WEBVTT - Free Picks for EVERY Week 5 NFL Game (Ep. 350)

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to betting pros. It's time to place

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>your bet and it's me Joey B Joe P's a

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>P and it's week five in the NFL. It's time

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to look ahead at some of the games that we

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>have going forward. I think there's a lot of early value.

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I am excited for it. And to help me break

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>it all down, of course, Sam Hoppin and Pat fitz Morris,

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:20.319
<v Speaker 1>the boys from betting pros and Fantasy pros, We're gonna

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:22.119
<v Speaker 1>take you through some of the early lines and the

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>values and see what might be worth wagering on early on.

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Definitely last week there were some fun thing. Sam Hoppin,

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I hope you had a good week, certainly a better

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>week than maybe the Chicago Bears have. Maybe we could

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>start there, right.

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, but the bar is pretty low for having

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 2>a better week than the Chicago Bears. I mean it was.

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:44.959
<v Speaker 2>My wife asked me after the game, She's like, are

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 2>you surprised that the Bears lost? And I'm like, well,

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm not based on what I thought before the game,

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 2>but I am based on how the game was going

0:00:55.760 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 2>three quarters in. So yeah, not looking too great in Chicago.

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>No, I'll tell you what though, speaking of how that

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>game was going, Pat fitz Morris, this is my favorite

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>moment of Sunday. A little in game live betting I

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>was doing there. I'm I'm watching some of these games

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:13.759
<v Speaker 1>because some of these games were a little tight there,

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, well, we look for an opportunity.

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>We were a team that falls behind, and Denver Broncos

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>fell behind, and all of a sudden their money line

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>became plus five twenty on FanDuel and Joey P bet it,

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and then Joey P got real nervous because I thought

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that the Bears were got to kick a field goal.

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>They chose not to even after the time out. Pat,

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>my favorite bet of the Sunday things feel good? Did

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you cut your sleeves off on Sunday at any given

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>time too, like Sean Payton just out of curiosity.

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 3>I did not, Joe, But yeah, I was a little

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 3>surprised by that moment in the Bears Broncos game too,

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.919
<v Speaker 3>where the Bears lined up to go for it. Everyone

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 3>thought they were going to kick the field goal at

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 3>the Broncos to try to jump off sides didn't work.

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Come out of the timeout and still decide to go

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 3>for it and come up woefully shorts, leading to yet

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 3>another line. So yeah, we'll talk about the bearsmore in

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 3>a minute here. But oh yeah, they don't inspire confidence,

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 3>at least not here among you know, my neighbors, my

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 3>Bears fans.

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, term of confidence, Like I'm confident. I was very

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>confident that even when they were up, they were going

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to lose. So I guess it's a different kind of

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>confidence at.

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 2>The end of the day.

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's what's so beautiful about the wagering market. There's

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:25.359
<v Speaker 1>early value, there's value during the week, there's value while

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the games are going on, so it never stops. So

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>if you want to get in on it, make sure

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you download the Betting Pros apps, sink all your sports books.

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh and don't forget, we're also getting away free stuff here.

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>We're giving away an Odell Beckham signed Baltimore Ravens Jersey

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks to us here a Betting Pros. All you have

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.239
<v Speaker 1>to do is subscribe to our Betting Pros YouTube channel

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and of course drop a comment below let us know

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>what your favorite early picks are. We love hearing from

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you in the YouTube comments and click the little BELTI

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 1>that goes ding for notification, so you know when all

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the content drops here and when you're notified if you

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>are the big winner of the Objay jersey. Let's start

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>here with, of course, Thursday night football, and guess what

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>it's the Chicago Bears zero to four heading to Washington.

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Washington's two and two. The forty five and a half

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>is the number you're getting here on bet MGM. Forty

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:12.679
<v Speaker 1>four and a half at sugar House. Six is the

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>number across the board. If you like Chicago for the

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 1>upset of plus two twenty, there you have it over

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>on FanDuel. But pat short week for a team that

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>has trouble preparing no matter how much time you give him.

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Washington looked very solid, really competitive against the Eagles last week.

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:28.359
<v Speaker 1>So or are we liken this six for the Washington

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:28.959
<v Speaker 1>early on.

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 4>A little bit?

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.679
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Joe, I mean, it would just be so reckless

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 3>to bet the Bears at this point, and the short

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 3>week might be the only thing preventing Matt eber Flus

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 3>and his staff from being summarily dismissed this week. Like

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 3>things have gone so sideways for the Bears. One of

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 3>the interesting things to come out of Bears headquarters this

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 3>past week was from the Chase Claypole sagin We know

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 3>he was deactivated on Sunday, No surprise there. He has

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 3>not endeared himself to the organization this year with his effort.

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 3>But Bears head coach Matt Eberflus told the media it

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 3>was Claypool's choice not to come to the stadium after

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 3>he was informed he was going to be deactivated. A

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 3>team spokesman later clarified that it was not in fact

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 3>Claypool's choice. He was told not to come. So obviously

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 3>morale is not going to be high for an h

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 3>and to four team to begin with, and it doesn't

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 3>help that eber Flus is making odd choices like that

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 3>decision to go forward on fourth and one yesterday and

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 3>easy field goal range, or the decision to throw one

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 3>of his own players underneath the bus by saying that

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 3>he chose not to come to the stadium when he

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 3>was told not to.

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>So, I eber Flus, pat, You're thinking when he was there,

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't present, So what's the difference, right? It's true,

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 1>but there was very zen, wasn't it.

