WEBVTT - Coaching Is Not An Autocracy with Muffet McGraw

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Good Game with Sarah Spain, where we're still

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>cheesing over the Minnesota frost rocking eighties ski suits to

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>their Denver Takeover Tour game. It's Tuesday, January fourteenth, and

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>on today's show, we'll be chatting with Hall of Fame

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>coach Muffett McGraw about Notre Dame's success this season, Hannah Hidalgo,

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the state of coaching in women's sports, and more. Plus

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a brit goes to Canada College hockey gets cooking and

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>some folks have punched their tickets straight to the bad place.

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>It's all coming up right after this welcome back slices.

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Here's what you need to know today to soccer. Casey

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Stoney has officially been confirmed as the next coach of

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the Canadian national team, just seven months after her questionable

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>firing as head coach of the San Diego Wave. If

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you remember, Stony led the Wave to the playoffs in

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the team's inaugural season before winning the NWSL Shield and

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>NWSL Challenge Cup in the following two years. The lead

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>for Team Canada after former head coach Bev Priestman was

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>handed a one year suspension by FIFA and then fired

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>by Soccer Canada after an investigation into the program's use

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of drones to spy on other teams. There's also some

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>coaching news in pro basketball, with a couple WNBA teams

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>rounding out their benches. Newly announced Dallas Wings coach Chris

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Koklanis has hired Camille Smith and Nola Henry to serve

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>as assistants. Smith and Henry both served as assistants for

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the Los Angeles Sparks under then head coach Kurt Miller

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>during the twenty twenty four season. Henry is also one

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of the head coaches for the inaugural season of Unrivaled,

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>where she'll lead the Rose basketball club. The New York

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Liberty also announced the signing of a new assistant coach,

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Sonia Rahman. She most recently served as an assistant coach

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>for the mnba's Memphis Grizzlies, spending five seasons with the team.

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>To college hockey, the Women's bean Pot gets underway tonight.

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>The annual tournament is a big deal in Boston, where

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the four local teams Northeastern, bu BC, and Harvard meet

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>up to compete for bragging rights. Last year's championship mark

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the five first time the women played at t D Garden,

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>home of the NHL's Bruins, and they'll be back again

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>this year for next Tuesday's championship. But first, the semi

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 1>finals get underway tonight at Northeastern's Matthew's Arena. Boston College

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 1>faces off against Harvard, followed by BC against Northeastern. Finally,

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>some infuriating and scary news over the weekend, A fifty

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>five year old man from Texas was arrested in Indianapolis

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and charged with felony stalking after he allegedly sent threats

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and sexually explicit messages to WNBA star Caitlin Clark. The

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Athletic reviewed the court documents and reported that the man,

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>named Michael Lewis, traveled from his home in Texas to

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Indiana in order to be closer to Clark. The Indianapolis

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Star reported that prosecutors have moved to ban the man

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>from the two home venues where the Fever play, Hanklefield

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>House and Gainbridge Field House. We got to take a

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>quick break. When we come back, we get real honest.

0:02:52.440 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>With Muffett McGraw joining us now. She was the head

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>women's basketball coach at Notre Dame from nineteen eighty seven

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to twenty twenty, compiling an eight hundred and forty eight

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.119
<v Speaker 1>and two to fifty two record over thirty three seasons.

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>She led her team to nine final fours, seven championship

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>game appearances, and two National Championship wins. A college player

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>at Saint Joseph's University, then briefly a pro player for

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the California Dreams of the Women's Professional Basketball League, she

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>coached a few spots before Notre Dame, including Lehigh, where

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.959
<v Speaker 1>she coached now WNBA Commissi Kathy Engelbert, a member of

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the Nasmith Basketball Hall of Fame and the Women's Basketball

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame and the first female coach at Notre

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Dame to have a statue in her honor. She was

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>born Ann, but she legally changed her name to Muffett.

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes like little Miss Muffett, and she once appeared on

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>NPR's weight Wait don't tell me an incorrectly answered a

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>question about a nursery rhyme that's actually about consorting with prostitutes.

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>It's Muffett McGraw. What's up, coach?

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 2>I remember that. Wait, wait, don't tell me. That was

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 2>so much fun. I'd love that show.

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I was shocked to hear that the Lucy goosey or

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.119
<v Speaker 1>whatever rhyme was actually about hookers.

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 2>I had little to I know.

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Coach, thank you so much for taking time to come

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>on the show. You retired from coaching in twenty twenty,

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and we saw you pop up on ESPN recently doing

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>some NCAA hoops analysis. Can we expect more of that?

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Tell us what else you've been up to.

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm on every Thursday night on the ACC Network. We

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 2>have a women's show. It's the only women's show in

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 2>the country. We feature ACC basketball, but we have an

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 2>hour long show all women, and that's all we talk

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 2>about every single week right up through the tournament. And

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing a little bit of ESPN also, but mostly

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 2>we cover ACC Network.

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>What's the show called, tell us?

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it's called nothing but Net. But the problem is

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:38.919
<v Speaker 2>the men's show is called nothing but Net also, so

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.239
<v Speaker 2>when you're taping them, you're going to get a hundred

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 2>of them instead of just the one. So you have

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 2>to find a Thursday night show.

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Thursday night, nothing but Net. I love that. I

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>want to talk some Irish hoops before we zoom out

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and go more big picture. We've seen former players take

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>over coaching duties at their alma maters with success before,

0:04:55.880 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>but neil Ivy's transitioned to head coach just felt especially seamless.

