WEBVTT - NFL Week 4 Reaction: Chiefs CRUSH Ravens, Eagles ISSUES? Cowboys & Packers TIE? | Nick Wright

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in What's Driving Nick Great Episode three seventy two,

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and as always, this episode is brought to you by

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>our friends at boost Mobile. So much to do today, Demons, Sorry,

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>pale your your team. It's not sometimes in sports you'll

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, lose the battle but win the war. I

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>fear the Ravens might have lost the battle and the

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>war on Sunday. I fear they could be in real

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>trouble moving forward. Now they have a division that's winnable,

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and I don't really believe in Aaron Rodgers, and so

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>they have time to ready to steady the ship.

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 2>But the Chiefs have our number.

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>If the moment is this era of football, Yes, that

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>is true, So we will get to that. We will

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.960
<v Speaker 1>also get to listen the Monday Night The Monday Night

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>doubleheader was terrible. Those were not great games, and sadly

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the only real news from those games is a absolutely

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>catastrophic injury to one of the greatest players of the

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 1>era in Tyreek Kill. So we will get to that

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in a bit. Also, of course, a bizarre Cowboys Packers

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>game where the offer did hit by the way, demand's

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>demand hold on. Before we get to Chiefs, Ravens can

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I tell demon's a occasionally. I don't know. Do you

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>like dream about a bet you want to make late?

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Or do you have a couple couple cocktails on a

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Saturday night and you're like, I want to get this

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>bet in? So is this do I have about? Right?

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Just it just gets super late, and I don't know.

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 2>I think it's what everybody's sleep. My brain is the

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 2>most active. Mike, this all makes sense. I'm gonna lock

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 2>it in. But obviously I'm in California.

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>So Demand's in California. So he can't put these teasers

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in on his own. And while he has been great,

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>up did your teaser hit this week?

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Back to a cover by the Jets last night?

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, perfect, Well that's why listen, that's why you tease

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>up those points. He has been great on following all

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>teaser rules consistently for the show pick. However, he in

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:39.679
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the night Saturday night text me, can

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you put this in for me? My biggest wager of

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the season, and not only did he not follow any

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of the teaser rules, it's just an abomination of a bet.

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>It's the Eagles from minus three and a half to

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>plus four and a half, the Chiefs up to plus

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>ten and a half playing against his team, and then

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 1>the Pace Day resistance because he loves eight point teasers.

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>The Packers, who are were a perfect teaser candidate that

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>actually wouldn't have won a six point teaser. Yeah, I

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>told that wouldn't have won. Oddly, teasing through the zero

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>is the only reason this one, because it was a

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>tie the Packers the plus one and a half. He

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:27.519
<v Speaker 1>put it in. By the way, I paid you this morning.

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you saw it, but I paid

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.519
<v Speaker 1>you this morning. I wake up to that at seven

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>am Sunday morning, that this guy wants the worst teaser ever,

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>but it worked, So what he has he cash props

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to you. All right, let's get to straight. The voicemail

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by Boost Mobile. We are not on

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the show today, getting to NBA Media Day reactions. We

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>are not going to do baseball playoffs today. We will

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>do some of that on Thursday. And JJ Reddick evidently

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>has ninety minute conversations with his friend Cha which chat GPT.

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna judge it. I know a lot of people,

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, have a lot of you know, are very productive.

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>We get a lot of things done through AI and

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>through talking with AI and working with AI. I have

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>not fully embraced that technology as of yet. I'm sure

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>at some point I will. Once upon a time, I

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>used to be on the radio making fun of the

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>concept of Twitter and how I would never be on Twitter,

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know now it's my only social media platform.

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>So I recognize I'll get there one day. I'm just

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>not there yet. Where I am, though, Demons is fully

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>relaxed and comfortable and relieved about the Chiefs. Let's get

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 1>right to the game of the weekend.

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we all saw what happened on Sunday. Your

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs crushed my Ravens. We were obviously riddled with injuries.

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Our quarterback went down very early into the third quarter,

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 2>she said, after starting two.

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>That is not hold on. Your quarterback did not go

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 1>down early in the third. He went down at the

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>end of the third quarter when when he tapped out

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>when they were down seventeen.

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 2>But go ahead, all right, you said your Chiefs had

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 2>the chance to rewrite history after starting oh and two,

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 2>after this game, do you think they did so? Well?

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 1>Listen, they studied themselves and the ow and to start

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>what they had to do was beat the Giants. That

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>was an ugly game that obviously turned on the tackle

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that turned the tide. And then they had to go

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 1>take care of business against the Ravens, and take care

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of business they did, and not shockingly, the moment the

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs had close to a competent receiving corps, the offense

0:05:56.520 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>looked good again. And we don't have to do this

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>full history in depth, but it is worth mentioning that

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs traded away Tyreek Hill Mahomes snap in an offseason,

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>changed the way he played based on the receivers they

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>had one league MVP. The very next year, dealt with

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>more drops than any quarterback literally in modern NFL history,

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>figured it out by the playoffs, won the Super Bowl.

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>The next year, dealt with the most injured wide receiver

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and running back room in the NFL, got all the

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>way to the Super Bowl. And the next year, which

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>was this year, walked into the season with his number

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>one receiver suspended for six games and his number two

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 1>receiver knocked out of Game one three plays in. And

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it looked shaky for a bit. And I told you

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>guys that I knew real like I guess insight that

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that Chargers Week one game plan. Xavier Worthy was the

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>EPI center of it, and him being knocked out three

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>plays in threw everything off. But this, the fatalism surrounding

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs from almost everyone else in the media was

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And I don't want to be a scold, and I

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be more annoying than I naturally am,

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>but it was embarrassing, and it was so fickle and

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>so myopic, my opic, pardon me, as if they don't

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>have a Hall of Fame head coach, a Hall of

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Fame caliber decordinator, and the most talented quarterback to ever live,

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that they couldn't figure it out. And it was as

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>if they were getting boat raced in these early games,

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>or as if they were playing terrible teams and losing.

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Neither were true. Now I want to make this clear.

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Chiefs are, you know, quote fully back.

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>If back means being the highest scoring team in the league,

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's who they're going to be. I

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think the Chiefs have solved all their issues. I

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>still think the running back room leaves a lot to

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>be desired, and their ability to get pressure on the

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>opposing quarterback without sending a blitz at the moment leaves

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot to be desired. But you look, if you

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 1>going into the Baltimore game, if you looked around the AFC,

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the only team that really you could say had no

0:08:56.400 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>holes to poke at it was the Chargers going into

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:05.599
<v Speaker 1>Week four, but they already were dealing with some potentially

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:10.280
<v Speaker 1>mounting injuries that sadly, they dealt with more of during

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Week four in a game they had no business losing,

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>but lost, And so the Bills were undefeated. But the

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Bills defense had looked shaky, and they they had and

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>have played three consecutive games against just bottom feeders. The

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Ravens were given this huge benefit of the doubt despite

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>having the same record as the Chiefs, and then every

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 1>other team that had a good record, like the Steelers

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:40.839
<v Speaker 1>or the Jags, you had real reason to be concerned about.

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 2>And so who's first, I mean, I don't know if

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 2>this matters whose first slay to games. Who do you

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 2>think has had the tougher schedule through the first four

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 2>weeks between the Ravens and the Chiefs.

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 1>I think it's been almost identical. Okay, so like they

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>played each other. So if we want to call that

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>like I so call the Chiefs Ravens game, you know,

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 1>a war so to speak. The Ravens played the Browns.

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs played the Giants, which is, I think the

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Giants are better than the Browns, but the Browns have

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a better defense than you know what I mean. Call

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that a wash. And then the Ravens played the Bills.

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs played the Eagles. The Ravens player, I guess

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>we could do Bills, Chargers, Eagles, Lions, you know what

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Like, I think the Bills are a little

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>better than the Chargers, but I think the Eagles are

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a little better than the Lions. So to me, it's

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>very very similar. Like as far as what the opening

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>slate was, now you could argue the Chief Ravens game

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 1>being in Kansas City, like the Ravens having to go

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 1>on the road for that tilts it. But the other

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>piece of it that was maddening to me and has

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>been even more maddening in the after There have been

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>two things that have happened in the aftermath of this

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>game that really drive me crazy. And I had kind

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of a rough moment near the end of yesterday's show

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>on TV with why yesterday I'll apologize to him when

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I see him today. It's not really the tone of

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>our show. But I got I got angry when I

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have the And I mean, I don't think he

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>took it like terribly. Like I think he might be

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>surprised when I apologize to him, but maybe not. But

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it Two things have happened that to me are so frustrating.