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 3>If you're one of the players about it, Joe, I

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 3>mean like, I got to think they got some major.

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm pissed at the guy. I'm like, true, this guy Sam.

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>You know Pat mentioned reckless. When I think reckless, I

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>think Sam Hoppin. Sam, what do you think about this one?

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Any early value on this short week here, where you know,

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you take a little bit out of some confidence boost

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>from the commanders and their performance in Philly.

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so. I was very encouraged by how

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Washington performed against Philadelphia. I think that was more so

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 2>a game in which Washington played up to the competition

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 2>than Philadelphia playing down to the competition. We saw the

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 2>good Sam Howell on Sunday. Now he gets to face

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 2>a Bears defense that ranks thirty first in pass ePaper play,

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty seventh in success rate, and twenty fifth in explosive

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.679
<v Speaker 2>pass rate. So I don't know if I like any

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 2>side here, because again, backing Sam Howell still is a

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 2>little nerve racking to me. But I'd certainly be looking

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 2>at Washington's team total. I mean, the Bears defense is

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 2>terrible and they're just letting anyone score points on them.

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>No, that's a good point. That's a good point of

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>view on this game. Jacksonville stays in London for another week.

0:05:57.920 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>There again, they're home away from home. The Buffalo Bills

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>are travel out there. Forty eight and a half is

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the number you can get on the under, forty seven

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half on Sugarouse, forty eight and a half

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>on points Bet. Right now, you're seeing the spread vary

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>somewhere between four and a half on the Buffalo side

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>here on DK and plus five and a half over

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>on Caesars if you like the Jacksonville side, plus one

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>ninety five on bet three sixty five. Again, I'm seeing

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>all these lines at bettingpros dot com or you just

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>download the app. This is how you can see the

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>best lines. Is there a letdown potentially, Sam in this one,

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>with Buffalo having a big important game against Miami, coming

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>off two wins in a row, and then getting on

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a plane and going to London.

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so. I think the Bills are an

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 2>absolute wagon right now. There's no team that I was

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 2>more impressed with on Sunday than the Buffalo Bills. I

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 2>was on the the Dolphins money line in our chat

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 2>earlier before the game and that did not pan out well.

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 2>But they've put up thirty five plus points in three

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 2>straight games. They are humming on all cylinders. They lost

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 2>to Davis White, which sucks, but it sounds like von

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.039
<v Speaker 2>Miller is expected to start practicing with the Bills again

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 2>on Monday. I don't think if Jacksonville gets out to

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 2>a lead that they'll be able to hold that lead.

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 2>They're twenty eighth in pressure rate on defense, they are

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 2>struggling to run the ball a ton outside of Trevor

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Lawrence scrambles, and so I think this is just a

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 2>tremendous spot for the Bills again, heading to Jacksonville's home

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 2>away from home.

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Pat, any value here in your opinion, or any advantage

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>with Jacksonville already being out there and already kind of

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>adjusted to life out there in terms of time difference

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and all the other stuff, or is that just overrated?

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 4>I actually think so, Joe.

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 3>I think this is a good spot for the Jaguars.

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you've got the Bills coming off this emotional

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 3>win against their chief rival in the AFC East, and

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 3>now the Bills have to travel to London after this

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 3>big game.

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 4>The Jaguars have already been there.

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 3>They the Week four game in London, so they get

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 3>to just kick back and enjoy Bangers in mash all

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 3>week while they're waiting for the Bills to show up

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 3>in London. They've got the whole play overseas thing down

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 3>to a science by now too, since they are the

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 3>regulars in London.

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 4>So what do we do here?

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.239
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we know the Bills are the superior team,

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 3>but there is reason to believe they might not throw

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 3>their best punch coming off this big win and traveling overseas.

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't think this line is going to go down.

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of people are going to be

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 3>confident in the Bills after what we saw against the Dolphins,

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 3>So I think this line is going up.

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 4>I want to wait.

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 3>I want to try to get a little bit more

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 3>value here and then bet the Jaguars.

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that makes sense to me, So let's wait on

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>this one. Maybe no early value. What about Tennessee Indianapolis again?

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we are plus one and a half on

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the Tennessee side of this game. You get plus one

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>though on Indianapolis at DK, so we're basically, you know,

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>between fan duel and DK there you're at a pick

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>him at this point. Indianapolis did come back. They were

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>very competitive in the second half of that game after

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of a sluggish start against the Rams, and Tennessee

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>put a hurtin on the Cincinnati Bengals. They got to

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback something again. They're gonna have a little bit

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 1>more mobile quarterback this week to face Hine Richards is

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>going to get out of the pocket a little bit

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>better than Joe Burrow. Forty one and a half is

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the number for this one on the total over a

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>bet MGM forty two and a half at points bet fits.

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is one of those classic kind of

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>pickup games. We did get the Tennessee Titans. You know

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that we were hoping for and looking for right a

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago. But we thought, oh yeah, this

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>is when the Tennessee Titans bring it down to their level.

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Play in the mud, hit a hard place, smashmouth football.

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>We were just a week too late. Does it continue

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 1>this week? Yeah?

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't like betting against Mike Frable teams because of

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:37.559
<v Speaker 3>this reason. I think they can outperform their talent. Should

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 3>we like the over here? I mean we are looking

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 3>at two of the worst hals defenses. Yeah, I mean,

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 3>I know neither of these passing offenses are real inspiring,

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 3>but these are two really bad pass defenses. And we

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 3>might see Jonathan Taylor possibly return to the Colts this week.

