WEBVTT - Chiefs @ Bills Preview, Upset Brewing? & Nick’s Picks

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>including Jirell Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panya, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in What's Right with Nick Wright Episode two oh nine,

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 2>and we are days away from my favorite sports weekend

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 2>of the year, the best sports weekend of the year,

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Divisional Round playoff weekend. Two game Saturday, two game Sunday.

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy. Speaking of two game Saturday, let's bring de

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 2>monse in real quick before we get to what missed

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 2>the cut. This is an old I don't know what

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 2>videos Instagram sends you if you're like scrolling their reels

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 2>or whatever, but I'm sure it's different than the ones

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 2>the algorithm sends me, because the algorithm sends me gambling

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 2>videos and then parenting slash marriage videos, a bunch of

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 2>like this is how dumb my husband is videos, and

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 2>there is a whole cottage industries who's strung a word,

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 2>but a whole genre of you know my reaction when

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 2>you know I tell my wife I can't find something,

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 2>and then she gets up and looks for it, and

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 2>it's the guy with sweat pouring down his face a

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 2>variation of that, and a whole genre of you know,

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 2>my wife telling me about the plans today that she

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 2>has told me about seven different times over the previous

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 2>two months, and the guy's like, what plands? I am

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 2>here to tell you. Though, those two genres could not

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 2>be more accurate to my lived experiences. And I had

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 2>one of those moments today when your mom says to me, oh,

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm so excited for Ashley's painting reveal Saturday. I said, huh.

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 2>She was like, we talked about it, Ashley was here,

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 2>she told you how excited you were. I'm like, oh yeah.

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 2>And when she said I was like, oh yeah, I remember,

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 2>I was like, but when is that? She's like Saturday.

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, when Saturday said six o'clock and I gave her.

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 2>She said, is there football? I'm like, and now I

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 2>have turned it on her because her telling me plans

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 2>it registers in my brain the same place that the

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 2>NFL playoff schedule registers in her brain, which is nowhere.

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 2>And so I was like, yeah, there's football's visional weekend.

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 2>She was like, at six o'clock a bad time. I'm like,

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 2>it's the worst time. Originable couldn't pick a worst time.

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:08.799
<v Speaker 2>Six o'clock guarantees I would miss the second half of

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens game and the beginning of the Packer game.

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 2>She was like, so, what are we gonna do? And

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I was like, well, I know what I'm gonna do.

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna watch the games. Like I don't know. I

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 2>don't know how I can make this up to anyone,

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 2>but this is there's no possibility I can miss it now.

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 2>She was very nice. She was like, I understand, it's fine,

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 2>you can come meet up with us after. And I

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 2>don't know that she fully registered that there's the four

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 2>thirty game, but then there's another game after, so this

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 2>event starts at six. She said, I can come meet

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 2>up with her after. The after is like midnight, but

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 2>we sold her on, so listen, I am super excited

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 2>about this weekend and the final game is the game

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 2>of the weekend or what people would have you believe

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 2>is the game of the weekend. Chiefs Bills will get

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 2>to all of that in a moment. First, what missed

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 2>the cut Pacers trading for Pascal Siakam? I don't think

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 2>you could have found a more perfect pairing of good

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 2>but not great player going to good but not great

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 2>team that creates precisely zero buzz. It's like a mad

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 2>libs of fringe All Star Fringe contender combined forces. That

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 2>is it? Okay, who is the player and the team

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 2>we could put together that might make zero of the

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 2>talk shows? And the answer is, well, what if we

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 2>want Pascal Siakam on the Indiana Pacers? They're like perfect?

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 2>Do it? Kyrie wanted to reunite with Lebron. There will

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 2>be more discussion about Kyrie's you know, fever dream about

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe joining the Lakers than Pascal Siakam actually joining the Pacers.

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Modern media and Girl Scout Cookie season begins. Are you

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 2>guys trying tell me in my ear? Producers the Girl

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Scout Cookies thing? Are you guys trying to get me

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 2>Have I done my Girl Scout Cookies rant on this

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 2>show before you guys trying to bait me into that

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 2>or is that an honest question? Oh? I haven't done it. Okay,

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 2>all right, stay for the end of the show. I'll

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 2>do my girl Scout Cookies rant because there's I have

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 2>strong opinions on this, and it's not about what the

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 2>best flavors. I agree with you De Monsey. I like

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 2>thin mints, but thin mints and the freezer delicious. So

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 2>we'll do all of that. But first demand let's get

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 2>into the actual show. Go ahead.

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 3>After getting absolutely embarrassed at home last week by the

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Green Bay Packers, the Dallas Cowboys are keeping McCarthy. Everybody

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 3>thought he was gonna lose his job, including me, maybe you.

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 3>But with so many quality coaching candidates opening up, why

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 3>does it make sense for Dallas to keep McCarthy.

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I only it does. And I've now come

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 2>to aation that maybe others came to before, and maybe

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 2>some think I'm wrong on That's fine. And the realization

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 2>is I don't think Jerry Jones' number one goal is

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 2>to win a Super Bowl. I think Jerry Jones' number

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 2>one goal is to be the face, voice and have

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 2>full control of his franchise. And he'd like to win

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 2>a Super Bowl. But he has to have that because

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:30.559
<v Speaker 2>if your number one goal is to win a Super Bowl,

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 2>and Jim Harbaugh might be available, Bill Belichick is available,

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 2>Mike Vrabel is available, hell Pete Carroll is available, maybe,

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 2>just maybe Mike Tomlin could be available, all those things,

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 2>and you decide to run it back with Mike McCarthy.

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 2>It's because your number one objective is to have unquestioned,

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 2>full control of your franchise, be the unquestioned voice and

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 2>face of the franchise. And I think it's a bad decision. Now.

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 2>I understand that, you know, Greg Olsen, who I think

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 2>has been awesome and I have massive respect for that.

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Greg Olsen during the broadcast and since the game, you know,

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 2>via Twitter, has been very adamant that the smart move

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 2>is to keep Mike McCarthy. That it's too reactionary, it's

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 2>too prisoner of the moment he to keep Mike McCarthy.

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 2>I vehemently disagree with that take. I think people probably

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 2>thought that when the Denver Broncos uh three years in.

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Was it three years or four years? I'm gonna check

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 2>it to be because I want to be exactly right here.

0:07:56.520 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 2>But with John Fox in Denver, what'd you say.

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 3>It's been a long moment too as well, you know,

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 3>prisoner of the moment, this keeps happening.

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, sure, the very fair point. But so John

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Fox in Denver, he was the coach there for four years,

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 2>but he was the coach with Peyton for three. In

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 2>those three years, they went thirteen and three, lost in

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 2>the divisional round their first playoff game, went thirteen and three,

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 2>lost in the Super Bowl, went twelve and four, lost

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 2>in the divisional round their first playoff game. They had

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 2>the bye every year, they made a Super Bowl. So

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 2>he was forty six and eighteen three and four in

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 2>the postseason, won a playoff game with Tim Tebow as

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 2>his quarterback, made the playoffs with Tim Tebow. Once he

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 2>got Peyton, they won twelve or thirteen games and had

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 2>the bye every year and made a super Bowl, and

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 2>they fired him because they said, we need to get

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 2>over for the hump, we need to be better. And

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 2>by the way, the next year they won the Super Bowl.

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 2>And so I don't think. I do think there are

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 2>certain losses that wipe away all the good work you

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 2>did in that regular season. And when I evaluate coaches,

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 2>I ask the very simple question because my coach and

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 2>my GM evaluation is very different. With a the better

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 2>the job the GM does, the higher expectations the coach has.

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 2>The worst job a GM does, the lower expectations a

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 2>coach has. Which is why Belichick was in such a

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 2>weird spot at the end of New England because it's like, well,

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 2>he is making the most with a roster that doesn't

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 2>have any talent, but he picked the talent, so that

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 2>obviously then works for him as a coach against him

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 2>as a GM. I think the Cowboys were tremendously talented,

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 2>and I think the Cowboys were once again unprepared for

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the postseason. The Cowboys in two of the last three

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 2>years losing home playoff games to Jimmy Garoppolo and Jordan Love.

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 2>And no disrespect to Jordan because he's been excellent, but

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 2>they were the seventh seed. They were fighting for their

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 2>playoff lives in the final week of the year. It's

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 2>his first ever playoff start, so losing those home playoff

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 2>games as significant favorites is firing worthy. It just is.

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 2>And when you look at Mike McCarthy, if you are

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 2>a team that is as Brew has been saying all year,

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 2>super Bowler bust and I have been arguing, well the

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:05.319
<v Speaker 2>very least NFC Championship game or Bust. You do need

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 2>to ask yourself when is the last time in the

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 2>postseason one of his teams overachieved or met expectation? When

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 2>is the last time the Green Bay Packers or the

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Dallas Cowboys with Mike McCarthy, once they got to the postseason,

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 2>got to where they were supposed to be. So in

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty ten, they win the Super Bowl as the wild card.

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:39.119
<v Speaker 2>It's why it's amazing. It's a great job by all involved.

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Since then we can go through the years, guys, and

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 2>in fact, we will go through the years. The very

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 2>next year, the Green Bay Packers were fifteen and one,

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 2>and in their first playoff game at home, they don't

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 2>lose to the Giants. They get blown out out by

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 2>the Giants. In twenty twelve, they're eleven and five. They

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 2>win their first playoff game against the Vikings, and then

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 2>they play the Niners and they don't lose to the Niners.

