WEBVTT - BFFs 7/17 Hour 1: Patriots and Dolphins Fantasy Previews

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy best friends forever. Do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Do Do don too. Yeah, I p s I know

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you like I PA, You'll be all right. You know

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>what's funny? We e y are. I actually had a

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>random conversation yesterday about where he lives in Nashville, Tennessee.

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Hipsters came up, and one of the first things he

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>brought up about hipsters he hates that they all wear flannel.

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>For all those listening on demand, Greg Susman is wearing

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a a flannel esque shirt today, so you might fit

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that description. You don't have the you don't have the

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>facial hair, though, so you're all right, Greig, Hello, Hello,

0:00:56.280 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>Eric Hello, flannels. Flannels. Fine, it's just when you're obviously

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>not a woodsman or a tradesman or a construction worker

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and you're trying to look like that, you're wearing scuffed

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>up boots and a car heart jacket and this big

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>beard and this red and plaid flannel. You've probably never

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>slept a day outside. You've probably never swung in a

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>real axe, so for at some hippie ax throwing thing,

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>which actually really fun. By the way, Oh my god,

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>have you ever swung into X before? Greg I have not.

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't shoot a gun once in my life though.

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I actually have never shot a gun. But I have

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>swung an X shot a gun, wash chopping some wood.

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>E Y would have been proud. I don't do it

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.119
<v Speaker 1>in my flip flops like you, e Y. But I tried.

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't. I was late at night. I just didn't

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>have time to get shot was Um. You should have

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>seen me shooting a gun. It was very funny as

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you expect. Yeah, I can. I can only imagine Greg

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Susamani with a gun in his hand. We're all safe,

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>all right. Um, just a quick update. My fort loader

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>down tomorrow. It'll be like high eighties, but it will

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like nine the humid today. You're going there starting tomorrow, Yes, okay,

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>so there you go. That's a little programming. Know for

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the week. Greg's been out Thursday and Friday.

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.639
<v Speaker 1>I'll be here with e Y tomorrow. E Y. You

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>run on Friday as well. We'll try to make it

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>myself e Y and Florio again on Friday, get the

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>band back together an hour to tomorrow. Have Alex Fasano

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>from downstairs up in studio as well. I won't be

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>there you won't be here now, just me flying solo

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>ish kind of not not really at all, not you

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>have you have friends in terms of in studio kind

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of solo. So for those I did not admittedly get

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>a chance to listen to the program yesterday, as you

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 1>saw me right outside at a meeting that Greg was

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>doing big boy things. What did I have to What

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>do I have to know in regard to um, the

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Vikings and the Packers. Just quick quick update here. So

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I said that it in a one quarterback league. I'm

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>more after draft Aaron Rodgers this upcoming season than I

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>have been probably ever before. He's coming at a discount.

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:12.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that some positive touchdown regression is coming his way.

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>E Y and I both agreed that Aaron Jones has

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>RB one upside. I believe the Y said that he

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>has Aaron Jones is RB twelve. You know I have

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams as my wide receiver. One the toss up

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>for the Packers was whether or not you want Geronimo

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Allison or MVS because they basically are going at the

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>same point right now, and I slightly lean MVS, but

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that there is a right answer to

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that question. Greg. So it's it's interesting. I was in

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>my my Scott's fish bowl and I was deciding between

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>both of them, and instead I just think James Washington

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>because I couldn't decide which one. Yeah, but I think

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that's very comparable. And I said that yesterday too, I said,

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>those are two situations where you want exposure to whoever

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver too is correct. So you're gonna take

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a shot on Allison or mvs and with the Steelers

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>will get to them in the next coming weeks. You're

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a shot on Washington or Dante Crief because

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>there could be legitimate fantasy value in either one of

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>those situations. I feel seen that in the past. For

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, I feel better about James Washington that I

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>do Moncreeve Allison and Envy has a really really tough

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to figure out um and I think they might play

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>different roles. I think Liston has been working out of

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the slot really so far in like O t As,

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll see what happens in training. I think I think

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of him were like a James Jones types. That's really

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting that he's working out of the slot. So most

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>people might not even realize this but MVS is actually

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>bigger and faster than Geron Alison. So he plays on

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the outside and he's been working with I read this yesterday.

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>He's been working with Randy Moss. Doesn't mean he's Randy Moss,

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 1>but he's six ft four greg and his his forty

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>yard dash and his speed score both ranking like the

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>nineties six percentile coming out of college. Very interest. So

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>MBS is like a really really interesting power speed combination

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>at the outside wide receiver position. Yeah. Again, I'm gonna

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>want these packers. I also, speaking of the packers, I

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>drift that Jamal Williams this morning in my Scott's Fish Bawl.

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you have Aaron Jones? No? All right, Well I'm

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>sorry then. I don't really think there's much upside with

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Williams. I mean, unless Aaron Jones gets hurt, with

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>which I guess is a possibility, has like three m

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>c L hairs already in his career. The sixteenth round,

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, hey, why not? I put out a

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>poll yesterday, Uh Dnala Allison versus MVS, and MVS won

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the poll fifty eight percent of the vote. I would

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>let Jeronali Allison. For some reason, I mean, I like both.

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>If I could get my hands on either one, I'm

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm down. I think I'd just slightly lean MVS over

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Alison when what was the Minnesota conversation. The Minnesota conversation

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>was we don't really see a pack to Kirk Cousins

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>being all that fantasy viable because we believe the Vikings

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>are gonna run the football a ton if Dalvin Cook

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>stays healthy, he has top five RB upside and good

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>luck figure out who you want between Adam Feeling and

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Stefon Diggs. When I do, you probably lean Diggs because

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>he's a town at leave Feeling. There's a real connection

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:49.679
<v Speaker 1>there between him and Kirk Cousins fair and he plays

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>a slot too. Absolutely right, We'll take a break. No

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>more Vikings, no more Packers. Today we hit on the

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Patriots and the Dolplins. They're around. More on the way next. Hey,

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>thank for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you want

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app, download

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the tune and app and just search for Fantasy Sports

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 1>Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube on twitch or on Periscope

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Back with you on the BFF spreak stand for Eric Young,

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Greg Suspan all here with you. And today as we

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>get away from the NFC, we move on to the

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:52.039
<v Speaker 1>a f C East, and we know that you've gotten

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of all the previews of course on the network,

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>but we're doing in our own style. Like I have

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of questions, as I mentioned, and I'm just

0:06:58.120 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to get the answered. I'm not trying to previews

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 1>my position round by around. I'm trying to do that

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>and maybe we will get there, and I have a

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>feeling when we finished kind of going over these teams

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>will probably take it round by round after that. I

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>know you have some other stuff you want to do

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>as well, but where to get to all that stuff?

