Speaker 1: Senator, always a pleasure to be with you in person.
Speaker 1: Somebody's lying. I think that's pretty clear. It's been very
Speaker 1: confusing over this hunter Byde investigation. Did Weiss have authority
Speaker 1: to actually bring charges? He's saying he did. He had
Speaker 1: the ability to do whatever he wanted to do. Whistle
Speaker 1: Blowers are saying, no, you didn't, and we think we
Speaker 1: have the proof to show that you actually didn't. Or
Speaker 1: could it be that he did have the power he
Speaker 1: chose not to. It's confusing. Break it down for us.
Speaker 2: Look, the past ten days, things have gotten consistently worse
Speaker 2: for Merrick Garland. He is in the greatest legal jeopardy
Speaker 2: he has been since the day he took the oath
Speaker 2: to be Attorney General. We now have two different IRS
Speaker 2: whistleblowers who have flat out accused him of lying under
Speaker 2: oath and of obstruction of justice.
Speaker 3: Not hardcore Republicans. Either should be made clear.
Speaker 2: That they are career IRS employees with no reason to lie.
Speaker 2: That anyone knows if what they're saying saying is true,
Speaker 2: Merrick Garland is guilty of serious felonies. If what they're
Speaker 2: saying is true, Merrick Garland should be impeached. If what
Speaker 2: they're saying is true. A special council should be appointed
Speaker 2: in the Department of Justice to consider charging Merrick Garland
Speaker 2: with lying under oath and obstruction of justice. Here, just
Speaker 2: a few months ago, you can see Garland testifying in
Speaker 2: front of the Senate and here's what he had to say.
Speaker 4: The US Attorney in Delaware has been advised that he
Speaker 4: has full authority to make those kind of referrals that
Speaker 4: you're talking about, or to bring cases in other jurisdictions
Speaker 4: if he feels it's necessary, and I will assure that
Speaker 4: if he does, he will be able to do that.
Speaker 5: Does the Delaware US Attorney lack independent charging authority over
Speaker 5: certain criminal allegations against the President's son outside of the
Speaker 5: district of Delaware.
Speaker 4: He would have to bring if it's in another district,
Speaker 4: he would have to bring the case in another district. But,
Speaker 4: as I said, to ensure that he's able to carry
Speaker 4: out his investigation and that he be able to run it,
Speaker 4: and if he needs to bring it in another jurisdiction,
Speaker 4: he will have full authority to do that.
Speaker 1: You believe him, I mean he said it there pretty clearly. Look,
Speaker 1: he said it under oath. Yeah, if he's knowingly lying.
Speaker 1: You just witnessed a felony. Now the irs whistleblowers said
Speaker 1: something completely contrary. Well here, let's listen to because Garland
Speaker 1: elaborated it even more so, listen to Garland even further.
Speaker 4: Under oath, under the regulations, that kind of act he
Speaker 4: would have to bring to me, under to the Attorney General,
Speaker 4: under the regulations, those kind of charging decisions would.
Speaker 6: Have to be brought.
Speaker 4: I would then have to authorize it, and I'll permit
Speaker 4: it to be brought in another jurisdiction. And that is
Speaker 4: exactly what I promised to do here already, that if
Speaker 4: he needs to bring a case in another jurisdiction, he
Speaker 4: will have my full authority to do that.
Speaker 5: Has the Delaware US Attorney sought permission from permission of
Speaker 5: another US Attorney's office, such as in the District of
Speaker 5: Columbia or in California, to bring charges? If so, was
Speaker 5: it denied?
Speaker 6: So I don't know the answer to that.
Speaker 4: I do, and I don't want to get into the
Speaker 4: internal elements of decision making by the US Attorney. But
Speaker 4: he has been advised that he is not to be
Speaker 4: denied anything that he needs, and if that were to happen,
Speaker 4: it should send to the department's ranks that I have
Speaker 4: not heard anything from that office to suggest that they
Speaker 4: are not able to do everything that the US Attorney
Speaker 4: wants to do.
Speaker 2: So there are several things in there to break down.
Speaker 2: Number one, the IRS whistleblowers have specifically alleged that Weiss
Speaker 2: asked the US Attorney in DC to bring charges and
Speaker 2: asked the US Attorney in the Central District California to
Speaker 2: bring charges. The IRS whistle blowers allege that those district
Speaker 2: attorneys said no. In our last PEP podcast on Friday,
Speaker 2: we went and last week's podcast Monday, Wednesday and Friday
Speaker 2: did a deep dive into these facts. All three are
Speaker 2: worth listening to if you have not listened to them,
Speaker 2: But on last Friday's podcast, we walk through how the
Speaker 2: US Attorney in d C was a political donor to
Speaker 2: Joe Biden, how the US Attorney in the Central District
Speaker 2: California was a political donor to Kamala Harris, and at
Speaker 2: least what the IRS whistleblowers are saying, those US attorneys
Speaker 2: said no, we will not prosecute Hunter Biden. The other
Speaker 2: avenue is Weiss could have been named a special US
Speaker 2: Attorney able to bring charges outside of Delaware, in other words,
Speaker 2: in d C or in the Central District California. The
Speaker 2: reason that matters is the most serious of the charges
Speaker 2: Hunter faced, we're for conduct in twenty fourteen and twenty
Speaker 2: fifteen where the violations were committed either in DC or
Speaker 2: the Central District of California. So the Delaware US Attorney
Speaker 2: can't bring it in Delaware because he wasn't in Delaware
Speaker 2: when he committed the crime. He's got to bring it
Speaker 2: where the crime occurred. If the IRS whistleblower is right,
Speaker 2: then what Merrick Garland said is flat out wrong. Now
Speaker 2: it's interesting he you know, one of the things Chuck
Speaker 2: Grassley asked. He said, well, did Weiss ask to bring
Speaker 2: these these charges? And Garland said, I don't know.
Speaker 3: Ignorance is Bliss right, would work his favor.
Speaker 2: So I have seen speculation from some observers that Weiss
Speaker 2: may have asked Lisa Monico. Who's Monico? Lisa Monico is
Speaker 2: the Deputy Attorney General. The DAG is what she's called
Speaker 2: internally in DOJ parlance, the DAG the Deputy Attorney General
Speaker 2: that as a typical matter, US attorneys report up through
Speaker 2: the DAG. It is possible that Lisa Monico denied that
Speaker 2: denied the request and never even let Merrick Garland know.
Speaker 2: If that's the case, then he's still lying because he's responsible.
