WEBVTT - How Insurance Costs Make NYC Construction So Expensive

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 3>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy all the way.

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 2>So Tracy, everyone just like very into affordability these days

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 2>in the cost of living and all that stuff. But

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, there's all kinds of things you

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 2>can do and whatever, but it seems like one fundamental thing,

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 2>which is probably true, is whatever we're talking about, whether

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 2>it's building infrastructure for public transportation, whether it's building offices,

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 2>whether it's building houses, Like, there's various costs involved, but

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 2>one is like just the cost of construction. And if

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 2>the cost of construction is very high, it's hard to

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 2>imagine affordability improving much on anything, right.

0:00:56.240 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 3>So, yes, absolutely, I can't really that point, But it

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 3>does seem like construction is this like one area where

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 3>so many different things come into play. So you have

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 3>the cost of basic materials, which have gone up, especially

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 3>since the pandemic. You have the cost of labor, which

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 3>has also gone up since the pandemic. You have the

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 3>cost of insurance, which has also gone up since the pandemic.

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 3>You have regulations which we've done many many episodes about

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 3>the added costs from the permitting process for various things.

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 3>It just seems like it's this bucket where you can

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 3>throw all these different factors in and then get this

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of like reinforces itself and just makes it even

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 3>more expensive.

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, totally.

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 2>And then you know you sort of hit it with

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 2>the insurance, but also just like cost of financing, right

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 2>because like as interest rates go high.

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.119
<v Speaker 3>The yeah, I forgot financing that too. It's a big bucket.

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:44.839
<v Speaker 4>It's a big bucket.

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 2>And like we know that construction is an area across

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>the economy, not just in New York City where we

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 2>talked about it. With residential housing, there's been a lot

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 2>of productivity growth, right, Yeah, like there's.

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 3>Been like no productivity growth according to at least one

0:01:58.400 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 3>paper I read. I think it was a Richmond fed

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 3>I will have to go back and check. But it's

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.559
<v Speaker 3>a really unusual industry in the sense that you haven't

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 3>actually seen you know, we don't have robots building houses yet.

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 2>We don't have robots building houses yet, So I don't know,

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think we need to learn more. You know,

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 2>sometimes you see these viral statistics like oh, the MTA

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 2>spent sixty million dollars on building an elevator, or cost

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 2>three million.

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Dollars to build seven million installing those plastic fins on

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 3>the subway turnstiles. I'm not even sure that qualifies as construction,

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 3>but seven million.

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Millions to build a bathroom, which is not fun if

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 2>like you have little kids, all kinds of things. Anyway,

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 2>we should do more about wide costs a lot to

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 2>build and maybe whether there's something that can be done

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 2>about it.

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, let's do it. Well.

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm very excited to say we really do have two

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 2>perfect guests.

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 4>Today.

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 2>We're going to be talking about the high cost of construction,

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 2>more infrastructure and stuff like that. In New York City.

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 2>We're going to be speaking with Elizabeth Crowley. She's the

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 2>president and CEO of the Building Trades Employers Association, also

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 2>known as BTA, as well as Michael Capasso. He is

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 2>a president and CEO of CAC Industries, Inc. So Elizabeth

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 2>and Michael, thank you so much for coming on od lots,

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 2>thank you for having us.

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, thank you, Joan Tracy. We are grateful for the

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 5>opportunity to talk today. I represent over twelve hundred contractors

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:19.519
<v Speaker 5>in the BTA who are building our skyscrapers, our subways,

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 5>building commercial buildings, hospitals, schools, about sixty five billion dollars

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 5>worth of work annually.

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 2>And wants to tell us about sac industries. What's your background?

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 6>Michaelac's Public Works heavy highway contractor based in New York

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 6>City and Queens. We work for the public agencies, Port

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 6>Authority of New York, Department of Design and Construction, Department

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 6>of Environmental Protection, MTA mays Battery Park City.

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Did you see the highline as well? Yes, that's amazing, amazing.

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Do you know that I do some research before I

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 3>come on this podcast. I know a lot of people

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 3>don't think so, but you know a little bit. Okay,

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 3>let me ask the first question. Let's just get it

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 3>out of the way. But your organization represents unionized workers,

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 3>and I think your company is also unionized workers. A

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of people are going to hear a high cost

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 3>of construction and NYC and immediately go to the union factor.

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 3>What is your response to that.

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 5>Well, our members are employers, so they're really businesses. We're

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 5>a business association and our members are employing over one

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 5>hundred thousand workers and we're proud that we're union contractors.

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 5>You know, we're the good guys, and there are a

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 5>lot of non union contractors out there that are racing

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 5>to the bottom. We're paying for benefits and wages, and

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 5>that's just part of the cost of construction. And really

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 5>what we're looking at doing is reforming costs that are

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.359
<v Speaker 5>more controllable, you know, the costs, the hidden costs that

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 5>go into construction, such as construction insurance.

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Definitely want to talk about construction insurance and all this stuff,

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 2>But again just on this point of like how much

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:57.359
<v Speaker 2>is quote hidden costs versus how much is just labor.

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Maybe Michael, you could like sort of break down or

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 2>either one of you breakdown how we should think about, like,

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 2>in a given project, when people see these big numbers,

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 2>how much should people think about the labor components specifically

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.239
<v Speaker 2>versus measuring these these other costs.

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, I would say typically labor ranges thirty

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 6>to thirty five percent of the total construction cost. But

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 6>getting back to your original statements about union and sometimes

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 6>people think that raises the cost of construction, I would

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 6>actually take the counter argument to that. All the public

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 6>works contracts in New York and the utility contracts are

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 6>subject to the city or the state prevailing wage laws,

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 6>which the union's rates are in line with Labor Law

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 6>two twenty, which are in the city contracts. Those the

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 6>wages and benefits you have to pay the employee. So

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 6>it's not the union wages that are costing too much money.

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 6>They're in line with all the rules and regulations of

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 6>the city and state. When we think about union wages

0:05:56.480 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 6>and why maybe there's this misconception. Yes, compared to people

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 6>that are not paying union wages, these people are paying good,

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 6>honest wages and benefits for the work they put in

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 6>during the day. There are people cut corners who don't

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 6>pay that fair market rate, which is where that kind

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 6>of concept comes from.