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>But right now, as I said, I just have questions,

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and my questions today start with the Miami Dolphins. And

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>my my question really is and I truly can't understand it,

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's why everybody is not in love with Kenyan

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Drake like I am, Like I I love this dude. Admittedly,

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>he helped me with a championship a couple of years ago,

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>so I had afinity for him. But last year with

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Frank Gore in Miami and Adam Gaze there, I was like, oh,

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, who knows what's to come, who knows what

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>he could possibly be. And it was very, very frustrating

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>cause whatever you had the ball, and it was certainly

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>not as much as he should have. I thought he succeeded,

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and down the stretch he had, he got a little

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>bit more time, his head did come off a bit.

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>But whenever Kenyan Drake was given an opportunity, he succeeded.

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Now the two biggest detractors of Kenyan Drake are gone.

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>There's no more Adam Gaze, there's no more Frank Gore.

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>It's Kenyan Drake, and it's Calen Blage. Fine, Caylen Blage.

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Nothing wrong with him, all good. Kenyan Drake has proven

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that he's an NFL running back. He has proven that

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>he can have success between the tackles, he could have

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a success in the passing game. He could do a

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit of everything. And yet when I look at

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake's e d P, to me, it doesn't nearly

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>reflect how good he could be. Kenyan Drake is currently

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the forty six player off the board when it comes

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.559
<v Speaker 1>to the running backs. Kenny and Drake, according to the

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.559
<v Speaker 1>nf FC in the month of July, is the twenty

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>second running back off the board after a guy that

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>you like in mark Ingram, after carry On Johnson, who

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we've spoken about, uh right before, Philip Lindsay and David Montgomery.

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>To me, the fact that you're getting this guy at

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the end of the fourth round made the early fifth.

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm missing something because this offense, which

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>is not gonna be very good. I get it, Ryan,

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>It is one guy. It's Kennyan Drake. He does everything

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:09.479
<v Speaker 1>we're looking for. All these situations where we want one guy,

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>we found him and someone's had success before. Frank, What

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>am I missing? Well, you hit on a few of

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the things there. I think this team overall is not

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be very good. And I think if Josh

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Rosen is the quarterback that limits some of the upside

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>as well. I think if Ryan Fitzpatrick were the quarterback

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately helps the offense, helps them have big plays

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and helps him get down the field. In terms of

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>putting them in position to score points overall, getting inside

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the red zone. So I think Ryan Fitzpatrick would help

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>him do that. But I am in the uh. I'm

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in the side that I believe Josh Rosen probably starts

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the games this year for the Miami Dolphins.

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you that Kenyan Drake is a really,

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 1>really talented running back. We all saw it in twenty seventeen,

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.439
<v Speaker 1>that final month of the season where he led all

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>running backs in rushing yards. He was the RB seven

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>during that stretch from weeks thirteen through seventeen back in

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>ten And you know, I have a bunch of stats

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>listed here. I can basically talk your ear off about

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>how good he is on a per touch basis, Greg,

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>But I know that's awesome, That's exactly it. Do you

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.559
<v Speaker 1>think I'll throw this back your way? Do you think

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that wherever he's been throughout college and in the NFL,

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>there is a reason he has not had a hundred

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>more than a hundred and thirty three carries dating back

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to high school? Is there a reason? Is it because

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>he's I couldn't pass protection? Can he not withstand a

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>workhorse workload? Because at some point Greg I look at

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>everything that's happened in college and the NFL level, and

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe the coaches know something that we don't

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:43.479
<v Speaker 1>about Kenyan Drake, whether it's his durability or something like that.

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>That's the question mark that I have that kind of

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>holds me back and the fact that the Dolphins offense

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>is just not gonna be good. This conversation reminds me

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of an exact conversation that we had three years ago,

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>exact conversation, and it revolved around a forward Dolphins running back,

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 1>and that is Lamar Miller. Because the same thing in college,

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the worklod at Miami, went to the Dolphins,

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the workload with the Dolphins, and he went

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to the Houston Texans, and everybody in fantasy football drooled

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:15.199
<v Speaker 1>over him because it was gonna be finally for him

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>in an offense by himself. Now, admittedly it was not

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>nearly the season that we had hoped for, But when

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you were drafting Lamar Miller that year with everything going

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 1>right for him, it was the second round. You're getting

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake two rounds later, and e y, he's the guy.

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 1>Like we have questions about Josh Jacobs, you have questions

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, and we disagree about this. We'll get

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:40.079
<v Speaker 1>to it next week. About mark Ingram, there are questions

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Kenny and Drake's the man, he's had success. What am

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I missing? Man? I mean for me, I'm on the

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>same boat as you. I may not be as high.

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 1>I think I got him right as uh running back overall,

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>So I mean that's probably higher than most. I believe

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>in this player. I believe in he has every skill.

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think the scary part is Adam Gates. That's

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>where it comes down to. Adam and Gays is gone

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>is finally Yeah, Adam gys is gone finally has a

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>coach that theoretically is going to track is Yes, no

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>doubt about it. We've never seen Brian Floress. We've never

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>seen Chad o'sheay being offensive coordinator. We've seen them together

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>in New England. But everybody, ladies doing just wants to

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>run the ball, right like we know that. We know

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly the Manatrician does. We knew Bill O'Brien, Bill O'Brien did,

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Charlie whis steyd Romeo Cornell does. Everybody wants to run

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the ball here's their running back. They're going to run

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the football. We actually spoke about this a lot yesterday

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:45.199
<v Speaker 1>and we kind of agreed that everybody wants to run

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the football, but hey, you need to be winning games

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to be able to run the football greg and you

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>have to have a pretty solid defense. Those things I

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think are going to be the case this year

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>for the Miami Dolphins. I think they're probably going to

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>be one of the worst teams in the NFL. They're

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>often of line is ranked thirty second according to Pro

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Football Focus. They lost their two arguably two of their

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>three best offensive lineman from last season in free agency,

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>So the offensive line not being good, not gonna have

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of leads. It just all kinds of adds

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>up to I don't know how many carries's gonna get now.