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>The first one is I understand the Ravens during the

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>game lost Rokwan Smith and late in the game lost

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Humphrey and once the game was over over over lost

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Nate Wiggins. But they went into the game missing four starters.

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.319
<v Speaker 1>Everyone and the defense already had been bad all year.

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Everyone knew that and picked them. That's fine, by the way,

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Like you can pick whoever you want. And I'm not

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>acting like that game was a lot for the the

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>way it played out. The Chiefs at full control, but

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, something goes differently. Maybe not, but to know

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the team has those injuries going in and then afterwards

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>be like, well, of course Kansas City did that. Look

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>at all the injuries on defense. It's just bullshit. It's

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that if your handicap going into the game was I

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>think the Ravens at full strength are better, but they're

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>not full strength. Therefore, I think the Chiefs will win.

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>And then you see that game be like, yeah, that's

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 1>what I thought, so be it. But that wasn't anyone's handicap.

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>The handicap was even with the Ravens defensive injuries, the

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs offense, with Patrick freaking Mahomes on it and Andy

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Reid calling the plays, is so broken that they're not

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to move the ball.

0:12:54.520 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean Vegas had them as underdogs as well, correct money, Yeah.

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Like, which it's so again, two and a half one

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>underdogs at home to a one and two team that

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the two competent offenses that they had played moved the

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:20.239
<v Speaker 1>ball at will and so to then Monday morning quarterback

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh, well, obviously this was gonna happen. That's

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>not what you believed. That wasn't people's picks. That wasn't

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>people's opinion. The conversation going into the game was who

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>needed it more? Kansas City? Who do you trust more?

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore Good I watched Orlowski do the Ravens are built

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 1>to beat the Chiefs? What it's like, No, they're built

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to beat the Chiefs In the Bengals. They're just they

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>they're not built to beat the I think he said

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers in the line something I don't know. I

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>it was consent, and the other piece of it was

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>And this is my other level of frustrating, because while

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 1>Ronnie Stanley did go out during this game, the Ravens

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>offense is healthy, and it was that, well, the Chiefs

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>aren't gonna be able to slow down a Ravens offense

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that no one's been able to slow down. They score

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty plus in every game, and that, of course is

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>not what happened. And so that frustrated me. And the

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>other thing that frustrated me had nothing to do with

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Brewer Wilds, but it had to do with me listening

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to Simmons Pod as I do every Monday morning, listening

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to Greg Rosenthal's NFL Daily Pod, as I do every day,

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>listening to you know a lot of them, and watching

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the Monday morning shows and all of it, and I

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>was like, I could not believe that I was going

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>going to once again have to be I guess, the

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>bad guy in pointing out the obvious fact that this

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>game turned on a totally predictable, yet inexplicable horrific Lamar

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>pick and the Ravens were up seven to three with

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the ball on first down around midfield, and Lamar re

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>pedaled backwards and then threw up a prayer for no

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>reason whatsoever, a guy who has he and and again

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>people can be mad at me, but here are the

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>facts of it. And every year people get mad at me,

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>And then every year we get another piece of evidence

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that I'm stone right about this. And then every year

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I have to listen to folks stick their fingers in

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the ears and be like, Nope, actually wrong. Lamar is

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the greatest passer of the football we've ever seen. His

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>hires passer rating ever, never turns the ball over, and

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>all the big game, playoffs, games against the chief stuff

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>is just dumb random luck. In the last thirty games

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Lamar is played, he has multiple turnovers in three of them,

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the AFC Championship game against Kansas City, the Divisional round

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>against Buffalo, and Sunday against Kansas City. I guess that's

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a coincidence. In the last thirty games Lamar is played,

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>he has thrown seven interceptions, which is remarkable that he's

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>only thrown seven. He had like a fifty to four

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>touchdown interception ratio. You know, in this stretch you moved

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. It was crazy. The interceptions are as follows

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>four regular season interceptions prior to Sunday, three of which

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 1>we played the video hit his receiver in the hands

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and then either got like bobbled or stolen, one of

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>which Bateman just stopped running his route. But four passes

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that did not need to be picked, the only three

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>in the last thirty games, the only three interceptions Lamar

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>has thrown where it's like, what the hell was that

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>AFC Championship game into triple coverage in the fourth quarter

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>against Kansas City Divisional round game, early against both against

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo and the one Sunday. He also in those three

0:17:53.160 --> 0:18:02.719
<v Speaker 1>games had inexplicable fumbles out of nowhere. To pretend like

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that is coincidental when we once again saw Lamark throwing

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:14.479
<v Speaker 1>his helmet out of sorts, it's just dishonest. And I

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>know Bill Pollion was mean in his commentary towards the

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>guy eight years ago, and I know some of the

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>worst actors in media, sports or otherwise tried to pigeonhole

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>him as a wide receiver in a pretty nakedly at

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>times racist way. I get that, and I understand because

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of that there has been a almost protectionism and a

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>want for folks to see him succeed at the highest level.

0:18:53.119 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't disagree with that, But why do we have

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to pretend what is obviously true is not? Why do

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:12.120
<v Speaker 1>we have to pretend that this is a unique thing

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen across sports? Our whole lives the all

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>time great, legendary player who sadly gets tight in his

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 1>biggest spots and plays his worst in his biggest moments.

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>That's part of sports man. And nobody was going back

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and taking away Peyton Manning's MVPs and his records because

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>he struggled massively in the biggest spots. But we weren't

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 1>pretending it was coincidental either, talking about the Peyton Manning face,

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about how he got anxious, talked about how his

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>brother was like the bizarro version of him, a holy meeting,

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>theocre player for giant expanses of his career, who somehow,

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in the biggest spots played his absolute best, and for

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>some reason with Lamar, we gotta pretend it's not happening.

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 1>I gotta and listen, I don't know this guy but

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he does good work. I think he's a

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>smart commentator. But I Deontay Lee at the ringer. I

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>before the Lamar fumble, I tweeted, Lamar's basically gone two

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>years without making that this was on the pick, without

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>making that exact type of mistake except for in the

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty three AFC Championship game, of the twenty four Divisional

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>round and just now against Kansas City probably a coincidence,

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and Deontay Lee quote tweets it right. Nobody can identify

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the intrinsic traits of a winner and loser like Nick Wright.

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>He is the seer. It's like, no, bro, I'm not

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 1>trying to tell you, I'm not trying to act like

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I look in at guy's eyes and can determine whether

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>he has the IT factor. I'm just trying to act

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>like I've watched this guy's whole fucking career, and from

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:30.239
<v Speaker 1>day one, he has been a guy who, in the

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>postseason or in these instances now when he sees Patrick

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 1>across the field, plays his worst football. And we can

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>act like it's a small sample, but he's played the

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs seven times. He's played I think ten playoff games,

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>like it's not a small sample. And I my frustration

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is and again, so this is the other thing, demand say,

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>And this is what I'll say before we keep it moving,

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and maybe demands you'll tell me this is unfair. I

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think if I'm a Ravens fan, I don't think.

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>The thing that I came out of that game most

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 1>disheartened about was the defense. And the reason for that

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>is obviously, if the defense is this bad, they are

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>drawing dead, you know what I mean. They can't have

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the worst defense in football. But what to me was

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>so disheartening about it if you're a Ravens fan, is

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you're now gonna have in the back of your head,

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 1>even if we get the defense fixed by when we

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>get to these moments against Josh or Patrick, are we

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 1>getting MVP Lamar Or are we getting throwing his head back,

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 1>slamming the helmet, taking terrible sacks, throwing off his back

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:04.120
<v Speaker 1>foot lamar I That to me is the concern defense.

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Defense definitely has to get better. Think that will help

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 2>a lot, obviously, but it's it's every single time you

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 2>are realizing more and more that I think it's a

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 2>mental thing. It's not like a physical he's pretty I

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 2>don't want to say he I don't want to put

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.360
<v Speaker 2>it all on themar but seems pretty checked out from

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 2>the start. I don't want to say checked out, like disinterested,

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 2>but I mean there was a nice third and eleven

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 2>that he picked up one when they were still up,

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 2>and he still just kind of walked back to the

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 2>huddle looked a little sad. He's, yeah, he's his emotions.

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 2>He's just not up in spry like I see him

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:39.959
<v Speaker 2>in other games, and it's just it is a little disfunte.