Speaker 2: If his henchmen under him are acting directly contrary to
Speaker 2: what he said, then he doesn't get to go lie
Speaker 2: to Congress just because he remains willfully unaware of what's
Speaker 2: going on. Now. Another development, on June thirtieth, David Weiss
Speaker 2: sent a letter back to Jim Jordan. Jim Jordan had
Speaker 2: sent an oversight letter asking about the investigation, and Weiss
Speaker 2: right now is sticking with Mary Garland. So Weiss says
Speaker 2: several things in the letter. He says, number One, I'm
Speaker 2: not at liberty to provide you the materials you seek
Speaker 2: about the investigation. I am required to protect confidential law
Speaker 2: enforcement information delibert of communications. Thus, I will not provide
Speaker 2: specific information related to the Hunter Biden investigation at this time. Secondly,
Speaker 2: he says, I will provide some general insight on two issues. First,
Speaker 2: the Department of Justice did not retaliate it against an
Speaker 2: Internal Revenue Service criminal supervisor, special agent and whistleblower, as
Speaker 2: well as his entire investigative team for making protective disclosures
Speaker 2: to Congress because oh wait, there is no because that's
Speaker 2: all he says about it. He didn't say what happened.
Speaker 2: He literally has one sentence, We did not retaliate. I'm
Speaker 2: not going to tell you why. I'm not going to
Speaker 2: give you any facts. I'm not going to respond. My
Speaker 2: answer is no, I gotta say, Weiss, it's doing a
Speaker 2: good job channeling Joe Biden. You know Joe Biden, when
Speaker 2: asked about it, just goes no, no, just like an
Speaker 2: old man in his lawn. No, no, get off my lawn. No, Wiss,
Speaker 2: we did not retaliate. Facts. The whistleblowers alleged they were
Speaker 2: all removed from the case. I'm not aware that anyone
Speaker 2: disputes they were removed from the case. Were they removed
Speaker 2: from the case? Yes or no? Sorry, Weiss won't tell us.
Speaker 2: Were they removed for the case because they were whistleblowers?
Speaker 4: Yes?
Speaker 7: Or no?
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, Weis won't tell us. This is a stone walling. No,
Speaker 2: they were not retaliated against. And I don't have to
Speaker 2: tell you another damn word because I don't work for
Speaker 2: the American people. I am in the Department of Justice. Second,
Speaker 2: Weiss says in my June seventh letter, I stated, quote,
Speaker 2: I've been granted ultimate authority over this matter, including responsibility
Speaker 2: for deciding where, when, and whether to file charges, and
Speaker 2: for making decisions necessary to preserve the integrity of the
Speaker 2: prosecution consistent with federal law, the principles of federal prosecution,
Speaker 2: and departmental regulations. I stand by what I wrote, and
Speaker 2: I wish to expand on what it means. And here's
Speaker 2: what he expands. He says, as the US Attorney for
Speaker 2: the District of Delaware, no charging authority is geog My
Speaker 2: charging authority is geographically limited to my home district. It's
Speaker 2: what I just said. If venue in the case lies elsewhere,
Speaker 2: common departmental practice is to contact the US Attorney's office
Speaker 2: for the district in question and determine whether it wants
Speaker 2: a to partner in the case. If not, I may
Speaker 2: request special attorney status with the Attorney General pursuitt to
Speaker 2: twenty eight USC. Section five point fifteen. Here, I have
Speaker 2: been assured that, if necessary, after the above process, I
Speaker 2: would be granted five point fifteen authority in the District
Speaker 2: of Columbia, the Central District California, or any other district
Speaker 2: where charges could be brought in this matter. Now, notice
Speaker 2: what Weiss doesn't say. He doesn't say, did you ask
Speaker 2: the DCUs attorney to break charges? Doesn't answer that, did
Speaker 2: you ask the Central District California US attorney to bring charges?
Speaker 2: He doesn't answer that, did you ask to be appointed
Speaker 2: as special attorney status so you could bring charges? He
Speaker 2: doesn't answer that. He just says, well, if necessary, I've
Speaker 2: been told after all of these processes, ultimately I could,
Speaker 2: I would have the authority. I'll tell you what's a fact.
Speaker 2: The statute of limitations has run on the most serious charges.
Speaker 2: There's a six year statute of limitations. When you commit
Speaker 2: a crime, most crimes, there's the statute of limitations, and
Speaker 2: after that statute of limitation, you cannot be charged for
Speaker 2: the crime. One day after the statute of limitations, you're
Speaker 2: scott free. What is a fact, to the very best
Speaker 2: of my knowledge, is the state it has run on
Speaker 2: the most serious crimes. They ran while David Weiss was
Speaker 2: allegedly investigating this, and this letter is saluting to the
Speaker 2: Attorney General and saying sir, yes, sir, I'm still on
Speaker 2: the team. But it is a fact that the charges
Speaker 2: were not brought. It is a fact that this sweetheart deal,
Speaker 2: which the Biden White House desperately, desperately desperately wants to
Speaker 2: close the door in all investigations on Joe Biden, provides
Speaker 2: that Hunter Biden served not a minute in jail, not
Speaker 2: a day in jail, served no jail time at all
Speaker 2: for millions of dollars in tax fraud. And David Weiss
Speaker 2: nowhere addresses the most serious allegations in the whistleblowers claims,
Speaker 2: which are that DOJ blocked any and all investigations into
Speaker 2: Joe Biden's corruption, no asking about the big guy, and
Speaker 2: in fact that DOJ tipped off Hunter Biden over and
Speaker 2: over and over again to thwart search warrants, to thwart
Speaker 2: investigationsations this. At this point, the statements between Merrick Garland
Speaker 2: and David Weiss on one side and the two IRS
Speaker 2: whistleblowers on the other side are entirely in conflict. The whistleblowers,
Speaker 2: as I've noted, we have no reason to think they're lying.