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I do think that he is going to have a

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>prominent role in the past game. And you mentioned that

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Chad O'shay is calling place for the first time in

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>his career. He was the wide receiver coach in New England,

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>so he's kind of worked under Josh McDaniels. He's seen

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>what McDaniels has done, so he's kind of learned how

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to use a running back as a pass catcher. There's

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>always been a pass catcher in New England and last

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>year we saw what they did with James White at

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the least. I think that's the big thing for him

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:47.719
<v Speaker 1>right like, is he's not going to come off the

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Kevin Blage or whatever his name is, isn't going

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to be He's not a pass catcher. He's a big bruiser,

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>goal line guy. Drake's going to be on the field.

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean the question is are they going to throw

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the ball to him? Is he going to get usage?

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>If he does, I think he's going to be a

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>good running back. I mean a very very very good,

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 1>good UH draft position for him where he's a very

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>great value at this point. I mean I got him

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>in Scott Fish Bowl as my number two running back,

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and I mean I'm super happy with that right now.

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely well of course, and that and that that I

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't hate his ADP. Like I like where

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>he's going right now. Greg I could get in on

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>him based on that. Again, I think he's going to

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>catch a lot of pass this year. I think that's

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be the that's gonna be what saves his

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>fantasy value. You know, if he doesn't have the opportunity

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to run the ball fifteen plus times a game because

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>they're trailing a ton, I still think that he is

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>going to get a lot of targets. So you look

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>at that range, like right around mark Ingram. Who do

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you like more carry On Johnson? I like harry On Johnson.

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Why there's three? We talked about it last week. I

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>think the Detroit Lions are gonna be a better team.

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Don't suck I I disagree. I think they're gonna be

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a better team. Was there over under? I couldn't tell

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you off It's probably like seven. It's probably in that range.

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a tough division. I realized that they made a

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of additions to the defense in the off season

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and needed it. They're going I think their offensive line

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>is pretty good too. It's the middle of the pack.

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>But I just think there are a lot of things

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that are playing in carry On Johnson's favor that are

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>much better than Kenyan Drake. Look, we're just going based

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>off the assumption that he's going to be a workhorse

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>running back this year. We don't know that for sure.

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Over All, the projections I've seen for Kenyan Drake's carries

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>this here are a hundred and sixty five six and

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a half. Otherwise, the over under, I think that they're

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be Yeah, I mean it's tough, probably over that.

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that the Detroit lines are going to be

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>better this year. I like their offensive line and I

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>like carry On Johnson overall too. You said there's three

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>guys there, I mean, what does that mean, Greg Well,

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't think that they're really gonna use

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>c J. Anderson. I don't think he signs there Unles

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna use them. Yeah, he has opportunities. Calein Blash

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to get a few carries per games, but

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>c J. Anderson is It was a free agent chose

0:15:57.640 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to go to Detroit. He had other I think the

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Lions theo riti as well. I believe that when I

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>see it. It's been there for a long time where

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>there's fire. I've been They've been talking about it, no

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>doubt about it, but there is no dispute. Hendon Drake's

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a guy this year in Miami, and I'm gonna take

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>advantage of it by drafting him. We'll take a break

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>when we come back the other pieces on Miami. If

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>there are any that you want, bring it down next.

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>From the NFL to the NBA. Daily Rohodo dot Com

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>is the place to win millions in daily fantasy. You

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>can get the best DFS NFL coverage all season long

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>for a price of one, or dominate the entire Daily

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports realm with the Elite package at month. If

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you use the promo code f n T s Y,

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you get ten percent off your Daily Rodo package. Go

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to Daily Rodo dot Com, pick your NFL Elite Package,

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>enter promo code f n T s Y, and you'll

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>be on your way to becoming the next Daily Rhodo millionaire.

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>We are back with you here on the the f

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>f's Frank Snaffle Gregument. Here with you very young as

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 1>well advantage football season. It's begun and he's a long

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>drafts in full sway. Roadal Experts has you covered with

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>their NFL from the sixty five Fantasy football package includes

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:30.199
<v Speaker 1>best math based seasonal projections and rankings available anywhere on

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. Davis Maddick and the Road Experts providing dynastys

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>season long, petty Bestball and NFL draft content every day

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of the year, give you needge regardless of what type

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of fantasy football that's your play, same temper cent at

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>road Experts dot Com with will code FNCS. Why that's

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>temper say off with the promo code fnc is why

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the NFL three sixty five Fantasy Football package available right

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>now only at road to Experts dot Com. Yeah, Greg,

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy you brought up those projections because during the

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.439
<v Speaker 1>break I pulled them up. Here's what Davis Maddick has

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to say about Kenyan Drake RBT five one D fifty

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>six carries, sixty two targets. All right, it doesn't sound

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>like you agree that, all right. I'm just saying now

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that that's two people who make projections for a living,

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Davis Maddick and Blake Bailey have him both for under

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>one sixty five carries. I'm just saying, I'm throwing it

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.479
<v Speaker 1>out there. I'm saying that they are wrong, all right.

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean they very well could in terms of ADP.

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Like you read at Colin howse stupid projections were right, which,

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>well he's probably bring it back. Which, uh, which running

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>back going around Kenyan Drake? Would you rather have Kenyan

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Drake over? I'd rather have them to carry on Johnson,

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>all right. I can't get behind that. That's fine. They

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>got him one to one over carry on Johnson, Lindsey

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>just in front of him, Josh Jacobs one in front

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of him, rather have him to Josh Jacobs. I disagree

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>with with that. That's fine, just because Josh Jacobs is

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be I mean, they drafted him to be

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a they used the first round pick on him. They're

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>going to use him like a workhorse run back. It's

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a better offense that I can see in PPR. I

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>can see Kenyan Drake over mark Ingram and PPR in

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>full point, PPR and half and standard. I think mark

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Ingram's gonna score more touchdowns with the Ravens. We'll see,

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, the other weapons, if you will. With the

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins, Uh, there's not much, Frank. You look at

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>what they've done offensively, it's all the same, and it

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>was not very good last year. Kenny Stills, DeVante Parker,

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Butler, here Man and and and this is the

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 1>offense that of a running back that you want on

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 1>your team. I'm just gonna keep hammering home that point.

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.159
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't think that they're going to have

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>many scoring opportunities. I don't know how often they're going

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to get down the field and look, it's it's the

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.959
<v Speaker 1>same as last year. It's Kenny Stills, it's Devonte Parker,

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it's Bryce Butler. Those are your projected starting wide receivers

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. For the Miami Dolphins. They have Mike Caasecki.

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's see if he can take a step forward in

0:19:57.680 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>year two. He was drafted in the second round by

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the these Miami Dolphins. It is a new coaching regime

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:06.719
<v Speaker 1>that didn't have anything to do with drafting Mikeasecki. But overall,

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:09.360
<v Speaker 1>for all the weapons involved, I'm not really targeting any

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of them outside of Kenyan Drake. If Ryan Fitzpatrick were

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the starter for like the first month of the season,

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I would have a lot more interest in someone like

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Stills, who led this team with like a sixteen

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>average depth of target last year. Yeah, totally, Kenny Stills.

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick would obviously work, And I think that's something

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that I can get behind. It's not gonna cost you anything.

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>And when we find out who the quarterback is, I

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>totally agree, because Ryan Fitzpatrick is going to be bombs away.

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>But let's say we're drafting right now, we why and

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>we don't know who the quarterback is going to be.

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>Between Fitzpatrick and Josh Rosen, are you taking a shot

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>on any of these wide receivers or the tight end

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in Miami or are you you know, saying I'll rather

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>than somebody else, no matter what the prices. Yeah. I mean,

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>as of right now, nobody knows who's going to be

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the starting quarterback there, not even the team, not even

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the head coach, not neither of the quarterbacks. No. Um.

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I was reading a thing the other day saying that

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick looked good and he's uh been the more impressive

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>one in camp. I was like, well, we'll see. Josh

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Rosen went from a terrible offensive line to not another

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 1>good offensive line, so that's gonna be. Uh it's a

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>hard move for this guy. I mean, I feel like

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 1>he was considered a very good quarterback. But I mean,

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>we're going to find out. I think Josh Rosen starts

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>because they're gonna want to see what they have in him. Um,

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like they know that they're not going

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to be ultracompetitive this year. So that's what I think.

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And for me, Still. I have the DeVante DeVante Parker disease.

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>He has all the intangibles, but he's never played in

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>an offense that is any good. So we'll see with

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.199
<v Speaker 1>these coaches how they scheme it up. I like that

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>this guy was a Patriots wide receiver coach. He was

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Round McDaniels. If nothing else, he at least has an

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>idea how to scheme these guys open and how to

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:59.479
<v Speaker 1>use players with their best skills, you know, like that's

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>what the page it's due. They figure out what you're

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>good at and you do that thing. So hopefully this

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>guy does that, uses Drake, uses Parker. Kenny Stills has

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>proven he can do it again. I think Albert Wilson

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting as a as a gadget slot guy,

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>um crazy speed. We saw him flash a bit last year.

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not writing the Dolphins off because I mean,

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the route is is. Nobody knows. This is way too early.

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 1>They were bad last year, but this is going to

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>be a different team. Uh not different players, but different coaches,

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 1>different schemes, different offensive play calling. So we're going to

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>find out. Yeah, I actually agree with e Y that

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I think. Again, we don't know, but I think Josh

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Rosen probably starts the majority, if not all, the games

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>this season. The Miami Dolphins gave up a second round

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 1>pick for him. I think they want to see what

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>they have in Rosen, and they're not going to win

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of games, so they need to decide whether

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>or not Josh Rosen could be their quarterback in the future,

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.360
<v Speaker 1>because if not, if they have like a you know, first,

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>second or third overall pick next year, it's a very

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>strong quarterback class coming out of college next season with

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Tua and and Justin Herbert, So you know, they need

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to figure out whether Josh Rosen is that guy, because

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>if he's not, then they're going to want to be

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in on one of those quarterbacks. So I agree with

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>e Y overall that Josh Rosen is more than likely

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.959
<v Speaker 1>starting the majority of the games here, and it was

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the worst possible situation that he can be thrust into

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 1>last year as a rookie. Entire offensive line was just

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 1>depleted by injury and a you know, a an an incompetent.

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I will use that word for their offensive coordinator Mike McCoy,

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>who didn't know how to use David Johnson didn't really

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 1>know how to get anybody open um. Just it was

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>just a train wreck of the season for Josh Rosen.

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Not really a much better situation here from Miami, but

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it seems like they have a little bit more confidence

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in him than the Arizona Cardinals did. Totally totally agree

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>with that. I want to shift gears here because we

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>only have a half hour left the Fantasy conversation with Eric,

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>so I want to get on shoot the rand. The

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Patriots and the thing those is We've kind of alluded

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to this a bunch here on the show, and I'm

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>very high on Kenyan Drake. He just heard that, but

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>also high Sony Michelle. And it seems to me that

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fantasy experts and analysts and fans are

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>not nearly with me when it comes to Sony Michelle.

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>And my my evidence is it's kind of obvious to me, right,

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>Like Sony Michelle, we talked about first round pedigree. He

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>has it. He was a first round draft pick last

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>year of the New England Patriots. He battled injuries early,

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's gonna be a recurring theme that we're gonna

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about. He battled injuries early, got healthy, and then touchdown, touchdown, touchdown.

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>All some injuries in the middle of the season, came back,

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>had some success, touchdown, touchdown. You get into the playoffs,

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>he was a dominant force, scoring what four touchdowns in

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the a F c um SETI Final whatever you want

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to call it. Had six total touchdowns in three games.

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>In the division championship game, he had three or four touchdowns.

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>It was literally boom touchdown, boom touchdown, boom touchdown. Came

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>back a week later, more touchdowns, and now Rex Burkhead

0:24:59.880 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>was there. But they wrote Sony Michelle as their true,

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>tried and true running back. You have the Super Bowl

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>boom touchdown again, tried and true running back. He is

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the guy now in ppor leagues. I get it. He's

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 1>never gonna be the past catch in his offense. Never.

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>That's James White, and we're gonna get to him in

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>a moment because I think he's under value it alsot.

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 1>But Sony Michelle is going to be the running back.

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 1>He's going to scoring the touchdowns. Rex Berg heads there.

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>It's annoying. I I get that. That's fine. That's why

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>he's going a little bit later than the guys we

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>just talked about with Kennyan Drake. But Sony Michelle is

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the running back. He is the volume guy. More often

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 1>than not, he's the guy on the goal line. And

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.479
<v Speaker 1>Frank and Eric will point out to you, well, he's

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>battling under the knee injury and they just drafted Damien

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Harris out of college. That's true, But Sony Sony Michelle

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>was a first round draft pick, not three years ago

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.120
<v Speaker 1>or four years ago, even two years ago. Last year.

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>He was a first round traffic last year and he

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>did that. They're giving up on him for Damian Harris

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>one year later. You're wrong, Sony Michelle, y s talent,

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's another player being undervalue by the

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 1>fantasy community this far. I think you keep saying something.

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>The only thing wrong you're saying is is he is?

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 1>He is? He was that last year. This, I think

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you guys can both agree, is the most most maddening

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>group of running backs to own in fantasy football. Has

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>been like this for eight or ten years. You never

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 1>know who's going to get the ball. Okay, last year, yes,

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 1>uh he was. When he was on, he was, he

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 1>was good. Burkehead was hurt. He was hurt. James White

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 1>is the past catcher, but week to week game the game,

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.479
<v Speaker 1>you never know if he's going to get workload. They

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 1>could come in and know that the team they're playing,

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins are terrible at covering the running backs. In

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the passing game, Sony Michelle will not touch the ball

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>more than ten or fifty times. So that I mean,

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>if you want to roll the dice and draft him

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>where he's where he's being drafted and maybe have a

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:10.439
<v Speaker 1>running back six of the time, feel free. I'm not

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>arguing that Sony Michelle is a great running back when

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>he has the ball. But the truth is, with the

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>New England Patriots and Bill Belichick, he has proven year

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>after year you never know the opportunity is there, but

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>will he get it or will it be Birkhead or

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>will it be Harris, or will it be White or

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>will they not run the ball and throw the ball

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 1>hunter times? This is what he does. This is what

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the New England Patriots do. They scheme against you and

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>and you never know week to week. So if you

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:38.679
<v Speaker 1>if you want to do that, go ahead. I'm not

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>going to do that because it makes me nuts. Drafting Harris.

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Drafting Harris is playing their hand to say they're worried

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>if you drafted running back in the first round, and

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the following year you draft a running back early again,

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>they're worried. That's what that says. I don't give a

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>crap what anybody says. They're worried about his knees. They're

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.479
<v Speaker 1>worried about him being healthy. If they weren't, they wouldn't

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>draft a running back high again. Yeah, and I'm closer

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to where e Y is when it comes to them

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>do drafting Damien Harris greg I can make the case

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>four and against Sony Michelle. The number to know what

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle is eighteen. He saw eighteen or more carries

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:16.199
<v Speaker 1>in six games last season. He scored a touchdown in

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>five out of six of those games. In all of

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>those games that he scored a touchdown, the Patriots won

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 1>by double digits. So if you're good at predicting game flow,

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>then Sony Michelle is your guy. Same thing in the postseason.

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>He saw at least eighteen carries in each of those games.

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>What do you know he scored a touchdown in each

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>one of those games. He has six touchdowns. Tell you

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>more about why you don't want Sony Michelle. We get that.

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll also hear about why you shouldn't want James White

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and Julius Settlement, Julius Julius, Julian Edelman going out next. Hey,

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you want

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to listen live, download the Heart Radio app, download the

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>tune and app and just search for Fantasy Sports Radio

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, all on Twitch, or on

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Periscope and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network.

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 1>You'll find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>All Right, before we hit the break, we're talking about

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Tony Michelle and I believe he is a strong fantasy commodity.

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>You do not believe that, Frank, Yeah, I mentioned the

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>number before the break. To know what Tony Michelle was

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>eighteen in the In the six games where he saw

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>eighteen or more carries, he scored a touchdown in five

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of those. You saw three more games in the postseason

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>with eighteen plus carries, he scored a touchdown and all

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of those. I just don't know how realistic it is

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>for him to get eighteen plus carries in a game

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>this season. I understand the Patriots want to run the football,

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>or at least they are going to paint the image

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that they want to run the football and then probably

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>do something completely different because as they said, that's what

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the New England Patriots do. But the Pats finished eighth

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>in rush rush percentage last season, so that tells me

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>at least last year they really wanted to run the football.

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>And Tom Brady is one year older, so overall I

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>think they want to. I think that's why they went

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>out and got Damien Harris. And while we're on that

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 1>topic again, I agree with e Y. I think if

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you draft a running back in the first round, you

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>come back the next year and you use a third

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>round pick on an all purpose running back. And Damian

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Harris that's what he's been described as, that's what I've

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>seen out of him, is that he can be a

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>three down running back. It just throws another wrench in

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the mix for the New England Patriots backfield. I don't

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>have a problem taking any of these guys in best

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>ball Greg and maybe just straight up in a full

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>PPR league, I'll take James White because we know what

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>his role is. But in just your standard Redraft League

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to plug in a Patriots running back on a

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>weekly basis. It is one of the most frustrating things

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy football. I do love Damian Harris right now

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in Best Ball too, because it wouldn't surprise me if

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>at some point, like he has some monster games. The

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Patriots constantly turned out um rushing touchdowns year in and

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>year out from their running backs. He's probably gonna be

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>in that makes at some point, we just don't know when.

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I really like him for Best Ball,

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 1>because he's going the latest out of the three running

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 1>backs who I think are fantasy viable. Now, you mentioned

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 1>James White, and I think everybody's right in saying that

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>week so weet it's going to be annoying. But you

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>also said that James White, we know his role and

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 1>there is no competition for his role like it's James White.

