Speaker 1: Welcoming in his verdict with Senator Ted Cruz Ben Ferguson
Speaker 1: with you. We've got a lot to chat about today,
Speaker 1: including some breaking news with China and Iran, plus a
Speaker 1: attack on judges coming from the Democrats, plus COVID vindication.
Speaker 1: But first we're going to start with China. Senator. It
Speaker 1: is many are concerned now that we may be on
Speaker 1: the verge of this turning into a really big war
Speaker 1: between Russia Ukraine. Some are referring to it as World
Speaker 1: War three. The UK, we're being told, is going to
Speaker 1: supply Ukraine with long range weapons. China is also giving Russia,
Speaker 1: or being accused of giving Russia lethal support. You had
Speaker 1: that question asked this morning to Anthony B. Lincoln on
Speaker 1: Face the Nation, and I want everybody to hear what
Speaker 1: he had to say and then your reaction. There is
Speaker 1: open source reporting that Chinese companies are providing surveillance equipment
Speaker 1: to that mercenary group, the Wagner group, fighting in Ukraine.
Speaker 1: Does the US consider this to be providing military support
Speaker 1: to Russia. We've been concerned from day one about about
Speaker 1: that possibility. In fact, if you go back to the
Speaker 1: very first conversations the President Biden President she had about
Speaker 1: Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine. Just a couple of
Speaker 1: weeks into the war, President Biden shared with President she
Speaker 1: are deep concerned about the possibility China would provide lethal
Speaker 1: support to Russia, to Russia in this effort, as well
Speaker 1: as engaging the systematic evasion of sanctions. And the reason
Speaker 1: for that concern was just weeks before the aggression. You'll
Speaker 1: remember the President and President Putin had a meeting in
Speaker 1: which they just talked about a partnership with no limits,
Speaker 1: I mean, Senator, a partnership with no limits. That obviously
Speaker 1: something that would concern you. But now seeing that apparently
Speaker 1: they're providing lethal aid to assist Russia's invasion of Ukraine,
Speaker 1: your reaction, well. Number One, China is the most serious
Speaker 1: geopolitical threat the United States faces for the next century,
Speaker 1: and this administration is fundamentally weak on China. They are
Speaker 1: soft on China. They are unwilling to stand up to
Speaker 1: the Chinese communist government. Number Two, when it comes to
Speaker 1: the war in Ukraine. From the beginning, President Biden's policy
Speaker 1: has been utterly incoherent. He has been weak on Russia,
Speaker 1: and he has been effectively funding both sides of the war,
Speaker 1: providing aid military aid to Ukraine, but also funding the
Speaker 1: people who in turn are funding Russia. You talk about
Speaker 1: China right there. As you know, I forced to vote
Speaker 1: on the floor of the Senate floor to enact a
Speaker 1: ban on the federal government purchasing electric vehicles or batteries
Speaker 1: made using slave labor in concentration camps in China. Every
Speaker 1: single Democrat but one, everyone but Joe Mansion voted. Now
Speaker 1: they all voted to keep importing electric cars electric batteries
Speaker 1: made using slave labor. John Kerry's response, when asked about
Speaker 1: the concentration camps and slave labor said, it's not my department.
Speaker 1: He's not concerned with it, and so you have in
Speaker 1: effect this administration. I would note also, and we've talked
Speaker 1: a lot about this on the podcast, the Ukraine War
Speaker 1: started because Biden waived the sanctions on Nordstream too. He
Speaker 1: waived the sanctions on Russia. He waived the sanctions on
Speaker 1: Putin and allowed Nordstream two to be built while Ukraine
Speaker 1: and Poland were begging him, don't let this pipeline be completed.