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 5>And look, there's a lot of cost to the delays.

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 5>And when we look at yeah, when we look at

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 5>our government leaders. Now we have a new mayor in

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 5>the City of New York who believes that we should

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 5>pay baristas forty dollars an Now, so when Mike talks

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 5>about the cost of union labor, it's not much more

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 5>an hourly rate. And these are inherently dangerous jobs. But

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 5>we have a mayor that wants to build more abundantly,

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 5>wants to cut the time it takes to build. So

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 5>the land use process from two years down to under

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 5>six months, and we support that, and the stars are

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 5>aligning also with the governor. You know, she has an

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 5>ambitious plan to build a new subway or railway from

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 5>Brooklyn to Queens. We haven't built like that in like

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 5>over one hundred years. She's in her budget going after

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 5>our environmental review. I mean environmental review should only take

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 5>a few months. You can see that process sometimes take

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 5>well over a few years, some bad cases five years.

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 5>And so what we're doing here as an industry leader,

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 5>the BTA, we're looking to reform insurance costs so that

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 5>we can not only build more abundantly, build faster, but

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 5>bring down the cost. And this is a substantial cost.

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 5>We found out from a recent report that nearly ten

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 5>percent of construction costs are wasted in New York as

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 5>opposed to any other state, even expensive states like California,

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 5>the cost of insurance is only about two percent for

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 5>the total project costs, where we're spending upwards of ten

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 5>twelve percent.

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.119
<v Speaker 3>Definitely want to talk about insurance. But you said something

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.119
<v Speaker 3>interesting there that just reminded me. You said, delays add

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 3>to the cost pressure This might be a dumb question,

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 3>But why is that? Because I think back to like

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 3>my own home construction project. If I have a contractor

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 3>and he says it's going to take six weeks, but

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 3>then he gets caught up on another project, it ends

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 3>up taking eight weeks. The cost usually doesn't go up.

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 3>It's just frustrating for me because I have to live

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 3>in a construction site. Also, I want to say, my

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 3>contractor knows I have a podcast. He's a very good contractor.

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Delays rarely happen, so thank you very much. But why

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 3>would that cause additional expenses?

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 5>Well, just sheer time. I mean what can be controllable,

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 5>certainly the land news process. Before representing the BTA, I

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 5>was a New York City Council member, so I served

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 5>for nine years, and a quick case by the time

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 5>it goes through the local community board, the borough President's

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 5>office and then comes to the council with the best lobbyists,

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 5>happens within two years. And so if the mayor could

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 5>get that narrowed down, and the council speaker is also

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 5>pledging to reduce the time to a window of less

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 5>than six months, that's twenty five percent of the average,

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 5>and so that's significant time saved. That's something that we

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 5>should be able to control, and if our government leaders

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:03.319
<v Speaker 5>want to control it, that's real reform.

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm not surprised at all to hear about like delays

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 2>a particularly environmental review. People like talk about this. Let's

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 2>actually talk about it a little bit more grainuarly. Like, so,

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 2>like you get like some projects that you want to

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 2>do I don't know, maybe something with a highway or

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 2>something like that, and you have some time frame or

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 2>some window that you think like you could get this done,

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 2>and then we always hear, oh, delays, Right, what drives

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 2>the delays, who intervenes, and what are the processes by which,

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 2>like these calendars get very extended.

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 6>There could be design errors or omissions in the bid documents. Okay,

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 6>so when you actually go out to commence construction and

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 6>do your preliminary work, the drawings don't match up with

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 6>actual field conditions, which then result in changes to the

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 6>contract and that process can be very lengthy. So now

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 6>you have to document the changes. Then as a contractor

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 6>with one of the public agencies, need to negotiate those

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 6>changes then get it approved. Depending on what the agency is,

0:09:57.800 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 6>it could be with the Controller's office in the City

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 6>of New York, or if it's at the MTA with

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 6>the board or whoever approves it at the MTA, and

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 6>all those steps take time. While those delays are being incurred,

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 6>contractors are then experiencing indirect overhead costs that are assigned

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 6>to the project. Well, no productive work explain it.

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 4>What are these indirect overhead cost?

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 6>Project managers, projects, supervision, safety directors, quality assurance personnel.

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 2>So their salaries and their fees continue to run.

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 3>You can't reassign them to another project while they're waiting.

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 6>Correct, they're assigned to a project. You don't know when

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 6>those processes will come to an end, so it could

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 6>go very expeditiously, it could be delayed longer, depending on

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:45.319
<v Speaker 6>how complex the changes are. So that project staff sits

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 6>there in theory underutilized, and then, as is our contractual right,

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 6>we will file a claim with that contracting agency for

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 6>those additional costs coupled with that and I don't know

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 6>how these costs are calculated. The agent see internally also

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 6>has those same costs for the people on those projects,

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:09.359
<v Speaker 6>whether in house staff or through third party consultants, accombination

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 6>of the two. So those costs all get compounded while

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 6>these changes happened.

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:16.839
<v Speaker 5>And what are the last projects I've funded as a

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 5>council member was to pay for turf in a park

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 5>like just like a running athletic field replacement, simple replacement.

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 5>It was funded fully in the budget. I left the

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 5>council in twenty seventeen. They only cut the ribbon on

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.439
<v Speaker 5>that project being fully completed just in twenty twenty four.

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 3>So what happened to those sing like, what are these

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.319
<v Speaker 3>studying by the turf? You stick it on?

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 4>What happened?

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 5>The Parks Department said it was going to be a

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:47.719
<v Speaker 5>four million dollar field replacement. Then the contractor came out

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 5>to the site. There was a lot of surface repair

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 5>underneath that needed to happen underlying, you know, just you know,

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 5>uneven surface or something like that. They sent it back.

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 5>I had to go back before Design Review Council. I mean,

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.719
<v Speaker 5>it really is something so small and so simple that

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 5>shouldn't even cost as much as it does. Gets the

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 5>lave a far too long, and we need real reform

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:14.359
<v Speaker 5>in city government. I believe government leaders are finally addressing

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 5>this as an impediment to building abundantly.