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 1>He tried to take it back, but he said a

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>few years ago that Mahomes had been as kryptonite and

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>he was asked like member, and it was like the

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>how you know, excited do you get to play the

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs And he's like, I'm not excited at all, like

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.199
<v Speaker 1>and it was kind of charming almost, but then he

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>tried to pull it back later He's like, no, I

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>don't feel that way. It it's in his head and

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think his team And this is what I

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>want your take on. I don't think the play calling

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>in these spots does him any favors by trying to

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>put the whole game on him, you have Derrick Henry.

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:27.679
<v Speaker 2>Derrick, Yeah, exactly. We weren't using him as much as

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 2>we should have in the game.

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>And it was the same story in the AFC Championship game.

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have Derrick Henry then, but they had a

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 1>great running game. They wouldn't run the ball like it's

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it's like they it sometimes feels like they go into

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>these games like trying to prove a point that Lamar

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:48.439
<v Speaker 1>can just do it Patrick, like just go get the

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>get the win.

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 2>And then even in a couple instances where he would

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 2>have normally evaded, he just kind of I don't know,

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.199
<v Speaker 2>he just seemed like he almost took the sac. I

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 2>see Lamar getting out of some of those situations that

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 2>he got trapped in.

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>But well, it's been two weeks in a row, where

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>like they yeah, and so listen, and I'm not going

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:11.719
<v Speaker 1>to kill him too much on some of those sacks

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>because some of the greatest Lamar plays ever are plays

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it looks like he should have been sacked, somehow gets

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 1>away and then makes a crazy throw. So to keep

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>those available, sometimes you're just not gonna get away. But yeah,

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he wasn't good and I just don't think

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 1>it's coincidental. Let's get to some of these follow ups here.

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Pal, So with Baltimore, do you think that Kansas City

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:40.199
<v Speaker 2>isn't a good spot right now, because obviously Baltimore is

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 2>super down, So like, is Kansas City humming or is Baltimore,

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, just at a heavy disadvantage right now.

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>So listen, I think that I don't think everything is

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, the sky is falling in Baltimore, because I

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>do think that Lamar is going to instantly be back

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to being regular season Lamar. Like I expect Lamar against

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a great Texans defense to be excellent. I expect Lamar

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>against the Rams to be excellent. Like I don't. I'm

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>not too worried about the hamstring. That was a weird

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>one because he got no treatment and he's like the trainers. Yeah,

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it was like he wrapped a that was a weird one.

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think he's gonna play and I think he'll

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>be good. But I think the defense, you know, they're

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna just have to outscore people and hope the defense

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:40.439
<v Speaker 1>gets healthy by the end of the year. And I

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think Kansas City is fully fixed, but I think

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City has now fully steadied themselves, and the Chargers

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>did them a huge favorite by blowing that game to

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. And now it's like, you know, in short order,

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers could theoretically be or the Chiefs could be

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>back in for plays.

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 2>What else do we have, so chat Andy asks Nick.

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 2>Nick worried that the chief success is seemingly tied to

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 2>a skinny wire receiver's health Worthy. Yeah, I mean big

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 2>focal point.

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>It was huge. Now listen, Xavier was healthy all last

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>year and took some big shots. Yes, but I am

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>worried about that. I also think though, that once they

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>get Rashie back, it's less tied just to Worthy. And

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>in theory, once they get Rashie back, the Chiefs should

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 1>have the best receiving core mahomes has had in four years.

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Rashi Worthy. Thornton's been Knight a nice addition, like it

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of pushes Hollywood Brown.

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I got like, I'm obviously a Ravens fan, but

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 2>you guys weren't. You guys did look good in the game, and.

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>It was fun and and the Chiefs are more fun

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>when they play like that and Mahomes Listen, those Mahomes

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 1>red zone touchdowns to Thornton and to Juju were sick.

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Those were starts that yes, he had to fire those

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 1>in and I thought, I thought those were those were excellent.

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's do one more Baltimore followup for him.

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Let's go on home with Derrick Henry. Like obviously he's

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 2>had the track were going of fumbling this season, but

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 2>his usage.

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.959
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't worry about the fumbles. I just don't know

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>why they didn't give him the ball more. It's just

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>so weird to me that they wouldn't give him the

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:33.640
<v Speaker 1>ball more. He had I think four carries for thirty

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>one yards on the opening drive. Yeah, and so listen,

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not ready to do Harball hot seat, especially because

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:45.719
<v Speaker 1>here's the other thing. I still think they're gonna win

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the AFC North demanse. The Bengals are a mess. The

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Browns have the worst offense in the league outside of

0:28:55.280 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe Tennessee. And I don't I don't trust pitch yet

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>now I thought they were gonna lose like I was

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>wrong about Pittsburgh Sunday morning. If so, let me put

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it like this, I think right now ten wins still

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>wins Baltimore the AFC North, and I obviously think they

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>can get to ten wins, they would have to go

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>nine and four the rest of the way, and I

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>expect them to definitely be able to do that. Now,

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>if Pittsburgh really gets rolling, maybe A'll adjust. But I

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't panic about missing the playoffs on Baltimore. I just

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>panic about what have I seen this year that makes

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>me feel like I'm a real contender. And my answer

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to that question is nothing. Today's show brought to you

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>by our presenting sponsor, hard Rock Bet. New customers can

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>place a five dollar bet and if it hits, you

0:29:57.840 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>not only get your winnings, but also one hundred and

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars in bonus bets. The leaves are falling, but

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the stakes are rising. Postseason baseball is here and every

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>swing could change the season. Step up to the plate

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and take your own swing. On hard Rock Bet today,

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>new customers place a five dollar bet and if it hits,

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you get not only your winnings, but also one hundred

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and fifty dollars in extra bonus bets. Plus every day

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>this week on a hard Rock Bet, you can get

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a profit boost for a postseason baseball parlay. New promos

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>every day boost your same game parlay or same game

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>parlay max, so your bet pays extra winnings. Want to

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 1>see what everyone else is betting on tonight? Who's going

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to Homer, top picks or parlays across any other sport,

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 1>The hard Rock Bet app literally shows you. It's another

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>reason download the app just for the info. Tap discover

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and you can see trending picks and parlays at any time.

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Download the hard Rock Bet app and make your first

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>deposit payable in bonus bets, not a cash offer offered

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>by the Seminal Try of Florida. In Florida offered by

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Seminal hard Rock Digital LLC and all other states, must

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>be twenty one plus and physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana,

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia to play. Terms and

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>conditions apply. Concerned about gambling in Florida, call one eight

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight Admit it. In Indiana. If you were someone

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you know as a gambling problem wants help, call one

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred and nine with it. Gambling problem called one

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred gambler in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee,

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>or Virginia. Let's go to Packers Cowboys pout.

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 2>So you said on Thursday show that there was no

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 2>way that Dallas is going to be green Bay, and

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 2>I guess you were correct to a certain extent. That

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 2>game ended forty forty in a tie and overtime. Mike

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 2>had eight quarterback pressures and probably got to deck when

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 2>it mattered the most. But you said the bigger story

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 2>of the game here was green Bay's offense late. What

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 2>did you see there?

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, So let me do with Micah first quickly,

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll do the Packers. Listen, I'm the Packers'

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>defense had been a plus through three weeks, and then

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>they were really bad on Sunday night. There's no you know,

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>there's no getting around that. That's obvious. They were really

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>bad Sunday night. I did think Micah's shoestring tackle on

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Dakh saved the Packers because Dak was gonna score a touchdown,

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>held him to a field goal because of it. But

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that was a disappointing performance for the Packers. And on

0:32:40.800 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the mic afront, I I can't watch the I can't

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>watch the Cowboys offense look the way it has looked

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>through a month and not feel like, man, had they

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>just gotten it worked out with Micah, they they'd be

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>like a fringe contender. Dak is playing out of his mind, bro,

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>like he's playing great and doing that against that defense

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>without Ceedee Lamb Pickens having the game of his life

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>was so impressive, and so it just feels so bitter

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 1>sweet if you're a Cowboys fan, where it's like, man,

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>if we had just gotten this worked out with Micah

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and our defense was just average, like we'd be a

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>real team. I think right now they'd be three and

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>one instead of one two and one, and they'd be

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a problem for teams and Joe valid game. I think

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>it's so that the thing is, I think it's the opposite.

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I I know that, Yeah, I know, but a lot

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of people had that take because the Packers defense was bad,

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 1>but the Cowboys defense was just as bad.

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:15.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And so like I I know, this feels maybe

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 3>a little unfair, but the better the Cowboys offense plays,

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 3>the more I hate the trade because it's like, man,

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 3>you had a real chance to contend.

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 1>Now the end of the game is the concerning part.