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>And we know she was your assistant for over a

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>decade before taking over. That certainly helps. But what is

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it about her that makes her such an excellent head

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>coach and recruiter?

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think point guards make the best coaches.

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 2>They look at the game differently, they study the game differently,

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, they see it from that angle where they're

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 2>seeing the whole floor. They know everything that's going on

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 2>in every position. And as a point guard, she was

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 2>that kind of player, just a really smart player, a

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 2>great leader, and I knew a long time ago that

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 2>she was going to be a terrific coach. So when

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 2>I had a job open, it was pretty much the

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 2>easiest decision ever made to hire neil Ivy. And she

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 2>was young, she didn't know, she didn't have any experience,

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 2>she didn't know a lot, But each day, each year

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 2>really kind of gave her a little bit more and

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more until eventually she was ready to

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 2>do it all. But the first year she came in,

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I said you have one job. Get Skylar Diggins to

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 2>say yes to Notre Dame. That's the only recruit you have.

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I want you working full time on that. And then

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 2>of course she did that very well and continued to

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 2>be one of our recruiters. But also she was a

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 2>great scout. She understands offense and defense. And then the

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 2>year that I was about to retire, she had an

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to go to Memphis in the NBA and have

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 2>a year in the NBA. And you know, I said,

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 2>what a great training ground for you. You've only ever

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 2>known me. You know I'm the only person you played

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 2>for me. You coach with me, go learn something different

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 2>from somebody else at the highest level. And I think

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 2>that really helped her as well.

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>So speaking of recruiting, actually I want to ask you this.

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Caitlyn Clark talked about how Notre Dame was top of

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the list and then she made the switch to Iowa.

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 1>What do you remember about those conversations and what would

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it have looked like if it had been Caitlyn Clark

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>at Notre Dame.

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I may still be coaching if Kaitlyn Clark couldn't come

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 2>to Notre Dame. I remember it well. I loved recruiting

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 2>her terrific, terrific person, loved her game of parents, great family,

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 2>everything was good. She went to a Catholic school. When

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 2>I went to recruiting at Dallan Catholic, they waited on me.

0:06:58.160 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they brought me popcorn, they brought me drink,

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 2>you know, they gave me special seating. It was amazing.

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Everybody in the place, I think, wanted her to go

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 2>to Notre Dame. And it was fun recruiting or the

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 2>home visit was great. She committed to us, but I

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 2>had a feeling it was kind of a soft commitment

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 2>when she did, because she couldn't decide, couldn't decide. And

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 2>then finally she said, you know, I want to come,

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 2>but it wasn't it wasn't like I'm coming, you know,

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 2>it was kind of like I made the decision. And

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 2>so after that we waited and waited for her to

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 2>announce it because, as you know, we're not allowed to

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 2>announce anything. The players have to do that themselves. And

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 2>so she made the announcement. A long time after that,

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I kept saying, when is it coming out? And then

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 2>when she made the announcement she was going to Iowa.

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 2>But of course she called me first to tell me

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 2>that she was going to that classy person that she is,

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, And I thought, after seeing four years of

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 2>her at Iowa, it was probably a pretty good decision

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 2>because I remember thinking, I'm not sure I'm gonna like

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 2>those shots right over half court when we have all

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 2>these good players around you. So I think she made

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 2>a good decision. We would have obviously been contending for

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 2>national championship if she had come to Notre Dame, but

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 2>total respect for her game.

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I can hear the Notre Dame fans out there

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>both crying and screaming about that missed opportunity. Okay, let's

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>talk this Irish team. After a little transitional period, they've

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>been back in the top five on a regular basis

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>for the last three seasons, currently sitting at number three

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>in the country with what feels like a pretty good

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.119
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to make a title run. What do you enjoy

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>most about watching this group of players and the brand

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of hoops they're playing.

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 2>The best backcourt in the country at Notre Dame. I'm

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 2>loving Olivia Miles is an incredible passer. She has such

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 2>great vision. She's really fun to watch improved a three

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 2>point percentage by twenty percentage points.

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 2>And then Hannah Hidalgo, who was the national player of

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 2>the year I think, and she also leads the nation

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 2>in steals. She's I think second in the country in scoring,

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 2>first in steals. Those two are so hard to guard.

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 2>You want to put your best defender on one of them,

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 2>and you can't decide which one. And then you've got

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Sonya Citron on the wing. Mattie Westfield is back and healthy.

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what a terrific, terrific squad. And they got

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 2>Leah tu King from pitt in the transfer portal. She

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 2>is playing great basketball right now. So this team has

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 2>all of the tools to get to the final four.

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Doesnielle ever call you just like, Hey, I have a

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>quick question or I was thinking about this. What do

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you make of this? Oh?

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we talk and I text her pretty frequently just

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 2>after games about great stuff. I don't I never critique

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:36.079
<v Speaker 2>the team, but yeah, we talk more in the preseason.

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, here's what we're putting in. What do you

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 2>think about this or that?

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Wow, what a nice thing for her to have

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you on on standby for that. You mentioned Hannahidalgo such

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a fun player to watch, absolutely insane swag, so many

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>skills in her bag, and it's been interesting to see

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the reaction to her play. She obviously as a player,

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>is undoubtedly, like you said, in the running for Player

0:09:57.960 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of the Year. But I haven't seen a lot of

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:01.719
<v Speaker 1>covered of some of the online pushback that she got.

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Last summer, she reposted a conversation to her Instagram story.