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Really, yeah, so this just reminded me. This is something

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 3>else I want to ask, But when you mentioned site reviews,

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 3>is there something unique or sort of inherent about the

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 3>way New York City is laid out and built and

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 3>its geography that also makes it more expensive. I'm thinking

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 3>like in Manhattan, obviously we have crowded buildings. Is some

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 3>of Manhattan on reclaimed land? I can't remember now.

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 6>Well, Battery Park cities all reclaim land there.

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 3>We go reclaim land and it's mostly an island with

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 3>few ins and outs, right, So I imagine there are some

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 3>restrictions on how much material you can actually get into

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 3>the city. Does just the physicality of the city make

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 3>it more expensive?

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, all that's built into the contract costs. So when

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 6>we're getting vendor quotes for different types of materials that

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:04.959
<v Speaker 6>will go into a construction project, most of the manufacturing

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 6>base is not within the Five boroughs, right, So it's

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 6>coming either from upstate out on Long Island, New Jersey,

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 6>maybe Pennsylvania, Southern New Jersey. You have the cost of

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 6>that transportation into the Five boroughs, right. So this if

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 6>you're a vendor who's manufacturing somewhere in Central Jersey, well

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 6>you probably can make multiple deliveries within the state of

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 6>New Jersey, where maybe that same freight carrier can only

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 6>make one delivery a day into the five boroughs.

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Ken Burns's brother, he made a great

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 2>documentary about New York. It's like a ten hour eleven

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 2>hour documentary. And there's a whole section on the speed

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 2>with which steel got from the Bethlehem steel Mill to

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 2>build the Chrysler building or something like that. Is just

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 2>an unbelievable logistics I imagine it would be a little

0:13:54.000 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 2>bit slower today. Let's get to insurance and all of

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 2>that stuff. You even brought us a nice report material

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 2>scaffold Law Economic Impact, which evidently, even though on the

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 2>cover of the report has a picture of a scaffold,

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 2>is not about scaffold.

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 3>Not just about skefla, not about.

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Scaffold per se per se. But what is the scaffold

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 2>law and why is this like an important priority of yours?

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 5>Well, look, if a worker was to fall off the scaffold,

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 5>then the scaffold law would apply, and it's to any

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 5>height related injury. A New York contractor, New York City

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 5>contractor is held one hundred percent liable and in forty

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 5>nine other states, it's comparable negligence. So what we found

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 5>through that economic impact study was that every hundred million

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 5>dollars that is wasted on frivolous claims, when you look

0:14:59.880 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 5>at reinvesting that into the economy, that's one hundred and

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 5>forty million dollar output, and that amounts to about fifty

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 5>five million dollars in wages and over six hundred jobs.

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 5>And we look at big projects like the President wants

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 5>to build Penn Station that's estimated to be seven billion

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 5>dollars in cost. If we were to put comparative negligence

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 5>on that project, we could save over five hundred million dollars.

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 5>That's half a billion dollars.

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 3>So just so we understand the difference between comparative negligence

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 3>and absolute liability. So if I'm a construction worker working

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 3>on a skyrise or something and I am not wearing

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 3>my helmet and I fall off a sixty story building,

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 3>I would be dead. But let's assume that I get injured.

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 3>I would probably be dead, all right, three story building, yeah, okay,

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 3>one story okay, But I'm not wearing my helmet, even

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 3>though my employer says I should be wearing a helmet.

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 3>And then I, you know, file acclaim. The absolute liability

0:15:56.280 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 3>rule basically says that you can't divide blood between the

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 3>company and the worker. Is that right? So instead of

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 3>being ninety percent at fault for my own injury because

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't wearing a helmet and I got a head injury,

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 3>the company is now one hundred percent at fault.

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 5>That's absolutely right. And in other states they do comparative

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 5>netligence and it's really driving up the cost of insurance

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 5>so much so that insurance don't even want to write

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 5>insurance in New York anymore.

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 6>The market's limited.

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 2>It tell us about the insurance market for you, because

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 2>this is a good thing for us.

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 6>So I mean, there's zero purchasing power. Contractors make a

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 6>significant investment in safety. I promise you there's nothing more

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 6>important to the contracting community than for every employee to

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 6>go home safe to their family, loved ones, or whoever

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 6>that may be. At the end of the day. I

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 6>know everybody cares about that. But when we go to

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 6>renew our insurance every year, and the large insurance carriers

0:16:54.880 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 6>look at what this market for them is considered or

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 6>the least favorable market to write insurance. So much so

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 6>that carriers don't even want to write insurance in this

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 6>market anymore, and if they do, deductibles are really high.

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 6>Rates are really high, So on a percentage base of revenue,

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 6>we're talking about five, six, ten x other states with

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 6>much higher deductibles. So now contractors carry the cost of

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:29.360
<v Speaker 6>those deductible payouts in their bids, which goes into these

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 6>public work bid numbers. So that's where you exponentially see

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 6>the higher cost of construction. But it actually take it

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 6>a step further. All the subcontractors and vendors that are

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 6>going to be working on our jobs also have the

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 6>same problem. And typically the subcontractors are smaller contractors by

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 6>either volume or revenue or employees, so they're typically paying

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:58.439
<v Speaker 6>a higher premium on a percentage basis. So those numbers

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 6>are also baked into our contract pricing.

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, our report really when we say contractors in New

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 5>York are paying ten percent of total construction costs to insurance,

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 5>that's five hundred percent more than other states, when in

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 5>other states it's only about two percent. And then Michael

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 5>mentioned the subcontractor. They get hit the worst on average,

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 5>if you were a concrete subcontractor or a steel painting

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 5>contractor you're paying fifteen to twenty percent your total volume

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 5>of work, and it's unsustainable.

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 3>So New York is the only city or only state city,

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 3>state that still has this long place. Is that right?

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 3>What happened in other states when we saw it go away.

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 5>So the last state to reform the so called scaffol

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 5>law absolute liability standard was Illinois in nineteen ninety five.

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.640
<v Speaker 5>So this is one hundred and forty year old law.

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 5>It's antiquated, it's broken policy. Even both the Democrats and

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 5>the Republicans when you speak to them one on one,

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:04.360
<v Speaker 5>they know this is bail policy. An interesting thing Illinois,

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 5>the number of fatalities declined after they put a comparative

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 5>negligence model in. So those that say it's you know,

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 5>you have some trial lawyers, then there really it is

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 5>a cash count for the trial. Why I mean that was.

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 3>Gonna be my next question. So if everyone agrees that

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 3>this is an antiquated law, who's actually standing in the way.

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 2>You're definitely going to get any email after this episode

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 2>and they're like, your guests are totally biased. There's gonna

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 2>be from some lawyer and they're like, come on and

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 2>do a follow up, But this raised the question, Okay,

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 2>the law has been around for over one hundred years,

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 2>so why not. I mean, like I can understand that

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 2>that might raise Yes, Okay, New York is going to

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 2>be a higher cost state. That doesn't explain the surge

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 2>per se. Has something changed in the last five, ten,

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight years. I mean New York used to do

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot more building, or used to build a lot.

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Has something changed such that the law has more teeth

0:19:58.320 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 2>or bites more.

0:19:59.040 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 4>Than it did?

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean, and you talk about the disappearance of certain

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 2>insurance carriers.

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 4>The law existed fifty years ago.

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.360
<v Speaker 6>Right right when I was first started my business. Yeah,

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 6>a little over thirty years ago. You know, insurance was

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 6>an add on the bid where you didn't really focus

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 6>about it. We're talking about one two percent of the

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 6>contract price, and that held true maybe up until even

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 6>ten years ago. And in the last ten years we've

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 6>seen a significant rise in the cost of insurance. And

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 6>I think it directly correlates with frequency of claims, third

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 6>party claims, payouts of those claims, and how either a

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 6>judge or jury awards damages in those cases. There's been

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 6>well documented cases of staged construction accidents on sites.

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 5>What Michael said is absolutely true. In New York for

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 5>scaffold laws, the bodily injury claimed settlements for scaffolows six

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 5>and a half times the average of other claim settlements.

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 5>The sheer volume has been increased by tenfolds. We're talking

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 5>about in fifteen years. And that's why these insurers are leaving.

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 5>You know why, Now, why do we think we have

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 5>a real opportunity, Not just because we have this economic

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:19.120
<v Speaker 5>impact report that shows is exactly how much we're spending.

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 5>Because government leaders are finally talking about the fraud and

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 5>abuse that's happening. Our governor and her state of the

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 5>state a last month called on insurance reform for the

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 5>automobile industry. Now half of the consumers in the state

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 5>are car owners. Right, they're driving. They could relate to

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 5>us paying so much more. But we're paying fifty percent

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 5>more in car insurance compared to every other state, but

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 5>our contractors are paying five hundred percent more. And the

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 5>governor touched upon fraud and abuse, just like Mike said.

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 5>The governor says we need to address that, we need

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 5>to lower litigation costs and minds you and that these

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 5>are order insurance claims out much much less than the

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 5>scaffold law claims, and we need to fix this. We

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 5>need reform. So this is a step in the right direction,

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 5>and we're really focused on reform in Washington right now

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:12.199
<v Speaker 5>that there's movements there. There's a lot of support on

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 5>this big federal infrastructure package that's a part of a

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 5>surface Reauthorization transit bill that gets reauthorized every five years.

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 5>It pays for big projects like a second avenue subway

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:29.120
<v Speaker 5>or major roads and highways bridges, and it's a must

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 5>pass bill, and we think that we'll see reform there first,

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 5>and we're very hopeful that reform will come soon.

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 3>In Albany, how would you actually go about reducing litigation costs?

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Because my assumption is as long as you're doing like

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 3>a jury process, it's going to be pretty expensive unless

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 3>you go to something like arbitration.

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, the litigated costs, one would say it goes

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 5>to jury, but all of these insurance companies right now

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 5>are just afraid to get that far.

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 3>In New York State, so they settle pretty quickly.

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 5>One insurance company, Tradesman Insurance, they filed five different reco

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 5>cases in recent years. Probably i've heard them say that

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 5>they invested over sixteen million dollars to do personal investigations

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 5>to stop fraud and abuse. And they say that because

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:17.120
<v Speaker 5>they were able to get so many claims dropped by

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 5>showing the Ford that there were bad actors, they saved

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 5>over two billion dollars. And the numbers keep growing. And

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 5>one law firm, Super and Assault shit that had like

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 5>three hundred different cases dropped, apparently closed their doors last month.

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 5>So it shouldn't get to that where insurance companies have

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 5>to do the reform. This is bad public policy and

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 5>we need our leaders in Washington and Albany to do reform. Now.

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 6>It's I mean, I think it's well documented. It's all

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 6>public information of just one building or a couple of buildings,

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 6>where multiple claimants from the same building, with the same

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 6>law firm utilizing the same medical practices filing these lawsuits.

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and some of the doctors are losing their licenses

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 5>and they're barred from workers' comp cases, and so that

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 5>is reassuring to see action happen. And we've reaching a

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 5>critical mass at this point. So I think that's why

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 5>now we're hopeful for reform.

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Michael, can you talk a little bit more about today

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 2>versus mid nineties. You win a bid with the city

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 2>or whatever, you have a project. You mentioned Back then,

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 2>insurance was an add on. Okay, there was one or

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 2>two percent. I was ten percent. But setting aside the

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 2>price going out and finding which carrier will take that,

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 2>can you just talk about what life was like I

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 2>don't know again thirty years ago verus today in terms

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 2>of going out into the market for finding that insurance available, options,

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 2>negotiations and so forth.

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean it was much easier and much more

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 6>simple twenty thirty years ago than it is today.

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 4>All Right, what did you do?

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 6>You talked to your insurance broker. They would come back

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 6>with three or four quotes, all roughly the same. What

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 6>did you feel comfortable with? You would do your annual renewals.