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 2>They get blown out by the Niners. The next year,

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 2>so that to me getting the divisional round. That year,

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 2>they weren't as good as the Niners. That's a road

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 2>playoff game, that's I guess meeting expectation. But you got

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 2>blown out. The next year they sneak into the playoffs

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 2>eight seven and one. They lose the Niners again. Okay.

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 2>The next year they are the one seed, I'm sorry,

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 2>the two seed. They get the bye, They are in

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 2>the NFC Championship game against Seattle, have a two score

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 2>lead with minutes to go and blow the game. Now

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 2>they reached about as far as they were supposed to go.

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 2>They were the two seed. They lost to the one seed,

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 2>but they lost in horrific fashion. The very next year

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 2>they lose. It takes two Aaron Rodgers Hail Mary's to

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 2>force overtime against the Cardinals and you lose. And the

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 2>next year they play I would say to their seed,

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 2>maybe above their seed, get to the NFC Championship game

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 2>and get blown out by the Falcons, and then we

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 2>know the story in Dallas. So I think Jerry decided

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 2>it was more important to have a coach that he

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:41.839
<v Speaker 2>could control, that he could be the voice of the franchise,

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 2>all of that. Then that he could give themselves the

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 2>best chance to win a championship. Now, folks will make

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 2>the argument, what did Andy Reid's postseason resume look like

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 2>before he got packed Mahomes? And I understand that argument

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 2>because Andy had a lot of years where they were

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 2>good but not great, couldn't get over the hump. The

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 2>difference is Andy did not have nearly as many absolute

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 2>flameouts and Andy most notably did not have these years

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 2>where he had the better quarterback in a playoff game

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 2>and kept losing. And people are like, oh, look at

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 2>the Andy with the Chiefs before Mahomes got there, they

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 2>lost to the Colts. Blew a twenty said that one

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 2>was painful. Flew his twenty seven point lead to the

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Colts in the playoffs. Yeah, I understand that it was

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Alex Smith versus Andrew Luck that the next time they

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 2>were in the playoffs lost to the Patriots, it was

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Alex Smith against Tom Brady. The next time they were

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 2>in the playoffs lost to the Steelers, it was Alex

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Smith against Big Ben. That was a tough one too.

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs scored two touchdowns, Steelers scored zero touchdowns. In the

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs I lost that game eighteen to sixty two field

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 2>goals for the steel six field goals for the Steelers.

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Pardon me, now the next year Alex Smith last year

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 2>lost to Marcus Mariota. Now that's a terrible one. Up

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty one to three, loose to Marcus Mariota, And so yeah,

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean that that's a really, really bad one. But

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 2>you also were not a true Super Bowl contender that year,

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 2>and then Mahomes takes over and you reach these heights.

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 2>The point, the reason to me that Andy Reid Mike

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 2>McCarthy analogy doesn't quite fit is Mike McCarthy had his

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 2>version of Patrick Mahomes. It was Aaron Rodgers, and he

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 2>made one Super Bowl in a decade. So I think

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 2>it's a bad job.

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 4>It's a bad job by Jerry keeping him all right. Next,

0:15:57.400 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 4>so you laid out on your show. How Yeah, I'm

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 4>coming down. That's something I'm sorry for all the listeners.

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 4>Voice is gonna be a little.

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 2>You're right, don't worry about it.

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, you laid out. This is the biggest game

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 3>for nearly everybody on the Bills, most notably Josh Allen.

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 3>They're the favorites at home and have the momentum on

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 3>their side. Would you say that the biggest edge for

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs right now is how big this game is

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 3>for Buffalo.

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, the biggest edge for the Chiefs is that

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 2>they're better. And I say these things and people immediately

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 2>they're like, oh my god, what a Homer. And I

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 2>laid this out on the TV show Yesterda. I'm going

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 2>to lay it out again. The Bills win eleven and

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 2>six and won their division and were considered terrifying. The

0:16:40.800 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs went eleven and six and won their division and

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 2>it was considered disappointing. In a failure, Josh Allen had

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 2>a worse passer rating than Patrick Mahomes, touchdown interception ratio

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 2>than Patrick Mahomes, yards per attempt than Patrick Mahomes, completion

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 2>percentage in Patrick Mahomes, and yards per game than Patrick Mahomes.

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 2>Every single passing statistic Allen was worse than Mahomes. This year,

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Josh was considered an MVP candidate Mahomes. It was considered,

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 2>what's wrong.

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.479
<v Speaker 3>Slightly with the passer rating that the passing numbers are

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 3>they slightly better Mahomes.

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 2>It's all very close. It's all very close. And so

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 2>if the answer is because Josh is running if the golf,

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 2>if you think the golf between Mahomes and Allen in

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 2>how they were discussed this year, is equivalent to Josh

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 2>is a better runner, I disagree, Mahomes. The it was

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 2>we were Nobody was saying Josh Allen is broken as

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 2>a passer. The offense is broken for the Bills. Nobody

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 2>nationally and Mahomes across the board had better passing numbers.

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 2>And it's just again, it's how we discussed the teams.

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 2>The Bills have the number nine defense in the NFL.

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 2>Nobody thinks it's a glaring weakness. The Chiefs, believe it

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 2>or not, have the number nine offense in the NFL.

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 2>It's their Achilles heel. So I am here to tell

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 2>you it is. It is not that, oh, Nick, But

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 2>they played before and the Bills won. They did, and

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 2>you give them credit for that. The I think if

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 2>you remember that game, it was a Cadarius Tony game.

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 2>That to me is the definition of a coin flip game,

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 2>a game that could go either way. And in that game,

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs were without both of their starting linebackers, their

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 2>left tackle and their running back, and the Bills were

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 2>coming off a bye. The Chiefs were not in this game.

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 2>The injury advantage is on the chief side rather than

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 2>the Bill's side. The Bills played Monday, the Chiefs played Saturday,

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 2>and all those guys the Chiefs were missing her back.

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 2>So the biggest edge the Chiefs have is they're a

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 2>better football team. And there are a lot of interesting

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 2>elements to this game. And I'm wearing my no Gamble,

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:27.439
<v Speaker 2>No Future sweatshirt in part because I love it, but

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 2>also because that is my buddy, Buffalo, Brent Hanks's television show,

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 2>and I want him to have some you know, good

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 2>vibes and good feelings leading up to Sunday, because Sunday

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 2>is going to be so painful for him. Because when

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 2>Sunday comes around and when the Chiefs win that game,

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 2>what is Buffalo's next move? If you can't beat the

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:54.120
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs this year in this spot in your building, when

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 2>are you going to? And credit to Bill Simmons because

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 2>he he brought up this analogy and I thought it

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 2>was really smart. He said, if the Bills don't win

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 2>this game, are they the Atlanta Hawks of the nineteen

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 2>eighties with Josh Allen being Dominique Wilkins. I was like, Oh,

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 2>that's good. So once Dominique got to the Hawks, you know,

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 2>once he was really really great. They lose to the

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Celtics in round two. Then the next year they lose

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 2>to the Pistons in round two. Then the next year

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 2>they lose to the Celtics in round two again. Eventually,

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:37.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, they lose to the Bulls. Once they lose

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 2>to the Pistons. Can they never even make a conference final.

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 2>The other reason that one works is one of their

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Round twos against the Celtics. That Game seven is one

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 2>of the greatest NBA games ever played. They lost by

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 2>two points in heartbreaking fashion, and Dominique, some would argue,

0:20:56.560 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 2>outplayed bird. Dominique had forty seven and they lose by two.

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 2>That's kind of the divisional round game. You could argue

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 2>from a couple of years ago, the thirteen seconds game.

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 2>So if they don't win this year, I don't know

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 2>when they're winning. But I also don't like this bullsh

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 2>that this is a rivalry. Not yet. It could be.

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 2>If the Bills win Sunday, it's not a rivalry. If

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 2>one team wins every big spot, it's not a rivalry.

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 2>If the Chiefs in this era demans, what's the Chief's

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 2>worst year in this era that you don't have to

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 2>give me the year, but the worst result the Chiefs

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 2>have had since Mahomes has been there.

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 3>They lost some play lost in the playoffs of the Begels.

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's exactly right. The overtime AFC Title Game lost

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 2>two years ago was the Chief's worst season since Mahomes

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 2>took over. What's the Bill's best year getting blown out

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 2>in the AFC title four years ago by Kansas City.

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 2>If we were to line up the best and worst

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 2>of the Mahomes Allen era and rank them, the number

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 2>one seed the Chiefs last year League MVP, Super Bowl Champion,

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:20.360
<v Speaker 2>number two seed the Chiefs in twenty nineteen Super Bowl Champion,

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 2>the number three seed the Chiefs in twenty twenty went

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 2>to the Super Bowl and lost. The number four seed

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs in twenty eighteen League MVP, losing overtime in

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 2>the AFC Title Game to Brady the number five seed

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs in twenty twenty one, losing overtime to Joe

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Burrow in the AFC Title Game. The five best seasons

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 2>for the Chiefs and Bills since they've had Mahomes and

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Allen are all Chiefs years. The best Bill's year would

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 2>be the sixth seed losing in the AFC title game

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 2>to the Chiefs and getting blown out, which is the

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 2>long way of saying this the Chief's best year of

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 2>this era. I'm sorry. The Chief's worst year of this

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 2>era is better than the Bill's best year of the

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 2>era by any definition, by any metric. So they lose

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 2>this year, Buff And just think about even the context

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 2>of how they've been discussed this week. The Chiefs win

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 2>by nineteen against an eleven win team that had a

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 2>fringe MVP candidate at quarterback. Eh, it was called out,

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 2>What does it really matter. The Bills win by fourteen

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 2>against a ten win team that made the playoffs on

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 2>the final day of the year with their third string quarterback.