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 3>We don't know if that's going to happen yet, but boy,

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 3>what an interesting matchup that is going to be if

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Taylor comes back. You've got Anthony Richardson and Jonathan Taylor

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 3>going up against maybe the best run defense in the NFL.

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 3>I'd really like to see that. I think there might

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 3>be a little bit of value in the over. I mean,

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 3>the Titans shut down Joe Burrow and the Bengals. I know,

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 3>like this is not the same Bengals offense, so let's

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 3>not read too much into that. I just this is

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 3>a low total and two pretty bad pass defenses. So

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't be surprised if the Colts and Titans were

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 3>able to do some business through the air in this

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 3>one and get this over the total.

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Sam bad pass defense is also an explosive playmaker. Anthony

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Richardson when he starts humming when he's on and he

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 1>saw in the second half like he started to get

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that juice back right all of a sudden, I feel like,

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>no total safe when it's in the Colts game, and

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I like the over last week, and when we talked

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 1>about the Rams game, right, I was very much all.

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 1>I was like, hey, Richardson's back, anything could happen. That

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.319
<v Speaker 1>guy is so explosive. Do you think forty one and

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a half is enough where you like the over two?

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I think so. It's it's an intriguing because of how

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 2>fast the Colts are playing. I mean they are second

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 2>in neutral script seconds per play, first in neutral script

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 2>no huddle rate. They are just moving at lightning speeds

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:17.559
<v Speaker 2>right now. They were doing it with Gardner Minshew as

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 2>well when he started the other week. Again, I mentioned

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 2>that the Bills were the most impressive team on Sunday,

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Tennessee was the second most impressive to me. They played incredible. Again.

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.839
<v Speaker 2>We know that this Bengals offense is not what it

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 2>was built up to be in the preseason, but you

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 2>saw that vintage Derrick Henry touchdown run where he just

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 2>pushed defenders to the side. You know, they had that

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 2>very bad game against Cleveland a couple of weeks ago,

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 2>but Cleveland's defense has also been exceptional this year. So

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 2>I think the Titans could potentially be in obviously in

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 2>this race for the AFC South and think that they'll

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 2>take call him the win against India this Sunday.

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>One of the best stores in the NFL has to

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>be the Houston Texans. They are two and two heading

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 1>to Atlanta, coming off a loss, coming off a long

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>plane ride back home. Right now, still Atlanta is two

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half point favorites in this one. Forty two

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>is the number if you like the under on DK.

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>But you can get forty one at points bet plus

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>one twenty five if you like the Houston Texas for

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the upset. Now, look, Sam, when you beat the Pittsburgh Steelers,

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that's gotta be like the b in your bonnet, right

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the feather in your cap or whatever other head where

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you know the comment I want to make here, But

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Texans I think have something fun and special

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>going on. Does it carry with them on the road

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to Atlanta. That's the question.

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 2>It does for sure. It The better quarterback in CJ.

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Stroud is getting the points. Yeah, it is as easy

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 2>as that he is. You know, he's lighting it up.

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 2>You may not have passed the S two cognition test,

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 2>but he's certainly passing the eye test on the film.

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean he is playing lights out again. People thought

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 2>he'd take a step back against this Pittsburgh defense, which

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 2>has shown to have some holes in it at this point,

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 2>but again putting up that much yardage and making these

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:14.839
<v Speaker 2>defenses look silly weak after a week, he got to

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:15.959
<v Speaker 2>buy in at this point.

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, Pat, how do you want to buy into

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>this game with CJ. Stroud? You want to just take

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>him outright? Do you want to go ahead? Because if you,

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>if you do, want to go ahead, take him on

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the moneyliner a game plus one twenty five just to

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>win this football game.

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I like it out right.

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 3>And the Falcons were the darlings of people in the

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 3>preseason to win the NFC South, and I think people

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 3>should maybe be second guessing that because you know, once

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 3>again we're in the situation where Arthur Smith is not

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 3>utilizing his best offensive talent to maximum capacity.

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 4>Sam said it.

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there is a decisive quarterback advantage for the

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Texans here and making CJ. Stroud's performance so far all

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 3>the more impressive the fact that he's got like none

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 3>of his starting offensive linemen playing right now, well maybe

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 3>one three are on ir and Laramie Tunsel didn't play

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 3>either on Sunday. So they picked their teeth with the

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 3>Pittsburgh Steelers. I mean, they absolutely destroyed the Steelers on Sunday.

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 3>That was not even a close game.

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to do a dealer. Just check on

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Bogman tonight when we do.

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 4>I know, man, I really.

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>See it's okay.

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 3>And like, I don't think the Texans are capable of

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 3>being in a letdown spot right now. They're just too

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 3>young for that. And like ta Meco Ryans is, he's

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 3>doing such a good job with this team, like they're

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 3>they entered Week four third in special Teams DVOA. The

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 3>defense like we thought they were going to be under

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 3>man but the defense is overachieved. The offense is tremendously overachieving. Yeah,

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 3>I like Houston more. I think they're the better team.

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>While Pat was talking that plus money went to even

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way, so just saying like that's all right,

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>people are in on it. They must have been, you know,

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>somehow listening live. Maybe there's a listening device in this room.

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but I just saw that happen over

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>at betting Pros. So get in while the getting's good

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>because the word might be turning of this game as

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>people sit back and start to marinate about ZJ. Stroud

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and what they've seen so far. We haven't seen a

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>win yet from the Carolina Panthers. They are zero and four.

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>They are eight and a half point underdogs right now

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>on FanDuel going to the Detroit Lions. We'll look really strong.