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And I was looking at the Patriots last night and

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm quite frankly wondering who Tom Brady is going to

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>throw too, because you have James White and you had

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:51.959
<v Speaker 1>Julian Edelman. When he gets both of them just right now,

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>whateppen to that's to kill Harry. It's two Marius Thomas.

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 1>It's dontrelle in in Matt Lacosse. How Dad, you forget him? Greg,

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>He's a little Matt Lacosse. That's it. I believe Brady

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to heavily rely upon James White and Julian Edelman,

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know, Frank, that their current A DPS

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>reflect where they or how valuable they will be to

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>their team. James White is going back to back with

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle. It's twenty five, twenty six pick pick fifty

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>one and fifty two. That's in the NFCC, which is

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a full point pp a full point PR. So when

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you say that out loud, how ridiculous is that sound?

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>That they're going back to back, Like James White should

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 1>be far away, going ahead of Sony Michelle in full

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>point PPR leaks. Sony Michelle had eleven targets last year

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:51.959
<v Speaker 1>and seven receptions. You need him to score touchdowns at

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a rapid pace, and I just don't know that he's

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be healthy enough to do so. I don't think

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 1>anybody knows right now. Julian Edelman is going at pick

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty six, basically the end of the third round, early

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>fourth round. His wide receiver rank is in the NFFC fifteen. Okay,

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I was actually higher than I thought it was. To

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you, I still don't have a problem

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 1>with it at all. No, Ey, how inner you are,

0:33:14.880 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>how you or you on James White and Julian Edelman.

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I think PPR like you said, like he of course

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>he's a value, he's proven that year over year. But

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>but anywhere else, I feel like, I mean, you just

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know what his usage is going to be, and

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that's scary. Like, I mean, they're the Patriots, They're going

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to win football games, are going to win the division again,

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>they're probably play for the super Bowl again, and everyone's

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>tired of it. But I mean, until you can beat them,

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that's just the way it's going to be for me.

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>James White is about right where his ADP is. I

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>think I probably have him a little bit behind that.

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Even you just have to adjust depending on what lead

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you're drafting. And if it's a four point PPR, then

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.040
<v Speaker 1>he's a value. Other than that, I mean, he doesn't

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't run the ball, barely ever runs the ball.

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>So and then if you're telling me you're a sony

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Michelle fan, and he's going to touch the ball eighteen

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to twenty times or twenty times or more, and he's

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the bell cow. Then how can James White beyond the

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 1>field too? They don't play to two running back sets

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that they never do that and they go back and forth.

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>But week to week, I mean, it's it's a dark

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>throw and I don't I just don't want it on

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:21.879
<v Speaker 1>my team. I would have to agree with you, Greg

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that given the fact that Gronk is now gone, and

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 1>there are a bunch of numbers that show that when

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Gronk is not on the field, Julian Edelman's targets go up,

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 1>his receptions go up, his receiving yards go up, his

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns go up. Everything goes up across the board for

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Julian Edelman when Gronk is not on the field, And

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we started to see some of that last year.

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Even with Gronk on the field, he was a shell

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of himself last season. He just clearly was not nearly

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 1>as effective as he has been in years past. And

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>we saw that with Julian Edelman's usage. When he returned

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 1>from Week five on till the rest of the season,

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>he was a top ten wide receiver. He finished his

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:57.320
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver nine and half PPR from weeks five on

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>last season once he returned from that suspension. And you know,

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>while we're talking about Edelman, will bring up James White

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>because again I agree with you, Greg, I don't know

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that Tom Brady has dependable targets. How often have we

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>seen a rookie wide receiver come in and have a

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 1>massive impact for the New England Patriots. Oh wait, it's

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:24.240
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't happen often. It's Rock and Aaron Hernandez worked

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 1>but different positions. But nik look, Nikil Harry. I think

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>he's a talented receiver. I think that they needed a

0:35:32.640 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>big bodied receiver on the outside, someone who can help

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 1>them a little bit more in the red zone. But

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.439
<v Speaker 1>while we're talking about red zone, James White finished top

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>ten last year in red zone targets and Julian Edelman

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>was just behind him. Julian Edelman finished top twelve and

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 1>red zone targets last year. He missed four games. What

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>does that tell you about his usage moving into this season.

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:52.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that you could just look at years

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:56.759
<v Speaker 1>past and say Julian Edelman is has you know, he's

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 1>pigeonholed as this PPR wide receiver, he's not want to

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:03.719
<v Speaker 1>catch touchdowns. We have to project forward. That was in

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the past when Gronk was on the field, when he

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>was their red zone weapon. Last season again, Edelman top

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 1>twelve and red zone targets, and he missed four weeks

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of the season. So I think that the touchdowns weren't

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:18.879
<v Speaker 1>as flukey as they were last year for Julian Edelman.

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:21.319
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's probably going to be a real

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 1>thing for him moving forward, because I don't know who

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:26.919
<v Speaker 1>else Tom Brady is going to trust in the red zone.

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Greg He clearly has a very good rapport with both

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 1>James White and Julian Edelman. Is James White counna scored

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>twelve total touchdowns again this year? No, probably not, but

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>he finished as what a top eight running back. He's

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:40.279
<v Speaker 1>not being drafted as a top eight running back. So

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in a in a PPR league, I have no problem

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>whatsoever with James White as my flex running back in

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that similar range as Terrico and and I would probably

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>lean James White overtree. Let me throw this at both

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of you, though, what about the half point PPR is

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>more and more people are playing in that half point PPR.

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:57.400
<v Speaker 1>We talked about standard PPR all the time in the

0:36:57.480 --> 0:36:59.719
<v Speaker 1>value what about the half point e y when it

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 1>comes two guys that are major players in the quantity game,

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to receptions in Edelman and White, what

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>do you do with him in the half point PPR? Yeah,

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 1>obviously he's worth more than he is in a standar

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:15.320
<v Speaker 1>in a standard I'm not touching James White, He's completely worthless.

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean basically, in a half point PPR, he's he's valuable.

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Half points add up, especially like you said with Gronk

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Gun it's it's proven in the past that his receptions

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 1>will go up, so you know that's that's their their

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>short distance mid range reception. Guy Edelman does that too.

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:34.919
<v Speaker 1>But like Frank said, he last year was definitely used

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 1>on the goal line and in the red zone, and

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to be used there again. Bill

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Belichick very seldomly trust rookies. I think last year, you know,

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Michelle was an exception, But I don't know if burke

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Head didn't get hurt, if Michelle would have got that

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 1>much work. Fregy half point PPR, what do you think?

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 1>I still don't mind James White as my flex. I

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want him as my RB two in a half

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:01.839
<v Speaker 1>point PPR if you start your draft zero running backs.

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 1>If you start with like three wide receivers in a

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:05.479
<v Speaker 1>row or two running backs on one of the elite

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, and you end up with, you know, James White,

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 1>there is your r B two. You can probably make

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it work. I mean, there are many different ways to

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>win in fantasy football, but me personally, I would feel

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 1>better with James White as my flex option in both

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 1>half point and full point PPR um just because I

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know how many touchdowns he's going to score overall.

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, he scored tall total touchdowns last year.

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's gonna be really really hard for him

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 1>to come close to that number. And I agree with

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>with E. Y and standard or non PPR, like, James

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 1>White is still going to score. If I had to predict, like,

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>he's probably gonna end up with like anywhere from six

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to eight touchdowns this year, maybe like one or two

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:48.839
<v Speaker 1>on the ground and like five or five or six

0:38:48.880 --> 0:38:50.959
<v Speaker 1>through the air. Probably something like that for James White.

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:53.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's not completely useless, but he does take a

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 1>big hit in non PPR leagues that's James White. Yeah. Absolutely.

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Now I believe Ben Watson is suspended with her four

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:02.879
<v Speaker 1>games a year right with New England. He resigned there

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to replace Rob Gronkowski. Uh, Frankie mentioned nikkil Harry's Marius

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Thomas is coming off his own major injury. That's why

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just more and more on Julian Edelman. But before

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:15.879
<v Speaker 1>we wrap up the Patriots, I have to ask about

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady. Because Brady forever was a a top five

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 1>drafted quarterback, the goat, he's the greatest quarterback of all time.

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:26.680
<v Speaker 1>But right now in the NFFC, he's the twenty second

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterback off the board. That is making him barely a

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 1>QB two, somebody that cost you, well, almost nothing in

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:38.279
<v Speaker 1>drafts to get. I understand taking the name of the

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 1>back of the jersey, frank and you're all about that,

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:48.319
<v Speaker 1>understandably so, but twenty two for Brady seems incredibly low here.

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it just seems low because we've played fantasy

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 1>football for so long. We've seen the years where Tom

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Brady was the elite fantasy football quarterback. It's just let's

0:39:57.480 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>be realistic with ourselves. This guy's going to be four

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>two years old. When the season starts. Mind you, he's

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.640
<v Speaker 1>still in you know, maybe better shape than some of

0:40:05.680 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the other quarterbacks that are in the league. Does phenomenal

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 1>job of keeping himself in good shape. But he is

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 1>forty two years old, and last year he finishes QB

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and Fantasy points per games. So I don't know

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 1>that the upside is still there. As I mentioned earlier,

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:22.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that the Patriots they understand what Brady is

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 1>at this point. I don't think that they want to

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:26.239
<v Speaker 1>force him to throw the ball all that much. I'm

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 1>sure that there's going to be games where it's a

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit more up and down, competitive games where he

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:33.440
<v Speaker 1>does have to throw the ball more. But ultimately I

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:35.359
<v Speaker 1>think that they want to rely on the running backs.

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 1>That's why, you know, they continue to have one of

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the best offensive lines in the league. That's why they

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 1>bring in a Damien Harris, they still have uh Sony Michelle,

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 1>they still have James White. They're gonna rely heavily on

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 1>those running backs. I just don't know that they're going

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to have to ask Tom Brady frankly Greg to do

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 1>much more than what he did last year, which barely

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 1>made him a top twenty quarterback and fantasy points for games,

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and if they don't ask him to do more, that's

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a lot of James White, James White, James White,

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 1>James White. Plus he's historically been much better with drawn

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:07.479
<v Speaker 1>f on the field as well, so he can't down

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:10.399
<v Speaker 1>play that. But look, if you play in a super

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 1>flex league, I think you can do a lot worse

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:13.920
<v Speaker 1>than Tom Brady. You know, if I took one of

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 1>these upside shots as my QB one, someone who has

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of risk. Cam Newton has a ton of

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:21.760
<v Speaker 1>upside this year, but also has the injury risk. Kyler

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Murray has a ton of upside this year, but he's

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a rookie, so inherently that comes with risk as well.

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:29.880
<v Speaker 1>If I took one of those quarterbacks as my quarterback

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:32.839
<v Speaker 1>one in a super flex league, that's a situation where

0:41:32.880 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I would not mind taking Tom Brady as my second

0:41:35.560 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 1>quarterback or as my super flex quarterback to kind of

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 1>balance out that volatility that you have in your quarterback one.

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Are you drafting Tom Brady? Eric Probably not. I mean,

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:48.200
<v Speaker 1>like he they showed last year that, I mean, they're

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:50.840
<v Speaker 1>just not They're not wanting to rely on him like

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 1>they did it. And it's not because he's not good.

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:55.759
<v Speaker 1>That's just not what they do. They they just beat

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:58.479
<v Speaker 1>you however they can. And it's not about Tom having

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to make all the throws. With the Patriots though, like

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I said earlier, I mean they could come out this

0:42:03.440 --> 0:42:05.799
<v Speaker 1>year and he could score forty five touchdowns. I mean

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:08.160
<v Speaker 1>they're good enough to do that. If they decide they

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 1>want to do that, I think they could. UM. But

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 1>having that that talent and at running back, I think

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that shows their hand. You can't ever listen to what

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 1>any team says. You could only pay attention to what

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 1>they do. And by drafting Sony Michelle last year number

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>one and Harris this year, keeping burkehead, keeping White, they're

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:30.840
<v Speaker 1>saying we're going to run the ball, we're going to

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 1>be ahead, we're going to play good defense, and we're

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:35.799
<v Speaker 1>going to keep the ball and we're going to win.