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, the Bills are terrifying. Folks are trying

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 2>to speak this into existence, but it does not yet exist.

0:23:54.680 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 2>And so I'm excited to see the game. But the

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 2>fact of the matter is, since Mahomes took over Chief

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:09.439
<v Speaker 2>season start, Conference championship game weekend. A great season you

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 2>go to and zero. A disappointing season you go one

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 2>and one, and an awful season you go zero to one.

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs have had two great seasons, one disappointing season,

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 2>and two awful seasons. The season this weekend will be

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 2>a nice preamble to it for Kansas City, but that's

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 2>what it is. And so we'll go out and see.

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 2>And I'm gonna say one other piece of this because people,

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 2>and by people, I mean my television co host, say Nick,

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 2>so much of your argument is the history. And it's

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 2>not just the history. It's that I just saw Mahomes

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:56.959
<v Speaker 2>play the best negative degree playoff game anyone's ever played.

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Rashi Rice is turning into a star, and they the

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 2>best defense in the NFL. It's not just that, but yeah,

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 2>I am looking to Mahomes's postseason history. Because Mahomes' postseason history,

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 2>how has he lost? Well, I can tell you because

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 2>it's only happened three times. He lost in twenty eighteen

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 2>in the AFC title Game. In that game, the Chiefs

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 2>were down ten points going into the fourth quarter. Mahomes

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.640
<v Speaker 2>led back to back touchdown drives. They're up twenty one

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 2>to seventeen. The Patriots score with three and a half

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 2>minutes left. Mahomes gets the ball back leads another go

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 2>ahead drive. They're up twenty eight to twenty four. The

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Patriots score with thirty nine seconds left to take the lead.

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes leads another drive to tie the game. They lose

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:58.239
<v Speaker 2>the toss the Patriots the ball went in overtime. So

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 2>that game, to beat Mahomes, you had to overcome the

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 2>fact that he had three fourth quarter comebacks in the

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 2>same game. The next time he lost was in the

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl, got his ass kicked throughout the game. Bucks

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:19.640
<v Speaker 2>were better. Bucks deserved it. If you watch that game,

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes played kind of brilliantly despite the Vegas down four

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 2>offensive linemen, but they got absolutely rolled. The only other

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 2>game he's lost was the only time in his career

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 2>he's played poorly in the postseason, which was over the

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 2>second the overtime loss to Cincinnati when in the second

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 2>half he semi melted down if you will, made the

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 2>big mistake before halftime. It seemed to short circle him,

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 2>and he played poorly in the second half. That's it.

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 2>So what's the the reason that I think the history

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 2>here matters is Patrick Mahomes in his career has played

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 2>a dozen playoff games before the Super Bowl, He's ten

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 2>and two, both losses in overtime. And it's thirty one

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 2>touchdowns and three picks. I'll say that again. He has

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 2>thirty one touchdowns and three picks. Patrick Owens has played

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:15.479
<v Speaker 2>seven Divisional Rounder wild card games. He's seven to zero

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:20.360
<v Speaker 2>with seventeen touchdowns and one pick. Seventeen touchdowns, one pick

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 2>in the Divisional round of wildcard round. So yeah, the

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 2>history there matters a lot to me. And I think

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs have the better def right now, going into

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 2>this week. Chiefs have the better quarterback, they have a

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 2>better coach, they have the better defense. They've been a

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 2>running back, they have a better tight end, and sneaky,

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 2>they might have the better number one receiver, and it's

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna get real nervous up in Orchard Park, real nervous

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 2>up in Orchard Park. And Demons, I saw you kind

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 2>of grimace when I said they might have the number one,

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 2>the better number one receiver. You go make some money

0:27:55.280 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 2>on FanDuel. FanDuel projected totally. Well, I'm just saying, projected

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 2>total yards for Digs sixty five, projected total yards for

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Rice seventy five. So the book makers, whether whoever they

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 2>think is better, they think where she Rice is gonna

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 2>have the bigger game, So take for that what you

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 2>will next.

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 3>They have to think where they think the quarterback's more

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 3>likely to get the ball to them. But I hope,

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 3>for your sake, the Chiefs win this game. So the

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Packers and Jordan Love are obviously coming off that upset

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 3>versus the Cowboys, and now they're headed in to play

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 3>the Niners. So what's your lack of your lack of

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 3>faith in brock Party. You probably think there's a chance

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.239
<v Speaker 3>they could upset them. Correct, I don't know what if

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 3>they come out there, you know, score a touchdown immediately, Rely,

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 3>bron Party's playing from behind. No, No, I don't. So

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 3>you think brock Party is good?

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Here you go the okay, go ahead, just keep going.

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean that's that's the question. What's the script for

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 3>green Bay to pull off the upset? Oh?

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's really a script. I don't think

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 2>green Bay this game, So I don't listen. I no,

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 2>I said, I don't think green Bay can win the game.

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't think green Bay can win the game. The Yes,

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 2>you're right, I'd love it if they did, but I

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 2>don't think they can. I would be shocked, really shocked,

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 2>more shocked than Green Bay beating Dallas. If Green Bay

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 2>were to win this game, I don't think the Green

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Bay defensive personnel can deal with the Niners offensive personnel.

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 2>No again, the I don't. I'm not going to. I'm

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 2>not really interested in continuing a five month long brock

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 2>party argument. I'm not if people watch like that, we

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 2>could have been having the same exact argument about TUA.

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 2>It's the same thing. I'm not interested in having the

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 2>argument the I do not and people people are treating

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 2>credit like it is an infinite resource. It's not. It's

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 2>a finite resource, and so people want me to give

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 2>brock Purty more credit. But I view credit as, like

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 2>I said, a zero sum game. In order to give

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 2>to someone, you must take from someone. So I when

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 2>I look at the Niners, I just look at a

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 2>bunch of people who are, you know, first up at

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 2>the credit pie before brock Purty, Kyle Shanna and Christian McCaffrey,

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 2>a hand Ayuk Debo, a lot of guys. With that said,

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 2>the only chance the Packers have to win this game

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 2>is Purty melting down, and I don't think he will

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 2>melt down. So if is that credit, I don't know

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 2>if that's credit or not. I don't think brock perty

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 2>is gonna come out and be bad. I think that

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Loves sh be good. This is not a shot

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 2>at Jordan Love, but I don't I did not believe

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 2>in the Packers defense before the Cowboys game. I don't

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 2>believe in him now, even though they played well against Dallas,

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 2>that to me was more about Dak melting down than

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 2>it was anything Green Bay did. And so credit to Brock.

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he'll melt down, but I do not

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 2>think it is realistic to believe in Green Bay this weekend.

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 2>They've had a wonderful season and credit to them, and

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 2>they are a scary team moving forward. But they are

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we'll get to my pick shortly. They are

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 2>near ten point underdogs for a reason, for an absolute reason.

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 3>Next so it is a do or die time for

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Lamar Jackson against the Texans rookie quarterback coach Combo. But

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 3>we obviously know that Lamar was in this exact same

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 3>position once upon a time ago won the MVP. He

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 3>got the by got bounced out of the first round.

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Does anyone have more to lose this weekend than Lamar Jackson? Oh?

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Uh No? I mean, it's Lamar and it's a rough spot,

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 2>but it's what it is. If it's not the same.

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 2>But remember I always said on Tuesday that Dak's MVP adjacent

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 2>season actually worked against him because of how he played

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 2>in the postseason. The exact same story for Lamar. Lamar

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 2>being so great this regular season actually will be weaponized

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 2>against him if he plays poorly in the postseason and

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't have to win the Super Bowl. I don't

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 2>even know that he has to make the super Bowl,

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Honest to god. If Lamar makes the AFC title game

0:32:56.800 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 2>and just gets outdueled by Patrick Mahomes, then I don't

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 2>think anyone's gonna kill him. I think people, I think

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 2>the story coming out of that or even if you

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 2>were out dueled by Josh Allen, which I don't think

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna play that game, but so be it, the

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 2>story coming out of that game will be, Oh my god,

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Mahomes is freaking thanos Man. Even with this team

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 2>this year, he's back in the Super Bowls.

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 3>But if yeah, why did you pronounce it? If how

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 3>do you say it thos?

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean? I thought that's what his name was.

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm not into the Marvel Cinematic Universe. I'm not sure

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 2>I've read it. I've seen the memes with the Infinity Stones.

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know it's Thanos. Okay, so they'll think he's Thanos.

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Just the my apologies. Uh So. I don't think he

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 2>has to win the super Bowl or even make the

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl, but he has to win this game, has

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 2>to and needs to play well in it. Right now,

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 2>of the eight playoff quarterbacks remaining, Lamar has the lowest

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 2>career playoff passer rating by far, the lowest career win

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 2>percentage by far. It's a problem. And he cannot fall

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:18.839
<v Speaker 2>to one in four and have another bad passing game

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:22.399
<v Speaker 2>in the postseason at home, rested healthy as the one

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 2>seed can't happen, and that's why there's more pressure on

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.399
<v Speaker 2>him than anyone. Here's the other thing. If it were,

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 2>I know, Lamar is the gonna be the league MVP

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:39.240
<v Speaker 2>if it were to happen, Demanse, where does he start

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 2>next year in AFC quarterback rankings?