Speaker 1: If you do, Russia will invade Ukraine. Will Biden ignored
Speaker 1: it he went soft on Russia like he'd gone soft
Speaker 1: on China. And by the way, they're doing the exact
Speaker 1: same thing with Iran as well. They're lifting and waving
Speaker 1: sanctions on Iran, and so the Russians are using those
Speaker 1: Iranian drones to kill Ukrainian citizens, and the Biden administration
Speaker 1: is literally funding every side of the war. They're funding
Speaker 1: the Ukrainians, They're funding the Iranians by lifting sanctions on them,
Speaker 1: They're funding the Chinese by buying electric cars and electric
Speaker 1: batteries from them. And it is that weakness and incoherence
Speaker 1: that makes this so incredibly dangerous. Anthony Blinkin was asked
Speaker 1: senator about the Iranian part of this and this this
Speaker 1: was his response, and face the nation themselves. Iran is
Speaker 1: also accused of providing more weaponry to Russia here, so
Speaker 1: they are they are building an alliance. We've seen Iran
Speaker 1: provide drones that Russia is using in Ukraine to attack
Speaker 1: civilian infrastructure, to kill civilians. This is something that's going
Speaker 1: on for months. We've been working to expose that, to
Speaker 1: take action against it, to sanction it. There's an increasingly
Speaker 1: noxious relationship between Russia and Iran and it's actually a
Speaker 1: two way street. Not only is Iran providing this equipment
Speaker 1: to Russia, but Russia is also providing military equipment to Iran,
Speaker 1: including it looks like sophisticated fighter planes. That's something that
Speaker 1: looks like it may be happening, which would make Iran
Speaker 1: an even greater threat if it acquires that that technology.
Speaker 1: So this is something that we've been talking about with
Speaker 1: allies and partners around the world. That relationship is a
Speaker 1: growing concern. Senator. This reminds me so much of the
Speaker 1: acts of evil after nine to eleven, when the President
Speaker 1: clearly went to Congress and talked about that acts of evil.
Speaker 1: Before I do, I gotta tell all of everyone listening
Speaker 1: about our good friends. Everyone against this precious metals. And
Speaker 1: if you've been saving for your retirement for a long
Speaker 1: time and you know how important it is to protect
Speaker 1: your money, they can help you do that with a
Speaker 1: gold ira. I use Augusta precious medals. I have used
Speaker 1: them for part of my retirement and they are different
Speaker 1: because not only will they tell you if a gold
Speaker 1: ira isn't your answer, they will also give you a
Speaker 1: lot of facts. They do something it's really cool. They
Speaker 1: do a web conference with each and every person that
Speaker 1: wants to learn more about how gold iras work and
Speaker 1: how it can help you with your four O one
Speaker 1: k So important right now if you're close to retirement,
Speaker 1: you want to protect your assets because you don't have
Speaker 1: the time to make up losses. That is why you
Speaker 1: should call august of Precious Medals. If you've saved one
Speaker 1: hundred thousand dollars or more, take a look at their
Speaker 1: free guide and you can sign up for their web
Speaker 1: conference one eight seven seven four gold IRA. That's one
Speaker 1: eight seven seven four gold IRA. Or visit Augusta Precious
Speaker 1: Medals dot com say I sent you, and they'll pay
Speaker 1: your fees for up to ten years. That's Agusta Precious
Speaker 1: Medals dot com. All right, center, My question for you
Speaker 1: first is you're now looking at Ran, Russia and China.
Speaker 1: Is this a new axis? Well, look, they have been
Speaker 1: our enemies for a long time. The fact that they're
Speaker 1: working together much of that has to do with the
Speaker 1: weakness and incoherence coming from Joe Biden. Biden, what he'll
Speaker 1: do is he'll occasionally have some tough rhetoric, but he's
Speaker 1: got multiple other domestic political priorities that he cares more
Speaker 1: about than actually following through and defending our national security.
Speaker 1: So let's take a Ran for example. Biden came into
Speaker 1: the White House with his number one foreign policy objective
Speaker 1: being to re enter the Obama Iran nuclear deal, and
Speaker 1: so from the very outset, he bent over backwards to
Speaker 1: give Iran everything it wanted, even as the Iranian Ayatollah
Speaker 1: leads chance of death to America and death to Israel.
Speaker 1: Even as the Iranian government is funding terrorist activity. They
Speaker 1: are the number one state sponsor of terrorism in the world. Nevertheless,
Speaker 1: the Biden White House decided they had a political objective,
Speaker 1: and their political objective was to have a new Iran
Speaker 1: nuclear deal, and so they immediately began lifting sanctions on Iran.
Speaker 1: The most potent sanction is the oil sanctions that we
Speaker 1: had in place. And actually, under President Trump, you'll recall,
Speaker 1: Trump pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal. That was
Speaker 1: the right thing to do. It was something I urged
Speaker 1: him to do. Trump did so over the recommendations of
Speaker 1: both his own State Department and his own Defense Department.