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll have some extra rest, who got all their running

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>backs back in healthy last week against the Green Bay Packers.

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Forty four is the number on FanDuel right now. You

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>get forty three and a half on the over over

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>on bet MGM. If you like Carolina for the upset

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>and I don't, it's plus three forty on the money line.

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>But let's talk about this. Detroit looks really good. Pat

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>This is a big number though, eight and a half

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty large. Are we that confident yet with the Detroit Lions,

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>even against a winless Carolina Panther team, that they're going

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to cover that number?

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 3>No, And maybe we should be. Our friend Derek Brown

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 3>was just pointing out on a Fantasy Pros podcast how

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 3>good this Detroit defense has been. And this has turned

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 3>into a near elite run defense, and it's been pretty

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 3>good against pass too. They're dialing up pressure. They made

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 3>the Green Bay Packers offense look pretty inept for at

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 3>least the first half of the Week three game on

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Thursday night. So I don't know, do we see a

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 3>letdown game for the Lions after that big divisional win?

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 4>Maybe maybe not.

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't know they've had extra extra prep time or

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 3>will have had. I just I feel like we're due

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 3>for a decent Bryce Young game which we have not gotten.

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Me like, no offenses looked so ragged, but I just like,

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 3>I can't lay this many points with the Lions.

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm just not there.

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Yet, Sam, Like I said, there's a couple early games.

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I really like. This one is another one where we

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>spoke about earlier where I feel like, if you wait,

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>this one's going to grow bigger and it could even

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>start to you know, scratch nine and a half or

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>even ten. That's I think when I would bet Carolina.

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree or disagree?

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 4>I do.

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean this is a slightly lower total. It's around

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 2>forty three, forty four points right now, so if it

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 2>gets out to ten, then I think Carolina is certainly

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 2>the side to take. The thing is that the Lions

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 2>should be able to get ahead early and then hold

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 2>that league against one of the leagues, if not the

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:17.239
<v Speaker 2>league's worst rushing defense in EPA per play. Carolina just

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 2>can't really stop anyone right now. Obviously had a somewhat

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 2>decent game against Minnesota, but I just think that Detroit

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 2>will be able to get a lead early and then

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 2>continue to run the ball with David Montgomery like they

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:32.120
<v Speaker 2>did this past week.

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Now, we don't have definitive news yet, but it would

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:37.919
<v Speaker 1>certainly see that Kenny Pickett is in danger, I believe

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of missing. Is that safe to say everybody in danger

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of missing Week five? Can I say that I can?

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay good in danger of missing Week five? They are

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 1>at home with potentially Mitchell Trubisky being there. They are

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>four point home underdogs coming in here on points bet

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>over on the on their side against the Baltimore Ravens

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.360
<v Speaker 1>who had a big win in Cleveland. Again no Deshaun Watson,

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 1>so we want to take it out of that, but

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>you get Baltimore minus two and a half right now

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 1>at bet Rivers. The number for this game obviously slugfest

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>typical AFC North forty on points bet forty one on

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>sugar House. If you like the under if you like

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh to figure it out with mister Bisky plus one

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>sixty of points. Bet that's the number here. So it's

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 1>been a very weird year so far. I would say

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it was a strange September sam for this division. I

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>think overall, I think it's safe to say we thought

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>this was going to be the Juggernaut Division and it's

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>starting to look like is Can anybody stay healthy and

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>win this thing? It's a great opportunity for the Baltimore

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Ravens to handle their business against a down and out

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steeler team. Will they do that? And do you

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>want to hop on this line now before people have

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>more time to think about what Pittsburgh isn't doing well

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>or doesn't have for this game?

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I hate to say hip, but the

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 2>line has already moved out. It looks like it's at

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 2>minus four and a half for the Ravens right now.

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 2>And this is probably probably one of my biggest conviction

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 2>plays of the week, taking Baltimore with the points and

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 2>the points it's the Steelers defense again I mentioned it earlier,

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 2>does not look like it really was what we thought

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 2>it would be. Baltimore just put up a great offensive

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 2>performance against Cleveland, who again we I think still think

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 2>is a phenomenal defense, and the Pittsburgh offense is just

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 2>so underwhelming. I mean, even if you get Mitch Trubisky,

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 2>which might be an upgrade over Kenny Pickett at this point,

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 2>or at least it's something different.

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Careful, you never know comes back, Todgen.

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 2>The Baltimore defense has been playing exceptionally well, and again

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 2>you can look at some of their opponents that they've faced,

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 2>but you have the schedule that you have and the

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 2>way that they're stopping some of these opposing offenses is

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 2>very impressive, especially with the missing players they've had.

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Pat Your thoughts and feelings about Baltimore Pittsburgh.

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Joe, you mentioned h Kenny Pickett was in danger

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 3>missing this game. Would you say he's in grave danger

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 3>of missing this job.

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 4>You're wearing.

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 1>You're wearing a.

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 4>Top gun T shirt. I had to do a Tom

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 4>Cruise EF.

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.719
<v Speaker 1>That's there. I do podcasts or people die. That's it.

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>That's where I stand on a wall and I do

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 1>shows all day. That's what I do. You want to bet,

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>go download the betting pros app. That's what you do. Otherwise,

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>don't tell me how to do my job. It's a

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>little few good men, everybody, just in case, just in case,

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you go ahead, packed titu off.