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 3>Are you saying if you were to like, are you

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 3>just saying, if you were to get bounced out in

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 3>the first round?

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this round, I guess not the first round, So yeah,

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 2>bounced bounced out by c J. Stroud and the Texans.

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean.

0:34:58.280 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 2>The answer is.

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:00.479
<v Speaker 3>Fifth, right outside of five?

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, yeah, I mean mahomes, CJ. Burrow, and Allen

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 2>will all be if CJ is a rookie beats him

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:16.800
<v Speaker 2>on the road. Yeah, I mean Burrow has been awesome

0:35:16.840 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 2>in the playoffs throughout his career, had big moments. Josh

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Allen obviously has had some amazing moments in the postseason.

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 2>You're not the no one's even gonna be able to

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:31.359
<v Speaker 2>make a credible argument that he's in the top four,

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 2>and so it's a tough spot for him, man. And

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 2>now again this is.

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 3>The most equipped they've ever been to do it.

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 2>In my opinion is you're right, and Mark Andrews is

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:45.320
<v Speaker 2>coming back.

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know if that's I don't know if

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:51.879
<v Speaker 3>that's good or bad, to be honest, but uh, trying

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 3>to stick with why.

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:54.240
<v Speaker 2>You think he might go to him too often?

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think we should stick to what's been working.

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:00.879
<v Speaker 3>And you know, obviously Andrew's gotta play ork him in there,

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 3>but the likely situation is it's been working.

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, no, that's fair.

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 3>It's so in practicing moving around he still doesn't look one,

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:11.839
<v Speaker 3>which is.

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 2>I No, I mean, I'm it's not guaranteed that he's

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 2>gonna play this weekend, but I'm saying he's eligible to

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 2>be able to play this weekend, all right, last one?

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 3>All right. So arguably nobody's riding higher than the Lions

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 3>right now. But Tampa's got something brewinged with Baker in

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 3>that defense? Would the Niners? Would the Niners sneaky rather

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 3>play Detroit than Tampa, I think.

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 2>But no, No, Listen, if the Niners path to the

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl is the nine and eight Packers followed by

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 2>the nine and eight Bucks, they're pretty happy. Detroit, on

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 2>the other hand, could present some problems in this regard.

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Detroit might be able to truly get in a shootout

0:36:56.960 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 2>with him. Detroit, I don't think could stop San Francisco,

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 2>but I think that Detroit could, in the right circumstances,

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 2>could score with San Francisco if that offensive line can

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:17.840
<v Speaker 2>block it up. And so, No, the Niners would much

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:21.760
<v Speaker 2>much rather play Tampa. It would be a great story

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 2>for Baker to be in the NFC title game, but

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 2>that's a tough putt. I think the Eagles, being so

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 2>poorly coached and seemingly being so just over the season

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 2>made us maybe slightly overstate the personnel Tampa has. So listen,

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 2>this is a hell of a year by Baker, a

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 2>very successful season by Tampa, but they're in a rough

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:49.799
<v Speaker 2>spot against Detroit. Go ahead to Monte.

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 3>I just want to say that the Bucks are going

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 3>to win this game, and I'm on the record saying it. Yeah.

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 4>Whose that's a perfect segue.

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 2>We'll do our pick segment next What's Right? Welcome back

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 2>in What's Right with Nick Wright, Episode two, poh nine.

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 2>This episode is brought to you by US Bank. Winter

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 2>can be a drag. Thankfully, we have sports to get

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 2>us through this part of the year, and if you

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 2>ask me, nothing goes together like your favorite foods and

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 2>your favorite teams. Especially in the wintertime. We've got the

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:29.319
<v Speaker 2>NFL Playoffs Pro basketball. You can just stay inside and

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 2>watch your teams until it finally gets warm out in

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:34.840
<v Speaker 2>the US Bank altitude. Go Visa signature card provides the

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 2>perfect way to earn rewards, whether watching your team with

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 2>other super fans at a local restaurant or in the

0:38:40.680 --> 0:38:43.759
<v Speaker 2>comfort of your living room. Earn four times points when

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 2>you dine out or have food delivered. Maybe order a

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 2>pizza and watch the Big Game on your big screen TV,

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 2>and you can earn two times points at grocery stores,

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:54.839
<v Speaker 2>which is great no matter what you're making at home,

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 2>and if you're willing to brave the elements, even getting

0:38:57.719 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 2>to the game can be rewarding, as you'll learn two

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:03.759
<v Speaker 2>times points at gas stations and ev charging stations. Go

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 2>to usbank dot com slash altitude go to learn more

0:39:08.239 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 2>about how you can earn twenty thousand bonus points worth

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 2>two hundred dollars if you spend one thousand dollars in

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:17.360
<v Speaker 2>the first ninety days of opening your account. Score big

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:21.359
<v Speaker 2>with the US Bank Altitude Go. Visa signature card Visit

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 2>usbank dot com slash altitude go to apply and live

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 2>every day your way limited time offer. Creditor and issuer

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 2>of this card is US Bank National Association. Pursue it

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 2>to a license from Visa USA Incorporated. Some restrictions may apply.

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, so demands. We can show you last week's picks.

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:43.840
<v Speaker 2>For me, I went three and three, but in reality

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 2>I went three and two. We'll call it three and three.

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:50.760
<v Speaker 2>But the Pittsburgh plus ten if you listen to the show,

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:55.400
<v Speaker 2>there is a lot of snow wind Blizzard analysis. The

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 2>game then got moved. It's so three and three is

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 2>the real record, because if they would have somehow gotten

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:05.239
<v Speaker 2>that backdoor cover, we would have gotten the win. But

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 2>still not really. I feel like I got two games

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 2>dead well. I got two games dead wrong this weekend,

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 2>one game semi wrong that I ended up winning. I

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:21.360
<v Speaker 2>thought the Rams were gonna win outright. I think I

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 2>picked twenty seven to twenty four Rams. The Rams end

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 2>up losing butt covering Kansas City and easy cover against

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 2>Miami and Tampa, which I said was gonna win out right,

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 2>And I can't, you know what. I'm not one to

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 2>demand credit, but I'm gonna demand credit on this. I

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:45.880
<v Speaker 2>said on television on Friday Demanse that we're going to

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 2>know the Nick Sirianni era in Philly is dead when

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 2>in this game against Tampa they go for two via

0:40:57.239 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 2>tush push and don't get it. And then in the

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 2>game they went for two via toush push and didn't

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 2>get it. And that's not that that might be the

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 2>best sports prediction anyone made all year. I just is

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:14.400
<v Speaker 2>it called that specific thing happening?

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:18.680
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, go ahead, I don't remember. I thought you.

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 3>I know you said something about the toush push and

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 3>the and the Bucks stopping, and I didn't know you

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:24.840
<v Speaker 3>said anything about it being on a two point conversion.

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 3>I remember that part of it.

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well it's the It's check my Twitter. I put

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:32.799
<v Speaker 2>out the video, all right, Demanse. Also, by the way,

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:35.799
<v Speaker 2>my Super Bowl Exact is dead, which means my preseason

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 2>bets were terrible. All right, we'll just move on. It's okay.

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:40.359
<v Speaker 2>We don't need to show it. We know it's red,

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 2>we know Dallas is out. All right, let's go to

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 2>the games this weekend.

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:46.760
<v Speaker 3>All right. You've got Houston plus nine and a half

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 3>at Baltimore.

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I think Houston can win the game, outright, and

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:59.240
<v Speaker 2>I certainly like them getting almost ten points. Lamar sneaky bad.

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:04.719
<v Speaker 3>Win the game outright, Yeah, the game out right. I've

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 3>actually made sacrifices for Lamar. I've got a cold right now,

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:08.799
<v Speaker 3>so he could not get one.

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:13.239
<v Speaker 2>But oh, okay, oh that's good. I appreciate that. But

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Lamar on extra rest one in six against the spread,

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Lamar one in eight against the spread is a favorite

0:42:22.520 --> 0:42:26.960
<v Speaker 2>of greater than seven and a half. But now one

0:42:27.000 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 2>of this year. Now one of those I don't know

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:30.920
<v Speaker 2>if that's just this year. By the way, one of

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 2>those games was against Houston Week one, but I'm gonna

0:42:33.680 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 2>throw out the Houston Week one game entirely anything that

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 2>happened the first I mean, that's the first game of

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:41.319
<v Speaker 2>Stroud's career, the first game with Damiko as head coach.

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't care about that. Lamar. Obviously, CJ. Stroud currently

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:51.320
<v Speaker 2>has a far better playoff resume than Lamar Jackson, and

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:53.879
<v Speaker 2>I need to see it from Lamar. And so I'm

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 2>getting nine and a half points from a team that

0:42:56.960 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 2>I think absolutely can win. Out right, I'll take Houston

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:03.240
<v Speaker 2>plus nine and a half. The Ravens are your team,

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:04.399
<v Speaker 2>go right ahead?

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, geez man, I just it's crazy how

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 3>you take the Houston plus nine and a half and

0:43:13.040 --> 0:43:15.439
<v Speaker 3>didn't and you don't want to take Green Bay plus

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:17.879
<v Speaker 3>nine and a half. It's telling me, obviously you got

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:21.279
<v Speaker 3>more faith in CJ. Stroud than Jordan Love. So I

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 3>guess it's fair, but uh no.

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 2>It's also it's also the teams they're going against. And

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 2>I think the Niners are a better team than Baltimore

0:43:33.920 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 2>from top to bottom, and I trust the Niners in

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs more than I trust Baltimore. All right, next,

0:43:39.680 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean.