Speaker 1: Both the Secretary of State and the Secretary Defense advised
Speaker 1: staying in the Iran deal. I made the case to
Speaker 1: him that a nuclear Iran was an existential threat to
Speaker 1: the United States and to Israel. Trump agreed with me,
Speaker 1: he pulled out of the deal. Even after he pulled
Speaker 1: out of the deal, however, whole series of waivers remained
Speaker 1: in place that still gave a ran meaningful relief. And
Speaker 1: the biggest one was there was an oil waiver that
Speaker 1: allowed Iran to sell oil free of the sanctions. And
Speaker 1: I made the case to the President that we needed
Speaker 1: to end the oil waiver. In this case, the Secretary
Speaker 1: of State was Mike Pompeo, and Secretary Pompeo argued, do
Speaker 1: not end the oil waiver, that it will cause global
Speaker 1: oil prices to go up. Once again, Trump overrode his
Speaker 1: own State department. He agreed with me. He ended the
Speaker 1: oil waiver. Turned out Energy was right, State was wrong.
Speaker 1: The global price of oil didn't move barely at all.
Speaker 1: And the effect was we cut off a million barrels
Speaker 1: a day of oil sales to the Ayatola. What happened
Speaker 1: when Joe Biden came back in, he stopped and forcing
Speaker 1: the sanctions on oil. So the Ayatola is selling a
Speaker 1: million barrels a day of oil. This to show the incoherence.
Speaker 1: This is at the same time the Biden administration is
Speaker 1: waging war on US oil and gas production. He's weight
Speaker 1: effectively waving sanctions. He's refusing to enforce sanctions on Iran,
Speaker 1: letting the Ayatola sell a million barrels of oil a day.
Speaker 1: That money is being used, among other things, to fund
Speaker 1: terrorism targeting Americans, and to fund drones that are being
Speaker 1: used in Russia to kill Ukrainian soldiers in Ukrainian civilians.
Speaker 1: It's incoherent. The answer is simple, enforce the sanctions on Iran,
Speaker 1: reimpose the oil sanctions and the so called civilian nuclear waivers.
Speaker 1: Use our economic force, and we should do the same
Speaker 1: thing on China. We should not be buying the products
Speaker 1: the fruits of their slave labor. But the Biden White
Speaker 1: House doesn't want to actually be strong and consistent. Instead,
Speaker 1: it's trying to appease domestic political constituencies. Class question on this,
Speaker 1: at what point do you think this starts to hurt
Speaker 1: the presence approval rating? Refusing to come out, for example,
Speaker 1: and even say directly to China, stop flying these these
Speaker 1: spy balloons over the United States of America, Stop you know,
Speaker 1: sending these things up trying to come into our country
Speaker 1: in our airspace. If he won't do that, do you
Speaker 1: have any belief that it will actually do any of
Speaker 1: these other things like Santa to China if they're involved
Speaker 1: in this way with Russia. For two years as president,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden has consistently shown us he will not be
Speaker 1: strong standing up to China. The Democrat Party today they're
Speaker 1: structurally pro China. The people who fund them, big business,
Speaker 1: big tech, big Hollywood, the big universities, they're all in
Speaker 1: bed with China. You look at the Penn Biden Center
Speaker 1: funded by communist China. They're the people writing the checks
Speaker 1: are communist China. Where did Hunter Biden go to get
Speaker 1: make millions of dollars selling access to daddy communist China?
Speaker 1: That is why the Democrat Party is unwilling to stand up.
Speaker 1: And then you put the on top of that, Joe
Speaker 1: Biden just structurally believes in appeasement. He's unwilling to stand
Speaker 1: up to our enemies. He began his presidency by giving
Speaker 1: Putin everything he wanted and giving China everything it wanted.
Speaker 1: And you know what, our enemies got the message and
Speaker 1: all of them are more aggressive as a result. No
Speaker 1: doubt about it. I want to move to another issue
Speaker 1: that also is a very important issue. But before we
Speaker 1: get to that, I want to tell you about our
Speaker 1: incredible friends over at Patriot Mobile. If you've got a
Speaker 1: cell phone, you need to check out Patriot Mobile because
Speaker 1: every time you use your phone, every time you send
Speaker 1: a text, and every time you pay your bill, you
Speaker 1: will be supporting conservative cause is that we believe in.