Speaker 2: One of them is a gay Democrat who's married to
Speaker 2: a man. Both of them are career IRS employees. Neither
Speaker 2: of them have any indication that they're in any way
Speaker 2: shape or form Republican and they've come over and risked
Speaker 2: their entire careers by calling out what appears to be
Speaker 2: a pattern of felonies. Here's what needs to happen. The
Speaker 2: House of Representatives needs to have a hearing with Merrick
Speaker 2: Garland at the table, with David Weiss at the table,
Speaker 2: and with the irs whistleblowers at the table. Every one
Speaker 2: of them needs to raise their hand and take an
Speaker 2: oath and testify under oath. And you need real people
Speaker 2: who know how to cross examine, find out who's telling
Speaker 2: the truth and find out who's lying. And if it's
Speaker 2: Merrick Garland, he should be impeached and he's should be prosecuted.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you about our friends real quick. Hit
Speaker 1: Augusta Precious Medals. If you are sick and tired of
Speaker 1: being stressed out over your retirement account and you've lost
Speaker 1: money and you're in retirement or close to retirement and
Speaker 1: there's no time to make up losses, you know how
Speaker 1: important is to preserve your wealth. And that is where
Speaker 1: gold is being used right now by countless people all
Speaker 1: over the world. Augusta Precious Metals is the company that
Speaker 1: I trust. Why because they will sit down with you,
Speaker 1: look over your financial portfolio, your timeline for retirement, are
Speaker 1: what your goals are, and see if gold is right
Speaker 1: for you. They can easily help you switch over to
Speaker 1: gold in your IRA or your four oh one K. So,
Speaker 1: if you want a company that you can trust, a
Speaker 1: company that will talk to you one on one about
Speaker 1: what you are doing and your goals right now, check
Speaker 1: out august of Precious Metals their number eight seven seven,
Speaker 1: the number four GOLDRA. They will send you an amazing
Speaker 1: Investor's God on Gold number one, and they'll do a
Speaker 1: one on one web conference with you. Their experts will
Speaker 1: talk to you about what your goals are and how
Speaker 1: gold may work well for you. Eight seven seven the
Speaker 1: number four Gold ir A or online at Augusta Precious
Speaker 1: Metals dot com. That's Augusta Precious Metals dot com. Senator,
Speaker 1: I got to ask you about the satch of limitations.
Speaker 1: We mentioned this in one of the past podcasts, but
Speaker 1: it almost seems like wise understood two things.
Speaker 3: I probably don't want the power.
Speaker 1: To be a special prosecutor where I can bring charges
Speaker 1: wherever I want to.
Speaker 3: That's that maybe too much.
Speaker 1: He didn't want that, right, He didn't want to have
Speaker 1: that ability to do that, because then he could say, hey,
Speaker 1: it's on that guy, that prosecutor who said no, and
Speaker 1: it's on that prosecutor. The other one that everybody seems
Speaker 1: to be now really focusing in on is did he
Speaker 1: slow play this investigation so he couldn't bring the most
Speaker 1: serious charges against the Bidens. So, in other words, if
Speaker 1: you say every day you're investigating while the clock is
Speaker 1: taking down to that time bomb, right when you get
Speaker 1: past that moment, you won by default for the Bidens.
Speaker 2: So, look, I don't know David Weiss. I've never met
Speaker 2: David Weiss. The media, the corporate media, loves saying he
Speaker 2: was the Trump appointed US attorney. Let me underscore, you
Speaker 2: cannot get appointed US attorney without the explicit sign off
Speaker 2: of both home state senators. In this case, Delaware's two
Speaker 2: home state senators are Chris Coons and Tom Carper. They
Speaker 2: are both Democrats. They are both partisan Democrats. That means,
Speaker 2: for all intents and purposes, David Weiss was the handpicked
Speaker 2: selection of two Democrat senators from Delaware. And by the way,
Speaker 2: every politician in Delaware is completely in bed with Joe Biden.
Speaker 2: Delaware is a tiny state and if you're a Democrat
Speaker 2: politician with Joe Biden, Joe Biden is the godfather, and
Speaker 2: every other politician in Delaware is at best a lower coppo.
Speaker 2: So on the question of who's going to be the
Speaker 2: US attorney in the state of Delaware, every Democrat senator,
Speaker 2: every day Democrat politician has great incentive to make sure
Speaker 2: that the big guy is taken care of. I don't
Speaker 2: know if David Weiss is actually complicit.
Speaker 1: It seems like a really long time, and you know,
Speaker 1: and I'm actually six years excuse me, six years to
Speaker 1: investigate a really long time, especially when it's such a
Speaker 1: high profile case that involves so many issues with the presidency,
Speaker 1: with the vice presidency when he's back, and the vice president,
Speaker 1: and with the president's son is Would you have ever
Speaker 1: expected to take this long look?
Speaker 2: It shouldn't have. It should have moved quickly. Weiss is
Speaker 2: either complicit in covering up for Joe Biden, or at best,
Speaker 2: he's incredibly weak and is allowing himself to be used
Speaker 2: as a patsy. Those are really the only options any
Speaker 2: US attorney with any integrity if told, no, you can't
Speaker 2: ask about the big guy, No you can't investigate No,
Speaker 2: you can't find out when you see a text, the
Speaker 2: text the WhatsApp to a Chinese official saying I'm here
Speaker 2: with my father. No, you can't investigate any attorney general
Speaker 2: with a shred of backbone, or rather, any US attorney
Speaker 2: would say I'm going to investigate these facts and if
Speaker 2: you don't want me to fire me, that's what he
Speaker 2: should have done. There's no indication he did. And now
Speaker 2: he sends a letter said, no, I had all the authority.
Speaker 2: All right, weis you want all the authority on your part?
Speaker 2: Then you're the one that's covering up for Joe Biden Pickett.
Speaker 2: Is it you or is it the Attorney general who's
Speaker 2: engaged in obstruction of justice? Maybe the answer is you're
Speaker 2: the one who's engaged in obstruction of justice. Somebody is Yeah,
Speaker 2: if what the irs whistle blowers is saying is accurate,
Speaker 2: somebody is obstructing justice. And I'll tell you I'm encouraged.
Speaker 2: I think the House is onto this. Listen, listen to
Speaker 2: Speaker McCarthy and Jim Jordan.
Speaker 6: Here someone has lied here.
Speaker 7: If we find that Garland has lied to Congress, we
Speaker 7: will start impeachment inquiry.
Speaker 6: But you have to understand what we found out.
Speaker 7: First of all, I've got to thank these three chairmen,
Speaker 7: what Jim Jordan, what Comer has done, what Jason Smith
Speaker 7: has done.
Speaker 6: We wouldn't know any of this if we didn't win
Speaker 6: the majority.
Speaker 7: We would not know any of this, if we didn't
Speaker 7: start the Weaponization committee that Jim Jordan runs over. There
Speaker 7: are people now that are lying and think of what transpired.
Speaker 7: They let the statue of limitation run out six years.
Speaker 7: These are the most serious allegations that he would get
Speaker 7: prosecuted over. But also remember this is the timeline when
Speaker 7: his father was serving as vice president. Then they did
Speaker 7: not allow the prosecution. They let him off on paying
Speaker 7: hundreds of thousands of dollars on the taxes of what
Speaker 7: he transpired. Then they also tipped off his attorneys. His
Speaker 7: attorneys didn't even know he had a storage unit with
Speaker 7: papers in it. Why would they call and tell him
Speaker 7: ahead of time and say we're going to come a
Speaker 7: couple days later. They literally tipped off the inaugural committee.
Speaker 7: They tipped off when they wanted to go see hunter
Speaker 7: byden before. No one else would get treated this way.
Speaker 7: But this goes direct conflict of what Garland has told
Speaker 7: members of Congress and Senate that Weiss had all power,
Speaker 7: and now we're finding that that's not true. So what
Speaker 7: we need to do, just like you do, is anything else.
Speaker 7: Bring everybody into the room. Let's look everybody in the
Speaker 7: eye who's lying here, because you've got six people, You've
Speaker 7: got two IRS agents that have worked very hard on this.
Speaker 6: They have no axe to grind anywhere else. They just
Speaker 6: see that justice is not equal.
Speaker 1: You hear him talk about just a storage unit, and
Speaker 1: many people may not even understand this part of the story.
Speaker 1: So I think we should definitely shine a light on it.
Speaker 1: You had a storage unit that apparently Hunter Biden's own
Speaker 1: attorneys didn't even know existed, with documents that clearly related
Speaker 1: to this case could have been damning criminally to Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: They didn't even know it existed, and they were tipped
Speaker 1: off by the investigators about the storage unit and then
Speaker 1: that we might want to see what's in the storage unit.
Speaker 1: If David Why knew that and was tipping them off,
Speaker 1: how is he not colluding with the Bidens.
Speaker 2: If the IRS whistleblower's allegations are true, he is to
Speaker 2: tip off the subject of the investigation. Hey, here's where
Speaker 2: we're going to search and here's what day to tip
Speaker 2: out the subject of the investigation. Hey, we're gonna come
Speaker 2: question you on this date. Get ready. That is actively
Speaker 2: frustrating the investigation. I'll tell you another development that we have.
Speaker 2: Also on June thirtieth, Hunter Biden's lawyer sent a long
Speaker 2: letter to the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee
Speaker 2: complaining about releasing the testimony.
Speaker 1: Yeah, why why would he not want that testimony out there?
Speaker 1: And complain, well, he has a sweetheart deal. He wants
Speaker 1: the sweetheart deal to go through. And he says, this
Speaker 1: was really mean of you to release this testimony because
Speaker 1: it makes my client look really bad.
Speaker 3: And so do you think they're really concerned that this
Speaker 3: plea deal?
Speaker 1: A judge might say, in light of all that's come out,
Speaker 1: it's impossible for me to give you this sweetheart deal.
Speaker 2: I don't know, but it's bad. They're worried it is.
Speaker 2: So the funniest part of this letter is is on
Speaker 2: page eight of the letter. Yeah, and he reproduces the
Speaker 2: WhatsApp between Hunter and the Chinese official Henry Zao, who
Speaker 2: who We've read that in the last couple of podcasts.
Speaker 2: It's the one where five times Hunter made references to
Speaker 2: the man sitting next to me, the guy sitting next
Speaker 2: to me, my father. We he makes clear this is
Speaker 2: all about the big guy. So what is really funny?
Speaker 2: I said in each of the last three podcasts last week.
Speaker 2: If this WhatsApp is accurate, this is a smoking gun.
Speaker 2: This demonstrates that Joe Biden flat out lied. This demonstrates
Speaker 2: that Joe Biden was deeply involved in Hunter Biden's shakedown
Speaker 2: of communist China. And this demonstrates, if it's true and accurate,
Speaker 2: that at the Biden DOJ is stonewalling and protecting the
Speaker 2: Biden White House. And I said, there's one one possibility.
Speaker 2: Maybe it's not accurate. It could be a fraudulent document.
Speaker 2: We don't know that. That would be a possible defense.
Speaker 2: We talked about the laptop. When the laptop first broke,
Speaker 2: I said, look, this could be fake. Hunter could come
Speaker 2: out and say these this laptop is not true, it's
Speaker 2: not mine. The Biden White House would come out and
Speaker 2: say this laptop is not true, it's not mine. They
Speaker 2: never did that. Why did they not do that? Because
Speaker 2: it was true, because it was accurate. So this is
Speaker 2: his lawyer's first chance to respond to the WhatsApp and
Speaker 2: I'm going to read you from the paragraph. So Jason
Speaker 2: Smith tweeted out two different things with the WhatsApp, and
Speaker 2: here's what the letter says. The screen grab images you
Speaker 2: posted are not real and contain a myriad of issues.
Speaker 2: Both include a photo of mister Biden, not from twenty seventeen,
Speaker 2: but from the White House Easter egg roll on April
Speaker 2: twenty twenty two, long after the purported message was sent.
Speaker 2: Both images portray the message in a blue bubble, when
Speaker 2: WhatsApp messages are in green. One image superimposed the Chinese
Speaker 2: flag for content ID, when surely that was not how
Speaker 2: a text or contact was kept, and one purports to
Speaker 2: be a screenshot with the dot dot dot of someone
Speaker 2: composing a text as in Apple's eye message, when that
Speaker 2: does not happen in WhatsApp. In short, the images you
Speaker 2: circulated online are complete fakes, and complete fakes is in italics.
Speaker 2: You know what is screamingly funny about this. They don't
Speaker 2: dispute a word of the message.
Speaker 1: Yeah, they don't say these messages or texts were never set.
Speaker 2: They don't dispute that hunter sent it sent it to
Speaker 2: a Chinese Communist official, and five times referred to his
Speaker 2: father being sitting in the room, sitting next to him.
Speaker 2: They don't dispute that at all. They don't dispute that
Speaker 2: the money transferred almost immediately thereafter that, once a week,
Speaker 2: once Hunter threatened retribution from Daddy.
Speaker 3: Over five million showed up.
Speaker 2: Within a week, the Chinese Communist money started flowing. So
Speaker 2: they don't dispute any of it. What they say as well,
Speaker 2: you know the tweet, it's not the right color, so
Speaker 2: like the graphic designer took the actual text and framed
Speaker 2: it a little differently. You put a Chinese flag on it. Dammit.
Speaker 2: We didn't have a Chinese flag on the tweet. We
Speaker 2: were just asking for money. Yeah, so we didn't put
Speaker 2: a like. This is the one of the funniest legal
Speaker 2: documents I've ever read because they used the word complete fakes.
Speaker 2: But what they don't say is fake is the actual
Speaker 2: text of it.
Speaker 1: And if that was the case, they would have said
Speaker 1: these words were never text, right, is any lawyer worth
Speaker 1: their weight would have been known. That's how you would
Speaker 1: have confronted this. Not that the bubbles are different with
Speaker 1: the remake.
Speaker 2: All right, let me ask you this, Ben if when
Speaker 2: you came home your wife said, I heard you went
Speaker 2: out and had Chinese food dinner and then had sex
Speaker 2: with nine other women on the fifty yard line of
Speaker 2: the Dallas Cowboys Stadium and your response was I did
Speaker 2: not have Chinese food. How much trouble would you go?
Speaker 3: A lot? Yeah, lot, It'd be a bad day.
Speaker 2: That's the equivalent of what happened here, Like this is
Speaker 2: a smoking gun that implicates the president of the United States,
Speaker 2: and official corruption implicates dog and covering it up. And
Speaker 2: they say, you guys put a Chinese flag on that.
Speaker 2: That is their response. And much like Sherlock Holmes the
Speaker 2: dog that did not bark the absence of a rebuttal,
Speaker 2: here is an admission. That is a real message Hunter
Speaker 2: Biden sent. The only question now is was Hunter telling
Speaker 2: the truth or lying? But interestingly, you know what Hunter's
Speaker 2: lawyers don't say, Oh, by the way, Joe Biden went with.
Speaker 1: Him, Yeah, those dates didn't match up. The president wasn't
Speaker 1: even the same thing the same time, none of that.
Speaker 3: And they know his.
Speaker 1: Schedule could figure that out very easily, and they could
Speaker 1: have said, hey, here is the alibi. Joe Biden on
Speaker 1: this date was in this place nowhere close to Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: They could clear it.
Speaker 2: Up just by not denying it, because they know the
Speaker 2: corporate media will continue to lie and stonewall. Now CBS
Speaker 2: has started to have a crack in the wall. We'll
Speaker 2: see if other corporate media out let's follow up. All right,
Speaker 2: I want to walk through Breitbard had a really good
Speaker 2: article that did a timeline of the corruption. I think
Speaker 2: it's worthwhile, so I want to do this quick. Yeah,
Speaker 2: but run through the facts of the timeline.
Speaker 1: Of when the money start falling in. Yeah, let's do that.
Speaker 1: But first, let me tell you about our friends of
Speaker 1: her Chalk. If you're a guy and you're getting a
Speaker 1: little bit older and you feel like you've lost a
Speaker 1: little of your strength and vitality, that just fatigue, that
Speaker 1: sitting around, that weakness, that not wanting to get up
Speaker 1: and go do things used to love. You're not active
Speaker 1: like used to, You're not working out like used too.
Speaker 3: You're not alone.
Speaker 1: Testastrum rates have dropped off the charts right now, not
Speaker 1: just here, but all over the world. And that's where
Speaker 1: Chalk can help you. They can help you boost your
Speaker 1: Testosterer mobiles up to twenty percent over ninety days, you
Speaker 1: can get rid of that fatigue feeling and get back
Speaker 1: your strength and your energy.
Speaker 3: All you got to do is go to chalk.
Speaker 1: Choq dot com choq dot com and you can pick
Speaker 1: out the mail vitally stack.
Speaker 6: Now.
Speaker 1: I've been taking this now for several months and I
Speaker 1: can tell you it works. So if you're getting a
Speaker 1: little bit older and you are ready to feel like
Speaker 1: you used to maximize your testasm by boosting your levels
Speaker 1: up to twenty percent over ninety days, go to chalk
Speaker 1: choq dot com. Use the promo code Ben and you'll
Speaker 1: get thirty five percent off your order. That's cch oq
Speaker 1: dot com. Use the promo code Been thirty five percent
Speaker 1: off sentator. I want to go through this and I'll
Speaker 1: let you start with number one. And for everyone that's listening, uh,
Speaker 1: we're doing this as a video version as well, so
Speaker 1: you can actually see this this video and you can
Speaker 1: share it on social media. But make sure you share
Speaker 1: this podcast because all the points are about to give you.
Speaker 1: Outside of Breitboard, no one has talked about this at all.
Speaker 2: Go ahead well and make sure you subscribe both to
Speaker 2: video and audio. We typically do one video show a week.
Speaker 2: We do three audio shows a week, and so you
Speaker 2: want to catch them both. The article, by the way,
Speaker 2: this is from, is an article in Breitbart that is
Speaker 2: entitled nineteen point timeline Joe Biden's infamous links to the
Speaker 2: family businesses point number one. In twenty thirteen, Hunter flew
Speaker 2: to China with Vice President Joe Biden to board Air
Speaker 2: Force two. During the excursion, Hunter introduced the Vice president
Speaker 2: to his business partner, Jonathan Lee, the CEO of a
Speaker 2: company linked to Chinese intelligence. Ten days after the visit
Speaker 2: to China, Hunter secured a ten percent interest in BHR Partners,
Speaker 2: a Chinese state backed investment fund co founded with Lee.
Speaker 2: The funds capitalization will was one billion.
Speaker 3: Dollars twenty thirteen.
Speaker 1: Move Forward photos from twenty fourteen revealed Joe Biden met
Speaker 1: with Hunter's Mexican business associates, a billionaire mogul and his
Speaker 1: son in the Vice President's office. The then vice president
Speaker 1: also flew Hunter and his partner, Jeff Cooper on Air
Speaker 1: Force two to Mexico City in twenty sixteen, where Hunter
Speaker 1: ranged to meet the man's son for a meeting over
Speaker 1: quote a Flippin' gigantic that's exact quote A flippin' gigantic
Speaker 1: business deal that Daily Mail.
Speaker 2: Reported that sounds bad. Number three. In twenty sixteen, Hunter
Speaker 2: and Joe Biden flew aboard Air Force two to Mexico,
Speaker 2: where Hunter met with a business associate for Mexico City.
Speaker 2: On the trip, Jeff Cooper, who ran a large litigation
Speaker 2: firm Simmons Cooper, invested one million dollars in Hunter and
Speaker 2: James Biden's now defunct hedge fund.
Speaker 1: I just wonder if that was a bad day you
Speaker 1: go from a billion dollar loan to just a million
Speaker 1: dollar investment.
Speaker 3: I like, I wonder if that's like doubt playing it
Speaker 3: for that.
Speaker 1: Every million helps million, that's true, Every million helps Number four.
Speaker 1: A photo reportedly taken in twenty fourteen shows Joe Biden
Speaker 1: golfing with Hunter and Devon Archer hold on center. Didn't
Speaker 1: Joe Biden say he never talked about business with his son,
Speaker 1: his brother, or any of the family members ever.
Speaker 2: Only about one thousand times.
Speaker 3: Okay, So they're playing golf. He's playing golf with.
Speaker 1: Devon Archer, Hunter's fellow board member at the Ukrainian gas
Speaker 1: company Barisma. Archer, who was imprison for fraud, is in
Speaker 1: talks to comply with the House Oversight Committee subpoena regarding
Speaker 1: his knowledge of the Biden's family alleged ten million dollars
Speaker 1: Ukrainian bribe and additional Biden family business transactions. The photograph
Speaker 1: includes a fourth man who has not been identified.
Speaker 3: I wonder if we could figure out who he is.
Speaker 1: However, he is not Brisma's top executive or the founder.
Speaker 1: So wonder who that person is. Maybe the world can
Speaker 1: figure that one out.
Speaker 2: If only there were, say, investigative journalists that actually if
Speaker 2: investigated five. In twenty fifteen, Borisma was under suspicion of
Speaker 2: money laundering and public corruption. Prosecutor Victor Chokin was investigating
Speaker 2: the case before his termination due to pressure applied by
Speaker 2: then Vice President Joe Biden, who threatened to withhold one
Speaker 2: billion dollars in usaid from Ukraine if the Ukrainian government
Speaker 2: did not fire Shokun. Joe Biden later bragged about the
Speaker 2: firing during a twenty eighteen appearance at the Council of Fourimulations.
Speaker 2: That would be the infamous son of a bitch they
Speaker 2: fired him.
Speaker 3: I wanted five.
Speaker 1: I want to say some of a bitch next time, Okay,
Speaker 1: So next time we go through a list.
Speaker 3: I want that line on my side fair enough.
Speaker 1: Number six, an FBI informant claims to possess two pieces
Speaker 1: of evidence that showed Joe Biden received five million after
Speaker 1: threatening to withhold aid to Ukraine until Chokin was fired.
Speaker 1: House Oversight Committee Republicans told reporters after reviewing the Bureau's
Speaker 1: information informant file of that.
Speaker 2: In Number seven. In twenty fifteen, the day after Joe
Speaker 2: and Hunter Biden met with foreign business partners at Cafe Milano,
Speaker 2: a very Shishi restaurant in DC, one of the men
Speaker 2: emailed Hunter Biden his thanks for quote the opportunity to
Speaker 2: meet your father.
Speaker 3: But remember they never talked business.
Speaker 1: Number eight, Hunter and Joe Biden allegedly coursed a Barisma
Speaker 1: executive into paying them ten million in bribes. We now
Speaker 1: know about the five and five, a source familiar with
Speaker 1: the FBI's informant document confirmed to bright Bart News. According
Speaker 1: to Senator Grassley, the FBI informant document said the founder
Speaker 1: of Barisma, who allegedly paid Joe Biden and his son,
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden, kept seventeen audio recordings of his conversations with
Speaker 1: Joe and Hunter as quote. An insurance policy that may
Speaker 1: be the smartest guy in all of this.
Speaker 2: Well, and those would be the seventeen audio recordings that
Speaker 2: the deputy director of the FBI refused to admit to
Speaker 2: me under oath existed and refused for the FBI to
Speaker 2: provide them to Congress because the FBI is stonewalling for
Speaker 2: the Biden White House number nine. In twenty fifteen, Hunter
Speaker 2: and Joe Biden met with business associates from Ukraine, Russia,
Speaker 2: and Kazakhstan and a popular Washington, DC restaurant. Joe Biden
Speaker 2: was then vice president.
Speaker 1: They did a lot of business overseas. It's interesting these
Speaker 1: countries number ten. In twenty seventeen, Joe Biden penned a
Speaker 1: college recommendation letter for a child of Hunter's Chinese business partner,
Speaker 1: At Lee, with whom Joe Biden also met with in China.
Speaker 3: I wonder if they talked business there.
Speaker 2: So this would be the same Jonathan Lee who put
Speaker 2: a billion dollars, was responsible for the billion dollars in
Speaker 2: the fund. Suddenly Daddy Joe is writing a recommendation letter
Speaker 2: for his kid. Amazing. Look at that.
Speaker 3: No business was connected, that was just friends.
Speaker 2: And that's very impressive that you have that conversation without
Speaker 2: discussing business. Number eleven. In twenty seventeen, Hunter Biden stated
Speaker 2: in an email that Joe Biden was one of his
Speaker 2: quote new officemates after he quote went into business with
Speaker 2: the CFC executive. According to The Washington Post, Hunter also
Speaker 2: made a key for Joe Biden to use at the
Speaker 2: House of Sweden in Georgetown. Hunter appeared to cancel the
Speaker 2: lease with the House of Sweden in twenty eighteen after
Speaker 2: the CFC energy deal failed. In twenty seventeen, the Biden
Speaker 2: family had previously negotiated a deal with CEFC whereby Joe
Speaker 2: Biden the Big Guy, would receive a ten percent equity
Speaker 2: state in the joint venture. Hunter Biden's former business partner
Speaker 2: Tony Bobolinski.
Speaker 1: Oh, Yes, the same guy that came out right for
Speaker 1: the election saying no one will listen to me, including
Speaker 1: the FBI, so I'll go publish.
Speaker 2: Yeah, David Weis would an interview him, but putim in
Speaker 2: front of the Grand Jury.
Speaker 1: At least they met with him once right after that
Speaker 1: press conference, and then they never talked to him again.
Speaker 3: Number twelve.
Speaker 1: In twenty seventeen, whistle blower Tony Bobolinski one of Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden's many business partners twice met with Joe Biden to
Speaker 1: discuss a business this deal in China. Quote I directly
Speaker 1: dealt with the Biden family, including Joe Biden, Bobolinski stated.
Speaker 1: After Babolinsky dined with the former Vice President Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: his brother Jim Biden, and an Hunter, they were all
Speaker 1: there to discuss their deal in China. Bobylinsky messaged James
Speaker 1: telling him think Joe quote unquote.
Speaker 2: For his time number thirteen between twenty nine. Between twenty
Speaker 2: nine and twenty seventeen, Hunter business partner Eric Schwerin met
Speaker 2: with Vice President Joe Biden at the White House. How
Speaker 2: many times? Not once, not twice, not six, not ten,
Speaker 2: nineteen times nineteen times Hunter's business partner. By the way,
Speaker 2: the nineteen times Hunter's business partner met with Vice President
Speaker 2: Joe Biden at the White House never discussed business any
Speaker 2: of those nineteen times, because Joe Biden says he doesn't
Speaker 2: talk business with any of the people that are making him,
Speaker 2: his brother, his son, his grandson's, his entire family stinking freakin' rich.
Speaker 2: Never discussed his business within him nineteen times. White House visitors'
Speaker 2: logs obtained by The New York Post revealed Schwerin was
Speaker 2: the president of the infamous but now dissolved investment fund
Speaker 2: Rosemont Seneca Partners Number fourteen.
Speaker 1: In twenty seventeen, Hunter Biden demanded payment from the Chinese
Speaker 1: Communist Party link Chinese businessman Zoo while Joe Biden was
Speaker 1: sitting next to him. According to I finally got a
Speaker 1: good Win Center. According to a screenshot of the WhatsApp
Speaker 1: message from an IRS whistleblower, quote.
Speaker 3: I am sitting here with my father.
Speaker 1: Number one timing invokes's dad, and we number two would
Speaker 1: like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled.
Speaker 1: The screen capture shows quote tell the director that I
Speaker 1: would like to resolve this now before it gets out
Speaker 1: of hand, and now means tonight.
Speaker 2: And this would be the WhatsApp that Hunter's lawyers implicitly
Speaker 2: conceded was accurate and true in the text because their
Speaker 2: complaint was you put a Chinese flag on that image.
Speaker 2: We didn't have a Chinese flag when we were out
Speaker 2: negotiating and checking down the Chinese Communists. Number fifteen, just
Speaker 2: days after demanding to be paid by a CEFC associate
Speaker 2: and a WhatsApp text with Joe Biden sitting next to him.
Speaker 2: Hunter Biden asked a second CFC business associate Gong Win
Speaker 2: Kevin Dong for ten million dollars in another WhatsApp text,
Speaker 2: noting the Biden family is best at quote doing exactly
Speaker 2: what the chairman wants. Let me repeat that again, noting
Speaker 2: in another WhatsApp text, the Biden family is best at
Speaker 2: quote doing exactly what the chairman wants. In a message
Speaker 2: dating dated August third, twenty seventeen, Hunter Biden told Kevin
Speaker 2: he wanted to quit squabbling over quote peanuts and settle
Speaker 2: on a firm deal by putting quote this to bed
Speaker 2: tonight and get to work. I am tired of this, Kevin.
Speaker 2: I can make five million in salary at any law
Speaker 2: firm in America. Let me pause for a second. Okay,
Speaker 2: Hunter Biden, to the best of my knowledge no legal
Speaker 2: skills at all, has not practiced law in any meaningful way.
Speaker 2: Nobody would pay Hunter Biden to represent them in a lawsuit.
Speaker 2: Nobody would pay Hunter Biden for legal work. If he
Speaker 2: can make five million dollars in ain't law firm in America.
Speaker 2: It is purely because he's selling access to the big guy.
Speaker 2: That's all his business is Yes, he has a law degree,
Speaker 2: but to the best of my knowledge, the guy never
Speaker 2: practiced law. And I say this as someone who earned
Speaker 2: a seven figure salary at a law firm. I know
Speaker 2: what it actually entails to practice law and generate that
Speaker 2: kind of money. Hunter Biden has zero experience, but he
Speaker 2: confidently tells you. What he's really telling is, Oh, look,
Speaker 2: there're lots of buddies of my daddy who would pay
Speaker 2: me five million dollars because when they pay me five
Speaker 2: million dollars, they get to talk to my daddy and
Speaker 2: he does them favors. Going back to this quote very simple,
Speaker 2: Hunter wrote, quote ten million per annum budget to use
Speaker 2: to further the interest of the JV. This move to
Speaker 2: five million is completely new to me and is not
Speaker 2: acceptable obvious. How dare you offer me five million? I
Speaker 2: want ten million. When I'm shaking you down, I want
Speaker 2: it all. Quote. If you think this is about money,
Speaker 2: by the way, that's not actually in it. That's shaking
Speaker 2: me down is my commentary. What's in it is what
Speaker 2: I say. Quote quote. If you think this is about money,
Speaker 2: it's not. Quote. The Bidens are the best I know
Speaker 2: at doing exactly what the chairman wants from this partnership.
Speaker 2: Let's not quibble over peanuts. Chris Clark, Hunter Biden's attorney,
Speaker 2: admitted the twenty seventeen WhatsApp text demanding money from a
Speaker 2: CCP linked businessman while sitting next to his dad was
Speaker 2: indeed Hunter's message. Quote the DOJ investigation covered a period
Speaker 2: which was a time of turmoil and addiction for my client. Quote.
Speaker 2: Any verifiable words or actions of my clients in the
Speaker 2: midst of a horrible addiction are solely his own, and
Speaker 2: I am not connection to anyone in the family. Mind you.
Speaker 2: They're saying is a drug addict, and so the fact
Speaker 2: that he was shaking down Chinese communists on behalf of
Speaker 2: his father who was allegedly sitting next to him, is
Speaker 2: not his father's fault.
Speaker 3: Yeah, because he's a drug addict.
Speaker 2: It's the demon drugs. Yeah, it's not.
Speaker 1: The drugs made me do it, and my dad just
Speaker 1: having to be sitting there with me a part of it.
Speaker 3: Number sixteen.
Speaker 1: In twenty eighteen, two years after Joe and Hunter, Biden
Speaker 1: flew to another country. By the way, let's throw it
Speaker 1: on the list of Mexico to meet with Cooper, Hunter
Speaker 1: texted Cooper about a deal he had in the works
Speaker 1: with a new business partner named Slim. The New York
Speaker 1: Post reported, spoke to my dad quote unquote about Slim, asked.
Speaker 1: Hunter said to Cooper, Oh, that sounds so effing good.
Speaker 2: Cooper responded, you know, it's really hard to talk to
Speaker 2: dad about Slim's request when you don't talk to Dad
Speaker 2: about business deal.
Speaker 1: Yeah, because that whole text exchange is about business.
Speaker 2: You know what, Maybe Slim was asking Dad to write
Speaker 2: a letter of recommendation for Lee's son. Could happen that
Speaker 2: has nothing to do with business.
Speaker 3: You should be a lawyer.
Speaker 2: There you go, Number seventeen. Anyone want to pay me
Speaker 2: five million dollars, You'll do it? Well, ten million, come
Speaker 2: on you, god bless number seventeen.
Speaker 3: Let's not. Let's go what is it over? Peanuts? Is
Speaker 3: that what they call five million?
Speaker 2: Those are expensive peas, that's one. Hell of those are
Speaker 2: macadamia nuts. Those are well, we're not talking the mister peanut,
Speaker 2: the monicle stuff. Those are high end. Those are the
Speaker 2: great pupona.
Speaker 3: Fin at costco. Is what you're saying?
Speaker 2: Number seventeen. In twenty eighteen, Joe Biden called Hunter, Biden
Speaker 2: and left a voicemail about a business deal with the
Speaker 2: Chinese energy company CEFC. The voicemail revealed the Biden family's
Speaker 2: concern that sensitive information was included in a New York
Speaker 2: Times article about Hunter Biden's involvement with CFC chairman Ye
Speaker 2: Jin Ming. Hey pal, it's dad. It's eight fifteen on
Speaker 2: Wednesday night. If you have a get a chance, just
Speaker 2: give me a call. Nothing urgent. I just wanted to
Speaker 2: talk to you. That's what Joe Biden said, But he continued,
Speaker 2: I thought the article released online it's going to be
Speaker 2: printed tomorrow in the Times, was good. I think you're clear.
Speaker 2: And anyway, if you give it, get a chance to
Speaker 2: give me a call. I love you. That's how the
Speaker 2: message concludes.
Speaker 3: Definitely not talking about business there.
Speaker 1: No, not at all because the article. You know, I
Speaker 1: had nothing to do but business.
Speaker 2: But the article is about Manjan Yeah, it was not
Speaker 2: about the corrupt business deals. Had nothing to do with
Speaker 2: corrupt business deals. Mind. You just read it and said, Okay,
Speaker 2: I think you're in the clear right here. Okay, wow.
Speaker 2: Sure they didn't report the bad stuff on this one.
Speaker 2: It is the Times.
Speaker 1: They have our back, not bad, not bad for peanuts
Speaker 1: day of work right with the cash there number eighteen.
Speaker 1: But first, let me tell you about Patriot Mobile, the
Speaker 1: only conservative cell phone company in the US. If you
Speaker 1: are just sick and tired like I am, and you're
Speaker 1: ready to fight back with your dollars giving your money
Speaker 1: to woke companies, switched to Patriot Mobile.
Speaker 3: They give you amazing nationwide coverage.
Speaker 1: You have to keep your same cell phone number you
Speaker 1: have right now if you want to your same cell
Speaker 1: phone you have in your hand, and you get the
Speaker 1: best nationwide coverage that you can get.
Speaker 3: They have deals with.
Speaker 1: All three major carriers, so you don't have to worry
Speaker 1: about coverage.
Speaker 3: Now, here's what you get in return.
Speaker 1: Not only do you get great service, but every time
Speaker 1: when you pay your bill, you're actually standing up for
Speaker 1: what you believe in. We're talking about standing up for
Speaker 1: First and Second Amendment. We're talking about stand up for
Speaker 1: on board and children. We're talking about helping with adoptions,
Speaker 1: We're talking about standing with our first responders, our wounded warriors.
Speaker 1: Because Patriot Mobile takes a portion of your bill every
Speaker 1: month and they give it back to conservative and Christian
Speaker 1: causes that you want to stand with. That's why I
Speaker 1: love this company. So if you've got a cell phone,
Speaker 1: stop giving it to corporations and stand with a company
Speaker 1: that fights for our values. Eight seven eight Patriots The
Speaker 1: number that's eight seven eight Patriot or online at Patriotmobile
Speaker 1: dot com slash Verdict use a promo code Verdict and
Speaker 1: you'll get the best deals of the year, plus free activation.
Speaker 1: Eight seven eight Patriot Mobile dot Com.
Speaker 3: Number eighteen.
Speaker 1: In twenty and nineteen, Hunter Biden revealed to his daughter
Speaker 1: that Joe Biden collected quote half my family for thirty years.
Speaker 1: The money salary, my salary for thirty years. Hunter reportly
Speaker 1: paid thousands of dollars for Joe Biden's house repairs from
Speaker 1: the money reportly obtained from selling access to Joe Biden.
Speaker 3: Quote.
Speaker 1: I hope all of you can do what I did
Speaker 1: and pay for everything for this entire family for thirty years.
Speaker 1: That's the text, quote unquote from Hunter. It's really hard,
Speaker 1: but don't worry. Unlike Pop that would be Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: I won't make you give me half your salary.
Speaker 2: Holy cow, that's.
Speaker 1: A lot of money. If you're not talking about business.
Speaker 1: That's nasty, all right. Number nineteen the last in the list.
Speaker 1: In twenty twenty, three.
Speaker 2: Former Obama White House stenographer Mike McCormick alleged that the
Speaker 2: FBI had ignored Joe Biden's role in the family's foreign
Speaker 2: influenced peddling conspiracy in Ukraine. McCormick, who told The New
Speaker 2: York Post he has relevant information implicating Joe Biden the
Speaker 2: family business affairs in Ukraine, submitted a tip to the
Speaker 2: FBI in February. McCormick said he had never heard back
Speaker 2: from the FBI. That's a pattern. This same law enforcement
Speaker 2: agency which allegedly shut down the investigation of Hunter's abandoned
Speaker 2: laptop from Hell. According to McCormick, Biden's farmer, National Security
Speaker 2: aid Sullivan told reporters on April twenty first, twenty fourteen,
Speaker 2: on Air Force two, as an anonymous quote senior Administration official,
Speaker 2: that the United States intended to help Ukraine's natural gas industry.
Speaker 2: Unknown to the public at the time, Hunter Biden was
Speaker 2: already a board member of Barisma, Interestingly enough, a Ukrainian
Speaker 2: natural gas company. Hunter's position on the board was not
Speaker 2: disclosed by the company until May twelfth, twenty fourteen, nearly
Speaker 2: a month after Sullivan's statement to reporters.
Speaker 1: Senator I I'm going to say this because this list
Speaker 1: right here needs to go viral. Everyone that's listening or watching.
Speaker 1: If you're listening, go grab the video off YouTube and
Speaker 1: share it. The Facebook video of this will be up.
Speaker 1: There is where you can share that on Facebook on
Speaker 1: that platform. But this needs to be seen so everyone
Speaker 1: knows the timeline now and I hope all of you
Speaker 1: will share it on Twitter, Facebook, wherever you are on
Speaker 1: social media and make this go viral because without conservatives
Speaker 1: that are listening and watching to this show, this information
Speaker 1: never gets out. And I need to say this more often.
Speaker 1: Thank you for everybody that gets involved. We have so
Speaker 1: many people that take what we do here each week
Speaker 1: and share it. So thank you because this is how
Speaker 1: we fight back. But this must get out to the public.
Speaker 1: And I think, yeah, start tribe.
Speaker 2: Subscribe, Yeah, subscribe to the audio podcast. You can do
Speaker 2: that wherever you get podcasts. Subscribe to YouTube. The YouTube
Speaker 2: page will give you the video. Typically it's one a week,
Speaker 2: is video all three a week or audio, so you
Speaker 2: should subscribe to both, give them five star reviews, urge
Speaker 2: your friends to do the same. The corrupt corporate media
Speaker 2: gives you none of this information. So if you want
Speaker 2: to know what's actually going on. That is the point
Speaker 2: of this podcast.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and look, I love that we're I feel like
Speaker 1: the pendulum is starting to flip here a little bit
Speaker 1: on this story, and it's because people are telling their
Speaker 1: family and friends and that's what it takes. So all
Speaker 1: of you, thanks for joining us. As always, Monday, Wednesday, Friday,
Speaker 1: we do the show. If there's big breaking news in between,
Speaker 1: we do it. Don't miss an episode. As the Senator
Speaker 1: just said, hit that follow button if you're listening on Apple,
Speaker 1: hit the subscriber download button if you're listing on another platform.
Speaker 1: It's always free the show and we'll see you back
Speaker 1: here in a couple of days