1 00:00:03,000 --> 00:00:09,080 Speaker 1: Welcome to Invention, a production of I Heart Radio. Hey, 2 00:00:09,240 --> 00:00:12,040 Speaker 1: welcome to Invention. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm 3 00:00:12,119 --> 00:00:14,440 Speaker 1: Joe McCormick, and we're back with part three of our 4 00:00:14,480 --> 00:00:18,239 Speaker 1: discussion of the invention of photography. Now, last time, we 5 00:00:18,280 --> 00:00:21,000 Speaker 1: got up to the moment of invention, the debut of 6 00:00:21,040 --> 00:00:24,560 Speaker 1: the Daguero type of of course Louis Daguerre in Paris, 7 00:00:25,120 --> 00:00:30,320 Speaker 1: and the early paper based negative photo procedure of Henry 8 00:00:30,320 --> 00:00:34,760 Speaker 1: Fox Talbot in England, which was initially far less successful. Right. Yeah, 9 00:00:34,800 --> 00:00:36,680 Speaker 1: we we spent a lot of time talking about the 10 00:00:37,040 --> 00:00:42,840 Speaker 1: early laborious methods of taking a photograph, but the startling 11 00:00:42,880 --> 00:00:47,560 Speaker 1: and just game changing results, uh that they gave us. Um, 12 00:00:47,600 --> 00:00:49,480 Speaker 1: you know, in all that discussion of de Guarat types, 13 00:00:49,960 --> 00:00:53,680 Speaker 1: I neglected to mention my Daguarat type boyfriend and what 14 00:00:53,800 --> 00:00:55,680 Speaker 1: is this? This is a I believe it was a 15 00:00:55,680 --> 00:00:59,120 Speaker 1: tumbler page and it was just a collection of like 16 00:00:59,280 --> 00:01:03,920 Speaker 1: handsome do dudes with their you know, their photo having 17 00:01:03,920 --> 00:01:05,720 Speaker 1: been taken with the Deguarat type. A lot of like 18 00:01:05,800 --> 00:01:09,600 Speaker 1: a really neat sideburns and whatnot. But it was kind 19 00:01:09,600 --> 00:01:12,200 Speaker 1: of a trend at least a few years ago. I 20 00:01:12,240 --> 00:01:14,360 Speaker 1: remember it making the rounds and people having a lot 21 00:01:14,400 --> 00:01:17,280 Speaker 1: of fun with it. I'm looking at it now. You know. 22 00:01:17,319 --> 00:01:20,760 Speaker 1: One of the things is nobody smiling in their deguaratype. Yes, 23 00:01:20,880 --> 00:01:23,479 Speaker 1: some guys look kind of smug, but it's not really 24 00:01:23,480 --> 00:01:26,120 Speaker 1: a smile, right, And there's an important reason for that, 25 00:01:26,160 --> 00:01:28,360 Speaker 1: which we'll get into in this episode. This is a 26 00:01:28,400 --> 00:01:30,600 Speaker 1: great blog now that I'm looking at it. Do you 27 00:01:30,600 --> 00:01:33,920 Speaker 1: have a favorite old school deguerotype or I don't know 28 00:01:33,920 --> 00:01:35,640 Speaker 1: if it's actually a deguaratype. The one I'm going to 29 00:01:35,680 --> 00:01:38,920 Speaker 1: bring up in an old school photograph doppelganger a favorite 30 00:01:38,920 --> 00:01:41,000 Speaker 1: one of those? Of course? I love the old Nicholas 31 00:01:41,080 --> 00:01:43,679 Speaker 1: Cage from the nineteenth century. Yeah, I think that that's 32 00:01:43,720 --> 00:01:46,400 Speaker 1: the main one that comes to mind. But because yeah, 33 00:01:46,400 --> 00:01:50,040 Speaker 1: you go back to enough photographic history, even though we 34 00:01:50,360 --> 00:01:53,200 Speaker 1: have very little of it really, I mean, can can 35 00:01:53,360 --> 00:01:56,680 Speaker 1: compare to the you know, the deeper history of of 36 00:01:56,720 --> 00:01:58,800 Speaker 1: the human species. But yeah, you can find these weird 37 00:01:58,840 --> 00:02:02,160 Speaker 1: doppelgangers where you're like, that looks like Stevie Sinny, especially 38 00:02:02,160 --> 00:02:04,280 Speaker 1: if I just kind of, you know, blur my eyes 39 00:02:04,320 --> 00:02:08,120 Speaker 1: a little bit. Yeah. So, last time we covered this 40 00:02:08,200 --> 00:02:14,799 Speaker 1: transition from the resin based heliography method of Joseph Nissa fourneeps, 41 00:02:15,080 --> 00:02:19,280 Speaker 1: the French inventor and scientist and aristocrat to the big 42 00:02:19,320 --> 00:02:23,040 Speaker 1: breakthrough announced and described in eighteen thirty nine by Louis Dega, 43 00:02:23,280 --> 00:02:26,280 Speaker 1: the da Gara type method, which for a brief refresher 44 00:02:26,320 --> 00:02:29,720 Speaker 1: on how that worked. Remember it had many steps, so 45 00:02:29,800 --> 00:02:32,760 Speaker 1: that was sort of Dagar's breakthrough was the multi step 46 00:02:32,800 --> 00:02:37,840 Speaker 1: chemistry procedure um. So it involved sensitizing a silver coated 47 00:02:37,880 --> 00:02:41,200 Speaker 1: plate with iodine fumes, and this would produce a layer 48 00:02:41,240 --> 00:02:44,680 Speaker 1: of the light sensitive compound silver iodide. And then you'd 49 00:02:44,680 --> 00:02:48,120 Speaker 1: expose that plate inside a camera obscura. And then, and 50 00:02:48,200 --> 00:02:51,000 Speaker 1: this is the real genius step, you would take the 51 00:02:51,240 --> 00:02:54,400 Speaker 1: lightly exposed plate on which the image would still be 52 00:02:54,440 --> 00:02:56,800 Speaker 1: invisible to the naked eye. You couldn't see anything yet, 53 00:02:56,960 --> 00:03:00,480 Speaker 1: and you would develop that by exposing it to mercury fumes, 54 00:03:00,520 --> 00:03:02,959 Speaker 1: which would bring out the latent image on the plate 55 00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:06,600 Speaker 1: and create a sharp contrast. Uh And then finally you'd 56 00:03:06,600 --> 00:03:09,880 Speaker 1: wash off the remaining silver eyedide to prevent further darkening. 57 00:03:10,120 --> 00:03:13,560 Speaker 1: And originally this washing off step took place in in 58 00:03:13,639 --> 00:03:17,200 Speaker 1: hot salt water until the better solution of hyposulfite of 59 00:03:17,280 --> 00:03:22,280 Speaker 1: soda now known as sodium. Theosulfate was suggested by John Herschel. Now, 60 00:03:22,280 --> 00:03:26,240 Speaker 1: I think it's widely agreed that Digear's most original and 61 00:03:26,400 --> 00:03:31,799 Speaker 1: brilliant contribution to the invention of photography was this chemical 62 00:03:32,040 --> 00:03:36,120 Speaker 1: development stage. Of course, the development was so useful because 63 00:03:36,120 --> 00:03:39,480 Speaker 1: it greatly cut down on exposure times, which before had 64 00:03:39,480 --> 00:03:42,800 Speaker 1: been very long. Before the development stage, you might have 65 00:03:42,840 --> 00:03:46,240 Speaker 1: to expose a plate for hours at a time, like 66 00:03:46,280 --> 00:03:49,640 Speaker 1: maybe seven hours or twelve hours before the image would 67 00:03:49,680 --> 00:03:52,120 Speaker 1: really come through on it. You only had to get 68 00:03:52,160 --> 00:03:55,520 Speaker 1: a very faint initial exposure of maybe ten to fifteen 69 00:03:55,600 --> 00:03:58,960 Speaker 1: minutes before you could develop it with the mercury fumes, 70 00:03:59,200 --> 00:04:02,120 Speaker 1: which sounds like a lot to us. But but like 71 00:04:02,160 --> 00:04:04,920 Speaker 1: you said, it was a huge improvement over hours of 72 00:04:04,960 --> 00:04:08,280 Speaker 1: exposure time. Yeah, gigantic difference back then. I mean that 73 00:04:08,360 --> 00:04:12,680 Speaker 1: it made it suddenly realistic to photograph landscapes. So if 74 00:04:12,680 --> 00:04:16,080 Speaker 1: you had to expose a plate for hours on a landscape, 75 00:04:16,080 --> 00:04:18,240 Speaker 1: all the shadows would be messed up, right, I mean, 76 00:04:18,279 --> 00:04:21,400 Speaker 1: shadows are such an important part of our our view 77 00:04:21,440 --> 00:04:24,400 Speaker 1: of the natural world. If the shadows keep shifting over 78 00:04:24,440 --> 00:04:26,800 Speaker 1: the many hours of exposure, nothing's going to look right. 79 00:04:27,480 --> 00:04:29,680 Speaker 1: Um Now. Also in the last episode, we talked about 80 00:04:29,680 --> 00:04:33,800 Speaker 1: the English polymath, scientist, politician and inventor Henry Fox Talbot, 81 00:04:33,839 --> 00:04:37,400 Speaker 1: who had independently invented a kind of different method of 82 00:04:37,440 --> 00:04:41,680 Speaker 1: photography years earlier in England. But unfortunately, even though he 83 00:04:41,760 --> 00:04:45,000 Speaker 1: invented it first, he never got around to publishing his 84 00:04:45,120 --> 00:04:48,719 Speaker 1: findings until after de Gara announced his invention in France 85 00:04:49,000 --> 00:04:51,360 Speaker 1: and was cemented in the minds of most people as 86 00:04:51,440 --> 00:04:55,640 Speaker 1: the inventor of photography. Henry Fox Talbot's original method was different. 87 00:04:55,680 --> 00:04:59,080 Speaker 1: It used paper instead of these sensitized metal plates. He 88 00:04:59,160 --> 00:05:02,440 Speaker 1: sensitized the paper to light by coating it in silver chloride, 89 00:05:02,680 --> 00:05:04,560 Speaker 1: and then he would expose it in a camera for 90 00:05:04,640 --> 00:05:08,200 Speaker 1: a longer period than Diga's final method, and then wash 91 00:05:08,279 --> 00:05:11,400 Speaker 1: it off afterwards to stop the exposure. Now, Talbot actually 92 00:05:11,440 --> 00:05:14,440 Speaker 1: had a few different methods over time. After Dager's method 93 00:05:14,520 --> 00:05:17,440 Speaker 1: was announced in eighteen thirty nine, Talbot eventually went on 94 00:05:17,520 --> 00:05:21,159 Speaker 1: to create and patent a different process known as the 95 00:05:21,320 --> 00:05:24,560 Speaker 1: Calo type, which also made use of a different chemical 96 00:05:24,640 --> 00:05:27,839 Speaker 1: form of Dagas concept of development right to shorten the 97 00:05:27,880 --> 00:05:31,360 Speaker 1: exposure time needed in the camera. And while Dagas method 98 00:05:31,680 --> 00:05:35,360 Speaker 1: produced these kind of sharp, one of a kind positive, 99 00:05:35,720 --> 00:05:40,440 Speaker 1: shiny reflective images on metal plates. Talbot's method produced kind 100 00:05:40,440 --> 00:05:46,120 Speaker 1: of fuzzy, soft, but highly replicable, copyable negative images on paper. 101 00:05:46,480 --> 00:05:48,520 Speaker 1: So these are the two main things you've got by 102 00:05:48,600 --> 00:05:52,240 Speaker 1: eighteen forty and again we just have to drive home 103 00:05:52,400 --> 00:05:58,960 Speaker 1: how photography was this collision of advancements in optics, chemistry, 104 00:05:59,400 --> 00:06:01,760 Speaker 1: and the r it's all of it coming together, uh, 105 00:06:02,279 --> 00:06:05,240 Speaker 1: just the right time, with just the right individuals. Yeah. 106 00:06:05,320 --> 00:06:06,800 Speaker 1: And one of the things we talked about in the 107 00:06:06,880 --> 00:06:10,280 Speaker 1: last episode is how surprising it is that this, this 108 00:06:10,400 --> 00:06:13,440 Speaker 1: first big breakthrough comes from Louis de Guerre, who was 109 00:06:13,480 --> 00:06:16,120 Speaker 1: not a scientist. He was not he was not trained 110 00:06:16,120 --> 00:06:19,159 Speaker 1: in chemistry. Digerre was a painter. He was an artist. 111 00:06:19,160 --> 00:06:22,760 Speaker 1: I mean, he was clearly a very clever and energetic 112 00:06:23,080 --> 00:06:26,279 Speaker 1: kind of go getter, but he he was not trained 113 00:06:26,320 --> 00:06:28,600 Speaker 1: in chemistry. He didn't have a lot of scientific knowledge. 114 00:06:28,600 --> 00:06:31,039 Speaker 1: He was kind of just bumbling around in the dark 115 00:06:31,080 --> 00:06:33,200 Speaker 1: in a way, at least at first. And one of 116 00:06:33,279 --> 00:06:35,120 Speaker 1: the funny things about this is we know a lot 117 00:06:35,160 --> 00:06:37,760 Speaker 1: about what Henry Fox Talbot was doing because he usually 118 00:06:37,760 --> 00:06:40,839 Speaker 1: took extensive notes and journals about his ideas and his 119 00:06:40,920 --> 00:06:44,200 Speaker 1: projects de Garrett generally did not. So remember last time 120 00:06:44,240 --> 00:06:46,440 Speaker 1: we talked about how Louis de Guerre had this brief 121 00:06:46,520 --> 00:06:51,280 Speaker 1: partnership with with niece four Niepps. How did Gare got 122 00:06:51,360 --> 00:06:55,479 Speaker 1: from Niepps's heliography which used this resin and wasn't really 123 00:06:55,800 --> 00:06:58,640 Speaker 1: like the ultimate process of the Daguero type to the 124 00:06:58,680 --> 00:07:02,200 Speaker 1: Daguero type. What happened in those years in between is 125 00:07:02,279 --> 00:07:07,360 Speaker 1: not fully known. We don't have accurate, reliable information about 126 00:07:07,440 --> 00:07:12,680 Speaker 1: what Degres postings, partnership experiments were, or like what roadmap 127 00:07:12,720 --> 00:07:15,320 Speaker 1: of discoveries led to his inventions, So there's kind of 128 00:07:15,320 --> 00:07:19,320 Speaker 1: a mystery there. There are stories that were reported later. 129 00:07:20,120 --> 00:07:22,560 Speaker 1: One common example of one of these stories is the 130 00:07:22,600 --> 00:07:25,960 Speaker 1: story about Degres magic cabinet. Have you ever heard about this? 131 00:07:26,520 --> 00:07:30,440 Speaker 1: Uh No, but it already sounds uh perhaps a little 132 00:07:30,600 --> 00:07:34,320 Speaker 1: dramatic size you know very well could be apocryphal. But 133 00:07:34,360 --> 00:07:37,960 Speaker 1: that's always the tendency, right, Like do you lay out 134 00:07:38,000 --> 00:07:42,280 Speaker 1: the various steps and and uh minor revelations that lead 135 00:07:42,360 --> 00:07:44,760 Speaker 1: to some sort of an invention, or do you come 136 00:07:44,840 --> 00:07:47,800 Speaker 1: up with something uh more sexy like I saw it 137 00:07:47,840 --> 00:07:49,920 Speaker 1: in a dream, you know? Or do you tell a 138 00:07:49,960 --> 00:07:52,560 Speaker 1: good story? Yeah, and so The Magic Cabinet is one 139 00:07:52,560 --> 00:07:55,800 Speaker 1: of these good stories that might not be true. Supposedly, 140 00:07:55,800 --> 00:07:59,040 Speaker 1: it was about how he discovered the developing process, his 141 00:07:59,200 --> 00:08:03,760 Speaker 1: most his most important key insight on photography the mercury 142 00:08:03,800 --> 00:08:07,880 Speaker 1: fumes to bring out the latent image from a short exposure. Supposedly, 143 00:08:07,880 --> 00:08:11,160 Speaker 1: what happened is that Degare had under exposed a plate 144 00:08:11,520 --> 00:08:13,360 Speaker 1: and then he put it inside a cabinet that he 145 00:08:13,400 --> 00:08:16,640 Speaker 1: was storing some chemicals in, and then came back later 146 00:08:16,800 --> 00:08:20,040 Speaker 1: and found that the under exposed plate had had an 147 00:08:20,040 --> 00:08:21,880 Speaker 1: image brought out in it, and it was like, WHOA, 148 00:08:22,000 --> 00:08:24,480 Speaker 1: what's going on here? And he realized it must have 149 00:08:24,520 --> 00:08:27,240 Speaker 1: been exposure to one of the chemicals in the cabinet. 