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I don't know if I've ever seen

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 3>a Mike Tomlin Steelers team look this disheveled before, Like

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 3>they just don't look bad. And Tomlin has Someone asked

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 3>him if they were going to be changes made this week,

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:51.400
<v Speaker 3>and he stated very affirmatively, yes, there would be changes

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 3>this week. I don't know what that means, but I

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 3>don't think this can be repaired. And one of the

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.360
<v Speaker 3>few things that the Steelers have had working for them,

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 3>at least up until Week four was their pass rush.

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 3>They were third in pressure rate going into week four

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 3>and first in sacks. Couldn't get to CJ. Stroud at

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 3>all despite that injury riddled Texans offensive line, and Lamar

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 3>Jackson has been getting the ball out really quickly and

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 3>neutralizing pressure like that has worked fabulously well with Todd

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 3>Monkin redoing this Ravens offense. So yeah, I like the

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 3>Ravens here. I would play this up to five. I

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 3>have no confidence in the Steelers at this point.

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, Scott Bogman, Well, I mean I think Scott would

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>agree with you knowing Bogs, he believed he might have

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 1>less confidence. Speaking of little confidence, we're gonna talk about

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots next, but before we do, just a reminder.

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>When you're making picks, do them in the Betting Pros app,

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 1>but join our NFL contest so that you can win

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>some free stuff. Our grand prize winner is gonna win

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>a Jackson Smith and jig but autograph jersey just for

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>making five picks a week and one hundred picks for

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the year. It's not too late to join just because

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>it's October, because we're also doing weekly and monthly prizes too.

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 1>We're giving away shop swag from Betting pros from Fantasy Pros.

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>We're also so giving away premium upgrades to Betting Pros

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and Fantasy Pros. So to join the NFL contest, just

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.959
<v Speaker 1>go to bettingpros dot com slash ANDFL contest, or you

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.439
<v Speaker 1>can also just click the community tab on the Betting

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 1>Pros app and join the NFL contest that way as well.

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's a great way for you to make picks

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>have some fun. Even if betting's not legal in your state,

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you can still pick along with us and enjoy the

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>ride and again. Free stuff. Free stuff is great, all right, Pat,

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I've been loathing to get to this game, but here

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>we are, denw Engo. Patriots are one and three. Matthew

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Judon is hurt. The offense looks terrible. Somehow, I don't

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>know how, but somehow they are still one point favorites

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>at home against the New Orleans Saints. I don't know.

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I just this makes my head hurt. This line is

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>completely wrong, Pat, and I don't know what I have

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to do about this, but give me New Orleans all

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the time in this game. New Orleans at plus one

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>oh five on the money line, yes, please? The total

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously where you think it is. It's thirty nine and

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 1>a half floating between that and thirty nine. To me,

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it's New Orleans just going there and handing New England

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>because I think New England's just done.

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 4>It could be, Joe, and I can understand.

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look how bad Mac Jones was against a

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 3>very good Dallas defense, and the Saints defense is pretty

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 3>good too. But I just don't know if I can

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 3>take the Saints confidently when I'm not totally convinced in

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 3>their ability to put up points like that. Passing game

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 3>just didn't look good yesterday, has has sputtered at times

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 3>this year, and man going into New England as you know,

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 3>a road favorite. I can't do it if it was

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 3>a Tom Brown, I know, I know. And they have

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 3>no Matthew Judah. That does take some of.

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>The the secondaries all hurt. Everybody named name Jones except

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Mac is hurt on this football team. It's a it's

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a problem.

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 3>And I don't want to bet the Patriots in this one, Joe,

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 3>But I don't really want to bet the Saints either, Sam.

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:01.679
<v Speaker 1>I want to bet the Saints. In fact, I already have.

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think about this one?

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Tell me if I'm right or wrong, I would employ

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 2>you to just have some fun with it. Joe. I

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 2>can't say far far, far enough away from this game.

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if it even gets onto red zone this Sunday,

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna use it as an opportunity to go to

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 2>the bathroom. It just the Saints offense does not look

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 2>good either. These defenses are somewhat decent. I mean, they've

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 2>held their own in some situations. But I you know,

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 2>I bet the over in the Patriots Cowboys game because

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 2>both of those teams play pretty fast, and it still

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 2>didn't get there, even though it was twenty eight to

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 2>three at the half. I mean that the Patriots, even

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 2>trying to get some zappy hour match again, couldn't do anything.

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>They got nothing. They got no playmakers on offense, they

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>got no pass rush without Judah on the secondary's banged

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>up is a hot mess. New Orleans Saints boocket. There

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you go. I'll stand on my island. That's fine. Miami

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins at nine and a half point favorites on DK

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>against the New York Giants. We'll see what the Giants

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>have for us tonight. We also don't know definitively if

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.359
<v Speaker 1>we get Saquon Barkley back or not again. High angle

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>sprains take weeks. He has had now weeks, he's probably

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>unlikely to play tonight. Forty nine and a half is

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the number here, plus three ninety for the Giants upset.

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>This is a tough situation here because you know, obviously

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Miami did struggle in Buffalo, but this feels like they

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>get right back on track. The question is sam is

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the nine too many points?

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 2>It's too many points for me to bet it. I

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 2>think it's right right about where I would have it

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be the Giants on a short week. They'll

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 2>be traveling to Miami to play down there, and I

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 2>think this is going to be just a huge bounce

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:57.679
<v Speaker 2>back spot for the Dolphins offense, who struggled quite a

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 2>bit on Sunday against the Bill. So I make it

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 2>about minus nine and a half for Miami, but it's

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 2>still it's a lot to lay there.