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>It was a conversation between former CNN host and gay

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>man Don Lemon and Candice Owens, who's a political commentator,

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and she later deleted it, but she posted this part

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of the video where Lemon asked Owens if she believes

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that he's sinful because he's married to a man, and

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Owens responded, yes, you're sinning, you're in a sinful relationship.

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't believe marriage can be between two men.

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, obviously people are allowed to have their beliefs,

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>but when religious beliefs include sharing some of those bigoted views,

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and especially when they're in this space of women's basketball

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that has plenty of out gay athletes, I wonder what

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>responsibility there is for the team or the media, I guess,

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to hold an athlete accountable to expect them to speak

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>on that and defend that behavior. What did you make

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of that and how it's been responded to or maybe

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>not responded to.

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was a really poor choice on her part,

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 2>first been leaving that I think it's a poor choice,

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 2>and then saying it on as you said, on a

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 2>stage where women's basketball. There are a number of gay

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 2>players out there, and I thought that it was almost

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:14.239
<v Speaker 2>insulting to our teammates, to everybody in the game of basketball.

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 2>I was really disappointed that it came out that way.

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:20.439
<v Speaker 2>I was happy that she deleted it, but the damage

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.719
<v Speaker 2>I think was done before she deleted it.

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think we've talked about this on our show

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>with a couple different athletes, where the natural instinct is

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to call someone out for behavior that you disagree with,

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately, when you're on a team, you're in a

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>locker room, you have to work together with a shared goal.

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>There is this feeling of calling in. How do you

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>hold someone accountable and also try to let them learn

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>or experience life in a way that might change their

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>mind about something like that. How do you balance accountability

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in a locker room when you were coaching with all

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>these different mindsets and lived experiences coming together.

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, Sarah, I think the great thing about

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 2>sports is we're a microcosm of society and we deal

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 2>and live work with different people who you know, different

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 2>They come from different backgrounds, black, white, straight, gay, religious,

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 2>not religious. You know, there's so many things that they

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 2>do to work together, and they come out as a

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 2>team with one goal, one team. And so I think

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 2>it's really hard to have a player in the locker

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 2>room that feels that way about somebody else in the

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 2>locker room who may be gay. So I think it's

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 2>going to take it would take a lot of conversations.

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 2>Accountability for me, was like that was the number one

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 2>thing in having a championship team. Honesty, trust and accountability.

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:36.959
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to trust when you have somebody that believes

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 2>that what you believe is wrong. So I think it

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 2>takes a lot of time to kind of get to

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 2>know people, learn, you know, this is what I think,

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 2>this is who I am, you know, and really have

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 2>open conversations about it, because I don't think it's a

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 2>good idea to just see it and then not talk

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 2>about it.

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it does feel like ultimately it's as festers

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>when there aren't more open conversations about it. She's a

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>young person and I hope that she does find her

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>way to the other side of that kind of thinking.

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>But hopefully there is support within that locker room and

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:12.599
<v Speaker 1>accountability eventually. Right if any of those posts continue, or

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>if she continues to make those kind of statements. I

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about now that you're separated from the

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>space a little bit more, not in it every day.

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Back in twenty twenty one, you said you thought ESPN

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>was biased toward Yukon. Do you still think that's an issue?

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Has it changed at all? And now that there is

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more parody in terms of the superstar players, coaches, storylines,

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is ESPN doing a better job sharing the wealth?

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 2>Well? I think now the fact that the Big East

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 2>is on Fox, I think that they don't have as

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 2>many games on. But I think the real thing that's changed,

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Sarah was when conferences got their own TV deals, the

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:51.959
<v Speaker 2>ACC Network, the SEC Network, people were able to watch

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 2>games without hearing about Yukon because the announcers were focusing

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 2>on that conference. So I think that conversations really have

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 2>turned to you know, what's happening in the SEC, what's

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 2>happening in the ACC, what's happened in the Big Ten.

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, everybody has their own networks, so when you

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 2>watch games, you're not constantly hearing about that. And I

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 2>think the fact that we've you know, we've had other

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 2>really good teams South Carolina, LSU, so many other different

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 2>teams are winning now, I think that there is room

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 2>for everyone. I think that Connecticut definitely benefited from what

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 2>they got from ESPN through the years, but lately with

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 2>other teams winning, I don't I think that they still

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 2>believe that everybody wants to watch Yukon play. And then

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 2>when you look at the teams and the games, and

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 2>you saw what happened in the final last year with

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, Connecticut wasn't in the final, and we set

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 2>records for people watching and listening. So I think they're

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 2>they're learning, but I think they still that's still their fallback.

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's so close, like literally geographically too. So

0:14:54.720 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I found those conversations simultaneously infuriating and fascinating for all

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>those years about like, is Yukon women's basketball bad for women?

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And it was like you both understood that singular focus

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>was limiting your ability to learn about the rest of

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the teams and stars. And you also knew that when

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you create this like sometimes person or team to hate

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>because they're always winning, it also drives interest in a

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>way that spreading the wealth doesn't. So I think we're

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in a much better spot now as women's basketball. But

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I do think they played their role in kind of

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the same way that Caitlyn played a role in this

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>massive leap of excitement. Is people sometimes need that one

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>thing to focus in on that kind of opens the

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>door for them. Do you agree?

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 2>I absolutely agree? And can I get set the standard?

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean they raised the bar for everyone, and you know,

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 2>rising tide lifts all boats. Everybody started to say, we

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 2>got to do what they're doing. How are we going

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 2>to do that? What do we have to do recruiting wise,

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 2>what kind of style of play? What is it that

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 2>we need to improve on to get to their level?