150 00:08:27,280 --> 00:08:30,600 Speaker 1: So he just started removing one chemical at a time 151 00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:33,200 Speaker 1: and trying to figure out what it was, until eventually 152 00:08:33,240 --> 00:08:36,320 Speaker 1: he had removed everything from the cabinet and the cabinet 153 00:08:36,360 --> 00:08:39,040 Speaker 1: was still doing this. It was still bringing out the 154 00:08:39,080 --> 00:08:42,840 Speaker 1: image in under exposed plates, until he discovered that some 155 00:08:43,000 --> 00:08:46,360 Speaker 1: mercury had been spilled inside the cabinet and it was 156 00:08:46,440 --> 00:08:50,960 Speaker 1: this spill that was that was creating bringing the image out. Well, 157 00:08:50,960 --> 00:08:53,480 Speaker 1: you know, that seems like a plausible story, and even 158 00:08:53,520 --> 00:08:55,480 Speaker 1: if it didn't quite happen like that. It is a 159 00:08:55,800 --> 00:09:00,960 Speaker 1: it is a nice way of describing, you know, how 160 00:09:01,120 --> 00:09:02,959 Speaker 1: he might have discovered it, you know, like it's this 161 00:09:03,200 --> 00:09:06,640 Speaker 1: nice story shaped explanation. Yes. And I will say, for 162 00:09:06,679 --> 00:09:10,720 Speaker 1: all of Dager's apparently good qualities, he he does not 163 00:09:10,840 --> 00:09:13,200 Speaker 1: strike me, having read a good bit about his life now, 164 00:09:13,440 --> 00:09:16,000 Speaker 1: as someone who would be above making up a story 165 00:09:16,200 --> 00:09:18,680 Speaker 1: about how things came about. Because he was a salesman, 166 00:09:18,720 --> 00:09:23,040 Speaker 1: you know, businessman. A lot of his his accomplishments came from, 167 00:09:23,080 --> 00:09:24,800 Speaker 1: you know, as we said in the last episode, you know, 168 00:09:24,960 --> 00:09:28,160 Speaker 1: being a great networker, being karas mad at, being able 169 00:09:28,160 --> 00:09:32,679 Speaker 1: to bring people together and get them behind his vision. Yes, exactly. 170 00:09:33,280 --> 00:09:36,199 Speaker 1: So when d Get revealed his method publicly, he actually 171 00:09:36,240 --> 00:09:38,800 Speaker 1: he did not take out a patent on the process 172 00:09:38,840 --> 00:09:42,000 Speaker 1: anywhere except in England, or I don't know if he 173 00:09:42,080 --> 00:09:45,319 Speaker 1: actually held it. I think a different guy held this patent. 174 00:09:45,400 --> 00:09:48,400 Speaker 1: But there was a patent on the daguerrotype process in England, 175 00:09:48,440 --> 00:09:51,760 Speaker 1: but only in England. Uh And instead Dagara was given 176 00:09:51,760 --> 00:09:54,800 Speaker 1: a pension by the French government and the Daguara type 177 00:09:54,840 --> 00:09:57,880 Speaker 1: method was sort of presented as a free gift to 178 00:09:57,960 --> 00:10:02,360 Speaker 1: the world from France. Except guests to England. Henry Fox Talbot, 179 00:10:02,360 --> 00:10:04,760 Speaker 1: on the other hand, he tried to patent his callow 180 00:10:04,800 --> 00:10:09,600 Speaker 1: type process, though he faced enormous resistance and public scorn. 181 00:10:09,760 --> 00:10:13,000 Speaker 1: And it is amazing, by the way, to read sections 182 00:10:13,040 --> 00:10:17,720 Speaker 1: from articles in publications like The Economist viciously attacking the 183 00:10:17,840 --> 00:10:22,040 Speaker 1: very concept of patents as quote injurious to the progress 184 00:10:22,080 --> 00:10:25,719 Speaker 1: of production and to the common weelfare and thus illegitimate 185 00:10:25,760 --> 00:10:29,199 Speaker 1: in the light of the principle of property rights. Can 186 00:10:29,240 --> 00:10:34,040 Speaker 1: you imagine that? Well, yeah, it certainly makes sense. I mean, 187 00:10:34,120 --> 00:10:38,600 Speaker 1: you still see various discussions these days about things that 188 00:10:38,760 --> 00:10:41,160 Speaker 1: are being patent certainly in the you know, sort of 189 00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:45,800 Speaker 1: the genetic sciences. Oh yeah, So you know, it's not 190 00:10:45,840 --> 00:10:48,280 Speaker 1: too much of elite to imagine people getting upset about 191 00:10:48,320 --> 00:10:52,319 Speaker 1: the the idea of patenting photography, especially in retrospect, seeing 192 00:10:52,360 --> 00:10:55,959 Speaker 1: like what effects photography had. I'm not surprised in that. 193 00:10:56,360 --> 00:10:58,680 Speaker 1: It's not that I don't think it's a legitimate ethical 194 00:10:58,760 --> 00:11:01,160 Speaker 1: debate to be had. I'm is kind of surprised we'd 195 00:11:01,200 --> 00:11:04,720 Speaker 1: see this coming from The Economist in the eighteen forties. Yeah, 196 00:11:05,120 --> 00:11:07,120 Speaker 1: it also seems a little unfair that Talbot is the 197 00:11:07,160 --> 00:11:10,040 Speaker 1: one who's who who gets it here, you know, because 198 00:11:10,040 --> 00:11:13,120 Speaker 1: he's he's kind of coming up just a little behind 199 00:11:13,480 --> 00:11:17,040 Speaker 1: Deger at every turn. Yeah, and uh So, in those 200 00:11:17,080 --> 00:11:20,400 Speaker 1: first few decades, the world of photography was absolutely dominated 201 00:11:20,400 --> 00:11:22,920 Speaker 1: by the daguerotype, and and Talbot really seems to have 202 00:11:23,360 --> 00:11:25,600 Speaker 1: gotten the short end of the stick, even though his 203 00:11:25,640 --> 00:11:29,640 Speaker 1: inside of producing negatives that could be easily copied would 204 00:11:29,679 --> 00:11:33,400 Speaker 1: later prove hugely important to photography as as you might guess. 205 00:11:34,000 --> 00:11:37,120 Speaker 1: But any way, pretty much immediately after it was publicly 206 00:11:37,160 --> 00:11:41,600 Speaker 1: explained and demonstrated, the dagaratype became enormously popular, and people 207 00:11:41,720 --> 00:11:44,880 Speaker 1: all over we're trying it out. Initial reception of the 208 00:11:44,920 --> 00:11:48,200 Speaker 1: method was was mostly extremely positive, and in the last 209 00:11:48,240 --> 00:11:50,440 Speaker 1: episode we discussed a few examples of this, like the 210 00:11:50,480 --> 00:11:54,920 Speaker 1: absolutely glowing reception uh the daguerotype got from Edgar Allan 211 00:11:55,000 --> 00:11:58,360 Speaker 1: Poe when he described its quality as quote truth itself 212 00:11:58,520 --> 00:12:02,240 Speaker 1: in the suprem nous of it perfection. One of the 213 00:12:02,280 --> 00:12:05,160 Speaker 1: types of reviews that I like less I feel kind 214 00:12:05,160 --> 00:12:07,720 Speaker 1: of icky about, but I see pretty often as people 215 00:12:07,760 --> 00:12:14,079 Speaker 1: who are repeatedly, uh negatively comparing traditional artistic methods to 216 00:12:14,240 --> 00:12:17,480 Speaker 1: the daguero type. Like there's this example Polish in the 217 00:12:17,480 --> 00:12:21,160 Speaker 1: Gazette de France in UH in its announcement about the 218 00:12:21,200 --> 00:12:24,040 Speaker 1: Daguero type in eighteen thirty nine, quote, you will see 219 00:12:24,040 --> 00:12:26,679 Speaker 1: how far from the truth of the Daguero type are 220 00:12:26,720 --> 00:12:30,280 Speaker 1: your pencils and brushes. That's right, artists for lunatics. Now 221 00:12:31,280 --> 00:12:33,120 Speaker 1: it sounds like a line that will be spoken by 222 00:12:33,160 --> 00:12:35,319 Speaker 1: like a villain in a video game. You know, that's 223 00:12:35,360 --> 00:12:39,200 Speaker 1: already been translated poorly. Once you will see how weak 224 00:12:39,240 --> 00:12:41,960 Speaker 1: are your brushes. But I can I can imagine there 225 00:12:42,040 --> 00:12:44,240 Speaker 1: might be you know, the kind of tension, right, It's 226 00:12:44,280 --> 00:12:47,360 Speaker 1: kind of like, oh, my goodness, but the photos exist. Now, 227 00:12:47,600 --> 00:12:50,120 Speaker 1: is this going to impact my career as a painter? Yeah, 228 00:12:50,160 --> 00:12:52,200 Speaker 1: I mean we can. We always see that kind of 229 00:12:52,280 --> 00:12:57,720 Speaker 1: anxiety and perhaps uh, you know, overestimation of of what 230 00:12:57,800 --> 00:13:01,000 Speaker 1: a new technology can do exactly. And and I think 231 00:13:01,080 --> 00:13:05,880 Speaker 1: in some ways that reaction was sort of reasonable, even 232 00:13:05,880 --> 00:13:10,160 Speaker 1: though you know, we view painting and photography as different things. 233 00:13:10,800 --> 00:13:14,040 Speaker 1: Obviously some artists would have viewed photography not just as 234 00:13:14,040 --> 00:13:17,959 Speaker 1: a new art form, but as a substitute for realist 235 00:13:18,000 --> 00:13:21,959 Speaker 1: painting or a general replacement for traditional forms of art. 236 00:13:22,240 --> 00:13:24,400 Speaker 1: I want to mention the story that's related in one 237 00:13:24,440 --> 00:13:26,800 Speaker 1: of my main sources on these episodes. A book by 238 00:13:26,800 --> 00:13:29,960 Speaker 1: Helen Rappaport and Roger Watson called Capturing the Light The 239 00:13:30,000 --> 00:13:32,520 Speaker 1: Birth of Photography, A True Story of Genius and Rivalry, 240 00:13:32,559 --> 00:13:34,680 Speaker 1: which is a great book that goes into detail in 241 00:13:34,679 --> 00:13:38,360 Speaker 1: the lives of Louis de Guerre and Henry Fox Talbot especially, 242 00:13:39,040 --> 00:13:42,120 Speaker 1: but there's a section where it mentions this famous story. 243 00:13:42,120 --> 00:13:44,640 Speaker 1: This only reported many years after the fact, so again 244 00:13:44,679 --> 00:13:47,680 Speaker 1: possibly untrue, kind of like Degare's own story about where 245 00:13:47,720 --> 00:13:49,800 Speaker 1: the idea of the mercury fumes came from. But this 246 00:13:49,880 --> 00:13:53,720 Speaker 1: is a story that the realist painter Paul Delaroche, who 247 00:13:53,800 --> 00:13:58,040 Speaker 1: was known for realistic looking depictions of historical scenes such 248 00:13:58,040 --> 00:14:00,400 Speaker 1: as the execution of Lady Jane Gray, you might have 249 00:14:00,400 --> 00:14:03,720 Speaker 1: seen that painting before. Uh that he saw a daguerotype 250 00:14:03,720 --> 00:14:07,160 Speaker 1: for the first time and commented, quote from today, painting 251 00:14:07,320 --> 00:14:10,120 Speaker 1: is dead. So he may not have actually said this, 252 00:14:10,160 --> 00:14:12,760 Speaker 1: but it no doubt reflects like an anxiety that some 253 00:14:12,880 --> 00:14:15,560 Speaker 1: in the art world must have felt. And remember, today 254 00:14:16,200 --> 00:14:19,480 Speaker 1: we appreciate photography and painting as a as like separate 255 00:14:19,600 --> 00:14:23,440 Speaker 1: art forms, they each have their own uses. But before photography, 256 00:14:23,560 --> 00:14:28,000 Speaker 1: painting wasn't just a fine art. It also served practical 257 00:14:28,040 --> 00:14:31,120 Speaker 1: purposes that we now mostly leave up entirely to photography, 258 00:14:31,200 --> 00:14:35,240 Speaker 1: such as family portraiture. Like, while photography doesn't supersede all 259 00:14:35,360 --> 00:14:38,000 Speaker 1: forms of painting, there were clearly some cases where it 260 00:14:38,040 --> 00:14:40,920 Speaker 1: did simply automate work that would once have been done 261 00:14:40,920 --> 00:14:45,040 Speaker 1: by a human painter. Yeah, it's interesting, isn't it. How 262 00:14:45,120 --> 00:14:47,560 Speaker 1: like that the one area that we were one of 263 00:14:47,560 --> 00:14:50,160 Speaker 1: the few areas were able to sort of keep photography 264 00:14:50,160 --> 00:14:52,600 Speaker 1: out of it is think of the courtroom in some 265 00:14:52,640 --> 00:14:55,680 Speaker 1: cases where you have where you have the courtroom sketch 266 00:14:56,440 --> 00:15:00,720 Speaker 1: still being an important part of the journalist effort there. 267 00:15:00,880 --> 00:15:03,040 Speaker 1: That's a funny inversion because I mean one of the 268 00:15:03,040 --> 00:15:06,520 Speaker 1: earliest uses of photography that will discuss later on as 269 00:15:06,640 --> 00:15:09,520 Speaker 1: like it's like a form of objective evidence to use 270 00:15:09,520 --> 00:15:12,560 Speaker 1: in court. But yeah, there are prohibitions in some cases 271 00:15:12,560 --> 00:15:15,040 Speaker 1: of allowing cameras into the courtrooms. And so now you 272 00:15:15,080 --> 00:15:17,200 Speaker 1: get to see, like what does it look like when 273 00:15:17,240 --> 00:15:20,880 Speaker 1: you draw a picture of Paul Manifort. Yeah, and some 274 00:15:20,920 --> 00:15:26,120 Speaker 1: of these pictures are still rather amusing in the ambiguity 275 00:15:26,200 --> 00:15:29,960 Speaker 1: that is sometimes possible with just a what is you know, 276 00:15:30,000 --> 00:15:35,240 Speaker 1: probably a rushed sketch of of of happenings in a courtroom. Now, 277 00:15:35,240 --> 00:15:39,280 Speaker 1: apart from the anxiety of painters and artists, there also 278 00:15:39,640 --> 00:15:42,600 Speaker 1: uh were a few at least to question the morality 279 00:15:42,720 --> 00:15:46,520 Speaker 1: or propriety of photography as a medium. And there was 280 00:15:46,560 --> 00:15:49,880 Speaker 1: a really interesting article that was quoted in in Watson 281 00:15:49,880 --> 00:15:53,200 Speaker 1: and Rapp reports book from a German publication called The 282 00:15:53,280 --> 00:15:58,880 Speaker 1: Leipziger Stattenzeiger, and it goes a little something like this quote. 