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>So I I want to give Matt Lafleur grace in

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:40.760
<v Speaker 1>this regard, he was terrified of Brandon Aubrey. What Matt

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 1>Lafleur was trying to avoid was the Packers kicking a

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>field goal with thirty seconds left and then having to

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 1>kick off to this mutant kicker, Brandon Aubrey, indoors where

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>they could would potentially get to God, if they get

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 1>to their own forty five yard line and it's a

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:13.280
<v Speaker 1>seventy two yard field goal, you'd feel like got a chance.

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>And with the new kickoff rule, if you you know,

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 1>kick a touch back, they started the thirty five like

0:35:20.000 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys probably fought thought man, they could start fifteen

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 1>yards from field goal range. So they were trying to

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:37.359
<v Speaker 1>make sure if they kicked a field goal, that if

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>they kicked a field goal, that Green Bay was not

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>going to have any time. I understand that, and you.

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Know that to get the kickoff to you to get start.

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 1>To ignore that, ignore that, and so the the I

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 1>understand Dan Matt Lafleur being cautious, I don't understand or

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't understand it. First his total lack of trust

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in Jordan Love, who's playing a good game, to take

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 1>any chances to just win the game with a touchdown.

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 1>The way you remove Brandon Aubrey from the equation is

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you score a touchdown. Okay, you score a touchdown, the

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 1>game's over. But it was kind of validated by the

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>fact that Jordan Love almost butchered the end of that game.

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>They're very lucky that the Cowboys timekeeper is ethical and

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 1>what didn't just delay by a half second and let

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the clock run out. You would that was a very

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 1>nice thing for a road timekeeper to do. But Jordan lucky.

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 2>But that was what happened though, Like that was the

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:04.319
<v Speaker 2>amount of time that was I mean maybe I mean,

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 2>like this seconds.

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>When it hit the ground, Like it feels like if

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 1>there were tenths of a second de Mon's that that

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>thing would have been like point two. And if it's

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 1>point two, like you could probably just be like, oh

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, but regardless, the the fact of the

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 1>matter is it's second down. The Packers have no timeouts,

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and Jordan Love, instead of throwing it away or like

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 1>scrambling and throwing it away, checks it down. And now

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the clock inbounds, and now the clock's running. He has

0:37:49.360 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to know if I cannot get this snap off at

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>with ten seconds left, I need to just spike the

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 1>ball and will take the field goal. They almost got

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a procedural penalty, which would have been a ten second

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:09.320
<v Speaker 1>runoff game over. They everything happened late and they almost

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 1>ran out of time. That for a guy who's not

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:15.759
<v Speaker 1>even close to a rookie, he's been in the league

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a long time at this point, that was a brutal

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and almost just killed like in the game, end of

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 1>game sequence. That made me more concerned about the Packers'

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl hopes than anything else was the fact that

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I still don't have full trust in Jordan Love. I

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:42.360
<v Speaker 1>just don't. And so that was I thought that was

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:46.280
<v Speaker 1>really shaky, and I thought Lafleur showed he didn't fully

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:49.279
<v Speaker 1>trust Jordan Love by not letting Love just try to

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:52.360
<v Speaker 1>go for the touchdown with the play calls. It seemed

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:55.959
<v Speaker 1>like it was very conservative out on the edges don't

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 1>make a mistake and seemed And the other thing is

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:01.799
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised Green and they seemingly was okay with

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the tie when they're going to be in a dog

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>fight for that division and for seeding and the win

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to be way more valuable for them. But

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 1>so that's it, all right, what's follow up here?

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Would you would you change the ot rules overtime rules?

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 2>And if you would, how would you change them?

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, people are like, oh, you shouldn't have ties or

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it make the period longer. I totally disagree with that.

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Football is a brutal, dangerous, violent sport. They do not

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>need to be playing longer when it's the regular season.

0:39:41.239 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I would be totally fine with moving over, no removing overtime.

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 1>The goal is to win in regulation, and if you

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 1>don't win in regulation, it's a tie. Deal with them.

0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:00.319
<v Speaker 1>I would be fine with that. And if you're not

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 1>going to do that, I like sudden death, and I

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 1>know people are you know, the first score wins, have

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:10.839
<v Speaker 1>it be over. People are like, oh, that's unfair. Then

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to a coin flip again. If you

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 1>frame the conversation as I always have, which is the

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>goal of the game is to win in sixty minutes.

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Once you fail at that goal, randomness and variance and

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 1>bad luck comes into play. And so this idea that, oh, no,

0:40:35.920 --> 0:40:39.440
<v Speaker 1>they should have kept that game going is absurd.

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 1>No, and so or bring back the fifteen minute overtime.

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't like any of that. The goals to win

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in regulation, and if you don't win in regulation, it

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 1>could be you know, it's subject to what people consider unfair.

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:59.319
<v Speaker 1>But I would be fine with getting rid of OT

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in the regular season entirely personally. And I think that

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>also would lead to some very interesting late game decisions,

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Like if a team is down three late in the game,

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>do they go for a field goal knowing, all right,

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the best we can do now is tire, or do

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 1>they go for the touchdown? If the team is down

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:25.399
<v Speaker 1>seven and scores a touchdown super late, do they automatically

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 1>go for two? I think that I think those things

0:41:27.600 --> 0:41:30.200
<v Speaker 1>could be interesting. All right, let's go on to some

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 1>other games.

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 2>So the Eagles are still undefeated, but it has not

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 2>looked very good. Hert said, zero second half passing yards.

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Sakwan can't get it going. AJ Brown is distraught. Even

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:44.319
<v Speaker 2>with all those injuries. We talked about how much of

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 2>a disadvantage Tampa Bay was last week. They still came down.

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 2>They were a Baker goal line interception away from making

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 2>the game. What's going on over there?

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:53.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 2>What's going on over there in Philly?

0:41:55.880 --> 0:42:00.920
<v Speaker 1>So they just can't play a normal game. I give

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>him a listen. They have an excellent team. And you

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 1>know they last two weeks ago, they block a field

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 1>goal to win a game. This week they get the

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:13.759
<v Speaker 1>game going with a blocked punt. You know what I mean,

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:16.839
<v Speaker 1>Like I in a block punt touchdown. It's really impressive.

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 1>But two weeks ago, they had negative passing yards in

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the first half and then we're excellent in the second half.

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 1>This week, they were excellent in the first half and

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 1>then zero completions in the second half. And they just can't.

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:43.880
<v Speaker 1>And AJ Brown is tweeting, you know, passive aggressive scripture.

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 1>He's not happy. It's it's now. They've had a brutal

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 1>schedule and they're four and up. They've played the Cowboys,

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs, the Rams, the Bucks. So I'm not nagging

0:42:57.040 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles here. I do think that they could. I

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:08.399
<v Speaker 1>called them the Chiefs of last year last week, where

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, you're undefeated, but everybody's nitpicking you. I now

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:15.480
<v Speaker 1>would recommend the Eagles take a page out of the

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs of two years ago book. When if you remember

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:22.359
<v Speaker 1>when the Chiefs were the defending champs and they were

0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:25.920
<v Speaker 1>having some struggles during the year, and I brushed it

0:43:25.960 --> 0:43:30.120
<v Speaker 1>off with their practicing. I was like, they are working

0:43:30.160 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 1>on things, so they are during the games, so they

0:43:34.120 --> 0:43:38.239
<v Speaker 1>are malleable late in the year and can beat you

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of different ways. And then I was proven

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:49.920
<v Speaker 1>exactly correct. I think that might be worthwhile for Philadelphia.

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>It might be worthwhile to use some of these games

0:43:56.239 --> 0:44:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to be like, hey, let's have the purpose of this

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:07.239
<v Speaker 1>game for aj Brown to leave it happy. Let's draw

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:12.640
<v Speaker 1>some inbreaking over the middle routes where he never gets

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 1>thrown the ball, and see if see what it looks like,

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 1>see if Jalen can be more reliable as a pure

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 1>drop back passer, Just so we have that club in

0:44:27.040 --> 0:44:36.160
<v Speaker 1>our bag. It is because right now they are just

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:42.800
<v Speaker 1>playing weird games with weird vibes afterwards, because one of

0:44:42.880 --> 0:44:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the very best players on their team is clearly unhappy and.

0:44:49.920 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:44:52.440 --> 0:44:57.719
<v Speaker 1>And the other piece of it is Saquan is not

0:44:59.000 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 1>nearly as effect this year as he was last year.

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Now maybe that changes, but we're a quarter of the

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 1>way through and he's three point one yards per carry.

0:45:12.760 --> 0:45:17.240
<v Speaker 1>He's gone for sixty eighty eight, forty six and forty

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:22.360
<v Speaker 1>three in these games. He is seventy total receiving yards.