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 2>And that was the biggest thing. I think It's all

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 2>about recruiting. They have three Player of the Years right

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 2>now on their high school Player of the Years, and

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna have a pretty good team when you get

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the number one player. And what happened to give us parody?

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, Asia decides you're gonna go to South Carolina

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 2>and Leah Boston went to South Carolina, and different people

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 2>were going different places, and that's really how we got

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 2>the parody going. Somebody like Caitlin Clark stays in Iowa

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 2>and brings them to a Final Four. So I think

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 2>when you have players that are willing to go different places.

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 2>But again, if you're not hearing Connecticut all the time

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 2>every time you're watching the game, maybe you will think, hey,

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 2>we're watching South Carolina right now, and they had a

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 2>pretty good spob.

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure. And also just investment right across the

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>space where you see what Yukon has and you think,

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>let's bring that to our school by actually investing in

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>coaches and resources and everything else, which has been really

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>cool to see. Yeah, I want to pick your brain

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>about coaching, in particular in women's basketball. Let's take a

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>listen to this answer that you gave you. You were

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>asked a question about women and coaching at the Final

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Four back in twenty nineteen and talked about women in

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>leadership spaces in general, and this went truly viral. Let's

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.360
<v Speaker 1>take a listen. Muffett. I know you made some comments

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>about hiring practices and what you do in the future.

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>How important. As your career has gone on and we've

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:17.360
<v Speaker 1>lost past summit, how seriously do you take being that voice?

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.479
<v Speaker 2>Did you know that the Equal Rights Amendment was introduced

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen sixty seven and it still hasn't passed. We

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 2>need thirty eight states to agree that discrimination on the

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 2>basis of sex is unconstitutional. We've had a record number

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 2>of women running for office and winning, and still we

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 2>have twenty three percent of the House and twenty five

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 2>percent of the Senate. I'm getting tired of the novelty

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 2>of the first American, the first female governor of this state,

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 2>the first female African American mayor of this city. When

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 2>is it going to become the norm instead of the exception.

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 2>How are these young women looking up and seeing someone

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 2>that looks like them preparing them for the future. We

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 2>don't have enough female role models, We don't have enough

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 2>visible women leaders. We don't have enough women in power.

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Girls are socialized to know when they come out, generals

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:18.959
<v Speaker 2>are already set. Men run the world, Men have the power,

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Men make the decisions. It's always the men that is

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the stronger one. And when these girls are coming out.

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Who are they looking up to to tell them that

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 2>that's not the way it has to be. And where

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 2>better to do that than in sports. All these millions

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 2>of girls that play sports across the country. They could

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 2>come out every day and we're teaching them great things

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 2>about life skills. But wouldn't it be great if we

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 2>could teach them to watch how women lead. This is

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 2>a path for you to take to get to the

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 2>point where in this country we have fifty percent of

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 2>women in power. We have less out right now, less

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 2>than five percent of women are CEOs of fortune five

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 2>hundred companies. So yes, when you look at men's basketball

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 2>and ninety nine percent of the jobs go to men,

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 2>why shouldn't one hundred or ninety nine percent of the

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 2>jobs in women's basketball go to women. Maybe it's because

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 2>we only have ten percent women athletic directors in division. IE.

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 2>People hire people who look like them, and that's the problem.

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Gosh. I'm still very moved by that, and I remember

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>being asked about it on around the Horn with you know,

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the obvious and expected questions about is it

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>similarly discriminatory to not hire men and only hire women?

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>But to first, I want to ask do you feel

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>better or worse about the state of coaching and equality

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in general today than you did then?

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think I think there were some improvements initially.

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 2>I think right after that people really did start to think.

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 2>But I think we're still sixty percent men forty percent women,

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 2>and that's a problem. The problem comes from the athletic

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 2>directors who are doing the hiring. People hire people who

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 2>look like them, and that is still true today. That's

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 2>why there's so many men. And I think that women, unfortunately,

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 2>we're not as aggressive go for jobs. I think we

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 2>could do a better job, first of all, of applying

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.120
<v Speaker 2>for the job, of you know, going after the job,

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 2>where men are going to pick up the phone and say,

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 2>I want that job. I'm going to take your team

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 2>to the to the final four. If you hire me,

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 2>you know they're gonna they're gonna be a lot more

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 2>confident in the interview. And I've read a really interesting

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 2>article in the Harvard Business Journal and it's said men

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 2>win the interview because of their confidence, but women really

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 2>have better skills to do the job. They're much better

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.919
<v Speaker 2>team players and collaborators. And the way coaching is going now,

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 2>it's not an autocracy. It's it's not come in and

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 2>this is what we're doing and here's how we're doing it.

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 2>It's really about team and bonding in chemistry and getting

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 2>people to work together, and women are so good at

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 2>that and we we just need to have the opportunity.

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 2>And when men get the job, I think it's up

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 2>to them to hire women. And that's something that Gino

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 2>has always done. He's always had women on his staff.

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.199
<v Speaker 2>You have to be able to mentor them though and

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 2>get them off and become coaches. And I wish that

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 2>in the NBA, they're doing a great job. They're hiring

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 2>a lot of women. Bring them back like Becky Hammond,

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 2>and let's get some really good quality coaches on the

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 2>women's side.

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think one of the points you're making is

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.400
<v Speaker 1>so solid, which is that our kind of idea of

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>what a good coach looks like is still pretty antiquated.