283 00:15:59,600 --> 00:16:03,920 Speaker 1: The wi to capture evanescent reflections is not only impossible, 284 00:16:04,400 --> 00:16:08,000 Speaker 1: as has been shown by thorough German investigation, but the 285 00:16:08,040 --> 00:16:13,000 Speaker 1: mere desire alone, the will to do so is blasphemy. Blasphemy. 286 00:16:14,080 --> 00:16:17,400 Speaker 1: God created man in his own image, and no man 287 00:16:17,400 --> 00:16:20,600 Speaker 1: made machine may fix the image of God. Is it 288 00:16:20,720 --> 00:16:24,320 Speaker 1: possible that God should have abandoned his eternal principles and 289 00:16:24,400 --> 00:16:27,600 Speaker 1: allowed a Frenchman in Paris to give to the world 290 00:16:27,640 --> 00:16:32,280 Speaker 1: an invention of the devil, the idea of the revolution fraternity, 291 00:16:32,520 --> 00:16:36,200 Speaker 1: and Napoleon's ambition to turn Europe into one realm. All 292 00:16:36,240 --> 00:16:39,800 Speaker 1: these crazy ideas, Monsieur de gear now claims to surpass 293 00:16:40,160 --> 00:16:42,880 Speaker 1: because he wants to outdo the creator of the world. 294 00:16:43,200 --> 00:16:46,200 Speaker 1: If this thing were at all possible, then something similar 295 00:16:46,240 --> 00:16:48,720 Speaker 1: would have been done a long time ago in antiquity 296 00:16:48,800 --> 00:16:52,400 Speaker 1: by men like Archimedes or Moses. But if these wise 297 00:16:52,440 --> 00:16:55,560 Speaker 1: men knew nothing of mirror pictures made permanent, then one 298 00:16:55,600 --> 00:16:58,560 Speaker 1: can straightaway call the Frenchman to gear who boasts of 299 00:16:58,600 --> 00:17:02,520 Speaker 1: such unheard of things, the fool of fools. Well that's 300 00:17:02,600 --> 00:17:07,200 Speaker 1: the that's a kind of a confusing review. Yeah, Um, 301 00:17:07,600 --> 00:17:10,440 Speaker 1: he can't possibly do it, and since he's doing it, 302 00:17:10,440 --> 00:17:15,399 Speaker 1: it's very bad. Wow. Uh so that that is definitely 303 00:17:15,440 --> 00:17:18,639 Speaker 1: a negative review for um, the Garrett type. Well, I 304 00:17:18,680 --> 00:17:20,960 Speaker 1: think it's interesting because this does not seem to be 305 00:17:21,200 --> 00:17:23,840 Speaker 1: a common reaction to it. It seems, by and large 306 00:17:23,880 --> 00:17:27,040 Speaker 1: people were very excited by it. But it does reflect 307 00:17:27,520 --> 00:17:31,960 Speaker 1: the general impression of the magnitude of photography as an invention. Right. 308 00:17:32,240 --> 00:17:35,280 Speaker 1: It seems absurd now that people would think of photography 309 00:17:35,320 --> 00:17:38,720 Speaker 1: as a blasphemy, but I think it's possible back then 310 00:17:38,800 --> 00:17:41,040 Speaker 1: for people to think this way because this was such 311 00:17:41,080 --> 00:17:44,640 Speaker 1: a strange and new and unheard of thing. And yet 312 00:17:44,680 --> 00:17:47,120 Speaker 1: at the at the same time, like like I'm trying 313 00:17:47,359 --> 00:17:51,560 Speaker 1: really zoning in on no man made machine may fix 314 00:17:51,600 --> 00:17:54,760 Speaker 1: the image of God. Now, obviously people were and again 315 00:17:54,800 --> 00:17:57,680 Speaker 1: that saying this because the idea that man is made 316 00:17:57,680 --> 00:18:01,640 Speaker 1: and uh in the likeness of God and all that. 317 00:18:01,680 --> 00:18:05,840 Speaker 1: But uh so, just merely fixing the image of God 318 00:18:05,920 --> 00:18:08,200 Speaker 1: can't be the thing he's upset about because because painting 319 00:18:08,240 --> 00:18:10,760 Speaker 1: did that. It's the idea that it's a machine. Is 320 00:18:10,760 --> 00:18:13,680 Speaker 1: that this idea that that we have made a thing 321 00:18:13,800 --> 00:18:16,879 Speaker 1: that does the thing? Is this like a Butlerian Jihad 322 00:18:17,280 --> 00:18:20,800 Speaker 1: kind of situation? Oh yeah, you shall not make an 323 00:18:20,800 --> 00:18:23,400 Speaker 1: image in the what make a machine? And the likeness 324 00:18:23,400 --> 00:18:26,639 Speaker 1: of human human mind? Yeah? Yeah, it reminds me a 325 00:18:26,720 --> 00:18:28,320 Speaker 1: lot of that. Well, I don't know. I mean, there 326 00:18:28,480 --> 00:18:31,920 Speaker 1: is a thing that's very often mentioned by people writing 327 00:18:31,920 --> 00:18:34,439 Speaker 1: about photography at the time, in the eighteen forties and 328 00:18:34,440 --> 00:18:38,240 Speaker 1: eighteen fifties, is there there's all this mention of the sun. 329 00:18:38,640 --> 00:18:42,920 Speaker 1: I think now because we often take photos in rooms 330 00:18:42,920 --> 00:18:45,679 Speaker 1: with artificial light, Like our cameras are more sensitive, they 331 00:18:45,720 --> 00:18:49,280 Speaker 1: can take dim photos. We have cameras with cameras with flashes, 332 00:18:49,440 --> 00:18:53,440 Speaker 1: we have you know, brighter artificial lights. Back then, there 333 00:18:53,560 --> 00:18:55,600 Speaker 1: was all all of this talk about how when you 334 00:18:55,640 --> 00:19:00,240 Speaker 1: take a photo, it's heliography, right, the sun is drawing 335 00:19:00,280 --> 00:19:03,439 Speaker 1: your pictures for you. It's all about sunlight because that 336 00:19:03,560 --> 00:19:05,800 Speaker 1: was the only light that was generally bright enough to 337 00:19:05,880 --> 00:19:09,639 Speaker 1: actually create a photo exposure. So I think maybe this 338 00:19:09,680 --> 00:19:12,639 Speaker 1: association with the sun is one of the reasons that 339 00:19:12,760 --> 00:19:15,520 Speaker 1: somebody might have a more religious reaction to it, right 340 00:19:15,600 --> 00:19:18,119 Speaker 1: that that that it's like the sun, the source of all, 341 00:19:18,160 --> 00:19:21,200 Speaker 1: you know, the the symbol of God's glory shining down 342 00:19:21,200 --> 00:19:23,680 Speaker 1: on all things bright and beautiful, all things great and small. 343 00:19:23,800 --> 00:19:26,119 Speaker 1: Now it's making images for you, and this is a 344 00:19:26,160 --> 00:19:29,080 Speaker 1: perversion of the light that God has given to us, 345 00:19:29,119 --> 00:19:31,879 Speaker 1: fixed it in darkness. Yeah, but like I said, I 346 00:19:32,119 --> 00:19:34,840 Speaker 1: do not get any indication that this was like a 347 00:19:34,880 --> 00:19:37,200 Speaker 1: major opinion. It might have been popular in Germany. I 348 00:19:37,240 --> 00:19:39,399 Speaker 1: don't know, just because they didn't like Frenchmen that that 349 00:19:39,520 --> 00:19:42,840 Speaker 1: didn't like the fact that the dgear that this was 350 00:19:42,880 --> 00:19:45,600 Speaker 1: like something that France was bragging about. It's like, oh, 351 00:19:45,640 --> 00:19:48,000 Speaker 1: here's our free gift to the world, and and some 352 00:19:48,040 --> 00:19:50,720 Speaker 1: Frenchman really did take take on that idea right of 353 00:19:51,240 --> 00:19:54,439 Speaker 1: of giving it to the world, of sharing photography with 354 00:19:54,480 --> 00:19:56,919 Speaker 1: the world. Yeah, overall, people loved the Daguero type and 355 00:19:56,920 --> 00:19:59,359 Speaker 1: it gave way to a sort of Daguerreotype craze in 356 00:19:59,359 --> 00:20:03,040 Speaker 1: which amage you're in professional photographers by the hundreds embarked 357 00:20:03,040 --> 00:20:06,320 Speaker 1: on all kinds of projects of documenting things. One example 358 00:20:06,359 --> 00:20:08,919 Speaker 1: in the early days is this French optician named Noel 359 00:20:09,000 --> 00:20:12,080 Speaker 1: Paymal lara Bor, and he had the idea to equip 360 00:20:12,119 --> 00:20:15,840 Speaker 1: a team of traveling de guerra typists to go around 361 00:20:15,880 --> 00:20:19,600 Speaker 1: the world and capture images of foreign landscapes and sites 362 00:20:19,640 --> 00:20:22,200 Speaker 1: of interest, and then then to send the images back 363 00:20:22,240 --> 00:20:25,560 Speaker 1: to Paris so that people could see these places like 364 00:20:25,960 --> 00:20:29,320 Speaker 1: Niagara Falls, like the Great Mosque of Algiers, or like 365 00:20:29,359 --> 00:20:33,320 Speaker 1: the Acropolis, see them in full realism for the first time. 366 00:20:33,840 --> 00:20:35,920 Speaker 1: Lara Bor wanted to publish them in a book, which 367 00:20:35,920 --> 00:20:39,399 Speaker 1: he did in eighteen forty one called Excurgion dig de 368 00:20:39,520 --> 00:20:45,040 Speaker 1: guerrienes da guariens. I think, except there's a problem, because 369 00:20:45,080 --> 00:20:48,480 Speaker 1: remember what's true about the daguerrotype. The Daguera type is 370 00:20:48,520 --> 00:20:51,800 Speaker 1: an opaque, one of a kind print on a metal plate. 371 00:20:52,720 --> 00:20:56,040 Speaker 1: It can't be copied directly, and at the time certainly 372 00:20:56,040 --> 00:20:58,719 Speaker 1: it couldn't be printed in a book. So unfortunately, the 373 00:20:58,760 --> 00:21:02,360 Speaker 1: best he could do was to have the daguerrotypes from 374 00:21:02,400 --> 00:21:07,160 Speaker 1: these locations redrawn by hand as engravings so they could 375 00:21:07,160 --> 00:21:10,040 Speaker 1: be printed in the book, which is. I mean, on 376 00:21:10,040 --> 00:21:12,119 Speaker 1: one hand, there there actually was a great level of 377 00:21:12,160 --> 00:21:16,040 Speaker 1: realism in these engravings and illustrations, since the engravings were 378 00:21:16,040 --> 00:21:19,680 Speaker 1: copied from real photographs. But they weren't the photographs themselves. 379 00:21:20,040 --> 00:21:22,520 Speaker 1: A kind of bizarre irony. The first like big book 380 00:21:22,520 --> 00:21:27,399 Speaker 1: of photographs wasn't it wasn't photographs illustrations. All right, Well, 381 00:21:27,440 --> 00:21:29,119 Speaker 1: on that note, let's take a quick break. When we 382 00:21:29,200 --> 00:21:31,880 Speaker 1: come back, we will continue to discuss the de Guara 383 00:21:31,920 --> 00:21:41,240 Speaker 1: type craze and other developments in early photography. Alright, we're 384 00:21:41,280 --> 00:21:44,560 Speaker 1: back now. Remember the Dagara type was revealed in eighteen 385 00:21:44,600 --> 00:21:47,520 Speaker 1: thirty nine, sort of announced I think in January, and 386 00:21:47,560 --> 00:21:51,239 Speaker 1: then he really described his process publicly in August, and 387 00:21:51,280 --> 00:21:54,880 Speaker 1: by December eighteen thirty nine there were already jokes about 388 00:21:54,920 --> 00:21:58,520 Speaker 1: how trendy this new invention of photography had become. One 389 00:21:58,640 --> 00:22:02,800 Speaker 1: really great one is a lithograph by the artist Theodore 390 00:22:02,960 --> 00:22:08,520 Speaker 1: Morrissette called La ladgera type of many. I think that's 391 00:22:08,560 --> 00:22:12,040 Speaker 1: the French version. I think it means degera type of mania. Uh. 392 00:22:12,080 --> 00:22:16,320 Speaker 1: And it is this manic, hieronymous, bosh like hell of 393 00:22:16,400 --> 00:22:20,560 Speaker 1: people swarming all around with camera boxes and photographing everything. 394 00:22:20,960 --> 00:22:23,520 Speaker 1: There's even a camera hanging from a hot air balloon, 395 00:22:23,560 --> 00:22:28,840 Speaker 1: apparently anticipating like spy planes. Uh. My favorite detail is 396 00:22:28,920 --> 00:22:31,800 Speaker 1: up in the upper right of the image, which appears 397 00:22:31,840 --> 00:22:34,160 Speaker 1: to be some kind of a cult ritual in which 398 00:22:34,200 --> 00:22:38,560 Speaker 1: pagan revelers are dancing in a circle lasciviously around a 399 00:22:38,640 --> 00:22:42,280 Speaker 1: steaming vat of mercury. Remember the mercury fumes where the 400 00:22:42,320 --> 00:22:46,840 Speaker 1: where the chemical insight used to develop the quick exposed print. Yeah, 401 00:22:46,840 --> 00:22:49,680 Speaker 1: this is amusing because it also reminds me of our 402 00:22:49,720 --> 00:22:52,640 Speaker 1: reaction to various other bits of technology. In fact, often 403 00:22:53,040 --> 00:22:57,760 Speaker 1: photographic technology. Uh, like, for instance, selfie sticks come to mind. 404 00:22:58,320 --> 00:23:01,280 Speaker 1: You can well imagine the same illustration Asian popping up 405 00:23:01,640 --> 00:23:06,200 Speaker 1: in uh contemporary news paper to criticize the widespread juice 406 00:23:06,240 --> 00:23:08,720 Speaker 1: of selfie sticks or the or a Pokemon phone game 407 00:23:09,000 --> 00:23:14,320 Speaker 1: or whatever kind of handheld technological craze is sweeping the nation. Well, 408 00:23:14,359 --> 00:23:19,320 Speaker 1: you know who hated selfies was the French poet Charles Baudelaire. Yeah, well, 409 00:23:19,359 --> 00:23:22,639 Speaker 1: obviously they didn't have selfies then, but the equivalent. So 410 00:23:22,720 --> 00:23:26,040 Speaker 1: I would like to talk a bit about portraits of people, 411 00:23:26,200 --> 00:23:28,760 Speaker 1: because this is one of the most important early uses 412 00:23:29,240 --> 00:23:32,800 Speaker 1: of photography. But to quote Bodelaire writing in eighteen fifty 413 00:23:32,840 --> 00:23:36,560 Speaker 1: nine about the early days of photography, Get this, A 414 00:23:36,720 --> 00:23:39,719 Speaker 1: vengeful God has given ear to the prayers of this 415 00:23:39,800 --> 00:23:43,480 Speaker 1: multitude to gear was his messiah. From that moment, our 416 00:23:43,560 --> 00:23:47,840 Speaker 1: squalid society rushed narcissus to a man to gaze at 417 00:23:47,880 --> 00:23:51,320 Speaker 1: his trivial image on a scrap of metal. A madness 418 00:23:51,320 --> 00:23:56,120 Speaker 1: and extraordinary fanaticism took possession of all these new sun worshippers. 