investors join It's because the profits on

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the billion dollar investment will be capped, and so the

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>other investors joining in the fund can take more of

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the profits. And that's important because most private investors putting

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>money in, say a solar farm in Kenya, see it

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>as a riskier investment than a solar farm in France.

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>That's because developing countries can often have currencies that fluctuate,

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bureaucracies that can mean payments are delayed

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>or myriad other problems, and so the private investors want

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>higher returns from a Kenyan solar farm than they would

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>from a French solar farm, and that's what all Terra's

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar is promising to deliver.

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 2>But you just said that there are billions being invested

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 2>in developing countries already. Is it just more billions going

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 2>in or is it actually opening new marks?

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Great? Great question. To date, the majority of the capital

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 3>going into emerging markets has it has gone towards transition

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 3>or decarbonization investments, But I would say ones that are

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 3>more de risked, and therefore within those markets, it is

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 3>a somewhat limited opportunity set that most investors are allowed

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 3>to target within these markets. With now the benefit of

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 3>the Catalytic Transition Fund and its differentiated investment profile and

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 3>return mandate, there are different things we can look at,

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 3>and I'll give you an example to make this play out.

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 3>If we go to large developing markets like India and

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Brazil and we use our large global corporate off take

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 3>relationships and we partner with some of the biggest global

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 3>corporates simply to build wind and solar farms there with

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty year inflation link corporate off takes, we add absolutely

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 3>we're already doing that in markets like India and Brazil

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 3>and Columbia to date.

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Connor refers to corporate opt takes or corporate PPAs interchangeably.

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>PPA basically stands for power purchasing agreements, and global companies

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>are one of the biggest reasons for signing these power

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>purchasing agreements for renewable deployment across the world. It's because

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>companies like Amazon or Google want their warehouses and data

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>centers to be only powered by renewables, regardless of where

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>they operate in the world, and so they signed contracts

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>with utilities that build solar wind farms, with almost all

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the electricity generated being fully consumed by these companies. It's

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a good deal for the utilities because they know these

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 1>global companies will pay them on time. And it's a

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>good deal for the global companies because they get clean

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>energy in a country whether grid is typically powered by

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels. And from an investor perspective, it means this

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>type of solar farm asset is risk free, lower risk,

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 1>or as Connor says, de risked.

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 3>But in some of the emerging markets, maybe there isn't

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 3>that well defined robust revenue construct. Maybe the corporate ppa

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 3>market isn't as long in term, and therefore things like

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 3>the catalytic capital appropriately adjust the risk return profile to

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 3>make it more attractive. Maybe in even more mature developing

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 3>markets like Brazil and India. It's not necessarily the down

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 3>the fair Way wind and solar, but maybe it's getting

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 3>into things like building out hydrogen or equipment supply chains

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 3>and things like that. So while there is capital flowing

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 3>into some of those developing markets already, there is no

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 3>doubt that the Catalytic Transition Fund, with its differentiated risk

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 3>return profile, certainly one increases the number of geographies, but

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 3>even within those geographies increases the spectrum of investible opportunities.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.199
<v Speaker 2>We do not name any new geographies that you have

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 2>not invested in which could open up with.

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 3>This, So today we are not invested in Southeast Asia,

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:09.719
<v Speaker 3>so that is a market that will open up as

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 3>a result of this. We are quite active in Latin

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 3>in Brazil that goes very long to Brookfield's history. But

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 3>I would say there are more geographies we can now

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 3>go to, particularly in and around Central America where perhaps

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 3>we haven't gone in the past, as well as Eastern Europe,

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 3>where we have a modest presence but not in all countries.

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 3>And with this fund, we now have the mandate to

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 3>go into more countries in those regions. So I would

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 3>expect to see the Catalyic Transition Fund lead to us

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 3>bringing our global platform and its operating capabilities and its

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 3>capital to a large number of new countries.

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, the all Terra Funds catalytic portion has been pitched

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 2>as never done before, is going to make a revolutionary difference. Now,

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 2>we as journalists haven't really got to details, and so

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 2>we are taking this claim on face value. But it's

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 2>difficult to make this capital work. How serious do you

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 2>think EUAE is when it's making this investment?

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Very serious, and I would perhaps put it in three buckets.