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Fair enough, go ahead? Yeah, my bad. Next, you got

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco minus nine and a half versus Green Bay.

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:49.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, this just feels like a game that

0:43:49.360 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco gets out to a fourteen to three lead

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:55.000
<v Speaker 2>and does exactly what they want to do. This feels

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 2>like a game that San Francisco controls.

0:43:57.280 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 3>If we win that toss in a second way.

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Listen, if it's close in the second half, I think

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Love can throw a real scare into San Francisco.

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it'll be close in the second half.

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco ten times this year or eleven times this

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 2>year is won by double digits. That's the most in football.

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Green Bay struggles to run the ball, so they're gonna

0:44:20.239 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 2>be in a drop back passing game against this Niners

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:26.719
<v Speaker 2>pass rush and Kyle Shanahan. How about this is the

0:44:26.760 --> 0:44:30.440
<v Speaker 2>only coach since nineteen ninety to be undefeated against the

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 2>spread as a playoff home favorite. And so I just

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:38.880
<v Speaker 2>the I would obviously like if Green Bay, you know,

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:41.879
<v Speaker 2>made this a game. This is why you fight all

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 2>year for the one seed. So you can get the

0:44:45.560 --> 0:44:48.759
<v Speaker 2>seventh seed if they upset the two. You can get

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 2>the team that just had their mini super Bowl by

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 2>winning that game against Dallas while you've been resting, and

0:44:56.440 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 2>you get the worst team remaining in the bracket. That's

0:44:59.239 --> 0:45:02.360
<v Speaker 2>your reward of being the one seed. San Francisco earned it.

0:45:02.440 --> 0:45:04.080
<v Speaker 2>I like San Francisco in that spot.

0:45:04.200 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 3>Next, you got Tampa Bay plus seven at Detroit.

0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 2>So I don't think Tampa wins outright, but I think

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:15.440
<v Speaker 2>this a can be a close game and b great

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:20.799
<v Speaker 2>backdoor cover potential. Uh Baker has covered every playoff game

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:22.839
<v Speaker 2>of his career. He's two to one. The only team

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:24.719
<v Speaker 2>to eat Baker Mayfield in the playoffs they can't say

0:45:24.840 --> 0:45:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs remember that. I also think there is a potential

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 2>for a slow start from Detroit because of the emotional

0:45:33.120 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 2>letdown of last week, their first home playoff game, playing

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Stafford all of that, where Tampa can jump out to

0:45:40.480 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 2>maybe a seven to nothing lead and Detroit all of

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 2>a sudden's in a dog fight throughout the game. I

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 2>do like Detroit to win this game, but it feels

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:52.239
<v Speaker 2>like a twenty three to twenty type of game. I

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 2>think that a lot of the blitzes Todd Bowles and

0:45:55.480 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 2>the Bucks did last week are not gonna work against Detroit.

0:45:58.520 --> 0:46:02.919
<v Speaker 2>But seven points is too many points, and so I'll

0:46:02.920 --> 0:46:04.320
<v Speaker 2>take Tampa plus the seven.

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Next next you got Kansas City plus two and a

0:46:08.040 --> 0:46:09.080
<v Speaker 3>half at Buffalo.

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Listen. So there's this funny thing going around these terrible

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 2>NFL aggregators. You know, there's like been this all of

0:46:18.120 --> 0:46:21.359
<v Speaker 2>a sudden surplus of these NFL accounts that are like

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:24.799
<v Speaker 2>a couple initials in the word football, and they do

0:46:25.280 --> 0:46:27.680
<v Speaker 2>none of their own reporting, none of their own anything.

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 2>They just fire out other people's thoughts, tweet stats or

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:34.560
<v Speaker 2>whatever so they can gain followers and make money off,

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:40.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, Musk's Twitter. So one of them tweeted out unfair.

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Mahomes is eight and two in his career with

0:46:44.760 --> 0:46:49.200
<v Speaker 2>the ref for Chiefs Bills like oh basically the fixes

0:46:49.239 --> 0:46:54.719
<v Speaker 2>in and that is such a hilarious tweet because eight

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:57.480
<v Speaker 2>and two means he wins eighty percent of his games

0:46:57.960 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 2>refed by this guy, Patrick Mahomes wins eighty percent of

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:03.359
<v Speaker 2>his games.

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:04.920
<v Speaker 3>I saw that tweet.

0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Literally, He's eighty six and twenty five in his career,

0:47:09.880 --> 0:47:13.040
<v Speaker 2>which means for every ten games he wins eight of them,

0:47:13.640 --> 0:47:19.800
<v Speaker 2>and so like the So mahomes as good as his

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 2>winning percentages overall as an underdog, He's only been an

0:47:25.080 --> 0:47:27.880
<v Speaker 2>underdog ten times in his career. He's eight one and

0:47:28.040 --> 0:47:32.880
<v Speaker 2>one against the spread, seven and three straight up, Andy Reid.

0:47:33.000 --> 0:47:35.759
<v Speaker 2>Now you guys are calling this extended rest. I don't

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:39.399
<v Speaker 2>call this really extended rest. It's one day more than

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 2>you normally get, but it's two more days than Buffalo got.

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:46.640
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs are the first time the Chiefs played the Bills.

0:47:46.680 --> 0:47:48.799
<v Speaker 2>They not have their left tackle, their running back, they're

0:47:48.840 --> 0:47:52.839
<v Speaker 2>starting inside linebacker, or their backup inside linebacker, and they

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:55.279
<v Speaker 2>still had the game one if it wasn't stolen from

0:47:55.320 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 2>them in a theft of the ages on the Kadarias

0:47:58.040 --> 0:48:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Tony play. I spent twenty minutes discussing this game earlier.

0:48:02.080 --> 0:48:04.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't need to do it here. Kansas City's the

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:07.440
<v Speaker 2>better team, Kansas City's going to win outright, and the

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Bills are gonna have a really, really long offseason. Ask themselves,

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:13.520
<v Speaker 2>how do we ever beat this team? All right? So

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:17.239
<v Speaker 2>my picks for this weekend are Houston plus nine and

0:48:17.280 --> 0:48:19.880
<v Speaker 2>a half, San Francisco laying nine and a half, Tampa

0:48:19.920 --> 0:48:22.759
<v Speaker 2>plus seven, and Kansas City plus two and a half.

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:24.319
<v Speaker 2>All right, what's the offer this week?

0:48:24.520 --> 0:48:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Oh? All right, this one's called Demon Day's Guys Lamar

0:48:28.800 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 3>party and love all to have over one and a

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 3>half passing touchdowns at plus four hundred and you can

0:48:36.040 --> 0:48:41.880
<v Speaker 3>even throw thank you? Okay, So I'm guessing if you don't,

0:48:42.440 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm guessing you don't have faith in Lamar to throw

0:48:45.080 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 3>two passing touchdowns.

0:48:46.800 --> 0:48:52.279
<v Speaker 2>That's correct. Yeah, and listen, and McCaffrey might end even

0:48:52.320 --> 0:48:55.399
<v Speaker 2>if the Niners score thirty five, It could McCaffrey could

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:58.319
<v Speaker 2>snipe a lot of those touchdowns. But yeah, listen, I

0:48:58.320 --> 0:49:01.320
<v Speaker 2>gotta I gotta see it to believe it, Lamar. Sorry,

0:49:01.800 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 2>we play a new game called blindly Right. Plus I

0:49:06.560 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 2>give my girl Scout cookies. Rant we'll do all that next.

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:09.640
<v Speaker 3>What's right?

0:49:14.080 --> 0:49:15.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, welcome back in What's You Everything?

0:49:15.880 --> 0:49:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Great?

0:49:16.120 --> 0:49:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Episode two nine? We'll get let's right now, get to

0:49:19.880 --> 0:49:23.000
<v Speaker 2>a new game. It's called blindly Right, Demons, Can you

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:24.440
<v Speaker 2>explain it to the audience?

0:49:25.400 --> 0:49:27.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So we've got a new game called blindly Right.

0:49:27.960 --> 0:49:30.360
<v Speaker 3>So we all obviously know that you're super confident in

0:49:30.360 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 3>your takes, but we want to see if you can

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:34.719
<v Speaker 3>do them without looking. So I'm going to give you

0:49:34.800 --> 0:49:38.200
<v Speaker 3>five potential outcomes to the Chiefs Bills game, and you

0:49:38.239 --> 0:49:40.279
<v Speaker 3>tell me which one you would like the best or

0:49:40.320 --> 0:49:43.480
<v Speaker 3>will be the best for you. The ketchet is right,

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:43.719
<v Speaker 3>but I.

0:49:43.719 --> 0:49:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Don't know what all the possibilities are.

0:49:47.080 --> 0:49:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Right, The catches that you're not going to know what

0:49:50.440 --> 0:49:53.319
<v Speaker 3>the next thing is that I say. So we're gonna

0:49:53.320 --> 0:49:56.680
<v Speaker 3>start off by giving you two totally totally polar opposites

0:49:56.760 --> 0:50:00.759
<v Speaker 3>just to set it up. So, first off, you've got

0:50:00.840 --> 0:50:06.759
<v Speaker 3>up I'm sorry, guys. First off, you got Chiefs that one, right,

0:50:07.040 --> 0:50:07.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you've.