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>It's this man who yells a lot and is intimidating.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>For a lot of people, that's still what they imagine

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>when they think of a great coach. Four out of

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the six unrivaled head coaches are men. Five of the

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>eight head coach hires in this WNBA offseason where men,

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>As you mentioned, four out of ten coaches in NCAA

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>sports are women. Six out of ten are men across

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Division one, and in the last reporting that I saw

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one to twenty two, women were just sixty

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>six percent of head coaches in Division one college women's basketball.

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>So how much of this is a lack of imagination

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>or an outdated idea of what a good coach looks like?

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>And how much do you think is about pipeline or

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>other issues.

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 2>I think it is mostly outdated, and gender bias is real.

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean you don't have to look very far in

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 2>any business in any way, you know, look at politics.

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 2>We haven't gotten a women president yet, and gender bias

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 2>is real. I firmly believe that women are not getting

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 2>job just because when it comes right down to it,

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 2>they say, oh, I'll hire a woman. I don't mind

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 2>hiring a woman, I'll vote for a woman, But when

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 2>it comes down to it, they don't. And I think

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 2>that's a problem. When you look at really everything, you know,

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 2>you look in movies and TV and stuff we're watching,

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 2>how many producers, how many people behind the scenes. When

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 2>you look at how much they are they getting paid.

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 2>How much are the women getting paid compared to them,

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 2>to the male actors. I think it's across the board.

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, we're struggling to have equal pay, We're struggling

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 2>to have equal opportunity. They're taking our rights away. I mean,

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:52.959
<v Speaker 2>we are going in the wrong direction. We have so

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:57.199
<v Speaker 2>many things that we need to really find somebody in

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 2>a leadership position that really understands women, and right now

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 2>we don't have that.

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I completely agree. And to your point about the

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:08.640
<v Speaker 1>way men might pitch themselves as opposed to the job

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that actually needs to be done is fascinating. I have

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a friend named Linda lu who wrote a piece about

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>co leadership and the co leadership model that she uses

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>with her co head of company, and she wrote, the

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 1>most prominent model of leadership we've seen focuses on finding

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.719
<v Speaker 1>ways to have more power over more people and in

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>turn to control a press and dictate how others should be.

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>This type of leadership is steeped in the white supremacy

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>culture of a deep sense of urgency, an immense amount

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of control, Bigger is better thinking, and a simplistic view

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that there's only one right way to be an effective leader.

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>And the right way is to lead with certainty even

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>when you're uncertain, with power concentrated at the top, and

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.360
<v Speaker 1>with a singular vision for the organization which all other

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 1>team members are then incentivized to achieve. But true leadership

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>is not about power and control. It's about a balance

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>between vision and journey, rooted and expansiveness, evolution, and always

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in service to uniting, uplifting and caring for the collective.

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like a team to me, the second one, not

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 1>the first one. And yet it does feel like the

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>old ideas around coaches and particularly why men get those jobs,

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>is the idea of my way or the highway. I'm

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>certain power at the top, everybody following, if you do

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>what I say, will win. How do we convince people

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>that that ain't it anymore?

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 2>I think it's starting to come when when you read

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 2>any kind of leadership books now, they all talk about

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 2>it's not top down leadership anymore. That's not the way

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 2>you lead because so many of those leaders fail eventually,

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 2>So you have to find the person that's going to

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 2>be a clever And all of the definitions that she

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 2>used to describing that second leadership thing, I kept thinking,

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 2>that's a woman, that's a woman. All these things are

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 2>what our strengths are, and that's what real leadership looks like.

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 2>And I think we have to start younger. I mean,

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 2>when you look at kids going out to play soccer

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 2>when they're five and six years old, who's coaching the team?

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Somebody's dad. Every time they have a chance to see

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 2>what leadership looks like, there's a man at the top.

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:00.360
<v Speaker 2>You go into middle school, you go to aau, all

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.719
<v Speaker 2>of those coaches are men. So you're teaching these kids

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 2>men and women, Like, why isn't a woman. We have

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 2>so many great soccer players, why don't they coach their

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 2>sons team. Now, let's get more women out there coaching

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 2>boys at the younger ages so that they can look

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:17.439
<v Speaker 2>up and say, oh so I have a coach that's

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 2>a woman. It's no big deal, you know, and they

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 2>start to accept it at a younger age because we're

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 2>still so stereotypical. You know, you look at the boys

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 2>and girls. You know, you're pink, you're blue, you're going

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 2>down the aisle with the dolls, or you're going down

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 2>for the chemistry set and the trucks. You know, we

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 2>have to do something at a younger age to teach

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 2>these kids that you can be anything you want to be.

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And it feels too like there has to be

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>an over correction with intention because to your point about

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>women coaches, sometimes what happens is the first barrier is, well,

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't play Division one, so I can't coach them. Meanwhile,

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the dad over there never played at all, but he's

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>like I know this, yeah right. So after you get

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>past that, though, then it's are you able to be

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>away from your home or family for this the hours

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>or are you the primary caregiver right? Or are you

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>able to travel with the team If you have children

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>at home? Is their childcare right? So some of the

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>steps aren't just equality of opportunity, but what does the

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>pipeline and then the path of the work look like

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>so that women are capable of doing it? And do

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>we have to overcorrect in that way so that we

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>create more space.