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:25.280
<v Speaker 1>And this is coming off one of the greatest years.

0:45:25.440 --> 0:45:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Last year he averaged Himan's five point eight yards per carry.

0:45:30.040 --> 0:45:35.399
<v Speaker 1>This year he's averaging barely half that at three point one.

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Like that is that's a real I don't want to

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 1>say concern, but it's something to look at if you

0:45:47.760 --> 0:45:54.840
<v Speaker 1>need to figure out, Okay, if he's not dominant, what

0:45:54.960 --> 0:46:00.160
<v Speaker 1>are other ways we can beat you? And so listen, Philly,

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:04.520
<v Speaker 1>they're the defending champs. They've won twenty out of twenty

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:09.319
<v Speaker 1>one games, or nineteen out of twenty games. They've won

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:11.560
<v Speaker 1>in a bunch of different ways. I have a ton

0:46:11.560 --> 0:46:15.359
<v Speaker 1>of respect for it, and I gotta give Sirianni credit, begrudgingly,

0:46:16.239 --> 0:46:22.799
<v Speaker 1>but they're trying to get through twenty games here and right,

0:46:23.080 --> 0:46:26.479
<v Speaker 1>and you can't have in two weeks like the two

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of the entire league, thirty two teams have played four games,

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 1>so that's one hundred and twenty eight you know games,

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:45.800
<v Speaker 1>two halves a game, So there's been two hundred and

0:46:45.840 --> 0:46:49.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty six halves of football played in the NFL this year.

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 1>The two worst passing halves of the two hundred and

0:46:57.520 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty six where the first first half by Philadelphia two

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:04.919
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago and the second half by Philadelphia two days ago.

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:08.680
<v Speaker 1>That's weird. And I'm not even like banging on jail

0:47:08.760 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in here or anything. It's just weird. And I don't know,

0:47:13.040 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they can ignore it just because they've

0:47:15.520 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 1>been winning. All right, What else do we got?

0:47:18.880 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Baker was talking trash with down three touchdowns? Yeah, how

0:47:22.719 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 2>many other quarterbacks in the league do you think you're

0:47:24.719 --> 0:47:24.880
<v Speaker 2>doing it?

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Maybe just Baker? And I do understand some of the

0:47:29.320 --> 0:47:32.759
<v Speaker 1>Eagle fans being frustrated, like do the taunting rules not

0:47:32.880 --> 0:47:36.560
<v Speaker 1>apply to this guy? But that's just Baker. There's a

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:40.399
<v Speaker 1>little bit of like the Draymond effect of oh, he

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:43.400
<v Speaker 1>does this the entire game in all ways, so the

0:47:43.440 --> 0:47:48.279
<v Speaker 1>refs get a little, you know, numb to it. But

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:53.200
<v Speaker 1>speaking of Baker to perfect segue to our brand new

0:47:53.360 --> 0:47:59.879
<v Speaker 1>sponsored segment, College Football's Walk On Mount Rushmore, presented by

0:48:00.160 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Chad Powers, now streaming on Hulu and Hulu on Disney

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Plus for Bundle subscribers. Each of the next four weeks,

0:48:07.760 --> 0:48:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll be revealing my Mount Rushmore of college football walk ons,

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 1>paying tribute to the legends who started with no scholarship,

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:20.719
<v Speaker 1>no spotlight, and still carved out unforgettable careers like you

0:48:20.760 --> 0:48:25.880
<v Speaker 1>are going to see Chad Powers hopefully do on the

0:48:25.920 --> 0:48:29.920
<v Speaker 1>new show on Hulu and Hulu on Disney Plus again.

0:48:29.960 --> 0:48:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten a sneak preview of the show. It's really

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:36.920
<v Speaker 1>fun and we'll talk more about that later. But the

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 1>first person on the Mount Rushmore of walk Ons is,

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of course Baker Mayfield, who took being a walk on

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:51.760
<v Speaker 1>twice two two times, being the Big twelve Offensive Player

0:48:51.760 --> 0:48:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of the year, was an All American, won the Heisman.

0:48:55.360 --> 0:48:59.640
<v Speaker 1>He walked on at Texas Tech and you know, found

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:03.200
<v Speaker 1>fought his way and got a starting job, but that

0:49:03.440 --> 0:49:06.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't enough for him. He then walked on at Oklahoma

0:49:07.480 --> 0:49:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and had truly a record setting college career. He left

0:49:13.400 --> 0:49:16.600
<v Speaker 1>college at the time with the highest passer rating ever.

0:49:16.960 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 1>His first year at Oklahoma thirty six touchdown seven picks

0:49:21.480 --> 0:49:24.360
<v Speaker 1>in fourth in the Heisman voting, his second year at

0:49:24.360 --> 0:49:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma forty touchdowns eight picks, completed seventy one percent of

0:49:29.280 --> 0:49:32.560
<v Speaker 1>his passes, third in the Heisman voting, and his final

0:49:32.640 --> 0:49:36.879
<v Speaker 1>year at Oklahoma forty three touchdown six picks, again over

0:49:36.960 --> 0:49:41.920
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent completions, first in the Heisman voting, won the

0:49:41.960 --> 0:49:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Maxwell Award, won the Walter Camp Award, the whole nine

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and he had to walk on everywhere, and now he's

0:49:49.640 --> 0:49:52.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of been a walk on in the NFL, had

0:49:52.120 --> 0:49:54.799
<v Speaker 1>to walk on with the Bucks, kind of fight with

0:49:54.880 --> 0:50:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Trash for his job, and has just been, you know,

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:08.759
<v Speaker 1>turned himself into a great, great player. So uh. The

0:50:08.800 --> 0:50:15.000
<v Speaker 1>first up in the Walk on Mount Rushmore, brought to

0:50:15.080 --> 0:50:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you by Chad Powers, now streaming on Hulu and Hulu

0:50:18.560 --> 0:50:22.319
<v Speaker 1>on Disney Plus is Baker Mayfield. Make sure to check

0:50:22.320 --> 0:50:26.200
<v Speaker 1>out Chad Powers new episode streaming every Tuesday on Hulu

0:50:26.280 --> 0:50:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and Hulu on Disney Plus for Bundle subscribers. All right, demanse,

0:50:31.280 --> 0:50:33.360
<v Speaker 1>let's get to one more game before we get to

0:50:33.440 --> 0:50:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek and some of the quick hitters.

0:50:36.520 --> 0:50:39.399
<v Speaker 2>So you're Jackson proved a three to one all while

0:50:39.400 --> 0:50:42.960
<v Speaker 2>making Party look awful. Could things have gone any better

0:50:43.000 --> 0:50:44.839
<v Speaker 2>for you in this game? You hater?

0:50:46.040 --> 0:50:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm not a hater, but I mean Party came

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:54.880
<v Speaker 1>back from injury and had three turnovers. The Jacks are

0:50:56.040 --> 0:50:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the Jacks. Aer is something to deal with and you

0:50:59.480 --> 0:51:01.680
<v Speaker 1>know what the you know, that's the Monday night game.

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:04.279
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, it's it's the right ball, is what you want?

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Probably want to call that?

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Huh oh, yeah, oh nice, nice. I like that. I

0:51:10.200 --> 0:51:11.560
<v Speaker 1>should have thought of that myself.

0:51:12.480 --> 0:51:16.880
<v Speaker 2>What if wins, you'd be that'll.

0:51:16.640 --> 0:51:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Be a bummer. If Jacksonville wins, you gotta take them

0:51:19.800 --> 0:51:27.000
<v Speaker 1>real serious, because here's the deal. The Jags offense has

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:30.560
<v Speaker 1>not been that good. Like I can't be like, oh,

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:33.759
<v Speaker 1>I told you so about Trevor. Trevor's not been that good.

0:51:34.280 --> 0:51:36.919
<v Speaker 1>He has five touchdowns, four picks, less than six yards

0:51:36.960 --> 0:51:40.240
<v Speaker 1>per attempt to seventy five rating. That's not their story.

0:51:40.640 --> 0:51:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Their story is last year. This is such a crazy

0:51:46.640 --> 0:51:49.440
<v Speaker 1>stat that I want to make sure it's correct. I

0:51:50.200 --> 0:51:53.680
<v Speaker 1>know it's correct, but I just want to double checks.

0:51:55.080 --> 0:51:58.400
<v Speaker 1>It's their takeaways compared to last year. So I'm double

0:51:58.480 --> 0:52:04.320
<v Speaker 1>checking this last year year the Jaguars. Yeah, it is correct.

