WEBVTT - Love: There's An App For That

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with text Stuff from dot

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>com either and welcome to text Stuff. I'm Jonathan Strickland,

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and today I have a special guest host, Alison louder Milk,

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>wu's editor extraordinary here in Hell Stuff Works dot Com.

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, Donathan. I love that introp So

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad now those of you who have been listening

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to How Stuff Works podcast for a while will recognize

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Allison's voice. She's an old hand at podcasting. Though you've

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>taken a nice long hiatus, I have that. It's a

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>pleasure to be here today. Yeah, fantastic, And so I

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>asked Allison what she would like to talk about. When

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>she agreed that, you know, she jump on and be

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a guest. I give my guests the opportunity to pick

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>if they want to. And you jokingly suggested an app

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>called Cuddler, And while that was a joke, it led

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to the actual choice of this episode, which goes beyond Cuddler.

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>But we will talk about that right, right, right, We

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>were talking about it in the break room and the

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>fascination that was Cuddler. Yeah, yeah, there's kind of a

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>horrid fascination for a lot of us here and how

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff works. Who have very specific parameters, uh, within which

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we welcome that kind of personal interaction, and when it's

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>outside those parameters, we get a little wigged out by it,

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>but we'll get there. So we decided we wanted to

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about how the Internet has become an incredible tool

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>for people to first meet each other in the online

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>space or the digital space, and then event eventually transition

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that into meeting in real life. And a lot of

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>what we're going to talk about today is focused on dating,

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.919
<v Speaker 1>but that's not exclusively what we're going to talk about.

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>But it turns out that's a that's a big part

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and has been a big part of the Internet since

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the Internet became a thing that most of us got

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>access to. Yes, do you have any kind of early

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>memories of some emails you sent, maybe to a lady

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you were interested in, or well, there's a there's a

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>lady that I was very much interested in, a lady

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>who I'm still very much interested in because she's my wife.

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I met her in a chat room online, Yeah, a

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>tell net chat room, so not even a web based one.

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>In fact, when I met my wife, the web was

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>new to me, Like I had not even used a browser. Uh.

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I had seen other people on a browser, and I thought, well,

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that looks really interesting. But I was jumping into chat

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>rooms just chatting about anything really and she and I

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>hit it off, and we ended up, uh, corresponding quite

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a bit, and then we met in person, and then

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>we started dating, and then she moved to Georgia, and

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>then we got engaged, and then we got married. And

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 1>seventeen years later, here we are so early story of

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>using the Internet to do exactly what we're talking about.

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>So I have personal experience here, but you know, we've

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>seen the people use the Internet for all sorts of

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>things along those lines. And here's an interesting statistic I found.

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>According to the American National Academy of Sciences, which did

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 1>a survey back in two thousand thirteen, more than thirty

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>three of all people who got married in the United

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>States between two thousand five and two thousand twelve met

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>their spouse online. Yeah. That's a large swath of people. Yeah,

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>more than a third of all of all married couples

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>first met online, well married couples from two thousand five

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand and twelve. And that's incredible to me.

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I remember when I started dating my wife,

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that was considered unusual. Yeah, we all have friends who've

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>met online, and I was kind of a novelty back

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>in the day. I remember thinking, you know, one of

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>my very dear friends met her husband on match dot com,

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and I was a little wary, like, but it's it's

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty it's pretty normal now normal if I when when

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>more than a third, you know, it's quickly becoming as

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>normal as other method of meeting people and getting to

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>know someone and dating them. And uh, yeah, for me,

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it was it was outside the norm both because one

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the Internet was so new, and too that I was

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>getting a date, so it was multiple outside the norms.

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>But uh, I read a CNN article which was not

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>entirely helpful because they reported that a survey which was

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>unnamed in the article, so that by two thousand nine

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of all same sex couples reported meeting online first, and

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 1>about half of all married couples who met online did

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>so through dating sites. So in order for us to

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>really talk about it, we're gonna be looking a lot

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>at dating sites early on in this episode and what

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>they do and how they do it. So across platforms,

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>about eleven percent of Internet users have said they've used

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>an online dating site, and across cell phone users, about

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>seven percent have used a dating app on their phones,

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like it's going more in that direction,

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:59.799
<v Speaker 1>although if you look at it from a stock market

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>type perspective, it's still the online dating sites that are kicking,

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>but in terms of market share and actually making revenue,

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and that that comes from a two thousand thirteen report

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 1>from the Pew Research Internet Project. And what's also interesting

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>is that it just continues to get more segmented, right,

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 1>so you have you know, Jonathan, maybe you and I

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>were first interested in this, but now it's our parents,

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and now it's more niche markets to oh sure, yeah,

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing lots of of services and sites pop

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>up that are catering to very specific demographics. Right, So

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you might see one that's catering specifically to uh, to

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the baby boomer boomer generation, or some that are obviously

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>based just on the experience, geared towards folks who are

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>more in the college age range or uh. You know,

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>there are a ton of different variations on this. So there,

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>of course some sites that try to be all things

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to all people, and then we're seeing a lot more

0:05:56.480 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of these that are kind of tailor made for specific demographics.

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 1>It was funny. I was talking to a coworker who

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>just signed up her mom last night for I think

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.359
<v Speaker 1>it was called Our World or My World. Her sixty

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>three year old mom was like, Hey, can you help

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>me get on some of these dating sites? And she said, okay, Mom, Yeah.

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, that might sound unusual to us, in

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>particular not to put a number to our ages, but

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Alison and I both can remember a time when the

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Internet wasn't really a thing that we access um, So

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly something that's still there's still elements of it

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that are kind of unusual to us, but it's becoming

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>increasingly normal to the younger generations because they grew up

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>with this, And you know, why not have this be

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a tool to to meet people and to try and

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>match yourself up with people who are sharing the same

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 1>sort of interest that you do and thus potentially find

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>someone with whom you're going to be really compatible with.

0:06:55.120 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned before that this is a big industry. You know,

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you talked about a lot of how how many people

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet had used a site, and you mentioned

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that you know, there's there's real money to be made here.

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>But let's get to some real figures, right, So there

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is some serious money to be made here. I was

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>reading a report from IBIS World looks like some sort

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of industry research type of report at two thousand fourteen,

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and the authors were estimating that it's about a two

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar market dating services in the US. So that's

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the broader context. And within that, of course, online is

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be you know, a slice of that, and

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that slice is about so one point four billion is

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about now, and I can only see

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that growing. Yeah, yeah, I agree, And we're seeing it

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>grow in interesting ways too. Whereas the desktop online dating

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>sites are still very much a thing, we're seeing an

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>explosion of this kind of stuff in the mobile space,

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>both mobile apps that are tied into an existing online

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>dating site and those that are its own experience ends.

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>And we'll talk about some of those two. And uh,

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's not just that's big business, but for

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the consumer, as in the person who's looking for a date,

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it turns out to make sense financially too, right, So

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>this is pretty interesting. Um I. And another report um

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>from the Topeka Capital Markets that was again like two thousand,

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>fourteen or so. Um, they found that it was cheaper. Right,

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So you're paying for your subscription to your online site,

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>but what you're looking at, according to this report, is

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>about a twenty three dollar tab before you finally wind

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>up making a match of your dreams. Yeah, so these

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>guys are saying that if you pay your subscription of

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe two d or some dollars, you're gonna

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>wind up with cost savings, like in a thousands of dollars.

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>So so online dating makes sense to your wallet, Yeah,

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>because it means that what what it means is that

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>while you're in pursuit of finding this person who's going

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to compatible with you, you can do a lot of

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that early work online as opposed to meeting people in places,

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>going out to take people out to to, you know, whatever,

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a dinner or a movie or whatever, even if everyone's

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>paying for their own thing. Obviously, all of that stuff

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>starts to mount up, and not every date turns out

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to be a success. Sometimes you realize, oh, you know,

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>this person is really nice, but we're not really clicking things. Yeah,

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 1>there's no spark there, and so yeah, I could I

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>could definitely see this. I am personally very thankful for

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the money that the Internet has saved me in that sense.

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:40.559
<v Speaker 1>So looking more closely at what's going on with these

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>dating sites, like how they work, you actually have to

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>go all the way back to nineteen sixty five. Now,

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.680
<v Speaker 1>clearly I'm not talking about an Internet dating service that

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>far back, because that's pre Internet. We're talking arpennet days

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>back then. But ninety five was before the era of

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the personal computer. We didn't even have PCs yet. But

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a Harvard undergraduate named Jeff Tar was working on this idea.

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>He had come up with a notion. He noticed that

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other Harvard undergraduate graduates were talking about

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>finding it difficult to find a date, like it's just

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 1>hard to go out and meet people that were compatible.