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Fitz, what about the total in this one too? Forty

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half? I mean, I feel like Miami's

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>so explosive and they got held in check a little

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 1>bit last week obviously on Sunday, but the Giants have

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>had problems holding anybody in check if you like.

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:25.879
<v Speaker 4>They have, Joe.

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 3>And the only concern is that the Giants are going

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 3>to do their part to get it over the total.

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 3>That's my hang up on the total. I think Miami

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.120
<v Speaker 3>is going to do their part. And look, the Dolphins

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 3>ran into a buzz saw in Buffalo. And the thing is, Joe,

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 3>do we really think this Giants defense is capable of

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 3>disrupting Miami's offensive machinery.

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 4>The way Buffalo did on Sunday? Yeah?

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so either. So and on a short

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 3>week of preparation and rest. Like, I think this is

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 3>a great bounce back spot for the Dolphins. I'm happy

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 3>to lay the points here.

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Fitzie and I were talking about this next game here

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 1>before the show. Philadelphia four and oh five point favorites

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>over on Caesars, five and a half on DK right

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>now against Los Angeles Rams. They're going to travel to LA.

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I get all, like, you know, they got to travel

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and all this stuff, But forty six and a half

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is the number forty seven on DraftKings, four six and

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a half on FanDuel like LA for the upsets plus

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>one eighty eight fits. I'm confident in the Eagles. I

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people have lost some confidence in them.

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Feels like because they let the Commanders kind of you know,

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>as excuse me, as Sam was saying earlier, they played

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>down to the Commanders a little bit. Okay, fine, but

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's a good gut check for them. They came

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>out victorious. Now you got to go to LA play

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>football game here, and I think that the five is

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty generous. I like the Eagles in the five pap,

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>But what do you think of this game?

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 3>If you had showed me this total or this line

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 3>in August show and told me that, like there were

0:27:56.880 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 3>no major injuries to the Eagles affecting this line, Like

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 3>I would have bet a mortgage payment on the Eagles here.

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 3>But they have not been the wrecking ball that we

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 3>thought they were going to be. The Rams have not

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 3>been the pile of rubble we thought they were going

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 3>to be. This is just a line I sort of

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 3>look at and throw my hands in the air. I'm

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 3>not sure what to do it. I mean, I could

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 3>definitely envision a scenario where the Eagles blow out the Rams.

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 3>I could envision a scenario where the Rams hang with

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 3>the Eagles. What I'm worried about is the scenario where

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 3>the Eagles are holding a comfortable lead, keeping the Rams

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 3>at arm's length, and in a back door type of

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:36.919
<v Speaker 3>situation at the end of the game. So I just

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm walking away from this one.

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>All right. So Patsy's four outcomes in this one, Sam,

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>what do you see?

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 2>I'd clean with the Eagles right now. Cooper cup is

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 2>expected to resume practice this week, which is good, but

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Matthew Stafford did sustain a hip injury during the game

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 2>against Indianapolis. It sounds like he will be fine. But

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 2>just something to monitor throughout the week. Eagles offense hasn't

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 2>looked tremendous by any means, but they're still holding their own.

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 2>I think they've scored thirty plus points in multiple games

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 2>so far this season. The Rams don't play a ton

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 2>of man, but I think the Eagles offense should be

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 2>able to work their way down the field easily enough.

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 2>The over in this game is already getting steamed a ton.

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 2>It's up to fifty points now, so we're expecting some

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 2>shootout potential here and.

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Recovery Los Angeles, right, that's what we're also expecting. So

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what kind of impact that makes on this game.

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you like the over, you might want to

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>bet it now before the number keeps move. In Cincinnati

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Bengals one in three, they I'd be saying that against

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:54.239
<v Speaker 1>the Arizona Cardinals one and three now, the Cardinals at

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>plus five or home underdogs. Sam I already took this

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 1>last night when I was putting the show planned together.

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Forty two and a half is the number on Fandal

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>forty two at sugar House plus one seventy five for

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the Arizona Cardinals to win outright, So it's my lack

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of confidence right now. The Cincinnati Bengals. They're a much

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>better theoretical team, but they are not a better team

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>right now in terms of practicality. And Arizona has proven

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that they play hard. They're not a good football team,

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>but they do play hard. So that's where this comes

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>for me with the early value. But you think I'm

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>a waft bass here. Do you think that Cincinnati just

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>completely gets right here and no T Higgins and they

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>just go out to Arizona and just you know, put

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a big hurting on them.

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so. I think you're right here. I'm

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 2>not touching it just because of like that smidge percent

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 2>that Cincinnati actually is Cincinnati and they're going to be

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 2>most likely without T. Higgins, which is a huge bummer.

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Arizona again has been very plucky this season. They had

0:30:56.760 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 2>it within one score again San Francisco in second half

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 2>this past weekend, then the game sort of got away

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 2>from them.

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>But they have about the Giants too. Look what they

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>did to the Yeah, I mean same thing, and the

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys they beat them, Like when do we start

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>giving the Cardinals a little credit.

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 2>It's one of those things where, again you know, to

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Pat's point on the last game, if you would have

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 2>told me that this was going to be the line

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 2>by this point in the season, with you know, no

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 2>major injuries to the Bengals save T Higgins, like I'd

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 2>be smashing the Bengals. But it's with the way that

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 2>offense looks it. It just I can't swallow that pill

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 2>right now.

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Look, I understand. Look, I get it. It's hard

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to say things like the Houston Texans should be favored,

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's hard to say things like the Arizona Cardinals

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you should take those points because they're gonna battle. Pat.