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, I definitely think we need an overcorrection. I think

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 2>that's a good point. I think that's why women don't

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 2>move around as much as men. You know, I'm going

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 2>to take this shob that I'm going to take that

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 2>job because it's more money. You know, they're more loyal,

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 2>they're looking at different things. They're probably a tendency to

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 2>stay more in one space, But I think that's changing too,

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 2>And I think that you have to look at the

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:44.719
<v Speaker 2>questions we get asked, Well, who's going to take care

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:46.719
<v Speaker 2>of the kids while you're out recruiting? You know, they

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 2>don't ask men those questions, So we really we just

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:54.159
<v Speaker 2>need to figure out a way to be that leader

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 2>and show people like we can do it. And there's

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 2>plenty of coaches that are doing it now. There are

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot of women out there who have kids and

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 2>people are everybody's been taken care of, you know, it's

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.879
<v Speaker 2>not our job all the time. And really having a

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 2>great spouse, I think that's really a big part of

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 2>the job. If you can have somebody to share that

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 2>load with you and be a teammate at home, I

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 2>think that's where women are going to find more success.

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, where would you start to change the makeup of

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the coaching ranks? Would you try to talk to more

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 1>of the decision makers and change their mindset? Would you

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 1>try to start at lower levels and create the kind

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 1>of training in both confidence and ability to be willing

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>to put themselves out there more for these jobs, Like

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:37.360
<v Speaker 1>where's the best place that we need to be investing

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:38.640
<v Speaker 1>time and resources.

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's so hard to say, Sarah, because you

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.679
<v Speaker 2>want to start at both places. We definitely need a

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 2>good pipeline. We need these women who are assistant coaches

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.880
<v Speaker 2>to believe that they're capable and they're ready to move on.

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 2>And that is the head coach's job really to start

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 2>to prepare them to be that next assistant coach. I

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 2>always thought that was that's part of my job, like

0:27:57.920 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 2>I want you to be a head coach. I want

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 2>people to move on, and so we need to do

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 2>that more. But I think the athletic directors for sure,

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 2>sometimes I mean we're getting to a spot where now

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 2>there is a little bit more money. Now I'm going

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:12.479
<v Speaker 2>to be making money from the NCAA. Now suddenly we

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:15.719
<v Speaker 2>might have some money coming in. So ads are a

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 2>little more worried about who they hire. Well, you know,

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 2>there was a time when they really they really didn't

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 2>take it that seriously. You know, well nobody applied, No

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 2>women applied, as if the football job opened and they

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 2>were waiting to see who was going to apply for

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 2>that job. So I think they they definitely need somebody

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 2>to be helping them and and I think that's I

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 2>think that's happening. I know a few ads that have

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:38.959
<v Speaker 2>never hired a man to coach their women's team, So

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 2>there's some of them out there. We just need more.

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>How do you apply to someone that listened to your

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>h I'm not going to call it a rantom to

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>call it an inspired speech from a couple of years ago,

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and responded to your hire only women's stance with you know,

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you should hire the best person? Or what if a

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>men's coach said the same thing, what's your response to that? Well?

0:28:57.160 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I think when whenever I would say to somebody, are

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 2>you looking to hire a woman? They would say I'm

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 2>going to hire the best person for the job. And

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 2>I would say, great, then you're going to be hiring

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 2>a woman. And I think that that people don't again

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 2>they you know, they look at the interview and they're

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 2>looking at men doing certain things and we're going to

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 2>get better at that. We can get better at that.

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 2>But I think you have to go out intentionally. I

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 2>think you have to look and say it's women's basketball.

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 2>These women need a role model, they need somebody they

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 2>can look up to and say that's what I want

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 2>to be. There's where my path to success is going

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 2>to be. That's my future. I'm looking at somebody. Men

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 2>can't teach women women what it's like to be a

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 2>woman at this age, in this time of their life

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 2>and the things that we have to go through, and

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 2>the stereotypes were battling the little I call them paper

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 2>cuts that you know, we all go through, like just

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 2>almost daily, somebody says something, or you hear something, you

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 2>read something, and you think, oh, my gosh, how are

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 2>we going to deal with this? They need strong women

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 2>to be able to look up to and help them

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:57.719
<v Speaker 2>through so many different things that they're going through at

0:29:57.720 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 2>this age.

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think if you're tempted to apply the

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>same logic in reverse, you will be ignoring the context

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that exists. There is not currently a vacuum of male

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>representation in sport. There is not a vacuum or historic

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>precedent of men not being in leadership positions that women

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and men can see. So if you're talking about why

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it's great to add a female coach to a men's team,

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>there are myriad ways that that is necessary and beneficial

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:28.479
<v Speaker 1>that don't apply in reverse the other way because they

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>are already seeing and exposed to a million different male

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>leadership models across the space, and usually in their coaching

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 1>coming up and everywhere else. Do we hold it against

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>spaces that are not making enough of an effort or

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>at least not getting the outcome, or at least not

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>resulting in enough women coaches. Like I mentioned, Unrivaled is

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>for women by women, and yet four of the six

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>head coaches are men. The WNBA is getting further away

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>from diversity in terms of both race and gender in

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of their head coaching. Do we hold these places

0:30:57.600 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 1>feet to the fire or do we look at it

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in cycles and give them the benefit of the doubt

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that that's what the interviews came up with.

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I definitely think we should hold them accountable. You

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 2>look at what happened at Phoenix last year when they

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:12.959
<v Speaker 2>had a coaching changed. They not only hired a man

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 2>who had no experience with coaching women, but he was

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 2>the highest bided coach in the new UNBI. Now how

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 2>is that possible? So, you know, was there a public outcry?

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 2>I didn't feel it. I mean, I think there was

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot of things said behind closed doors, But you know,

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 2>and then the team was not very successful. So what

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 2>are we looking at now? And I think the other

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 2>problem is a lot of teams look and say, you

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 2>know what, hired a woman, tried that didn't work. Hired

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 2>a man. I mean, you know, but never say that

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 2>when it's a guy. You know, we are like representing

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 2>our entire gender every time we take a jump.