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 3>The first is simply the size of the commitment they

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 3>are making, which is truly transformational and well, a significant

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 3>amount of that out capital has been allocated today, much

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 3>of it will be allocated in the future, but the

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 3>sheer size of it and the multiplier effect it will

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 3>have on crowding in other institutional capital, it should not

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 3>be dismissed. This is quite transformative and very commendable what

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 3>they've done. From that perspective, the second thing, which I

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 3>think can be taken to demonstrate the seriousness of it

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 3>and how it will have an enduring impact, is they

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 3>have partnered with the leaders of this type of investing

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 3>around the world, have sought out council from the leading

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 3>transition platforms, all that have slightly different mandates and invest

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 3>slightly differently, but they have worked with those and supported

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 3>those and picked very strategically who their partners are in

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 3>order to have the best effect. And then the third

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:21.959
<v Speaker 3>point we would make is what we have experienced in

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:25.719
<v Speaker 3>working with the team at all Terra is this is

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 3>something they are very committed to. They are not simply

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 3>committing capital, they are committing human capital. They have dedicated

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 3>significant time and resources to working alongside those partners to

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 3>structure these vehicles to ensure that they're not only going

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 3>to be successful today at announcement, but will be successful

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 3>as they are executed in years to come.

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 2>The total amount that is needed to be invested in

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 2>the transition in developing countries needs to be three to

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 2>four times as it is today. Developed economies are getting

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 2>much of that money. But let's look at the fact

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 2>that you painting a picture which is yes, there's some problems,

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 2>but it's really rosie. There is just so much to build,

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 2>so much support and lots of profit on the table.

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 2>If that's the case, why is it that oil and

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 2>gas companies are trying to shrink their renewables portfolio. Right,

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 2>these are companies that know how to do large infrastructure projects.

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 2>What causes them to step back?

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 3>So I would maybe come at that dynamic this way.

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 3>In the last few years, there are three things that

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 3>we have really seen in the developed transition market. The

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 3>first one is a larger and more attractive opportunity set

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 3>than both a commercial opportunity set and a more impactful

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 3>decarbonization opportunity set then I think almost anyone imagined. The

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 3>second one is in recently around the world we are

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 3>seeing energy transition is more of a corporate pull than

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 3>a government push. And what we would say is the

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 3>trend line on decarbonization is being driven by corporates, the

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 3>EBB and flow above that trend line is being driven

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 3>by government policy. And then the third deal that's specifically renewables,

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 3>renewables and other decarbonization solutions, whether it be biofuels or

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 3>carbon capture, things like that.

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Surely that's not true given the fact that Inflation Reduction

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Act the European Green Deal were necessary for these things.

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 3>To move on to.

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 2>That renewables, I may let you have that case. These

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 2>tax crisers in the US have been around for a while,

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 2>but really is the corporate ppa market that's driving the transition.

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Those numbers make sense, but other solutions.

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Let me frame it a different way, and let's see

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 3>if we agree, which is things like biofuels in carbon capture.

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:55.439
<v Speaker 3>Without question, IRA has accelerated their growth. Nobody disputes that

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 3>they would still have been growing and still have been

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 3>accelerating in the absence of IR right. And then maybe

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.119
<v Speaker 3>just the third one to round it out is the

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 3>last thing we've seen is not on the investment opportunity side,

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 3>but rather on the investor side. And in that bucket

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 3>we've seen really two or three things. One more and

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 3>more investors around the world having a transition or decarbonization

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 3>investing allocation. And I think that's because the commercial opportunity

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 3>set is large and growing. And then secondly, an increased

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 3>pragmatism amongst those investors that it isn't all about simply

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 3>what's building out more of what is already perfectly green

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 3>and clean and pristine, but also a willingness to sometimes

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 3>go where the emissions are in order to decarbonize something.

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 3>I highlight those three dynamics. Corporate demand, large and attractive

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 3>opportunity set, and growing investor momentum, and investor pragmatism because

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 3>we see I see all three of those things happening

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 3>in emerging markets very similar to how they have happened

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 3>in developed markets, but on a slightly lagged basis. And

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 3>that's why as we look to investing in those markets

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 3>going forward, we do think one, it's an attractive opportunity

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 3>set today. Now let's get back to the oil question. This,

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 3>I would say comes down to a very specific question

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 3>of who are your stakeholders and what do they want.