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready, I'm here. I've seen enough in September. It's October.

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I've turned the page. It's not that I believe in

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the arason on a Cardinals so much as I believe

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in them enough, and I'm disbelieving in what I've seen

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>en Cincinnati, especially that offensive line. They have played terribly

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>this year.

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm with you, Joe.

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 3>I hit the Cardinals when I first saw this line

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 3>on Sunday Nights. Here's the thing, Joe, I think there's

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 3>a decent chance we don't see Joe Burrow play this

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 3>game like, in which case this line probably winds up

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 3>being something close to a pick him. I mean, Burrow

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 3>is just so clearly compromised right now, and it seems

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 3>like coaching malpractice to keep running him out there when

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 3>like he can't move in the pocket at all. And

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 3>I just wonder if this is the week where Zach

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Taylor finally makes that concession and decides to do that,

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 3>and if so, like, I want to be on this

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 3>line before that happens. So even if Burrow does play

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 3>Joe you said it, I mean Jonathan Gannon, Yes, he

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 3>was a lightning rod for jokes and everything with his

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 3>lesson inspiring inspirational speech before the start of the season.

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 3>But man, like he's got these guys playing so hard

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:08.719
<v Speaker 3>you have to at least admire it. Like they are

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 3>not gonna roll over for teams.

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>It appears they are not, all right. The New York

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Jets one and two had the Denver one in three.

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Right now New York is one in three now two

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>pardon me, three point underdogs right now. The New York

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Jets are going into Denver. That feels right. Forty's the

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 1>number that feels right plus one thirty five for the

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Jets to win. Intriguing to me. But again it's the

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>confidence of like, I know Zach Wilson did some things better,

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>but still made enough mistakes where he gave the game

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>away and the game got away from them. Pat, do

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you see any value here at this one? Now? I

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 1>know Sam was running away from games, this is the

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 1>one I'm running away from.

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I do see value.

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 3>I want to bet the Jets on the money line,

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 3>and because I still have a lot of faith in

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 3>that defense, and I don't have a lot of faith

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 3>in Zach Wilson. Although he did play better against the

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs on Sunday night, However, he is running into a

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Denver Broncos defense that nursed the Chicago Bears offense back

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 3>to good health on Sunday, at least until you know,

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 3>the Bears got into their mistake prone ways again in

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 3>the second half. But I don't know what to believe

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 3>in with Denver anymore. Like, I just don't think there's

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot to like here with them, and I think

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:23.879
<v Speaker 3>the Jets defense is gonna take it to them. So yeah,

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 3>I want I want to bet the Jets. And we

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:28.840
<v Speaker 3>haven't seen Denver like do anything with home field advantage

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 3>either this year. Like I mean, losing to the Raiders,

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:36.839
<v Speaker 3>losing to the Commanders. Yeah, give me the Jets here.

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>By the way, that number for the Cardinals game is

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 1>already at three, So if you like it, you better

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>get it at Sugarhouse A plus five while it's still

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:49.240
<v Speaker 1>up there, because that's not gonna last much longer. Sam, again,

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:52.240
<v Speaker 1>this one scares me. Does it scare you?

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:54.879
<v Speaker 2>No? I'm with Pat. I think this is my sort

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:58.840
<v Speaker 2>of second big conviction play here. Going with the Jets.

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 2>I think their defense is absolutely legit. Their raw numbers

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:06.879
<v Speaker 2>are not phenomenal, but when you consider the opponents they've

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 2>faced in Dallas, Kansas City, and Buffalo and what they've

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 2>done to sort of hold those offenses in check, I

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 2>think it's incredibly impressive. Again, Pat mentioned it. We saw

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 2>what the Broncos defense can do for one poor offense

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 2>in Chicago, and I think they'll do the same thing

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 2>for a Jets offense that again didn't look out of

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 2>sorts and has, in my opinion, some better playmakers on

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 2>offense as well.

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get to the next one here. I

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 1>got the Kansasity Chiefs taking on the Minnesota Vikings. The

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:42.760
<v Speaker 1>number for this one's fifty two. Minnesota's defense is not great.

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:45.280
<v Speaker 1>We know that just because they beat the Carolina Panthers.

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not getting all crazy about that Minnesota six point underdogs.

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I love a home underdog, but I don't know if

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I love them this much. Here your thoughts on this one,

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City and Minnesota, Sam.

0:35:56.480 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm laying the points with Kansas City. I think their

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:04.760
<v Speaker 2>offense again played not great against the Jets on Sunday

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Night Football, and the Vikings defense is not as good

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:12.799
<v Speaker 2>as the Jets defense. I think that the Kansas City

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs sorts are just gonna roll over them. Brian Floras

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Blitz is a ton, and I think Patrick Mahomes will

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:23.839
<v Speaker 2>be able to take advantage of the one on one

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 2>receivers with those Blitz packages coming fits.

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you see this one the same way?

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't really see any betting value here, Joe. Maybe

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:36.839
<v Speaker 3>the over might intrigue me to some degree, but I don't.

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't like either side.

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I have it. Let's get to the last two

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:43.320
<v Speaker 1>games we have here. A big one Sunday Night Football,

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboy, San Francisco forty nine ers. They're in San

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 1>France and Franz three and a half point favorites in

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>this game. Forty five and a half is the number

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Dallas to win outright? Plus one sixty five? All right,

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:56.319
<v Speaker 1>here we go. Dallas rebounded. Now, Micah Parsons will check

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 1>on his healthy and rolled his ankle in that game Sunday.