0:50:07.440 --> 0:50:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Got seeing it right there, Casey blows out the Bills

0:50:09.880 --> 0:50:13.120
<v Speaker 2>and the Bills blow up. The Chiefs is seven. So

0:50:13.280 --> 0:50:15.600
<v Speaker 2>now you're gonna throw stuff at me and I'm gonna

0:50:15.640 --> 0:50:18.279
<v Speaker 2>rank it. But I have to try to figure out

0:50:18.560 --> 0:50:21.359
<v Speaker 2>what you know. Okay, I understand the game. I've seen

0:50:21.360 --> 0:50:23.640
<v Speaker 2>this on the internet before. They do this sometimes for

0:50:23.719 --> 0:50:25.880
<v Speaker 2>like player rankings, but they don't tell.

0:50:25.719 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Your favorite song. Okay, go ahead this that yeah, all right.

0:50:29.200 --> 0:50:33.279
<v Speaker 3>So first we've got Bills win, but you hit a

0:50:33.320 --> 0:50:39.840
<v Speaker 3>plus twenty thousand dollars parlay twenty thousand. Sorry, Bill, you

0:50:39.880 --> 0:50:42.960
<v Speaker 3>want to put that one out?

0:50:43.920 --> 0:50:46.080
<v Speaker 2>If the Bills win. I won't give it about the parlay.

0:50:47.160 --> 0:50:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, we're putting that at six.

0:50:49.600 --> 0:50:50.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna put that at five.

0:50:51.560 --> 0:50:52.879
<v Speaker 3>Five, I'm gonna put that at five.

0:50:53.000 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Bills win, but I make some money.

0:50:55.280 --> 0:50:57.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, go ahead, next, all right, So it's next we

0:50:57.840 --> 0:51:01.280
<v Speaker 3>have Chiefs win, but the ref's hand them the game.

0:51:03.719 --> 0:51:04.880
<v Speaker 3>That's so stupid.

0:51:05.760 --> 0:51:11.279
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's just there is so dumb. Uh. I'm

0:51:11.280 --> 0:51:15.080
<v Speaker 2>gonna put that at uh. I mean, I know how

0:51:15.160 --> 0:51:18.880
<v Speaker 2>you guys work, so I think you guys are gonna.

0:51:18.640 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Have more.

0:51:22.160 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 2>More Bill's win outcomes than Chiefs win outcomes. So I'm

0:51:29.080 --> 0:51:32.040
<v Speaker 2>gonna put that at three.

0:51:32.760 --> 0:51:37.760
<v Speaker 3>At three, Okay, it's a controversial call. So next, off,

0:51:37.920 --> 0:51:41.799
<v Speaker 3>we've got Chiefs lose and you get blamed for jinxing them.

0:51:42.840 --> 0:51:45.160
<v Speaker 2>M that's four.

0:51:46.239 --> 0:51:51.360
<v Speaker 3>That's four chiefs. Yeah, that's four, all right? Next next

0:51:51.440 --> 0:51:56.000
<v Speaker 3>you got Chiefs win. Wait what Yeah, cause you explained

0:51:56.160 --> 0:52:01.960
<v Speaker 3>your thought process on that being four. Yeah, you wouldn't

0:52:01.960 --> 0:52:02.879
<v Speaker 3>want to put that at last.

0:52:03.000 --> 0:52:07.080
<v Speaker 2>It's just four. No, I'm not explaining it. Just go explain.

0:52:07.960 --> 0:52:09.120
<v Speaker 2>I want to see how this goes.

0:52:09.880 --> 0:52:12.879
<v Speaker 3>The Chiefs win, but Alan out plays my home skill,

0:52:12.880 --> 0:52:13.920
<v Speaker 3>little anxious.

0:52:13.880 --> 0:52:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Don't give a ship number two okay.

0:52:17.800 --> 0:52:21.320
<v Speaker 3>Bills win and then they mentioned you as bullets and

0:52:21.400 --> 0:52:22.239
<v Speaker 3>more material.

0:52:23.360 --> 0:52:27.160
<v Speaker 2>There you go, perfect. I nailed this. I nailed this

0:52:27.360 --> 0:52:33.359
<v Speaker 2>exactly right. I mean I I got this exactly right

0:52:34.520 --> 0:52:37.680
<v Speaker 2>as to where I where I would want this. So

0:52:37.800 --> 0:52:41.560
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't really the the stuff like this like I'm

0:52:41.560 --> 0:52:44.520
<v Speaker 2>not really I'm not giving analysis about this because it's

0:52:44.520 --> 0:52:47.560
<v Speaker 2>a theoretical of a theoretical of a theoretical. I'm just

0:52:47.640 --> 0:52:51.000
<v Speaker 2>trying to outsmart the producers. And I did. I knew

0:52:51.080 --> 0:52:54.040
<v Speaker 2>exactly how you guys would line this up. I did

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:57.719
<v Speaker 2>not have a single Bill's win at higher ranked than

0:52:57.840 --> 0:53:00.640
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs winning. I got a perfect score on that.

0:53:01.000 --> 0:53:05.040
<v Speaker 2>So that's so I feel gratified and satisfied. Daniels in

0:53:05.120 --> 0:53:07.680
<v Speaker 2>my air saying, explain it, trying to throw me off. No,

0:53:07.840 --> 0:53:10.400
<v Speaker 2>I won't explain it. I'm just going to nail it.

0:53:10.960 --> 0:53:14.480
<v Speaker 2>That's what's gonna happen there, all right. You guys wanted

0:53:14.520 --> 0:53:20.680
<v Speaker 2>my girl Scout cookie rant. So here's what it is.

0:53:25.440 --> 0:53:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Kids should sell their own damn cookies. What is the

0:53:29.719 --> 0:53:34.680
<v Speaker 2>whole idea? It's you don't post it at work, you

0:53:34.719 --> 0:53:37.800
<v Speaker 2>don't send out an email, you don't tweet the link.

0:53:38.320 --> 0:53:42.719
<v Speaker 2>It is not a contest of hey, girls, girls out there,

0:53:43.040 --> 0:53:46.600
<v Speaker 2>which of your parents has the biggest social media following

0:53:46.920 --> 0:53:49.680
<v Speaker 2>or has the biggest job at work, to where people

0:53:49.719 --> 0:53:52.640
<v Speaker 2>feel pressure that they have to buy from this person.

0:53:52.960 --> 0:53:55.719
<v Speaker 2>The whole I listen, if we're being honest here, the

0:53:55.719 --> 0:53:58.719
<v Speaker 2>whole thing's kind of a little scam adjacent to begin with.

0:53:58.960 --> 0:54:02.920
<v Speaker 2>If I'm Keebler, I'm super pissed about this thing even existing, Like,

0:54:02.960 --> 0:54:05.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure what the tax status is any of

0:54:05.520 --> 0:54:09.040
<v Speaker 2>this stuff. But the reason that it's gotten a that

0:54:09.120 --> 0:54:11.640
<v Speaker 2>we've all agreed with it is it's like, oh, a

0:54:11.680 --> 0:54:16.440
<v Speaker 2>little entrepreneurship, go knock on some doors, cute kids for

0:54:16.560 --> 0:54:19.200
<v Speaker 2>the neighbors, all of it. And then all of a

0:54:19.280 --> 0:54:24.360
<v Speaker 2>sudden people were like, oh, guys, reply all email that

0:54:24.600 --> 0:54:27.640
<v Speaker 2>time of year again, who wants to order for my kid?

0:54:27.800 --> 0:54:30.799
<v Speaker 2>Like huh? And then yesterday I saw people you like

0:54:30.920 --> 0:54:34.560
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter like, hey, here's the link to my kid's

0:54:34.640 --> 0:54:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Girl Scout stuff. That's not the point of this. If

0:54:38.440 --> 0:54:42.760
<v Speaker 2>the ultimately we all know this, the girl the Girl

0:54:42.800 --> 0:54:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Scout cookies, you know, are enriching someone. We'll call it,

0:54:46.719 --> 0:54:50.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Big Girl Scout Corporation.

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Aches Girl Scouts can you get Girl Scout cookies outside

0:54:53.800 --> 0:54:56.319
<v Speaker 3>of Girl Scout Girl Scouts Cookie Season? Like can you

0:54:56.360 --> 0:54:57.320
<v Speaker 3>just buy them anywhere?

0:54:59.120 --> 0:55:01.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't know the answer that I don't know.

0:55:02.360 --> 0:55:05.200
<v Speaker 3>People like what if when that email gets sent, its like,

0:55:05.239 --> 0:55:07.799
<v Speaker 3>oh my gosh, like it's finally that season again, gotta

0:55:07.840 --> 0:55:10.240
<v Speaker 3>get my Girl Scout cookies like they wouldn't have otherwise.

0:55:12.440 --> 0:55:17.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying that some people probably get happy, Okay, And.

0:55:17.280 --> 0:55:22.160
<v Speaker 2>What I'm saying is because you are a generation that

0:55:23.000 --> 0:55:26.800
<v Speaker 2>thinks like, oh, you wouldn't know it's Girl Scout Cookie

0:55:26.880 --> 0:55:30.960
<v Speaker 2>season without the email, because for the last decade, the

0:55:31.360 --> 0:55:34.200
<v Speaker 2>way people for all of time found out it was

0:55:34.239 --> 0:55:37.400
<v Speaker 2>a Girl Scout Cookie season, someone rings their door, or

0:55:37.440 --> 0:55:39.360
<v Speaker 2>you go to the grocery store, there's a little stand

0:55:39.480 --> 0:55:43.080
<v Speaker 2>set up. It's like, oh, it's Girl Scout Cookie Season. Sweet.

0:55:43.400 --> 0:55:45.520
<v Speaker 2>I'll take either a couple of boxes because I don't

0:55:45.560 --> 0:55:48.200
<v Speaker 2>really like it, but I appreciate your ingenuity and I

0:55:48.239 --> 0:55:52.200
<v Speaker 2>appreciate your stick touitiveness, or I'll take one hundred boxes

0:55:52.400 --> 0:55:54.640
<v Speaker 2>because I love it. No, and then take that off

0:55:54.680 --> 0:55:57.680
<v Speaker 2>the gosh darned screen. I do not hate Girl Scouts.

0:55:57.719 --> 0:56:04.360
<v Speaker 2>I actually am. I dislike parents, uh, working the system

0:56:04.400 --> 0:56:09.360
<v Speaker 2>against the idea of it, the whole idea here, the idea.

0:56:09.480 --> 0:56:14.560
<v Speaker 2>The reason Girl Scout Cookies exist as a thing is

0:56:14.680 --> 0:56:19.080
<v Speaker 2>not because we all decided years ago, you know what,

0:56:20.320 --> 0:56:25.440
<v Speaker 2>not enough sweet treats available to us, we need something

0:56:25.520 --> 0:56:29.360
<v Speaker 2>like why it's the It would be like to me,

0:56:29.520 --> 0:56:32.480
<v Speaker 2>the Girl Scout cookies are like Pinewood Derby cars for

0:56:32.600 --> 0:56:36.759
<v Speaker 2>boy Scouts. Right, the idea there is not this. The

0:56:36.880 --> 0:56:40.920
<v Speaker 2>market has demanded this void be filled. We as a

0:56:40.960 --> 0:56:46.960
<v Speaker 2>society need more wooden cars made by poor engineers. It

0:56:47.040 --> 0:56:50.600
<v Speaker 2>wasn't that, it was hey, the kids are gonna learn

0:56:50.760 --> 0:56:53.880
<v Speaker 2>something from this. So if all of a sudden Pinewood

0:56:53.880 --> 0:56:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Derby cars you just saw everywhere, it's like, hey, Pinewood

0:56:58.640 --> 0:57:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Derby season. If anyone knows somebody in the Mario Andretti

0:57:02.920 --> 0:57:05.399
<v Speaker 2>family that'd like to make this for my kid, I'd

0:57:05.440 --> 0:57:08.520
<v Speaker 2>like to win the contest, we'd say, well, that's dumb.

0:57:08.880 --> 0:57:13.120
<v Speaker 2>That's not the point. The idea of Girl Scout Cookie

0:57:13.120 --> 0:57:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Season was these girls take pride in it, have to

0:57:18.560 --> 0:57:21.880
<v Speaker 2>put in work, and the winner is the one who

0:57:22.000 --> 0:57:25.600
<v Speaker 2>knocked on enough doors, was cute enough to get someone

0:57:25.640 --> 0:57:28.760
<v Speaker 2>to buy some extra All these things. It has now

0:57:28.840 --> 0:57:33.520
<v Speaker 2>been perverted to the winner is the one whose parent

0:57:34.000 --> 0:57:38.560
<v Speaker 2>has four hundred thousand followers on Instagram and everybody buys

0:57:38.600 --> 0:57:42.480
<v Speaker 2>from them. It's dumb, it's wrong. It defeeds the purpose.

0:57:43.640 --> 0:57:44.560
<v Speaker 2>So that's my rant.

0:57:45.520 --> 0:57:48.080
<v Speaker 3>I had to sell chocolate bars at Liatoba once upon

0:57:48.120 --> 0:57:49.680
<v Speaker 3>a time and I just ate them all. So it's

0:57:49.720 --> 0:57:52.080
<v Speaker 3>probably probably would have been good.

0:57:52.320 --> 0:57:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, but you did I I that happened, and

0:57:56.920 --> 0:58:01.040
<v Speaker 2>you know what, And there is always like this whole

0:58:01.160 --> 0:58:07.320
<v Speaker 2>thing of my kid needs to raise money for X.

0:58:08.320 --> 0:58:12.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna basically do a go fund me for It

0:58:12.360 --> 0:58:18.720
<v Speaker 2>defeats the purpose. The purpose is the selling, not the sales.

0:58:19.960 --> 0:58:23.680
<v Speaker 2>The reason they get prizes is because it's supposed to

0:58:23.880 --> 0:58:27.920
<v Speaker 2>reward the kid who worked the hardest, not the one

0:58:28.160 --> 0:58:30.840
<v Speaker 2>whose parent works in a big enough office that they

0:58:30.880 --> 0:58:35.560
<v Speaker 2>can pressure the other people. Like what if Gabe sent

0:58:35.640 --> 0:58:39.320
<v Speaker 2>out to all a Blue Duck. It's Girl Scout Cookie season.

0:58:39.560 --> 0:58:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Gabe's the boss Girl Scout Cookie Season, and what if

0:58:44.400 --> 0:58:46.240
<v Speaker 2>and it's like, all right, I'm not saying who you're

0:58:46.240 --> 0:58:49.600
<v Speaker 2>gonna buy from, but it's Girl Scout Cookie season. Here's

0:58:49.640 --> 0:58:53.040
<v Speaker 2>the link to my kids thing. And then what if

0:58:53.280 --> 0:58:57.040
<v Speaker 2>new Father Matt also as a kid selling Girl Scout

0:58:57.040 --> 0:59:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Cookies and it's like, well, gosh darn it, now it's

0:59:00.280 --> 0:59:02.560
<v Speaker 2>not gonna get the brand new twelve speed. Gabe's kid

0:59:02.600 --> 0:59:06.280
<v Speaker 2>is because Gabe trump me on this. That's nonsense. It's

0:59:06.280 --> 0:59:07.280
<v Speaker 2>not how it's supposed to go.

0:59:08.080 --> 0:59:12.959
<v Speaker 3>What somebody Caden Wolf said, bros like Aaron Rodgers versus

0:59:13.040 --> 0:59:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Big Pharma, but it's Nick versus Big Cookie.

0:59:17.120 --> 0:59:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Well no, I actually think Big Cookies should be pissed,

0:59:21.280 --> 0:59:24.680
<v Speaker 2>like I uh if I again like, and I'm not

0:59:24.720 --> 0:59:27.800
<v Speaker 2>and I assume this is a tax dodge to begin with.

0:59:28.200 --> 0:59:30.240
<v Speaker 2>I should have researched this, but I didn't even know

0:59:30.240 --> 0:59:33.080
<v Speaker 2>it was coming up. Girl, I'm I'm googling it real quick.

0:59:33.120 --> 0:59:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Girl Scout Cookies tax tax right off? Hold on, is

0:59:38.840 --> 0:59:41.200
<v Speaker 2>my purchase of Girl Scout Cookies tax deductible? If you

0:59:41.240 --> 0:59:43.440
<v Speaker 2>buy Girl Scout Cookies and take the cookies home to

0:59:43.480 --> 0:59:46.320
<v Speaker 2>consume them, you purchased probably a fair market value. For

0:59:46.320 --> 0:59:49.880
<v Speaker 2>this reason, they're not tax deductible. Oh hold on, this

0:59:49.960 --> 0:59:54.920
<v Speaker 2>is okay, So that's good. Are Girl Scout Cookies somehow

0:59:55.520 --> 1:00:00.600
<v Speaker 2>a tax scam? I'm uh, let me se see that.

1:00:02.400 --> 1:00:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Scouts.

1:00:04.840 --> 1:00:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh but there, listen, I'm just letting you know there's

1:00:07.760 --> 1:00:10.200
<v Speaker 2>something I I haven't done the research on this. Now

1:00:10.240 --> 1:00:12.240
<v Speaker 2>I am gonna sound like Aaron Rodgers. You know what

1:00:12.240 --> 1:00:15.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean. I've done one cursory Internet search and pretend

1:00:15.160 --> 1:00:17.480
<v Speaker 2>like I'm an expert. I'm not sure, but I feel

1:00:17.480 --> 1:00:20.560
<v Speaker 2>like Keebler should be pissed about it. Oh, you know,

1:00:20.720 --> 1:00:22.600
<v Speaker 2>that's what I want to find out. Actually, hold on

1:00:23.160 --> 1:00:32.400
<v Speaker 2>who actually makes Girl Scout Cookies. Currently, two commercial bakers

1:00:32.440 --> 1:00:35.600
<v Speaker 2>are licensed by Girl Scout Cookies, ABC Bakers and Little

1:00:35.600 --> 1:00:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Brownie Bakers. This is again from Girl Scouts Dot Org.

1:00:38.960 --> 1:00:40.800
<v Speaker 2>So they're in on it, like I want to know. Oh,

1:00:40.840 --> 1:00:44.920
<v Speaker 2>there go nine things you didn't know about Girl Scout Cookies.

1:00:44.960 --> 1:00:47.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna read that report back. Here's what I do know.

1:00:49.840 --> 1:00:53.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm not buying them from your list serve. I'm buying

1:00:53.280 --> 1:00:57.040
<v Speaker 2>them from a child that knocks on my door and

1:00:57.440 --> 1:01:00.360
<v Speaker 2>takes your check that I give to them, and I

1:01:00.440 --> 1:01:01.800
<v Speaker 2>may or may not ever get them.

1:01:02.160 --> 1:01:03.600
<v Speaker 3>That's you're gonna give them a check?