Speaker 1: We're talking about defending the First and Second Amendment rights,
Speaker 1: the rights of the unborn, helping with adoptions, funding of
Speaker 1: those adoptions. That's why we love Patriot Mobile. Patriot Mobile
Speaker 1: is a conservative Christian cell phone company, the only one,
Speaker 1: and instead of giving your money to Big Mobile, where
Speaker 1: they're fighting against your traditional family values, Patriot Mobile was
Speaker 1: started so that you could work with a company that
Speaker 1: actually made a difference with every phone call you make.
Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile also gives you nationwide coverage. They give you
Speaker 1: unlimited talk and texts. They give you the exact same
Speaker 1: coverage you have right now because you'll be using the
Speaker 1: exact same cell phone towers, except when you pay your bill,
Speaker 1: you'll be standing up for the values you believe in.
Speaker 1: So check them out. Patriot Mobile dot Com. Slash verdict.
Speaker 1: That's Patriot Mobile dot com slash verdict. Use the promo
Speaker 1: code verdict. You can also call them nine seven to Patriot.
Speaker 1: That's nine seven to Patriot or Patriotmobile dot com slash verdict.
Speaker 1: I want to move to another issue, Senator. That's a
Speaker 1: very important issue, and this deals with intimidation of judges.
Speaker 1: We saw this get too, I think a new low
Speaker 1: when Democrats were doxing the home addresses of judges, trying
Speaker 1: to stop the overturning of Rov Wade, the releasing of
Speaker 1: those internal documents from the Supreme Court so that we
Speaker 1: knew the decision was coming, so that there could be
Speaker 1: pressure on the conservative justices. And now there are two
Speaker 1: different opinion articles out there. Well, let me say, one
Speaker 1: opinion article and another one coming from one of your colleagues,
Speaker 1: Senator widen At a vile attack on the federal judiciary.
Speaker 1: This on top of the way the Washington Post put
Speaker 1: it their opinion pieces quote, there is one way to
Speaker 1: reign in Republican judges. Shame them. And all, by the way,
Speaker 1: was almos assassinated. And the DJ has made zero arrests
Speaker 1: related the protests outside of the judges homes outside, this
Speaker 1: would be assassin. Basically, they said, everybody else, you're good
Speaker 1: to go. And we still don't know who leaked this
Speaker 1: decision from the Supreme Court, which is very shocking to
Speaker 1: me and everybody else, knowing what level of government was
Speaker 1: supposed to be involved in finding that leaker. Well, it
Speaker 1: is dismaying because we seem to have reached a new
Speaker 1: chapter where the Democrats have escalated their attacks on the
Speaker 1: judiciary and listen. For some time, the Democrats have been
Speaker 1: willing to use violence and threats of violence to try
Speaker 1: to intimidate people into giving into their political agenda. That
Speaker 1: was true in twenty twenty and the so called Summer
Speaker 1: of Love when you had Antifa and Black Lives Matter
Speaker 1: riots all over the city, where you had the far
Speaker 1: left more than happy to use the threat of violence,
Speaker 1: of rioting, of fire bombing, of looting, of murder to
Speaker 1: try to intimidate people into going along with their political agenda.
Speaker 1: When it comes to the courts, we saw, in particular
Speaker 1: with the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe, that the left
Speaker 1: responded with violence. They responded with angry and aggressive protests
Speaker 1: at the home of the justices. These are justices sometimes
Speaker 1: who have children, even small children. When you have angry
Speaker 1: protesters at a home with small children, there is a
Speaker 1: threat of violence in the air. It's also a federal crime.
Speaker 1: There is a federal statue that makes it a crime
Speaker 1: to go to a justice's home and protest at the home.
Speaker 1: The Biden Department of Justice refuses to enforce that law.
Speaker 1: They simply what, won't do anything about it? Why because
Speaker 1: they are quite happy they agree with the threats the
Speaker 1: intimidation directed at the justices. Chuck Schumer stood on the floor,
Speaker 1: or rather on the steps of the Supreme Court and
Speaker 1: threatened to unleash the whirlwind, to use his language in
Speaker 1: an effort to threaten the justices to rule how he
Speaker 1: wanted in the case concerning Row. Now, what we've seen
Speaker 1: in the past week is two things. Number One, we
Speaker 1: saw in the Senate floor Senator Ron Wide and out
Speaker 1: of Oregon give a really vicious speech attacking a federal
Speaker 1: district judge in Texas, Matthew Kesmarik. Now, this speech was
Speaker 1: directed at Judge Kesmark not for a ruling he's made,
Speaker 1: but rather because the Democrats are afraid he's going to
Speaker 1: make a ruling they don't like. And in particular, he
Speaker 1: has a case before it that deals with the legality
Speaker 1: of abortion drugs and the legality of how the FDA
Speaker 1: allowed them, and the left is concerned that he is
Speaker 1: going to rule against them, and so what they're trying
Speaker 1: to do is intimidate the judge and demonize the judge. So,
Speaker 1: for example, Widen on the floor said this about Judge
Speaker 1: Kasmaric quote. This judge is not upholding the oath he took.
Speaker 1: He is not adhering to the Constitution. He is making
Speaker 1: a dangerous mockery of the rule of law. Something needs
Speaker 1: to be done about it. Now that something needs to
Speaker 1: be done about it is an invitation. It is an
Speaker 1: invitation harassment. It may even be an invitation to violence.
Speaker 1: We know at least one leftist heard the invitation to
Speaker 1: violence and traveled from California to Bethesda, Maryland, in an
Speaker 1: effort to murder Justice Kavanaugh. He was apprehended with weapons
Speaker 1: late at night outside Justice Kavanaugh's house. By the way,
Speaker 1: Widen didn't direct his attack just to one judge, judge
Speaker 1: who hasn't even ruled in the case yet. He also
Speaker 1: went ahead and impugned the integrity of the rest of
Speaker 1: the judicial system. Here's what Widen went on to say.
Speaker 1: The Fifth Circuit, which is the Court of Appeals that covers,
Speaker 1: among other things, Texas. The Fifth Circuit, which has little
Speaker 1: respect for precedent or the authority of the other two
Speaker 1: branches of government, will almost certainly uphold his ruling. Then
Speaker 1: the Roberts Court will almost certainly leave the ruling in
Speaker 1: place through the long and arduous appellate process. So let's
Speaker 1: be clear. This is now a calculated and direct attacked
Speaker 1: attack on the judiciary on every level of the judiciary,
Speaker 1: on federal district judges, on the Courts of Appeals, on
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court, and it is coming in a concerted matter.
Speaker 1: Widened speech occurred at the same time as a big
Speaker 1: op ed in the Washington Post, again arguing for harassing
Speaker 1: and going after judges. This is dangerous. It's not only dangerous.
Speaker 1: Is it fair to call it on precedent to have
Speaker 1: someone do this type of attack from the Senate? For
Speaker 1: I mean, I understand if you're outside playing politics on
Speaker 1: the Senate fo to do this, was this shocking to
Speaker 1: many members of that body? Well, I don't know that
Speaker 1: much of anything shocks us anymore. It look, it is
Speaker 1: not unusual for elected officials to disagree with the court's
Speaker 1: ruling and to denounce a ruling after the fact that happens,
Speaker 1: and that happens on both sides. It is unusual for
Speaker 1: politicians to do it before the court decides, in a
Speaker 1: manner that seems calculated to try to threaten and intimidate
Speaker 1: the judiciary. You know, I mentioned what Chuck Schumer said
Speaker 1: on the steps of the Supreme Court. He said, quote,
Speaker 1: I want to tell you Gorsuch. I want to tell
Speaker 1: you Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will
Speaker 1: pay the price. You won't know what hit you if
Speaker 1: you go forward with these awful decisions and ben Look,
Speaker 1: one of the things that is unique about our nation
Speaker 1: is that we have an independent judiciary that is by
Speaker 1: designs not political, that is supposed to follow the law,
Speaker 1: follow the constitution. Most countries the judiciary is steeped in politics,
Speaker 1: and many countries the judiciary is political. It is corrupt.
Speaker 1: And one of the most fundamental protectors of our liberty
Speaker 1: is that we have a judiciary that doesn't respond to
Speaker 1: the passions of the moment, doesn't respond to the mob,
Speaker 1: but instead is faithful to the law. These democrats in
Speaker 1: a concerted way are trying to intimidate and tear down
Speaker 1: that judiciary. Yeah, no doubt about. It's a great point,
Speaker 1: and they're not going to stop, I think, anytime soon,
Speaker 1: which is also concerning. It's why these elections are so important,
Speaker 1: so that we can make sure they keep some of
Speaker 1: their radical judges off the court. Glassly Center. I want
Speaker 1: to move into another important issue, but before we get
Speaker 1: to that, I want to tell you about my friends
Speaker 1: at Chalkhoq. If you're a guy and you're getting a
Speaker 1: little older and you feel like you're losing your edge,
Speaker 1: don't lose it. You need to know about Chalk because
Speaker 1: it's time for you to choose strength and vitality over
Speaker 1: weakness and complacency. We got far too much of that
Speaker 1: liberal America. So if you're a conservative guy, then you
Speaker 1: need to hear what Chalk can do for you. The
Speaker 1: problem usually with men when they get older is a
Speaker 1: loss of testosterum levels. Right they drop off a cliff.
Speaker 1: Historically they dropped to all time loads. Thankfully, the patriots
Speaker 1: at Chalk c Choq are here to help real American
Speaker 1: men take back their right to proudly maximize their masculinity
Speaker 1: by boosting testosterum levels up to twenty percent over ninety days. Now.
Speaker 1: I've been taking chalk all right. My good friend Jesse Kelly,
Speaker 1: he turned me onto this, like, dude, you gotta take it.
Speaker 1: Chalk sho q you and I've been taking it now
Speaker 1: for what two weeks. It is impressive. I've been taking
Speaker 1: the Male Vitality Stack and it is phenomenal. You can
Speaker 1: go right now to chalkcoq dot com and you can
Speaker 1: use my code Ben for thirty five percent off any
Speaker 1: Chalk subscription for life. Use the promo code Ben for
Speaker 1: thirty five percent off. Get that strength and vitality back
Speaker 1: that you may have lost. You'll like it. You'll check
Speaker 1: it out. You'll understand this patriotic American company is gonna
Speaker 1: help you have a new you. So don't give in
Speaker 1: to complacency. Take back your strength. Chalkcoq dot com. Use
Speaker 1: promo code Ben, Senator, I want to move to something else.
Speaker 1: I can't believe I saw it from NBC News of
Speaker 1: all places, but they have a headline now and this
Speaker 1: is what it reads. Immunity acquired from a COVID infection
Speaker 1: is as protective as vaccination against severe illness and death.
Speaker 1: A new study finds I'm waiting for doctor Fouce you
Speaker 1: to have a press conference apologizing to everybody your thoughts
Speaker 1: on the fact. Now finally we're getting this news out there,
Speaker 1: you know. George Orwell and Nights eighty four talked about
Speaker 1: how facts could be altered. Where at war with Eurasia?
Speaker 1: We have always been at war with Eurasia, simply stated
Speaker 1: in the corrupt media parrots it along. That's what they're
Speaker 1: doing here. Of course, natural immunity is potent, and in
Speaker 1: many instances more potent than the vaccine. That's true of
Speaker 1: most diseases. That was true and obvious early on in COVID.
Speaker 1: But if you said it, you got blocked on social media,
Speaker 1: you got silenced on social media, and if you actually
Speaker 1: lived by it, you got fired. How about the Biden
Speaker 1: administration apologizing to the thousands of soldiers and sailors and
Speaker 1: airmen and marines and coast guardsmen that they fired, many
Speaker 1: of whom it had COVID HA had natural immunity, but
Speaker 1: they decided not to take the COVID vaccine. The Biden
Speaker 1: administration needs to hire them back. We have huge manpower
Speaker 1: shortages across the military, and these imbeciles have fired trained
Speaker 1: navy seals, experienced officers. They need to hire them back
Speaker 1: and right. There needs to be a public apology for
Speaker 1: everyone that tried to destroy someone's life, their livelihood, their business,
Speaker 1: to throw them out of school, to shut down their
Speaker 1: school because they refuse to comply with an irrational and
Speaker 1: arbitrary vaccine mandate. There needs to be accountability. This was
Speaker 1: true then, it's true now, and miraculously only now the
Speaker 1: corporate media is acknowledging it. Well. Last question for you
Speaker 1: over under on Fauci ever admitting maybe he got it wrong. Zero. No,
Speaker 1: there you go, ha ha ha. I like it Center
Speaker 1: as always, it's a pleasure. I appreciate it for everybody listening.
Speaker 1: Don't forget we do this podcast three days a week
Speaker 1: so that subscriber auto download button, share it with your
Speaker 1: family and friends, and riots to five star reviews so
Speaker 1: we can reach more people on the charts. And we'll
Speaker 1: see you back here at Wednesday morning.