WEBVTT - The Challenge for Dems Following the Mueller Report.  Lanhee Chen talks to Armstrong & Getty

0:00:01.080 --> 0:00:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's put all of that out there as well, so

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:06.559
<v Speaker 1>we can pass judgment about how the how the investigation

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>was conducted, or at least the predicate for the investigation

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>was conducted during the Obama year, right. Going to one

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of the more interesting aspects of this, the whole Steel dossier,

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the Carter Page warrant and the rest of it, that's

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be one of those topics we hit at

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 1>greater length tomorrow. I suspect but a gentleman who worked

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>with Marco Rubio, who we just heard, Lanhachen, the host

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of the podcast Crossing Lines with lanha Chen, also the

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:34.200
<v Speaker 1>David and Diane Stephy Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and the director of Domestic Policy Studies and Lecture in

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the Public Policy Program at Stanford University, joins us now

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>loan here. How are you, sir, Joe? Good morning, How

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>are you terrific? Thanks? It's a it's an really really

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting day on so many levels. What have you found

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>yourself thinking about most in the last forty eight hours

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>or so with the Muller report out, at least in

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>summary form. Well, it's interesting because I think, on the

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>one hand, it didn't really change the dialogue of either side.

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Democrats all along have been banking on

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>this investigation. You'll notice that they have expanded the field

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of their discussion to say any investigation of the president

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that in some ways it almost didn't matter what was

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Mulla report, because they have now expanded the

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>field beyond just the allegations of Russian collusion to say, essentially,

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>look at all these misdiefs the presidents engaging. And then

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, for conservatives and those who support President Trump,

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a vindication of what they've been saying

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:40.479
<v Speaker 1>all along regarding the president's alleged collusion with the Russians.

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>So it's funny. Yes, it is a big deal, and

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it is clearly a huge victory for the president,

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>but it does not, in my mind, change the political

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>dialogue that we're in, this really toxic cycle where Democrats

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and progressives believe what they believe in Republicans and supports

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of the president believe what they believe, and that's not

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>going to change. Tell me if I'm wrong on this,

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>because you could be right, and in a way I

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>hope you're right, because I would prefer frankly that the

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Republicans win the next midterm. I don't hide my my

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:11.519
<v Speaker 1>political leanings. On the other hand, I think it'd be

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>insane if the Democrats continued down this road, because the

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>strategy might not have changed. But it's like I'm watching

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a football game and and they said, we're gonna come

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>out and throw the ball. Well, now the winds blowing

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>at sixty miles per hour. And by that I mean

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the American people have become very, very cynical about investigations

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>in general. Is has made clear by the poll that

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>came out last week. I think it was before the

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>results of the Muller investigation even came out. You have

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty saying yeah, this is a witch hunt. I mean,

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>if you continue to throw a ball in the face

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of that sixty wind, I think you're crazy. You. I

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 1>think you're right, Joe. But I think what the challenges

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>for the Democrats is this, they have a progressive base

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that is increasingly becoming influential in in how the Democratic

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>mainstream thing, and and those folks I'm talking about Bernie

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Sanders and Alexandriacagio Cortez, etcetera. These folks are going to

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 1>continue with that same strategy visavi the president. So they're

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>not going to change, and they're gonna place tremendous pressure

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>on those who might want to take a more moderate line.

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's say, someone like Joe Biden or even Nancy Pelosi,

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>who wants to say, look, let's focus on ways in

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>which the Trump administration might not be serving the American people.

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Whatever the line they want to take is, those folks

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>are going to be outshouted by the progressive left. And

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the progressive left would love to continue to

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>go after President Trump. And and it doesn't matter what

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the Mulla report says. I mean, they've been laying the

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>groundwork for this for the last week. They've said, look,

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the Mulla Report is fine, we want to First of all,

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>they're at the same they want to see the whole report.

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>And second of all, they're saying, you know, regardless of

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>what happens in the report, you've got all sorts of

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>different pending investigations in the Southern District of New York, etcetera.

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>So I don't imagine Joe the strategy is going to

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>change a whole lot for many Democrats. But I would

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>hope um for the same. The political competitiveness that they

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>would take a different line. So, Lanie, if you were

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in charge then of White House messaging, and I think

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that would be a huge step forward if you were, UM.

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>But if you were in charge, what other than obviously

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>there is no collusion, what themes would you really hammer

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>in the coming weeks and in a few months, UM,

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>in contrast to what you just described, well, I would

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I would come back to this basic point, which is

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that the that the fundamentals of the economy at this

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 1>point looked looked pretty good. Americans by and large are

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>doing well, which is not to say that there aren't

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>any problems. President Trump's policies have been UM, have been

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>relatively positive for many Americans. I would focus on how

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 1>the administration is trying to do what it can to

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>improve the lives of Americans while Democrats are busy, uh,

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 1>perpetuating this witch hunt that even Bob Mueller, even somebody

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that they had said was it was a neutral arbiter

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of the fact, even he has said that there was

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>nothing there. And yet they continue to be obsessed with Trump.

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>While they're obsessed with Trump, Trump is obsessed with helping

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the American people, and and that's the message I would

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>come back to. I imagine that they're going to spend

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 1>a couple of days, by the way, because the president

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>will want to take a victory lap on this, and

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I do hope they move beyond that to to begin

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to address the substance, because I do think the President's

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>got a case to run for re election on that's

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 1>pretty solid. Right Well, Listen, I may be asking a

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>horse to play the clarinet here, but I've got to

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 1>believe if in the last month of the campaign, Trump

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>could adopt a Listen, I know I rub a lot

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of people the wrong way. It's just it's me and

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and I don't I'm sorry about that, but I really

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>care about this country above If he could be a

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 1>little self, if facing a little I understand, I piss

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you people off. I understand I'm a tough guy to take,

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, Assuming that there are no giant historic changes

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>as to what's going on in the country, I could

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>see that being really, really effective. Yeah, And I think

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>he could. He could do quite well. I mean I

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>think he could. Um, he could win more states than

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>he did in sixteen even and and a larger percentage

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of the of the popular vote. I would also say,

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you know that the one thing, just to go back

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to the short term impact of this report. There's been

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot of talk, you know, amongst the media, especially about,

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, will there be a Republican challenger to the president.

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>I think the outcome of the Mulla report all but

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>guarantees there will not be a serious challenge to the

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>president from within the Republican party. So he's gonna be

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>running unopposed or as the Democrat. We're going to have

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 1>a blood bath here over the next six months. Lani

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Chen is the host of the podcast Crossing Lines with

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Lanha Chen. Do you have any thoughts on the question

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of obstruction of justice? I thought that was really interesting

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to me. The Special Council said, yeah, there's stuff that

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>looks like it, but there's stuff that makes it look

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>like probably not, and there wasn't an underlying crime, So

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>just done. I'll know. I mean, that's more or less

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>what he said. Yeah, I mean what it was interesting

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>us The line obviously that opponents of the president are

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>seizing on to say that that the Special Council wasn't

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>able to exonerate the president of the charge of obstruction.

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>There's two things to bear in mind here. One is

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the Special Council makes the point, according to the Attorney

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>General's letter, that everything the president had done potentially that

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>could make up an obstruction charge was done in public.

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like there's anything secretive or furtive that's

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>going on here. If you believe what the president did

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>made out a case for obstruction, everything he did was

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>in public. That's the first point. The second point is, look,

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>it's up to the charging authority in this case, the

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General, to determine whether whether the accumulated evidence makes

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>up a charge of obstruction, and and and so I

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>think the Special Council felt, look, we we certainly don't

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>have enough to pass judgment. The Attorney General felt that

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that he and his team didn't have enough to pass judgment,

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and and and so I think this is one of

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>those things where, to the extent there is any political

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>wiggle room for the Democrats to argue the Mueller report

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>was full to Trump, they're going to seize on this point.

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>But this point is such a specific point of law

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that I don't think they're going to have a very

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>very good time trying to actually make headway out of

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>this one. And if a political fodder. To be sure,

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>would you agree with me that I posited earlier in

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the show that Donald J. Trump, real estate magnate, simply

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>took too much of his management playbook into the Oval

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>office with him and saying, look, this project is dead.

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>It's it's stupid, like for instance, the Flynn investigation or

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the Russia collusion investigation. He was being a ceo saying,

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you know this, this hotel is never gonna make money.

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>We gotta close it. It's dumb, and which is fine

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>as a real estate magnate, but as president, it looks

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>like obstruction of justice. I think that's probably what happened. Yeah, yeah,

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right. I mean, I think that there

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of things about First of all, nobody's

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>prepared to be president on day one. I don't care

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 1>how many jobs you've had before that might qualify you.

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 1>And and added at the fact that you know, Donald

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Trump came out of a private sector culture that's pretty

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>different from a political culture, from from being a politician before.

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think there was a learning curve. I

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>think the way that he conducted himself probably was very

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:12.559
<v Speaker 1>similar to how he conducted himself in the private sector.

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think you're absolutely right on that account, and

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I and I do think that. Again, the Special counsel

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>by by saying essentially, look, if you wanted to claim

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>obstruction obstruction of justice, there is nothing else you need

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to know, or there's nothing else you need to look

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>at than what he did publicly, you can decide that.

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>In my mind, the President can certainly use to his

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>favor because he can say, look, the only thing they're

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>alleging is stuff that's out of the open. So you

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you'd be the judge if you think this was what

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it was. But I think you're absolutely right. It goes

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>back to his conduct as a businessman, and I think

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people would say, yeah, I mean as

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 1>a businessman, I completely understand that. Now as president of

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>standards different, but um, you know, I don't think it's

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>enough to to to create a debt in Trump's armor

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>going forward. What's crossing lines with lanh Chen going to

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>be about this week? Well, we haven't done an episode

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a little while, in part because I've been on vacation. Uh,

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>we are gonna we are going to spend back up.

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I've got a couple of guests in the hopper for

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the coming week. Some I'm working on the on on

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>economic policy. Some I'm talking a little bit about the

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>future of the healthcare debate. But this week we're gonna

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>do something on Mueller. Have to figure out who the

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>guests is gonna be. But but but hopefully it'll be

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 1>something good and we'll have that episode out by the

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>end of the week. I think, well, if you run

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>out of actual smart people to talk to, we'll talk

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to you. But anyway, that would be fun. We have

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to do that sometimes, we really do. That'd be a

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun. We'd be delighted. Absolutely, it would be

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.599
<v Speaker 1>an honor. Lana ch Chen is the host of the

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast Crossing the Lines. Lani chen Fellow with the Hoover Institution,

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>heads up the domestic Policy department at Stanford. Lani, it's

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>always a pleasure. Thanks a million, thanks to a good day.

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>You got it? Uh so, yeah, I just it's funny.

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm so much more into governance than politics. Jack's usually

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the guy who really really wants to talk about the

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>politics of the stuff. But I'm telling you, just going

0:10:56.040 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>forward the whole we've got to investigate. I just think

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the the amount of eye rolling on the right and

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Center over that very idea is well, I

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be overwhelming. And listen, I'm not saying

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>it's completely nuts. If you can uncover the fact that

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, Donald Trump actually was the guy who committed

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.079
<v Speaker 1>the Son of Sam murders in the eighties or something

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>like that, I mean, well that was the seventies, I guess,

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, go ahead, I suppose because that would

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>hurt the hell out of him in the election. But

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't love your chances and coming up

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>with something like that, and you got fifty of Americans

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:38.959
<v Speaker 1>at least thinking it's all witch Huntissa, Well, good luck,

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Adam Schiff. You're listening to the Armstrong and Getty Show.