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 3>There is no question that if you look at the

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:38.719
<v Speaker 3>investment profile of a new build twenty year contracted wind

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 3>or solar facility, it is a lower return. But if

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 3>you have a twenty year inflation linked off take with Microsoft,

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 3>you could argue it's a very de risk return. It's

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:51.159
<v Speaker 3>slightly lower on the risk return spectrum. I am not

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.239
<v Speaker 3>a oil and gas engineer, but I understand that if

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 3>you drill for oil, and you do it well and

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 3>you hit a good reserve, your short returns can be

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot higher. And you are seeing some leading energy

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:11.199
<v Speaker 3>companies either invest in renewables or invest in things like

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 3>e fuels or hydrogen where they feel their skill set

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 3>is more appropriate, or invest in other decarbonization solutions where

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 3>they feel that is more in line with the investment

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 3>profile that their investors want them to take.

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Now, wearing the President's had seventy seven billion out of

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 2>the eight hundred and fifty billion dollars is renewables, you

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of other assets and they are carbon generating.

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 2>What are you doing about those?

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's an important thing to recognize and

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 3>it's something we say proudly at Brookfield, even those within

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:50.159
<v Speaker 3>the Renewable Power in Transition platform. It's important to recognize

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 3>that every asset at Brookfield is decarbonizing, not just the

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 3>ones in the Renewable Power and Transition platform, because we

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 3>have a fundamental belief across our organization that by decarbonizing

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 3>our investments, we are de risking them going forward and

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 3>enhancing their value. So it doesn't matter if you're in

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 3>real estate or infrastructure or private equity business. This is

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 3>a value lever to enhance the returns of our portfolio companies.

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you have a zero by twenty fifty target for

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 2>all your assets, but real estate is a really difficult

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 2>asset to decarbonize. What's short term looking like, are you

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 2>able to hit the powers goals of being able to

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 2>havelff your asset emissions by twenty thirty.

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 3>You picked real estates one where I would say we

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 3>feel most confident about hitting those goals because of there

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 3>are such well established ways to reduce the carbon emissions

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 3>in real estate. Most notably the biggest thing is sourcing

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 3>and procuring green power. And then secondly, the other obvious

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 3>one when it comes to real estate is improving the

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 3>energy efficiency within the buildings, whether it be a facts

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 3>or smart meters, our products and solutions like that. One

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 3>of the key differentiators of those good versus bad dynamics

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 3>is how energy efficient is you're building and how well

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 3>is it set up. As those energy efficiency standards increase

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 3>going forwards, We're not doing that just to get a certification.

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 3>We're doing that because our end customers, the tenants are

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 3>demanding it when they pick the next place that they're

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 3>going to lease retailer office space. So I would say

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 3>this is front of mind, not simply as a philosophy,

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 3>but as a key commercial initiative to drive returns in

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 3>our investments.

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 2>One other thing that Rupield is trying to do hasn't

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 2>quite succeeded yet is trying to get brown assets fossil

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 2>assets and then trying to turn them into green assets.

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 2>You tried that with the Australian Utility AGL, didn't work out.

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 2>You are trying it and again there's failure today of

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 2>trying to or Origin and that didn't work out. Could

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 2>you just talk through the philosophy and why has it

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 2>been so hard?

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 3>We do feel that one of the most impactful ways

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 3>to drive the energy transition is that willingness to go

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 3>where the emissions are in order to make carbon intensive

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 3>but critical industries more sustainable going forward. And the nature

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 3>of these businesses is they need not only large capital

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 3>providers to effectuate that significant transition, but they also need

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:40.719
<v Speaker 3>people with very large operating capabilities. This isn't necessarily a

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 3>problem you can just throw money at capital is a

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 3>big part of the solution, but it's also having the

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 3>know how of how to transition those large, critical, somewhat

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 3>complicated businesses to more sustainable business models.

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:57.479
<v Speaker 1>Just a little bit of context here. AGAL and Origin

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>are some of the biggest electricity producers in Austria, with

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>many power plants burning fossil fields. Brookfield and a few

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>other like minded investors have tried to buy out these

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>public companies, make them private, and then accelerate their transition

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to clean energy. The trouble is that it would mean

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Brookfield will have to take on the additional emissions from

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>these companies when advise them, and then keep them on

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>its books until the clean energy transition is complete. In

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>accounting terms, it would look like Brookfield is going in

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the wrong direction on its net zero goals, even as

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it is helping the world get to net zero faster.