0:24:56.200 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 6>There would be incremental cost of living in fla shenary

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 6>adjustments to your annual rate. You signed on again for

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 6>another year. Now it's a much more detailed, thorough process,

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 6>thorough review, how much you're going to raise your deductibles.

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:15.199
<v Speaker 6>Where back then deductibles might have been twenty five thousand dollars,

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I think we're at seven hundred and fifty

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 6>five hundred and seven hundred and fifty thousand now per occurrence.

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 6>I mean significant significant changes where now the insurance company

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 6>will dictate when you're going through your quotes, if you

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 6>don't raise your deductible, we won't even write your insurance

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 6>where that didn't happen back then. So there was much

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 6>more purchasing power in the contracting community twenty thirty years

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 6>ago in the marketplace than there is today.

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is what I wanted to ask. So if

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:45.919
<v Speaker 3>the scaffolding law goes away, are you confident that new

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 3>insurance actors would actually come into the market, because it

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 3>feels like part of the problem here is a lot

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 3>of people have exited, so you have limited insurers to

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 3>actually choose from, which means they now have all the

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 3>pricing power.

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 5>I think the free market will work itself. It's a

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 5>competitive market right now for the limited that do do

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 5>business in New York. I was just on the phone

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 5>earlier today with Zorich, which is a worldwide inshore, and

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 5>they stopped ensuring small contractors and they'll only do big

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 5>wrap up projects. In New York State, our Department of

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 5>Financial Services regulates the companies to make sure that they

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 5>can't charge too much or too little. And again it's

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 5>the market. As long as they can prove they can

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 5>make money here in New York, they'll come back.

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 6>It just dawned on me. One other thing to consider,

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 6>which sometimes is good for the local contracting community, but

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 6>also not necessarily good for the overall city of New York.

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 6>There are contractors based in other states that won't work

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:55.640
<v Speaker 6>here because their insurance companies will exclude their policy from

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 6>working in New York, and then they would have to

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 6>buy jobs specific or site specific policies, which are also

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 6>very uncompetitive rates. So it's easier for them just to

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 6>stay out of the marketplace that then, in theory, may

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 6>drive down competition right from a low cause bid analysis,

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 6>I think.

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:15.679
<v Speaker 5>And interesting, you know, to bring it back to what

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 5>the governor has taken on in her state of the

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:21.439
<v Speaker 5>state or her and her budget auto insurance. You know,

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 5>we mentioned the trial lawyers and how this is really

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 5>a cash cow for them, but you know, they like

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 5>to paint the insurance companies as the bad actors.

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 6>But we look in.

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 5>Places like Florida, for example, they had a similar no

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 5>fault auto insurance policy like New York currently has, and

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 5>they changed the policies there and they've given rate payers

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 5>double digit refunds. So there is a situation, a scenario

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 5>where we could see the same for our contractors if

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 5>real reform happens here in New York.

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Just to be clear, does the high cost of insurance

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 3>also apply to projects where heights presumably don't come into

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:00.199
<v Speaker 3>it very much? So you know, if you're build a

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:03.360
<v Speaker 3>new subway tunnel or something like that, I assume there's

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 3>probably some scaffolding involved, but like maybe you're not falling

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 3>too much.

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 6>You could be standing on a ladder in a sewer trench,

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 6>six inches up on the ladder, with the ladder secured

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 6>on the bottom of the hole, tied up, all in

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 6>conformance with ocean regulations, and if the employee falls six

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 6>inches to the ground, which typically we all think we

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 6>would be okay falling six inches, but then some injury

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 6>arises months later and ends up in a lawyer's desk

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 6>and the contractors ensued there'll be some sort of payout

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 6>and that would fall under the scaffold loss. So even

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 6>though you're not up on the heights of a building,

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 6>not building a superstructure, that law still applies.

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 2>I find this argument to be very compelling, and the

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 2>high cost of insurance on a per project basis in

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 2>New York City versus every other state, that seems like

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 2>an issue.

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 4>Unquestionably. All that Big.

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Said, some of the numbers you read about construction processes, Okay,

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 2>let's say we take only thirty percent for labor or

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 2>labor is thirty percent of the job, and then let's

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 2>say insurance is ten percent of the job.

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 4>So this other part.

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 2>And when you read about the cost of an elevator

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 2>in a subway, it seems like even if we like

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 2>knocked off a lot of it for insurance and labor, whatever,

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 2>it still seems crazy expensive in New York.

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 4>So can we just talk about, like are these numbers real?

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Like when we see like, oh, it cost sixty million

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 2>dollars to build an elevator somewhere, is that real or

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 2>is that clickbait?

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 4>What's going on there?

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I don't know where it costs sixty million

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 6>to build an elevator. But look, remember there are subsurface

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 6>conditions in New York that you have to deal with,

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 6>like relocating utilities and gas manes and steam mains and

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 6>a lot that all may go into the cost of

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 6>that elevator, but it's really not the direct cost of

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 6>the elevator. So like when the MTA goes and puts

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 6>a new elevator in on a corner. Yeah, yes, maybe

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 6>the cost of that elevator project sounds enormous, and it

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 6>is for the elevator project, but not all of it

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 6>is directly tied to the elevator. It's clearing away.

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 2>But other cities have this too, right, Like I mean, yeah, absolutely,

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 2>it's not all There's going to be real estate acquisition

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 2>costs and all the issues and materials and everything. But

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 2>I get the impression that like building an elevator in

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 2>New York City, like, should taxpayers.

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 4>Be happy with?

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Like the numbers and they seem very high, and they

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 2>seem out of proportion with what we see in other city.

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I don't know the comparative data.

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we are most expensive to build in comparison to

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 5>other cities like San Francisco. Yeah, but it's still very

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 5>expensive to build there too.

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:52.479
<v Speaker 4>Sure, so what are we paying for?

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 6>Like?

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 2>What what are these number? I mean again, let's go

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 2>back to the turf example. Yeah, turf on let's and.

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 5>You did and I laughed before when you mentioned the Skyscraper,

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 5>the Chrysler Building, and the Bethlehem Steel and how that

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 5>was probably put together in less than a year, the

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 5>Empire State Building, and today we're building mega towers that

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 5>were taken three four years. And while they're important projects

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 5>and the very expensive projects, we were able to do

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 5>it in such a shorter time frame back then. Of course,

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 5>you save money when you reduce the time. Back to

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 5>that track, it was in Juniper Park, and it's funny

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 5>that you mentioned that, but actually I realized after you

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 5>spoke about Battery Park and how you know that was

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 5>water before we expanded, that was a swampland once in

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 5>Queens that particular park. And so those are the constraints

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 5>that we don't think about when we're building In New York.

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 5>It's so hard to find schools, you know, places to

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 5>build schools. I remember as a council member just having

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 5>the most overcrowded school district and so many sites were

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 5>contaminated and we couldn't find a good site. It's just

0:31:57.920 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 5>these difficult things that happen in such dense city and

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 5>part of the reason it's so expensive to build here.

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Does anyone have any good examples of building like efficiently

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 3>at not so much cost relatively in New York City

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 3>or New York State speak, but still to a high standard,

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 3>like an example of a project that was done really well. Michael,

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 3>surely you should be naming some of your own Yeah, No.

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 6>We don't have, unless they're a major design flaws or errors.

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:31.479
<v Speaker 6>I feel like almost all of our projects do go

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 6>extremely well. Right. It's a competitive marketplace. We're the low

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 6>bitter right typically when you get the job, which means

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 6>we're the cheapest price, the lowest responsible bidder, and more

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 6>often than not, we don't have these major overruns or changes.

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 6>They seem to go fairly well.

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 5>And Michael introduced himself as the president of the company

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 5>is But me and Michael worked together on the Mayor's

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 5>Task Force for Capital Reform, and we went up to

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 5>Albany as part of the reforms two years ago and

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 5>push for progressive design bills or different ways of building

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 5>projects that New York didn't use, in other states used

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 5>and that actually decreased the timeline and you were able

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 5>to build for less by using these delivery methods. And

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 5>I think that at Shirley Chisholm Park they just may

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 5>Or Mom Dommy cut the ribbon. But DDC is pointing

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 5>to that project that's coming in under budget and in

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 5>a short amount of time that was estimated that it

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 5>would take to build. So there are ways we could

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:34.719
<v Speaker 5>work together, putting our minds together to bring about real reform.

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 6>I think one area that we didn't touch on, which

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 6>I think is important. I know you probably know the

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 6>statistics right if you look at the counter argument, like

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 6>if you said the trial lawyers to what's driving these

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 6>insurance costs? You would think if these stricter rules and

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 6>laws are in place, it would make everything much safer

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 6>or safer for the worker, less injuries. And do you

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 6>want to touch timulous.

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 5>There's nothing more important than safety. That's a cornerstone of

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 5>the work that our contractors do. You know, they want

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 5>their workers to go home as safe as they were

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 5>when they came to work that day. We're you know,

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 5>even focusing on culture on the job site and total wellness.

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 5>That's important. So we need to continue to be forward thinking.

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 6>But the data set, the results in New York are

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 6>equal to other states, oh, in.

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 5>Terms of our rate of fatalities. In fact, New York

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 5>has a higher rate of fatalities. Despite this law in

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 5>comparison to state like New Jersey or the average in

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 5>the country. You know, when we have nearly twelve fatalities

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 5>per one hundred thousand workers, whereas the national average is

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 5>under ten, and so we're twenty percent higher in New

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 5>York despite having such a strict liability on contractors.

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:56.799
<v Speaker 4>Can we talk a little bit about current conditions.

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 2>So one of the things that we hurt a lot

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 2>in like twenty twenty one, twenty three, this like intense

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:07.720
<v Speaker 2>scarcity of skilled tradesmen and various things electrical, et cetera.

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 2>How is that Is that still a big Is that

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 2>a big issue? Still a major constraint right now finding

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 2>available labor?

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 6>I think an aging workforce at least I mean without

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:22.359
<v Speaker 6>me having any demographic data, just like visual context, and

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 6>we do have an aging workforce. I don't think the

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 6>younger generations are so inclined to either go to a

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 6>vocational school or some type of trade school. I would

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:36.839
<v Speaker 6>sit here and I would tell anyone I think it

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:39.359
<v Speaker 6>would be a great industry with the disruption going on

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 6>in the world right now, with you know, the advent

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 6>of AI and on all these jobs.

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:47.399
<v Speaker 2>Like for you, like right now, is this like when

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 2>you think of the various headaches that you have in

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 2>your life, is keeping a sort of steady the available

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:55.440
<v Speaker 2>flow of labor that knows how to build things like

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that keeps you up at night.

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean available flow of labor is one of

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 6>the things that's kept up at night since I started

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:04.720
<v Speaker 6>my business. Okay, we converted to a one hundred percent

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 6>employee owned company a couple of years ago, so much

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 6>so that I included the trades people, So the collectively

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 6>bargained employees or the different unions in the city are

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 6>part of that ESOP.

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 5>That's very unusual, and I applaud Michael and his team

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:23.480
<v Speaker 5>for doing that. But when we think about workforce needs,

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:26.959
<v Speaker 5>many of our contractors that are doing the infrastructure work,

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:32.359
<v Speaker 5>like Michael, are experiencing difficulties and often take talent from

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 5>one another. So ESOP is going to stop that for sure.

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 5>But when you look at the commercial buildings that are

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 5>going up, which is more of a private market or residential,

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 5>that is not happening. We really didn't have a chance

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 5>to talk much about affordable housing, but that any of

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:53.800
<v Speaker 5>that building is much more likely to be non union today,

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:57.240
<v Speaker 5>which is a real shame because a lot of times

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:02.760
<v Speaker 5>those workers are not getting paid on the books. More likely,

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 5>eighty percent of the injuries that happen on job sites

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 5>are happening on non union job sites. So we really

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 5>want to prevent that and help promote union employment as

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:11.800
<v Speaker 5>much as possible.