0:52:04.640 --> 0:52:09.560
<v Speaker 1>How many takeaways do you think the Jacksonville Jaguars had

0:52:09.680 --> 0:52:10.280
<v Speaker 1>last season?

0:52:10.680 --> 0:52:11.440
<v Speaker 2>I'll go three.

0:52:13.040 --> 0:52:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's crazy, but it's played the game poorly. You

0:52:18.640 --> 0:52:21.640
<v Speaker 1>played the game like you went so low. You went

0:52:21.880 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 1>so low that it's no longer crazy what I'm saying.

0:52:26.000 --> 0:52:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I should have said this the second the second worst

0:52:31.040 --> 0:52:34.319
<v Speaker 1>team in takeaways last year, where the Browns and the

0:52:34.360 --> 0:52:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Patriots with twelve. The Jags had nine they had nine

0:52:39.719 --> 0:52:47.800
<v Speaker 1>takeaways all season. This year they have thirteen. They have

0:52:48.320 --> 0:52:54.120
<v Speaker 1>they have thirteen takeaways through four games. They had nine

0:52:54.239 --> 0:52:59.160
<v Speaker 1>takeaways through seventeen last year. So that's been the story.

0:52:59.200 --> 0:53:02.560
<v Speaker 1>The defense has been excellent. Liam Cohen's fired up, wanting

0:53:02.600 --> 0:53:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to fight Bob Salah, Bob Slas threatening to end his

0:53:05.640 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 1>effing life. Whole thing. The But the Jags, because the

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Texans have been such a mess. The Colts came back

0:53:14.800 --> 0:53:17.839
<v Speaker 1>down to earth a bit. The Jags are legitimate.

0:53:19.760 --> 0:53:21.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean came down to earth a little bit bit.

0:53:21.800 --> 0:53:23.080
<v Speaker 2>That team is serious though.

0:53:23.640 --> 0:53:28.439
<v Speaker 1>That was an impressive game, even in the loss. Yeah,

0:53:29.360 --> 0:53:33.280
<v Speaker 1>but like if we were right now, you it's hard

0:53:33.320 --> 0:53:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to make an AFC Top five and not really consider

0:53:38.560 --> 0:53:43.000
<v Speaker 1>including the Jags. Uh and the Niners on the other hand,

0:53:43.560 --> 0:53:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I just Perty's trying to do a little too much.

0:53:46.680 --> 0:53:50.720
<v Speaker 1>And now they play Thursday night. Pierce all got added

0:53:50.760 --> 0:53:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to the injury report, party went back on the injury report.

0:53:54.760 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the Niners could be in real, real trouble.

0:53:58.760 --> 0:54:00.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I want to about Tyreek for a

0:54:00.960 --> 0:54:04.839
<v Speaker 1>second here. First I want to say this, I think

0:54:04.880 --> 0:54:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the Internet can be real shitty at times and the

0:54:09.040 --> 0:54:13.280
<v Speaker 1>whole like, oh, Tyreek was so sick of playing with Tua.

0:54:13.680 --> 0:54:17.680
<v Speaker 1>He's clapping and smiling, guys, because if you guys, because

0:54:17.840 --> 0:54:20.000
<v Speaker 1>when he was carted off the field, he seemed like

0:54:20.200 --> 0:54:30.719
<v Speaker 1>before it almost yep, guys, I do not think you

0:54:30.800 --> 0:54:36.040
<v Speaker 1>should take anything away from how a person is reacting

0:54:37.280 --> 0:54:45.200
<v Speaker 1>moments after they suffer a truly even by NFL standards,

0:54:45.920 --> 0:54:51.319
<v Speaker 1>catastrophic injury. As far as what that the shock and

0:54:51.360 --> 0:54:55.799
<v Speaker 1>the adrenaline and the emotion, what how what that does

0:54:55.880 --> 0:55:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to your brain like that is I would imagine as

0:55:02.120 --> 0:55:06.480
<v Speaker 1>close to being not sober, like the way being hammered

0:55:06.560 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 1>can impact your brain. I would imagine that's similar. So

0:55:09.760 --> 0:55:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I thought that was crummy, even by modern

0:55:13.640 --> 0:55:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Internet standards. And listen, I'm not trying to defend across

0:55:17.440 --> 0:55:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the board. You know, Tyreek the guy, But I thought

0:55:20.280 --> 0:55:26.319
<v Speaker 1>that was unfair. Here's the other thing, man, That is

0:55:26.400 --> 0:55:30.239
<v Speaker 1>the type of injury to Monse that he could be

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:35.440
<v Speaker 1>out for all of next year. That's as bad as

0:55:35.480 --> 0:55:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it gets. The knee dislocation is not a knee cap dislocation.

0:55:42.280 --> 0:55:46.440
<v Speaker 1>It is a true full knee dislocation with all the

0:55:46.480 --> 0:55:54.400
<v Speaker 1>ligament terrors that go along with it. And I I

0:55:54.520 --> 0:56:03.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know if he comes back then and the speed

0:56:03.560 --> 0:56:07.759
<v Speaker 1>that's right, That's the thing, Like, I don't know what

0:56:08.040 --> 0:56:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that will do to his ability to be an impactful player.

0:56:15.400 --> 0:56:21.839
<v Speaker 1>And so it does feel at least kind of appropriate

0:56:22.520 --> 0:56:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to at least look at if this is it for

0:56:26.680 --> 0:56:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Kill, which it might be. Tyreek Kill the football

0:56:32.080 --> 0:56:40.880
<v Speaker 1>player is quite simply one of the greatest receivers any

0:56:40.960 --> 0:56:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of us have ever seen. And that is not an overstatement.

0:56:46.640 --> 0:56:52.560
<v Speaker 1>The only the only receivers. I'm going to try to

0:56:52.600 --> 0:56:54.440
<v Speaker 1>do this off the top of my head, but I

0:56:54.480 --> 0:56:58.040
<v Speaker 1>want to just pull up like all time receiving touchdowns,

0:56:58.680 --> 0:57:03.640
<v Speaker 1>just uh uh, make sure I'm not forgetting anybody, uh

0:57:04.840 --> 0:57:11.239
<v Speaker 1>you know obvious. I'm trying to think the only receivers that,

0:57:12.080 --> 0:57:15.840
<v Speaker 1>without a shadow of a doubt, you know, I feel

0:57:16.320 --> 0:57:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather have than Tyreek Moss, Jerry Rice. Are you

0:57:30.760 --> 0:57:39.240
<v Speaker 1>know what that's the list for me. I'm not saying

0:57:39.280 --> 0:57:41.760
<v Speaker 1>he's the third greatest receiver ever, and in fact, he

0:57:42.160 --> 0:57:46.280
<v Speaker 1>definitionally isn't you know, because it you know, didn't play

0:57:46.320 --> 0:57:48.920
<v Speaker 1>long enough in all you know, all of that. But

0:57:50.600 --> 0:57:57.520
<v Speaker 1>as far as guys that, hands down were better than him,

0:57:58.520 --> 0:58:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the only guys that I can say were hands down

0:58:01.720 --> 0:58:06.000
<v Speaker 1>better than Tyreek for me are Moss and Jerry Rice,

0:58:07.960 --> 0:58:17.000
<v Speaker 1>now Megatron t O. Uh, those guys you can obviously

0:58:17.080 --> 0:58:22.600
<v Speaker 1>make a very strong case were better than him. I

0:58:22.720 --> 0:58:27.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I agree with that case. I Tyreek

0:58:28.160 --> 0:58:41.000
<v Speaker 1>was such a dynamic, indefensible weapon that I just if

0:58:41.000 --> 0:58:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you want, if you believe he's one of the five

0:58:45.920 --> 0:58:51.000
<v Speaker 1>greatest receivers of all time, I think that's a legitimate opinion.