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>And he thought, hmm, there are these computer things that

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>crunched numbers really well. And he was he was a

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 1>math major, uh, and he he got to work with computers,

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 1>but he didn't really understand programming. At this point, they said,

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are these computers that are really good

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>at number crunching. If we were to reduce the personality,

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>uh preferences of people to numbers, then a computer could

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:45.679
<v Speaker 1>theoretically start matching people who have the most similar responses

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to a survey. So that's why he did. He developed

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a survey, gave it to tons of his classmates, and

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>he essentially relied on the second person to create a

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>computer program that would match up these were ponses, and

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>he rented time on one of the enormous computers at Harvard.

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it was like a hundred dollars a day

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>or something in order for him to rent the time

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>on this machine. It might have even been higher than that,

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>but it was a wild success. People loved the idea

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of being able to use a machine to take out

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the guesswork of trying to find that perfect person. In fact,

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>there was one report of a young lady who was

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>matched up with her ex boyfriend and got back with

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>him because the computer told her to. So that we

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>started to act like the computer was like the oracle

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and that we must obey the machine. Uh. But you

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>know again, it kind of showed a couple of different

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>things that showed how people really wanted to find someone

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>who was compatible. And it also showed that there was

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>this reverence for computers because they were objects a myth

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and legend to most people back in the sixties, they

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the experience with computers that we do today.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Once you've gone through a few blue screens of death,

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you realize they're not infallible machines. But at any rate,

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>if you flash forward to the nineteen nineties, by then

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you had had some computer dating services uh competing in

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the United States. But now we see the rise of

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, especially with the World Wide Web. The Internet

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>had been around, but the World Wide Web was what

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>made it accessible, and uh so you've got those earliest

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>days of regular folks getting access to it, and the

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>connectivity opened up the opportunity for meeting new people that

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Speaker 1>you might never have ever encountered in your life otherwise.

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 1>So we've got an article actually on how Stuffworks dot

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 1>Com about how online dating works. So it'll cover all

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the basics. But if anyone has ever done any browsing

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>on an online dating site, you know typically what they're about.

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>It's usually you you create a profile, probably include a picture. Absolutely,

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>you probably include the best pictures you possibly can to

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>present yourself in the best light possible professional head shot.

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Then you are going to fill out a profile that

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>includes a lot of your preferences, things that you enjoy

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>things that you're you're not into. It might be things,

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>yeah I'm a non smoker, that kind of stuff. Political affiliation,

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>it could be is, and it really depends upon the site.

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Like some sites, that's true. Also, are you are you

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>into pets? Do you like pets? Do you like kids,

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:25.679
<v Speaker 1>you're not like kids? Do you want to have kids?

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 1>Do you already have kids? These are all the sorts

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of questions that you would put it there, and then

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>when you go for a search, then you can say

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 1>which parameters you consider to be the most important, like say, uh,

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>they need their age needs to fall within this range,

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>or I'm not going to have anything in common with

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>this person, or height is a big one. Height is

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a big one. I read that b m I in

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>regards to men looking for women was a big factor. Yeah, yeah,

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it was around like eighteen point five percent.

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Was one figure sided like they like women with that

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of b m I, which is ridiculous. Well, now

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole other discussion we could have about expectations

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and realism. But at any rate, one of the interesting

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>things I found was that we don't necessarily know what

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:16.719
<v Speaker 1>it is we're looking for when we're looking for it

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>nor or we may we may have a suspicion, but

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>we may not be honest about it when we're doing

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>our search. For example, let's say that I put in

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>there that I really want to meet someone who's really

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>interested in reading, but it turns out that there are

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>other factors that I think are way more important. But

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to present myself as someone who is an

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>intellectual and therefore value this. Some online dating sites can

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>figure out when you're fibbing, because it's your behavior that

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>tells the site what you're really into. Because if I

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>start going through profiles and I'm spending less than a

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of seconds on them, and I'm zooming through them

0:14:55.680 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>really quickly, the the online dating stars can log all

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that and say, all right, well, we gave him the

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>matches based upon what he said he wanted, but he

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>totally breathed through them all so except this one. He

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>spent a couple of months looking at this one. So

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>really he's looking more for what this person represents rather

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>than what he says he represents. And as more and

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>more data gets accumulated, the more people who use the site,

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the dating site algorithms adjust themselves and start showing you

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>what you really want, even if you're not aware that

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that's what you want to you. Yeah, which is kind

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of weird. I mean, we've talked on tech stuff many

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>times about how it only takes a little data to

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>give a system a great idea of who you are

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>as a person, but it even is true in the

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>dating world. There's also approach called collaborative filter filtering. This

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>is where a system will organize people into large groups

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>just based on preferences which might not even be obvious

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>from the outside. So, all right, so let's say we've

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>we've at a population of like ten thousand people and

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>they've all created profiles. The algorithm will start to find

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>commonalities between those people that again, if you were just

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to look at the profiles as a human being, you

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>might not even be able to pick out which things

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>they have in common. But because we're talking about sites

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that have access to such huge amounts of data and

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>can run all these different types of comparisons against one another,

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>it makes perfect sense to the algorithm, which is kind

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of creepy in a way when you think about it,

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>because it ultimately starts to divide people into large groups

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and it suggests that there are a limited number of

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>groups that people fall into. In other words, it's kind

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of like thinking about horoscopes. I don't like the idea

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of a horoscope because it suggests that there are only

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>twelve types of people in the world, right, I mean,

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>if you if you leap to that, if you say,

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>my horoscope for today is, etcetera, that means that roughly

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>one twelfth of the world's population is going to have

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the same sort of day I'm going to have, which

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make sense. But these systems actually show that that's

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>not that far off from the truth in the sense

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that there a limited number of categories that you can

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 1>actually shove people into, and from at least a mathematic perspective,

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense. It works. Yeah, so little creepy um,

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>But it turns out like that's not it's not always

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>just about the data, the personal data about yourself, right right.

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:31.199
<v Speaker 1>So one really interesting thing that I found, um was

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I happened to stumble upon a gentleman by the name

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>of Dan Arielli. I believe that's how you say his

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>last name. And he's over a duke, and he's a

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>professor of psychology and behavioral economics. By the way, behavioral

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:48.360
<v Speaker 1>economics is so fascinating. So um Dan gave an interview

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to the big thing, and what he was saying was right,

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not all about the personal data. It's not about

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>the boxes you check or you know, your particular preferences.

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>And what he was postulating after he kind of browsed

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>online dating sites and found them significantly lacking, was that

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>it's more about your interaction with the person. That you

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>can tell a lot more about an interaction with a

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>person than by simply like knowing that you're eyes are

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>blue and you like cats and whatever it is about you. Right,

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like the difference between a resume and

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a job interview. Absolutely, And so his idea is, let's

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>get away from the check boxes and let's set up

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>ways for people to interact. And so he set up

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:31.719
<v Speaker 1>this website and it was basically you can pick an

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>avatar and just really simple. It wasn't like one of

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>these crazy avatars. It was maybe a triangle and a square,

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 1>there's some color in there. And then he basically put

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 1>like movies and images and words, and you kind of

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>move around and navigate and you talk to other avatars

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>as you encounter them, and so how all these encounters went,

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 1>which is set up like a better interaction for people

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to meet each other and get to know each other

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>and have a successful date ultimately. Well, that's really cool

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that the channel of that is that it kind of

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>requires a synchronous approach, meaning that both parties need to

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>be active at the same time, whereas we're seeing a

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of communication online is asynchronous, right, the idea that

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I can send you a message, Allison, and then you

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>respond to it when you have the availability when you

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>may not even notice that you have a message until

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>an hour later, and you respond and I might not

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 1>notice till three hours later. But we can continue to

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>have this communication, which is effective in many ways, but

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 1>it because, yeah, it's disjointed. It's it's you don't have

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a continuous experience. It takes away a lot of that

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>spontaneity that you would have in a conversation with an

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>actual person in real time. So it's not that there's

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 1>no value in that type of communication. There certainly is.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 1>And uh, and I love using all the tools that

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>have this asynchronous communication aspect to them, but uh, you know,

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 1>this approach, while it might be more effective than say,

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 1>just a a collection of profiles. It demands that you

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>have this you know, real time interaction with somebody, which

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>limits the number of people that you can presumably encounter

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>because it all depends on when both parties are available

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to interact, right, So if you're available to interact at

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the same time, I'm thinking that a synchronous interaction, I mean,

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it just seems like it would be more effective, right

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 1>because you're talking to somebody who's in the same frame

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 1>of minded view. Sure, yeah, I mean, and there are

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of dating sites that have a message system

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 1>where you know, either it's like an instant message type

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>thing or something along those lines, where you can set

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing up if both parties are online,

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>but they don't, they don't depend upon that, right. That's

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that's an added benefit to those sites. You could totally

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>have and asynchronous conversation with someone in a series of messages,

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, back and forth between each other. But I

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 1>do think that ari elli is onto something. I think

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Arie Ellie is right and that these kind of interactions

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 1>tend to have more value to them than the asynchronous type.