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's so true. You know. One of the things

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that was the biggest change in the makeup gender makeup

0:31:55.920 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of college women's sports was money. Historically it was predominant women,

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and it was back with Pat Summit had to do

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the laundry and coach the team. Right, you start making money,

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>men are like that looks nice over there, They get

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>hired more, and bam, all of a sudden, we have

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>all these women's teams being coached by men instead. There's

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 1>also that disparity between the professional and college ranks. Historically,

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>hoops coaching jobs have been more financially desirable than coaching

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 1>in the WNBA. The best college coaches are making more

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>money than most WNBA head coaches. USA Today reported eighteen

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>college coaches last year had an annual based salary of

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>more than a million. As far as we know, just

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Nate Tibbets you just mentioned and Becky Hammond make that much.

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>How do you think that paid disparity plays into whether

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>coaches decide to coach in college or the W And

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>is that something that the W needs to address in

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>order to draw the kind of candidates that might go elsewhere.

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think the W could address that, but I

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 2>think we're going to see very soon coaches leaving college.

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 2>We have two of them already this year leaving the

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 2>college game and heading to the WNBA because of n

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 2>and the transfer portal. I think, especially some of the

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 2>older coaches that are looking in saying this in the

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 2>job I signed up for, I really want to teach,

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, I really feel like I'm an educator as

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 2>much as a coach. And now it's all about who's

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 2>got the most money, and that's really not what amateur

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:19.479
<v Speaker 2>athletics was supposed to be about. So I think we

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 2>will see some coaches moving on like the two that

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 2>did it this year, and see what kind of success

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 2>they had, and that could be I can see women

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 2>being driven out of the game because they don't want

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:35.479
<v Speaker 2>to deal with all the money issues, the transfer stuff.

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>We were talking earlier about how money might change some

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of the investments and more parody across the college space.

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>There is a potential, too, for another distribution of money

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>across the college spase. The twenty twenty five NCAA Convention

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 1>is this week. Full membership is expected to vote on

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>whether to approve a women's basketball distribution fund, which is

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 1>called the Unit. If you haven't heard of the Unit,

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the context is basically, since ninety one, NCAA has paid

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>conferences for the games their teams play during March Madness.

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>So you earn a unit at about two million dollars

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 1>each for every game they play during the tournament, and

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 1>then over the next six years, the conferences decide how

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:13.919
<v Speaker 1>to allocate the money to each school. So SEC got

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>sixteen units last year. That's about thirty two million for

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>the men's basketball teams over the previous six years, but

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>no women's teams in the SEC have earned any money

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>from that. Even though the game Cocks made the Final

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>four for four straight years won two titles, that doesn't

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>make the school money. Now, this is something I've railed

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 1>against for years, because how do you incentivize investment in

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>your women's team if you have nothing to show for it?

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 1>When they have great success, and on the men's side,

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you're constantly getting paid every time your team approves. So

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the NCAA membership can vote to change that this week.

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 1>The amount for the women's tournament is not surprisingly far

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:47.320
<v Speaker 1>less than what the men's would make. It would be

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>about fifteen million allocated from this tournament compared to two

0:34:50.440 --> 0:34:52.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty million on the men's side. But it's

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a start. Do you think that that needs to happen?

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Do we need to start showing schools if you care

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 1>about women's sports and your teams do well, it will

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:00.920
<v Speaker 1>help you financially.

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, it's been a long time coming. I think Charlie

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 2>Baker's really done a great job as ahead of the

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 2>nc DOUBLEA. He is very pro women and pro equality.

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 2>And you're right, it's such a small number. I mean,

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 2>you take fifteen million. If you divide it by thirty

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 2>two conferences, or even even if you went to sweet sixteen,

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 2>you get a million dollars for your conference. How much

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 2>is these school going to gates? Some of these leagues

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.799
<v Speaker 2>have eighteen teams, so you know, but I think it's

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:29.359
<v Speaker 2>a good starting point that the other issue is how

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 2>are they gonna enhance that every year. I think there

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:33.839
<v Speaker 2>was like a percentage it's going to go up four

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 2>percent every year or six or whatever. That's not very much.

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:40.359
<v Speaker 2>I mean we need to double it every year, and

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 2>we need to try to catch up. They certainly have

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 2>enough money on the men's side's let's share that pot.

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, and particularly as the numbers continue to be less

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 1>jarring in favor of the men. Last year, the women's

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>final game, the championship game, got better ratings than the men.

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>There are far more household names on the women's side

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:01.759
<v Speaker 1>because as the one and done situation on the men's

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 1>side means that a star is in and out and

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:05.839
<v Speaker 1>moved on before you've had a chance to really learn

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:07.800
<v Speaker 1>about them. On the women's side, we are getting players

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>like Juju Watkins, for instance, who had such a spectacular

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 1>freshman year that were sophomore year and she has already

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:16.320
<v Speaker 1>known and starring across the space, drawing fans, drawing interest

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that should be viewed in a way that we for

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>years have ignored. On the women's side, This value that

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:26.759
<v Speaker 1>they're bringing to their schools, and to do it by

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 1>virtue of tournament appearances and success just makes sense. When

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it on the men's side. One last question

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:34.879
<v Speaker 1>about the sort of NCAA we've seen over the last

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:38.359
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, beginning really with the independent investigation into

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the rights values of the women's tournament, where they realize

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that they at the time said it was worth about

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>eighty million a year to have the rights to the

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>women's tournament, with upwards of one hundred and ten million

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in value per year, and they were being coupled with

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>all the rights to the other national titles for about

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>six million. It was an absolute disgrace, and for a

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>place that's really known to care mostly about money in

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the NCUBA in a lot of ways, for them to

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>be losing that much money just told you how much

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 1>the misogyny and the antiquatedy is about the value of

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>women's sports were baked in that they didn't even have

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a belief that they were missing out on so much.

