WEBVTT - Waiting for the Panic

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to What Goes Up, a Bloomberg weekly

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>market podcast. I'm Sarah pontecor reporter on the Cross Asset team,

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Mike Reagan, a senior editor on the Markets team.

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>This week on the show, you could say the market's

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>gone wild. Swings of three to four in the spire

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>have become the norm. The Fed issued its first emergency

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>rate cut since two thousand and eight, and ten year

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>treasury yields are below one. What does it all mean?

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>And when will it end? I don't know, Sarah? Why

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>are you asking me? How would I possibly know that?

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought you have the answer to everything. Anyway, of course,

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 1>when the episode with the craziest thing we saw in

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>markets this week? Sorry, you know I abstained from that

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>competition last time. You abstained last time because you're gonna

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>have an extra extra great one that well, you know

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>since I abstained, you know what that means? Still undefeated.

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's true. We'll give it to you. I'll

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 1>give it to you this time because I'm feeling nice.

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, we've got some great guests that will hopefully

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>tell us when will it end? No pressure here, but

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>joining us for the first time on the show. Very

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>happy to have him. He is the chief macro strategist

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>at e I a all weather Alpha Partners not fullsnala.

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>How welcome to the show. Thanks for having me. Appreciate

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it absolutely and also back on the show, our old friend.

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>He's a cross set reporter. He's a Reddit aficionado. Lukawa,

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the show. I'm not just I am not.

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>You're more so than the rest of us. Now that

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:41.639
<v Speaker 1>you're here, I have to I have to tell you something. Okay,

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know I consider you a friend. Sara

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is your friend. Even novels your friend. We gather do

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>here to talk about that that white belt you've been wearing.

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>The white belt, this is an intervention. This is an intervention.

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>It's always in between Memorial Day and Labor Day somewhere.

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Is he wearing it now, Luke? Oh yeah. For listeners

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>who don't know Luke, I will describe he You actually asked,

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>how would you describe Luke's fashion sense? I describe it

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>as risk on. He's sorry, he's like a lever. He's

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>like a Leverty, triple LEVERTYTF of fact. You know how

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Luke described it? Loud, loud, loud, loud and cheap. Was

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>actually the full description is it's reddy. It's a very

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 1>it's hip on Reddit. Look, you know there's appropriate time

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to wear a white belt, you know, like you just

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>started karate lessons, maybe where it's like a special occasion

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>at the retirement home bingo night or something. Sara's from Florida,

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:40.959
<v Speaker 1>she knows. I'm just jealous. Anyway, I'm Luke is very

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>progressive dresser. Michael Michael come in on Monday with a

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>white belt. I'd be happy to give Mike my belt.

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>He just wouldn't fit it. Cheeze Luke. All Right, you win,

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you win anyway, not for Let's start with you, because

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>apart from Luke's white belt this, uh, it's just been

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a crazy week. I was going through one of your notes, uh,

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>from from your hedge fund that you sent around the clients,

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and I was astounded because you've tallied up the number

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of tests being done in each country for the coronavirus,

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and then you obviously divided it by population. Let me

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>read the listeners. Some numbers here, Uh, South Korea approximately

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>test per million people, and you give sort of a

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 1>league table here, Austria two thirty five per million goes

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>on and on, Finland twenty three per million, Vietnam eighteen,

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>all the way at the bottom. United States one test

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>per per million people. And later in the you say

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously that the market is is very much gonna be

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a referendum on how well uh the government here is

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>managing this crisis. I'm not getting much confidence from that

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>one per million, as has the tide turned it? Although

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>do you think they're they're starting to get out ahead

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of this? Obviously, Congress past this eight billion and change

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>UH bill to to put some money into the health

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>care system and fight this. How how concerned is the

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>market that this is just not gonna end up well

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>for the the US? Right? So? I think, um, you know,

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>before before this kind of shock to the markets, the

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 1>markets were kind of trying to debate whether or not

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>this was going to be primarily kind of like a

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>China story, a China, China only story. I think as

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>we started to see the case counts in South Korea

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>pick up, it became clear that, no, this is not

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be kind of isolated to China. And now

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that we've fallen as far as we have, I do

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>think the market now is expecting you know, a rise

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in case counts as we get testing to plif rate. However,

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>we still are quite behind the curve. So like right now,

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>for example, the latest is that you know, we get

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>about a million and a half testing capacity going forward

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:51.919
<v Speaker 1>over the next couple of weeks. However, because of the

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>lab constraints, we can only do about ten k per day,

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 1>which would take a while to scale up. So we

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>would expect that, like there is an inflection in case

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>counsel's coming, but it's probably not going to be too

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>quickly unless a private sector really steps up. And we're

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>quite quite down the line on the league tables, as

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, so we're pretty concerned that um ultimately the

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>markets will decide that the White House is a bit

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>behind the curve on this threat. I remember a couple

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.239
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago there was a lot of optimism building

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>up because there are reports coming out saying that the

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus was speaking. Of course, a lot of this pertained

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to China, but now we're seeing this international spread and

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of numbers data flying out there regarding

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus. I mean, what actually are the factors that

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you guys look out to try to get a sense

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of how this is actually progressing, and to inform any

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>investment decisions, if at all, because it seems like it's

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>so difficult when there's so many UH numbers and so

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>much data out there that kind of flies against the

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>phase of another one. Right, These are the type of

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>environments that me, as a macer junkie, I love, although

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the social implications. But the idea is that, yes,

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>there was a case sequence show case counting clients in

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>China after a historic quarantine, right, Um, even if we

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>wanted to that wouldn't happen here. Um, And it did spread,

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and there were community spread events across the world. And

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>so what we're looking at is we want to see

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>folks start to migrate from the idea of we can

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>contain this virus, which I think is a fantasy, and

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>people are coming around to toward how do we deal

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>with congestion and how do we deal with capacity constraints.

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 1>If you do certain social isolation procedures that prevents super

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>high congestions and hospitals and you know, just regular public

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>health and in fact public spaces in general, well that

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>does as slow as the virus with the capacity and

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the health, health care infrastructure, and biotechnology developments can catch

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>up to the threat. So what we're focused on mostly

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>is how quickly does the United States, in response to

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>rising case counts, implements social isolation procedures that slows the

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>viruses transmission and allows the health care apparatus to catch

0:06:57.720 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>up to the threat. If you answer your phone, it's

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.919
<v Speaker 1>one of your fund investors, uh, and they say, you know,

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>what are you guys doing? What's going on? You know,

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is it novels? Not here right now? Please leave a message?

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>You know what what are you telling people? You know,

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>what would you tell a client if they called and said,

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>what do you how do you guys dealing with this? Well,

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>if it's daring market hours then um, probably somebody else

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>um our business will be handla um. If but you know,

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you get me on the phone outside of market hours,

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:29.239
<v Speaker 1>first thing I say, please wash your hands. It really

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it really does make a huge difference. You know, we

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>can we can debate whether basks are helpfulness and that,

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>but like you know, I'm sure you guys have seen

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>what happens to the bacteria and viruses when not just

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>virus but bacteria as well. Um, when when you wash

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>your hands for twenty seconds. It's a. It's a. It's amazing.

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>So what is the portfolio allocations when of washing your hands? Right? Right? Right? Yeah,

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>no kidding, I like I like that. So, you know,

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>we we were quite bearish around Valentine's Day, as we

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>wrote in our past note, UM, so we were pretty

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>well positioned going in to this shock. Um. Now what

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of expecting is um, you know, it takes

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>some time for the market to digest the shock. We

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>probably have a relatively wide and volatile range for the

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>time being. And as we start to see the potential

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>for social isolation procedures be implemented, then it becomes, like

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you said, a referendum about how behind or on the

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>curve is the White House and to what extent um?

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, how long are we gonna have social isolation

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>procedures to the extent we get them. If we get them,

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the biggest risk to like earning his growth and

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>potential for job losses. And then the question becomes eight

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>point three billion dollars is not going to move the needle.

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna need you know, we need to add another

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>zero to that. If you look at like nine eleven,

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Hurricane Katrin, a Hurricane Sandy, billion dollars packages. So you

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>know that we're we're nowhere near that level right now.

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>If we see the White House and Congress suddenly catch up,

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>perhaps you know, the lowest in based on the fact

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that President Trump called it the Corona flu Wednesday night,

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>we do expect there's some risk for potential more downside,

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>potentially new lows. Once we get to the point where, um,

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're starting to see kind of a little

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>bit of panic about the effect of potential social isolation procedures.

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Then we start bargain hunting. And then I kind of

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>passed the baton to my partner who runs our launch

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>short portfolio. Gotcha, gotcha, Look, let's bring you in here.

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you wear that white belt, but I consider

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you a black belt in looking at volatility markets. Right

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>half hots segue, what what's what? What's the volt market

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:46.719
<v Speaker 1>look like to you? I mean, unless I looked, the

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>VIX is kind of in that thirty range, absolutely screaming.

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.559
<v Speaker 1>The volatility term structure is, you know, has signaling a

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>persistent degree of alarm that you know, I haven't seen

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>in my few years in this business. If I if

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I was back in I probably would have seen something

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>like this in terms of the persistence in the magnitude

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of how much the ball markets are saying, be very

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>very worried about now, but also be worried about later.

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of what the read and you get when

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the front ball month is so uh, the front futures

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.719
<v Speaker 1>contract is so high. Uh, there's about the second is

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>also still so high. And one thing that's been happening

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>is people have been getting absolutely roasted trying to short volatility.

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>People think, you know, when VALL goes up, that means,

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:32.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a it's a good short. And you know,

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it is true that when VALL goes up you have

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>more kind of profit potential, more room to move just

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>on VALL coming in. But the the structure of the

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>market recently has been such that spot vix is actually

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>much much much higher than the front month, and uh,

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>that convergence is taking place more and more with the

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>front month. So your actual investible way to short fall

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, in an easy way short of getting

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 1>the strip uh is actually converging to the upside. So

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>people are getting uh, pretty much absolutely killed on this.

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.079
<v Speaker 1>And it's a reminder that you know, I got to

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>look at the curve structure, gotta look at the term structure. Oh,

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>when you're getting involved in this, whatsoever is that notion

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that you know, the market was so blatantly short vaultil

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you're heading into this, Is that sort of rebounding into

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the equity market, You think that maybe making these sell

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>offs a little bit worse. I think somewhat. I do

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:23.719
<v Speaker 1>think there's something to the argument that the you know,

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the degree of euphoria we saw in January and early

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>February has you know, the necessary every reaction has an

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>opposite and equal reaction just means that it's a little

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>worse on the other side. I you know, I think

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>all the people that were h kind of flooding into

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>single stock calls, we've seen that reverse. The equity put

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>call actually taught actually bottomed the day of the market

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>topped at like point five five, so many more calls

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>training them puts. But it hasn't really risen to kind

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.959
<v Speaker 1>of you know, alarming level, since we're still short of

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>like Q four team put call ratios. So you know,

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that could be a sense that people are just cutting

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 1>risk rather than hedging risk. But the vall metrics in

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of what people are looking for, it's crazy, Like

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 1>when you think about what does the thirty vix mean,

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>it means essentially, we're expecting a near two percent move

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>every day for a month and the SMP five hundred.

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>But that's what we're realizing. We're realizing insanely high than

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>So I want to get your take because what that said.

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:28.479
<v Speaker 1>So Monday we had four percent bounds, then on Tuesday

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>we had this massive sell off. Then the next day

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.839
<v Speaker 1>and this was after Super Tuesday, we get another four

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>percent balance, and we have people out there saying, oh,

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it's the Biden balance because Vice President Biden did better

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in Super Tuesday. Yet on Thursday we get another massive

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 1>sell off. How much can you actually look to politics

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>at this point in time and look at the potential

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Democratic nominees to say who's going to run and actually

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>make a direct correlation to market moves in a market

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in which it seems like we are just moving NonStop

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>one way or the other inmentum bets every every single day.

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:05.079
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we ever had any leftism priced into

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the market. Um. You know, it made sense um to

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>me at least that on Tuesday when the Fed cut

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty BIPs, that a lot of folks, including me, would

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>come in and say, all right, this, you know, the

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>upside catalyst has been materialized and realized. You know, we

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:22.719
<v Speaker 1>can go ahead and dump the long risk and we

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>can shorten this bounce, which is what happened. Then you know,

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 1>you get that rally on Wednesday on Biden, and I

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 1>think there is you know, the market practitioners tend to

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit right leaning, so there is a

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 1>bit of a you know, personal kind of like you know,

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>just feeling like a little bit more relieved. And the

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>markets were quite volatile, so you know, these type of

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>moves are gonna happen anyway. So that also, you know,

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of made sense to me. But that's why we

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>were looking to fade that bounce. Um, you know, and

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's starting to work. But but speaking to your

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>point in Luke, you know this, you know, the folks

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>have this recency bias of you know, by the dip

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:01.839
<v Speaker 1>or like short the spikes and volatility. This is a

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>very different shock than our typical shocks. This is not

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a shock that fiscal policy and monetary policy can um

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>by themselves handle. This is a crisis of confidence. Um,

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that cannot be you know, stemmed by central bank liquidity.

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And uh, it's kind of analogous to the nine eleven

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and so it really depends on the White House's response.

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And um, you know we're we're below Vietnam and our

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>testing testing ratios. So and to me, the big, the

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>big issue is what happens in the credit markets. Uh.

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>You know we saw this sort of little known British

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>air airline, uh fly By. I say, I hadn't heard

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of fly Have you heard of Never? I'm you know,

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm a greatound guy, so greatly alright, I would say, Um,

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>but you know you see the credit false swaps on

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the cruise ship operators, Carnival and and Real Caribbean. At

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>what point do you think the credit market really starts

0:14:58.600 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to freak out? I mean it kind of is a

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit of issuance was down, high yield issuance was

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of froze up for a few days there. It

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>does this have the potential to to become a credit crisis?

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you think? I mean, they're the potential is there.

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it will happen because I do think

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the pressure from the equity markets will eventually necessit will

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>eventually pressure a sufficient response, even if it's belated. Um,

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a credit guy, so I'm not going to

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>pretend like I am. But from what I understand, it's

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>been very difficult to trade right now. It's very a

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>liquid There has been a bit of a diversion between

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>equity and credit. So I wouldn't be surprised if, for example,

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>like one of the things we're looking for for like

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a real bottom, um is a durable bottom. Is that? Okay?

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>We we have some public health policies in place that

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>are kind of freaking out folks about earning trajectories and

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>like kind of commercial activity credit is starting to kind

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of you know, spreads are starting to wide and blah

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>blah blah, and you know the hidie holes, the places

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>where people are kind of hiding in, like you know,

0:15:56.480 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>tech tech software or like utility staples, those are getting

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>hit too, reflecting, you know, just risk constraints, position liquidation.

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>That's where we're looking for a real bottom, and we don't.

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>We don't really quite see that yet. So the fun

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>credit divergence that's really crept up recently that I can

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>comment on is, you know, I was just Thursday morning,

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I was running through the numbers and looking at you know,

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>your weekly change in the SMP five d versus the

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>weekly net move and investment grade credit of fault swaps.

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, normally you think stock market up, that

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>means you know, risk on our companies are getting more

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>credit worthy, perceived risk of default going down. Uh. The

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>combination of having stocks up at least you know, point

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>eight on the week and at this point we were

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>up you know, three point five on the SMP five

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred and I g C d X at least five

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>basis points wider. Uh, that combination is incredibly rare. It's

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the last time it happened was the week ending eighteen,

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>which was literally the day after the peak in the

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>right before the route. So that's that's something I've been

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of giving my eye on his credit is um

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 1>credit is saying that, you know, the bounce that we've

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>gotten in stocks is should be treated as kind of

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the way knofs outlined how he's treating it

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>not your most encouraging analogy, but not also pointed out

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>some places that investors have been hiding watching tech and

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>the sort look you've been pointing out low volatility stocks

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>because that was also an area that a lot of

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>people went to hide last year. Uh, and you found

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.719
<v Speaker 1>that low volatility stocks have not really been living up

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to their name. Uh. What does that really tell you?

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>And can you walk us through what you've actually been seeing? Yes,

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>So this has been weird, and I think it's like Uh,

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a combination of a high baseline volatility

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:46.239
<v Speaker 1>environment with you know, the most defining feature we've had

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in the market is the relentless treasury bid that you know,

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>has brought yields to all time lows tenure below one, etcetera, etcetera.

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>So what we've seen is that ten day realized volatility

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and SMP five hunder low Volatility index actually exceeds that

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, of the market at large. So

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this happens from time to time, but this doesn't happen

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>during spikes. The only time this has happened, you know,

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in the past five years, Uh, during a time when

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, realize vall is anything you could consider elevated,

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>was in September. I believe at that time we were

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of worried about lack of central bank monetary ammunition,

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and at that time, you know, some Trump worries seeping

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>into the market. There was a time when investors actually

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>thought Trump would be the worst thing ever for the market,

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>but before they decided the exact opposite. Uh, you know,

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>in the course of a night. So what we found

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>there is essentially that the outsized movements in high vall

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be a function of and especially this

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>was key last week when we had you know, a

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>correlation one sell off. Basically everything getting hit the same

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 1>amount looks kind of looks like your mass equity index

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>futures selling. So what happens in bad days? Everything goes down,

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>everything goes down together in a big way. But then

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>on the up days, what what are people gravitating back

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 1>to something with an above average dividend yield? In something

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.719
<v Speaker 1>in which the company is their cash flow. Utilities and uh,

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe reads reads one of them, but utilities and

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>consumer staples you make up SMP five low vall that's

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>over three times the SMP five hundred those cash streams.

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Even in an ensignment of social distancing, you're you're still

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty reliable, especially when LSOL and Clorox exact paper is

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in there. Yes, so it just it just strikes me

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>as something worth monitoring because if you, I'll get out

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>my craziest thing I've seen this this week, you have

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to have SMP time. To have SMP five hundred low

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>vall beating the market on a day when the SMP

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>five hundred is up at least four percent, that's happened

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>now four times, going back to early nine seventy two.

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Happened March sixteenth two, not a great time if you remember.

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>October eight also not a great time if you remember,

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and twice this week on Monday and Wednesday. Alright, nice,

0:19:57.680 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate the segue because I did not have a

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>segue influence. So we do have some voicemail. We the

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>what goes Up hotline has been overflowing with voicemails with

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>crazy things and other observations. Apologies that we can't play

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>them all, but we have a couple to play, so

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>let's let's hear him. Hey, this is a message for

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>what goes Up? Long time listener, first time caller. This

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>is your friend and colleague, Cameron christ I'm the craziest

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>thing I saw in markets this week was a horrible

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:32.479
<v Speaker 1>white Nauga hide tie worn by Luke Kawa just because

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it seems as if markets are on trajectory to go

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>back to nineteen seventies levels, Luke, doesn't mean you have

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to dress like it. Thanks guys, well you this, Thank

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you Cameron for that completely unsolicited complete Yeah, it's

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>like I said, I refused that at your column. If

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 1>you don't call bust. I told him to the belt though,

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know what tie he's talking about. You know,

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea either. All of my ties are wonderful.

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>You must have meant to say belt, and he just

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>went on and went and said, but I'm just jealously

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 1>because I had six older brothers, I was the youngest,

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and the bullying all went downhill. So I I kind

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 1>of look at you, was that little brother. I never

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>had the outlet for the bullying. I hope that's okay.

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>It's like I was wondering where this is going. I

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>was expecting it to end up in some complimentary that. Yeah. Yeah,

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>And also you owe me money. That's just how it works. Yes, Sarah,

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 1>do you have a crazy thing you saw in them?

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Mor I do have a crazy thing, and it'll go

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>back to the idea of a demand for consumer staples.

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I was looking around just for some different price dislocations

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that are caused by the coronavirus and people maybe going

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 1>a little bit crazy and emergency shopping. And I went

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon and was looking at Purell bottles because you

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>can't really find Purell any anywhere anymore. And uh, I

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 1>found a two pack of one Leader Purell bottles for

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and fifty dollars. It's it's crazy, I mean truly,

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the creer. Okay, I think you won. You might have

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>just scored your first on that you haven't gone yet.

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And I also have one to the other side too,

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>let's hear it. Uh, there's a pretty good story on

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the terminal that was laying out how flights have all

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden becoming pretty cheap because a lot of

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 1>people don't want to be flying anymore. So you can

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 1>get around trip flight from New York to Miami now

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 1>for fifty one dollar. So I think I'm going to

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>have to go, Oh really, we can have the problem

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>with that fifty flights, then you gotta buy a two

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>bottle purealitis the hedge. Yeah, all right, I'll were joint

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>joint winners for this one. If you both had that

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.360
<v Speaker 1>one but I do have a backup. You know, I've

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>been just staring at the screens all day, so unfortunately

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been able to check price line too frequently,

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>so I guess you beat me on that one. But

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's pretty wild. Um, And this is more

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>earnest than been funny that we're price now for BIS

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>for the end of the year and FED funds. What

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 1>that means to me is that it's very difficult now

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>for bonds to short circuit any more stock weakness. And

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.880
<v Speaker 1>combine that with the quote unquote Corona flu that President

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:21.919
<v Speaker 1>Trump had referred to, UM, pretty pretty crazy that we're

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>at this point right now. Um, you know people still

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, they're defending that three thousand level,

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we're kind of we're kind of out

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of firepower. I would say one thing along these lines, though,

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Chair Powell made the right move

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to move swiftly and forcefully because he just got the

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>FED out of the way and now the pressures on

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the White House and Congress instead of the next two

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>weeks being this long political debate about is the FED

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>doing enough? And Um, so I think he made the

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>right move. But because of that we're at a point

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 1>now where you know, the market, the markets unless they're

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:00.160
<v Speaker 1>going to price a negative rates, it's up to that's

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 1>up to the White House. Now what I'm curious, so

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the market's prices in a realistic sense, where say the

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>ten year could go this year? I mean, well, what

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>would you guys say, I mean, I mean the you know,

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess you can't right now wash your hands. My

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 1>crazy thing is is similar in that in the treasury

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>futures market, you can now buy call options on an

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>off the run bond. I think it's like a mature

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>ten year bond that implied negative yields, So you can

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>now buy a call for for negative years. Yeah, and

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing you're seeing volume in those in those contracts,

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>especially the euro dollar ones, a lot of flows there.

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>But but just just the kind of offset uh Mr

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Mr Cameron crisis uh Anti Luke commentary. Um, because Lucas Canadian,

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>I would like to say that Canadian bonds have some yields.

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's so even you know, we we were

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>riding long rates both in the in the in the

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>in your all our belly contract midcurve contracts as well

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>as the long end for a while. UM, that's less

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>interesting to us. And now because again we're priced to

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I basically go to zero by the end of the year. UM,

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 1>so we're much more focused on the downside and equities now.

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>But there's still some um, some room for the Bank

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of Canada to catch I don't know if it's catch

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>up or down to the FED in those guys down

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of it's gonna be taking that Greyhound up

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to Toronto to get some clips and funds. I do

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 1>also have to say that I believe Luke wasn't the

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>only one who took some heat this week on the

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Podcast hot Line. I'm pretty sure Mike took some

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>heat as well. All Right, this is Paul Meyer from

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Northern California, and I'm talking about what goes up. And

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm disappointed that recently we haven't gotten any obscure classic

0:25:56.560 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>rock references, not since I think James can funk for

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you nine. So come on, Mike, give us something. Come on, Mike,

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>give us something. That one hurts that that I feel

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.959
<v Speaker 1>that one because as we all know, classic obscure classic

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>rock rock references are an integral part of financial journalism.

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I've been I've been letting the readers

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and listeners down, and you might ask yourself, how did

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I get you? This is my beautiful two percent treasury.

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Kid's got a future. All right, I'll give you one

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>classic rock reference. You know, everyone's talking about what song

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:34.479
<v Speaker 1>they they sing when they wash their hands. People saying birthday.

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm singing the wreco of the Edmund Fitzgerald. That's how

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:40.239
<v Speaker 1>long I'm watching where I'm not taking any chances, all right,

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>So there you go, no chances taken. And as a reminder,

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you can give us a call at our Bloomberg Podcast hotline,

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>leave us a message and we might play it on

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the show. And that number is six or six three

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to four three for nine zero. And with that said,

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>novel Luke, thanks so much for joining the show this week.

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Many thanks, thank you. What goes up. We'll be back

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>next week. Until then, you can find us on the

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Bluemberg terminal, website and app or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>We love it if you took the time to rate

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>interview the show on Apple podcast. Some more listeners can

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>find us and you can find us on Twitter, follow

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>me at at Sarah Pontzack. Mike is a ryg anonymous,

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>lu Kawa is at l j Kwa and no ful

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Sinala is at no ful Sinala. You can also follow

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg podcasts at podcasts. What Goes Up is produced by

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Toper Foreheads. The head of Bloomberg podcast is Francesca Levie.

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, See you next time.