419 00:23:56,760 --> 00:23:59,320 Speaker 1: There's the sun again. But also so he's being a jerk. 420 00:23:59,400 --> 00:24:01,959 Speaker 1: He's being like the grump who's mad about selfie sticks. 421 00:24:02,240 --> 00:24:05,120 Speaker 1: But at the same time he's not wrong, right, Like, 422 00:24:05,359 --> 00:24:08,560 Speaker 1: once people could take photos, what's the one thing people 423 00:24:08,600 --> 00:24:12,800 Speaker 1: would really most want photos of? Well, themselves, right and 424 00:24:13,000 --> 00:24:15,800 Speaker 1: in a less narcissistic vein, of their families and loved ones. 425 00:24:15,840 --> 00:24:18,600 Speaker 1: But obviously there was a lot of demand for people 426 00:24:19,040 --> 00:24:22,399 Speaker 1: to have photos of themselves and people they knew. And 427 00:24:22,440 --> 00:24:25,959 Speaker 1: this is a far more affordable option, even at this 428 00:24:26,080 --> 00:24:29,639 Speaker 1: level of photography, compared to getting say a talented painter, 429 00:24:30,400 --> 00:24:33,919 Speaker 1: hiring a painter to to create your likeness on on 430 00:24:34,000 --> 00:24:38,480 Speaker 1: a canvas. That's absolutely true. Photography was an egalitarian innovation. 431 00:24:38,920 --> 00:24:42,840 Speaker 1: Painted portraiture was very expensive. Only the rich could afford it, 432 00:24:43,119 --> 00:24:45,560 Speaker 1: but even regular people could save up to pay a 433 00:24:45,640 --> 00:24:48,960 Speaker 1: de Garat typist for a portrait and individual portrait or 434 00:24:49,000 --> 00:24:53,600 Speaker 1: a family portrait. This suddenly put realistic imagery of people 435 00:24:53,800 --> 00:24:57,639 Speaker 1: within the pocketbook reach of normal people. And it was 436 00:24:57,720 --> 00:25:00,280 Speaker 1: also clear early on the lot of the commerce full 437 00:25:00,320 --> 00:25:04,160 Speaker 1: potential for the new art and technology of photography would 438 00:25:04,200 --> 00:25:06,720 Speaker 1: be in portraits of people. That's what people want to 439 00:25:06,760 --> 00:25:09,560 Speaker 1: pay money for, and so obviously people wanted to start, 440 00:25:09,640 --> 00:25:14,159 Speaker 1: you know, de Garat type portraiture businesses. But there's a problem. 441 00:25:14,400 --> 00:25:19,080 Speaker 1: Portraits were a very, very difficult proposition for the earliest 442 00:25:19,119 --> 00:25:24,959 Speaker 1: photography methods because exposure times were still too long too 443 00:25:25,040 --> 00:25:29,240 Speaker 1: sharply capture live subjects. When Degar revealed his method, he'd 444 00:25:29,240 --> 00:25:32,680 Speaker 1: gotten the exposure through through the chemical development. He'd gotten 445 00:25:32,720 --> 00:25:36,280 Speaker 1: exposure down from hours to minutes, but even the minutes 446 00:25:36,480 --> 00:25:40,040 Speaker 1: were really hard. It's hard to hold a pose without 447 00:25:40,080 --> 00:25:43,080 Speaker 1: moving at all for ten or fifteen minutes, right. You 448 00:25:43,440 --> 00:25:47,119 Speaker 1: might end up moving somehow, changing your facial expression, and 449 00:25:47,119 --> 00:25:49,679 Speaker 1: that's going to create blurry nous, which is going to 450 00:25:49,800 --> 00:25:53,080 Speaker 1: lessen the value of the photo, which is an impediment 451 00:25:53,080 --> 00:25:56,160 Speaker 1: to commercial success. And in fact, when I was reading 452 00:25:56,160 --> 00:26:00,320 Speaker 1: about this, I started to wonder if the you know, 453 00:26:00,400 --> 00:26:04,160 Speaker 1: eighteen forties exposure times of around ten or fifteen minutes 454 00:26:04,520 --> 00:26:08,200 Speaker 1: are an explanation for why people in old photos are 455 00:26:08,280 --> 00:26:11,639 Speaker 1: so rarely smiling. Oh yeah, because I mean, I think 456 00:26:11,680 --> 00:26:13,120 Speaker 1: a lot of us can can look at this, even 457 00:26:13,160 --> 00:26:16,359 Speaker 1: our own family histories, dig up these old photos and 458 00:26:16,359 --> 00:26:21,600 Speaker 1: it's a bunch of like pain godish looking humans. You know, um, 459 00:26:21,760 --> 00:26:24,560 Speaker 1: they just got bad news, right, And and of course 460 00:26:24,560 --> 00:26:25,880 Speaker 1: one of the things is a lot of times we're 461 00:26:25,880 --> 00:26:29,600 Speaker 1: looking at pictures from rougher time, so it's easy to 462 00:26:29,720 --> 00:26:31,919 Speaker 1: just fall in line with thinking, oh, well, you know 463 00:26:31,920 --> 00:26:34,200 Speaker 1: it was it was tough back then. You know, this 464 00:26:34,240 --> 00:26:37,520 Speaker 1: is this photo was taken perhaps at a funeral um. 465 00:26:37,560 --> 00:26:39,320 Speaker 1: But no, it's not. I mean, people in the past 466 00:26:39,359 --> 00:26:43,320 Speaker 1: were happy. There were times that they smiled, but but 467 00:26:43,440 --> 00:26:46,040 Speaker 1: it was just not very often in photos. And I 468 00:26:46,080 --> 00:26:49,240 Speaker 1: think one reason for this is that try to hold 469 00:26:49,240 --> 00:26:52,359 Speaker 1: a smile for fifteen minutes. Oh yeah, it's certainly anything 470 00:26:52,720 --> 00:26:56,560 Speaker 1: approaching a natural looking smile. Now, this would only apply 471 00:26:56,720 --> 00:26:59,680 Speaker 1: to like the earlier photos that had the longer exposure 472 00:26:59,720 --> 00:27:02,240 Speaker 1: times as as time went on, as the years went on, 473 00:27:02,320 --> 00:27:04,639 Speaker 1: exposure times got shorter and shorter, and we'll talk about 474 00:27:04,640 --> 00:27:08,160 Speaker 1: how in a minute, but it's really hard to hold 475 00:27:08,200 --> 00:27:12,040 Speaker 1: a smile for even just five minutes, right, And apparently 476 00:27:12,160 --> 00:27:13,960 Speaker 1: I'm not the first person to wonder about this. I 477 00:27:14,240 --> 00:27:16,040 Speaker 1: was looking this up and I found a really great 478 00:27:16,080 --> 00:27:19,080 Speaker 1: twenty sixteen piece in Vox by Phil Edwards about why 479 00:27:19,119 --> 00:27:22,120 Speaker 1: people didn't smile in old photos, and there are several explanations. 480 00:27:22,520 --> 00:27:24,560 Speaker 1: The first point we should note is that some people 481 00:27:24,600 --> 00:27:27,359 Speaker 1: actually did smile in old photos, just not as many 482 00:27:27,440 --> 00:27:29,640 Speaker 1: as we're used to today now in our culture, when 483 00:27:29,640 --> 00:27:32,320 Speaker 1: you take a picture, you smile, right, This was just 484 00:27:32,680 --> 00:27:35,360 Speaker 1: not nearly as common. But I found you know, there's 485 00:27:35,400 --> 00:27:38,520 Speaker 1: one great example. Uh that's kind of hard to believe. 486 00:27:38,560 --> 00:27:40,359 Speaker 1: It was taken in nineteen o four, but it was 487 00:27:40,400 --> 00:27:43,359 Speaker 1: taken in nineteen o four in China by a photographer 488 00:27:43,400 --> 00:27:46,719 Speaker 1: and anthropologist named Berthold Lawfer, and it looks like it 489 00:27:46,760 --> 00:27:49,399 Speaker 1: was taken last year. It does. It's I mean, for 490 00:27:49,440 --> 00:27:52,040 Speaker 1: one thing, it's it's just a high quality. But a 491 00:27:52,119 --> 00:27:54,520 Speaker 1: lot of it too, is the fact that the the 492 00:27:54,560 --> 00:27:58,320 Speaker 1: individual in the photo is smiling. There is there's emotion 493 00:27:58,440 --> 00:28:00,959 Speaker 1: beaming through their face and you're just you're just not 494 00:28:01,040 --> 00:28:03,760 Speaker 1: used to seeing that in pictures from nineteen o four. 495 00:28:04,320 --> 00:28:08,320 Speaker 1: And and I think also, you know, you mentioned, you know, 496 00:28:08,359 --> 00:28:11,040 Speaker 1: to Gara types in this effort to like document other 497 00:28:11,240 --> 00:28:14,040 Speaker 1: places and other people's uh and so you know, you 498 00:28:14,080 --> 00:28:19,200 Speaker 1: give rise to all this anthropological photography, you know, which 499 00:28:19,560 --> 00:28:21,520 Speaker 1: I think on one level, you know, there's this noble 500 00:28:21,560 --> 00:28:25,639 Speaker 1: effort to document and understand other other people. But at 501 00:28:25,720 --> 00:28:28,000 Speaker 1: the at the same time, if you can't get them 502 00:28:28,040 --> 00:28:30,480 Speaker 1: to smile, if they if you're having to depend on 503 00:28:30,520 --> 00:28:34,399 Speaker 1: these long exposures and you're getting like a grim dour expression, 504 00:28:34,640 --> 00:28:39,480 Speaker 1: like if if most photographic proof of the human species 505 00:28:39,920 --> 00:28:42,320 Speaker 1: is is like a grim faced person who's ready for this, 506 00:28:42,640 --> 00:28:45,360 Speaker 1: this long exposure to be done with. Like you're not 507 00:28:45,440 --> 00:28:48,400 Speaker 1: getting a true sense of of the people, You're not 508 00:28:48,440 --> 00:28:51,600 Speaker 1: You're missing out on a vital aspect of the human condition. Yeah, 509 00:28:51,600 --> 00:28:53,440 Speaker 1: and I think that's one reason we're seeing here. And 510 00:28:53,440 --> 00:28:55,960 Speaker 1: now this photo was taken later when exposure times were shorter. 511 00:28:56,480 --> 00:28:58,920 Speaker 1: Uh So, so the exposure time isn't nearly as much 512 00:28:58,920 --> 00:29:01,680 Speaker 1: an issue here, but uh this this was an anthropologist 513 00:29:01,720 --> 00:29:04,200 Speaker 1: who was trying to document life, who wasn't like you 514 00:29:04,200 --> 00:29:06,760 Speaker 1: know it wasn't like this is the portrait of this 515 00:29:06,800 --> 00:29:09,120 Speaker 1: man in the photo who that will be his portrait 516 00:29:09,160 --> 00:29:11,320 Speaker 1: that hangs in his house forever. He's trying to show 517 00:29:11,360 --> 00:29:13,880 Speaker 1: what life was like. And in life, a lot of 518 00:29:13,880 --> 00:29:17,000 Speaker 1: times people smile because they're happy. This guy's got He's 519 00:29:17,040 --> 00:29:18,720 Speaker 1: like a guy sitting there at a table with a 520 00:29:18,720 --> 00:29:22,000 Speaker 1: bowl of rice and he looks really excited. But anyway, 521 00:29:22,000 --> 00:29:24,360 Speaker 1: even though some people did smile in old photos, if 522 00:29:24,400 --> 00:29:26,840 Speaker 1: you see a photo from the US or Europe from 523 00:29:26,840 --> 00:29:29,200 Speaker 1: the eighteen hundreds, there's a very good chance that the 524 00:29:29,280 --> 00:29:32,760 Speaker 1: subjects are not smiling. And yes, if it's a photo 525 00:29:32,840 --> 00:29:35,240 Speaker 1: from those early years of photography, you know one of 526 00:29:35,240 --> 00:29:38,600 Speaker 1: the eighteen forties Dagara types say, a good reason why 527 00:29:38,600 --> 00:29:42,240 Speaker 1: nobody is smiling is probably exactly what we've been discussing. 528 00:29:42,280 --> 00:29:44,280 Speaker 1: You can't hold a smile as long as they had 529 00:29:44,320 --> 00:29:47,320 Speaker 1: to expose the plate. But there are some interesting other 530 00:29:47,360 --> 00:29:50,720 Speaker 1: explanations mentioned in that Phil Edwards piece. One was just 531 00:29:50,800 --> 00:29:54,240 Speaker 1: the idea that early photography was art and it was 532 00:29:54,440 --> 00:29:57,840 Speaker 1: seen as sort of a new version of painting, and 533 00:29:57,920 --> 00:30:01,600 Speaker 1: in painted portraits generally people didn't smile because that was 534 00:30:01,640 --> 00:30:05,360 Speaker 1: the artistic style, right. So, and as we discussed I 535 00:30:05,400 --> 00:30:10,080 Speaker 1: think the first photo episode. Uh, the photographic technology like 536 00:30:10,120 --> 00:30:13,920 Speaker 1: picks up where painting left off, so the the existing 537 00:30:13,960 --> 00:30:17,800 Speaker 1: styles would carry over. And then I'm also imagining that 538 00:30:18,560 --> 00:30:21,480 Speaker 1: if there if there was some aspect of portraiture style 539 00:30:21,600 --> 00:30:25,280 Speaker 1: that was due to the limitations of the technology, such 540 00:30:25,280 --> 00:30:29,120 Speaker 1: as disposure times, like that would either uh you know, 541 00:30:29,280 --> 00:30:33,720 Speaker 1: it would either further ingrain the standards or it would 542 00:30:33,920 --> 00:30:36,760 Speaker 1: uh it would it would make this be the standard 543 00:30:36,840 --> 00:30:40,080 Speaker 1: of the photograph, you know, like you would establish conventions 544 00:30:40,120 --> 00:30:44,200 Speaker 1: even if it wasn't necessarily still necessitated by the technology. Yeah, 545 00:30:44,240 --> 00:30:46,760 Speaker 1: because otherwise the photographer shows up, Hey there's a new camera. 546 00:30:46,840 --> 00:30:50,080 Speaker 1: Now everybody can smile. You might be like, well, why 547 00:30:50,080 --> 00:30:52,040 Speaker 1: would I smile? That's just not done. We didn't used 548 00:30:52,040 --> 00:30:53,760 Speaker 1: to smile and photographs, Why am I'm not going to 549 00:30:53,840 --> 00:30:57,040 Speaker 1: be the dummy to start doing it exactly. Yeah. Another 550 00:30:57,080 --> 00:30:59,719 Speaker 1: point made in this Edwards piece that's interesting is that, 551 00:31:00,200 --> 00:31:03,040 Speaker 1: you know, early photos are not the same as our photos. 552 00:31:03,120 --> 00:31:08,600 Speaker 1: Our photos are often just ephemeral records capturing individual moments, 553 00:31:09,080 --> 00:31:12,280 Speaker 1: and we understand them to be about moments. They're about 554 00:31:12,360 --> 00:31:15,120 Speaker 1: what was going on in this one second and how 555 00:31:15,160 --> 00:31:17,959 Speaker 1: we were feeling then and a lot of times in 556 00:31:18,000 --> 00:31:20,120 Speaker 1: that vain people want to be smiling to show their 557 00:31:20,160 --> 00:31:23,719 Speaker 1: having a good time. But photos back then weren't like that. 558 00:31:23,800 --> 00:31:28,080 Speaker 1: They were sort of precious and immortal records of people 559 00:31:28,240 --> 00:31:32,719 Speaker 1: as people, not not of moments as moments, right. And 560 00:31:32,720 --> 00:31:35,400 Speaker 1: and also they were private, which is something that I 561 00:31:35,400 --> 00:31:38,280 Speaker 1: think is easy to forget with with photographs today. Now, 562 00:31:38,280 --> 00:31:41,560 Speaker 1: obviously there's still a lot of private photography. Not everybody is, 563 00:31:41,600 --> 00:31:44,800 Speaker 1: you know, is taking their their latest family photos and 564 00:31:44,920 --> 00:31:47,760 Speaker 1: uh and plastering them all over the world, but a 565 00:31:47,760 --> 00:31:50,000 Speaker 1: lot of people are. I mean, that's become what we 566 00:31:50,080 --> 00:31:52,080 Speaker 1: do with photos. A lot of the photographs we take, 567 00:31:52,120 --> 00:31:54,840 Speaker 1: we're taking to share, at least with a select audience 568 00:31:54,840 --> 00:31:58,880 Speaker 1: on social media, or to you know, put on a resume, 569 00:31:59,000 --> 00:32:02,640 Speaker 1: to put on our online and resume or what have you. Yeah, exactly. 570 00:32:02,640 --> 00:32:05,440 Speaker 1: In in contrast, I think these old photos, when people 571 00:32:05,440 --> 00:32:08,880 Speaker 1: were first getting photo portraits made in the nineteenth century, 572 00:32:09,360 --> 00:32:12,760 Speaker 1: the photo was interpreted as something like a painted port portrait. 573 00:32:12,840 --> 00:32:17,760 Speaker 1: It was kind of a serious artifact representing your immortal character. 574 00:32:17,840 --> 00:32:19,960 Speaker 1: I think the difference between a photo today and a 575 00:32:20,000 --> 00:32:22,920 Speaker 1: photo of the eighteen fifties was kind of the difference 576 00:32:22,960 --> 00:32:26,240 Speaker 1: between a tweet and a eulogy, and to take that 577 00:32:26,280 --> 00:32:28,320 Speaker 1: to extremes. I mean, in Victorian culture, it was a 578 00:32:28,360 --> 00:32:32,080 Speaker 1: relatively common practice to photograph the dead and dead members 579 00:32:32,120 --> 00:32:34,840 Speaker 1: of your family as a record of a person. Somebody 580 00:32:34,840 --> 00:32:37,760 Speaker 1: in your family would die and you the only photo 581 00:32:37,880 --> 00:32:40,080 Speaker 1: of them you might have might be of them as 582 00:32:40,080 --> 00:32:42,240 Speaker 1: a corpse. Yeah. I think a lot of us out there, 583 00:32:42,360 --> 00:32:45,440 Speaker 1: if we look through like our famili's photographic history goo 584 00:32:45,480 --> 00:32:49,360 Speaker 1: will sometimes encounter those those photos of say a dead child. Yeah, 585 00:32:49,600 --> 00:32:52,920 Speaker 1: it's very strange to us today, but it's another indication 586 00:32:52,960 --> 00:32:56,760 Speaker 1: of how differently they thought about photography back then. Uh. 587 00:32:56,800 --> 00:33:00,400 Speaker 1: And just to to cement this idea of like potograph 588 00:33:00,480 --> 00:33:03,880 Speaker 1: being a serious thing that was about serious values and 589 00:33:03,920 --> 00:33:06,280 Speaker 1: not a place for smiling. Uh. There is even a 590 00:33:06,280 --> 00:33:08,720 Speaker 1: comment from Mark Twain, who you know, Mark Twain wasn't 591 00:33:08,760 --> 00:33:10,760 Speaker 1: like a person without a sense of humor. He wrote 592 00:33:10,760 --> 00:33:13,200 Speaker 1: all kinds of funny stuff, but he said at one 593 00:33:13,240 --> 00:33:16,600 Speaker 1: point quote, I think a photograph is a most important document, 594 00:33:16,760 --> 00:33:19,080 Speaker 1: and there is nothing more damning to go down to 595 00:33:19,160 --> 00:33:24,560 Speaker 1: posterity than a silly, foolish smile caught unfixed forever. Well, 596 00:33:24,600 --> 00:33:26,880 Speaker 1: that's another thing to think about it with these two. Right, 597 00:33:26,920 --> 00:33:29,840 Speaker 1: Like nowadays, with a photo shoot, you can you can 598 00:33:29,960 --> 00:33:32,600 Speaker 1: you know, you get like a hundred or more images, right, 599 00:33:32,680 --> 00:33:35,200 Speaker 1: and then you can you can then decide which ones 600 00:33:35,280 --> 00:33:38,120 Speaker 1: have an acceptable smile, which ones have that magical smile 601 00:33:38,200 --> 00:33:42,160 Speaker 1: that feels right and also doesn't make you look too silly. 602 00:33:42,240 --> 00:33:45,520 Speaker 1: You can pinpoint the photo that makes you look the 603 00:33:45,560 --> 00:33:48,240 Speaker 1: way you want to look. Uh. And then of course 604 00:33:48,240 --> 00:33:51,840 Speaker 1: there's you know, post processes as well. But uh, yeah, 605 00:33:51,880 --> 00:33:53,720 Speaker 1: I can see where you might say, like, why would 606 00:33:53,720 --> 00:33:56,720 Speaker 1: I risk a smile. I'll just stick with serious because 607 00:33:56,840 --> 00:33:58,960 Speaker 1: I know that I can probably get that. That's a 608 00:33:58,960 --> 00:34:01,920 Speaker 1: good point. Yeah. I mean, I'm somebody who's not good 609 00:34:01,920 --> 00:34:04,640 Speaker 1: at smiling in photos. When people take pictures of me 610 00:34:04,640 --> 00:34:07,040 Speaker 1: and I smile, I often see it and I'm like, oh, 611 00:34:07,080 --> 00:34:08,920 Speaker 1: what was that? You know, I look like I'm like 612 00:34:09,040 --> 00:34:13,000 Speaker 1: chewing on a spider or something. I don't know. I 613 00:34:12,800 --> 00:34:16,279 Speaker 1: I can sympathize. And then finally, one last point that 614 00:34:16,400 --> 00:34:18,840 Speaker 1: Edwards makes in that article is that it appears that 615 00:34:19,000 --> 00:34:22,240 Speaker 1: in Europe and America during the Victorian and Edwardian periods, 616 00:34:22,440 --> 00:34:25,279 Speaker 1: some people just generally didn't think highly of smiling, Like 617 00:34:25,360 --> 00:34:28,880 Speaker 1: they thought smiling was a sign of stupidity. So cultural 618 00:34:28,920 --> 00:34:31,759 Speaker 1: norms just coming into play again. Right, But back to 619 00:34:31,800 --> 00:34:34,560 Speaker 1: the long exposure times of the earliest portraits. Watson and 620 00:34:34,640 --> 00:34:37,000 Speaker 1: Rapp report in their book have an excellent chapter about 621 00:34:37,000 --> 00:34:39,759 Speaker 1: early portraits, and one of the things that they have 622 00:34:39,840 --> 00:34:43,520 Speaker 1: in there is an amazing quote of a firsthand description 623 00:34:43,560 --> 00:34:46,000 Speaker 1: of what it was like to pose for a Daguera 624 00:34:46,080 --> 00:34:50,279 Speaker 1: type by a Mr. Chittenden of Boston. We'll see how 625 00:34:50,320 --> 00:34:53,640 Speaker 1: you like this one, Robert quote. The operators rolled out 626 00:34:53,680 --> 00:34:56,760 Speaker 1: what looked like an overgrown barber's chair with a ballot 627 00:34:56,800 --> 00:34:59,680 Speaker 1: box attachment on a staff in front of it. I 628 00:34:59,800 --> 00:35:02,760 Speaker 1: was seated in the chair and his briery and arms 629 00:35:02,760 --> 00:35:06,399 Speaker 1: seized me by the wrists, ankles, waist and shoulders. There 630 00:35:06,440 --> 00:35:09,480 Speaker 1: was an iron bar which served as an elongation of 631 00:35:09,560 --> 00:35:12,880 Speaker 1: the spine, with a crossbar in which the head rested, 632 00:35:13,120 --> 00:35:16,359 Speaker 1: which held my head and neck as in a vice. Then, 633 00:35:16,480 --> 00:35:18,719 Speaker 1: when I felt like a martyr in the embrace of 634 00:35:18,719 --> 00:35:22,080 Speaker 1: the Nuremberg Maiden, which the some of the iron Maiden 635 00:35:22,120 --> 00:35:26,239 Speaker 1: there um, I was told to assume my best Sunday expression, 636 00:35:26,280 --> 00:35:28,400 Speaker 1: to fix my eyes on the first letter of the 637 00:35:28,440 --> 00:35:31,400 Speaker 1: sign of a beer saloon opposite, and not to move 638 00:35:31,520 --> 00:35:34,759 Speaker 1: or wink on pain of spoiling the exposure. So it 639 00:35:34,800 --> 00:35:37,440 Speaker 1: sounds like you have to climb into a torture device 640 00:35:38,000 --> 00:35:41,000 Speaker 1: in order to be held still for this photo. Well 641 00:35:41,040 --> 00:35:43,359 Speaker 1: you know, but but still today, if you get your 642 00:35:43,400 --> 00:35:45,840 Speaker 1: photo taken by someone who knows what they're doing, you 643 00:35:45,920 --> 00:35:51,799 Speaker 1: may be asked to for imposes that otherwise feel unnatural. 644 00:35:52,400 --> 00:35:55,040 Speaker 1: You know. But it's uh, it's it's it's the thing 645 00:35:55,120 --> 00:35:57,799 Speaker 1: about a photograph, of posing for a photograph is not 646 00:35:57,880 --> 00:36:01,040 Speaker 1: necessarily a natural act, you know, it is it is 647 00:36:01,080 --> 00:36:03,160 Speaker 1: about the finished product. And so yeah, you might have 648 00:36:03,200 --> 00:36:05,520 Speaker 1: to roll your shoulders in a way that you normally 649 00:36:05,520 --> 00:36:08,360 Speaker 1: wouldn't or roll you know, position your your chin in 650 00:36:08,400 --> 00:36:11,520 Speaker 1: a way that you normally wouldn't even think about. And 651 00:36:11,520 --> 00:36:14,200 Speaker 1: and you do see people still grive about getting their 652 00:36:14,200 --> 00:36:19,600 Speaker 1: photo taken with this degree of of disdain. Yeah, well, 653 00:36:19,640 --> 00:36:21,359 Speaker 1: I mean, one of one of the funny things you're 654 00:36:21,440 --> 00:36:23,279 Speaker 1: you're pointing out there is like how you have to 655 00:36:23,360 --> 00:36:27,600 Speaker 1: sometimes act unnatural to look natural. And this was also 656 00:36:27,640 --> 00:36:31,280 Speaker 1: true in scenes, in bigger scenes, not just individual portraits, 657 00:36:31,320 --> 00:36:33,960 Speaker 1: but like there are stories from the days of early 658 00:36:34,040 --> 00:36:37,080 Speaker 1: de Guero types and crowd scenes and parties where guests 659 00:36:37,160 --> 00:36:40,319 Speaker 1: would sometimes be prepared in advance that at some point 660 00:36:40,400 --> 00:36:43,240 Speaker 1: they would be asked to freeze to create a quote 661 00:36:43,239 --> 00:36:47,040 Speaker 1: general immobility for about seven minutes so that a decent 662 00:36:47,160 --> 00:36:49,840 Speaker 1: photo of the room could be taken. Obviously, in a 663 00:36:49,880 --> 00:36:52,120 Speaker 1: crowd scene, like, they're going to be details that are 664 00:36:52,120 --> 00:36:54,560 Speaker 1: a little less crucial because somebody might move and they'll 665 00:36:54,600 --> 00:36:57,160 Speaker 1: just be a blurry part of the photo. But just yeah, 666 00:36:57,239 --> 00:36:59,040 Speaker 1: try to imagine that. You're, like you're at a party 667 00:36:59,080 --> 00:37:00,680 Speaker 1: and they want to get a sure what the party 668 00:37:00,680 --> 00:37:02,160 Speaker 1: looked like. So at some point they're just going to 669 00:37:02,239 --> 00:37:06,560 Speaker 1: ask everybody to hold still while they expose it to guaratype. Yeah, 670 00:37:07,360 --> 00:37:10,640 Speaker 1: everything that might be awkward in modern photography, and and 671 00:37:10,719 --> 00:37:13,359 Speaker 1: you know covering an event, uh is going to be 672 00:37:13,440 --> 00:37:16,759 Speaker 1: just a little bit more awkward with the limited technology. Yeah, 673 00:37:17,360 --> 00:37:19,640 Speaker 1: because it sounds like a lot like a grip and grin, 674 00:37:19,840 --> 00:37:22,080 Speaker 1: you know, which is still a standard of any time 675 00:37:22,160 --> 00:37:24,640 Speaker 1: like a new business opens or uh, you know, any 676 00:37:24,719 --> 00:37:27,040 Speaker 1: kind of business e thing happens and it needs to 677 00:37:27,080 --> 00:37:30,760 Speaker 1: be documented. You're gonna get that that nice staged uh 678 00:37:30,800 --> 00:37:34,080 Speaker 1: and faked image of like two people shaking hands or 679 00:37:34,120 --> 00:37:36,399 Speaker 1: presenting some sort of document that sort of thing. Can 680 00:37:36,440 --> 00:37:38,879 Speaker 1: I tell you. I actually realized I have a sort 681 00:37:38,920 --> 00:37:42,160 Speaker 1: of a prejudice against people who are good at posing 682 00:37:42,200 --> 00:37:46,160 Speaker 1: for photos. There's something about it when people are just 683 00:37:46,280 --> 00:37:49,960 Speaker 1: really good. It's suddenly assuming the pose and doing the face, 684 00:37:50,000 --> 00:37:52,600 Speaker 1: and they look perfectly photogenic and can do it time 685 00:37:52,640 --> 00:37:58,719 Speaker 1: after time. I find that distrustful. Wait, isn't distrustful the 686 00:37:58,760 --> 00:38:03,160 Speaker 1: right word. I find that trustworthy untrustworthy. Well, I don't 687 00:38:03,160 --> 00:38:04,880 Speaker 1: know about that. I mean, most of it is just 688 00:38:05,480 --> 00:38:09,479 Speaker 1: obeying the photographer, and and and I guess it helps 689 00:38:09,480 --> 00:38:11,480 Speaker 1: if the photographer is good at communicating what they want 690 00:38:11,520 --> 00:38:14,560 Speaker 1: you to do with your body. You know, how to 691 00:38:14,680 --> 00:38:18,440 Speaker 1: roll your shoulders or your head, your chin, etcetera. Well, 692 00:38:18,480 --> 00:38:20,560 Speaker 1: that's true, even if it doesn't feel right, listen to 693 00:38:20,560 --> 00:38:23,480 Speaker 1: the photographer. They can see you. You can't see you, right. 694 00:38:23,560 --> 00:38:25,560 Speaker 1: It was probably was even more important then, right because 695 00:38:25,560 --> 00:38:29,680 Speaker 1: nowadays the photographer can see rather instantly what the the 696 00:38:29,680 --> 00:38:31,440 Speaker 1: the image is going to look like. You know, it's 697 00:38:31,440 --> 00:38:33,239 Speaker 1: going to be a framed and squared and they may 698 00:38:33,280 --> 00:38:34,880 Speaker 1: even be sharing that with you, either showing you the 699 00:38:34,920 --> 00:38:37,600 Speaker 1: back of their digital camera or using some sort of 700 00:38:37,640 --> 00:38:43,040 Speaker 1: a like a wireless or wired viewing system. But back 701 00:38:43,080 --> 00:38:45,799 Speaker 1: in uh, the olden days were discussing here like it 702 00:38:45,840 --> 00:38:49,480 Speaker 1: was all uh if they were using a box of camera, 703 00:38:49,600 --> 00:38:52,120 Speaker 1: it was all just in the box. It's only later 704 00:38:52,239 --> 00:38:55,560 Speaker 1: that the images are going to become real. Now. Obviously, 705 00:38:55,680 --> 00:38:58,359 Speaker 1: an exposure time of like ten to fifteen minutes for 706 00:38:58,400 --> 00:39:01,640 Speaker 1: a portrait is just unsustained ball. That's it doesn't really work. 707 00:39:02,040 --> 00:39:05,879 Speaker 1: So people tried all kinds of things to shorten the exposure. 708 00:39:06,239 --> 00:39:09,319 Speaker 1: This is also sometimes called the sitting time, right. Uh. 709 00:39:09,480 --> 00:39:12,880 Speaker 1: So one thing people tried is powdering the subject's face 710 00:39:13,000 --> 00:39:15,760 Speaker 1: to make it reflect more light, because the brighter something 711 00:39:15,880 --> 00:39:18,560 Speaker 1: is obviously the less time it takes to expose the photo. 712 00:39:18,920 --> 00:39:20,920 Speaker 1: Even on modern cameras. You know, you can think of 713 00:39:20,920 --> 00:39:23,480 Speaker 1: the analogy of how shooting in low light means you 714 00:39:23,480 --> 00:39:26,000 Speaker 1: have to leave the shutter open longer. So if you 715 00:39:26,040 --> 00:39:29,920 Speaker 1: basically cover somebody in in pale powder, they reflect more light, 716 00:39:30,000 --> 00:39:32,680 Speaker 1: it takes less time. Another one would be a photo 717 00:39:32,719 --> 00:39:35,759 Speaker 1: studio with white plaster walls to reflect as much light 718 00:39:35,800 --> 00:39:39,400 Speaker 1: as possible. Sometimes they would use like mirrors to shine 719 00:39:39,400 --> 00:39:42,400 Speaker 1: more sunlight onto the subject, which sounds really comfortable. I'm 720 00:39:42,440 --> 00:39:44,280 Speaker 1: sure that makes it even easier to hold the pose 721 00:39:44,320 --> 00:39:46,719 Speaker 1: when you've got like the sun in your eyes. Uh. 722 00:39:46,760 --> 00:39:50,040 Speaker 1: Sometimes they tried like blue glass to make bright light 723 00:39:50,080 --> 00:39:52,400 Speaker 1: from the windows less painful on the eyes of the 724 00:39:52,440 --> 00:39:56,080 Speaker 1: subject who just had to sit there staring into the sun. Uh. 725 00:39:56,120 --> 00:39:59,080 Speaker 1: Supposedly Henry Fox Talbot worked around this. He tried to 726 00:39:59,120 --> 00:40:02,920 Speaker 1: reduce sitting times by using a smaller camera. The light 727 00:40:03,000 --> 00:40:05,359 Speaker 1: had to travel less distance, and thus it would be 728 00:40:05,440 --> 00:40:09,040 Speaker 1: brighter and took less time to expose. There were some 729 00:40:09,120 --> 00:40:13,440 Speaker 1: improvements in lenses in general camera design. Uh. There was 730 00:40:13,480 --> 00:40:15,960 Speaker 1: a guy named Richard Beard who had a studio with 731 00:40:16,000 --> 00:40:19,200 Speaker 1: a chair that rotated to get the best son. But 732 00:40:19,280 --> 00:40:23,399 Speaker 1: the biggest improvements came in advances in chemistry. So around 733 00:40:23,440 --> 00:40:28,239 Speaker 1: the mid eighteen forties, people started using additional sensitizing chemicals. 734 00:40:28,320 --> 00:40:32,560 Speaker 1: Remember Digere only had to use iodine to to sensitize 735 00:40:32,600 --> 00:40:34,959 Speaker 1: the silver plate. But there were a couple of guys 736 00:40:35,040 --> 00:40:37,920 Speaker 1: named Paul Beck Goddard in the in the United States 737 00:40:37,960 --> 00:40:41,240 Speaker 1: and John Frederick Goddard in England. That they're not related, 738 00:40:41,320 --> 00:40:44,920 Speaker 1: just both happened to be Goddard's. Uh. They started using 739 00:40:45,280 --> 00:40:48,400 Speaker 1: bromine fumes to make the plate even more sensitive to 740 00:40:48,480 --> 00:40:50,879 Speaker 1: light so it would capture more detail. And less time. 741 00:40:50,920 --> 00:40:53,680 Speaker 1: And then there was a French photographer named Antoine Claude 742 00:40:54,000 --> 00:40:56,840 Speaker 1: who used chlorine fumes in addition to the iodine to 743 00:40:56,920 --> 00:41:00,360 Speaker 1: make the plates more sensitive. So by further sensitizing the plate, 744 00:41:00,640 --> 00:41:03,800 Speaker 1: they could make it gather more light data in less time. 745 00:41:04,239 --> 00:41:08,440 Speaker 1: And these improvements, paired with better lenses and cameras and 746 00:41:08,520 --> 00:41:12,600 Speaker 1: good light, altogether reduced exposure times from minutes to a 747 00:41:12,640 --> 00:41:15,360 Speaker 1: matter of seconds. Now, of course, one thing that's funny 748 00:41:15,520 --> 00:41:18,200 Speaker 1: is that, uh, we mentioned the idea that a lot 749 00:41:18,239 --> 00:41:21,520 Speaker 1: of traditional artists didn't love the idea of photo portraits 750 00:41:21,560 --> 00:41:23,799 Speaker 1: because they might have seen it as replacing the work 751 00:41:23,880 --> 00:41:27,080 Speaker 1: they were doing. But there's another thing not everybody loved 752 00:41:27,120 --> 00:41:31,000 Speaker 1: about photo portraiture, which is that photos are too accurate. 753 00:41:31,560 --> 00:41:35,600 Speaker 1: They're not always flattering. A painter could do the equivalent 754 00:41:35,640 --> 00:41:38,920 Speaker 1: of photo shopping you to get the ward off your eyelid, 755 00:41:39,040 --> 00:41:41,680 Speaker 1: or to make you look taller. A Daguero type is 756 00:41:41,760 --> 00:41:48,160 Speaker 1: depressingly almost violently accurate. You know. Yeah, that's true. Um, yeah, 757 00:41:48,160 --> 00:41:51,040 Speaker 1: there were there were only so many things you could do, uh, 758 00:41:51,160 --> 00:41:54,160 Speaker 1: in order to cover up bluemishes, et cetera when using 759 00:41:54,200 --> 00:41:56,720 Speaker 1: the Daguerada. Now that's not to say that there weren't 760 00:41:57,239 --> 00:42:01,560 Speaker 1: hand painted say improvements to deguerotypes at the time. They're 761 00:42:01,560 --> 00:42:03,879 Speaker 1: actually wereb though a lot a lot of people thought 762 00:42:03,880 --> 00:42:07,160 Speaker 1: these looked bad. Like. One of the things that started 763 00:42:07,160 --> 00:42:10,359 Speaker 1: happening or pretty early on, was the hand painted coloration 764 00:42:10,400 --> 00:42:12,400 Speaker 1: of Deguara types, which, of course, because it was not 765 00:42:12,680 --> 00:42:15,720 Speaker 1: color photography and people were like, well, where's the color. 766 00:42:15,840 --> 00:42:17,800 Speaker 1: Some people had the idea of, well, we'll just paint 767 00:42:17,840 --> 00:42:20,279 Speaker 1: the colors in, but of course that made it look 768 00:42:20,360 --> 00:42:23,160 Speaker 1: less like a realistic photo and more like a hand 769 00:42:23,160 --> 00:42:26,480 Speaker 1: painted thing, more like a like an illustration from a 770 00:42:26,520 --> 00:42:30,879 Speaker 1: William Blake uh publication. Right yeah. Now, of course, there's 771 00:42:30,920 --> 00:42:33,640 Speaker 1: no way to talk about all the many different little 772 00:42:33,640 --> 00:42:36,960 Speaker 1: incremental improvements and new methods that emerged in the following 773 00:42:37,000 --> 00:42:40,080 Speaker 1: decades in the forties and fifties, but one that's really 774 00:42:40,080 --> 00:42:44,200 Speaker 1: worth mentioning, I think would be Frederick Scott Archer's wet 775 00:42:44,239 --> 00:42:47,879 Speaker 1: plate method of photography. This was really important, which used 776 00:42:47,880 --> 00:42:51,279 Speaker 1: a treatment called a colodeon which it was this thick 777 00:42:51,360 --> 00:42:54,600 Speaker 1: liquid made out of like cotton, dissolved in nitric acid, 778 00:42:54,960 --> 00:42:57,440 Speaker 1: and then you'd mix that with alcohol and ether, and 779 00:42:57,440 --> 00:42:59,879 Speaker 1: then you'd apply that to a glass plate too since 780 00:43:00,120 --> 00:43:02,600 Speaker 1: ties it and this method actually got the best of 781 00:43:02,680 --> 00:43:06,920 Speaker 1: both worlds, between Dager's Daguero type and Henry Fox Talbot's 782 00:43:06,960 --> 00:43:11,879 Speaker 1: Callo type. It made a reproducible negative image like the calotype, 783 00:43:11,920 --> 00:43:14,279 Speaker 1: so you can make copies. But it also it was 784 00:43:14,480 --> 00:43:17,560 Speaker 1: sharp like the daguerotype. Remember the calotype was people thought 785 00:43:17,600 --> 00:43:21,040 Speaker 1: it looked kind of fuzzy and less realistic and striking 786 00:43:21,080 --> 00:43:24,080 Speaker 1: than the daguerotype. So this got the best of both worlds. 787 00:43:24,360 --> 00:43:28,080 Speaker 1: But speaking of quick turnaround on photos, one one type 788 00:43:28,120 --> 00:43:31,440 Speaker 1: of photochemical process that came along to improve the speed 789 00:43:31,480 --> 00:43:34,600 Speaker 1: and convenience of photo production was what came to be 790 00:43:34,640 --> 00:43:37,839 Speaker 1: known as the pharotype or the tin type. Yeah, this 791 00:43:37,880 --> 00:43:40,279 Speaker 1: is this is really interesting. So pharotype is the more 792 00:43:41,000 --> 00:43:44,560 Speaker 1: authentic term here, right, more accurate. Tin type was kind 793 00:43:44,560 --> 00:43:48,719 Speaker 1: of the informal um term, which is like tin as 794 00:43:48,760 --> 00:43:52,000 Speaker 1: you'll say, it has to do with the seeming cheapness 795 00:43:52,080 --> 00:43:54,920 Speaker 1: of the of the material. So yeah, and in eighteen 796 00:43:55,120 --> 00:43:58,799 Speaker 1: fifties of photography innovation that became really popular in the 797 00:43:58,800 --> 00:44:02,560 Speaker 1: eighteen seventies. He was first described in eighteen fifty three 798 00:44:03,040 --> 00:44:06,319 Speaker 1: by out Alf Alexandra Martin, but it was patented in 799 00:44:06,360 --> 00:44:09,000 Speaker 1: eighteen fifty seven by Hamilton's Smith in America and by 800 00:44:09,040 --> 00:44:12,720 Speaker 1: Clone and Jones in England. It used a process similar 801 00:44:12,760 --> 00:44:14,960 Speaker 1: to wet plate photography that we were just talking about. 802 00:44:15,320 --> 00:44:18,040 Speaker 1: It would produce an under exposed negative image on an 803 00:44:18,080 --> 00:44:20,799 Speaker 1: iron plate. And this is a very When I say 804 00:44:20,840 --> 00:44:24,040 Speaker 1: iron plate, I don't want you to imagine like an enormous, 805 00:44:24,160 --> 00:44:28,160 Speaker 1: thick like bullet catching piece of iron. It's very thin. 806 00:44:28,560 --> 00:44:30,799 Speaker 1: And this is where we get the tin type because 807 00:44:30,840 --> 00:44:34,840 Speaker 1: it was like this, this very thin layer um and 808 00:44:34,880 --> 00:44:38,160 Speaker 1: then imagining one of those like aluminum foil baking dishes, yeah, 809 00:44:39,120 --> 00:44:42,160 Speaker 1: something along those lines. So then it was blackened by 810 00:44:42,640 --> 00:44:45,560 Speaker 1: painting or lacquering and then coated with an emulsion, and 811 00:44:45,600 --> 00:44:48,480 Speaker 1: the dark background of the plate gave the image life, 812 00:44:48,600 --> 00:44:52,000 Speaker 1: and tin dipes didn't require special backing. All of this 813 00:44:52,040 --> 00:44:53,880 Speaker 1: could be done in a matter of minutes. Even so 814 00:44:53,920 --> 00:44:56,279 Speaker 1: you're preparing it, you're exposing it, you're developing, and you're 815 00:44:56,360 --> 00:44:59,319 Speaker 1: varnishing it. So this is essentially the first type of 816 00:44:59,400 --> 00:45:02,920 Speaker 1: instant pot right. It's kind of like the polaroid cameras 817 00:45:02,960 --> 00:45:05,080 Speaker 1: you'd see later, where you could you could have the 818 00:45:05,120 --> 00:45:08,400 Speaker 1: image ready in just a few minutes. Yeah, but also 819 00:45:08,440 --> 00:45:11,279 Speaker 1: it was more affordable than the the garatype, So it 820 00:45:11,400 --> 00:45:15,160 Speaker 1: was another one of these cases where the technology is 821 00:45:15,239 --> 00:45:20,320 Speaker 1: being um changed in a way that makes it reach 822 00:45:20,400 --> 00:45:24,560 Speaker 1: more people. And I think one of the interesting things 823 00:45:24,600 --> 00:45:28,880 Speaker 1: in the with the uh, with the innovations and inventions 824 00:45:28,920 --> 00:45:31,759 Speaker 1: that remain in this episode is that at this point 825 00:45:31,840 --> 00:45:36,560 Speaker 1: we're really getting into photography, not merely as a single invention, 826 00:45:36,920 --> 00:45:40,239 Speaker 1: not even really as a as you know, a sort 827 00:45:40,280 --> 00:45:43,120 Speaker 1: of a cloud of various folks working all over the 828 00:45:43,160 --> 00:45:47,320 Speaker 1: world and making slight changes, but we're getting into photography 829 00:45:47,360 --> 00:45:52,000 Speaker 1: as an industry of photography as as a business, and 830 00:45:52,040 --> 00:45:54,120 Speaker 1: it really begins to take on a life all its own. 831 00:45:54,800 --> 00:45:59,200 Speaker 1: One of the key examples here is George Eastman's Kodak, 832 00:45:59,320 --> 00:46:01,560 Speaker 1: which we'll talk about when we come back from one 833 00:46:01,600 --> 00:46:12,640 Speaker 1: more break. All right, we're back. So everybody's heard of Kodak, right, 834 00:46:12,760 --> 00:46:15,480 Speaker 1: and you've probably heard of heard of George Eastman. Uh, 835 00:46:15,840 --> 00:46:19,319 Speaker 1: not the Italian B movie actor, but but the but 836 00:46:19,440 --> 00:46:24,560 Speaker 1: the historic, the truly famous George Eastman. And yeah, his 837 00:46:24,840 --> 00:46:28,719 Speaker 1: advancements with Kodak here really took something that was previously 838 00:46:28,880 --> 00:46:34,360 Speaker 1: this kind of science experiment of contraption, something best left 839 00:46:34,400 --> 00:46:39,200 Speaker 1: to experts and the wealthy and adventures and really made 840 00:46:39,360 --> 00:46:41,960 Speaker 1: huge strides and putting it towards putting it in the 841 00:46:42,000 --> 00:46:44,960 Speaker 1: hands of everyday people. It seems like it was the 842 00:46:45,000 --> 00:46:49,360 Speaker 1: next big step down in democratizing the art for everybody. 843 00:46:49,440 --> 00:46:52,760 Speaker 1: So the Dagara type and the Cala type like those 844 00:46:53,040 --> 00:46:57,560 Speaker 1: made imagery, realistic imagery much more accessible than just painting 845 00:46:57,640 --> 00:47:01,520 Speaker 1: portraiture had been. And then Kodak was even farther. Yes. 846 00:47:02,040 --> 00:47:06,040 Speaker 1: So George Eastman lived eighteen through nineteen ten. He was 847 00:47:06,239 --> 00:47:08,960 Speaker 1: a largely self educated guy who was the son of 848 00:47:09,000 --> 00:47:12,880 Speaker 1: a New York politician and educator, Harvey G. Eastman, founder 849 00:47:12,960 --> 00:47:16,239 Speaker 1: of Eastman's Commercial College in Rochester. And at the age 850 00:47:16,239 --> 00:47:19,400 Speaker 1: of twenty three, George Eastmen obtained a camera for a 851 00:47:19,480 --> 00:47:21,919 Speaker 1: vacation trip. This is going to go on. So if 852 00:47:21,920 --> 00:47:23,880 Speaker 1: he was born in eighteen twenty and he was at 853 00:47:23,920 --> 00:47:25,920 Speaker 1: the age of twenty three, this would have been about 854 00:47:25,960 --> 00:47:28,600 Speaker 1: eighteen forty three, just about three or four years after 855 00:47:28,680 --> 00:47:32,239 Speaker 1: the Daguara type process was publicly revealed, right, So you 856 00:47:32,280 --> 00:47:34,239 Speaker 1: know he was going to do what a lot of 857 00:47:34,320 --> 00:47:36,080 Speaker 1: us do now and take for granted, I'm going to 858 00:47:36,160 --> 00:47:38,520 Speaker 1: bring a camera on a vacation, get some photos, you know, 859 00:47:38,600 --> 00:47:41,760 Speaker 1: contribute to this, this this craze of photography that's sweeping 860 00:47:42,280 --> 00:47:45,400 Speaker 1: the world. But he ended up not ended up not 861 00:47:45,480 --> 00:47:48,879 Speaker 1: making the trip, but the equipment equipment that he had 862 00:47:48,880 --> 00:47:52,120 Speaker 1: picked up. It fascinated him, but he he had some 863 00:47:52,200 --> 00:47:54,600 Speaker 1: issues with the cost, with the weight, and with the 864 00:47:54,640 --> 00:47:57,279 Speaker 1: awkward design of the equipment. All of this irked him. 865 00:47:57,280 --> 00:48:01,239 Speaker 1: So he spent three years experimenting with gelatine emulsions in 866 00:48:01,239 --> 00:48:05,960 Speaker 1: his mother's kitchen and UH in seventy eight he demonstrated 867 00:48:05,960 --> 00:48:10,279 Speaker 1: how effective gelatine dry plates could be as opposed to 868 00:48:10,320 --> 00:48:14,000 Speaker 1: wet plates. This is this is an improvement wet plates, UH, 869 00:48:14,040 --> 00:48:18,640 Speaker 1: which had to be coded, exposed, and developed while still wet. UH. 870 00:48:18,640 --> 00:48:20,960 Speaker 1: You know that put some limitations on how much time 871 00:48:21,000 --> 00:48:24,480 Speaker 1: can pass after the photograph before developing it. Yeah. With 872 00:48:24,560 --> 00:48:26,759 Speaker 1: Archer's method, there are these stories about how you would 873 00:48:26,760 --> 00:48:29,480 Speaker 1: have to have portable dark rooms, right because if you 874 00:48:29,520 --> 00:48:31,600 Speaker 1: wanted to take a picture of something out in nature, 875 00:48:31,640 --> 00:48:33,480 Speaker 1: out in the field, you have to get make the 876 00:48:33,480 --> 00:48:35,600 Speaker 1: emulsion and get it wet and all that and take 877 00:48:35,640 --> 00:48:38,400 Speaker 1: the photo immediately before it dried out, and you have 878 00:48:38,440 --> 00:48:41,480 Speaker 1: to do all this in the dark. But with this 879 00:48:41,719 --> 00:48:44,279 Speaker 1: gelatine method, the dry plates could be exposed and then 880 00:48:44,320 --> 00:48:47,680 Speaker 1: you could develop them later at your leisure. Um, like 881 00:48:48,120 --> 00:48:50,319 Speaker 1: suddenly it's not just off to the races when you 882 00:48:50,360 --> 00:48:53,440 Speaker 1: take a picture. Then in eighteen eighty he invented and 883 00:48:53,520 --> 00:48:56,920 Speaker 1: patented a dry plate coading machine and this allowed for 884 00:48:56,960 --> 00:49:01,560 Speaker 1: the commercial production of these dry plates. And so at 885 00:49:01,560 --> 00:49:04,799 Speaker 1: this point things began to get more business e Right, 886 00:49:05,200 --> 00:49:08,520 Speaker 1: with the backing of Rochester businessman Henry Strong, he forms 887 00:49:08,520 --> 00:49:11,480 Speaker 1: the Eastman Dry Plate Company in eighteen eighty one, and 888 00:49:11,480 --> 00:49:14,560 Speaker 1: then this was reincorporated as the Eastman Dry Plate and 889 00:49:14,640 --> 00:49:17,160 Speaker 1: Film Company in eighteen eighty four and then as Eastman 890 00:49:17,239 --> 00:49:21,520 Speaker 1: Kodak Company in eighteen uh And of course Kodak uh 891 00:49:21,760 --> 00:49:24,360 Speaker 1: is still around today. It's still a publicly traded company. 892 00:49:24,719 --> 00:49:27,360 Speaker 1: Uh so. Um, you know, despite all the changes that 893 00:49:27,400 --> 00:49:30,520 Speaker 1: have occurred in the photographic world. I think it's you know, 894 00:49:30,560 --> 00:49:33,239 Speaker 1: it's a testament to the impact this company had to 895 00:49:33,280 --> 00:49:35,440 Speaker 1: realize that it is. It is still there now as 896 00:49:35,440 --> 00:49:39,719 Speaker 1: a photography business. Kodak wasn't just working on like the 897 00:49:40,160 --> 00:49:43,440 Speaker 1: media for the production, like the plates themselves. They actually 898 00:49:43,480 --> 00:49:46,440 Speaker 1: did work on cameras, right. Yeah. One of the big 899 00:49:46,480 --> 00:49:48,920 Speaker 1: things they did is they developed more affordable and easy 900 00:49:48,960 --> 00:49:53,080 Speaker 1: to use cameras. Uh, certainly by eighteen eighty eight. Uh, 901 00:49:53,120 --> 00:49:56,400 Speaker 1: this was when they started busting out the box camera. 902 00:49:56,920 --> 00:49:59,640 Speaker 1: So the box camera is when I say a box, 903 00:50:00,160 --> 00:50:01,719 Speaker 1: you can look at pictures of these. They did look 904 00:50:01,800 --> 00:50:05,080 Speaker 1: like a box, just like a whole on one end 905 00:50:05,120 --> 00:50:07,200 Speaker 1: for the lens it had, but it had the lens 906 00:50:07,719 --> 00:50:11,400 Speaker 1: film everything you needed to take a basic photograph. This 907 00:50:11,480 --> 00:50:16,480 Speaker 1: wasn't the first box camera in the Kodak rolled out, 908 00:50:16,480 --> 00:50:19,040 Speaker 1: but it was the first commercially viable one. And their 909 00:50:19,360 --> 00:50:23,600 Speaker 1: their motto was you press the button, we do the rest, uh, 910 00:50:23,880 --> 00:50:26,080 Speaker 1: which is also just you know, it's it's a great slogan, 911 00:50:26,120 --> 00:50:28,320 Speaker 1: but but yeah, they've taken this thing that we've described, 912 00:50:28,360 --> 00:50:30,640 Speaker 1: this laborious process, and they've put it in a box 913 00:50:30,680 --> 00:50:33,799 Speaker 1: and you push a button and you're essentially good to go. 914 00:50:34,719 --> 00:50:37,680 Speaker 1: And this is also really the point in which modern 915 00:50:37,760 --> 00:50:42,120 Speaker 1: snapshot photography truly becomes possible. Uh, just a really a 916 00:50:42,120 --> 00:50:45,000 Speaker 1: major moment in the accessibility of photography. You don't have 917 00:50:45,040 --> 00:50:47,920 Speaker 1: to set out to do this science experiment. You can 918 00:50:47,960 --> 00:50:53,480 Speaker 1: just grab your camera and go. So other key moments 919 00:50:53,520 --> 00:50:55,399 Speaker 1: from the history of Kodak. And I'm we're not gonna 920 00:50:55,400 --> 00:50:57,160 Speaker 1: be able to cover it all because again this is 921 00:50:57,719 --> 00:51:00,520 Speaker 1: a company with a long history, but they establish professional 922 00:51:00,560 --> 00:51:04,520 Speaker 1: photo finishing. They developed a flexible celluloid film that would 923 00:51:04,520 --> 00:51:07,839 Speaker 1: be extremely important in the development of motion pictures, which 924 00:51:07,880 --> 00:51:10,880 Speaker 1: we'll get to believe in the next episode. Unless we 925 00:51:10,920 --> 00:51:12,839 Speaker 1: take a photo break, I'm not sure what we're gonna Well, 926 00:51:12,840 --> 00:51:17,200 Speaker 1: certainly in an episode soon in the future. Yes, they 927 00:51:17,239 --> 00:51:22,400 Speaker 1: busted out the pocket code at camera, the folding pocket camera, 928 00:51:23,200 --> 00:51:27,760 Speaker 1: and uh then in nineteen hundred the one dollar Brownie camera, 929 00:51:28,360 --> 00:51:30,319 Speaker 1: which I was not familiar with this one. Looked at 930 00:51:30,360 --> 00:51:32,360 Speaker 1: pictures of it. It's a little box camera and it 931 00:51:32,400 --> 00:51:37,160 Speaker 1: has this kind of cartoon uh tweedle dumb tweedlede kind 932 00:51:37,200 --> 00:51:39,279 Speaker 1: of character on the side. And yeah, it was a 933 00:51:39,400 --> 00:51:42,120 Speaker 1: camera you could buy for a dollar. Granted those were 934 00:51:42,239 --> 00:51:46,120 Speaker 1: nineteen hundred dollars, but still, um, like, this is the 935 00:51:47,360 --> 00:51:51,200 Speaker 1: the the camera becoming ever more inexpensive and ever more 936 00:51:51,239 --> 00:51:53,200 Speaker 1: available to the people at large. Well, I think one 937 00:51:53,239 --> 00:51:55,920 Speaker 1: thing that we should make a distinction about is the 938 00:51:56,160 --> 00:52:01,319 Speaker 1: democratization of access to photography is like like a thing 939 00:52:01,400 --> 00:52:05,680 Speaker 1: you could get like a portrait made, versus the democratization 940 00:52:05,800 --> 00:52:09,239 Speaker 1: of photography as something you could do yourself, choosing what 941 00:52:09,440 --> 00:52:12,640 Speaker 1: to take a photo of. Right, because so there were 942 00:52:12,719 --> 00:52:14,960 Speaker 1: people who were you know, who would take a decara 943 00:52:15,040 --> 00:52:17,840 Speaker 1: type of you in the eighteen forties and the eighteen 944 00:52:17,920 --> 00:52:20,719 Speaker 1: fifties that you could pay, and that made it affordable 945 00:52:20,760 --> 00:52:22,560 Speaker 1: for people to get an image of themselves. But if 946 00:52:22,600 --> 00:52:24,719 Speaker 1: you wanted to go out in the world and take 947 00:52:24,760 --> 00:52:27,520 Speaker 1: a picture of something that struck your fancy, this is 948 00:52:27,600 --> 00:52:31,600 Speaker 1: where that that's really changing. Yeah. Um, other advancements in 949 00:52:31,719 --> 00:52:34,239 Speaker 1: nineteen o two they rolled out the developing machine that 950 00:52:34,480 --> 00:52:37,239 Speaker 1: you could develop your own film without a dark room. Uh. 951 00:52:37,360 --> 00:52:40,600 Speaker 1: Aerial photography advancements took place in nineteen seventeen. So here 952 00:52:40,640 --> 00:52:44,200 Speaker 1: we see, you know, the uh, the advancement of photography 953 00:52:44,560 --> 00:52:48,719 Speaker 1: lining up with advancements in other fields. Five you get 954 00:52:48,760 --> 00:52:52,600 Speaker 1: Code Chrome, the first commercially successful amateur color film, and 955 00:52:52,840 --> 00:52:55,800 Speaker 1: at nineteen thirty seven you get the code of slide 956 00:52:55,840 --> 00:52:59,840 Speaker 1: projector uh. So uh kind of going back to the 957 00:53:00,239 --> 00:53:03,280 Speaker 1: uh some of the ideas of the the camera obscura 958 00:53:03,480 --> 00:53:06,600 Speaker 1: right like, now we're taking our images and we're projecting 959 00:53:06,680 --> 00:53:08,920 Speaker 1: them onto the wall again, only we're doing it right 960 00:53:09,000 --> 00:53:12,680 Speaker 1: side up this time and with more clarity and Again, 961 00:53:12,760 --> 00:53:15,520 Speaker 1: this is just a sample because of course Kodak is 962 00:53:15,800 --> 00:53:20,000 Speaker 1: was one of the world's leading photo technology companies. But 963 00:53:20,200 --> 00:53:23,080 Speaker 1: I think it does highlight just the kind of um, 964 00:53:23,400 --> 00:53:26,320 Speaker 1: really rapid advancements you see, and so in business savvy 965 00:53:26,360 --> 00:53:30,440 Speaker 1: advancements that end up taking place once uh, the invention 966 00:53:30,600 --> 00:53:33,480 Speaker 1: becomes the property of industry, and of course it would 967 00:53:33,480 --> 00:53:36,640 Speaker 1: play into other industries as well. Um Kodak would end 968 00:53:36,760 --> 00:53:40,000 Speaker 1: up being involved in not only the development of motion pictures, 969 00:53:40,000 --> 00:53:42,400 Speaker 1: which we alluded to already, but also the X ray industry, 970 00:53:42,800 --> 00:53:46,480 Speaker 1: which we've already podcasted on. Well, yeah, I mean that's 971 00:53:46,520 --> 00:53:50,400 Speaker 1: something to think about as we consider the legacy of photography, 972 00:53:50,520 --> 00:53:54,360 Speaker 1: especially in the early years. One really positive and practical 973 00:53:54,560 --> 00:53:56,680 Speaker 1: use we should think of coming out of photography, I 974 00:53:56,760 --> 00:54:00,840 Speaker 1: think is going back to X rays and runkin. Like 975 00:54:01,440 --> 00:54:04,120 Speaker 1: the use of various forms of photography and medicine has 976 00:54:04,160 --> 00:54:08,680 Speaker 1: been absolutely incalculable and the good it's provided and people. 977 00:54:08,800 --> 00:54:11,759 Speaker 1: You know, when we express gratitude for modern medicine, we 978 00:54:11,920 --> 00:54:16,080 Speaker 1: often correctly think to mention things like vaccines and antibiotics 979 00:54:16,280 --> 00:54:20,680 Speaker 1: and anesthetics and modern surgical techniques. It's I think it 980 00:54:20,880 --> 00:54:24,360 Speaker 1: less often occurs to us to think of medical imaging 981 00:54:24,560 --> 00:54:27,600 Speaker 1: is something to be thankful for. But the radical advancement 982 00:54:27,640 --> 00:54:30,200 Speaker 1: of medical imaging is one of the most important things 983 00:54:30,280 --> 00:54:32,560 Speaker 1: that happened in medicine over the past two hundred years. 984 00:54:32,640 --> 00:54:36,359 Speaker 1: It it improves accuracy and diagnosis of internal problems, which 985 00:54:36,520 --> 00:54:39,680 Speaker 1: drastically improves outcomes, and it can, in a way, all 986 00:54:39,760 --> 00:54:42,080 Speaker 1: be traced back to photography. Now again, there's just so 987 00:54:42,200 --> 00:54:46,319 Speaker 1: many photo photographic innovations and inventions were just not gonna 988 00:54:46,320 --> 00:54:50,040 Speaker 1: have time to cover, Like the polaroid was a major point. 989 00:54:50,160 --> 00:54:53,120 Speaker 1: I remember just being fascinated by the polaroid camera when 990 00:54:53,160 --> 00:54:56,600 Speaker 1: I was a child. You could point the camera, uh 991 00:54:56,760 --> 00:54:58,880 Speaker 1: take the picture. How did it comes? You just kind 992 00:54:58,920 --> 00:55:01,360 Speaker 1: of shake it or let it do thing and the 993 00:55:01,480 --> 00:55:04,120 Speaker 1: image materializes there. You didn't have to take film anywhere 994 00:55:04,120 --> 00:55:06,040 Speaker 1: to be developed. Who are you know? They didn't have 995 00:55:06,160 --> 00:55:08,759 Speaker 1: to uh stick anything in a little tube. It was 996 00:55:08,840 --> 00:55:12,640 Speaker 1: just there. It was ready to go immortalized. In fact, 997 00:55:12,680 --> 00:55:15,120 Speaker 1: as we all discovered when we got older, you didn't 998 00:55:15,120 --> 00:55:18,239 Speaker 1: even actually have to shake it. Um. One of the 999 00:55:18,280 --> 00:55:20,080 Speaker 1: funny things that I was reading about was how in 1000 00:55:20,120 --> 00:55:23,080 Speaker 1: the early days did guara type as a word. It 1001 00:55:23,200 --> 00:55:26,120 Speaker 1: got the same sort of treatment as words like band 1002 00:55:26,160 --> 00:55:31,319 Speaker 1: aid and Xerox, where a specific brand name uh came 1003 00:55:31,400 --> 00:55:34,719 Speaker 1: to be used as a stand in for all technologies 1004 00:55:34,760 --> 00:55:37,399 Speaker 1: of its type. Like there's a story that Henry Fox 1005 00:55:37,600 --> 00:55:40,520 Speaker 1: Talbot was distressed to find out that his callow type 1006 00:55:40,600 --> 00:55:44,600 Speaker 1: method was sometimes being referred to as the paper diguero type. 1007 00:55:46,520 --> 00:55:48,719 Speaker 1: What a kick in the face. So let's talk just 1008 00:55:48,760 --> 00:55:52,279 Speaker 1: a little bit more about about the legacy of the photograph. Um. 1009 00:55:52,400 --> 00:55:53,920 Speaker 1: You know, we've touched on a lot of this already 1010 00:55:53,960 --> 00:55:55,800 Speaker 1: in the previous two episodes, but you know, there's a 1011 00:55:55,800 --> 00:55:57,840 Speaker 1: tremendous amount to be said about the idea of the 1012 00:55:57,880 --> 00:56:00,960 Speaker 1: photograph as an objective statement of truth an in many 1013 00:56:01,000 --> 00:56:03,319 Speaker 1: ways it is you know, it would prove a highly 1014 00:56:03,400 --> 00:56:06,880 Speaker 1: essential tool in journalism and the documentation of wars and strife, 1015 00:56:07,400 --> 00:56:10,120 Speaker 1: as well as in you know, positive movement movements and 1016 00:56:10,440 --> 00:56:15,800 Speaker 1: humanizing moments in in recent human history. We can easily 1017 00:56:15,880 --> 00:56:18,719 Speaker 1: think to the really jarring photographs of misery and death 1018 00:56:18,760 --> 00:56:22,279 Speaker 1: in wartime of racial strife, of protests, but also the 1019 00:56:22,600 --> 00:56:26,759 Speaker 1: humanizing movement moments where uh, you know, an individual that 1020 00:56:26,840 --> 00:56:30,040 Speaker 1: might otherwise be um, you know, considered you know another 1021 00:56:30,239 --> 00:56:33,960 Speaker 1: and and and dehumanized or made more human through the imagery. 1022 00:56:34,200 --> 00:56:39,680 Speaker 1: I wonder if the widespread use of realistic imagery, photography, 1023 00:56:39,800 --> 00:56:43,279 Speaker 1: and then later on motion pictures and video is to 1024 00:56:43,440 --> 00:56:48,160 Speaker 1: some degree responsible for the increasing appreciation of human rights 1025 00:56:48,239 --> 00:56:51,719 Speaker 1: in the twentieth century, Like the idea that, oh, you know, 1026 00:56:51,840 --> 00:56:54,239 Speaker 1: maybe people in a place other than where I am 1027 00:56:54,400 --> 00:56:56,960 Speaker 1: do matter and have the same you know, rights and 1028 00:56:57,080 --> 00:57:00,239 Speaker 1: concerns that I do. Yeah, it's yeah. But on the 1029 00:57:00,320 --> 00:57:04,040 Speaker 1: other hand, though, and there are examples of the photograph 1030 00:57:04,120 --> 00:57:07,480 Speaker 1: being used I think as a tool of um, you know, 1031 00:57:07,560 --> 00:57:10,080 Speaker 1: who want to focus on the otherness of different races 1032 00:57:10,120 --> 00:57:12,840 Speaker 1: and cultures, as well as by those who wish to, uh, 1033 00:57:12,880 --> 00:57:15,080 Speaker 1: you know, to highlight our similarities. Um you know. We 1034 00:57:15,120 --> 00:57:18,320 Speaker 1: should remember that it was not only the photography was 1035 00:57:18,360 --> 00:57:21,040 Speaker 1: not only used to document things in a positive manner, 1036 00:57:21,120 --> 00:57:23,160 Speaker 1: was also used in an attempt to control people of 1037 00:57:23,240 --> 00:57:26,120 Speaker 1: Photography has been used as a tool of state control, 1038 00:57:26,320 --> 00:57:30,360 Speaker 1: of social control, as a means of tracking individuals. Um 1039 00:57:31,240 --> 00:57:33,440 Speaker 1: you know it is. It's been a tool of propaganda 1040 00:57:33,480 --> 00:57:36,480 Speaker 1: as well. It's been a tool of blackmail and exploitation. 1041 00:57:37,280 --> 00:57:40,840 Speaker 1: Uh you know. They These are not cases where the 1042 00:57:40,960 --> 00:57:45,000 Speaker 1: invention necessarily changes human nature, but it's always worth remembering 1043 00:57:45,040 --> 00:57:48,640 Speaker 1: that human nature is going to shine through a technology, right, Uh, 1044 00:57:48,760 --> 00:57:51,480 Speaker 1: and that means in both positive and negative ways, Like 1045 00:57:51,880 --> 00:57:56,080 Speaker 1: the things that make humans admirable, We're going to see 1046 00:57:56,120 --> 00:57:58,560 Speaker 1: that in a ubiquitous technology, but we're also going to 1047 00:57:58,640 --> 00:58:03,480 Speaker 1: see our awfulness. I guess the I guess one of 1048 00:58:03,520 --> 00:58:06,080 Speaker 1: the things that you see that I guess you see 1049 00:58:06,120 --> 00:58:10,040 Speaker 1: both of those and say, um, uh wartime photography and 1050 00:58:10,160 --> 00:58:14,280 Speaker 1: journalistic photography where you're capturing the ugliness, but you're trying 1051 00:58:14,320 --> 00:58:16,360 Speaker 1: to bring the truth of the ugliness out in a 1052 00:58:16,440 --> 00:58:20,120 Speaker 1: way that that that can benefit us, that can enable 1053 00:58:20,240 --> 00:58:23,840 Speaker 1: us to move past it, you know, And um, you know, 1054 00:58:23,920 --> 00:58:25,960 Speaker 1: I guess ultimately that's what we have to to try 1055 00:58:26,000 --> 00:58:29,360 Speaker 1: and grab onto in and and looking at our history 1056 00:58:29,400 --> 00:58:31,320 Speaker 1: of technology, but again always just coming back to the 1057 00:58:31,360 --> 00:58:36,040 Speaker 1: realization that technology is uh. Any given technology is not 1058 00:58:36,160 --> 00:58:39,000 Speaker 1: good or evil. Uh, it is uh. It is all 1059 00:58:39,040 --> 00:58:41,560 Speaker 1: about the way that it is utilized. Well, yeah, that's true, 1060 00:58:41,560 --> 00:58:43,960 Speaker 1: because technology does not act on its own, though at 1061 00:58:44,000 --> 00:58:47,960 Speaker 1: the same time, I'm certainly of the opinion that not 1062 00:58:48,120 --> 00:58:53,000 Speaker 1: all technology is say neutral or or equally neutral. I mean, um, 1063 00:58:53,480 --> 00:58:56,880 Speaker 1: technology doesn't do anything until it's used by people. But 1064 00:58:56,960 --> 00:59:02,080 Speaker 1: there are technologies that have technologies of inherent tendencies, They 1065 00:59:02,160 --> 00:59:05,320 Speaker 1: have ways that are in which they can easily be 1066 00:59:05,680 --> 00:59:08,680 Speaker 1: used and deployed. And so I don't think that like 1067 00:59:08,920 --> 00:59:11,840 Speaker 1: all technologies are on an equal footing in terms of 1068 00:59:11,960 --> 00:59:15,040 Speaker 1: like how harmful they are likely to be. In some cases, 1069 00:59:15,120 --> 00:59:18,440 Speaker 1: this is really clear. I mean obviously, like a uh, 1070 00:59:19,720 --> 00:59:22,680 Speaker 1: like a poison gas or a gun is not the 1071 00:59:22,720 --> 00:59:25,440 Speaker 1: same as like a method of sterilizing wounds. You know, 1072 00:59:25,560 --> 00:59:29,320 Speaker 1: these like have inherent tendencies that make them more easy 1073 00:59:29,360 --> 00:59:31,960 Speaker 1: to be used for good or evil. Photography is one 1074 00:59:31,960 --> 00:59:35,160 Speaker 1: of those big ones where you know, it's it's it's 1075 00:59:35,320 --> 00:59:37,920 Speaker 1: it's scope is so broad that it's hard to it's 1076 00:59:37,960 --> 00:59:40,720 Speaker 1: hard to put it in one of those categories. Uh, 1077 00:59:40,920 --> 00:59:44,080 Speaker 1: it's it's used for everything because it is the objective 1078 00:59:44,200 --> 00:59:48,080 Speaker 1: record of life. It is the objective record of the world. 1079 00:59:48,920 --> 00:59:51,720 Speaker 1: And thus in any case where it can be useful 1080 00:59:51,760 --> 00:59:54,800 Speaker 1: to represent the world, which is in almost every domain 1081 00:59:54,880 --> 00:59:58,480 Speaker 1: of human life, it can be used can be. Yeah, 1082 00:59:58,840 --> 01:00:02,560 Speaker 1: the the key here though, But but now, for the 1083 01:00:02,640 --> 01:00:05,800 Speaker 1: most part, I definitely agree that the photography has had 1084 01:00:05,880 --> 01:00:08,240 Speaker 1: tremendous positive impact. But I just think we have to 1085 01:00:08,320 --> 01:00:11,240 Speaker 1: keep in mind, uh, the areas where it has been 1086 01:00:11,400 --> 01:00:14,640 Speaker 1: used for ill as well. All right, so there you 1087 01:00:14,720 --> 01:00:18,360 Speaker 1: have it. Uh photography. Uh, I think I think that'll 1088 01:00:18,400 --> 01:00:21,520 Speaker 1: do it. Uh. Three episodes. Uh, there's a lot to cover. 1089 01:00:21,640 --> 01:00:25,200 Speaker 1: We didn't cover nearly all of it. But hopefully everyone 1090 01:00:25,280 --> 01:00:27,760 Speaker 1: will leave these episodes with a new you know, a 1091 01:00:27,800 --> 01:00:31,720 Speaker 1: new respect and even awe of what photographs do for 1092 01:00:31,960 --> 01:00:34,880 Speaker 1: us and and what kind of amazing power we have, 1093 01:00:35,160 --> 01:00:37,200 Speaker 1: you know, in our pockets right now, most of us 1094 01:00:37,760 --> 01:00:41,360 Speaker 1: in the modern digital camera. Now as we uh we 1095 01:00:41,480 --> 01:00:45,320 Speaker 1: mentioned we're not done with with with photos. We're certainly 1096 01:00:45,360 --> 01:00:47,560 Speaker 1: not done with the image. We're hopefully I'm going to 1097 01:00:47,640 --> 01:00:50,400 Speaker 1: move on to motion pictures at some point in the 1098 01:00:50,480 --> 01:00:53,640 Speaker 1: future here. But uh, yeah, this was a fun one. 1099 01:00:53,640 --> 01:00:55,640 Speaker 1: I really feel like I I learned some things I 1100 01:00:55,800 --> 01:00:58,600 Speaker 1: wasn't aware of regarding the history of photography, and I 1101 01:00:58,720 --> 01:01:01,720 Speaker 1: have a new respect for the media myself. Yeah, totally. 1102 01:01:01,800 --> 01:01:04,600 Speaker 1: This has proved very rich subject matter. In the meantime, 1103 01:01:04,640 --> 01:01:06,560 Speaker 1: if you want to check out more episodes of Invention, 1104 01:01:06,640 --> 01:01:09,440 Speaker 1: head on over to Invention pod dot com and that's 1105 01:01:09,480 --> 01:01:12,360 Speaker 1: where we'll find the episodes. And uh, if you want 1106 01:01:12,400 --> 01:01:14,160 Speaker 1: to support the show, the best thing you can do 1107 01:01:14,280 --> 01:01:16,480 Speaker 1: is just make sure you have subscribed, and then if 1108 01:01:16,520 --> 01:01:19,600 Speaker 1: you can leave us a nice rating a nice review 1109 01:01:19,680 --> 01:01:22,640 Speaker 1: wherever you get the show, that would also be tremendously helpful. 1110 01:01:22,800 --> 01:01:26,600 Speaker 1: Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer, Tari Harrison. 1111 01:01:27,080 --> 01:01:28,800 Speaker 1: If you would like to get in touch with us 1112 01:01:28,840 --> 01:01:31,000 Speaker 1: to let us know feedback on this episode or any other, 1113 01:01:31,080 --> 01:01:33,400 Speaker 1: to suggest a topic for the future, or just to 1114 01:01:33,440 --> 01:01:37,080 Speaker 1: say hello, you can email us at contact at invention 1115 01:01:37,200 --> 01:01:44,960 Speaker 1: pod dot com. Invention is production of I Heart Radio. 1116 01:01:45,360 --> 01:01:47,600 Speaker 1: For more podcasts from my heart Radio because the iHeart 1117 01:01:47,680 --> 01:01:50,080 Speaker 1: Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your 1118 01:01:50,120 --> 01:01:50,760 Speaker 1: favorite shows,