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.800
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about now the idea that they are

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 1>separating the rights packages. They're actually looking at the women's

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 1>tournament as a money maker, they're actually looking at the

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>valuation realistically. But that number, that eighty one to one

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twelve million, that was sort of ignored instead

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>they agreed to continue bundling it with other NCAA championships

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 1>as part of an eight year deal with ESPN. Nine

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty million dollars. Sounds like a big number,

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 1>but that's all of them. Do you think the women's

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 1>tournament should have just been sold separately? Do you think

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 1>they should have looked at that valuation and said, let's

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:45.839
<v Speaker 1>actually get out there and see what we can get

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for this product.

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 2>I think that was the hope of most of the people,

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 2>and the Women's Coaches Association and people familiar with what

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 2>we're doing here. I think everybody wanted us to go out,

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 2>be separate, stand on our own, see what we could do.

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:03.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what happened in the negotiations. Obviously it

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 2>did not come to fruition, but I really do have

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 2>faith in Charlie Baker and where he has taken women's basketball,

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 2>So I hope that in the future there was a plan.

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:15.319
<v Speaker 2>But I think Camlyn Clark changed the game. I mean

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 2>she changed everything. We were playing in arenas that were

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 2>probably too small, you know, by the time, but you know,

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 2>you have to make those decisions five years out. Before

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 2>she even got to Iowa. The decision was made where

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:27.879
<v Speaker 2>they're going to play the NCAA tournament. So I think

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 2>that we were maybe a little short sighted with our vision,

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 2>and now I think we've seen what we can be.

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 2>I think we're finally at that point where so many

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:38.440
<v Speaker 2>women in my generation are saying, I knew what would happen.

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad it happened in my lifetime, and now let's

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 2>build on that.

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I would like to see some failures in the

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:47.400
<v Speaker 1>opposite direction where they're like, oops, we went too big.

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Yes we didn't sell out, like how we don't see

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:51.839
<v Speaker 1>that often. Usually what we see as well sold out

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:53.400
<v Speaker 1>in twenty four hours. Oh well you could have gone

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:57.320
<v Speaker 1>even bigger. Do it next time? Right? Yeah? Well, coach,

0:38:57.400 --> 0:38:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know you've got the ACC show, you're

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 1>doing some stuff ESPN. I know you have earned retirement

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and to do nothing but eat bombbonds all day and

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 1>sit marks. But please keep your voice in these spaces.

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Get Charlie on the phone as often as possible. Talk

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to the people in decision making spaces, because your voice

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 1>is so needed, and we are at this precipice of major,

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>major change that could get much much bigger. But we

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 1>need people to not drop the ball in these opportunities,

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and I trust you and I would follow you into battle,

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 1>so you know, make sure you're around when these conversations

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:29.839
<v Speaker 1>are being had.

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Sarah, I feel the same about you. I love

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:34.799
<v Speaker 2>your voice. You are doing your best and we all

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 2>need to get on board.

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Thanks again to coach for taking the time. If you

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:42.319
<v Speaker 1>want to watch that great viral speech again, we'll link

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to it in the show notes, as well as an

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:47.280
<v Speaker 1>essay from Director of Women's Coaches and Executives at Wasserman

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Emily Joe Roberts about investing in women coaches, and we'll

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 1>put the link to the co leadership essay I mentioned

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 1>from my friend Linda Lou as well. We got to

0:39:55.160 --> 0:40:05.799
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break stick around welcome back slices. We

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 1>always love that you're listening and we love to hear

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 1>from you, so hit us up on email good game

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 1>at wondermedianetwork dot com or leave us a voicemail at

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>eight seven two two oh four point fifty seventy and

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 1>don't forget to subscribe, rate and review. It's easy. Watch

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 1>folks setting up fake GoFundMe accounts in the wake of

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the California fires rating minus infinity Karma points review. Please

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 1>be careful when showing your support for victims of the

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 1>LA fires. Be sure to give to links that go

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to organizations, not individuals, unless you know the person directly.

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:42.319
<v Speaker 1>There are even some accounts using real victims that then

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>divert the money to a scammer instead. People are truly

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the worst, but giving supplies and funds and ensuring that

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:51.239
<v Speaker 1>they go to the right people is the only way

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to counteract their evil, So do please get involved. Just

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:57.839
<v Speaker 1>quadruple check your links and your recipients. Now's your turn,

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 1>rate and review. Thanks for listening, See you tomorrow. Good Game, Muffett,

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Good Game, neel Ivy you gender bias. Good Game with

0:41:08.120 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Spain is an iHeart women's sports production in partnership

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:13.440
<v Speaker 1>with Deep Blue Sports and Entertainment. You can find us

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:19.840
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts. Production by Wonder Media Network, our producers are

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Alex Azzie and Misha Jones. Our executive producers are Christina Everett,

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Jesse Katz, Jenny Kaplan, and Emily Rudder. Our editors are

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Emily Rudder, Britney Martinez, Grace Lynch, and Lindsay Crawdowell. Production

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:33.800
<v Speaker 1>assistants from Lucy Jones and I'm Your Host Sarah Spain.