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Michael, you mentioned AI, So now I have to ask,

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, we dug in a little bit into construction

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 3>productivity at the beginning of this conversation, and you know,

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 3>I think construction is largely done now as it was

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 3>probably like twenty or thirty years ago, and there happened

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:30.399
<v Speaker 3>some technological advances like the nail gun, but beyond that,

0:37:30.480 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 3>we don't have actual robots that are like putting shingles

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 3>on our houses and things like that. But how confident

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 3>are you that it's gonna actually stay that way forever?

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Because I mean ms chat GPT kind.

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:44.799
<v Speaker 2>Of like how you're looking at me, like I've got

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 2>like vibe code. I'm going to vibe code the Running show.

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 3>It's all Joe's fault. But it came out of nowhere

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:52.760
<v Speaker 3>for white collar workers. Could it come out of nowhere

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 3>for blue collar I think so.

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 6>Look, I don't think it's going to replace the Workforce.

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:01.399
<v Speaker 6>Actually was at a construction conference a couple of weeks ago,

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 6>and my biggest takeaway is AI isn't replacing employees, but

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 6>employees who use AI will replace the employees who aren't.

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Do you see that, Like are there in your firm

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 2>or are you getting value from it? Is anyone doing

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 2>anything with like tech or anything? So is anyone using it.

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 6>For We had our off site strategy session last week

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 6>and one of our quarterly priorities is all around implementing

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 6>artificial intelligence in our processes and workflows. So really, how

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 6>can we get information sooner? So instead of relying on

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 6>maybe these incumbent software models, taking the data we have

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:41.919
<v Speaker 6>and using AI to give us analysis of that data

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 6>much quicker.

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 3>So not so much the physical process of putting up drywall,

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 3>but the planning and.

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 6>Look that's coming. I mean I have friends who have

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:52.799
<v Speaker 6>robots that can tie rebars now with wire right. They've

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:56.799
<v Speaker 6>invested in these companies and I'm not utilizing those robots yet,

0:38:57.160 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 6>but they're out there. Caterpillar has technology the having equipment

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 6>manufacturer where someone can sit let's call it like what

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 6>we grew up with a video game, Like it looks

0:39:08.239 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 6>like a pole position, I don't I if I'm dating myself,

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 6>and you can operate four different machines, not at the

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 6>same time, but from one TV screen for actual caterpillar

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 6>machines at four different locations, just sitting in like what

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:26.280
<v Speaker 6>I would call an arcade machine WOW, with no operator

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 6>in the seat.

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 5>Interestingly enough, you know I mentioned Zorich earlier. Zoric Insurance

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 5>will only ensure a project in New York if their

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 5>cameras watching. Now, they use AI after a day's work

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 5>to study any movement that was dangerous. So it's not

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 5>just like people, you know, believe it's for surveillance to

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:51.320
<v Speaker 5>stop fraud and abuse from happening, but it's really to

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 5>correct workers to and reduce risk. And they've seen that

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 5>their incidents have gone down significantly and their job sites

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 5>are much more safer.

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:03.879
<v Speaker 6>I'm part of a tri venture group doing the East

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:06.320
<v Speaker 6>Coast Resiliency project on the Lower East Side. It is

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 6>one point three billion dollar project and we're utilizing that

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 6>exact system. The cameras are located on machines on poles

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:20.800
<v Speaker 6>and the data gets downloaded every night analyzed by AI.

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:24.399
<v Speaker 6>So not only do we get like near misses or data,

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 6>but we also use it for training the workforce, so

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:30.720
<v Speaker 6>the videos that it captures to make the job site safer.

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what about again, just talk about current conditions. What

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:36.279
<v Speaker 2>about materials cost? So we know that the cost of

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 2>everything surged a lot immediately in the wake of the pandemic,

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:43.320
<v Speaker 2>you get to any relief. Have the pacent price increases

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 2>gone slowed at all? Are there any parts we've talked about,

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:49.799
<v Speaker 2>like transformers, like various key electrical parts that you can't

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 2>get easily at any price. What are you saying right

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:54.279
<v Speaker 2>now on just acquisition of materials?

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I have not seen prices come down. Okay, you

0:40:57.040 --> 0:40:58.800
<v Speaker 6>know it's no different when there was like a fuel

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 6>search charge, right that the oil market spiked and every

0:41:02.320 --> 0:41:06.080
<v Speaker 6>vendor would put a fuel searcharge on deliveries. Somehow those

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 6>fuel search charges never go away.

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 2>What about other like just other raw materials, like other

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 2>things that are in like scarcity that you like have

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 2>a difficult time finding at all at any price right now?

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 6>No, I think we're pretty much getting everything we need.

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:23.279
<v Speaker 6>I know COVID and coming out of COVID, there was

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:24.040
<v Speaker 6>big issues.

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:26.800
<v Speaker 3>When you walk into a building like the Bloomberg offices,

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 3>do you look around and you think, like, what a

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 3>marvel of structural engineering or do you think I wonder

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:32.399
<v Speaker 3>what the insurance costs are?

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:34.080
<v Speaker 6>No, I think I should have done something different in

0:41:34.120 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 6>my career.

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 2>One last thing that you mentioned, and I've read people

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:42.399
<v Speaker 2>who like talk about like you know, abundance, et cetera.

0:41:42.600 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 2>They talk about how a lot of like public projects,

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 2>there's a big consultant element that many aspects of it

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:52.720
<v Speaker 2>have been outsourced from the public sector, that these third parties,

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 2>and that that drives up you mentioned consultants. Does that

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:58.839
<v Speaker 2>Does that resonate with you in terms of where you

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:01.360
<v Speaker 2>see potent cost bloat and so forth.

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean I don't know the value of the

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:07.080
<v Speaker 6>consultant contracts, but I can tell you based on my experience.

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:11.160
<v Speaker 6>We used to work on a lot more contracts that

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 6>were run in house by the agencies, and now you

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:18.719
<v Speaker 6>see a lot of third party like resident engineer and

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:22.280
<v Speaker 6>inspection services and other tests that used to be performed

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 6>in ou so that are now performed by third party consultants.

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 5>And often they're called owners reps. And we'll get complaints

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:33.280
<v Speaker 5>from our contractors that owners reps are delaying the project,

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:36.120
<v Speaker 5>so they continue to get paid for the project, and

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 5>that's something where we're interested in seeing some reform too.