1:01:07.280 --> 1:01:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Typically, I think I buy his Girl Scout Cookies via

1:01:10.040 --> 1:01:14.000
<v Speaker 2>check in my mind, not handing this cash all of

1:01:14.040 --> 1:01:16.120
<v Speaker 2>a sudden, they could get rolled in the streets like

1:01:16.160 --> 1:01:19.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm giving them a check. The check's gonna get cashed

1:01:19.480 --> 1:01:21.920
<v Speaker 2>and I may or may not ever get them. That's

1:01:21.960 --> 1:01:22.440
<v Speaker 2>the idea.

1:01:23.440 --> 1:01:26.280
<v Speaker 3>He's gonna cast that check for their Parents shouldn't be involved.

1:01:28.040 --> 1:01:31.680
<v Speaker 2>The parents can help. Let the parents walk with them,

1:01:31.920 --> 1:01:34.720
<v Speaker 2>parents help them set it up. The parents don't use

1:01:34.800 --> 1:01:38.640
<v Speaker 2>their social media clout or work pressure to get other

1:01:38.680 --> 1:01:42.600
<v Speaker 2>people to buy them. It's very simple. I don't I

1:01:42.880 --> 1:01:46.120
<v Speaker 2>think this is something everyone should agree with. All right,

1:01:46.160 --> 1:01:47.040
<v Speaker 2>what are the questions?

1:01:48.400 --> 1:01:52.000
<v Speaker 3>All right? So producers asked, did you see Lloyd's retarding

1:01:52.000 --> 1:01:54.080
<v Speaker 3>to Jeopardy. I think we're gonna show a link. I

1:01:54.080 --> 1:01:56.360
<v Speaker 3>think that we got a picture of them. This guy's

1:01:56.400 --> 1:01:58.080
<v Speaker 3>always on Jeopardy, Man, what's going on.

1:01:58.520 --> 1:02:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm so happy for Lloyd because he's awesome, because Louis

1:02:07.520 --> 1:02:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I know. I'm not sure. I just know that I'm

1:02:11.600 --> 1:02:14.320
<v Speaker 2>car There was a whole bunch of sports media people

1:02:14.320 --> 1:02:16.960
<v Speaker 2>on Celebrity Jeopardy and I wouldn't one of them. So

1:02:17.040 --> 1:02:19.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, legit bitter about that. But I also want

1:02:19.400 --> 1:02:22.080
<v Speaker 2>to get on Real Jeopardy. But in the meantime, since

1:02:22.080 --> 1:02:24.280
<v Speaker 2>I haven't been able to, I'll take Celebrity Jeopardy and

1:02:24.320 --> 1:02:27.640
<v Speaker 2>I will kill folks like don't like I'm gonna sound

1:02:27.720 --> 1:02:32.240
<v Speaker 2>arrogant here. I don't mean it. I would a Ken

1:02:32.360 --> 1:02:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Jennings style run if they let me on Celebrity Jeopardy,

1:02:36.720 --> 1:02:41.680
<v Speaker 2>like me against other just dopey media people for in

1:02:41.720 --> 1:02:46.880
<v Speaker 2>a in a knowledge competition. Oh my goodness? All right? Next?

1:02:47.720 --> 1:02:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Uh Dwight of the Dead asked how do I spend

1:02:50.720 --> 1:02:53.400
<v Speaker 3>on How much do I spend on Girl Scale cookies

1:02:53.440 --> 1:02:53.800
<v Speaker 3>this year?

1:02:55.920 --> 1:03:00.280
<v Speaker 2>What are they? Four bucks a box? If if you're

1:03:00.280 --> 1:03:04.000
<v Speaker 2>buying them via someone at work sending an email, buy

1:03:04.240 --> 1:03:07.880
<v Speaker 2>one box just to be like I saw your email.

1:03:08.080 --> 1:03:10.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm buying one box. Don't send it to it again.

1:03:11.160 --> 1:03:13.360
<v Speaker 2>If you're buying it from a child that knocks on

1:03:13.440 --> 1:03:17.720
<v Speaker 2>your door, twenty five boxes, minimum one hundred bucks. That's

1:03:17.720 --> 1:03:18.200
<v Speaker 2>the answer.

1:03:18.280 --> 1:03:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Next, all right?

1:03:20.440 --> 1:03:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

1:03:20.680 --> 1:03:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Nora arigezs a question for Deman, say, what would the

1:03:23.960 --> 1:03:25.880
<v Speaker 3>house be like during the Super Bowl if it was

1:03:25.880 --> 1:03:28.280
<v Speaker 3>for if it was for your guys Jordan Love versus

1:03:28.400 --> 1:03:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Nick nixt Guy Mames. Well, I wouldn't be there. That

1:03:33.040 --> 1:03:35.000
<v Speaker 3>might be a situation where we have to end up

1:03:35.040 --> 1:03:41.720
<v Speaker 3>watching that together, but it'd be pretty crazy, and I mean,

1:03:43.800 --> 1:03:46.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I would feel great about it. Win

1:03:46.120 --> 1:03:48.520
<v Speaker 3>or lose but he'd have to eat a lot of words.

1:03:48.640 --> 1:03:51.320
<v Speaker 2>That answer is no, no, no. The answer is we'd both

1:03:51.320 --> 1:03:53.440
<v Speaker 2>be rooting for the Chiefs. It would already be a

1:03:53.440 --> 1:03:56.560
<v Speaker 2>win for Jordan Love, and so you would be obligated

1:03:56.560 --> 1:03:58.000
<v Speaker 2>to root for the Chiefs or I couldn't watch it

1:03:58.040 --> 1:04:00.280
<v Speaker 2>with you. I want to leave it on this. I

1:04:00.280 --> 1:04:05.560
<v Speaker 2>got an email from a guy named Mel Springs that

1:04:05.640 --> 1:04:11.680
<v Speaker 2>wrote this. The headline was your boy, Demonse Nick. I've

1:04:11.720 --> 1:04:16.080
<v Speaker 2>noticed a personality trait which is common among us all,

1:04:16.640 --> 1:04:22.000
<v Speaker 2>in particular with Demonse. He likes or plants his flag

1:04:22.440 --> 1:04:27.720
<v Speaker 2>for players that somehow resemble him. His hilarious take about

1:04:27.800 --> 1:04:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Poole averaging thirty, and now how he's all in

1:04:31.040 --> 1:04:34.720
<v Speaker 2>on Jordan Love. What's the same In these situations they

1:04:34.760 --> 1:04:38.040
<v Speaker 2>both somewhat resemble Demonse Love. And then it was a

1:04:38.160 --> 1:04:40.840
<v Speaker 2>very nice rest of the message about the podcast, and

1:04:40.880 --> 1:04:43.240
<v Speaker 2>we appreciate that, Mel. But I thought about it. I

1:04:43.280 --> 1:04:46.200
<v Speaker 2>was like, you know what he might be onto something

1:04:47.120 --> 1:04:51.560
<v Speaker 2>he might like Jordan. I mean, listen, Jordan Poole legit

1:04:52.880 --> 1:04:55.800
<v Speaker 2>reminds me of you. Jordan Love not so much, but

1:04:55.880 --> 1:04:58.480
<v Speaker 2>there is I guess I'd put it like this, of

1:04:58.560 --> 1:05:02.080
<v Speaker 2>all the starting NFL Corps backs. He looks the most

1:05:02.120 --> 1:05:06.800
<v Speaker 2>like you the available options.

1:05:07.760 --> 1:05:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I'm secretly doing that and like I just don't

1:05:10.240 --> 1:05:11.640
<v Speaker 3>know it, but no, I mean.

1:05:15.640 --> 1:05:20.440
<v Speaker 2>That guy that guy was saying was is that it's subconscious.

1:05:20.840 --> 1:05:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Is that people What that guy was saying is that

1:05:23.240 --> 1:05:25.400
<v Speaker 2>people do it without even knowing they're doing it, That

1:05:25.440 --> 1:05:26.360
<v Speaker 2>it's subconscious.

1:05:27.200 --> 1:05:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh, copy psychological thing exactly. Yeah, man, I want to

1:05:33.680 --> 1:05:36.040
<v Speaker 3>see the guy that looks like me, but be great,

1:05:36.200 --> 1:05:37.160
<v Speaker 3>let's I get it.

1:05:37.520 --> 1:05:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there, the chiefs are going to roll the bills.

1:05:41.880 --> 1:05:44.480
<v Speaker 2>I hope everyone enjoys it. Talk to you guys on Tuesday.

1:05:44.560 --> 1:05:47.880
<v Speaker 2>What's right? Hey, it's Nick right. Thank you so much

1:05:47.920 --> 1:05:51.040
<v Speaker 2>for watching. Please do us a favor. Click subscribe. It

1:05:51.120 --> 1:05:54.960
<v Speaker 2>helps my ego and Demonsy's got a financial bonus writing

1:05:54.960 --> 1:05:57.520
<v Speaker 2>on a number of YouTube subscribers will help him out.

1:05:57.640 --> 1:05:59.440
<v Speaker 2>And also click the bell. I don't know what the

1:05:59.480 --> 1:06:01.000
<v Speaker 2>bell does, and they tell me to tell you to

1:06:01.040 --> 1:06:04.240
<v Speaker 2>click to bell. And you're audio listeners, people that have

1:06:04.360 --> 1:06:08.040
<v Speaker 2>commute strives, whatever it is, subscribe to the podcast as well.

1:06:08.080 --> 1:06:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Wherever you get the podcast, same show, just you know,

1:06:11.160 --> 1:06:13.320
<v Speaker 2>just in your ears instead of through your eyes. All that.

1:06:13.440 --> 1:06:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Check it out appreciate your for ship