0:58:51.440 --> 0:58:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Didn't have one. If it is over for him, and

0:58:55.200 --> 0:58:57.600
<v Speaker 1>again it's crazy we're talking about this, but you have

0:58:57.760 --> 0:59:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it's on the board, it's over. Obviously, didn't have one

0:59:02.520 --> 0:59:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of the five greatest careers of all time. Like my

0:59:05.240 --> 0:59:08.040
<v Speaker 1>old co host, my pal Chris Carter had a better

0:59:08.120 --> 0:59:14.200
<v Speaker 1>career than Tyrek. Marvin Harrison and Larry Fitzgerald had better

0:59:16.520 --> 0:59:24.920
<v Speaker 1>careers than Tyreek. But as far as guys who I

0:59:25.040 --> 0:59:35.840
<v Speaker 1>would rather have, I think it's Moss, Rice, Tio's tough

0:59:36.960 --> 0:59:42.440
<v Speaker 1>te TiO was as great as TiO was, his peak

0:59:42.560 --> 0:59:46.520
<v Speaker 1>was not Tyreek's peak. This guy is a five time

0:59:47.760 --> 0:59:52.600
<v Speaker 1>first team All Pro and his receiving yards after his

0:59:52.800 --> 0:59:57.840
<v Speaker 1>rookie year ago twelve hundred, fifteen hundred, eight hundred he

0:59:57.920 --> 1:00:01.440
<v Speaker 1>was injured twelve hundred and twelve hundred and then leaves

1:00:01.520 --> 1:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City and goes seventeen hundred eighteen hundred and in

1:00:06.160 --> 1:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, he was I mean, he averaged averaged eighty

1:00:13.440 --> 1:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>yards per game in the postseason with seven postseason touchdowns.

1:00:19.960 --> 1:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Eight postseason touchdowns. I Jones no seven postseason touchdowns? What's up?

1:00:27.760 --> 1:00:29.840
<v Speaker 2>The Jones and the Chet says it's Tyreek a Hall

1:00:29.880 --> 1:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>of Famer if he never comes.

1:00:31.000 --> 1:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Back, Oh, first ballot. It's not even that's that's like,

1:00:39.000 --> 1:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that's not debatable, uh. I mean, being a five time

1:00:46.720 --> 1:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>first team All Pro is bananas. Being a guy who

1:00:52.760 --> 1:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>is only one, two, three, four, eight time Pro bowler

1:00:58.760 --> 1:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>in what five times? This is his tenth year and

1:01:03.600 --> 1:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>so this year gets if it gets wiped out, he

1:01:06.560 --> 1:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>will have played nine years and was a first team

1:01:09.400 --> 1:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>All Pro five of them, and his average for his career,

1:01:15.720 --> 1:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>his average season was thirteen hundred yards and ten touchdowns.

1:01:23.640 --> 1:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's just one of the greatest players I've

1:01:26.160 --> 1:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>ever seen. So that's my I hope it's not over

1:01:32.040 --> 1:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>for him, but man, it is. It's certainly on the

1:01:36.240 --> 1:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>board that it's over for him. Crazy, So thinking about

1:01:42.120 --> 1:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>upgrading to the all new iPhone seventeen Pro, design to

1:01:44.840 --> 1:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>be the most powerful iPhone ever. But you're also are

1:01:48.800 --> 1:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you also thinking about the traffic on your way to

1:01:50.920 --> 1:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the store or that headache of transferring all your data? Well,

1:01:54.400 --> 1:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>good news. When you order a new phone online with

1:01:57.120 --> 1:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>boost Mobile, they'll send an expert to your home or

1:02:00.400 --> 1:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>work to deliver your brand new iPhone seventeen Pro and

1:02:04.560 --> 1:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>get you all set up on boost Mobile within minutes,

1:02:07.960 --> 1:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>no hassled. Visit boostmobile dot com to get started. Delivery

1:02:12.000 --> 1:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>available for select devices. Purchase at boost mobile dot com.

1:02:16.120 --> 1:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Terms do apply, all right, deman s Let's get to

1:02:20.680 --> 1:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>these the other games quickly.

1:02:22.400 --> 1:02:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Here h Seahawks defeat the Cardinals twenty three to twenty.

1:02:26.960 --> 1:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, those Thursday night listen, the Seahawks gotta be taken seriously.

1:02:30.920 --> 1:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>The defense playing really well. Mike McDonald's got that team

1:02:34.240 --> 1:02:36.479
<v Speaker 1>going in the right direction, and Donald's been way better

1:02:36.480 --> 1:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>than I expected. Like I gotta be hand up and

1:02:39.200 --> 1:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>be like I might have been wrong about this. I

1:02:41.800 --> 1:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>killed the Seahawks for what I thought was getting worse

1:02:44.240 --> 1:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback going from Geno to Donald. That has not

1:02:47.680 --> 1:02:49.920
<v Speaker 1>been a downgrade at this point. It's been an upgrade

1:02:50.000 --> 1:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>right now, So credit words due Seahawks. Seahawks have to

1:02:53.560 --> 1:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>be taken seriously.

1:02:54.520 --> 1:02:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Next Dublin games, Steelers defeat the Vikings twenty four to

1:02:58.080 --> 1:02:58.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty one.

1:02:59.400 --> 1:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Hand up on that one too. I did not think

1:03:03.280 --> 1:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers be able to keep Rogers upright. Instead, he

1:03:06.480 --> 1:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>threw every pass within us well, and he just threw

1:03:09.840 --> 1:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>got rid of it so fast and he was super efficient.

1:03:14.160 --> 1:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>He was like eighteen of twenty two for two hundred yards,

1:03:17.160 --> 1:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and Carson Wentz was just awful. That was They almost

1:03:22.280 --> 1:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>found a way to blow it at the end, or

1:03:25.000 --> 1:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>at least have me closer than they should have. The Steelers,

1:03:27.120 --> 1:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a great win for them.

1:03:28.160 --> 1:03:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Next the Giants to feed the Charges twenty one to eighteen.

1:03:31.600 --> 1:03:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Upset of the week.

1:03:32.400 --> 1:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Huh, upset of the week. And Amarian Hampton had twelve

1:03:38.600 --> 1:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>carries for one hundred and thirty yards in a game

1:03:43.920 --> 1:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that was close against a rookie quarterback when you couldn't

1:03:47.960 --> 1:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>block well for them to not let Hampton. They called

1:03:52.560 --> 1:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>forty five dropbacks and twelve runs. It was the Chargers did.

1:03:57.000 --> 1:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>It was crazy and Joe Alt got hurt in that game,

1:04:01.040 --> 1:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>which is really concerning for them. That was a brutal,

1:04:04.200 --> 1:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>brutal game for the Chargers.

1:04:05.760 --> 1:04:07.000
<v Speaker 2>What do you want to say, would do you think

1:04:07.040 --> 1:04:09.000
<v Speaker 2>they would have won that game with Russell Wilson.

1:04:10.560 --> 1:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>The Giants? No, Yeah, I think Dart. I think Dart

1:04:13.680 --> 1:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>was an upgrade for them, even though he didn't like

1:04:15.800 --> 1:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>play great, he was an upgrade for them and gave

1:04:18.000 --> 1:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>him an energy boost. And the obviously other stories. Sadly,

1:04:21.120 --> 1:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>is Malik Neighbors done for the year with an acl

1:04:25.600 --> 1:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>beck Odell Beckham said it was the Giants turf.

1:04:28.160 --> 1:04:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Next Bill's to feed. The Saints thirty one to nineteen.

1:04:32.640 --> 1:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Not an impressive game from Buffalo. The Saints, down five

1:04:38.000 --> 1:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth quarter, throw a touchdown pass to take

1:04:40.600 --> 1:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a fourth quarter lead. The pass gets overturned on review

1:04:44.720 --> 1:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and they were the catch does and they were right.

1:04:46.920 --> 1:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>They end up kicking a field goal. Josh has a

1:04:49.400 --> 1:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>great scramble on third and five to basically ice the game.

1:04:52.280 --> 1:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>But that was a two point game in the fourth

1:04:56.120 --> 1:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>quarter and it could have been Saints' lead in the

1:04:59.080 --> 1:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter. The Bills oddly have not looked great the

1:05:04.200 --> 1:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks. The Dolphins game was not that impressive,

1:05:07.520 --> 1:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>The Saints game was not impressive. Now, Luckily for them,

1:05:10.760 --> 1:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>they've gone Ravens and then Jets, Dolphins, Saints and so

1:05:16.360 --> 1:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the schedules allowed for But that defense has to get better. Flatly,

1:05:20.520 --> 1:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>they score thirty every week. The defense has to get better.

1:05:23.280 --> 1:05:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Next, Falcons to feed the Commanders thirty four to twenty seven.

1:05:27.880 --> 1:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Listen, not let's take away on the Commander's side, because

1:05:30.040 --> 1:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>no Jaden Daniels. But for the Falcons, it's a nice

1:05:33.280 --> 1:05:35.959
<v Speaker 1>bounce back game by Penis and he needed it after

1:05:36.000 --> 1:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that horrible, horrible loss thirty to nothing to the Panthers.

1:05:40.400 --> 1:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>That was a really nice bounce back game by Penix.

1:05:42.720 --> 1:05:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Next, Texas defeed the Titans twenty six to zero. I

1:05:46.760 --> 1:05:48.320
<v Speaker 2>took the Titans plus the points.