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 1>So he had a funny stat and what he was

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>suggesting with that online dating right is ineffective and inefficient.

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>And so one of the things that he said was

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that about six hours of chat for one lousy coffee date.

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's a lot of time invested. There's a

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of time invested. Yeah, I mean it's And that's

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the thing is that you can't expect every single interaction

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>to go well. In fact, we'll be talking about expectations

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot in this episode. Uh, you know, the people

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>are people, and you may think going into something that

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have this incredible interaction, which might just

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>be unrealistic expectations. Um, And that's just a human problem

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that's been around forever. I mean that has nothing to

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>do necessarily with the Internet. It's or or these dating

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:55.719
<v Speaker 1>apps and sites. The dating sites often create kind of

0:21:55.760 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a problem with this because they're built upon the promise

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that their service will help you find someone special. So

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:09.959
<v Speaker 1>it behooves them to kind of foster this image that

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you are going to meet Mr or Mrs Wright just

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.719
<v Speaker 1>by following, you know, us, creating a profile and seeking

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>them out this way. But human interaction is far more

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>complicated than that. That, however, is not the right way

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 1>to sell memberships to your dating site. Hey, it's complicated

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and you may or may not like this person. Come

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>join our site for twenty bucks a month, but at

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>any rate. Um. You know, we also have the interesting

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:43.880
<v Speaker 1>research that goes into, uh, how the dating sites create

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 1>these algorithms that match people up. Um. There have been

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 1>some folks who have looked into it from a personal perspective,

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>people who happened to work in statistics and mathematics and

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 1>computer science, who who were looking for a date and wondering, well,

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>what's the most effective way for me to use this tool?

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Engineers tend to think in that way, like you gave

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:06.920
<v Speaker 1>me a tool, and I can use it this way,

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>but is there a better way to use it? So,

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>people like Chris McKinley and Amy Webb have experimented with

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>various online dating sites to find out what was working

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes, How were these matches made the most

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 1>successful profiles, What what was it about those profiles that

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>made them successful? And so they really looked deeply into

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>these things to figure out how they work, so that

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>not that they could game the system, but so that

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>they could make the most effective profile to find the

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 1>people they're interested in meeting. Okay, so when we're talking

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>about an effective profile, do we mean like somebody who's

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>been successful at finding one relationship that the person is

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 1>stuck with or just having a lot of dates. I

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>think it was more about the number of responses. They

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>wanted to find a profile that got the most responses

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 1>from the people that seemed to be the target audience,

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the people that the folks that the the individuals themselves

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>were interested in dating. And so Amy Web actually has

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic ted talk where she goes through this whole

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>process and talked about how she identified the language that

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>was being used in very successful profiles. She had created

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>several fake profiles and populated them with different approaches to

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of see which ones were the most effective, you

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>know what, what sort of UH profiles would get the

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>most responses. And the the results were dramatic. And some

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>people might say, well, as that totally ethical, I mean,

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you've got actual people who are looking for a date

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're pursuing a date with a fake persona. But

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>at any rate, she said, well, I was doing research,

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I needed to find out how this worked.

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>And once I knew that, I could tweak my own profile,

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and sure enough she met a guy they ended up dating,

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and then they ended up getting married. So she was

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>doing it both because she is interested in the system

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 1>and also because she genuinely was trying to find someone

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to to go out on dates with. So it to

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>me what was interesting is that there are now two

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>different types of algorithms out there. There's the algorithm that's

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>being used by the dating site to figure out how

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to match people up, and then there are the algorithms

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that people have come up with to figure out how

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to make their profile the most attractive in order to

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:27.719
<v Speaker 1>get the most potential dates, therefore having the most potential

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:30.919
<v Speaker 1>chances of finding that someone special. I'd be curious to

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>hear what she found out was effective. I mean, I

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>think that we've all kind of had the experience of

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe your friend is going to go on an online

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>dating service, and I certainly, as an editor and lover

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 1>of words in general, have helped friends craft profiles. And

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.199
<v Speaker 1>it's comical. I mean it is comical. So whatever the

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>your flaw is, say you're a big old procrastinator, Well,

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm laid back, you know, I'll like to take my

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>time and enjoy life, right right, So all the code

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 1>were it's in the little editing that you do to

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>just tweak it enough. Yeah, it's it's again. It's a

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>lot like building a resume, which is both a good

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 1>and a bad thing, right because a resume is all

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>about putting your best professional face forwards that you get

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the best opportunity to get a job interview. This is

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 1>putting your best personal face forward to get that opportunity

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 1>for a date. Uh yeah, it's and it's serious business.

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is this is these are people's lives

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 1>and not to mention, an entire one point four billion

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 1>dollar industry. So it's a big deal. So how do

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>these websites actually make money? Right? So, we talked about

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the subscription service model, right, so you pay some feed

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.479
<v Speaker 1>monthly and or maybe you get I mean, okay, Cupid

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, does not it's all free. But then match

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe an e Harmony and some of those uh

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, to get messages and things like that, you

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>have to pay a subscription and then their ads of course, sure, yeah,

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>adds support is one of the big ways that any

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>web presence makes money. Right. So, but it's not clear

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>how some of these apps are making money, and I

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>think that they aren't I mean, yeah, no, that's a

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of apps don't make money because what the app

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 1>developers trying to do is create a tool that becomes

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:22.640
<v Speaker 1>so popular that some other company buys out the person

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>who developed it, right, I mean, that's the approaches. Let's

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>let's make a tool that everyone loves so much that

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 1>a company is going to swoop in here, pay me

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a huge amount of money because of the value that

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the potential or the potential value of that app, because

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of all the people who are using it. You know,

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind, whenever we're talking about a service or

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>an app like this kind of thing, ultimately the product

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 1>is us, the people using that service or app. Where

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the product where the We're the thing that is making

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the money, making money for whatever company owns it. So

0:27:55.960 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 1>if you are like a tender and you have no jones,

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>actually there you go. So if you if you had

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>created that app and uh, you didn't have a way

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of monetizing it directly, it may just be that you're

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>doing it because it's a really useful thing. People are

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 1>really into it. People are a lot of people are

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>are downloading it and active on it. Someone is going

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to find that valuable and they're going to purchase you.

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them also just exist on venture capitalist

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>investment for the short term, which is that's risky because

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that's an investment. People expect to have a return on

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that investment, So you have to eventually figure out a

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>way to make some money or you're just gonna you know,

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you've slid your reputation. If you are known as someone

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 1>who makes tools that ultimately never pay out, then you're

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>not going to get any financial backing for your future work.

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>So uh, I think that's the main way that these

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>apps are making money is they're getting bought, which that's

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 1>a risky move. But if you can make a really

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>good app, then that's something that you know, it's it's

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>something you can count on at least as a potential

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>opportunity down the road. It was reading the guy who

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>just created Cuddler, Charlie. Yeah, that old Charlie had no idea.

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>He was just planning for a soft launch of Cuddler.

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I forget Charlie's last name, sorry Charlie, Yeah, sorry Charlie. Anyway,

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>he was just he was unprepared for the sheer amount

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of attention that Cudler received. Yeah. Yeah, it got covered

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>by a couple of different UH news outlets like Huffington

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Post and Slate I think wrote about it and uh,

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and that attention meant that there was an explosion in

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>downloads and suddenly this app that Charlie probably felt was

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>not totally ready yet was being adopted by tons of people.

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>And and normally if you're launching, yeah, yeah, it was

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be a soft launch where he could do

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>some testing, get feedback, tweak stuff. But now it goes

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>when you get that large adoption, it goes from testing

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 1>phase to now it's a product, and that is a problem.

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Now we should probably mention what Cuddler is. In fact,

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a great way of transitioning into just mobile

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>apps in general. So Cuddler, which was of course the

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>app that that Allison brought to my attention. I did

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>not know about this app until you mentioned it to me.

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I had not heard about it. Yeah, my head was

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>under a rock apparently when this came out. So Cuddler

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is pretty much what sounds like. It's an app that

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is designed to allow someone who wants to just cuddle

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>with somebody else, you know, just find somebody to to

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>cuddle with, you know. That's it. Just some personal contact um. Right,

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's geolocation base. So you're finally you're finding people

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>who are in need of a cuddle nearby you. And

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty simple set up actually, if in case you

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>guys haven't experimented with it, and I know a lot

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of people have, um, but the basic premises, Yeah, you

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>say that you're up for a cuddle, you find people

0:30:57.920 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>in your area who are up for it. Once you

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>get a match, both of your locations are shown, and

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>then you meet. I think you're allowed to send one message, yeah,

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>indicating the cuttle time and place. Right. Yeah, this is

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the location thing is definitely an issue, I think because

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a The way I've read it described is that

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>it shows a map and it plots the location of

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the two parties on the map. Right, So if we

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>were looking for a cuddle, I could see you heading

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 1>across the park towards me, and you could see me

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>heading for that park bench that we decided we were

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>going to cuttle on. Right. It's just it's using the

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>GPS on your phone to track where you are. Maybe

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>even it could could use a cellular tower location even

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have GPS turned on, because that can

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>at least give you an estimation of where the person is.

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a little less accurate than GPS, but still works.

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>And so you could actually watch as the two people

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>converge by looking at the map and uh to to

0:31:55.560 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, cuttle point zero where you're going to cuddle um.

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And so that also the curious thing about Cuddler was

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that I think that the founder or Charlie, he really

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't anticipate, you know, that people would be using it

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>as they do Tinder, which is you know, for sex. Yeah. Yeah,

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>there are people using it to kind of hook up.

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of folks have described Cuddler as being

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of a creeper app, especially with the the fact

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that it shows the location on the map. Um that

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it could be an app for someone to to creep

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>on some boy, stalk someone harassed somebody. Uh. But Charlie

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>really seems to have his heart in the right place

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:36.239
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that he just wanted to build a

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>tool that would let people who have a lack of

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 1>social interaction and personal contact meet up with other people

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>who are having the same sort of issue. And you

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>know personal contact, I mean actual physical contact. Yeah, it's

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>it's an important part of human interaction and it and

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it definitely can contribute to our sense of well being,

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>our sense of fulfillness. If we go without it for

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a long time, it can lead to depression. I mean,

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>they're there are real reasons why people could crave and

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>need personal contact, but this particular implementation raises a lot

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of troubling questions. Part of it is just again the

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>way that the information is displayed. But another part of

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it is just that if you have if you're catering

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to a population of people who are lacking that kind

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of contact, you're probably going to have at least a

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>few cases of negative outcomes, right, I mean you're talking

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>about people who maybe in a very either they themselves

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 1>are in a very vulnerable place, which can lead to problems,

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>or it could lead to people who are praying upon

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>folks who are in a vulnerable place. Right. So there

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>is that one account that we both read. The writer

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>from gig Um Carmel Yeah, d M mess I believe. Yeah,

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 1>she wrote of her experience. She wrote up an entire

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>article which was an entertaining read and also a little

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a little scary. Yeah, she met up with another young lady. Well,

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, young lady. She met up with another lady,

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think she was actually an older woman who

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Carmel called Monica. In the article, she explained that she

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>had changed the name to protect Monica's privacy, which I

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:18.359
<v Speaker 1>think was the right choice to go to go with,

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and that she met at Monica's home and yeah, for

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a cuddle. So the problem there clearly is her not

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>being in a public place and going to the person's home.

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:30.359
<v Speaker 1>And it seems like it worked out okay for this

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>writer and good for her for trying and bravery and

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff, but also a little alarming that she

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>went to somebody's house. And as she added that the

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 1>woman Monica showed her a gun at one point and

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 1>showed her how to use it. Yeah, to say that,

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, she had worried about safety, and that's when

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>she had gone out and got a gun. And this

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>was all part of the casual conversation. But at the

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>same time, the reporter says it's a little worrisome, and

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that she had contacted Charlie, the creator of Cutler, and

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 1>he said, yeah, that was probably not a good idea.

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I did and intend for that. When I wrote this app,

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking that people would first meet in a

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 1>safe location, like a public space. But then Carmel's point is, well,

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're already having this this problem of a lack

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>of physical contact, does it add even more anxiety to

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 1>require it to take place in public where people can

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>see you? And that is a little weird. Yeah. I

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I respect the idea behind it, I really do. I

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>understand that we all need human interaction and I could

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>totally use a hug on most days. But but I

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 1>think we've outlined the problematic aspects of it. Yeah. Now,

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>on a on a personal level, I am I'm big

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 1>into hugs. I'm a big I'm a big fan of hugs,

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 1>but only with certain circles of my friends. I have

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>never gotten hug just by the way from me, No,

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:53.240
<v Speaker 1>because I don't hug coworkers. Yeah, thinks like a decent policy.

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 1>There's Yeah, there's there's certain like like worker, Well, I

0:35:57.239 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 1>have to because Candice. I mean, how can you How

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:02.399
<v Speaker 1>can you not hug Candice? She's like probably the most

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 1>huggable person on the planet. But um, yeah, I don't.

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't tend to hug co workers. I put them

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>in a circle where I think these are the types

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:13.279
<v Speaker 1>of social interactions that are appropriate for people that I

0:36:13.320 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 1>work with. And if I meet them outside of that

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and we socialize outside of that and they enter another

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 1>circle of friends, like, if that then diagram has overlap,

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:26.799
<v Speaker 1>that's perfectly acceptable. But otherwise, yeah, I don't. I don't

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:29.760
<v Speaker 1>think of it as acceptable for co workers in general.

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm not against it, but on principle, it's just that's

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:36.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of how I think. But uh, and strangers don't

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 1>tend to hug them. Uh, there are exceptions. There have

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 1>been some people who have been introduced to me and

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 1>upon introduction, they immediately hugged me. But they did so

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>with such uh genuine charm that I was all right

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>with it. But it's a really rare thing. In fact,

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I interviewed one of them just the other day protect stuff.

0:36:56.280 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 1>So do you want to hear my idea for an app? Yes,

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that they should be a backscratcher app. You know,

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:06.239
<v Speaker 1>I can totally agree to that. So a similar thing,

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:07.839
<v Speaker 1>but you have to be I think you have to

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 1>make the premise or the area of to put the

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 1>call at to you much smaller. You don't want to

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>cross town to find finally get that person toscribe because

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>by then the itch is gone, right, the itch is gone,

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes you just can't reach it. It's just right

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>there between the shoulder blades. And you know, the more

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>we talk about, the more it's going to actually start

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to creep into my mind. So I'm going to change

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the subject. But that's a great idea. Yeah, it's much

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>better than a phone that has a backscratcher that swings

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 1>out from it, because that would just bulk. So you

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:39.280
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Tender, which is a great app to to refer

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to as well, because it's so popular that one debuted

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 1>back in two thousand twelve, and you mentioned that it's

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 1>owned by match dot com. Uh. Now, the founders like

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it as being a social discovery tool

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that you're you use it to find people to hang

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:57.760
<v Speaker 1>out with. And the way tender works is it pulls

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>photos from Facebook profile. Else then you look at the

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 1>profile and you can swipe left, left to dismiss it

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 1>or right if you're interested and you want to make

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:10.839
<v Speaker 1>contact with this person. Um. But while they talk about

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it as a social discovery tool, that's not necessarily it's

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:17.319
<v Speaker 1>all about hooking up. It's about you know, it's the

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 1>hot or not approach. It's you know, this person is

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>this person I find attractive this one I don't find attractive. No, no, no, yes, no,

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>no no. And um, you know the fact that it

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 1>has this kind of swipe to dismiss or swipe to accept,

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:36.479
<v Speaker 1>really I think drives that home. It actually is, making

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it a physical activity that you associate with either accepting

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 1>or rejecting. So I think there's something interesting psychologically there.

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a psychologist, so I certainly can't draw any conclusions,

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:50.880
<v Speaker 1>but I would love to hear a study about this

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of behavior and what it sort of feeds into

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 1>because one of the things one of the criticisms I've

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:59.320
<v Speaker 1>read about online dating in general is that it promotes

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:03.280
<v Speaker 1>this kind of shopping behavior. Absolutely, so the idea of

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of your You're like, it's like you're going through a catalog,

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's not it's not really promoting an interaction so

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 1>much as this this very rapid except reject kind of approach,

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 1>and Tender sort of just exemplifies that because of the

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 1>way the app is built, right, Well, so I wonder

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>what the outcomes ultimately would be from that, Right, So

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>you hook up with somebody on Tender and then you know,

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 1>are you If you're just looking for a hook up,

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:32.359
<v Speaker 1>that's fun. But if you're looking to date somebody, I mean,

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 1>what are the outcomes? You know, do you wind up

0:39:34.480 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 1>dating having successful like partnerships with people are not so much. Yeah,

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know what basis is that

0:39:41.680 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 1>split second decision in which you're swiping left or swiping right? Like,

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 1>how true is that instinct? Well, and there are people

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>who have said that perhaps the activity of using Tinder

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 1>itself is more exciting than any actual interaction that follows,

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:01.879
<v Speaker 1>that that the thrill of ender is just the use

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of Tinder, not not not any kind of actual encounter

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 1>that might follow, but just the the feeling of rejecting

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 1>or saying this person is attractive to me itself is

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 1>social activity. It's one that you can do with your friends.