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a tricky accounting problem that investors trying to speed

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>up the transition will have to deal with. For now.

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Brookfield didn't succeed in Australia with AGL or with Origin,

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>but it has examples of making this kind of transition

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>work for other big companies.

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 3>We have a very successful investment in Central America called

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 3>inter Energy. This is a multi asset, class, multi jurisdictional

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 3>utility across five or six different countries in Central America

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 3>and we are currently working to get it off of

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 3>heavy fuel oil and diesel onto strictly natural gas and renewables.

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 3>And it's one of these great examples where doing so

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 3>not only very materially decarbonizes the business, but also enhances

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 3>the margins of the company as well. Many years ago,

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 3>we invested in a company called TransAlta in Canada where

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 3>we provided a very large structured investment into their portfolio

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 3>of operating assets, and that capital was used to transition

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 3>some of their coal facilities to more cleaner forms of

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 3>power generation and retire others while building out its renewable fleet.

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 3>So and today I would have to check the stat

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:54.719
<v Speaker 3>but I believe the emissions of TransAlta are off seventy

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 3>eighty percent versus the time when we invested in that company, and.

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Both of those have provided good returns.

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 3>At or above our targets.

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 2>And that's what's powering your interest in trying to go

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 2>to Australia and try and make that transition faster. Absolutely,

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 2>And what is in Australia? What is your philosophy? Is

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 2>it that Labor government has come through has set a

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 2>really ambitious renewables target and you see clearly if they're

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 2>going to have to meet this target, they're going to

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 2>have to clean up their utilities.

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 3>I would say that some of it, but I would

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 3>say when we look at these types of investments, the

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:33.719
<v Speaker 3>investment philosophy and the investment thesis tends to be a

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 3>lot more micro in that when we looked at some

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 3>of the gen tailors in Australia, we thought they had

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 3>a very strong base of infrastructure that as you retired

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 3>the more carbon intensive power generation assets, you could leverage

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 3>some of that existing infrastructure to build out some of

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 3>the renewables. The other thing that was interesting about some

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 3>of the opportunities in Australia, but was equally interesting about

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 3>let's say our inter energy opportunity, is it paired not

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 3>only the generation asset with the off take, and therefore,

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 3>as you built out more of those renewables, there was

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.919
<v Speaker 3>a clear off taker for that green power as well.

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 2>In doing so in the short term, at least, if

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 2>these assets are to be decarbonized faster than they were previously,

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 2>in the short term, you're going to take on emissions

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 2>as a result. How are you going to deal with

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 2>that accounting problem which is a real one.

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 3>We will take on those emissions in our accounting. We

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 3>do truly feel that this is some of the most

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 3>impactful and powerful decarbonization investing you can do. But you

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 3>do get that short term spike in your emissions, and

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 3>therefore we feel that people do recognize the benefit of

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 3>this type of investing, but you need to be very

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:52.760
<v Speaker 3>transparent about what you're doing, and what we have generally

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 3>seen is you do have to take those emissions on absolutely,

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:59.879
<v Speaker 3>but typically if you break them out from your broad

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 3>portfolio and show that these are emissions, we are going

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.799
<v Speaker 3>to rationalize very quickly, and we are going to be

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 3>upfront and transparent. This isn't buried on page seventy of

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 3>your annual report. This is right up front in your

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 3>shareholder letter, tracking the progress you are making and being

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 3>transparent about how quickly you are decarbonizing, whether you're behind

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:24.359
<v Speaker 3>schedule or ahead of it, then people are understanding if

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 3>you took some of those emissions on day one.

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, conor, thank you, it was great to be here.

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening to Zero. If you liked this episode,

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:43.359
<v Speaker 1>please take a moment to rate or review the show

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Share this episode with a

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 1>friend or with a green investor. You can get in

0:35:50.120 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 1>touch at zero pod at Bloomberg dot Net. Zero's producers

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 1>are Tiffany Troy Magnus, Henrickson and Sommersadi. Our team music

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 1>is composed by Wonderley Special thanks to Kurepindrum. I'm Ashatrati

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 1>back next week.