1:05:50.120 --> 1:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>We can't yeah, we can no longer Brian Callahan's can't

1:05:54.600 --> 1:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>bet under any circumstances. Now, it should be said, if

1:05:59.080 --> 1:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you didn't watch this game, good for you. But also

1:06:02.480 --> 1:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it was six nothing in the fourth quarter. The Texans

1:06:06.080 --> 1:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>offense was struggling mightily, and then in the fourth quarter

1:06:09.480 --> 1:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>finally got clicking. Now, maybe that's a sign of things

1:06:12.600 --> 1:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to come. Maybe it's the Titans were you know, kind

1:06:15.400 --> 1:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of gave up. But that was an ugly game, and

1:06:18.720 --> 1:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I gotta think Brian Callahan's days are numbered. At this point,

1:06:23.680 --> 1:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that Titans team looks like far and away the worst

1:06:26.720 --> 1:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>team in the league again.

1:06:28.520 --> 1:06:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Next, Patriots defeat the Panthers forty two to thirteen.

1:06:32.680 --> 1:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Drake May's playing ball, you know they they The Patriots

1:06:37.320 --> 1:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>played well against Pittsburgh moving the ball, but they turned

1:06:41.120 --> 1:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it over five times. They cleaned that up in this

1:06:44.120 --> 1:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>game and they annihilate the Panthers. And speaking of days

1:06:47.680 --> 1:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>being numbered, Bryce is in trouble, buddy. He had that

1:06:52.760 --> 1:06:54.600
<v Speaker 1>nice little stretch at the end of last year, but

1:06:55.680 --> 1:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Bryce has been brutal Patriots. Huge game for the Patriots,

1:06:59.560 --> 1:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Patriots Bills, and by the way, for the Patriots if

1:07:04.600 --> 1:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>they can somehow upset the Bills and get to three

1:07:08.680 --> 1:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and two their next three games, demonsay Saints Titans, Browns,

1:07:14.920 --> 1:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Saints Titan's Browns in a row. It's unbelievable. The Patriots

1:07:20.040 --> 1:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>have games left, Saints Titan's Browns, two games against the Jets,

1:07:26.520 --> 1:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>another game against the Dolphins, the Bengals, and the Giants.

1:07:32.360 --> 1:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>What a schedule for the New England It's unbelievable.

1:07:35.280 --> 1:07:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Next, watch out Lines defeat the Browns. Thirty four to ten.

1:07:40.120 --> 1:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Flaco's gotta be done. I mean that the defense can

1:07:43.200 --> 1:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>only do so much. Uh, they got it. This is

1:07:46.240 --> 1:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>going just according to plan for sure, actually, because Flacco's

1:07:52.480 --> 1:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>been awful. If you the idea being Flacco gets benched

1:07:58.840 --> 1:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>early enough that there's time for Gabriel to go in,

1:08:04.040 --> 1:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and then he gets benched and then Shardor gets the

1:08:06.560 --> 1:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>end of the season. I think that's how this plays out.

1:08:09.080 --> 1:08:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Next, Rams defeat the Colts twenty seven to twenty.

1:08:15.080 --> 1:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Listen, the story of this game is ad Mitchell. Yeah,

1:08:20.640 --> 1:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>ad Mitchell making an unbelievable catch and run after and

1:08:26.320 --> 1:08:28.519
<v Speaker 1>then just the ball slipping out of his hands when

1:08:28.640 --> 1:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't setting it down but he was trying to

1:08:30.360 --> 1:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>extend it slips out of his hands, and then he

1:08:32.439 --> 1:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>also had a hold on a Jonathan Taylor touchdown or else.

1:08:37.240 --> 1:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>This is different. A great Matt Stafford game. Great Matt

1:08:41.439 --> 1:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Stafford game, and two to two at well with the

1:08:43.800 --> 1:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>game winner. That's a great win for the Rams.

1:08:46.160 --> 1:08:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Next Bears defeat the Raiders twenty four.

1:08:50.520 --> 1:08:55.519
<v Speaker 1>Listen. Gino's been brutal. Ashton genty, though, looked like Ashton

1:08:55.600 --> 1:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>genty for the first time since Boise State got back

1:08:58.880 --> 1:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to his little upright pre snap style and looked like

1:09:01.680 --> 1:09:05.479
<v Speaker 1>his old self. The Bears feel like, all right, we

1:09:05.520 --> 1:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>got to two and two, we have the buye, everything's settled. Yeah,

1:09:09.880 --> 1:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>great win. And then last night, the one game we

1:09:12.880 --> 1:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't talk about, Broncos to beat the Bengals twenty eight

1:09:17.040 --> 1:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to three. Ugly. The Bengals are in real, real trouble.

1:09:22.479 --> 1:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Chase is frustrated and credit where's due. After a very

1:09:26.320 --> 1:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>shaky open to the game, Bo Nicks made a great

1:09:29.160 --> 1:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>throw right before halftime that essentially ended the game. Aikman

1:09:32.439 --> 1:09:35.479
<v Speaker 1>and Buck had no interest in that game at all.

1:09:36.680 --> 1:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>And the Broncos get to two and two and steady themselves.

1:09:41.000 --> 1:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>And the question with the Bengals is are they gonna

1:09:43.120 --> 1:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>call about Kirk Cousins or Russell Wilson or are they

1:09:45.840 --> 1:09:50.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna ride with Browning? And so we'll see. In the

1:09:50.720 --> 1:09:52.479
<v Speaker 1>other Monday night game we talked about it, I guess

1:09:52.479 --> 1:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of Tyrek injury. The Dolphins beat the

1:09:55.360 --> 1:09:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Jets justin Fields had won sick play, but the Jets don't.

1:09:59.280 --> 1:10:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Know how to hit it. Go razy bet on that

1:10:01.000 --> 1:10:02.880
<v Speaker 2>game last night. I can't believe I'm bringing it up.

1:10:02.920 --> 1:10:05.479
<v Speaker 2>But I had. I had the over three and a

1:10:05.520 --> 1:10:08.760
<v Speaker 2>half on the punts and under on tous yardage, and

1:10:08.800 --> 1:10:11.679
<v Speaker 2>then I had justin fields for a touchdown pass which

1:10:11.680 --> 1:10:13.360
<v Speaker 2>he did not throw until the end of the game.

1:10:13.960 --> 1:10:16.320
<v Speaker 2>And then the Dolphins couldn't pick up like fifteen yards

1:10:16.720 --> 1:10:18.439
<v Speaker 2>ended up having a punt at the end to give

1:10:18.439 --> 1:10:19.160
<v Speaker 2>it to the Jets there.

1:10:20.280 --> 1:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh, so you it's a crazy bet that you would

1:10:23.439 --> 1:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>have won but didn't.

1:10:24.720 --> 1:10:27.000
<v Speaker 2>No, I won it because the Miami couldn't pick up

1:10:27.040 --> 1:10:28.800
<v Speaker 2>ten yards after they got the ball back on the

1:10:28.840 --> 1:10:32.280
<v Speaker 2>last possession, and it was the last stat was over

1:10:32.400 --> 1:10:36.320
<v Speaker 2>three and a half punts. Oh yeah, I had all

1:10:36.360 --> 1:10:37.240
<v Speaker 2>around three and a half.

1:10:37.400 --> 1:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>It was on this This is a great example as

1:10:40.320 --> 1:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to why NFL ratings are so high, because we got

1:10:43.320 --> 1:10:46.759
<v Speaker 1>dufuses like my son betting over three and a half punts,

1:10:46.960 --> 1:10:49.679
<v Speaker 1>so he's locked into one of the worst football games

1:10:49.720 --> 1:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of the year. I mean, it's just it's just unbelievable.

1:10:53.120 --> 1:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, save our listener questions for Tuesday. Apologies, but

1:10:57.040 --> 1:10:58.879
<v Speaker 1>if you put them in the show listen on Tuesday,

1:10:59.120 --> 1:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to some of then. Thank you. Oh, by

1:11:01.720 --> 1:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, shout out to our great sponsors, hard Rock

1:11:04.880 --> 1:11:08.439
<v Speaker 1>bet Boost Mobile, Chad Powers, and Hulu are friends at

1:11:08.640 --> 1:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Zen Like rate, subscribe review, Thank you to Volume, Thank

1:11:12.760 --> 1:11:14.799
<v Speaker 1>you to Blue Dock. I gotta go do Colin Coward

1:11:14.800 --> 1:11:16.679
<v Speaker 1>and make fun of his chargers. See you guys later.

1:11:16.760 --> 1:11:17.200
<v Speaker 1>What's right,