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 5>I've heard of that on more than one type of

0:42:43.160 --> 0:42:45.360
<v Speaker 5>project that could you know, it could be a school

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 5>being built or a bridge being painted.

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:50.799
<v Speaker 2>Michael and Elizabeth, thank you so much for coming on

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:51.239
<v Speaker 2>Odd Loves.

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:51.879
<v Speaker 4>That's a lot of fun.

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:54.239
<v Speaker 5>Thank thanks for having us.

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:55.719
<v Speaker 3>That was great us.

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's very nice.

0:43:10.239 --> 0:43:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Tracy, that was a fun conversation. I like it felt

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 2>like we learned about the city in some way, you

0:43:15.719 --> 0:43:16.360
<v Speaker 2>know what I'm saying.

0:43:16.560 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 3>I learned a lot about absolute liability.

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:19.800
<v Speaker 4>Ye, absolute liability.

0:43:19.920 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 3>That is interesting. Look, I also think the point about

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:26.239
<v Speaker 3>delays is very striking to me because again, that would

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 3>seem to be an issue where you're still paying people

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 3>to build something, but building it is taking ten years

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:33.400
<v Speaker 3>instead of five years.

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Or especially at a time when interest rates are high,

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:37.879
<v Speaker 2>can they compound extra right?

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:41.560
<v Speaker 3>And also it seems like there's a potential problem of

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:45.320
<v Speaker 3>incentives here, right, Like if I am a consultant working

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 3>on a project and I am still getting paid, the

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:51.319
<v Speaker 3>project's not actually going and I can spend a lot

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 3>of time I don't know, pointing out like individual issues

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:57.920
<v Speaker 3>and potentially delaying stuff like that's an incentive problem.

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, I guess I would say I find the point

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:04.799
<v Speaker 2>about insurance to be compelling, and the point about like

0:44:05.560 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 2>forty nine other states have gotten rid of these laws

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 2>and they're not actually even making New York a safer workplace.

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:14.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it would be one thing, I guess if

0:44:14.520 --> 0:44:16.960
<v Speaker 2>like New York had like half the accent right as

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:18.920
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the country, and then you say, okay, well,

0:44:18.960 --> 0:44:21.120
<v Speaker 2>look like you could point to a law like this

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 2>and say this is clearly making causing everyone to take

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 2>safety board. Seriously, if you can't point to that, if

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:30.319
<v Speaker 2>every other state has gotten rid of it, I mean,

0:44:30.360 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't have any opinion. But and again I'm sure

0:44:32.960 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 2>we're going to hear from lawyer.

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:36.440
<v Speaker 3>About to get make an enemy out of the child bar.

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, we're gonna get emails from lawyers saying we

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 2>want to do a rebuttal episode. But my gut is

0:44:43.640 --> 0:44:45.879
<v Speaker 2>that there's probably so definitely something to that.

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, the other thing I was thinking about on the

0:44:47.680 --> 0:44:49.920
<v Speaker 3>insurance point is, you know, I have this pet theory

0:44:49.960 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 3>that like insurers basically run the world. Yeah, I mean,

0:44:53.080 --> 0:44:55.680
<v Speaker 3>they control a lot of money. They set like not

0:44:55.719 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 3>just safety standards, but social standards for a lot of things.

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:02.879
<v Speaker 3>Is really interesting here about using AI to monitor yeah,

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 3>oh yeah, security camerage, footage, like for health and safety,

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:11.480
<v Speaker 3>because I can imagine, you know, if that helps the insurers.

0:45:11.640 --> 0:45:14.800
<v Speaker 3>I can imagine them asking that to become standard practice everywhere.

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:16.879
<v Speaker 2>It's super interesting to think, like, Okay, yeah, you want

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:19.880
<v Speaker 2>to have cameras because if there's an accident, then you could.

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:21.120
<v Speaker 4>Go back and review the footage.

0:45:21.320 --> 0:45:23.680
<v Speaker 2>But this idea that like, oh you could like see

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 2>if there was a near miss or something like that,

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:28.719
<v Speaker 2>the AI can detect it directly potentially.

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:29.440
<v Speaker 4>That's interesting.

0:45:29.680 --> 0:45:31.320
<v Speaker 2>And then of course there's gonna be all these questions

0:45:31.320 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 2>about surveillance and whether people like that. But this is

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 2>going to be it's gonna be a big topic. Yeah,

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 2>it's only it's gonna come on very fast.

0:45:39.120 --> 0:45:40.800
<v Speaker 3>I know I keep saying this, but we really should

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:42.360
<v Speaker 3>do more on insurance. We'll figure out.

0:45:42.239 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 2>We're sureing to do more, you know, like if we

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:46.879
<v Speaker 2>keep saying it like we are, you know, no, yes,

0:45:47.280 --> 0:45:49.360
<v Speaker 2>but even more even more I agree.

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Shall we leave it there?

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:51.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, let's leave it there.

0:45:51.239 --> 0:45:51.479
<v Speaker 6>Okay.

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:53.880
<v Speaker 3>This has been another episode of the ad Thoughts podcast.

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:57.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:45:56.880 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 4>And I'm Jill Wisenthal.

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:00.760
<v Speaker 2>You can follow me at the Stalwart hellow our producers

0:46:00.800 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Kerman Rodriguez at Kerman armand dash Ol Bennett at dashbod

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:06.960
<v Speaker 2>and Keil Brooks at Kelbrooks. More odd Laws content, go

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:09.359
<v Speaker 2>to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots with the daily

0:46:09.480 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 2>newsletter and all of our episodes. You can chat about

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 2>all of these topics twenty four to seven in our

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:17.400
<v Speaker 2>discord discord gg slash odlines.

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:19.279
<v Speaker 3>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you want us

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 3>to do even more on insurers, then please leave us

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 3>a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember,

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:28.239
<v Speaker 3>if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:31.239
<v Speaker 3>all of our episodes absolutely add free. All you need

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:33.960
<v Speaker 3>to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 3>and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.

0:47:01.040 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 2>In e