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I was reading an article about in the Wall Street

0:40:19.000 --> 0:40:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Journal about some football players, professional football players I think

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:24.720
<v Speaker 1>out of New York, maybe the Jets or the Giants,

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and they were essentially using Tinder to um find people

0:40:28.680 --> 0:40:32.239
<v Speaker 1>without advertising that they were professional football players. And so

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:35.759
<v Speaker 1>you know they're sitting around though swipe left, yeah, swipe right,

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and they were you know, meeting up with some of

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the people they found on Tinder, and they found it

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:43.439
<v Speaker 1>useful for when they were they were away from home

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 1>at training camp I think, maybe an upstate New York

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and also to kind of give them a little bit

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of a layer of anonymity until they were ready to

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:53.400
<v Speaker 1>say like, hey, you know, I do this for a living.

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And so in that case, they were actually looking at

0:40:57.080 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to strip away some of the identifying information that would

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 1>otherwise bias someone towards them, like, you know, I want

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to see if this person would be interested in meeting

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 1>up with me and or at least carrying on a

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 1>conversation with me before they know what I do for

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a living, because if they know what I do for

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a living, I'll never be sure if that's the reason

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:20.800
<v Speaker 1>why they pursued me. Yeah, I think that was the idea. Interesting.

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 1>And then for those uh you know, Tinder is not

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 1>itself a new idea. There was actually an app that

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 1>pre uh that predated Tinder, uh called Grinder that was

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:35.319
<v Speaker 1>specifically for gay and bisexual and by curious men to

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:39.080
<v Speaker 1>find one another for essentially the purpose of hooking up. Yeah,

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:40.920
<v Speaker 1>it was the first one, I believe. Yeah, so that

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 1>was that was something that led to the development of

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 1>other apps, So you can kind of see that as

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 1>being the genesis of the same sort of idea that

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:51.240
<v Speaker 1>we've seen with Tinder and to maybe some extent, Cuddler,

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:55.760
<v Speaker 1>even though again Cudler is mostly it's it's intended for

0:41:56.200 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 1>non sexual cuddling, or at least that's you know, that

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the intention. It's hard for me to

0:42:03.680 --> 0:42:06.880
<v Speaker 1>ever say that what was intended without speaking directly to

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the person who created these acts, but just based upon

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:12.439
<v Speaker 1>what I've read, Yeah, so I guess I'm wondering if

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:14.840
<v Speaker 1>things like Tinder and Grinder and all these things that

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>are sort of more geared at hooking up, if that

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:20.359
<v Speaker 1>makes people change your behavior on online dating sites, Right,

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 1>so you can kind of segment out your behavior. Okay,

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 1>this is what I'm gonna use for hooking up, and

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 1>this is what I'm going to use to find my

0:42:27.480 --> 0:42:31.359
<v Speaker 1>lifelong partner. So essentially, the difference between like a real

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:35.320
<v Speaker 1>life situation where you might go to a specific club

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:38.560
<v Speaker 1>or bar in order for you to find someone to

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 1>hook up with, versus you know, you're looking seriously for

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:44.919
<v Speaker 1>that person who's going to be taking an important part

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:48.319
<v Speaker 1>of your life like from that point forward. Absolutely, I

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:50.719
<v Speaker 1>expect that that actually is the case. I mean, I

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:53.720
<v Speaker 1>imagine that that is true. UM. I don't know which

0:42:54.000 --> 0:42:56.319
<v Speaker 1>online dating sites are the most popular for the people

0:42:56.360 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 1>who tend to use the apps like Tinder. There are

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>other apps that are more meant to try and bring

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:07.160
<v Speaker 1>people together in a social setting without the pressure of

0:43:07.200 --> 0:43:10.320
<v Speaker 1>this one on one meeting. One of them is called Grouper.

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Group sounds really fun. I have to say Grouper is

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:15.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of a neat idea, and that you end up

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 1>creating a group of three and usually, at least the

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:21.560
<v Speaker 1>way I've seen it portrayed, it's three people of the

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:25.799
<v Speaker 1>same gender who are going after a chance to meet

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 1>three other people of whichever gender the three prefer. So

0:43:29.400 --> 0:43:31.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, it doesn't have to be opposite sex, it

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:33.799
<v Speaker 1>could be same sex. But the idea being that you

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>have these three people who have paid into the service

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to be matched up with three other people that the

0:43:40.640 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>service has decided appear to be uh compatible for an

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 1>enjoyable evening. Yet and and the app also includes uh

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it pays for the first round of drinks for everybody,

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 1>so everyone gets one free drink. Yeah, so you get

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a group of six people together to hang out, and

0:43:59.440 --> 0:44:03.320
<v Speaker 1>it takes pressure off of the one on one meeting,

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 1>although it could lead to other really socially awkward situations

0:44:08.200 --> 0:44:11.080
<v Speaker 1>where maybe two people have interest in one person or

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:14.359
<v Speaker 1>let's get out of here man, yeah, which right? Or

0:44:14.480 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>yeah or you get it, where like, you know, one

0:44:18.080 --> 0:44:20.880
<v Speaker 1>person gets left out because two of the people are

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 1>interested in you know, and and in member number one,

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 1>one person's interested in member number two. Remember number three

0:44:26.600 --> 0:44:28.839
<v Speaker 1>is out. Meanwhile, remember number one is like, well great,

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:31.360
<v Speaker 1>now I've got these two people after me. Um. So

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:33.160
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of different things that could come up,

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:35.319
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't necessarily have to lead to that. It

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:37.919
<v Speaker 1>could just be oh, that was a fun evening out,

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and now I've got a new group of friends and

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I can hang out with them and do stuff. So,

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you I could see for this is

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 1>uh so I am not available, but one of my

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 1>friends is available. And I would totally be a wing woman.

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think that is a position you can take

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:54.960
<v Speaker 1>up when you do these group of things. You can

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:57.520
<v Speaker 1>be a wing woman or a wingman. Sure, I actually

0:44:57.520 --> 0:44:59.440
<v Speaker 1>like to think of myself as a rather good wing woman.

0:44:59.680 --> 0:45:05.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm terrible. Yeah, I'm a great talker, but I'm also oblivious,

0:45:05.360 --> 0:45:09.839
<v Speaker 1>so I'm I'm just not in that headspace right So

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 1>for me, I would be terrible. I would be trying

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:13.799
<v Speaker 1>to think of the next funny thing to say just

0:45:13.840 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to make everybody laugh. And I meanwhile, whoever I'm being

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 1>wingman for is just thinking, just shut up, Jonathan, just

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 1>just shut up for a minute. Um. What's cool and

0:45:23.440 --> 0:45:25.759
<v Speaker 1>maybe not cool about Grouper at the same time is

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, how does it come up with how to

0:45:28.640 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 1>match you up with another group of people, and it

0:45:31.600 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 1>it minds your Facebook information. Now, keep in mind you

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:39.520
<v Speaker 1>have to, uh, you have to authorize the app to

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:43.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to mind that information. And you can always

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:45.160
<v Speaker 1>keep stuff private. I mean a lot of this ends

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:48.239
<v Speaker 1>up being information that's publicly available because you have put

0:45:48.280 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it up on Facebook and you didn't set the privacy

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:54.320
<v Speaker 1>setting so that it couldn't be seen by other entities.

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:57.360
<v Speaker 1>But it does mean that it's going to be looking

0:45:57.400 --> 0:45:59.759
<v Speaker 1>at everything from your age. It's also gonna look at

0:45:59.760 --> 0:46:03.319
<v Speaker 1>your ends list because it doesn't want to match up

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:07.160
<v Speaker 1>three people with folks that they already know. That's not

0:46:07.239 --> 0:46:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the perfect problem in a small town setting, I would think. Yeah,

0:46:09.760 --> 0:46:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's even a problem just for neighborhoods, right,

0:46:12.600 --> 0:46:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Atlanta is in most cities are collections of neighborhoods,

0:46:17.360 --> 0:46:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and you have people who tend to be very um

0:46:20.920 --> 0:46:25.040
<v Speaker 1>like like they'll they'll range outward from their neighborhood, but

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:28.799
<v Speaker 1>it's it gets increasingly smaller, like the they'll they'll spend

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:31.239
<v Speaker 1>less time the further out right, unless they happen to

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:32.840
<v Speaker 1>live in a part of town that they just considered

0:46:32.840 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to be dead and they need to go to a

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:38.279
<v Speaker 1>different part of town for stuff that happens. But I

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 1>can definitely see that becoming a challenge, especially if you're

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a really social person, particularly if you're really social online,

0:46:44.960 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 1>because I know people who accept friend requests online. Yeah,

0:46:49.239 --> 0:46:51.680
<v Speaker 1>they'll have hundreds of them, and most studies say that

0:46:51.880 --> 0:46:55.279
<v Speaker 1>we're only capable of supporting about a hundred fifty relationships.

0:46:55.440 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh did you just see that great video we did

0:46:57.600 --> 0:46:59.759
<v Speaker 1>on that? I know that Ben did a video on

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:01.680
<v Speaker 1>sure it's on brain stuff. I was good. I thought

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:05.839
<v Speaker 1>it was super interesting. It's a really good video, right, yeah, yeah,

0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:07.880
<v Speaker 1>And I had heard about that before we before he

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:09.359
<v Speaker 1>had done the video, but he did a great job

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 1>explaining it. So if you keep that in mind, you

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:14.920
<v Speaker 1>might be someone who accepts lots of friend requests anyway.

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 1>And it may be that you know you've got hundreds

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of friends on Facebook. That's gonna narrow down your options

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:24.880
<v Speaker 1>when you use something like Grouper that's specifically looking to

0:47:24.920 --> 0:47:27.239
<v Speaker 1>try and match you up with people you don't know.

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 1>The one cool thing I will say about Grouper is um, actually,

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's pretty cool in general. But the one

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>thing I would say about Grouper though, is that I

0:47:35.560 --> 0:47:37.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's in line with a lot of with how

0:47:37.480 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 1>people go out these days, especially the young people. If

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you got a big group and so it's got that

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:44.160
<v Speaker 1>going on for it's right in line with that. Yeah.

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:47.879
<v Speaker 1>And I think again it all depends upon the expectations

0:47:47.920 --> 0:47:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you bring, right, So if you bring the expectation of

0:47:50.920 --> 0:47:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I just want to go out and meet some folks,

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:56.320
<v Speaker 1>get to know them, have some fun, and then maybe

0:47:56.920 --> 0:47:59.600
<v Speaker 1>we find out that some of us click and that's awesome.

0:47:59.640 --> 0:48:01.319
<v Speaker 1>And may be it doesn't happen, but as long as

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:04.160
<v Speaker 1>we're having a good time and enjoying ourselves, that's cool too.

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Like I think, if you go in with the right expectations.

0:48:06.680 --> 0:48:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Then you're you're much less likely to you know, pen

0:48:09.600 --> 0:48:12.000
<v Speaker 1>all your hopes on something that may or may not happen,

0:48:12.120 --> 0:48:15.359
<v Speaker 1>and thus avoid a crash if it doesn't turn out

0:48:15.360 --> 0:48:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the way you had hoped. But that's easier said than done.

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:20.399
<v Speaker 1>That's said by a guy who's been married seventeen years.

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:24.359
<v Speaker 1>So I don't you know, I don't. It's no, I'm not.

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Then there's a how about we, which is an interesting

0:48:28.560 --> 0:48:32.080
<v Speaker 1>app It lets people propose a specific date experience. Now

0:48:32.080 --> 0:48:35.720
<v Speaker 1>this can actually be between existing couples, where it's really

0:48:35.760 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 1>just you could send a message to your your partner

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and say, how about we, you know, go out for

0:48:42.040 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 1>sushi tonight. That could be your thing, Or it could

0:48:45.320 --> 0:48:47.120
<v Speaker 1>be a way of trying to look for a date

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 1>where you describe a date that you think would be fun.

0:48:50.520 --> 0:48:54.520
<v Speaker 1>You say, how about we go to karaoke, you know

0:48:54.680 --> 0:49:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and seeing John Cougar Mellencamp song really loudly, and and

0:49:00.560 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 1>so you say that, and then you wait to see

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:05.759
<v Speaker 1>if anyone responds, and if they do, and it's and

0:49:05.800 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it's truly a date experience that you think would be

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:10.000
<v Speaker 1>fun and they also think it would be fun. The

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:12.680
<v Speaker 1>idea there is that you would be very compatible to

0:49:12.760 --> 0:49:16.759
<v Speaker 1>have a good time. Maybe nothing romantic comes out of it,

0:49:16.800 --> 0:49:18.880
<v Speaker 1>but you would be able to have a fun interaction

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:22.759
<v Speaker 1>with another human being doing something you both enjoy. So, uh,

0:49:23.080 --> 0:49:25.840
<v Speaker 1>from why I understand the people who use how about

0:49:25.840 --> 0:49:28.560
<v Speaker 1>we tend to be in an older age bracket than

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:31.279
<v Speaker 1>the folks who use Tender, but they're using it for

0:49:31.680 --> 0:49:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of similar purpose, not necessarily to hook up,

0:49:34.560 --> 0:49:37.000
<v Speaker 1>but to have these kind of interactions with people that

0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 1>they haven't met before. So this was interesting. There's this

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 1>one called Siren then I came across when I was

0:49:42.680 --> 0:49:45.640
<v Speaker 1>researching this podcast, and this one is a two thousand

0:49:45.719 --> 0:49:48.920
<v Speaker 1>fourteen invitation only entrant in the app world, in the

0:49:49.320 --> 0:49:51.960
<v Speaker 1>dating app world, and the spin here is that the

0:49:52.040 --> 0:49:55.800
<v Speaker 1>women control their visibility. Right. So the founders is, um,

0:49:55.880 --> 0:49:59.200
<v Speaker 1>she's actually very interesting, Susie Lee. She's an artist and

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:01.879
<v Speaker 1>she's also the sa EO, and she wanted to give

0:50:01.960 --> 0:50:05.000
<v Speaker 1>women the power back in these online dating sites and

0:50:05.080 --> 0:50:09.480
<v Speaker 1>dating apps, and so instead of profiles or swiping left

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 1>or right right. So we've kind of already gone through

0:50:11.640 --> 0:50:14.560
<v Speaker 1>like what maybe problematic with the profile and talked about

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the swiping business what you do here is you respond

0:50:17.320 --> 0:50:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to these daily q and a's posted by a sponsor

0:50:20.280 --> 0:50:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and there I think the sponsors are cultural types like

0:50:22.640 --> 0:50:26.640
<v Speaker 1>museums or you know, music organizations stuff like that, so

0:50:26.719 --> 0:50:29.520
<v Speaker 1>not like fast food restaurants or something. Right, but one

0:50:29.520 --> 0:50:31.719
<v Speaker 1>of the sample questions, one of the sample q and

0:50:31.760 --> 0:50:34.719
<v Speaker 1>as they said, was that describe your favorite sandwich from

0:50:34.760 --> 0:50:37.760
<v Speaker 1>top to bottom. Right, so you see this one pop

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:40.440
<v Speaker 1>up on your siren app and you describe it. I

0:50:40.440 --> 0:50:43.120
<v Speaker 1>think you can also post video and then you can

0:50:43.120 --> 0:50:46.440
<v Speaker 1>make it visible. And people, I mean, people are pretty witty,

0:50:46.480 --> 0:50:49.080
<v Speaker 1>people are funny, and for me as an editor, one

0:50:49.080 --> 0:50:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I find really attractive about people

0:50:51.640 --> 0:50:55.680
<v Speaker 1>is their their way with words. So I think reading something,

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it just gets that more of somebody's personality, like

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that they're able to show right there. Yeah, yeah, the

0:51:01.680 --> 0:51:04.319
<v Speaker 1>the way that someone answers a question can tell you

0:51:04.360 --> 0:51:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot about their general thinking process, whether or not

0:51:08.200 --> 0:51:11.719
<v Speaker 1>you find that to be an attractive feature or not.

0:51:12.320 --> 0:51:15.160
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I could certainly see that as being a

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:17.960
<v Speaker 1>really cool way of deciding whether or not to try

0:51:18.120 --> 0:51:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and take that further with an actual interaction. Right. So,

0:51:22.560 --> 0:51:24.840
<v Speaker 1>so you like the way that this person described their

0:51:24.880 --> 0:51:27.600
<v Speaker 1>favorite sandwich, and what do you know, The next question

0:51:27.760 --> 0:51:29.920
<v Speaker 1>is who's your favorite beatle? The next day and the

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:32.520
<v Speaker 1>same person says, like, you know, makes you laugh because

0:51:32.520 --> 0:51:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it's John Lennon and your favorite beatle is Shohn Lennon.

0:51:35.280 --> 0:51:38.440
<v Speaker 1>You've got to meet this person. So what you do

0:51:38.480 --> 0:51:41.280
<v Speaker 1>then is you'd make your information visible to the man.

0:51:41.440 --> 0:51:44.279
<v Speaker 1>And so that's that's pretty interesting. Again, it's it's kind

0:51:44.280 --> 0:51:47.279
<v Speaker 1>of a feminist dating app in that, um, you the

0:51:47.320 --> 0:51:50.840
<v Speaker 1>woman is unlocking her data for the man at her choice.

0:51:51.120 --> 0:51:53.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the big premise here. And I know people, some

0:51:53.600 --> 0:51:55.560
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna be unhappy and why do you need that?

0:51:55.680 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 1>But she thought there was a need for it, and

0:51:59.200 --> 0:52:01.799
<v Speaker 1>I think it's pretty no. I I do too, I think,

0:52:02.160 --> 0:52:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, considering that we're talking about something that in

0:52:06.160 --> 0:52:10.640
<v Speaker 1>our culture, and in the United States in particular, uh,

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it tends to be the cultural idea tends to be

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that the man is in pursuit of the woman and

0:52:18.000 --> 0:52:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that women are things to be pursued. And that's the

0:52:20.480 --> 0:52:25.440
<v Speaker 1>problem there. It's viewing women as things as exactly exactly.

0:52:25.520 --> 0:52:28.520
<v Speaker 1>So this is an approach that to try and kind

0:52:28.520 --> 0:52:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of counteract that in a way and Uh, and you know,

0:52:32.280 --> 0:52:34.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a problematic thing because we're talking about a

0:52:35.000 --> 0:52:39.440
<v Speaker 1>cultural issue. It's deep seated, and it's something that changes

0:52:39.560 --> 0:52:42.759
<v Speaker 1>very gradually with time and only with effort. Right, It's

0:52:42.760 --> 0:52:47.280
<v Speaker 1>not something that's gonna spontaneously change. So I like seeing

0:52:47.320 --> 0:52:50.400
<v Speaker 1>this kind of creative approach because I do want to

0:52:50.440 --> 0:52:54.560
<v Speaker 1>see that model eventually change. I would like to see

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:58.920
<v Speaker 1>there to be a little more equality here between the genders. Um. So,

0:52:59.360 --> 0:53:01.399
<v Speaker 1>once you just side you like somebody, and if maybe

0:53:01.400 --> 0:53:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you're feeling like you want to meet somebody, you can

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:06.400
<v Speaker 1>put out what's called a siren call, and that's basically

0:53:06.440 --> 0:53:08.880
<v Speaker 1>like you're interacting with people to see if anybody's up

0:53:08.920 --> 0:53:11.200
<v Speaker 1>for something. I love that it's a siren call. Yeah,

0:53:11.239 --> 0:53:13.759
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of awesome, right, yeah, because that doesn't have

0:53:13.800 --> 0:53:17.560
<v Speaker 1>any kind of uh, you know, sinister overtones, do it

0:53:17.640 --> 0:53:19.880
<v Speaker 1>at all? For those of us who enjoy things like

0:53:19.920 --> 0:53:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the Odyssey? But no, it is pretty funny. Uh. We

0:53:24.080 --> 0:53:28.320
<v Speaker 1>can't have this discussion without bringing to light an app

0:53:28.400 --> 0:53:32.359
<v Speaker 1>that was truly problematic, one that came up in two

0:53:32.400 --> 0:53:36.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twelve called Girls Around Me. Now, this app

0:53:36.640 --> 0:53:39.399
<v Speaker 1>was one that that Allison, you had not heard about right,

0:53:39.600 --> 0:53:41.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I heard about it because I

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:45.080
<v Speaker 1>was very much following all the tech news at the time,

0:53:45.719 --> 0:53:48.439
<v Speaker 1>and it was one that I immediately found to be troubling. Now,

0:53:48.680 --> 0:53:51.919
<v Speaker 1>it was troubling in a very kind of, hey, it's

0:53:51.960 --> 0:53:55.600
<v Speaker 1>not our fault kind of way, which makes it doubly

0:53:55.680 --> 0:53:59.920
<v Speaker 1>troubling to me. The app pulled information from four Square

0:54:00.080 --> 0:54:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and from Facebook. Now again, to use these things, you uh,

0:54:05.880 --> 0:54:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, you create your profiles and you are actively

0:54:08.600 --> 0:54:11.279
<v Speaker 1>sharing things, so that that seems to be the justification

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:13.359
<v Speaker 1>of well, it's okay for us to make this app then,

0:54:13.400 --> 0:54:17.600
<v Speaker 1>because people are active, Yeah, they're they're the ones presenting

0:54:17.600 --> 0:54:21.640
<v Speaker 1>this information. We're just aggregating it and displaying it um.

0:54:21.640 --> 0:54:24.680
<v Speaker 1>But part of the problem is, I think not everyone

0:54:24.760 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is aware of exactly the implications of sharing their data.

0:54:28.040 --> 0:54:31.399
<v Speaker 1>They're thinking, oh, I'm I'm checking into this restaurant because

0:54:31.440 --> 0:54:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I really like the restaurant and I just want my

0:54:33.840 --> 0:54:35.560
<v Speaker 1>friends to know, and I think it's kind of cool,

0:54:35.680 --> 0:54:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, get and I get bonuses if I

0:54:37.920 --> 0:54:40.680
<v Speaker 1>check in enough times. So what this app was doing

0:54:40.840 --> 0:54:43.239
<v Speaker 1>was it was pulling the check in information from four

0:54:43.280 --> 0:54:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Square and pulling Facebook profiles that were connected to those

0:54:48.680 --> 0:54:52.000
<v Speaker 1>four square profiles and pulling in pictures and information about people.

0:54:52.080 --> 0:54:54.000
<v Speaker 1>So if I had the app and I wanted to

0:54:54.080 --> 0:54:55.680
<v Speaker 1>use it, I could pull it up. It would pull

0:54:55.760 --> 0:54:59.680
<v Speaker 1>up a map show the check ins surrounding my area.

0:55:00.080 --> 0:55:01.839
<v Speaker 1>If I click on any of them, it would show

0:55:01.840 --> 0:55:04.879
<v Speaker 1>me pictures from the Facebook profile of the person who

0:55:04.880 --> 0:55:07.160
<v Speaker 1>had checked in. I could even look at their profile

0:55:07.200 --> 0:55:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and get more information about them, like what they like,

0:55:09.600 --> 0:55:13.000
<v Speaker 1>what their name is, how old they are, And so

0:55:13.200 --> 0:55:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people pointed out that this could really

0:55:15.200 --> 0:55:19.600
<v Speaker 1>facilitate stalkers, right, I mean, if I look up a person,

0:55:19.680 --> 0:55:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I think, oh, she's cute. Oh, and she likes these

0:55:22.160 --> 0:55:24.560
<v Speaker 1>bands and this is her name. I could walk up

0:55:24.560 --> 0:55:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to her and say, hey, there Susie. Uh yeah, you

0:55:27.680 --> 0:55:30.440
<v Speaker 1>know this band is coming to town again and I

0:55:30.480 --> 0:55:33.600
<v Speaker 1>was just thinking maybe we could go check it out. Yeah. Especially,

0:55:33.719 --> 0:55:36.920
<v Speaker 1>you could present yourself as if this person already knew you,

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:43.279
<v Speaker 1>and that is very problematic. So especially find that problematic

0:55:43.800 --> 0:55:48.600
<v Speaker 1>for for younger people. Yeah, yeah, especially for anyone again

0:55:48.640 --> 0:55:51.920
<v Speaker 1>who is not truly aware of the implications of sharing.

0:55:52.360 --> 0:55:54.520
<v Speaker 1>And we see this a lot where people just don't

0:55:54.600 --> 0:55:58.080
<v Speaker 1>really think of the consequences of sharing. A lot of information. Well,

0:55:58.239 --> 0:56:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it caused so much commotion, and that four Square pulled

0:56:01.640 --> 0:56:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the API, the part of their their programming that allows

0:56:05.480 --> 0:56:09.160
<v Speaker 1>people to develop apps to take advantage of four squares capabilities.

0:56:09.400 --> 0:56:12.640
<v Speaker 1>They pulled it, so it took away the functionality of

0:56:12.680 --> 0:56:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the app, and eventually the the Russian company that created

0:56:15.680 --> 0:56:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the app removed it from the iTunes store because it

0:56:18.080 --> 0:56:21.040
<v Speaker 1>was broken. You couldn't use it anymore because the four

0:56:21.080 --> 0:56:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Square functionality have been pulled from it. But it certainly

0:56:24.560 --> 0:56:26.000
<v Speaker 1>was one of those things that opened up a lot

0:56:26.000 --> 0:56:29.399
<v Speaker 1>of eyes about the potential dangers of using these kind

0:56:29.400 --> 0:56:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of apps. So it is important to have this human interaction,

0:56:34.160 --> 0:56:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and we don't want to discourage people from having human interaction,

0:56:37.120 --> 0:56:39.960
<v Speaker 1>but you have to do it with the right context.

0:56:40.080 --> 0:56:42.000
<v Speaker 1>You have to do it with the right mind for

0:56:42.080 --> 0:56:45.880
<v Speaker 1>your safety, into your security and just whatever it is

0:56:45.920 --> 0:56:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that you're hoping to get out of it, that you

0:56:47.360 --> 0:56:52.080
<v Speaker 1>have the right expectations for it, because otherwise bad things

0:56:52.120 --> 0:56:57.520
<v Speaker 1>could happen. It's just that's that's the Yeah. Yeah, as

0:56:57.560 --> 0:57:00.839
<v Speaker 1>we pointed out, a lot of solid relationships, it's true. Yeah,

0:57:00.880 --> 0:57:03.239
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of studies about online dating that

0:57:03.280 --> 0:57:06.920
<v Speaker 1>have suggested that there are lots of benefits. Gives you

0:57:07.040 --> 0:57:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot more chances to meet a potential partner, so

0:57:09.920 --> 0:57:15.080
<v Speaker 1>your your h pool of potential partners is increased, meaning

0:57:15.080 --> 0:57:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that you have a chance of finding that relationship that

0:57:17.680 --> 0:57:21.160
<v Speaker 1>gives you real meaning and in a sense of fulfillment. Um.

0:57:21.280 --> 0:57:24.280
<v Speaker 1>It helps cut down on potentially threatening context because you

0:57:24.280 --> 0:57:27.640
<v Speaker 1>can have those early interactions in an online space as

0:57:27.680 --> 0:57:31.880
<v Speaker 1>opposed to a physical space, and you can determine quickly

0:57:32.600 --> 0:57:35.040
<v Speaker 1>which ones are the ones that are most promising and

0:57:35.120 --> 0:57:37.480
<v Speaker 1>which ones you think are not going to lead anywhere

0:57:37.560 --> 0:57:42.320
<v Speaker 1>or are undesirable. So that's an advantage as well. Uh,

0:57:42.440 --> 0:57:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it gives you the chance to omit people from that

0:57:44.920 --> 0:57:47.440
<v Speaker 1>pool if you realize very early on, like no, this

0:57:47.480 --> 0:57:49.240
<v Speaker 1>is not what I want, this person is not and

0:57:49.280 --> 0:57:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I are not going to click. Um. Now, we talked

0:57:52.680 --> 0:57:56.560
<v Speaker 1>about the shopping downside with the objectification of people. You

0:57:57.000 --> 0:57:59.919
<v Speaker 1>treat them as objects. This person is hot, this person

0:58:00.120 --> 0:58:04.120
<v Speaker 1>not hot. That is an issue. Uh, it's really easy

0:58:04.200 --> 0:58:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to to just blast through people as if they are

0:58:07.680 --> 0:58:12.440
<v Speaker 1>just data and that isn't that's a problem. Objectifying people

0:58:12.520 --> 0:58:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is not not a great outcome psychologically speaking. Um. And

0:58:16.880 --> 0:58:19.680
<v Speaker 1>also that matching with personality types appears to have a

0:58:19.720 --> 0:58:23.800
<v Speaker 1>relatively minor role in romantic attraction or relationship success. So

0:58:23.880 --> 0:58:26.360
<v Speaker 1>even if you find that person who on paper is

0:58:26.360 --> 0:58:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a perfect match for you, it doesn't guarantee that you

0:58:28.560 --> 0:58:31.840
<v Speaker 1>will have a happy relationship with that person. It's more

0:58:31.880 --> 0:58:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to it than that. And uh, again, it doesn't help

0:58:35.720 --> 0:58:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that we can't necessarily know what we're actually looking for

0:58:39.080 --> 0:58:41.600
<v Speaker 1>when we go out looking for that potential someone. We

0:58:42.480 --> 0:58:45.160
<v Speaker 1>think we do, yeah, because we think we know exactly

0:58:45.200 --> 0:58:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the things that are going to appeal to us. But

0:58:47.400 --> 0:58:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not always the case, you know. They say like

0:58:49.960 --> 0:58:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the opposites attract. Part of that is to say that

0:58:53.600 --> 0:58:55.840
<v Speaker 1>if you go and find someone who's exactly like yourself,

0:58:55.880 --> 0:58:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you may not find that to be a rewarding experience.

0:58:58.360 --> 0:59:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I know that if my wife are exactly like I am,

0:59:01.640 --> 0:59:03.520
<v Speaker 1>one of us would have killed the other one. By now,

0:59:04.240 --> 0:59:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it would have happened. One of me is more than enough,

0:59:07.240 --> 0:59:10.480
<v Speaker 1>is what I'm saying. But the studies show that online

0:59:10.480 --> 0:59:13.760
<v Speaker 1>relationships can be just as stable as those that were

0:59:13.760 --> 0:59:18.920
<v Speaker 1>formed offline. So online is a great way to meet people,

0:59:19.040 --> 0:59:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it's and it can lead to a happy, stable relationship. Um,

0:59:23.480 --> 0:59:27.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just important that you know, you take that expectation

0:59:27.080 --> 0:59:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and you check it to make sure that you're not

0:59:29.040 --> 0:59:32.480
<v Speaker 1>going in with with with online stars in your eyes

0:59:33.080 --> 0:59:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and m so I think the end of the day,

0:59:36.080 --> 0:59:39.480
<v Speaker 1>we say use use online tools if that's what you're

0:59:39.760 --> 0:59:41.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you're looking for someone, whether you're looking

0:59:41.560 --> 0:59:43.400
<v Speaker 1>for someone to hang out with or you're looking for

0:59:43.440 --> 0:59:47.320
<v Speaker 1>someone to potentially be uh, you know that that special

0:59:47.360 --> 0:59:51.360
<v Speaker 1>someone in your life, but do so with critical thinking,

0:59:51.560 --> 0:59:54.480
<v Speaker 1>do so with safety in mind. Do so knowing that

0:59:54.480 --> 0:59:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that's another person at the end of that profile, you know,

0:59:58.040 --> 1:00:01.280
<v Speaker 1>not an object. That is another person, eman being with feelings.

1:00:01.720 --> 1:00:04.439
<v Speaker 1>They've got hopes, they've got dreams, they've got aspirations, they've

1:00:04.440 --> 1:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>got fears, they've got doubts about themselves. And if you

1:00:07.680 --> 1:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>keep that in mind, and you're more likely to have

1:00:09.680 --> 1:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a human interaction as opposed to something that crashes and

1:00:13.560 --> 1:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>burns and is a terrible experience for everybody. UM, I

1:00:17.640 --> 1:00:20.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know why I'm giving dating advice. I'm not necessarily

1:00:20.240 --> 1:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>an authority on the subject. I'm just a very empathetic

1:00:22.760 --> 1:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of person that I did have a blast researching

1:00:25.120 --> 1:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. Yeah, it's fascinating world of modern love. Yeah,

1:00:29.400 --> 1:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm really uh and that's a great song by David Bowie.

1:00:32.720 --> 1:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm really um hoping that we can find more studies

1:00:36.960 --> 1:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that show really what was the psychological impact of some

1:00:40.640 --> 1:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of these approaches. I'm very curious to see what the

1:00:44.360 --> 1:00:48.200
<v Speaker 1>tender approach is like. Uh. From that, From that a

1:00:48.240 --> 1:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>psychological perspective, I often I also think that most of

1:00:51.920 --> 1:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the people who are using tender tend to be in

1:00:54.160 --> 1:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>an age group where it's you know, they're not necessarily

1:00:57.600 --> 1:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>looking for the person who's going to be with them

1:00:59.520 --> 1:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of their lives. And there's nothing necessarily

1:01:01.560 --> 1:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>wrong with that. Again, assuming that everyone's going in with

1:01:05.080 --> 1:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>equal expectations. Um, So I don't necessarily think it's harmful

1:01:10.240 --> 1:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in the long run. It may just be one of

1:01:12.880 --> 1:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>those phases of maturity, right so um. But again I'm

1:01:17.400 --> 1:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>not an expert on that either. This is a lot

1:01:19.280 --> 1:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of armchair psychology from Jonathan today. Alison, thank you so

1:01:23.200 --> 1:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>much for joining me. I had a blast, Jonathan, thanks

1:01:26.320 --> 1:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>for having me. Yeah, Alison is an incredibly busy woman.

1:01:31.200 --> 1:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>She and it's a lot of the articles that you

1:01:33.720 --> 1:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>see at how stuff works dot com and if you've

1:01:36.280 --> 1:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>ever visited the site and thought, Wow, this site is awesome.

1:01:39.200 --> 1:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>A huge part of that comes from Allison makes make

1:01:42.400 --> 1:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>sure that the awesome gets through and they'm not awesome

1:01:44.720 --> 1:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get through. So uh, Alison, keep fighting the good fight.

1:01:50.160 --> 1:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>You're doing great work. And guys, if you have any

1:01:52.880 --> 1:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>suggestions for future episodes of tech Stuff, maybe there's some

1:01:55.680 --> 1:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>other aspect of technology that you've always wondered more about,

1:01:59.520 --> 1:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>like what's the cultural impact of something, or just how

1:02:02.480 --> 1:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>something works? Right in ask me a question my email

1:02:05.880 --> 1:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>addresses tex stuff at how stuff works dot com, or

1:02:09.240 --> 1:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>dropped me a line on Facebook, Twitter or Tumbler. The

1:02:12.160 --> 1:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>handle at all three is tech Stuff H. S W

1:02:15.280 --> 1:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again. Really sick for more

1:02:21.640 --> 1:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>on this and bathands of other topics because it has

1:02:24.040 --> 1:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to have works dot Com