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:39.280
<v Speaker 1>That's what they do. UM. Now, that doesn't translate to fantasy,

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>especially at the quarterback position last year, and I think

0:42:41.560 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that's what they're going to do again this year. But

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 1>he slid, I mean as all as it gets, and

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:47.359
<v Speaker 1>I think he's probably the best quarterback to ever play.

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Will do you a break here. When we come back,

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 1>we have our three questions in three minutes segment with

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 1>e L asked me three questions about the two teams

0:42:57.040 --> 0:42:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that we talked about, and we'll wrap up previous of

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 1>course with in Miami Dolphins and the New England Patriots,

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and we'll move on to the action hour. Here all

0:43:05.200 --> 0:43:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the BFFs. That's Eric Young, that's Frank Stample, I'm Greg

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:10.440
<v Speaker 1>sous will take our break. We'll be back just at

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the moments. From the NFL to the NBA. Daily Rodo

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:27.240
<v Speaker 1>dot Com is the place to win millions in daily Fantasy.

0:43:27.360 --> 0:43:29.920
<v Speaker 1>You can get the best DFS NFL coverage all season

0:43:30.000 --> 0:43:33.439
<v Speaker 1>long for a price of one, or dominate the entire

0:43:33.640 --> 0:43:37.399
<v Speaker 1>Daily Fantasy Sports realm with the Elite package a month.

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 1>If you use the promo code f n t s Y,

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you get ten percent off your Daily Rodo package. Go

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to Daily Rodo dot com, pick your NFL Elite Package,

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:48.000
<v Speaker 1>enter promo code f n t s Y, and you'll

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:51.279
<v Speaker 1>be on your way to becoming the next Daily Rhodo millionaire.

0:44:05.440 --> 0:44:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Three questions, three minutes, Final three of the Fantasy Program.

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Frank Stafle, Greg Sussman, Eric Young, Let's get right to

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 1>we only have three minutes to go. Well, you know,

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:18.359
<v Speaker 1>ask both of you guys the question question number one,

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:22.360
<v Speaker 1>outside of Julian Edelman and James White, what which past

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 1>catcher in New England do you want the most? Frank,

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 1>we start with you. I know, I just sat here

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:30.239
<v Speaker 1>in bass Mikill Harry, but the opportunity for him to

0:44:30.360 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 1>be a starting wide receiver for the New England Patriots

0:44:33.120 --> 0:44:35.279
<v Speaker 1>on the outside and potentially do some work in the

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 1>red zone is still there for him. Um. I don't

0:44:38.160 --> 0:44:40.360
<v Speaker 1>love rookie wide receivers with the Patriots, but if I

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:42.120
<v Speaker 1>had to choose one after those guys, it would be

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:46.080
<v Speaker 1>nik Hill, Harry Eric. It's Matt Lacost for me. I mean,

0:44:46.120 --> 0:44:48.400
<v Speaker 1>they've proven that they want to throw to the tight end.

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:50.920
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I don't think he's not going to be Gronk.

0:44:50.960 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 1>He's never going to be wrong, but I feel like

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 1>he could be a touchdown guy. And with tight ends like, look,

0:44:55.719 --> 0:44:57.719
<v Speaker 1>there's four or five that you want to own and

0:44:57.760 --> 0:44:59.320
<v Speaker 1>then the rest of it is roll the dice and

0:44:59.520 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 1>close your and hope. Fun fact, I took Matt la

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 1>coss is my third tight end in a Best Ball

0:45:03.600 --> 0:45:07.120
<v Speaker 1>draft last night. Nice Frankie, not really, but thanks Greg,

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you got it. Funny question number two, Speaking on the

0:45:09.760 --> 0:45:12.879
<v Speaker 1>tight end, Frank mantioning, Mike Kasecki was in early round

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:15.759
<v Speaker 1>draft pick last year four Miami never really got the

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:18.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunity with his new coaching staff, and there isn't much

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 1>talent there in Miami. Mike Aseck U I be a

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 1>fantasy commodity. Yeah, I think now I have him as

0:45:24.040 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a tight end sleeper. I took him in a bunch

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of Bestball leagues so far already, Um the coach worked

0:45:30.000 --> 0:45:32.319
<v Speaker 1>with the Patriots. They know how to scheme tight ends

0:45:32.360 --> 0:45:35.800
<v Speaker 1>open and use them. This guy has every intangible that

0:45:35.880 --> 0:45:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a tight end needs. He's fast, he can catch, he's

0:45:39.680 --> 0:45:42.720
<v Speaker 1>good after after the catch. He's got all the tools.

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:44.440
<v Speaker 1>And I mean someone's going to catch the ball. They're

0:45:44.440 --> 0:45:46.520
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have me throwing. They're going to be behind,

0:45:46.960 --> 0:45:49.239
<v Speaker 1>and it could be him. He's a he's a dice roll.

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:51.759
<v Speaker 1>But in a basketball or or you know your last

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 1>draft pick, you'll know a week one or two whether

0:45:53.600 --> 0:45:55.520
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be figured in. I agree with you,

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:57.120
<v Speaker 1>why I don't mind him as your tight end two

0:45:57.200 --> 0:45:59.959
<v Speaker 1>or three in a Best Ball draft. If Josh Rosen

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 1>is the quarterback. He probably needs a safety blanket to

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:05.839
<v Speaker 1>lean on. That might be Mike Kasecky Question number three

0:46:05.960 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 1>or final question, final minute of the Fantasy Hour, and

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that is regards to DeVante Parker or fans. At some

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>point this season, will fantasy owners be freaking out about

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 1>DeVante Parker once again? Frank probably yes, yes, in a

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:21.279
<v Speaker 1>good way. I think that this is it for him.

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:23.759
<v Speaker 1>I think he's got something to prove and UH, with

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a new coaching staff there, he's going to show that

0:46:26.440 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 1>he is he is who we've always thought he was.

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Here you go, he's Eric Young. That was three questions

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 1>in three minutes. Frank and e Y will be back

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:35.359
<v Speaker 1>for Fantasy to talk tomorrow. When we come back, move

0:46:35.400 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 1>on to the Action Hour here on the BFFs. Couldn't

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you catch the live show? Make sure to download our

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:44.760
<v Speaker 1>podcast at the v n T S Y Sports Network

0:46:44.800 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Audio Boom channel oh