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 1>But Dallas defense bounce back in a big way after

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a disappointing game. Dak Prescott's already got it on his

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:06.280
<v Speaker 1>craw about the San Francisco forty nine Ers. He already

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>heard stuff after the game last night. So here we are,

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:13.400
<v Speaker 1>forty nine Ers undefeated Dallas three and one, pat. How

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:14.240
<v Speaker 1>do you see this game?

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:16.880
<v Speaker 3>I see it as a great game that I do

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:19.319
<v Speaker 3>not want to beat Joe and I just like I

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:22.840
<v Speaker 3>think the line in the total are spot on. And

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 3>maybe Dallas has shown a few more blemishes than San

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Francisco has to this point. But let's not forget Dallas

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 3>really should have beaten the forty nine ers in San

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 3>Francisco in the playoffs last year. Like I thought, the

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 3>forty nine Ers were lucky to escape that game with

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:41.120
<v Speaker 3>a win. So I think these two teams are still

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 3>reasonably even matched. I think maybe the forty nine Ers

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:45.800
<v Speaker 3>are a little bit better, but I don't want to

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:47.880
<v Speaker 3>lay three and a half to the Cowboys.

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Fair enough, fair enough to me, this is a fun

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 1>anytime touchdown score one like you're looking for some individual

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>props maybe I mean CMC scoring a touchdown feels like

0:37:56.960 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 1>a lock every single week, Sam, But what do you

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 1>think about this when any early value? See gonna wait

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 1>and see how it unfolds.

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:05.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm with fits here, I'm gonna wait on it. I

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:09.479
<v Speaker 2>don't think that San Francisco will get down to minus three,

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 2>but if it does, that's when I would certainly jump

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 2>on it. I think it'll stick right around three and

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 2>a half for the majority of the week, unless we

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 2>again hear something with potentially Michael Parsons. I think he

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 2>could cause that to obviously move in in favor of

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 2>the forty nine ers. But I'm laying off it for

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:28.720
<v Speaker 2>right now and just looking forward to a great Sunday

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 2>night football matchup.

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Last one Monday night football. Your Packers Boys are go

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>ahead and taking on the Las Vegas Raiders. The Raiders

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:38.880
<v Speaker 1>can get a plus one and a half over on

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 1>fan Do we get Green Bay a plus one over

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 1>on DK? Right now? Forty three and a half is

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:47.319
<v Speaker 1>the number. This one's very tight here, Sam, I don't

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:49.359
<v Speaker 1>know about this one. I'm not sure exactly why this

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 1>line is where it is because I'm far more confident

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 1>in green Bay than I am in Las Vegas. But

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you think?

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 4>I agree?

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 2>And Green Bay has a lot going for them. Obviously,

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 2>played on Thursday night this past week and are playing

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 2>on Monday night this upcoming week, so they get eleven

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 2>days of rest, eleven days of preparation for Las Vegas.

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 2>It could be enough time for Luke Musgrave to clear

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:15.799
<v Speaker 2>concussion protocol. Hopefully they get Eldon Jenkins back, Alexander and

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Defandre Campbell. So the health is definitely trending in the

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 2>right direction with that extra rest, excuse me, extra rest.

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Las Vegas is just eighteenth and pressure eight this year,

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 2>so I don't think we see quite the reckoning on

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 2>the Packers offensive line that we saw against Detroit Thursday night.

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 2>So I love Green Bay in this spot. I'm laying

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:41.360
<v Speaker 2>the one and a half points with them.

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Pat your thoughts on green Bay Vegas. To close it.

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:46.759
<v Speaker 3>Out, I'm going to continue my season long fade of

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:50.719
<v Speaker 3>Josh McDaniels and the Raiders, and like I do think

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:52.799
<v Speaker 3>green Bay is the better team. And even though I'm

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 3>assuming that Jimmy Garoppolo is going to be back from

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 3>his concussion for the Raiders this week, Like, are they

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:00.799
<v Speaker 3>going to have a home field advantage because green Bay

0:40:00.880 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 3>fans travel really well, I suspect there will be. This

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 3>is going to be like a neutral site game, and

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:06.759
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to.

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Take too much out of them lose it against the Lions.

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:10.399
<v Speaker 1>I think the Lions are a very strong football team

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 1>this year, very hungry football team too. So I'm with you, guys.

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I think Green Bay is the confident one. And remember everybody,

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 1>make sure you set those line alerts over on your

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros app so you know when on the line

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:22.760
<v Speaker 1>movement happens. You can set game notifications for specific games,

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 1>and this is one that also might be changing as

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 1>more people have time to think about it. A lot

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:28.359
<v Speaker 1>of these lines are going to change in the next

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>six days, so stay on top of it. Download the

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros app right now. Don't forget. If you have iOS,

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you get three free days of Premium Betting Pros when

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you download that as well. So set those game notifications

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and those line alerts. Don't forget to drop a comment

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:43.839
<v Speaker 1>below what are you in on this week in week

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:45.879
<v Speaker 1>five and your early values. We want to hear from

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you and if you subscribe to the channel when you

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 1>make that comment, you just might win yourself. An Odell Beckham, Jersey.

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to us here at Betting Pros. Join our NFL

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>contest Bettingpros dot com slash and FL contest. That'll do

0:40:57.560 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it for us, but the story of the game goes

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 1>on for Pat and say I'm Joey P. We'll see

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you next time. Kids.

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast.

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Follow us on x and TikTok at betting Pros and

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Instagram at Betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:14.840
<v Speaker 1>channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros